Datasets:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -17,21 +17,26 @@ This dataset contains **100,000 rows** sampled from the `allenai/c4` English spl
|
|
17 |
|
18 |
## Methods
|
19 |
|
20 |
-
|
21 |
-
The classifiers output probabilities converted to logits log(p). The **quality score** is computed as the difference of logits between the high-quality and low-quality classes.
|
22 |
|
23 |
-
|
24 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
26 |
-
|
27 |
-
-
|
28 |
-
- [nvidia/quality-classifier-deberta](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/quality-classifier-deberta): difference of logits (high - low)
|
29 |
-
- [agentlans/bge-small-en-v1.5-ultrafineweb-vs-pile-classifier](https://huggingface.co/agentlans/bge-small-en-v1.5-ultrafineweb-vs-pile-classifier): difference of logits
|
30 |
|
31 |
### Overall score computation
|
32 |
-
- Scores from all classifiers were
|
33 |
- Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was applied.
|
34 |
-
- The
|
|
|
35 |
|
36 |
For convenience, the dataset is split into an **80% training set** and a **20% testing set**.
|
37 |
|
@@ -42,10 +47,10 @@ For convenience, the dataset is split into an **80% training set** and a **20% t
|
|
42 |
- The **lower triangle** shows pairwise density plots of classifier scores.
|
43 |
- The **diagonal** presents the distribution of each classifier's scores.
|
44 |
- The **upper triangle** displays correlations between pairs of classifiers.
|
45 |
-
- `uvp` refers to `agentlans/bge-small-en-v1.5-ultrafineweb-vs-pile-classifier`
|
46 |
|
47 |
-
The classifiers' scores show moderate to strong correlations, except for the Nvidia classifier, which is less correlated.
|
48 |
-
The
|
|
|
49 |
|
50 |
## License
|
51 |
This dataset is licensed under the **[Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-BY)](https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/)**.
|
|
|
17 |
|
18 |
## Methods
|
19 |
|
20 |
+
Classifiers used:
|
|
|
21 |
|
22 |
+
| Label | Model | Method |
|
23 |
+
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
|
24 |
+
| fineweb2hq | [agentlans/multilingual-e5-small-fineweb2hq-vs-c4-classifier](https://huggingface.co/agentlans/multilingual-e5-small-fineweb2hq-vs-c4-classifier) | Logit difference |
|
25 |
+
| finewebedu | [HuggingFaceFW/fineweb-edu-classifier](https://huggingface.co/HuggingFaceFW/fineweb-edu-classifier) | Raw logits |
|
26 |
+
| gneiss | [ibm-granite/GneissWeb.Quality_annotator](https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/GneissWeb.Quality_annotator) | FastText |
|
27 |
+
| nemo | [nvidia/nemocurator-fineweb-nemotron-4-edu-classifier](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/nemocurator-fineweb-nemotron-4-edu-classifier) | Raw logits |
|
28 |
+
| nvidia | [nvidia/quality-classifier-deberta](https://huggingface.co/nvidia/quality-classifier-deberta) | Logit difference |
|
29 |
+
| ultrafineweb | [openbmb/Ultra-FineWeb-classifier](https://huggingface.co/openbmb/Ultra-FineWeb-classifier) | FastText |
|
30 |
+
| uvp | [agentlans/bge-small-en-v1.5-ultrafineweb-vs-pile-classifier](https://huggingface.co/agentlans/bge-small-en-v1.5-ultrafineweb-vs-pile-classifier) | Logit difference |
|
31 |
|
32 |
+
For FastText-based classifiers, the classifiers' output probabilities were converted to logits log(p).
|
33 |
+
The **quality score** for those classifiers were computed as the difference of logits between the high-quality and low-quality classes.
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
35 |
### Overall score computation
|
36 |
+
- Scores from all classifiers were centreed and scaled.
|
37 |
- Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was applied.
|
38 |
+
- The first principal component (PC1) was normalized to z-scores (mean 0, standard deviation 1)
|
39 |
+
- The z-score is taken as the overall quality score.
|
40 |
|
41 |
For convenience, the dataset is split into an **80% training set** and a **20% testing set**.
|
42 |
|
|
|
47 |
- The **lower triangle** shows pairwise density plots of classifier scores.
|
48 |
- The **diagonal** presents the distribution of each classifier's scores.
|
49 |
- The **upper triangle** displays correlations between pairs of classifiers.
|
|
|
50 |
|
51 |
+
- The classifiers' scores show moderate to strong correlations, except for the Nvidia classifier, which is less correlated.
|
52 |
+
- The custom-trained classifiers often give bimodal distributions instead of smoothly varying values.
|
53 |
+
- Despite the above, the overall score correlates well with each individual classifier's quality score.
|
54 |
|
55 |
## License
|
56 |
This dataset is licensed under the **[Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-BY)](https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/)**.
|