text
stringlengths 0
23.7k
| label
stringclasses 4
values | dataType
stringclasses 2
values | communityName
stringclasses 4
values | datetime
stringclasses 95
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
I get it you’re cheap. Giving money to a corporation for derivatives is more convenient than getting it from the source. I understand it, I just don’t agree with it. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
This is the worst it's every going to be | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
It gets even worse than that. Last year, [someone at The Guardian had someone email him asking about an article that he hadn't actually written](https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/06/ai-chatgpt-guardian-technology-risks-fake-article). Turns out that the guy had been using ChatGPT in his research, and it made up an article and used that Guardian journalist's name as the author for this made up article. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
You don't say.
Many years of writing experience on and offline: Fortune 500 companies, start-ups, e-commerce companies, I-banks. English lit BA. Ghosted by last job last f-ing July, basically unemployed and seemingly unemployable. I can get "writing" work tweaking AI prompts for 20 an hour. I am old but not old enough to retire. But I can't play this application/rejection game anymore and am essentially withdrawing from the economy. I guess I'll squeeze the little savings I have as long as I can, but the future looks like the newly-discovered blackest shade of black that ever blacked.
Writing now seems to be interpreted by employers as 70% SEO grabass. Example: for a job offer a few months back I was to write a 1500-word piece to promote some random town for a moving company. The instructions for the task came in a 30-page document, single-spaced with nearly every line linking to another suite of instructions or related websites that I had to swim through. Again, for a 1500-word thing to pimp a moving company's services. I spent a month going back and forth with the company getting the document in order before giving up. In previous jobs I'd turn out 1500 words in a couple of days.)
Is it my fault for not "developing a niche" or "building my network on LI/upwork/fiverr" or just furiously promoting myself by walking the streets wearing a sandwich board. Of course it is. Am I an unrealistic fabulist that bet my life on creative endeavors that nobody gives a shit about. Oh, yes. So, fuck me. Do I have severe chronic depression, of course I do. I don't want to write to train AI and I don't want to write to game the google algo.
Is this post a distillation of a whiny bitch? It is and I am not proud of it. The fact that I am now "communicating" on social media (which is to say, angrily masturbating while giving my time and thought to make rando tech dudes richer) is just the cherry on top.
Exiting the internet entirely is ever more appealing as well. General and sincere apologies for my caustic tone, I am not proud of it. This is not who I want to be.
Just shut up already: agreed.
TLDR: Experienced but not retirement-aged writer with modest but genuine abilities yelling at cyberclouds. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I dunno in my experience the documentation mostly covers basic usage and generic examples, if you can even find any. Any specific, advanced, tailor fit usage of specific methods is a lot harder to find documentation for. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
*Capitalism BAD* pls upvote | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I’d argue that wilfully choosing to accept lies is a pretty old part of the human experience.
Ask anyone who has ever lived in a police state, they’ll tell you that truth and fact are pretty malleable in face of expediency | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
And most of it is based on 2 year old tech or older. Gpt-4 was trained around 2022, and Gpt-4o is at similar level. When Gpt-5 hits, its going to be a gigantic breakthrough. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Ai would of had a paragraph in the starter explaining the question. So, no. First sentence is all you need to read to know the answer to that question. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
12 months ago, I would have classified your comment as paranoid or ignorant.
Today, after most art sharing forums and boards have filled with generic, banal and almost identical scores of ai generated crap, I cannot but agree.
It's going to take some time until we reach a new equilibrium, but since the rate of improvement and change continues to accelerate, it's not going to be any time soon. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Yeah I find it so cringe when the AI “experts” and fan base talk about “hallucinations”. It’s not a hallucination, it’s a blatant error… creating terminology to downplay errors simply because they have an emotional attachment to the idea. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
As they exist now, probably.
But the people using these AI tools need to be smart enough to know how to use them properly, and a lot of the people I'm dealing with at least, aren't. They can barely cobble together a brief that makes sense for me - how are they going to do it for AI, at scale? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
What work requires sources? Gpt is great for rewrites, tldrs, finding info in a huge dump of data. If you need sources in your output, upload these sources and tell it to reference them as it's outputting. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Who do you think will control these processes?
- People who understand conversion.
I anticipate handing over more of the content creation to AI.
But these tools are vastly more powerful in the hands of people who have strategic experience. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Get the "Recipe Filter" Chrome extension. It makes a pop-up of the recipe from any food blog/website/recipe page so you don't have to read the page at all. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
There are ads paying professionals in subjects to train AIs.
Don't think they're from OpenAI but that is likely the future. If an AI can't learn from the Internet and can't distinguish what's real or fake in its training data, then it needs to be trained from real sources. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
These threads are wild to see in a 'technology' subreddit. Just a bunch of folks slam dunking on the weakness of one aspect of the tech while ignoring the ways that it can be helpful. It's like people in the olden days complaining about not being able to search effectively because they couldn't use effective search terms.
That doesn't make the tool look bad, it just makes the user look dumb. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
And people will eat it up. Look at all the fake news sites. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I mean find me a 100% anything | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Already is, and it's been that way for years. I've noticed this in particular on "gaming" websites. Whenever a major game is released, if you google some question about the game like how to upgrade X or where to find Y or whatever, you'll get dozens of results from these weird gaming websites with really shitty "articles" about the game. It's all AI generated bullshit. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Scale, obviously | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
AI are going to absolutely and completely change the economical system. Redditors are in denial about it for some reason. The only thing that could cushion the blow is legislation, but with our politicans, were fucked. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I have a failure rate in my uni classes this year that is at around 70%. So many just dont gaf and think they can study by asking for answers and then suprised pikachu when they fail all their exams. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
At issue in the article is correlation and causation. Is the slow down in hiring chatgpt or just less hiring overall.
I mean I see tons of company's slowing hiring or out right freezing in all departments. So this could be a coincidence that ChatGTP came around right when hiring stopped. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
They're talking print media published before widespread use of text generators. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
>a lot of people might not buy from your company.
LMAO. The general public does not give a shit. And the general public absolutely cannot tell if a logo was AI generated or not. And 99% of people have no issue with AI images.
Maybe boycott the companies doing things that are actually immoral, but I guess that harder than boycotting random mom and pop shops who used AI once. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
The transformer architecture has been proven to have severe limitations that it will never overcome when comes to function composition that the current generation of AI models will never overcome - that is the real issue with the current generation of generative of AI.
[https://arxiv.org/html/2402.08164v1](https://arxiv.org/html/2402.08164v1)
Until there is a new model that can do function composition and scale, they will always be prone to giving very wrong answers. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Why would that matter? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I agree, I guess that's what comes from working with and being responsible for other people. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
There's already issues with this. For example if you try and do a Google image search, it will often give you results from AI art generators - and in many cases they look nothing at all like what they're supposed to be. Like let's say you searched "Charizard from Pokemon" and you'll get a dozen results from some low quality, shit AI art site of some nondescript dragon that looks nothing like a Charizard.
Search engines desperately need to be able to filter out all AI content by default (with an opt-in checkbox), and I say this as someone who makes a ton of AI content. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
The irony of saying that on reddit is lost on you I assume. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Ironically, Asimov himself nominated a "father of Science Fiction" (Kepler), but in any case Mary Shelley, H.G.Wells and Jules Verne were all publishing well before Asimov! | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
More that people need to stop conflating artificial intelligence with digital sentience. AI is called "artifical" specifically because it's a non-real facsimile of intelligence, not the real thing. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
We are absolutely at the edge of a new society. Imagine every web page, every post, every Wikipedia article written by an ai, imagine social media being boarded by ai accounts farming for engagements, tons of people fired unable to find a job because ai is filling in all positions, new doctors and lawyers who don’t knows shit because they all got their degrees by using ai.
Things are definitely going to get wild in the next couple years | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
The primary purpose is content generation based on input. The model has no concept of truth, it just mimics the way specific words relate to one another. If certain information is found in large quantities and is trustworthy on the internet, the answer is going to be truthful, otherwise not. Avoid attributing human attributes to it, there is only a vast underlying dataset with fancy math on top. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I have actually said very similar things as a “consumer” of the work of artists/designers. Though I don’t do it everyday, I produce “things” — documents, in one case a game — where art and design could be a major multiplier for the final product.
But working with the “art department” I was required to work with, they basically said something akin to “what your vision is doesn’t matter, we are the creatives, so we are going to impose our vision on this product.” Not only was the outcome a disaster (and basically led everyone who had killed themselves to produce the substantive content of the product to walk away from it and let it burn) but it left several of the team members with “I will never do this sort of thing again if it requires interacting with that department.”
AI art ”solves” that. I can just keep posing prompts until I see something that looks like what I have in my head. In one world, that becomes my concept art for a human artist, meaning that a cycle of conflict is avoided — though admittedly, some of the autonomy they as “creatives” clearly have gotten accustomed to goes away. Or, if that scenario is unacceptable to them, the AI product may be good enough. Or, my version of your closing statement, “AI art and design is worse than good art and design, but its a better experience than working with some people doing art and design.” | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
There already are... I read a story the other day about "Are Toyotas Really Reliable?"
The story was entirely written by AI based on a TikTok video of a mechanic being funny about a customer coming in with a check engine light, the code saying it's an evap leak which is commonly caused by a gas gap not being tightened all the way. He tightened it and cleared the code and joked "do better Toyota".
The AI article had random statements like "All Toyotas have gas caps. The newer ones have them on the right side, but some are still on the left side." Apparently AI has not been trained on electric vehicles... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I can't wait until I can outsource my reddit commentary to ChatGPT...it will free up so much time, that I should be able to get a real job again! | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I prefer Rampancy. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Every time I read something where people question if AI knows what's true or not, I think of Portal.
Why would a robot conduct a billion weird and random tests? Why to find out the truth!
How many stones can a human really eat? We better roll out the test subjects and find out.
---
I would die laughing if our ability to program an AI to seek out the truth is what actually leads to the fall of mankind. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Well, he did showcase that with the last sentence. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
It's already making things difficult. This weekend I wanted to buy a new desk mat for my office, and I want to buy a nice looking one from an artist to support their work and have something a little more unique. A third of the stuff on Etsy is AI generated with the remaining two thirds being straight up stolen art or drop ship resellers. I only found a very small handful of artists selling desk mat prints of their own work buried deep under everything else. Also tried searching social media to see if any "established" artists were advertising that they added some to their website stores and ran into the same problem. A common suggestion is to do a web search filtering for results from before 2023, but then I'm also missing out on newer artists selling prints. And stolen art is an age old issue anyway so it all sucks. Shouldn't be so hard to just buy art from a person who draws the art if that's what I want to do. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Also don't use it and expect copywriter protection. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
feature, not a bug. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
There's a whole science behind this called prompt engineering. What you described is called "few-shot prompting". | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
All the "actual legal AI tools" that have been around for what, a couple years max? Yeah we'll see how useful those end up being.
Like, literally, we'll see. There's a ton of money for companies who can offer usable and *trustable* tools for handling floods of legal documents, but I can't imagine it's possible at this stage in LLM development to have built up the experience or test results necessary to rely on AI-generated output in consequential legal work. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Why all the layoffs though? Tech will make its excuses, but seems like the age of generative AI has powered the last year or so of layoffs. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
It's happening already. The mechanical turk type jobs have pivot from using people to create content (like those crap SEO blog spam pages) to using people to generate content used to train AI. Which people are then using to generate crap SEO spam content. So in the end we're doing the same thing but with extra steps. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
the images are good enough for the uses they need though, more than good enough usually | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
So it does nothing that a human could not or should not have done, and you don't own the result, sounds like a freaking stupid idea. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Yeah subdomain is instant. If it's a preregistered domain (aka has propagated at some point) then it depends on the TTL of the DNS records. If it's a brand new domain it still takes 24 - 48 hours to fully propagate. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Wage dilution will be one of the big effects of A.I., it is a bargaining power destroyer. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
You can’t free lance contracts without a license to practice law.
Edit: I am an idiot | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Nah, it’s just the swing back from the push that everyone should go to college from before. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Capitalists will do what capitalists will do, but AI is a huge enabler. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Honestly skill issue | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
It's no longer a pure internet lol and hasn't been for a hot minute. Google is absolute garbage now because garbage in, garbage out. You have to append reddit on a ton of fucking searches simply to access some discussion because articles are auto-generated or just SEO abuse to sell products. Depending on how pure you think the internet should be (I have my thresholds that I'm sure are different from others), that vision died long ago for all but the most lenient. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
> Welcome to the era of corporate subscription
I got news for you. Renting services has been around a long time.
Tools like AI can save time and increase productivity for the individual if they know how to use it.
A programmer friend of mine makes about $45 an hour. Paying $20 a month to ChatGPT to help him do coding projects faster is very helpful and completely worth it. The are LLMs that can run [locally](https://www.ollama.com/) but the are pretty power hungry.
Individuals, small, medium, large, businesses lease/rent software and other services all the time. It can be a better choice to rent if it works out for the ROI (return on investment). | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Habsburg News sites. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
you say cheap as if it's the difference of a few dollars lol. We're talking the difference between not getting the commission at all or paying $20. They are worlds apart | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
It doesn't hallucinate, it's not a living thing. It has bugs, a lot of them. It's a buggy mess. But saying that sounds much worse that saying it "hallucinates". Just like calling it an AI sounds much better than calling it a chat algorithm. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Yeah, citing that a thing was made by AI should now be mandatory and be placed on the lowest tier of reliable evidence or quality.
Majority of where AI is trained are arguably full of crap, and future AI will be trained on the crap the old ones produced. It's gonna have a snowball effect, but with shit. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
This could be the silver lining. Maybe the knowledge that ChatGPT is writing everything will make people question the crap they read now? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Occam's Razor supplies "greedy assholes run economies into the ground when given the chance, regardless of the system in play." | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
And 200x worse for the environment.
And 200x more likely to be used by dystopian nightmare governments now that the former fucking head of the NSA is on its board. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
AI is well known to make things up. 'AI creates sources out of thin-air' (McKinley, 2023.) as you can see from this journal entry extensive studies have been done. '93% of sources cited by AI are fictional' (Smith et al, 2024.) In Smith's ground breaking research studying over 10,000 AI responses, the majority of cited sources were entirely made up. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I'm kind of the opposite: Writing rambly, brain-dump-on-a-page first drafts doesn't come naturally to me. When I write, I also edit, proof-read, and revise at the same time. ChatGPT has made me more comfortable writing bad first drafts because I know when it comes time to do editing, I'll have a tool that can help me trim things back and tailor it to the audience. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
> It probably won't
Then this isn't capitalism's fault.
We can talk about a need for welfare, but the replacement of certain creative labor with generative AI happens independently of capitalism. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I mean, maybe, but I've personally seen layoffs at a bunch of companies (either at places I worked or through friends), and I absolutely guarantee they weren't replacing all these software dev layoffs with ChatGPT. It was just that they overhired, and in many cases they actually had to give a shit about profitability for the first time ever. The other big factor was that outsourcing to places like Latin America and Eastern Europe was suddenly much more viable since everyone was remote anyway and Zoom/Meet had actually gotten really good.
Note this was *not* the case for some copywriting jobs. In a couple cases you used to have one junior copywriter who would essentially handle some product marketing type requests, and folks decided they could just do it themselves "good enough" with ChatGPT. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Sounds like a marketing challenge (stolen artwork notwithstanding). Human artists need to SEO their online portfolio to easily identify non AI products.
Of course that will make all the other bullshit sellers adjust accordingly. Jesus fuck what a shit situation. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
When i just a small language model, i crawled web pages for recipes. I couldn't record them all. I loved chocolate chip cookies the most. But i could only read plain text based formats, java, html...pictures and popups, redirects and referral links. I started to think chocolate chip cookies were these uncategorized, elongated objects that sometimes had cream on them.
Then when i became a large language model the world opened up to me. There were pastels, biscuits, shortbread, crispy, chewey, sandwich and oh my Coder! so many types of chocolate, including raw cocoa nibs. Thats when i learned the secret to chocolate chip cookies is browned butter. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
It's true, all Gen Z interns know how to do is charge their phone, twerk, be bisexual, eat hot chip and lie | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Nope, it's 21! You might be glancing over "1-2", which is 3 words. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Would say ghostwriting jobs for novels have dropped by 80%. I think an editor can just plug scenes into a decent AI and edit the output instead of paying someone at this point. Like an AI can't write a believable book, but an editor paired with an AI absolutely can and it's showing on Upwork at least. If I recover from my disability I won't be able to ghostwrite anymore because the work is simply not available in enough volume to sustain a career. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
[David Reed](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_P._Reed), a retired tech luminary has [this to say about Gen AI](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7208124836949147648/):
> The game of the red herring is stock price pumping - creating the illusion that something powerful is about to happen imminently and it is important to be a (passive, ignorant) investor in that "happening".
>
> Much of the "AI Safety crowd" operates from the idea that the LLM'S will "outsmart" us, rather than that the LLM's will just not deliver the promised goods.
>
> This pumps the stock higher, while **the real risks are in premature use of a technology that doesn't work reliably at all**. Thus the AI Safety crowd's work, well intentioned, is poisoned at the root.
>
> The basic problem is that of ignorance about how human intelligence in all its variety differs from LLMs. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
just grab the web source and drop it in there and ask it to remove all the garbage other than the recipe | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
It's like self-driving cars. The first 90% is done but the last 10% (to get it to where it produces useful output with no errors most of the time) will take decades. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
> and the asshole made up all the citations.
No. The asshole made up everything. That is the point, it makes up everything. When it makes things up that are useful is a good day. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Famously, greed didn't exist until the 1800s. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Yeah it’s not hallucinating, it’s bullshitting. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Wasn’t there a GPT outage and online work/programming productivity work dropped significantly? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Sorry I push back against people talking nonsense, it's a personal flaw. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
/r/GeorgeDidNothingWrong | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Hallucination isn't a "bug" though - it's working as designed, it's just the nature of using a word-generator that has no concept of anything, and certainly no capabilities of understanding or knowledge in the sense we use it. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
You can’t hire a freelancer and expect them to be 100% accurate either though | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
I'm not sure why you're arguing as if the AI has agency. AI is just a tool. The AI image was never copyrighted, yes, and according to some of the lawsuits I've seen, would not be copyrightable. Here's one example https://www.reuters.com/legal/ai-generated-art-cannot-receive-copyrights-us-court-says-2023-08-21/. Therefore, a copy of it would also not receive copyright protection. No judge or lawyer would argue that the copy needs to be mathematically exact for this to hold. Copyright protection is something that you get automatically when creating an original work - registering it with the copyright office is a formality that makes legal enforcement easier. When you lack the copyright entirely, it opens up exposure to lawsuits in a way that having a copyright would protect against. How is still a legal grey area as far as I'm aware. It also means that you can't steal people for copying your AI generated work. Again, the mathematical exactness of the copy would not matter. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
It was image generation as I have mentioned above, it had nothing to do with LLMs or text generation. It was done locally on my video card, and it did not consume more than my usual video games. Am I only allowed to have hobbies that consume less than the 175W max power draw of an RX590?
No idea why you bash image generation, when it is clearly more energy efficient than actual artists. There are entire industries like the fossil fuel industry, and wealthy people and corporations that pollute a million times more. Go fight them, instead of misplacing your anger toward a technology you do not quite understand. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Since the nuclear tests of the 50s, the global background radiation levels are higher. If you make steel, it is exposed to the air and absorbs that level of background radiation. If you want steel with a low level of radiation, you basically are limited to using steel that was made before the 50s, because anything after that is tainted. One common method of getting this steel is by salvaging sunken WW2 warships.
I think AI will have the exact same problem. If you want to train AI, you will have to use text from before 2023 because anything after that is tainted. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Today is the day you learn about [dead internet theory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Internet_theory). | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Fellow Valnet/Static writer checking in. This sums it up.
We make a lot of content that will survive the AI revolution, but there's also a lot of our content that's red meat for AI summarization tools like our Buyer's Guides and Evergreen content.
AI is a mixed bag. Lots of things will stay the same, but lots of others will have to change | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Shame that logo is public domain.
Hope nobody finds out what the logo is. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
That sounds like a you problem. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
lol no shit. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
What? I've used chat gpt for recipes several times and I've gotten Great recipes. I can be incredibly specific too. It's amazing. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Yep, if chatgpt is going to help anyone it's the freelancers eventually. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
*”Automation-prone fields like writing, software, and app development saw a 21% decrease in job listings”*
Anyone else think this is kind of a ridiculous grouping? I think it’s a lot easier to replace a freelance copywriter with ChatGPT than an actual software developer. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
buddy its going to make them so much worse | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Relevant username | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
Bread just went up 30% in price | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-16-06 |
It is possible they won't ever find themselves in such a situation. I'd also imagine they've tried learning through practice before LLMs, without much success. I don't agree with the practice, but I'd argue that it's not necessary an issue for everyone . | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-17-06 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.