Benjamin Aw
Add updated pkl file v3
6fa4bc9
{
"paper_id": "W14-0150",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T05:53:10.666748Z"
},
"title": "First steps towards a Predicate Matrix",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Maddalen",
"middle": [],
"last": "L\u00f3pez De Lacalle",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "UPV/EHU Donostia",
"location": {
"country": "Spain"
}
},
"email": "[email protected]"
},
{
"first": "Egoitz",
"middle": [],
"last": "Laparra",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "[email protected]"
},
{
"first": "German",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rigau",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "[email protected]"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "This paper presents the first steps towards building the Predicate Matrix, a new lexical resource resulting from the integration of multiple sources of predicate information including FrameNet (Baker et al., 1997), VerbNet (Kipper, 2005), PropBank (Palmer et al., 2005) and WordNet (Fellbaum, 1998). By using the Predicate Matrix, we expect to provide a more robust interoperable lexicon by discovering and solving inherent inconsistencies among the resources. Moreover, we plan to extend the coverage of current predicate resources (by including from WordNet morphologically related nominal and verbal concepts), to enrich WordNet with predicate information, and possibly to extend predicate information to languages other than English (by exploiting the local wordnets aligned to the English WordNet).",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "W14-0150",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "This paper presents the first steps towards building the Predicate Matrix, a new lexical resource resulting from the integration of multiple sources of predicate information including FrameNet (Baker et al., 1997), VerbNet (Kipper, 2005), PropBank (Palmer et al., 2005) and WordNet (Fellbaum, 1998). By using the Predicate Matrix, we expect to provide a more robust interoperable lexicon by discovering and solving inherent inconsistencies among the resources. Moreover, we plan to extend the coverage of current predicate resources (by including from WordNet morphologically related nominal and verbal concepts), to enrich WordNet with predicate information, and possibly to extend predicate information to languages other than English (by exploiting the local wordnets aligned to the English WordNet).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Predicate models such as FrameNet (Baker et al., 1997) , VerbNet (Kipper, 2005) or PropBank (Palmer et al., 2005) are core resources in most advanced NLP tasks, such as Question Answering, Textual Entailment or Information Extraction. Most of the systems with Natural Language Understanding capabilities require a large and precise amount of semantic knowledge at the predicateargument level. This type of knowledge allows to identify the underlying typical participants of a particular event independently of its realization in the text. Thus, using these models, different linguistic phenomena expressing the same event, such as active/passive transformations, verb alternations, nominalizations, implicit realizations can be harmonized into a common semantic representation. In fact, lately, several systems have been developed for shallow semantic parsing an explicit and implicit semantic role labeling using these resources (Erk and Pado, 2004) , (Shi and Mihalcea, 2005) , (Giuglea and Moschitti, 2006) , (Laparra and Rigau, 2013) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 34,
"end": 54,
"text": "(Baker et al., 1997)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 65,
"end": 79,
"text": "(Kipper, 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
},
{
"start": 92,
"end": 113,
"text": "(Palmer et al., 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
},
{
"start": 930,
"end": 950,
"text": "(Erk and Pado, 2004)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
},
{
"start": 953,
"end": 977,
"text": "(Shi and Mihalcea, 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
},
{
"start": 980,
"end": 1009,
"text": "(Giuglea and Moschitti, 2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
},
{
"start": 1012,
"end": 1037,
"text": "(Laparra and Rigau, 2013)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "However, building large and rich enough predicate models for broad-coverage semantic processing takes a great deal of expensive manual effort involving large research groups during long periods of development. In fact, the coverage of currently available predicate-argument resources is still far from complete. For example, (Burchardt et al., 2005) or (Shen and Lapata, 2007) indicate the limited coverage of FrameNet as one of the main problems of this resource. In fact, FrameNet1.5 covers around 10,000 lexical-units while for instance, WordNet3.0 contains more than 150,000 words. Furthermore, the same effort should be invested for each different language (Subirats and Petruck, 2003) . Moreover, most previous research efforts on the integration of resources targeted at knowledge about nouns and named entities rather than predicate knowledge. Well known examples are YAGO (Suchanek et al., 2007) , Freebase (Bollacker et al., 2008) , DBPedia (Bizer et al., 2009) , BabelNet (Navigli and Ponzetto, 2010) or UBY (Gurevych et al., 2012) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 325,
"end": 349,
"text": "(Burchardt et al., 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 353,
"end": 376,
"text": "(Shen and Lapata, 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
},
{
"start": 662,
"end": 690,
"text": "(Subirats and Petruck, 2003)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
},
{
"start": 881,
"end": 904,
"text": "(Suchanek et al., 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF27"
},
{
"start": 916,
"end": 940,
"text": "(Bollacker et al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 951,
"end": 971,
"text": "(Bizer et al., 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 983,
"end": 1011,
"text": "(Navigli and Ponzetto, 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
},
{
"start": 1019,
"end": 1042,
"text": "(Gurevych et al., 2012)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Following the line of previous works (Shi and Mihalcea, 2005) , (Burchardt et al., 2005) , (Johansson and Nugues, 2007) , , , (Tonelli and Pianta, 2009) , (Laparra et al., 2010) , we will also focus on the integration of predicate information. We start from the basis of SemLink (Palmer, 2009) . Sem-Link aimed to connect together different predicate resources such as FrameNet (Baker et al., 1997) , VerbNet (Kipper, 2005) , PropBank (Palmer et al., 2005) and WordNet (Fellbaum, 1998) . However, its coverage is still far from complete.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 37,
"end": 61,
"text": "(Shi and Mihalcea, 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
},
{
"start": 64,
"end": 88,
"text": "(Burchardt et al., 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 91,
"end": 119,
"text": "(Johansson and Nugues, 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 126,
"end": 152,
"text": "(Tonelli and Pianta, 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF29"
},
{
"start": 155,
"end": 177,
"text": "(Laparra et al., 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF18"
},
{
"start": 279,
"end": 293,
"text": "(Palmer, 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF22"
},
{
"start": 378,
"end": 398,
"text": "(Baker et al., 1997)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 409,
"end": 423,
"text": "(Kipper, 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
},
{
"start": 435,
"end": 456,
"text": "(Palmer et al., 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
},
{
"start": 461,
"end": 485,
"text": "WordNet (Fellbaum, 1998)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "The Predicate Matrix, the resource resulting from the work presented in this paper, will allow to extend the coverage of current predicate resources (by including from WordNet closely related nominal and verbal concepts), to discover in-herent inconsistencies among the resources, to enrich WordNet with predicate information, and possibly to extend predicate information to languages other than English (by exploiting the local wordnets aligned to the English WordNet). Moreover, the Predicate Matrix uses WordNet as a central resource. In that way, each row (or line) in the matrix presents partial predicate information related to a particular WordNet word sense.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "First, as SemLink takes VerbNet as the central resource, we present a complete study of the coverage of the mappings between each resource included in SemLink to VerbNet. We describe the coverage and gaps of these mappings with respect to the lexical entries and the role structures of each resource. Second, we exploit WordNet to propose straightforward methods to discover incosistencies among the resources as well as to extend their coverage towards a more complete and robust predicate lexicon.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "As a starting point for building the Predicate Matrix, we consider the sources of predicate knowledge connected to SemLink.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Sources of Predicate information",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "SemLink 1 (Palmer, 2009 ) is a project whose aim is to link together different predicate resources establishing a set of mappings. These mappings make it possible to combine the different information provided by the different lexical resources for tasks such as inferencing, consistency checking, interoperable semantic role labelling, etc. Currently, SemLink provides partial mappings to VerbNet (Kipper, 2005) , PropBank (Palmer et al., 2005) , FrameNet (Baker et al., 1997) and Word-Net (Fellbaum, 1998) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 10,
"end": 23,
"text": "(Palmer, 2009",
"ref_id": "BIBREF22"
},
{
"start": 397,
"end": 411,
"text": "(Kipper, 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
},
{
"start": 423,
"end": 444,
"text": "(Palmer et al., 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
},
{
"start": 456,
"end": 476,
"text": "(Baker et al., 1997)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 481,
"end": 506,
"text": "Word-Net (Fellbaum, 1998)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Sources of Predicate information",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "FrameNet 2 (Baker et al., 1997 ) is a very rich semantic resource that contains descriptions and corpus annotations of English words following the paradigm of Frame Semantics (Fillmore, 1976) . In frame semantics, a Frame corresponds to a scenario that involves the interaction of a set of typical participants, playing a particular role in the scenario. FrameNet groups words or lexical-units (LUs hereinafter) into coherent semantic classes or frames, and each frame is further characterized by a list of participants or frame-elements (FEs hereinafter). Different senses for a word are represented in FrameNet by assigning different frames.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 11,
"end": 30,
"text": "(Baker et al., 1997",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 175,
"end": 191,
"text": "(Fillmore, 1976)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Sources of Predicate information",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "PropBank 3 (Palmer et al., 2005) aims to provide a wide corpus annotated with information about semantic propositions, including relations between the predicates and their arguments. Prop-Bank also contains a description of the frame structures, called framesets, of each sense of every verb that belong to its lexicon. Unlike other similar resources, as FrameNet, PropBank defines the arguments, or roles, of each verb individually. In consecuence, it becomes a hard task obtaning a generalization of the frame structures over the verbs.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 11,
"end": 32,
"text": "(Palmer et al., 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Sources of Predicate information",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "VerbNet 4 (Kipper, 2005 ) is a hierarchical domain-independent broad-coverage verb lexicon for English. VerbNet is organized into verb classes extending (Levin, 1993) classes through refinement and addition of subclasses to achieve syntactic and semantic coherence among members of a class. Each verb class in VerbNet is completely described by thematic-roles, selectional restrictions on the arguments, and frames consisting of a syntactic description and semantic predicates.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 10,
"end": 23,
"text": "(Kipper, 2005",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
},
{
"start": 153,
"end": 166,
"text": "(Levin, 1993)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF19"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Sources of Predicate information",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "WordNet 5 (Fellbaum, 1998) is by far the most widely-used knowledge base. In fact, WordNet is being used world-wide for anchoring different types of semantic knowledge including wordnets for languages other than English (Gonzalez-Agirre et al., 2012a). It contains manually coded information about English nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs and is organized around the notion of a synset. A synset is a set of words with the same part-of-speech that can be interchanged in a certain context. For example, <learn, study, read, take> form a synset because they can be used to refer to the same concept. A synset is often further described by a gloss, in this case: \"be a student of a certain subject\" and by explicit semantic relations to other synsets. Each synset represents a concept that are related with an large number of semantic relations, including hypernymy/hyponymy, meronymy/holonymy, antonymy, entailment, etc.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Sources of Predicate information",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Obviously, we can also exploit the existing SemLink mappings to aid semi-automatic or fully automatic extensions of the current mapping coverage, in order to increase the overall overlapping.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Sources of Predicate information",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "As SemLink uses VerbNet as the central resource, we present a complete study of the coverage of the mappings between each resource included in Sem-Link to VerbNet.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "SemLink coverage",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Although VerbNet is one of largest verb lexicons available it does not reach the coverage of the verbal part of WordNet. While WordNet contains 25,047 different verb senses there are just 6,293 predicates in VerbNet classes. This means that the mapping between both resources is, obviously, incomplete. Specifically there are 18,559 senses of WordNet, corresponding to 9,995 different lemmas, that have not been assigned to any VerbNet predicate. Many of these cases appear because of the distinct granularities of both resources. In fact 6,120 WordNet senses (corresponding to 2,099 lemmas) that are not mapped to VerbNet belong to lemmas that have at least another WordNet sense properly mapped to VerbNet. For instance, Table 1 shows the mapping between the verb drown in WordNet and VerbNet. Note that only two of the five WordNet senses are assigned to VerbNet. The rest of missing senses correspond to those cases where the lemma does not exist in the Verb-Net lexicon (7,320 lemmas and 11,201 senses). For example the verb abort does not appear in VerbNet since its three WordNet senses are not part of SemLink. The remaining cases (1,443 WordNet senses and 576 lemmas) correspond to lemmas that exist in both resources but there is no sense mapping between them. For instance, there is no mapping between the WordNet sense harm%2:29:00:: and the VerbNet verb that belongs to the class 31-1.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 723,
"end": 731,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "WordNet and VerbNet aligment",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Moreover, SemLink does not provide mappings to WordNet senses for 1,077 VerbNet predicates. 304 of these VerbNet predicates share the same lemma with some other VerbNet sense that is al-ready mapped to a WordNet sense. This is the case of reveal as shown in Table 2 From the rest of missing members, 574 correspond to those cases the lemma of the predicate also exists in WordNet (like the example of harm explained previously). Finally, there are only 199 verb senses in VerbNet whose lemmas do not exist in WordNet. For example:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 258,
"end": 265,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF3"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "WordNet and VerbNet aligment",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "africanize v , backfill v or carbonify v .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "WordNet and VerbNet aligment",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "The mapping between PropBank and VerbNet introduces additional complexity to the comparison of both resources. In this case, aligning the lexicon means that the arguments of the PropBank predicates must be aligned to the VerbNet thematicroles.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "PropBank and VerbNet aligment",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "First, regarding the lexicon mapping, once again, the differences in the coverages of the resources impede to obtain a complete alignment. From the 6,181 different PropBank predicates (comprising 4,552 lemmas), just 3,558 have their corresponding VerbNet predicate in Sem-Link. That is, 2,623 PropBank predicates have no correspondances to VerbNet. However, all the lemmas of PropBank are contained within the VerbNet lexicon. This means that for each one of the 2,623 missing predicates from PropBank there exists at least another predicate with the same lemma that is mapped to VerbNet. That is the case of the PropBank predicate abandon.02, shown in Table 3 . ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 653,
"end": 660,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF5"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "PropBank and VerbNet aligment",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "laugh v and flow v",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "PropBank and VerbNet aligment",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "Regarding the PropBank arguments and the VerbNet thematic-roles, 7,915 out of 15,871 arguments from PropBank 6 are mapped to a thematicrole from VerbNet 7 . That is, around a half of the total PropBank arguments, leaving out the remaining 7,956 arguments. From the opposite point of view, 9,682 out of 17,382 thematic-roles from VerbNet are included in the SemLink mapping. This means that 7,700 thematic-roles are not aligned to any PropBank argument. Table 5 contains some examples of existing and also missing mappings between PropBank arguments and Verb-Net thematic-roles.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 453,
"end": 460,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": "TABREF8"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "PropBank and VerbNet aligment",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "The alingment between FrameNet and VerbNet proves to be very incomplete. For example, only 1,730 lexical-units from FrameNet 8 are aligned to, at least, one VerbNet predicate 9 . This number represents only 16% out of the total 10,195 lexicalunits of FrameNet. SemLink also includes the alignment between the roles of both resources. However, unlike Prop-Bank the roles of FrameNet, that are called frameelements, are defined at frame-level and not at predicate level. Therefore, the mapping of the VerbNet thematic-roles and the frame-elements of FrameNet is defined between VerbNet classes and FrameNet frames. Table 7 presents an example of the aligment of some roles from both resources for the VerbNet class 54.1. A VerbNet predicate member of this class has been aligned to the WordNet sense total%2:42:00. Once again, the mapping between VerbNet and FrameNet presents significant gaps and miss-matches. For instance, just 825 of the 7,124 frameelements of FrameNet 10 are linked to a VerbNet thematic-role. That is, 88% of the frame-elements from FrameNet are not aligned to any VerbNet thematic-role. Moreover, only 262 frames out of 795 have at least one frame-element aligned to a VerbNet thematic-role. That is, just a few frames are used in the mapping. However, it also seems that, at a class level, most of the VerbNet thematicroles appear to be aligned to at least one frameelement. VerbNet covers 787 different thematicroles 11 . From these, 541 appear to be aligned to a FrameNet frame-element. In other words, it seems that just 246 thematic-roles are missing from the mapping provided by SemLink. Table 8 presents some class level aligments between Verb-Net thematic-roles and FrameNet frame-elements (FEs). 4 Using WordNet to cross-check predicate information",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 613,
"end": 620,
"text": "Table 7",
"ref_id": "TABREF11"
},
{
"start": 1616,
"end": 1623,
"text": "Table 8",
"ref_id": "TABREF13"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "FrameNet and VerbNet aligment",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "In this section, as a proof-of-concept, we will show a simple way to exploit WordNet for validating the predicate information appearing in Sem-Link. We apply a very simple method to check the consistency of VerbNet. Consider the following WordNet synset<understand, read, interpret, translate> with the gloss \"make sense of a language\" and the example sentences \"She understands French; Can you read Greek?\". As synonyms, these verbs denote the same concept and are interchangeable in many contexts. However, in SemLink read%2:31:04 appears aligned with the VerbNet class learn-14-1 12 while one of its synonyms understand%2:31:03 appears aligned to the VerbNet class comprehend-87.2 13 . Moreover, the thematic-roles of both classes are different. Learn-14-1 has the following thematic-roles Following with this example, the VerbNet predicate understand v has no connection to FrameNet, but its VerbNet class comprehend-87.2-1 has some other verbal predicates aligned to FrameNet. For instance, apprehend v , comprehend v and grasp v are linked to the Grasp 14 FrameNet frame. Among the lexical-units corresponding to the Grasp frame it appears also the verbal predicate understand v . This means that possibly, this verbal predicate should also be aligned to the FrameNet frame Grasp. The core frame-elements (roles) of this frame are Cognizer (with semantic type Sentient), Faculty and Phenomenon. Is this set of roles compatible with the previous ones?",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "FrameNet and VerbNet aligment",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "As we have seen in Section 3, the mapping between the different sources of predicate information is far from being complete. However, the existing aligments also offer a very interesting source of information to be systematically exploited. In fact, we are devising a number of simple automatic methods to extend SemLink by exploiting simple properties from WordNet. As a proof-of-concept, we present in this section two very simple approaches to extend the coverage of the mapping between VerbNet predicates and WordNet senses. Moreover, we also plan to use additional semantic resources that use WordNet as a backbone. For instance, exploiting those knowledge resources integrated into the Multilingual Central Repository 15 (MCR) (Atserias et al., 2004; Gonzalez-Agirre et al., 2012a) to extend automatically the aligment of the different sources of predicate information (VerbNet, Prop-Bank, FrameNet and WordNet). Following the line of previous works, in order to assign more WordNet verb senses to VerbNet predicates, we also plan to apply more sophisticated word-sense disambiguation algorithms to semantically coherent groups of predicates (Laparra et al., 2010) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 733,
"end": 756,
"text": "(Atserias et al., 2004;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
},
{
"start": 757,
"end": 787,
"text": "Gonzalez-Agirre et al., 2012a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 1148,
"end": 1170,
"text": "(Laparra et al., 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF18"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Using WordNet to extend SemLink",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "Monosemous verbs from WordNet can be directly assigned to VerbNet predicates still without a WordNet aligment. This very simple strategy solves 240 aligments. In this way, VerbNet predicates such as divulge v , exhume v , mutate v or upload v obtain a corresponding WordNet word sense 16 . Remember that only 576 lemmas from VerbNet were not aligned to WordNet.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 285,
"end": 287,
"text": "16",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "VerbNet Monosemous predicates",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "A very straightforward method to extend the mapping between WordNet and VerbNet consists on including synonyms of already aligned Word-Net senses as new members of the corresponding VerbNet class. Obviously, this method expects that WordNet synomyms share the same predicate information. For instance, the predicate desert v member of the VerbNet class leave-51.2-1 appears to be assigned to desert%2:31:00 WordNet verbal sense. In WordNet, this word sense also has three synonyms, abandon v , forsake v and desolate v . Obviously, these three verbal senses can also be assigned to the same VerbNet class. This simple approach can create up to 5,075 new members of VerbNet classes (corresponding to 4,616 different WordNet word senses). For instance, Table 9 presents two productive examples. Moreover, applying this method 103 VerbNet predicates without mapping to WordNet in SemLink are aligned to a WordNet word sense.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 751,
"end": 758,
"text": "Table 9",
"ref_id": "TABREF15"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "WordNet synonyms",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "WordNet New leave-51.2.1 desert%2:31:00 abandon%2:31:00:: forsake%2:31:00:: desolate%2:31:00:: remove-10.1 retract%2:32:00 abjure%2:32:00:: recant%2:32:00:: forswear%2:32:00:: resile%2:32:00:: Table represents the mapping of a role over the different resources and includes all the aligned knowledge about its corresponding verb. The Table presents the cases obtained originally from SemLink, denoted as SEMLINK, and the cases inferred following the methods explained previously, identified as SYNONYMS or MONOSEMIC depending on the case. The Table also includes the following fields: the lemma and the class in VerbNet, the sense of the verb in WordNet, the thematic-role in VerbNet, the Frame of FrameNet, the corresponding lexical-entry and frame-element of FrameNet, the predicate in Prop-Bank and its argument, the offset of the sense in WordNet and the knowledge associated with that sense in the MCR, such as the Adimen-SUMO (\u00c1lvez et al., 2012) and the new WordNet domain aligned to WordNet 3.0 (Gonz\u00e1lez-Agirre et al., 2012b) features as well as the Base Level Concept (Izquierdo et al., 2007) of the sense. Finaly, each line also includes the frequency and the number of relations of the WordNet word sense.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 932,
"end": 952,
"text": "(\u00c1lvez et al., 2012)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1078,
"end": 1102,
"text": "(Izquierdo et al., 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 193,
"end": 209,
"text": "Table represents",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "VerbNet",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We are now producing and studying initial versions of the Predicate Matrix by exploiting Sem-Link and applying very simple methods to extend and validate its content. By developping more advanced versions of the Predicate Matrix, we expect to provide a more robust and interoperable predicate lexicon. We plan to discover and solve inherent inconsistencies among the integrated resources. Moreover, we plan to extend the coverage of current predicate resources (by including from WordNet morphologically related nominal and verbal concepts, by exploiting also FrameNet information, etc.), to enrich WordNet with predicate information, and possibly to extend predicate information to languages other than English (by exploiting the local wordnets aligned to the English WordNet) and predicate information from other languages. For instance, the Ancora Spanish corpus and lexicon (Taul\u00e9 et al., 2008) . ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 878,
"end": 898,
"text": "(Taul\u00e9 et al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF28"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "VerbNet",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://verbs.colorado.edu/semlink/ 2 http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://verbs.colorado.edu/\u02dcmpalmer/ projects/ace.html 4 http://verbs.colorado.edu/\u02dcmpalmer/ projects/verbnet.html 5 http://wordnet.princeton.edu/",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Arguments of particular PropBank predicates. For instance, Arg0 of paint.01.7 Thematic-roles of particular VerbNet predicates. For instance, Agent of paintv.8 Lexical-units of particular FrameNet frames. For instance, sellv from the frame Commerce sell.9 Predicate of a particular VerbNet class. For instance, sellv from 13.1-1 VerbNet class.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Frame-elements of a particular FrameNet frame. For instance, the frame-element Cognizer for the Adding up frame 11 Role of a particular VerbNet class. For instance, Agent of VerbNet class 10.10",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://verbs.colorado.edu/verb-index/ vn/learn-14.php#learn-14-113 http://verbs.colorado.edu/verb-index/ vn/comprehend-87.2.php#comprehend-87.2-114 https://framenet2.icsi.berkeley.edu/ fnReports/data/frame/Grasp.xml",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://adimen.si.ehu.es/MCR 16 Obviously, these aligments can be considered just as sugestions to be revised later on manually.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://adimen.si.ehu.es/web/ PredicateMatrix",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [
{
"text": "We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. This work has been partially funded by SKaTer (TIN2012-38584-C06-02), OpeNER (FP7-ICT-2011-SME-DCL-296451) and NewsReader (FP7-ICT-2011-8-316404), as well as the READERS project with the financial support of MINECO, ANR (convention ANR-12-CHRI-0004-03) and EPSRC (EP/K017845/1) in the framework of ERA-NET CHIST-ERA (UE FP7/2007 -2013 .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 403,
"end": 408,
"text": "-2013",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Acknowledgment",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Adimen-sumo: Reengineering an ontology for firstorder reasoning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Paqui",
"middle": [],
"last": "Javier\u00e1lvez",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "German",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lucio",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rigau",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS)",
"volume": "8",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "80--116",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Javier\u00c1lvez, Paqui Lucio, and German Rigau. 2012. Adimen-sumo: Reengineering an ontology for first- order reasoning. International Journal on Seman- tic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 8(4):80- 116.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "The meaning multilingual central repository",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jordi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Atserias",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lu\u00eds",
"middle": [],
"last": "Villarejo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "German",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rigau",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Eneko",
"middle": [],
"last": "Agirre",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "John",
"middle": [],
"last": "Carroll",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Bernardo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Magnini",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Piek",
"middle": [],
"last": "Vossen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of GWC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jordi Atserias, Lu\u00eds Villarejo, German Rigau, Eneko Agirre, John Carroll, Bernardo Magnini, and Piek Vossen. 2004. The meaning multilingual central repository. In Proceedings of GWC, Brno, Czech Republic.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "The berkeley framenet project",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Collin",
"middle": [
"F"
],
"last": "Baker",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Charles",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Fillmore",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "John",
"middle": [
"B"
],
"last": "Lowe",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1997,
"venue": "COL-ING/ACL'98",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Collin F. Baker, Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe. 1997. The berkeley framenet project. In COL- ING/ACL'98, Montreal, Canada.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Dbpedia-a crystallization point for the web of data",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bizer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jens",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lehmann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Georgi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kobilarov",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S\u00f6ren",
"middle": [],
"last": "Auer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Becker",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Richard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cyganiak",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sebastian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellmann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web",
"volume": "7",
"issue": "3",
"pages": "154--165",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Christian Bizer, Jens Lehmann, Georgi Kobilarov, S\u00f6ren Auer, Christian Becker, Richard Cyganiak, and Sebastian Hellmann. 2009. Dbpedia-a crys- tallization point for the web of data. Web Seman- tics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 7(3):154-165.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Kurt",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bollacker",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Colin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Evans",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Praveen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Paritosh",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tim",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sturge",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jamie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Taylor",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1247--1250",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Kurt Bollacker, Colin Evans, Praveen Paritosh, Tim Sturge, and Jamie Taylor. 2008. Freebase: a col- laboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 1247-1250. ACM.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "A WordNet Detour to FrameNet",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Aljoscha",
"middle": [],
"last": "Burchardt",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Katrin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Erk",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Anette",
"middle": [],
"last": "Frank",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proceedings of the GLDV 2005 GermaNet II Workshop",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "408--421",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Aljoscha Burchardt, Katrin Erk, and Anette Frank. 2005. A WordNet Detour to FrameNet. In Pro- ceedings of the GLDV 2005 GermaNet II Workshop, pages 408-421, Bonn, Germany.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Combining word sense and usage for modeling frame semantics",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Diego",
"middle": [],
"last": "De Cao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Danilo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Croce",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Marco",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pennacchiotti",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roberto",
"middle": [],
"last": "Basili",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Proceedings of The Symposium on Semantics in Systems for Text Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Diego De Cao, Danilo Croce, Marco Pennacchiotti, and Roberto Basili. 2008. Combining word sense and usage for modeling frame semantics. In Pro- ceedings of The Symposium on Semantics in Systems for Text Processing (STEP 2008), Venice, Italy.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "A powerful and versatile xml format for representing role-semantic annotation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Katrin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Erk",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sebastian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pado",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of LREC-2004",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Katrin Erk and Sebastian Pado. 2004. A powerful and versatile xml format for representing role-semantic annotation. In Proceedings of LREC-2004, Lisbon.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "WordNet. An Electronic Lexical Database",
"authors": [],
"year": 1998,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Christiane Fellbaum, editor. 1998. WordNet. An Elec- tronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Frame semantics and the nature of language",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Charles",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Fillmore",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1976,
"venue": "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech",
"volume": "280",
"issue": "",
"pages": "20--32",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Charles J. Fillmore. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech, volume 280, pages 20-32, New York.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Semantic role labeling via framenet, verbnet and propbank",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ana-Maria",
"middle": [],
"last": "Giuglea",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Alessandro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moschitti",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "Proceedings of COLING-ACL 2006",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "929--936",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ana-Maria Giuglea and Alessandro Moschitti. 2006. Semantic role labeling via framenet, verbnet and propbank. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL 2006, pages 929-936, Morristown, NJ, USA. ACL.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Multilingual central repository version 3.0",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Aitor",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gonzalez-Agirre",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Egoitz",
"middle": [],
"last": "Laparra",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "German",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rigau",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "LREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2525--2529",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Aitor Gonzalez-Agirre, Egoitz Laparra, and German Rigau. 2012a. Multilingual central repository ver- sion 3.0. In LREC, pages 2525-2529.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "A graph-based method to improve wordnet domains",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Aitor",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gonz\u00e1lez-Agirre",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "German",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rigau",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mauro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Castillo",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "CICLING",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "17--28",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Aitor Gonz\u00e1lez-Agirre, German Rigau, and Mauro Castillo. 2012b. A graph-based method to im- prove wordnet domains. In CICLING, pages 17-28. Springer.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "Uby: A large-scale unified lexical-semantic resource based on lmf",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Iryna",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gurevych",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Judith",
"middle": [],
"last": "Eckle-Kohler",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Silvana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hartmann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [],
"last": "Matuschek",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Christian",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Meyer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wirth",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of EACL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "580--590",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Iryna Gurevych, Judith Eckle-Kohler, Silvana Hart- mann, Michael Matuschek, Christian M Meyer, and Christian Wirth. 2012. Uby: A large-scale unified lexical-semantic resource based on lmf. In Proceed- ings of EACL, pages 580-590.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Exploring the automatic selection of basic level concepts",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Rub\u00e9n",
"middle": [],
"last": "Izquierdo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Armando",
"middle": [],
"last": "Su\u00e1rez",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "German",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rigau",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proceedings of RANLP",
"volume": "7",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Rub\u00e9n Izquierdo, Armando Su\u00e1rez, and German Rigau. 2007. Exploring the automatic selection of basic level concepts. In Proceedings of RANLP, volume 7. Citeseer.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Using WordNet to extend FrameNet coverage",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Richard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Johansson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pierre",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nugues",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Workshop on Building Frame-semantic Resources for Scandinavian and Baltic Languages",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Richard Johansson and Pierre Nugues. 2007. Using WordNet to extend FrameNet coverage. In Proceed- ings of the Workshop on Building Frame-semantic Resources for Scandinavian and Baltic Languages, at NODALIDA, Tartu, Estonia, May 24.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "VerbNet: A broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Karen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kipper",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Karen Kipper. 2005. VerbNet: A broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. Ph.D. thesis, Univer- sity of Pennsylvania.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Impar: A deterministic algorithm for implicit semantic role labelling",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Egoitz",
"middle": [],
"last": "Laparra",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "German",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rigau",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2013)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "33--41",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Egoitz Laparra and German Rigau. 2013. Impar: A deterministic algorithm for implicit semantic role la- belling. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2013), pages 33-41.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Exploring the integration of wordnet and framenet",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Egoitz",
"middle": [],
"last": "Laparra",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "German",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rigau",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Montse",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cuadros",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 5th Global Word-Net Conference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Egoitz Laparra, German Rigau, and Montse Cuadros. 2010. Exploring the integration of wordnet and framenet. In Proceedings of the 5th Global Word- Net Conference (GWC 2010), Mumbai, India.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Beth",
"middle": [],
"last": "Levin",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1993,
"venue": "",
"volume": "348",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Beth Levin. 1993. English verb classes and alter- nations: A preliminary investigation, volume 348. University of Chicago press Chicago.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "Babelnet: Building a very large multilingual semantic network",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Roberto",
"middle": [],
"last": "Navigli",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Simone",
"middle": [
"Paolo"
],
"last": "Ponzetto",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of ACL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "216--225",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Roberto Navigli and Simone Paolo Ponzetto. 2010. Babelnet: Building a very large multilingual seman- tic network. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meet- ing of ACL, pages 216-225.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Martha",
"middle": [],
"last": "Palmer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Daniel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gildea",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Paul",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kingsbury",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "31",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "71--106",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Martha Palmer, Daniel Gildea, and Paul Kingsbury. 2005. The proposition bank: An annotated cor- pus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71-106, March.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "Semlink: Linking propbank, verbnet and framenet",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Martha",
"middle": [],
"last": "Palmer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Generative Lexicon Conference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "9--15",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Martha Palmer. 2009. Semlink: Linking propbank, verbnet and framenet. In Proceedings of the Gener- ative Lexicon Conference, pages 9-15.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "Automatic induction of FrameNet lexical units",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Marco",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pennacchiotti",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Diego",
"middle": [
"De"
],
"last": "Cao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roberto",
"middle": [],
"last": "Basili",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Danilo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Croce",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [],
"last": "Roth",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Proceedings of EMNLP",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Marco Pennacchiotti, Diego De Cao, Roberto Basili, Danilo Croce, and Michael Roth. 2008. Automatic induction of FrameNet lexical units. In Proceedings of EMNLP.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Using semantic roles to improve question answering",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Dan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mirella",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lapata",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Joint Conference on (EMNLP-CoNLL)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "12--21",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dan Shen and Mirella Lapata. 2007. Using semantic roles to improve question answering. In Proceed- ings of the Joint Conference on (EMNLP-CoNLL), pages 12-21.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "Putting pieces together: Combining framenet, verbnet and wordnet for robust semantic parsing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lei",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Rada",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mihalcea",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proceedings of CI-CLing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Lei Shi and Rada Mihalcea. 2005. Putting pieces to- gether: Combining framenet, verbnet and wordnet for robust semantic parsing. In Proceedings of CI- CLing, Mexico.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "Surprise: Spanish framenet! In Proceedings of the International Congress of Linguists",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Carlos",
"middle": [],
"last": "Subirats",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Miriam",
"middle": [
"R L"
],
"last": "Petruck",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Carlos Subirats and Miriam R.L. Petruck. 2003. Sur- prise: Spanish framenet! In Proceedings of the In- ternational Congress of Linguists, Praga.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "Yago: A Core of Semantic Knowledge",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Fabian",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Suchanek",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gjergji",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kasneci",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gerhard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Weikum",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "WWW conference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Fabian M. Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. 2007. Yago: A Core of Semantic Knowl- edge. In WWW conference, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "Ancora: Multilevel annotated corpora for catalan and spanish",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Mariona",
"middle": [],
"last": "Taul\u00e9",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "LREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Mariona Taul\u00e9, Maria Ant\u00f2nia Mart\u00ed, and Marta Re- casens. 2008. Ancora: Multilevel annotated corpora for catalan and spanish. In LREC.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF29": {
"ref_id": "b29",
"title": "A novel approach to mapping framenet lexical units to wordnet synsets",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Sara",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tonelli",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Emanuele",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pianta",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Proceedings of IWCS-8",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sara Tonelli and Emanuele Pianta. 2009. A novel ap- proach to mapping framenet lexical units to word- net synsets. In Proceedings of IWCS-8, Tilburg, The Netherlands.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"TABREF1": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": ""
},
"TABREF2": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"2\">VerbNet</td><td>WordNet</td></tr><tr><td>member</td><td>class</td><td>sense</td></tr><tr><td>reveal</td><td>29.2</td><td>reveal%2:32:00</td></tr><tr><td>reveal</td><td>37.7</td><td>reveal%2:32:00</td></tr><tr><td>reveal</td><td colspan=\"2\">37.10 reveal%2:32:00</td></tr><tr><td>reveal</td><td>48.1.2</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>reveal</td><td>78</td><td>-</td></tr></table>",
"text": "."
},
"TABREF3": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": "VerbNet to WordNet aligment for reveal v"
},
"TABREF5": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"2\">VerbNet</td><td>PropBank</td></tr><tr><td>member</td><td>class</td><td>predicate</td></tr><tr><td>laugh</td><td>40.2</td><td>laugh.01</td></tr><tr><td>flow</td><td>47.2</td><td>flow.01</td></tr><tr><td>flow</td><td>48.1.1</td><td>-</td></tr></table>",
"text": "PropBank to VerbNet aligments for accept v and abandon v On the other hand, we found that the num-ber of VerbNet predicates that are not aligned to PropBank is smaller than the number of Prop-Bank predicates not aligned to VerbNet. That is, up to 4,736 of the 6,293 VerbNet predicates are aligned to PropBank while only 1,557 VerbNet predicates are not aligned to PropBank. Moreover, 298 of these VerbNet predicates do not exist in the PropBank lexicon, for instance arrogatev , deconstruct v , mewl v or sprint v .Finally, there are 312 VerbNet predicates whose lemmas (265 in total) are actually part of the PropBank lexicon but there is no aligment for them. For example, the predicate offload v of the VerbNet class wipe manner-10.4.1 is not connected to the Prop-Bank predicate offload.01.Table 4shows some aligments from VerbNet to PropBank."
},
"TABREF6": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": ""
},
"TABREF7": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td>presents some alig-</td></tr></table>",
"text": ""
},
"TABREF8": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td colspan=\"3\">: Some aligments between VerbNet</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">thematic-roles and PropBank arguments</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">ments between VerbNet predicates and FrameNet</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">lexical-units.</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">VerbNet</td><td>FrameNet</td><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">class member</td><td>frame</td><td>lexical-unit</td></tr><tr><td>13.1-1</td><td>sell</td><td>Commerce sell</td><td>sell.v</td></tr><tr><td>13.5.1</td><td>buy</td><td>Commerce buy</td><td>buy.v</td></tr><tr><td>53.1-1</td><td>delay</td><td>Hindering</td><td>delay.v</td></tr><tr><td>53.1-1</td><td>delay</td><td>Change event time</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">13.5.3 employ</td><td>Employing</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>105</td><td>employ</td><td>Using</td><td>-</td></tr></table>",
"text": ""
},
"TABREF9": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": ""
},
"TABREF11": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": ""
},
"TABREF13": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": ""
},
"TABREF15": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td>We already produced a preliminary version of the</td></tr><tr><td>Predicate Matrix 17 . The original SemLink in a</td></tr><tr><td>Predicate Matrix form resulted in 36,174 rows</td></tr><tr><td>(corresponding to 6,556 WordNet word senses).</td></tr><tr><td>By applying the synonyms method described in</td></tr><tr><td>the previous section the Predicate Matrix extended</td></tr><tr><td>to 69,508 rows (10,984 WordNet word senses). Fi-</td></tr><tr><td>nally, by applying the monosemous method, the</td></tr><tr><td>Predicate Matrix further extended to 70,391 rows</td></tr><tr><td>(11,146 WordNet word senses).</td></tr><tr><td>Table 10 presents a full example of the infor-</td></tr><tr><td>mation that is currently available in the Predi-</td></tr><tr><td>cate Matrix including the new mappings obtained</td></tr><tr><td>by the methods described in the previous section.</td></tr><tr><td>Each row of this</td></tr></table>",
"text": "New WordNet senses aligned to VerbNet 6 A first version of the Predicate Matrix"
},
"TABREF16": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": "Partial view of the current content of the Predicate Matrix"
}
}
}
}