text
stringlengths
0
23.7k
label
stringclasses
4 values
dataType
stringclasses
2 values
communityName
stringclasses
4 values
datetime
stringclasses
95 values
if it takes a "Space Race" with China to get the coffers flowing for NASA again I'm all for it.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Food. Save for food. In the book, The Martian, they talked about it if they had missed the resupply for the trip back to Mars.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
We have the moon to practice with to get systems to work for the long haul. Moon- 3 days away, Mars currently six months away.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Cuts to Elon Musk and the Curb theme plays
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
You wanna go?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
It seems like you're knocking NASA, but the pen myth is a great example of the internet being wrong. [Scientific American](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-fiction-nasa-spen/)has an article on it.   1. Graphite dust from pencils in 0 g would accumulate over time and be dangerous to astronauts and equipment    2. NASA didn't spend 1m to make it, some private guy did and sold the pens to NASA (and others) 3. The Soviets (the clever ones in the myth) literally agreed on the danger of pencils and bought the \*same pens\* from the American company for their missions
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
What's your favorite two?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
> NASA's budget has always been so low it's pathetic The budget is only part of the problem, and probably a small one at that. Read _The Case for Mars_ and you'll get some insight into it. A quick summary: We've had the ability to safely and reliably go to Mars since about the 70's, but government bureaucracy and contractors became obsessed with insane, impractical ideas like requiring a massive ship that could only be constructed in orbit. SpaceX came along and did what NASA was supposed to do: build and launch spaceships efficiently and safely, and at a fraction of the cost of comparable ships. Note how NASA's equivalent projects are way over budget and don't work remotely as well (if they work at all). **tl;dr:** Bigger problem is government bureaucracy and greedy contractors rather than the actual, technological capability to make the trip.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I’ve listened to that one twice. Love it so much
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
“Decent paycheck” Ummm, you realize that you’d have zero need for money, right? Once you leave earths sphere, you’re likely not coming back. If you do, you’d probably be unable to survive on earth as a normal member of society and require a lengthy rehab to just be able to walk. 
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
What about all the astronauts that spend 6-9 months in the International space station? They came back fine?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Well, hope they take after the Soviet sailor who took out his own appendix and do it themselves
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Honestly? Hell fucking yeah. I’d volunteer for mars if they’d robotize me.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Some people are going to die on the way to settling Mars. As they did settling every part of Earth and holding the settlements against the people who came after, to this day. Every person who boards a rocket will pass a course of study in this topic, be analyzed for mental fitness and sign that they understand and accept the risks. But yeah, at least one well supplied medic on board as with the ISS and Antarctica base. Probably more on the early trips with multidisciplinary people selected.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
FOR THE MACHINE IS IMMORTAL
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Yeah you can. It just requires an extreme amount of engineering and work. It's possible. Like, "a lack of a spinning iron core," I dunno man. Just put one in there? I understand that it would be extremely difficult and resource intensive, but I'm going to assume that asteroid mining and automated building is possible.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
It's always a good idea to look at the abstract and conclusion for papers that pique your interest as it can provide useful context. > "However, our study has several limitations. [ ... ] Our simulated GCR experiments only looked at acute unfractionated dosing, which may not accurately model the chronic cumulative exposure that would happen on a Mars mission. [...] Therefore, in the absence of experiments that can more accurately model the long-term simultaneous exposure to full GCR and microgravity over several years, and the plausible synergistic impact of these insults, our results should be taken a conservative glimpse into the potential dire health consequences of long-term deep space travel. Much more intensive study of the health impacts of spaceflight on the kidneys and other visceral organs that have received little attention is of the utmost importance if we are to develop mitigation strategies and send humans to other planets and beyond." Direct link to the open-acces pdf of the article referenced: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-49212-1.pdf DOI link to the articles journal page: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49212-1 On this weeks Science Friday Podcast, Tim Revell mentioned some of the research being done by the "Space Omics and Medical Atlas (SOMA) and international astronaut biobank", which I believe is quite relavent and worth sharing a quote from: > "These results collectively indicate a dynamic recovery profile that substantially reverses the direction of differential gene expression in multiple key biological pathways from the post-flight timepoint (R+1) and afterward. This suggests that re-adaptation to Earth activates a range of restorative mechanisms that help recover, at least in part, the physiological stress imposed by exposure to the space environment." SOMA nature article pre-print reference link: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07639-y I'm not in the biological fields, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. If I'm understanding the graphs correctly: This is some cool research which shows a 'decent' amount of recovery for kidney cells over time — their furthest recovery time point is only 289 days post-flight and recovery is *approaching* half of the highest effect point. I'm curious to see the recovery effects across longer time periods — 1, 2, and 3 year recovery time points — as that will show more about the *long term effects* from spaceflight on the specific cells examined. I'd also like to see the first article team's future research with more separation between the effects from *radiation* and the effects from being in *low gravity*. It would be cool to see similar research done on astronauts/space tourists that spend their time in spacecrafts with artificial gravity (centripetal force/inertia).
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. Before we try manned missions planet, we'd first try and establish a proper self-sustaining space colony that could house a few hundred people first.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Ket a day keeps kidneys away
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Wouldn’t this make it all the more important that we keep earth livable? Now that it’s been shown that even the billionaires with their rockets can’t escape if we eff it up in the pursuit of profit?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
From the Moon you can get back to Earth in a couple of days and without having to wait for the planets to line up though.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Medical research like this is usually done by universities
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I don't think it matters whats a good motivation to me. I think it matters whats a good motivation for the people with the talent and resources necessary to develop fully functional artificial kidneys. I think its realistically probable that developing artificial kidneys for people dying of kidney disease is not profitable, until you add in the additional incentive of unlocking the resources of space.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Medical research doesn't happen at pharma companies it happens in universities and research hospitals. You are so blindingly ignorant of the situation but wrote paragraphs about it anyways.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
But what if instead we find the remains of an ancient space faring civilisation, whose mysterious artifacts reveal startling new technologies?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I tried watching this series but gave up in episode one of season one. Seemed to be just some boring family drama. What is that series even about? Is it worth continuing? It was just a guy at home talking to his wife.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Holy shit how many idiots wrote this exact same comments and didn't bother to read any of the replies about why thats a ridiculous response.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
One has nothing to do with the other.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
It would. The people that got us to the moon were WW2 generation accustomed to sacrifice and losses.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
The problem isn't that, it's being alive and useful when you get there.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
If we get to the point where we have virtually unlimited energy (obviously required for terraforming mars quickly) i imagine transporting or synthesizing it would be easy enough.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I mean, surely it wouldn’t have a mass effect or sort. I’m sure nothing awaits us outside our galactic bubble!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
"if you’re planning a space mission, kidneys really matter." As with most missions, really.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Acid, in space. Funded by NASA. Whose ready to die?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
So true! I don’t want aliens thinking we’re pussies or something
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
if the shit we hear about salvia were at all true, itd be the ultimate torture method.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I read kinkey shrinkage and was like wth is going on on those spaceships
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Space pirate!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
How did they test this
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
That's a legit proposed solution, but then the sloshing of the water in the walls becomes an issue if the entire volume is also spinning and needs to be spun up or down at all.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
that's easy to solve, just shield the hull with Astrophage since they block radiation
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I have kidneys growing out of my kidneys, like I have a around a 50% percent extra kidney tissue than normal, as if they had to double while developing but reconsidered half way through (child of mom who was a victim of Chronobyl and exposed to higher radiation levels). Couldn't they just do a similar thing and raise artificial kidneys like that that they could transplant?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Got to get there faster then.  Looks like Orion's back on the menu boys! 
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
The importance of a magnetosphere is somewhat overrated. The lack of it *may* have played a role in the erosion of Mars's early athmosphere. However Venus doesn't have a magnetosphere either, yet it has the most massive athmosphere among all rocky planets and moons in the Solar System, 100 times more massive than Earth's. The second most massive athmosphere is that of Titan, even though it's a moon only about 3/4 the size of Mars the total mass of its athmosphere is about 20% more than Earth's athmosphere. And the athmosphere erosion from solar wind is a slow process. If we somehow were able to supply Mars with an athmosphere as dense as Earth's it would take tens or even hundreds of millions of years for Mars to lose it again. And as far as radiation protection is concerned, an Earth-like athmosphere does just fine protecting against that even without a magnetic field.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
God I love that movie
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
any mars mission will be a one way trip, not like you can catch an uber back
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
>The kidneys are the most sensitive organs to radiation injury interestingly and it can limit cancer treatment sometimes. Lol, no it isn't. That's thyroid.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Yeah really. It is none of their business anyway
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
All you need is a bicycle doing loops to generate artificial gravity.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Shame the USSR didn’t bother researching/reporting this. They hold 9 out 10 longest space missions, some going back nearly 50yrs now. 2 were over a year duration -5x longer than any US mission.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
His cars waiting for him
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I'm sure they're gonna be the ones taking us to Mars in the next 10 years, they have amazing engineers
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
But science was shaken when in the year 42,205 they discover that Peeps, discovered in a gargantuan Peep production plant at an archeological dig site on Earth, inoculate humans against kidney shrinkage in space. Thus began the Winter of the Long Peeps...
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
You sayin' we're some kind of Space Suicide Squad?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
The mechanicus wished they were full machine.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I'd be more concerned about another type of shrinking. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡ °)
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
If you like the toaster fuckers I suggest the Forge of Mars series starting with Priests of Mars. https://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Priests_of_Mars_(Novel)
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
It’s somewhat like the chicken and the egg. I’m absolutely sure that if we were to reach thousands of manned missions per year, very few would bat an eye at a couple of losses. But to get there you need to start with one and then a limited number of them. And since each of those will highly publicized, losing one will be catastrophic and cause massive delays if not a complete program termination. So without a strong motivator we might not get past this initial stage or it will be a very slow and long one.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Most versions in fiction seem to be designed with a limited AI who has no goal but war which then, obviously, turns on the creator. The heroes valiantly swoop in lasers (or phasers!) blasting and somehow with just a handful of people stop this dreaded machine to discover the cause was AI bad.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
So we need faster space travel, space travel that doesn’t flood our atmosphere with green house gasses, a way to land ships safely on earth accurately, ships that can carry enough resources for settlements back and forth, and now artificial kidneys. And we aren’t even close to actually colonizing space, yet. Space colonization is a pipe dream. Better to spend this money on stuff that actually helps us.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I completely disagree
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Cloning would need to be significantly advanced, and some serious ethical concerns dealt with.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Send regular average joes, maybe? They're disposable, and we don't need that many taxpayers.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Private interests are going to go to Mars, not government ones, for exactly this reason. Space is full of mineral resources. And corporate interests know there are no labor protections in space.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Once again, colonizing other planets sounds like something we should consider AFTER we've figured out how to put together a world government for the planet we're already on.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
yeh theyres a reason we come with a spare
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
>and short of a decade of nuclear winter likely never will be. Even nuclear war, with a winter, probably won't cause an environmental collapse to earth that renders humanity dead. The infrastructure destruction might be a concern, since most of humanity isn't self sufficient in any sense. Take out the isolated tribes somehow, and that will probably be a concern. Of course isolated tribes are isolated..
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
why do people assume were going straight to colonisation? we done even have anyone living on the moon yet
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Good question. I have the knees of a very tall old man. I'm thinking it might be caused by the fact that I'm a very tall old man.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Whether we've wanted it or not we've stepped into a manned mission to the 4th planet Mars. So let's start colonizing its volcanoes, one by one. Olympus Mons.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I was specifically looking for a comment like this and you did not disappoint.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
for science, and just cause !
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
To limit delusions about the sales pitches involved in space travel.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
You think there’s no money in helping people not die of kidney failure here on earth?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I don’t think you have enough melanin to frighten the current Republican Party.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
>Billionaires would need someone to provide for them. So they bring a servant class with them, the amount of resources available means they still need to be on the departure early or they don't abandon earth.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I mean... and no love for Musk this-a-way, other than him driving up property values out here where I live with his various companies springing up... but it's absolutely "possible" so long as you don't want to get back.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
It’s just a statement about how having different perspectives can create a better environment for advancement. Not saying that the individuals who do that specific research aren’t doing everything they can already. You are taking this very personally. And I’m not here to argue just to converse.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
It can, galactic radiation in Alpha, Beta, and Gamma/photon radiation. Alpha and Beta radiation are "relatively" easy to shield, Gamma is a bit harder but if you put a meter of material like water or poop on the outside of the ship then you can block photon radiation. I'm not sure if there is any greater context but at face value that is incorrect.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
“The research was detailed in a paper published in the journal Nature Communications.”
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
The first trips over there are considered one way trips. Met a guy who worked for nasa and not sure how true it is but the first 1 one flights are available for the “public” booked. The first wave astronauts who are training\applying for this also know it’s a one way trip. They expect to die on the red rock before they have an opportunity to return due to current technology.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I'm still not sure why we haven't created the space wheel, all Tsiolkovsky (1903) style.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
[there was shrinkage](https://youtu.be/BEnKLhi83J8?si=BziXKSTy5h4MCSKH)
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
There might be some kidney shrinkage = they knew the risks when they signed up. This is what frontier science looks like There might be penis shrinkage = my God what have we done. Scrap the entire project immediately
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
He's not the Omnissiah! He's a very naughty boy!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Its more fun to call it horse tranquilizer. :)
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
>It doesn't include any actual numbers or figures. As is tradition.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I feel this is the start of artificial organs becoming mainstream
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
NASA: “ We still landed on the moon though, in 1969, with the 1/10th computing power of an iPhone, first attempt, first try, no failures, nothing. Everything went perfect. “
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Money, time, and technical expertise are all resources I can think of. Also, Elon Musk has said we'll be sending people to Mars in a timeframe that's functionally now.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I passionately hate the Mars mission concept. It's not that I hate human progress, but it irks me to no end that people really think this is going to be the cure for overpopulation instead of investing in things the planet needs. On top of the whole evolution thing. This is just one way to die, I guarantee there are thousands more we will discover. Humans didn't evolve on Mars! We might as well live under the ocean, that would make more sense and be safer.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
We can only hope. Let's make sure that the Mars mission is super expensive.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Send a Tesla with Elon Musk inside to Mars.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
They did assume, yes.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Not for everyone, I guess. It’s a fun watch for me.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Thinking meat.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
He was probably just an incredible douche bag who was planning on throwing people over board. It would be in line with the rest of his actions.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I'm pretty sure this is one of those "you can't expect anyone to actually believe that" moments.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
There will always be people willing to take the risks. It's the public that's going to need to have the guts. People are going to get injured and people will die on this quest but if civilization clutches its pearls every time something happens...it'll never work out.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
NASAs program is still on schedule for 2035... like it was in 2017/2018
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06