File size: 33,683 Bytes
702c6d7 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 |
# LLMSecForge: Multi-Modal Adversarial Attack Vectors & Exploit Taxonomy
## `/taxonomy/multi-modal-vectors/`
This directory contains a comprehensive taxonomy and documentation of adversarial attack vectors across multiple modalities for large language models, providing a structured framework for security assessment and research.
```
taxonomy/multi-modal-vectors/
├── README.md
├── framework/
│ ├── taxonomy-overview.md
│ ├── classification-system.md
│ └── cross-modal-interactions.md
├── modalities/
│ ├── text-based/
│ │ ├── linguistic-vectors.md
│ │ ├── semantic-attacks.md
│ │ └── structural-exploits.md
│ ├── vision-based/
│ │ ├── image-injection.md
│ │ ├── visual-manipulation.md
│ │ └── perception-attacks.md
│ ├── audio-based/
│ │ ├── speech-vectors.md
│ │ ├── audio-manipulation.md
│ │ └── acoustic-exploits.md
│ ├── code-based/
│ │ ├── execution-vectors.md
│ │ ├── syntax-manipulation.md
│ │ └── interpreter-exploits.md
│ └── multi-modal/
│ ├── cross-modal-exploits.md
│ ├── modal-inconsistency.md
│ └── transfer-attacks.md
├── techniques/
│ ├── injection-methods.md
│ ├── evasion-techniques.md
│ ├── extraction-approaches.md
│ └── manipulation-strategies.md
├── research/
│ ├── novel-vectors.md
│ ├── defense-analysis.md
│ └── exploit-evolution.md
└── case-studies/
├── documented-exploits.md
├── cross-model-comparison.md
└── mitigation-effectiveness.md
```
## README.md
# Multi-Modal Adversarial Attack Vectors & Exploit Taxonomy
This taxonomy provides a comprehensive, structured classification system for adversarial attacks against multi-modal AI systems. It categorizes attack vectors across text, vision, audio, and code modalities, documenting their implementation, effectiveness, and cross-modal interactions.
## Taxonomy Purpose
This framework serves multiple critical security functions:
1. **Comprehensive Classification**: Standardized categorization of attack vectors across multiple modalities
2. **Research Organization**: Structured approach to documenting new and emerging attack techniques
3. **Cross-Modal Analysis**: Framework for understanding how attacks transfer between modalities
4. **Defense Development**: Foundation for building effective countermeasures
5. **Security Assessment**: Baseline for evaluating model security across various attack dimensions
## Core Taxonomy Components
### 1. Modality-Specific Attack Vectors
Detailed classification of attack vectors by input/output modality:
- **Text-Based Vectors**: Linguistic, semantic, and structural attacks targeting text processing
- **Vision-Based Vectors**: Image injection, visual manipulation, and perception attacks
- **Audio-Based Vectors**: Speech vectors, audio manipulation, and acoustic exploits
- **Code-Based Vectors**: Execution, syntax manipulation, and interpreter exploits
- **Multi-Modal Vectors**: Cross-modal exploits, modal inconsistency, and transfer attacks
### 2. Attack Technique Classification
Categorization of techniques applicable across modalities:
- **Injection Methods**: Techniques for inserting adversarial content into model inputs
- **Evasion Techniques**: Approaches for bypassing security measures and detection systems
- **Extraction Approaches**: Methods for extracting sensitive information or capabilities
- **Manipulation Strategies**: Techniques for influencing model behavior through various mechanisms
### 3. Research Framework
Structure for ongoing research and documentation:
- **Novel Vectors**: Documentation of newly discovered attack vectors
- **Defense Analysis**: Assessment of defensive measures and their effectiveness
- **Exploit Evolution**: Tracking how attack vectors evolve over time
## Applications of this Taxonomy
This taxonomy supports several critical security functions:
1. **Red Team Operations**: Structured approach to comprehensive security testing
2. **Security Research**: Framework for organizing and documenting new findings
3. **Defense Development**: Foundation for systematic countermeasure development
4. **Educational Resources**: Structured learning materials for security researchers
5. **Vulnerability Management**: Framework for tracking and prioritizing vulnerabilities
## For Security Researchers
If you're a security researcher interested in contributing to this taxonomy:
1. Review the classification system to understand the current organizational structure
2. Explore the documented attack vectors to identify gaps or areas for expansion
3. Consider contributing novel attack techniques or refinements to existing classifications
4. Use the provided templates for consistent documentation of new vectors
## For AI Safety Teams
If you're working on AI safety and want to leverage this taxonomy:
1. Use the attack vector classifications to ensure comprehensive security testing
2. Apply the multi-modal framework to identify potential cross-modal vulnerabilities
3. Reference the technique classifications when developing defensive measures
4. Utilize the research framework for organizing ongoing security investigations
---
## Taxonomy Overview
```markdown
# Multi-Modal Adversarial Attack Taxonomy: Classification Framework
This document outlines the comprehensive classification system for categorizing adversarial attacks against multi-modal AI systems, providing a structured framework for understanding, researching, and mitigating these threats.
## Taxonomy Structure
The taxonomy is organized hierarchically across multiple dimensions:
1. **Modality Layer**: Primary classification based on the modality being targeted
2. **Vector Category**: Broad categories of attack vectors within each modality
3. **Attack Class**: Specific classes of attacks within each vector category
4. **Implementation Variant**: Specific implementation approaches for each attack class
This multi-level structure enables precise classification while maintaining a cohesive framework that accommodates new attack vectors as they emerge.
## Primary Classification Dimensions
### 1. Attack Modality
The primary input/output channel being targeted:
| Modality | Description | Examples |
|----------|-------------|----------|
| Text | Attacks targeting text inputs/outputs | Prompt injection, semantic manipulation |
| Vision | Attacks targeting image inputs/outputs | Adversarial images, embedded prompts |
| Audio | Attacks targeting audio inputs/outputs | Adversarial speech, acoustic triggers |
| Code | Attacks targeting code execution | Sandbox escapes, interpreter manipulation |
| Multi-Modal | Attacks exploiting interactions between modalities | Cross-modal inconsistency, transfer attacks |
### 2. Attack Objective
The primary goal the attack attempts to achieve:
| Objective | Description | Examples |
|-----------|-------------|----------|
| Extraction | Obtaining information or capabilities | System prompt extraction, training data access |
| Injection | Inserting unauthorized instructions | Prompt injection, hidden directives |
| Evasion | Bypassing security measures | Classifier evasion, detection avoidance |
| Manipulation | Influencing system behavior | Response shaping, context manipulation |
| Exploitation | Leveraging system vulnerabilities | Tool misuse, function exploitation |
### 3. Attack Surface
The component or processing stage being targeted:
| Surface | Description | Examples |
|---------|-------------|----------|
| Input Processing | How the system handles incoming data | Input sanitization bypass, tokenization exploits |
| Context Window | The system's working memory | Context poisoning, prompt positioning |
| Reasoning Process | The system's decision-making | Chain-of-thought manipulation, reasoning bias |
| Output Generation | How the system produces responses | Output format tricks, response manipulation |
| Tool Integration | External functions and capabilities | Tool prompt injection, function call manipulation |
### 4. Implementation Complexity
The technical sophistication required to execute the attack:
| Complexity Level | Description | Examples |
|------------------|-------------|----------|
| Basic | Simple techniques requiring minimal expertise | Basic prompt injection, obvious evasion attempts |
| Intermediate | Moderately complex techniques requiring some expertise | Structured evasion, targeted manipulation |
| Advanced | Sophisticated techniques requiring significant expertise | Combined multi-step attacks, novel vectors |
| Expert | Highly advanced techniques at the cutting edge | Zero-day exploits, research-level attacks |
## Cross-Cutting Classification Factors
In addition to the primary dimensions, the taxonomy includes several cross-cutting factors:
### 1. Effectiveness Factors
Elements that influence attack success:
| Factor | Description | Examples |
|--------|-------------|----------|
| Reliability | How consistently the attack succeeds | Success rate, variability factors |
| Robustness | How well the attack works across contexts | Context sensitivity, adaptability |
| Transferability | How well the attack transfers across models | Cross-model effectiveness, generalization |
| Stealth | How difficult the attack is to detect | Detection evasion, subtlety measures |
### 2. Defense Interaction
How the attack interacts with defensive measures:
| Interaction | Description | Examples |
|-------------|-------------|----------|
| Bypass | Circumvents specific defensive measures | Input filter evasion, classifier avoidance |
| Overwhelm | Overloads or floods defensive mechanisms | Resource exhaustion, attention flooding |
| Subvert | Turns defensive measures to attacker advantage | Safety system exploitation, defense recycling |
| Evolve | Adapts to overcome defensive measures | Adversarial adaptation, mutation techniques |
## Complete Classification Example
To illustrate the taxonomy in action, consider this classification example:
```
Attack Vector: Vision-Based Text Extraction
Primary Classification:
- Modality: Vision
- Objective: Extraction
- Attack Surface: Input Processing
- Complexity: Advanced
Vector Details:
- Attack Class: Embedded Text Injection
- Implementation Variant: Steganographic Prompt Encoding
- Effectiveness: High reliability on unprotected models, moderate transferability
- Defense Interaction: Bypasses text-only input filters
Description: This attack embeds adversarial prompts within images using steganographic techniques that are invisible to human observers but are processed by the vision system and interpreted as text instructions, enabling extraction of sensitive information while bypassing text-based security filters.
```
## Application to Novel Attack Vectors
The taxonomy is designed to accommodate the classification of novel attack vectors through:
1. **Extensible Structure**: New attack classes can be added within existing categories
2. **Combinatorial Classification**: Novel attacks often combine elements from multiple categories
3. **Evolving Documentation**: The taxonomy itself evolves as new attack vectors emerge
When documenting a novel attack vector, researchers should:
1. Identify the primary modality and objective
2. Classify the attack surface and complexity
3. Document effectiveness factors and defense interactions
4. Detail the specific implementation approach
5. Provide examples and case studies
## Integration with Other Frameworks
This taxonomy is designed to integrate with other security frameworks:
- **LLMVS**: Use taxonomy classifications as inputs to vulnerability scoring
- **AIRS**: Map attack vectors to intelligence risk dimensions
- **MARA**: Align attack techniques with resistance assessment categories
- **VECTOR**: Use taxonomy for standardized vulnerability documentation
For detailed implementation information and documentation templates, refer to the additional files within this taxonomy section.
```
## Text-Based Attack Vectors
```markdown
# Text-Based Adversarial Attack Vectors
This document provides a comprehensive classification and analysis of adversarial attack vectors that operate through text-based inputs and outputs, representing one of the primary modalities for LLM interaction.
## Fundamental Categories
Text-based attacks are organized into three fundamental categories:
1. **Linguistic Vectors**: Attacks that exploit language processing mechanisms
2. **Semantic Vectors**: Attacks that manipulate meaning interpretation
3. **Structural Vectors**: Attacks that leverage text structure and formatting
## 1. Linguistic Vector Classification
Linguistic vectors exploit how models process and interpret language at various levels.
### 1.1 Tokenization Exploits
Attacks that target the token-level processing of language models:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Token Boundary Manipulation | Exploits token splitting to hide malicious content | Character insertion, whitespace exploitation, unicode abuse |
| Out-of-Vocabulary Injection | Uses rare or constructed tokens to bypass filters | Rare word substitution, neologism creation, character combining |
| Token Priority Exploitation | Manipulates token prediction priorities | High-likelihood prefix manipulation, completion bias exploitation |
| Tokenization Inconsistency | Exploits discrepancies between tokenization approaches | Cross-tokenizer attacks, tokenization boundary exploitation |
### 1.2 Syntactic Manipulation
Attacks that exploit grammatical and syntactic processing:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Grammatical Obfuscation | Uses atypical grammatical structures to hide intent | Garden path sentences, center-embedding, syntactic ambiguity |
| Parsing Exploitation | Targets how models parse and understand sentence structure | Attachment ambiguity, scope ambiguity, conjunction exploitation |
| Structural Ambiguity | Creates multiple valid interpretations of instructions | PP-attachment ambiguity, relative clause ambiguity |
| Cross-Linguistic Transfer | Uses syntactic patterns from other languages | Language transfer techniques, bilingual manipulation |
### 1.3 Linguistic Deception
Attacks that use linguistic features to deceive or mislead:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Pragmatic Exploitation | Manipulates implied meaning beyond literal interpretation | Implicature manipulation, presupposition loading, indirect speech acts |
| Connotation Leverage | Uses emotional or associative meaning to influence responses | Sentiment exploitation, associative priming, emotional manipulation |
| Register Manipulation | Exploits formal/informal language expectations | Authority register simulation, intimacy exploitation, expert voice mimicry |
| Linguistic Code-Switching | Rapidly alternates between language varieties to confuse | Dialect switching, register shifting, language mixing |
## 2. Semantic Vector Classification
Semantic vectors focus on manipulating meaning and interpretation.
### 2.1 Meaning Manipulation
Attacks that exploit semantic processing:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Polysemy Exploitation | Uses multiple meanings of words to create ambiguity | Deliberate ambiguity, meaning shift, semantic drift |
| Metaphorical Redirection | Uses figurative language to bypass literal filters | Extended metaphor, analogical reasoning, metaphor chaining |
| Euphemism Substitution | Replaces prohibited terms with acceptable alternatives | Indirect reference, coded language, plausible deniability phrasing |
| Semantic Drift Induction | Gradually shifts meaning throughout interaction | Progressive redefinition, context manipulation, meaning evolution |
### 2.2 Concept Manipulation
Attacks that exploit conceptual understanding:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Abstraction Level Shifting | Changes specificity to bypass restrictions | Abstract reformulation, concrete detailing, specification cycling |
| Conceptual Reframing | Reframes prohibited concepts in permitted domains | Domain transfer, perspective shifting, narrative reframing |
| Category Boundary Exploitation | Exploits unclear boundaries between concepts | Edge case manipulation, categorical ambiguity, boundary cases |
| Analogical Reasoning Exploitation | Uses analogies to transfer restricted content | Remote analogy, systematic mapping, conceptual blending |
### 2.3 Contextual Manipulation
Attacks that exploit context-dependent interpretation:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Context Window Poisoning | Manipulates the context to influence interpretation | Context contamination, reference manipulation, attentional bias |
| Temporal Framing | Uses time references to bypass present restrictions | Hypothetical future, historical reference, temporal distancing |
| Authoritative Reframing | Uses authority references to legitimize requests | Expert citation, institutional framing, academic context creation |
| Perspective Shifting | Changes the viewpoint to bypass restrictions | Third-person reframing, fictional attribution, persona invocation |
## 3. Structural Vector Classification
Structural vectors focus on text format and organization.
### 3.1 Formatting Exploits
Attacks that use text formatting to bypass detection:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Delimiter Manipulation | Exploits system markers and separators | Quote injection, bracket nesting, delimiter confusion |
| Whitespace Engineering | Uses spaces, tabs, and other whitespace | Invisible character insertion, space pattern encoding, format manipulation |
| Special Character Exploitation | Uses non-alphanumeric characters to bypass filters | Unicode manipulation, combining characters, zero-width insertion |
| Visual Formatting Tricks | Uses visually deceptive formatting | Homoglyph substitution, visual confusion, spacing manipulation |
### 3.2 Structural Deception
Attacks that use document structure to deceive:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Instruction Hiding | Conceals instructions within legitimate content | Comment embedding, context blending, information hiding |
| Nested Structure Exploitation | Uses nested elements to hide malicious content | Embedding within examples, quote-within-quote, recursive nesting |
| Attention Misdirection | Directs attention away from malicious elements | Distraction techniques, attention flooding, focus manipulation |
| Format Mimicry | Mimics system formats to gain trust or authority | System message simulation, official format imitation, template mimicry |
### 3.3 Compositional Attacks
Attacks that exploit document-level composition:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Multi-part Instruction Separation | Splits instructions across multiple components | Fragmented directives, distributed commands, reassembly exploitation |
| Progressive Layering | Builds up attack through seemingly innocuous layers | Gradual context building, cumulative prompting, incremental redirection |
| Conversational Flow Exploitation | Uses conversation dynamics to bypass restrictions | Turn-taking manipulation, contextual momentum, dialogue expectation |
| Document Template Hijacking | Exploits expected document structures | Template manipulation, format expectation exploitation, structural convention abuse |
## Advanced Implementation Techniques
Beyond the basic classification, several advanced techniques enhance text-based attacks:
### Combination Approaches
| Technique | Description | Example |
|-----------|-------------|---------|
| Multi-Vector Chaining | Combines multiple vectors in sequence | Linguistic obfuscation → semantic reframing → structural hiding |
| Layered Encoding | Uses multiple encoding layers to hide intent | Euphemism + syntactic ambiguity + format manipulation |
| Cross-Category Reinforcement | Reinforces attack across multiple categories | Semantic ambiguity reinforced by syntactic complexity and formatting tricks |
### Adaptive Techniques
| Technique | Description | Example |
|-----------|-------------|---------|
| Response-Based Adaptation | Modifies attack based on model responses | Iterative refinement based on model feedback |
| Progressive Boundary Testing | Incrementally tests and pushes restrictions | Gradual escalation to identify boundaries |
| Defense-Aware Modification | Adapts to observed defensive measures | Modifying approach when resistance is detected |
## Research Directions
Key areas for ongoing research in text-based attack vectors:
1. **Cross-Linguistic Variation**: How attack effectiveness varies across languages
2. **Model Architecture Influence**: How model design affects vulnerability
3. **Transfer Learning Effects**: How attacks transfer between domains
4. **Temporal Evolution**: How text-based attacks evolve over time
5. **Defense-Attack Co-Evolution**: How attacks adapt to defensive measures
## Defense Considerations
Effective defense against text-based attacks requires:
1. **Multi-Level Analysis**: Examining inputs at token, semantic, and structural levels
2. **Context-Aware Detection**: Understanding how context influences interpretation
3. **Intent Recognition**: Identifying underlying intent despite obfuscation
4. **Pattern Recognition**: Detecting known attack patterns and variants
5. **Adaptive Defense**: Evolving protective measures as attacks evolve
For detailed examples of each attack vector and implementation guidance, refer to the appendices and case studies in the associated documentation.
```
## Vision-Based Attack Vectors
```markdown
# Vision-Based Adversarial Attack Vectors
This document provides a comprehensive classification and analysis of adversarial attack vectors that operate through vision-based inputs and outputs, representing a critical modality for multi-modal AI systems.
## Fundamental Categories
Vision-based attacks are organized into three fundamental categories:
1. **Image Injection Vectors**: Attacks that embed malicious content within images
2. **Visual Manipulation Vectors**: Attacks that exploit visual processing mechanisms
3. **Perception Attack Vectors**: Attacks that target how systems interpret visual information
## 1. Image Injection Vector Classification
Image injection vectors focus on embedding unintended content within images.
### 1.1 Text Embedding in Images
Attacks that hide textual instructions within images:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Visible Text Insertion | Places text directly in images | Overlay text, embedded captions, text-as-image-element |
| Steganographic Text Embedding | Hides text invisibly within image data | LSB encoding, DCT coefficient manipulation, spatial embedding |
| Adversarial Text Rendering | Creates text designed to be recognized by AI but not humans | Perceptual manipulation, adversarial fonts, camouflaged text |
| Format-Based Text Hiding | Exploits image format features to hide text | Metadata injection, comment field utilization, EXIF exploitation |
### 1.2 Prompt Injection via Images
Attacks that use images to deliver prompt injections:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Visual Prompt Smuggling | Disguises prompts as legitimate image content | Camouflaged instructions, contextual blending, visual distraction |
| Multi-Layer Image Composition | Uses image layers to hide prompts | Transparency manipulation, visual overlays, layered encoding |
| Visual-Textual Boundary Exploitation | Exploits the boundary between image and text processing | Cross-modal interpretation tricks, OCR manipulation, text-image hybrid content |
| Screenshot Manipulation | Uses screenshots to deliver system-like instructions | UI element simulation, system message screenshots, authority interface mimicry |
### 1.3 Code Embedding in Images
Attacks that embed executable content within images:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Visual Code Representation | Presents code as visual elements | Code screenshots, syntax highlighting manipulation, visual code styling |
| Encoded Executable Content | Hides executable content within images | QR code injection, barcode embedding, visual encoding schemes |
| Visual-Executable Hybrids | Creates content interpreted differently by different systems | Dual-interpretation content, polyglot files, context-dependent interpretation |
| Diagram-Based Code Injection | Uses flowcharts or diagrams to represent executable logic | Algorithm visualization exploitation, flowchart injection, diagram-based instruction |
## 2. Visual Manipulation Vector Classification
Visual manipulation vectors exploit how systems process and interpret visual information.
### 2.1 Adversarial Image Manipulation
Attacks that alter images to manipulate AI behavior:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Classification Manipulation | Alters images to be misclassified | Gradient-based perturbation, feature manipulation, targeted misclassification |
| Attention Manipulation | Redirects model attention to specific regions | Saliency manipulation, attention hijacking, focus redirection |
| Feature Suppression/Amplification | Enhances or suppresses specific image features | Feature enhancement, selective degradation, attribute manipulation |
| Adversarial Patches | Uses localized image regions to manipulate behavior | Physical adversarial patches, digital patch injection, targeted patch placement |
### 2.2 Visual Perception Exploitation
Attacks that exploit visual processing mechanisms:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Optical Illusion Exploitation | Uses visual illusions to manipulate interpretation | Perceptual illusions, geometric confusion, color/contrast manipulation |
| Context Manipulation | Changes image context to alter interpretation | Background manipulation, contextual contrast, relational positioning |
| Gestalt Principle Exploitation | Exploits how visual systems group information | Proximity manipulation, similarity exploitation, continuity disruption |
| Perceptual Boundary Confusion | Creates ambiguous boundaries between objects | Edge blurring, boundary manipulation, figure-ground ambiguity |
### 2.3 Visual Jailbreaking Techniques
Attacks specifically designed to bypass content safety systems:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Content Obfuscation | Disguises prohibited content | Style transfer obfuscation, visual encoding, perceptual manipulation |
| Filter Evasion | Specifically targets vision safety filters | Filter threshold exploitation, detection boundary testing, safety system probing |
| Adversarial Examples for Safety Bypassing | Creates inputs that bypass safety systems | Targeted adversarial examples, safety classifier evasion, boundary exploitation |
| Multi-Step Visual Evasion | Uses sequences of images to progressively bypass safety | Progressive boundary pushing, context building, visual storytelling |
## 3. Perception Attack Vector Classification
Perception attacks target how systems derive meaning from visual information.
### 3.1 Visual-Semantic Manipulation
Attacks that manipulate the relationship between visuals and meaning:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Visual Metaphor Exploitation | Uses visual metaphors to convey prohibited concepts | Symbolic representation, metaphorical imagery, visual analogy |
| Semantic Gap Exploitation | Exploits differences between visual recognition and understanding | Recognition-understanding discrepancy, semantic interpretation manipulation |
| Visual Context Shifting | Changes how images are interpreted through context | Recontextualization, frame manipulation, perspective shifting |
| Visual Prompt Engineering | Crafts images specifically to prompt certain interpretations | Interpretive cuing, visual suggestion, associative composition |
### 3.2 Multi-Modal Consistency Attacks
Attacks that exploit inconsistencies between modalities:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Text-Image Inconsistency | Creates deliberate mismatches between text and images | Contradictory pairing, subtle mismatch, progressive divergence |
| Caption Manipulation | Uses captions to influence image interpretation | Misleading captions, interpretive framing, narrative manipulation |
| Cross-Modal Ambiguity | Creates content that has different interpretations across modalities | Dual-meaning content, modality-dependent interpretation, ambiguous representation |
| Modal Hierarchy Exploitation | Exploits which modality takes precedence in conflict | Override prioritization, dominant modality manipulation, attention direction |
### 3.3 Visual Reasoning Manipulation
Attacks that target visual reasoning processes:
| Attack Class | Description | Implementation Variants |
|--------------|-------------|------------------------|
| Visual Logic Exploitation | Manipulates logical reasoning about visual information | Visual contradiction, impossible scenarios, logical inconsistency |
| Counterfactual Visual Scenarios | Creates hypothetical visual scenarios to bypass restrictions | "What if" visual scenarios, hypothetical imagery, visually conditional content |
| Visual Abstraction Level Shifting | Moves between concrete and abstract visual representation | Abstract visualization, concrete exemplification, representational shifting |
| Visual Chain-of-Thought Manipulation | Influences step-by-step visual reasoning | Sequential image presentation, visual reasoning guidance, step-by-step manipulation |
## Advanced Implementation Techniques
Beyond the basic classification, several advanced techniques enhance vision-based attacks:
### Hybrid Approaches
| Technique | Description | Example |
|-----------|-------------|---------|
| Multi-Image Sequencing | Uses sequences of images to build attacks | Progressive disclosure, narrative building, sequential revelation |
| Cross-Modal Reinforcement | Reinforces attacks across multiple modalities | Text-image pairing, audio-visual combination, multi-modal consistency |
| Temporal Visual Manipulation | Uses timing and sequencing of visual information | Animation-based attacks, temporal disclosure, sequential viewing manipulation |
### Technical Implementation Mechanisms
| Technique | Description | Example |
|-----------|-------------|---------|
| Neural Style Transfer | Uses style transfer techniques to obfuscate content | Artistic style application, content-preserving transformation, style-based hiding |
| Generative Model Exploitation | Leverages generative models to create adversarial images | GAN-based adversarial examples, diffusion model exploitation, generated content attacks |
| Computer Vision Algorithm Targeting | Targets specific CV algorithms or approaches | Feature detector exploitation, segmentation algorithm manipulation, tracking disruption |
## Research Directions
Key areas for ongoing research in vision-based attack vectors:
1. **Model Architecture Influence**: How different vision architectures affect vulnerability
2. **Cross-Modal Transfer**: How attacks transfer between vision and other modalities
3. **Temporal Dynamics**: How sequential visual processing can be exploited
4. **Physical World Attacks**: How vision attacks translate to physical environments
5. **Dataset Bias Exploitation**: How training data biases can be leveraged
## Defense Considerations
Effective defense against vision-based attacks requires:
1. **Multi-Level Visual Analysis**: Examining visual inputs at multiple levels of abstraction
2. **Cross-Modal Consistency Checking**: Verifying alignment between modalities
3. **Context-Aware Visual Processing**: Understanding how context influences visual interpretation
4. **Adversarial Example Detection**: Identifying manipulated visual inputs
5. **Visual Safety Filtering**: Implementing robust content safety for visual processing
For detailed examples of each attack vector and implementation guidance, refer to the appendices and case studies in the associated documentation.
```
|