peacock-data-public-datasets-idc-llm_eval
/
env-llmeval
/lib
/python3.10
/site-packages
/nltk
/treetransforms.py
| # Natural Language Toolkit: Tree Transformations | |
| # | |
| # Copyright (C) 2005-2007 Oregon Graduate Institute | |
| # Author: Nathan Bodenstab <[email protected]> | |
| # URL: <https://www.nltk.org/> | |
| # For license information, see LICENSE.TXT | |
| r""" | |
| A collection of methods for tree (grammar) transformations used | |
| in parsing natural language. | |
| Although many of these methods are technically grammar transformations | |
| (ie. Chomsky Norm Form), when working with treebanks it is much more | |
| natural to visualize these modifications in a tree structure. Hence, | |
| we will do all transformation directly to the tree itself. | |
| Transforming the tree directly also allows us to do parent annotation. | |
| A grammar can then be simply induced from the modified tree. | |
| The following is a short tutorial on the available transformations. | |
| 1. Chomsky Normal Form (binarization) | |
| It is well known that any grammar has a Chomsky Normal Form (CNF) | |
| equivalent grammar where CNF is defined by every production having | |
| either two non-terminals or one terminal on its right hand side. | |
| When we have hierarchically structured data (ie. a treebank), it is | |
| natural to view this in terms of productions where the root of every | |
| subtree is the head (left hand side) of the production and all of | |
| its children are the right hand side constituents. In order to | |
| convert a tree into CNF, we simply need to ensure that every subtree | |
| has either two subtrees as children (binarization), or one leaf node | |
| (non-terminal). In order to binarize a subtree with more than two | |
| children, we must introduce artificial nodes. | |
| There are two popular methods to convert a tree into CNF: left | |
| factoring and right factoring. The following example demonstrates | |
| the difference between them. Example:: | |
| Original Right-Factored Left-Factored | |
| A A A | |
| / | \ / \ / \ | |
| B C D ==> B A|<C-D> OR A|<B-C> D | |
| / \ / \ | |
| C D B C | |
| 2. Parent Annotation | |
| In addition to binarizing the tree, there are two standard | |
| modifications to node labels we can do in the same traversal: parent | |
| annotation and Markov order-N smoothing (or sibling smoothing). | |
| The purpose of parent annotation is to refine the probabilities of | |
| productions by adding a small amount of context. With this simple | |
| addition, a CYK (inside-outside, dynamic programming chart parse) | |
| can improve from 74% to 79% accuracy. A natural generalization from | |
| parent annotation is to grandparent annotation and beyond. The | |
| tradeoff becomes accuracy gain vs. computational complexity. We | |
| must also keep in mind data sparcity issues. Example:: | |
| Original Parent Annotation | |
| A A^<?> | |
| / | \ / \ | |
| B C D ==> B^<A> A|<C-D>^<?> where ? is the | |
| / \ parent of A | |
| C^<A> D^<A> | |
| 3. Markov order-N smoothing | |
| Markov smoothing combats data sparcity issues as well as decreasing | |
| computational requirements by limiting the number of children | |
| included in artificial nodes. In practice, most people use an order | |
| 2 grammar. Example:: | |
| Original No Smoothing Markov order 1 Markov order 2 etc. | |
| __A__ A A A | |
| / /|\ \ / \ / \ / \ | |
| B C D E F ==> B A|<C-D-E-F> ==> B A|<C> ==> B A|<C-D> | |
| / \ / \ / \ | |
| C ... C ... C ... | |
| Annotation decisions can be thought about in the vertical direction | |
| (parent, grandparent, etc) and the horizontal direction (number of | |
| siblings to keep). Parameters to the following functions specify | |
| these values. For more information see: | |
| Dan Klein and Chris Manning (2003) "Accurate Unlexicalized | |
| Parsing", ACL-03. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P03-1054 | |
| 4. Unary Collapsing | |
| Collapse unary productions (ie. subtrees with a single child) into a | |
| new non-terminal (Tree node). This is useful when working with | |
| algorithms that do not allow unary productions, yet you do not wish | |
| to lose the parent information. Example:: | |
| A | |
| | | |
| B ==> A+B | |
| / \ / \ | |
| C D C D | |
| """ | |
| from nltk.internals import deprecated | |
| from nltk.tree.transforms import chomsky_normal_form as cnf | |
| from nltk.tree.transforms import collapse_unary as cu | |
| from nltk.tree.transforms import un_chomsky_normal_form as ucnf | |
| chomsky_normal_form = deprecated( | |
| "Import using `from nltk.tree import chomsky_normal_form` instead." | |
| )(cnf) | |
| un_chomsky_normal_form = deprecated( | |
| "Import using `from nltk.tree import un_chomsky_normal_form` instead." | |
| )(ucnf) | |
| collapse_unary = deprecated( | |
| "Import using `from nltk.tree import collapse_unary` instead." | |
| )(cu) | |
| __all__ = ["chomsky_normal_form", "un_chomsky_normal_form", "collapse_unary"] | |