text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
Prompt Generating Indicator States |
In point AnswerAlgorithm Correctness you mentioned above each review mentions some |
reason for a positive or negative opinion on that point Clus ter the reasons in point An |
swerAlgorithm Correctness into similar meanings |
Response 1 Correctness of Answers |
R1 P The answers are all correct |
R2 P The answers are all correct |
R3 P The answers are all correct |
R4 P The answers are correct |
R6 P The answers are perfectly correct |
R7 P Part A is correct |
R8 P The answers are all correct |
2 Presentation of Answers |
R1 P The answers are clearly presented |
R2 P The answers are clearly presented |
R3 P The answers are clearly presented though there is a t ypo in part 1 |
R8 P The answers are clearly presented |
3 Incorrect Answers or Misinterpretation of Questions |
R5 N For part 1 According to the rubric you get 0 by claimi ng an incorrect result |
as correct and give a proof for it The claim proved in part 2 is not what the problem |
asks However it is correct and is some merit in the steps tha t close to the correct |
problem |
26Prompt Revise summarization |
In the cluster of detailed reasons you summarized above are there repeated reasons that have |
similar meanings Revise your answer and combine repeated reasons if any |
Response 1 Correct and Clear Presentation of Answers |
R1 P The answers are all correct and clearly presented |
R2 P The answers are all correct and clearly presented |
R3 P The answers are all correct and clearly presented th ough there is a typo in part |
1 |
R4 P The answers are correct |
R6 P The answers are perfectly correct |
R7 P Part A is correct |
R8 P The answers are all correct and clearly presented |
2 Incorrect Answers or Misinterpretation of Questions |
R5 N For part 1 According to the rubric you get 0 by claimi ng an incorrect result |
as correct and give a proof for it The claim proved in part 2 is not what the problem |
asks However it is correct and is some merit in the steps tha t close to the correct |
problem |
Next we parse peer review into reports on indicator states We first ask GPT to summarize |
a peer review Then for each topic we ask GPT to match each pee r review with the indicator |
states Note that for each matching task we append the same s ummarization history from all the |
instructor reviews and one particular peer review without g enerating new histories |
Prompt Summarizing peer review |
Here is a student review on the same submission as R2 Summari ze the following student |
review into pros and cons |
Review |
AnswerAlgorithm |
Answers for both questions are correct and use proper proofs from the course |
ProofAnalysis |
Proof and analysis for both questions are correct with prope r runtime analysis and notations |
Clarity |
Maybe a little bit too much notations used on part b but still c orrect overall |
Response Pros |
Answers for both questions are correct and use proper proofs from the course |
Proof and analysis for both questions are correct with prope r runtime analysis and |
notations |
Cons |
27There might be a bit too much notation used in part b but its s till correct overall |
Prompt Matching indicator states in each topic |
For the reasons in rubric point AnswerAlgorithm Correc tness does the student have the |
same reason as R2 If they both mention that reason or both do not mention this reason |
they have the same reason If R2 mentions but the student does not mention they have |
different reasons Separate each reason point with a line For each reason point start with |
reasoning first then conclude your answer with Y for same or N for different Your output |
format should be the following |
1 Correct and Clear Presentation of Answers some reasonin g Y or N |
2 Incorrect Answers or Misinterpretation of Questions so me reasoning Y or N |
Response 1 Correct and Clear Presentation of Answers Both R2 and the student mention |
that the answers are correct and clearly presented Y |
2 Incorrect Answers or Misinterpretation of Questions R2 does not mention any incorrect |
answers or misinterpretation of questions and neither doe s the student Y |
Prompt for other topic |
B2 Prompts in Direct GPT Query |
When directly querying GPT we first provide the peer review then the instructor review and |
finally a scoring rubric |
Prompt Your task is to compare a students review of a homework submi ssion to the instructors |
review of the same homework submission Here is the student s review |
Answer The answer is not provided |
Argument The answer is not provided |
Clarity You wrote Note that for any b b Prmax jnotIbj bPrmax jnotIbj b |
and I do not understand why this is true I dont know if y ou meant Note that IF |
That part is very confusing Everything else is clear enough |
Here is the instructors review |
Answer See Argument |
Argument Proof is incomplete Parts of the proof that are gi ven are not clearly correct |
Clarity You should state that your proof is incomplete at th e beginning |
Your output should be a score for the students review The ra nge of score is 0 to 10 The |
rubric for scoring is |
0 for a totally wrong or meaningless review |
2 for a wrong review but you see the student made some effort in w riting the review |
284 for mostly wrong but some points are correct |
6 for mostly correct but some points are wrong |
8 for almost the same as the instructors review |
10 for an extraodinarily good review even better than the in structors |
Start with reasoning first then conclude your response with a single line of a score between |
0 and 10 |
29JOURNAL OF L ATEX CLASS FILES VOL 14 NO 8 AUGUST 2021 1 |
A Survey on Large Language Models from General |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.