id
stringlengths 40
40
| text
stringlengths 200
731k
| source
stringclasses 1
value | added
timestamp[s] | created
timestamp[s] | metadata
dict | attributes
dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ac1efea761b570b3eadd6c9a417d1e611b801839 | JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : INSCOM/CSF
RECORD NUMBER : 194-10004-10355
RECORDS SERIES : DOD-AFFILIATED PERSONNEL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PAGE 4
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : USA
FROM : SHORTT, C L
TO : CHIEF, USA PERS SEC GRP
TITLE : [ RESTRICTED ]
DATE : 07/02/69
PAGES : 1
SUBJECTS : MARTI, MANUEL
RETENTION IN ARMY
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/07/95
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS : BASIC LETTER INDEXED SEPARATELY. INCLOSURE NOT INCLUDED.
GPIN-SP (8 Apr 69) 1st Ind (FOUO)
SUBJECT: MARTI, Manuel (MMN), PFC, US 52 773 870
DPOB: 17 May 1946; San Juan, Puerto Rico
SSAN: 093-36-4601
HQ, US Army, Pacific, APO San Francisco 96558 2 JUL 69
TO: Chief, US Army Personnel Security Group, Ft Holabird, Md 21219
1. Reference paragraphs 14b(10) and 27a, AR 604-10.
2. Based on review of the attached investigative file, which is summarized in basic letter, this headquarters concurs in the opinion of Hq, US Army Vietnam that SUBJECT'S retention in the Army is clearly consistent with the interests of national security.
FOR THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF:
[Signature]
1 Incl
nc
Copy furnished:
CGUSARV (AVHGB-C)
APO 96375 | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/194-10004-10355.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 2286,
"total-output-tokens": 552,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
640,
1
],
[
640,
1313,
2
]
]
} |
22375f515dc92bb80c860dd9248c50a42313bcb3 | JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : INSOM/CSF
RECORD NUMBER : 194-10004-10356
RECORDS SERIES : DOD-AFFILIATED PERSONNEL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PAGES 5-6
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : USA
FROM : LOOS, DONALD A
TO : CDR IN CHIEF, USA, PACIFIC
TITLE : [ RESTRICTED ]
DATE : 04/08/69
PAGES : 2
SUBJECTS : MARTI, MANUEL
RETENTION IN ARMY
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
PUERTO RICAN COMMUNIST PARTY
AMERICAN LABOR PARTY
CHARACTER REFERENCES
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/07/95
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS : INCLOSURE NOT INCLUDED. RECORD WAS REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON 20 JUL 94.
AVHGB-C
SUBJECT: MARTI, Manuel (NMN), PFC, US 52 773 870
DPOB: 17 May 1946; San Juan, Puerto Rico
SSAN: 093-36-4601 (U)
Commander in Chief
United States Army, Pacific
ATTN: GPIN-SP
APO 96558
1. (U) Reference paragraph 27a, AR 604-10.
2. (U) Based upon a review of the attached file, this headquarters considers that SUBJECT'S retention in the Army is clearly consistent with the interests of national security and, therefore, recommends that this case be closed favorably under paragraph 27a, AR 604-10.
3. (C) Background and reason for investigation. SUBJECT'S father was reported to have had the following CP association: 1939 to 1943, active in the Puerto Rican Communist Party (PCP) in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico and President of the Party in that city from 1941 to 1943; 1946, selected as PCP Organizational Secretary; 1948 to 1949, in charge of CP meetings in New York City; 1950, attended PCP meetings with marked regularity; 1951, belonged to the Bronx County, NYC Section of the CP; 1952, registered as a member of the American Labor Party (ALP) and showed preference for the ALP for two years; July 1952, met with the PCP Labor Secretary and other Puerto Rican communists in NYC; 1953, reported to be a CP member; 1956, sympathized with the CP but no evidence of membership in the CP; November 1963 to April 1964, attended CP meetings; 1964, attended meetings and rally sponsored by the Emergency Committee for Disaster Relief to Cuba; February 1967, approved as a member of the new Bronx County CP Committee; and in 1966 and 1967, attended meetings of the Puerto Rican Commission of the CP. SUBJECT'S father was interviewed by the FBI in January 1957 and July 1959 and denied being a member of the PCP, the CFUSA, ever attending meetings of either organization, or ever fostering their causes.
b. (U) A favorable NAC concerning SUBJECT was completed on 23 September 1968. DD Forms 98 and 398 executed by SUBJECT on 12 May and 1 August 1968,
AVHCB-C
SUBJECT: MARTI, Manuel (NMN), PFC, US 52 773 870
DPCB: 17 May 1946; San Juan, Puerto Rico
SSAN: 093-36-4601 (U)
respectively, were unqualified. Local agencies disclosed the information in paragraph 3a, above. COMUS and USAFRV limited investigations from 21 August 1968 to 25 March 1969 disclosed the following:
(1) Local agencies disclosed no record of SUBJECT or HIS sister. A local agency disclosed that in 1962, SUBJECT'S brother was a subscriber to New Horizons for Youth, a CP publication. Three education checks disclosed no derogatory information; an education source recommended HIM favorably. Two employments were checked with favorable results; five employment sources interviewed disclosed no derogatory information and recommended HIM favorably.
(2) Nine character references disclosed no derogatory information concerning SUBJECT and recommended HIM favorably. Five of the sources disclosed that no member of HIS family had ever been known to make statements critical of the US or to voice pro-communist views. One of the sources disclosed that HIS father occasionally brought home a socialist newspaper and agreed with its comments critical of the US. On these occasions, SUBJECT and HIS brother argued in defense of the US and HIS father was not able to influence HIS political thinking and beliefs.
(3) SUBJECT was interviewed under oath on 25 March 1969, and was willing to submit to polygraph examination. HE stated substantially as follows: HE was anti-communist. HE never participated in communist activities or knowingly associated with any CP members. HIS father was a democrat but he did not always agree with party views or their candidates. HIS father's political ideologies had no influence on HIM. HE was loyal to the US and supported its Constitution in its entirety.
4. (U) SUBJECT'S ETS is 20 May 1970 and HIS DEROS is December 1969.
FOR THE COMMANDER:
Donald A. Loos
DONALD A. LOOS
ITC, GS
Acting Asst Adjutant General
1 Incl
Case File | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/194-10004-10356.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 3,
"total-input-tokens": 3429,
"total-output-tokens": 1458,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
758,
1
],
[
758,
2711,
2
],
[
2711,
4693,
3
]
]
} |
cb37a7a24df202aca202acc0af6a73cf29ac9549 | JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : INSCOM/CSF
RECORD NUMBER : 194-10004-10357
RECORDS SERIES : DOD-AFFILIATED PERSONNEL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PAGE 7
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : USA
FROM : [ RESTRICTED ]
TO :
TITLE : [ RESTRICTED ]
DATE : 03/27/69
PAGES : 1
SUBJECTS : MARTI, MANUEL
SUBJECT INTERVIEW
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/07/95
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS : EXHIBIT INDEXED SEPARATELY
(SUBJECT INTERVIEW) On 25 March 1969, Manuel MARTI, PFC, US52773870, Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 4th Battalion, 60th Artillery, APO 96294, after being advised of HIS rights under Article 31, Uniform Code of Military Justice, and HIS right to Legal Counsel, was interviewed under oath in the Conference Room, Headquarters, 4th Battalion, 60th Artillery, An-Khe, Republic of Vietnam. MARTI executed a sworn statement, DA Form 2820 (EXHIBIT__) dated 26 March 1969, which states in substance as follows:
MARTI thought the communists were trying to take over the world and HE didn't go for it. SUBJECT had not participated in any Communist Party activities nor had no knowledge of ever associating with any members of the Communist Party. HE belonged to a stamp collectors' organization.
SUBJECT's father or mother had not been an influence on HIS political ideologies or activities. HE did not object to being in the military, but if HE didn't have to serve, HE wouldn't. HE liked serving in Vietnam better than in the United States. SUBJECT thought that the United States should be in Vietnam to keep communism from spreading.
MARTI owed HIS allegiance to the United States and supported the Constitution of the United States in its entirety.
MARTI was willing to submit to a polygraph examination on the information HE provided. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/194-10004-10357.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 2286,
"total-output-tokens": 605,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
589,
1
],
[
589,
1930,
2
]
]
} |
a31c4813e0d050200b2b0c41d9b5c00055cc7c5d | JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : INSCOM/CSF
RECORD NUMBER : 194-10004-10359
RECORDS SERIES : DOD-AFFILIATED PERSONNEL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PAGES 9-10
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : USA
FROM : [ RESTRICTED ]
TO :
TITLE : [ RESTRICTED ]
DATE : 03/26/69
PAGES : 2
SUBJECTS : MARTI, MANUEL
COMMUNISM, VIEWS ON
AFFIDAVIT
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/07/95
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS :
STATEMENT BY ACCUSED OR SUSPECT PERSON
PLACE: An Khe, Republic of Vietnam
DATE: 26 March 69
TIME: 1330
FILE NUMBER: 093-36-4601
LAST NAME, FIRST NAME, MIDDLE NAME: MARTI, Manuel
SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NO.: US52773870
GRADE: E3
ORGANIZATION OR ADDRESS: Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 4th Bn., 60th Artillery, APO 96294
PART I - WAIVER CERTIFICATE
I HAVE BEEN INFORMED BY William L. Brooks, Special Agent
OF US Army Intelligence Corps
THAT HE WANTS TO QUESTION ME ABOUT
association with possible members of the Communist Party
OF WHICH I AM ACCUSED-OR SUSPECTED. HE HAS ALSO INFORMED ME OF MY RIGHTS.
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT AND THAT ANY STATEMENT I MAKE MAY BE
USED AS EVIDENCE AGAINST ME IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL.
I UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONSULT WITH COUNSEL AND TO HAVE COUNSEL PRESENT
WITH ME DURING QUESTIONING. I MAY RETAIN COUNSEL AT MY OWN EXPENSE OR COUNSEL WILL BE APPOINTED FOR
ME AT NO EXPENSE TO ME. IF I AM SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE, APPOINTED COUNSEL
MAY BE MILITARY COUNSEL OF MY OWN CHOICE IF HE IS REASONABLY AVAILABLE.
I UNDERSTAND THAT EVEN IF I DECIDE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS NOW WITHOUT HAVING COUNSEL PRESENT,
I MAY STOP ANSWERING QUESTIONS AT ANY TIME. ALSO, I MAY REQUEST COUNSEL AT ANY TIME DURING QUESTIONING.
I (DO) (DO NOT) WANT COUNSEL.
I (DO) (DO NOT) WANT TO MAKE A STATEMENT AND ANSWER QUESTIONS.
INTERROGATOR: Donald M. Miyoshi
WITNESS: William L. Brooks
PART II - SWORN STATEMENT
I, Manuel Marti, WANT TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT UNDER
OATH:
Q. What are your views on communism as practiced in the world today?
A. I think the communists are trying to take over the world. I don't go for it.
Q. Have you ever participated in any communist party activities?
A. None.
Q. Have you ever associated with any members of the communist party?
A. Not to my knowledge.
Q. What organizations or associations do you belong to?
A. I belong to the American Stamp Dealers Association.
Q. Any others?
A. No.
Q. What degree of influence did your parents' political ideologies and activities have on you?
A. My mother wasn't too interested in politics. My father is a Democrat but he doesn't always agree with the ideas of either party or with the candidates. My father's political ideologies have not been an influence. Sometimes I agree with my father and other times I don't.
Q. What is your attitude toward military service?
A. Like everyone else, if I didn't have to be here I wouldn't. I don't object to being in the military.
Q. What is your attitude toward service in Vietnam?
EXHIBIT
INITIALS OF PERSON MAKING STATEMENT
PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES
ADDITIONAL PAGES MUST CONTAIN THE HEADING "STATEMENT OF... TAKEN AT... DATED... CONTINUED." THE
BOTTOM OF EACH ADDITIONAL PAGE MUST BE INITIALED AS "PAGE OF... PAGES." WHEN ADDITIONAL PAGES ARE UTILIZED, THE BACK OF PAGE 1 WILL BE LINKED OUT, AND THE STATEMENT WILL BE CONCLUDED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF ANOTHER COPY OF THIS FORM.
STATEMENT (Continued)
A. I like serving in Vietnam better than in the States.
Q. What is your attitude toward US Policy in Vietnam?
A. From what I have read and what I know I think we should be here. I think we should be in Vietnam to keep communism from spreading.
Q. Do you support the United States Constitution in its entirety?
A. I do.
Q. Do you owe your allegiance to the United States?
A. I do.
Q. Do you have anything further to add to this statement?
A. No.
END OF STATEMENT
AFFIDAVIT
I, Manuel Marti, have read or have had read to me this statement which begins on page 1 and ends on page 2. I fully understand the contents of the entire statement made by me. The statement is true. I have initialed all corrections and have initialed the bottom of each page containing the statement. I have made this statement freely without hope of benefit or reward, without threat of punishment, and without coercion, unlawful influence, or unlawful inducement.
Manuel Marti
(Signature of Person Making Statement)
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a person authorized by law to administer oaths, this 26 day of March, 1969, at An Khe, Republic of Vietnam.
Donald M. Miyoshi
(Signature of Person Administering Oath)
DONALD M. MIYOSHI, SPECIAL AGENT
(Typed Name of Person Administering Oath)
UCMJ 136h
(Authority To Administer Oaths) | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/194-10004-10359.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 3,
"total-input-tokens": 3429,
"total-output-tokens": 1546,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
579,
1
],
[
579,
3558,
2
],
[
3558,
4905,
3
]
]
} |
5e50970ecafa9a33e58796c125baed65001fa6a0 | JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : INSCOM/CSF
RECORD NUMBER : 194-10004-10360
RECORDS SERIES : DOD-AFFILIATED PERSONNEL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PAGES 11-12
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : USA
FROM : BURKE, J E
TO : ASST COF, G-2
TITLE : [ RESTRICTED ]
DATE : 08/21/68
PAGES : 2
SUBJECTS : MARTI, MANUEL
SECURITY DETERMINATION
INVESTIGATIONS
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : CONFIDENTIAL
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/07/95
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS : DOCUMENT REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON 20 JUL 94
REQUEST FOR AND RESULTS OF PERSONNEL SECURITY ACTION
(AR 381-130)
TO: (Control Office, Address and ZIP Code)
DCS OPNS
USAINTC
PO BOX 398
Ft Holabird, Md., 21219
THRU: (Include ZIP Code)
FROM: (Include ZIP Code) (Include Control Code Number - See AR 381-45.)
DCSI
Third US Army
Fort McPherson, Ga.
(Enter name and address and ZIP Code of ACTION AGENCY to which results are to be sent.)
Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2
United States Army, VIETNAM
APO San Francisco 96375
DATE 21 Aug 68 0300
CONTROL OFFICE USE ONLY
DATE OPENED
REQUEST NO.
DATE CLOSED
DOSSIER NO.
REMARKS
SECTION I - REQUESTER TO CONTROL OFFICE
1. SUBJECT (Last name in capitals, first, middle)
MARTI, Manuel (MNR)
2. ALIAS(ES), MAIDEN NAME
3. SERVICE/SOCIAL SECURITY NO.
US 52773870
093 36 4601
4. DATE OF BIRTH (Month, Day, Year)
May 17, 1946
5. PLACE OF BIRTH (City, State and Country)
San Juan, PR
6. GRADE AND POSITION
PVT
CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) AND LINE OUT INAPPLICABLE WORDS IN PARENTHESES
7. INVESTIGATIVE ACTION REQUESTED AND REASONS THEREFOR
☐ BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION REQUIRED FOR:
☐ (Access) (Limited Access) TO
☐ MATERIAL CLASSIFIED
☐ (CONFIDENTIAL) (SECRET) (TOP SECRET).
☐ ALIEN REQUIREMENT
☐ CONTAINED IN AR 600-200.
☐ (Limited) (Critical)
☐ NUCLEAR WEAPON POSITION
☐ PRESCRIBED IN AR 50-3.
☐ OTHER (Specify).
☐ (Special Background Investigation) (Reinvestigation) REQUIRED FOR (Ultra-Sensitive Position) (Special Category Position).
☐ LIMITED INVESTIGATION REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 24 AR 381-130 TO RESOLVE ADVERSE INFORMATION ENTERED IN ITEM 11 OR ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
OTHER INVESTIGATIVE ACTION REQUIRED AND REASONS THEREFOR:
☐ AS REQUIRED BY AR 604-5, LOCAL FILES
☐ PERSONNEL, ☐ INTELLIGENCE, ☐ PROVOST MARSHAL, ☐ MEDICAL, WERE CHECKED ON (Date) 15 Aug 68 AND REVEALED: ☐ NO UNFAVORABLE INFORMATION
☐ UNFAVORABLE INFORMATION SUMMARIZED IN ITEM 11 BELOW WHICH IS NOT A BAR TO CLEARANCE OR ACTION CONTEMPLATED.
9. LATEST INVESTIGATION AND/OR CLEARANCE (Indicate type, when made, by whom, and file or dossier number.)
10. NO BREAK IN FEDERAL SERVICE EXCEEDING SIX MONTHS SINCE:
11. REMARKS (Use continuation sheets as required.)
Request Limited Investigation re SUBJECT to determine if action UP AR 604-10 is warranted - LI to include technical FP Check.
SUBJECT currently assigned to USATC, Ft Jackson, S. C.
Regraded Unclassified When Separated
From Classified Resources
and Material
"FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - This Protective
Marking is Excluded From Automatic
"Doss 093364601" TYPE NAME AND TITLE
J. E. BURKE, LTC, GS
Chief, Scty Div
RECLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
CH 20 Feb 68
BY 20 Feb 68
WITH PARA 1-62
SIGNATURE
DA FORM 2784
REPLACES EDITION OF 1 APR 64 WHICH IS OBSOLETE EFFECTIVE 1 APR 66 OR WHEN STOCKS BECOME EXHAUSTED, WHICHEVER IS SOONER.
NW 88613 Docld:34529176 Page 2
SECTION II - CONTROL OFFICE TO REQUESTER
☐ NEW FINGERPRINT CARD REQUIRED. ☐ ITEMS RED LINED ON SPH (PSQ) REQUIRE CORRECTION AND/OR COMPLETION.
☐ REQUEST CLARIFICATION OF PARA ABOVE.
INCL TYPED NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE
SUBJECT: [Redacted]
SECTION III - REQUESTER TO CONTROL OFFICE
☐ ACTION REQUIRED BY SECTION II HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
☐ REQUEST INVESTIGATION BE CANCELED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON:
☐ CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT TERMINATED. ☐ SUBJECT HAS BEEN (Separated) (Discharged) AND ORDERS ARE ATTACHED.
☐ SUBJECT HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED (Orders attached).
INCL TYPED NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE
SECTION IV - CONTROL OFFICE TO ACTION AGENCY
SUBJECT ASGD TO: USARP TRANS
RESULTS OF COUNTERINTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATION:
☐ FAVORABLE. ☐ ATTACHED DOCUMENTS FORWARDED FOR SECURITY DETERMINATION.
TYPE OF INVESTIGATION COMPLETED:
☐ BACKGROUND ☐ SPECIAL ☐ REINVESTIGATION ☐ LIMITED ☐ COMPLAINT
CONTROL OFFICE COMPLETING INVESTIGATION
SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL CLOSING INVESTIGATION
DATE COMPLETED
2 DEC 1968
USAINTC
INCL 1. no
CHAD B. WHITE
LTC, MI, Deputy Chief, ICOP III
SECTION V - ACTION AGENCY TO GAINING COMMAND
RECEIVING COMMAND AND ADDRESS (Include ZIP Code)
DATE
SUBJECT TRANSFERRED TO YOUR COMMAND PER SPECIAL ORDER NO. (Copy inclosed).
INCL (Include orders) TYPED NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE
SECTION VI - RECORD OF FINAL ACTION (ACTION AGENCY TO USAIRR)
FAVORABLE DETERMINATION.
☐ CLEARANCE GRANTED (TOP SECRET) (SECRET) (CONFIDENTIAL) (CRYPTO) (SPECIAL).
CLEARANCE DENIED AND ACTION TAKEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARA 24, AR 604-5.
REMARKS:
INCL TYPED NAME, TITLE AND ORGANIZATION SIGNATURE
CONFIDENTIAL
NW 88613 Docld:34529176 Page 3 | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/194-10004-10360.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 3,
"total-input-tokens": 3429,
"total-output-tokens": 1862,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
642,
1
],
[
642,
3455,
2
],
[
3455,
5105,
3
]
]
} |
c60d16e553006a76c992bc500558527fbedf8a0f | JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : INSOM/CSF
RECORD NUMBER : 194-10004-10361
RECORDS SERIES : DOD-AFFILIATED PERSONNEL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PAGE 13
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : USA
FROM : BLOOM, HAROLD
TO :
TITLE : [ RESTRICTED ]
DATE : 11/22/68
PAGES : 1
SUBJECTS : MARTI, MANUEL
LOCAL AGENCY CHECK
FEDERAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION (FBI)
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/07/95
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS :
(LOCAL AGENCY) On 26 September 1968, the New York Office, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), United States Department of Justice, 201 East 69th Street, New York, New York, furnished the following information concerning Manuel MARTI, SUBJECT:
FBI, New York, New York, has no information on file regarding Manuel MARTI, other than what may appear in the FBI reports on MARTI'S father which have been furnished to the 108th Military Intelligence Group. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/194-10004-10361.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 2286,
"total-output-tokens": 396,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
598,
1
],
[
598,
1052,
2
]
]
} |
2508cb3e01a1ebfd79af0c4c6f47600d51f3476b | JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : INSOM/CSF
RECORD NUMBER : 194-10004-10362
RECORDS SERIES : DOD-AFFILIATED PERSONNEL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PAGE 14
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : USA
FROM : 108TH MIL INTELL GRP
TO :
TITLE : [ RESTRICTED ]
DATE : 11/18/68
PAGES : 1
SUBJECTS : MARTI, MANUEL
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : CONFIDENTIAL
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/07/95
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS : COVER SHEET ONLY. RECORD REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED WHEN SEPARATED FROM CLASSIFIED INCLOSURES.
UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE COMMAND
EXHIBIT
COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: MAHIÉL MARTI
FILE NUMBER: 8240-6019
093 36 4601
PREPARING UNIT: 108th Military Intelligence Group (I-SIB)
AGENT REPORT DATED: 18 November 1968
DESCRIPTION: Ten FBI Reports, FBI New York, file number 100-100474, subject Adrian Sotomayor; reports dated 30 January, 12 May, 26 August, and 29 October 1953; 19 November 1956; 11 April 1957; 16 April 1958; 27 April 1961; 2 May 1962 and 20 June 1964.
IC FORM 171
17 NOV 67
Regarded FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY when separated from CLASSIFIED inclosures | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/194-10004-10362.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 2286,
"total-output-tokens": 538,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
639,
1
],
[
639,
1206,
2
]
]
} |
68e9a752fc021b2d0a54b709e13a73837620c7fd | JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : INSCOM/CSF
RECORD NUMBER : 194-10004-10363
RECORDS SERIES : DOD-AFFILIATED PERSONNEL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PAGE 15
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : USA
FROM : [ RESTRICTED ]
TO :
TITLE : [ RESTRICTED ]
DATE : 10/01/68
PAGES : 1
SUBJECTS : MARTI, MANUEL
LOCAL AGENCY CHECK
MARTI, MANUEL (FATHER)
ALIASES
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/07/95
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS :
(LOCAL AGENCY - FATHER) On 30 September 1968, the files of the San Juan Field Office, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico, were examined concerning Manuel Marti, also known as Adrian Sotomayor; Adrian Marti; Adrian Marti-Aponte; Adrian Martes-Aponte; Adrian Martes; Adrian Sotomayor-Marti; Adrian Sotomayor-Martes; Manuel Sotomayor-Marti and "Soto", SUBJECT'S father, with the assistance of Mrs. Carmen Orraca, Records Supervisor, and failed to reveal any additional information subsequent to 21 June 1967.
AGENT'S NOTES: Attention is invited to Agent Report Birth-Father, dated 25 September 1968, wherein the results of birth records examination reveals that the name of SUBJECT'S father was changed on 5 March 1963. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/194-10004-10363.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 2286,
"total-output-tokens": 485,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
596,
1
],
[
596,
1333,
2
]
]
} |
a8d205dc8b814dd38f9153c74d6ef864eae1ba8b | JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : INSCOM/CSF
RECORD NUMBER : 194-10004-10364
RECORDS SERIES : DOD-AFFILIATED PERSONNEL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PAGE 16
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : USA
FROM : [ RESTRICTED ]
TO :
TITLE : [ RESTRICTED ]
DATE : 11/22/68
PAGES : 1
SUBJECTS : MARTI, MANUEL
LOCAL AGENCY CHECK
MARTI, IVAN
HORIZONS FOR YOUTH
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/07/95
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS : EXHIBIT INDEXED SEPARATELY
(LOCAL AGENCY) On 26 September 1968, the New York Office, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI, United States Department of Justice, 201 East 69th Street, New York, New York, furnished the following information concerning Ivan Marti, brother of SUBJECT;
On 29 January 1961 and again on 20 May 1962 a confidential source who has furnished reliable information in the past, advised that Ivan Marti of Apartment 2E, 905 East 167th Street, Bronx, New York, was a subscriber to New Horizons for Youth. Attached hereto is a characterization of Horizons for Youth, EXHIBIT 4.
AGENT'S NOTE: 905 East 167th Street, New York, New York, is shown on SUBJECT'S Personal History Statement (DD Form 398) as HIS address until September 1965. Same DD Form 398 lists HIS brother Ivan's present address as 1201 University Avenue, New York, New York. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/194-10004-10364.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 2286,
"total-output-tokens": 531,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
623,
1
],
[
623,
1455,
2
]
]
} |
bdb6b8348dda1d14ee4e6d4a88d6eda62576161b | JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM
IDENTIFICATION FORM
AGENCY INFORMATION
AGENCY : INSCOM/CSF
RECORD NUMBER : 194-10004-10365
RECORDS SERIES : DOD-AFFILIATED PERSONNEL INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : PAGE 17
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
ORIGINATOR : USA
FROM : 108TH MIL INTELL GRP
TO :
TITLE : [ RESTRICTED ]
DATE : 11/22/68
PAGES : 1
SUBJECTS : MARTI, MANUEL
HORIZONS FOR YOUTH
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT
CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED
RESTRICTIONS : 3
CURRENT STATUS : RELEASED WITH DELETIONS
DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 03/07/95
OPENING CRITERIA :
COMMENTS : CHARACTERIZATION INDEXED SEPARATELY
UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE COMMAND
EXHIBIT
COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: Manuel MARTI NMN
FILE NUMBER: 8240-6019
093 36 4601
PREPARING UNIT: 108th Military Intelligence Group (I-NYFO)
AGENT REPORT DATED: 22 November 1968
DESCRIPTION: Characterization of HORIZONS for YOUTH.
IC FORM 171
17 NOV 67 | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/194-10004-10365.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 2286,
"total-output-tokens": 407,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
606,
1
],
[
606,
903,
2
]
]
} |
952ea2b890e62a6903ee1c0436f5dd318429edef | SECRET
STAFF 2420582 DIRECTOR 228470
TO: GUAYAQUIL INFO QUITO, CARACAS
WNINTEL RYBAT
REF: GUAYAQUIL 22196 0741704
1. HQS WORKING AGREEMENT WITH HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS (HSCA) PROVIDES FOR NOTICE TO HQS BY HSCA INVESTIGATORS OF ALL PLANNED CONTACTS WITH CURRENT OR FORMER STAFF PERSONNEL. IN ABSENCE OF SUCH NOTICE IN THIS CASE IT OUR ASSUMPTION THAT NO CONTACT WITH STATION/BASE STAFFERS, AS SUCH, IS PLANNED.
2. IN EVENT YOU ARE CONTACTED PLS RESTRICT YOUR COMMENTS TO WORK PERFORMED IN YOUR COVER CAPACITY.
3. NO FILE. E2, IMPDET,>
ORIG: C/LA/STB (STURBITTS), COORD: C/LA/VCE/E (TURBERVILLE)
SA/DO/O (SHEPANEK), OLC (BRECKINRIDGE), C/LA/VCE/V (AMORI),
AUTH: ADC/LA/S (BEARDSLEY), REL: C/LAD (WARREN), CLBY: 12180.
END OF MESSAGE
SECRET | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10067-10044.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 1,
"total-input-tokens": 1143,
"total-output-tokens": 341,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
764,
1
]
]
} |
6613e6e85eeae439fa93d02559bb6489d5e1ed45 | 10/25/
SECRET
FRP: , , , , ,
STAFF
ACTION: LA-B (292) INFO: FILE, VR, D/DCI, DDD-4, CS/RF, C/PCS, EPS/COMP, EPS/EG-2, ICS, ODPU-D, OG/DMS, PCS/LSH, SA/DO/D, (24/h)
78 0741704 PAGE 001 IN 0741704
TOR: 2316322 MAY 78 GAYA 22196
SECRET 2315562 MAY 78 STAFF
CITE GUAYAQUIL 22196
TO: DIRECTOR INFO QUITO, CARACAS
REF: STATE 129679
1. HASSF HAS JUST RECEIVED COPY OF REF WHICH ADVISES OF VISIT TO GUAYAQUIL ON 29 MAY OF MESSRS GAETON FONZI AND ALBERT GONZALES, STAFF MEMBERS OF HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS.
2. NATURE OF PURPOSE OF VISIT NOT EXPLAINED, BUT WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF HUS AWARE OF ABOVE AND SHOULD BASE EXPECT CONTACT FROM SUBJECTS.
3. SUBJECTS SCHEDULED FOR CARACAS 1 JUNE.
4. NO FILE, E2. IMPDET.
END OF MESSAGE
SECRET
RX-9379
Bernie: P/S per
Heerman who's
LAD from
response for
Condell
writes B
05625 | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10067-10046.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 1,
"total-input-tokens": 923,
"total-output-tokens": 416,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
834,
1
]
]
} |
f557feac48d48b2be9cbb9a679939447dd4814d2 | SECRET
ADV LA 1900Z
ACTION: C/LA-8
INFO: FILE, VR, C/CCS, C/CI-4, D/COMMO-5, CWO-
DDA, C/IP/DMS, ODPD-D, OGC-2, OLC, D/SECUR-3, DCI/PA, DDO-4, CS/RF,
78 0443808
PAGE 001
TOR: 211827Z MAR 78
IN 0443808
MEXI 44345
SECRET 211706Z MAR 78 STAFF
CITE MEXICO CITY 44345
TO: PRIORITY DIRECTOR.
WNINTEL RYBAT MNSPLASH
REFS: A. DIRECTOR 190792
B. MEXICO CITY 44308 0429877
C. DIRECTOR 184902
1. REF A CABLE ANSWERS SOME OF THE QUESTIONS OF PRIMARY
CONCERN TO THIS STATION, BUT AT SAME TIME, IT CONFIRMS THE WORST
FEARS EXPRESSED IN REF B CONCERNING REVELATIONS ABOUT OPERATIONS
AGAINST THE SOVIET TARGET IN MEXICO CITY.
2. IN ORDER OF IMPORTANCE, THE NBC PROGRAM CANNOT HELP BUT
BE DAMAGING TO U.S. SECURITY INTERESTS AND THIS AGENCY IN THE
FOLLOWING MANNER:
A. REVELATION OF SOURCES. THE STATEMENT BY BACH IN
REF C THAT HE "HAD NOT IDENTIFIED ANY SOURCES BY NAME OR DES-
CRIPITION THROUGHOUT THE TAPING..." IS REFUTED BY THE STATEMENT
THAT A SOVIET WAS RECRUITED BY FORMER COS (ROGER T. KINGMAN)
DURING HIS TOUR. APART FROM THE DESCRIPTION OF THE CIRCUM-
STANCES UNDER WHICH THE RECRUITMENT WAS MADE, THE SIMPLE STATE-
MENT THAT A SOVIET OFFICIAL WAS RECRUITED IS SUFFICIENT TO
SET OFF A FULL SCALE INVESTIGATION BY THE KGB INTO EVERY
SOVIET OFFICIAL WHO SERVED IN MEXICO CITY DURING THAT TIME
FRAME. THE SOVIETS HAVE THE RESOURCES AND DETERMINATION TO
EVENTUALLY IDENTIFY THE SPY.
B. FUTURE RECRUITMENTS. HOW WILL IT BE POSSIBLE FOR
THIS AGENCY TO RECRUIT SOVIETS, OR ANYONE FOR THAT MATTER, IF
THE AGENCY CANNOT OFFER GUARANTEES THAT THE IDENTITY OF SOURCES
WILL NOT BE EXPOSED BY SOME EMPLOYEE, REGARDLESS OF MOTIVATION?
WHILE THIS PROGRAM WILL HAVE IMMEDIATE IMPACT IN MEXICO CITY,
LA PAZ, AND MUNICIPAL VIDEO, THE FALLOUT AFFECTING FUTURE RECRUITMENTS
WILL BE WORLD WIDE.
SECRET
Ø7642
C. REVELATION OF METHODS. THE OPERATIONAL TRADECRAFT AND METHODS (TELTAPS) REVEALED BY BACH ARE STILL IN PRACTICE AT THIS STATION. WHILE IT MAY BE ARGUED THAT THE METHODS HAVE BEEN EXPOSED BY OTHERS SUCH AS AGEE, THE BACH REVELATIONS WOULD HAVE FAR GREATER IMPACT BECAUSE THEY CARRY THE IMPRIMATUR OF A REPUTABLE U.S. NEWS AGENCY AND ORIGINATE WITH A PERSON WHO IS NOT IN LEAGUE WITH ANY HOSTILE COUNTRY (AS FAR AS WE KNOW).
D. DAMAGE TO LIAISON. A CONSIDERABLE SEGMENT OF THIS STATION'S OPERATIONS ARE BASED ON LIAISON CO-OPERATION. THE RELATIONSHIP THIS STATION ENJOYS WITH HIGH LEVELS OF THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT ALSO PROVIDES A HUNTING LICENSE FOR UNILATERAL ENDEAVORS. THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT IS EXTREMELY SENSITIVE TO THE POSSIBILITY OF EXPOSURE OF INSTANCES OF CO-OPERATION. THE POLITICAL RISK WHICH THE GOVERNMENT IS WILLING TO UNDERGO FOR THIS AGENCY IS NOT UNLIMITED. EXISTING OR POTENTIAL OPERATIONS COULD BE CURTAILED.
E. DAMAGE TO EXISTING SOURCES. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN HOW MANY CURRENT SOURCES WILL CONTINUE COLLABORATING WITH THE AGENCY IN MEXICO CITY (OR OTHER STATIONS) AFTER THIS PROGRAM IS RELEASED.
F. EMBARRASSMENT TO PRESIDENT LOPEZ PORTILLO. AS NOTED IN REF B, THE MEXICAN PRESIDENT WILL TRAVEL TO MOSCOW ON A STATE VISIT IN ABOUT SIX WEEKS TIME. AS A MEANS TO DAMAGE CIA, IT WOULD NOT BE UNLIKE THE SOVIETS TO POINT OUT THAT UNBRIDLED CIA OPERATIONS AGAINST A LEGITIMATE SOVIET PRESENCE IN MEXICO ARE A MATTER OF CONCERN TO THE SOVIET UNION AND A POTENTIAL IMPEDIMENT TO CONTINUING FRIENDLY RELATIONS BETWEEN THE TWO COUNTRIES. THE PRESIDENT MAY CHOOSE TO FINESSE SUCH A STATEMENT, BUT THE POINT WILL HAVE BEEN MADE.
G. STATION SECURITY. DURING PAST MONTHS, HARDLY A DAY HAS PASSED WHEN THE LOCAL PRESS HAS NOT CARRIED SOME ATTACK AGAINST ALLEGED CIA ACTIVITIES IN MEXICO. WITHIN RECENT WEEKS, THE AGENCY HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF EVERY CRIME FROM THE MURDER OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY TO THE ABDUCTION OF ALDO MORO. THE NBC PROGRAM WILL PROVIDE NEW GRIST FOR THE LOCAL PROPAGANDA MACHINE AND FURTHER HIGHLIGHT CIA PRESENCE IN MEXICO WITH CONCOMITANT EROSION OF STATION SECURITY.
H. FUTURE BACH REVELATIONS. THERE PROBABLY IS NO WAY TO ESTIMATE THE AMOUNT OF INFORMATION THAT BACH HAS REVEALED TO UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS. BACH ADMITS THAT HE HAS UNBURDENED HIS SOUL TO HIS FRIENDS, AND UNDOUBTEDLY HAS PROVIDED MATERIAL TO NBC
WHICH WAS NOT USED ON THE PROGRAM. FURTHER, AFTER THE PROGRAM IS BROADCAST, BACH WILL BECOME AN INSTANT CELEBRITY AND A SUBJECT OF INTEREST TO OTHER NEWSMEN OF VARIOUS STRIPES. WHEN WILL HIS REVELATIONS END?
3. STATION WOULD APPRECIATE RECEIVING MORE PRECISE IDENTIFICATION OF SITES MENTIONED PARA 5 REF A, PARTICULARLY THOSE OF RESIDENCES AND LANDMARKS. WERE THESE THE RESIDENCES OF FORMER OR CURRENT STATION PERSONNEL? WOULD ANY OF THE LANDMARKS BE OF CONCERN TO THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT? RECOGNIZE THAT IN ABSENCE OF SOUND TRACK, THAT IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT FOR ANYONE EXCEPT A PERSON FAMILIAR WITH MEXICO CITY AND STATION OPS ACTIVITIES TO IDENTIFY THESE LOCATIONS AND JUDGE THEIR SIGNIFICANCE. NEVERTHELESS, SUCH INFO ESSENTIAL IF STATION TO COMPLETE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT PRIOR BROADCAST OF THIS PROGRAM. PLS ADVISE SOONEST.
4. FILE: 200-120-150. E2, IMPDET.
END OF MESSAGE | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10067-10291.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 3,
"total-input-tokens": 3503,
"total-output-tokens": 1749,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
1799,
1
],
[
1799,
4138,
2
],
[
4138,
5013,
3
]
]
} |
f5ab256a9f8a94af02eb5e2c14ca91b12e953143 | HYBRID MESSAGE 011M
1. REFERENCE ALUSNA CABLE CSQ-015 OF 26 NOVEMBER WHICH DESIGNATED TO SECRET.
2. CABLE DETAILS TELEPHONE CONVERSATION INCLUDING VERBATIM THAT REMARKS POSSIBLE CONNECTION SOVIET GOVERNMENT WITH ASSASSINATION.
3. CABLE DETAILS TELEPHONE CALL OF 15 OCTOBER 1962.
4. CABLE PLANS ANY CHANCE OR LIASON CONTACT WITH POLISH DRIVER AND RESULTS SUCH CONTACT. NOTE REGID-5 ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY THIS ACTIVITY TO KUBIK.
5. ALL ASPECTS ASSASSINATION HAVE HIGHEST IDENTIFICATION AND OPERATIONAL PRIORITY.
C/S COMMENT: *Asst. ALUSNA received telephone call on 23 November from person claiming to be Polish driver of Russian vehicle. Information touched on several areas including possible Soviet connection supplying money to individual in U.S. to assassinate President, possible Soviet implication in U.S.S. Thresher incident, etc. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10068-10142.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 1,
"total-input-tokens": 1180,
"total-output-tokens": 262,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
843,
1
]
]
} |
9ae753095dd3e3c809a92f3e5308ca67844d757e | SECRET
13-6-18-3
14... 292
SECRET
61320
AQUATIC LEAGUE
SEP [REDO] 6707 (IN 97957)
PERMISSION GRANTED TRAIN LEAGUE-1 AND ISSUE SYSTEM AS REQUESTED REP.
END OF MESSAGE
TED CONSENT: Request permission train LEAGUE-1 SW Match $23209 and Developer $22689. Be to train LEAGUE-6 to use match.
Coordinated by phone with:
RE/MEO: R. Chia, x5357
RE/TULB: Mr. John Kennedy, x5938
RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce
SIGNED: RUSSELL
CHIEF, TED
SECRET
REPRODUCTION BY OTHER THAN THE ISSUING OFFICE IS PROHIBITED. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10068-10164.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 1,
"total-input-tokens": 1180,
"total-output-tokens": 252,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
529,
1
]
]
} |
e800e97f9ff7bb087ce0748aec4ff6145a245cc3 | SECRET 1222222
WAVE INFO DIR MEXI CITE PACY 1245
DIDURIC TPRANSACK
1. THE FEDERACION INTERAMERICANA DE ORGANIZACIONES DE PERIODISTAS PROFESIONALES (FIOPP) IS MOLDING ITS SECOND REGIONAL SEMINAR IN MEXICO CITY 18-29 NOV. FIOPP IS A KUBARK INFLUENCED ORGANIZATION. CONTACT IS MAINTAINED WITH ITS INTERAMERICAN REP IN PANAMA AND ITS COCHAIRMAN IN WASHINGTON, BOTH OF WHOM ARE COVERT ASSOCIATES.
2. ATTENDING THE MEXI SEMINAR FROM THE COLEGIO NACIONAL DE PERIODISTAS DE LA REPUBLICA DE CUBA (IN EXILE) ARE:
A. GUILLERMO GENEZ RODRIGUEZ
VICE DECANO DEL CNP
SOUTH BAY SHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLA
B. SALVADOR DIAZ VERSON
VICE DECANO DEL CNP
5773 S.W. 21 ST, MIAMI, FLA
C. FRANCISCO GOMEZ HECTOR
DIPUTADO DE LA JUNTA DE GOBIERNO
3333 COLLINS AVE, MIAMI BEACH, FLA.
D. MARIO BARRERA
DECANO DEL CNP
567 S.W. 3 ST, MIAMI, FLA.
3. REQUEST TRACES ON ABOVE. OF SPECIFIC INTEREST IS INFO DEALING ON PARTICIPANTS POSSIBLE ACTIONS AT SEMINAR. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10068-10172.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 2286,
"total-output-tokens": 444,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
739,
1
],
[
739,
945,
2
]
]
} |
3f60fb8f14da5ce452a8e470eabcd5531ca56d92 | Subject: Reported Use of Yacht Potomac by Alpha 66
1. On 20 Nov 62 LAFO received an unsolicited telephone call on the listed telephone number. The caller wanted to advise that there was reportedly in the harbor at Long Beach a vessel, formerly used by the late Theodore Roosevelt, called the Potomac. This vessel, according to the informant, was being used by the Alpha 66 organization. She was believed taking on a cargo of weapons crated as Argentine beef, and destined to leave soon for Seattle. He added that a Wes Davis had just signed on as an engineer, and there was another character named Cliff Roberts on board. Both were described as bearded adventurers.
2. The caller refused to identify himself, claiming that he did not know whether contact with the Agency would be approved by his employer, and further did not know whether or not the information was valid or of interest.
3. In response to a call to the Intelligence Officer, WO2, it was learned that there is a vessel, the Potomac, formerly one of the 155' USSO cutters. For some time it had been used by the late F. D. Roosevelt as the presidential yacht. Later it had been disposed of to the Maryland (State) Fish and Game Commission, and more recently it had been acquired by the Hydro-Capital, Inc., 410 West Coast Highway, Newport Beach, California (05-5-1969).
4. USSO advised further that an investigator for the Los Angeles County Prosecutor, D. L. Wheeler, had accepted an assignment (taking leave of absence to do so) to bring the Potomac from the Barbados to California. The plan, supposedly, was to make her a floating museum of some sort. On his arrival in Barbados, Wheeler is reported to have found the craft in foul shape, with only a single engine operative. He refused the job and returned to Los Angeles. The craft later, however, did turn up in San Diego in October and was later observed tied up in Cerritos Channel; Los Angeles harbor area; and subsequently, she was moved back to San Diego, where it is presently in a shipyard. She has since been painted, and appears to be undergoing some modifications to her hull.
5. The unidentified informant (paragraphs 1 and 2), subsequently identified as Asst. US Attorney Bill Spivak, was re-contacted by telephone. It was suggested to him that in the event any more information concerning the Potomac and the likelihood of her use in any foreign activity came his way, we would appreciate another call. On this occasion, Spivak volunteered the statement that it was his understanding that the Cliff Roberts he had referred to previously had come from Barbados with the vessel. This was Spivak's first reference to Barbados.
6. The above is for your information only. The sketchiness of the material presented LAFO as well as the circumstances of its origin militate against its credibility. As a consequence, no follow-up is anticipated unless requested. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10069-10077.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 1,
"total-input-tokens": 997,
"total-output-tokens": 683,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
2893,
1
]
]
} |
4367b0d09cfcbc8114f9a7651ba6cfab75baec59 | Office Memorandum
TO: Chief, Contact Division
FROM: Chief, New York Office
DATE: 31 August 1962
SUBJECT: Robert Pratchett, Cuban Counterrevolutionary Group, Alpha-66
1. We have in contact with a new source who will be a continuing one, known as Robert A. Pratchett, a US citizen with 27 years experience in Cuba who is currently in direct contact with a Cuban counterrevolutionary group in the US known as Alpha-66, and who is also in contact with anti-Castro Cubans working in Havana. He will give us more detailed information during the coming weeks, and represent to us the ambitions, operations and proposed sabotage activities of Alpha-66 so that they can either be controlled, encouraged or discouraged, as the case may be from the viewpoint of those interested in Cuban action groups.
2. No data on Pratchett, for any prior clearance or interest in him, based on what he may present to us for consideration, is as follows:
Date & Place of Birth - 31 Oct 1918, Havana, Cuba (US citizen by birth)
Education - University of Pennsylvania, 1940
Employment - 1961 - Present: J. H. Pike Co., New York and Havana
1958 - 1960: Brando and Co., Havana
1946 - 1958: Paramount Pictures International, Havana
1941 - 1945: US Army (Rank of Major)
Present Address - 35 Walton Ave., New Providence, New Jersey
3. Pratchett, who appears to be a mature and loyal US citizen, is interested in being of the best possible service to the US Government in a non-pay status, in assisting where he can in terms of his detailed knowledge of Cubans, Cuba, and the Spanish language, which he speaks perfectly. Other than observing the plans of the Alpha-66 group as a potentially successful sabotage group, he is not affiliated with any counterrevolutionary group, but is now in business for himself as a private investor in a firm he owns and operates, called [REDACTED] Business Forms Inc., 60 East 42nd St., New York. He indicated that Alpha-66 plans were to blow all the power plants in Cuba.
[Signature]
[Stamp: RETURN TO CIA
Background Use Only
Do Not Reproduce] | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10069-10112.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 1,
"total-input-tokens": 923,
"total-output-tokens": 578,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
2080,
1
]
]
} |
db5a2148fd3d6cc12ffc69b23501c65f4c2cd567 | Memorandum
TO: Chief, Contact Division
ATTN: Support Branch (Crowley)
FROM: Chief, Minneapolis Office
DATE: 31 August 1962
SUBJECT: Cuban Refugee Group
1. Enclosed are three names provided by George Hauer of Cleveland, Ohio. These apparently are the leaders of the Cuban group which you and I have discussed in some detail. For the record, Hauer lost in touch with me because we had some rather extensive debriefing sessions in 1959, and apparently he prefers to continue that relationship for the present. Headquarters' records will show, however, that he was interviewed by Gene Rittenburg in September 1960.
2. The Cubans listed on the enclosure are the leaders of a small group which is shuttling back and forth to Cuba for the purpose of establishing reception groups, taking in medical supplies, ammunition and weapons, and to bring out other Cubans who wish to leave the country. As you know from our discussions, they are seeking help in the form of supplies, etc. Hauer understands that no help will be given without some measure of control by our Agency, and he agreed to provide the names for Agency consideration. The third man on the list is in Cuba at the present time. Hauer specifically requested that we treat any on-the-street investigation with great care.
3. Please expedite any checking you might do and give me your expression of interest as soon as possible. Hauer is not an exceptionally patient man, and I certainly expect to receive an inquiry from him in the near future. I believe he is genuinely motivated and quite capable, and in his present position of recruiting executive personnel for Ernst & Ernst he could be quite useful to the Agency.
Vernon R. Sando
Enclosure
1. Ernesto Rodriguez y Moreno
Cities Service Station
Marathon Shores, Florida
Age 42, married, three children, owner of gas station.
2. Aurelio Batista
157 S.W. 22nd Street
Miami, Florida
Son of prominent and reputable Havana banker, Augustin Batista.
3. Victor Faneque
Age 42, former July 26th Commander
Presently in Cuba. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10069-10120.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 1844,
"total-output-tokens": 556,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
1708,
1
],
[
1708,
2057,
2
]
]
} |
aa055071433d2a904b0dcbcb0856f958df893ef2 | | No. | FUSA-3203 |
|-----|------------|
| Date| |
| RI/ANALYSIS | |
| 1. | FE |
| 2. | UN/FE |
| 3. | CF/4/1m |
| 4. | FE/4/CO.4 |
| 5. | |
| 6. | |
| 7. | |
| 8. | |
| 9. | |
| 10. | |
| 11. | |
| 12. | RIVAN |
| 13. | RITY |
| 14. | |
| 15. | RI/71 - 1400 L |
Comments: "For use of RI only" Do not write below this line.
SECRET
To: Chief of Station, Phnom Penh
From: Chief of Station, Vientiane
Subject: Specific Information concerning Item A
ACTION REQUIRED: None
In answer to request of Gregory C. SAGAN, the following is a composite of information from LIEUTENANT COLONEL (USAF) (Item B) and WILBUR H. SAGAN (Item C) concerning Item A.
1. Description of subject: between 35 and 40 years old, about 6 feet tall, rather bold, small mustache, very strong and vigorous, fine white teeth, Jewish. Speaks quite good English. He is married and has one 9 or 10-year old daughter. He has a sister in New York who is a naturalized American citizen. Subject speaks well, loves fine music, has an impressive library, reads continuously and paints very well.
2. Early during the war he was deported as a Jew to a German concentration camp (tattooed prisoner's identification number on right arm—[redacted]), where he spent several horrible years and survived only by luck. Since 1945 he has spent most of his time in Indochina and was apparently in intelligence or related fields most of the time. [Redacted] reports that the first HUAC rap in Paris 1950-51 was made in by an officer from subject to report combined operations and was shortly afterwards declared nonsense and made by the French.
3. Subject took part as a civilian in the Atlanta Operation, etc., according to one report, went in with vast sums of money to make propaganda, buy off the opposition, etc. [Redacted] (Item B) and [Redacted] (Item B) considered Item A's accomplishment in Central Viet Nam among the few notable achievements in that area, particularly in respect to his contribution to the Vietnamese pacification program which is coordinated throughout the course of Operation Atlanta.
4. Subject is an old friend of Col. [Redacted], former chief of VILLERS. He was for a time (June-August 1955) in the National Security Division, during which time he proposed to VILLERS joint operations—pool resources and experience—(similar to [Redacted] proposal, above) but VILLERS refused, considered proposal provocative nonsense.
5. March-April 1954 subject approached Station and USAGID for military support for program to support nucleus of a people's militia (people's militia) in the Khe Sanh area. Information and correspondence on this proposal will be sent upon request.
SECRET
SECRET
6. In February-March 1955, subject was sent by the French on a special mission to Poland and East Germany to attend a conference.
7. Subject claims that while working for MIBH he organized an operation (not known), the latter asked that he be removed from Poland. Subject stated that (name) wanted to get rid of him for "political" reasons—approximately 15 December 1955.
8. At present Subject is (name) at Polish High Commission, as of 26 December 1956. He frequently travels to Poland, was seen here last 17 May.
[Signature]
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
| olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10069-10132.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 4,
"total-input-tokens": 4572,
"total-output-tokens": 1082,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
470,
1
],
[
470,
2805,
2
],
[
2805,
3403,
3
],
[
3403,
3403,
4
]
]
} |
f525b635a854f15fe847134d9ff90f3245e406ec | Memorandum
TO: Director, Domestic Contact Service
ATTN: OSS (Liberty)
FROM: Chief, Miami Field Office
SUBJECT: Gordon Cooper and Associates
REF: 004(5) 222/16285-72
1. On 22 June 1972 we met at lunch length with Larry Gordon Cooper, President, Gordon Cooper and Associates, Houston, Texas. The purpose of this meeting was the acquisition of additional information concerning Gordon Cooper and Associates (GCA) which may have a bearing on the confirmed CIA (CIA) and possibly on future clandestine interest in the organization.
2. GCA was formed approximately two years ago as an enterprise and airline consulting firm. Cooper stated that the company cannot be disbanded shortly because of disagreements between Cooper and one of his partners, Mel Adler. Adler supposedly is a stock manipulator who deals closely to operating outside the law and therefore not the type of person with whom Cooper desires to associate. Adler has refused to sell his stock in GCA and to disassociate himself with CIA so the firm will probably be allowed to simply run out of business. GCA will be replaced with Gordon Cooper Consultants Corporation which will be incorporated either in Texas or the Republic of Panama. The activities will remain the same and a Miami office will be established.
3. In addition to activities within his own firm, Cooper is a member of the Board of Directors of Grand Cayman International (GCI), Grand Cayman Island. GCI is owned by Edward Callini, Robert Callini, and Dino Callini and its activities center around the establishment and operation of gambling facilities throughout the world. Cooper claims that he has assured himself that GCI operates within the limits of US laws even though they are headquartered in Grand Cayman and that the Callini brothers, all US citizens, are legally responsible for operating a legitimate business. He claims that there is no interference of all personnel connected with the organization, an "open book" policy is maintained with the US Internal Revenue Service, and he cooperates completely with the FBI. Cooper frankly stated that he is not afraid of the use of his name and his ability to capitalize on his past as an astronaut due to introduce GCI to individuals in countries throughout the world.
4. Cooper has recently been instrumental in the establishment of a casino in Istanbul, Turkey, and he is currently assisting in the negotiations for the establishment of additional casinos in Athens and Tunis. GFI now operates a casino in Yugoslavia and is working on the establishment of an additional one in a Yugoslav location which Cooper cannot recall. In conjunction with GFI, Cooper is working on the establishment of a travel club which would, in addition to offering tour packages to various parts of the world, offer facilities to gambling casinos. GFI would fund the travel expenses of those individuals who could be counted upon to gamble heavily at GFI casinos. As an aside, Cooper mentioned that GFI has "fantastic" ties on individuals in all parts of the world who are known to be habitual gamblers. These ties include their spending habits, income and outgo and general financial situations.
5. The Haitian airline possibility as reported in reference has no connection with GFI. Cooper is very interested in the project, is pursuing it personally and expects to have some definite word from the Government of Haiti after a trip to Haiti within the next week or two. If the deal reaches fruition, Cooper will be closely associated in Haiti with one Norman Dupree, a Canadian citizen who allegedly is the former president of the telephone company in Haiti and who has extremely close ties with the Haitian government.
6. Cooper reiterated and emphasized his willingness to cooperate with the Agency in whatever capacity would be most appropriate. He said that he felt very strongly about such cooperation and that we should feel at complete liberty to approach him personally at any time on any matter of interest to GFI. His data is being furnished.
| olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10069-10177.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 3,
"total-input-tokens": 2917,
"total-output-tokens": 916,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
2263,
1
],
[
2263,
4031,
2
],
[
4031,
4031,
3
]
]
} |
284a49df030ca7e7f9e4f945b8aeb12367c561bf | 1. INTRODUCTION. As a follow up to reference, Maj. Watlington arrived in Miami on 6 June 1962. After Maj. Watlington had an opportunity to discuss the local situation with Lt. Col. Carlos Causse, the local ACSI representative, arrangements were made for a lengthy session on the subject of Agreed Activities. It was agreed that this discussion would take place at 1000 hours on 7 June 1962 at a JMWAVE safehouse facility. This meeting subsequently took place as scheduled and was participated in by Lt. Col. Causse, Maj. Watlington, Dudley R. JENTONS, Charles B. WIESINGER and Andrew K. REUTERMAN. The specific points which were outlined in this discussion are covered in the following paragraph.
2. DISCUSSIONS. In the course of the 7 June 1962, conversations with ACSI representatives the following topics worthy of recording were discussed.
a. Opa Locka Refugee Referral Procedures. Maj. Watlington made the point that in accordance with the agreements which had been reached between ACSI and KUBA, local procedures were to be agreed upon in order that ACSI might obtain refugee referrals from Opa Locka which could be used as a basis upon which to mount OB collection operations. Maj. Watlington underscored the point that ACSI had no interest or charter to run other than OB collection operations. At the same time if any of their operations produced intelligence on subject matter other than OB, this intelligence would be reported via existing ACSI reports channels. REUTERMAN indicated that JMWAVE acknowledged the validity of ACSI's mission in the OB field, and we were therefore willing to cooperate fully in this regard. On the other hand, we believed that it was essential that certain
safeguards be built into any Opa Locka referral in order that we could minimize the possibilities for duplication of effort and/or wire crossing. This concept was readily accepted by Maj. Watlington. It did not, however, strike a totally responsive chord in Lt. Col. Causes. This was noted but in order to proceed with preliminary arrangements, REUTERMAN put forth the proposal that ACSI register a list of urgent requirements with Opa Locka and that this list could then be used as a basis upon which refugee screenings could be conducted. It was suggested that Col. Kail would be the logical point of reference in Opa Locka through which the referral system could be managed. In this connection it was pointed out that once Col. Kail identified an individual whom he considered to be primarily of ACSI interest, he could arrange for this individual to be referred to Lt. Col. Causes' covert unit. At the same time Col. Kail would make arrangements to pass to KUBARK representatives at Opa Locka and to Station JINWAVE a copy of the Opa Locka debriefing of the individual who had been referred to ACSI. Upon receipt of this information KUBARK representatives at Opa Locka and at Station JINWAVE would review the referral. If this review revealed that the individual was not of operational interest to JINWAVE and his primary access was not in fields other than OB, no objections would be expressed relative to ACSI retention and full exploitation of the body. Maj. Watlington expressed satisfaction with this proposal and stated that he would be prepared to discuss it further once he had an opportunity to personally review the functioning of the Opa Locka center.
b. Antonio CUESTA Valle. Born 13 June 1925. Lt. Col. Causes asked if we could clarify the current status of our relationship with Cuesta. As this name did not ring a bell with any of the JINWAVE representatives, Lt. Col. Causes was asked for further details. This produced the statement that ACSI was interested in Cuesta and wanted to use him in an infiltration operation. ACSI had allegedly previously traced Cuesta with Station JINWAVE and had received a reply that KUBARK had been in touch with the individual but had terminated him because he was unreliable. In view of this response Lt. Col. Causes wanted to know whether we would recommend the reuse of Cuesta by ACSI. We responded to this by stating that we would review our files and would forward a written reply to Lt. Col. Causes within the next few days.
c. Laureano BATISTA Palla. Born 1 May 1935. Lt. Col. Causes asked if we still retained an operational interest in Batista. If we did not ACSI was interested in using this individual in an infiltration operation and as a result wanted JINWAVE's opinion as to Batista's capability and reliability. We advised Lt. Col. Causes that we would check our files and would forward a written reply relative to Batista within a matter of a few days.
d. Antonio ORDONZ Hernandez. Born 24 August 1918. Lt. Col. Causes asked if we were currently in touch with Ordonez. As this name rang a bell with REUTERMAN we responded by stating that subject was of interest to us. In this connection we indicated we were willing to reexamine our relationship with Ordonez in order to determine his full potential or capability, and if his capability was greater in the OB field than in fields which were of interest to us, we would certainly consider relinquishing our interest.
Lt. Col. Causes stated that he felt that he had established his equity in Ordonez through the same trace procedure. Despite this, he had found that Ordonez had disappeared from circulation; and, therefore, he assumed that we were debriefing this man.
e. Third Country Diplomats. REUTERMAN asked the ACSI representatives whether they were currently in touch with any third country diplomats. Maj. Watlington stated that ACSI had previously tried to harness the capabilities of the Spanish, Uruguayan and Canadian diplomatic pouches. Coordination of these activities with KUBARK had resulted in ACSI's being denied the use of these facilities. As a result Maj. Watlington stated that at the present time ACSI was not in touch with any third country diplomats. On the other hand, ACSI was interested in pursuing the third country diplomatic channel as a means of establishing communications with inside assets. At this point Lt. Col. Causes stated that he was very disappointed at KUBARK's refusal to allow him to use the facilities of the Spanish, Uruguayan or Canadian pouches. It was indicated that KUBARK understood Col. Causes' reaction; however, the KUBARK position was based on sound security principles and could not be altered. The additional explanations which were made relative to the security implications which were inherent in the use of third country diplomats and how misuse could affect long standing government to government or service to service agreements between ODYGEN and free world countries did not make any impact on Lt. Col. Causes. This gentleman was predisposed to interpret KUBARK's refusal to allow him to use certain diplomatic pouch channels as a clear indication that one of KUBARK's primary responsibilities in the Miami area was to restrict and inhibit ACSI operational activity. Once this attitude was identified no further attempts were made to persuade Lt. Col. Causes that our actions had been taken in the best interests of the intelligence community.
f. Maritime Infiltration of ACSI Agents. A discussion of these support services which KUBARK might render to ACSI operations revealed that Lt. Col. Causes was still interested in having JMWAVE infiltrate two of his agents into PBRUMEN. In this connection the point was made by ACSI that under optimum circumstances they would prefer that JMWAVE assume responsibility for the agents in the Miami area and then deliver them through a secure mechanism to Havana. If this were not possible ACSI would reluctantly accept infiltration of their agents into any point in PBRUMEN. Lt. Col. Causes was told in very precise terms that JMWAVE would not undertake to infiltrate any of his agents into Havana. On the other hand, we would consider any proposal for the infiltration of selected agents to a beach area in PBRUMEN. The point was made that in this connection Lt. Col. Causes had to understand that our maritime capabilities were limited and we were currently committed to the full exploitation of these assets for at least six weeks in advance. As a result any operational plan which he might submit to us should be keyed to the assumption that approximately six to eight weeks would pass before we could realistically consider the servicing of his request. Lt. Col. Causes agreed to project his operational plans within this frame of reference.
g. Documentation. A discussion of the documentation problem relative to agent infiltrations revealed that at the moment ACSI did not have any documentation problems which they felt warranted discussion at this session.
h. Coordination Forms. The discussion of operational coordination revealed that ACSI was willing for JNWAWE to coordinate locally those operational proposals which might be received from Lt. Col. Causes. Once this coordination was effected and if there were disagreement, then the operation could be referred to the Washington headquarters of both ACSI and JNWAWE. Maj. Watlington stated that the forms for effecting coordination in accordance with procedures which had been agreed upon at Washington would be sent to both JNWAWE and the ACSI unit in Miami in the near future. In view of this Maj. Watlington suggested that we not initiate the coordination mechanism until these forms were on hand circa 1 July 1962.
i. W/T Assets. The discussion of the use of W/T facilities in terms of PBRUMEN operations revealed that the Miami ACSI unit did not have any W/T assets in PBRUMEN at this time. On the other hand, Lt. Col. Causes was interested in establishing W/T assets in PBRUMEN. In view of this he asked if JNWAWE would continue to assess, polygraph and train those individuals that ACSI thought were suitable W/T candidates. It was indicated that we were certainly prepared to review all appropriate cases and would render whatever support was required. This then resulted in a discussion of whether JNWAWE would be willing to monitor ACSI W/T transmissions from PBRUMEN in those instances where the W/T operator had not been assessed, polygraphed or trained by KUBARK. We indicated that we would be glad to monitor such transmissions if we were told in advance of the date, time and frequencies on which the broadcasts were to be made. This then led to a discussion of whether JNWAWE would be willing to transmit C/W messages for ACSI agents. Here again, we stated that we would favorably consider any requests for C/W transmissions providing that we knew the content of the message, the identity of the agent who was to receive it, and the agent's location and equipment which he might be using. Lt. Col. Causes stated that in view of this discussion we could anticipate that he would be levying requirements on us in the near future for support in the W/T field.
j. Secret Writing. A discussion of S/W techniques revealed that if a request for the issuance of S/W were received from their Miami representative it would be reviewed, and if ACSI approved the operation KUBARK would be asked to issue a system. If JNWAWE agreed via local coordination that the operation in question required the use of S/W, then this recommendation would be cabled to our Washington Headquarters where coordination would be effected with ACSI. Once this was accomplished, KUBARK Washington would cable to JNWAWE the number of the system which was to be issued. JNWAWE would then issue the system to the ACSI representative in Miami.
3. COMMENT. At the conclusion of the above discussion arrangements were made for lunch, but Lt. Col. Causes chose not to participate in the luncheon session. During the luncheon conversation Maj. Watlington indicated that he did not believe that Lt. Col. Causes would cooperate within the spirit of the DCID's. As a result he asked that JNWAWE be extremely patient with ACSI until such time as Lt. Col. Causes retired and could be replaced. Maj. Watlington
indicated that the retirement was scheduled to take place at the end of September 1962. At the end of the luncheon session arrangements were made for JENTONS to take Maj. Watlington on a tour of Opa Locka. Based on this tour additional discussions were to be held with Maj. Watlington particularly in regard to the development of procedures for referral of agents to ACSI from the Opa Locka flow.
4. OPA LOCKA. Maj. Watlington and JENTONS subsequently went out to the Interrogation center at Opa Locka. Here they had an interview with Col. Kail, the tenor of which was, on the part of Maj. Watlington, to assure himself that the ACSI representative, Francasi, was having adequate access to operational leads. Col. Kail said that operational leads were shared according to their abilities between the KUBARK representative and the ACSI man. However, there were occasional difficulties in assuring that the men best qualified received the body in question. In addition, he said KUBARK occasionally pulled a man out of the Center without his completing the full treatment which precluded the ACSI representative's getting his hands on someone who might be well qualified for their operations. Maj. Watlington believed that assurance that the ACSI representative got a fair deal might be achieved through a more complete briefing of Col. Trudencio Ulibarri, who is in charge of the preliminary screening so that he would more fully understand what was needed. JENTONS said that this would be a very good idea, but that it would be better if it were a dual briefing with a KUBARK representative being present as well. Maj. Watlington said that he would ask his headquarters for permission to have such a briefing given. Col. Kail expressed his opinion that the assignment of JENTONS to formal liaison with the ACSI representatives would do much to eliminate present difficulties and all present echoed this pious thought.
5. AGREEMENT. When JENTONS turned Maj. Watlington over to Lt. Col. Causes after the meeting at Opa Locka, the two ACSI representatives said that they believed that, for the time being, it would be better to continue the system as at present, pending JENTONS' permanent arrival at the beginning of July 1962. As Lt. Col. Causes is obviously skeptical about the outcome, this was agreed to as a stopgap measure.
END OF DISPATCH | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10069-10185.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 5,
"total-input-tokens": 5715,
"total-output-tokens": 3229,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
1700,
1
],
[
1700,
5140,
2
],
[
5140,
8477,
3
],
[
8477,
11978,
4
],
[
11978,
14323,
5
]
]
} |
b8c5e7061f338647ca407608a4ecbd00b3dbe51f | Chief, Contact Division
Att'n: Non-Sav Bloc Area
Chief, New Orleans Office
The Information Council of the Americas, 620 Gravier Street,
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130
Ref.: NO-152-65, Support Branch (Richardson) memo of 20 April 1965, NO-161-65
1. The Information Council of the Americas (INCA) of 620 Gravier Street,
New Orleans, Louisiana, was recently opened as a source of foreign intelligence
information on the radio broadcasting industry in Latin America. The current
program of INCA is primarily concerned with the dissemination of taped record-
ings of anti-Communist material, called Truth Tapes, to certain radio broad-
casting stations in Latin America and North America for use as a weapon against
Communist penetration in the Americas. Its headquarters are located at 620
Gravier Street, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130. You will find the names of its
officers, directors, and consultants given on the enclosed letterhead of the
organization.
2. We have been in recent contact with Edward Scannell Butler, Executive
Vice President and Staff Director, and have received his assurances of whole-
hearted cooperation in our agency's mission. Yesterday we examined all of the
files of correspondence between Mr. Butler and personnel of various radio
stations in 16 Latin American countries. In order to build up a market for
the Truth Tapes program in Latin America, Mr. Butler first obtained from the
appropriate consul in New Orleans a list of the radio stations in operation in
his country. He next wrote the administrative personnel of these stations
about the anti-Communist purpose of INCA and offered to supply each station
with Truth Tapes. Those stations requesting them were then provided with a
series of the tapes. One or two years later, Mr. Butler sent the participating
station a questionnaire designed to elicit information about audience response
to the Truth Tapes program. Copies of the first questionnaire and of a revised
one are attached for your information. Judging by the responses we read, the
INCA correspondence files will provide a limited amount of information; dated
1954 and 1955, on the identification of radio stations in Latin America which
are broadcasting Truth Tapes, their addresses, the names of key personnel, the
identification of stations not responding to the INCA offer, sizes of audiences,
and their responses. In the case of Uruguay, the exchange of correspondence
between Mr. Butler and Dr. Martin Higueo-Narancio contained information about
the political orientation of key radio personnel in Montevideo [NO-10571].
This example, however, is an exception, since the files contain virtually no
detailed political information of significance.
3. Mr. Butler mentioned yesterday that, inasmuch as he was again revising the questionnaire, he would welcome our suggestions about additional topics. We suggested questions designed to elicit technical information about the station and its equipment, such as descriptions (manufacturer, type, model) of transmitter, receiver, antenna type and power, frequencies and frequency range, reliability of equipment, normal and emergency power sources, remote pick-up arrangements, etc. We stressed of course that none of these topics should be introduced into the questionnaire unless Mr. Butler was convinced of their suitability for his immediate purpose as well as for the long-term propaganda aim of his organization. He stated that our suggestions were entirely proper and, in his opinion, were reasonable requests that would not arouse the station manager's curiosity. We pointed out to Mr. Butler that, while information about key personnel and their political orientation, about the station's administrative policies, etc., was of prime importance to us, these subjects obviously could not be introduced into the questionnaire. He agreed that it would be better to elicit such information in another manner, as he had done with [Dr. Miqueo-Harancio], but because of his very heavy responsibilities, he did not have time to develop similar sources of information in each of the other 15 countries.
4. It occurs to us that you or a possible consumer could assist us by suggesting other appropriate topics for Mr. Butler's consideration in the revision of the questionnaire. We shall appreciate whatever help you can give us in this regard.
5. In the meantime, as soon as all of Mr. Butler's current correspondence has been properly filed, we expect to extract the appropriate information from the folders and to present the material in a series of 60-B reports.
LLOYD A. RAY
DABrandao/gn
Enclosures
cc: Services Branch | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10069-10260.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 2286,
"total-output-tokens": 1072,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
2701,
1
],
[
2701,
4625,
2
]
]
} |
9096c5904adb507d150a88c7491719ee7153ec2d | | TO: (Office designation, room number, and building) | DATE | OFFICER'S INITIALS | COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment) |
|--------------------------------------------------|------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| 1. TFW/Regt. No. 10366 EB2702 | | | I am sending this to the following: |
| 2. Sam Halpern, Staff TFW/Regt. EB2702 | | | 1) TFW |
| 3. TFW/Regt. | | | 2) SR/CI |
| 4. TFW/Regt. | | | 3) CI/LN |
| 5. Contact liaison (supp) TFW/Regt. | | | 4) Security |
| 6. Contact liaison (supp) TFW/Regt. | | | |
**WH-729**
Subject: Current Address of Maurice Halperin
1. A source of this office has just advised us that he received a Christmas card (1962) from Maurice Halperin on which the return address was given as: "Apt C-2, Calle 12, no 103, Miramar, Habana, Cuba." The only message on the card was one of Christmas greetings. Halperin and our source have known each other for a number of years and they always exchange Christmas cards. This is the first one Halperin has sent with a Cuban address on it. The last time that our source saw Halperin was in Moscow when he (the former) was visiting in the USSR during August-September 1961 as part of an official US delegation.
2. In view of Halperin's past activities and associations, we are making this information known to you. Our source comments that Halperin always seems to show up wherever there is some sort of activity going on.
-end- | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10069-10359.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 2323,
"total-output-tokens": 529,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
1135,
1
],
[
1135,
2013,
2
]
]
} |
12c10253985240d7036ee299bbb86df5666c1ada | 9 March 1968
TO: COS/Mexico City
FROM: Douglas J. Freamane
SUBJECT: Status Report, Project (LIGOLE/LIMIX) Covering Period 1 February thru 29 February 1968
1. ACTIONS TAKEN:
(1) LIMIX-1 prepared and published 5,000 copies of the monthly LIMIX political newspaper for distribution in offices of the PRI in Mexico City and to selected officials in the provinces. Copies are included as Attachment A to this report. This issue contains good photographic coverage of the national convention of the PRI; an article on page 3 which is based on previous speeches by the new President of the PRI, Alfonso Martinez Domínguez; a series of interviews with political and intellectual figures regarding Martinez Domínguez on page 4; an article boosting the future leader of the federal workers union, Arístides Eduardo Paredes Santiago, on page 13; and a "plug" for the Olympics on the back page, in addition to other serious and light features of general interest. (2) LIMIX-1 also prepared the 24th monthly ideological magazine supplement (see Attachment B) which contains the inaugural speech of the new President of the PRI and the new PRI "official mayor," Fluvio Vísta Altamirano, and which is included as an insert with the Attachment A newspaper. (3) LIMIX-1 provided the Station with information from very reliable sources on the dismissal of Lic. Francisco Galindo Ochoa from his post in the Presidency and on that the government expects Martinez Domínguez in the PRI. (4) LIMIX-1 continued a close relationship with ex-Deputy Salvador Padilla Flores who is supposed to be a good friend of the new President of the PRI. (5) The representative of the Municipal Government of Mexico City (Atzcapozalco) and Lic. Raúl Zarza Montemayor, provided LIMIX-1 with a second office, also located in a building owned by the Municipality. (6) The DENA group continued, now with official support, to organize athletic events, show motion pictures provided by QKFLOWAGE and the West German embassy and activities related to organization of PRI youth activities in this zone of Mexico City (Atzcapozalco). (7) The LIMIX "Ateneo" (headed by IDENTIY B) suffered a "temporary loss" of its TV programs and (8) IDENTIY B was busy trying to find governmental contacts with sufficient power to force Channel 11 to return the TV time to the "Ateneo." (9) IDENTIY B believes the loss was caused by the dismissal of GALINDO Ochoa from the Presidency (GALINDO had given IDENTIY B un-official support in his relationship with the TV Station management.) It is believed that "Ateneo" time can be recovered; however, IDENTIY B is also investigating the possibility of obtaining time on a commercial TV channel and a radio station. (10) IDENTIY B and LIMIX-1 continued cultivation of Lic. Esteban Ruiz Ponce who is employed as a "secretario adjunto" to Lic. Domingo Cisneros, the Private Secretary of the President of Mexico. (LIMIX-1) also had several
meetings with the Private Secretary of Lic. Rafael MINOR. (9) LIMIX-I prepared, published and distributed 3,000 copies of the Attachment C monthly IPN student publication which included an interview with the new President of the Federación Nacional de Estudiantes Técnicos (FNET) José CEBERROS. On page 6, several articles provided by QKFLOWAGE and the West German embassy as well as other material of interest to IPN students. The CEBERROS interview was an "exclusive". (10) LIMIX-I was able to obtain one of the 2,000 "tickets" available for the national convention of the PRI, and attended both day's meetings. (11) LIMIX-I provided the Station with a report on the FNET Congress and his participation therein. As a result, a close friend of the President of the FNET, and LIMIX-I was named one of the advisors of the FNET President. (12) LIMIX-I continued contact with a variety of political personalities with the objective of being able to penetrate the new PRI headquarters.
II. ACTIONS PENDING: The major pending action is the establishment of a penetration and/or friendships within the PRI. Once the situation in PRI headquarters has solidified to some degree. For example, Lic. Juan MALDONADO sits in a sort of "limbo" at this date, neither out of his job nor confirmed in a job. However, it would appear that the LIMIX mechanism has at least five channels into the new PRI national executive staff which are being developed for appropriate utilization. A separate report will be prepared on these channels into the PRI national. Other channels exist to provide contacts within the PRI Regional headquarters for Mexico City, but nothing can be done until current officers are retired and the new men appointed.
III. INDICATIONS OF EFFECTIVENESS: As reported in paragraph I, #3, 5, 10 and 11.
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES: Nothing new to report.
V. SECURITY SITUATION: No security problems were encountered.
VI. AGENT MEETINGS: Meetings between FREAPANE and LIMIX-I were held on a weekly basis in a restaurant.
VII. REMARKS: While operations are no longer the priority of operations of this project, FREAPANE continues to encourage LIMIX-I contact with the IPN student politicians because of the continuing, and even increasing political problems caused by far left student agitation, thus providing WOFIRM with a continuing possibility for intelligence gathering and political action in this field.
Prepared on 9 March 1968 by: Douglas J. FREAPANE | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10070-10009.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 2,
"total-input-tokens": 1842,
"total-output-tokens": 1358,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
2921,
1
],
[
2921,
5382,
2
]
]
} |
098304848d1c7ce70694258ca4772b33b7514380 | DISPATCH
TO: Chief, Task Force W
FROM: Chief of Station, JMWAVER
SUBJECT: Operational/GYROSE
Gravure and Analysis of AMFAUNA Operation
Action Required:
1. Traces on AMFAUNAs 2 through 23, identified in Attachment E.
POAs on AMFAUNAs 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19.
2. Ascertain whether AMFAUNA-3 is of operational interest to
ODIBEX (see paragraph 15b).
3. Forward evaluations of documentary intelligence provided by
AMFAUNA-4 (see paragraph 56).
Summary
AMFAUNA-1 is a Cuban national who was recruited and trained in
the United States and returned legally to Cuba (in March 1961 to serve as
resident agent in Havana). Since then he has built a net of over twenty
sub-agents and has sent back 140 S/W messages, from which upwards of
fifty intelligence disseminations have been made. He is highly
motivated for his work and under effective control by JMWAVER. The
quality of his production is, for the most part, very good and improving,
although he is at times distracted by an understandable interest in
para-military operations. Operationally he is very skillful; however,
he has been known to take unnecessary risks. There is no reason to
think that he is under hostile control nor that the operation is likely
in the future to be turned against us. There is, however, the real
risk that he may one day fall into a G-2 trap baited with the Escambray
guerrillas. If so, this will be due to the fact that contact with the
guerrillas was his first assignment and, although he has been re-
directed to intelligence collection, he sometimes seems to feel that
he has failed in his primary mission. This, plus the fact that he
evidently believes that the end is now very close, is apt to make him
vulnerable to an appeal from the "heroes of the Escambray".
Present Status of the Operation - Modus Operandi:
5. There is considerable evidence that AMFAUNA-1 is extraordinarily
Attachments: A-D, Incl.
Charts A, B, C, D h/w
Attach. E - Identities (AMFAUNAs 2-23)
Attach. F - Identities (AMFAUNAs 2-23)
Distribution:
3-Headquarters
SECRET
DATE TYPED: 11 July 1962
DATE DISPATCHED: 11 July 1962
DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER: UFGA-4703
HEADQUARTERS FILE NUMBER: 19-6-50/3
201-291230
# 8904
skillful in the practice of security. He has built a false identity which he uses wherever possible in his operational contacts, he is usually selective and cautious in his choice of collaborators, he takes pains to check on the security of his sub-agents, and he uses a system of cutouts for much of his work.
6. Some of AMFAUNA-1's older collaborators know him by true name, but wherever possible he introduces himself to new contacts by the name of "Julio Rojo." Evidently he is now living the part of Julio Rojo to such an extent that he has in effect a double identity. In one of his S/W messages he asked that the widow of AMCUSP-1 be warned not to reveal that "Julio" is in Cuba. Since AMFAUNA-1 is in Cuba legally, and all his family and friends know it, this can only mean that she should not reveal that AMFAUNA-1 and "Julio Rojo" are identical.
7. In recruiting sub-agents, AMFAUNA-1 relies primarily on his own judgment and intuition. If he approves of a person, he will recruit him. However, he has shown himself to be very cautious in granting his approval. He has reported two persons whom he does not completely trust because, while otherwise well qualified, they drink too much and are indiscreet. For two other examples, AMBOA-1 and LITAU-5 approached him separately and revealed their relationship with KUBARK, hoping to collaborate with him; AMFAUNA-1 treated them both with reserve while he checked them out with JMwave. He has submitted the names of other contacts for checking. In the case of AMFAUNA-4, whom he recruited without prior checking because time did not permit it, he put his misgivings in writing: "Right away AMFAUNA-1 arranged for a personal interview, taking utmost precautions, since we have had sad previous experiences with members of CASTRO's armed forces."
8. Once he has recruited a sub-agent, AMFAUNA-1 manages to keep an independent eye on the former's security. On more than one occasion he has reported that one of his sub-agents is under G-2 surveillance, and that for the time being he is staying away from him.
9. In general AMFAUNA-1 seems to trust in the efficiency of his security precautions. On 25 February 1962 he reported that Identity 11 had been caught, but that he was in no danger because he had been compartmented from her. This compartmentation is achieved by the use of five cutouts: AMFAUNA-2, AMFAUNA-3, AMFAUNA-4, AMBOA-1, and AMFAUNA-5, who maintain contact for AMFAUNA-1 with most if not all of his sub-agents. Chart A, which shows AMFAUNA-1 in direct contact with AMFAUNA-7 through 13, may be in error on this point. It would be more in keeping with AMFAUNA-1's known modus operandi for him to have cutouts between himself and these sub-agents. If there is a cutout or cutouts here, their identity is not yet known. There may also be an unreported cutout between AMFAUNA-1 and AMFAUNA-4.
10. Except for AMFAUNA-4, all the above-mentioned cutouts are women. Two of his support agents, including his mail drop, are also women. AMFAUNA-1 has not been explicit on this point, but it is believed that he shares his favors between them. If so, he has the best of cover for his relations with them. It also clarifies the otherwise puzzling picture of a legal resident of Cuba sleeping in a different bed each night. This practice must certainly reduce the possibility that the G-2 will pick him up for routine questioning.
Communications:
11. The bulk of AMFAUNA-1's communications come via S/W. His messages to JMwave are sent to accommodation addresses serviced by AMPAN-2 and AMCUCLER-1. JMwave's messages to him are addressed to AMFAUNA-14. AMFAUNA-1 can also use (diplomatic couriers) for sending documents and other material unsuitable for S/W. He has a personal contact with two of the officers of the Spanish Embassy, who either bring it to the JMwave area and mail it to AMCUCLER-1, or carry it (undetected) when it is flown over to the (undetected) area in which it is to be dropped.
second via AMFAUNA-13.
12. The courier system can also work in the other direction. AMFAUNA-1 has been supplied with S/W materials for his own use by way of the (Spanish Embassy) and for the use of AMRIPE-1 and AMRAVEL-1 by way of the (Argentine Embassy).
13. A third communications channel exists in the weekly telephone conversations between AMFAUNA-1 and his wife AMFAUNA-2. It is useful for passing signals already prearranged by S/W, and for confirming that AMFAUNA-1 is still at liberty. If he is ever arrested, the news will probably come first by this means.
Finances:
14. Expenses of the operation are $530 per month. The money is given monthly to Identity-3 or Identity-4 in the JMWAVE area. Identity-3, upon receipt of the dollars, notifies identity-1 in Havana who in turn pays Cuban pesos to AMFAUNA-1. Identity-4 follows the same procedure with Identity-2. AMFAUNA-1 confirms receipt of this money by S/W.
Sub-agents:
15. Following is a description of the sub-agents in the AMFAUNA net, including AMCOG-2 and AMBOA-1 who, although they have their own independent connections to JMWAVE, have to some extent joined forces with AMFAUNA-1. For the identities of AMFAUNA-2 through 23, see Attachment E, forwarded under separate cover.
a. AMFAUNA-2: AMFAUNA-1's sister-in-law, she formerly served as his contact to members of his net (in asylum in the various embassies) and now serves as his cutout to at least the following:
(1) AMCOG-2: She first appears in AMFAUNA-1's correspondence in his S/W message No. 14 dated 19 May 1961, where he mentions that she was his link to a radio station operated by the (Rescate) organization. Nothing ever came of this proposed communications channel, but AMCOG-2 remained in contact with AMFAUNA-1, helping him arrange asylum for burned agents and passing some of his communications to diplomatic couriers. AMFAUNA-1 reported on 9 July 1961, in his S/W message No. 21, that AMCOG-2 knew him only by his alias (Julio ROJO). In his message No. 118, dated June 1962, he reported that AMFAUNA-15 had accidentally blown his true name to AMCOG-2. For a further discussion of AMCOG-2, and her relation to the security of AMFAUNA-1 see paragraph 56 below.
(2) AMFAUNA-14: She is the secretary of AMCOG-2 with whom she has done clandestine work. She now serves AMFAUNA-1 as an accommodation address and as a source of information. Message No. 112 dated 18 April 1962 included the name of a Communist nurse who has allegedly come to the United States with the mission of infiltrating a counter-revolutionary group. AMFAUNA-14 obtained this information from a doctor (in a Havana clinic). She also is AMFAUNA-1's link to the Dutch diplomatic pouch.
(3) AMFAUNA-15: She is a relative of AMFAUNA-14 and a friend of AMCOG-2. She is also the wife of AMFAUNA-17 and a friend of AMFAUNA-18 who is now imprisoned on the Isle of Pines and sends her
b. AMFAUNA-3: AMFAUNA-1's first mention of her is in his 57W message No. 127 dated 4 May 1962. She has provided information on (military hospital) and has a trusted contact (Identity 7) in the G-2. She also was AMFAUNA-1's cutout to Identity-12, who was a Havana contact of the guerrilla leader Oswaldo RAMIREZ. In early June 1962 she was approached by Identity-8 who claimed to be the new contact to the RAMIREZ organization. (See also paragraph 58 below.) On 15 March 1962 AMFAUNA-3 was traced by ODIBEX who proposed to use her in their Operation CASINO. A negative trace reply was given at that time. Headquarters is requested to ascertain whether ODIBEX has a valid prior claim on this agent.
c. AMFAUNA-4: He is a high-ranking Cuban Army officer who has provided AMFAUNA-1 with documentary information which ought to be of some value, although JMWAVE has not yet seen it, it having gone to Headquarters via (Madrid) through the channel described in paragraph 11 above. He also claims to be receiving information from Identity-9 and Identity-10. AMFAUNA-1 was introduced to AMFAUNA-4 by AMCQ-2 who in turn was introduced to him by Identity-13. For a further discussion of this matter, see paragraph 56 below.
d. AMBOA-1: The origin of AMFAUNA-1's contact with this agent, who has also been recruited independently by JMWAVE, is uncertain. He first mentioned her in October 1961 as his cutout to Identity-14, a Cubana Airlines pilot who had formerly been a contact of AMCQ-1 and who subsequently defected. AMFAUNA-1's last mention of her was on 15 November when he reported that she had given him a map showing artillery installations on the south coast of Las Villas. It is possible that AMFAUNA-1 has broken contact with her, but since he has not reported having done so it is considered more likely that she remains his cutout to (two Cuban Airlines pilots) who are known to be still reporting.
(1) AMFAUNA-18: He was recruited in March 1962, and has provided AMFAUNA-1 with passenger lists and the location of artillery emplacements which he has spotted from his aircraft. It is not known how AMFAUNA-1 first met AMFAUNA-18, and it is possible that AMFAUNA-1 meets directly with him. It is only surmised that AMBOA-1 is his cutout to him.
(2) AMFAUNA-19: He was recruited at the same time as AMFAUNA-18. Although AMFAUNA-1 did not explicitly say so, it can be inferred that he and AMFAUNA-18 are witting of each other's recruitment.
e. AMFAUNA-5: AMFAUNA-1 first reported her as an agent in September 1961. She is the sister-in-law of AMFAUNA-23, a former naval officer who had been an agent of AMFAUNA-1 as early as July 1961 but had been caught and imprisoned for trying to leave Cuba illegally. She has been the source of information on Cuban airfields and is the cutout to a group of people employed at Rancho Boyeros Airport. It is believed that the identities of all these people have not yet been reported, but they seem to be effective. On 29 May 1962 AMFAUNA-1 reported the arrival of an undocumented Soviet plane at Rancho Boyeros and forwarded the passenger list which he said one of his agents had obtained clandestinely. Following are the persons with whom AMFAUNA-5 is known to be in contact.
(1) AMFAUNA-20, her husband. AMFAUNA-1 has written that he has broken personal contact with this man.
(2) AMFAUNA-12: A former chief engineer of the Office of Airports, he was recruited by Havana Station in 1960, and has been corresponding with JMWAVE by S/W.
(3) AMFAUNA-21: A chief inspector of mechanics for Cubana Airlines. He has stated his willingness to sabotage air traffic, but his precise contribution to AMFAUNA-1's operations is not known.
(4) AMFAUNA-22: A chief of electrical instruments for Cubana Airlines. Nothing more is known about this man.
(5) AMFAUNA-23: Brother-in-law of AMFAUNA-5.
f. AMFAUNA-6: A support agent. AMFAUNA-1 has written that she has no access to information of interest, but is an intelligent and brave female whom he uses for cover and to secure overt information.
g. AMFAUNA-7: An old friend of AMFAUNA-1 and his brother AMCUTLER-13. He works closely with AMFAUNA-8 and formerly was AMFAUNA-1's cutout to the Uruguayan Embassy.
h. AMFAUNA-8: An old friend of AMFAUNA-1 and his brother AMCUTLER-13. He has a contact in the Interior Ministry and works closely with AMFAUNA-7.
i. AMFAUNA-9: A former sales manager for a coffee firm. He secures information of general interest from coffee buyers travelling throughout Cuba.
j. AMFAUNA-10: A widow of a bank employee, she has contacts in Santiago de Cuba and in the Cuban Navy and G-2. She is also related to the son of Fidel Castro and has provided information on the son's whereabouts and indoctrination.
k. AMFAUNA-11: An employee of the Ministry of Foreign Trade and the wife of a Communist member of the Central Planning Board (JUCEPLAN). She has reported political intelligence. In March 1962 AMFAUNA-1 reported that she was under surveillance and that he was therefore avoiding her.
l. AMFAUNA-12: He obtains information from contacts within the Cuban Petroleum Institute (ICP).
m. AMFAUNA-13: An insurance company employee with contacts in the Cuban Government, he has reported information on G-2 activities in Cuba and the United States.
Background and Motivation:
AMFAUNA-1 is a 39-year-old Cuban male, born in Cuba of Spanish parents. He has tried his hand at various kinds of work, including import business, journalism (he was once editor of Diario de la Marina) and insurance. He has also ventured into politics, having been a candidate of the Autentico Party in 1958. During the Spanish Civil War he was a member of the Falange Española, and during World War II, until the entry of the United States, he was an agent of the German Intelligence Service. The JMWAVE case officer who trained AMFAUNA-1 in tradecraft in March 1961 (see UFGA-1247 of 10 April 1961) observed that he already had a grounding in clandestine techniques. The case officer also characterized AMFAUNA-1 as "a pleasant, intelligent fellow" and "the most astute member of the team" comprising himself, AMCUTLER-13, and AMFAUNA-1.
children, all still in Cuba (as of March 1961). However, it is noted that the two children have different matronymics, that neither of them is his wife's last name, and that all three dependents have different addresses. It is assumed that this is his third wife. Since AMFAUNA-1 has never mentioned her in any of his S/W correspondence, it is also assumed that she has gone the way of her two predecessors.
18. AMCUTLER-1, who was questioned on this point, said that his brother is living in Guanabacoa with his present wife, that he has been married only once before and has only one child from the first marriage. This information is not considered definitive, because the last point is directly contradicted by AMFAUNA-1's PRQ Part I which he wrote himself, but it is included here for what it may be worth. AMCUTLER-1 added that his brother has no sexual relations with his sub-agents except what is considered normal and acceptable by Cuban standards.
19. The elements of AMFAUNA-1's motivation, then, include an adventurous spirit and a taste for clandestine work. Although "anti-Communism" may be an overworked expression, it would seem to apply in the case of AMFAUNA-1, if his former membership in the Falange and the German Intelligence Service can be taken as indicators. Also included should be the loss of a (freight forwarding business) which started out promisingly in 1959 but folded up after a year of CASTRO's revolutionary government. Finally, although these factors did not yet exist in January 1961 when he was recruited, AMFAUNA-1 is certainly affected now by the death of AMCUSP-1 and the imprisonment of his father.
20. It is evident from his S/W messages that AMFAUNA-1 derives great personal satisfaction from his work against the CASTRO regime. His connection with KUBARK provides him with the means to do this work. This is believed to be a strong element of control. There have been many opportunities to test this control, by ordering AMFAUNA-1 to do something or to desist from doing something else, and the control is believed to be effective.
Previous History of the Operation - January to May 1961:
21. AMFAUNA-1 was engaged in some form of clandestine work against the CASTRO regime as early as December 1960. As with so much else in this operation, details are lacking, but it is known that he already had an understanding with Identity-29 whom he had known for twenty years. In December 1960, Identity-29 introduced AMFAUNA-1 to Identity-27, (an MAR coordinator from Matanzas) who had been introduced to Identity-29 by one of the members of her group, Identity-28. Identity-27, in turn brought in Identity-26, (a fellow MAR coordinator).
22. In January 1961, AMFAUNA-1 came legally to the United States together with AMCUSP-1 and AMCUTLER-1 and looked up their old friend AMJAG-4, who at that time was heavily engaged in work with the resistance groups. AMJAG-4 introduced them to a JMwave case officer who instructed them to return to Cuba, to form contacts with as many resistance groups as possible, and to report their progress through AMRUNC-1, who was JMwave's principal agent in the paramilitary field. Also in the JMwave area at this time were Identity-19 and Identity-23 whom they met and with whom they were later to work.
23. AMFAUNA-1, AMCUTLER-1, and AMCUSP-1 returned to Cuba in January 1961. They dispatched Identity-16 to the Escambray, Identity-17 to Sancti Spiritus, Identity-18 to Trinidad, and Identity-37 to Camagüey, Bayamo, and Santiago de Cuba. An unidentified courier was put into touch with the guerrilla leader Identity-15, and AMCUSP-1 and AMCUTLER-1 went to Cienfuegos with Identity-19 to make contacts with insurgent groups there.
time, as did AMRUNG-1.
25. To support the activities of AMFAUNA-1, AMCUTLER-1, and AMCUSP-1, it was agreed that JMWAVE would deposit $1,000 monthly into the local bank account of AMCUSP-1 and the latter would provide the equivalent in Cuban pesos from his own resources inside Cuba.
26. AMCUSP-1 and AMCUTLER-1 continued to busy themselves with preparations for supporting the April invasion. They contacted Identity-21 who, at their request, provided cover as travelling drug salesmen for Identity-19 and also for Identity-20 who was intended to be a radio operator for Identity-23. Although AMFAUNA-1 knew all these people, he was compartmented from these operations to some extent, so that after the arrest of AMCUSP-1 and the escape of AMCUTLER-1 he had some difficulty in re-establishing contact with them.
27. AMCUTLER-1 and AMFAUNA-1, working together, held meetings with Identity-33, a Cuban Army officer stationed at the San Antonio de los Banos base, and discussed plans for supporting the invasion. AMFAUNA-1 also contacted Identity-35, the commanding officer of the San Julian base, and arranged for its surrender, using Identity-34, head of the OA in Pinar del Rio, as a cutout. He had another agent on the base, Identity 36, and had already recruited AMFAUNA-1, an employee of the Ministry of Foreign Trade.
28. On 18 March 1961, AMCUSP-1 and AMRUNG-1 were arrested by the G-2 while holding a clandestine meeting. At first this was not regarded as too serious a matter. The G-2 had broken into the meeting only after having been alerted by the suspicious behavior of a woman of lookout, and it was believed that they had no real evidence. AMCUTLER-1 came to the JMWAVE area on 13 April 1961 and returned again to Cuba on 10 April. He was still optimistic that AMCUSP-1 and AMRUNG-1 would either be released or could be helped to escape. However, one of the other prisoners apparently confessed and implicated AMCUSP-1 and AMRUNG-1 who were executed on 20 April. With the wave of arrests accompanying the April 17 invasion, AMCUTLER-1 took asylum in the Venezuelan Embassy and AMFAUNA-1 went temporarily into hiding.
29. On 27 April 1961 AMFAUNA-1 resumed operations by sending Identities 24, 25, 26 and 27 to collect order of battle information in Matanzas. Identities 26 and 27 returned to Havana to report. Identity-25 remained in Matanzas, and Identity-24 was caught by the G-2.
30. In May 1961, Identity-30 informed AMFAUNA-1 that some kind of conspiratorial activity was going on in the home of AMCOG-2. He arranged to meet her through Identity-30 whom he thereafter used as a cutout to her.
31. This phase of the AMFAUNA operation is diagrammed in Chart B. The following people participating in this phase were separated from the operation by known causes:
a. By arrest and execution:
(1) AMCUSP-1
(2) AMRUNG-1
b. By arrest and detention:
(1) Identity-24
(2) Identity-28
c. By asylum or escape to the U.S.:
(1) AMCUTLER-1
(2) Identity-23
32. In the period beginning June 1961, AMFAUNA-1 first began making regular use of AMFAUNA-2. He needed contact with his collaborators who were in asylum in various Western embassies, and with AMFAUNA-2 (openly visiting her husband AMCUTLER-1) who was a natural choice for the job. With the departure of Identities 29 and 30, AMFAUNA-1 began using AMFAUNA-2 as cutout to AMCOG-2 who was useful to him for her ability to obtain the help of diplomatic couriers. In August 1961 he used this channel to send out some order of battle information obtained by Identity-21.
33. Identity-21 continued to help Identities 19 and 20 until they took asylum in the Argentine Embassy. He also served as AMFAUNA-1's cutout to Identity-50 who was a close friend of the insurgent leader Oswaldo RAMIREZ. For cutouts to Identity-21, AMFAUNA-1 first used Identity-51 and then AMFAUNA-8. AMFAUNA-8 also served as cutout to Identity-45 about whom nothing more is known than his name.
34. AMFAUNA-1 developed another contact to Oswaldo RAMIREZ during this period in the person of Identity-52, a close relative of RAMIREZ and a former lieutenant in the Rebel Army. Identity-52 met AMFAUNA-1 and Identity-21 on 27 October 1961, and then remained in touch through Identity-51. A few weeks later Identity-52 was arrested.
35. At some time during the period June to November 1961, AMFAUNA-1 began collaborating with AMBOA-1. The origin of this collaboration is not known, but it appears that the initiative was taken by AMBOA-1. AMFAUNA-1 reported that she had revealed to him the fact that she has a channel of S/W communication to KUBARK, and that she had claimed to be a friend of the widow of AMCUTLER-1. AMFAUNA-1 asked JM WAVE to confirm her bona fides, and this was done. AMBOA-1 then began working as AMFAUNA-1's cutout to Identity-14, a Cubana Airlines pilot who in turn was receiving information from Identity-40, an employee of Cubana. At some time prior to November 1961, Identity-40 was fired from her job and held for interrogation by the G-2.
36. During the same period AMFAUNA-1 added the following new agents:
a. AMFAUNA-23 (for description see paragraph 15e5 above).
b. AMFAUNA-5 (for description see paragraph 15e above).
c. Identity-41, a person who allegedly was collaborating with several other clandestine groups. He had two sub-agents in the Ministry of Public Works. Identities 42 and 43. No production has been attributable to these people.
d. Identity-46, a clerk in the Ministry of Communications who allegedly was able to obtain the text of cables between Cuba and Czechoslovakia. Nothing ever came of this contact.
e. Identity-47, a secretary to the Chief of the Revolutionary Armed Forces. AMFAUNA-1 obtained some order of battle information from her, apparently on an unwitting basis. In August 1961 he reported that he was dropping her because she was a strong Communist and had given him information which he considered of doubtful reliability.
f. Identity-48, a foreman on the Havana docks who provided some order of battle information.
g. Identity-49, Chief of Maritime Police in Cienfuegos. Although his recruitment was reported, AMFAUNA-1 never mentioned him again.
and AMFAUNA-1 hid him in Havana until he was able to get asylum for him in the Ecuadorian Embassy.
38. This phase of the AMFAUNA operation is diagrammed in Chart C. The following people participating in this phase were separated from the operation by known causes:
a. By arrest and detention:
(1) Identity 19 (subsequently escaped and took asylum in the Argentine Embassy)
(2) Identity 20 (subsequently escaped and took asylum in the Argentine Embassy)
(3) Identity 46 (interrogated by G-2, but the duration of her detention is not known).
(4) Identity 52.
b. By asylum:
(1) Identity 21
(2) Identity 37.
Previous History of the Operation - December 1961 to April 1962:
39. During the period from December 1961 to April 1962, AMFAUNA-1 continued to use AMFAUNA-2 as a cutout to AMCOG-2. The latter was given a lead in March 1962 from Identity-13, one of her diplomatic contacts, to a disaffected Cuban Army officer, AMFAUNA-4. She turned this lead over to AMFAUNA-1, and the latter held his first meeting with AMFAUNA-4 in AMFAUNA-2's automobile.
40. AMFAUNA-3 was also used as an alternate cutout to Identity-11, a woman with contacts in the Cuban Navy. The other alternate cutout was AMFAUNA-8. Identity-11 was arrested in February 1962. According to AMFAUNA-1's account of the incident in his message No. 89 of 25 February 1962, Identity-11 had been meeting a member of Fidel Castro's bodyguard. AMFAUNA-1 had warned her not to trust the man, but she met him again on the following day and was caught with him. AMFAUNA-1 commented that some of his other agents were not compartmented from her, and he had ordered them to go into hiding. He did not identify these other agents. Presumably they included AMFAUNA-2 and AMFAUNA-8.
41. AMFAUNA-3 was recruited during this period and used as a cutout to Identity-12, the Havana representative of the insurgent leader Oswaldo RAMIREZ. According to an official announcement by the Cuban Government, RAMIREZ was killed in action on 16 April 1962. Other sources have contradicted this report and the matter still remains in some doubt. However, according to information obtained by AMFAUNA-1, Identity-12 was arrested in his home in Havana in late April. For a further discussion of the possible security implications of this connection, see paragraph 59 below.
42. Identity-51, who during the period June to November 1961, had been serving as a link to the Oswaldo RAMIREZ group, now established a contact with Identity-54, a resident of Cienfuegos who claimed to be a disillusioned counter-revolutionary. As a cutout to Identity-54, she used Identity-53. As far as the records show, no results were ever obtained from this connection.
43. Identity-14 defected during this period, as did Identity-57, another Cubana Airlines pilot whom AMFAUNA-1 had recruited and was
paragraph 15a above, AMFAUNA-1 seems to have an excellent network within Cuban aviation, but how it works remains a matter for conjecture. It is supposed that AMROA-1 is handling the two new pilots.
44. AMFAUNA-21 and AMFAUNA-22, both employees at Rancho Boyeros Airport, first made their appearance during this period, and AMPAN-12 (who has and continues to use his own S/W communications to JMwave) found his way into the AMFAUNA operation. All three are known to AMFAUNA-5, and it is believed that she is probably the cutout to them.
45. Identity-55 and Identity-56 were mentioned briefly as active during the period from December 1961 to April 1962. The former had been a contact of AMKUNG-10 and seems to have gone into hiding; in any case, nothing more has been reported on him. The latter was an agent of AMFAUNA-1 in Santiago de Cuba. In January 1962 he was in hiding and awaiting a chance to go into asylum.
46. AMFAUNA-11 remained active during this period, and AMFAUNA-9, 10, and 12 were added to the operation. For descriptions of these agents, see paragraph 15 above.
47. This phase of the AMFAUNA operation is diagrammed in Chart D. The following people participating in this phase were separated from the operation by known causes:
a. By arrest and detention:
(1) Identity-11
(2) Identity-12.
b. By asylum or defection:
(1) Identity-14
(2) Identity-55
(3) Identity-56
(4) Identity-57.
Production:
48. JMwave records do not show the total number of AMFAUNA reports disseminated since January 1961. The figure is at least fifty, and is believed to be nearer one hundred, if the present frequency of dissemination can be a criterion. In content they have leaned heavily toward the activities of insurgent groups, militia movements, location of artillery, and aviation matters. There has been a more recent tendency toward political and economic information, which is being encouraged by JMwave. Evaluations of his production are lacking.
Security Analysis:
49. The possibility that AMFAUNA-1 is a double agent is considered remote. His successful LCFLUTTER, the fact (or what is believed to be the fact) that his close friend and fellow agent AMCUSP-1 was executed, and AMFAUNA-1's own character and background, all argue against the proposition that he was originally dispatched by the G-2. However, it must be admitted that the LCFLUTTER can be beaten. Also that there is no proof, other than the fact that AMCUSP-1's wife is in the JMwave area and behaving like a widow, that AMCUSP-1 was really executed. There is documentary evidence in the form of a letter written by a fellow prisoner to AMCUSP-1's widow, that he was held in prison in March and April 1961. However, the person who identified and buried the body was AMFAUNA-1's father, who was subsequently
50. Similarly, all that is known about AMFAUNA-1's background comes from AMFAUNA-1's own statements embodied in his PRQ Part I. No confirmation of this information has ever been obtained. From this point of view there is no guarantee that AMFAUNA-1 is what he claims to be. For all the proof to the contrary available to JMMAVE, he could as easily have been a Spanish Communist as a member of the Spanish Falange.
51. These points are listed for the sake of completeness, but little importance is attached to them. The known fact that QUANTUM-51 and QUANTUM-52 consider AMFAUNA-1 reliable suggests that he at least was not a Spanish Communist. And an unusually extensive independent view has been obtained of AMFAUNA-1's operations through the reports and debriefings of eight of his agents who have either escaped to or are in communication with the United States. The defection of Identity-14, and the escape and debriefings of Identity-19, Identity-23, Identity-26, and Identity-29, have all confirmed parts of AMFAUNA-1's story. Finally, AMCOG-3 has reported by S/W that AMCOG-2 is in contact with AMFAUNA-1, and AMFAUNA-2's telephone conversations with AMCUTLER-3 provide a continuing check on the safety and whereabouts of AMFAUNA-1.
52. For the same reasons, the possibility is heavily discounted that AMFAUNA-1 has been caught and doubled by the G-2 since his arrival in Cuba. Additional indications that all is still well are the fact that he never omits the safety signal that was given him for use in his S/W, that his operational activities are consistent with his character and background, and that the reporting of his agents is consistent with their access to information.
53. Whether AMFAUNA-1 is now in danger of being detected, and whether the G-2 could double him if they do catch him, are two questions remaining to be considered. Taking the second question first, it is believed that the chances of the G-2 running a successful CI operation against KUBARK through AMFAUNA-1 are extremely slim. To be sure, the G-2 has certain weapons that they could use against AMFAUNA-1. His father is already in prison, serving a fifteen-year sentence, and his mother and two children are still in Cuba as potential hostages. It is also conceivable that the G-2 could use AMFAUNA-1's own interest in paramilitary operations as a lever by persuading him that KUBARK, by neglecting to support the insurgent leader Oswaldo RAMIREZ, was responsible for the latter's death and has demonstrated its indifference to the fate of the Cuban people. This would all take time, however, because AMFAUNA-1's reaction to arrest at least initially, would probably be an attempt to emulate his two heroes, AMCUP-3 and AMCUN-1. In the time that it would take the G-2 to break down this resistance, AMCUTLER-1 would almost certainly have learned, either through his phone conversations with AMFAUNA-2 or by the interruption of the same, that something is wrong with AMFAUNA-1.
54. The risks that AMFAUNA-1 is now running are believed to be considerable. For one thing, at least ten persons with varying degrees of knowledge of his clandestine operations, have been held temporarily or permanently by the G-2, which is believed to be increasing in competence as a security force. For another, AMFAUNA-1 takes unnecessary chances, as by interrogating a new and untested agent (AMFAUNA-4) in the personal automobile of his sister-in-law, or by personally trying to penetrate a restricted area. And for a third, he has some contacts which can be dangerous to him.
55. AMCOG-2 knows too much about AMFAUNA-1 for the latter's good. It is believed that AMFAUNA-1 himself is aware that this is a potentially serious security weakness, because he took the trouble to report it (see paragraph 15a1 above). The AMCOG operation is itself a fairly complex one, and will be analyzed in a separate dispatch. The aspects of it which bear on the AMFAUNA operation are that AMCOG-2 and her brother AMCOG-3 are close relatives of a very prominent anti-Communist Cuban politician, and that they are widely known, both in Cuba and in
prosecution for acts against it, is a matter for wonder. It has been rumored that the old politician has a blackmail hold over Fidel CASTRO by virtue of his possession of very damaging information about CASTRO. There may be some substance to this rumor. As a young student, CASTRO is believed to have committed criminal acts, and the old politician would have been in the best possible position at the time to obtain proof of them. This might well explain why the family enjoys immunity today.
56. It would seem, though, that an alert and competent security service, which the G-2 shows signs of becoming, if it is enjoined from arresting and prosecuting an espionage suspect, would at least try to control and monitor his operations by penetrating them. It is therefore a cause for speculation that, in February 1962, an important officer of the Cuban Army (AMFAUNA-4) was allegedly desirous of defecting, was introduced by Identity-13 to AMCOG-2, and a matter for deep concern that AMCOG-2 passed the lead along to AMFAUNA-1 who accepted it without any prior checking and actually held his first meeting with the would-be defector in an automobile traceable to AMFAUNA-2. Since then, it has been observed that reports and sub-sources offered by AMFAUNA-4 are absorbing an increasing amount of AMFAUNA-1's time. The military manuals and documents turned over by AMFAUNA-4, and sent to Headquarters via the QUANTUM and the MADRID STATION, have not yet been seen by JMWAVE, so it is not yet known whether AMFAUNA-4's production can be given a sufficiently high evaluation to allay the doubts raised by the manner of his recruitment. Headquarters is asked to advise on this as soon as possible, and to provide traces on AMFAUNA-4.
57. The other potentially dangerous contacts are, as might be expected, in the field of para-military activities. In November 1961, AMFAUNA-1 was in touch with Identity-52, a nephew of Oswaldo RAMIREZ, through Identity-51, a resident of Cienfuegos. Identity-52 was arrested late in the year. AMFAUNA-1 then developed another contact to the Oswaldo RAMIREZ group through Identity-12, RAMIREZ's Havana representative, whose cutout to AMFAUNA-1 was AMFAUNA-3, a woman from Sancti Spiritus now resident in Havana. Identity-12 was arrested in April presumably as an aftermath of the 16 April battle in which RAMIREZ was reportedly killed.
58. In late May or early June 1962, Identity-8, a person from Sancti Spiritus known to AMFAUNA-3, called on her in the company of a certain Ricardo IZQUIERDO, who claimed to have had a meeting on 28 May near Trinidad with one Comandante Fidel HERNANDEZ Perez, who gave IZQUIERDO a letter for delivery to Identity-12. Unable to find Identity-12 because of the latter's arrest, IZQUIERDO approached Identity-8 who introduced him to AMFAUNA-3, whom he handed over the letter. The letter reads as follows:
"Dear Brother-in-Arms:
"I greet you and officially report to you, as our representative to the Military Junta of the FND, the sad news of the death of our commander-in-chief, Oswaldo RAMIREZ, on 16 April last at 9 a.m. He fell in battle together with other brothers. The certificate to this effect, containing the testimony of Captain BORGE, chief of the personal guard, and of other members of his escort, is in my possession, and I will hand it over to you or to anyone designated by the Military Junta of the FND.
"The disorganization caused by the above-mentioned events prevented our reporting this news to you right away, and only now have we been able to make contact with the bearer, a man who has been working for some time as messenger and enjoying the complete confidence of Oswaldo RAMIREZ and of ourselves in particular."
who will occupy the position of supreme commander of our liberation army. Whether it be one supreme chief or a joint command must be decided by you.
"Although the National Liberation Army has continued working and acting according to the norms laid down by you and by our late chief, you will understand the urgency of this interview which the bearer will tell you how to arrange. In anticipation of your decisions I sign myself respectfully,
(Capt. Julio E. "CARRETERO")
59. As mentioned in paragraph 15b above, ODIBEX has some kind of interest in AMFAUNA-3, and it may be that their files contain intelligible answers to some of the questions raised by this development. For instance:
a. Why did the RAMIREZ organization not know of the arrest of Identity-12, one of its own members, which had occurred at least a month previously?
b. If the RAMIREZ organization was so poorly informed about Identity-12, how did they know about AMFAUNA-3, and why did they think she would be the appropriate person to give the letter to?
c. Given the disorganization complained of by the writer of the letter, and the fact that all meetings must have been arranged and held under clandestine conditions, how to account for the fact that in the maximum of six days between 28 May and 3 June when AMFAUNA-1 reported the developments by S/W, something like the following sequence of events must have taken place:
(1) [IZQUIERDO] meets [HERNANDEZ] near Trinidad in Las Villas Province, and receives the letter.
(2) [IZQUIERDO] travels to Havana and tries to locate Identity-12.
(3) [IZQUIERDO] is informed that Identity-12 has been arrested.
(4) [IZQUIERDO] returns to Las Villas, reports that the letter cannot be delivered to Identity-12, and is told that AMFAUNA-3 should be given the letter.
(5) [IZQUIERDO] goes to Sancti Spiritus and locates Identity-8 who is a personal friend of AMFAUNA-3 and can introduce him to her, and who providentially is able to vouch for the authenticity of [CARRETERO'S] signature on the letter.
(6) [IZQUIERDO] and Identity-8 go to Havana and give the letter to AMFAUNA-3.
Future Plans
60. It is difficult if not impossible to give an operation of this complexity the support and direction it needs, when the only communication with the principal agent is by secret writing. There is never enough room in an S/W message for both the positive intelligence reporting and the supporting operational details, and it is the latter that suffer. S/W communication also inevitably involves a time lag which, in the case of this operation, has sometimes run as high as three weeks because of the frequent absences from town of AMCUTLER-1.
61. As a first step toward speeding up communications, it is planned to find another accommodation address in the JMWAVE area for AMFAUNA-1's use which can be expected to function without the delays that have been experienced recently. Because of the importance and urgency of some of AMFAUNA-1's intelligence reports, consideration is also being given to assigning a radio operator to him, probably AMGLEN-9 who is awaiting only his signal plan to become active and who will probably not be needed in the AMWREN net as originally planned.
62. AMFAUNA-1 will be instructed to break off contact with AMCOG-2, and to cease interesting himself in the affairs of the Escambray. As for AMFAUNA-4, it is feared that AMFAUNA-1 is already so deeply involved with him that, if he was not a bona fide defector, the damage has already been done. Nevertheless, AMFAUNA-1 will be warned of the potentialities of this situation so that he can be prepared to go into hiding if it should develop badly. Specific military requirements will be sent to AMFAUNA-1 for AMFAUNA-4 to help in establishing his value as a source. Also for the improvement of the security of the operation, AMFAUNA-1 will be told to stop taking personal and unnecessary risks such as his penetration of a restricted beach.
63. For the continued improvement of production, political and economic requirements will be sent to him. AMFAUNA-1 is very responsive to requirements, and has already developed sources and informants in the political and economic areas in response to instructions from JMWAVE. It is believed that an increased output of higher-priority intelligence can be expected from this operation.
END OF DISPATCH
2. Maria del Carmen TRUEBA y de la Campa
Born 6 August 1929, Guanabacoa, Havana
Resides Calle 24 #105, Apt. 2, Miramar, Havana
3. Hortensia ORIZONDO Meneses
Born 11 April 1924, Sancti Spiritus, Cuba
Resides Avenida 26 #1108, Apt. 2, Nuevo Vedado, Havana, Cuba
4. Gabino GONZALEZ Agudin aka "Felipe"
Born 27 January 1931, Chambas, Granma, Cuba
Resides #354 Chorrera St., Cerro, Havana, Cuba
5. Ofelia PEREZ Arce
Born 15 May 1925, Havana, Cuba
Resides #155 Encarnacion St., Apt. 1, Santo Suarez
6. Esperanza MANRESA Duarte
Born 27 February 1939, Havana, Cuba
Resides #155 Encarnacion St., Apt. 1, Santo Suarez
7. Raul GRANADOS
Born 24 January 1938, Havana, Cuba
Resides #155 Encarnacion St., Apt. 1, Santo Suarez
8. Conrado "SALMO del Castillo aka Nene"
9. Pepe EMBAS
Former sales manager for Regil Coffee
10. Yolanda PRADA Gutierrez
Born 2 September 1935, Santiago, Cuba
Resides #151 41st St., Apt. 1, Alturas del Vedado, Havana, Cuba
11. Zoraida MARTINEZ Cabal
Born 24 January 1938, Havana, Cuba
Resides #155 Encarnacion St., Apt. 4, Casino Deportivo, Havana, Cuba
12. Secundino CARRERA Sanchez
Born 21 May 1925
Resides #155 Colonia, Santos Suarez, Havana, Cuba
13. Jose Diego "TATO Rey aka "Juanito"
Born 12 April 1923, Havana, Cuba
14. Beatriz PEREZ aka "Betty" SEX: F
Resides Calle 8 #170, Apt. 8, Vedado, Havana
15. Elvira BIOSCA SEX: F
16. Miguel PORTOLL
17. Mauricio MARTINEZ Lopez aka "Gustavo"
Born 4 September 1933
18. Camilo MARTINEZ Bazuero aka "Anselmo"
Born 28 April 1928, Havana
19. Jorge MARTINEZ Cabo aka "Eduardo"
Born 16 April 1939
Resides #333 10th St., Apt. 7, Vedado, Havana
20. Francisco PEREZ Arce
21. Jesus DIAZ
22. Jose Antonio DIAZ
23. (Capt.) Manuel PEREZ Arce
24. (Capt.) Manuel PEREZ Arce
25. Avelia VASQUEZ Coto
2. Maria del Carmen TRUEBA y de la Campa
DOB: 8 August 1929, Guanabacoa, Havana
Resides: Calle 24 #105, Apt. 2, Miramar, Havana
3. Hortensia ORIZONDO Meneses
DOB: 11 April 1924, Sancti Spiritus, Cuba
Resides: Avenida 26 #1108, Apt. 2, Nuevo Vedado, Havana, Cuba
4. Gabino GONZALEZ Agudin aka "Felipe"
DOB: 27 January 1931, Chambas, Camaguey, Cuba
Resides: 1354 Chorrera St., Cerro, Havana, Cuba
5. Ofelia PEREZ Arce
DOB: 27 February 1939
Resides: 155 Encarnacion St., Apt. 1, Santo Suarez, Havana
6. Esperanza MANRESA Duarte
7. Raul GRANADOS
8. Conrado SALMO del Castillo aka "Nene"
9. Pepe EMBAS
Former sales manager for Regil Coffee
10. Yolanda PRADA Gutierrez
DOB: 2 September 1935, Santiago, Cuba
Resides: 1951 41st St., Apt. 1, Alturas del Vedado, Havana, Cuba
11. Zoraida MARTINEZ Cebal
DOB: 24 January 1938, Havana, Cuba
Resides: 115 Entrada St., Apt. 4, Casino Deportivo, Havana, Cuba
12. Secundino CARRERA Sanchez
DOB: 21 May 1925
Resides: 611 Coluria, Santos Suarez, Havana, Cuba
13. Jose Diego TATO Rey aka "Juanito"
DOB: 12 April 1923, Havana, Cuba
14. Beatriz PEREZ aka "Betty" SEX: F
Resides: Calle 8 #120, Apt. 8, Vedado, Havana
15. Elvira BIOSCA SEX: F
16. Miguel TORTOLL
17. Mauricio MARTINEZ Lopez aka "Gustavo"
DOB: 4 September 1933
18. Camilo MARTINEZ Bazuero aka "Anselmo"
Father of Berta Gonzalez
Ramon NAVIN, 428 E. Flagler St., Miami
Berta GOMEZ, 424 NE 6th St., Apt. 204, Miami
Frank GOMEZ (born 4 October 1910, Havana)
Resides 1742 SW 1st Ave., Miami, Fla.
Margarita de RAMOS (born 7 December 1899, Havana)
Resides 735 Calle Oeste Ave., Coral Gables, Fla. (1911-1944)
"Panchito" VILLA
Ruben GOMEZ, 4301 8th St., Havana
Tomas GOMEZ, employee of Ministry of Education, Havana
(Lt.) Rolando P. GOMEZ (born 30 September 1929, Oriente, Cuba)
Maria Luisa GOMEZ (born 21 June 1931, Bahia Honda, Pinar del Rio, Cuba)
Resides 501 27th Ave., Apt. 9, Vedado, Havana, Cuba.
Luis RODRIGUEZ Rodriguez, aka Andres FUENTE
(Dr.) Tomas GOMEZ, Librarian, Havana
Electo GOMEZ de Leon (born 14 May 1931, Santiago de Cuba)
Former Flight Captain of Cubana Airlines who defected in Nassau, 8 March 1962.
(Comandante) Evelio DUQUE
Sergio GOMEZ
Antonio GARCIA
Adalio PEREZ
Miguel GOMEZ Alfonso aka "Panchito"
(fmr) REYES
Miguel Angel REYES, Partida (born 13 December 1922, Las Villas, Cuba)
Fernando MORENO, resident of Santiago, Cuba
Manolo RODRIGUEZ
"Hugo"
"Animal"
Jose RODRIGUEZ, teacher, Havana
Candido RODRIGUEZ (291-39/1922) and "Animal"
Luis NAVARRO, Havana (merchant)
Alfredo FORMOSO Prieto (born 14 May 1921, Coruna, Cuba)
Identity 30: Elsa de FORMOSO
Identity 31: Luis de ARMAS (born 11 July 1910)
Identity 32: Concepción (sister-in-law of Luis de ARMAS), resides Calle 24 #705, Miramar, Havana, Cuba.
Identity 33: Capt. Oscar FERNANDEZ aka "Lopez"
Identity 34: Raul GARCIA
Identity 35: Capt. Roger REED
Identity 36: Maria AMAYA
Identity 37: Luis AMAYA
Identity 38: John BENNETT (born 5 July 1917, 6th St., Miami, FL)
Identity 39: alias "Cara", true name similar to AMAYA
Identity 40: alias "FORMOSO", true name similar to AMAYA
Identity 41: Santiago, Havana, Cuba
Identity 42: Quintino, Havana, Cuba
Identity 43: Doctor, Havana, Cuba
Identity 44: Juan, Havana, Cuba
Identity 45: Jesus, Havana, Cuba
Identity 46: Jesus, Havana, Cuba
Identity 47: Roberto, Calixto, Havana, Cuba
Identity 48: Jesus, Havana, Cuba
Identity 49: "Nilda"
Identity 50: Domingo, Havana, Cuba
Identity 51: Aurelio, Havana, Cuba
Identity 52: Alonso, Havana, Cuba
Identity 53: Jesus MILLANES, Chief Pilot for Cubana Airlines, now defected. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/104-10070-10079.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 18,
"total-input-tokens": 20685,
"total-output-tokens": 14228,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
2218,
1
],
[
2218,
6184,
2
],
[
6184,
9072,
3
],
[
9072,
12394,
4
],
[
12394,
15205,
5
],
[
15205,
18911,
6
],
[
18911,
21897,
7
],
[
21897,
25084,
8
],
[
25084,
27922,
9
],
[
27922,
30727,
10
],
[
30727,
34833,
11
],
[
34833,
38539,
12
],
[
38539,
41200,
13
],
[
41200,
42886,
14
],
[
42886,
44738,
15
],
[
44738,
46111,
16
],
[
46111,
47376,
17
],
[
47376,
48364,
18
]
]
} |
975e5a6a0891cc71a04e4d7dedf6cd334f7a9a88 | | SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |
|------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------|---------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|--------------------------|
| 416-54-2948| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | STAFF COUNSEL | 32,000.00 | 2,666.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--10-01-77 |
| 390-44-4227| BAETZ, CONRAD E | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 046-36-4592| BEESON, PETER G | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 2,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 327-46-4790| BERLOW, LISA M | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 579-46-4548| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | SECRETARY | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--10-01-77 |
| 243-74-5787| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 243-48-4536| BLAKEY, G ROBERT | CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR| 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--07-01-77 |
| 556-78-1139| BRADY, SURELL | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 466.67 | 10-25-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-25-77 |
| 237-90-5178| BROWN, ELIZABETH METTS | STAFF ASSISTANT | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 098-20-3182| BROWN, WILLIAM | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 438-48-7116| BURAS, ROBERT C, JR | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 414-98-4025| BURFORD, JUDITH R | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 086-46-9506| CHAMPION, OLIVER J | CLERICAL ASSISTANT | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 438-86-9756| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 263-08-0234| COOPER, CYNTHIA SUE | DOCUMENTS CONTROL CLERK | 12,000.00 | 933.33 | 10-03-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-03-77 |
| 462-88-1832| COPELAND, EILEEN | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 460-74-1179| CORNWELL, GARY T | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 579-40-4377| CROSS, WILLIAM H | ASST TO DIR OF SECURITY | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 220-36-0563| CULLINGS, JEROME A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 132-14-2717| DALY, MARTIN J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 229-26-8374| DAY, CLARENCE J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 436-62-4154| DELSA, LAWRENCE A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 578-32-6132| EAGLE, MARJORIE A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 14,500.00 | 1,208.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--10-01-77 |
| 324-40-6284| EBERHARDT, MICHAEL C | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--10-01-77 |
| 242-28-3222| ECCLES, FRANK L | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|------------|------------------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|---------|
| 108-30-7723 | EMANUEL, CARYL M | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 129-22-1805 | EVANS, EDWARD M | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 341-44-6951 | FACTER, JEFFREY | STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 082-22-5909 | FENTON, CLIFFORD A JR | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 214-60-6734 | FLANAGAN, T MARK | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 136-28-8924 | FONZI, GAETON J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 272-42-7056 | GAY, DONOVAN L | CHIEF RESEARCHER | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 299-50-7438 | GENZMAN, ROBERT W | RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 219-40-9759 | GIANGRASSO, DOMINICK K | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 119-36-4041 | GODFREY, JANE E | SECRETARY | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 058-44-6772 | GOLDSMITH, MICHAEL | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 082-14-2877 | GONZALES, ALBERT | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 212-56-6718 | GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | RESEARCHER | 21,000.00 | 1,750.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 579-22-9353 | HACK, ALFRED S | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 251-86-1541 | HAMILTON, ALFRED P | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 263-17-0952 | HARDWAY, DAN L | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 129-36-7823 | HAUSMAN, ALAN B | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 220-48-5696 | HESS, JACQUELINE | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 219-58-7593 | HINDLE, LOUIS H | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 559-28-5038 | HOLT, LAURA MAE | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 194-30-5931 | HORNBECK, JOHN W | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 015-18-1386 | HOWARTH, THOMAS | STAFF COUNSEL | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 226-10-4799 | HUTTON, E MCK | DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 128-20-8996 | ISRAEL, MAURICE | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 437-92-5320 | JACKSON, MARGO E | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| DOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | APPOINTMENT | REMARKS |
|-------------|------------------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|-------------|---------|
| 223-38-6743 | JOHNSON, ERNESTINE G | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 371-40-1135 | JOHNSON, GENE R | ASST DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 577-56-7465 | JOHNSON, LILLIAN B | SECRETARY | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 577-32-9574 | JOHNSTON, ALICE E | RECEPTIONIST | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 578-58-2498 | JONES, DIANA N | SECRETARY | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 103-18-7227 | KELLY, JAMES P | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 161-38-7640 | KILKER, ELIZABETH A | SECRETARY | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 068-38-5091 | KLEIN, KENNETH D | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 371-32-3731 | KUHN, DOLORETH W | RECEPTIONIST-TYPIST | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 233-92-1962 | LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 579-58-9975 | LAWSON, BELFORD L. III | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 093-42-2090 | LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 071-28-5111 | LEHNER, ROBERT J | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 042-52-4602 | LICHTENFELS, BETH ANNE | DOCUMENTS CONTROL CLERK | 12,000.00 | 666.67 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT | 10-11-77|
| 534-50-0480 | LINDLEY, ROBIN D | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 541.67 | 10-18-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT | 10-18-77|
| 017-36-1972 | LOCKE, RALPH C | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 087-48-2165 | LOPEZ, EDWIN J | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 338-48-1298 | MARS, MITCHELL A | RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 237-56-8144 | MASON, M C | TYPIST/SECRETARY | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 013-34-3361 | MATTHEWS, ISIAH C | SPECIAL COUNSEL | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 10-01-77|
| 526-74-9097 | MATTHEWS, LEODIS C | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT | 10-11-77|
| 109-20-5111 | MAXWELL, ALBERT | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 240-66-7674 | MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 214-42-6489 | MILLER, DAWNE C | ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | 21,500.00 | 1,791.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 024-24-7568 | MILLER, DONNE B | SECRETARY | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|-------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|---------|
| 579-24-3862 | MORTARITY, JOHN J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 403-36-7980 | MORRISON, ROBERT C | DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 177-42-4376 | MOSLEY, BARBARA L | TYPIST/SECRETARY | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 215-66-2714 | ORR, PATRICIA M | SENIOR RESEARCHER | 17,500.00 | 1,458.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 219-64-3205 | ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | DOCUMENT CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 508-22-0421 | PALMER, ELIZABETH J | RESEARCHER/DOCUMENT CLERK | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 452-74-2381 | PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 211-38-9707 | PURDY, DONALD A, JR | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 254-66-1801 | REEVES, FLOYD L | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 147-40-4845 | RESNICK, GINA I | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 438-68-2917 | RISINGER, MARLIN, III | DOCUMENTS CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 220-20-6648 | ROSE, HAROLD A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 048-58-4432 | ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 227-18-5345 | ROSS, IDA JANE | ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 029-38-8530 | SCHLICHTMANN, JAN R | LAW ASSISTANT | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 209-46-4088 | SCHULTZ, NANCY P | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 531-50-7701 | SELLECK, ELIZABETH K | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 245-56-4327 | SISSON, BETTY LOU | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 235-94-3124 | SMITH, BEVERLY | CLERK TYPIST | 11,500.00 | 31.94 | 10-30-77 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-30-77 |
| 528-64-5299 | SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 023-36-0715 | SPEISER, MARK A | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 77.78 | 10-30-77 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-30-77 |
| 227-76-3525 | STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 264-98-4680 | SVENSON, LANCE W | XEROX MESSANGER | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 036-34-9187 | TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | SENIOR RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 216-34-9326 | THOMAS, JOSEPH A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | FROM | TO | PERIOD | REMARKS |
|-------------|------------------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|------|------|--------|--------------------------|
| 550-50-7581 | TRIPLETT, WILLIAM K | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 101-22-5012 | WAGNER, OLIVE E | RECEPTIONIST | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 260-40-7319 | WALKER, ROBERT J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 087-26-0521 | WAXMAN, MEL | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 049-34-8893 | WEBB, WILLIAM A | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 2,177.78 | 10-03-77 | 10-31-77 | | APPOINTMENT 10-03-77 |
| 247-78-3852 | WILANDER, ANNE PAUL | STAFF ASSISTANT | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 169-28-6880 | WILLS, MARION H | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 171-38-3757 | WIZELMAN, LESLIE H | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 383-52-5221 | WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | DOCUMENT CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 057-40-6887 | WOLF, JAMES LERER | STAFF COUNSEL | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 113-18-5784 | WRASE, RICHARD C | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 400.00 | 10-25-77 | 10-31-77 | | APPOINTMENT 10-25-77 |
**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**
| EMPLOYEES NUMBER OF PAID/ACTIVE | THIS MONTH PAYROLL EXPENDITURES USED | SALARY PROJECTION USED |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------|
| CLERICAL | .00 | .00 |
| PROFESSIONAL | .00 | .00 |
| SUB TOTAL | .00 | .00 |
| INVESTIGATIVE | 111 111 | 188,754.19 | 197,500.00 |
| GRAND TOTAL | 111 111 | 188,754.19 | 197,500.00 |
I CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm.
**U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES**
**FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM**
**Assassinations**
**PAYROLL CERTIFICATION**
**ACCOUNTING PERIOD 8/1/77 TO 8/31/77**
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|
| Robert K. Tanenbaum | 127-32-4970 | | $36,000.00 | $300.00 | 8/1/77 8/3/77 | Employee terminated 8/3/77 |
**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF UNUSED MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|--------------|--------------------------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| 1 | | | $300.00 | | |
I certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this Committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.
/5/
Chairman, House Administration Comm. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10095.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 6,
"total-input-tokens": 6858,
"total-output-tokens": 9782,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
4455,
1
],
[
4455,
8093,
2
],
[
8093,
12277,
3
],
[
12277,
15238,
4
],
[
15238,
18397,
5
],
[
18397,
19754,
6
]
]
} |
e5f0a87784783fcd9a0887866c75989fbb265f50 | | SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | FROM | TO | PERIOD FROM | TO | P/R CHANGE | REMARKS |
|-------------|--------------------------|---------------|------------------|------|------|-------------|------|-------------|---------|
| 416-54-2948 | AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 32,000.00 | 2,666.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 10-01-77 |
| 390-44-4227 | BAETZ, CONRAD E | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 046-36-4592 | BEESON, PETER G | 28,000.00 | 2,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 327-46-4790 | BERLOW, LISA M | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 579-46-4548 | BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 10-01-77 |
| 243-74-5787 | BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 243-48-4536 | BLAKEY, G ROBERT | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 07-01-77 |
| 556-78-1139 | BRADY, SURELL | 28,000.00 | 466.67 | 10-25-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-25-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT | 10-25-77 |
| 237-90-5178 | BROWN, ELIZABETH METTS | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 098-20-3182 | BROWN, WILLIAM | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 438-48-7116 | BURAS, ROBERT C, JR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 414-98-4025 | BURFORD, JUDITH R | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 066-46-9506 | CHAMPION, OLIVER J | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 438-86-9756 | CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 263-08-0234 | COOPER, CYNTHIA SUE | 12,000.00 | 933.33 | 10-03-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-03-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT | 10-03-77 |
| 462-68-1832 | COPELAND, EILEEN | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 460-74-1179 | CORNWELL, GARY T | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 579-40-4377 | CROSS, WILLIAM H | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 220-36-0563 | CULLINGS, JEROME A | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 132-14-2717 | DALY, MARTIN J | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 229-26-6374 | DAY, CLARENCE J | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 436-62-4154 | DELSA, LAWRENCE J | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| 578-32-6132 | EAGLE, MARJORIE A | 14,500.00 | 1,208.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 10-01-77 |
| 324-40-6284 | EBERMARDT, MICHAEL C | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE | 10-01-77 |
| 242-28-3222 | ECCLES, FRANK L | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | | |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |
|-------------|------------------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|
| 108-30-7723 | EMANUEL.CARYL M | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 129-22-1805 | EVANS.EDWARD M | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 341-44-6951 | FACTER.JEFFREY | STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 082-22-5909 | FENTON.CLIFFORD A.UR | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 214-60-6734 | FLANAGAN.T MARK | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 136-28-8924 | FONZI.GAETON J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 272-42-7056 | GAY.DONOVAN L. | CHIEF RESEARCHER | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 299-50-7438 | GENZMAN.ROBERT W | RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 219-40-9759 | GIANGRASSO.DOMINICK K | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 119-36-4041 | GODFREY.JANE E | SECRETARY | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 058-44-6772 | GOLDSMITH.MICHAEL | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 082-14-2877 | GONZALES.ALBERT | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 212-56-6718 | GRIMES.MARY SUSAN | RESEARCHER | 21,000.00 | 1,750.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 579-22-9353 | HACK.ALFRED S | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 251-68-1541 | HAMILTON.GERALD P | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 263-17-0952 | HARDWAY.DAN L | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 129-38-7823 | HAUSMAN.ALAN B | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 220-48-5696 | HESS.JACQUELINE | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 219-58-7593 | HINDLE.LOUIS H | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 559-28-5038 | HOLT.LAURA MAE | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 194-30-5931 | HORNBECK.JOHN W | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 015-18-1386 | HOWARTH.THOMAS | BUDGET OFFICER | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 226-10-4799 | HUTTON.E MCK | DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 128-20-8996 | ISRAEL.MAURICE | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 437-92-5320 | JACKSON.MARGO E | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | FROM | TO | PERIOD | APPOINTMENT | REMARKS |
|-------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------|------------------|------|----|--------|-------------|---------|
| 223-38-6743 | JOHNSON, ERNESTINE G | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 09-06-77 |
| 371-40-1135 | JOHNSON, GENE R | ASST DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 577-56-7465 | JOHNSON, LILLIAN B | SECRETARY | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 577-32-9574 | JOHNSTON, ALICE E | RECEPTIONIST | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 578-58-2498 | JONES, DIANA N | SECRETARY | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 103-18-7227 | KELLY, JAMES P | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 161-38-7640 | KILKER, ELIZABETH A | SECRETARY | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 068-38-5091 | KLEIN, KENNETH D | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 371-32-3731 | KUHN, DOLOTHY W | RECEPTIONIST-TYPIST | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 233-92-1962 | LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 579-58-9975 | LAWSON, BELFORD L III | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 093-42-2090 | LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 071-28-5111 | LEHNER, ROBERT J | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 042-52-4602 | LICHTENFELS, BETH ANNE | DOCUMENTS CONTROL CLERK | 12,000.00 | 666.67 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-11-77 |
| 534-50-0480 | LINDELL, ROBIN D | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 541.67 | 10-18-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-18-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-18-77 |
| 017-36-1972 | LOCKE, RALPH C | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 087-48-2165 | LOPEZ, EDWIN J | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 338-48-1298 | MARS, MITCHELL A | RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 237-56-8144 | MASON, M C | TYPIST/SECRETARY | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 013-34-3361 | MATHEWS, ISAIAH C | SPECIAL COUNSEL | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--10-01-77 |
| 526-74-9097 | MATTHEWS, LEODIS C | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-11-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-11-77 |
| 109-20-5111 | MAXWELL, ALBERT | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 240-66-7674 | MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L | EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 214-42-6489 | MILLER, DAWNE C | ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | 21,500.00 | 1,791.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| 132-24-7659 | MISITA, ANNE B | SECRETARY | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 | |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | FROM | TO | PERIOD | REMARKS |
|-------------|---------------|---------------------------|---------------|------------------|------|----|--------|---------|
| 579-24-3862 | MORTIARY, JOHN J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 403-36-7980 | MORRISON, ROBERT C | DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 177-42-4376 | MOSLEY, BARBARA L | TYPIST/SECRETARY | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 215-66-2714 | ORR, PATRICIA M | SENIOR RESEARCHER | 17,500.00 | 1,458.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 219-64-3205 | ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | DOCUMENT CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 508-22-0421 | PALMER, ELIZABETH J | RESEARCHER/DOCUMENT CLERK | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 452-74-2381 | PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 211-38-9707 | PURDY, DONALD A JR | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 254-66-1801 | REEVES, FLOYD L | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 147-40-4845 | RESNICK, GINA I | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 438-68-2917 | RISINGER, MARLIN III | DOCUMENTS CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 220-20-6648 | ROSE, HAROLD A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 048-58-4432 | ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 227-18-5345 | ROSS, IDA JANE | ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 029-38-8530 | SCHLICHTMANN, JAN R | LAW ASSISTANT | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 209-46-4088 | SCHULTZ, NANCY P | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 531-50-7701 | SELLECK, ELIZABETH K | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 245-56-4327 | SISSON, BETTY LOU | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 235-94-3124 | SMITH, BEVERLY | CLERK TYPIST | 11,500.00 | 31.94 | 10-30-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-30-77 |
| 526-64-5299 | SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 023-36-0715 | SPEISER, MARK A | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 77.78 | 10-30-77 | 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-30-77 |
| 227-76-3525 | STRICKLAND, ANN LYNN | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 264-98-4680 | SVENDSEN, LANCE W | XEROX/MESSANGER | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 036-34-9187 | TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | SENIOR RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| 216-34-9326 | THOMAS, JOSEPH A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 | 10-31-77 |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|-------------|------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|--------------------------|
| 550-50-7581 | TRIPLETT.WILLIAM K | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 101-22-5012 | WAGNER.OLIVE E | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 260-40-7319 | WALKER.ROBERT J | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 087-26-0521 | WAXMAN.MEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 049-34-8893 | WEBB.WILLIAM A | 28,000.00 | 2,177.78 | 10-03-77 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-03-77 |
| 247-78-3852 | WILANDER.ANNE PAUL | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 169-28-6880 | WILLS.MARION H | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 171-38-3757 | WIZELMAN.LESLIE H | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 383-52-5221 | WOLF.ELIZABETH ANN | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 057-40-6887 | WOLF.JAMES LERER | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 10-01-77 10-31-77 | |
| 113-18-5784 | WRASE.RICHARD C | 24,000.00 | 400.00 | 10-25-77 10-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 10-25-77 |
**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**
| EMPLOYEES | THIS MONTH PAYROLL EXPENDITURES | SALARY PROJECTION |
|-----------|---------------------------------|-------------------|
| NUMBER OF PAID/ACTIVE | USED | USED |
| CLERICAL | .00 | .00 |
| PROFESSIONAL | .00 | .00 |
| SUB TOTAL | .00 | .00 |
| INVESTIGATIVE | 111 | 111 | 188,754.19 | 197,500.00 |
| GRAND TOTAL | 111 | 111 | 188,754.19 | 197,500.00 |
I CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON
Allowed
Chairman, House Administration Comm.
**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|---------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
| 1 | | | $300.00 | | |
I certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this Committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Committee. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10096.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 6,
"total-input-tokens": 6858,
"total-output-tokens": 10046,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
3907,
1
],
[
3907,
7444,
2
],
[
7444,
10862,
3
],
[
10862,
13649,
4
],
[
13649,
15921,
5
],
[
15921,
16700,
6
]
]
} |
49eb33d8ec0e3a0f57b676eff8ba02eededfe325 | **U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES**
**FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM**
**PAYROLL CERTIFICATION**
**ACCOUNTING PERIOD 9/1/77 TO 9/30/77**
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|
| Alfred S. Hack | 579-22-9353 | | $24,000 | 1,666.67 | 9/6/77 9/30/77 | New employee |
| Staff Investigator | | | | | | |
| Ernestine G. Johnson | 223-38-6743 | | $24,000 | 1,666.67 | 9/6/77 9/30/77 | New employee |
| Staff Investigator | | | | | | |
**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|---------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
| 2 | | | $3,333.34 | | |
I certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this Committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm.
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|------------|------------------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|--------------------------|
| 416-54-2948| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | STAFF COUNSEL | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 390-44-4227| BAETZ, CONRAD E | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 046-36-4592| BEESON, PETER G | STAFF COUNSEL | 28,000.00 | 2,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 327-46-4790| BERLOW, LISA M | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 579-46-4548| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | SECRETARY | 21,500.00 | 1,791.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 243-74-5787| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 243-48-4536| BLAKEY, G ROBERT | CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 215-52-9164| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 666.67 | 09-01-77 09-16-77 | TERMINATED 09-16-77 |
| 258-72-6151| BROWN, CLAIRE L | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 833.33 | 09-01-77 09-20-77 | TERMINATED 09-20-77 |
| 237-90-5178| BROWN, ELIZABETH METTS | STAFF ASSISTANT | 13,000.00 | 144.44 | 09-27-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-27-77 |
| 098-20-3182| BROWN, WILLIAM | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 438-48-7116| BURAS, ROBERT C, JR | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 414-98-4025| BURFORD, JUDITH R | DOCUMENT CLERK | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 086-46-9506| CHAMPION, OLIVER J | CLERICAL ASSISTANT | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 438-86-9756| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 462-88-1832| COPELAND, EILEEN | RESEARCHER | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 460-74-1179| CORNWELL, GARY T | RESEARCHER | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-01-77 |
| 579-40-4377| CROSS, WILLIAM H | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 220-36-0563| CULLINGS, JEROME A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 1,466.67 | 09-09-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-09-77 |
| 132-14-2717| DALY, MARTIN J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 229-26-8374| DAY, CLARENCE J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 436-62-4154| DELSA, LAWRENCE J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 578-32-6132| EAGLE, MARJORIE A | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 324-40-6284| EBERHARDT, MICHAEL C | SECRETARY | 32,000.00 | 1,066.67 | 09-19-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-19-77 |
| 242-28-3222| ECCLES, FRANK L | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND JOB TITLE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|-------------|---------------|----------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|---------|
| 108-30-7723 | EMANUEL, CARYL M | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 129-22-1805 | EVANS, EDWARD M | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 341-44-6951 | FACTER, JEFFREY | STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 132-34-5625 | FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 36,000.00 | 1,200.00 | 09-01-77 09-12-77 | TERMINATED 09-12-77 |
| 231-86-6887 | FARMER, JOHN J, JR | CLERK | 7,200.00 | 0.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | TERMINATED 08-31-77 |
| 082-22-5909 | FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 214-60-6734 | FLANAGAN, T MARK | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 136-28-8924 | FONZI, GAETON J | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 272-42-7056 | GAY, DONOVAN L | CHIEF RESEARCHER | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 299-50-7438 | GENZMAN, ROBERT W | RESEARCHER | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 219-40-9759 | GIANGRASSO, DOMINICK K | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-06-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-06-77 |
| 119-36-4041 | GODFREY, JANE E | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 059-44-6772 | GOLDSMITH, MICHAEL | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 082-14-2877 | GONZALES, ALBERT | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 212-56-6718 | GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | RESEARCHER | 21,000.00 | 1,750.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 251-88-1541 | HAMILTON, GERALD P | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 263-17-0952 | HARDWAY, DAN L | RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 129-38-7823 | HAUSMAN, ALAN B | STAFF COUNSEL | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 220-48-5696 | HESS, JACQUELINE | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 219-58-7593 | HINDLE, LOUIS H | SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 559-28-5038 | HOLT, LAURA MAE | STAFF COUNSEL | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 194-30-5931 | HORNBECK, JOHN W | STAFF COUNSEL | 34,000.00 | 1,133.33 | 09-19-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-19-77 |
| 015-18-1386 | HOWARTH, THOMAS | BUDGET OFFICER | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 226-10-4799 | HUTTON, E MCK | DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 128-20-6996 | ISRAEL, MAURICE | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|------------|------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|---------|
| 437-92-5320 | JACKSON, MARGO E | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 371-40-1135 | JOHNSON, GENE R | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 577-56-7465 | JOHNSON, LILLIAN B | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 577-32-9574 | JOHNSTON, ALICE E | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 578-58-2498 | JONES, DIANA N | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 103-18-7227 | KELLY, JAMES P | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 161-38-7640 | KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 068-38-5091 | KLEIN, KENNETH D | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 371-32-3731 | KUHN, DOROTHY W | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 233-92-1962 | LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 579-58-9975 | LAWSON, BELFORD L, III| 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 093-42-2090 | LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 071-28-5111 | LERNER, ROBERT J | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 017-36-1972 | LOCKE, RALPH C | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 087-48-2165 | LOPEZ, EDWIN J | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 338-48-1298 | MARS, MITCHELL A | 18,000.00 | 1,150.00 | 09-08-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-08-77 |
| 518-56-7099 | MARTIN, REBECCA W | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 237-56-8144 | MASON, M C | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 013-34-3361 | MATHews, ISIAH C | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 109-20-5111 | MAXWELL, ALBERT | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 240-66-7674 | MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 214-42-6489 | MILLER, DAWNE C | 21,500.00 | 955.56 | 09-15-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-15-77 |
| 132-24-7659 | MISITA, ANNE B | 12,000.00 | 833.33 | 09-06-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-06-77 |
| 102-30-2631 | MORDANA, SARI | 19,500.00 | 812.50 | 09-01-77 09-15-77 | TERMINATED 09-15-77 |
| 579-24-3862 | MORTARY, JOHN J | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|------------|------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|---------|
| 403-36-7960 | MORRISON, ROBERT C | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 177-42-4376 | MOSLEY, BARBARA L | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 215-66-2714 | ORR, PATRICIA M | 17,500.00 | 1,458.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 219-64-3205 | ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 508-22-0421 | PALMER, ELIZABETH J | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 452-74-2381 | PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 211-38-9707 | PURDY, DONALD A, JR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 254-66-1801 | REEVES, FLOYD L | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 147-40-4845 | RESNICK, GINA I | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 438-68-2917 | RISINGER, MARLIN, III | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 220-20-6648 | ROSE, HAROLD A | 24,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-06-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-06-77 |
| 048-58-4432 | ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 227-18-5345 | ROSS, IDA JANE | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 578-80-2773 | RUDDER, MIRIAM | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 029-38-8530 | SCHLICHTMANN, JAN R | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 209-46-4088 | SCHULTZ, NANCY P | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 531-50-7701 | SELLECK, ELIZABETH K | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 245-56-4327 | SISSON, BETTY LOU | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 528-64-5299 | SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 227-76-3525 | STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 264-98-4680 | SVENDSEN, LANCE W | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 036-34-9187 | TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 216-34-9326 | THOMAS, JOSEPH A | 24,000.00 | 1,466.67 | 09-09-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-09-77 |
| 550-50-7581 | TRIPLETT, WILLIAM K | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 101-22-5012 | WAGNER, OLIVE E | 11,000.00 | 672.22 | 09-09-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-09-77 |
| SOC SEC NUM | EMPLOYEE NAME | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY EARNED | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|------------|------------------------|---------------|------------------|----------------|--------------------------|
| 260-40-7319| WALKER, ROBERT J | 24,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 09-06-77 09-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 09-06-77 |
| 020-36-4147| WALSH, KEVIN RESEARCHER| 15,000.00 | 666.67 | 09-01-77 09-16-77 | TERMINATED 09-16-77 |
| 087-26-0521| WAXMAN, MEL STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 247-78-3852| WILANDER, ANNE PAUL STAFF ASSISTANT | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 169-28-6880| WILLS, MARION H SECRETARY | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 171-38-3757| WIZELMAN, LESLIE H RESEARCHER | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 383-52-5221| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN DOCUMENT CLERK | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
| 057-40-6887| WOLF, JAMES LERER STAFF COUNSEL | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 09-01-77 09-30-77 | |
**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**
| EMPLOYEES NUMBER OF PAID/ACTIVE | THIS MONTH PAYROLL EXPENDITURES | SALARY PROJECTION USED |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------|------------------------|
| CLERICAL | .00 | .00 |
| PROFESSIONAL | .00 | .00 |
| SUB TOTAL | .00 | .00 |
| INVESTIGATIVE | 107 102 | 174,859.76 | 178,583.36 |
| GRAND TOTAL | 107 102 | 174,859.76 | 178,583.36 |
I CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10097.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 6,
"total-input-tokens": 6858,
"total-output-tokens": 9005,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
1747,
1
],
[
1747,
5813,
2
],
[
5813,
8770,
3
],
[
8770,
11675,
4
],
[
11675,
14569,
5
],
[
14569,
16818,
6
]
]
} |
4a6e8743bed6884b14d8a00a92a659da12495188 | | EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BAETZ, CONRAD E | 390-44-4227 | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |
| BEESON, PETER G | 046-36-4592 | 28,000.00 | 1,788.89 | 08-08-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-08-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BERLOW, LISA M | 327-46-4790 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 21,500.00 | 1,791.67 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BLAKEY, G ROBERT | 243-48-4536 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |
| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | |
| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| BROWN, WILLIAM | 098-20-3182 | 24,000.00 | 1,066.67 | 08-15-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-15-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |
| BURAS, ROBERT C, JR | 438-48-7116 | 24,000.00 | 1,066.67 | 08-15-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-15-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |
| BURFORD, JUDITH R | 414-98-4025 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | |
| CHAMPION, OLIVER J | 086-46-9506 | 9,500.00 | 343.06 | 08-18-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-18-77 |
| CLERICAL ASSISTANT | | | | | |
| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-0264 | 34,000.00 | 0.00 | | TERMINATED 07-31-77 |
| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | |
| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| COPELAND, EILEEN | 462-88-1832 | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE--08-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| CROSS, WILLIAM H | 579-40-4377 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-01-77 |
| ASST TO DIR OF SECURITY | | | | | |
| DALY, MARTIN J | 132-14-2717 | 24,000.00 | 1,066.67 | 08-15-77 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-15-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |
| DAY, CLARENCE J | 229-26-8374 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |
| DELSA, LAWRENCE J | 436-62-4154 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 08-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |
| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9,500.00 | 422.22 | 08-01-77 08-16-77 | TERMINATED 08-16-77 |
| CLERICAL ASSISTANT | | | | | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|
| EAGLE, MARJORIE A | 578-32-6132 | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| ECCLES, FRANK L | 242-28-3222 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| EMANUEL, CARYL M | 108-30-7723 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | | |
| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | |
| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| FARMER, JOHN J. JR | 231-86-6887 | 7,200.00 | 600.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | | |
| FENTON, CLIFFORD A. JR | 082-22-5909 | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| FLANAGAN, T MARK | 214-60-6734 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| GAY, CONOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| GENZMAN, ROBERT W | 299-50-7438 | 18,000.00 | 100.00 | 08-29-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-29-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| GOLDSMITH, MICHAEL | 058-44-6772 | 30,000.00 | 166.67 | 08-29-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-29-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| GONZALES, ALBERT | 082-14-2877 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| GRANT, KENNETH G | 099-20-0966 | 24,000.00 | 1,533.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-23-77 | TERMINATED 08-23-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | 212-56-6718 | 21,000.00 | 1,750.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HAMLIN, ALICE E JOHNSTON | 577-32-9574 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | |
| HARDWAY, DAN L | 263-17-0952 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HAUSMAN, ALAN B | 129-38-7823 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HINDLE, LOUIS H | 219-58-7593 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| HOLT, LAURA MA | 559-28-5038 | 27,692.30 | 2,000.00 | 08-05-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-05-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|---------|
| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| BUDGET OFFICER | | | | | | | |
| HUTTON, E MCK | 226-10-4799 | 38,500.00 | 3,208.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | | | | | | | |
| ISRAEL, MAURICE | 128-20-8996 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |
| JACKSON, MARGO E | 437-92-5320 | 12,000.00 | 994.45 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-02-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| JOHNSON, GENE R | 371-40-1135 | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| ASSISTANT DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| JOHNSON, LILLIAN B | 577-56-7465 | 13,000.00 | 72.22 | 08-29-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-29-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| JONES, DIANA N | 578-58-2498 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| KELLY, JAMES P | 103-18-7227 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |
| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 161-38-7640 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 066-38-5091 | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| KUHN, DOROTHY W | 371-32-3731 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-01-77 |
| RECEPTIONIST-TYPIST | | | | | | | |
| LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| LAWSON, BELFORD L. III | 579-58-9975 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| LEMMER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | 42,500.00 | 3,541.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| LOPEZ, EDWIN J | 087-48-2165 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | | | |
| MASON, M C | 237-56-8144 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| TYPIST/SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| MATHews, ISIAH C | 013-34-3361 | 19,500.00 | 1,516.67 | 08-03-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-03-77 |
| SPECIAL COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| MAXWELL, ALBERT | 109-20-5111 | 24,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-16-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-16-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |
| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | | |
| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| MORIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 08-01-77 |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | TO | REMARKS |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|----|--------------------------|
| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | TERMINATED 08-05-77 |
| MORTON, CECILIA T | 578-66-0125 | 12,000.00 | 166.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-05-77 | |
| MOSLEY, BARBARA L | 177-42-4376 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| O'NEILL, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | 17,500.00 | 1,458.33 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| SENIOR RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| O'NEILL, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| PALMER, ELIZABETH J | 508-22-0421 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER/DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| PURDY, DONALD A JR | 211-38-9707 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| REEVES, FLOYD L | 254-66-1801 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-01-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |
| RESNICK, GINA I | 147-40-4845 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| RISINGER, MARLIN III | 438-68-2917 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | | |
| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | 14,000.00 | 0.00 | | | | TERMINATED 07-31-77 |
| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| ADM SEC'TY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | | |
| RUGGER, MIRIAM | 578-60-2773 | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| MAIL/DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| SCHLICHTMANN, JAN R | 029-38-8530 | 19,500.00 | 325.00 | | 08-25-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-25-77 |
| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| SCHULTZ, NANCY P | 209-46-4088 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| SELLECK, ELIZABETH K | 531-50-7701 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |
| SISSON, BETTY LO | 245-56-4327 | 14,000.00 | 350.00 | | 08-22-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-22-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| SVENDSEN, LANCE W | 264-98-4680 | 9,500.00 | 791.67 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-01-77 |
| XEROX/MESSANGER | | | | | | | |
| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | 36,000.00 | 0.00 | | | | TERMINATED 07-31-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 08/01/77 TO 08/30/77
OFFICE: 83000, SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|
| TRIPLETT, WILLIAM K | 550-50-7581 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| WAXMAN, MEL | 087-26-0521 | 24,000.00 | 533.33 | 08-23-77 | 08-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 08-23-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| WILANDER, ANNE PAUL | 247-78-3852 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| STAFF ASSISTANT | | | | | | |
| WILLS, MARION H | 169-28-6880 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| WIZELMAN, LESLIE H | 171-38-3757 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |
| WOLF, JAMES LERER | 057-40-6887 | 36,000.00 | 3,000.00 | 08-01-77 | 08-31-77 | P/R CHANGE -08-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER OF LEAVE W/O PAY | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | UNUSED NEXT MONTH | PROJECTION | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| 95 | 0 | 541,564.36 | 150,904.20 | 390,660.16 | 162,324.37 | 228,335.79 | |
I CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10098.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 5,
"total-input-tokens": 5715,
"total-output-tokens": 10191,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
2847,
1
],
[
2847,
10132,
2
],
[
10132,
13468,
3
],
[
13468,
20116,
4
],
[
20116,
23661,
5
]
]
} |
720d3db9169512529cd52ddd11275b593047afea | | EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|
| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| BERLOW, LISA M | 327-46-4790 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| BLAKEY, G ROBERT | 243-48-4536 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 07-01-77 |
| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | | |
| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| BURFORD, JUDITH R | 414-98-4025 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |
| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | | |
| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | 28,000.00 | 222.66 | 07-01-77 | 07-11-77 | TERMINATED 07-11-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| COPELAND, EILEEN | 462-88-1832 | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| DAY, CLARENCE J | 229-26-8374 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| DELSA, LAWRENCE J | 436-62-4154 | 24,000.00 | 1,733.33 | 07-05-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-05-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| MESSENGER | | | | | | |
| EAGLE, MARJORIE A | 578-32-6132 | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| ECCLES, FRANK L | 242-28-3222 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| EMANUEL, CARYL M | 108-30-7723 | 10,850.00 | 904.17 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | | |
| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 25,000.00 | 2,083.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | |
| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 36,000.00 | 3,511.11 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 07-17-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/01/77 TO 07/31/77
OFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|---------|
| FARMER, JOHN J. JR | 231-86-6887 | 7.200.00 | 410.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 07-20-77 |
| CLERK | | | | | | |
| FENTON, CLIFFORD A. JR | 082-22-5909 | 30.000.00 | 2.500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | | |
| FLANAGAN, T MARK | 214-60-6734 | 12.000.00 | 666.67 | 07-11-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| FONZI, AETON J | 136-28-8924 | 30.000.00 | 2.500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| GAY, DONOVAN L. | 272-42-7056 | 30.000.00 | 2.500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 14.000.00 | 1.166.67 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| GONZALES, ALBERT | 082-14-2877 | 24.000.00 | 1.333.33 | 07-11-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| GRANT, KENNETH G | 099-20-0966 | 24.000.00 | 200.00 | 07-28-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-28-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | 212-56-6718 | 21.000.00 | 1.750.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | 24.000.00 | 2.000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HAMLIN, ALICE E JOHNSTON | 577-32-9574 | 10.000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 07-01-77 |
| RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | |
| HARDWAY, DAN L | 263-17-0952 | 12.000.00 | 666.67 | 07-11-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HAUSMAN, ALAN B | 129-38-7823 | 28.000.00 | 2.333.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | 24.000.00 | 2.000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HINDLE, LOUIS H | 219-58-7593 | 13.000.00 | 1.083.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | | |
| HOLT, LAURA MAE | 559-28-5038 | 20.000.00 | 1.666.67 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1366 | 30.000.00 | 2.500.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| BUDGET OFFICER | | | | | | |
| HUTTON, E MCK | 226-10-4799 | 36.000.00 | 3.511.11 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 07-17-77 |
| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | | | | | | |
| ISRAEL, MAURICE | 128-20-8996 | 24.000.00 | 2.000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| JACKSON, MARGO E | 437-92-5320 | 10.000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |
| JOHNSON, GENE R | 371-40-1135 | 32.000.00 | 2.666.67 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | | | | | | |
| JONES, DIANA N | 578-58-2498 | 12.000.00 | 1.000.00 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| KELLY, JAMES P | 103-18-7227 | 24.000.00 | 1.333.33 | 07-11-77 | 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 161-38-7640 | 16.000.00 | 1.333.33 | 07-01-77 | 07-31-77 | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 068-39-5091 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| LAWSON, BELFORD L. III | 579-58-9975 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | 23,000.00 | 1,916.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | |
| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | 36,000.00 | 3,511.11 | 07-17-77 07-16-77 | P/R CHANGE--07-17-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| LOPEZ, EDWIN J | 087-48-2165 | 12,000.00 | 666.67 | 07-11-77 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | |
| MASON, M C | 237-56-8144 | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| TYPIST/SECRETARY | | | | | |
| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | |
| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | |
| MORTON, JOHN J | 579-24-3662 | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | |
| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | 20,000.00 | 1,555.55 | 07-11-77 07-10-77 | P/R CHANGE--07-11-77 |
| DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | | | | | |
| MORTON, LECIELA T | 578-66-0125 | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| MOSLEY, BARBARA L | 177-42-4376 | 12,000.00 | 866.67 | 07-05-77 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-05-77 |
| TYPIST/SECRETARY | | | | | |
| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | | | | |
| ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| PALMER, ELIZABETH J | 508-22-0421 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER/DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | |
| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | |
| PURDY, DONALD A. JR | 211-38-9707 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| RESNICK, GINA I | 147-40-4845 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | |
| RISINGER, MARLIN III | 438-68-2917 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | |
| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|
| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | 578-80-2773 | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 209-46-4088 | | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| SCHULTZ, NANCY P | | | | | | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| SELLECK, ELIZABETH K | 531-50-7701 | | 16,000.00 | 888.89 | 07-11-77 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 528-64-5299 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 227-76-3525 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | 127-32-4970 | | 36,000.00 | 3,511.11 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 07-17-77 |
| STRICKLAND, ANN LYNN | 036-34-9187 | | 17,000.00 | 1,416.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | | | | | | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD RESEARCHER| | | | | | |
| TRIPPLET, WILLIAM K | 550-50-7581 | | 30,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 07-17-77 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-17-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 020-36-4147 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| WALSH, KEVIN RESEARCHER | 247-78-3852 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| WILANDER, ANNE PAUL STAFF ASSISTANT | 169-28-6880 | | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| WILLS, MARION H SECRETARY | 171-38-3757 | | 12,000.00 | 666.67 | 07-11-77 07-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 07-11-77 |
| WIZELMAN, LESLIE H RESEARCHER | 383-52-5221 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | 057-40-6887 | | 29,000.00 | 2,416.67 | 07-01-77 07-31-77 | |
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/01/77 TO 07/31/77
OFFICE: B3000, SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER LEAVE W/O PAY | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | UNUSED NEXT MONTH | PROJECTION | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------|------------|-------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| 83 | 0 | 415,238.84 | 126,325.71 | 288,913.13 | 131,004.16 | 157,908.97 | |
I CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.
[Signature]
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10100.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 5,
"total-input-tokens": 5715,
"total-output-tokens": 7833,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
6425,
1
],
[
6425,
9621,
2
],
[
9621,
12602,
3
],
[
12602,
15848,
4
],
[
15848,
16886,
5
]
]
} |
5156a5f3c75e1636c2428d920978aa7e532801d8 | | EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|
| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| BERLOW, LISA M | 327-46-4790 | | 12,000.00 | 300.00 | 06-22-77 | 06-30-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-22-77 |
| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| BLAKEY, G ROBERT | 243-48-4536 | | 27,000.00 | 1,050.00 | 06-17-77 | 06-30-77 |
| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-17-77 |
| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| BURFORD, JUDITH R | 414-98-4025 | | 10,000.00 | 250.00 | 06-22-77 | 06-30-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-22-77 |
| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | | 34,000.00 | 3,770.83 | 06-26-77 | 06-25-77 |
| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | | P/R CHANGE - 06-26-77 |
| CHENGWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | | 28,000.00 | 607.25 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | |
| CONZELIAN, JAMES K | 436-86-9756 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| COPELAND, EILEEN | 462-08-1832 | | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| DAY, CLARENCE J | 229-26-8374 | | 24,000.00 | 266.67 | 06-27-77 | 06-30-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-27-77 |
| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| MESSENGER | | | | | | |
| EAGLE, MARJORIE A | 578-32-6132 | | 13,500.00 | 600.00 | 06-15-77 | 06-30-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-15-77 |
| ECCLES, FRANK L | 242-28-3222 | | 24,000.00 | 1,533.33 | 06-08-77 | 06-30-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-08-77 |
| EMANUEL, CARYL M | 108-30-7723 | | 10,850.00 | 904.17 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-01-77 |
| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | | |
| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | | 25,000.00 | 2,083.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | |
| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| FARMER, JOHN J, JR | 231-86-6687 | | 3,600.00 | 230.00 | 06-08-77 | 06-30-77 |
| CLERK | | | | | | APPOINTMENT 06-08-77 |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | CROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | TO | REMARKS |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|----|---------|
| FENTON, CLIFFORD A. JR | 082-22-5909 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | | | |
| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-29-8924 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |
| GANNON, THOMAS M. SJ | 180-30-1309 | | 20,000.00 | 944.44 | 06-01-77 | 06-17-77 | TERMINATED 06-17-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| GAY, DONOVAN L. | 272-42-7056 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 549-48-4370 | | 30,000.00 | 666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-08-77 | TERMINATED 06-08-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN RESEARCHER | 212-56-6718 | | 21,000.00 | 1,750.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| HAMLIN, ALICE E JOHNSTON | 577-32-9574 | | 11,300.00 | 941.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-01-77 |
| RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | | |
| HAUSMAN, ALAN B | 129-38-7823 | | 28,000.00 | 2,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| HINDLE, LOUIS M | 219-58-7593 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | | | |
| HITCHCOCK, CORNISH F | 042-40-0959 | | 20,000.00 | 388.89 | 06-01-77 | 06-07-77 | TERMINATED 06-07-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| HOLT, LAURA MAE | 559-28-5038 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| BUDGET OFFICER | | | | | | | |
| HUTTON, E MCK | 226-10-4799 | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | | | | | | | |
| ISRAEL, MAURICE | 128-20-8996 | | 24,000.00 | 266.67 | 06-27-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-27-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |
| JACKSON, MARGO E | 437-92-5320 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-01-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| JOHNSON, GENE R | 371-40-1135 | | 32,000.00 | 3,097.22 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | P/R CHANGE--06-11-77 |
| ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | | | | | | | |
| JONES, DIANA N | 578-58-2498 | | 12,000.00 | 833.33 | 06-06-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-06-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| KILKER, ELIZABETH A SECRETARY | 161-39-7640 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 068-39-5091 | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| LARRIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| LAWSON III, BELFORD L STAFF COUNSEL | 579-58-9975 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|------------------|
| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | | 23,000.00 | 1,916.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | | |
| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | | 47,500.00 | 3,952.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| LEWIS, ALVIN B, JR | 205-26-3636 | | 47,500.00 | 0.00 | | | TERMINATED 05-31-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | | | |
| MASON, M. C | 237-56-8144 | | 12,000.00 | 300.00 | 06-22-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-22-77 |
| TYPIST/SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| MORRANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| MORIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | | 24,000.00 | 2,000.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | | | |
| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | | | | | | | |
| MORTON, CECELIA T | 578-66-0125 | | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | | | | | | |
| ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| PALMER, ELIZABETH J | 508-22-0421 | | 18,000.00 | 450.00 | 06-22-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-22-77 |
| RESEARCHER/DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2391 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | | 6,500.00 | 0.00 | | | TERMINATED 05-31-77 |
| CLERK | | | | | | | |
| PURDY, DONALD A, JR | 211-38-9707 | | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| RESNICK, GINA I | 147-40-4845 | | 10,000.00 | 500.00 | 06-13-77 | 06-30-77 | APPOINTMENT 06-13-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| RISINGER, MARLIN, III | 438-68-2917 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | | |
| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | P/R CHANGE--06-01-77 |
| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | | |
| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | | | |
| SCHULTZ, NANCY P | 209-46-4068 | | 12,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 06-01-77 | 06-30-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 06/01/77 TO 06/30/77
OFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |
| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | 17,000.00 | 1,416.67 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| WILANDER, ANNE PAUL | 247-78-3652 | 13,000.00 | 650.00 | 06-13-77 06-30-77 APPOINTMENT 06-13-77 |
| STAFF ASSISTANT | | | | | | |
| WILLS, MARION H | 169-28-6880 | 13,500.00 | 1,125.00 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |
| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| WOLF, JAMES LERER | 057-40-6887 | 29,000.00 | 2,416.67 | 06-01-77 06-30-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | |
| ZEVNIK, PAUL A | 415-84-5593 | 22,000.00 | 1,038.89 | 06-01-77 06-17-77 TERMINATED 06-17-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL-KENNEDY | | | | | | |
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER OF LEAVE W/O PAY | AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | ALLOWANCE | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | UNUSED | NEXT MONTH | UNUSED | PROJECTION |
|---------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------|-------------------------|--------|------------|--------|------------|
| 73 | 0 | 308,498.97 | | 111,090.02 | 197,408.95 | 118,104.15 | 79,304.80 |
I CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10101.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 4,
"total-input-tokens": 4572,
"total-output-tokens": 8273,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
6428,
1
],
[
6428,
12832,
2
],
[
12832,
20056,
3
],
[
20056,
23471,
4
]
]
} |
7054f0392a26d00d4bd057a649d604a38fd46f26 | | EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY FROM TO | PERIOD | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|------------------|--------|---------|
| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 20.000.00 | 1,666.67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BARROW, GIULIA M | 145-46-6759 | 14.000.00 | 583.33 | 05-01-77 05-15-77 | TERMINATED 05-15-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| DERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 16.000.00 | 1,333.33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 18.000.00 | 1,500.00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 13.000.00 | 1,083.33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 15.000.00 | 1,250.00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | | |
| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | |
| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | 28.000.00 | 661.42 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-02-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |
| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | 13.000.00 | 1,083.33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| COPELAND, EILEEN | 462-88-1832 | 11.000.00 | 458.33 | 05-16-77 05-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 05-16-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9.000.00 | 750.00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | | |
| MESSENGER | | | | | |
| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 30.000.00 | 3,061.11 | 05-29-77 05-28-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-29-77 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | |
| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 25.000.00 | 2,583.34 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-09-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | |
| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| FEENEY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | 47.500.00 | 1,451.39 | 05-01-77 05-11-77 | TERMINATED 05-11-77 |
| DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATIONS | | | | | |
| FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | 082-22-5909 | 30.000.00 | 3,061.11 | 05-29-77 05-28-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-29-77 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | |
| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | 30.000.00 | 3,061.11 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-29-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |
| GANNON, THOMAS M, SJ | 180-30-1309 | 20.000.00 | 1,666.67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| GAY, DONOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | 30.000.00 | 3,061.11 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-29-77 |
| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 549-48-4370 | 30.000.00 | 3,061.11 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-29-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 14.000.00 | 1,166.67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE 05-01-77 |
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05/01/77 TO 05/31/77
OFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY FROM TO | PERIOD | REMARKS |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-------------------|--------|---------|
| GRIMES.MARY SUSAN RESEARCHER | 212-56-6718 | 21 000 | 1.750 00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| HAMILTON.GERALD P DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 251-88-1541 | 24 000 | 2.326 39 | 05-06-77 05-06-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-06-77 |
| HESS.JACQUELINE DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 220-48-5696 | 24 000 | 2.326 39 | 05-06-77 05-06-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-06-77 |
| HINDLE.LOUIS H CLERK | 919-58-7593 | 13 000 | 1.083 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| HITCHCOCK.CORNISH F STAFF COUNSEL | 042-40-0959 | 15 000 | 1.250 00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| HOLT.LAURA MAE STAFF COUNSEL | 559-28-5038 | 20 000 | 1.666 67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| HOWARTH.THOMAS BUDGET OFFICER | 015-18-1386 | 30 000 | 3.861 11 | 05-09-77 05-28-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-29-77 |
| HUTTON.E MCK DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 226-10-4799 | 47 500 | 3.958 43 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| JOHNSON.GENE R ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | 371-40-1135 | 47 500 | 3.958 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| KILKER.ELIZABETH A SECRETARY | 161-38-7640 | 16 000 | 1.333 23 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| KLEIN.KENNETH D STAFF COUNSEL | 068-38-5091 | 30 000 | 3.861 11 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| LARKIN.JOYCE ANN SECRETARY | 233-92-1962 | 14 000 | 1.666 67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| LAWSON III.BELFORD L STAFF COUNSEL | 579-58-9975 | 20 000 | 1.666 67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| LEE.SHEILA JACKSON STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 093-42-2090 | 23 000 | 2.052 78 | 05-03-77 05-02-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-03-77 |
| LEHNER.ROBERT J DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 071-29-5111 | 47 500 | 3.958 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| LEWIS.ALVIN B.JR STAFF COUNSEL | 205-26-3636 | 47 500 | 3.958 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| LOCKE.RALPH C RESEARCHER | 017-36-1972 | 15 000 | 1.250 00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| MARTIN.REBECCA W CHIEF CLERK | 518-56-7099 | 20 000 | 1.666 67 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| MCCRAY.DENISE LOUISE SECRETARY | 577-72-8453 | 12 000 | 500 00 | 05-01-77 05-15-77 | TFRMINATED | 05-15-77 |
| MCPHERSON.VIVIAN L EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | 240-66-7674 | 16 000 | 1.333 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| MORDANA.SARI LAW ASSISTANT | 102-30-2631 | 15 000 | 1.250 00 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| MORIARTY.JOHN J STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | 579-24-3862 | 24 000 | 2.326 39 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| MORRISON.ROBERT C SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | 403-36-7980 | 16 000 | 1.333 33 | 05-01-77 05-31-77 | P/R | CHANGE: 05-01-77 |
| MORTON.RITA L SECRETARY | 579-64-6855 | 26 000 | 00 00 | 00 00 | TERMINATED | 04-30-77 |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|--------------------------|
| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | | 16,000.00 | 1,333.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |
| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | 219-64-3205 | | 11,000.00 | 916.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |
| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |
| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |
| PURDY, DONALD A. JR | 211-38-9707 | | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| RISINGER, MARLIN III | 438-88-2917 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | | |
| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | | 16,200.00 | 1,170.00 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 05-05-77 |
| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4439 | | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |
| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | | |
| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | | | |
| SCHULTZ, NANCY P | 209-46-4088 | | 12,000.00 | 266.67 | 05-23-77 | 05-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 05-23-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | | 17,000.00 | 1,416.67 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | | 25,000.00 | 1,819.45 | 05-01-77 | 05-19-77 | TERMINATED 05-19-77 |
| SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| WILLS, MARION H | 169-28-6880 | | 13,500.00 | 1,041.67 | 05-02-77 | 05-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 05-02-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| WOLF, JAMES LERER | 057-40-6887 | | 29,000.00 | 3,598.61 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-24-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | | |
| ZEVNIK, PAUL A | 415-84-5593 | | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 05-01-77 | 05-31-77 | P/R CHANGE - 05-01-77 | | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10102.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 3,
"total-input-tokens": 3429,
"total-output-tokens": 6246,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
2904,
1
],
[
2904,
6629,
2
],
[
6629,
12525,
3
]
]
} |
dd59c635a8d2d30242b3b4ee2938367461a76d3c | | EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|----|---------|
| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 42,400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| BARROW, GIULIA M | 145-46-6759 | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 33,600.00 | 2,800.00 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| BLACKMER, S. JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 38,200.00 | 3,183.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | | | |
| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | 47,500.00 | 2,232.25 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |
| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | | |
| MESSANGER | | | | | | | |
| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | | | |
| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | | |
| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| FEENEY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATIONS | | | | | | | |
| FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | 082-22-5909 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | | | |
| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | | |
| GANNON, THOMAS M. SJ | 180-30-1309 | 42,400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| GAY, DONOVAN L | 272-12-7056 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 549-48-4370 | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | 212-56-6718 | 44,600.00 | 3,716.67 | 04-01-77 | 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE | 04-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04/01/77 TO 04/30/77
OFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| HINDLE, LOUIS H | 219-58-7593 | 13.000.00 | 1,083.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| CLERK | | | | | |
| HITCHCOCK, CORNISH F | 042-40-0959 | 30.000.00 | 2,500.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| HOLT, LAURA MAE | 559-28-5038 | 42.400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| BUDGET OFFICER | | | | | |
| HUTTON, E MCK | 226-10-4799 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | | | | | |
| JOHNSON, GENE P | 371-40-1135 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | | | | | |
| KELLY, FRANCIS J | 082-24-2085 | 18.450.00 | 0.00 | | TERMINATED 03-31-77 |
| DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | | | | | |
| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 161-38-7640 | 33.600.00 | 2,800.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 068-38-5091 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | 26.000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| LAWSON III, BELFORD L | 579-58-9975 | 42.400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| LAZIN, TERRY W | 149-38-9108 | 47.500.00 | 1,451.39 | 04-01-77 04-11-77 | TERMINATED 04-11-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | |
| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| LEWIS, ALVIN B, JR | 205-26-3636 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | 30.000.00 | 2,500.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | 42.400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | |
| MCCRAY, DENISE LOUISE | 577-72-8453 | 18.000.00 | 1,500.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | 33.600.00 | 2,800.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | |
| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | 30.000.00 | 2,500.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | |
| MORIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | 47.500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | |
| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | 33.600.00 | 2,800.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY POSITION NO. AND TITLE | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|---------------------------|--------------|--------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| MORTON, RITA L | 579-64-6855 | SECRETARY | | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| O'ROURKE, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | 33,600.00 | 2,800.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| O'ROURKE, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | CLERK | | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | |
| PURDY, DONALD A, JR | 211-38-9707 | STAFF COUNSEL | | 38,200.00 | 3,103.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| RISINGER, MARLIN, III | 438-58-2917 | DOCUMENT CLERK | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | |
| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | SECRETARY | | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | RESEARCHER | | 22,000.00 | 1,833.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | 42,400.00 | 3,533.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 570-80-2773 | CLERK | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | |
| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | DOCUMENT CLERK | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | |
| SPRAGUE, RICHARD A | 402-30-6486 | CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | 24,354.00 | 0.00 | TERMINATED 03-31-77 | |
| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | SECRETARY | | 26,000.00 | 2,166.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | RESEARCHER | | 36,100.00 | 3,008.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | RESEARCHER | | 30,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | |
| WOLF, JAMES LERER | 057-40-6887 | STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | 47,500.00 | 3,958.33 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 |
| ZEVNIK, PAUL A | 415-84-5593 | STAFF COUNSEL-KENNEDY | | 46,700.00 | 3,891.67 | 04-01-77 04-30-77 | P/R CHANGE -04-01-77 | | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10103.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 3,
"total-input-tokens": 3429,
"total-output-tokens": 6183,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
3144,
1
],
[
3144,
6575,
2
],
[
6575,
10210,
3
]
]
} |
4e34d6e2fb337df158c08a1d4875f43eb619aa56 | | EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| BAISH, EDYTH | 169-16-0121 | 11,070.00 | 246.00 | 03-01-77 03-08-77 TERMINATED 03-08-77 | |
| BARROW, GIULIA M | 145-46-6759 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| BONIFER, SHERYL L | 228-62-4715 | 10,000.00 | 111.11 | 03-01-77 03-04-77 TERMINATED 03-04-77 | |
| BOSTON, KENNETH EDWARD, JR | 519-42-7339 | 20,910.00 | 464.67 | 03-01-77 03-08-77 TERMINATED 03-08-77 | |
| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | 21,913.00 | 100.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 P/R CHANGE -03-01-77 | |
| CONNOR, LINDA MAE | 231-58-8079 | 12,300.00 | 683.33 | 03-01-77 03-20-77 TERMINATED 03-20-77 | |
| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 15,375.00 | 1,281.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| FEELEY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | 082-22-5909 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| GANNON, THOMAS M, JR | 180-30-1309 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY POSITION NO. AND TITLE | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|---------------------------|--------------|--------------|-----------|-------------|----|---------|
| GAY, DOHOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | CHIEF RESEARCHER | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 549-48-4370 | STAFF COUNSEL | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| GODFREY, JAMIE E | 119-36-4041 | SECRETARY | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| GRINES, MARY SUSAN | 212-56-6718 | RESEARCHER | 12,915.00 | 1,076.25 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HINDLE, LOUIS H | 219-58-7593 | CLERK | 9,100.00 | 758.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HITCHCOCK, CORNISH F | 042-40-0959 | STAFF COUNSEL | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HOLT, LAURA MAE | 559-28-5038 | STAFF COUNSEL | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | BUDGET OFFICER | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HUTTON, MCK | 226-10-4799 | DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| JENKINS, NANCY S | 216-40-9950 | SECRETARY | 10,332.00 | 114.80 | 03-01-77 | 03-04-77 | TERMINATED | 03-04-77 |
| JOHNSON, GENE R | 371-40-1135 | ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | 19,680.00 | 1,640.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| KELLY, FRANCIS J | 082-24-2085 | DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 161-38-7640 | SECRETARY | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 068-38-5091 | STAFF COUNSEL | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| LARRIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | STAFF COUNSEL | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| LARSON, BILLIE GAY | 529-60-6414 | SECRETARY | 10,000.00 | 165.67 | 03-01-77 | 03-06-77 | TERMINATED | 03-06-77 |
| LAWSON, BELFORD L.III | 579-58-9975 | STAFF COUNSEL | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| LAZIN, TERRY W | 149-38-9108 | STAFF COUNSEL | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 14,145.00 | 1,178.75 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| LEWIS, ALVIN B.JR | 205-26-3636 | STAFF COUNSEL | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | RESEARCHER | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | | |
| MCCRAY, DENISE LOUISE | 577-72-8453 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | |
| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | |
| MORIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3662 | | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | | |
| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | | | | | | |
| MORTON, RITA L | 579-64-6855 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECT | | | | | | |
| DRR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | |
| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | | |
| PURDY, DONALD A. JR | 211-38-9707 | | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| RISINGER, MARLIN, III | 438-68-2917 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | |
| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | |
| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | | |
| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |
| SPRAGUE, RICHARD A | 402-30-6486 | | 24,354.00 | 2,029.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECT | | | | | | |
| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | | 10,455.00 | 871.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | | 15,375.00 | 1,281.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | | | | | |
| TINAJERO, DOROTHY R | 427-54-6905 | | 11,070.00 | 215.25 | 03-01-77 03-07-77 TERMINATED 03-07-77 | |
| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | | | | | | |
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03/01/77 TO 03/31/77
OFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | PAY SALARY | PAY GROSS | PAY FROM | PAY TO | REMARKS |
|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|------------|-----------|----------|--------|---------|
| WALSH, KEVIN RESEARCHER| 020-36-4147 | 10.000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 |
| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | 383-52-5221 | 10.000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 |
| WOLF, JAMES LERER STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 057-40-6887 | 17.835.00 | 1.466.25 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 |
| ZEVNIK, PAUL A STAFF COUNSEL-KENNEDY | 415-84-5593 | 13.530.00 | 1.127.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 |
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER OF LEAVE W/O PAY | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES UNUSED NEXT MONTH | PROJECTION NEXT MONTH UNUSED | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| 66 | 0 | 66,545.20 | 74,994.58 | -8,449.38 | 74,718.83 | -83,168.21 | |
I CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10104.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 4,
"total-input-tokens": 4276,
"total-output-tokens": 6482,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
2018,
1
],
[
2018,
5778,
2
],
[
5778,
12621,
3
],
[
12621,
14438,
4
]
]
} |
f795b04483e1ff936660c112ec28545062fcfb8c | ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02/01/77 to 02/28/77
OFFICE: 83000. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BAISH, EDYTH | 169-16-0121 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | | | | | |
| BARROW, GIULIA M | 145-46-6759 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| BONIFER, SHERYL L | 228-82-4715 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| BROOKS, KENNETH EDWARD, JR | 519-42-7339 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| CHARDON, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | |
| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | 20,964.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |
| CONNOR, LINDA MAE | 231-58-8079 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| EDITOR/HISTORIAN | | | | | |
| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 436-86-9756 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-5826 | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| MESSENGER | | | | | |
| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | |
| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 15,375.00 | 1,281.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | |
| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| FEENEY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATIONS | | | | | |
| FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | 082-22-5909 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | |
| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | |
| GANNON, THOMAS M, SJ | 180-30-1309 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|---------|
| GAY, DONOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| CHIEF RESEARCHER | 549-48-4370 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 119-36-4041 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 212-56-6718 | 12,915.00 | 1,076.25 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| GODFREY, JANE E | 251-88-1541 | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| SECRETARY | 220-48-5696 | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | 219-58-7593 | 9,100.00 | 758.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| RESEARCHER | 042-40-0959 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 559-28-5038 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 015-18-1386 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HESS, JACQUELINE | 226-10-4799 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | 216-40-9950 | 10,332.00 | 861.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HINDLE, LOUIS H | 371-40-1135 | 19,680.00 | 1,640.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| CLERK | 082-24-2085 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| HITCHCOCK, CORNISH F | 161-38-7640 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 068-38-5091 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| KELLY, FRANCIS J | 233-92-1962 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | 529-60-6414 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 579-58-9975 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| SECRETARY | 149-38-9108 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| LARSON, BILLIE GAY | 093-42-2090 | 14,145.00 | 1,178.75 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 071-28-5111 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 205-26-3636 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 017-36-1972 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 | 03-31-77 | | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| MCCRAY, DENISE LOUISE | 577-72-8453 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| MORDANA, SARAH | 102-30-2631 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | |
| MORTIARY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | |
| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | | | | | |
| MORTON, RITA L | 579-64-6855 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | | | | |
| ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | |
| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | |
| PURDY, DONALD A, JR | 211-38-9707 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| RISINGER, MARLIN, III | 438-68-2917 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | |
| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | |
| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | |
| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | |
| SPRAGUE, RICHARD A | 402-30-6486 | 24,354.00 | 2,029.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | |
| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | 10,459.00 | 871.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | 15,375.00 | 1,261.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | | | | |
| TINADERO, DOROTHY R | 427-54-6505 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 | |
| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | | | | | |
PAYROLL CERTIFICATION
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02/01/77 to 02/28/77
OFFICE: B3000, SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| WALSH, KEVIN RESEARCHER | 020-36-4147 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | 383-52-5221 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| WOLF, JAMES LERER STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 057-40-6887 | 17,835.00 | 1,486.25 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
| ZEVNIK, PAUL A STAFF COUNSEL-KENNEDY | 415-84-5593 | 13,530.00 | 1,127.50 | 03-01-77 03-31-77 |
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER LEAVE W/O PAY | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | PROJECTION NEXT MONTH | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| 73 | 0 | 66,545.20 | 80,053.83 | 81,779.91 | 80,132.91 | 80,132.91 |
CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR DESIGNATED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
NW 88326 Docld:32269642 Page 4 | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10105.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 4,
"total-input-tokens": 4276,
"total-output-tokens": 6091,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
2627,
1
],
[
2627,
5835,
2
],
[
5835,
8670,
3
],
[
8670,
10326,
4
]
]
} |
9b56cb03ea23d1fada8dc6ce27e49d8859267830 | FEB. PAID IN MARCH
DATE: 3/11/77
OFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations
OFFICE CODE: 83000
PAYROLL CERTIFICATION
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO |
|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|
| Risinger, Marlin, III | 438-68-2917 | | $10,000.00 | $833.33 | 2/1/77 2/28/77 |
Documents Clerk
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|--------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
| 1 | | | $833.33 | | |
I certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm.
February paid in March
DATE: March 8, 1977
OFFICE NAME: Select Comm. On Assassinations
OFFICE CODE: 83000
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01/77 TO 2/28/77
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|
| Akers, Jeremy Ray | 416-54-2984 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |
| Baish, Edyth | 169-16-0121 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |
| Berning, Elizabeth | 579-46-4548 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | |
| Blackmer, Jon | 243-74-5787 | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | | |
| Brooten, Ken | 519-42-7339 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | | |
| Chardak, Burton | 194-18-8264 | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | | |
| Connor, Linda | 231-58-8079 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | |
| Evans, Ed | 129-22-1805 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | |
| Facter, Jeff | 341-44-6951 | 15,375.00 | 1,281.25 | | |
| Fallis, Stephen | 132-34-5625 | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | | |
| Feeney, Rick | 213-46-6688 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | |
| Fenton, Clifford | 082-22-5909 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | |
| Fonzi, Gaeton | 136-28-8924 | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | |
| Gannon, Thomas | 180-30-1309 | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | |
February paid in March
DATE: March 8, 1977
OFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations
OFFICE CODE: 83000
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO | REMARKS |
|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|---------|
| Gay, Donovan | 272-42-7056 | | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 | |
| Gilbert, Howard | 549-48-4370 | | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | | |
| Grimes, Mary | 212-56-6718 | | 12,915.00 | 1,076.25 | | | |
| Hamilton, Gerald | 251-88-1541 | | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | | | |
| Hess, Jackie | 220-48-5696 | | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | | | |
| Holt, Laura | 559-28-5038 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | | |
| Howarth, Thomas | 015-18-1386 | | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | | |
| Hutton, E Mck | 226-10-4799 | | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | | | |
| Jenkins, Nancy | 216-40-9950 | | 10,332.00 | 861.00 | | | |
| Johnson, Gene | 371-40-1135 | | 19,680.00 | 1,640.00 | | | |
| Kelly, Francis | 082-24-2085 | | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | | |
| Kiker, Elizabeth | 161-38-7640 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | | |
| Klein, Kenneth | 068-38-5091 | | 18,450.00 | 1,537.50 | | | |
| Larson, Billie | 529-60-6414 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | | |
| Lawson, Belford | 579-58-9975 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | | |
February paid in March.
DATE: March 8, 1977
OFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations
OFFICE CODE: 83000
PAYROLL CERTIFICATION
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |
|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|
| Lazin, Terry | 149-38-9108 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |
| Lee, Sheila | 093-42-2090 | | 14,145.00 | 1,178.75 | | |
| Lehner, Robert | 071-28-5111 | | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | | |
| Lewis, Alvin | 205-26-3636 | | 20,910.00 | 1,742.50 | | |
| Martin, Rebecca | 518-56-7099 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | |
| McPherson, Vivian | 240-66-7674 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | |
| Moriarty, John | 579-24-3862 | | 14,760.00 | 1,230.00 | | |
| Morrison, Robert | 403-36-7980 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | |
| Orr, Patricia | 215-66-2714 | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | | |
| Purdy, Donald A. Jr.| 211-38-9707 | | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | | |
| Ross, Ida Jane | 227-28-5345 | | 12,300.00 | 1,025.00 | | |
| Sprague, Richard A. | 402-30-6486 | | 24,354.00 | 2,029.50 | | |
| Tanenbaum, Robert K.| 127-32-4970 | | 22,140.00 | 1,845.00 | | |
| Taylor, Ann Furnald | 036-34-9187 | | 10,455.00 | 871.25 | | |
| Thornell, Joan Talbert | 579-54-1505 | | 15,375.00 | 1,281.25 | | |
FEVERUARY PAID IN MARCH
DATE: 3-8-77
OFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations
OFFICE CODE: 83000
PAYROLL CERTIFICATION
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |
|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|
| Tinajero, Dorothy R.| 427-54-6905 | | 11,070.00 | 922.50 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |
| Wolf, James Lerner | 057-40-6887 | | 17,835.00 | 1,486.25 | | |
| Zevnik, Paul A. | 415-84-5593 | | 13,530.00 | 1,127.50 | | |
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O AMT AVAILABLE PAY THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
| CLERK HIRE CHARGES | 47 | | $59,857.98 | |
I certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm.
FEbruary PAID IN MARCH
DATE: 3-9-77
U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations
PAYROLL CERTIFICATION
OFFICE CODE: 83000
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|
| Boland, Colleen T. Researcher | 215-52-9164 | $10,000.00 | $833.33 | 2/1/77 2/28/77 |
| Godfrey, Jane E. Secretary | 119-36-4041 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 2/1/77 2/28/77 |
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF UNUSED MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|--------------|--------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| 2 | | | | | |
CLERK HIRE CHARGES 2 $1,666.66
I certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.
Allowed
Chairman, House Administration Comm.
FEBRUARY PAID IN MARCH
DATE: 3/14/77
U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OFFICE NAME: Select Comm. on Assassinations
PAYROLL CERTIFICATION
OFFICE CODE: 83000
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |
|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|
| Rosen, Merete Muff | 048-58-4432 | 10,000.00 | | 833.33 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |
| Researcher | | | | | | |
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF UNUSED MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|---------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| 1 | | | 833.33 | | |
CLERK HIRE CHARGES: 1
I certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm.
**U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES**
**FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM**
**PAYROLL CERTIFICATION**
**ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2/1/77 TO 2/28/77**
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | PERIOD TO |
|---------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|
| Barrow, Giulia M. | 145-46-6759 | $10,000 | | 833.33 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |
| Secretary | | | | | | |
| Strickland, Ann | 227-76-3525 | 10,000 | | 833.33 | 2/1/77 | 2/28/77 |
| Secretary | | | | | | |
**OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY**
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | LEAVE W/O PAY | AMT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | NO. OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NO. OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|---------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
| 2 | | | | | |
CLERK HIRE CHARGES 1,666.66
I certify that the listed employees have performed their assigned official duties in the offices of this committee and that they have certified that they have no relationship to a current Member of Congress, unless otherwise noted hereon.
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm.
| EMPLOYEE NAME | POSITION NO. AND TITLE | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|------------------------|--------------|--------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| AHERN, JAMES | STAFF COUNSEL | 446-54-2940 | 10,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| BAUGH, EDITH | STAFF COUNSEL | 169-16-0421 | 11,700.00 | 925.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | BARRON, JULIA M | 145-46-6759 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | SECRETARY | 579-46-4548 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| BLACKMER, S. JONATHAN | SECRETARY | 243-74-5287 | 11,700.00 | 925.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | STAFF COUNSEL | 215-52-9164 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| BONIFER, SHERYL L | RESEARCHER | 228-82-4715 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| BROOKE, KENNETH EDWARD, JR | SECRETARY | 519-42-7339 | 22,100.00 | 1,841.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| BROWN, CLAIRE L | STAFF COUNSEL | 258-72-6151 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| CHARDAK, BURTON A | RESEARCHER | 194-48-8264 | 22,100.00 | 1,841.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 081-12-1326 | 20,964.00 | 100.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| CONNOR, LINDA M | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 231-58-8039 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | RESEARCHER | 438-86-9756 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | MESSENGER | 077-48-6826 | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| EVANS, EDWARD M | CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | 129-22-1805 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| FACTER, JEFFREY | STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | 341-44-6951 | 16,250.00 | 1,354.17 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 132-34-5625 | 23,400.00 | 1,950.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| FENTON, CLIFFORD A. JR | DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATIONS | 243-46-6686 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| FONZI, GALEN | STAFF INVESTIGATOR | 136-28-8824 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| GANNON, THOMAS M. JR | STAFF COUNSEL | 180-30-1309 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| GAY, DONOVAN L | 222-42-7056 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| CHIEF RESEARCHER | 549-48-4370 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| GILSEAT-HOWARD M | 119-36-4041 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 212-56-6718 | 13,650.00 | 1,137.50 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| GODFREY, JANE E | 251-88-1541 | 15,600.00 | 1,300.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 220-48-5696 | 15,600.00 | 1,300.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| HESS, JACQUELINE | 219-58-7593 | 9,100.00 | 758.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| CLERK | 042-40-0959 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 559-28-5038 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| BUDGET OFFICER | 226-10-4799 | 23,400.00 | 1,950.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | 216-40-9950 | 10,920.00 | 910.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| JOHNSON, GENE P | 371-40-1135 | 20,800.00 | 1,733.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | 082-24-2065 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| KELLY, FRANCIS J | 161-38-7640 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 068-38-5091 | 19,500.00 | 1,625.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 233-92-1962 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| LARSON, BILLIE GAY | 539-60-6414 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 529-56-9975 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 149-36-9108 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 093-42-2090 | 14,950.00 | 1,245.83 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 071-28-5111 | 23,400.00 | 1,950.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 205-26-3636 | 22,100.00 | 1,811.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | 017-36-1972 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| MARRAN, REBECCA W | 518-66-7099 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | | |
| MCCRAY, DENISE LOUISE | 577-72-8453 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| MCMHORSON, VIVIAN L | 240-66-7674 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | |
| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | |
| MOLIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | 15,600.00 | 1,300.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | | |
| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7880 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | | | | | | |
| MORTON, RITA L | 579-64-6855 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| ORR, PATRICIA M | 315-66-2714 | 10,400.00 | 866.67 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | | | | | |
| ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | |
| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | | |
| RUNDY, DONALD A JR | 211-38-9707 | 11,700.00 | 975.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| RISINGER, MARLIN III | 438-68-2917 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | |
| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| ROSS, JANE | 227-16-5345 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | |
| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| CLERK | | | | | | |
| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 526-64-5299 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | |
| SPRAGUE, RICHARD A | 402-36-6466 | 25,740.00 | 2,145.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | | |
| STRICKLAND, ANN LYNN | 227-76-3525 | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | 23,400.00 | 1,950.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | 11,050.00 | 920.83 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| THOMAS, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | 15,250.00 | 1,262.50 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
| SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | | | | | |
| TINADERO, DOROTHY R | 427-54-6965 | 11,700.00 | 975.00 | 02-01-77 02-28-77 | |
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02/01/77 TO 02/28/77
OFFICE: 83000: SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY | PAY NUMBER | SCHEDULE | PAY | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | FROM | TO | PERIOD | REMARKS |
|---------------------|-----------------|------------|----------|-----|---------------|-----------|------|------|-------|---------|
| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | | | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-28-77 | | |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | | | | |
| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | | | | 10,000.00 | 833.33 | 02-01-77 | 02-26-77 | | |
| DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | | | | | | | | | | |
| WOLF, JAMES-LERER | 057-40-6887 | | | | 18,850.00 | 1,570.00 | 02-01-77 | 02-26-77 | | |
| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 415-84-5593 | | | | 14,369.66 | 1,191.67 | 02-01-77 | 02-26-77 | | |
| ZEVNIK, PAUL A | | | | | | | | | | |
| STAFF COUNSEL-KENNEDY | | | | | | | | | | |
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER OF LEAVE W/O | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | UNEXPENDED | NEXT MONTH | UNEXPENDED | APPROPRIATION TOTAL |
|---------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|------------|------------|------------|---------------------|
| 73 | 0 | 34,516.00 | 83,454.93 | 48,938.93 | 85,101.93 | 134,040.86 | 20,274.93 |
I CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.
Allowed:
Chairman, House Administration Comm. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10106.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 12,
"total-input-tokens": 12828,
"total-output-tokens": 10931,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
1274,
1
],
[
1274,
2506,
2
],
[
2506,
4828,
3
],
[
4828,
7003,
4
],
[
7003,
8523,
5
],
[
8523,
9941,
6
],
[
9941,
11451,
7
],
[
11451,
13102,
8
],
[
13102,
15652,
9
],
[
15652,
18614,
10
],
[
18614,
21529,
11
],
[
21529,
23810,
12
]
]
} |
c0d04d1f813902d420d6f7a68d69b59905c4813c | | EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|-----------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|--------------------------|
| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| BAISH, EDITH | 169-16-0121 | | 11,700.00 | 1,010.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| BARROW, GIULIA M | 145-46-6759 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| BERNING, ELIZABETH L | 579-46-4548 | | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | | 11,700.00 | 1,010.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-9164 | | 10,000.00 | 850.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| BONIFER, SHERYL L | 228-82-4715 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| BROOTEN, KENNETH EDWARD, JR | 519-42-7339 | | 22,100.00 | 1,907.78 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | | 10,000.00 | 861.11 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | | 22,100.00 | 1,907.78 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| CHENOWETH, JAMES H | 081-12-1326 | | 20,964.00 | 139.09 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | 01-01-77 |
| CONNOR, LINDA MAE | 231-58-8079 | | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |
| EDITOR/HISTORIAN | | | | | | 01-01-77 |
| CONZELMAN, JAMES K | 438-86-9756 | | 10,000.00 | 850.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | | 9,000.00 | 750.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |
| MESSENGER | | | | | | 01-01-77 |
| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | | 16,250.00 | 1,402.78 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | | 23,400.00 | 2,020.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | 01-01-77 |
| FEENEY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 APPOINTMENT |
| DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATIONS | | | | | | 01-03-77 |
| FENTON, CLIFFORD A, JR | 082-22-5909 | | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | | 01-01-77 |
| FONZI, GAETON J | 136-28-8924 | | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR | | | | | | 01-01-77 |
| GANNON, THOMAS M, SJ | 180-30-1309 | | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 APPOINTMENT |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | 01-01-77 |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|-------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| GAY, DONOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| GILBERT, HOWARD M | 549-48-4370 | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| GRIMES, MARY SUSAN | 212-56-6718 | 13,650.00 | 1,178.34 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | 15,600.00 | 1,346.66 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HESS, JACQUELINE | 220-48-5696 | 15,600.00 | 1,346.66 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | | |
| HINDLE, LOUIS M | 219-58-7593 | 9,100.00 | 758.34 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| CLERK | | | | | | |
| HITCHCOCK, CORNISH F | 042-40-0959 | 10,000.00 | 861.11 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| HOLT, LAURA MAE | 559-28-5038 | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| HOWARTH, THOMAS | 015-18-1386 | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| BUDGET OFFICER | | | | | | |
| HUTTON, E MCK | 226-10-4799 | 23,400.00 | 2,020.00 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| DEPUTY DIRECTOR | | | | | | |
| JENKINS, NANCY S | 216-40-9950 | 10,920.00 | 942.66 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| JOHNSON, GENE R | 371-40-1135 | 20,800.00 | 1,795.56 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| ASST CHIEF COUNSEL-KING | | | | | | |
| KELLY, FRANCIS J | 082-24-2085 | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| DIRECTOR OF SECURITY | | | | | | |
| KILKER, ELIZABETH A | 161-38-7640 | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| KLEIN, KENNETH D | 068-38-5091 | 19,500.00 | 1,683.34 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| LARKIN, JOYCE ANN | 233-92-1962 | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| LARSON, BILLIE GAY | 529-60-6414 | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | |
| LAWSON, BELFORD L, III | 579-58-9975 | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| LAZIN, TERRY W | 149-38-9108 | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| LEE, SHEILA JACKSON | 093-42-2090 | 14,950.00 | 1,290.56 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | | | | | | |
| LEHNER, ROBERT J | 071-28-5111 | 23,400.00 | 2,020.00 | 01-03-77 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| LEWIS, ALVIN B, JR | 205-26-3636 | 22,100.00 | 1,807.78 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | |
| LOCKE, RALPH C | 017-36-1972 | 10,000.00 | 861.11 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM | TO | REMARKS |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|----|--------------------------|
| MARTIN, REBECCA W | 518-56-7099 | | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| CHIEF CLERK | | | | | | | |
| MCCRAY, DENISE LOUISE | 577-72-8453 | | 10,000.00 | 844.45 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| MCPHERSON, VIVIAN L. | 240-66-7674 | | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| MORDANA, SARI | 102-30-2631 | | 10,000.00 | 861.11 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| LAW ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| MORIARTY, JOHN J | 579-24-3862 | | 15,600.00 | 1,346.66 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF INVESTIGATOR/KENNEDY | | | | | | | |
| MORRISON, ROBERT C | 403-36-7980 | | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SECURITY/INVESTIGATION/AA | | | | | | | |
| MORTON, RITA L | 579-64-6855 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| ORR, PATRICIA M | 215-66-2714 | | 10,400.00 | 897.78 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SPEC ASST TO CHIEF COUNSEL & DIRECTOR | | | | | | | |
| ORR, PHOEBE CURTIS | 219-64-3205 | | 10,000.00 | 838.89 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| PONDER, MARY ELIZABETH | 452-74-2381 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| PRICE, PATRICIA LYNN | 228-98-6892 | | 6,500.00 | 541.67 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| CLERK | | | | | | | |
| PURDY, DONALD A. JR | 211-38-9707 | | 11,700.00 | 1,010.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| RISINGER, MARLIN. III | 438-68-2917 | | 10,000.00 | 833.34 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| DOCUMENTS CLERK | | | | | | | |
| ROBERTS, ANTOINETTE MORRIS | 048-28-0439 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| ROSEN, MERETE MUFF | 048-58-4432 | | 10,000.00 | 850.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| ROSS, IDA JANE | 227-18-5345 | | 13,000.00 | 1,122.22 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| ADM SECTY/RECEPTIONIST | | | | | | | |
| RUDDER, MIRIAM | 578-80-2773 | | 7,500.00 | 625.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| CLERK | | | | | | | |
| SMITH, JOHANNA LYNN | 528-64-5299 | | 10,000.00 | 833.34 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| DOCUMENT CLERK | | | | | | | |
| SPRAGUE, RICHARD A | 402-30-6486 | | 25,740.00 | 2,222.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| CHIEF COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR | | | | | | | |
| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON | 227-76-3525 | | 10,000.00 | 855.56 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | | | |
| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K | 127-32-4970 | | 23,400.00 | 2,020.00 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | | | |
| TAYLOR, ANN FURNALD | 036-34-9187 | | 11,050.00 | 953.88 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | | | |
| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT | 579-54-1505 | | 16,250.00 | 1,402.78 | 01-01-77 | 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| SPECIAL ASSISTANT | | | | | | | |
| TINAJERO, DOROTHY R | 427-54-6905 | | 11,700.00 | 1,010.00 | 01-03-77 | 01-02-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01/01/77 TO 01/31/77
OFFICE: 06689, SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
PAYROLL CERTIFICATION
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01/01/77 TO 01/31/77
OFFICE: 06689. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL PAY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|------------|-----------|----------------|---------|
| WALSH, KEVIN | 020-36-4147 | 10,000.00 | 861.11 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN | 383-52-5221 | 10,000.00 | 833.34 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| WOLF, JAMES LERER | 057-40-6887 | 18,850.00 | 1,627.22 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
| ZEVNIK, PAUL A | 415-84-5593 | 14,300.00 | 1,234.44 | 01-01-77 01-31-77 | APPOINTMENT 01-03-77 |
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER OF LEAVE W/O PAY | AMOUNT AVAILABLE THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | EXPENDITURES UNUSED NEXT MONTH | PROJECTION | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| 73 | 0 | 51,629.27 | 86,145.53 | -34,516.26 | 85,101.93 | 119,618.19 | |
I CERTIFY THAT THE LISTED EMPLOYEES HAVE PERFORMED THEIR ASSIGNED OFFICIAL DUTIES IN THE OFFICES OF THIS COMMITTEE AND THAT THEY HAVE CERTIFIED THAT THEY HAVE NO RELATIONSHIP TO A CURRENT MEMBER OF CONGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON.
Allowed
Chairman, House Administration Comm.
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | FROM TO PERIOD | REMARKS |
|---------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|---------------|---------|
| AKERS, JEREMY RAY | 416-54-2948 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| AMATO, CAROLYN HANSEN | 257-56-9440 | 16,000.00 | 666.67 | 12-01-76 12-15-76 TERMINATED 12-15-76 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| BAISH, EDITH | 169-16-0121 | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |
| TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | | | | | |
| BLACKMER, S JONATHAN | 243-74-5787 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BOLAND, COLLEEN T | 215-52-0164 | 13,000.00 | 144.44 | 12-27-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-27-76 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| DONIER, SHERYL L | 228-82-4715 | 14,000.00 | 700.00 | 12-13-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-13-76 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| DOHER, LEWIS JR | 205-26-3636 | 34,000.00 | 2,361.11 | 12-06-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-06-76 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BROGEN, KENNETH EDWARD JR | 519-42-7339 | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| BROWN, CLAIRE L | 258-72-6151 | 15,000.00 | 83.33 | 12-29-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-29-76 |
| RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| CHARDAK, BURTON A | 194-18-8264 | 34,000.00 | 2,833.33 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |
| PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER | | | | | |
| CONNOR, LINDA MAE | 231-58-8079 | 20,000.00 | 888.89 | 12-15-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-15-76 |
| EDITOR/HISTORIAN | | | | | |
| DOYLE, KEVIN SEAN | 077-48-6826 | 9,000.00 | 425.00 | 12-14-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-14-76 |
| MESSENGER | | | | | |
| EVANS, EDWARD M | 129-22-1805 | 26,000.00 | 1,300.00 | 12-13-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-13-76 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KING | | | | | |
| FACTER, JEFFREY | 341-44-6951 | 25,000.00 | 69.44 | 12-30-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-30-76 |
| STAFF COUNSEL LEGAL UNIT | | | | | |
| FALLIS, STEPHEN JAMES | 132-34-5625 | 36,000.00 | 2,400.00 | 12-07-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-07-76 |
| DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| FEENSY, RICHARD J | 213-46-6688 | 25,000.00 | 2,083.33 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |
| ADMINISTRATOR | | | | | |
| FENTON, CLIFFORD A JR | 082-22-5909 | 26,000.00 | 1,300.00 | 12-13-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-13-76 |
| CHIEF INVESTIGATOR-KENNEDY | | | | | |
| GANNON, THOMAS M SJ | 160-30-1309 | 20,000.00 | 1,000.00 | 12-13-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-13-76 |
| STAFF COUNSEL | | | | | |
| GAY, DONOVAN L | 272-42-7056 | 25,000.00 | 2,083.33 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 |
| CHIEF RESEARCHER | | | | | |
| GODFREY, JANE E | 119-36-4041 | 14,000.00 | 38.99 | 12-30-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-30-76 |
| SECRETARY | | | | | |
| HAMILTON, GERALD P | 251-88-1541 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 12-01-76 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-01-76 |
| Employee Name | Social Security Number | Pay Schedule | Annual Salary | Gross Pay | Period From | Period To | Remarks |
|-------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|--------------------------|
| Hess, Jacqueline | 220-48-5696 | 20.000.00 | 1,666.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-01-76 |
| Howarth, Thomas | 015-18-1366 | 30.000.00 | 2,500.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-01-76 |
| Jenkins, Nancy S | 216-40-9950 | 16,800.00 | 186.67 | 12-27-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-27-76 |
| Kilker, Elizabeth A | 161-38-7640 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |
| Larson, Billie Gay | 529-60-6414 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | P/R Change - 12-01-76 |
| Lewis, Belford L. III | 579-58-9975 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-01-76 |
| Lehner, Robert J | 071-28-5111 | 36,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 12-06-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-06-76 |
| Locke, Ralph C | 017-36-1972 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |
| Martin, Rebecca W | 518-56-7099 | 20,000.00 | 1,666.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |
| McCray, Denise Louise | 577-72-8453 | 12,000.00 | 600.00 | 12-13-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-13-76 |
| McPherson, Vivian L. | 240-66-7674 | 14,000.00 | 1,166.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |
| Mordana, Sari | 102-30-2631 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |
| Moriarty, John J | 579-24-3862 | 24,000.00 | 266.67 | 12-27-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-27-76 |
| Morrison, Robert C | 403-36-7980 | 14,000.00 | 700.00 | 12-13-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-13-76 |
| Morton, Rita L | 579-64-6855 | 14,000.00 | 155.56 | 12-27-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-27-76 |
| Orr, Patricia M | 215-66-2717 | 13,000.00 | 1,083.33 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |
| Orr, Phoebe Curtis | 219-64-3205 | 11,000.00 | 458.33 | 12-16-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-16-76 |
| Ozer, Robert C | 174-32-6125 | 39,600.00 | 770.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-07-76 | | Terminated 12-07-76 |
| Price, Patricia Lynn | 228-98-6892 | 6,500.00 | 270.83 | 12-16-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-16-76 |
| Purdy, Donald A. Jr | 322-39-9707 | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-01-76 |
| Risinger, Marlin III | 438-68-2917 | 10,000.00 | 111.11 | 12-27-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-27-76 |
| Roberts, Antoinette Morris | 048-28-0439 | 14,000.00 | 350.00 | 12-22-76 | 12-31-76 | | Appointment 12-22-76 |
| Smith, Johanna Lynn | 528-64-5299 | 8,000.00 | 666.67 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |
| Sprague, Richard A | 402-30-6486 | 39,600.00 | 3,300.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 | | |
Office: 06689. Select Committee on Assassinations
Accounting Period 12/01/76 to 12/31/76
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 12/01/76 TO 12/31/76
OFFICE: 06689, SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
| EMPLOYEE NAME | SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER | PAY SCHEDULE | ANNUAL SALARY | GROSS PAY | PERIOD FROM TO | REMARKS |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|--------------|---------------|-----------|----------------|------------------|
| STRICKLAND, ANN LYON SECRETARY | 227-76-3525 | | 14,000.00 | 116.67/ | 12-28-76 | 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-28-76 |
| TANENBAUM, ROBERT K DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL | 127-32-4970 | | 36,000.00 | 2,500.00 | 12-06-76 | 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-06-76 |
| THORNELL, JOAN TALBERT SPECIAL ASSISTANT | 579-54-1505 | | 25,000.00 | 2,083.33 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 |
| TINAJENO, DOROTHY R TASK FORCE OFFICE MANAGER | 427-54-6905 | | 18,000.00 | 1,500.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 |
| WALSH, KEVIN RESEARCHER | 020-36-4147 | | 15,000.00 | 1,250.00 | 12-01-76 | 12-31-76 |
| WOLF, ELIZABETH ANN DOCUMENT/RESEARCHER | 383-52-5221 | | 10,000.00 | 83.33/ | 12-28-76 | 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-28-76 |
| WOLF, JAMES LERER STAFF COUNSEL-LEGAL UNIT | 057-40-6887 | | 29,000.00 | 886.11/ | 12-20-76 | 12-31-76 APPOINTMENT 12-20-76 |
OFFICE PAYROLL SUMMARY
| NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES | NUMBER LEAVE W/O PAY | ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AVAILABLE | EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH | UNEXPENDED | PROJECTION NEXT MONTH | UNEXPENDED | NUMBER OF MAJORITY CLERKS/PROF | NUMBER OF MINORITY CLERKS/PROF |
|---------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------|------------|-----------------------|------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| 50 | 0 | 110,548.02 | 61,716.39 | 48,832.53 | 81,991.70 | 33,159.17 | | |
CORRECT: SERVICES RENDERED.
I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE PERSONS NAMED ON THE WITHIN PAYROLL IS NOT PROHIBITED BY ANY PROVISIONS OF LAW LIMITING THE AVAILABILITY OF THE APPROPRIATION(S) INVOLVED
[Signature]
Chairman, House Administration Comm.
Allowed:
Employee paid in supplemental payroll | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10107.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 7,
"total-input-tokens": 7779,
"total-output-tokens": 12943,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
6027,
1
],
[
6027,
11703,
2
],
[
11703,
19148,
3
],
[
19148,
20950,
4
],
[
20950,
23724,
5
],
[
23724,
27838,
6
],
[
27838,
30272,
7
]
]
} |
37f54c98f0f3acd6fd81dab9976a531136c51897 | Agency Information
AGENCY: HSCA
RECORD NUMBER: 180-10125-10172
RECORD SERIES: SECURITY VIOLATION CASE FILE
AGENCY FILE NUMBER:
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: HSCA
FROM:
TO:
TITLE:
DATE: 07/00/1978
PAGES: 100
SUBJECTS:
PHOTOGRAPHS AND FILM
KENNEDY, JOHN, AUTOPSY
BLAHUT, REGIS
HSCA, ADMINISTRATION
CIA, STAFF
HSCA, FILES
DOCUMENT TYPE: REPORT
CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified
RESTRICTIONS: Consulted
CURRENT STATUS: Withhold
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 08/20/1993
OPENING CRITERIA:
COMMENTS: Box 1.
Released under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2107 Note). Case# NW 88326 Date: 2025
Select Committee on Assassinations
U.S. House of Representatives
3331 House Office Building, Annex 2
Washington, D.C. 20515
3-26-79
To whom it may concern:
This file is of an unusual nature because it deals with an incident involving a CIA employee and this committee. It has not been logged into our system by agreement with the CIA.
Lance Swindon
Director of Security
It's a very interesting story.
July 14, 1978
TO: Mr. G. Robert Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
Select Committee on Assassinations
U. S. House of Representatives
3331 House Office Building
Annex 2
Washington, D. C. 20515
RE: REQUEST BY HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS
U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (HSCA)
FOR LATENT PRINT COMPARISONS
Letter July 13, 1978, and specimens delivered to
Latent Fingerprint Section on July 13, 1978
REFERENCE:
EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: Addressee
SPECIMENS:
Two cards bearing five transparent lifts
Five photographs of enlarged inked fingerprints
This report supplements and confirms the
information personally furnished to Mr. Kenneth
Klein on July 13, 1978.
The specimens were examined and four latent
fingerprints of value for identification purposes
are present on three of the transparent lifts.
The latent fingerprint, which is present
on the lift on the card bearing the notation "off
back of 39E2," and the inked fingerprint appearing
in the two photographs designated A-1 and A-2 in
the Latent Fingerprint Section were made by one
and the same individual.
(Continued on next page)
Mr. G. Robert Blakey
July 14, 1978
The two latent fingerprints, which are present on one lift on the card bearing the notation "B - from inside outer edge of safe door," and the inked fingerprints appearing in the two photographs designated B and C in the Latent Fingerprint Section were made by one and the same individual.
The remaining latent fingerprint is not identical with the inked fingerprints appearing in the five submitted photographs.
The specimens are being retained in the Latent Fingerprint Section until called for by a representative of your office.
off back of 39E2
A = from face of safe drawer
B = from inside outer edge of safe door
A. Flanagan, Thomas Mark
10y Prints
7-10-28
2:30
4 RB
| Name | Approved | Date |
|--------|----------|--------|
| Fenton | | |
| Hess | | |
| Gay | | |
| Klein | | |
| Wolf | | |
| Cornwall | | 7/13 |
| Blakey | | 7-13-25 |
Cornwell
Select Committee on Assassinations
U.S. House of Representatives
3331 House Office Building, Annex 2
Washington, D.C. 20515
July 13, 1978
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
Attorney General of the United States
Department of Justice
Washington, D.C.
Attn: Mr. Robert L. Keuch
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division, Room 2112
Dear Mr. Attorney General:
This is to request that the Federal Bureau of Investigation provide the Select Committee with a qualified fingerprint expert to examine certain lifted and known fingerprints, and to render an opinion as to whether they are the fingerprints of the same person.
Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
G. Robert Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
GRB: gcd
cc: Danny Coulson
| Approved | Date |
|----------|----------|
| Fenton | |
| Hess | |
| Gay | |
| Klein | |
| Wolf | |
| Cornwell | |
| Blakey | 6-21-78 |
DRAFTED BY: [Signature]
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
Attorney General of the United States
Department of Justice
Washington, D. C. 20530
Attn: Mr. Robert L. Keuch
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division, Room 2113
Dear Mr. Attorney General:
This is to request that the fingerprint cards prepared in connection with the FBI security background check on the following staff people be returned, temporarily, to the Committee:
Andy Purdy
Mark Flanagan
Mitch Mars
Dan Hardway
Eddie Lopez
Lance Svendsen
Oliver Champion
Bill Cross
Bob Morrison
Betty Lou Sisson
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
LOUIS STOKES
Chairman
LS:dm
cc: Danny Coulson
OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
TO: Griffin Bell
| Approved | Date |
|----------|------|
| Fenton | |
| Hess | |
| Gay | |
| Klein | |
| Wolf | |
| Cornwell | |
| Blakey | 6-29-78 |
DRAFTED BY: Dawn Miller
June 29, 1978
The Honorable Griffin B. Bell
Attorney General of the United States
Department of Justice
Washington, D. C. 20530
Attn: Mr. Robert L. Keuch
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division, Room 2113
Dear Mr. Attorney General:
This is to request that the fingerprint cards prepared in connection with the FBI security background check on the following staff people be returned, temporarily, to the Committee:
Joseph Basteri 10/24/22
New York City
William Brown 9/18/28
New Orleans, LA
Robert Buras 7/13/37
Memphis, TN
Judith Burford 9/14/55
Brooklyn, NY
Martin Daly 7/11/29
Clarence Day
Lawrence Delsa 8/11/43
New Orleans, LA
Eileen Dineen 9/14/48
Philadelphia, PA
Marjorie Eagle 10/2/23
North Carolina
Frank Eccles 11/7/24
New York, NY
Al Gonzales 4/22/23
Washington, DC
Susan Grimes 11/14/49
Pittsburgh, PA
John Hornbeck 1/23/40
E. M. Hutton 9/25/20
Hampton, VA
Ralph Locke 2/10/53
Boston, MA
Vivian McPherson 2/4/43
Norfolk, VA
Floyd Reeves 2/25/43
Tampa, Florida
Gina Resnick 4/3/53
New Brunswick, NJ
Marlin Risinger 1/28/54
Shreveport, LA
Harold Rose 9/28/28
Baltimore, MD
Elizabeth Selleck 12/3/48
Wenatchee, WA
Ann Strickland 8/4/49
Rocky Mount, N.C.
Ann Taylor 12/19/49
San Diego, CA
Joseph Thomas 10/13/35
Mary's County
William Triplett 8/18/40
Delaware, CA
Robert Walker 9/11/22
Atlanta, GA
Richard Wrase 6/19/28
New York, NY
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
LOUIS STOKES
Chairman
LS:dm
cc: Danny Coulson
NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF FINGERPRINT CARDS
I, William H. Cross, hereby acknowledge receipt from the FBI of twenty-three (23) Applicant Fingerprint Cards (Form FD-258) concerning the following persons:
| Name | Date of Birth | Place of Birth |
|-----------------------|---------------|---------------------------------|
| Basteri, Joseph John | 10-24-22 | U.S.A. |
| Brown, William | 9-8-28 | New York, New York |
| Burford, Judith Renee | 9-24-55 | Memphis, Tennessee |
| Daly, Martin James | 7-1-29 | New York, New York |
| Day, Clarence Joseph | 1-8-31 | Alexandria, Virginia |
| Eagle, Marjorie Ann | 10-2-23 | Phoenixville, Pennsylvania |
| Gonzales, Albert | 4-22-23 | New York, New York |
| Grimes, Mary Susan | 11-4-49 | Washington, D. C. |
| Hornbeck, John William| 1-23-40 | Pennsylvania |
| Hutton, Elbert McKinley| 9-25-20 | Hampton, Virginia |
| Locke, Ralph Christopher| 2-10-53 | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Lopez, Edwin Juan | 5-3-55 | New York |
| McPherson, Vivian Leigh| 2-4-43 | Norfolk, Virginia |
| Reeves, Floyd Leroy | 7-25-43 | Tampa, Florida |
| Resnick, Gina Irene | 4-3-53 | New Jersey |
| Risinger, Marlin III | 12-8-54 | Louisiana |
| Rose, Harold A. | 9-28-28 | Baltimore, Maryland |
| Strickland, Ann Lyon | 8-4-46 | Rocky Mount, N. Carolina |
| Taylor, Ann Furnald | 12-19-49 | San Diego, California |
| Thomas, Joseph Aloysious| 10-13-31 | Maryland |
| Triplett, William Karrol| 8-8-40 | Delano, California |
| Walker, Robert James | 9-1-23 | Atlanta, Georgia |
| Wrase, Richard Charles| 6-19-28 | New York, New York |
Recei'd from W.H. Cross 7/5/78 above Fingerprint Card.
Signed William H. Cross
Title Assistant Director of Security HSCA
NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF FINGERPRINT CARDS
I, William H. Cross, hereby acknowledge receipt from the FBI of twenty-three (23) Applicant Fingerprint Cards (Form FD-258) concerning the following persons:
| Name | Date of Birth | Place of Birth |
|-----------------------|---------------|---------------------------------|
| Basteri, Joseph John | 10-24-22 | U.S.A. |
| Brown, William | 9-8-28 | New York, New York |
| Burford, Judith Renee | 9-24-55 | Memphis, Tennessee |
| Daly, Martin James | 7-1-29 | New York, New York |
| Day, Clarence Joseph | 1-8-31 | Alexandria, Virginia |
| Eagle, Marjorie Ann | 10-2-23 | Phoenixville, Pennsylvania |
| Gonzales, Albert | 4-22-23 | New York, New York |
| Grimes, Mary Susan | 11-4-49 | Washington, D. C. |
| Hornbeck, John William| 1-23-40 | Pennsylvania |
| Hutton, Elbert McKinley| 9-25-20 | Hampton, Virginia |
| Locke, Ralph Christopher| 2-10-53 | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Lopez, Edwin Juan | 5-3-55 | New York |
| McPherson, Vivian Leigh| 2-4-43 | Norfolk, Virginia |
| Reeves, Floyd Leroy | 7-25-43 | Tampa, Florida |
| Resnick, Gina Irene | 4-3-53 | New Jersey |
| Risinger, Marlin III | 12-8-54 | Louisiana |
| Rose, Harold A. | 9-28-28 | Baltimore, Maryland |
| Strickland, Ann Lyon | 8-4-46 | Rocky Mount, N. Carolina |
| Taylor, Ann Furnald | 12-19-49 | San Diego, California |
| Thomas, Joseph Aloysious| 10-13-31 | Maryland |
| Triplett, William Karrol| 8-8-40 | Delano, California |
| Walker, Robert James | 9-1-23 | Atlanta, Georgia |
| Wrase, Richard Charles| 6-19-28 | New York, New York |
Signed [Signature]
Title Assistant Director of Security HSCA
June 28, 1978
NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF FINGERPRINT CARDS
I, [Name], hereby acknowledge receipt from the FBI of eight (8) Applicant Fingerprint Cards (Form FD-258) concerning the following persons:
| Name | Date of Birth | Place of Birth |
|-----------------------------|---------------|---------------------------|
| 1. Champion, Oliver John | 6-12-55 | Jersey City, N. J. |
| 2. Cross, William Horace | 8-22-32 | Washington, D. C. |
| 3. Flanagan, Thomas Mark | 8-25-54 | Pittsburgh, Pa. |
| 4. Hardway, Danny Lynn | 2-15-54 | Webster Springs, W. Va. |
| 5. Mars, Mitchell Allen | 9-13-52 | Chicago, Illinois |
| 6. Morrison, Robert Crittendon | 7-7-33 | Glasgow, Kentucky |
| 7. Purdy, Donald Alexander, Jr. | 4-5-51 | Philadelphia, Pa. |
| 8. Søndsen, Lance William | 9-8-52 | Great Lakes, Illinois |
Signed [Signature]
Title [Title]
[Signature]
[Date] 7-28-78
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK PRINTING INK.
2. DISTRIBUTE INK EVENLY ON PRINTING SLAB.
3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.
4. ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO NAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN IMPRESSION OR DEFICIENCY MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.
7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A MEMO STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR INFREQUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN FINGERPRINTING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.
2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF EMPLOYMENT, LICENSING, AND PERMITS, AS AUTHORIZED BY STATE STATUTES AND APPOINTED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND COUNTY OFFICIALS, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
3. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS.
4. OFFICIALS OF FEDERALLY CHARTERED GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO PROTECT OR MAINTAIN THE SECURITY OF THOSE INSTITUTIONS.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.
2. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
3. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
4. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.
5. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
6. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.
7. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
8. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.
9. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
10. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.
11. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
12. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.
13. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
14. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.
15. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
16. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.
17. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
18. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.
19. PRINTS ARE TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES OR NOT SATISFACTORY TO FINGERPRINTING.
20. PRINTS MAY BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, OR THEY MAY BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION IN CASES WHERE FINGERPRINTS HAVE BEEN FOUND DURING THE COURSE OF THE INQUIRY.
RECORDED
NOV 25 1977
IDENT. DIV. 78
APR 4 1978 1750
MAR 24 1978 1635
William Breed
120-17 Arrow Place
Bronx, 10475, NY
USA
MB 6-24-21
BR BL
NYC
US House of Rep
Wash. DC
9-8-28
15 M 5 U 00 I 12
I 1 U 10 I
09-20-3182
Fingerprints
1. LOOP
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE MINDPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK INK ON THE FINGER.
2. DISTRIBUTE INK EVENLY ON INKING PAD.
3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.
4. ROLL FINGER ON INKING PAD, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN IMPRESSION IS INCOMPLETE, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.
7. IF SOME PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NEW STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. RETAIN THE UNPRINTED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST MINDPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR INFREQUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).
2. WHORL
3. ARCH
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFICATION APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.
2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND FOR USE IN AUTHORIZED BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND STATE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, AND OTHER LEGAL PURPOSES.
3. THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN CONNECTION WITH CLEARANCES.
4. PERSONS GENERALLY QUALIFIED FOR HUMAN RECOGNITION IDENTIFICATION.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.
2. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.
3. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.
4. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.
5. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.
6. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.
7. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.
8. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.
9. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.
10. PRINT NAME IN BLOCKS OR CAPITAL LETTERS THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE BLOCKS. PRINT ONLY THOSE LETTERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY PRINTED.
RECORDED
AUG 16 1977
IDENT. DIV. 9
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK INK.
2. DISTRIBUTE PRESSURE EVENLY ON ROLLING BLANK.
3. ROLL AND ROLL TOWARDS CENTER.
4. ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO NAIL AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. PRESSURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN AMOUNT OF DEFICIENCY MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
7. IF SOME PHYSICAL DEFICIENCY MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR INFREQUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).
THIS CARD IS FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.
2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION, LICENSING, AND REGISTRATION OF AUTHORIZED BY STATE TO PERFORM AND AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES. LOCAL APPLICANTS CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF THIS CARD.
3. LOCAL APPLICANTS CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF THIS CARD.
4. LOCAL APPLICANTS CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF THIS CARD.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. PRESS AND ROLL EACH FINGER INDIVIDUALLY.
2. PRESS AND ROLL EACH FINGER INDIVIDUALLY.
3. PRESS AND ROLL EACH FINGER INDIVIDUALLY.
4. PRESS AND ROLL EACH FINGER INDIVIDUALLY.
RECORDED
JUL 7 1977
IDENT. DIV. 58
NW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 36
Martin J. Daly
109A Frederick Circle
Charlottesville, Virg.
U.S.
8/8/70
House Select Committee
On Assassinations
132-14-2717
USHOR000Z A
US HOUSE OF REP
WASH. DC
07 01 29
M W 76 215 BlueBwn N.Y.C.
14 M 07 W M00 13
S 2K 001
NW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 37
1. LOOP
2. WHORL
3. ARCH
THE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST SHOW
THE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTA MUST BE CLEAR
ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS
CENTER OF LOOP
DELTA
THIS CARD IS FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL IN PROCESSING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PERMITS.
2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION, LICENSING, AND REGISTRATION.
3. OFFICIALS OF STATE UNITS OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS, AND OTHER ENTITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.
4. OFFICIALS OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS, AND OTHER ENTITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.
5. OFFICIALS OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS, AND OTHER ENTITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.
6. OFFICIALS OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS, AND OTHER ENTITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.
LEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK
RECORDED
AUG 22 1977
IDENT. DIV. 58
NW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 38
Gonzales Albert
USHORD00Z A
US HOUSE OF REP
WASH. DC
4- 22- 23
M-W 6" 4" 250 Brn Gr N.Y., N.Y.
14 0 13 0 000 10
M 18 R 000
Select Committee on
Assassinations. Annex 2
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK PRINTERS INK.
2. DISTRIBUTE INK EVENLY ON INKING SLAB.
3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.
4. ROLL FINGERS TIGHTLY TO NAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN APPLICATION OR DEPARTMENT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, HAVE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.
7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A MEMO STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR FREQUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.
2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES.
3. PERSONS WHOSE OCCUPATIONS REQUIRE THE IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS.
4. PERSONS WHOSE OCCUPATIONS REQUIRE THE IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS.
APR 3 1978 3 4
RECORDED
APR 27 1977
IDENT. DIV. 58
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK INK.
2. DISTRIBUTE INK EVENLY ON INKING SLAB.
3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.
4. ROLL FINGERS PROPERLY TO NAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN APPLICANT OR DEFENDANT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.
7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MANY IMPRESSIONS FALL INTO THE PATTERN SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR FREQUENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES.
2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION, LICENSING, REGISTRATION, OR AUTHORIZATION.
3. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES, AND LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES.
4. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES, AND LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES.
CONTINUOUS PRINT
1. PRINTS SHOWN IN THE CENTER OF THE CARD ARE CONTINUOUS PRINTS. THE CENTER OF THE CARD IS THE CENTER OF THE CARD.
2. PRINTS SHOWN IN THE CENTER OF THE CARD ARE CONTINUOUS PRINTS. THE CENTER OF THE CARD IS THE CENTER OF THE CARD.
3. PRINTS SHOWN IN THE CENTER OF THE CARD ARE CONTINUOUS PRINTS. THE CENTER OF THE CARD IS THE CENTER OF THE CARD.
4. PRINTS SHOWN IN THE CENTER OF THE CARD ARE CONTINUOUS PRINTS. THE CENTER OF THE CARD IS THE CENTER OF THE CARD.
RECORDED
SEP 26 1977
IDENT. DIV. 70
APR 4 1978 1750
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK PRINTERS INK.
2. INK FINGERS EVENLY ON INKING SLAB.
3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.
4. ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO NAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN AMPUTATION OR DEFORMITY MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.
7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A MEMO STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR IMPROBABILITY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN FINGERPRINTING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.
2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF CONVICTION, LICENSING, AND REGISTRATION, OR AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, LOCAL, AND COUNTY COUNCILS.
3. PERSONS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED IN APPLICABLE STATE OR LOCAL LEGISLATION.
4. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
5. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
6. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
7. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
8. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
9. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
10. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
11. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
12. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
13. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
14. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
15. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
16. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
17. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
18. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
19. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
20. PERSONS EMPLOYED OR AUTHORIZED TO MAKE FINGERPRINTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS.
ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS
RECORDED
JUL 11 1977
IDENT. DIV. 9
NW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 50
Rocke, Ralph Christopher
USHOR000Z A
US HOUSE OF REP
WASH. DC
2-10-53
M W 5'8" 150 bl br Boston, Mass.
security clearance for sensitive position
017-36-1972
815 Massachusetts Ave. NE
Washington, D.C. 20002
Select Committee on Assassinations,
Washington, D.C. 20515
NW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 51
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK INK.
2. DISTRIBUTE INK EVENLY ON INK PAD.
3. DRY AND DRY FINGER THOROUGHLY.
4. POLISH FINGER FROM NAIL TO NAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE REGISTRED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN ANOMALY OR DEFECT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.
7. IF SOME FINGERPRINTS CANNOT BE OBTAINED, MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SHOW THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A MEND STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. INCLUDE ALL IDENTIFIED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT ONLY IMPRESSIONS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR).
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.
2. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.
3. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.
4. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.
5. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.
6. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.
7. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.
8. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION APPLICANT.
ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS
RECORDED
APR 29 1977
IDENT. DIV. 58
1. LOOP
2. WHORL
3. ARCH
THE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST SHOW CLEAR LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS MUST BE CLEAR
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. FINGERPRINTS MUST BE CLEAR AND SHOW THE CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA.
2. WHORLS MUST SHOW CLEAR LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS.
3. ARCHES MUST HAVE NO DELTAS.
RECORDED
JUL 27 1977
IDENT. DIV. 9
1. LOOP
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK PRINTING INK.
2. DISTRIBUTE IN EVENLY ON INKING SLAB.
3. ROLL AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.
4. ROLL FINGERS CLEARLY TO HAIL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN AMOUNT OF DEFORMATION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.
7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. CHECKING AND COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, HEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERN SHOWN ON THIS CARD OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR RARELY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE.
2. WHORL
3. ARCH
THE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST SHOW
THOSE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS MUST BE CLEAR
ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS.
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.
2. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.
3. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.
4. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.
5. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.
6. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.
7. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.
8. LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES APPLYING APPLICANTS FOR CLASSIFIED POSTS.
LEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK
APR 3 1978 3 7 9
RECORDED
APR 29 1977
IDENT. DIV. 58
| REEVES, FLOYD | LEROY |
|---------------|-------|
| N/A | US HOUSE OF REP WASH. DC |
| | 7 25 43 |
| | M B 6' 195 BR. BLK. Tampa, Fla. |
254-66-1801
U.S. HOUSE OF REP. SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS, Washington, D.C. 20515
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK INK ONLY.
2. PRESS THE INK ON FINGER BLADE.
3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.
4. ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO HAIL AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. BE SURE IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN AMPUTATION OR DISABILITY MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.
7. IF SOME FINGER CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NAIL STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR IRREGULARLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN RECORDING THIS APPLICANT'S CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS.
2. OFFICIALS IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION, RECORDING, AND PERMITTING AUTHORIZED BY STATE AND LOCAL LAW AND AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES. LOCAL AGENCIES COLLECTED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE APPLICANT'S STATE AUTHORIZED TO USE THIS CARD FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION AND CLEARANCES.
3. LOCAL AGENCIES COLLECTED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE APPLICANT'S STATE AUTHORIZED TO USE THIS CARD FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION AND CLEARANCES.
4. LOCAL AGENCIES COLLECTED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE APPLICANT'S STATE AUTHORIZED TO USE THIS CARD FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION AND CLEARANCES.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. PRINT NAME MUST BE SHOWN EXACTLY AS APPLIED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES. NAME MUST BE CLEARLY PRINTED IN BLOCK LETTERS AND IN INK.
2. PRIVACY ACT OF 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552A, APPLIES TO THIS CARD. PERSONAL INFORMATION COLLECTED ON THIS CARD IS SUBJECT TO THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552A, AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER. PERSONAL INFORMATION COLLECTED ON THIS CARD IS SUBJECT TO THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552A, AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER.
3. PRINT NAME MUST BE SHOWN EXACTLY AS APPLIED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES. NAME MUST BE CLEARLY PRINTED IN BLOCK LETTERS AND IN INK.
4. PRINT NAME MUST BE SHOWN EXACTLY AS APPLIED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES. NAME MUST BE CLEARLY PRINTED IN BLOCK LETTERS AND IN INK.
5. PRINT NAME MUST BE SHOWN EXACTLY AS APPLIED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES. NAME MUST BE CLEARLY PRINTED IN BLOCK LETTERS AND IN INK.
RECORDED
MAY 2 1977
IDENT. DIV. 58
NW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 62
Harold A. Rose
1907 Tadcaster Rd.
Baltimore, Maryland 21228
U.S. House of Rep.
Wash. DC
Sept. 28, 1928
M 30 W 101
22 U 007
220-20-6648
House Select Committee on Assassinations
Select Committee on Assassinations
227-76-3525
Taylor Ann Furnald
US House of Rep
Wash. DC
12-19-49
F W 5'4" 127 BL BK San Diego, Ca
FEMALE
0 M 25 W II 015
M 17 U 010
Employment
036-34-9187
2506 Lakevale Dr.
Vienna, Virginia
U.S. House of Representatives
H.O.B. Annex #2
[Handwritten notes and fingerprints]
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK INKING ROLLER.
2. DEPLETE THE INKING ROLLER BLANK.
3. ROLL AND ROLL FINGER TIP.
4. ROLL FINGER TIP UNTIL ROLLER AND AVOID ALLOWING DROPS TO SLIP.
5. BE SURE ROLLER IS CLEAN AND RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN INKED ROLLER IS NOT AVAILABLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT ON THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER PRINT.
7. IF SOME ROLLER POSITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SIMPLY
THE NEXT ROLL THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NEW ROLLER TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. CLEARLY THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT
MOST PRINTS HAVE FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THE CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR
IMPROBABILITY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).
THE CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR USE BUT NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION.
2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION.
3. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
4. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
5. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
6. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
7. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
8. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
9. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
10. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
11. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
12. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
13. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
14. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
15. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
16. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
17. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
18. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
19. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
20. PERSONS WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS.
RECORDED
JUL 22 1977
IDENT. DIV. II
Walker, Robert James
US House of Rep
Wash. DC
Clearance.
260-40-73/9
LEFT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY
RIGHT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. Use black printer's ink.
2. Distribute ink evenly on inking slab.
3. Wash and dry fingers thoroughly.
4. Roll fingers from nail to nail, and avoid allowing fingers to slip.
5. Be sure impressions are recorded in correct order.
6. If an annotation or deformity makes it impossible to print a finger, make a notation to that effect in the individual fingerprint block.
7. If some physical condition makes it impossible to obtain perfect impressions, submit the best that can be obtained with a memo stapled to the card explaining the circumstances.
8. Examine the completed prints to see if they can be classified, bearing in mind that most fingerprints fall into the patterns shown on this card (other patterns occur infrequently and are not shown here).
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. Law enforcement agencies in fingerprinting applicants for law enforcement positions.*
2. Officials of state and local governments for purposes of employment, licensing, and permits, as authorized by state statutes and approved by the Attorney General of the United States, local and county ordinances, unless specifically based on applicable state statutes do not satisfy this requirement.
3. All government agencies in connection with clearances.*
4. Officials of federally chartered or insured banking institutions to protect or maintain the security of those institutions.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Prints must first be checked through the appropriate state identification bureau, and only those fingerprints for which no disqualifying record has been found locally should be submitted for FBI search.
2. Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-502) requires that federal, state, or local agencies inform individuals whose social security number is requested whether such disclosure is mandatory or voluntary, and if authority for such solicitation, and uses which will be made of it.
3. Identity of private contractors should be shown in space "employer and address." The contractor is the name of the agency submitting the fingerprint card to the FBI.
4. For members, it should always be furnished in the appropriate space.
MISCELLANEOUS NO. — Record: Other Armed Forces No., Passport No., Alien Registration No., Alien Registration No. (AR), Port of Entry, Selective Service No. (SS), Veteran's Administration Claim No. (VAC).
WRAESE, Richard Charles
37 Clearview Dr
Wheatley Heights, N.Y. 11798
U.S. House of Rep.
Wash. D.C.
House Select Committee on Assassinations Clearance
113-18-5784
6-19-28
M W 6'4" 270 Bl 66 Y H Y. N Y.
10
m 17 R
17
1. LOOP
2. WHORL
3. ARCH
THE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST NOT SHOW
THESE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS MUST BE CLEAR
ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS
TO OBTAIN CLEAR AND DEEP FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK PRINTING INK.
2. DISTRIBUTE THE INK EVENLY ON INKING SLAB.
3. WASH AND DRY FINGERS THOROUGHLY.
4. ROLL FINGERS FROM NAIL TO NAIL, AND AGAIN ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. PRESS IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN AMPLIFICATION OR DEFORMATION MAKES IT IMPRACTICAL TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.
7. IF SOME PHYSICAL CONDITION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A HAND STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, BEARING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR RARELY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN FINGERPRINTING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.
2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF EMPLOYMENT, LICENSING, AND PERMITS, AS AUTHORIZED BY STATE LAWS AND APPROVED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES. LOCAL AND COUNTY COMMISSIONS, UNIFICATION BOARD OR APPLICABLE STATE AGENCIES, OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENCIES.
3. ALL OTHER AGENCIES IN CONNECTION WITH CRIMES.
NOTE: THIS CARD IS NOT TO BE USED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES OR TO MAINTAIN THE SECURITY OF FINGERPRINTS.
RECORDED
APR 4 1978 1750
RECORDED
NOV 7 1977
IDENT. DIV. 79
1. LOOP
2. WHORL
3. ARCH
THE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST SHOW
BASE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS MUST BE CLEAR
ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK INK.
2. FINGERPRINTS SHOULD BE MADE ON INKED SLAB.
3. PRESS AND ROLL PRINTS TO OBTAIN.
4. ROLL PRINTS FACING DOWN TO MAIL, AND AVOID ALL ONGOING HANDS TO CLIP.
5. ALL PRINTS ARE TO BE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN INKED SLAB IS NOT AVAILABLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGERPRINT.
7. IF SOME FINGERPRINTS ARE INCOMPLETE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STATED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED. REMEMBER IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD. (SOME PATTERNS OCCUR INHERENTLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE.)
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN FINGERPRINTING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.
2. OFFICIALS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFICATION, LIKE POLICE, AND FORENSIC, AS AUTHORIZED BY STATE STATUTES AND APPROVED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.
3. LOCAL AND STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.
4. LOCAL AND STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.
IDENTIFICATION:
1. FORCES PRINTS SHOULD BE TAKEN THROUGH THE APPLICABLE FINGERPRINTING PROCEDURE AND ONLY THOSE PRINTS WHICH SHOW CLEARLY SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR IDENTIFICATION.
2. PRINTS OF THE FINGERTIPS, TIPS OF THE FINGERS, AND THE TIPS OF THE FINGERS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR IDENTIFICATION.
3. PRINTS OF THE FINGERTIPS, TIPS OF THE FINGERS, AND THE TIPS OF THE FINGERS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR IDENTIFICATION.
4. PRINTS OF THE FINGERTIPS, TIPS OF THE FINGERS, AND THE TIPS OF THE FINGERS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR IDENTIFICATION.
RECORDED SEP 15 1977
IDENT. DIV. 70
1. LOOP
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIABLE FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK PRINTING INK.
2. DISTRIBUTE INDIVIDUALLY ON INKING SLAB.
3. PRESS AND ROLL FINGER, INDIVIDUALLY.
4. ROLL FINGER FORWARD TO ROLL, AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. FINGER IMPRESSIONS ARE RECORDED IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF AN UNUSUAL OR ELONGATED IMPRESSION IS MADE TO PERMIT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION TO THAT EFFECT IN THE INDIVIDUAL FINGER BLOCK.
7. IF SOME FINGER IMPRESSIONS ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE BEST THAT CAN BE OBTAINED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. EXAMINE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO SEE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, HAVING IN MIND THAT MOST FINGERPRINTS FALL INTO THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THE CARD (OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR IRREGULARLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE).
2. WHORL
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.
2. STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF EMPLOYMENT, LICENSING, AND PERMITS, AS AUTHORIZED BY STATE STATUTES AND APPOINTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, LOCAL AND COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OR OTHER AUTHORITY BASED ON APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES.
3. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.
4. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.
5. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.
6. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.
7. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.
8. FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR IDENTIFICATION WITH CLEARANCES.
3. ARCH
ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS
RECORDED
AUG 10 1977
IDENT. DIV. 58
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20537
APPLICANT
TO OBTAIN CLASSIFIED FINGERPRINTS:
1. USE BLACK INK OR PENCIL.
2. INK MUST BE APPLIED ON BOTH SIDES.
3. FINGERPRINTS MUST BE CLEAR.
4. FINGERPRINTS MUST BE TAKEN AND AVOID ALLOWING FINGERS TO SLIP.
5. FINGERPRINTS MUST BE TAKEN IN CORRECT ORDER.
6. IF ANY FINGERPRINTS ARE INCOMPLETE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PRINT A FINGER, MAKE A NOTATION ON THE BACK OF THE MECHANICAL FINGER CLIP.
7. IF ANY FINGERPRINTS ARE INCOMPLETE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PERFECT IMPRESSIONS, SUBMIT THE CARD THAT CAN BE COMPLETED WITH A NOTE STAPLED TO THE CARD EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES.
8. ENSURE THE COMPLETED PRINTS TO BE IF THEY CAN BE CLASSIFIED, READING IN MIND THAT
9. FINGERPRINTS THAT HAVE THE PATTERNS SHOWN ON THIS CARD OTHER PATTERNS OCCUR
10. UNREADABLY AND ARE NOT SHOWN HERE.
THIS CARD FOR USE BY:
1. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN IDENTIFYING APPLICANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS.
2. REGULARS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURCHASE OF CLOTHING, EQUIPMENT, AND SUPPLIES.
3. AUTHORIZED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.
4. LOCAL, STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS TO IDENTIFY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.
5. EMPLOYERS OF INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND OTHER INDUSTRIES.
6. EMPLOYERS OF INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND OTHER INDUSTRIES.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. ENSURE THAT THE CARD IS CLEAR AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN.
2. ENSURE THAT THE CARD IS CLEAR AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN.
3. ENSURE THAT THE CARD IS CLEAR AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN.
4. ENSURE THAT THE CARD IS CLEAR AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN.
5. ENSURE THAT THE CARD IS CLEAR AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION IS SHOWN.
APR 4 1978 1750
RECORDED
JUL 22 1977
IDENT. DIV. 15
| LAST NAME | FIRST NAME | MIDDLE NAME | SEX | RACE |
|-----------|------------|-------------|-----|------|
| | | | | |
| FINGERPRINTS SUBMITTED BY |
|---------------------------|
| |
| SIGNATURE OF PERSON FINGERPRINTED |
|----------------------------------|
| |
| RESIDENCE OF PERSON FINGERPRINTED |
|----------------------------------|
| |
| DATE FINGERPRINTED |
|--------------------|
| |
| LEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK |
|------------------------|
| |
| PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IN CASE OF EMERGENCY |
|--------------------------------------------|
| NAME |
| ADDRESS |
| DATE FINGERPRINTED |
|--------------------|
| |
| PLACE OF BIRTH |
|----------------|
| |
| CLASS. |
|--------|
| |
| CITIZENSHIP |
|------------|
| |
| REF. |
|------|
| |
| SCARS AND MARKS |
|-----------------|
| |
See Reverse Side for Further Instructions
| 1. RIGHT THUMB | 2. RIGHT INDEX | 3. RIGHT MIDDLE | 4. RIGHT RING | 5. RIGHT LITTLE |
|----------------|----------------|-----------------|--------------|-----------------|
| | | | | |
| 6. LEFT THUMB | 7. LEFT INDEX | 8. LEFT MIDDLE | 9. LEFT RING | 10. LEFT LITTLE |
|---------------|--------------|---------------|-------------|-----------------|
| | | | | |
| LEFT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY |
|---------------------------------------|
| LEFT THUMB | RIGHT THUMB | RIGHT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY |
| | | |
To obtain classifiable fingerprints:
1. Use printer's ink.
2. Distribute ink evenly on inking slab.
3. Wash and dry fingers thoroughly.
4. Roll fingers from nail to nail, and avoid allowing fingers to slip.
5. Be sure impressions are recorded in correct order.
6. If an amputation or deformity makes it impossible to print a finger, make a notation to that effect in the individual finger block.
7. If some physical condition makes it impossible to obtain perfect impressions, submit the best that can be obtained with a memo stapled to the card explaining the circumstances.
8. Examine the completed prints to see if they can be classified, bearing in mind the following:
Most fingerprints fall into the patterns shown below (other patterns occur infrequently and are not shown here):
**WHORL**
- **DELTA**
- **THESE LINES RUNNING BETWEEN DELTAS MUST BE CLEAR**
**ARCH**
- **ARCHES HAVE NO DELTAS**
**LOOP**
- **CENTER OF LOOP**
- **DELTA**
- **THE LINES BETWEEN CENTER OF LOOP AND DELTA MUST SHOW**
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file:
File Designation
Blahut File
Date
7-11-78 and 7-13-78
From
To
2 audio cassettes
Interview and questioning of Regis Blahut
THIS ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AND TRANSFERRED TO THE NATION PROPER AND SIGNED
RECORDING BRANCH. separate by at end of series
OUTSIDE CONTACT REPORT
Name: Scott Breckinridge
Address: CIA
Type of Contact: Telephone
I. Identifying Information:
II. Summary of Contact:
- Called concern on possible security violation
- Red JFK autopsy photo
- Wanted to talk with Regis Blahut—one among others who had access to area
- Talked informally with him
- Wanted to take more formal, i.e., tape, statement
III. Recommended Follow-up (if any):
Signature: [Signature]
DATE: 11-15
TIME: 11:30
Scott said he would recommend that he be asked to cooperate. It would all go back in 0.11.
Scott called back and said cleared with Garbis & Regis Bea would be told O.K. by phone.
Let me know when you will need
Please let me know
Kasikos, 1504 Long
(503)
July 10, 1978
TO: G. Robert Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
House Select Committee on Assassinations
FROM: Robert Morrison, Director of Security
William H. Cross, Assistant Director of Security
RE: The tampering with Kennedy Autopsy photos located in Safe #102095 in the Reading Room of Room 3381 of the Committee Offices.
About 4:05 P.M. Friday June 23, 1978, Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the Security Room along with Lance Svendsen of the Security Staff upon opening safe #102095 noted that several Kennedy autopsy photos were loose on top of the Kennedy Autopsy photo books. The photos removed from the books were numbered 39E1, 39E2, 40E and 41E. This was two pages consisting of 4 photos. 39E1 and 39E2 along with the cellophane cover had been ripped from the book, and the cellophane enclosure was torn at binder holes. One photo, 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and lying loose. A quick check by Flanagan and Svendsen revealed the photos were from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. An immediate check of all the photo books was begun to ascertain if any other photos were missing. This check by Flanagan and Svendsen showed no other photos to be missing or tampered with. Book Five, Part One had not been signed out since September of 1977 according to the check out log. Both Flanagan and Svendsen stated they would have noticed the photos when the safe was opened at 10 A.M. Friday June 23, 1978 if they had been lying where they were when discovered. They both feel there was no way this could have been done accidently. Someone had to enter the safe, and do this. The safe was unlocked, but shut.
Approximately 5 P.M. Friday, June 23, 1978 at the request of Committee Investigator John Moriarty, three members of the Metropolitan Police Identification section responded to Room 3381 for the purpose of attempting to get latent prints. Pvt. Pat McGinnis, Sgt Blake and Detective Pvt McGinnis was able to lift 13 separate cards of latent prints from the interior of the safe, and from the Kennedy Autopsy photo book that was tampered with. These men left at approximately 8:35 PM Friday June 23, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty, William H. Cross or Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey were present at all times during the lifting of the prints. The lifted prints were turned over to Investigator John Moriarty, and remained in his possession.
The persons who were in this office alone on Friday June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway and Mitch Mars of the Committee Staff, and Regis Blahut of the CIA.
On Monday June 26, 1978 the 13 cards of prints lifted by Pvt McGinnis were turned over to Director of Security Robert Morrison by Investigator John Moriarty and locked in safe #45471 in Room 3381 of Committee Office.
On June 27, 1978, and June 29, 1978 requests were made to the FBI for certain Committee Staff member fingerprint cards.
The first request for cards was filled, and received the latter part of the week of June 25, 1978. The second request was filled and received on July 5, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty had contacted a Pvt Colon Alford of the Metropolitan Police Identification section, and requested he try to make comparisons of known and latent prints. During the week of June 26, 1978 Pvt. Alford spent one hour in Committee spaces checking staff members prints against those lifted. On July 5, 1978 at the request of Pvt Alford, and with the consent of Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey the 13 cards of lifted prints and all staff member print cards from the FBI were turned over to Pvt Alford which he receipted for, so he could take them away from Committee spaces to enable him to spend more time studying them. During the week of July 2, 1978. Pvt Alford was able to obtain the fingerprints of Regis Blahut, an employee of the Central Intelligence Agency. On Friday July 7, 1978 at approximately 2:30 P.M. Pvt Alford phoned William H. Cross of Security Staff and stated he had made a tentative identification of Blahuts prints on the inside of the safe door, and on one of the photos in Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. On Monday July 10, 1978 at 2:30 P.M. Pvt Alford responded to the Committee offices and in the presence of Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey, Robert Morrison, and William H. Cross returned all fingerprint cards, and the 13 cards of lifted prints. These were returned to safe #45471 in Room 3381. Pvt Alford stated he had identified a certain number of points in several prints, and in his opinion they were those of Regis Blahut. These prints were matched with those on the inside of the safe door, and on the back of photo 39E2 which had been ripped from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos, and the photo which had been removed from the cellophane cover. After returning all materials Pvt Alford departed Committee Spaces at 2:55 P.M. Monday July 10, 1978.
Robert Morrison
Director of Security
William H. Cross
Assistant Director of Security
OUTSIDE CONTACT REPORT
DATE: July 11 1978
I. Identifying Information:
Name: Regis Blahut
Telephone:
Address:
Type of Contact:
II. Summary of Contact:
On two occasions on this date Gary Cornwell and I spoke with Regis Blahut of the CIA. We first spoke to him at approximately 11AM in Gary Cornwell's office. We spoke with him a second time at approximately 2PM at which time we recorded his statement pertaining to a breach of security at the HSCA. The recorded statement fully covers the substance of the first conversation with two exceptions:
1) In the first conversation Regis originally told us that he looked through an autopsy photo book after receiving permission to do so. Later, during that same conversation, when asked from whom he received permission to look through the autopsy photo book he denied having said he received permission to look through the book and stated that he at no time received permission to look through the autopsy photo book. Both Gary and I distinctly recall him telling us at the outset of the conversation that he looked through the book only after receiving permission to do so.
2) In the first conversation Regis told us that he was alone in the security room when he saw the book on the window sill and decided to look through it. However, when asked during the taped recorded conversation whether he was alone when he looked through the autopsy book he then stated that there were people present in the room when he looked through the autopsy book but that he cannot recall who they were. Once again, both Gary and I clearly recall him telling us when we first spoke with him that no one was present when he looked through the photo book.
III. Recommended Follow-up:
At the outset of the recorded conversation Regis told us that he had spoken to his superior and neither he nor they had any objections to the conversation being recorded.
Signature: [Signature]
Form #5
July 10, 1978
TO: G. Robert Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
House Select Committee on Assassinations
FROM: Robert Morrison, Director of Security
William H. Cross, Assistant Director of Security
RE: The tampering with Kennedy Autopsy photos located in Safe #102095 in the Reading Room of Room 3381 of the Committee Offices.
About 4:05 P.M. Friday June 23, 1978, Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the Security Room along with Lance Svendsen of the Security Staff upon opening safe #102095 noted that several Kennedy autopsy photos were loose on top of the Kennedy Autopsy photo books. The photos removed from the books were numbered 39E1, 39E2, 40E and 41E. This was two pages consisting of 4 photos. 39E1 and 39E2 along with the cellophane cover had been ripped from the book, and the cellophane enclosure was torn at binder holes. One photo, 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and lying loose. A quick check by Flanagan and Svendsen revealed the photos were from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. An immediate check of all the photo books was begun to ascertain if any other photos were missing. This check by Flanagan and Svendsen showed no other photos to be missing or tampered with. Book Five, Part One had not been signed out since September of 1977 according to the check out log.
Both Flanagan and Svendsen stated they would have noticed the photos when the safe was opened at 10 A.M. Friday June 23, 1978 if they had been lying where they were when discovered. They both feel there was no way this could have been done accidently. Someone had to enter the safe, and do this. The safe was unlocked, but shut.
Approximately 5 P.M. Friday, June 23, 1978 at the request of Committee Investigator John Moriarty, three members of the Metropolitan Police Identification section responded to Room 3381 for the purpose of attempting to get latent prints. Pvt. Pat McGinnis, Sgt Blake and Detective Pvt McGinnis was able to lift 13 separate cards of latent prints from the interior of the safe, and from the Kennedy Autopsy photo book that was tampered with. These men left at approximately 8:35 PM Friday June 23, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty, William H. Cross or Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey were present at all times during the lifting of the prints. The lifted prints were turned over to Investigator John Moriarty, and remained in his possession.
The persons who were in this office alone on Friday June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway and Mitch Mars of the Committee Staff, and Regis Blahut of the CIA.
On Monday June 26, 1978 the 13 cards of prints lifted by Pvt McGinnis were turned over to Director of Security Robert Morrison by Investigator John Moriarty and locked in safe #45471 in Room 3381 of Committee Office.
On June 27, 1978, and June 29, 1978 requests were made to the FBI for certain Committee Staff member fingerprint cards.
The first request for cards was filled, and received the latter part of the week of June 25, 1978. The second request was filled and received on July 5, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty had contacted a Pvt Colon Alford of the Metropolitan Police Identification section, and requested he try to make comparisons of known and latent prints. During the week of June 26, 1978 Pvt. Alford spent one hour in Committee spaces checking staff member prints against those lifted. On July 5, 1978 at the request of Pvt Alford, and with the consent of Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey the 13 cards of lifted prints and all staff member print cards from the FBI were turned over to Pvt Alford which he receipted for, so he could take them away from Committee spaces to enable him to spend more time studying them. During the week of July 2, 1978. Pvt Alford was able to obtain the fingerprints of Regis Blahut, an employee of the Central Intelligence Agency. On Friday July 7, 1978 at approximately 2:30 P.M. Pvt Alford phoned William H. Cross of Security Staff and stated he had made a tentative identification of Blahuts prints on the inside of the safe door, and on one of the photos in Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. On Monday July 10, 1978 at 2:30 P.M. Pvt Alford responded to the Committee offices and in the presence of Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey, Robert Morrison, and William H. Cross returned all fingerprint cards, and the 13 cards of lifted prints. These were returned to safe #45471 in Room 3381. Pvt Alford stated he had identified a certain number of points in several prints, and in his opinion they were those of Regis Blahut. These prints were matched with those on the inside of the safe door, and on the back of photo 39E2 which had been ripped from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos, and the photo which had been removed from the cellophane cover. After returning all materials Pvt Alford departed Committee Spaces at 2:55 P.M. Monday July 10, 1978.
Robert C. Morrison
Director of Security
William H. Cross
Assistant Director of Security
To: Robert C. Morrison
From: William Webb
Re: Access to Autopsy Photographs
At 3:50pm on 5/27/78 Ida Dox, the medical illustrator, requested permission to view the Kennedy autopsy photographs along with the Medical Pannel. After trying to contact Blakey and Mathews without success, I, William Webb, authorized Oliver Champion to allow the pannel and Mrs. Dox access.
OUTSIDE CONTACT REPORT
DATE July 14 11AM
1978
I. Identifying Information:
Name Regis Blahut
Telephone
Address
Type of Contact: Telephone
x Person
II. Summary of Contact:
On this date Gary Cornwell and myself spoke with Regis Blahut in Gary's office. Mr. Blahut stated the following:
1) He lied to us in our conversation of July 13 when he stated that on the second occasion he looked through the black looseleaf binder, he put it back on the window sill after reading it. He told us that the truth was that while he was looking through the book it dropped on the floor. He stated that when it dropped on the floor some of the pages came out of the book. He became frightened that someone would enter the room at this time so he opened the black safe which contained the autopsy books and placed the black looseleaf binder and the pages which had fallen out, into the top part of the safe. Prior to him opening it to put in the book, the safe door had been completely closed (i.e. notajar), although it was not locked. He said he opened it by pressing down on the handle and pulling the door open. He stated that he did not recall whether the top part of the safe
III. Recommended Follow-up (If any):
Signature: ____________________________
had a shelf or a drawer in it. He also stated that at this time he did not observe any of the photos to be out of the plastic sheeting which ordinarily held them in the black binder. Mr. Blahut denied however that he opened the safe at any time other than when he put the book inside.
2) He stated to us that the first time he had looked through the book -- the time when Jim Conzelman took it out of the safe -- he slid one of the photos partly out of the plastic to look at it. To the best of his recollection this photo was either a photo of the brain or a photo of the bust of Kennedy. He stated this was the only time that he had observed any of the photos to be out of their plastic sheeting.
3) He stated that he did not wish to allow us to make a tape recording of this statement.
OUTSIDE CONTACT REPORT
DATE 7/17/78 TIME 8:00 A.M.
I. Identifying Information:
Name Admiral Stansfield Turner Telephone
Address Central Intelligence Agency
Type of Contact: Telephone XX Person
II. Summary of Contact:
Bob Blakey and I met with DCI Turner, DDCI Carlucci and Fred Hitz of the Office of Legislative Counsel at 8:00 A.M. in Turner's office. Blakey initially noted that he had come at Chairman Stokes' request to discuss with Turner a recent security violation which had been discovered by the Committee. Blakey began by describing to Turner the nature of the Kennedy autopsy pictures, the restrictions under which the Committee has acquired and possessed them, the security precautions (separate safe, limited access, and log record) utilized to safeguard them, and the possible motives that might exist for someone unlawfully removing them from the Committee.
Blakey next described the circumstances and details of the Committee's discovery, made on 6/23/78, that the autopsy
III. Recommended Follow-up (if any):
photos had been tampered with, and the investigation which the staff thereafter conducted, including the identification of all of those persons who had access to the security space where they were located, the fingerprinting process and results, and ultimately the questioning of Regis Blahut, the CIA employee who was in the security space on that date.
Finally, Blakey recalled to Turner his (Turner's) statement made to Blakey and Cornwell on February 4, 1978, to the effect that if the Committee found any impropriety or wrongdoing on the part of any CIA employee, he would personally look into and get to the bottom of it. Blakey stated that the Chairman had been told of Turner's comment on February 4, 1978, and now requested that Turner conduct a further investigation of the Blahut matter. Blakey stated that the Committee felt such an investigation was necessary for the following reasons:
1. The Committee had spoken to Blahut on three occasions (July 11, 13 and 14) about his knowledge of the tampering with the autopsy photos, on two of which, by Blahut's own subsequent admissions, he had lied about significant details, and on the last of which, by independent evidence, Blahut had also lied;
2. Blahut's actions were deliberate, as evidenced
by the fact that Blahut had opened the Committee's safe in which the photos were stored, and on the first two interviews with the Committee, he lied about having done so;
3. There is only one possible innocent motive for Blahut's handling and viewing of the autopsy photos, that being personal curiosity, and the evidence unequivocally shows that personal curiosity was not the motive (a page was ripped out, a photo was removed from the plastic sheeting, the log shows that the photo book in question had not been removed from the safe by the Committee staff since September, 1977, and Blahut's story about his handling of, and access to that photo book on June 23, 1978 is patently unbelievable); and most significantly,
4. Prior to at least two of the three occasions on which Blahut was interviewed by the Committee staff, he spoke to his superiors at the Agency, and after each of those conversations he told lies to the Committee about his involvement.
Turner said that he had already looked into the matter, and handed us a report which had been written. Turner suggested that Blakey and Cornwell go read the report (not take a copy with them from the building), and also look at Blahut's
personnel file, and then let the Agency know what else he (Blakey) suggested they should do.
Upon inspection, the report reflected the following:
(a.) The Agency interviewed Blahut on Friday evening, July 14, and polygraphed him three times for roughly two hours each time on Saturday, July 15;
(b.) Blahut's supervisors had been spoken to, and denied any involvement;
(c.) Blahut admitted lying to the Committee;
(d.) Blahut basically told the same story to the polygraph expert (Felippo) he had finally told the Committee on the morning of July 14, except that on July 15 he admitted that he was never given permission by any Committee staff member to view the Kennedy autopsy pictures;
(e.) Blahut persisted in his story (but lied in doing so, according to the polygraph) that he had opened the Committee safe only once, and that was to put a photo book into the safe, and also (again, untruthfully) stated that he had only viewed the autopsy books on two occasions.
(f.) Blahut has been assigned to a CIA operation code named MHCHILD since April, 1977.
Office of Security Chief Gambino, and Carlucci's assistant, Hav Smith, met with Blakey and Cornwell after they
* Polygraph showed no deception on
1) didn't copy
2) entered wrong else
3) didn't call in media
4) not "sent on mission"
had reviewed the investigative report provided by Turner. Blakey requested that he be permitted to see Blahut's security file. Gambino refused, but offered the personnel file instead.
The personnel file reflected that Blahut had consistently received excellent ratings from his superiors, that he showed leadership qualities in his work, and that he had been commended for consistently reporting to his superiors what he had observed and done during his assignments, and alerting them to any problems he encountered.
Finally, Smith and Gambino asked Blakey what he felt the Agency should do now. Blakey said that full interviews of all of Blahut's supervisors should be conducted, and written reports made. In addition, Blakey stated that new polygraphs should be taken, focusing primarily on the area that was essentially omitted on July 15, namely, the question of motive.
Hav Smith asked whether the Committee was going to accept the Agency's investigation after it was completed; he said he wanted to know now, that he wanted a commitment. Smith said that he was 99 percent sure that the final report would show no involvement in the tampering on the part of the Agency. Gambino said, "We know we're clean." In reply, I asked how the Agency could be so sure at this early point that none of their employees except Blahut were involved, and I also commented that Smith was asking the Committee to "buy a pig in a poke" in suggesting that we should tell him now whether or not we would be satisfied with the Agency's investigation.
* The deposition report indicated Blahut said we accused him of being a "CIA plant." It also said we didn't want to tape him on the 2nd occasion. Smith was similarly briefing that each statement was untrue.
before it was even conducted. Both Blakey and I stated that what we could now state was that we had come to the Agency with the suggestion that they investigate it, because we felt that from among the alternatives now available to the Committee, that alternative was the one with the best chance of success. Finally Blakey also noted that his hope was that after the Agency's investigation was complete, copies of the reports could be placed in the Agency's and the Committee's files, and that would be the end of it.
The meeting was terminated with the general understanding that Blakey's suggestions would be followed, and the Agency would let us know when they had their reports complete.
July 10, 1978
TO: G. Robert Blakey
Chief Counsel & Director
House Select Committee on Assassinations
FROM: Robert Morrison, Director of Security
William H. Cross, Assistant Director of Security
Re: The tampering with Kennedy Autopsy photos located in Safe # 102095 in the Reading Room of Room 3381 of the Committee offices.
About 4:05 P.M. June 23, 1978 Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the Security room along with Lance Svendson of Security staff upon opening safe #102095 noted that several autopsy photos were lying loosely on top of the other books. The photos removed were 39E1, 39E2, 40 E and 41 E. This was two pages consisting of 4 photos. Photos 39 E1 and 39E2 had been ripped from the book. One photo 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and laying loose. A quick check showed that these photos were from Book Five, Part One. An immediate check of all books was begun by Flanagan and Svendson to ascertain if any other photos might be missing. No other photos were found to be missing or tampered with. Book Five, Part One had not been signed out recently according to the check out log. Both Mark Flanagan and Lance Svendson stated they would have noticed the photos when the safe was open at 10 AM June 23, 1978 if they had been lying were they were. They both feel there is no way this could have been done accidently. Someone had to enter safe and do this. The safe was unlocked but shut.
Approximately 5 P.M. June 23, 1978 at the request of Committee Investigator Jack Moriarty three members of the Metropolitan Police Identification section responded to Room 3381 for the purpose of attempting to get latent prints. Pvt Pat McGinniss, Sgt Blake and Det. Pvt. McGinniss was able to lift 13 separate cards of latent prints from the interior of the safe, and from the Kennedy Autopsy photos book that was tampered with. These men left at approximately 8:35 PM June 23, 1978. Investigator Moriarty, William H. Cross or G. Robert Blakey were present at all times during the lifting of the prints. The lifted prints were turned over to Investigator Moriarty, and remained in his possession.
The persons who were in this office on June 23, 1978 other than Security personnel were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway, Mitch Mars, and Regis Blahut of the CIA.
On June 27, and June 29, 1978 requests were made to the FBI for certain staff members print cards. The first were received the week of June 26, 1978, and the second packet on July 5, 1978. Investigator Moriarty had contacted a Pvt. Colon Alford of the Metropolitan Police Department ID section and requested he try to make comparisons of known and latent prints. During the week of June 26, 1978 Pvt Alford spent one hour in Committee office checking staff members prints against those lifted. On July 6, 1978 the latent prints and all
staff members print cards from the FBI were turned over to Pvt. Alford which he received for so he could take them away from Committee spaces so he could spend more time studying them. During the week of July 2, 1978 Pvt. Alford was able to obtain the fingerprint card of Regis Blahut (a former D.C. Fireman) On Friday July 7, 1978 at approximately 2:30 P.M. Pvt Alford contacted William Cross of Security staff and stated he had made a tentative identification of Blahut's prints on the safe door and one of the photos in Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. On Monday July 10, 1978 at 2:30 PM Pvt Alford responded to the Committee offices and in the presence of G. Robert Blakey, Robert Morrison and William H. Cross returned all fingerprint cards. The 13 cards of lifted prints, and stated he had identified a certain number of points in several prints, and in his opinion they were those of Regis Blahut. These prints were on the inside of the safe door and on photo 39E2 which had been ripped from Book Five Part One, and had been removed from the cellophane cover. After returning all materials Pvt Alford departed at 2:55 PM July 10, 1978
ROBERT MORRISON
WILLIAM H. CROSS
About 4.05 PM June 23, 1978 Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the security room along with Lance Svendson noted that several autopsy photos were laying loosely on top of the other books. The photos removed were 39E1, 39E2 and 40 E and 41 E. this was two pages consisting of 4 photos. Photos 39e1 and 39E2 had been ripped from the book. One photo 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and laying loose. A quick check showed that theses photos were from Book Five Part one A immediate check of all the books was begin by Flanagan and Svendson to ascertain if any other photos might be missing. This check is still in progress.
Book Five has not been signed out recently
Check completed by Mark & Lance. Nothing found missing
The persons who were in this room on June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez. Dan Hardway, Mitch Mars, Regis Blahut CIA
Both mark and lance feel there is no way this could have been done accidently. Some one had to go into the safe and do this
About 4.05 PM June 23, 1978 Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the security room along with Lance Svendson noted that several autopsy photos were laying loosely on top of the other books. The photos removed were 39E1, 39E2 and 40 E and 41 E. this was two pages consisting of 4 photos. Photos 39e1 and 39E2 had been ripped from the book. One photo 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and laying loose. A quick check showed that these photos were from Book Five Part one. A immediate check of all the books was begin by Flanagan and Svendson to ascertain if any other photos might be missing. This check is still in progress.
Book Five has not been signed out recently.
Check completed by Mark & Lance. Nothing found missing.
The persons who were in this room on June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway, Mitch Mars, Regis Blahut CIA.
Both Mark & Lance feel there is no way this could have been done accidently. Some one had to go into the safe and do this.
Mr Blakey was notified at 5:05 PM after he completed a meeting in his office. He stated that from now on the JFK safe will be locked at all times. If something is taken out the safe will be relocked until it is returned.
I suggest that until such time as the persons using that room are finished in there we should lock all the safes at all times.
Bill
July 10, 1978
NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF
FINGERPRINT CARDS
I, [Signature], hereby acknowledge receipt from the FBI of the following:
One (1) FD-258 Applicant Fingerprint Card for Betty Lou Sisson, date of birth 3-11-39
One (1) Photographic copy of an Armed Forces Fingerprint Card for Lawrence J. Delsa, Jr., date of birth 8-11-43
Signed [Signature]
Title Security Assistant
House Select Committee on Assassination
Clearance
245-56-4327
1. LOOP
2. WHORL
3. ARCH
---
**INSTRUCTIONS:**
1. PRINTS MUST BE CHECKED THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STATE IDENTIFICATION BUREAU, AND ONLY THOSE FINGERPRINTS FOR WHICH NO QUALIFYING RECORD EXISTS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR FINGERPRINTING.
2. THE ACT OF 1925 (45 U.S.C. 77) REQUIRES THAT FINGERPRINTS BE SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL BUREAU OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. THE LOCAL BUREAU OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COLLECTION AND SUBMISSION OF FINGERPRINTS TO THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.
3. FINGERPRINTS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL BUREAU OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
---
**LEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK**
---
**RECORDED**
AUG 29 1977
IDENT. DIV. 58
| SERVICE NO. | PLACE OF BIRTH |
|-------------|----------------|
| | New Orleans, Louisiana |
| COLOR OF EYES | LEAVE THIS SPACE BLANK |
|---------------|------------------------|
| Green | |
| COLOR OF HAIR | WEIGHT | SEX |
|---------------|--------|-----|
| Black | 175 | Male|
| DATE OF ENLISTMENT, APPOINTMENT, ETC. | SCARS AND MARKS | SIGNATURE OF OFFICIAL TAKING FINGERPRINTS | DATE SIGNED BY OFFICIAL TAKING FINGERPRINTS |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| 13 May 62 | None | | 13 May 62 |
| 1. RIGHT THUMB | 2. RIGHT INDEX | 3. RIGHT MIDDLE | 4. RIGHT RING | 5. RIGHT LITTLE |
|----------------|----------------|-----------------|--------------|-----------------|
| | | | | |
| 6. LEFT THUMB | 7. LEFT INDEX | 8. LEFT MIDDLE | 9. LEFT RING | 10. LEFT LITTLE |
|---------------|--------------|---------------|-------------|-----------------|
| | | | | |
| LEFT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY | LEFT THUMB | RIGHT THUMB | RIGHT FOUR FINGERS TAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY |
|----------------------------------------|-----------|------------|----------------------------------------|
| | | | |
Since neither fingerprints nor an identifying number which is indexed in our files accompanied your request, FBI cannot guarantee in any manner that this material concerns the individual in whom you are interested.
Mr. Bannen 324-5404
a Mr. Payne.
Robert J. Burde, New Orleans 7/3/37
Eileen G. Duneen (Copeland) 8/14/48
Frank L. Eccles - 1/7/24 N.C.
Eliza K. Selleck 12/31/48 Honolulu Wa
They have Season.
Lawrence Dulan will make photo copy
of Military
3 x 5 tissue stating no record.
June 27.
June 29.
On to Aldford for which he agreed a fee of £25. On the 2nd week ended July 1st, he was able to deliver the fingerprint card. I kept Blechert (a former D.C. Armagh) on the 7th July. On July 7th at 230 P.M. he contacted William Cusack, a select comm. and stated he had made an effort to locate the Blechert prints on the door and one of the photos in the back end of the house. On July 10th, 1978, Pat Aldford called to the H.S.C. office in the presence of S. Blechert. Blechert, Robert Monahan and William Cusack returned all fingerprint cards. The 13 cards identified prints, and identified a certain number of prints in several prints. In his opinion, we concluded that Major Blechert had handled these items.
On June 27, 1978, a request was made to the FBI for certain staff fingerprint cards. These were received the week of June 26. The record on Wednesday, July 5, 1978, showed that Mr. Colen Alford of MPDC had contacted a Mr. Colen Alford of MPDC about a request he had to make concerning known and latent lifts. During the week of June 26, Mr. Alford spent one hour in committee over which Mr. Burton of staff was present. These reflected on July 5, 1978. The latest lifts and all staff fingerprint cards from FBI were turned
approx. 5 pm Jan 23, 1978
at the request of Investigator
Jack Mairant - 3 members of
the MDC I det. unit
responded for the purpose of
attempting to get latent prints
office Det mcgraw Sgt
Bleme and Det
McGrain was able to get
latent print - 13 separate cards
from the interior of rock ad
from the kennedy antique photo
book that was tampered with.
These men left at approximately
8:35 pm 1/23/78 and thurston
morinig, William Cus 2 C. Robert
Pfleyer were present at all times
during the lifting of prints.
About 4:05 PM June 23, 1978 Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the security room along with Lance Svendson noted that several autopsy photos were laying loosely on top of the other books. The photos removed were 39E1, 39E2 and 40 E and 41 E. This was two pages consisting of 4 photos. Photos 39E1 and 39E2 had been ripped from the book. One photo 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and laying loose. A quick check showed that these photos were from Book Five Part one. A immediate check of all the books was begin by Flanagan and Svendson to ascertain if any other photos might be missing. This check is still in progress. No other photos were found.
Book Five has not been signed out recently.
Check completed by Mark & Lance. Nothing found missing.
The persons who were in this room on June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway, Mitch Mars, Regis Blahut CIA.
Both Mark & Lance feel there is no way this could have been done accidentally. Someone had to go into the safe and do this.
25000
11/78
About 4:05 PM June 23, 1978 Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the security room along with Lance Svendson noted that several autopsy photos were laying loosely on top of the other books. The photos removed were 39E1, 39E2 and 40 E and 41 E. this was two pages consisting of 4 photos. Photos 39E1 and 39E2 had been ripped from the book. One photo 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and laying loose. A quick check showed that theses photos were from Book Five Part one A immediate check of all the books was begin by Flanagan and Svendson to ascertain if any other photos might be missing. This check is still in progress.
Book Five has not been signed out recently
Check completed by Mark & Lance. Nothing found missing
The persons who were in this room on June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway, Mitch Mars, Regis Blahut CIA
Both Mark & Lance feel there is no way this could have been done accidently. Some one had to go into the safe and do this
Book I part 1
Photos removed
3921
3922
402
412
Two pages total
4 photos
One page ripped out
3922
3922
Photo laying out completely
3922
4:05 PM 6/23/78
3 photos from one of the Kennedy auto
Book 5
Page 1
Alfred
727-4118
Blanket - not too great
inside outer edge of door
6 to 7 feet
left hand
Back 39 32 - 7 points
Motorcycle itself back portion
Ruth Thunk
Alfred was in his open
Blanket is the man
727 4118
ACFORD
7AM
THURSDAY
121-4565
They were fruits in the inside of the door and on 39 & 2 plates in the front and rear. After returning all material, put Alfred lift on 255 pm.
TO G. Robert Bleck
Director & Chief Counsel
HSCA
From: Walter H. Cox
Counsel to the Senate
HSCA
Subject: Re: Tampering with evidence
Enclosed photos located in Safe 102095 in Realty Room of Room 3381. HSC Committee on Committee Office.
July 10, 1978
TO: G. Robert Blakey
Chief Counsel and Director
House Select Committee on Assassinations
FROM: Robert Morrison, Director of Security
William H. Cross, Assistant Director of Security
RE: The tampering with Kennedy Autopsy photos located in Safe #102095 in the Reading Room of Room 3381 of the Committee Offices.
About 4:05 P.M. Friday June 23, 1978, Mark Flanagan upon returning some autopsy material to the Security Room along with Lance Svendsen of the Security Staff upon opening safe #102095 noted that several Kennedy autopsy photos were loose on top of the Kennedy Autopsy photo books. The photos removed from the books were numbered 39E1, 39E2, 40E and 41E. This was two pages consisting of 4 photos. 39E1 and 39E2 along with the cellophane cover had been ripped from the book, and the cellophane enclosure was torn at binder holes. One photo, 39E2 was out of the cellophane enclosure and lying loose. A quick check by Flanagan and Svendsen revealed the photos were from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. An immediate check of all the photo books was begun to ascertain if any other photos were missing. This check by Flanagan and Svendsen showed no other photos to be missing or tampered with. Book Five, Part One had not been signed out since September of 1977 according to the check out log. Both Flanagan and Svendsen stated they would have noticed the photos when the safe was opened at 10 A.M. Friday June 23, 1978 if they had been lying where they were when discovered. They both feel there was no way this could have been done accidently. Someone had to enter the safe, and do this. The safe was unlocked, but shut.
Approximately 5 P.M. Friday, June 23, 1978 at the request of Committee Investigator John Moriarty, three members of the section responded to Room 3381 for the purpose of attempting to get latent prints. They were able to lift 13 separate cards of latent prints from the interior of the safe, and from the Kennedy Autopsy photo book that was tampered with. These men left at approximately 8:35 PM Friday June 23, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty, William H. Cross or Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey were present at all times during the lifting of the prints. The lifted prints were turned over to Investigator John Moriarty, and remained in his possession.
The persons who were in this office alone on Friday June 23, 1978 were Edwin Lopez, Dan Hardway and Mitch Mars of the Committee Staff, and Regis Blahut of the CIA.
On Monday June 26, 1978 the 13 cards of prints lifted by Pvt McGinnis were turned over to Director of Security Robert Morrison by Investigator John Moriarty and locked in safe #45471 in Room 3381 of Committee Office.
On June 27, 1978, and June 29, 1978 requests were made to the FBI for certain Committee Staff member fingerprint cards.
The first request for cards was filled, and received the latter part of the week of June 25, 1978. The second request was filled and received on July 5, 1978. Investigator John Moriarty had contacted a section, and requested he try to make comparisons of known and latent prints. During the week of June 26, 1978, I spent one hour in Committee spaces checking staff members prints against those lifted. On July 5, 1978 at the request of and with the consent of Chief Counsel C. Robert Blakey the 13 cards of lifted prints and all staff member print cards from the FBI were turned over to which he receipted for, so he could take them away from Committee spaces to enable him to spend more time studying them. During the week of July 2, 1978, I was able to obtain the fingerprints of Regis Blahut, an employee of the Central Intelligence Agency. On Friday July 7, 1978 at approximately 2:30 P.M. I phoned William H. Cross of Security Staff and stated he had made a tentative identification of Blahuts prints on the inside of the safe door, and on one of the photos in Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos. On Monday July 10, 1978 at 2:30 P.M. I responded to the Committee offices and in the presence of Chief Counsel C. Robert Blakey, Robert Morrison, and William H. Cross returned all fingerprint cards, and the 13 cards of lifted prints. These were returned to safe #45471 in Room 3381. I stated he had identified a certain number of points in several prints, and in his opinion they were those of Regis Blahut. These prints were matched with those on the inside of the safe door, and on the back of photo 39E2 which had been ripped from Book Five, Part One of the Kennedy Autopsy photos, and the photo which had been removed from the cellophane cover. After returning all materials, I departed Committee Spaces at 2:55 P.M. Monday July 10, 1978.
Robert C. Morrison
Director of Security
William H. Cross
Assistant Director of Security
off outer plastic to 39E
Off face of 3952
off face of 37E2
off face of 29E outer
Outer: plastic 39E2 Palm
Print
off outer plastic
Polar Points
off outer plastic to 39 E2
outer plastic 39E2
off outer plastic of 43E
from inside of safe door
outer edge
off outer plastic of 38E Palm Print | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10125-10172.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 159,
"total-input-tokens": 181077,
"total-output-tokens": 32062,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
624,
1
],
[
624,
1030,
2
],
[
1030,
2135,
3
],
[
2135,
2707,
4
],
[
2707,
2707,
5
],
[
2707,
2724,
6
],
[
2724,
2724,
7
],
[
2724,
2724,
8
],
[
2724,
2724,
9
],
[
2724,
2724,
10
],
[
2724,
2724,
11
],
[
2724,
2724,
12
],
[
2724,
2724,
13
],
[
2724,
2819,
14
],
[
2819,
2848,
15
],
[
2848,
2848,
16
],
[
2848,
2848,
17
],
[
2848,
2848,
18
],
[
2848,
2848,
19
],
[
2848,
2848,
20
],
[
2848,
3138,
21
],
[
3138,
3908,
22
],
[
3908,
4149,
23
],
[
4149,
4834,
24
],
[
4834,
5085,
25
],
[
5085,
6575,
26
],
[
6575,
6575,
27
],
[
6575,
8799,
28
],
[
8799,
10962,
29
],
[
10962,
11983,
30
],
[
11983,
11983,
31
],
[
11983,
17001,
32
],
[
17001,
17165,
33
],
[
17165,
19754,
34
],
[
19754,
19754,
35
],
[
19754,
21348,
36
],
[
21348,
21612,
37
],
[
21612,
22691,
38
],
[
22691,
22691,
39
],
[
22691,
22691,
40
],
[
22691,
22691,
41
],
[
22691,
22691,
42
],
[
22691,
22859,
43
],
[
22859,
22859,
44
],
[
22859,
22859,
45
],
[
22859,
24022,
46
],
[
24022,
24022,
47
],
[
24022,
25869,
48
],
[
25869,
25869,
49
],
[
25869,
28920,
50
],
[
28920,
29222,
51
],
[
29222,
30418,
52
],
[
30418,
30418,
53
],
[
30418,
30758,
54
],
[
30758,
30758,
55
],
[
30758,
32431,
56
],
[
32431,
32700,
57
],
[
32700,
32700,
58
],
[
32700,
32700,
59
],
[
32700,
32700,
60
],
[
32700,
32700,
61
],
[
32700,
35149,
62
],
[
35149,
35330,
63
],
[
35330,
35330,
64
],
[
35330,
35378,
65
],
[
35378,
35378,
66
],
[
35378,
35643,
67
],
[
35643,
35643,
68
],
[
35643,
35643,
69
],
[
35643,
35643,
70
],
[
35643,
35643,
71
],
[
35643,
38125,
72
],
[
38125,
38278,
73
],
[
38278,
40613,
74
],
[
40613,
40836,
75
],
[
40836,
42408,
76
],
[
42408,
42408,
77
],
[
42408,
42408,
78
],
[
42408,
42408,
79
],
[
42408,
42408,
80
],
[
42408,
42408,
81
],
[
42408,
44431,
82
],
[
44431,
44431,
83
],
[
44431,
44431,
84
],
[
44431,
44431,
85
],
[
44431,
45992,
86
],
[
45992,
45992,
87
],
[
45992,
45992,
88
],
[
45992,
45992,
89
],
[
45992,
45992,
90
],
[
45992,
45992,
91
],
[
45992,
47835,
92
],
[
47835,
49733,
93
],
[
49733,
50767,
94
],
[
50767,
50767,
95
],
[
50767,
51092,
96
],
[
51092,
51552,
97
],
[
51552,
51811,
98
],
[
51811,
54721,
99
],
[
54721,
56804,
100
],
[
56804,
58732,
101
],
[
58732,
61643,
102
],
[
61643,
63728,
103
],
[
63728,
64097,
104
],
[
64097,
65349,
105
],
[
65349,
66140,
106
],
[
66140,
67182,
107
],
[
67182,
68443,
108
],
[
68443,
69642,
109
],
[
69642,
70942,
110
],
[
70942,
72687,
111
],
[
72687,
73380,
112
],
[
73380,
76205,
113
],
[
76205,
77400,
114
],
[
77400,
78385,
115
],
[
78385,
79728,
116
],
[
79728,
80103,
117
],
[
80103,
80167,
118
],
[
80167,
80848,
119
],
[
80848,
82469,
120
],
[
82469,
82684,
121
],
[
82684,
82959,
122
],
[
82959,
83690,
123
],
[
83690,
84213,
124
],
[
84213,
84719,
125
],
[
84719,
85749,
126
],
[
85749,
86732,
127
],
[
86732,
86870,
128
],
[
86870,
86940,
129
],
[
86940,
87141,
130
],
[
87141,
87181,
131
],
[
87181,
87325,
132
],
[
87325,
87564,
133
],
[
87564,
90389,
134
],
[
90389,
92340,
135
],
[
92340,
92340,
136
],
[
92340,
92365,
137
],
[
92365,
92365,
138
],
[
92365,
92382,
139
],
[
92382,
92382,
140
],
[
92382,
92399,
141
],
[
92399,
92399,
142
],
[
92399,
92421,
143
],
[
92421,
92421,
144
],
[
92421,
92453,
145
],
[
92453,
92453,
146
],
[
92453,
92485,
147
],
[
92485,
92485,
148
],
[
92485,
92512,
149
],
[
92512,
92512,
150
],
[
92512,
92531,
151
],
[
92531,
92531,
152
],
[
92531,
92556,
153
],
[
92556,
92556,
154
],
[
92556,
92592,
155
],
[
92592,
92592,
156
],
[
92592,
92592,
157
],
[
92592,
92592,
158
],
[
92592,
92627,
159
]
]
} |
66ffb6b586f949d31828fb4b3a02445965417a79 | ## CONTENTS
| TESTIMONY OF: | PAGE |
|--------------|------|
| YURI IVANOVICH NOSENKO -- Resumed | 2 |
## EXHIBITS
| EXHIBITS | Marked | Received |
|----------|--------|----------|
| JFK F-2 | 10 | |
| JFK F-3 | 11 | |
| JFK F-4 | 18 | |
| JFK F-5 | 24 | |
| JFK F-6 | 32 | |
| JFK F-7 | 49 | |
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Tuesday, June 20, 1978
U.S. House of Representatives,
Select Committee on Assassinations,
Subcommittee on the Assassination
of John F. Kennedy
Washington, D.C.
The Committee met, pursuant to recess, at 6:20 o'clock
p.m., in Room 1-D, Headquarters, Central Intelligence Agency,
Langley, Virginia, the Honorable Louis Stokes (Chairman of
the Committee) presiding.
Present: Representatives Stokes, Preyer, Burke, Fithian,
Devine and Sawyer.
Also present: G. R. Blakey, G. Cornwell, M. Goldsmith,
R. Morrison, E. Berning, M. Jackson, J. Smith, K. Klein and
S. Brady.
The Chairman. The Committee will come to order.
At this time the Committee will resume its sitting. We
are still in executive session by virtue of the resolution
adopted by the Committee this past evening.
At this time the Chair will recognize Mr. Blakey.
Mr. Blakey. Off the record.
(Discussion off the record.)
The Chairman. Anything further?
Bring the witness in.
Let the record reflect that the Committee has resumed its sitting and at this time the witness, Yuri Nosenko, is back before the Committee once again.
Mr. Nosenko, I admonish you that you are still under the oath that you took last night.
TESTIMONY OF YURI IVANOVICH NOSENKO -- Resumed
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
The Chairman. And at this time, then, the Committee will recognize the counsel for the Committee, Mr. Klein.
Mr. Klein. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Good evening.
Mr. Nosenko. Good evening, sir.
Mr. Klein. You told us that after the assassination you had an opportunity to be present when Oswald's file was brought from Minsk, is that right?
Mr. Nosenko. Absolutely right.
Mr. Klein. Did you have an opportunity to read the entire file at that time?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir.
Mr. Klein. How much of the file did you read?
Mr. Nosenko. It was simply looking, page by page, first part of the first volume.
Mr. Klein. You went through the first part of the first volume, page by page?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. Did you go through any of the other volumes?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir.
Mr. Klein. You told us that an officer named Matveev took the file away to prepare a summary?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. Do you know who wrote that summary?
Mr. Nosenko. The summary was written by the First Department of the Second Chief Directorate.
Mr. Klein. Do you know who, in particular?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir, I do not know.
Mr. Klein. And did you ever have an opportunity to read the summary that the First Department prepared?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir; I didn't see it.
Mr. Klein. The Russian word "spravka", does that mean --
Mr. Nosenko. Is summary, right.
Mr. Klein. And why were you not able to read the summary that they wrote?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, the file was taken in the First Department. I was working in the Seventh Department.
Mr. Klein. Did you make any attempt to read it?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Klein. Was it at all unusual that with all your
involvement in the case you did not have an opportunity to
read that file?
Mr. Nosenko. It was the decision of the Chief of the
Second Chief Directorate, given big importance to this question,
that a resume will be prepared by the most prestigious depart-
ment, American Department, and that is why we couldn't even ask.
Mr. Klein. You didn't even ask to see it?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Klein. So it was not unusual that you were not
allowed to see it?
Mr. Nosenko. No, it was not unusual.
Mr. Klein. You have testified before this Committee that
the KGB did not allow Lee Harvey Oswald to defect because he
was uninteresting. You have testified the KGB did not even speak
to Lee Harvey Oswald because he was uninteresting; and that you
decided he was not interesting without speaking to him.
Do you know what year Lee Harvey Oswald came to the Soviet
Union?
Mr. Nosenko. 1959.
Mr. Klein. In 1959, approximately how many Americans
wanted to defect to the Soviet Union or requested permission to
defect?
Mr. Nosenko. There was a defectionist, I remember, one
of the employees, one of the workers, who was helping to or-
organize the American Exhibition in Moscow, Mr. Webster.
Mr. Klein. Without giving particular names, how many Americans would you say asked permission to defect in 1959?
What would the number be?
Mr. Nosenko. These two were known to me -- Oswald and Webster.
Mr. Klein. From 1955 to 1960, what would be your best estimate as to how many Americans asked permission to defect to the Soviet Union?
Mr. Nosenko. As far as I heard, there I think was one only.
Mr. Klein. One other, meaning three altogether.
Mr. Nosenko. One besides Oswald and Webster, what I know.
Mr. Klein. Three?
Mr. Nosenko. Three.
Mr. Klein. Of the three, was Oswald the only one turned down because he was uninteresting?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. Do you know any other defector who was ever turned down because he was uninteresting?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Allow me to tell, as you have seen, and you told yourselves, how many Americans are defected. It is a very rare occasion and KGB prefers defection when they are planning, they want, these types of defectors, they like and invite those people who can
give them certain information which is valuable.
Mr. Klein. Do you recall telling this Committee yesterday that up until 1960 the Seventh Department was recruiting left and right?
Mr. Nosenko. Absolutely right.
Mr. Klein. And that you recruited a woman in Utah who was --
Mr. Nosenko. I simply had given example of this recruitment which took place up to 1960. When Seventh Department was recruiting and giving files to the Intelligence Service, First Chief Directorate, not asking them before, is it person will be for them valuable or not.
Mr. Klein. And that KGB officers were getting bonus and promotions when they induced people to recruit?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. And despite that, Lee Harvey Oswald, when he asked to defect, you turned him down without even speaking to him, to find out if he had any information; is that right?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, we had quite a few recruitments in '59, a very big amount of them in '59, very interesting, much, much more interesting -- professors and teachers -- and even was a CO-OP from CIA. We had quite a few recruitments, and Oswald was nothing on this base, on this foundation.
Mr. Klein. Would the KGB have any interest in an American student?
Mr. Nosenko. As I told you yesterday, KGB interested in
students, but particularly those students who are studying the Russian language, Russian history, Russian economy.
Mr. Klein. And would they have any interest in an American who had strong anti-American views and who was a professed Marxist? Would they have any interest in that kind of person?
Mr. Nosenko. Here were are coming to a very interesting and sensitive question. From mid-1950, by the order of Central Committee Communist Party, Soviet Union, KGB was prohibited to make any approachment and recruitment of members of the Communist Party of the West.
Mr. Klein. I am not asking about a member of the Communist Party.
Mr. Nosenko. Your question is, and if he is some type of Marxist here, the question maybe he is possibly a member of Communist Party, and to check it for KGB very difficult if he is a member of Communist Party or not of his country.
Mr. Klein. Would they ask him if he is a member of the Communist Party?
Would they check it?
Mr. Nosenko. No, they would not ask him.
Mr. Klein. They wouldn't ask him?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Klein. Would the Soviet Union be interested in someone who was in the military and worked with radar equipment?
Mr. Nosenko. It depends. If he was corporal, private, is no big interest. If he was officer, maybe they would be interested.
Mr. Klein. The fact that he worked with the equipment wouldn't be enough; they would want to know what his rank was?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir; it is not enough because they had sources.
Mr. Klein. And in 1959 would the Soviet Union have been interested in someone who served as a radar operator on an air base where U-2s took off and landed?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir; it would be very interested.
Mr. Klein. It is your testimony that Lee Harvey Oswald, who was a student, who was a professed Marxist, who had --
Mr. Nosenko. Students? I never heard that he was a student.
Mr. Klein. -- who had been a radar operator and had worked on a base from which U-2 airplanes took off and landed, that he wasn't even interesting enough for the KGB to speak to him, to find out if he knew any of this information?
Mr. Nosenko. Mr. Klein, I understand your position, but we didn't know that he had any connection with U-2 flights. That is one thing.
And if you, Mr. Klein, are basing on what was written by Mr. Epstein in the book, it is a little bit from the air taken ideas. Mr. Epstein even telling that how important
for KGB to know about such base -- that base. We knew it in '50's when I worked in GRU at the Navy, in 1950, '51, '52. We knew every base and in Japan, at this Atsugi Base, and we knew what kind of airplanes had been. We didn't know about U-2, no. Sure, it is very interesting, but when Oswald applied, requested to stay in the Soviet Union, we didn't know a word about his knowledge, anything concerning U-2 flights.
Mr. Klein. And you didn't ask him if he had any kind of information about that when he wanted to defect, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Klein. And you told us that one reason that no one was working on Oswald was because all of your people were concentrating on the American Exhibition in 1959, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir. Not only American Exhibition, there were other tourists and among them were interesting targets, very interesting targets.
Mr. Klein. You told us yesterday that things didn't --
Mr. Nosenko. I can explain you why, because an American Exhibition in Moscow was by the information which KGB had, I don't know how much it's right, how much it's wrong, but it was suspected quite a number of people from American intelligence community who were working on American Exhibition in Moscow, and when the work is going on against such targets,
it is not one officer, it is a big amount of people involved on each case, because it is very serious target.
Mr. Klein. Do you know what date Lee Harvey Oswald came to the Soviet Union?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir, I do not.
Mr. Klein. Mr. Chairman, I would ask that this document be marked for identification and shown to the witness.
The Chairman. Without objection.
(The document referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. F-2 for identification.)
Mr. Klein. Looking at this document --
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
The Chairman. Did counsel want to identify for the record how the document has been marked?
The Clerk. JFK-F-2.
Mr. Klein. Looking at this document, does it say on the top "Visa and Registration Office, Interior Department, Executive Committee of the Moscow City Council"?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. Do you recognize that type of document?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes. It is from Department of giving Visas and Registrations, which is working under auspices of Directorate of Internal Affairs of Moscow City.
Mr. Klein. And does this appear to be an authentic
document, an authentic copy of the document?
Mr. Nosenko. Sure.
Mr. Klein. Looking at Number 8, does it say what date Lee Harvey Oswald came to the Soviet Union for the first time?
Mr. Nosenko. October, 1959.
Mr. Klein. October what?
Mr. Nosenko. October 16, 1959.
Mr. Klein. I would ask that this document be marked for identification, Mr. Chairman.
The Chairman. Without objection.
Would the clerk indicate for the record?
The Clerk. JFK-F-3, Mr. Chairman.
(The document referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. F-3 for identification.)
Mr. Klein. Looking at the newspaper article clipping, on the right hand side, with the heading "U.S. Fair in Soviet Jammed at Close," do you see that?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. And what is the date of that story?
Mr. Nosenko. The date is September 4.
Mr. Klein. Are you aware of the fact that the American Exhibition ended on September 4, more than a month before Oswald came to the Soviet Union?
Mr. Nosenko. Mr. Klein, I would like you to ask when Americans who were working for this Exhibition left Moscow.
Mr. Klein. I will ask you another question.
Yesterday, when I asked you if things got back to normal once the fair ended, did you say yes?
Mr. Nosenko. No, till they were leave the Soviet Union. No. They are the same targets. Okay, you are right, it is closed September 4th, but does it change the importance of these people against whom KGB was working? They were still in Moscow.
Mr. Klein. Do you recall yesterday my asking you, did things in your department get back to normal once the fair ended, and do you recall saying yes?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, I meaning fair ended when left all the people involved in work on American Exhibition, Americans when they left, and they were staying quite a long time after it was closed. It was closed for visits for Soviet citizens, but it took quite a time for them to leave.
Mr. Klein. You also testified yesterday that Lee Harvey Oswald was allowed to stay in the Soviet Union after he said that he was going to kill himself if they sent him home. You told us that he slashed his wrists and two psychiatrists examined him and both found him mentally unstable.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. What was the point of having the two
psychiatrists examine him?
Mr. Nosenko. I think simply to be assured that it was right found decision, concerning this person. Two independent.
Mr. Klein. After they examined him, the decision was made to let him stay; is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. It is not because of the examination he was allowed to stay, Mr. Klein. You are a little bit mixing things. He was allowed to stay because KGB and Soviet Government had come to the conclusion if this person will kill himself it will bereaction in newspapers, which can in any way hurt the starting, the warming of Soviet-American relations.
Mr. Klein. The Soviets were worried he would kill himself in the Soviet Union?
Mr. Nosenko. Right, if they would not allow him to stay.
Mr. Klein. Could the KGB have taken him and put him on the next plane out of Russia and thereby ended their whole problem with Lee Harvey Oswald?
Mr. Nosenko. It is a very sensitive question. He can jump out of car. If he decided, if he is mentally unstable, you don't know what he will do.
Mr. Klein. Do you think the KGB didn't do that because they were worried he might jump out of the car or do something like that?
Mr. Nosenko. Simply a mentally unstable person, they
didn't want to go it on any such action.
Mr. Klein. They would rather keep him in the Soviet Union?
Mr. Nosenko. No, they would rather prefer they washed their hands, Mr. Klein; they are not making decision, KGB. In Soviet Union decisions are made by the Central Committee of the Communist Party, and General Secretary and Politburo, not by KGB. KGB a servant of the Politburo and Central Committee Communist Party.
Mr. Klein. Going by the facts as you have told them to this Committee --
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. -- why wasn't he put on a plane and sent back to America?
Mr. Nosenko. KGB washed their hands. Then from Intourist it was given information Ministry of Foreign Trade; Ministry of Foreign Trade reported to the Soviet Government. As I said, I assumed the Chairman was surely asked; he told his opinion of the KGB, and up to the Soviet Government how they would decide.
Mr. Klein. Could he have been brought to the U.S. Embassy and told them he is an American, "You take care of him; we don't want him"?
Mr. Nosenko. It can be done, sure. It can be done, but it wasn't done.
Mr. Klein. Instead they elected to allow him to stay indefinitely in the Soviet Union and they have to worry about him every single day, what an unstable American would do, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. They didn't allow, KGB didn't allow. Soviet government allowed.
Mr. Klein. The facts as you have testified to them are that the KGB allowed this mentally unstable person to stay in Russia, and they sent him to Minsk to live and work in a radio factory. Then the KGB allowed this mentally unstable individual to marry a Soviet woman, and then this mentally unstable individual was allowed to join a hunting club where he had access to a gun.
Can you think of any other cases in all the time you worked in the KGB where a mentally unstable person was treated in this kind of manner?
Mr. Nosenko. I told you I do not know any other cases of mentally unstable, excluding one code clerk, American, was also mentally ill; he was delivered in Soviet Union. I heard it. I never have worked with him, I never have seen him. And the thing is, I am sorry, but you are putting and stressing a number of questioning, and it sounds so peculiar. What does it mean, KGB allow him to marry?
Mr. Klein, in the Soviet Union there is by degree of Presidium of Supreme Soviet U.S.S.R. a law allowing marriage of
Soviet citizens with foreign. A foreigner can marry a Soviet citizen, by the law. There is not a thing that KGB can in any way try not to give, not to make it possible, but this is in cases when the person who is marrying a foreigner worked in some sensitive place, let's say, in missiles, rocket industry production, was in process of any place of his working seeing classified material. In these cases, KGB will try to put different type of fences. But it is unlawful. In accordance with Soviet law, marriage is allowed; he doesn't need to ask permission of Soviet Government or anyone. And his wife, Marina, wasn't working in any place which was sensitive from the point of view of Soviet security.
Mentally unstable it doesn't mean that he is raving mad; it is mentally unstable.
Mr. Klein. You testified that not only was Oswald not spoken to when he first said he wanted to defect but even after the decision was made to allow him to remain in the Soviet Union, still nobody from the KGB spoke to him, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. You also testified to the extensive resources that were devoted to put physical and technical surveillance on Oswald. You told us the men involved, the time involved, the facilities involved?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. Do you find great contradiction --
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir.
Mr. Klein. -- in the fact that, on the one hand, you put all these resources into following Oswald around, trying to see who he talked to and what he does and, on the other hand, you don't even have a person go and talk to him and ask him, "Tell us your background; tell us about yourself."
Is there any contradiction?
Mr. Nosenko. Even in the United States, yes, sure, for you, for me just now American citizens, yes, sure, but there, no.
Mr. Klein. They don't talk to people there?
Mr. Nosenko. They can talk and cannot to talk, but I don't see contradiction there. Anyone, any foreigner who will be staying, even if this defector not on his own, but, let's say, KGB pushed him to stay, to defect, he still will be watched and on him will be put this same type of work that was put on Oswald, not less.
Mr. Klein. You talk about their society is different than ours. Is it unusual that they allow an American to defect and live there without ever questioning him, to ask him if he is an intelligence agent?
Mr. Nosenko. On the contrary, no doubt, let's say he was intelligence agent, what he will tell them that he was sent with mission as intelligence agent? Why to scare him? Let him live how he wants. We will be watching him. He
will show by his behavior, by his action.
Mr. Klein. They purposely don't speak to him; is that your testimony?
Mr. Nosenko. In this case they didn't speak with him because he didn't present interest for the KGB and because he was mentally unstable.
Mr. Klein. You testified that you read the reports of two psychiatrists who examined Lee Harvey Oswald at the hospital after he cut his wrist, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. You said both found him mentally unstable?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. You told us in great detail how this decision was made to have these psychiatrists examine him.
I would ask that this document be marked for identification.
The Chairman. The clerk will identify for the record the number appearing on the document.
The Clerk. It will be JFK-F-4.
(The document referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. P-4 for identification.)
Mr. Klein. Have you ever seen that document before?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir. I haven't seen it.
Mr. Klein. Were you aware that the Soviet Government
provided certain documents to the Warren Commission in 1964?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir. I wasn't aware of this.
Mr. Klein. Looking at that document in front of you --
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. -- is that a hospital record?
Mr. Nosenko. Oh, yes, sure. It is a hospital record.
Mr. Klein. And whose hospital record? Does it have a name on it?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir. It is from Botkin Hospital.
Mr. Klein. Whose name is it?
Mr. Nosenko. Lee Harvey Oswald.
Mr. Klein. Does it say what date he was admitted?
Mr. Nosenko. Discharged, admitted 23rd, discharged 28th.
Mr. Klein. What year is that?
Mr. Nosenko. October of 1959.
Mr. Klein. And does it have on the bottom the diagnosis why he was in the hospital?
Mr. Nosenko. Incised wound of one-third of the left forearm.
Mr. Klein. And that date, October of 1959, is that when Oswald first came to the Soviet Union and cut his wrist?
Mr. Nosenko. I cannot tell you dates, sir. I do not remember.
Mr. Klein. You have in front of you the other document
which told -- Number 8 -- what date he came to the Soviet Union.
Is that still there?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir. This is admittance to the hospital and discharge.
Mr. Klein. Number 8?
Mr. Nosenko. Arrival, October 16.
Mr. Klein. And the date on the hospital admittance is what date?
Mr. Nosenko. Twenty-third of October.
Mr. Klein. And would you turn to the hospital admittance form, the one I just gave you, to the third page, please?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Klein. And do you see where it says "History of Present Illness"?
Mr. Nosenko. No, I don't see.
Mr. Klein. On the third page?
Mr. Nosenko. I have the third page.
Mr. Klein. It has Number 6 on the top of the page, but it's the third page on the document.
Mr. Nosenko. Oh, Number 6, History of Present Illness. Yes. Just a second.
Mr. Klein. Would you glance through that and would you tell us if this is the hospital report from when Lee Harvey Oswald cut his wrist and was taken to Botkin Hospital?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. Now, would you turn to the next to the last page. It has a 13 on the right hand side.
Do you see that page?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. The next to the last page.
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. And do you see where it says, two-thirds of the way to the bottom, "Psychiatric Department" underlined?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. Would you read what is said under that?
Mr. Nosenko. "His mind is clear; perception is correct; no hallucination or deliriums. He answers the questions legible and logically; he has a firm desire to remain in the Soviet Union; no psychiatric symptoms were noted; the patient is not dangerous for other people; his condition permits him to stay in Psychiatric Department by an order of the Assistant to the Chief Physicians, Dr. Kornika. The patient is transferred to the Seventh Ward."
Mr. Klein. Is there anything in there to indicate he is mentally unstable?
Mr. Nosenko. Here I do not see.
Mr. Klein. Does that report indicate that he was normal?
Mr. Nosenko. Here I do not see what I have seen. But this you receive from the Soviet Government, and if you think you received the true things, what was in file, you are wrong,
Mr. Klein.
Mr. Klein. And that document, according to you, is that not an authentic copy?
Mr. Nosenko. KGB can prepare you any document. Take the material, or ask the doctors who are cooperating with KGB and they will prepare you any document.
Mr. Klein. I am not asking you what they can do. Are you testifying that this document is not authentic, it is not the document?
Mr. Nosenko. This document never was in the file of the KGB.
Mr. Klein. So --
Mr. Nosenko. This I testify.
Mr. Klein. -- it is your testimony that the KGB sent us a phony document?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. You testified before this Committee that there was periodic physical surveillance of Lee Harvey Oswald which was ordered by Moscow, to be carried out in Minsk?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. And you testified in detail about that, and you told us how the physical surveillance consisted of following Oswald for a month or month and a half at a time, and there were a number of people that would be involved, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. It was a big operation?
Mr. Nosenko. Big operation? No, it's not a big operation.
Mr. Klein. There were a number of people involved, weren't there?
Mr. Nosenko. It is not a big operation. It is routine. In KGB it is a routine, nothing serious. It's not an operation even. It's surveillance, it's not an operation.
Mr. Klein. And have you ever stated that the only coverage of Oswald during his stay in Minsk consisted of periodic checks at his place of employment, inquiry of neighbors and associates and review of his mail? Have you ever stated that was the only coverage of Oswald in Minsk?
Mr. Nosenko. I stated before, and I stated it to you yesterday, and I state now, that the order was given, and I have seen it -- to cover him by surveillance periodical, to cover him by an agent watching in places of his living, places he is working, control over his correspondence and control of his telephone conversations.
Mr. Klein. My question is, have you ever stated that the only coverage was checking at his places of employment and his neighbors and associates, and not say anything about periodic, physical surveillance?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I cannot tell you what I stated. I was
for quite a big period of time, quite a few years, interrogated, by hours, and in different types of conditions, including hostile conditions.
Mr. Klein. That was by the CIA?
Mr. Nosenko. Where they asked questions in such form which later my answer will be interpreted in any way, however they want to interrogate us.
Mr. Klein. That was by CIA?
Mr. Nosenko. And I cannot tell you what I did say. I cannot remember dates. You must understand, it's hundreds of interrogations, hundreds.
Mr. Klein. This period that you are telling us about, you were questioned by the CIA during that period, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sure.
Mr. Klein. Were you questioned during that period by FBI?
Mr. Nosenko. I questioned by FBI in February, yes.
Mr. Klein. At this time I would ask that this document be marked for identification and shown to the witness.
The Chairman. The clerk will indicate for the record the number appearing on the document.
The Clerk. Exhibit JFK-F-5.
(The document referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. F-5 for
Mr. Klein. These hostile interrogations you just alluded to, did they lead you to state other than the truth to these interrogators?
Mr. Nosenko. I was answering questions which were put to me.
Mr. Klein. Did you ever not tell the truth?
Mr. Nosenko. No, I was telling the truth.
Mr. Klein. I would direct your attention --
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. Just a moment. Before you you have a Federal Bureau of Investigation report, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. I would direct your attention to page 29 of that report.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. The last paragraph, beginning with, "Nosenko stated" -- it's underlined. Would you please read that paragraph to us?
Mr. Nosenko. "Nosenko stated that in view of instruction from the KGB Moscow, no active interest could be taken in Oswald in Minsk without obtaining prior approval from KGB in Moscow. According to Nosenko, no such approval was ever requested or granted, and based on his experience, he opined that the only coverage of Oswald during this stay in Minsk
consisted of periodic checks of his places of employment, inquiries of neighbors and associates, and review of his mail."
Mr. Klein. Did you make that statement?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir. What do you find here wrong?
Mr. Klein. Does that statement say anything about physical surveillance?
Mr. Nosenko. No, it didn't.
Mr. Klein. Did you forget to tell them about the physical surveillance?
Mr. Nosenko. Maybe I forget; maybe they didn't put; I do not know.
Mr. Klein. Do you recall speaking to agents Poptanich and Gheesling on March 3rd and 4th, 1964?
Mr. Nosenko. I cannot tell you. I do remember the date, no. I remember I was speaking with agents from FBI.
Mr. Klein. When you spoke to them, did you recall that they spoke to you at that time, March 3rd and 4th, about Lee Harvey Oswald?
Mr. Nosenko. I told you, they were speaking with me about Oswald, but I cannot tell you the date when.
Mr. Klein. Was it in March 1964?
Mr. Nosenko. They were speaking with me -- February and the beginning of March of 1964.
Mr. Klein. And did they tape the conversations?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, they were taping all conversations.
Mr. Klein. Did the agents make notes when you were talking?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. Did they ever show you those notes?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Klein. Were you aware that the statements you were making to them were going to be written down in to a report?
Mr. Nosenko. Sure.
Mr. Klein. Did you ever have an opportunity to see the report?
Mr. Nosenko. No. The only one which was sent to the Warren Commission, this I have seen.
Mr. Klein. Were you aware that the report would be put in your file?
Mr. Nosenko. Must be.
Mr. Klein. Were you aware that report would be shown to a committee such as this investigating the assassination?
Mr. Nosenko. I didn't know that it would be created, the Committee, because it was 1964.
Mr. Klein. You didn't know that?
Mr. Nosenko. No. Did you know that this Committee -- in 1964 -- will be existing in '78, '77?
Mr. Klein. And were you telling them the truth when you told them that the only coverage of Oswald, and listing these things and
not telling them about the physical surveillance, was that the truth you told them?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, I told them that there was done the work against Oswald; it was ordered, passive type of work, it's called passive. Whenever it's ordered not to make an approach, not to make a contact, not to make a recruitment, this is passive.
Anything when enters besides whatever is done, contact, approaches, recruitment, attempt to recruit, it is immediately called active.
Mr. Klein. Looking at that report, did you tell them about the physical surveillance which you told this Committee about yesterday?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not see here, but I have no doubts. I do not know. Maybe I didn't mention that this date you said, maybe. I didn't mention but I was telling them about surveillance.
Mr. Klein. Didn't you tell us that you always told the truth and told everything you knew when you spoke to the FBI and the CIA?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. If they would have asked you, "Was there physical surveillance?" --
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, I will answer yes, it was.
Mr. Klein. -- you would have answered yes?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. You also testified before this Committee that in accord with the orders from Moscow that there was technical surveillance, and you told us in detail about how they tapped his phone and they would record it and make copies of it and gave it to a certain person.
Again, drawing your attention to page 29 of that same paragraph, does that say anything about the technical surveillance that you told us about?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir.
Mr. Klein. Did you forget?
Mr. Nosenko. But, if you ask, even an agent of FBI, I doubt it, no. In KGB control of correspondence, control of telephone, it's not big deal. It's giving order to control a telephone can be given by Chief of Section, not speaking of Chief of Department, not speaking of Chief of Directorate, and not speaking to receive a warrant from the judge. Control of correspondence can be signed, permission to put control over correspondence can be done by the Deputy Chief of Section even.
Do you understand what I want to tell you, it is absolutely considered, KGB, nothing important.
Mr. Klein. Is it a big deal to check periodically at someone's place of employment and talk to their neighbors? Is that a big deal?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Klein. But you told them about that, didn't you?
Mr. Nosenko. I tried simply to describe them what kind of, not to take active -- what does it mean, passive type of coverage of the target?
Mr. Klein. If they would have asked you was there any technical surveillance, then would you have told them?
Mr. Nosenko. I would have said they were told, even word for word, in this document said not the technical surveillance. They have a certain terminology. Let's say surveillance, it's called to lead the measurement N/N, and to control telephone to lead the measurement M.
Mr. Klein. If they would have said, "Was there any technical surveillance of Oswald?" would you have said "yes"?
Mr. Nosenko. Sure.
Mr. Klein. You also testified to this Committee that the KGB would have had to have known about Marina Oswald, you said, by the end of the month they would have a batch of papers?
Mr. Nosenko. You told me, if she had seen him, you something mentioned, 15, 13.
Mr. Klein. Because surveillance was on Oswald, they would have had to pick her up?
Mr. Nosenko. I cannot tell you it was in the moment when
he was seeing her or not. You said assume that he met her
16 and 13, and it became known to KGB through surveillance. I
said by the end of month that at least something will have on
her, who is she, where she is working, where she studied, where
she work.
Mr. Klein. They would know that through the surveillance
on Oswald?
Mr. Nosenko. The fact will be known through surveillance;
then through other outfits of KGB they will find whatever
possible on her.
Mr. Klein. Were you ever asked the following question
and did you give the following answer:
"Question: Why wouldn't she -- referring to Marina -- have
been investigated when she first met Oswald?
"Answer: They did not know she was a friend of Oswald
until they applied for marriage. There was no surveillance
on Oswald to show that he knew her."
Were you ever asked that question and did you give that
answer?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not remember my questions, and
answers.
Mr. Klein. I would ask that this document be marked for
identification, please, and shown to the witness.
The Chairman. The clerk will identify for the record
the number appearing on the document.
The Clerk. JFK-F-6.
(The document referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. F-6 for identification.)
Mr. Klein. Looking at that document, have you ever seen it before?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir.
Mr. Klein. You have never seen that before?
Mr. Nosenko. I never have seen it before.
Mr. Klein. And is that a report that says on the cover, "Memorandum for the Record; Subject: Followup Report on the Oswald Case; Source: AEDONOR." Was AEDONOR your code name at one time?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not know.
Mr. Klein. "Date of Interview: 3 July 1964." Does it say that on the cover?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. And turning to the very last page, page 18.--
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. Does it say, "Thomas A. Ryan"?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Klein. "SR/CI/KGB"?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Klein. Did you ever hear of a man named Thomas A. Ryan?
Mr. Nosenko. No, I do not know a man Thomas A. Ryan.
Mr. Klein. Do you recall speaking to a man named Thomas Ryan?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir.
Mr. Klein. Would you turn in this document to page 9. On page 9, the last question and answer, would you read the question for us, and read the answer?
Mr. Nosenko. "Why wouldn't she have been investigated when she first met Oswald?"
"They didn't know she was a friend of Oswald until they applied for marriage. There was no surveillance on Oswald to show that he knew her."
Mr. Klein. Were you ever asked that question and did you ever --
Mr. Nosenko. I do not remember, sir. But if it is, it must be asked and I this answered.
Mr. Klein. Was that the truth?
Mr. Nosenko. As far as I remember, those conditions in which I was asked, better ask where I was in this period of time, what conditions I was kept, and what type of interrogations were going on.
Mr. Klein. Did you tell us yesterday that you always told the truth?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Klein. -- when you spoke about Oswald?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Klein. Was this question relating to Oswald?
Mr. Nosenko. I was answering what I could.
Mr. Klein. Is that the truth, that they didn't --
Mr. Nosenko. It's how it is put, how it is put. You see, again, why wouldn't she have been investigated. Here must be question was in this form. The investigation, not the checkup of her, but, let's say, invitation for conversation, something of this kind, it's some kind of here misunderstanding on both parts, that would be mine, and interrogator.
Mr. Klein. It is an inaccurate transcript?
Mr. Nosenko. I consider many, many things are inaccurate.
Mr. Klein. Is that transcribed accurately?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not know, sir.
Mr. Klein. That answer, do you think it is transcribed accurately, that that's your answer?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, I can only explain only one thing. Let's say there was KGB found out that he had an acquaintance, Marina Prusakova. They were not married. They didn't know -- they didn't apply for marriage. What kind of first will be investigation? Checkup in archives of KGB of Byelorussia, and on the basis whatever kind of material on her will be found. Let's say, if she was ever on trial by militia, under arrest. If militia had any material, they can expand further. They can also send checkup in the place of her -- one, it's in one order, to give us the picture of the character of the target, check on him in place of his work and check in place of his living,
in one order.
But more, farther investigation, the true investigation --
this is called checkup -- will be studied and they will start
when they see something, let's say, suspicious in behavior of
Oswald and this his connection.
In case of Marina, when they found out that they are going
to marry, sure, they will be more, farther investigation,
though investigation; but before it will only be checkup.
From this point of view I was answering this question.
Mr. Klein. Let me make it simple.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. If the question was asked exactly as it appears
here, "Why wouldn't she have been investigated when she first
met Oswald?" would this be your answer? Is that a correct
answer as it appears here?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, it appears here, but I do not remember.
Sure, I answered and this was question, but, gentlemen --
Mr. Klein. Was this true? This says "There was no
surveillance on Oswald to show that he knew her" -- is that
right or wrong?
Mr. Nosenko. This is what I answered, yes. It is right.
It is written here.
Mr. Klein. You remember answering that?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Klein. How do you know you answered that?
Mr. Nosenko. You are giving me official document.
Mr. Klein. You have no recollection of answering this?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not have any recollection of interrogations.
Mr. Klein. If you answered that, were you telling the truth?
Mr. Nosenko. I don't know. I answered. Must be. This is how I answered question.
Mr. Klein. You testified to this Committee that the KGB decided to have Lee Harvey Oswald examined by two psychiatrists. You told us about how it was decided, who decided it, where it was decided. Then they found Lee Harvey Oswald to be mentally unstable?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. Have you ever been asked the following questions and given the following answers:
"Question: Did the KGB make a psychological assessment of Oswald?
"Answer: No, nothing, but at the hospital it was also said he was not quite normal. The hospital didn't write that he was mad, just that he is not normal.
"Question: Did the hospital authorities conduct any psychological testing?
"Answer: I don't think so. There was no report like this."
Mr. Nosenko. No, I told that there was opinion of
psychiatrists that he was mentally unstable.
Mr. Klein. Is what I read to you correct?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not know whether it is correct or wrong. I am answering you what I know.
Mr. Klein. Did you ever make a statement like that?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not remember statements for five years, interrogation.
Mr. Klein. I would direct your attention to the Ryan Report.
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Klein. Page 7.
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Klein. Would you read for us the first and second questions and answers, please.
Mr. Nosenko. "Did the KGB make psychological assessment of Oswald?"
"No, nothing. But at the hospital it was also said he was not quite normal. The hospital didn't write that he was mad, just that he was not normal, mentally unstable."
Mr. Klein. Please keep reading.
Mr. Nosenko. "Did the hospital authorities conduct any psychological testing?"
"I don't think so. There was no report like this.
"What was the Soviets' opinion of Oswald's personality, what kind of man did they think he was?"
"KGB thought he was of no interest for the country or for the KGB, that he is not normal, that he should leave the country."
Mr. Klein. Did you say anything in there about two psychiatrists examining Oswald and about reading their reports which said he was mentally unstable? Did you say anything about that there?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not remember what I said to them; but I would like you to find out the conditions in which interrogations were done, how it was done, by what procedures, when two interrogators are seated. I never knew any names -- they never announced me names -- one playing part of bad guy and other good guy, and it starting slapping then, not physically but I mean, psychologically and in conversation, turning question upside down, however they would like, then this leave, another one will start in softer way.
Mr. Klein. When did this --
Mr. Nosenko. And I would not trust any of their documents in those periods of time. Up to 1967 when we started from the beginning, to work, Mr. Bruce Solie. That is the one thing. Second, my knowledge of language was very poor in '64. I didn't understand many questions, and none of them, excluding Mr. Deryabin, knew Russian language and Mr. Deryabin was asking me only questions concerning my biography and this type of question, but nonoperative questions.
Mr. Klein. Do you have any recollection of being asked these questions and giving the answers that you just read to us?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I told you, and I will tell, I do not remember their questions, and I do not remember my answers; but I tried to be truthful with them. Then was period of time when I have seen that they were simply was laughing at me; I rejected to answer questions, and whenever they were asking, I would answer, "I do not remember, I do not know, I do not remember."
Mr. Klein. These answers, do they say "I do not know, I do not remember" or do these give responsive answers?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not trust this document prepared by people in those years.
Mr. Klein. Is it your testimony that these might not be accurate questions and answers?
Mr. Nosenko. My opinion -- I cannot tell you exactly, I say might be.
Mr. Klein. You testified --
Mr. Nosenko. One more thing: If we are going into this, a number of interrogations, I was under drugs, and on me was used a number of drugs, and I know that, and hallucinations and talking during night and sodium and everything, even many others, and a number of things were absolutely incoherent.
Mr. Klein. This hostile interrogation that you have been referring to, when did it begin?
Mr. Nosenko. Arrested me 4th of April, 1964, started
interrogate me in two days. They interrupted -- I don't know --
interrogate a month, two, made break; then again, then again
period of no interrogation; then again interrogations, up to
24 hours, not giving me possibility to sleep.
Mr. Klein. And this was all after April 4, 1964?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
That is why I will not take as a document anything what
concerns interrogations in hostile, absolutely hostile,
situation.
Mr. Klein. You testified in detail yesterday about the
cable which you saw which was sent from Mexico City to the First
Chief Directorate in Moscow, and you testified that you actually
read that cable and that it told that Oswald was in Mexico City
and he wanted permission for visa to come to the Soviet Union.
Do you remember reading that cable and describing it for
us in detail, how long it was?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. Did you ever say to anyone that after Oswald
went to Minsk, the next time you heard of him was in connection
with Oswald's application to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City
for a Soviet reentry visa, and you did not know how Mexico City
advised Moscow of the subject's application; your knowledge
resulted from an oral inquiry of your department by M.I. Turalin.
Did you ever say that, that you did not know how Mexico
City advised Moscow of Oswald's application?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not remember. I am telling you what I have seen, cable, what was told through Lieutenant-Colonel Alekseev to tell to Turalin the opinion of Second Chief Directorate Seventh Department.
Mr. Klein. I draw your attention to page 30 of the FBI report in front of you.
Mr. Nosenko. I do not have it.
(Pause)
Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. On the top of page 30, read for us the underlined section on the top, beginning "The next time" --
Mr. Nosenko. "The next time Nosenko heard of Oswald was in connection with Oswald's application to Soviet Embassy in Mexico City for a Soviet reentry visa. Nosenko did not know how Mexico City advised Moscow of subject's application. His knowledge resulted from an oral inquiry of Nosenko's department by Turalin, Service No. 2, Counterintelligence in Foreign Countries, First Chief Directorate. Nosenko recalled that Turalin had orally contacted Vladimir Alexseev, Chief of Sixth Section of Nosenko's Tourist Department, with respect to Oswald. Nosenko's department had no interest in Oswald and they recommended that Oswald's request for reentry visa be denied. Nosenko couldn't recall when Oswald visited Mexico City in connection with visa application."
Mr. Klein. Did you ever say this to an FBI agent?
Mr. Nosenko. Must be I said it, it's here in document.
Mr. Klein. It says in here that Nosenko did not know how Mexico City advised Moscow of subject's application. Did you say that?
Mr. Nosenko. Must be; I said this in this way.
Mr. Klein. And did you tell us that not only did you know how they advised them by cable but that you read the cable?
Mr. Nosenko. This is what I recollection.
Mr. Klein. Did you tell them the truth?
Mr. Nosenko. I was trying to tell what I remembered.
Mr. Klein. And this FBI report which you just read from, would you look back on the first page and would you tell us the date of that report?
Mr. Nosenko. Fifth of March, 1964.
Mr. Klein. March 5, 1964. Is that before April 4, 1964?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. That was before any hostile interrogations began, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Klein. And at that time you said that you did not know anything about the cable, is that right?
Mr. Nosenko. This is what I answered them, how I remembered.
Mr. Klein, I have a question. Do you understand from what psychological turmoil a person passing who defected, do
you understand that it is necessary time, time to settle psycholog-
ically, he doesn't know how he will be living, what he will
be doing, and at the same time a person feels attitude on the
part of those who helped him to come CIA? I felt something
going on.
Mr. Klein. You testified to us today that you didn't
know how wrote the summary of Oswald's file in the First Depart-
ment because you never had an opportunity to read it. Did you
ever tell anyone that Fedroseve and Matveev, F-e-d-r-o-s-e-v-e
and M-a-t-v-e-e-v of the First Department, Second Chief
Directorate, took the file and wrote a second "spravka", which
you told us was a summary?
Mr. Nosenko. Summary.
Mr. Klein. Did you ever tell anybody that?
Mr. Nosenko. Must be I told, it is again right, because
you see, not Fedroseve -- Fedroseve was Chief of First Depart-
ment, American Department, and I will repeat what I told you
yesterday. Matveev has come to take file, but surely Fedroseve
who is Chief of American Department, he had given call to Chief
of Seventh Department. He was involved in this; that is why I
mentioned him. He was Chief of First American Department.
His deputy, Colonel Matveev, has come, and not alone; with him
was a couple of officers, has come and told that Gribanov
ordered and Fedroseve giving call to Department, we must take
it, and took. Who of them wrote, I do not know, no doubts that Fedroseve,
and Matveev were participated in the preparation of documents.
They are responsible for First American Department.
Mr. Klein. So you have an idea of who would have written, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. American Department, no doubts that this two will be participating or correcting.
Mr. Klein. But you didn't read that summary, is that right?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not remember reading the summary.
Mr. Klein. Did you read it? Do you have any recollection of reading it?
Mr. Nosenko. No, I haven't seen summary.
Mr. Klein. Are you positive that you didn't see that summary?
Mr. Nosenko. I have seen summaries in the file of Oswald.
Mr. Klein. Are you positive you didn't see the summary written by the First Department after they took the file away?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not remember seeing. As I told you, I haven't seen it.
Mr. Klein. You testified that Oswald was considered normal prior to the time he cut his wrist, and even told us that you were surprised, you had no indication he would do something like that.
Were you ever asked the following question, and did you give the following answer:
"In what way was the Oswald case handled differently from cases of other American defectors?"
"Answer: The main difference is that he was not to be allowed to stay. He was considered to be not normal."
Mr. Nosenko. This is what cases I know, who were staying.
Mr. Klein. Did you ever say that he was considered not normal, referring to the period before he tried to commit suicide?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not remember; but if I said it, it's not right because we didn't know that he was normal or not normal. Up until the moment of he cut his wrist we started to suspect.
Mr. Klein. Did you ever say that he was considered not normal?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not remember.
Mr. Klein. Well, if you would have said it, would it have been correct?
Mr. Nosenko. No, it would not be correct, because he cannot be considered abnormal. We didn't know anything up till he cut the wrist.
Mr. Klein. You testified to this Committee that you were present at a meeting with the Chief of the Seventh Department Chief of your section, Major Rastrusin, at that meeting, it was decided that Oswald should not be given permission to defect. You told us where the meeting took place, told us who was there.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. You told us that Krupnov was not even in the
Seventh Department at that time?
Mr. Nosenko. Krupnov appeared a little later.
Mr. Klein. Did you ever tell anyone that on the basis of your evaluation of Oswald, you instructed Krupnov to advise Oswald through Intourist interpreter that Oswald would not be permitted to remain in the U.S.S.R. permanently and that he would have to depart at the expiration of his visa?
Did you ever tell anybody that?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not remember. If I said it, it was wrong, not right, because Krupnov started participation only in this case when Oswald was allowed to stay. In the moment when Oswald arrived in Soviet Union, when he went in hospital, Krupnov was still not in Seventh Department. He very soon appeared later. Then it was wrong. If I stated it, it was wrong.
Mr. Klein. Directing your attention to the FBI report in front of you, I would like to draw your attention to page 28.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Klein. Beginning with the underlined section beginning with the first "On the basis" in the second paragraph, would you read this?
Mr. Nosenko. "Nosenko and Krupnov on the basis of this information, concluded that Oswald was of no interest to the KGB and both agreed that Oswald appeared somewhat abnormal."
Mr. Klein. Not that, the second paragraph, "On the basis of" --
Mr. Nosenko. "On the basis of Nosenko's evaluation of Oswald, he instructed Krupnov to advise Oswald through the Intourist interpreter Oswald would not be permitted to remain in the U.S.S.R. permanently and that he would have to depart at the expiration of his visa, and thereafter seek reentry as a permanent resident through routine channels at the Soviet Embassy in the United States."
Mr. Klein. Did you ever say that?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not remember saying this. It can be that simply misunderstanding, and, you see, this is not transcription from the tape. It is, I will say a summary, and I do not remember. But, if I said this, it is not right because Krupnov didn't participate it in the beginning.
Mr. Klein. Also it says --
Mr. Nosenko. It was participation of Rastrusin.
Mr. Klein. Also is it correct when it says in there that you made the decision and --
Mr. Nosenko. No, I couldn't make decision, being Deputy Chief of Section.
Mr. Klein. Does it say anything there --
Mr. Nosenko. I could say my opinion, yes.
Mr. Klein. Does it say anything there about a meeting to determine what to do, or does it say that on basis of your evaluation, you told Krupnov to do it?
Mr. Nosenko. It's not right. I said only that Krupnov
appeared later. This period, what we are discussing here, was
Rastrusin involved, decision cannot be done on my own, being
Deputy Chief of Section, decision cannot be done even being
Deputy Chief of Section, Chief of Section, at least it
must be on the level of Chief of Department.
Mr. Klein. So it is incorrect, is that what you are saying?
Mr. Nosenko. It is incorrect, and Krupnov -- I do not
remember.
Mr. Klein. You told us, when I questioned you about the
fact that you didn't tell the FBI that there was physical
surveillance, the last question I asked you, if they would have
asked you if he was physically surveilled, would you have told
them, and you said yes?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sure. I will say.
Mr. Klein. Were you ever asked the following question
and did you give the following answer:
"Was he physically surveilled" and that is referring to
Minsk, and you answered "No, there was none"?
Mr. Nosenko. It was not right, because it was order given
and he was under periodical surveillance.
Mr. Klein. I draw your attention to page 9 of the CIA
document in front of you, Memorandum for the Record.
Mr. Nosenko. I do not have it.
Mr. Klein. The Ryan Report. I draw your attention to page
9.
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Klein. Would you read the first question and the first answer?
Mr. Nosenko. "Was he physically surveilled?"
"No, there was none."
Mr. Klein. Did you ever give that answer to that question?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not remember; it's not right, the answer.
Mr. Klein. I would ask that this tape, which is marked 3 July '64, Reel No. 66, be deemed marked for identification.
The Chairman. Indicate for the record the marking.
The Clerk. JFK-F-7.
(The item referred to was marked as JFK Exhibit No. F-7 for identification.)
The Chairman. We will recess for about five minutes.
(A brief recess was taken.)
The Chairman. The Committee is back in session.
During the recess the witness made a request of the Chair that he be permitted to make a brief statement prior to counsel for the Committee resuming interrogation.
The Chair is going to grant that request and recognize the witness at this time for such statement as he would like to make.
Mr. Nosenko. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, I arrived in the United States in 1964, 12th of February. I felt something was going wrong because the attitude on the part of the officers from CIA who was dealing with me, I felt was going wrong, by a number of remarks, their behavior. Besides, I was in a psychological process. It's a very big thing, when you are coming to live in a new country. I left the country where I was born, never mind, my defection was strictly on ideological basis, but still psychologically is very big thing and very serious thing.
A very short period of time, April 4, I was invited on check-up for the doctor, and this checkup turned to be arrest. Arrested was in very rude form, nobody beat my physically, no, but in rude form, trying to put dignity of the person, of human being, down, kept in very hard conditions. I was smoking from 14 years old, never quitted. I was rejected to smoke. I didn't see books. I didn't read anything. I was sitting in four walls, metal bed in the center of the room and that is all.
I was hungry, and this was the most difficult for me because how I tried not to think about food. I was thinking about food because all the time I want to eat. I was receiving very small amount, and very poor food. I was sitting some kind of attic; it was hot, no air conditioning, cannot breathe; windows -- no windows, closed over. I was permitted to shave once a week,
to take showers once a week.
From me were taken toothpaste, toothbrush. The conditions were really inhuman, conditions in this place; and later transferred in another place, which is now I know where it was, the second place, Camp Perry, where certain house and the same very, very Spartan conditions; three and a half years. Besides that, on me were used different types of drugs and sleeping drugs, hallucination drugs, and whatever I do not know, and don't want to know.
What I want to tell you, the arrest was done illegally, without due process of law, without -- in violation of Constitution, which was found by Rockefeller Commission. It wasn't mentioned, my name, but simply nameless defector, who was over three years in extremely Spartan conditions.
Interrogations were done sometimes 24 hours, not giving me an hour to sleep. Interrogations were in very hostile manner. Simply, what I would say were rejected. How long I will be, why it is without due process, no warrants; "You will be eternally, 25 years." How long we would want you to keep. That is why I consider all interrogations, all materials, which concerns this period of time are illegal, and I am not recognizing them and don't want to see them. And I am asking you not to ask questions based on this interrogations, including trying to play the tape during this interrogations. For me it's difficult to return back. I passed through hell. I started new life in
'69 only because I was true defector. I never raised this question with correspondents. I never went in press, because I am loyal to the country which accepted me, and I didn't want to hurt the country.
I didn't hurt, even to hurt, the intelligence, the CIA.
I didn't consider the whole CIA was responsible. Were responsible several people, for this. Thank God they are not working there anymore. They are out. If I will go in press, if I would be telling about these inhumane conditions, I will hurt not only the agencies, the intelligence service of the U.S.; I will hurt the interests of the U.S. Who would like to defect, reading in what conditions and what treatment defectors is receiving.
Sir, I prefer that you be using materials when it was started humane relations with me, which was started at the end of '67. I still was under arrest but I was transferred from the extremely Spartan conditions, and with me started to work Mr. Bruce Solie, who passed through the whole life, through all cases, through everything. People who were talking with me before were coming with what they were told, how to approach to me, how to treat me. They have come with made opinion, before whatever I will say yes or no. That is why I consider it is all unlawful documents in the period of interrogations done by anyone in CIA. up until the end of '67.
The Chairman. Is there anything further, Mr. Nosenko?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir.
(Pages 53 thru 78, being Committee business only, are excerpted.)
Mr. Blakey. Shall I inform the witness?
The Chairman. In light of the time situation and our original intention of trying to wind up by 10:00 p.m., the Chair thinks perhaps we ought to try and invoke a five minute rule so that everybody gets a fair opportunity rather than to proceed informally and extend this matter over a long period of time.
Anyone have any objection?
All right, bring the witness in.
(Whereupon, at 8:43 o'clock p.m., the witness returned to the hearing room.)
The Chairman. Let the record reflect the fact the witness has again returned to the witness table and, Mr. Nosenko, at this time counsel for the Committee has concluded his questions to you and at this point in time the members of the Committee would like to be able to pose questions to you with reference to your testimony here yesterday and this evening. Is that agreeable to you, sir?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
The Chairman. Thank you.
The Chair at this point would invoke the five minute rule. The Chair will begin the questions.
Mr. Nosenko, you are now a citizen of the United States, you are now an employee of the CIA, I understand as a consultant, is that correct?
Mr. Nosenko. On private contract. I am not an employee
of the CIA. I am on a private contract, used as a consultant on counterintelligence of the Soviet KGB.
The Chairman. And in that capacity, sir, are you paid an annual salary?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir, I am paid an annual salary.
The Chairman. And what is that salary?
Mr. Nosenko. $35,000.
The Chairman. And --
Mr. Nosenko. It is the last year, because it was cost of living.
The Chairman. I see. In that capacity, do you contract out also to other persons or other organizations?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
The Chairman. This is your sole income?
Mr. Nosenko. Only one sole income.
The Chairman. Has the CIA given you anything else of value other than a salary, that is, a home, anything of that sort?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir. And in the book published, written by Epstein was mentioned CIA bought me home. No, sir, I bought home on my money, nobody bought me a home, no.
The Chairman. You also now are remarried and you have --
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir, I am married. I am American citizen, I have five stepchildren and six grandchildren.
The Chairman. You now have a passport? Do you have a
passport as a --
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, I have a passport, which I once used being sent by the Agency in 1975, in England, for week where I was talking with British Intelligence and Counterintelligence Services, concerning my knowledge of the Second Chief Directorate, KGB in general.
The Chairman. Is that the only country to which you have traveled since your defection?
Mr. Nosenko. No. I have traveled on behalf of the Central Intelligence Agency also for the last four years. I was in eleven countries. And I never received or demanded or asking any special fees for consultations with all friendly intelligence services, never.
The Chairman. Have you ever returned to Soviet Russia?
Mr. Nosenko. Never once in Soviet Union from 1964 and hope will never see it again.
The Chairman. And how long have you now been a consultant for CIA?
Mr. Nosenko. I was from 1969, from April 1969, when I was released from detention arrest.
The Chairman. Now, will you clarify for us when you first were placed under arrest?
Mr. Nosenko. Fourth of April, 1964.
The Chairman. And on what date had you defected?
Mr. Nosenko. I defected 4th of February of 1964 in Geneva,
Switzerland.
The Chairman. And when you were placed under arrest, where were you placed in detention?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not know, it was somewhere around Washington, close to Washington, where I was '64 and beginning '65, approximately. I don't hear any radio, I didn't see any newspaper, I do not know, didn't know anything what happen in the world for many years.
I know that it was by car from Virginia where I was staying from 12 of February '64, I was taken by car for visit to doctor, and it was 30, 40 minute drive, it was in this area, but then in approximately after a year and maybe 13 months, a year and one month, roughly, I was transferred in very peculiar conditions, was put under shackles and handcuffs, blindfolded, put in the car, and don't know where I was going, only I heard, passing through city, I couldn't understand, I couldn't see anything, then I heard airplanes, I understood that I was somewhere in airport, and once I was scared to death, I think I was thinking they were returning me to the Russians. Well, they put me in airplane --
The Chairman. Mr. Nosenko, my time has expired. I want to recognize --
Mr. Nosenko. I do not know the place, sir. I know I only now found out reading the book of Daniel Schorr that I was in Camp Perry up to the end of '67. That is what I found out from
the book.
The Chairman. Thank you.
Mr. Preyer.
Mr. Preyer. Mr. Nosenko, one thing that comes through very strongly in your testimony is that it is a hard life to be a defector. I think to the average mentality we think it would be good for a country to welcome a defector, but to the intelligence mentality apparently a defector is immediately suspect, and you have recounted your treatment here, and apparently Lee Harvey Oswald, from your testimony, was greeted somewhat like this in the U.S.S.R. His treatment was much different from yours.
One thing he was not an intelligence agent, of course. But you have indicated that he was kept at arms' length by the KGB. The impression I get was the mere fact of being a defector caused the KGB to be less interested in him than if it was someone they had recruited?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Preyer. Although he was kept at arms' length by the KGB, in the sense that he was not contacted, it does appear that he lived very well there, relatively speaking. He certainly lived much better than you lived in your early years. That he was given a job in Minsk, he was given a pension, which is something that seems extraordinary in this country, from the Red Cross, and apparently pretty good housing conditions
in Minsk.
Is that typical way that a defector would be treated in Russia, is at arm's length?
Mr. Nosenko. Every defector will be watched but, sir, when you mentioned what he received being in Russia, it is very little. I can give you only one example. When defectors Martin and Mitchell, employees of NSA, who cooperated with KGB abroad, and then they defected to Soviet Union, they received extraordinary help. It is not like Oswald. Oswald is nothing.
Mr. Preyer. The amount of money?
Mr. Nosenko. The amount of money and other things, extraordinary.
Mr. Preyer. For Oswald were not extraordinary?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Preyer. You mentioned the other three defectors that you had known of. What sort of treatment did they receive?
Mr. Nosenko. I will tell you what Martin and Mitchell --
Mr. Preyer. Were they two of the other three?
Mr. Nosenko. These two, for example. I can mention others, what I heard, I never work with them, what I heard. Martin and Mitchell, by decision of Soviet Government was given them, to each one, $100,000 on their account, was given apartment, not like Oswald received, but real good apartment, so-called classless society, living high class. Each one was given car, each one received life pension a month of 5000 Soviet rubles
up to death. And each one was helped with work. Both were
assigned with some type of research work where they had given
position, let's say Martin was given position of researcher.
But amount of pay of his was analogical to the amount of pay
of the Director of this Institute, besides what he is
receiving of pension. This is the treatment of those defectors
whom they want, who had given them valuable information.
In case of -- excuse me -- was Annabella Bucar defected
something early '50s. She was working in American Embassy in
Press Department. She also received, in spite of the fact
was making very good money in the Soviet Union, she was working
for Moscow Radio, she was receiving life pension of big amount,
amount approximately what in Soviet Union is received by Deputy
of Minister, of Ministry, of this or that industry.
Mr. Preyer. But the defector who was not giving informa-
tion?
Mr. Nosenko. Now, he will be given a little bit something,
pension like was Oswald, to Oswald given pension. I don't
know what was given to Webster, a worker, who was defected in '59
and by the way, in very short period of time he decided he
doesn't like the life in the so-called Soviet paradise. He
wanted to return back home, but if he received it will be
analogical to what Oswald received, not more.
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. Devine.
Mr. Devine. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Were you solicited to be a defector?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir. No, sir.
Mr. Devine. Why did you defect?
Mr. Nosenko. I defected because I for years of my life has come to number of conclusions that the whole society, the whole system, is dictatorial system, nondemocratic system, the true police state system, and especially working the KGB opened eyes for me. My defection was strictly on ideological basis.
Mr. Devine. Had you been out of the Soviet Union prior to your defection?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Devine. Other than to Geneva?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, I was in England twice, then I was passing through a number of countries, staying day, two, France, Belgium, Holland. I was in 1960 in Cuba.
Mr. Devine. You were a married man in Russia?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Devine. Had a child?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, two daughters.
Mr. Devine. Were you having some domestic difficulties?
Mr. Nosenko. No. I tried in 1960-'61, I tried to arrange to go to work abroad with my family, and in the last moment it fell down, and I understood I cannot go abroad with family,
and that is why when I contacted CIA in '62, I -- psychologically
I was ready, ideologically was ready and psychologically ready
to defect, but the question of family was bothering me.
Mr. Devine. But not enough to keep you there?
Mr. Nosenko. Not enough to keep me there. And in '64
I has come knowing that I will never return.
Mr. Devine. You were willing to abandon your family?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir, because I didn't see possibility
to take family out. I was living the last four or five years
as a man with two souls, splitted personality, one I must show
and was showing, as good KGB officer, as a good Communist, as
a patriot of the Soviet system, the Soviet Union, and the other
part of me, the true part I am not believing in what I am
telling, I am not believing in the system, I do not like it,
I do not want it, and I consider what phony things are going
on because I was working in KGB, I knew it. I simply couldn't
more tolerate to be with this double splitted personality.
Mr. Devine. How did you dispose of your children and your
wife in Russia?
Mr. Nosenko. The thing was psychologically, my had, had
in my mind. help me. My mother was rather rich, after death of
father, she was very rich woman and she had a lot that will be
enough not only for my children but their children and grand-
children. From the point of view of material they will never
suffer.
Mr. Devine. Yes, but as a defector would there not be reprisals taken by the Soviet Union against your family?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, before the death of Stalin it could be taken drastic measures against the family, but after the death of Stalin, from middle 1950s, quite a little changes took place in the Soviet Union, and the family will not suffer.
Another thing, oh sure, will be certain things which they cannot achieve. Let's say my brother who studied later in the same Institute what I finish, Institute of International Relations, he will never have possibility to go abroad, but he will never be put in jail, can never be exiled from Moscow, the same, nothing happened with family.
Mr. Devine. The fact that you were a KGB man didn't your defection cause some irritation among those in power over there?
Mr. Nosenko. Sure.
Mr. Devine. Did they want to get you back, didn't they want to get even with you?
Mr. Nosenko. Oh, yes, and they are looking for me.
Mr. Devine. But they took no reprisals against your family.
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Devine. How do you know that?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, I do not know exactly, but you see, there were some defections before. The family didn't suffer like it was, let's say, in '40s and maybe up to death of Stalin.
Mr. Devine. Were those KGB defections?
Mr. Nosenko. Even from KGB.
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mrs. Burke?
Mrs. Burke. Well, I would like to go back a little bit after you decided to defect. I think you had a number of conversations with the American Embassy, was it, or was it CIA, during those ten days that you were in touch, where you negotiated whether or not you would in fact defect?
Mr. Nosenko. No, I contacted CIA in '62 and --
Mrs. Burke. In '64?
Mr. Nosenko. In '64, when I arrived in Geneva, on second day I mailed a cable, and I knew -- a prearranged addressed, and I knew that in two days somebody in appropriate place and appropriate time will meet me from CIA.
Mrs. Burke. And they met you --
Mr. Nosenko. They met me and I was meeting them every day, visiting, and when I had free time, visited secret address in Geneva.
Mrs. Burke. All right, during those times you were meeting them, did you negotiate in terms of what your situation would be here in the United States if you defected, or where you would go?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, I put a question that what amount of salary I want, that will find for me job. This I negotiate.
Mrs. Burke. Did you discuss whether or not you would be imprisoned?
Mr. Nosenko. No, it never come to my mind that they would imprison me.
Mrs. Burke. Did you tell them that -- I think you told us you had some information you would well to them for a certain amount of money.
Mr. Nosenko. It's in '62.
Mrs. Burke. In '62 you said that. In '64 you didn't discuss any sale of any information?
Mr. Nosenko. No, no, on the contrary, for the period of '62 -'64, I tried to get as much as possible information, not only to come what I knew where I participated in the department where I worked but to find out as much as possible what can be valuable to the American intelligence and I had come with some luggage.
Mrs. Burke. All right, well, during the time that you were talking to them about what your salary would be, the circumstances of your defection, and I assume you told them what your rank was, some of the things you worked on --
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mrs. Burke. -- did you tell them you worked on the Oswald file?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not remember, I can mention. I do not remember, honestly.
Mrs. Burke. Did you discuss Oswald at all with them during that period?
Mr. Nosenko. I must, sure, mentioned this fact because, no, it happened such a thing. I must mention. But I do not remember. I cannot tell you what questions were, what my answers were.
Mrs. Burke. Did you tell them that the Soviet Union thought that Oswald may have been a United States agent?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, I certainly -- it would be -- anyone treated. Oswald, or anyone from the United States who come to live on his own decided to defect, or they contacted him before, they will still will be suspected in a possibility that he is an agent of American intelligence, and also this fact.
Mrs. Burke. And is this the reason that you gave him why he was not allowed to remain in the Soviet Union?
Mr. Nosenko. The reason was that they didn't want him to stay because, KGB, because they didn't consider him an interesting target, an interesting person who has valuable information.
Mrs. Burke. I know that. In fact, I remember you saying something about a person would only be interesting under certain circumstances, one of which would be if they came in as a tourist and they applied a very short time before they arrived.
Mr. Nosenko. Oh no.
Mrs. Burke. And they were an add on to, for instance, the tour.
Mr. Nosenko. Right. Right.
Mrs. Burke. Now, from what that report shows, it shows that
Oswald received his visa in two days to come to the Soviet Union. So he would be automatically suspect, and he would be automatically what you would call an interesting person.
Mr. Nosenko. No, no, no. In this case, you see, Oswald even didn't receive a visa in United States; he received it passing through Europe.
Mrs. Burke. Through Helsinki?
Mr. Nosenko. Right, in Finland, where it's process was easier than it will be in the United States. He simply bought a tour and he received, managed to receive visa.
Mrs. Burke. Let me just ask one other thing.
Did you tell them any of your, aside from the ideological, why you wanted to defect? For instance, did you tell them anything about this promotion you thought you had when you went to, was it, Gorki?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mrs. Burke. But then you --
Mr. Nosenko. No, I didn't tell them. I simply said that my position, because with me, it was documented, I lied. I said my position was Lieutenant Colonel. It wasn't true. It was false statement. The same false statement was concerning recall telegram when I wanted to push the defection process.
Mrs. Burke. My time is up. May I just ask one question? Were you upset when you didn't get your promotion after they had --
Mr. Nosenko. No, no ma'am. I still didn't receive it. It was sent on signature. You see, they are signing, not immediately when they are received. Personnel Directorate gathering from all over the Soviet Union, from all KGBs and comment on signature to the Chairman, twice, three times a year. They were simply gathering in and didn't get enough materials. I do not know. Maybe it was signed in January. But up to my leaving, nobody informed me that it was signed. I didn't -- wasn't rejected.
The Chairman. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.
Mr. Dodd?
Mr. Dodd. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I wonder if you might let me ask you -- let me start back here, very quickly. One of the very first questions you were asked last night by Mr. Klein, was the way Mr. Klein worded the question, and I will ask you to expound on it if it is a correct recall on my part.
Mr. Klein asked you or stated that you arranged for your transfer to the American section of the KGB. He used the words you arranged for your transfer to that section. Is that an accurate statement? Did you want to be in that section? Did you specifically ask to be in that section?
Mr. Nosenko. No, it wasn't accurate, it wasn't right.
Arrangement was done in work form. I was working after finishing Institute in GRU, Navy Intelligence, and being in 1952 New Year,
in Moscow on New Year on a short leave, I was in company where it was one of my friends with whom I studied at the Institute. He worked in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. But his father-in-law was high ranked General of MGB, in those years was called KGB, and he asked me what I am doing, this General.
I said that I am working for the Navy Intelligence, GRU.
Do you like this work?
I said no, because I am not using what I received education.
Would you like to work in MGB?
I said, if it will be with the use of my disciplines which I studied at the Institute, why not? That is all. And in March after death of Stalin this general was appointed the First Deputy Minister of MGB of Beria. He remembered this conversation and several days after death of Stalin I was recalled to MGB which was called MVD in this period of time, in March of '53, and was assigned to Second Chief Directorate. This is what true statement.
Mr. Dodd. When you sent to the safe house or whatever it was in Geneva, in 1964, by your own admission you lied to the agent there in that you stated you had received a telegram issuing your recall back to the Soviet Union.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Dodd. Therefore, it was that important that they accept you immediately.
Did you show anyone a telegram?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir; no, sir. There wasn't any telegram.
Mr. Dodd. Did they ask for a telegram?
Mr. Nosenko. No, but, sir, what happened, I started to meet them in January, had passed three, four, five, six, seven days. I am afraid of that any moment my Chief of the Second Chief Directorate will be returning from France.
Mr. Dodd. I didn't ask you that, Mr. Nosenko. My question to you is, were you asked whether or not you had a copy of the telegram that you had received from the Soviet Union?
Mr. Nosenko. And I -- if I was even asked I couldn't give them because I cannot take it. It would be secret cable.
Mr. Dodd. You have answered my question.
You stated last night that -- and this might have been a supposition on your part, but I am curious about it -- you stated that it was your feeling that the intelligence community in this country considered you a dispatched agent in 1962. Is that something that you felt in 1962?
Mr. Nosenko. No. It's --
Mr. Dodd. A reflection back?
Mr. Nosenko. A reflection back. No, no, sir.
Mr. Dodd. You, by your own statement, again have received some very rough treatment, inhuman treatment, to use your words, living under spartan conditions, and I am sort of brushing over
this very quickly, between 1964 and 1969. Certainly you
couldn't have been very pleased with the way you were being
treated by a country that you had defected to and offered to
give information to. So for a period of that '64, to '69,
five years, you went through a rather rough period in your life?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Dodd. Why did you go to work for somebody who treated
you like that?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I, even was five year there, I didn't
consider that it was decision of the whole CIA. I didn't
consider that -- I didn't blame the whole CIA because it
wasn't the question decided by the whole Agency. It was
decided question by several persons who were I consider simply
in this period of time sick, mentally sick, not ill, but
were simply in fear, in scare, in mania as if KGB penetrated
everything.
Mr. Dodd. Is it your statement to me that for five
years, while you were incarcerated in almost solitary confine-
ment, that you thought that this was the individual acts of a
couple of employees of this Agency?
Mr. Nosenko. Not employees.
Mr. Dod. Without the approval of the very highest
authority in this Agency?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I have seen Chief of Soviet Russia
Division, Mr. David Murphy. He was a high ranking man. It was
his decision, decision of Mr. Angleton, decision of Mr. Murphy, and when they are coming to Director, and I know, from my life, they can report in the way how they will report it, and the Director will accept because they are responsible people, they are sitting in this place. He is not going into details, he is not going and studying, he is not going himself visiting. The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. Sawyer?
Mr. Sawyer. First, have you received any compensation for the period during which you were held in jail?
Mr. Nosenko. I received in several years later, I put the question, I want to be paid for every year which I was unlawfully arrest, the amount of money which we have agreed, with taken taxes and whatever American citizens are paying.
Mr. Sawyer. Did you get that?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, and on this sum of money I bought the house.
Mr. Sawyer. I see.
I will tell you what bothers me about your testimony, very frankly. You stated that they would be very interested in a member of the American intelligence community that they could even compel to defect. Here you had a willing defector, a guy who said that undoubtedly that he didn't like America, and that he did like Russia, and he wants to defect, and nobody even interrogates him, according to you, as to what exposure or
experience he had. He might have worked in the missile silos, he might have done anything, but nobody asked him, and that he lives there for a period of, a long period of time. Here is a guy that is totally willing to talk. It is not like approaching somebody who doesn't want to talk to you or that might not want to talk to you. And here is a fellow who was a radar operator, experienced to some degree, and I don't know to what degree, but apparently the Russians don't know to what degree either, because nobody asked him, in a highly secret air base in Japan, but they didn't ask him even about that, and it is very rare to have one come.
I have listened to Radio Free Cuba, where they air all kinds of propaganda, and this guy would have been certainly good for propaganda when he loved Russia and hated the United States. And I just, with those circumstances, I very frankly find it almost impossible to believe that they did not thoroughly interrogate him at least.
Mr. Nosenko. They never considered him an interesting target. It was known that he served in Marine Corps.
Mr. Sawyer. What I am getting at, how did they know whether he was an interesting target when they never even asked.
Mr. Nosenko. They judging by what they know about him what in questionnaire he filled and plus what they found out from interpreter on him. He said to interpreter, he served in Marine Corps, he finished his years of service.
Mr. Sawyer. But he might have been a cryptographer in the Marine Corps. He might have been as an enlisted man, he might have been a cryptographer and know all our codes and code methodology that might help break codes and that sort of thing, but nobody ever asked him. That is what I don't understand. And I can't believe it, very frankly.
Mr. Nosenko. I understand, sir, but I am telling you he wasn't considered interesting target, and --
Mr. Sawyer. But they didn't have any facts to know whether he was interesting, and here is a guy that wants to talk to them.
Mr. Nosenko. But the judgment made on each person to work actively against him on the basis of his questionnaire. If in questionnaire will be said he is, let's say, professor, teacher, let's say he is working for the government, any department, but for the Federal Government, or he is an officer sure, on him will be paid attention.
Mr. Sawyer. Well, all right, we can drop that for a minute.
But now, he got a visa in two days in Finland. I happen to have been in Finland four years ago and wanted to get a visa, a sort of a last minute decision, to go to Leningrad, and I was told there is a minimum of 30 days before you can get a visa. Now, to issue him a visa in two days for Russia, that is very unusual, apparently, so they must have had some
interest in getting him there.
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, what I know, there wasn't any interest
to get him. He managed to get this visa.
Mr. Sawyer. All right.
The other thing I am curious about is when they interrogated
you so carefully here, why someone like Oswald, a known defector
and who could well have been now a Russian intelligence agent,
comes back to the country, apparently CIA or FBI, or nobody
paid a bit of attention to him, and let him wander around the
country with a Russian wife at will.
I have used up my time.
The Chairman. Okay. The time of the gentleman has
expired.
Mr. Fithian.
Mr. Fithian. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Nosenko, as I piece it together, there are four
possibilities for this Committee to believe. Let me sketch
out what those possibilities are.
One, that you told the truth in 1964, but you are now
misleading this Committee.
Two, that you told an untruth in 1964, basically your
statements in 1964 were not true, but you are telling the truth
now.
Three, that in fact you were dispatched here by the KGB,
or the Soviet Government, because of apparent but unreal
connections between the Soviets and Oswald and the assassination of President Kennedy. Obviously the USSR would need this for obvious reasons. They would badly need this for all sorts of international reasons.
And finally, the fourth option is that you were dispatched here by the Soviet Government and the KGB because there was an actual connection between the KGB and the assassination of President Kennedy.
These are the items which I have picked up in the last two days that would tend to lead some people to believe the last of the four, or at least the third to the last of the four, either that the KGB dispatched you here because they needed it for political reasons, though they were not involved, or they dispatched you here because in fact they did collaborate with Oswald.
First, Oswald goes to Russia. You say he is rejected, but they grant him a pension, however small.
Second, they grant him the pleasures of a hunting club, even though you said earlier he was mentally unbalanced, and you are allowing him to use a gun.
Three, they allowed him to marry in Russia.
Four, they gave him a job.
Now, in -- not talking about the time when you were under stress and incarcerated, but just talking about the two months prior to that -- the FBI questioning, and the prearrest
story makes no sense.
The rejection of Oswald's offer to defect makes absolutely no sense to me.
Mr. Sawyer has just pursued that momentarily. I think that can be rejected by us, by reasonable people, prima facie. I see no reason to accept that part of your story whatsoever.
The exposition, taking you off to worry about the exposition, and so forth, was demonstrated a fraud.
No reprisals against your family. Nobody was working against Oswald, you said, yet later on you said you had seven to eight large files, you only read the first portion of one file. You said no KGB ever talked to Oswald regarding letting him defect. The reason you gave us for that was that he slashed his wrists and you concluded he was unstable. Yet prior to that discovery of his instability, you granted him a visa in two days and he asked to be permitted to defect prior to slashing his wrists, and therefore you had to make the decision prior to slashing his wrists, prior to knowing that he slashed his wrist, that you were going to reject him. That doesn't hold water either.
Finally, you said in your testimony American defection was very rare. All the more reason, if it only happens once every year or a couple of times a year, or three times between '56 and '59, it is totally incredible to me that he would not have been interrogated. No reasonable person can believe that story.
You said he was not interesting, you were not interested in him, the KGB rejected him. Despite that, you were "recruiting right and left all kinds of people to assist in the espionage operation."
Now, all of these things, Mr. Nosenko, leads me to be very, very disturbed by your story because it simply just on the face of what you told us last night and tonight, can't possibly be true.
In the first place, you remember too much now. You remember too much in the way of details after 15 years. Therefore, I have great difficulty accepting any of your story.
We as a Committee of the United States Congress are charged with trying to assess what actually happened in the assassination of President Kennedy. That is the central story. You have not helped us very much. You have confused the issue. In fact, by your testimony you have led at least this member to wonder whether or not you are still working with the KGB.
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
I will permit the witness to answer.
Mr. Nosenko. Mr. Congressman said his opinion. Do you ask me any question?
Mr. Fithian. I would just like to have you tell me why I shouldn't believe that you were dispatched here by the KGB, in the light of just the points I am making, in the light of the enormous differences, not in the CIA interrogation under
duress, but in the earlier period when you were not under that kind of duress. It doesn't wash with me.
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, if you want me to defend myself, I can say only one thing. I never done from the first day in the United States anything directed against this country. I tried before I has come, when I contacted '62 the CIA, and has come in '64, I tried to get as much as possible information. I am the source who told concerning existence of microphones in American embassy in Moscow. I am the man who have given, I don't know, 300 cases --
Mr. Fithian. We are only concerned --
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. Edgar.
Mr. Edgar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
It is very hard to follow Mr. Fithian's comments because I would like to shift gears a little bit. BUT you indicated to our Chairman that you now act as a consultant to the CIA.
Is that your only job?
Mr. Nosenko. It is the only job.
Mr. Edgar. In the course of acting as consultant to the CIA, do you have access to talking with CIA employees from time to time who contact you and who assist you and protect you and give you some of the direction for your consulting?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Edgar. Have you ever been in a conversation with any of the agents of the CIA about who might have been responsible for having you detained on April 4th, 1964?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Edgar. -- 1964.
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Edgar. You indicated earlier you thought it was a man by the name of Murphy.
Mr. Nosenko. Murphy, Chief of Soviet, former Chief of Soviet Russian Division, and Chief of Counterintelligence, former Chief of Counterintelligence of the CIA Mr. Angleton because it cannot without him be decided.
Mr. Edgar. Do you know of any other KGB agents or other defectors who were held in those very same conditions?
Mr. Nosenko. No, I do not know.
Mr. Edgar. Were there any other prisoners held nearby that you could hear or --
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir, I was in solitary absolutely confinement, no prisoner, nobody I could see.
Mr. Edgar. Yet you are still willing to be a consultant to the CIA?
Mr. Nosenko. I am -- no. Sir, I am consultant only on the base, on my knowledge what I know about counterintelligence work of the KGB.
Mr. Edgar. Well, you have suggested to the Committee that your statements given to the CIA in 1964 cannot be considered
reliable because the statements were given under duress, and
prior to our recess a few moments ago you indicated that you
felt that the tapes and the FBI and the CIA interrogations of
'64, '65, and '66 should not be considered as reliable
statements.
Is that not correct?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, because I considered the whole arrest
was unlawful, without due process of law, illegal arrest,
what was the finding as unlawful by Rockefeller Commission.
Mr. Edgar. Thank you.
You were held under those spartan conditions and you
indicated that those statements would have to be unreliable.
Now, I have three specific questions, then, to ask you.
Have you ever told the CIA that these statements could
not be considered reliable?
Mr. Nosenko. Sure, when we started, they change the
situation, they moved me from spartan conditions, started to
talk with me as a human being, to treat me as a human being.
Mr. Edgar. Did you go on a point by point correction of
any of those statements you previously made?
Mr. Nosenko. It wasn't in the form of simply returning
to document, it was case by case, whatever concerns me, my
biography, my work, whatever cases I knew, whatever cases I
was involved, all questions were raised by 20, 30 times each
case, when it was reevaluation of all information given by me.
Mr. Edgar. And it is your testimony that after 1967, '68, when those interrogations took place, you gave accurate, truthful statements?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir, whatever and how good I recollect, at the best.
Mr. Edgar. And those statements of '67-'68 should be considered by this Committee as the absolute truth?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Edgar. And nothing but the truth.
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, yes, sir.
Mr. Edgar. And it is clear to you that all the questions that were raised about Oswald were also raised in 1967 and '68?
Mr. Nosenko. Everything was raised in this period.
Mr. Edgar. If, then, this Committee discovers inconsistencies in your statements that you made in 1967 and '68, after your incarceration and the illegal period that you talk about, if we find inconsistencies between that statement and the statements you gave us last night and tonight, which should we believe?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, if -- you must believe -- not you must it is up to you what you believe. But, sir, let's say was read to me by Mr. Klein a question, that I said when I said concerning Oswald, I did not mention physical surveillance. It is a big operation. It is nothing big in the KGB to put under surveil-
ance Soviet or foreigner, or to control telephone conversations
or correspondence. I could maybe something miss, you see, when I mentioning. I do not have such a brilliant, brilliant mind that immediately like photographic memory, immediately return word and word. I simply was describing that it wasn't active work, that there wasn't planned recruitment, there wasn't planned approachment, contact. There was type of passive work which is called in KGB to watch him and what is it, agents, control of correspondénce, and explaining this, I simply, I could miss that he was under surveillance.
You can return to this and tell me, uh-huh, you told in '67 you didn't mention that he was under surveillance. It is not a contradiction.
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. Nosenko, in reply to Mr. Sawyer's question, you indicated you were paid for the period of time that you were under arrest, that it was a lump sum payment I suppose?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
The Chairman. What amount of money was that?
Mr. Nosenko. Something about, oh, about $80,000.
The Chairman. About $80,000?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
The Chairman. Any other sum in addition to that were you paid?
Mr. Nosenko. I think I received about $15,000 or $20,000 when I started on my own to live, to buy furniture. I received,
yes, in the beginning, in '69, in April. But this lump I received in '70, '71. '71.
The Chairman. So that the record is clear, you received $80,000 for the period of time you were under arrest.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
The Chairman. In order to get started again, you were given an additional $15,000, and that was in '69.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
The Chairman. Since 1969, to the present time, you have received $35,000 --
Mr. Nosenko. No, no, no, sir.
The Chairman. Would you --
Mr. Nosenko. They started, when they released me they started to pay me in the beginning $16,000. Then they raised each year, $2000, two and a half thousand were raises. I only received $35,000 this year, '78, from October of '77, approximately.
The Chairman. From October '77 to the present time you received $35,000.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
The Chairman. Can you give us some indication of how many days you have worked during 1978?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, I am working at home besides coming here when they need me, at least twice a month, and spending a week, approximately, besides traveling when they are
sending me the last few years abroad to talk with friendly
intelligence services. I am also working at home on my own.
I am studying Soviet periodicals, Soviet magazines, Soviet
newspapers. I am making certain researches, I am trying not to
lose what is going on, what changes taking place in policy.
The Chairman. Would it be fair to say that you sort of
set your time and that no one else sets your time?
Mr. Nosenko. When I am out of this area, yes, at home,
I am myself setting time.
The Chairman. And during the last year, how many weeks
would you say you have spent here at the Agency?
Mr. Nosenko. Not at the Agency. They are meeting me in
other places. I am very rare visiting this place, only if they
invite me for a lecture or about KGB counterintelligence. But
I am meeting them when I am in this area, under certain
conditions, in certain places where they need me.
Well, one monthly, twice I am coming. Let's say I am
spending about 12, 13 days a month here, it can be in some
cases seven, eight days a month, but in main the last period
of time I am coming, the last years, I am coming almost
twice a month.
The Chairman. For how long?
Mr. Nosenko. For a week, five, six days.
The Chairman. My time has expired.
Mr. Preyer?
Mr. Preyer. Mr. Nosenko, your testimony has been considered a major piece of evidence, and was so considered by the Warren Commission as rebutting any Russian connection with the assassination of Lee Harvey Oswald, and I think the key part of your testimony that we are concerned with, not so much the question about any inconsistencies in it, but are you right on the big question, namely, was Lee Harvey Oswald a KGB agent?
I want to mention, I have been a little surprised by your testimony, by the gaps in your knowledge of Oswald, and really how little you knew about him. For example, when he went to Minsk, he was transferred out of your oversight, I take it, and as I understood you, you did not know he was married until later on, and did not know he had gone back to the United States.
Mr. Nosenko. Mr. Congressman, if I was staying and working '60 and '61 period in the same Seventh Department which sent file on Oswald in Minsk, I would know, but I was working in First American Department.
Mr. Preyer. Right. Now, I am not questioning you about that. The question I wonder, that that brings to my mind is, if Oswald had been a KGB agent, are you certain you would have known it? In other words, if you didn't even know he was married, didn't even know he had gone to the United States, couldn't he have been a KGB agent in that period without your knowledge, or are you certain --
Mr. Nosenko. No, I couldn't, you are absolutely right, I couldn't know. But in '63 when happened assassination of the President, when it was mentioned that Oswald shot the President, when it start, demanded the file back from Minsk, when started conversation with Minsk, started in KGB investigation, detailed approach. This is what --
Mr. Preyer. So you convinced that seeing the first section--
Mr. Nosenko. Seeing the first section in which the most important material in the whole file will be this in first section of the first volume.
Mr. Preyer. Were the rest of the sections of that file, incidentally, wire -- telephone taps?
Mr. Nosenko. It will be information from agents in second part. In third part will be from telephone conversations, from surveillance. In fourth part, photocopies of letters, different mail, when they checking Soviet connections, Soviet friends of Oswald.
Mr. Preyer. Well, on this question of your knowledge of Oswald and being in position to know about him, you knew about the cablegram from Mexico yet you did not know he had gone back to the United States. Is that because you had moved to--
Mr. Nosenko. Again, I returned in Seventh Department and I was working '62, '63, up to '64 in Seventh Department and the cablegram has come in Seventh Department. Seventh Department was started against Oswald in '59.
Mr. Preyer. Have you read a lot about the Oswald case in recent years?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, I read several books, what appeared. I only didn't read the last book which was written about Marina Oswald by Mrs. Priscilla Johnson. Why? Because I knew that I would appear here, that the staff of your -- your staff will be talking with me. I didn't wanted something to get -- I can, you know, mix what I knew and something to use what I got from the book.
Mr. Preyer. I just wondered if you had read about the Mexican cable, and perhaps through the years may have been --
Mr. Nosenko. No, I never have seen that it was mentioned Mexican cable. I have seen that he visited Mexico, in Mexico visited Soviet and Cuban embassies. This I have seen in books, this fact.
Mr. Preyer. If I have got one more moment, Mr. Chairman, to change the subject, one of the things that struck me is that when you defected, as Mrs. Burke mentioned, in Geneva, in 1964, very shortly after the Kennedy Assassination, I get the impression that the CIA or American forces to whom you defected, did not have much to say about the assassination or was not --
Mr. Nosenko. They are -- I mentioned must be Oswald, the asked. But they were asking different, whatever cases I can immediately give them, names, when recruited, his position,
from what country, this they were interested, as much as possible
to take this type of information. They asked me about Oswald.
I told them what I knew.
The Chairman The ;time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. Devine.
Mr. Devine. I don't want to know where you live, but
do you reside in the general area of the nation's capital?
Mr. Nosenko. I was living in this area up to 19 -- middle
of 1973, but FBI gentlemen -- I didn't mention , I also meeting
FBI people when I am here, not only CIA, but they are not paying
me anything. FBI people inform me that they have information
that KGB trying to locate me. Then it happened in the area
where I was living in Maryland up to 1973, I was in a
shopping center, and on me was coming a Soviet from KGB. I knew
his face, and this whole -- I immediately reported this and
we decided that for me better to move from the area where
Soviet diplomats, KGB officer working under cover of diplomats
are freely traveling and can spot me.
Mr. Devine. That person didn't recognize you?
Mr. Nosenko. I immediately turned and went, turned my back
and went in another direction.
Mr. Devine. Have you been contacted or in touch with
anyone from the Soviet Embassy here in Washington?
Mr. Nosenko. Only in 1964, the Soviet Embassy in
Washington demanded to see me after defection.
Mr. Devine. Did you see them?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, in the State Department, in presence of American diplomats, I have seen for five, say seven minutes, Consul from Soviet Embassy and interpreter, another diplomat.
Mr. Devine. What did they want with you?
Mr. Nosenko. They ask me how could I do it, and do I understand the importance of this thing, that I defected from the country, and I said, gentlemen, nobody pushed me on this question, it is absolutely my own decision, and decision of free will, which I made long ago, and without any return. Then they told me now we know how to treat you, and what do you think about your Soviet citizenship.
I said, it's automatically, I am rejecting it. I do not need. And on this I finished conversation.
Mr. Devine. They made no threats of reprisals against your family back there?
Mr. Nosenko. No, no. They later only, Mr. Congressman, they later sent two letters, one from wife and another from my mother. These letters were delivered by them. They visited American embassy in Moscow and had left these two letters. These letters were sent by American embassy in Moscow to State Department, State Department had given to CIA, CIA had given me these letters. I answered one short note that my decision is final, decision ideological and in spite of all
my love to the family, and in spite of my respect to the
memory of the father, I can repeat that if he was alive I would
also would do the same, that is all.
Mr. Devine. Getting back to one of Mr. Stoke's questions
about the amount of money paid to you for your years of
incarceration, the fact that they gave you $15,000 or $20,000
which you used for furniture and so forth, were there any
strings tied to either of those funds, the $80,000 or the subse-
quently amount?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir, no.
Mr. Devine. That you would not contact the press or
anybody else about this?
Mr. Nosenko. No, it never was mentioned, never.
Mr. Devine. No strings attached?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Devine. Finally, do you have any knowledge of any
connection with Oswald and the assassination of President
Kennedy?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir.
Mr. Devine. From your connections in the KGB at that time?
Mr. Nosenko. Whatever I said, nothing more. I do not
know anything.
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mrs. Burke.
Mrs. Burke. I have just a few random questions. You
mentioned Priscilla Johnson's book. Did you by any chance while you were working in the American tourist area, did you have any occasion to investigate her coming to Russia or did she come during any of that time as a student?
Mr. Nosenko. Priscilla Johnson?
Mrs. Burke. Yes.
Mr. Nosenko. Why, yes, her name, she was a correspondent in Moscow working, and KGB didn't like her dispatches and they made very, very rude operations against her. They --
Mrs. Burke. What did they do.
Mr. Nosenko. Huh?
Mrs. Burke. What did they do to her?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, they wanted to get rid of her from the Soviet Union. They didn't see possibility to recruit her. They didn't see any possibility to find or to create compromising situation. They didn't like her dispatches which they were anti-Soviet. Then they decided to get rid of her, and they made such an operation in restaurant where she had dinner in evening. They put drugs in her liquor, which she was drinking, wine or vodka or whatever it would be, and she was absolutely drunk. And she was delivered in local regional, one of the regional little -- it's not clinic, it is where they deliver drunks to spend night. And they put her there and made photo pictures of her being drunk and other women drunk laying there and published an article and put even a picture. And surely
she was immediately recalled by her agency or her newspapers for which she was working.
Mrs. Burke. Do you think that is the wrong Priscilla Johnson?
Mr. Edgar. If the gentlewoman would yield, are you sure that you are talking about the same person?
Mr. Nosenko. Priscilla Johnson, yes, this correspondent, yes.
Mrs. Burke. Let me ask you one other question.
When she was there, did she interview Oswald?
Mr. Nosenko. I know it is now reading here the books. I didn't know that she interviewed. I only found out it with living in the United States, with reading books.
Mrs. Burke. That she interviewed him. That didn't show in your file?
Mr. Nosenko. I didn't read her book -- this is what in some other books mentioned that she had interviewed him.
Mrs. Burke. Let me ask again about Oswald in Minsk, and first of all, can American tourists go to Minsk easily?
Mr. Nosenko. Minsk is open city, yes.
Mrs. Burke. It is an open city now. Was it an open city then?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mrs. Burke. And when he was there, of course, I realize that you don't know and you did not keep up with what he was
doing there, but in reading that file, in the first few
pages or anything, did you notice anything in terms of his
contacts with Americans, or did you notice anything at all
that was extraordinary about him?
Mr. Nosenko. No, there wasn't. For the whole his period
of time there wasn't found any indication on suspicion,
suspicious meetings or anything suspicion concerning his contacts
with Americans.
Mrs. Burke. Let me -- As I understand it, it was fairly
routine that everyone's phone would be tapped, so that that
was not --
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mrs. Burke. -- your information that that would be
nothing unusual.
You know, there is one thing that is bothering me, and
that is the inconsistency and the greater detail that is present
today than in your earlier statements.
Could you give us an explanation of why there is more de-
tail today?
For instance, in your earlier statements I noticed you
refer to the interpreter as a tourist, the tourist guide, as
just a tourist guide or an interpreter? Today you referred
by name to that person. And again, the two psychiatrists --
Mr. Nosenko. I don't know even now name of this inter-
preter. I do not remember name.
Mrs. Burke. I see. I thought --
Mr. Nosenko. Interpreter, I never mentioned.
Mrs. Burke. You never mentioned the interpreter?
Mr. Nosenko. No. I do not remember her name.
Mrs. Burke. It was just this officer Rastrusin?
Mr. Nosenko. Officer, yes.
Mrs. Burke. He was -- but he was the one that found -- wasn't he the one that found Oswald?
Mr. Nosenko. No, this is the officer who reported about him.
Mrs. Burke. He reported it, but he didn't find him?
Mr. Nosenko. No, no, interpreter found him with administration of the hotel where Oswald was staying.
Mrs. Burke. Oh, I see.
Mr. Nosenko. You see, interpreter has come in the morning to take him or has come to take him to city, to show him, as interpreter on a guide, on a tour. And she was waiting about 20, 25, 30 minutes and was concerned.
The Chairman. Time is up. One more.
Mrs. Burke. All right, just one more question.
When Oswald arrived, then, he didn't speak very much Russian, is that right?
Mr. Nosenko. No. I didn't hear that he spoke in Russian.
Mrs. Burke. I see. Were there any notations at all in the file -- what is your understanding of his fluency in Russian
during the time of his stay?
Mr. Nosenko. Well, during time of his stay surely he started a little bit to talk, but it wasn't very, it wasn't good Russian. It wasn't even --
The Chairman. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.
Mrs. Burke. Thank you.
The Chairman. Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Dodd. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I would like to just pick up on that line of questioning, if I could, with you, Mr. Nosenko.
Correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it, Oswald, you were aware of Oswald's desire to defect. There was a decision, and in fact he was informed through his Intourist guide that his request had been rejected.
Is that correct so far?
Mr. Nosenko. Is in general, but it wasn't in this ways told to him. It was in so-called, you know, soft manner. It was explained to him by through Intourist --
Mr. Dodd. That he would have to go through his embassy?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, that Intourist not dealing with this question. He must go through this, this, this procedures.
Mr. Dodd. Okay.
Now, you, at the time of this, of Oswald's request, you were working in the Seventh Department of the Second Directorate which was involved with tourism?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Dodd. Okay. Could you tell me what would be the normal operating procedures within the Soviet Union if a tourist were involved, say, in a car accident with an Intourist guide. Say a Frenchman was involved in a car accident. Assuming it was not his fault, someone hit him, what happens? Do they notify immediately the French Embassy, what steps do they take in order to deal with that individual?
Mr. Nosenko. I would assume, sir, that he will be, sure, he immediately will be taken in polyclinic, will be informed his embassy.
Mr. Dodd. Those kind of steps.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Dodd. If you had made a decision that Oswald should not be accepted in the Soviet Union, and if you find him in his room with his wrist slit, why don't you then contact the American Embassy and notify them that you have an American on your hands who just tried to kill himself?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, he wasn't an employee of American embassy.
Mr. Dodd. He was a tourist, though.
Mr. Nosenko. A tourist.
Mr. Dodd. And I just asked you about a Frenchman who might be a tourist and get in a car accident, and you said you would take him to the hospital, you would notify the embassy. Why
don't you take Mr. Oswald to the hospital and notify the American embassy?
Mr. Nosenko. Nobody knew that he would cut wrist.
Mr. Dodd. No, but you found him with his wrist cut.
Mr. Nosenko. Right. He was delivered in hospital.
Mr. Dodd. Why didn't you notify the American embassy?
Mr. Nosenko. He wasn't dying, he wasn't serious, they made transfusion and put stitches. It is -- I am telling what I think why it was.
Mr. Dodd. You understand my problem here. You have got someone who you don't want to accept him. You have already made a decision that he shouldn't be allowed to defect. You walk into his room and find him with his wrist slit, it would seem to me that this guy has already indicated just by that act alone that he is not playing with a full deck of cards, and you decide then that you are going to accept him because you are worried that it might cause some embarrassment after Camp David.
Mr. Nosenko. No. But the question to inform the Embassy, it must be passing through such stage. Intourist itself cannot contact the American Embassy.
Mr. Dodd. No, obviously.
Mr. Nosenko. No. They must contact their Minister of Foreign Trade which in its turn putting question to Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Soviet
Union can contact the embassy.
Mr. Dodd. Let me jump onto something else quickly in the time we've got.
You knew that Lee Harvey Oswald was a Marine?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Dodd. You knew by your answer to Mrs. Burke's question a minute ago that Oswald had a student's knowledge of Russian?
Mr. Nosenko. When he was living in Minsk, not before, before he has come. No.
Mr. Dodd. You didn't know that?
Mr. Nosenko. No, when he was living in Minsk, when he was in daily contact with Soviets working at the plant and having friends.
Mr. Dodd. Did you know that he had been a student of Marxism?
Mr. Nosenko. No.
Mr. Dodd. Did you know that he had given the U.S. embassy his notice to defect?
Mr. Nosenko. No. I know that he visited embassy and after was, he was told that he will be allowed to stay, after this.
Mr. Dodd. You were not aware at that time that he contacted through Intourist and eventually your office and made it known that he intended to defect or wanted to defect, you were not aware or your department was not aware that he had
already notified the American embassy that he intended to
defect?
Mr. Nosenko. No, no, no, sir.
Mr. Dodd. You were not aware of that.
Mr. Nosenko. No. He wasn't under surveillance. We
didn't know. When he was going alone without interpreter, we
didn't know.
Mr. Dodd. I didn't ask you how you know. I just asked
you whether or not -- he didn't tell you that?
Mr. Nosenko. No. Nobody from KGB talked with him.
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. Sawyer?
Mr. Sawyer. When Congressman Devine asked you how you
knew your family was okay or that they hadn't invoked any
reprisals, I didn't get the answer.
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I asked Mr. Solie in '69, '70, once
I asked, anything about my family?
Mr. Sawyer. Mr. who?
Mr. Nosenko. Mr. Bruce Solie, CIA officer who was in
contact with me, '69, '70. He answered me that they are all
right, everything okay. But he didn't went in any detail
and I never returned more to this question. But there is another
point, sir. Besides the father's position, after he died, she
was receiving, she received pension, and besides that, for
the years --
Mr. Sawyer. How did you know she died?
Mr. Nosenko. Father died, I said. Father died in 1956. After father's death she received a pension.
Mr. Sawyer. I understand. You went through that before.
I noticed here though, when he slashed his wrist, the psychiatric examination report here by the doctor says the patient apparently understands the questions asked in Russian, so he must have spoken Russian, you know, to whatever degree, when he went there. I thought you said you were always interested in someone who can speak Russian or has studied anything Russian.
Mr. Nosenko. Who specializes in any field of Russia, who will be working for the United States government.
Mr. Sawyer. But here is a guy at that time, when he first came there, within a matter of days after, the doctor says the patient apparently understands the questions asked in Russian.
Mr. Nosenko. Sir --
Mr. Sawyer. That would have keyed interest right there, wouldn't it?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, if we knew that he studied in Columbia University, in Yale University --
Mr. Sawyer. Well, it says right --
Mr. Nosenko. In Russian Institute.
Mr. Sawyer. It says on the report, this was on the 21st or the 23rd or 25th of October, a week after he arrived, it
says the patient apparently understands the questions asked in Russian. So you knew he spoke Russian at that time. And yet that was one of your criteria.
Mr. Nosenko: Well, sir, I'm curious.
Mr. Sawyer. Something else I am a little curious about. Apparently, coming here, wanting to defect, wanting to leave America, wanting Russia, here is a guy that if he didn't know anything would be apparently capable of going back to the United States at the behest of KGB in areas of the country that Russian diplomats and so forth, KGB people weren't allowed to go and dig up information for them and come back. Here is a guy you didn't have to threaten, he volunteers. And it seems strange you wouldn't talk to him or be interested in him just from that point of view.
And how -- and another thing that greatly bothers me, how did you know that he, being in the Marines, you knew that, but how did you know he wasn't a cryptographer or how did you know he wasn't stationed in the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff as a guard or as a messenger or a clerk, or that he worked with U-2s, which apparently he did. Why would the KGB not at least find these things out, with a guy that wants to go to Russia, wants to be a Russian?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I only can repeat you, when on him was received the first information about his arrival, checkup was made on him. There wasn't any existing material in KGB, any
knowledge about him. He never was before in the Soviet Union.
In judging by the question --
Mr. Sawyer. Why weren't they asking, why wouldn't they ask, that's the question. Why wouldn't they ask?
Mr. Nosenko. They are not --
Mr. Sawyer. Apparently they knew he could speak Russian.
Mr. Nosenko. -- asking Americans approaching.
Judging by the questionnaire, they decided, the KGB decided, Seventh Department, he is not an interesting target.
Mr. Sawyer. Well, why would a person like this not even be interesting for something like the Tokyo Rose, on some kind of propaganda program where he could say how bad things were in the United States, and why he didn't want to stay there anymore and how great they were in Russia, like these propagandists do?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I am telling you why it was decided, and how KGB was thinking about him.
Mr. Sawyer. I yield back the balance of my time.
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. Fithian.
Mr. Fithian. Mr. Chairman, I just now got this report. I wonder if I could let Mr. Edgar go ahead of me?
The Chairman. The Chair will recognize Mr. Edgar.
Mr. Edgar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I have a series of questions which I hope most of which
will be yes and no kinds of questions.
Did you conduct in the KGB a program to compromise and recruit journalists?
Mr. Nosenko. I was working, when I started to work in the KGB in 1953, the first year I was working against American correspondents.
Mr. Edgar. But the KGB, not you personally, but the KGB did have a policy of going against journalists and trying to compromise them, yes or no?
Mr. Nosenko. Trying to recruit or compromise them.
Mr. Edgar. Did they censor all the journalists' notes that they could gather from the journalists? Did they censor the notes before they allowed the story to go out?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Edgar. Priscilla Johnson interviewed Oswald on the 15th of November, 1959. Would the KGB have looked at her notes from that interview?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, they are censored not by the KGB, but there is special -- it is government organization was censoring this. Some materials are coming to the KGB, some are not coming.
Mr. Edgar. Well, she reveals in her article that he was a Marxist, that Oswald was a Marxist and a Marine Corps radar man. It would seem to me the KGB would have discovered that in November of 1959.
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I didn't know this in those days.
Mr. Edgar. Do you know a correspondent by the name of Arlene Mosby??
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, I heard such a name, Mosby, a woman who was a correspondent.
Mr. Edgar. In the earlier questioning of Congresswoman Burke, you were not confusing Arlene Mosby with the treatment of Priscilla Johnson?
Mr. Nosenko. I think it was Priscilla Johnson, the case which I described, I think so. I think so, it was Priscilla Johnson.
Mr. Edgar. How do you know?
Mr. Nosenko. What I heard from colleagues who were in KGB, who were working against correspondents.
Mr. Edgar. But you are not absolutely clear?
Mr. Nosenko. And then there was an article in --
Mr. Edgar. You are not absolutely --
Mr. Nosenko. In literary newspaper, I think it was, not in Pravda, Izvestia, but in Literary Gazette.
Mr. Edgar. But you are not absolutely certain?
Mr. Nosenko. No. I think it was Priscilla Johnson, as I said.
Mr. Edgar. But it could have been someone else.
Mr. Nosenko. An American correspondent, woman.
Mr. Edgar. Are you certain that after 1967 you sat down
with the CIA and corrected your earlier statements about Oswald, yes or no?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
Mr. Edgar. We have only a few pages of written testimony, some three pages that you gave, and in fact, in the beginning part of that testimony, you indicate that you don't want to go through it again because your earlier testimony will stand for itself. I am paraphrasing what you said.
Were the notes and the recordings of those corrections made and kept by the CIA?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, Mr. Bruce Solie talking with me every day for a period from the end of '67, the whole '68, 1968, '69, every conversation he was recording. But he never has come and showed his notes, transcriptions or anything. He was returning to every case, to every aspect by 20, 25, 30 times.
Mr. Edgar. But specifically on the Oswald case, would it be correct in our assuming that it was more than three pages of notes on specifically Lee Harvey Oswald after 1967?
Mr. Nosenko. If he was raising questions concerning also Lee Harvey Oswald.
MR. Edgar. We have some information that Bruce Solie --
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, Mr. Solie.
Mr. Edgar. Stated in a deposition that there is nothing on Oswald other than the three pages.
Mr. Nosenko. I cannot say how many pages. I know
that he was passing through all cases, all questions, with me
for the period almost two years.
Mr. Edgar. Who other than Bruce Solie did you talk to about
correcting your earlier statements?
Mr. Nosenko. I wasn't correcting them. They were correcting;
they were talking returning back to every case.
Mr. Edgar. One final question.
Mr. Nosenko. And also besides Mr. Solie, were people coming
from FBI with cases in which were interested for them.
Mr. Edgar. One final question. You stopped our hearing
about an hour ago and were concerned about our playing the tape
and bringing up old memories, and I respect the fact that you are
very patriotic in coming before this Committee and helping us.
Would you be willing to sit down with our staff and go
through a series of written questions which outline specifically
for you the contradictions of your 1964, '65, '66 and early '67
timeframe, with the statements that you made in '67, '68 and
'78, and indicate in a yes-no manner which statement, laid side
by side, is true and which statement is false?
Mr. Nosenko. If it is the wish of the Committee, sure.
Mr. Edgar. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. Fithian?
Mr. Fithian. Mr. Nosenko, do you remember when it was that the
FBI first interviewed you concerning Oswald?
Mr. Nosenko. Sir, I do not remember dates, but --
Mr. Fithian. It was between February and April?
Mr. Nosenko. Right, right.
Mr. Fithian. The information we have is that it was early March, the first week in March. Is that about right?
Now have you talked to the FBI about that testimony at any time since then?
Mr. Nosenko. Gentlemen, on many, many times I have seen FBI, many, many questions raised. I cannot -- about this testimony, no, no.
Mr. Fithian. About the Oswald testimony?
Mr. Nosenko. About Oswald were asked questions, but not about this testimony. I do not remember about this testimony.
Mr. Fithian. My question is, there is a written transcript summary of your testimony to the FBI taken on March 5th, 1964.
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Fithian. My question is, have you at any time since then visited with the FBI about this testimony?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir, no, sir.
Mr. Fithian. Now, next, when -- what is your understanding as to when Oswald first offered to defect, when you first knew, when the KGB first knew he was interested in defecting?
Mr. Nosenko. I cannot give you a date.
Mr. Fithian. All right.
Well, he filled out an application --
Mr. Nosenko. No, no, no application, in oral form. He told the interpreter in oral form.
Mr. Fithian. This was the Intourist?
Mr. Nosenko. Interpreter of the Intourist.
Mr. Fithian. And then the Intourist came to the KGB?
Mr. Nosenko. Right, and it immediately was informed to KGB that this American applies, wants to stay, said to interpreter.
Mr. Fithian. And then you reviewed the file?
Mr. Nosenko. It was several pieces of pages what we had on him. It wasn't even file.
Mr. Fithian. But you reviewed whatever applications --
Mr. Nosenko. Right. No it wasn't application to stay. He in oral form told the interpreter that he wants to stay Soviet Union.
Mr. Fithian. You reviewed the pages that he had filled out for the visa and any other sheets that you had?
Mr. Nosenko. He didn't -- yes, these documents, yes, for the visa, questionnaire and --
Mr. Fithian. Yes. What I am trying to get at is what did you have in front of you physically, knowledgeably about Oswald?
Mr. Nosenko. What I remember, it was it was several pages only, was questionnaire, was form of document from Intourist received how long his tour and how many days. There was checks of Oswald in archives of KGB to forms. There was information from Intourist who work with Oswald and
Mr. Fithian. All right. Let me just stop you here.
Mr. Nosenko. Yes.
Mr. Fithian. The forms in there by the KGB were filled out based on what information?
Mr. Nosenko. On his name, what he supplied who he is, when he was asking visa.
Mr. Fithian. But they conducted no check, no search?
Mr. Nosenko. It is in the archives of KGB, if he ever was in Soviet Union, on him there will be something. If he wasn't in Soviet Union but he was known to intelligence service --
Mr. Fithian. But you didn't have any record on that.
Mr. Nosenko. Nothing.
Mr. Fithian. And so the final question is that the only thing that you had to judge -that he was an uninteresting subject was what he had told the Intourist guide?
Mr. Nosenko. Right.
Mr. Fithian. That is the only substantive thing?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir, and his questionnaire for who he is, his name, whatever he filled about himself. That's all.
The Chairman. The time of the gentleman has expired.
The Chair has one additional request from one member, for one additional question.
Mr. Sawyer?
Mr. Sawyer. I just have one additional question, and that is the $80,000 you got for compensation and the $15,000 or $20,000
you got later, that was net money after whatever taxes or whatever it was --
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, after all taxes were taken.
Mr. Sawyer. Thank you.
Mr. Dodd. Mr. Chairman?
The Chairman. Mr. Dodd?
Mr. Dodd. I just wondered for the record, I wondered if, Mr. Nosenko, you could tell us when you arrived in this country on February 12th, 1964, between February 12th, 1964 and April 4th, 1964, where were you in this country?
Mr. Nosenko. February 12 of 1964 and April 4th, I was staying in house in Virginia. I do not know address.
Mr. Dodd. Did you go -- did you travel at all?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir.
Mr. Dodd. No vacation?
Mr. Nosenko. Oh, I went in March on week to Hawaii I was.
Mr. Dodd. Were you on your own?
Mr. Nosenko. No, no, no, with guards.
Mr. Dodd. It was a relaxed period for you and just a chance to rest?
Mr. Nosenko. Chance to get a little bit rest.
Mr. Dodd. Is it your knowledge that this is the normal way that defectors are treated when they come to this country?
Mr. Nosenko. I do not know.
Mr. Dodd. Just one last point, Mr. Chairman, and that is
with regard to the American exhibit, as a result of a statement by Mr. Klein which I understand you did not disagree with, the American exhibit ended on September 4th, 1959? That's when the termination of the exhibit was?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, he showed me an article.
Mr. Dodd. Is it your knowledge that employees that worked during the exhibit stayed on for a period of time after that?
Mr. Nosenko. Sure, to it will be disassembled, this is the whole process is going on. It is closed for visitors to visit, to look.
Mr. Dodd. How long a period would that have been, a week?
Mr. Nosenko. No, more.
Mr. Dodd. More?
Mr. Nosenko. More, sure.
Mr. Dodd. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
The Chairman. Mr. Nosenko, with reference to your earlier comments this evening regarding what transpired during your period of isolation, which you described as extreme spartan conditions, I would like to make this request of you. I think the record ought to in a very graphic way portray those conditions under which you were subjected during that period of time, and while you are complying with Mr. Edgar's request and working with the staff in terms of the contradictory data, would you also agree to work with the staff in terms of seeing that the record has a complete and accurate description --
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
The Chairman. --of all the conditions which you underwent during that period?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
The Chairman. Thank you.
Did you have some?
Mr. Cornwell. Following up on the question that Congressman Dodd just asked you, the staff, in an attempt to determine how long it took to disassemble the exhibition, checked with a knowledgeable employee who was involved in that process in the State Department and were informed by that person that the exhibition was disassembled and the persons who were operating it had left by October the 4th, approximately 30 days after the exhibition was terminated.
Would you disagree with that information?
Mr. Nosenko. No, sir, I cannot disagree. I do not remember. I do not know, even, when they left, no, sir.
Mr. Cornwell. That is all I have.
The Chairman. Anything further from the Committee?
Now, Mr. Devine, do you have anything?
Mr. Devine. No. He is under continuing subpoena.
The Chairman. Under the rules of the Committee, Mr. Nosenko, any witness appearing before our Committee is entitled at the conclusion of his testimony to address the Committee for a period of five minutes for the purpose of clarifying anything
for the record or making any statement he so desires, and I want
to at this time afford you that five minute period to make such a
statement, if you so desire.
Mr. Nosenko. Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, I consider
my appearance, invitation to appear at Committee, as I told also
the same applies before, my meetings with the staff of the Commit-
tee, I consider it honor, great honor for me. I will try to
answer whatever I remember, whatever I know as only truth, and
but the truth. And you would like to see me appear at any time,
I am at your disposal and I will try to give you the only things
what I know.
The Chairman. Thank you.
That is the completion of your statement, sir?
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
The Chairman. Mr. Nosenko, on behalf of the Committee and
the United States Congress, I want to express our appreciation to
you for having appeared here and having given this Committee the
benefit of your testimony. At this time I would remind you of
the terms of your agreement to work with our staff and provide
further information to the Committee, that you will continue
under the oath administered to you by this Committee.
Mr. Nosenko. Yes, sir.
The Chairman. Thank you very much for your appearance
here.
Mr. Nosenko. Thank you, sir.
The Chairman. You are excused.
At this time, there being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting is adjourned subject to the call of the Chair.
(Whereupon, at 10:17 o'clock p.m., the Committee was adjourned subject to the call of the Chair.)
--- | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10131-10324.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 116,
"total-input-tokens": 132588,
"total-output-tokens": 39755,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
0,
1
],
[
0,
382,
2
],
[
382,
1256,
3
],
[
1256,
2260,
4
],
[
2260,
3319,
5
],
[
3319,
4502,
6
],
[
4502,
5532,
7
],
[
5532,
6797,
8
],
[
6797,
7969,
9
],
[
7969,
9205,
10
],
[
9205,
10505,
11
],
[
10505,
11578,
12
],
[
11578,
12538,
13
],
[
12538,
13828,
14
],
[
13828,
15036,
15
],
[
15036,
16139,
16
],
[
16139,
17438,
17
],
[
17438,
18761,
18
],
[
18761,
20025,
19
],
[
20025,
21063,
20
],
[
21063,
22076,
21
],
[
22076,
23067,
22
],
[
23067,
24259,
23
],
[
24259,
25283,
24
],
[
25283,
26505,
25
],
[
26505,
27552,
26
],
[
27552,
28606,
27
],
[
28606,
29735,
28
],
[
29735,
30733,
29
],
[
30733,
31849,
30
],
[
31849,
33056,
31
],
[
33056,
34188,
32
],
[
34188,
35325,
33
],
[
35325,
36173,
34
],
[
36173,
37321,
35
],
[
37321,
38670,
36
],
[
38670,
39825,
37
],
[
39825,
40926,
38
],
[
40926,
41944,
39
],
[
41944,
43275,
40
],
[
43275,
44594,
41
],
[
44594,
45926,
42
],
[
45926,
47182,
43
],
[
47182,
48307,
44
],
[
48307,
49790,
45
],
[
49790,
50930,
46
],
[
50930,
52105,
47
],
[
52105,
53396,
48
],
[
53396,
54640,
49
],
[
54640,
55852,
50
],
[
55852,
56874,
51
],
[
56874,
58286,
52
],
[
58286,
59725,
53
],
[
59725,
61220,
54
],
[
61220,
62440,
55
],
[
62440,
63530,
56
],
[
63530,
64694,
57
],
[
64694,
66022,
58
],
[
66022,
67281,
59
],
[
67281,
68554,
60
],
[
68554,
69927,
61
],
[
69927,
71031,
62
],
[
71031,
72413,
63
],
[
72413,
73745,
64
],
[
73745,
74926,
65
],
[
74926,
76033,
66
],
[
76033,
77341,
67
],
[
77341,
78574,
68
],
[
78574,
79909,
69
],
[
79909,
81158,
70
],
[
81158,
82422,
71
],
[
82422,
83670,
72
],
[
83670,
84991,
73
],
[
84991,
86418,
74
],
[
86418,
87740,
75
],
[
87740,
88848,
76
],
[
88848,
90139,
77
],
[
90139,
91515,
78
],
[
91515,
92845,
79
],
[
92845,
94082,
80
],
[
94082,
95251,
81
],
[
95251,
96554,
82
],
[
96554,
97818,
83
],
[
97818,
99066,
84
],
[
99066,
100151,
85
],
[
100151,
101398,
86
],
[
101398,
102795,
87
],
[
102795,
104149,
88
],
[
104149,
105457,
89
],
[
105457,
106775,
90
],
[
106775,
108077,
91
],
[
108077,
109150,
92
],
[
109150,
110481,
93
],
[
110481,
111591,
94
],
[
111591,
112765,
95
],
[
112765,
113911,
96
],
[
113911,
115068,
97
],
[
115068,
116264,
98
],
[
116264,
117535,
99
],
[
117535,
118590,
100
],
[
118590,
119702,
101
],
[
119702,
120935,
102
],
[
120935,
122338,
103
],
[
122338,
123559,
104
],
[
123559,
124724,
105
],
[
124724,
125824,
106
],
[
125824,
127076,
107
],
[
127076,
128402,
108
],
[
128402,
129577,
109
],
[
129577,
130846,
110
],
[
130846,
132025,
111
],
[
132025,
133107,
112
],
[
133107,
134393,
113
],
[
134393,
135596,
114
],
[
135596,
136857,
115
],
[
136857,
137127,
116
]
]
} |
821c0fb9c7c00e39ab578d5c7fc357e32fa1b7e2 | Agency Information
AGENCY: HSCA
RECORD NUMBER: 180-10131-10325
RECORD SERIES: SECURITY CLASSIFIED TESTIMONY
AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 014725
Document Information
ORIGINATOR: HSCA
FROM: TOVAR, BERNARD HUGH
TO:
TITLE: DEPOSITION OF BERNARD HUGH TOVAR
DATE: 06/29/1978
PAGES: 48
SUBJECTS:
CIA, METHODOLOGY
TOVAR, BERNARD HUGH, TESTIMONY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE
OSWALD, LEE, RUSSIAN PERIOD, DEFECTION TO RUSSIA
DOCUMENT TYPE: TRANSCRIPT
CLASSIFICATION: Top Secret
RESTRICTIONS: 3
CURRENT STATUS: Redact
DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 03/26/1997
OPENING CRITERIA:
COMMENTS: Box 5
TESTIMONY OF:
Bernard Hugh Tovar
PAGE 2
ASSASSINATION OF JOHN F. KENNEDY
Thursday, June 29, 1978
U. S. House of Representatives,
John F. Kennedy Subcommittee of
Select Committee on Assassinations,
Washington, D. C.
Deposition of:
BERNARD HUGH TOVAR
called for examination by staff counsel for the subcommittee,
pursuant to notice, in the offices of House Annex II, Room 3370,
Second and D. Streets, Southwest, Washington, D. C., beginning at
2:00 o'clock p.m., before Albert Joseph LaFrance, a Notary Public
in and for the District of Columbia, when were present on behalf
of the respective parties:
For the Subcommittee:
MICHAEL GOLDSMITH, ESQ. Staff Counsel
ELIZABETH WOLF
For the Deponent:
(There was representation by counsel)
TESTIMONY OF HUGH TOVAR
Mr. Goldsmith. State your name for the record.
Mr. Tovar. I sign my name B. Hugh. My full name is Bernard Hugh Tovar.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Tovar, my name is Michael Goldsmith, Senator Staff Counsel of the Select Committee on Assassinations. I have been designated by the Committee to take your deposition today. You are here voluntarily today?
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. You have the right to have counsel present. Do you waive that right?
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Have you read a copy of the Committee's supporting resolution?
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Have you had a chance to read Rule Number 4?
Mr. Tovar. I have.
Mr. Goldsmith. The Committee rules provide for the transcript of a deposition to be made available to a witness and actually be delivered for retention by any witness that gives the Committee a statement. However, by virtue of the arrangement that the Committee has worked out with the CIA, the Agency has asked us to request Agency employees testifying before us to waive the right actually to receive a copy of the transcript.
The reason for that is because the transcript frequently will contain classified information and the Agency prefers for that information to be kept in our secure area here. So I would like to ask you to waive your right to receive a copy of your statement but in so doing, I want to assure you that you will be given a right to review the transcript for accuracy, to make comment upon it and if necessary, to give an additional statement.
Mr. Tovar. I agree.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to inform you that the court reporter will provide you with a transcript and the transcript will be certified by the reporter as a complete, accurate and true record of all the testimony that you give here today.
Now, you are employed by the CIA, is that correct?
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. I had given you earlier a copy of a letter dated 23 March 1978 from Mr. Carlucci to the Chairman of this Committee. Have you had a chance to read that letter?
Mr. Tovar. I have.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you understand it?
Mr. Tovar. I understand it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Then I think we are ready to proceed to the substance of the questioning. What is your present position with the CIA?
Mr. Tovar. I am the Chief of the Counterintelligence
Staff of the Directorate of Operations.
Mr. Goldsmith. How long have you been working in that capacity?
Mr. Tovar. Ever since a year ago April.
Mr. Goldsmith. How long have you been working with the Agency?
Mr. Tovar. Thirty years.
Mr. Goldsmith. What was your assignment prior to becoming Chief of the CI Staff?
Mr. Tovar. I was recently returned from overseas where I was Station Chief in Bangkok and three years before that, Chief of the Station in Laos.
Mr. Goldsmith. Prior to assuming your position as Chief of the CI Staff had you had extensive experience in the area of counterintelligence?
Mr. Tovar. No, not particularly. We don't as a rule specialize. We are normally generalists. I do not consider myself a counterintelligence expert.
Mr. Goldsmith. During the years 1959 to '63 what position did you occupy with the Agency?
Mr. Tovar. In 1959 I was Chief of Station in Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia.
In 1920, I came back and I was originally Deputy Chief and then Chief of the Branch in Far East Division which controls operations in the Phillipines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia,
New Zealand, and Oceania. That was until 1964.
Mr. Goldsmith. Have you had a chance to review CIA
document number 1817 and the pages that follow it?
Mr. Tovar. Yes, I have read these. I had not read these.
They were released by one of my subordinates, Mr. Friedlander.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you telling us that today is the first
chance you had to read them?
Mr. Tovar. I did not read them this time. They went to
you, to the Committee but I have since read them.
Mr. Goldsmith. They were prepared by whom?
Mr. Tovar. Jack Friedlander, Chief of Operations. They
were signed by him, not prepared by him. They would have been
originated probably by Mr. Kowalski or Mr. Bradley, I am not
sure which. I think Kowalski almost certainly.
Mr. Goldsmith. The memorandum which is labeled CIA No.
1817 was a response by the Agency to an inquiry by the
Committee as to whether it was standard operating procedure for
the Agency to debrief what in effect were repatriated defectors.
I believe it is fair to say by way of summary that the memo
says that it was not in fact standard operating procedure
during the years 1959 to '63 to debrief such individuals. Is
that correct?
Mr. Tovar. Insofar as I understand it. My knowledge is
limited to what I see here before me in the paper. During this
period in question I was not involved, so I didn't know what
the current policy was then.
What I have been told since by those who should know is that there was no policy as set forth here.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know what the criteria were for selecting the 117 individuals whose files were reviewed?
Mr. Tovar. No. I think someone mentioned the other day that the names were incorporated in a memorandum I think originally by the FBI but I would not certify to that.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Tovar, since you have no direct knowledge as to the manner in which this memo was prepared and, for example, you don't know the criteria that was used for choosing these 117 people, I am not going to ask you questions pertaining to that document. I would like to request that you communicate with the Office of Legislative Counsel at the Agency and tell them the individual who was involved in the actual direct preparation of the document so that I could spend some time with him.
Mr. Tovar. The document, of course, is over my signature, so I stand behind the document. I am responsible for what was said there. If it is incorrect then I am incorrect in letting that document out. I have no personal first hand knowledge of the research he did to arrive at the conclusion here which he presented to me and I endorsed. I am prepared to stand behind it but I will give you his name.
Mr. Goldsmith. I want to ask you some questions about the
document. CIA no. 1818 indicates that CI Staff has completed a
review of the files of 117 US persons who had "defected" to
the USSR between 1959 and '63 and since returned to the United
States. Is that correct? '58 to '63?
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like you to review the statement
under the name Thomas Morri.dian M-O-R-R-I-D-I-A-N. While you
read that paragraph, I will state for the record that the way
the memo is set forth it indicates that it was not standard
operating procedure to debrief such individuals, that of 117
people whose files were reviewed only ten were debriefed.
Then it proceeds to list the ten individuals who in fact were
debriefed.
I have now requested Mr. Tovar to read the first summary
which is right next to the name of the first person who was
debriefed.
Mr. Tovar. Yes sir.
Mr. Goldsmith. When did that individual defect?
Mr. Tovar. 1947 is the year he went to the USSR. I
assume that is the year he defected, if that is the term.
Mr. Goldsmith. So that in fact that individual was not
someone who defected between 1958 and 1963?
Mr. Tovar. That is correct.
Mr. Goldsmith. Let us look at the next individual under
B, Joseph Marshall.
Mr. Tovar. Yes sir.
Mr. Goldsmith. When did Mr. Marshall defect?
Mr. Tovar. It is not clear. He was born in the US in 1897. He said he was employed in Hawaii in 1921. There is no indication whence he went to the USSR.
Mr. Goldsmith. There is no indication he defected between '58 and '63?
Mr. Tovar. No. He was arrested by the Soviets in 1945. Conceivably he might have defected after that.
Mr. Goldsmith. The letter "C", Tommaro S-G-O-V-I-O. Would you please read that section and tell us when this individual defected?
Mr. Tovar. Again, he went to the USSR with his parents in the 1930s. No indication when he defected. He left the USSR in 1960. No way of telling.
Mr. Goldsmith. This individual did not defect between '58 and '63?
Mr. Tovar. At last we have no indication he did. One would assume to the contrary.
Mr. Goldsmith. Letter "D", Mary Mackler, will you please read the first summary and tell us when she defected?
Mr. Tovar. There is no indication when she defected. She went to the USSR with her parents in 1931. Sometime after, married a Soviet.
Mr. Goldsmith. Again, no indication she defected between
'58 and '63?
Mr. Tovar. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you look at letter "E". Sonia and Fred A-S-I-N-I-A-N. When did they defect?
Mr. Tovar. They renounced their US citizenship in 1948. So I assume that is the operative year.
Mr. Goldsmith. Will you look at the letter "F" now?
Mr. Tovar. Jack Kurasinski.
Mr. Goldsmith. When did he defect?
Mr. Tovar. He recounced his US citizenship in '34 and departed USSR I assume in 1934.
Mr. Goldsmith. The point I am trying to make is that the memo responding to the Committee's inquiry makes reference to ten individuals who defected between the years '58 and '63. It then proceed to provide us with ten names. But in fact, if we continue to look through the list we will see that seven of the ten individuals did not defect during that time period. Some of them did return during that time period.
Mr. Tovar. And were debriefed.
Mr. Goldsmith. And were debriefed.
Mr. Tovar. Contacted.
Mr. Goldsmith. Of the ten, perhaps three or four returned during the relevant time period. I asked those questions mainly to draw your attention to the fact that the response given was not really --
Mr. Tovar. -- precisely what you wanted?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Tovar. I don't know the answer to that. I would assume that the criteria they applied here as best they could was when did he defect, when did he return, was he debriefed or contacted? In some cases they hit one out of three, in other cases two out of three. I think they were giving the best correlation with your criteria that they could.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand that. My point might be then that the introductory section should not have stated that these were people in 1958 and '63 when in fact they were not.
Mr. Tovar. You are right. That is an incorrect statement. Is your requesting memo here? That is not a very good statement.
Mr. Goldsmith. Here is the letter dated April 6, 1978 which I show you just for your information to show you what the Committee was requesting from the Agency. If you will look under number two.
Mr. Tovar. Then this would appear to correlate with that. You asked to indicate whether the Agency from '58 to '63 interviewed or debriefed former American defectors. So, the time they defected is not the operative consideration.
Mr. Goldsmith. No, it was not.
Mr. Tovar. The time of the debriefing --
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes, that would be the focus.
Mr. Tovar. So these would be at least consistent with that.
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes, that is true. I would like also for purposes of further clarification, to have you read the letter dated May 12, 1978 starting with the second full paragraph. It is not numbered.
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. I show you that only for your background purposes, not to ask you any questions about it. In any event, I would appreciate having the name of the individual who prepared the memo passed along to the Office of the Legislative Counsel.
Mr. Tovar. Yes sir.
Mr. Goldsmith. The response that was provided to the Committee indicates that the CIA had no standard procedure for debriefing returning US defectors. What was the basis for that policy or actually for the absence of the policy?
Mr. Tovar. I don't know. I can speculate only -- not having been there and not having any involvement -- I don't know what mentality of those in charge was at that time.
Mr. Goldsmith. What would your speculation be?
Mr. Tovar. I would speculate that the contact with and debriefing, in effect the supervision of Americans in that category would be FBI's prerogative and the Agency as a rule would not have had any basic interest or reason to be involved unless there were a specific counterintelligence concern.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does the Agency today have a policy of, as a matter of routine operating procedure, debriefing returning defectors?
Mr. Tovar. None that I am aware of.
Mr. Goldsmith. Again, would you say you relied on the FBI to conduct those interviews?
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is there any coordination between the Agency and the FBI so that the Bureau is informed when someone in fact is returning?
Mr. Tovar. On American defectors, the type you are speaking of here?
Mr. Goldsmith. An American defector who is repatriated.
Mr. Tovar. I know of no case where they would be interested in the subject. I can't say there is a procedure in being. Knowing the way we relate to the FBI, if we knew of a case of returning Americans, say we learned it from an overseas station and it seemed of interest, we would probably refer it directly to the FBI by letter.
I am speculating here because I know of no case in point.
Mr. Goldsmith. There is no standard procedure for contacting the Bureau and informing them of a returning defector?
Mr. Tovar. Not that I am aware of.
Mr. Goldsmith. You would be the person who would be aware of such a procedure?
Mr. Tovar. Between the Soviet-East European Division and CI Staff we should be aware of it. The two were most primarily concerned with the USSR. I think one or the other of us would inform the Bureau. This is not our primary concern: The Americans, even when they have been naughty boys, having gone to USSR and decided to return, we still don't have necessarily a professional interest in that type of person.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is the responsibility of the CI Staff within the CIA?
Mr. Tovar. In a couple of sentences it is a little difficult. I will tell you what we do. The CI Staff has two principal areas of activity. We are first of all a staff. Are you familiar with the staff as opposed to the division?
Mr. Goldsmith. No, I am not.
Mr. Tovar. You have seen the table of organization of DDO?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Tovar. You know generally how we are organized?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Tovar. The main set of components of the Directorate is divisions and staffs. The divisions operate a function overseas. We are staff and that is in the military sense we support the Directorate and we support the Director, we support one another in an advisory capacity and in various ways. So, we are not an operating component. We don't run spies. We have
a lot of activities which impact on operations but we are not in
the true sense of the term an operating element.
So, having said that, the primary field of activity for
the CI Staff is research and analysis, and then the other,
what we refer to as operations coordination. Now, that is sort
of the term which does not -- research and analysis is clear.
We examine and analyze cases, essentially cases. We are not
scrutinizing people. We are looking at intelligence operations,
old and current, primarily things that are not terribly
current. We don't tend to follow current operations in the
analytic sense. We take old cases and look them over to see
if mistakes were made, to see if we can derive lessons from
mistakes made in the past. We publish papers for the Agency's
community at large, all in the R&A field.
On the other side we function in the sense of a true staff.
We keep our fingers on the activity of the Directorate overseas.
We monitor what they are doing, not in the sense of being
spooky but we simply read the correspondence. We are given
normal distribution of most correspondence coming back from
overseas. We keep a hand on the pulse of counterintelligence
activities abroad.
To do this, we obviously have to have reasonable currency
on operational activity across the board. So, we are generally
aware of the operational patterns of activity that prevail in
various overseas stations. On that basis we are in a position
to advise the DDO or Directorate as to the level of performance, the kind of activity conducted, the quality, the proper or improper degree of emphasis. We maintain an overview on behalf of DDO.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is your concentration oriented towards counterintelligence threats of a foreign nature?
Mr. Tovar. Yes, totally.
Mr. Goldsmith. You would not be concerned at all with counterintelligence threats domestically?
Mr. Tovar. None whatsoever.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it correct to say that would be the responsibility of the Bureau?
Mr. Tovar. Absolutely.
Mr. Goldsmith. Now, Lee Harvey Oswald returned from the Soviet Union in 1962. While in the Soviet Union he worked as a worker in a radio factory. Upon his return I imagine there was someone concerned about his being a counterintelligence threat. Is it fair to say, and I do not want to ask you leading questions but would it be fair to say that would be more the responsibility of the Bureau rather than the Agency upon his actual return?
Mr. Tovar. Yes, the question whether or not he was, let us say, a counterintelligence threat.
Mr. Goldsmith. KGB agent?
Mr. Tovar. That would be a Bureau concern, no question
about that.
Mr. Goldsmith. However, would the Agency make any effort
to interview Oswald while Oswald was enroute from the Soviet
Union to the United States?
Mr. Tovar. You are speaking of what the Agency might have
done in '63 or '62?
Mr. Goldsmith. '62.
Mr. Tovar. Again, we are speculating concerning the
intelligence of the men who were in charge then. Today I
would like to think we would be interested in what he is doing.
At the time I don't know. I would think, why not. On the
other hand, I couldn't say they would or should be interested.
It was not their primary precise prerogative. I think if they
could, as I assume they did, the Bureau would discharge its
responsibilities vis-a-vis any American of questionable
propensity, I should think they would be deferring to the
Bureau.
Mr. Goldsmith. That would be the aspect of Oswald where
there was a concern that he posed a counterintelligence threat.
What about the fact that Oswald may have had positive intelli-
gence information that would have been helpful to the Agency?
That would not be within the jurisdiction of the Bureau?
Mr. Tovar. I think in that context it might have been
appropriate for the Agency, if the assumed the point you made,
to seek an interview with him. I think the appropriate
vehicle for that would have been the Domestic Contact Division
which I think handled most of the contacts referred to in this
memorandum.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is the function of the Domestic
Contact Division?
Mr. Tovar. They are responsible for intelligence that
can be checked properly and legally in the United States
normally through American businessmen or American persons and
nonofficials who travel abroad and acquire intelligence of
interest. This is not just USSR. It could be any other
country. Their primary field of activity is to contact and
debrief on a voluntary basis, if they so choose to respond,
Americans who return from overseas.
Mr. Goldsmith. I notice that the Committee's inquiry
concerning the CI's policy as to returning American defectors
was routed to your staff, CI Staff. When the memo was prepared
by the CI Staff for the Committee, was it done with the thought
of representing the entire agency or just the CI Staff?
Mr. Tovar. It is difficult for us to presume to speak for
the entire Agency. I think on this matter we are speaking for
the Directorate of Operations, not for the entire Agency.
Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. That is really the area with which
I was concerned anyway, Directorate of Operations.
Mr. Tovar. The only other element of the Directorate of
Operations that would be of an interest in this type of thing,
which might be construed as having an interest in this type
of activity, would be the SC Division. On this I think the CI staff could be considered as speaking for the Directorate.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is the Domestic Contact Division part of the CI Staff?
Mr. Tovar. No, part of the Directorate of Operations.
Mr. Goldsmith. The response of the Agency dated April 20, 1978, which appears in CIA Number 1818, indicates that contact seems to be based on opportunity and circumstance. Then it goes on to say only ten of the 117 persons have had any contact with CIA. Would it be possible for you to go into more detail on what is meant by opportunity and circumstance?
Mr. Tovar. In the ascense of a policy, of a guideline, a procedure, internal instruction which says you will debrief Americans who return from having resided in the USSR, in the absence of that, this thing is left to chance obviously. I cannot explain to you how the names of these 11 passed the desk of whoever was in charge at the time, but assuming they did, my guess, and it is really only a guess, would be that the person who read that, whatever document it was, would say, "Hmph! He looks like he might be interesting", and perhaps would then get in contact with CCD and suggest if they get in contact with a person, let us say he is known to be living in New York, suggest that they might want to seek out his location and if possible interview him.
I think it would be a matter of chance in the sense that the analyst or whoever it was who reviewed that document, might react, and yet he or she might not, too, depending on how they woke up that morning. It is sheer whimsy.
Mr. Goldsmith. Let me explain to you why the question whether or not it was standard operating procedure to debrief returning defectors is important to the Committee. Since the assassination of the President, there has arisen a group of researchers who have reviewed the Warren Commission Report and have reviewed releases made under the Freedom of Information Act by the CIA and the FBI.
Having reviewed these materials the argument has been made that Oswald received unusual treatment at the hands of the CIA. One example of this unusual treatment is that there is no record of Oswald having been debriefed by the CIA upon his return. For that reason, we are focusing on this issue. Is there any way you can give us guidance on how to respond to that question?
Mr. Tovar. I can't because I am speculating every step along the way. I would hesitate to say more than Oswald simply didn't connect with whoever happened to be looking -- let us assume his name appeared. Was his name in the list?
Mr. Goldsmith. No. That is the list of people who were debriefed.
Mr. Tovar. One hundred seventeen?
Mr. Goldsmith. I haven't seen the list of 117 people.
Mr. Tovar. What is this?
Mr. Goldsmith. That is a list of 350 odd people I was going to ask you about. However, since you don't have knowledge of the 117, I am not going to ask you about them.
Mr. Tovar. If Oswald's name was on the list, I can't explain why he might not have been contacted. Maybe he didn't appear attractive or interesting enough. I don't know what information might have been given with these names on the list, such as a memo from the FBI or State Department, whoever had originated it, what they said that would have titilated the analyst who might have seen it that would have elicited a response on the part of the analyst who would say "Ah, let us look into this further."
Mr. Goldsmith. In particular, a lot of focus has been given to Mr. Robert Edward Webster, who appears in CIA Number 1820 who defected approximately the same time that Oswald did and returned at approximately the same time that Oswald did and who was debriefed by the CIA for two weeks in Virginia.
Mr. Tovar. I didn't know that he was. It doesn't say so here.
Mr. Goldsmith. That does not indicate the extend of the debriefing. That information was obtained independently by this Committee.
Mr. Tovar. The name means nothing to me so I can't
enlighten you on it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does the CIA have any affiliation with organizations in the United States who might be responsible for debriefing someone?
Mr. Tovar. Not that I am aware of.
Mr. Goldsmith. In other words, if anyone is going to be debriefed it would be by the Domestic Contact Division?
Mr. Tovar. In the intelligence sense. In the sense of elucidation of intelligence, DCD would do it. A different type of inquiry, personal investigation, the Office of Security, or whoever it works through, would be the one.
The one we are talking about, DCD is the only organization I know of. I can visualize a circumstance under which operating components might seek out an individual or might have in times past but I can't think of a case in point in my own recollection. I would say, given the strictures on our operating in the United States, we would rely upon DCD to do it if they had any positive intelligence connotation. If it were of an operational nature today, the Foreign Resources Division might pursue it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Tovar. It is the division level of the Directorate. It is the division which seeks in the United States to develop potential intelligence assets for abroad. I think I had better defer to the other people on that. That is roughly where
it stands. They certainly would not have interest in debriefing defectors that I am aware of.
Mr. Goldsmith. In any event, for the purposes of summary, there is today no standard operating procedure of interviewing returning defectors?
Mr. Tovar. Right, insofar as I am aware, there is none.
Mr. Goldsmith. There is no standard operating procedure between the Bureau and the CIA which would coordinate any effort to contact returning defectors and share information?
Mr. Tovar. None that I am aware of.
Mr. Goldsmith. Turning to another area which I would like to get into briefly, would you define what a 201 file is?
Mr. Tovar. A 201 file is a file or files -- it could be several volumes to it -- which relates to an individual. It might pose a dicotomy, a 201 file and project file. A project file might deal with an activity, say collection operations in Timbucktu, a broad scale of activity involving several numbers of people, there might be several 201 files, A, B, C, who were associates in that project. The 201 file would be on the individual himself.
Mr. Goldsmith. Ti would contain primarily biographic information?
Mr. Tovar. No. It would contain a much vaster -- some of them might contain one sheet of paper with name, rank and date of birth. But if the association with him developed and
became more extensive, it might contain a considerable amount of information. If he became involved with this operation it might include operational material, intelligence operations as well, all part of the 201 complex.
The point I am making is that it is an individual file as opposed to an activity file.
Mr. Goldsmith. If you wanted to learn about the operations that an individual was involved in, would you go to his 201 file or to his operations file?
Mr. Tovar. I would go to the 201 file first. There might not be an operations file. In fact, in the vast majority of the 201 cases there are no operational files because there is no hard and fast rule on when you open a 201 file or who opens a 201 file.
If I, for example, am overseas and I become interested in a person who looks to me to have considerable promise from the operational standpoint, say a local foreign type, I might give my own local checks, I might examine my own files to see if I know anything about him. Then I say to headquarters "here is Joe Doe. He is interesting to me for these reasons. Will you please check against headquarters records and other agencies and let me know if you have anything of interest on him."
I might not ask for a 201 file. Headquarters might then, because they thought he was interesting, open a 201 file.
Conversely, I might likewise say this looks terribly interest-
ing Please open a 201 file and give me all of the information you can collect on him."
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand that the fact that someone has a 201 file does not mean at all that the individual was involved in any operations of the Agency. If you wanted to get information of an operational nature, would you go both to the 201 file and operations file?
Mr. Tovar. Assuming there was information of an operational nature?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Tovar. Yes, indeed we would.
Mr. Goldsmith. If someone is an agent of the CIA -- I am not referring now to case officers or staff agents -- someone is a field agent for the Agency, would that fact be indicated in the 201 file?
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. In the Directorate of Operations someone might open up a 201 file on an individual if the person was of a potential positive intelligence significance?
Mr. Tovar. Or counterintelligence, either one.
Mr. Goldsmith. That was going to be my question. The CI Staff in particular, when would you have occasion to open a 201 file?
Mr. Tovar. CI staff would not necessarily be the only one to open a 201 file. In the case of a person of CI interest,
a field station might have a counter-person I described earlier and become interested in him because he did have some CI attraction or interest. The station itself or the division would open the 201 file. It would not be us. The CI Staff as a rule is not involved in that type of thing.
At this stage of the game since we are not operating and we are not out soliciting new contacts, we are not working in that sense of the term, we don't to my knowledge originate 201 files.
Mr. Goldsmith. The CI Staff does not open up 201 files?
Mr. Tovar. There is no reason that we couldn't.
Mr. Goldsmith. As a practical matter?
Mr. Tovar. As practical matter it does not work that way. Our research is primarily focused upon established cases, cases that may even be dead, terminated, or dormant, or even current in certain cases, but as a rule not very many. 201 file is opened by someone else. We may examine those files and review them. We do review other activities. But the 201 file would be in existence. They should not be created by ourselves.
In former days when CI Staff files were segregated from the rest of the Directorate it might have been different. I don't know.
Mr. Goldsmith. When was that?
Mr. Tovar. Say prior to 1974, 1957. Today our files are integrated in the files of the Directorate or it is in the
process of being integrated. We have been working on this. This is one of our major final exercises in the past two or three years to make sure, when you go to the central files and research a name, if there is something in the CI Staff repository that will turn up when you are making a check of the index.
Mr. Goldsmith. Will most 201 files be open as a result of information coming into headquarters from the field, one of the field stations?
Mr. Tovar. Yes, the vast majority. In years before when they has such programs as MH Chaos, I assumed they opened 201 files of their own.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is that?
Mr. Tovar. MH Chaos program?
Mr. Goldsmith. For the record, will you indicate what that program is?
Mr. Tovar. I frankly would rather not because I don't know the precise definition of the program. It was a program which has been described in the press as domestic surveillance. Whether that is the correct proper designation, I don't know. Our CI Staff does not normally open a 201 file. We don't have occasion to.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know what the term CI/SIG stands for?
Mr. Tovar. Counter Intelligence/Special Investigative
Group, I think it is. Investigative or investigations, I don't know which.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is that group still in existence today?
Mr. Tovar. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. When did it go out of existence?
Mr. Tovar. I don't know exactly. Before my time. I think it ended in '73, '74, '75. I am not sure.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know what the function of that group was?
Mr. Tovar. Only in a very vague sort of way. I have heard about it, it was the investigative group in the CI Staff that investigated whatever the CI Staff did in those days. I can't speak to that with any first hand knowledge. I know some things they did but I would be hesitant to make a general definition of their function.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether the function of that group was to investigate Agency employees who were suspected of having been penetrated?
Mr. Tovar. I think, because I have seen nothing in writing on the subject, but I have been given to understand that was one of their functions in the context of their responsibilities that was included. But I am no authority on the subject.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether CI/SIG would have occasion to open a 201 file?
Mr. Tovar. I don't know. I can speculate. I don't know.
Mr. Goldsmith. What would your speculation be?
Mr. Tovar. I would speculate in the days when they were functioning they probably did. You have a very unauthoritative witness on that subject.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is the relationship if any between the Office of Security and the CI Staff?
Mr. Tovar. We have basically different functions. The Office of Security is under the Directorate of Administration and is responsible for the personnel and physical security of the entire division. It focuses on personnel security and physical security.
The CI staff as I described it, is an element of DDO concerned with research and analysis and operation and coordination. The relation between us and the Office of Security is simply that between us and another fraternal element of the Agency which has responsibility which sometimes comes close together.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does the Office of Security maintain files which contain information of a derogatory nature on individuals, not necessarily limited to Agency employees?
Mr. Tovar. To my knowledge they don't. My assumption is that I have never seen what is in their files -- my assumption is that they have files only on Agency personnel. I cannot visualize circumstances under which they would maintain information on people who are not in the Agency or who had not been
applicates for employment and then left.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is the Office of Security interested in maintaining information so that if in the future an individual was being considered for employment in some capacity with the Agency the Security Office would have that information on him?
Mr. Tovar. I cannot visualize that happening today.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to ask you to read CIA 0786, which is a document that this Committee obtained from the Office of Security files on Lee Harvey Oswald.
Mr. Tovar. That sort of suggests they maintained such information then. I still cannot visualize there doing it today.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you think the function of the Office of Security may be different today from what it was in 1959 with regard to maintaining such files?
Mr. Tovar. The function, I would use the term function, I would say the policy of the Office as far as the way the office operates today. I don't know what they do intrinsically. I cannot visualize their maintaining that kind of current records today. Maybe this is historic, it was in the files since 1969. With the injunction against destroying files, the files remained.
If it was John Q. Doe appearing today in a similar context I would not visualize the Office of Security maintaining this
kind of document.
Mr. Goldsmith. To whom would this document go today?
Mr. Tovar. You mean from the State Department?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes, a State Department document. Which is indicating that an American citizen is giving information, intelligence information to a foreign country, to whom in the CIA would that document go?
Mr. Tovar. I am not sure it would come to the CIA at all because the CIA does not have responsibility for that type of person. I think it would go to the FBI.
Mr. Goldsmith. Even though the individual is overseas?
Mr. Tovar. Yes. He is an American. Again, this is speculation. I don't know what moves the person who releases cables to the Moscow Embassy today. He might decide or somebody here in State Security might decide that CIA should see this. In that event, it probably would go to the Office of Security as a matter of information.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would information contained in this type of telegram normally lead to the opening of a 201 file?
Mr. Tovar. I would think not.
Mr. Goldsmith. Why not?
Mr. Tovar. There is nothing that suggests here this is going to be of continuing interest to the CIA. This is 1959. Let us say in 1962 the man came back and another message came over and it indicated that he was available for discussion.
or was of interest and so on and maybe there are reasons for
debriefing, I can visualize a 201 being opened if the matter
were of apparent continuing interest. I can see no reason why
a 201 would be opened in this case.
Mr. Goldsmith. What if this telegram was followed by a
able indicating that the individual had decided to defect?
Mr. Tovar. What do you mean? He is applying for Soviet
citizenship, so he is defecting here?
Mr. Goldsmith. You are correct. I withdraw the question.
Mr. Tovar. I think basically my point is that it is a
fact that a 201 need not be opened up on this type -- this is
a casual piece of information. If one could eliminate the
name Lee Harvey Oswald, which raises flags, it is John Doe
and there is nothing in this -- someone might say what an SOB
this is but there is nothing to indicate anything but an
unfortunate incidental event, I would say today, "why bother".
We have enough to do without opening 201 files on people of
that nature." The encyclopedic approach is not one that we
try to apply.
Bear in mind, I am doing a lot of speculating here. I
perhaps shouldn't.
Mr. Goldsmith. You really aren't aware of what the
procedure would be in 1959 for dealing with a telegram like
this?
Mr. Tovar. No. I would still say today I would not expect
that kind of document to be retained in Agency files anywhere. You know, inter-departmental correspondence is firing paper in all directions all the time on an informational basis. That does not mean it is retained.
Mr. Goldsmith. With regard to this document, after 1959 your testimony is more or less speculation but you are saying that today you don't think that this type of document would be retained and have any special significance?
Mr. Tovar. I don't think so. I am scratching my head trying to visualize circumstances under which it could be retained. There is nothing of interest to the Agency. There is nothing of immediate counterintelligence interest. I don't know who would retain it or why.
Mr. Goldsmith. For the purpose of clarification, if the CI asked that of the CIA, by that I mean the counterintelligence aspect of the CIA concerned primarily with a foreign counterintelligence threat, in other words, foreign nationals, foreign citizens?
Mr. Tovar. You are asking is it?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Tovar. Primarily yes, but not solely. We are concerned with Americans of counterintelligence interest. If an overseas station is informed by somebody that an American is contacting the Soviets and is apparently engaged in what looks like espionage, we would become interested. That is
espionage I am talking about.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand.
Mr. Tovar. You realize of course with the sensitivity of Americans investigations of Americans we have to be an we are extremely careful in making the determination as to when a person is of counterintelligence interest. We have very strict rules and regulations on the consideration of investigations, considerations retaining information, the rights of a person. The criteria are very stringent. They are under executive order and Attorney General guidelines. We don't approach this casually at all. It is proscribed activity.
Mr. Goldsmith. Both as to Americans?
Mr. Tovar. Primarily Americans. The Attorney General is not concerned essentially with non-US persons. Our focus of sensitivity is on US persons who are US citizens or residents, aliens or US entities, organizations, which are primarily American in composition.
Mr. Goldsmith. Again, would you focus outside the-borders of the United States?
Mr. Tovar. Yes. Inside US is FBI.
Mr. Goldsmith. Before when you made reference to a station overseas, you became aware of an American who might be involved in espionage for another country, you were referring to an American who was living abroad, is that correct?
Mr. Tovar. Yes, or traveling abroad.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to show you CIA Number 788 which is the field personality file request form that was used to open Oswald's 201 file. In the middle of the page there is a box which states the term 'Other identification'. If someone wrote the number or letter "AG" down, what does that stand for?
Mr. Tovar. I have no idea. What are they referring to here? I cannot think of anything.
Mr. Goldsmith. The form also indicates that Oswald's file was restricted. Do you know of any reason why Oswald's file would have been restricted?
Mr. Tovar. Where is that?
Mr. Goldsmith. Here.
Mr. Tovar. No, I don't know. I don't know what criteria they would have used at that time or even today for that matter, to open a restricted file. Bear in mind, there is a lot of latitude given to the individual who opened these things. He could be a very junior analyst who for reasons of his own decided he would do it this way. Supervision would not necessarily get down there very closely behind him.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know what the inter-agency source register is?
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is that?
Mr. Tovar. As I understand it, it is a register maintained in which other agencies of the government register their
interest in a person. Let us take, for example, you are working for the Army Intelligence and you are in Germany and you become intersted in Mr. Smith. Let us say you check Mr. Smith with the CIA and with the other agencies and in so doing you wish to have him recorded under the ISR, Inter Agency Source Registry, the entry of his name in the ISR will normally flag prior interest on the part of somebody in the government, in this case you are in the Army.
I don't know what this symbol is but they put two asterisks which indicates to anybody else who checks that name later the US Army has a prior interest in that person.
Mr. Goldsmith. What kind of interest would that be?
Mr. Tovar. Intelligence interest to me, potential intelligence interest. Again, the ISR may have ramifications that I am not aware of. In my experience the ISR has been the place we go to check, say, a new or potentially new source to see if there is ny other previously established government interest in the person which means keep your hands off. The military rely upon this very heavily because we coordinate their clandestine intelligence operations.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would an ISR index be checked prior to opening up a 201 file as a matter of routine?
Mr. Tovar. It has been so many years since I have done this. The way we have become mechanized today I would assume that a normal file check through the central files of the
Directorate would include or would turn up anything that was in the ISR. I am just not sure how it works.
Mr. Goldsmith. If someone were an agent of another intelligence organization would that be indicated in the 201 file?
Mr. Tovar. If it were an agent, agent of another service, that would be in the ISR only if it had been of interest to another agency which said "Put John Doe's name in the ISR and indicate he is a US Army intelligence source," at the very least a person of interest to the US Army Intelligence Agency. It would not be there if the Army had not put it in. So you might not know.
Again, I think almost any agent of the military would rely upon the ISR, I would think almost certainly would be entered in the ISR, because they want to maintain control of it, to make sure nobody else gets in the way and interferes with their operations.
Mr. Goldsmith. So if someone were an agent it would in all likelihood be indicated in the ISR and assuming the ISR is checked by a CI person prior to opening up the file, he would take note of that fact?
Mr. Tovar. Say that again. Some of this is pretty fuzzy to me. I don't want to mislead you by extrapolating from my own ignorance.
Mr. Goldsmith. If someone is an agent of another
intelligence service, that fact would be noted in the ISR?
Mr. Tovar. Another US intelligence service?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Tovar. A US military intelligence service only, yes, the military intelligence service would normally be registered in the ISR. Other than the military, the FBI intelligence assets would not be registered in the ISR to my knowledge.
Mr. Goldsmith. But the military tends to make that list-
ing?
Mr. Tovar. In my experience the military has been the primary element involved in the use and the exploitation of the ISR. Let me interpose another point here. I am not an expert in these procedures and I am way out of touch. You live most of your life overseas, you don't do these things back at headquarters. These procedures may be quite different in actuality. I am groping through my memory to see how they were dealt with on an active basis.
A fellow like Bill Donnelly might enlighten you much more than I could about the ISR.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand that. I think you can tell I am not pressing you for detail on it.
Mr. Tovar. I would like to help you. I am prepared to speculate as I have been doing on things that are somewhat beyond my direct experience and direct responsibility. There is a limit.
Mr. Goldsmith. Now, if someone checking ISR notes that
an individual is a military intelligence agent would the fact of that agency status be noted and a 201 file opened on that individual?
Mr. Tovar. I am not sure. I would think it would be. Again, I am speculating. I think almost certainly if I were doing a file check on a person whose name came from one of the field stations and it turned up the fact he was already registered in the ISR, if a person is of interest let us say, to the US Army Intelligence, that would automatically sort of proscribe further attempts on my part to go in and get involved. I think a notation would be made in the 201 file.
Mr. Goldsmith. As a practical matter that would be a good reason for making the notation?
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does the CIA regularly use the ISR?
Mr. Tovar. We maintain it as I understand it.
Mr. Goldsmith. So if someone is an agent of the CIA, would that fact be noted in the ISR?
Mr. Tovar. No, I don't believe it would. Again, you can check on that to make certain. Donnelly I think can help much better on it. I cannot visualize all our sensitive sources being registered there.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know how internal memoranda prepared by James Angleton when he was head of the CI Staff, how internal
paperwork relating to the JFK assassination was prepared and subsequently stored?
Mr. Tovar. No, I really don't. I have no idea. I have seen no documents on that subject. I have seen nothing either originated or approved or signed by him. You realize that any files on this subject are dead files. I am just doing my current job. Until you people became interested, we were not dealing with them on a daily basis.
Mr. Goldsmith. What happens to the personal files of an individual such as Angletons or even yourself after leaving the CI Staff?
Mr. Tovar. After leaving the staff or leaving the Agency?
Mr. Goldsmith. Let us take the first after leaving the CI Staff, what would happen to your personal papers?
Mr. Tovar. The personal file, official file on the person in the Agency is retained by the Office of Personnel.
Mr. Goldsmith. That would govern your personal file, your personal papers. What about internal memos, soft copy type files, what would happen to them?
Mr. Tovar. Having been only one element of the organization during my career, it is hard to say.
Mr. Goldsmith. I am not talking now about personnel file. I am talking about soft copy, working files that an individual may maintain.
Mr. Tovar. You mean the files he himself as an individual
maintained?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Tovar. Most individuals don't maintain personal files, I don't think. I would say, for example, anything I write, I dictate a memorandum and I send it to anybody you want to name, in a sense that is my work, I have done it but I don't keep a personal file on that. That goes into my office file. It is part of the office chronological file which is maintained by my secretary. Let us say multiply that by 500,000 over a period of years the files grow. At the time I leave I am incidental in a sense. I just happen to be the person in the job at the time. The files will still be there.
There is a normal retirement and destruction under normal conditions, retirement and destruction program which eliminates the accumulation of excessive useless material.
Mr. Goldsmith. Most paperwork would go in this office chrono file?
Mr. Tovar. Yes, anything of significance would go in the office chrono file. Anything I write to the Directorate of Operations, DDO, CI, it is normally part of the chrono files. If I want it, it is there. It is my own file in the sense that when I am on the job I have total access to it. If I left the job and wanted to look at it six months later, it is still in the file and I would ask somebody who took my place could I see what I wrote. I would not take it with me.
Mr. Goldsmith. If it is an office chrono file does that mean that everything is filed in a chronological order?
Mr. Tovar. Not necessarily. Here you ought to consult my secretary. There might be a subject breakdown. Ordinarily in the front office, we don't main-ain a lot of files. There is no point in it. Let us say something I signed off on, here is a case in point, memos that are signed on my behalf or that I might have signed, if I were there that day, I would not maintain that in my front office as a rule. That would probably be maintained by the office of origination. I think if I signed it my secretary would certainly maintain a log of things that had gone through me for signature. But I don't think, I could be wrong on this, I don't think as a rule she would maintain a routine memorandum just because I happened to sign it because I sign so many things on that staff. I sign off on a host of things which are not really my creation. I am representing the staff as a whole.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know when Mr. Angleton left the CI Staff?
Mr. Tovar. Yes. I am not certain of the precise date. I think it was either December '74 or January '75. That is the position of Chief, Counterintelligence?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Tovar. I believe he may have remained in the office for several months after that before he finally retired.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether, after Mr. Angleton left the CI Staff, any type of followup was done by that staff on the Nosenko issue?
Mr. Tovar. Followup work?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes. For example, one of the issues, the key issue with regard to Mr. Nosenko was his bona fides.
Mr. Tovar. Yes, indeed.
Mr. Goldsmith. After Mr. Angleton left was any additional analytical work done on that issue?
Mr. Tovar. A very detailed study was done by my predecessor George Kalaris. A very thorough analysis was made of the whole Nosenko question.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you referring to the Hart Report?
Mr. Tovar. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Other than the Hart report was any type of followup work or analytical work done after Mr. Angleton's departure?
Mr. Tovar. I don't know for certain. The Hart Report is a thick piece of paper. In the preparation of that report there were probably all kinds of drafts, scratchings and sort of preliminary jobs. All I know would be in the context of that report. All I know would be some representations in response to the Director's inquiry or your inquiry or someone else's inquiry as to what happened, what did it say, what does it mean, that type of thing, but really correlary efforts.
Mr. Goldsmith. Think for a moment on the Nosenko issue.
As Chief of the CI Staff, if it were demonstrated to you very clearly that the story given by Mr. Nosenko on Lee Harvey Oswald was full of contradictions and in addition to contradictions, it was in many ways simply incredible, what impact would that have on the Agency's assessment of Mr. Nosenko as being a bona fide rather than a dispatched defector?
Mr. Tovar. Well, it is difficult to answer. You are posing a question in a narrow sense. You are focusing on one point, Nosenko vis-a-vis Oswald and contradictions that may emerge there. I would answer by saying that again I am not an expert on Nosenko. I don't profess to have a full grasp of his bona fides or anything related to it.
I would say that question alone would not be enough to satisfy me that the inquiry had been made carefully. There is much more to it than what Nosenko had to say about Oswald. There are more aspects about the bona fides issue, more than I could give you today.
Mr. Goldsmith. I have read the Hart Report.
Mr. Tovar. He tried to deal with the whole consideration, the whole Oswald, the handling, the methodology. He did not go into every jot and tittle of the issue.
Mr. Goldsmith. In fact, the Hart Report did not mention the word "Oswald" even one time. Even so, the question I have, if it were demonstrated to you that Nosenko's story on the
Oswald issue is untrue, cannot be believed, would that have any impact on the Agency's assessment of him as a bona fide?
Mr. Tovar. The first reaction would be I would be deeply distressed and concerned, I would want to know more about it. You have to extrapolate from me to the Agency. Other people have views on this other than myself. If you carried this thing further and convinced everybody, the point you made is valid, then you would have --
Mr. Goldsmith. We are talking hypothetically now. Let us go beyond you. If it were demonstrated to the Director of the Central intelligence Agency that the story given by Nosenko on Oswald -- I am not talking about any of the other information he gave, but on Oswald -- simply cannot be believed because, A, part of it is incredible, B, it is full of contradictions, what effect do you think that would have on the Agency's assessment of him as a bona fide defector?
Mr. Tovar. I literally don't know. I am not sure what the comparative weight of that point would be when considered against the backdrop of the full Nosenko question.
Mr. Goldsmith. As Chief of the CI Staff, you would personally be troubled by that?
Mr. Tovar. Yes, I think I would be troubled by it. I would be troubled. I would be troubled that our current assessment is wrong. That would trouble me.
Again, I would say, too, if this is a serious proposition
you are making, let us say you adduced a number of analysts
who examined this thing thoroughly and were in a position of
making that kind of judgment, I would say, "I want to have
these analysts talk to my analysts because I am not in a posi-
tion to make that kind of judgment."
Mr. Goldsmith. First of all, I am not making the statement
that Nosenko's story on Oswald is inaccurate in any way.
Secondly, even if the story is inaccurate, I don't want
to suggest that because of that anyone on this Committee has
any feeling that that means Nosenko is not bona fide. My
question is really very limited. A, if it were demonstrated
that the story on Oswald is inaccurate, what impact would that
have on your overall assessment?
Mr. Tovar. You mean demonstrably inaccurate?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Tovar. It would have to be examined. It would have
to be examined the full panoply of the whole Oswald issue.
I would say we will get this team of analysts and we will
fight it out. We are talking about hypothesis.
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes. I would prefer to stay away from the
term "fighting it out" because there is no one here who is in
the posture of making a fighting issue out of it.
I no longer have any questions. I will have questions to
ask whoever on your staff participated in the preparation of
the memo that we discussed earlier.
Normally whenever a witness has an opportunity to testify before the Committee at a hearing, the Committee gives him five minutes at the end to make a statement. This is not a hearing. However, if you would like to make a statement for the record, feel free to do so. If not, you will be given a chance to verify the record for accuracy.
Mr. Tovar. Since I have no position to present and no point to make it is probably improper to make a statement. The only think I would reiterate is that I have been sort of speculating here in many respects. Bear in mind there is an area here where I have a purview that is perhaps valid. We are talking about a lot of things which are way beyond my immediate experience and certainly my current responsibility.
I would say, take some of my speculation with a grain of salt, because I don't mean to be dogmatic on these things. The procedure for handling the 201 file, there are some GS-7 girls down the line who could tell you much more about the 201 files than I would ever be able to compile for you. They are the ones you really should talk to.
Things like the ISR, I know the ISR in a limited framework from the standpoint of a guy overseas who is dealing frequently with the military and registers military sources in the ISR and checks the ISR either on behalf of the military or to see if they have already registered prior interest and so on. There may be other aspects of the thing that you should get more
professional advice on.
I think your questions have been reasonable. I have found no objection to try to meet you more than halfway on it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. Thank you very much.
(Whereupon, at 3:20 p.m., the deposition was concluded.)
CERTIFICATE OF NOTARY PUBLIC
I, Alfred Joseph LaFrance, the officer before whom the foregoing deposition was taken, do hereby certify that the witness whose testimony appears in the foregoing deposition was duly sworn by me; that the testimony of said witness was taken by me in stenotype to the best of my ability and thereafter reduced to typewriting under my direction, that said deposition is a true record of the testimony given by said witness; that I am neither counsel for, related to, nor employed by any of the parties to the action in which this deposition was taken; and further that I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the parties thereto, nor financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of the action.
Notary Public in and for the District of Columbia
My Commission expires November 14, 1980. | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10131-10325.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 50,
"total-input-tokens": 57150,
"total-output-tokens": 16512,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
564,
1
],
[
564,
606,
2
],
[
606,
1307,
3
],
[
1307,
2402,
4
],
[
2402,
3623,
5
],
[
3623,
4725,
6
],
[
4725,
6073,
7
],
[
6073,
7446,
8
],
[
7446,
8634,
9
],
[
8634,
9764,
10
],
[
9764,
10898,
11
],
[
10898,
12155,
12
],
[
12155,
13449,
13
],
[
13449,
14611,
14
],
[
14611,
15876,
15
],
[
15876,
17323,
16
],
[
17323,
18501,
17
],
[
18501,
19774,
18
],
[
19774,
21192,
19
],
[
21192,
22555,
20
],
[
22555,
23880,
21
],
[
23880,
25180,
22
],
[
25180,
26475,
23
],
[
26475,
27788,
24
],
[
27788,
29172,
25
],
[
29172,
30333,
26
],
[
30333,
31656,
27
],
[
31656,
32807,
28
],
[
32807,
34023,
29
],
[
34023,
35347,
30
],
[
35347,
36620,
31
],
[
36620,
37900,
32
],
[
37900,
39187,
33
],
[
39187,
40497,
34
],
[
40497,
41774,
35
],
[
41774,
43007,
36
],
[
43007,
44421,
37
],
[
44421,
45670,
38
],
[
45670,
46971,
39
],
[
46971,
48203,
40
],
[
48203,
49475,
41
],
[
49475,
50811,
42
],
[
50811,
52161,
43
],
[
52161,
53381,
44
],
[
53381,
54777,
45
],
[
54777,
56160,
46
],
[
56160,
57500,
47
],
[
57500,
58959,
48
],
[
58959,
59200,
49
],
[
59200,
60051,
50
]
]
} |
dd66920645ce96cedf36d249bed0f08f413d62cf | EXECUTIVE SESSION
---
TUESDAY, MAY 16, 1978:
---
U.S. House of Representatives,
Subcommittee on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy of the Select Committee on Assassinations,
Washington, D.C.
The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 4:40 p.m. in room 3370, House Annex No. 2, 2nd and D Streets, S.W.
Present: Michael Goldsmith and Dan Hardway.
---
Mr. Goldsmith. Miss Reporter, would you please swear in the witness?
The Reporter. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony which you are about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
Mr. Shaw. I do.
TESTIMONY OF ROBERT T. SHAW
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you state your name and address for the record?
Mr. Shaw. Robert T. Shaw, 3715 Acosta Road, Fairfax, Virginia, 22031.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is your present occupation, Mr. Shaw?
Mr. Shaw. I am undercover with the Department of State, but my actual occupation is Inspector, Office of the Inspector General, Central Intelligence Agency.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, I handed you earlier a copy of a letter from the Acting Director of the Central Intelligence, Mr. Carlucci, to the Chairman of this Committee. It corresponds to JFK Exhibit No. 94 in the Committee's hearing record.
Have you had a chance to read that letter?
Mr. Shaw. I read it just now.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you understand it?
Mr. Shaw. I understand it.
Mr. Goldsmith. I also would like to hand you the Committee's rules and resolutions and ask you at this time to read Rule No. 4 to yourself.
(Pause)
Mr. Shaw. I read it over.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you understand that?
Mr. Shaw. I understand it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you understand that you have a right to counsel?
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you waive that right to counsel?
Mr. Shaw. I do not need counsel.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you understand that, under the Committee rules, that you have a right to receive a copy of the statement you are going to give us at this deposition?
Mr. Shaw. I should hope so, to check it for accuracy.
Mr. Goldsmith. However, by virtue of the arrangement that the Committee has worked out with the Central Intelligence Agency, we have been asked to request of Agency employees that they waive their right to receive a copy of the deposition for their own retention. By that, I mean we would certainly be willing to grant you access to the deposition, to correct it in any way necessary, but the Agency has requested that we ask you to waive your right to receive an actual copy of the deposition.
Mr. Shaw. I have no problem with that.
Mr. Goldsmith. Thank you.
For the record, I would like to say that the Committee's mandate is to investigate the assassination of the President. The scope of the mandate includes who killed the President, was there a conspiracy? We are also required to evaluate
the performance of the investigative agencies, specifically
the FBI and the CIA and to evaluate the work of the Warren
Commission.
Do you understand that as well?
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Prior to coming here today, have you
discussed what your testimony is going to be with any CIA
employee?
Mr. Shaw. I have not, except to tell them that I was
going to tell the truth when I got over here.
Mr. Goldsmith. In terms of discussing the substance of
your testimony?
Mr. Shaw. None whatever.
Mr. Goldsmith. Have you discussed with any CIA employee,
past or present, who either has been interviewed by the
Committee or has given a statement under oath to the Committee,
what questions were asked of him or her?
Mr. Shaw. I have not.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you here today voluntarily and
without subpoena?
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, how long have you been working
under State Department cover?
Mr. Shaw. Since approximately the date I came aboard,
because I was promptly sent to the Department of State for
training. That would be March, 1948.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would your State Department file, if reviewed by a member of this Committee, indicate that you were actually a CIA employee?
Mr. Shaw. I have no idea.
Mr. Goldsmith. You do not understand how the cover arrangement would work between the Agency and the Department of State?
Mr. Shaw. I have never had anything to do with the setting up of such cover. It would well be that there might be some sort of an indicator or flag, or something in that file that would indicate to a person who knew the ropes that I was not bona fide.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would there be a personnel file on you at the Central Intelligence Agency?
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. As a matter of procedure, in terms of how you get paid, do you get paid by the Department of State?
Mr. Shaw. No. I am under, at the present time, nominal state cover. I actually, as far as the Department of State is concerned, resigned over there in 1973, I believe. At the present time, I am paid by the Agency.
Mr. Goldsmith. When you were working under cover, were you being paid by State at that time?
Mr. Shaw. Yes, I was.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you familiar at all with the literature that has been generated by the assassination of the President and the work done by the Warren Commission?
Mr. Shaw. Very little. I just noticed that green book there a minute ago. I have never read that thing.
Mr. Goldsmith. Book 5, for the record, of the Senate Committee Report.
Mr. Shaw. I have seen copies of the Warren Commission Report in various places around the government, but I never read it.
Mr. Goldsmith. When you were working with the State Department in other than a nominal capacity, what was your title?
Mr. Shaw. My last title was Special Assistant to the Ambassador and First Secretary of Embassy, Honduras.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you ever work as a consular officer?
Mr. Shaw. Yes, I did.
Mr. Goldsmith. When you worked as a consular officer, were you required to fulfill both responsibilities as a consular officer and as a CIA employee?
Mr. Shaw. To a certain extent.
For example, I have never issued a visa. I have issued a passport for another consular officer who accepted the application and I would be on the road in northwestern Mexico and issued the passport to the American citizen concerned.
I have done a modicum of what we call protection and welfare work. This would usually involve being again on the road, stopping in, for example, in a prison to see if there was an American citizen there, to find out what the story was, why he was there, how he was being treated and that sort of thing, and relay that information to the consular when I got back.
Actually, I have not done much consular work. I used the cover on several occasions, but was never emersed into the role to the point where it interfered with my Agency activity.
Mr. Goldsmith. Normally when somebody is acting under State Department cover, is the person required to hold down two jobs at the same time?
Mr. Shaw. It depends on the location of the person. As I understand it, people we have, for example, in the Iron Curtain countries, or the countries of Eastern Europe, do hold down virtually 100 percent full-time State Department, Foreign Service jobs. Some of the people that I have run into in my work as an Inspector for the Office of the Inspector General, notably in the Mid-Eastern countries, have spent much more time on their cover work than I did.
I think that it has to do basically with the permissiveness, or lack thereof, of the operational environment that you are in. In Mexico, it was not necessary to spend much
time, at least not for me, on cover duties.
Mr. Goldsmith. How long have you been working for the
Office of the Inspector General?
Mr. Shaw. Since August of 1976.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you have any responsibility in the
writing of the 1977 Inspector General Report pertaining to
the CIA's handling of the investigation of the Kennedy
assassination?
Mr. Shaw. None whatever.
Mr. Goldsmith. Has anyone ever interviewed you before
pertaining to the Mexico City situation as far as it pertained
to Oswald?
Mr. Shaw. Yes. It was about that time of '76, some-
body interviewed me in the CIA Headquarters building, and I
think it was a Senate Committee, but I am not sure. They had
some files.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you give your testimony under oath
at that time?
Mr. Shaw. No, not that I remember.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did any CIA person ever interview you
concerning Lee Harvey Oswald's activities in Mexico City and
the operations of the Mexico City station?
Mr. Shaw. I would have to qualify that. We discussed
the subject, of course, in Mexico City at the time of the
assassination, or immediately after the assassination.
But I cannot recall that I was ever called in anywhere and asked for my account of what transpired after the assassination.
Mr. Goldsmith. Headquarters never asked you to come in and give a description, for example, of Oswald's activities, to your knowledge, in Mexico City in 1963?
Mr. Shaw. No. I would not have known anything about Oswald's activities anyway.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you familiar with the photograph that was taken in 1963 that was reportedly linked to Oswald and which subsequently turned out not to be a picture of Oswald?
Mr. Shaw. I am familiar with a photograph that was identified by people at the station in Mexico City as possibly being an American-appearing person. I do not know that it was every considered to be Oswald.
I think, if I remember correctly, what they were doing—
Mr. Goldsmith. We will get into that. My question is, did anybody from Headquarters ever ask you about that particular photograph or the circumstances surrounding it?
Mr. Shaw. Negative.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did anybody from Headquarters ever ask you to give a statement or report as to the manner in which the surveillance operation in Mexico City were undertaken in 1963?
Mr. Shaw. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. Where were you serving in 1963?
Mr. Shaw. From about the middle of April, I was serving in Mexico City in our station.
Mr. Goldsmith. How long did you stay in Mexico City?
Mr. Shaw. I stayed there until September of 1966.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who was the Station Chief in Mexico City?
Mr. Shaw. Winston Scott.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you give us your assessment of his competence?
Mr. Shaw. Competence. It is difficult, because I was not looking from on high. He was a brilliant man. He was reputed to have a doctorate in mathematics. He had an uncanny ability to remember numbers and he carried in his head the file numbers of what we called P-files in Mexico City. P stood, I think, for personality. A P number usually was four digits or so, maybe five digits.
And he carried all these numbers in his head and he could mark something for such and such a file in black ink -- he always wrote in black ink -- putting the number down. He had a very good memory for numbers.
Winn and I were friendly. We were not close. We were not on the same level at all.
I considered him to be, from my standpoint, a competent,
effective, Chief of Station.
Mr. Goldsmith. What type of file-keeping system did he have in effect, without asking you to describe it in detail? By that, my question is directed towards his thoroughness and comprehensiveness.
Mr. Shaw. I would say that he probably had one of the most -- let me see -- complete file systems in being in the Agency. I think that he, my personal opinion is that he went overboard, and we had so much stuff back in our files, it was hard to believe the amount of paper we had in there.
His tendency was not to rely on cross-indexing. If you have a document, this piece of paper means something to you and you want to keep it and it has 15 names on it, he was quite capable of setting up 15 files for the same piece of paper. And we had a tremendous file room.
I often wondered if we needed that much paper. It was very thorough. I am not a technician as far as managing files, but I do know that the people who worked in the file room were kept very, very busy.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who were Mr. Scott's chief deputies?
Let me rephrase the question. Upon which individuals did he tend to rely the most?
Mr. Shaw. He had one Deputy who was Allen White. As far as reliance on other people, I would say he relied very heavily on Annie Goodpasture -- not in any way in a command
function, but as a Girl Friday.
He also seemed to think rather highly of a former one-time FBI agent named George Monroe.
Mr. Goldsmith. What about David Phillips?
Mr. Shaw. Yes. Dave Phillips ran the what we called the CA side of the shop, covert action, mostly propaganda. I came to Mexico City with the understanding that I was going to head up the Cuban shop. Very soon after I arrived there, Dave Phillips was tapped -- it was while we were still in the old Embassy building.
He was tapped and named the new Cuban Office Chief.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did that happen in October '63?
Mr. Shaw. I don't know. I do not remember. But it was not too long after I was there, and I was asked, I think by Dave; I don't remember -- if I had any objections to continuing to serve in Cuba.
I liked Dave, I respected him. I did not feel that I was being hurt, hurt careerwise, to step back and I was very interested in Cuban operations, so I did willingly, let us say, relinquish command, if you want to, of Cuban Ops and I served Dave as one more officer.
Later on, after Dave left, a year or two later, I once again took over the Cuban Ops group.
Mr. Goldsmith. You were in charge of Cuban Operations at the beginning. Then Phillips took it over at some point and
then, after Phillips left, you went back to that position?
Mr Shaw. That is right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Our review of Agency records indicates that Phillips would have assumed that position on October of '63. Would that be consistent with your recollection?
Mr. Shaw. My recollection would have been, had you not told me this based on your review of the files, that it took place earlier than October, but I do not know. I really do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. My questions are going to be confined, unless I indicate to the contrary, to the period up to the end of 1963. So, from the time of your arrival in Mexico City until the end of 1963, prior to the time that Mr. Phillips assumed the position of Cuban operations --
Mr. Shaw. Chief.
Mr. Goldsmith. Chief would be the word, and you had those responsibilities, what did those responsibilities include?
Mr. Shaw. Since it was not ratified to me upon my arrival that I was, indeed, Chief of Cuban Ops, I simply considered myself to be one more case officer working against the Cuban target. Our basic interest was in effecting penetrations of the Cuban government.
What we wanted most of all were effective penetrations of the Cuban Embassy, the Cuban Intelligence Service, and some possible line-in to their communications set-up.
Mr. Goldsmith. In 1963, did you manage to place any penetration agents in the Cuban Embassy or consulate?
Mr. Shaw. Did I?
Mr. Goldsmith. Did the station?
Mr. Shaw. There were two. I did not place either one, and I think they both pre-dated 1963.
Mr. Goldsmith. Were those two penetration agents within the Cuban consulate or Embassy at the time of the President's assassination?
Mr. Shaw. Yes. One was in the consulate -- LITAMIL-7 was the cryptonym. L-I-T-A-M-I-L-7. And the other one was in the Embassy -- L-I-T-A-M-I-L-9.
Mr. Goldsmith. What information did these people give you after the assassination pertaining to the possible involvement of the Cuban government?
Mr. Shaw. I did not handle LITAMIL-7, and LITAMIL-9. I did handle,
Mr. Goldsmith. Who handled LITAMIL-7?
Mr. Shaw. I think that it was Ray Swider, but I am not sure. I did not meet LITAMIL-7 until Ray Swider left the country.
Mr. Goldsmith. You nevertheless have had access to the information that this individual gave to Swider?
Mr. Shaw. I would normally have seen copies of contact reports which were reports that we wrote -- any of us who were
case officers wrote -- after station meetings, and it would have been normal for me, for example, to see any information of consequence that LITAMIL-7 produced, just like it would have been normal for any other case officer in the Cuban section to see my contact reports on meetings with LITAMIL-9.
Mr. Goldsmith. In light of that, do you know what information LITAMIL-7 gave concerning the Cuban government's reaction to the death of the President?
Mr. Shaw. I do not recall, and I do not recall the specifics of anything. You may have something in your files with my name on it; I do not know what LITAMIL-9 produced. I do have the recollection of the sense of feeling on the part of those people that there was no exultation or jubilation or happiness whatsoever inside the Cuban Embassy at the assassination of President Kennedy.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did the penetration agents ever indicate that Oswald had been to the Embassy and had stated that he was going to attempt to kill the President?
Mr. Shaw. No, not that I know of.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did any of those agents ever indicate that Oswald had had contact with the Agency -- with the Embassy, rather?
Mr. Shaw. I should imagine that LITAMIL-7 probably did -- I do not recall it. But since she was in the consulate, and --since it was my understanding that Oswald's contact with the
consular field rather than with the Embassy field, I should imagine, given the discussions that undoubtedly took place in the Cuban Embassy after this assassination, that she probably spoke about it. I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. What was the name of LITAMIL-7?
Mr. Shaw. I'd rather not give names.
(Discussion off the record.)
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, in light of your response, I am certainly aware of the sensitivity of this issue and of your concern for sources and methods, and I would also make two points. One is that under the letter, you are free of your secrecy obligation. At the same time, I am not about to rely upon that letter to compel an answer out of you, because you are here voluntarily today to help us. And, as I said, because I understand your concern for a sensitive source in this case, I am not going to ask you to state for the record the name of either one of these individuals.
Mr. Shaw. May I say something at this point?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Shaw. It is my understanding that both of these people are, if they are still alive, are living in Mexico and I do not want to be in a position of revealing a name which could harm either of those people. I notice here that it says--
Mr. Goldsmith. You are referring now to the letter from Mr. Carlucci?
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
"To provide the affected person the opportunity to receive guidance from me or my designees on the applicability of this authorization, particularly to questions which are asked."
I would like to get Frank Carlucci to tell me that I would reveal two names of agents, if it is necessary -- or you can find out from the file, probably, who they are.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, I understand your position. I want to make sure you understand mine. I am in no way forcing you to reveal a name. Once you had demonstrated a reluctance to, then, as far as I was concerned, then the matter was terminated.
Mr. Shaw. No problem?
Mr. Goldsmith. I will say that we will pursue this by contacting the appropriate people at the Agency.
Mr. Shaw. I think if you requested the Agency for those two names, it would probably produce them. I wouldn't want to be the guy to say it.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand your position perfectly. I hope you understand mine.
Mr. Shaw. I do.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would not want you to go back to the Agency and say that the staff of this Committee attempted to compel an answer out of you.
Mr. Shaw. I will not say any such thing.
Mr. Goldsmith. Fine.
For the record, would you spell the cryptonyms of these penetration agents?
Mr. Shaw. One of them was LITAMIL-7 -- L-I-T-A-M-I-L - 7.
The other was LITAMIL-9.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are these two agents still active?
Mr. Shaw. Neither one is active. I am quite sure that neither one is active.
Mr. Goldsmith. For purposes of clarification, LITAMIL-7, was that agent working out of the consulate?
Mr. Shaw. That agent was an employee of the consular section of the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City. LITAMIL-9 was an officer of the Embassy.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, on the question of the identity of these two agents, when you go back to the Agency, could you raise this question with the appropriate individual, appropriate superior authority, and we will do the same so that some time this week we can get together on that?
Mr. Shaw. I do not see any reason for us to get together. You can get it from them, I am sure. It is just that I have a rather strong feeling about protecting anybody who has cooperated with us.
It is not that I consider you do not have a right to that information, if you feel that you need it. It is just that I
cannot bring myself to reveal the true name of an agent unless I am required to do so.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand that concern. I certainly respect it.
(Pause)
I have been informed by my researcher, Dan Hardway, that the Agency is in the process of looking into this issue.
Mr. Shaw. Okay.
Mr. Goldsmith. At this time, I would like to get into the area of the telephone taps that were in operation in 1963 against the Cuban Embassy and consulate. My first question is, what responsibility, if any, did you have with regard to the telephone tap operation?
Mr. Shaw. No responsibility. I saw the product, usually.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who was the individual who was in charge of that tap?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know whose responsibility it was. I rather suspect that it may have been Ann Goodpasture's, but I do not know for sure. I do not remember.
There were two telephone operations, two tap operations. One of them was unilateral and one of them was joint with the Mexican government.
Mr. Goldsmith. Which one was the unilateral one? By that, I mean which phones were covered by the unilateral one?
Mr. Shaw. There was a mix, and I cannot recall which
were which. It may well have been that we were tapping some
Cuban Embassy phones unilaterally, and some of them were being
tapped jointly. I know that there was coverage on the joint tap
operation, which I believe was called LIENVOY. I am not sure.
Mr. Goldsmith. That is correct.
You indicated that you think Ann Goodpasture may have been
responsible for the telephone tap operation against the Cuban
operation. What basis do you have for that?
Mr. Shaw. Responsible in the sense of picking up the take.
I am not sure of that, because I know she did some of that kind
of work. I am not sure who did it. We used to get copies of
the transcripts and I remember -- I am sure I saw some of the
Cuban stuff on joint taps. And then, of course, taps that
were run by the Mexican government.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you review the transcripts that came
in as a matter of regular routine?
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you read all of them?
Mr. Shaw. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. Which ones would you read?
Mr. Shaw. I would have been interested primarily in the
Cuban ones, and what they called the resuma -- it was sort of
a Spanish word for resume -- the resuma was a distillation,
if you will, of the digest of the joint tap that was prepared,
I believe, for the Mexican President. You look at the resumé, which may be two pages, and you may have the gist of what might be a whole bunch of pages of tap.
Mr. Goldsmith. Normally, you read transcripts of conversations that took place on telephones of the Cuban Embassy, is that correct?
Mr. Shaw. Normally, I read some of that stuff. I do not remember whether I saw it all or not, because quite a bit of it was processed by other people. I do not know who they were, people on the outside, I suppose. And I read summaries of what appeared on these things, but I remember also, at times, seeing the verbatim -- Man Outside says so and so; Person Inside, Woman Inside, says such and such.
Mr. Goldsmith. Sometimes you would get summary transcriptions of the summary conversations or English and sometimes you would get verbatim translations, is that correct?
Mr. Shaw. Yes. I would see them, I would not get them. They would go past me. I would see them.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was it more likely that what you would see in verbatim form, conversations that took place, for example, in Russian and had to be translated before you received them?
Mr. Shaw. I certainly would not see any conversations in Russian, because the Cuban Embassy did not have any Russian conversations. I cannot really answer that question. I am not really sure I fully understand it. I do remember seeing
a variety of take, what we call take, from the various tap
operations. This take sometimes was processed into English.
The stuff that appeared in the resumé was in Spanish. Sometimes
the conversations were typed out in Spanish and translated into
English. I prefer them in Spanish, because I am at home in
Spanish.
Mr. Goldsmith. How many people reviewed the take from
the surveillance operation of the Cuban Embassy and consular
telephones?
Mr. Shaw. I have no idea. I assume there were quite a
few. The stuff was widely passed around.
Mr. Goldsmith. As a matter of routine, how many people
would review them?
Mr. Shaw. I have no idea.
Mr. Goldsmith. How many people were in Cuban operations?
Mr. Shaw. I would guess five or six.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who were they?
Mr. Shaw. Dave Phillips.
Mr. Goldsmith. We are talking now about the period 1963?
Mr. Shaw. That is right. Dave Phillips, myself, Ray
Swider. I am trying to think of the girl's name. We had
various secretaries in there. I do not know who was the secre-
tary in '63. Peggy Magert. I'm not sure she was there at
that time.
Of course, Allen White would see it. Winn Scott would see
Mr. Goldsmith. They would not review every transcript or summary that came in, would then? Allen White or Winn Scott?
Mr. Shaw. I imagine Winn Scott; I do not know about Allen White. Winn was pretty much, he tended to review almost all of the paper that came in and out of the station.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you saying that there was no routine procedure established for who was to review the take from the Cuban telephone surveillance operations?
Mr. Shaw. I am saying that, when I got there, the case officers in Cuban Ops saw this stuff that was routed around through the station and that persisted during the time that I was there.
Mr. Goldsmith. I am not sure that the answer --
Mr. Shaw. How that was routed, I am not sure.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you customarily see every conversation that came in?
Mr. Shaw. I doubt it. I doubt it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who would have seen the conversation and decided that it was not important enough to merit your attention?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who brought in the take from these operations to the station?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know that either, but it was my
understanding that non-official cover people on the outside picked up the tapes -- don't consider this gospel, but this is my understanding -- picked up tapes from the various listening posts, some of which had been processed by people in the listening post; some of which had not. But they, in turn, either processed those tapes or took them to people to continue the processing in case they had a foreign language in them, or something, and then turn them over to the station.
Somebody went out from the station, probably with a little attache case or something, and picked up takes again. It is my understanding that the person primarily involved in that was Ann Goodpasture, but I do not know for sure.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who was the first person that the transcripts would go to upon their arrival at the Embassy?
Mr. Shaw. I rather suspect Winn Scott, because I remember great numbers of those white pages that came across our desk had P numbers written on them in black ink by Winn Scott.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know how many lines were being tapped at the Cuban consulate and Embassy?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. You reviewed the transcripts and summaries of these conversations for two years and you have no idea how many lines were tapped?
Mr. Shaw. No. This was fifteen years ago. I can give you a guess.
Mr. Goldsmith. Sure. A best guess would be helpful.
Mr. Shaw. I would guess three or four lines. The primary interest was in the Soviets. You had far more converage.
That is a guess.
Mr. Goldsmith. Understood.
Mr. Shaw. I would guess, off-hand, two lines in the Embassy, one line in the consulate.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know if the Cuban consul's telephone was tapped?
Mr. Shaw. If the consulate line was tapped --
Mr. Goldsmith. It would have been his?
Mr. Shaw. Probably it would have been his, but they may have had a direct line in there. I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. How would a telephone tap actually work? I am talking now about the actual mechanics of the tap.
Mr. Shaw. I do not know. I never had anything do do with them. I know they used to take some of their taps at what they call the junction boxes. These would be the boxes out in the street where lines came in to be fed into this central -- I would rather suspect that the joint operations were mostly done at the central, since the Mexican government simply could have issued orders, you will tap such and such a phone.
Mr. Goldsmith. My question is oriented towards the following. Once a tap has been placed on a line, would that
mean that all calls, ingoing or outgoing, on that phone would be picked up, so long as the tap is in effect?
Mr. Shaw. So long as it is in effect, yes. Whether those would appear in the transcripts is another matter. If it was like a wrong number, or somebody saying pick up three rolls and bring them home for lunch, probably it would not appear on the transcript.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who would make that decision?
Mr. Shaw. Whoever transcribed the tapes.
Mr. Goldsmith. How much time would pass from the moment that a call came in until the transcription passed across your desk?
Mr. Shaw. I cannot answer your question with any precision. There was a system in the Embassy whereby if you had a fast-breaking situation, or something like that, you could -- I sure would like to get the transcripts of such and such a line fast, and that information would be processed and funneled back in to the Embassy or into the station on a priority basis.
I would guess, offhand, that it ran -- again, this is a guess -- five, six, seven days.
Mr. Goldsmith. What about the high priority cases?
Mr. Shaw. Sometimes you can get that pretty fast.
Mr. Goldsmith. Within a day?
Mr. Shaw. Yes. We could have somebody looking for a
certain call, and I do not recall ever doing that. But it was my understanding that if you expected some situation, that you could levy a requirement -- for example, let me give you a for instance here.
Let us suppose that we, the station, someone in the station was going to make a recruitment pitch to a Soviet officer. It would have been possible for the station to have organized things so that there was a live body and not just a machine hanging over phone calls coming in to the Soviet Embassy in case the guy called up and said, let me tell you the discussion I just had, or something like that.
This would be a little far-fetched, because a Soviet would not be likely to handle it by phone. But in a case where you are looking for something fast-breaking to protect yourself, being on top of the situation -- it would not apply much to Mexico, but if you had a revolutionary situation breaking out someplace, surely there is a possibility of getting information very quickly off any given line.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would the transcripts be reviewed by you in chronological order?
Mr. Shaw. I got them in batches and I would review them just in the order in which they came. I might have shuffled them in chronological order, yes. Quite often they came in four or five or six pages stapled together.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would they tend to come in chronological
order so you read a transcript from the 15th before the 16th?
Mr. Shaw. Generally yes, right.
Mr. Goldsmith. What happened to the transcripts after they were reviewed by you?
Mr. Shaw. They were usually routed. They had a routing sheet on it, and they would go on to somewhere else. Where they went, I do not know. Sometimes we would mark them for files. Of course, if there were a transcript in there that had specific information on somebody that we were interested in, we would mark a copy for the files and it would go into that person's -- either their P-file, which was their personnel file, or into any operational self-file that would we make, building up background information on a person, the little things like whether an officer's wife was unhappy with the maid or with living conditions or the cost or what have you of the drugstore. These little bits and pieces were built up and those came from transcripts.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would these transcripts eventually get sent to headquarters?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know. I will say that it was unlikely that Winn Scott ever threw anything away. It was somewhere, probably, in the file room.
Mr. Goldsmith. What about the tapes? What would happen with the tapes after a conversation had been transcribed?
Mr. Shaw. Again, you are getting into an area where I
never had any personal experience. It is my understanding that tapes were erased and reused, and they were used over and over again. Otherwise, we would have ended up with a room full of tapes and there really was no reason to keep them.
Now, I would also assume that if there was something important on a tape that they might have held it. I do not know. I do not recall ever saying, hold that tape for me. The transcript usually sufficed as the record.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know if, at the time of the assassination, that the station had a tape recording of Lee Harvey Oswald's voice?
Mr. Shaw. No, I do not know if they did. I think they did not. It was my understanding that what they had was a transcript of some guy calling, again, it is my understanding. I believe he called the Soviet Embassy from the Cuban Embassy, or the Cubans called the Soviet Embassy, I am not sure. But as far as having the tape with Oswald's voice on it, I seriously doubt it.
(Discussion off the record.)
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to show you now what was marked here as CIA No. 197 and, for purposes of the record and for your information, the Agency has provided us with its documents. Each page has been assigned a number. The reason it has been assigned a number is so that the Agency can make sure that everything given to the Committee is returned. For
reference purposes, we simply use those numbers for a witness when we are going through this pile of materials.
Now I would like you to take a look at CIA No. 197, the second paragraph.
(Pause)
Mr. Shaw. Okay.
Mr. Goldsmith. The second paragraph indicates that the station is unable to compare the voices, as the first tape was erased prior to the receipt of the second call.
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does that suggest to you that at least one tape was still in existence on November 23rd, the date that this cable was sent? Otherwise, the second paragraph would have said the tapes had been erased, routinely, whatever.
Mr. Shaw. It could indicate that. It does not definitely state that. That is an interpretation, certainly.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does that refresh your memory as to whether or not there was a taping system?
Mr. Shaw. I do not have anything in writing. This did not refresh my memory at all. This probably would have been considered. Was this after the assassination?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Shaw. No, I do not think it necessarily indicates, but I am surprised that it does not say that they were both destroyed, or both erased.
Mr. Goldsmith. Please take a look at CIA 208.
Mr. Shaw. 208.
Mr. Goldsmith. And read paragraph number four. Read it to yourself, please.
(Pause)
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. According to paragraph number four, it indicates that it seems a voice comparison of some kind was made.
Mr. Shaw. Yes, or it could well be that this guy, Fineglass --
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Tarasoff?
Mr. Shaw. Remembered the poor Russian of the first tape and the poor Russian of the second tape and figured that it was the same guy.
Mr. Goldsmith. How long were tapes normally retained prior to being erased?
Mr. Shaw. I have no idea. It would seem to me if you had a very productive tape, you probably would not keep it very long, once you transcribed it.
(Pause)
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like you to read the CS comment on CIA 239.
Mr. Shaw. I have read it.
Mr. Goldsmith. According to that, it indicates that the
normal time lag would be two weeks. In other words, the tapes would normally be retained for a two-week period.
Mr. Shaw. That is what it seems to say, yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is that consistent with your memory now, at the time?
Mr. Shaw. No, I do not have any idea. I was not involved in tape pick-ups or tape erasures.
Mr. Goldsmith. The Oswald telephone calls, as we will see later on, came in within approximately four days of each other, if, as CIA 239 indicates, the tapes were normally retained for two weeks prior to being routinely erased. Does that suggest to you that the Oswald tape was, for some reason, treated in an unusual manner, because either the first call came in, let's say September 27th. By the time the second call came in, the first tape had already been erased.
Mr. Shaw. No, it does not suggest that to me. — what is this number here — because this message came out 9 December 63. What it suggests to me is that, subsequent to the assassination, is that the station was to hold tapes for a minimum of two weeks.
Mr. Goldsmith. Please read into the record what 239 says.
Mr. Shaw. CS comment: station to erase routine tapes, Soviet Embassy, keeping normal two week lag.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does that suggest to you that the normal lag would not be two weeks?
Mr. Shaw. This was not addressed to me.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand that.
Mr. Shaw. There is no reason for me to read this anymore than there is reason for you to read that. The words stand by themselves.
Mr. Goldsmith. That is right, and you have just given an interpretation of those words, suggesting that that the meaning is prospective in intent. In other words, after December 9, 1963, the timelag for retention of tapes prior to erasure would be two weeks.
Mr. Shaw. I think it could read that, yes. I do not know what went on between Winn and the station as far as periods for keeping these, but I think what you are trying to do is lead me into a situation of pointing out that the station was remiss in destroying tapes, and I do not believe that is the case.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to indicate to you, and also for the record, that what I am trying to do here is go over questions that are raised by the documents and the Committee has no predisposition, one way or the other, to reach any particular conclusions.
The truth is that unless these questions are asked of you, both the Agency and the Committee will be criticized by people in the future who review these documents and say, why were not these questions asked of you.
Mr. Shaw. I can understand why you are asking the questions. I am simply not in a position to tell you, from memory
or anything else what the normal station procedure was regarding retention of tapes, although, as I did indicate earlier, that the tapes were routinely erased and used over again. As far as the time lag, you know as much about it, and probably more than I do, by now.
Mr. Goldsmith. What responsibility, if any, did you have with regard to the photo-surveillance operation against the Cuban Embassy and consulate?
Mr. Shaw. I had no responsibility for that operation until after I reassumed the Cuban Ops section which would have been the day Phillips left for Mexico, probably a year or two down the road. I do know, however, that the operation -- there was a Cuban photo, or a photo operation against the Cuban Embassy.
I do not remember why, but I think that observation was not active in the period when Oswald was in Mexico. If I remember correctly, the man, to the best of my knowledge who handled that, who was actually the inside case officer, if you will, was the little guy who was snapping the pictures, was a fellow by the name of Robert Zambarnadi, and I believe he is retired and living in Mexico. I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who was the station case officer responsible for running the photo-surveillance operation against the Cubans?
Mr. Shaw. As far as I know, it was Robert Zambarnadi,
who was the technical officer of the station. He was a technically qualified man.
Mr. Goldsmith. There was no one overseeing him?
Mr. Shaw. I do not believe so, but maybe Dave was. I do not know. We used to get batches of pictures. One of the things that I would do with the agent that I mentioned earlier was that I handled was take batches of these pictures to him and sit down with him and say, did you ever see this guy, or who was that? And he'd say, that's a courier, or that's the new officer who just arrived, or I do not know who this guy was, but he came in and talked to so and so, that sort of thing.
We used to try to identify people with those pictures.
Mr. Goldsmith. How many photo bases were there taking pictures of the Cuban consulate and Embassy?
Mr. Shaw. To the best of my knowledge, there was only one photo base. At times, the consulate was not covered and the Embassy was. If I may draw you a picture, this would be the block, the compound block. The Cuban Embassy was the big building up here, and there was a little gatehouse down here. I do not remember whether it was in or out.
This was the consulate, on the corner. People who would want to get visas would routinely appear here and they would send them down the street and they would go into the consulate. Sometimes they knew where they were going and they came in here,
or they asked a cab, take me to the Cuban consulate, they
would probably be delivered here.
This is a block, a city block. The house from which the
photographs were taken is over here on this corner. The
photographs were taken long distance down here and here. This
was not always covered. This was considered more important,
because it was routine -- either there was a lot of routine
visa stuff here.
Later on, subsequent -- gosh, it must have been a year
later. I do not remember just when -- we developed a system,
or somebody up here in the states who developed a system
whereby the camera would be triggered automatically. That is
movement -- sort of like a photo-electric cell or something --
movement up here in the picture that the camera was to cover
would cause a series of photos to be taken, maybe four or
five, zap, zap, zap, something like that.
But I believe that, at the time Oswald was in Mexico City,
not only was this down for some reason and not functioning,
but I believe, had it been functioning, that it would have
been individual picture snapping. I do not think that auto-
matic equipment was in Mexico at that time. I could be
wrong.
Mr. Goldsmith. I am not going to be able to introduce
this diagram into the record, so I am just going to describe
it as best as I can.
You indicated that on one block, on one corner of that block was a consulate building for the Cubans. The other side of the block was the Embassy building.
Across the street was the photo base.
Mr. Shaw. This was all wall. This was a compound.
Excuse me, if I may interject. There was another building back here that had a theatre downstairs and had offices upstairs.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was that within the compound also?
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Three buildings within the Cuban compound?
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. The photo base was located across the street. If was closer to the consulate than it was to the entrance of the Embassy?
Mr. Shaw. That is correct.
Mr. Goldsmith. From the diagram that you drew, it would seem that the location of the camera was closer to the consulate than it was to the Embassy entrance, yet you also indicated that most of the people of interest would have been entering the Embassy, not the consulate?
Mr. Shaw. That is correct.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was not the placement of that camera in an inappropriate position?
Mr. Shaw. I imagine that camera was placed wherever we could get it. Getting real straight across from one of those
embassies was very difficult.
I know, had we had our druthers, we would have placed that camera closer up here and the Soviet Embassy had a similar sort of situation, a camera over here and one down here. I believe the closer the better, yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. How many photo bases were there operating against the Soviet compound, without drawing a diagram?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know, but I think there must have been two or three.
Mr. Goldsmith. Are you sure you were not the case officer overseeing the surveillance operation against the Cubans?
Mr. Shaw. I certainly am.
Mr. Goldsmith. So Mr. Zambarnardi was not working under you?
Mr. Shaw. I did not consider him working under me, at that time. Later on, when he was replaced and I am not sure whether Dave Phillips was there or not, I did move into this operation. I am trying to think of the cryptonym for the operation. I cannot recall.
And the chap who then handled it was Zambarnardi's replacement, I think his name was Humphrey. That was the surname. Lou Humphrey, I think. I am not sure.
Mr. Goldsmith. What was the purpose of the photo-surveillance operation?
Mr. Shaw. Primarily to identify people in touch with the
foreign embassy.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would everyone's picture be taken?
Mr. Shaw. No, no way.
Mr. Goldsmith. Whose picture would be taken?
Mr. Shaw. For example, that you would normally in an operation like this be limited by time available for the photographer. You would be limited by daylight. You would not photograph a milkman, or a mailman or somebody who would be there repeatedly. You would not photograph a staffer of the Embassy if once you knew who he was, unless he was walking with somebody.
You would not photograph a regular visitor to the Embassy, if you knew who he was.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you photograph all foreigners?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know. I would have to say the answer is no. I never photographed any of them. Do you mean would all foreigners be photographed? I would say, given the limitations that I have enumerated, namely how long a person can sit there and watch, and they have to take a break now and then, daylight, Sundays they probably did not photograph because there is little activity. I am sure there were considerable down periods in this sort of operation.
No, I would say all foreigners were not photographed.
Ideally, you would like to have a picture of anybody who went in and out of there, surely.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand that.
My question is, while surveillance base was in operation, would a primary purpose of it be to take pictures of foreigners?
Mr. Shaw. Yes. That would have been a primary purpose. Not necessarily foreigners, but people you do not recognize. Foreigners or Mexicans; Mexicans are foreigners to us, of course.
Another thing they did, by the way, was they tried to photograph the license plates of automobiles that came to these embassies.
Mr. Goldsmith. During what hours were these photo bases in operation?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know. I would say most likely during business hours and proper daylight conditions, when the photographer was available to do the job.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you read back that answer?
The Reporter: "Question: "During what hours were these photo bases in operation?"
Answer: "I do not know. I would say most likely during business hours and proper daylight conditions, when the photographer was available to do the job."
Mr. Goldsmith. As a matter of routine, when would photographers have been available to do the job?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know. I was not involved in these operations. I used to see quite a bit of coverage.
Mr. Goldsmith. What were your primary responsibilities when you were down there? You were not involved in the photo-surveillance operation; you were not involved -- excuse me for interrupting you.
Mr. Shaw. Go ahead.
Mr. Goldsmith. You were not involved in the photo-surveillance operation and you were not involved in the wire tap operation, so, my question is, what was your primary responsibility?
Mr. Shaw. My primary responsibility was to try to effect penetrations of the Cuban government. I spent a good bit of time with Cubans of the non-Castro persuasion, attempting to identify Cubans of the Castro persuasion that we might go after.
By "go after," I mean attempt to recruit.
I spent a lot of time collecting information from the Cuban asset on the outside to process into the intelligence reports on what was happening in Cuba.
We had a system set up in Mexico City under an agent called AMSAIL who was the representative of the exile community. He would arrange to meet, help, debrief, Cubans who were arriving constantly from Cuba on the way to the United States or to Mexico or to somewhere else in the world, people who were exiting Cuba.
Mexico did not break relations with Cuba as did the other
countries of the Hemisphere. The OAS recommended that; Mexico did not do it.
So, when the refugee flow dried up in Florida, we probably had one of the most productive operations there in Mexico City regarding information on what was going on in Cuba.
I spent a lot of time with AMSAIL on that.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you ever try to recruit Eusbio Ascue?
Mr. Shaw. His name is Eusbio Ascue.
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Mr. Shaw. A-s-c-u-e. First name, E-u-s-b-i-o.
I did not try to recruit Ascue. That may have been attempted prior to my arrival, in which the man who would know about it, if it had been attempted, would be Mr. Thomas Hazelit.
Mr. Goldsmith. What about Teresa Proenza?
Mr. Shaw. No, I never made any attempt to recruit Teresa Proenza.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know if anyone ever did?
Mr. Shaw. I know we had an officer in Washington who had formerly served in Mexico City who was very interested in Teresa Proenza. That officer's name was Charles Anders.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is he still with the Agency?
Mr. Shaw. It is my understanding that he is.
Mr. Goldsmith. What about Guillermo Ruiz?
Mr. Shaw. That does not even ring a bell. Ruiz is a
very common Spanish name. Do you want to tell me who he is or if you have anything on him? Maybe it might ring a bell.
Mr. Goldsmith. Apparently, Mr. Ruiz was a Cuban intelligence officer at the Embassy, Cuban Embassy.
Mr. Shaw. I do not recall him there when I was there.
Mr. Goldsmith. What did you say that Mr. Ray Swider's responsibilities were, if you said?
Mr. Shaw. I did not say. I used his name -- he was another officer, like I was, in Cuban operations.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether he had anything to do with the photo operation.
Mr. Shaw. I do not know. He may have; I do not know. I do not think he did. He may have.
Mr. Goldsmith. After your arrival in Mexico City, did anyone attempt to recruit Ascue?
Mr. Shaw. As far as I know, there was no attempt made to recruit Ascue after my arrival. My memory could be playing tricks on me. I know I never went after him.
(A brief recess was taken.)
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like to get into the number of people who were in Cuban Operations in October of '63, September, October of '63. Could you tell me again how many?
Mr. Shaw. If you could show me a list of the people at the American Embassy at that time, I think I could pretty well quickly, in the station -- if you have such a list, I probably
could very quickly identify those that had some connection with Cuban Ops.
Mr. Goldsmith. The Agency has not given us that list today to have for this purpose.
Mr. Shaw. Do you have one lying around?
Mr. Goldsmith. No.
So far, according to my recollection of appearances, we have Mr. Phillips, yourself and Mr. Swider.
Mr. Shaw. When I arrived there, Tom Hasbrook would have been there. He would have been gone by that time.
John Zambérdi would have been involved in the technical ops.
I am not sure whether Peggy Magret was there or not.
Mr. Goldsmith. How many case officers were there in Cuban operations?
Mr. Shaw. Probably just three, three or four, I am not sure.
Mr. Goldsmith. There were three case officers, probably four?
Mr. Shaw. At least three, yes. Dave and Ray and myself.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was there a fourth?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know. I cannot recall, offhand, who else was there.
Wait a minute. Lorna McKay was there, as a researcher -- what was it called? Research analyst.
Mr. Goldsmith. I am interested now only in case officers. I do have a list here, referred to as CIA 169-70, which has a list of Agency employees. Would you please examine that list?
(Pause)
Mr. Shaw. Okay.
Perhaps there would have been myself, Ray Swider, Dave Phillips and Lorna McKay.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was Lorna McKay a case officer?
Mr. Shaw. Lorna McKay was not considered -- yes, I guess she was a case officer. I do not know what cases she handled. She did more of what we call INTEL analyst work. She had officer rank, I believe. I believe she was a GS-9 or -11 or something. I do not remember.
But Peggy, the girl I mentioned awhile ago, was not there until 1965. That was about it.
The ranking would have been David Phillips, myself, Ray Swider, Lorna McKay.
Mr. Goldsmith. How did you divide up your responsibilities?
Mr. Shaw. Let me interject. Jack Stewart was there, but he was not in Mexico City. He was in Yucatan, in the consulate.
Mr. Goldsmith. Fine.
How did you four divide up your responsibilities?
Mr. Shaw. We were given certain agents to handle and we handled those agents, and Dave Phillips would decide what
other activities he would pass around. I notice --
Mr. Goldsmith. Which were those other activities?
Mr. Shaw. Anything that might come to light that Dave would -- an ad hoc requirement, or something like that, he might ask any of us to help out, or somebody else might ask us to do something. I went out and helped surveil a meeting one time for one of these guys down here. It had nothing to do with Cuban Ops.
Mr. Goldsmith. What procedures did the four of you establish for reviewing photographs?
Mr. Shaw. The only procedure that was established was route the photographs and show them to any agent, personnel, who might be in a position to identify the persons in the photographs.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did any of you identify all the photographs in the Cuban Operation Branch?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was there a system to this?
Mr. Shaw. If there was, I did not set it up. When I got photographs, I would show them to LITAMIL-9 and have him tell me who they were and I would write a contact report and submit it to my Chief, who was Dave Phillips.
I would assume that Ray Swider probably did the same thing with his agents.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, unless there was a system for
reviewing the photographs, you had no way of knowing that all of the photographs were being reviewed by you and other Cuban Operations case officers?
Mr. Shaw. I had no way of knowing. I was seeing all the photographs, that is true. I assumed I did.
Mr. Goldsmith. You had no way of knowing that?
Mr. Shaw. Not unless I would have gone to pick them up from the man who took them and developed them, which I did not do.
Mr. Goldsmith. With regard to the transcripts, did you have any procedure for insuring that all of the transcripts were being reviewed?
Mr. Shaw. Did I have a procedure? No. The station routed the transcripts to the various officers. Winn Scott quite often routed them. I notice you had a transcript somewhere here --
Mr. Goldsmith. We will look at the transcripts later on.
Mr. Shaw. Winn Scott quite often routed those to a specific officer.
Mr. Goldsmith. Were all of the transcripts pertaining to Cuban operations that were sent to the station reviewed by at least one of the Cuban operations case officers?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. Was Mr. Scott a very demanding man?
Mr. Shaw. What do you mean by "demanding"?
Mr. Goldsmith. Did he expect his employees to work hard and to perform thorough, competent work?
Mr. Shaw. I assume he did. He never said so in so many words.
It was my understanding that until he was remarried he worked long hours in the Embassy, before I got there. Sometimes he had people in there at 9:00 o'clock at night.
Mr. Goldsmith. Compared to other station chiefs that you had worked under, was he more demanding or less?
Mr. Shaw. I would not say he was any more. He expected work out of his people and got it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it fair to say that the Mexico City station had one of the biggest telephone surveillance operations in existence?
Mr. Shaw. Certainly in Latin America.
Mr. Goldsmith. Any CIA station?
Mr. Shaw. I don't know about any CIA station. Certainly in Latin America. It ate up a lot of man hours.
Mr. Goldsmith. In light of the fact that Mr. Scott apparently was a demanding man and that you had one of the largest surveillance operations in effect in Latin America, your testimony today is that you do not know whether the Cuban operations case officers reviewed all of the transcripts?
Mr. Shaw. I do not think that the prefacing was necessary. The latter part of that, in which you asked me if I am aware
that all of the transcripts of the Cuban Ops were examined
by the Cuban Ops section, I would have to, again, say I do
not know.
(Discussion off the record.)
Mr. Goldsmith. We just went off the record for a moment
because Mr. Shaw had a question about where his car was parked
and whether there would be any problem about that, and I
indicated that I did not think there would be a problem.
Mr. Shaw, do you recall who delivered the photographs
to the station, the tape from the surveillance operation?
Mr. Shaw. It was my understanding that the technician
picked them up. Bob Zambernardi would have picked them up
from the agent.
You are talking of the Cuban Embassy now?
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes, and consulate.
Mr. Shaw. It is my understanding that he would have
picked them up from the agent who took the photographs. The
agent who took the photographs developed them, printed them,
and turned the prints over to Mr. Zambernardi. That is the way
I think it worked.
Mr. Goldsmith. How would you actually get to review the
photographs? Who would bring them to you?
Mr. Shaw. Usually I do not remember who brought them to
me. I have the impression it may have been Lorna McKay, but
I could be wrong. Maybe Bob brought them to me. I do not know.
But I would get a batch of photographs to go through.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who had reporting responsibility for passing along the information that had been obtained from the photographs and the transcripts?
Mr. Shaw. There was little reporting that came out of the photographs. Usually, it yielded what we called operational information rather than intelligence information, to enable us to develop a better understanding of who was in the area, of who was in the Cuban Embassy, and what they were up to.
As far as reporting intelligence that came from those, it probably was reported by the reports section of the Embassy. Next to Winn Scott's office was the CA Chief's office and, next to that, I'm getting in the new embassy now. I don't remember where the report section was in the old embassy.
We had reports officers who actually repaired most of the reports from raw reports, if you will, reported by the case officers.
Again, I would like to point out that these photographs yielded very little reportable intelligence. It was mostly operational intelligence.
Mr. Goldsmith. Understood.
Who was George Monroe?
Mr. Shaw. George Monroe was a former agent, Special Agent, of the Federal Bureau of Investigation who retired or resigned, I do not know how he left the Bureau, and worked in Mexico
City on the outside, as a non-official cover asset for Winn Scott. Ann Goodpasture, I believe, had a lot of contact with George Monroe. I very seldom saw George Monroe. I had nothing to do with him operationally.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know what his responsibilities were?
Mr. Shaw. I believe his responsibilities had to do with dealings with the Mexican government, liaison responsibilities. I think George was used by Winn because George had good contacts in the Ministry of Interior, which would have been sort of the equivalent of the Department of Justice here and out of that Ministry came, for example, the man who became President of Mexico. He was the station asset, contact, not agent.
Mr. Goldsmith. You mentioned earlier, Mr. Charles Anderson, is that correct?
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know why Mr. Anderson had an interest in Eusbio Ascue?
Mr. Shaw. No, I do not believe it was. I think it was Teresa Proenza. I do not think he had any interest in Ascue.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who was the individual who had the interest in Ascue?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know. I said if it had been before my arrival, I would suspect it was Tom Hasley. He was carrying the ball down there and was responsible for that sort of
activity. I do not know that he did, but if it happened in, say, late '62 or somewhere in there, it probably would have been Tom who would have done that.
Mr. Goldsmith. What was Anderson's position at the Embassy?
Mr. Shaw. He was not at the Embassy then. He was at the Embassy back in 1965. I do not know, for a number of years. At that time, Charlie had gone back to Headquarters and he was involved in Cuban operations from Headquarters, the details of which were not made known to me. Whether they were made known to Winn Scott or Dave Phillips or others, I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. When would he have made an effort, if he did, to recruit Teresa Proenza?
Mr. Shaw. I am not sure that he ever tried to recruit. I am merely saying that he had a lot of interest. I do not think anybody ever tried to recruit her. If they did, they were wasting their time.
Mr. Goldsmith. Why were they wasting their time?
Mr. Shaw. She was a pretty tough nut. I never saw -- if I can remember -- I do not remember any vulnerability of Teresa Proenza.
Mr. Goldsmith. What was the nature of Mr. Anderson's interest in her?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know. Some Cuban operational interest, maybe trying to get some information from her through a third
party. I have no idea.
Mr. Goldsmith. When did he spend time in Mexico City that he would have had an opportunity?
Mr. Shaw. He visited Mexico City quite often.
Mr. Goldsmith. Even though he was not stationed down there, he visited often?
Mr. Shaw. That is correct. He made trips in and out of Mexico City.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know what Teresa Proenza's position was at the Cuban Embassy or Consulate?
Mr. Shaw. I think by that time she was out of the Embassy, was she not? I do not remember. She left.
Teresa Proenza was a Mexican. She was not a Cuban. And I am under the impression that by the time I got there, Teresa had left the Embassy. I may be wrong. I think that she was involved in cultural activities.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether Mexican intelligence would have had any penetration agents at the Cuban Embassy or consulate?
Mr. Shaw. I think they would have tried. I do not know how effective Mexican intelligence was. I did not deal with it.
It would be assumed that they made every attempt, the Cubans were gradually removing Mexicans from their employee, from the Cuban Embassy. I think it highly unlikely that the
Mexican government, given its position, was the only government in the Western Hemisphere which maintained relations with Cuba, would have been -- it would have been highly unlikely for them to have tried to pitch a Cuban national.
On the other hand, I think it would have been likely, and would have been expected of them, to have tried to find out from any Mexican working in the Cuban Embassy what was going on.
What this comes down to, of course, is gardeners and secretaries.
Mr. Goldsmith. Why do you make that distinction between a Cuban national and a Mexican?
Mr. Shaw. I make that distinction because of the flap potential. If the Mexicans had attempted to pitch a Cuban and the Cuban had not accepted that pitch and had reported it to his superiors, the Mexican Foreign Office then would have had a problem with the Cuban Foreign Ministry.
Mr. Goldsmith. Of course, the Mexican government was also taking a risk by being involved in the liaison operation or the Agency as well.
Mr. Shaw. One could assume that they had measured their risk, yes, certainly. There is an element of risk in every operation. Do not get me wrong. I do not know whether they had anything going or not. I would assume, just based on my experience, that they would not have tried to pitch Cubans,
that they would have tried to exert subtle coercion on
Mexicans working there to report in the interest of Mexican
national security on what is going on in that Embassy.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who would have been in a position to know
if the Mexican government successfully penetrated the Cuban
Embassy or consulate?
Mr. Shaw. The President of Mexico would have known.
The chief or chiefs of the Mexican service or services.
Mr. Goldsmith. Any American?
Mr. Shaw. Not that I know of.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether there was any coordina-
tion between the telephone tap operations and the photo
operations. For example, if a conversation of interest came
up on the tap operation, would the people monitoring the call
be able to contact through an intermediary the photo bases
to warn them or indicate to them that someone is coming of
interest?
Mr. Shaw. It is my understanding that such a system did
not exist, and I do not believe that the guys monitoring the
telephone tap intercept bases were made aware of photograph
coverage.
However, I would assume that a man running a technical
operation, if he heard something exciting on the line, as
opposed to a tape several days later, would notify his case
officer right away and then it might be possible for the case
officer, assuming a quick reaction capability, to crank up
the people at the photo house to take pictures. This was in
the most perfect of all worlds. Usually things did not work
that way and you end up out on the street, in the middle of
the night two days later, contacting whoever it is taking
photographs.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether the Mexico City
station ever obtained a photograph of Lee Harvey Oswald?
Mr. Shaw. To my understanding, they did not. I never
saw anything down there that looked like Lee Harvey Oswald.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you ever hear an allegation that
Charlotte Bustos, at CIA Headquarters in Washington, found a
photograph of Oswald, or someone she thought to be Oswald,
in the Headquarters files shortly after the assassination?
Mr. Shaw. No, I have never heard such a story. Knowing
Charlotte -- not knowing her well, but having known her over
the years, I would assume that had she found such a thing
she would have rung a big loud bell and say, hey, look what
I found.
Mr. Goldsmith. With regard to the photo operation, let
us assume for a moment that you come across a picture of
interest. Did you have any way of determining on what day and
approximately what time the picture would have been taken?
Mr. Shaw. Very definitely.
Mr. Goldsmith. How would you have done that?
Mr. Shaw. The photographs were squared off and were annotated. We knew the day. We knew, usually, morning or afternoon, a.m. or p.m. Sometimes you could judge by the sequence.
Furthermore, sometimes the actual time of the person going in and going out was actually annotated, if the person operating was operating manually, he would no doubt, the guy with the red-checkered Hawaiian shirt went in at 10:05. He would note that in a little log.
I do not know whether he would note it on the photograph or submit the log with the number keyed to the log in the photograph. Quite often we knew to the minute when a person in a photograph came in or went out or stood in front or walked by.
Mr. Goldsmith. I see.
So, to your knowledge, there were photo-production logs that could be checked?
Mr. Shaw. To my knowledge, such logs did exist, yes. Whether the logs were kept after the information was noted on the photograph, on the back of the photograph or wherever it was noted, I have no idea.
The photographs, quite often came in the form of 35 mm. contact strip prints and then blow-ups of a number of those.
I recall -- I had not thought about it all these years, but usually you knew when a guy, you certainly knew when he went
in on Tuesday morning, the 16th of May, whatever that date was.
Mr. Goldsmith. Who would make the notations on the back of the photograph or contact print as to the time?
Mr. Shaw. In our case, I believe it was the man taking the photographs because he took the photographs, developed the photographs, printed them and turned them over.
Mr. Goldsmith. If he were to put the time on, he would have to go to his log and see what the time was and then make the entry?
Mr. Shaw. Right. He probably made a little notation to himself like I mentioned, the bright shirt or something. Then he would recognize that person in the photograph and make that notation.
(Pause)
Mr. Goldsmith. When was the first time that the name Lee Harvey Oswald came to your attention?
Mr. Shaw. It would have been the evening of the day of the assassination.
Mr. Goldsmith. How did that happen?
Mr. Shaw. We listened. We had a radio. I think it was one of those Zenith Trans-Oceanics in one of the Embassy offices.
I was out at an agent meeting when I heard about the assassination and I came back to the Embassy and went upstairs
and we sat and stood around that radio and I believe it was in Pat Johnson's office -- her name was something else in those days. I can't remember her married name.
And they said something about the police said it was Lee Harvey Oswald, or something. I do not remember. That was the first time that it came to my attention.
Mr. Goldsmith. I would like you now to take a look at CIA No. 13 which is a transcript of the conversation allegedly involving Oswald, a conversation taking place on 1 October '63. Would you please read through that?
(Pause)
When was the first time that you saw that transcript, if you have ever seen it before?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know whether I have ever seen it or not, but I may well have. I was aware that he had called the Soviet Embassy, was made aware after the notoriety of the man was established, but I do not recall ever seeing this before that.
Normally, I would not.
Mr. Goldsmith. Prior to the assassination, did you see it?
Mr. Shaw. No. If I did, I did not pay any attention. I do not believe that it was on a Cuban line.
Mr. Goldsmith. No, it was not.
Mr. Shaw. Sometimes you can tell who saw these things by
the initials up top.
Mr. Goldsmith. There are no writings or notations on that one, however.
Would you please read CIA 177, which is a cable from Mexico City station dated October 8th?
(Pause)
Mr. Shaw. Yes, this is typical where they try to identify somebody that was in the Embassy at the same time. Of course, that does not sound like it.
Mr. Goldsmith. This was the famous cable that has given rise to some of the issues that the Committee was concerned with. My first question is, did you have anything to do with the writing of this cable?
Mr. Shaw. No, I did not. I would not have had.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know how the photograph referred to in paragraph number two of that cable was in some way linked to Oswald?
Mr. Shaw. I would assume, my answer to your question is no. I would assume that this was an effort on the part of the person drafting the cable to help Headquarters identify Lee Oswald, the man who had made the call.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know how she made that conclusion that the photograph reflected Oswald?
Mr. Shaw. No. I do not think she did. I think she merely says that we got a guy who looks like he might be an
American going in, and maybe this is the fellow. I do not see from this cable any conclusion that that is Oswald. I rather suspect they never got a picture of Oswald. This is the one that appeared there, that looked like it could be an American. Therefore, an effort was made to help Headquarters by saying a man who looked like he might be an American entered the Soviet Embassy at that time.
Mr. Goldsmith. I agree with you, Mr. Shaw. Certainly, the cable does not say that the photograph is a photograph of Oswald. At the same time, though, it gives the information in paragraph 1 on Oswald and the second paragraph makes reference to a photograph taken of someone who appears to be North American.
Certainly they would not have sent to Headquarters simply a cable indicating the existence of a photograph, so by putting the photograph in paragraph 2 immediately below the information on Oswald, although the cable does not say that the photograph is one of Oswald, it does in some way suggest that they are related.
Mr. Shaw. It suggests to me that they know an American who claimed to be Lee Oswald called at a certain time, and then they went to the photographs to see if they could find anybody who looked like he might be an American, and the photo they found was of a man apparently 35, athletic build, about 6 feet tall, receding hair line and so forth; and they
submitted this on the off-chance that this might have been the man who made the call.
Mr. Goldsmith. I understand your answer. I am hopeful that you understand that I am not suggesting that the cable definitely says the photograph is one of Oswald.
Mr. Shaw. No, I do not see that it does at all.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you please take a look, now, at CIA 183?
(Pause)
Mr. Shaw. All right, I have read it.
Mr. Goldsmith. This is a cable, is it not, from CIA Headquarters back to the Mexico City station responding to the earlier cable from the station reporting Oswald's contact?
Mr. Shaw. That is what it looks like to me.
Mr. Goldsmith. The fifth paragraph of that cable requests that the station keep Headquarters advised of any further contacts or positive identification of Oswald?
Mr. Shaw. Yes.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether the station ever sent any additional information to Headquarters concerning Oswald?
Mr. Shaw. No, I do not, and I do not recall ever seeing this cable, either.
Mr. Goldsmith. Today is possibly the first time that you have seen that cable?
Mr. Shaw. It could well be, yes. You may have one with
my initials on it, but I doubt it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Looking at CIA 183, there is an arrow pointed to the word "Henry", "Lee Henry Oswald." Adjacent to the arrow it says "sic," s-i-c.
What do you think Mr. Scott was intending to indicate when he wrote "sic" next to the "Henry" in "Lee Henry Oswald"?
Mr. Shaw. I would rather suspect that he wrote this on here subsequent to the assassination when the word came out it was "Harvey Oswald" rather than "Henry Oswald" unless there is something in here that says "Harvey." Is there any?
Mr. Goldsmith. No, there is none.
Mr. Shaw. I would imagine that is something he wrote on later so that they would get the file in the right name. That would be my guess.
Mr. Goldsmith. Would you now take a look at CIA No. 14. You may also want to take a look at CIA No. 15 at the same time.
(Pause)
Would you identify the document that you just reviewed?
Mr. Shaw. What it looks like is a normal LIENVOY transcription. I see my name up here, but I don't see anything that indicates that I ever saw it. It looks like Scott and Goodpasture made checks on it. There is my name, but there is no indication, no initial on my part. Probably I did not see it.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is the date of that transcript?
Mr. Shaw. 28 September 1963 is what is listed on here.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you recall whether you ever saw that transcript before?
Mr. Shaw. I do not recall. I must have seen it afterwards, because I know Sylvia Duran was a person who had dealt with Oswald.
Mr. Goldsmith. When was the first time that this transcript was linked to Oswald?
Mr. Shaw. I have no idea.
Mr. Goldsmith. Let us backstep for a moment. The transcript that appears at CIA No. 13 contains a notation in brackets by the transcriber that this is the same person who called a day or so ago.
Mr. Shaw. To the Soviet Embassy.
Mr. Goldsmith. Yes.
Oswald also said I was there last Saturday. The transcript you just looked at, September 28th, was for a Saturday.
Do you recall whether anyone ever came to you and asked you whether you were aware of a contact by Oswald?
Mr. Shaw. I do not recall that anybody ever came to me, and I do not think that they did. This sounds familiar. I would have heard about this after the assassination, because I remember Sylvia Duran was the person being a Mexican citizen inside the Cuban Embassy who I dealt with.
Mr. Goldsmith. In other words, the point I was making on the October 1st transcript, it refers back to something that happened a day or two earlier, possibly Saturday, and I wondered if Herb Minnell, when they were discussing this, came to you to discuss this matter?
Mr. Shaw. I do not believe they did. Barbara probably would have processed this, but I do not recall that anybody ever came to me about it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Fine. Would you please now take a look at CIA Nos. 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20?
(Pause)
Mr. Shaw. Here you have one that I saw. Those are my initials -- No. 19. I did not see this one.
Let me see what we have got here.
(Pause)
I have read it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, you have read through CIA document No. 22.
Mr. Shaw. Yes, I have not read them carefully, but I have looked them over.
Mr. Goldsmith. Taking a look at CIA No. 16, could you identify that document?
Mr. Shaw. This is a LIENVOY transcript.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it a summary or a verbatim transcript?
Mr. Shaw. It is a summary.
Mr. Goldsmith. What is the date of that transcript?
Mr. Shaw. According to the thing in the margin, 27 September '63, 1963. This is really the same darned thing here.
Mr. Goldsmith. The same as the transcript that appears on CIA No. 17?
Mr. Shaw. It appears to be.
Mr. Goldsmith. Approximately what time was this phone call received?
Mr. Shaw. It looks like something put on by pen, "Five minutes after 4:00 in the afternoon." MF means a woman -- is that MF?
Mr. Goldsmith. Do not worry about that.
When was the first time you saw this transcript?
Mr. Shaw. I do not remember.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you see it before the assassination?
Mr. Shaw. I have no idea.
Mr. Goldsmith. Your name appears in the right-hand corner.
Mr. Shaw. My name appears there. However, it is not crossed out. If you turn over a couple of pages, you will see my initials on another thing which deals with the same period.
Mr. Goldsmith. I will do that in a minute.
Do you know whether this transcript was linked to Oswald prior to the assassination?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know whether it was or not. I gather it was not.
Mr. Goldsmith. Why is that?
Mr. Shaw. It does not say. There is no mark on it, Oswald on here anywhere.
Mr. Goldsmith. What are these numbers on the bottom right-hand --
Mr. Shaw. That is the file number.
Mr. Goldsmith. What file would that be?
Mr. Shaw. That says subject file. 50-8-10-6. I do not know off-hand what that is. I think the 50 stands for Mexico. 8-10-6 would be a subject file.
Probably, possibly someplace where they put information on people where they are trying to travel to the Soviet Union. I do not know; that is a guess.
Mr. Goldsmith. Let's take a look at CIA No. 19.
Mr. Shaw. Okay. CIA No. 19, 27 September, that looks like my initial. It is very similar.
Mr. Goldsmith. In the upper right-hand corner?
Mr. Shaw. I cannot imagine anyone else putting it there.
Mr. Goldsmith. This is the conversation that took place later in the day, is that correct?
Mr. Shaw. 27 September 63, right.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it fair to say that this conversation took place sometime around 4:26 in the afternoon, according to
the documents?
Mr. Shaw. There is an indication there.
Mr. Goldsmith. When did this document first come to your attention?
Mr. Shaw. I have no idea, because there is no date up there. I do not know when it was circulated or anything.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know when it was first linked to Oswald?
Mr. Shaw. I do not.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did Herbert or Barb Minnell ever come to you to discuss this transcript or conversation with you in reference to the transcript dated October 1st?
Mr. Shaw. Not that I remember.
Mr. Goldsmith. At the bottom of CIA No. 19, it says copy Oswald P-file. Essentially, do you know when that notation was put on?
Mr. Shaw. I do not know.
Mr. Goldsmith. Turning back to CIA-177, there is a notation on the left-hand side of the page. It says, D:200-5-41. Do you know what that would refer to?
Mr. Shaw. I have no idea what the D stands for. The 200-5-41 sounds like a file number.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know for what?
Mr. Shaw. No, I do not, but I would assume, again, that maybe that would be -- if it is in the 50 series, it would be
a Mexico City file. But it may be a Headquarters -- is this
a Mexico City document, or a Headquarters document?
Mr. Goldsmith. This is a Headquarters document.
Mr. Shaw. That is a Headquarters file number. I have no
idea what the D stands for. It does not look right.
Mr. Goldsmith. I have asked this question before, but
for the record and purposes of clarification, I would like to
ask you again, to your knowledge, after the Mexico City sta-
tion received the cable from Headquarters dated October 10th
or 11th, did the Mexico City Station ever send any additional
information concerning Oswald to Headquarters?
Mr. Shaw. To my knowledge, they did not, but I would
have no way of knowing.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you ever speak to Herb Minnell about
this?
Mr. Shaw. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. Barbara Minnell?
Mr. Shaw. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. Dave Phillips?
Mr. Shaw. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. What, if anything, do you know about the
arrest of Sylvia Duran shortly after the assassination?
Mr. Shaw. I remember that Sylvia Duran was arrested.
I do not know why. I could have suggested that myself, but I
do not remember.
I do remember sending a message to Winn Scott suggesting that, right after the assassination, that the Mexicans put in a ring of guards around the Cuban Embassy and question everybody going in and out. I remember that idea coming out of my head.
I know that Sylvia Duran was arrested. She was fair game because she was a Mexican national and the Cubans -- she did not have any Cuban diplomatic immunity.
I would have thought it would have been a good idea to question her very closely. As to whether I said that she should be arrested or I had anything to do with that, I do not know. I was perfectly capable of making such a suggestion.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know why Headquarters was upset about that arrest?
Mr. Shaw. I have no idea.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know why Headquarters did not want any Americans to confront her or to interview her?
Mr. Shaw. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you have any reason to believe that Oswald may have been an agent of the KGB?
Mr. Shaw. I have no reason to believe it.
Mr. Goldsmith. How about an agent, asset or source of the CIA?
Mr. Shaw. I would think that that would be completely out of the question.
Mr. Goldsmith. For purposes of the record, could you explain why you think that would be out of the question?
Mr. Shaw. Because I think it would have come to light immediately had he had any CIA connections.
Mr. Goldsmith. In what manner?
Mr. Shaw. Somebody would have revealed this fact.
Mr. Goldsmith. Had he been an agent of the CIA, asset or employee, is it possible that someone would have been able to cover that fact up?
Mr. Shaw. I do not think anyone could have covered up.
Mr. Goldsmith. Why not?
Mr. Shaw. Had he been an agent, then it would have been on the record somewhere.
Mr. Goldsmith. Is it possible that the record could have been erased or purged in some way?
Mr. Shaw. I seriously doubt it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Could you give a reason?
Mr. Shaw. Just my belief in the integrity of the organization. It stands on that, and the people in it.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does the Agency, to your knowledge, have any safeguards to prevent records from being erased or purged?
Mr. Shaw. Nowadays, of course, we have laws which say you can't destroy material. I would say that the safeguards again come back to the basic integrity of the people in the organization. When you lose a President, you do not mess
around, and I think everybody would have turned over every possible stone to find out anything they could that would be useful in determining the responsibility for that assassination.
I know I would have. I was a Kennedy man, and I imagine there were a lot of us in the outfit who identified very closely with the President.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did you ever know anybody by the name of Maurice Bishop?
Mr. Shaw. No.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know whether David Phillips, or anyone else, ever used the name Maurice Bishop as an operational alias of some kind?
Mr. Shaw. I am not aware that they did, but I would have to answer your question no. Dave Phillips does not seem like a Maurice type, somehow.
Mr. Goldsmith. Did Headquarters ever criticize the Mexico City station in any way for its handling of the Oswald matter prior to the assassination?
Mr. Shaw. Not that I am aware of.
Mr. Goldsmith. For that matter, after the assassination?
Mr. Shaw. Not that I am aware of. I must add that criticism would have been conveyed to the Chief of Station rather than to the case officers.
Mr. Goldsmith. When Oswald returned to the United States
from the Soviet Union, would it have been standard operating procedure for the Agency to have interviewed him or debriefed him in some way?
Mr. Shaw. No. I think that it would have been more likely for the FBI to interview him.
Mr. Goldsmith. Why is that?
Mr. Shaw. Because he was an American citizen in the United States. That was the FBI's territory.
Mr. Goldsmith. Even though Oswald worked for several years -- not for several years, but for some time -- in a radio factory while he was in Russia?
Mr. Shaw. I was not aware that he worked in a radio factory, but the fact that he had been in the Soviet Union, the fact that he had been in the United States Marine Corps, would indicate to me that if he had been interviewed, he would have been interviewed by the FBI.
Mr. Goldsmith. Does not the Agency have a Domestic Contacts Division, or service, which customarily interviews people who have been abroad in Communist countries?
Mr. Shaw. The Agency has the Domestic Contacts Division. It used to be called O/Q Contacts. I never worked with those people.
It is my understanding that what they do is routinely debrief, if the person is willing, businessmen -- in the old days, tourists -- who had visited the Soviet Union, or to
debrief a man who might have other involvement in the Soviets would not, I believe, have fallen within the purview of the O/O Contacts Branch.
Mr. Goldsmith. Do you have any knowledge of the operational activity of the CI/SIG Branch of the CIA?
Mr. Shaw. No. I do not know what SIG means. I have never heard of CI/SIG.
CI is Counterintelligence staff. I don't know what SIG is.
Mr. Goldsmith. Mr. Shaw, I would like to thank you for your testimony today. I especially would like to thank you for spending all of this time with us. I know that you have been here since approximately 3:00 o'clock or so and it is now about 7:30. You have been very patient.
Customarily, whenever a witness testifies before the Committee, the witness is given an opportunity to make a statement for the record. This is not a hearing, but I would like to give you the same opportunity, if you would like to take advantage of it.
Mr. Shaw. Well, I might take advantage of it. I had not thought about it until you mentioned it, but harkening back to what I said a little while ago, I do believe that our organization was made up of, like Bill Colby has on the cover of his book over there on the next table, of honorable men, and I do not think that anyone in the organization would have
allowed any cover-up or any destruction of evidence which might
shed some light on the assassination of President Kennedy.
I might add a little vignette. We had what it called a
Libra Pecima which is a book that the people signed when
they come to a funeral or something. You may have run into
something like this in the states, when you go in and sign
in at the funeral parlor that you were there or something.
You express your regrets -- pecima, in Spanish, means regrets,
or sorrow.
We had a book down in the lobby of the Embassy building
and when I came out one day shortly after the assassination
somebody in the crowd yelled Spanish for Bob, and I went over
and it was the Governor of the State of Sonora, which is
a big state up in northwestern Mexico. I had known him some
years earlier. He was the son of the General who was the
outstanding military leader of the Mexican Revolution from
about 1913 to about 1920.
His father had been President of Mexico. His father was
assassinated, having been elected to a second term. He was
already elected; he had not taken office.
I was profoundly touched by the presence of this son of
an assassinated President in the lobby of our Embassy to, in
turn, express his sorrow to us for the assassination of our
President.
That does not prove anything one way or another, but it
made a tremendous effect on me.
As I mentioned very early in our session today, I am not aware that there was any exultation, satisfaction, or happiness inside the Cuban Embassy over the assassination of the President. And I think, and my personal belief is, that everything points to Lee Harvey Oswald having done it, and done it alone.
There is nothing I have ever seen or heard which would lead me to accept, for one moment, any complicity on the part of my Agency or any other agency of the United States government.
Mr. Goldsmith. Thank you, Mr. Shaw.
I would like to add that as soon as the transcript of this deposition is available, we will be in touch with you so that you can have an opportunity to review it for accuracy and again, I would like to thank you for your time and help today.
Mr. Shaw. I thank you, gentlemen.
(Thereupon, at 7:30 p.m. the Executive Session recessed.)
CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
I, Rosemary C. Tascione, the officer before whom the foregoing deposition was taken, do hereby certify that the witness whose testimony appears in the foregoing deposition was duly sworn by the Notary; that the testimony of said witness was taken by myself, stenomask reporter, and thereafter reduced to typewriting under my direction; that I am neither counsel for, related to, nor employed by any of the parties to the action in which this deposition was taken, and further, that I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel employed by the parties thereto, nor financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of the action.
Rosemary C. Tascione
REPORTER | olmocr | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | 2025-03-20T00:00:00 | {
"Source-File": "../pdfs/180-10131-10329.pdf",
"olmocr-version": "0.1.60",
"pdf-total-pages": 78,
"total-input-tokens": 89154,
"total-output-tokens": 25215,
"total-fallback-pages": 0
} | {
"pdf_page_numbers": [
[
0,
0,
1
],
[
0,
613,
2
],
[
613,
1598,
3
],
[
1598,
2819,
4
],
[
2819,
3846,
5
],
[
3846,
4982,
6
],
[
4982,
6171,
7
],
[
6171,
7487,
8
],
[
7487,
8607,
9
],
[
8607,
9786,
10
],
[
9786,
10930,
11
],
[
10930,
12236,
12
],
[
12236,
13496,
13
],
[
13496,
14781,
14
],
[
14781,
15912,
15
],
[
15912,
17252,
16
],
[
17252,
18540,
17
],
[
18540,
19665,
18
],
[
19665,
20865,
19
],
[
20865,
21968,
20
],
[
21968,
23259,
21
],
[
23259,
24640,
22
],
[
24640,
25791,
23
],
[
25791,
26910,
24
],
[
26910,
28240,
25
],
[
28240,
29451,
26
],
[
29451,
30673,
27
],
[
30673,
32037,
28
],
[
32037,
33356,
29
],
[
33356,
34707,
30
],
[
34707,
35866,
31
],
[
35866,
36767,
32
],
[
36767,
38094,
33
],
[
38094,
39421,
34
],
[
39421,
40732,
35
],
[
40732,
42092,
36
],
[
42092,
43393,
37
],
[
43393,
44574,
38
],
[
44574,
45760,
39
],
[
45760,
47008,
40
],
[
47008,
48197,
41
],
[
48197,
49416,
42
],
[
49416,
50572,
43
],
[
50572,
51846,
44
],
[
51846,
52849,
45
],
[
52849,
53992,
46
],
[
53992,
55198,
47
],
[
55198,
56359,
48
],
[
56359,
57610,
49
],
[
57610,
58858,
50
],
[
58858,
60160,
51
],
[
60160,
61390,
52
],
[
61390,
62628,
53
],
[
62628,
63776,
54
],
[
63776,
65065,
55
],
[
65065,
66335,
56
],
[
66335,
67652,
57
],
[
67652,
68887,
58
],
[
68887,
70001,
59
],
[
70001,
71161,
60
],
[
71161,
72315,
61
],
[
72315,
73691,
62
],
[
73691,
74833,
63
],
[
74833,
76027,
64
],
[
76027,
77205,
65
],
[
77205,
78224,
66
],
[
78224,
79261,
67
],
[
79261,
80373,
68
],
[
80373,
81446,
69
],
[
81446,
82560,
70
],
[
82560,
83705,
71
],
[
83705,
84924,
72
],
[
84924,
86067,
73
],
[
86067,
87309,
74
],
[
87309,
88580,
75
],
[
88580,
89909,
76
],
[
89909,
90806,
77
],
[
90806,
91505,
78
]
]
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.