Datasets:

Modalities:
Text
Formats:
parquet
Size:
< 1K
ArXiv:
Libraries:
Datasets
pandas
File size: 3,676 Bytes
3f11844
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0cf10d6
3f11844
0cf10d6
 
3f11844
 
 
 
 
 
db5ebbf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
---
dataset_info:
  features:
  - name: question
    dtype: string
  - name: answer
    dtype: float64
  - name: program
    dtype: string
  - name: task
    dtype: string
  - name: context
    dtype: string
  splits:
  - name: train
    num_bytes: 306143
    num_examples: 246
  download_size: 144247
  dataset_size: 306143
configs:
- config_name: default
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: data/train-*
---

# Finance Fundamentals: Program Synthesis

This dataset contains 246 quantative reasoning financial math word problems, using data sourced from:
- [TatQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07624)
- [ConvFinQA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03849)

Each question is annotated with both a numeric target solution, along with a python program containing the explicit steps to reach that solution. For more information, see the [BizBench paper.](https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.452.pdf)

## Example

```
The market price of K-T-Lew Corporation's common stock is $60 per share, and each share gives its owner one subscription right. Four rights are required to purchase an additional share of common stock at the subscription price of $54 per share. If the common stock is currently selling rights-on, what is the theoretical value of a right? Answer to the nearest cent.
```

```
stock_price = 60.0
rights_sub_price_per_share = 54.0
rights_per_share = 4
value = (stock_price - rights_sub_price_per_share) / (rights_per_share + 1)
round(value, 2)
```

```
1.2
```

## Citation
If you find this data useful, please cite:
```
@inproceedings{krumdick-etal-2024-bizbench,
    title = "{B}iz{B}ench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance",
    author = "Krumdick, Michael  and
      Koncel-Kedziorski, Rik  and
      Lai, Viet Dac  and
      Reddy, Varshini  and
      Lovering, Charles  and
      Tanner, Chris",
    editor = "Ku, Lun-Wei  and
      Martins, Andre  and
      Srikumar, Vivek",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = aug,
    year = "2024",
    address = "Bangkok, Thailand",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.452/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.452",
    pages = "8309--8332",
    abstract = "Answering questions within business and finance requires reasoning, precision, and a wide-breadth of technical knowledge. Together, these requirements make this domain difficult for large language models (LLMs). We introduce BizBench, a benchmark for evaluating models' ability to reason about realistic financial problems. BizBench comprises eight quantitative reasoning tasks, focusing on question-answering (QA) over financial data via program synthesis. We include three financially-themed code-generation tasks from newly collected and augmented QA data. Additionally, we isolate the reasoning capabilities required for financial QA: reading comprehension of financial text and tables for extracting intermediate values, and understanding financial concepts and formulas needed to calculate complex solutions. Collectively, these tasks evaluate a model{'}s financial background knowledge, ability to parse financial documents, and capacity to solve problems with code. We conduct an in-depth evaluation of open-source and commercial LLMs, comparing and contrasting the behavior of code-focused and language-focused models. We demonstrate that the current bottleneck in performance is due to LLMs' limited business and financial understanding, highlighting the value of a challenging benchmark for quantitative reasoning within this domain."
}
```