premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Marcus is elderly. | entailment |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Arthur is not wild. | neutral |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Arthur is smart. | neutral |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Charles is not elderly. | contradiction |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Coleman is not elderly. | contradiction |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Coleman is not smart. | neutral |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Ramsey is not wild. | entailment |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Coleman is cotton. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Coleman is important. | entailment |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Adrian is cotton. | neutral |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Marcus is traditional. | entailment |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Marcus is not wild. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Marcus is wild. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Charles is not traditional. | contradiction |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Louis is not important. | neutral |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Charles is not wild. | contradiction |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Louis is elderly. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Charles is elderly. | entailment |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Charles is smart. | contradiction |
Adrian is wild.
Marcus is elderly.
Marcus is traditional.
Arthur is not cotton.
Coleman is cotton.
Louis is not elderly.
Marcus is not wild.
Charles is traditional.
Coleman is wild.
Charles is wild.
Louis is smart.
Ramsey is not wild.If Ramsey is elderly or Louis is not important, then Coleman is wild.
Someone being cotton is equivalent to being important.
If someone is not elderly and wild, then he is both not smart and not important, and vice versa.
If Louis is elderly, then Charles is not cotton.
If there is someone who is wild, then Louis is elderly.
If Ramsey is not important, then Arthur is not cotton, and vice versa.
If someone is not cotton and not elderly, then he is wild and traditional.
If Louis is smart, then Coleman is not cotton and Marcus is wild.
Someone who is eithor cotton or important is always elderly.
If someone is traditional, then he is both elderly and not smart.
If Arthur is important or Ramsey is cotton, then Coleman is not traditional.
If someone who is wild is also smart, then he is traditional. | Louis is not elderly. | self_contradiction |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Amanda is annoying. | neutral |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Jacob is environmental. | entailment |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Amanda is not friendly. | neutral |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Jeremiah is not ugliest. | neutral |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Ashley is not environmental. | self_contradiction |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Amanda is not environmental. | neutral |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Ashley is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Morris is wrong. | contradiction |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Amanda is friendly. | neutral |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Jacob is annoying. | contradiction |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Ashley is environmental. | self_contradiction |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Gilroy is not ugliest. | entailment |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Morris is ugliest. | entailment |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Gilroy is annoying. | contradiction |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Gilroy is not annoying. | entailment |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Gilroy is wrong. | entailment |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Sandy is environmental. | contradiction |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Morris is environmental. | self_contradiction |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Morris is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Sandy is not environmental.
Jeremiah is not friendly.
Morris is not annoying.
Ashley is not realistic.
Gilroy is not environmental.
Ashley is not friendly.
Gilroy is not ugliest.
Sandy is not wrong.
Morris is not environmental.
Jacob is not annoying.
Morris is ugliest.
Gilroy is wrong.Someone who is not realistic is always not environmental.
If someone is wrong or environmental, then he is not annoying.
Someone being not annoying is equivalent to being friendly.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental or friendly, then Gilroy is not ugliest.
Someone who is eithor ugliest or annoying is always not wrong.
If Amanda is realistic or Morris is wrong, then Jacob is not friendly.
If someone is not annoying or not realistic, then he is environmental.
If there is at least one people who is not environmental, then Morris is realistic.
Gilroy being not friendly implies that Morris is realistic and Ashley is not wrong.
Jacob is ugliest if and only if Jacob is friendly and Jeremiah is annoying.
If someone is realistic and not annoying, then he is both not wrong and not friendly, and vice versa.
Someone who is not environmental and annoying is always not wrong and not realistic. | Gilroy is not friendly. | contradiction |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Kimball is not careful. | entailment |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Kimball is scary. | contradiction |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Lee is clever. | self_contradiction |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Kimball is sticky. | entailment |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Kimball is clever. | self_contradiction |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Tommy is scary. | neutral |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Kimball is evil. | contradiction |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Lee is scary. | contradiction |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Lee is evil. | self_contradiction |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Tommy is not clever. | neutral |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Gilbert is scary. | neutral |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Gilbert is not clever. | contradiction |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Gilbert is sticky. | neutral |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Spencer is not scary. | contradiction |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Kimball is not clever. | self_contradiction |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Kimball is not scary. | entailment |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Spencer is sticky. | neutral |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Spencer is evil. | entailment |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Spencer is clever. | entailment |
Spencer is clever.
Kimball is not evil.
Murray is sticky.
Spencer is evil.
Alexia is careful.
Alexia is confident.
Gilbert is evil.
Kimball is clever.
Gilbert is careful.
Lee is sticky.
Kimball is not careful.
Lee is not scary.Alexia being careful implies that Gilbert is clever.
Someone who is not careful is always not scary.
If Alexia is clever, then Tommy is not sticky and Spencer is evil, and vice versa.
If someone is sticky, then he is not clever, and vice versa.
If someone is not confident, then he is careful, and vice versa.
Someone being both not scary and sticky is equivalent to being clever and not evil.
If there is at least one people who is not confident or careful, then Lee is not evil.
If Lee is not clever, then Spencer is scary.
If someone is evil or not scary, then he is confident.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and confident, then Lee is evil.
Lee is not confident if and only if Murray is not scary.
If someone is not clever or not sticky, then he is not evil. | Alexia is confident. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Kyle is not available. | neutral |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Paxton is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Neville is popular. | contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Sophia is not available. | entailment |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Robyn is not helpful. | neutral |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Chandler is not helpful. | neutral |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Neville is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Chandler is popular. | neutral |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Sophia is not similar. | contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Sophia is helpful. | entailment |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Paxton is not similar. | contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Sterling is similar. | entailment |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Chandler is helpful. | neutral |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Sterling is not helpful. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Robyn is hungry. | entailment |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Sophia is not hungry. | contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Sterling is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Sterling is not cool. | contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Neville is not helpful. | self_contradiction |
Neville is not popular.
Sterling is similar.
Paxton is not available.
Sterling is not available.
Neville is not helpful.
Sterling is cool.
Chandler is not similar.
Robyn is not cool.
Neville is not available.
Neville is hungry.
Robyn is popular.
Sophia is not available.If there is at least one people who is not hungry, then Sterling is cool and Sterling is available.
It can be concluded that Kyle is similar and Sophia is not helpful once knowing that Sterling is not cool.
If someone is not popular or he is not available, then he is hungry.
If there is someone who is either not similar or not hungry, then Sophia is not available and Paxton is not helpful.
If Robyn is popular, then Sterling is not helpful.
It can be concluded that Sterling is not available once knowing that Chandler is cool or Sterling is not helpful.
Someone is not available if and only if he is helpful.
Someone is similar and not popular if and only if he is helpful and hungry.
Chandler being not available implies that Chandler is not similar and Paxton is cool.
Sophia is cool if and only if Robyn is available.
As long as someone is either not available or not cool, he is hungry and similar.
All not popular people are not available. | Sterling is not popular. | entailment |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Luisa is not cheeky. | contradiction |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Connell is pink. | neutral |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Luisa is mean. | self_contradiction |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Luisa is whispering. | self_contradiction |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Rachelle is not tart. | neutral |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Garth is mean. | entailment |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Hannah is tart. | entailment |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Luisa is tart. | entailment |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Luisa is not whispering. | self_contradiction |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Vicki is not confident. | neutral |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Hannah is not confident. | neutral |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Vicki is mean. | entailment |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Martin is not mean. | contradiction |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Vicki is not whispering. | contradiction |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Garth is pink. | contradiction |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Martin is pink. | self_contradiction |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Connell is not confident. | entailment |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Luisa is not pink. | self_contradiction |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Rachelle is not pink. | contradiction |
Luisa is tart.
Hannah is cheeky.
Connell is not confident.
Vicki is not cheeky.
Luisa is confident.
Vicki is whispering.
Luisa is not mean.
Rachelle is pink.
Garth is cheeky.
Luisa is pink.
Luisa is not whispering.
Garth is mean.If Hannah is whispering, then Martin is not pink, and vice versa.
If Martin is not cheeky, then Martin is whispering, and vice versa.
All not cheeky people are not pink.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not pink and Connell is confident once knowing that Garth is not tart.
If someone is not whispering, then he is pink.
If Vicki is mean, then Martin is not whispering, and vice versa.
If someone is either confident or tart, then he is whispering and cheeky.
If someone is not cheeky or mean, then he is not pink.
Someone who is not tart is always not confident.
If someone is not pink or he is cheeky, then he is mean.
If there is at least one people who is not mean, then Hannah is cheeky and Hannah is tart.
It can be concluded that Luisa is not tart once knowing that Connell is not mean or Connell is confident. | Vicki is not tart. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.