premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Austin is not few. | contradiction |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Otis is not selfish. | self_contradiction |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Harlan is handsome. | neutral |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Chrysta is mental. | contradiction |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Austin is helpful. | neutral |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Herbert is helpful. | contradiction |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Odessa is helpful. | neutral |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Odessa is not handsome. | contradiction |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Harlan is selfish. | entailment |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Otis is not helpful. | neutral |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Herbert is not helpful. | entailment |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Hadden is not handsome. | entailment |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Chrysta is not handsome. | self_contradiction |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Herbert is not few. | self_contradiction |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Hadden is not obedient. | entailment |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Harlan is not obedient. | contradiction |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Herbert is few. | self_contradiction |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Otis is not obedient. | neutral |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Otis is not handsome. | entailment |
Hadden is not obedient.
Chrysta is not handsome.
Chrysta is not helpful.
Otis is not handsome.
Harlan is selfish.
Harlan is mental.
Hadden is not handsome.
Herbert is not mental.
Austin is not mental.
Harlan is obedient.
Chrysta is not mental.
Hadden is few.If someone is either not few or helpful, then he is not selfish and not mental.
If there is at least one people who is mental, then Otis is not selfish.
If someone who is not mental is also not helpful, then he is not few.
If Otis is not selfish, then Odessa is handsome, and vice versa.
If someone is few and handsome, then he is not mental, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is few, then Otis is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is helpful, then Hadden is not selfish and Herbert is mental.
It can be concluded that Herbert is not few once knowing that Harlan is selfish or Odessa is helpful.
If there is nobody who is not helpful, then Austin is handsome and Otis is obedient.
Otis being few or Austin being not mental implies that Herbert is not helpful.
if there is at least one people who is not helpful and not handsome, then Austin is few and Herbert is not selfish.
Someone who is not helpful is always both not mental and few. | Chrysta is not few. | self_contradiction |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Marlin is not beige. | self_contradiction |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Peter is not typical. | neutral |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Alexis is not sensible. | contradiction |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Rory is not sensible. | entailment |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Kim is not jealous. | contradiction |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Marlin is beige. | self_contradiction |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Kim is not sensible. | self_contradiction |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Alvin is beige. | neutral |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Marlin is not combative. | self_contradiction |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Kim is not beige. | entailment |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Rory is not combative. | neutral |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Alvin is not shiny. | self_contradiction |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Kim is beige. | contradiction |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Douglas is not combative. | contradiction |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Douglas is not typical. | entailment |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Douglas is not sensible. | neutral |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Marlin is typical. | entailment |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Alvin is not beige. | neutral |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Douglas is jealous. | entailment |
Rory is typical.
Alvin is not shiny.
Marlin is combative.
Kim is jealous.
Douglas is combative.
Rory is not sensible.
Douglas is not typical.
Kim is not beige.
Peter is combative.
Kim is not sensible.
Alvin is not typical.
Alexis is sensible.It can be concluded that Alexis is not jealous once knowing that Douglas is not shiny or Alexis is sensible.
If there is someone who is either sensible or beige, then Douglas is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Marlin is not combative and Alvin is shiny.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Marlin is typical.
If someone who is typical is also not combative, then he is not beige.
As long as someone is not jealous, he is sensible and beige.
If there is at least one people who is not beige, then Alvin is not combative and Kim is jealous.
If there is at least one people who is both typical and not combative, then Peter is not shiny.
Someone who is typical and not combative is always not shiny and beige.
Marlin is not typical if and only if Douglas is shiny.
If someone is shiny and sensible, then he is both jealous and beige, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or not combative, then Kim is sensible. | Alvin is typical. | contradiction |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Harley is massive. | entailment |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Laurence is not better. | neutral |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Laurence is not tart. | neutral |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Alexis is not terrible. | contradiction |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Phineas is tart. | entailment |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Harley is terrible. | entailment |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Sherman is massive. | self_contradiction |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Sherman is not better. | self_contradiction |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Alexis is tart. | neutral |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Sherman is not reserved. | self_contradiction |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Phineas is not better. | contradiction |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Phineas is better. | entailment |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Sherman is not tart. | neutral |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Harley is not massive. | contradiction |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Lincoln is not massive. | neutral |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Angus is reserved. | self_contradiction |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Harley is better. | entailment |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Sherman is not terrible. | contradiction |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Harley is reserved. | self_contradiction |
Sherman is not massive.
Angus is reserved.
Angus is better.
Harley is not self-confident.
Sherman is self-confident.
Angus is not terrible.
Laurence is terrible.
Sherman is terrible.
Phineas is not massive.
Sherman is not reserved.
Sherman is better.
Phineas is better.If there is at least one people who is terrible, then Sherman is not better and Phineas is tart.
Laurence being tart implies that Phineas is self-confident and Phineas is not massive.
Someone is reserved if and only if he is not self-confident.
If someone is not self-confident, then he is not reserved.
If there is someone who is terrible, then Sherman is not self-confident.
If Phineas is self-confident or Angus is not better, then Phineas is reserved.
If someone is massive, then he is both better and terrible.
Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being massive.
Someone who is not massive is always terrible.
If everyone is self-confident or not reserved, then Harley is not tart.
If there is at least one people who is reserved, then Angus is better and Alexis is terrible.
If there is at least one people who is not reserved or self-confident, then Harley is not tart. | Angus is not better. | contradiction |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Jesse is not tired. | contradiction |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Isaiah is lively. | neutral |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Angus is eastern. | self_contradiction |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Angus is handsome. | self_contradiction |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Marcus is not arrow. | neutral |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Isaiah is not arrow. | contradiction |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Angus is not arrow. | contradiction |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Marcus is arrow. | neutral |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Jeremiah is eastern. | contradiction |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Isaiah is not healthy. | self_contradiction |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Isaiah is arrow. | entailment |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Angus is not tired. | entailment |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Angus is not healthy. | self_contradiction |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Isaiah is handsome. | self_contradiction |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Marcus is not lively. | neutral |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Peter is not healthy. | entailment |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Jeremiah is not eastern. | entailment |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Isaiah is not tired. | entailment |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Angus is lively. | neutral |
Kane is eastern.
Marcus is tired.
Peter is not healthy.
Jesse is eastern.
Isaiah is arrow.
Peter is not eastern.
Jeremiah is handsome.
Isaiah is healthy.
Jeremiah is arrow.
Jeremiah is tired.
Angus is eastern.
Jesse is tired.If someone who is not tired is also not healthy, then he is not handsome.
If there is someone who is either not healthy or handsome, then Angus is arrow.
Someone who is not tired is always not eastern.
If someone is arrow, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is tired or lively, then Peter is eastern.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Isaiah is not tired.
Angus being lively implies that Jesse is not handsome and Marcus is not arrow.
If someone is not tired and healthy, then he is arrow, and vice versa.
If someone is not eastern or handsome, then he is not healthy.
Angus is not lively if and only if Peter is healthy and Peter is handsome.
If there is at least one people who is not lively, then Peter is not eastern.
If all people are not healthy, then Marcus is not arrow. | Isaiah is eastern. | contradiction |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Tobias is wooden. | neutral |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Trevor is angry. | contradiction |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Harlan is wooden. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Jed is clear. | neutral |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Harlan is not wooden. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Jed is funny. | contradiction |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Trevor is wooden. | contradiction |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Harlan is not clear. | entailment |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Jed is not clear. | neutral |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Trevor is diplomatic. | entailment |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Albert is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Robert is funny. | entailment |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Harlan is funny. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Tobias is funny. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Collier is not angry. | neutral |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Tobias is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Robert is clear. | entailment |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Albert is angry. | neutral |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Albert is clear. | entailment |
Harlan is angry.
Jed is adventurous.
Albert is adventurous.
Harlan is diplomatic.
Trevor is not wooden.
Trevor is not angry.
Tobias is not funny.
Harlan is not clear.
Collier is not clear.
Jed is not funny.
Robert is funny.
Robert is adventurous.Collier being clear implies that Trevor is funny and Harlan is not angry.
Someone is angry and wooden if and only if he is funny and not clear.
If there is someone who is not funny, then Albert is clear and Trevor is diplomatic.
It can be concluded that Jed is clear once knowing that Jed is not wooden.
Someone is not funny and clear if and only if he is not angry and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is both angry and funny, then Trevor is not wooden.
Someone being both funny and diplomatic is equivalent to being adventurous and not wooden.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic, then Robert is wooden.
If there is someone who is diplomatic, then Robert is clear and Tobias is funny.
If someone is not adventurous and not wooden, then he is both not clear and not diplomatic, and vice versa.
Tobias being not adventurous implies that Albert is not wooden and Harlan is diplomatic.
Someone is not funny and wooden if and only if he is not clear. | Jed is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.