File size: 3,338 Bytes
4838129 8ed21d3 4838129 9819ff7 8ed21d3 d78f3f2 1c3510e b8392e1 1c3510e 4838129 8ed21d3 1c3510e b8392e1 4838129 f341a85 4838129 f341a85 b5689bf f341a85 daf233f f341a85 b5689bf f341a85 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 |
---
dataset_info:
- config_name: edit
features:
- name: input
dtype: string
- name: target
dtype: string
- name: problem_id
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 56166875
num_examples: 48386
- name: val
num_bytes: 3336062
num_examples: 3338
- name: test
num_bytes: 857857
num_examples: 794
download_size: 365069
dataset_size: 60360794
- config_name: generate
features:
- name: problem_id
dtype: string
- name: problem_description
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 1793963
num_examples: 1262
- name: val
num_bytes: 96855
num_examples: 69
- name: test
num_bytes: 60776
num_examples: 49
download_size: 37588
dataset_size: 1951594
- config_name: generate_eval
features:
- name: problem_id
dtype: string
- name: runtimes
sequence: float64
- name: memories
sequence: float64
- name: num_sol
dtype: int64
splits:
- name: test
num_bytes: 770704
num_examples: 48
download_size: 147211
dataset_size: 770704
configs:
- config_name: edit
data_files:
- split: train
path: edit/train-*
- split: val
path: edit/val-*
- split: test
path: edit/test-*
- config_name: generate
data_files:
- split: train
path: generate/train-*
- split: val
path: generate/val-*
- split: test
path: generate/test-*
- config_name: generate_eval
data_files:
- split: test
path: generate_eval/test-*
---
# ECCO
Dataset from the paper "ECCO: Can We Improve Model-Generated Code Efficiency Without Sacrificing Functional Correctness?"
The dataset consists of 2 subsets `edit` and `generate` each with 3 splits (`train`, `val` and `test`).
Code repository: [https://github.com/CodeEff/ECCO](https://github.com/CodeEff/ECCO)
### Loading the dataset / benchmark
```python
dataset = load_dataset('CodeEff/ECCO', 'edit') # For history-based editing setting
dataset = load_dataset('CodeEff/ECCO', 'generate') # For nl-instructed generation setting
```
These are used to generate code by each model across the 2 paradigms. We use the `test` split for the evaluation/results and the `train` and `val` splits for finetuning and few-shot prompting.
### Download the test cases
```sh
mkdir data && cd data
wget https://huggingface.co/datasets/CodeEff/ECCO/resolve/main/test_cases.zip
unzip test_cases.zip
```
### Evaluation dataset
The dataset also consists of an additional 3rd subset `generate_eval` which consists of the runtime and memory of a spectrum of user solutions for each problem in the `test` split.
This is used for the percentile evaluation of the **NL-instructed generation** paradigm.
### Data Sources
Dataset is sourced from [IBM CodeNet](https://github.com/IBM/Project_CodeNet) which consists of primarily competetive programming solutions.
This is further filtered for efficiency and correctness as described in our paper.
### Citation
```bib
@article{waghjale2024ecco,
title={ECCO: Can We Improve Model-Generated Code Efficiency Without Sacrificing Functional Correctness?},
author={Waghjale, Siddhant and Veerendranath, Vishruth and Wang, Zora Zhiruo and Fried, Daniel},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14044},
year={2024}
}
``` |