Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,165 @@
|
|
1 |
-
---
|
2 |
-
license: cc-by-4.0
|
3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
---
|
2 |
+
license: cc-by-4.0
|
3 |
+
language:
|
4 |
+
- en
|
5 |
+
tags:
|
6 |
+
- Large Language Models
|
7 |
+
- Sequential Reasoning
|
8 |
+
- Knowledge Graphs
|
9 |
+
- Scaling Laws
|
10 |
+
- Synthetic Benchmarks
|
11 |
+
- Commonsense Reasoning
|
12 |
+
- Spatial Reasoning
|
13 |
+
- Pathfinding
|
14 |
+
- Logical Depth
|
15 |
+
- Backtracking
|
16 |
+
- Noise Robustness
|
17 |
+
- LLM Evaluation
|
18 |
+
---
|
19 |
+
|
20 |
+
# SeqBench: A Tunable Benchmark to Quantify Sequential Reasoning Limits of LLMs
|
21 |
+
|
22 |
+
## Description
|
23 |
+
|
24 |
+
SeqBench is a programmatically generated benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate and analyze the sequential reasoning capabilities of language models. Task instances involve pathfinding in 2D grid environments, requiring models to perform multi-step inference over a combination of relevant and distracting textual facts.
|
25 |
+
|
26 |
+
The benchmark allows for fine-grained, orthogonal control over key complexity dimensions:
|
27 |
+
|
28 |
+
1. **Logical Depth (L)**: The number of actions in the ground-truth optimal solution.
|
29 |
+
2. **Backtracking Count (B)**: The number of locked doors on the optimal path that necessitate detours to find corresponding keys.
|
30 |
+
3. **Noise Ratio (N)**: The proportion of distracting (irrelevant) facts relative to supporting (relevant) facts in the problem description.
|
31 |
+
|
32 |
+
This dataset (`seqBench_compact.jsonl.gz`) contains **7079 instances**, sampled to provide broad coverage across these complexity dimensions.
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
Each instance provides:
|
35 |
+
- `instance_id`: A unique identifier for the specific problem variant.
|
36 |
+
- `context`: The natural language problem description presented to the model.
|
37 |
+
- `completion`: The ground-truth sequence of actions representing the optimal solution.
|
38 |
+
- `complexity_parameters`: A dictionary containing the specific L, B, and N values for the instance.
|
39 |
+
- `instance_metadata`: Additional information, including maze dimensions and agent/target names.
|
40 |
+
- `structural_details`: A JSON string detailing the underlying base maze configuration. This includes room coordinate mappings, adjacency lists, door/key states, and all canonical facts (before noise application).
|
41 |
+
|
42 |
+
## Dataset Structure and Schema
|
43 |
+
|
44 |
+
The dataset is provided in gzipped JSONL format (`seqBench_compact.jsonl.gz`). Each line is a JSON object representing a single problem instance with the following fields:
|
45 |
+
|
46 |
+
* **`instance_id`** (`string`): Unique identifier for the problem instance.
|
47 |
+
* **`context`** (`string`): Textual problem description.
|
48 |
+
* **`completion`** (`string`): Expected sequence of actions (e.g., ` "['action1: param1', 'action2: param2', ...]" `).
|
49 |
+
* **`complexity_parameters`** (`object`):
|
50 |
+
* `logical_depth_L` (`int64`): Logical Depth (L).
|
51 |
+
* `backtracking_count_B` (`int64`): Backtracking Count (B).
|
52 |
+
* `noise_ratio_N` (`float64`): Applied Noise Ratio (N).
|
53 |
+
* **`instance_metadata`** (`object`):
|
54 |
+
* `maze_rows` (`int64`): Number of rows in the maze grid.
|
55 |
+
* `maze_cols` (`int64`): Number of columns in the maze grid.
|
56 |
+
* `agent_name` (`string`): Agent's name.
|
57 |
+
* `target_name` (`string`): Target/victim's name.
|
58 |
+
* **`structural_details`** (`string`): A JSON string containing:
|
59 |
+
* `mappings` (`object`):
|
60 |
+
* `coordinate_to_name` (`object`): Maps coordinate strings (e.g., "3,6") to original room identifiers (e.g., "D5").
|
61 |
+
* `structure` (`object`):
|
62 |
+
* `adjacency_list` (`object`): Maps coordinate strings to a list of directly connected coordinate strings.
|
63 |
+
* `door_details` (`object`): Maps a door identifier string (lexicographically sorted coordinate strings joined by "_", e.g., "3,6_3,7") to an object: `{"status": "open" | "closed and locked", "key_id": "string"}`.
|
64 |
+
* `key_locations` (`object`): Maps a `key_id` string to the coordinate string of the room containing the key.
|
65 |
+
* `start_room_coord` (`string`): Coordinate string of the agent's starting room.
|
66 |
+
* `end_room_coord` (`string`): Coordinate string of the victim's room.
|
67 |
+
* `canonical_facts` (`list`): A list of objects, where each object represents a true factual statement about the base maze (before noise/shuffling). Each fact object has: `{"type": "string", "args": list_of_strings, "supporting": boolean}`. The `args` are specific to the `type` (e.g., for "connected_rooms", args might be `["coord1_str", "coord2_str", "status_str"]`).
|
68 |
+
|
69 |
+
A machine-readable metadata file (`croissant.json`) is included in the metadata/ directory of the main repository to facilitate dataset discovery and integration.
|
70 |
+
|
71 |
+
## Using `structural_details`
|
72 |
+
|
73 |
+
The `structural_details` field offers a ground-truth representation of the maze.
|
74 |
+
|
75 |
+
```python
|
76 |
+
import gzip
|
77 |
+
import json
|
78 |
+
|
79 |
+
# Example: Load the first instance and inspect its structural_details
|
80 |
+
file_path = "seqBench_compact.jsonl.gz" # Path to your dataset file
|
81 |
+
instance_data = None
|
82 |
+
try:
|
83 |
+
with gzip.open(file_path, "rt", encoding="utf-8") as f:
|
84 |
+
first_line = f.readline()
|
85 |
+
if first_line:
|
86 |
+
instance_data = json.loads(first_line)
|
87 |
+
except FileNotFoundError:
|
88 |
+
print(f"Error: Dataset file not found at {file_path}")
|
89 |
+
except Exception as e:
|
90 |
+
print(f"Error loading dataset: {e}")
|
91 |
+
|
92 |
+
if instance_data:
|
93 |
+
print(f"Instance ID: {instance_data.get('instance_id', 'N/A')}")
|
94 |
+
|
95 |
+
# Parse the structural_details string
|
96 |
+
structural_details_str = instance_data.get("structural_details")
|
97 |
+
if structural_details_str:
|
98 |
+
structural_details = json.loads(structural_details_str)
|
99 |
+
|
100 |
+
structure = structural_details.get("structure", {})
|
101 |
+
start_coord_str = structure.get("start_room_coord")
|
102 |
+
print(f"Start Room Coordinate String: {start_coord_str}")
|
103 |
+
|
104 |
+
# Example: Door details for a hypothetical door
|
105 |
+
# Note: Door keys are formed by sorting coordinate strings and joining with '_'
|
106 |
+
coord1_str, coord2_str = "3,6", "3,7" # Replace with actual coordinates you want to check
|
107 |
+
door_dict_key = "_".join(sorted([coord1_str, coord2_str]))
|
108 |
+
door_info = structure.get("door_details", {}).get(door_dict_key)
|
109 |
+
if door_info:
|
110 |
+
print(f"Door info for {door_dict_key}: {door_info}")
|
111 |
+
else:
|
112 |
+
print(f"No direct door entry for {door_dict_key} (may not exist or names are different).")
|
113 |
+
|
114 |
+
print(f"Key locations: {structure.get('key_locations', {})}")
|
115 |
+
|
116 |
+
# print("First canonical fact:", structural_details.get("canonical_facts", [{}])[0])
|
117 |
+
else:
|
118 |
+
print("structural_details field is missing or empty.")
|
119 |
+
|
120 |
+
# For a deeper understanding of the data generation pipeline and semantics,
|
121 |
+
# refer to the scripts (`maze.py`, `maze_loader.py`, `rooms.py`)
|
122 |
+
# available in the main project repository.
|
123 |
+
```
|
124 |
+
|
125 |
+
## Dataset Statistics (for `seqBench_compact.jsonl.gz`)
|
126 |
+
|
127 |
+
* **Total Instances:** 7079
|
128 |
+
* **Logical Depth (L):**
|
129 |
+
* Range: [3, 774]
|
130 |
+
* Distribution: Instances span a wide range of L values. For L-bins of size 5 (e.g., L0-4, L5-9, etc.), there are typically 30-80 instances per bin in the lower to mid L-ranges.
|
131 |
+
* **Backtracking Count (B):**
|
132 |
+
* Range: [0, 6]
|
133 |
+
* Distribution:
|
134 |
+
* B = 0: 441 instances
|
135 |
+
* B = 1: 438 instances
|
136 |
+
* B = 2: 565 instances
|
137 |
+
* B = 3: 790 instances
|
138 |
+
* B = 4: 1046 instances
|
139 |
+
* B = 5: 1601 instances
|
140 |
+
* B = 6: 2198 instances
|
141 |
+
* **Noise Ratio (N):**
|
142 |
+
* Range: [0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0]
|
143 |
+
* Distribution: Instances are approximately evenly distributed across the 6 noise levels, each with roughly 1180 instances.
|
144 |
+
* **Combined Complexity:** The dataset is sampled to ensure coverage across (B, N) combinations (typically 60-380 instances per pair) and (L-bin, N) combinations (aiming for approximately 10 instances per L-bin of size 5 for each N, varying with the natural distribution of L).
|
145 |
+
|
146 |
+
## Generation Process
|
147 |
+
|
148 |
+
The benchmark instances are generated through a multi-stage process:
|
149 |
+
1. **Base Maze Generation**: Acyclic maze graphs are programmatically created on N x M grids.
|
150 |
+
2. **Rewind Construction**: A target number of backtracking maneuvers (B_target) are embedded by working backward from a goal room, strategically placing keys and locked doors.
|
151 |
+
3. **NLP Formulation**: For each base maze configuration, a list of canonical facts describing the environment and task is derived.
|
152 |
+
4. **Noise Application**: A specified `noise_ratio_N` is used to select a proportion of distracting (irrelevant) facts to include alongside supporting (relevant) facts, forming the final `context`.
|
153 |
+
|
154 |
+
## Citation
|
155 |
+
Please cite this work as:
|
156 |
+
```bibtex
|
157 |
+
@misc{anonymous2025seqbench,
|
158 |
+
author = {Anonymous Submission},
|
159 |
+
title = {SeqBench: A Tunable Benchmark to Quantify Sequential Reasoning Limits of LLMs},
|
160 |
+
year = {2025},
|
161 |
+
publisher = {Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},
|
162 |
+
note = {Special Theme: Interdisciplinary Recontextualization of NLP},
|
163 |
+
comment = {Dataset accessible at https://huggingface.co/datasets/emnlp-submission/seqBench}
|
164 |
+
}
|
165 |
+
```
|