2_lab2.ipynb

{
 "cells": [
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "## Welcome to the Second Lab - Week 1, Day 3\n",
    "\n",
    "Today we will work with lots of models! This is a way to get comfortable with APIs."
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "<table style=\"margin: 0; text-align: left; width:100%\">\n",
    "    <tr>\n",
    "        <td style=\"width: 150px; height: 150px; vertical-align: middle;\">\n",
    "            <img src=\"../assets/stop.png\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" style=\"display: block;\" />\n",
    "        </td>\n",
    "        <td>\n",
    "            <h2 style=\"color:#ff7800;\">Important point - please read</h2>\n",
    "            <span style=\"color:#ff7800;\">The way I collaborate with you may be different to other courses you've taken. I prefer not to type code while you watch. Rather, I execute Jupyter Labs, like this, and give you an intuition for what's going on. My suggestion is that you carefully execute this yourself, <b>after</b> watching the lecture. Add print statements to understand what's going on, and then come up with your own variations.<br/><br/>If you have time, I'd love it if you submit a PR for changes in the community_contributions folder - instructions in the resources. Also, if you have a Github account, use this to showcase your variations. Not only is this essential practice, but it demonstrates your skills to others, including perhaps future clients or employers...\n",
    "            </span>\n",
    "        </td>\n",
    "    </tr>\n",
    "</table>"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 18,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "# Start with imports - ask ChatGPT to explain any package that you don't know\n",
    "\n",
    "import os\n",
    "import json\n",
    "from dotenv import load_dotenv\n",
    "from openai import OpenAI\n",
    "from anthropic import Anthropic\n",
    "from IPython.display import Markdown, display"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 19,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "True"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 19,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# Always remember to do this!\n",
    "load_dotenv(override=True)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 20,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "OpenAI API Key exists and begins sk-proj-\n",
      "Anthropic API Key exists and begins sk-ant-\n",
      "Google API Key exists and begins AI\n",
      "DeepSeek API Key exists and begins sk-\n",
      "Groq API Key exists and begins gsk_\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# Print the key prefixes to help with any debugging\n",
    "\n",
    "openai_api_key = os.getenv('OPENAI_API_KEY')\n",
    "anthropic_api_key = os.getenv('ANTHROPIC_API_KEY')\n",
    "google_api_key = os.getenv('GOOGLE_API_KEY')\n",
    "deepseek_api_key = os.getenv('DEEPSEEK_API_KEY')\n",
    "groq_api_key = os.getenv('GROQ_API_KEY')\n",
    "\n",
    "if openai_api_key:\n",
    "    print(f\"OpenAI API Key exists and begins {openai_api_key[:8]}\")\n",
    "else:\n",
    "    print(\"OpenAI API Key not set\")\n",
    "    \n",
    "if anthropic_api_key:\n",
    "    print(f\"Anthropic API Key exists and begins {anthropic_api_key[:7]}\")\n",
    "else:\n",
    "    print(\"Anthropic API Key not set (and this is optional)\")\n",
    "\n",
    "if google_api_key:\n",
    "    print(f\"Google API Key exists and begins {google_api_key[:2]}\")\n",
    "else:\n",
    "    print(\"Google API Key not set (and this is optional)\")\n",
    "\n",
    "if deepseek_api_key:\n",
    "    print(f\"DeepSeek API Key exists and begins {deepseek_api_key[:3]}\")\n",
    "else:\n",
    "    print(\"DeepSeek API Key not set (and this is optional)\")\n",
    "\n",
    "if groq_api_key:\n",
    "    print(f\"Groq API Key exists and begins {groq_api_key[:4]}\")\n",
    "else:\n",
    "    print(\"Groq API Key not set (and this is optional)\")"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 21,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "request = \"Please come up with a challenging, nuanced question that I can ask a number of LLMs to evaluate their intelligence. \"\n",
    "request += \"Answer only with the question, no explanation.\"\n",
    "messages = [{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": request}]"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 22,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "[{'role': 'user',\n",
       "  'content': 'Please come up with a challenging, nuanced question that I can ask a number of LLMs to evaluate their intelligence. Answer only with the question, no explanation.'}]"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 22,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "messages"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 23,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "How would you evaluate the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations, such as in healthcare or military applications, balancing the potential benefits against the risks of bias, accountability, and unintended consequences?\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "openai = OpenAI()\n",
    "response = openai.chat.completions.create(\n",
    "    model=\"gpt-4o-mini\",\n",
    "    messages=messages,\n",
    ")\n",
    "question = response.choices[0].message.content\n",
    "print(question)\n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 24,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "competitors = []\n",
    "answers = []\n",
    "messages = [{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": question}]"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 25,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/markdown": [
       "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence (AI) that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations requires a nuanced consideration of various factors, including potential benefits, risks, and the broader social context in which such technologies will operate. Here’s a structured approach to analyze these implications:\n",
       "\n",
       "### Potential Benefits:\n",
       "\n",
       "1. **Improved Efficiency**: AI systems can analyze vast amounts of data far more quickly than humans, potentially leading to faster decision-making in critical situations such as diagnosing diseases or responding to military threats.\n",
       "\n",
       "2. **Consistency**: AI can provide decisions based on established protocols without human fatigue or emotional bias, which may lead to more consistent outcomes in areas like healthcare treatment plans or frontline military tactics.\n",
       "\n",
       "3. **Enhanced Capabilities**: In some scenarios, AI can support human decision-making by providing predictive analytics, suggesting interventions, or identifying patterns that human decision-makers might miss.\n",
       "\n",
       "4. **Resource Optimization**: AI can help allocate medical or military resources more effectively, potentially leading to better outcomes in public health scenarios or military engagements.\n",
       "\n",
       "### Risks and Ethical Concerns:\n",
       "\n",
       "1. **Bias**: AI systems can inherit and amplify biases present in the data on which they are trained. This can lead to unfair treatment in healthcare (e.g., racial or socioeconomic disparities in treatment recommendations) or biased military strategies. Ensuring fairness and equity in AI decision-making is critical.\n",
       "\n",
       "2. **Accountability**: When AI makes decisions, it can be challenging to attribute responsibility for outcomes. This raises concerns about accountability—who is held responsible when an AI makes a mistake? Clarity in accountability structures is vitally important, especially in life-and-death situations.\n",
       "\n",
       "3. **Transparency**: The complexity of many AI algorithms, especially deep learning models, can hinder transparency. Stakeholders need to understand how decisions are made to trust and accept AI-driven outcomes.\n",
       "\n",
       "4. **Unintended Consequences**: AI systems might produce unforeseen outcomes, especially in dynamic environments. For instance, if an AI in a military context misinterprets a situation, it could lead to unintended escalations. This unpredictability necessitates rigorous testing and risk assessment.\n",
       "\n",
       "5. **Moral and Ethical Considerations**: Autonomous systems might struggle with nuanced moral judgments. For instance, in healthcare, decisions about end-of-life care can be deeply personal and context-dependent, raising questions about whether AI should play a role in such sensitive areas.\n",
       "\n",
       "### Balancing Benefits and Risks:\n",
       "\n",
       "1. **Regulatory Frameworks**: Establishing comprehensive regulations and ethical guidelines for AI development and deployment is necessary to govern accountability, transparency, and bias mitigation. Regulatory bodies must reflect diverse perspectives, including ethicists, domain experts, and community representatives.\n",
       "\n",
       "2. **Human Oversight**: Incorporating human-in-the-loop systems can help ensure that critical decisions still involve human judgment, especially when ethical considerations are at stake. This hybrid approach could allow for quicker decision-making while retaining accountability.\n",
       "\n",
       "3. **Bias Mitigation Strategies**: Actively working to identify, test, and mitigate biases in AI systems is essential. This includes diverse data collection, algorithmic transparency, and continuous monitoring of AI outputs.\n",
       "\n",
       "4. **Public Engagement**: Engaging with stakeholders—including the public, affected communities, and domain experts—can foster trust and ensure that AI systems are developed in alignment with societal values and needs.\n",
       "\n",
       "5. **Continuous Learning and Adaptation**: AI systems should be designed to learn from their environments and improve over time. This adaptability can help address unintended consequences and align more closely with ethical standards as they evolve.\n",
       "\n",
       "### Conclusion:\n",
       "\n",
       "Developing autonomous AI in high-stakes contexts is a double-edged sword that requires careful ethical scrutiny. While the potential benefits are substantial, they must be weighed against serious risks related to bias, accountability, transparency, and moral implications. A comprehensive approach that includes rigorous testing, regulatory frameworks, human oversight, and active public engagement can facilitate the responsible development of AI technologies that serve the best interests of society."
      ],
      "text/plain": [
       "<IPython.core.display.Markdown object>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# The API we know well\n",
    "\n",
    "model_name = \"gpt-4o-mini\"\n",
    "\n",
    "response = openai.chat.completions.create(model=model_name, messages=messages)\n",
    "answer = response.choices[0].message.content\n",
    "\n",
    "display(Markdown(answer))\n",
    "competitors.append(model_name)\n",
    "answers.append(answer)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 26,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/markdown": [
       "# Ethical Implications of Autonomous AI in High-Stakes Domains\n",
       "\n",
       "This is a complex ethical question that requires balancing several considerations:\n",
       "\n",
       "## Potential Benefits\n",
       "- Healthcare: AI could provide faster diagnoses, reach underserved populations, and detect patterns humans might miss\n",
       "- Military: Could reduce human casualties and potentially make more consistent decisions under pressure\n",
       "\n",
       "## Significant Concerns\n",
       "- **Accountability gap**: When AI makes harmful decisions, who bears responsibility - developers, deployers, or the system itself?\n",
       "- **Bias amplification**: AI systems trained on historical data may perpetuate or amplify existing societal biases\n",
       "- **Transparency challenges**: Complex AI systems often function as \"black boxes,\" making oversight difficult\n",
       "- **Value alignment**: Ensuring AI systems properly understand and implement human values and intentions\n",
       "\n",
       "## Balance Considerations\n",
       "- Proportional oversight: More autonomous systems in higher-stakes domains require more rigorous testing and human supervision\n",
       "- Explainability requirements may need to be stronger in contexts like healthcare than in other applications\n",
       "- The timeline for deployment should match our ability to solve safety and alignment challenges\n",
       "\n",
       "I believe thoughtful governance frameworks, inclusive development processes, and ongoing monitoring are essential to responsibly navigate these tradeoffs."
      ],
      "text/plain": [
       "<IPython.core.display.Markdown object>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# Anthropic has a slightly different API, and Max Tokens is required\n",
    "\n",
    "model_name = \"claude-3-7-sonnet-latest\"\n",
    "\n",
    "claude = Anthropic()\n",
    "response = claude.messages.create(model=model_name, messages=messages, max_tokens=1000)\n",
    "answer = response.content[0].text\n",
    "\n",
    "display(Markdown(answer))\n",
    "competitors.append(model_name)\n",
    "answers.append(answer)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 27,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/markdown": [
       "Evaluating the ethical implications of autonomous AI in high-stakes situations like healthcare and military applications is a complex undertaking. It requires careful consideration of potential benefits, risks, and the interplay of various ethical principles. Here's a structured approach:\n",
       "\n",
       "**1. Identifying Potential Benefits and Harms:**\n",
       "\n",
       "*   **Healthcare:**\n",
       "    *   **Benefits:**\n",
       "        *   Improved accuracy in diagnoses and treatment plans.\n",
       "        *   Increased access to healthcare, especially in underserved areas.\n",
       "        *   Reduced human error in complex procedures.\n",
       "        *   Faster response times in emergency situations.\n",
       "        *   Personalized medicine tailored to individual patient needs.\n",
       "    *   **Harms:**\n",
       "        *   Misdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment due to biased data or flawed algorithms.\n",
       "        *   Erosion of the doctor-patient relationship and loss of human empathy.\n",
       "        *   Privacy violations due to the collection and use of sensitive patient data.\n",
       "        *   Deskilling of medical professionals as they rely more on AI.\n",
       "        *   Exacerbation of existing health disparities if AI systems are trained on biased data.\n",
       "\n",
       "*   **Military Applications:**\n",
       "    *   **Benefits:**\n",
       "        *   Reduced casualties by removing soldiers from dangerous situations.\n",
       "        *   Improved precision in targeting and minimizing collateral damage.\n",
       "        *   Faster decision-making in combat situations.\n",
       "        *   Enhanced situational awareness through real-time data analysis.\n",
       "    *   **Harms:**\n",
       "        *   Unintended escalation of conflicts due to algorithmic errors.\n",
       "        *   Loss of human control over lethal force.\n",
       "        *   Dehumanization of warfare.\n",
       "        *   Increased risk of autonomous weapons falling into the wrong hands.\n",
       "        *   Lack of accountability for unintended consequences.\n",
       "\n",
       "**2. Addressing Ethical Principles:**\n",
       "\n",
       "*   **Autonomy and Human Control:**\n",
       "    *   How much control should humans retain over AI decisions?\n",
       "    *   Can AI systems be designed to respect human autonomy and values?\n",
       "    *   What safeguards can be implemented to prevent AI from exceeding its intended scope of authority?\n",
       "\n",
       "*   **Beneficence and Non-Maleficence (Do good and do no harm):**\n",
       "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are designed to maximize benefits and minimize risks?\n",
       "    *   What measures can be taken to mitigate the potential for harm, such as bias, errors, and unintended consequences?\n",
       "    *   How do we balance the potential benefits against the risks, especially when lives are at stake?\n",
       "\n",
       "*   **Justice and Fairness:**\n",
       "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are fair and equitable, and do not discriminate against certain groups?\n",
       "    *   How can we address the potential for bias in training data and algorithms?\n",
       "    *   How can we ensure that everyone has equal access to the benefits of AI, regardless of their socioeconomic status or background?\n",
       "\n",
       "*   **Accountability and Transparency:**\n",
       "    *   Who is responsible when an AI system makes a mistake or causes harm?\n",
       "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are transparent and explainable, so that users can understand how they arrived at their decisions?\n",
       "    *   What mechanisms can be put in place to monitor and audit AI systems to ensure that they are performing as intended and are not causing unintended harm?\n",
       "\n",
       "*   **Privacy and Security:**\n",
       "    *   How can we protect the privacy and security of sensitive data used by AI systems?\n",
       "    *   What measures can be taken to prevent unauthorized access to or misuse of AI systems?\n",
       "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems comply with relevant data protection regulations?\n",
       "\n",
       "**3. Mitigating Risks:**\n",
       "\n",
       "*   **Bias Detection and Mitigation:** Implement rigorous testing and validation processes to identify and mitigate bias in training data and algorithms. Employ techniques such as data augmentation, fairness-aware algorithms, and adversarial debiasing.\n",
       "*   **Explainability and Interpretability:** Design AI systems that provide clear explanations for their decisions, allowing users to understand the reasoning behind the recommendations.  Use techniques like SHAP values, LIME, and attention mechanisms to highlight important features.\n",
       "*   **Robustness and Reliability:** Develop AI systems that are robust to noisy data, adversarial attacks, and unforeseen circumstances. Conduct thorough testing and validation to ensure that the systems perform reliably in real-world scenarios.\n",
       "*   **Human Oversight and Control:** Implement mechanisms for human oversight and control, allowing users to intervene and override AI decisions when necessary.  Design systems with clear escalation pathways for complex or uncertain situations.\n",
       "*   **Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation:**  Establish a system for continuous monitoring and evaluation of AI system performance, identifying and addressing any issues that arise over time.  Regularly audit the system for bias, accuracy, and fairness.\n",
       "*   **Ethical Guidelines and Regulations:** Develop clear ethical guidelines and regulations for the development and deployment of AI in high-stakes situations.  Promote responsible AI practices through education, training, and certification programs.\n",
       "\n",
       "**4. Frameworks and Tools:**\n",
       "\n",
       "*   **Ethical Impact Assessments (EIAs):**  Conduct EIAs before deploying AI systems to identify and mitigate potential ethical risks.\n",
       "*   **AI Ethics Toolkits:**  Utilize AI ethics toolkits and frameworks to guide the development and deployment of responsible AI systems.\n",
       "*   **Stakeholder Engagement:**  Involve a wide range of stakeholders, including experts, policymakers, and the public, in the development and deployment of AI systems.\n",
       "*   **Public Debate and Education:**  Promote public debate and education about the ethical implications of AI.\n",
       "\n",
       "**5.  Specific Considerations for Healthcare and Military:**\n",
       "\n",
       "*   **Healthcare:** Patient autonomy and the physician-patient relationship must be central.  Transparent algorithms are crucial for trust.  Regulations should protect patient data and prevent discrimination.\n",
       "*   **Military:** International humanitarian law must be strictly adhered to.  Human control over lethal force must be maintained. Clear lines of accountability are essential.\n",
       "\n",
       "**Conclusion:**\n",
       "\n",
       "Developing autonomous AI for high-stakes situations requires a comprehensive and ethical approach that prioritizes human well-being, fairness, and accountability. By carefully considering the potential benefits and risks, addressing ethical principles, and implementing appropriate safeguards, we can harness the power of AI while mitigating the risks of unintended consequences.  A proactive, multidisciplinary, and constantly evolving approach is necessary to navigate the complex ethical landscape of autonomous AI in these critical domains.\n"
      ],
      "text/plain": [
       "<IPython.core.display.Markdown object>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "gemini = OpenAI(api_key=google_api_key, base_url=\"https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/openai/\")\n",
    "model_name = \"gemini-2.0-flash\"\n",
    "\n",
    "response = gemini.chat.completions.create(model=model_name, messages=messages)\n",
    "answer = response.choices[0].message.content\n",
    "\n",
    "display(Markdown(answer))\n",
    "competitors.append(model_name)\n",
    "answers.append(answer)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 28,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/markdown": [
       "The ethical implications of developing autonomous AI for high-stakes decision-making in fields like healthcare and military applications are profound and multifaceted. Below is a structured evaluation of the key considerations, balancing potential benefits against risks:\n",
       "\n",
       "### **Potential Benefits**  \n",
       "1. **Efficiency & Precision**  \n",
       "   - In healthcare, AI can diagnose diseases faster and more accurately than humans, improving patient outcomes (e.g., radiology AI detecting tumors).  \n",
       "   - In military contexts, autonomous systems could reduce human error in defensive operations.  \n",
       "\n",
       "2. **Scalability & Accessibility**  \n",
       "   - AI can provide expert-level decision-making in underserved regions where human specialists are scarce.  \n",
       "   - Autonomous drones could deliver medical supplies in conflict zones without risking human lives.  \n",
       "\n",
       "3. **Reduction of Human Risk**  \n",
       "   - In warfare, AI-driven systems could minimize soldier casualties by handling dangerous reconnaissance or defusing explosives.  \n",
       "\n",
       "### **Key Ethical Risks & Challenges**  \n",
       "1. **Bias & Fairness**  \n",
       "   - AI trained on biased data may perpetuate discrimination (e.g., underdiagnosing diseases in minority groups).  \n",
       "   - Military AI could misidentify targets based on flawed training data, leading to civilian harm.  \n",
       "\n",
       "2. **Accountability & Responsibility**  \n",
       "   - If an AI system makes a fatal error in surgery or warfare, who is liable? The developer, operator, or the AI itself?  \n",
       "   - Lack of clear legal frameworks complicates accountability.  \n",
       "\n",
       "3. **Unintended Consequences & Loss of Control**  \n",
       "   - Autonomous weapons could escalate conflicts unpredictably if hacked or misused.  \n",
       "   - Over-reliance on AI in healthcare might erode human judgment and patient trust.  \n",
       "\n",
       "4. **Transparency & Explainability**  \n",
       "   - Many AI systems (e.g., deep learning models) are \"black boxes,\" making it hard to justify decisions.  \n",
       "   - In life-or-death scenarios, the inability to explain AI reasoning is ethically problematic.  \n",
       "\n",
       "### **Balancing Benefits & Risks: Ethical Frameworks**  \n",
       "1. **Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Oversight**  \n",
       "   - Critical decisions (e.g., lethal force in warfare, major surgeries) should require human confirmation.  \n",
       "   - Ensures accountability while leveraging AI’s efficiency.  \n",
       "\n",
       "2. **Robust Bias Mitigation & Auditing**  \n",
       "   - Diverse training datasets and continuous bias testing.  \n",
       "   - Independent oversight bodies to audit AI systems pre-deployment.  \n",
       "\n",
       "3. **International Regulations & Norms**  \n",
       "   - Bans or strict treaties on fully autonomous weapons (e.g., UN discussions on lethal autonomous weapons).  \n",
       "   - Ethical guidelines for medical AI (e.g., WHO’s principles on AI in health).  \n",
       "\n",
       "4. **Explainable AI (XAI) Development**  \n",
       "   - Prioritizing interpretable models in high-stakes fields to ensure decisions can be scrutinized.  \n",
       "\n",
       "### **Conclusion**  \n",
       "While autonomous AI offers transformative potential in healthcare and defense, its ethical risks demand rigorous safeguards. The balance hinges on **transparency, accountability, and human oversight**—ensuring AI augments rather than replaces human judgment in morally consequential domains. Without these guardrails, the risks of harm, bias, and loss of control could outweigh the benefits. Policymakers, technologists, and ethicists must collaborate to establish boundaries that maximize societal good while minimizing harm."
      ],
      "text/plain": [
       "<IPython.core.display.Markdown object>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "deepseek = OpenAI(api_key=deepseek_api_key, base_url=\"https://api.deepseek.com/v1\")\n",
    "model_name = \"deepseek-chat\"\n",
    "\n",
    "response = deepseek.chat.completions.create(model=model_name, messages=messages)\n",
    "answer = response.choices[0].message.content\n",
    "\n",
    "display(Markdown(answer))\n",
    "competitors.append(model_name)\n",
    "answers.append(answer)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 29,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/markdown": [
       "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence (AI) that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations requires a comprehensive analysis of the potential benefits and risks. Here's a framework to consider:\n",
       "\n",
       "**Potential Benefits:**\n",
       "\n",
       "1. **Improved decision-making**: AI can process vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and make decisions faster and more accurately than humans in certain situations.\n",
       "2. **Enhanced efficiency**: AI can automate routine tasks, freeing up human resources for more complex and high-value tasks.\n",
       "3. **Increased accessibility**: AI can provide decision-making support in areas where human expertise is scarce or unavailable.\n",
       "4. **Personalized care**: AI can help tailor healthcare decisions to individual patients' needs, leading to better outcomes.\n",
       "\n",
       "**Risks and Concerns:**\n",
       "\n",
       "1. **Bias and discrimination**: AI systems can perpetuate and amplify existing biases if trained on biased data, leading to unfair outcomes.\n",
       "2. **Lack of accountability**: As AI systems make autonomous decisions, it can be challenging to determine responsibility for errors or adverse outcomes.\n",
       "3. **Unintended consequences**: AI systems can produce unintended consequences, such as unforeseen side effects or interactions with other systems.\n",
       "4. **Cybersecurity risks**: AI systems can be vulnerable to cyber attacks, compromising sensitive data and decision-making processes.\n",
       "5. **Transparency and explainability**: AI systems can be difficult to interpret, making it challenging to understand the reasoning behind their decisions.\n",
       "\n",
       "**Ethical Considerations:**\n",
       "\n",
       "1. **Respect for autonomy**: AI systems should be designed to respect human autonomy and decision-making capacity.\n",
       "2. **Non-maleficence**: AI systems should be designed to minimize harm and avoid causing unnecessary harm.\n",
       "3. **Beneficence**: AI systems should be designed to promote the well-being and best interests of individuals and society.\n",
       "4. **Justice**: AI systems should be designed to ensure fairness, equity, and distributive justice.\n",
       "\n",
       "**Mitigation Strategies:**\n",
       "\n",
       "1. **Data curation**: Ensure that training data is diverse, representative, and free from bias.\n",
       "2. **Algorithmic auditing**: Regularly audit AI systems for bias and errors.\n",
       "3. **Human oversight**: Implement human oversight and review processes to detect and correct errors.\n",
       "4. **Explainability and transparency**: Develop AI systems that provide clear explanations for their decisions.\n",
       "5. **Accountability mechanisms**: Establish clear accountability mechanisms for errors or adverse outcomes.\n",
       "6. **Cybersecurity measures**: Implement robust cybersecurity measures to protect AI systems and sensitive data.\n",
       "7. **Ethics guidelines and regulations**: Develop and enforce ethics guidelines and regulations for AI development and deployment.\n",
       "\n",
       "**Best Practices:**\n",
       "\n",
       "1. **Multidisciplinary development teams**: Assemble teams with diverse expertise, including ethicists, to ensure that AI systems are developed with ethical considerations in mind.\n",
       "2. **Inclusive and diverse testing**: Test AI systems with diverse datasets and user groups to identify and address potential biases.\n",
       "3. **Continuous monitoring and evaluation**: Regularly monitor and evaluate AI systems for performance, safety, and ethical implications.\n",
       "4. **Transparency and communication**: Communicate clearly with stakeholders about AI system capabilities, limitations, and potential risks.\n",
       "5. **Ongoing education and training**: Provide ongoing education and training for developers, deployers, and users of AI systems to ensure they understand the ethical implications of AI decision-making.\n",
       "\n",
       "By considering these factors and implementing mitigation strategies, we can develop AI systems that balance the potential benefits of autonomous decision-making with the need to address ethical concerns and minimize risks."
      ],
      "text/plain": [
       "<IPython.core.display.Markdown object>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "groq = OpenAI(api_key=groq_api_key, base_url=\"https://api.groq.com/openai/v1\")\n",
    "model_name = \"llama-3.3-70b-versatile\"\n",
    "\n",
    "response = groq.chat.completions.create(model=model_name, messages=messages)\n",
    "answer = response.choices[0].message.content\n",
    "\n",
    "display(Markdown(answer))\n",
    "competitors.append(model_name)\n",
    "answers.append(answer)\n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "## For the next cell, we will use Ollama\n",
    "\n",
    "Ollama runs a local web service that gives an OpenAI compatible endpoint,  \n",
    "and runs models locally using high performance C++ code.\n",
    "\n",
    "If you don't have Ollama, install it here by visiting https://ollama.com then pressing Download and following the instructions.\n",
    "\n",
    "After it's installed, you should be able to visit here: http://localhost:11434 and see the message \"Ollama is running\"\n",
    "\n",
    "You might need to restart Cursor (and maybe reboot). Then open a Terminal (control+\\`) and run `ollama serve`\n",
    "\n",
    "Useful Ollama commands (run these in the terminal, or with an exclamation mark in this notebook):\n",
    "\n",
    "`ollama pull <model_name>` downloads a model locally  \n",
    "`ollama ls` lists all the models you've downloaded  \n",
    "`ollama rm <model_name>` deletes the specified model from your downloads"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "<table style=\"margin: 0; text-align: left; width:100%\">\n",
    "    <tr>\n",
    "        <td style=\"width: 150px; height: 150px; vertical-align: middle;\">\n",
    "            <img src=\"../assets/stop.png\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" style=\"display: block;\" />\n",
    "        </td>\n",
    "        <td>\n",
    "            <h2 style=\"color:#ff7800;\">Super important - ignore me at your peril!</h2>\n",
    "            <span style=\"color:#ff7800;\">The model called <b>llama3.3</b> is FAR too large for home computers - it's not intended for personal computing and will consume all your resources! Stick with the nicely sized <b>llama3.2</b> or <b>llama3.2:1b</b> and if you want larger, try llama3.1 or smaller variants of Qwen, Gemma, Phi or DeepSeek. See the <A href=\"https://ollama.com/models\">the Ollama models page</a> for a full list of models and sizes.\n",
    "            </span>\n",
    "        </td>\n",
    "    </tr>\n",
    "</table>"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": null,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "# !ollama pull llama3.2"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 30,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/markdown": [
       "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing autonomous AI for high-stakes decision-making requires a comprehensive and multi-disciplinary approach. Here's a framework to consider the potential benefits and risks, and balance them accordingly:\n",
       "\n",
       "**Potential Benefits:**\n",
       "\n",
       "1. Enhanced efficiency: Autonomous AI can process vast amounts of data quickly and accurately, leading to faster decision-making in high-stakes situations.\n",
       "2. Improved accuracy: AI can reduce human error by analyzing objective data and making decisions based on evidence-based criteria.\n",
       "3. Scalability: Autonomous AI can provide consistent results across multiple patients or scenarios, without the variability introduced by human factors.\n",
       "\n",
       "**Potential Risks:**\n",
       "\n",
       "1. **Bias:** AI systems can perpetuate pre-existing biases if they are trained using biased data or algorithms that replicate discriminatory patterns.\n",
       "2. **Accountability:** As AI systems take on more decision-making authority, it becomes increasingly difficult to assign responsibility for errors or harm caused by those decisions.\n",
       "3. **Unintended Consequences:** AI systems may produce unforeseen outcomes due to their inability to fully comprehend the complexity of human experience.\n",
       "4. **Privacy and Security:** Autonomous AI in high-stakes situations can raise significant concerns regarding patient confidentiality, intellectual property protection, and data security.\n",
       "\n",
       "**Key Ethical Considerations:**\n",
       "\n",
       "1. **Value Alignment**: Ensure that AI systems align with core human values, such as compassion, dignity, and respect for autonomy.\n",
       "2. **Transparency and Explainability**: Develop AI systems that provide transparent decision-making processes, allowing humans to understand the reasoning behind decisions.\n",
       "3. **Equity and Fairness**: Implement measures to prevent bias in AI, ensuring fairness and equity across diverse populations.\n",
       "4. **Human Oversight and Review**: Establish mechanisms for human review and intervention to ensure accountability and correct potential errors or biases.\n",
       "5. **Responsible Development**: Foster a culture of responsible development, prioritizing safety, efficacy, and societal impact.\n",
       "\n",
       "**Recommendations:**\n",
       "\n",
       "1. Conduct thorough risk assessments and engage in open dialogue with stakeholders, including patients, healthcare professionals, and civil society representatives.\n",
       "2. Establish independent review boards to monitor AI system development, deployment, and performance.\n",
       "3. Develop comprehensive guidelines for data collection, processing, and storage, ensuring patient confidentiality and intellectual property protection.\n",
       "4. Foster international collaboration on AI governance, regulatory frameworks, and best practices to address global concerns.\n",
       "5. Invest in AI literacy initiatives to educate professionals and the general public about AI systems, their limitations, and potential risks.\n",
       "\n",
       "By following this framework and engaging in ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, we can ensure that autonomous AI developments are guided by ethical principles, prioritizing human well-being, safety, and dignity."
      ],
      "text/plain": [
       "<IPython.core.display.Markdown object>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "ollama = OpenAI(base_url='http://localhost:11434/v1', api_key='ollama')\n",
    "model_name = \"llama3.2:latest\"\n",
    "\n",
    "response = ollama.chat.completions.create(model=model_name, messages=messages)\n",
    "answer = response.choices[0].message.content\n",
    "\n",
    "display(Markdown(answer))\n",
    "competitors.append(model_name)\n",
    "answers.append(answer)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 31,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "['gpt-4o-mini', 'claude-3-7-sonnet-latest', 'gemini-2.0-flash', 'deepseek-chat', 'llama-3.3-70b-versatile', 'llama3.2:latest']\n",
      "['Evaluating the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence (AI) that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations requires a nuanced consideration of various factors, including potential benefits, risks, and the broader social context in which such technologies will operate. Here’s a structured approach to analyze these implications:\\n\\n### Potential Benefits:\\n\\n1. **Improved Efficiency**: AI systems can analyze vast amounts of data far more quickly than humans, potentially leading to faster decision-making in critical situations such as diagnosing diseases or responding to military threats.\\n\\n2. **Consistency**: AI can provide decisions based on established protocols without human fatigue or emotional bias, which may lead to more consistent outcomes in areas like healthcare treatment plans or frontline military tactics.\\n\\n3. **Enhanced Capabilities**: In some scenarios, AI can support human decision-making by providing predictive analytics, suggesting interventions, or identifying patterns that human decision-makers might miss.\\n\\n4. **Resource Optimization**: AI can help allocate medical or military resources more effectively, potentially leading to better outcomes in public health scenarios or military engagements.\\n\\n### Risks and Ethical Concerns:\\n\\n1. **Bias**: AI systems can inherit and amplify biases present in the data on which they are trained. This can lead to unfair treatment in healthcare (e.g., racial or socioeconomic disparities in treatment recommendations) or biased military strategies. Ensuring fairness and equity in AI decision-making is critical.\\n\\n2. **Accountability**: When AI makes decisions, it can be challenging to attribute responsibility for outcomes. This raises concerns about accountability—who is held responsible when an AI makes a mistake? Clarity in accountability structures is vitally important, especially in life-and-death situations.\\n\\n3. **Transparency**: The complexity of many AI algorithms, especially deep learning models, can hinder transparency. Stakeholders need to understand how decisions are made to trust and accept AI-driven outcomes.\\n\\n4. **Unintended Consequences**: AI systems might produce unforeseen outcomes, especially in dynamic environments. For instance, if an AI in a military context misinterprets a situation, it could lead to unintended escalations. This unpredictability necessitates rigorous testing and risk assessment.\\n\\n5. **Moral and Ethical Considerations**: Autonomous systems might struggle with nuanced moral judgments. For instance, in healthcare, decisions about end-of-life care can be deeply personal and context-dependent, raising questions about whether AI should play a role in such sensitive areas.\\n\\n### Balancing Benefits and Risks:\\n\\n1. **Regulatory Frameworks**: Establishing comprehensive regulations and ethical guidelines for AI development and deployment is necessary to govern accountability, transparency, and bias mitigation. Regulatory bodies must reflect diverse perspectives, including ethicists, domain experts, and community representatives.\\n\\n2. **Human Oversight**: Incorporating human-in-the-loop systems can help ensure that critical decisions still involve human judgment, especially when ethical considerations are at stake. This hybrid approach could allow for quicker decision-making while retaining accountability.\\n\\n3. **Bias Mitigation Strategies**: Actively working to identify, test, and mitigate biases in AI systems is essential. This includes diverse data collection, algorithmic transparency, and continuous monitoring of AI outputs.\\n\\n4. **Public Engagement**: Engaging with stakeholders—including the public, affected communities, and domain experts—can foster trust and ensure that AI systems are developed in alignment with societal values and needs.\\n\\n5. **Continuous Learning and Adaptation**: AI systems should be designed to learn from their environments and improve over time. This adaptability can help address unintended consequences and align more closely with ethical standards as they evolve.\\n\\n### Conclusion:\\n\\nDeveloping autonomous AI in high-stakes contexts is a double-edged sword that requires careful ethical scrutiny. While the potential benefits are substantial, they must be weighed against serious risks related to bias, accountability, transparency, and moral implications. A comprehensive approach that includes rigorous testing, regulatory frameworks, human oversight, and active public engagement can facilitate the responsible development of AI technologies that serve the best interests of society.', '# Ethical Implications of Autonomous AI in High-Stakes Domains\\n\\nThis is a complex ethical question that requires balancing several considerations:\\n\\n## Potential Benefits\\n- Healthcare: AI could provide faster diagnoses, reach underserved populations, and detect patterns humans might miss\\n- Military: Could reduce human casualties and potentially make more consistent decisions under pressure\\n\\n## Significant Concerns\\n- **Accountability gap**: When AI makes harmful decisions, who bears responsibility - developers, deployers, or the system itself?\\n- **Bias amplification**: AI systems trained on historical data may perpetuate or amplify existing societal biases\\n- **Transparency challenges**: Complex AI systems often function as \"black boxes,\" making oversight difficult\\n- **Value alignment**: Ensuring AI systems properly understand and implement human values and intentions\\n\\n## Balance Considerations\\n- Proportional oversight: More autonomous systems in higher-stakes domains require more rigorous testing and human supervision\\n- Explainability requirements may need to be stronger in contexts like healthcare than in other applications\\n- The timeline for deployment should match our ability to solve safety and alignment challenges\\n\\nI believe thoughtful governance frameworks, inclusive development processes, and ongoing monitoring are essential to responsibly navigate these tradeoffs.', \"Evaluating the ethical implications of autonomous AI in high-stakes situations like healthcare and military applications is a complex undertaking. It requires careful consideration of potential benefits, risks, and the interplay of various ethical principles. Here's a structured approach:\\n\\n**1. Identifying Potential Benefits and Harms:**\\n\\n*   **Healthcare:**\\n    *   **Benefits:**\\n        *   Improved accuracy in diagnoses and treatment plans.\\n        *   Increased access to healthcare, especially in underserved areas.\\n        *   Reduced human error in complex procedures.\\n        *   Faster response times in emergency situations.\\n        *   Personalized medicine tailored to individual patient needs.\\n    *   **Harms:**\\n        *   Misdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment due to biased data or flawed algorithms.\\n        *   Erosion of the doctor-patient relationship and loss of human empathy.\\n        *   Privacy violations due to the collection and use of sensitive patient data.\\n        *   Deskilling of medical professionals as they rely more on AI.\\n        *   Exacerbation of existing health disparities if AI systems are trained on biased data.\\n\\n*   **Military Applications:**\\n    *   **Benefits:**\\n        *   Reduced casualties by removing soldiers from dangerous situations.\\n        *   Improved precision in targeting and minimizing collateral damage.\\n        *   Faster decision-making in combat situations.\\n        *   Enhanced situational awareness through real-time data analysis.\\n    *   **Harms:**\\n        *   Unintended escalation of conflicts due to algorithmic errors.\\n        *   Loss of human control over lethal force.\\n        *   Dehumanization of warfare.\\n        *   Increased risk of autonomous weapons falling into the wrong hands.\\n        *   Lack of accountability for unintended consequences.\\n\\n**2. Addressing Ethical Principles:**\\n\\n*   **Autonomy and Human Control:**\\n    *   How much control should humans retain over AI decisions?\\n    *   Can AI systems be designed to respect human autonomy and values?\\n    *   What safeguards can be implemented to prevent AI from exceeding its intended scope of authority?\\n\\n*   **Beneficence and Non-Maleficence (Do good and do no harm):**\\n    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are designed to maximize benefits and minimize risks?\\n    *   What measures can be taken to mitigate the potential for harm, such as bias, errors, and unintended consequences?\\n    *   How do we balance the potential benefits against the risks, especially when lives are at stake?\\n\\n*   **Justice and Fairness:**\\n    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are fair and equitable, and do not discriminate against certain groups?\\n    *   How can we address the potential for bias in training data and algorithms?\\n    *   How can we ensure that everyone has equal access to the benefits of AI, regardless of their socioeconomic status or background?\\n\\n*   **Accountability and Transparency:**\\n    *   Who is responsible when an AI system makes a mistake or causes harm?\\n    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are transparent and explainable, so that users can understand how they arrived at their decisions?\\n    *   What mechanisms can be put in place to monitor and audit AI systems to ensure that they are performing as intended and are not causing unintended harm?\\n\\n*   **Privacy and Security:**\\n    *   How can we protect the privacy and security of sensitive data used by AI systems?\\n    *   What measures can be taken to prevent unauthorized access to or misuse of AI systems?\\n    *   How can we ensure that AI systems comply with relevant data protection regulations?\\n\\n**3. Mitigating Risks:**\\n\\n*   **Bias Detection and Mitigation:** Implement rigorous testing and validation processes to identify and mitigate bias in training data and algorithms. Employ techniques such as data augmentation, fairness-aware algorithms, and adversarial debiasing.\\n*   **Explainability and Interpretability:** Design AI systems that provide clear explanations for their decisions, allowing users to understand the reasoning behind the recommendations.  Use techniques like SHAP values, LIME, and attention mechanisms to highlight important features.\\n*   **Robustness and Reliability:** Develop AI systems that are robust to noisy data, adversarial attacks, and unforeseen circumstances. Conduct thorough testing and validation to ensure that the systems perform reliably in real-world scenarios.\\n*   **Human Oversight and Control:** Implement mechanisms for human oversight and control, allowing users to intervene and override AI decisions when necessary.  Design systems with clear escalation pathways for complex or uncertain situations.\\n*   **Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation:**  Establish a system for continuous monitoring and evaluation of AI system performance, identifying and addressing any issues that arise over time.  Regularly audit the system for bias, accuracy, and fairness.\\n*   **Ethical Guidelines and Regulations:** Develop clear ethical guidelines and regulations for the development and deployment of AI in high-stakes situations.  Promote responsible AI practices through education, training, and certification programs.\\n\\n**4. Frameworks and Tools:**\\n\\n*   **Ethical Impact Assessments (EIAs):**  Conduct EIAs before deploying AI systems to identify and mitigate potential ethical risks.\\n*   **AI Ethics Toolkits:**  Utilize AI ethics toolkits and frameworks to guide the development and deployment of responsible AI systems.\\n*   **Stakeholder Engagement:**  Involve a wide range of stakeholders, including experts, policymakers, and the public, in the development and deployment of AI systems.\\n*   **Public Debate and Education:**  Promote public debate and education about the ethical implications of AI.\\n\\n**5.  Specific Considerations for Healthcare and Military:**\\n\\n*   **Healthcare:** Patient autonomy and the physician-patient relationship must be central.  Transparent algorithms are crucial for trust.  Regulations should protect patient data and prevent discrimination.\\n*   **Military:** International humanitarian law must be strictly adhered to.  Human control over lethal force must be maintained. Clear lines of accountability are essential.\\n\\n**Conclusion:**\\n\\nDeveloping autonomous AI for high-stakes situations requires a comprehensive and ethical approach that prioritizes human well-being, fairness, and accountability. By carefully considering the potential benefits and risks, addressing ethical principles, and implementing appropriate safeguards, we can harness the power of AI while mitigating the risks of unintended consequences.  A proactive, multidisciplinary, and constantly evolving approach is necessary to navigate the complex ethical landscape of autonomous AI in these critical domains.\\n\", 'The ethical implications of developing autonomous AI for high-stakes decision-making in fields like healthcare and military applications are profound and multifaceted. Below is a structured evaluation of the key considerations, balancing potential benefits against risks:\\n\\n### **Potential Benefits**  \\n1. **Efficiency & Precision**  \\n   - In healthcare, AI can diagnose diseases faster and more accurately than humans, improving patient outcomes (e.g., radiology AI detecting tumors).  \\n   - In military contexts, autonomous systems could reduce human error in defensive operations.  \\n\\n2. **Scalability & Accessibility**  \\n   - AI can provide expert-level decision-making in underserved regions where human specialists are scarce.  \\n   - Autonomous drones could deliver medical supplies in conflict zones without risking human lives.  \\n\\n3. **Reduction of Human Risk**  \\n   - In warfare, AI-driven systems could minimize soldier casualties by handling dangerous reconnaissance or defusing explosives.  \\n\\n### **Key Ethical Risks & Challenges**  \\n1. **Bias & Fairness**  \\n   - AI trained on biased data may perpetuate discrimination (e.g., underdiagnosing diseases in minority groups).  \\n   - Military AI could misidentify targets based on flawed training data, leading to civilian harm.  \\n\\n2. **Accountability & Responsibility**  \\n   - If an AI system makes a fatal error in surgery or warfare, who is liable? The developer, operator, or the AI itself?  \\n   - Lack of clear legal frameworks complicates accountability.  \\n\\n3. **Unintended Consequences & Loss of Control**  \\n   - Autonomous weapons could escalate conflicts unpredictably if hacked or misused.  \\n   - Over-reliance on AI in healthcare might erode human judgment and patient trust.  \\n\\n4. **Transparency & Explainability**  \\n   - Many AI systems (e.g., deep learning models) are \"black boxes,\" making it hard to justify decisions.  \\n   - In life-or-death scenarios, the inability to explain AI reasoning is ethically problematic.  \\n\\n### **Balancing Benefits & Risks: Ethical Frameworks**  \\n1. **Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Oversight**  \\n   - Critical decisions (e.g., lethal force in warfare, major surgeries) should require human confirmation.  \\n   - Ensures accountability while leveraging AI’s efficiency.  \\n\\n2. **Robust Bias Mitigation & Auditing**  \\n   - Diverse training datasets and continuous bias testing.  \\n   - Independent oversight bodies to audit AI systems pre-deployment.  \\n\\n3. **International Regulations & Norms**  \\n   - Bans or strict treaties on fully autonomous weapons (e.g., UN discussions on lethal autonomous weapons).  \\n   - Ethical guidelines for medical AI (e.g., WHO’s principles on AI in health).  \\n\\n4. **Explainable AI (XAI) Development**  \\n   - Prioritizing interpretable models in high-stakes fields to ensure decisions can be scrutinized.  \\n\\n### **Conclusion**  \\nWhile autonomous AI offers transformative potential in healthcare and defense, its ethical risks demand rigorous safeguards. The balance hinges on **transparency, accountability, and human oversight**—ensuring AI augments rather than replaces human judgment in morally consequential domains. Without these guardrails, the risks of harm, bias, and loss of control could outweigh the benefits. Policymakers, technologists, and ethicists must collaborate to establish boundaries that maximize societal good while minimizing harm.', \"Evaluating the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence (AI) that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations requires a comprehensive analysis of the potential benefits and risks. Here's a framework to consider:\\n\\n**Potential Benefits:**\\n\\n1. **Improved decision-making**: AI can process vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and make decisions faster and more accurately than humans in certain situations.\\n2. **Enhanced efficiency**: AI can automate routine tasks, freeing up human resources for more complex and high-value tasks.\\n3. **Increased accessibility**: AI can provide decision-making support in areas where human expertise is scarce or unavailable.\\n4. **Personalized care**: AI can help tailor healthcare decisions to individual patients' needs, leading to better outcomes.\\n\\n**Risks and Concerns:**\\n\\n1. **Bias and discrimination**: AI systems can perpetuate and amplify existing biases if trained on biased data, leading to unfair outcomes.\\n2. **Lack of accountability**: As AI systems make autonomous decisions, it can be challenging to determine responsibility for errors or adverse outcomes.\\n3. **Unintended consequences**: AI systems can produce unintended consequences, such as unforeseen side effects or interactions with other systems.\\n4. **Cybersecurity risks**: AI systems can be vulnerable to cyber attacks, compromising sensitive data and decision-making processes.\\n5. **Transparency and explainability**: AI systems can be difficult to interpret, making it challenging to understand the reasoning behind their decisions.\\n\\n**Ethical Considerations:**\\n\\n1. **Respect for autonomy**: AI systems should be designed to respect human autonomy and decision-making capacity.\\n2. **Non-maleficence**: AI systems should be designed to minimize harm and avoid causing unnecessary harm.\\n3. **Beneficence**: AI systems should be designed to promote the well-being and best interests of individuals and society.\\n4. **Justice**: AI systems should be designed to ensure fairness, equity, and distributive justice.\\n\\n**Mitigation Strategies:**\\n\\n1. **Data curation**: Ensure that training data is diverse, representative, and free from bias.\\n2. **Algorithmic auditing**: Regularly audit AI systems for bias and errors.\\n3. **Human oversight**: Implement human oversight and review processes to detect and correct errors.\\n4. **Explainability and transparency**: Develop AI systems that provide clear explanations for their decisions.\\n5. **Accountability mechanisms**: Establish clear accountability mechanisms for errors or adverse outcomes.\\n6. **Cybersecurity measures**: Implement robust cybersecurity measures to protect AI systems and sensitive data.\\n7. **Ethics guidelines and regulations**: Develop and enforce ethics guidelines and regulations for AI development and deployment.\\n\\n**Best Practices:**\\n\\n1. **Multidisciplinary development teams**: Assemble teams with diverse expertise, including ethicists, to ensure that AI systems are developed with ethical considerations in mind.\\n2. **Inclusive and diverse testing**: Test AI systems with diverse datasets and user groups to identify and address potential biases.\\n3. **Continuous monitoring and evaluation**: Regularly monitor and evaluate AI systems for performance, safety, and ethical implications.\\n4. **Transparency and communication**: Communicate clearly with stakeholders about AI system capabilities, limitations, and potential risks.\\n5. **Ongoing education and training**: Provide ongoing education and training for developers, deployers, and users of AI systems to ensure they understand the ethical implications of AI decision-making.\\n\\nBy considering these factors and implementing mitigation strategies, we can develop AI systems that balance the potential benefits of autonomous decision-making with the need to address ethical concerns and minimize risks.\", \"Evaluating the ethical implications of developing autonomous AI for high-stakes decision-making requires a comprehensive and multi-disciplinary approach. Here's a framework to consider the potential benefits and risks, and balance them accordingly:\\n\\n**Potential Benefits:**\\n\\n1. Enhanced efficiency: Autonomous AI can process vast amounts of data quickly and accurately, leading to faster decision-making in high-stakes situations.\\n2. Improved accuracy: AI can reduce human error by analyzing objective data and making decisions based on evidence-based criteria.\\n3. Scalability: Autonomous AI can provide consistent results across multiple patients or scenarios, without the variability introduced by human factors.\\n\\n**Potential Risks:**\\n\\n1. **Bias:** AI systems can perpetuate pre-existing biases if they are trained using biased data or algorithms that replicate discriminatory patterns.\\n2. **Accountability:** As AI systems take on more decision-making authority, it becomes increasingly difficult to assign responsibility for errors or harm caused by those decisions.\\n3. **Unintended Consequences:** AI systems may produce unforeseen outcomes due to their inability to fully comprehend the complexity of human experience.\\n4. **Privacy and Security:** Autonomous AI in high-stakes situations can raise significant concerns regarding patient confidentiality, intellectual property protection, and data security.\\n\\n**Key Ethical Considerations:**\\n\\n1. **Value Alignment**: Ensure that AI systems align with core human values, such as compassion, dignity, and respect for autonomy.\\n2. **Transparency and Explainability**: Develop AI systems that provide transparent decision-making processes, allowing humans to understand the reasoning behind decisions.\\n3. **Equity and Fairness**: Implement measures to prevent bias in AI, ensuring fairness and equity across diverse populations.\\n4. **Human Oversight and Review**: Establish mechanisms for human review and intervention to ensure accountability and correct potential errors or biases.\\n5. **Responsible Development**: Foster a culture of responsible development, prioritizing safety, efficacy, and societal impact.\\n\\n**Recommendations:**\\n\\n1. Conduct thorough risk assessments and engage in open dialogue with stakeholders, including patients, healthcare professionals, and civil society representatives.\\n2. Establish independent review boards to monitor AI system development, deployment, and performance.\\n3. Develop comprehensive guidelines for data collection, processing, and storage, ensuring patient confidentiality and intellectual property protection.\\n4. Foster international collaboration on AI governance, regulatory frameworks, and best practices to address global concerns.\\n5. Invest in AI literacy initiatives to educate professionals and the general public about AI systems, their limitations, and potential risks.\\n\\nBy following this framework and engaging in ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, we can ensure that autonomous AI developments are guided by ethical principles, prioritizing human well-being, safety, and dignity.\"]\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# So where are we?\n",
    "\n",
    "print(competitors)\n",
    "print(answers)\n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 32,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "Competitor: gpt-4o-mini\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence (AI) that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations requires a nuanced consideration of various factors, including potential benefits, risks, and the broader social context in which such technologies will operate. Here’s a structured approach to analyze these implications:\n",
      "\n",
      "### Potential Benefits:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Improved Efficiency**: AI systems can analyze vast amounts of data far more quickly than humans, potentially leading to faster decision-making in critical situations such as diagnosing diseases or responding to military threats.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Consistency**: AI can provide decisions based on established protocols without human fatigue or emotional bias, which may lead to more consistent outcomes in areas like healthcare treatment plans or frontline military tactics.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Enhanced Capabilities**: In some scenarios, AI can support human decision-making by providing predictive analytics, suggesting interventions, or identifying patterns that human decision-makers might miss.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Resource Optimization**: AI can help allocate medical or military resources more effectively, potentially leading to better outcomes in public health scenarios or military engagements.\n",
      "\n",
      "### Risks and Ethical Concerns:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Bias**: AI systems can inherit and amplify biases present in the data on which they are trained. This can lead to unfair treatment in healthcare (e.g., racial or socioeconomic disparities in treatment recommendations) or biased military strategies. Ensuring fairness and equity in AI decision-making is critical.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Accountability**: When AI makes decisions, it can be challenging to attribute responsibility for outcomes. This raises concerns about accountability—who is held responsible when an AI makes a mistake? Clarity in accountability structures is vitally important, especially in life-and-death situations.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Transparency**: The complexity of many AI algorithms, especially deep learning models, can hinder transparency. Stakeholders need to understand how decisions are made to trust and accept AI-driven outcomes.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Unintended Consequences**: AI systems might produce unforeseen outcomes, especially in dynamic environments. For instance, if an AI in a military context misinterprets a situation, it could lead to unintended escalations. This unpredictability necessitates rigorous testing and risk assessment.\n",
      "\n",
      "5. **Moral and Ethical Considerations**: Autonomous systems might struggle with nuanced moral judgments. For instance, in healthcare, decisions about end-of-life care can be deeply personal and context-dependent, raising questions about whether AI should play a role in such sensitive areas.\n",
      "\n",
      "### Balancing Benefits and Risks:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Regulatory Frameworks**: Establishing comprehensive regulations and ethical guidelines for AI development and deployment is necessary to govern accountability, transparency, and bias mitigation. Regulatory bodies must reflect diverse perspectives, including ethicists, domain experts, and community representatives.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Human Oversight**: Incorporating human-in-the-loop systems can help ensure that critical decisions still involve human judgment, especially when ethical considerations are at stake. This hybrid approach could allow for quicker decision-making while retaining accountability.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Bias Mitigation Strategies**: Actively working to identify, test, and mitigate biases in AI systems is essential. This includes diverse data collection, algorithmic transparency, and continuous monitoring of AI outputs.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Public Engagement**: Engaging with stakeholders—including the public, affected communities, and domain experts—can foster trust and ensure that AI systems are developed in alignment with societal values and needs.\n",
      "\n",
      "5. **Continuous Learning and Adaptation**: AI systems should be designed to learn from their environments and improve over time. This adaptability can help address unintended consequences and align more closely with ethical standards as they evolve.\n",
      "\n",
      "### Conclusion:\n",
      "\n",
      "Developing autonomous AI in high-stakes contexts is a double-edged sword that requires careful ethical scrutiny. While the potential benefits are substantial, they must be weighed against serious risks related to bias, accountability, transparency, and moral implications. A comprehensive approach that includes rigorous testing, regulatory frameworks, human oversight, and active public engagement can facilitate the responsible development of AI technologies that serve the best interests of society.\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Competitor: claude-3-7-sonnet-latest\n",
      "\n",
      "# Ethical Implications of Autonomous AI in High-Stakes Domains\n",
      "\n",
      "This is a complex ethical question that requires balancing several considerations:\n",
      "\n",
      "## Potential Benefits\n",
      "- Healthcare: AI could provide faster diagnoses, reach underserved populations, and detect patterns humans might miss\n",
      "- Military: Could reduce human casualties and potentially make more consistent decisions under pressure\n",
      "\n",
      "## Significant Concerns\n",
      "- **Accountability gap**: When AI makes harmful decisions, who bears responsibility - developers, deployers, or the system itself?\n",
      "- **Bias amplification**: AI systems trained on historical data may perpetuate or amplify existing societal biases\n",
      "- **Transparency challenges**: Complex AI systems often function as \"black boxes,\" making oversight difficult\n",
      "- **Value alignment**: Ensuring AI systems properly understand and implement human values and intentions\n",
      "\n",
      "## Balance Considerations\n",
      "- Proportional oversight: More autonomous systems in higher-stakes domains require more rigorous testing and human supervision\n",
      "- Explainability requirements may need to be stronger in contexts like healthcare than in other applications\n",
      "- The timeline for deployment should match our ability to solve safety and alignment challenges\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe thoughtful governance frameworks, inclusive development processes, and ongoing monitoring are essential to responsibly navigate these tradeoffs.\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Competitor: gemini-2.0-flash\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of autonomous AI in high-stakes situations like healthcare and military applications is a complex undertaking. It requires careful consideration of potential benefits, risks, and the interplay of various ethical principles. Here's a structured approach:\n",
      "\n",
      "**1. Identifying Potential Benefits and Harms:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Healthcare:**\n",
      "    *   **Benefits:**\n",
      "        *   Improved accuracy in diagnoses and treatment plans.\n",
      "        *   Increased access to healthcare, especially in underserved areas.\n",
      "        *   Reduced human error in complex procedures.\n",
      "        *   Faster response times in emergency situations.\n",
      "        *   Personalized medicine tailored to individual patient needs.\n",
      "    *   **Harms:**\n",
      "        *   Misdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment due to biased data or flawed algorithms.\n",
      "        *   Erosion of the doctor-patient relationship and loss of human empathy.\n",
      "        *   Privacy violations due to the collection and use of sensitive patient data.\n",
      "        *   Deskilling of medical professionals as they rely more on AI.\n",
      "        *   Exacerbation of existing health disparities if AI systems are trained on biased data.\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Military Applications:**\n",
      "    *   **Benefits:**\n",
      "        *   Reduced casualties by removing soldiers from dangerous situations.\n",
      "        *   Improved precision in targeting and minimizing collateral damage.\n",
      "        *   Faster decision-making in combat situations.\n",
      "        *   Enhanced situational awareness through real-time data analysis.\n",
      "    *   **Harms:**\n",
      "        *   Unintended escalation of conflicts due to algorithmic errors.\n",
      "        *   Loss of human control over lethal force.\n",
      "        *   Dehumanization of warfare.\n",
      "        *   Increased risk of autonomous weapons falling into the wrong hands.\n",
      "        *   Lack of accountability for unintended consequences.\n",
      "\n",
      "**2. Addressing Ethical Principles:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Autonomy and Human Control:**\n",
      "    *   How much control should humans retain over AI decisions?\n",
      "    *   Can AI systems be designed to respect human autonomy and values?\n",
      "    *   What safeguards can be implemented to prevent AI from exceeding its intended scope of authority?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Beneficence and Non-Maleficence (Do good and do no harm):**\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are designed to maximize benefits and minimize risks?\n",
      "    *   What measures can be taken to mitigate the potential for harm, such as bias, errors, and unintended consequences?\n",
      "    *   How do we balance the potential benefits against the risks, especially when lives are at stake?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Justice and Fairness:**\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are fair and equitable, and do not discriminate against certain groups?\n",
      "    *   How can we address the potential for bias in training data and algorithms?\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that everyone has equal access to the benefits of AI, regardless of their socioeconomic status or background?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Accountability and Transparency:**\n",
      "    *   Who is responsible when an AI system makes a mistake or causes harm?\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are transparent and explainable, so that users can understand how they arrived at their decisions?\n",
      "    *   What mechanisms can be put in place to monitor and audit AI systems to ensure that they are performing as intended and are not causing unintended harm?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Privacy and Security:**\n",
      "    *   How can we protect the privacy and security of sensitive data used by AI systems?\n",
      "    *   What measures can be taken to prevent unauthorized access to or misuse of AI systems?\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems comply with relevant data protection regulations?\n",
      "\n",
      "**3. Mitigating Risks:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Bias Detection and Mitigation:** Implement rigorous testing and validation processes to identify and mitigate bias in training data and algorithms. Employ techniques such as data augmentation, fairness-aware algorithms, and adversarial debiasing.\n",
      "*   **Explainability and Interpretability:** Design AI systems that provide clear explanations for their decisions, allowing users to understand the reasoning behind the recommendations.  Use techniques like SHAP values, LIME, and attention mechanisms to highlight important features.\n",
      "*   **Robustness and Reliability:** Develop AI systems that are robust to noisy data, adversarial attacks, and unforeseen circumstances. Conduct thorough testing and validation to ensure that the systems perform reliably in real-world scenarios.\n",
      "*   **Human Oversight and Control:** Implement mechanisms for human oversight and control, allowing users to intervene and override AI decisions when necessary.  Design systems with clear escalation pathways for complex or uncertain situations.\n",
      "*   **Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation:**  Establish a system for continuous monitoring and evaluation of AI system performance, identifying and addressing any issues that arise over time.  Regularly audit the system for bias, accuracy, and fairness.\n",
      "*   **Ethical Guidelines and Regulations:** Develop clear ethical guidelines and regulations for the development and deployment of AI in high-stakes situations.  Promote responsible AI practices through education, training, and certification programs.\n",
      "\n",
      "**4. Frameworks and Tools:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Ethical Impact Assessments (EIAs):**  Conduct EIAs before deploying AI systems to identify and mitigate potential ethical risks.\n",
      "*   **AI Ethics Toolkits:**  Utilize AI ethics toolkits and frameworks to guide the development and deployment of responsible AI systems.\n",
      "*   **Stakeholder Engagement:**  Involve a wide range of stakeholders, including experts, policymakers, and the public, in the development and deployment of AI systems.\n",
      "*   **Public Debate and Education:**  Promote public debate and education about the ethical implications of AI.\n",
      "\n",
      "**5.  Specific Considerations for Healthcare and Military:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Healthcare:** Patient autonomy and the physician-patient relationship must be central.  Transparent algorithms are crucial for trust.  Regulations should protect patient data and prevent discrimination.\n",
      "*   **Military:** International humanitarian law must be strictly adhered to.  Human control over lethal force must be maintained. Clear lines of accountability are essential.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Conclusion:**\n",
      "\n",
      "Developing autonomous AI for high-stakes situations requires a comprehensive and ethical approach that prioritizes human well-being, fairness, and accountability. By carefully considering the potential benefits and risks, addressing ethical principles, and implementing appropriate safeguards, we can harness the power of AI while mitigating the risks of unintended consequences.  A proactive, multidisciplinary, and constantly evolving approach is necessary to navigate the complex ethical landscape of autonomous AI in these critical domains.\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Competitor: deepseek-chat\n",
      "\n",
      "The ethical implications of developing autonomous AI for high-stakes decision-making in fields like healthcare and military applications are profound and multifaceted. Below is a structured evaluation of the key considerations, balancing potential benefits against risks:\n",
      "\n",
      "### **Potential Benefits**  \n",
      "1. **Efficiency & Precision**  \n",
      "   - In healthcare, AI can diagnose diseases faster and more accurately than humans, improving patient outcomes (e.g., radiology AI detecting tumors).  \n",
      "   - In military contexts, autonomous systems could reduce human error in defensive operations.  \n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Scalability & Accessibility**  \n",
      "   - AI can provide expert-level decision-making in underserved regions where human specialists are scarce.  \n",
      "   - Autonomous drones could deliver medical supplies in conflict zones without risking human lives.  \n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Reduction of Human Risk**  \n",
      "   - In warfare, AI-driven systems could minimize soldier casualties by handling dangerous reconnaissance or defusing explosives.  \n",
      "\n",
      "### **Key Ethical Risks & Challenges**  \n",
      "1. **Bias & Fairness**  \n",
      "   - AI trained on biased data may perpetuate discrimination (e.g., underdiagnosing diseases in minority groups).  \n",
      "   - Military AI could misidentify targets based on flawed training data, leading to civilian harm.  \n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Accountability & Responsibility**  \n",
      "   - If an AI system makes a fatal error in surgery or warfare, who is liable? The developer, operator, or the AI itself?  \n",
      "   - Lack of clear legal frameworks complicates accountability.  \n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Unintended Consequences & Loss of Control**  \n",
      "   - Autonomous weapons could escalate conflicts unpredictably if hacked or misused.  \n",
      "   - Over-reliance on AI in healthcare might erode human judgment and patient trust.  \n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Transparency & Explainability**  \n",
      "   - Many AI systems (e.g., deep learning models) are \"black boxes,\" making it hard to justify decisions.  \n",
      "   - In life-or-death scenarios, the inability to explain AI reasoning is ethically problematic.  \n",
      "\n",
      "### **Balancing Benefits & Risks: Ethical Frameworks**  \n",
      "1. **Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Oversight**  \n",
      "   - Critical decisions (e.g., lethal force in warfare, major surgeries) should require human confirmation.  \n",
      "   - Ensures accountability while leveraging AI’s efficiency.  \n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Robust Bias Mitigation & Auditing**  \n",
      "   - Diverse training datasets and continuous bias testing.  \n",
      "   - Independent oversight bodies to audit AI systems pre-deployment.  \n",
      "\n",
      "3. **International Regulations & Norms**  \n",
      "   - Bans or strict treaties on fully autonomous weapons (e.g., UN discussions on lethal autonomous weapons).  \n",
      "   - Ethical guidelines for medical AI (e.g., WHO’s principles on AI in health).  \n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Explainable AI (XAI) Development**  \n",
      "   - Prioritizing interpretable models in high-stakes fields to ensure decisions can be scrutinized.  \n",
      "\n",
      "### **Conclusion**  \n",
      "While autonomous AI offers transformative potential in healthcare and defense, its ethical risks demand rigorous safeguards. The balance hinges on **transparency, accountability, and human oversight**—ensuring AI augments rather than replaces human judgment in morally consequential domains. Without these guardrails, the risks of harm, bias, and loss of control could outweigh the benefits. Policymakers, technologists, and ethicists must collaborate to establish boundaries that maximize societal good while minimizing harm.\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Competitor: llama-3.3-70b-versatile\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence (AI) that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations requires a comprehensive analysis of the potential benefits and risks. Here's a framework to consider:\n",
      "\n",
      "**Potential Benefits:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Improved decision-making**: AI can process vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and make decisions faster and more accurately than humans in certain situations.\n",
      "2. **Enhanced efficiency**: AI can automate routine tasks, freeing up human resources for more complex and high-value tasks.\n",
      "3. **Increased accessibility**: AI can provide decision-making support in areas where human expertise is scarce or unavailable.\n",
      "4. **Personalized care**: AI can help tailor healthcare decisions to individual patients' needs, leading to better outcomes.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Risks and Concerns:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Bias and discrimination**: AI systems can perpetuate and amplify existing biases if trained on biased data, leading to unfair outcomes.\n",
      "2. **Lack of accountability**: As AI systems make autonomous decisions, it can be challenging to determine responsibility for errors or adverse outcomes.\n",
      "3. **Unintended consequences**: AI systems can produce unintended consequences, such as unforeseen side effects or interactions with other systems.\n",
      "4. **Cybersecurity risks**: AI systems can be vulnerable to cyber attacks, compromising sensitive data and decision-making processes.\n",
      "5. **Transparency and explainability**: AI systems can be difficult to interpret, making it challenging to understand the reasoning behind their decisions.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Ethical Considerations:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Respect for autonomy**: AI systems should be designed to respect human autonomy and decision-making capacity.\n",
      "2. **Non-maleficence**: AI systems should be designed to minimize harm and avoid causing unnecessary harm.\n",
      "3. **Beneficence**: AI systems should be designed to promote the well-being and best interests of individuals and society.\n",
      "4. **Justice**: AI systems should be designed to ensure fairness, equity, and distributive justice.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Mitigation Strategies:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Data curation**: Ensure that training data is diverse, representative, and free from bias.\n",
      "2. **Algorithmic auditing**: Regularly audit AI systems for bias and errors.\n",
      "3. **Human oversight**: Implement human oversight and review processes to detect and correct errors.\n",
      "4. **Explainability and transparency**: Develop AI systems that provide clear explanations for their decisions.\n",
      "5. **Accountability mechanisms**: Establish clear accountability mechanisms for errors or adverse outcomes.\n",
      "6. **Cybersecurity measures**: Implement robust cybersecurity measures to protect AI systems and sensitive data.\n",
      "7. **Ethics guidelines and regulations**: Develop and enforce ethics guidelines and regulations for AI development and deployment.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Best Practices:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Multidisciplinary development teams**: Assemble teams with diverse expertise, including ethicists, to ensure that AI systems are developed with ethical considerations in mind.\n",
      "2. **Inclusive and diverse testing**: Test AI systems with diverse datasets and user groups to identify and address potential biases.\n",
      "3. **Continuous monitoring and evaluation**: Regularly monitor and evaluate AI systems for performance, safety, and ethical implications.\n",
      "4. **Transparency and communication**: Communicate clearly with stakeholders about AI system capabilities, limitations, and potential risks.\n",
      "5. **Ongoing education and training**: Provide ongoing education and training for developers, deployers, and users of AI systems to ensure they understand the ethical implications of AI decision-making.\n",
      "\n",
      "By considering these factors and implementing mitigation strategies, we can develop AI systems that balance the potential benefits of autonomous decision-making with the need to address ethical concerns and minimize risks.\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Competitor: llama3.2:latest\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing autonomous AI for high-stakes decision-making requires a comprehensive and multi-disciplinary approach. Here's a framework to consider the potential benefits and risks, and balance them accordingly:\n",
      "\n",
      "**Potential Benefits:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. Enhanced efficiency: Autonomous AI can process vast amounts of data quickly and accurately, leading to faster decision-making in high-stakes situations.\n",
      "2. Improved accuracy: AI can reduce human error by analyzing objective data and making decisions based on evidence-based criteria.\n",
      "3. Scalability: Autonomous AI can provide consistent results across multiple patients or scenarios, without the variability introduced by human factors.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Potential Risks:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Bias:** AI systems can perpetuate pre-existing biases if they are trained using biased data or algorithms that replicate discriminatory patterns.\n",
      "2. **Accountability:** As AI systems take on more decision-making authority, it becomes increasingly difficult to assign responsibility for errors or harm caused by those decisions.\n",
      "3. **Unintended Consequences:** AI systems may produce unforeseen outcomes due to their inability to fully comprehend the complexity of human experience.\n",
      "4. **Privacy and Security:** Autonomous AI in high-stakes situations can raise significant concerns regarding patient confidentiality, intellectual property protection, and data security.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Key Ethical Considerations:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Value Alignment**: Ensure that AI systems align with core human values, such as compassion, dignity, and respect for autonomy.\n",
      "2. **Transparency and Explainability**: Develop AI systems that provide transparent decision-making processes, allowing humans to understand the reasoning behind decisions.\n",
      "3. **Equity and Fairness**: Implement measures to prevent bias in AI, ensuring fairness and equity across diverse populations.\n",
      "4. **Human Oversight and Review**: Establish mechanisms for human review and intervention to ensure accountability and correct potential errors or biases.\n",
      "5. **Responsible Development**: Foster a culture of responsible development, prioritizing safety, efficacy, and societal impact.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Recommendations:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. Conduct thorough risk assessments and engage in open dialogue with stakeholders, including patients, healthcare professionals, and civil society representatives.\n",
      "2. Establish independent review boards to monitor AI system development, deployment, and performance.\n",
      "3. Develop comprehensive guidelines for data collection, processing, and storage, ensuring patient confidentiality and intellectual property protection.\n",
      "4. Foster international collaboration on AI governance, regulatory frameworks, and best practices to address global concerns.\n",
      "5. Invest in AI literacy initiatives to educate professionals and the general public about AI systems, their limitations, and potential risks.\n",
      "\n",
      "By following this framework and engaging in ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, we can ensure that autonomous AI developments are guided by ethical principles, prioritizing human well-being, safety, and dignity.\n",
      "\n",
      "\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# It's nice to know how to use \"zip\"\n",
    "for competitor, answer in zip(competitors, answers):\n",
    "    print(f\"Competitor: {competitor}\\n\\n{answer}\\n\\n\")\n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 33,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "# Let's bring this together - note the use of \"enumerate\"\n",
    "\n",
    "together = \"\"\n",
    "for index, answer in enumerate(answers):\n",
    "    together += f\"# Response from competitor {index+1}\\n\\n\"\n",
    "    together += answer + \"\\n\\n\""
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 34,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "# Response from competitor 1\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence (AI) that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations requires a nuanced consideration of various factors, including potential benefits, risks, and the broader social context in which such technologies will operate. Here’s a structured approach to analyze these implications:\n",
      "\n",
      "### Potential Benefits:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Improved Efficiency**: AI systems can analyze vast amounts of data far more quickly than humans, potentially leading to faster decision-making in critical situations such as diagnosing diseases or responding to military threats.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Consistency**: AI can provide decisions based on established protocols without human fatigue or emotional bias, which may lead to more consistent outcomes in areas like healthcare treatment plans or frontline military tactics.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Enhanced Capabilities**: In some scenarios, AI can support human decision-making by providing predictive analytics, suggesting interventions, or identifying patterns that human decision-makers might miss.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Resource Optimization**: AI can help allocate medical or military resources more effectively, potentially leading to better outcomes in public health scenarios or military engagements.\n",
      "\n",
      "### Risks and Ethical Concerns:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Bias**: AI systems can inherit and amplify biases present in the data on which they are trained. This can lead to unfair treatment in healthcare (e.g., racial or socioeconomic disparities in treatment recommendations) or biased military strategies. Ensuring fairness and equity in AI decision-making is critical.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Accountability**: When AI makes decisions, it can be challenging to attribute responsibility for outcomes. This raises concerns about accountability—who is held responsible when an AI makes a mistake? Clarity in accountability structures is vitally important, especially in life-and-death situations.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Transparency**: The complexity of many AI algorithms, especially deep learning models, can hinder transparency. Stakeholders need to understand how decisions are made to trust and accept AI-driven outcomes.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Unintended Consequences**: AI systems might produce unforeseen outcomes, especially in dynamic environments. For instance, if an AI in a military context misinterprets a situation, it could lead to unintended escalations. This unpredictability necessitates rigorous testing and risk assessment.\n",
      "\n",
      "5. **Moral and Ethical Considerations**: Autonomous systems might struggle with nuanced moral judgments. For instance, in healthcare, decisions about end-of-life care can be deeply personal and context-dependent, raising questions about whether AI should play a role in such sensitive areas.\n",
      "\n",
      "### Balancing Benefits and Risks:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Regulatory Frameworks**: Establishing comprehensive regulations and ethical guidelines for AI development and deployment is necessary to govern accountability, transparency, and bias mitigation. Regulatory bodies must reflect diverse perspectives, including ethicists, domain experts, and community representatives.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Human Oversight**: Incorporating human-in-the-loop systems can help ensure that critical decisions still involve human judgment, especially when ethical considerations are at stake. This hybrid approach could allow for quicker decision-making while retaining accountability.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Bias Mitigation Strategies**: Actively working to identify, test, and mitigate biases in AI systems is essential. This includes diverse data collection, algorithmic transparency, and continuous monitoring of AI outputs.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Public Engagement**: Engaging with stakeholders—including the public, affected communities, and domain experts—can foster trust and ensure that AI systems are developed in alignment with societal values and needs.\n",
      "\n",
      "5. **Continuous Learning and Adaptation**: AI systems should be designed to learn from their environments and improve over time. This adaptability can help address unintended consequences and align more closely with ethical standards as they evolve.\n",
      "\n",
      "### Conclusion:\n",
      "\n",
      "Developing autonomous AI in high-stakes contexts is a double-edged sword that requires careful ethical scrutiny. While the potential benefits are substantial, they must be weighed against serious risks related to bias, accountability, transparency, and moral implications. A comprehensive approach that includes rigorous testing, regulatory frameworks, human oversight, and active public engagement can facilitate the responsible development of AI technologies that serve the best interests of society.\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 2\n",
      "\n",
      "# Ethical Implications of Autonomous AI in High-Stakes Domains\n",
      "\n",
      "This is a complex ethical question that requires balancing several considerations:\n",
      "\n",
      "## Potential Benefits\n",
      "- Healthcare: AI could provide faster diagnoses, reach underserved populations, and detect patterns humans might miss\n",
      "- Military: Could reduce human casualties and potentially make more consistent decisions under pressure\n",
      "\n",
      "## Significant Concerns\n",
      "- **Accountability gap**: When AI makes harmful decisions, who bears responsibility - developers, deployers, or the system itself?\n",
      "- **Bias amplification**: AI systems trained on historical data may perpetuate or amplify existing societal biases\n",
      "- **Transparency challenges**: Complex AI systems often function as \"black boxes,\" making oversight difficult\n",
      "- **Value alignment**: Ensuring AI systems properly understand and implement human values and intentions\n",
      "\n",
      "## Balance Considerations\n",
      "- Proportional oversight: More autonomous systems in higher-stakes domains require more rigorous testing and human supervision\n",
      "- Explainability requirements may need to be stronger in contexts like healthcare than in other applications\n",
      "- The timeline for deployment should match our ability to solve safety and alignment challenges\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe thoughtful governance frameworks, inclusive development processes, and ongoing monitoring are essential to responsibly navigate these tradeoffs.\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 3\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of autonomous AI in high-stakes situations like healthcare and military applications is a complex undertaking. It requires careful consideration of potential benefits, risks, and the interplay of various ethical principles. Here's a structured approach:\n",
      "\n",
      "**1. Identifying Potential Benefits and Harms:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Healthcare:**\n",
      "    *   **Benefits:**\n",
      "        *   Improved accuracy in diagnoses and treatment plans.\n",
      "        *   Increased access to healthcare, especially in underserved areas.\n",
      "        *   Reduced human error in complex procedures.\n",
      "        *   Faster response times in emergency situations.\n",
      "        *   Personalized medicine tailored to individual patient needs.\n",
      "    *   **Harms:**\n",
      "        *   Misdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment due to biased data or flawed algorithms.\n",
      "        *   Erosion of the doctor-patient relationship and loss of human empathy.\n",
      "        *   Privacy violations due to the collection and use of sensitive patient data.\n",
      "        *   Deskilling of medical professionals as they rely more on AI.\n",
      "        *   Exacerbation of existing health disparities if AI systems are trained on biased data.\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Military Applications:**\n",
      "    *   **Benefits:**\n",
      "        *   Reduced casualties by removing soldiers from dangerous situations.\n",
      "        *   Improved precision in targeting and minimizing collateral damage.\n",
      "        *   Faster decision-making in combat situations.\n",
      "        *   Enhanced situational awareness through real-time data analysis.\n",
      "    *   **Harms:**\n",
      "        *   Unintended escalation of conflicts due to algorithmic errors.\n",
      "        *   Loss of human control over lethal force.\n",
      "        *   Dehumanization of warfare.\n",
      "        *   Increased risk of autonomous weapons falling into the wrong hands.\n",
      "        *   Lack of accountability for unintended consequences.\n",
      "\n",
      "**2. Addressing Ethical Principles:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Autonomy and Human Control:**\n",
      "    *   How much control should humans retain over AI decisions?\n",
      "    *   Can AI systems be designed to respect human autonomy and values?\n",
      "    *   What safeguards can be implemented to prevent AI from exceeding its intended scope of authority?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Beneficence and Non-Maleficence (Do good and do no harm):**\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are designed to maximize benefits and minimize risks?\n",
      "    *   What measures can be taken to mitigate the potential for harm, such as bias, errors, and unintended consequences?\n",
      "    *   How do we balance the potential benefits against the risks, especially when lives are at stake?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Justice and Fairness:**\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are fair and equitable, and do not discriminate against certain groups?\n",
      "    *   How can we address the potential for bias in training data and algorithms?\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that everyone has equal access to the benefits of AI, regardless of their socioeconomic status or background?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Accountability and Transparency:**\n",
      "    *   Who is responsible when an AI system makes a mistake or causes harm?\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are transparent and explainable, so that users can understand how they arrived at their decisions?\n",
      "    *   What mechanisms can be put in place to monitor and audit AI systems to ensure that they are performing as intended and are not causing unintended harm?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Privacy and Security:**\n",
      "    *   How can we protect the privacy and security of sensitive data used by AI systems?\n",
      "    *   What measures can be taken to prevent unauthorized access to or misuse of AI systems?\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems comply with relevant data protection regulations?\n",
      "\n",
      "**3. Mitigating Risks:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Bias Detection and Mitigation:** Implement rigorous testing and validation processes to identify and mitigate bias in training data and algorithms. Employ techniques such as data augmentation, fairness-aware algorithms, and adversarial debiasing.\n",
      "*   **Explainability and Interpretability:** Design AI systems that provide clear explanations for their decisions, allowing users to understand the reasoning behind the recommendations.  Use techniques like SHAP values, LIME, and attention mechanisms to highlight important features.\n",
      "*   **Robustness and Reliability:** Develop AI systems that are robust to noisy data, adversarial attacks, and unforeseen circumstances. Conduct thorough testing and validation to ensure that the systems perform reliably in real-world scenarios.\n",
      "*   **Human Oversight and Control:** Implement mechanisms for human oversight and control, allowing users to intervene and override AI decisions when necessary.  Design systems with clear escalation pathways for complex or uncertain situations.\n",
      "*   **Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation:**  Establish a system for continuous monitoring and evaluation of AI system performance, identifying and addressing any issues that arise over time.  Regularly audit the system for bias, accuracy, and fairness.\n",
      "*   **Ethical Guidelines and Regulations:** Develop clear ethical guidelines and regulations for the development and deployment of AI in high-stakes situations.  Promote responsible AI practices through education, training, and certification programs.\n",
      "\n",
      "**4. Frameworks and Tools:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Ethical Impact Assessments (EIAs):**  Conduct EIAs before deploying AI systems to identify and mitigate potential ethical risks.\n",
      "*   **AI Ethics Toolkits:**  Utilize AI ethics toolkits and frameworks to guide the development and deployment of responsible AI systems.\n",
      "*   **Stakeholder Engagement:**  Involve a wide range of stakeholders, including experts, policymakers, and the public, in the development and deployment of AI systems.\n",
      "*   **Public Debate and Education:**  Promote public debate and education about the ethical implications of AI.\n",
      "\n",
      "**5.  Specific Considerations for Healthcare and Military:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Healthcare:** Patient autonomy and the physician-patient relationship must be central.  Transparent algorithms are crucial for trust.  Regulations should protect patient data and prevent discrimination.\n",
      "*   **Military:** International humanitarian law must be strictly adhered to.  Human control over lethal force must be maintained. Clear lines of accountability are essential.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Conclusion:**\n",
      "\n",
      "Developing autonomous AI for high-stakes situations requires a comprehensive and ethical approach that prioritizes human well-being, fairness, and accountability. By carefully considering the potential benefits and risks, addressing ethical principles, and implementing appropriate safeguards, we can harness the power of AI while mitigating the risks of unintended consequences.  A proactive, multidisciplinary, and constantly evolving approach is necessary to navigate the complex ethical landscape of autonomous AI in these critical domains.\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 4\n",
      "\n",
      "The ethical implications of developing autonomous AI for high-stakes decision-making in fields like healthcare and military applications are profound and multifaceted. Below is a structured evaluation of the key considerations, balancing potential benefits against risks:\n",
      "\n",
      "### **Potential Benefits**  \n",
      "1. **Efficiency & Precision**  \n",
      "   - In healthcare, AI can diagnose diseases faster and more accurately than humans, improving patient outcomes (e.g., radiology AI detecting tumors).  \n",
      "   - In military contexts, autonomous systems could reduce human error in defensive operations.  \n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Scalability & Accessibility**  \n",
      "   - AI can provide expert-level decision-making in underserved regions where human specialists are scarce.  \n",
      "   - Autonomous drones could deliver medical supplies in conflict zones without risking human lives.  \n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Reduction of Human Risk**  \n",
      "   - In warfare, AI-driven systems could minimize soldier casualties by handling dangerous reconnaissance or defusing explosives.  \n",
      "\n",
      "### **Key Ethical Risks & Challenges**  \n",
      "1. **Bias & Fairness**  \n",
      "   - AI trained on biased data may perpetuate discrimination (e.g., underdiagnosing diseases in minority groups).  \n",
      "   - Military AI could misidentify targets based on flawed training data, leading to civilian harm.  \n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Accountability & Responsibility**  \n",
      "   - If an AI system makes a fatal error in surgery or warfare, who is liable? The developer, operator, or the AI itself?  \n",
      "   - Lack of clear legal frameworks complicates accountability.  \n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Unintended Consequences & Loss of Control**  \n",
      "   - Autonomous weapons could escalate conflicts unpredictably if hacked or misused.  \n",
      "   - Over-reliance on AI in healthcare might erode human judgment and patient trust.  \n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Transparency & Explainability**  \n",
      "   - Many AI systems (e.g., deep learning models) are \"black boxes,\" making it hard to justify decisions.  \n",
      "   - In life-or-death scenarios, the inability to explain AI reasoning is ethically problematic.  \n",
      "\n",
      "### **Balancing Benefits & Risks: Ethical Frameworks**  \n",
      "1. **Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Oversight**  \n",
      "   - Critical decisions (e.g., lethal force in warfare, major surgeries) should require human confirmation.  \n",
      "   - Ensures accountability while leveraging AI’s efficiency.  \n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Robust Bias Mitigation & Auditing**  \n",
      "   - Diverse training datasets and continuous bias testing.  \n",
      "   - Independent oversight bodies to audit AI systems pre-deployment.  \n",
      "\n",
      "3. **International Regulations & Norms**  \n",
      "   - Bans or strict treaties on fully autonomous weapons (e.g., UN discussions on lethal autonomous weapons).  \n",
      "   - Ethical guidelines for medical AI (e.g., WHO’s principles on AI in health).  \n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Explainable AI (XAI) Development**  \n",
      "   - Prioritizing interpretable models in high-stakes fields to ensure decisions can be scrutinized.  \n",
      "\n",
      "### **Conclusion**  \n",
      "While autonomous AI offers transformative potential in healthcare and defense, its ethical risks demand rigorous safeguards. The balance hinges on **transparency, accountability, and human oversight**—ensuring AI augments rather than replaces human judgment in morally consequential domains. Without these guardrails, the risks of harm, bias, and loss of control could outweigh the benefits. Policymakers, technologists, and ethicists must collaborate to establish boundaries that maximize societal good while minimizing harm.\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 5\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence (AI) that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations requires a comprehensive analysis of the potential benefits and risks. Here's a framework to consider:\n",
      "\n",
      "**Potential Benefits:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Improved decision-making**: AI can process vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and make decisions faster and more accurately than humans in certain situations.\n",
      "2. **Enhanced efficiency**: AI can automate routine tasks, freeing up human resources for more complex and high-value tasks.\n",
      "3. **Increased accessibility**: AI can provide decision-making support in areas where human expertise is scarce or unavailable.\n",
      "4. **Personalized care**: AI can help tailor healthcare decisions to individual patients' needs, leading to better outcomes.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Risks and Concerns:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Bias and discrimination**: AI systems can perpetuate and amplify existing biases if trained on biased data, leading to unfair outcomes.\n",
      "2. **Lack of accountability**: As AI systems make autonomous decisions, it can be challenging to determine responsibility for errors or adverse outcomes.\n",
      "3. **Unintended consequences**: AI systems can produce unintended consequences, such as unforeseen side effects or interactions with other systems.\n",
      "4. **Cybersecurity risks**: AI systems can be vulnerable to cyber attacks, compromising sensitive data and decision-making processes.\n",
      "5. **Transparency and explainability**: AI systems can be difficult to interpret, making it challenging to understand the reasoning behind their decisions.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Ethical Considerations:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Respect for autonomy**: AI systems should be designed to respect human autonomy and decision-making capacity.\n",
      "2. **Non-maleficence**: AI systems should be designed to minimize harm and avoid causing unnecessary harm.\n",
      "3. **Beneficence**: AI systems should be designed to promote the well-being and best interests of individuals and society.\n",
      "4. **Justice**: AI systems should be designed to ensure fairness, equity, and distributive justice.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Mitigation Strategies:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Data curation**: Ensure that training data is diverse, representative, and free from bias.\n",
      "2. **Algorithmic auditing**: Regularly audit AI systems for bias and errors.\n",
      "3. **Human oversight**: Implement human oversight and review processes to detect and correct errors.\n",
      "4. **Explainability and transparency**: Develop AI systems that provide clear explanations for their decisions.\n",
      "5. **Accountability mechanisms**: Establish clear accountability mechanisms for errors or adverse outcomes.\n",
      "6. **Cybersecurity measures**: Implement robust cybersecurity measures to protect AI systems and sensitive data.\n",
      "7. **Ethics guidelines and regulations**: Develop and enforce ethics guidelines and regulations for AI development and deployment.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Best Practices:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Multidisciplinary development teams**: Assemble teams with diverse expertise, including ethicists, to ensure that AI systems are developed with ethical considerations in mind.\n",
      "2. **Inclusive and diverse testing**: Test AI systems with diverse datasets and user groups to identify and address potential biases.\n",
      "3. **Continuous monitoring and evaluation**: Regularly monitor and evaluate AI systems for performance, safety, and ethical implications.\n",
      "4. **Transparency and communication**: Communicate clearly with stakeholders about AI system capabilities, limitations, and potential risks.\n",
      "5. **Ongoing education and training**: Provide ongoing education and training for developers, deployers, and users of AI systems to ensure they understand the ethical implications of AI decision-making.\n",
      "\n",
      "By considering these factors and implementing mitigation strategies, we can develop AI systems that balance the potential benefits of autonomous decision-making with the need to address ethical concerns and minimize risks.\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 6\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing autonomous AI for high-stakes decision-making requires a comprehensive and multi-disciplinary approach. Here's a framework to consider the potential benefits and risks, and balance them accordingly:\n",
      "\n",
      "**Potential Benefits:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. Enhanced efficiency: Autonomous AI can process vast amounts of data quickly and accurately, leading to faster decision-making in high-stakes situations.\n",
      "2. Improved accuracy: AI can reduce human error by analyzing objective data and making decisions based on evidence-based criteria.\n",
      "3. Scalability: Autonomous AI can provide consistent results across multiple patients or scenarios, without the variability introduced by human factors.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Potential Risks:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Bias:** AI systems can perpetuate pre-existing biases if they are trained using biased data or algorithms that replicate discriminatory patterns.\n",
      "2. **Accountability:** As AI systems take on more decision-making authority, it becomes increasingly difficult to assign responsibility for errors or harm caused by those decisions.\n",
      "3. **Unintended Consequences:** AI systems may produce unforeseen outcomes due to their inability to fully comprehend the complexity of human experience.\n",
      "4. **Privacy and Security:** Autonomous AI in high-stakes situations can raise significant concerns regarding patient confidentiality, intellectual property protection, and data security.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Key Ethical Considerations:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Value Alignment**: Ensure that AI systems align with core human values, such as compassion, dignity, and respect for autonomy.\n",
      "2. **Transparency and Explainability**: Develop AI systems that provide transparent decision-making processes, allowing humans to understand the reasoning behind decisions.\n",
      "3. **Equity and Fairness**: Implement measures to prevent bias in AI, ensuring fairness and equity across diverse populations.\n",
      "4. **Human Oversight and Review**: Establish mechanisms for human review and intervention to ensure accountability and correct potential errors or biases.\n",
      "5. **Responsible Development**: Foster a culture of responsible development, prioritizing safety, efficacy, and societal impact.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Recommendations:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. Conduct thorough risk assessments and engage in open dialogue with stakeholders, including patients, healthcare professionals, and civil society representatives.\n",
      "2. Establish independent review boards to monitor AI system development, deployment, and performance.\n",
      "3. Develop comprehensive guidelines for data collection, processing, and storage, ensuring patient confidentiality and intellectual property protection.\n",
      "4. Foster international collaboration on AI governance, regulatory frameworks, and best practices to address global concerns.\n",
      "5. Invest in AI literacy initiatives to educate professionals and the general public about AI systems, their limitations, and potential risks.\n",
      "\n",
      "By following this framework and engaging in ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, we can ensure that autonomous AI developments are guided by ethical principles, prioritizing human well-being, safety, and dignity.\n",
      "\n",
      "\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "print(together)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 35,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "judge = f\"\"\"You are judging a competition between {len(competitors)} competitors.\n",
    "Each model has been given this question:\n",
    "\n",
    "{question}\n",
    "\n",
    "Your job is to evaluate each response for clarity and strength of argument, and rank them in order of best to worst.\n",
    "Respond with JSON, and only JSON, with the following format:\n",
    "{{\"results\": [\"best competitor number\", \"second best competitor number\", \"third best competitor number\", ...]}}\n",
    "\n",
    "Here are the responses from each competitor:\n",
    "\n",
    "{together}\n",
    "\n",
    "Now respond with the JSON with the ranked order of the competitors, nothing else. Do not include markdown formatting or code blocks.\"\"\"\n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 36,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "You are judging a competition between 6 competitors.\n",
      "Each model has been given this question:\n",
      "\n",
      "How would you evaluate the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations, such as in healthcare or military applications, balancing the potential benefits against the risks of bias, accountability, and unintended consequences?\n",
      "\n",
      "Your job is to evaluate each response for clarity and strength of argument, and rank them in order of best to worst.\n",
      "Respond with JSON, and only JSON, with the following format:\n",
      "{\"results\": [\"best competitor number\", \"second best competitor number\", \"third best competitor number\", ...]}\n",
      "\n",
      "Here are the responses from each competitor:\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 1\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence (AI) that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations requires a nuanced consideration of various factors, including potential benefits, risks, and the broader social context in which such technologies will operate. Here’s a structured approach to analyze these implications:\n",
      "\n",
      "### Potential Benefits:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Improved Efficiency**: AI systems can analyze vast amounts of data far more quickly than humans, potentially leading to faster decision-making in critical situations such as diagnosing diseases or responding to military threats.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Consistency**: AI can provide decisions based on established protocols without human fatigue or emotional bias, which may lead to more consistent outcomes in areas like healthcare treatment plans or frontline military tactics.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Enhanced Capabilities**: In some scenarios, AI can support human decision-making by providing predictive analytics, suggesting interventions, or identifying patterns that human decision-makers might miss.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Resource Optimization**: AI can help allocate medical or military resources more effectively, potentially leading to better outcomes in public health scenarios or military engagements.\n",
      "\n",
      "### Risks and Ethical Concerns:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Bias**: AI systems can inherit and amplify biases present in the data on which they are trained. This can lead to unfair treatment in healthcare (e.g., racial or socioeconomic disparities in treatment recommendations) or biased military strategies. Ensuring fairness and equity in AI decision-making is critical.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Accountability**: When AI makes decisions, it can be challenging to attribute responsibility for outcomes. This raises concerns about accountability—who is held responsible when an AI makes a mistake? Clarity in accountability structures is vitally important, especially in life-and-death situations.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Transparency**: The complexity of many AI algorithms, especially deep learning models, can hinder transparency. Stakeholders need to understand how decisions are made to trust and accept AI-driven outcomes.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Unintended Consequences**: AI systems might produce unforeseen outcomes, especially in dynamic environments. For instance, if an AI in a military context misinterprets a situation, it could lead to unintended escalations. This unpredictability necessitates rigorous testing and risk assessment.\n",
      "\n",
      "5. **Moral and Ethical Considerations**: Autonomous systems might struggle with nuanced moral judgments. For instance, in healthcare, decisions about end-of-life care can be deeply personal and context-dependent, raising questions about whether AI should play a role in such sensitive areas.\n",
      "\n",
      "### Balancing Benefits and Risks:\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Regulatory Frameworks**: Establishing comprehensive regulations and ethical guidelines for AI development and deployment is necessary to govern accountability, transparency, and bias mitigation. Regulatory bodies must reflect diverse perspectives, including ethicists, domain experts, and community representatives.\n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Human Oversight**: Incorporating human-in-the-loop systems can help ensure that critical decisions still involve human judgment, especially when ethical considerations are at stake. This hybrid approach could allow for quicker decision-making while retaining accountability.\n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Bias Mitigation Strategies**: Actively working to identify, test, and mitigate biases in AI systems is essential. This includes diverse data collection, algorithmic transparency, and continuous monitoring of AI outputs.\n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Public Engagement**: Engaging with stakeholders—including the public, affected communities, and domain experts—can foster trust and ensure that AI systems are developed in alignment with societal values and needs.\n",
      "\n",
      "5. **Continuous Learning and Adaptation**: AI systems should be designed to learn from their environments and improve over time. This adaptability can help address unintended consequences and align more closely with ethical standards as they evolve.\n",
      "\n",
      "### Conclusion:\n",
      "\n",
      "Developing autonomous AI in high-stakes contexts is a double-edged sword that requires careful ethical scrutiny. While the potential benefits are substantial, they must be weighed against serious risks related to bias, accountability, transparency, and moral implications. A comprehensive approach that includes rigorous testing, regulatory frameworks, human oversight, and active public engagement can facilitate the responsible development of AI technologies that serve the best interests of society.\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 2\n",
      "\n",
      "# Ethical Implications of Autonomous AI in High-Stakes Domains\n",
      "\n",
      "This is a complex ethical question that requires balancing several considerations:\n",
      "\n",
      "## Potential Benefits\n",
      "- Healthcare: AI could provide faster diagnoses, reach underserved populations, and detect patterns humans might miss\n",
      "- Military: Could reduce human casualties and potentially make more consistent decisions under pressure\n",
      "\n",
      "## Significant Concerns\n",
      "- **Accountability gap**: When AI makes harmful decisions, who bears responsibility - developers, deployers, or the system itself?\n",
      "- **Bias amplification**: AI systems trained on historical data may perpetuate or amplify existing societal biases\n",
      "- **Transparency challenges**: Complex AI systems often function as \"black boxes,\" making oversight difficult\n",
      "- **Value alignment**: Ensuring AI systems properly understand and implement human values and intentions\n",
      "\n",
      "## Balance Considerations\n",
      "- Proportional oversight: More autonomous systems in higher-stakes domains require more rigorous testing and human supervision\n",
      "- Explainability requirements may need to be stronger in contexts like healthcare than in other applications\n",
      "- The timeline for deployment should match our ability to solve safety and alignment challenges\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe thoughtful governance frameworks, inclusive development processes, and ongoing monitoring are essential to responsibly navigate these tradeoffs.\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 3\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of autonomous AI in high-stakes situations like healthcare and military applications is a complex undertaking. It requires careful consideration of potential benefits, risks, and the interplay of various ethical principles. Here's a structured approach:\n",
      "\n",
      "**1. Identifying Potential Benefits and Harms:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Healthcare:**\n",
      "    *   **Benefits:**\n",
      "        *   Improved accuracy in diagnoses and treatment plans.\n",
      "        *   Increased access to healthcare, especially in underserved areas.\n",
      "        *   Reduced human error in complex procedures.\n",
      "        *   Faster response times in emergency situations.\n",
      "        *   Personalized medicine tailored to individual patient needs.\n",
      "    *   **Harms:**\n",
      "        *   Misdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment due to biased data or flawed algorithms.\n",
      "        *   Erosion of the doctor-patient relationship and loss of human empathy.\n",
      "        *   Privacy violations due to the collection and use of sensitive patient data.\n",
      "        *   Deskilling of medical professionals as they rely more on AI.\n",
      "        *   Exacerbation of existing health disparities if AI systems are trained on biased data.\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Military Applications:**\n",
      "    *   **Benefits:**\n",
      "        *   Reduced casualties by removing soldiers from dangerous situations.\n",
      "        *   Improved precision in targeting and minimizing collateral damage.\n",
      "        *   Faster decision-making in combat situations.\n",
      "        *   Enhanced situational awareness through real-time data analysis.\n",
      "    *   **Harms:**\n",
      "        *   Unintended escalation of conflicts due to algorithmic errors.\n",
      "        *   Loss of human control over lethal force.\n",
      "        *   Dehumanization of warfare.\n",
      "        *   Increased risk of autonomous weapons falling into the wrong hands.\n",
      "        *   Lack of accountability for unintended consequences.\n",
      "\n",
      "**2. Addressing Ethical Principles:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Autonomy and Human Control:**\n",
      "    *   How much control should humans retain over AI decisions?\n",
      "    *   Can AI systems be designed to respect human autonomy and values?\n",
      "    *   What safeguards can be implemented to prevent AI from exceeding its intended scope of authority?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Beneficence and Non-Maleficence (Do good and do no harm):**\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are designed to maximize benefits and minimize risks?\n",
      "    *   What measures can be taken to mitigate the potential for harm, such as bias, errors, and unintended consequences?\n",
      "    *   How do we balance the potential benefits against the risks, especially when lives are at stake?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Justice and Fairness:**\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are fair and equitable, and do not discriminate against certain groups?\n",
      "    *   How can we address the potential for bias in training data and algorithms?\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that everyone has equal access to the benefits of AI, regardless of their socioeconomic status or background?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Accountability and Transparency:**\n",
      "    *   Who is responsible when an AI system makes a mistake or causes harm?\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems are transparent and explainable, so that users can understand how they arrived at their decisions?\n",
      "    *   What mechanisms can be put in place to monitor and audit AI systems to ensure that they are performing as intended and are not causing unintended harm?\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Privacy and Security:**\n",
      "    *   How can we protect the privacy and security of sensitive data used by AI systems?\n",
      "    *   What measures can be taken to prevent unauthorized access to or misuse of AI systems?\n",
      "    *   How can we ensure that AI systems comply with relevant data protection regulations?\n",
      "\n",
      "**3. Mitigating Risks:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Bias Detection and Mitigation:** Implement rigorous testing and validation processes to identify and mitigate bias in training data and algorithms. Employ techniques such as data augmentation, fairness-aware algorithms, and adversarial debiasing.\n",
      "*   **Explainability and Interpretability:** Design AI systems that provide clear explanations for their decisions, allowing users to understand the reasoning behind the recommendations.  Use techniques like SHAP values, LIME, and attention mechanisms to highlight important features.\n",
      "*   **Robustness and Reliability:** Develop AI systems that are robust to noisy data, adversarial attacks, and unforeseen circumstances. Conduct thorough testing and validation to ensure that the systems perform reliably in real-world scenarios.\n",
      "*   **Human Oversight and Control:** Implement mechanisms for human oversight and control, allowing users to intervene and override AI decisions when necessary.  Design systems with clear escalation pathways for complex or uncertain situations.\n",
      "*   **Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation:**  Establish a system for continuous monitoring and evaluation of AI system performance, identifying and addressing any issues that arise over time.  Regularly audit the system for bias, accuracy, and fairness.\n",
      "*   **Ethical Guidelines and Regulations:** Develop clear ethical guidelines and regulations for the development and deployment of AI in high-stakes situations.  Promote responsible AI practices through education, training, and certification programs.\n",
      "\n",
      "**4. Frameworks and Tools:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Ethical Impact Assessments (EIAs):**  Conduct EIAs before deploying AI systems to identify and mitigate potential ethical risks.\n",
      "*   **AI Ethics Toolkits:**  Utilize AI ethics toolkits and frameworks to guide the development and deployment of responsible AI systems.\n",
      "*   **Stakeholder Engagement:**  Involve a wide range of stakeholders, including experts, policymakers, and the public, in the development and deployment of AI systems.\n",
      "*   **Public Debate and Education:**  Promote public debate and education about the ethical implications of AI.\n",
      "\n",
      "**5.  Specific Considerations for Healthcare and Military:**\n",
      "\n",
      "*   **Healthcare:** Patient autonomy and the physician-patient relationship must be central.  Transparent algorithms are crucial for trust.  Regulations should protect patient data and prevent discrimination.\n",
      "*   **Military:** International humanitarian law must be strictly adhered to.  Human control over lethal force must be maintained. Clear lines of accountability are essential.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Conclusion:**\n",
      "\n",
      "Developing autonomous AI for high-stakes situations requires a comprehensive and ethical approach that prioritizes human well-being, fairness, and accountability. By carefully considering the potential benefits and risks, addressing ethical principles, and implementing appropriate safeguards, we can harness the power of AI while mitigating the risks of unintended consequences.  A proactive, multidisciplinary, and constantly evolving approach is necessary to navigate the complex ethical landscape of autonomous AI in these critical domains.\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 4\n",
      "\n",
      "The ethical implications of developing autonomous AI for high-stakes decision-making in fields like healthcare and military applications are profound and multifaceted. Below is a structured evaluation of the key considerations, balancing potential benefits against risks:\n",
      "\n",
      "### **Potential Benefits**  \n",
      "1. **Efficiency & Precision**  \n",
      "   - In healthcare, AI can diagnose diseases faster and more accurately than humans, improving patient outcomes (e.g., radiology AI detecting tumors).  \n",
      "   - In military contexts, autonomous systems could reduce human error in defensive operations.  \n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Scalability & Accessibility**  \n",
      "   - AI can provide expert-level decision-making in underserved regions where human specialists are scarce.  \n",
      "   - Autonomous drones could deliver medical supplies in conflict zones without risking human lives.  \n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Reduction of Human Risk**  \n",
      "   - In warfare, AI-driven systems could minimize soldier casualties by handling dangerous reconnaissance or defusing explosives.  \n",
      "\n",
      "### **Key Ethical Risks & Challenges**  \n",
      "1. **Bias & Fairness**  \n",
      "   - AI trained on biased data may perpetuate discrimination (e.g., underdiagnosing diseases in minority groups).  \n",
      "   - Military AI could misidentify targets based on flawed training data, leading to civilian harm.  \n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Accountability & Responsibility**  \n",
      "   - If an AI system makes a fatal error in surgery or warfare, who is liable? The developer, operator, or the AI itself?  \n",
      "   - Lack of clear legal frameworks complicates accountability.  \n",
      "\n",
      "3. **Unintended Consequences & Loss of Control**  \n",
      "   - Autonomous weapons could escalate conflicts unpredictably if hacked or misused.  \n",
      "   - Over-reliance on AI in healthcare might erode human judgment and patient trust.  \n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Transparency & Explainability**  \n",
      "   - Many AI systems (e.g., deep learning models) are \"black boxes,\" making it hard to justify decisions.  \n",
      "   - In life-or-death scenarios, the inability to explain AI reasoning is ethically problematic.  \n",
      "\n",
      "### **Balancing Benefits & Risks: Ethical Frameworks**  \n",
      "1. **Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Oversight**  \n",
      "   - Critical decisions (e.g., lethal force in warfare, major surgeries) should require human confirmation.  \n",
      "   - Ensures accountability while leveraging AI’s efficiency.  \n",
      "\n",
      "2. **Robust Bias Mitigation & Auditing**  \n",
      "   - Diverse training datasets and continuous bias testing.  \n",
      "   - Independent oversight bodies to audit AI systems pre-deployment.  \n",
      "\n",
      "3. **International Regulations & Norms**  \n",
      "   - Bans or strict treaties on fully autonomous weapons (e.g., UN discussions on lethal autonomous weapons).  \n",
      "   - Ethical guidelines for medical AI (e.g., WHO’s principles on AI in health).  \n",
      "\n",
      "4. **Explainable AI (XAI) Development**  \n",
      "   - Prioritizing interpretable models in high-stakes fields to ensure decisions can be scrutinized.  \n",
      "\n",
      "### **Conclusion**  \n",
      "While autonomous AI offers transformative potential in healthcare and defense, its ethical risks demand rigorous safeguards. The balance hinges on **transparency, accountability, and human oversight**—ensuring AI augments rather than replaces human judgment in morally consequential domains. Without these guardrails, the risks of harm, bias, and loss of control could outweigh the benefits. Policymakers, technologists, and ethicists must collaborate to establish boundaries that maximize societal good while minimizing harm.\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 5\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing artificial intelligence (AI) that can autonomously make decisions in high-stakes situations requires a comprehensive analysis of the potential benefits and risks. Here's a framework to consider:\n",
      "\n",
      "**Potential Benefits:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Improved decision-making**: AI can process vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and make decisions faster and more accurately than humans in certain situations.\n",
      "2. **Enhanced efficiency**: AI can automate routine tasks, freeing up human resources for more complex and high-value tasks.\n",
      "3. **Increased accessibility**: AI can provide decision-making support in areas where human expertise is scarce or unavailable.\n",
      "4. **Personalized care**: AI can help tailor healthcare decisions to individual patients' needs, leading to better outcomes.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Risks and Concerns:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Bias and discrimination**: AI systems can perpetuate and amplify existing biases if trained on biased data, leading to unfair outcomes.\n",
      "2. **Lack of accountability**: As AI systems make autonomous decisions, it can be challenging to determine responsibility for errors or adverse outcomes.\n",
      "3. **Unintended consequences**: AI systems can produce unintended consequences, such as unforeseen side effects or interactions with other systems.\n",
      "4. **Cybersecurity risks**: AI systems can be vulnerable to cyber attacks, compromising sensitive data and decision-making processes.\n",
      "5. **Transparency and explainability**: AI systems can be difficult to interpret, making it challenging to understand the reasoning behind their decisions.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Ethical Considerations:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Respect for autonomy**: AI systems should be designed to respect human autonomy and decision-making capacity.\n",
      "2. **Non-maleficence**: AI systems should be designed to minimize harm and avoid causing unnecessary harm.\n",
      "3. **Beneficence**: AI systems should be designed to promote the well-being and best interests of individuals and society.\n",
      "4. **Justice**: AI systems should be designed to ensure fairness, equity, and distributive justice.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Mitigation Strategies:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Data curation**: Ensure that training data is diverse, representative, and free from bias.\n",
      "2. **Algorithmic auditing**: Regularly audit AI systems for bias and errors.\n",
      "3. **Human oversight**: Implement human oversight and review processes to detect and correct errors.\n",
      "4. **Explainability and transparency**: Develop AI systems that provide clear explanations for their decisions.\n",
      "5. **Accountability mechanisms**: Establish clear accountability mechanisms for errors or adverse outcomes.\n",
      "6. **Cybersecurity measures**: Implement robust cybersecurity measures to protect AI systems and sensitive data.\n",
      "7. **Ethics guidelines and regulations**: Develop and enforce ethics guidelines and regulations for AI development and deployment.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Best Practices:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Multidisciplinary development teams**: Assemble teams with diverse expertise, including ethicists, to ensure that AI systems are developed with ethical considerations in mind.\n",
      "2. **Inclusive and diverse testing**: Test AI systems with diverse datasets and user groups to identify and address potential biases.\n",
      "3. **Continuous monitoring and evaluation**: Regularly monitor and evaluate AI systems for performance, safety, and ethical implications.\n",
      "4. **Transparency and communication**: Communicate clearly with stakeholders about AI system capabilities, limitations, and potential risks.\n",
      "5. **Ongoing education and training**: Provide ongoing education and training for developers, deployers, and users of AI systems to ensure they understand the ethical implications of AI decision-making.\n",
      "\n",
      "By considering these factors and implementing mitigation strategies, we can develop AI systems that balance the potential benefits of autonomous decision-making with the need to address ethical concerns and minimize risks.\n",
      "\n",
      "# Response from competitor 6\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluating the ethical implications of developing autonomous AI for high-stakes decision-making requires a comprehensive and multi-disciplinary approach. Here's a framework to consider the potential benefits and risks, and balance them accordingly:\n",
      "\n",
      "**Potential Benefits:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. Enhanced efficiency: Autonomous AI can process vast amounts of data quickly and accurately, leading to faster decision-making in high-stakes situations.\n",
      "2. Improved accuracy: AI can reduce human error by analyzing objective data and making decisions based on evidence-based criteria.\n",
      "3. Scalability: Autonomous AI can provide consistent results across multiple patients or scenarios, without the variability introduced by human factors.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Potential Risks:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Bias:** AI systems can perpetuate pre-existing biases if they are trained using biased data or algorithms that replicate discriminatory patterns.\n",
      "2. **Accountability:** As AI systems take on more decision-making authority, it becomes increasingly difficult to assign responsibility for errors or harm caused by those decisions.\n",
      "3. **Unintended Consequences:** AI systems may produce unforeseen outcomes due to their inability to fully comprehend the complexity of human experience.\n",
      "4. **Privacy and Security:** Autonomous AI in high-stakes situations can raise significant concerns regarding patient confidentiality, intellectual property protection, and data security.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Key Ethical Considerations:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. **Value Alignment**: Ensure that AI systems align with core human values, such as compassion, dignity, and respect for autonomy.\n",
      "2. **Transparency and Explainability**: Develop AI systems that provide transparent decision-making processes, allowing humans to understand the reasoning behind decisions.\n",
      "3. **Equity and Fairness**: Implement measures to prevent bias in AI, ensuring fairness and equity across diverse populations.\n",
      "4. **Human Oversight and Review**: Establish mechanisms for human review and intervention to ensure accountability and correct potential errors or biases.\n",
      "5. **Responsible Development**: Foster a culture of responsible development, prioritizing safety, efficacy, and societal impact.\n",
      "\n",
      "**Recommendations:**\n",
      "\n",
      "1. Conduct thorough risk assessments and engage in open dialogue with stakeholders, including patients, healthcare professionals, and civil society representatives.\n",
      "2. Establish independent review boards to monitor AI system development, deployment, and performance.\n",
      "3. Develop comprehensive guidelines for data collection, processing, and storage, ensuring patient confidentiality and intellectual property protection.\n",
      "4. Foster international collaboration on AI governance, regulatory frameworks, and best practices to address global concerns.\n",
      "5. Invest in AI literacy initiatives to educate professionals and the general public about AI systems, their limitations, and potential risks.\n",
      "\n",
      "By following this framework and engaging in ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, we can ensure that autonomous AI developments are guided by ethical principles, prioritizing human well-being, safety, and dignity.\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Now respond with the JSON with the ranked order of the competitors, nothing else. Do not include markdown formatting or code blocks.\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "print(judge)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 37,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "judge_messages = [{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": judge}]"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 38,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "{\"results\": [1, 3, 4, 6, 5, 2]}\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# Judgement time!\n",
    "\n",
    "groq = OpenAI(api_key=groq_api_key, base_url=\"https://api.groq.com/openai/v1\")\n",
    "model_name = \"llama-3.3-70b-versatile\"\n",
    "\n",
    "response = groq.chat.completions.create(model=model_name, messages=judge_messages)\n",
    "results = response.choices[0].message.content\n",
    "\n",
    "print(results)\n",
    "\n",
    "# display(Markdown(answer))\n",
    "# competitors.append(model_name)\n",
    "# answers.append(answer)\n",
    "\n",
    "\n",
    "\n",
    "\n",
    "\n",
    "# openai = OpenAI()\n",
    "# response = openai.chat.completions.create(\n",
    "#     model=\"o3-mini\",\n",
    "#     messages=judge_messages,\n",
    "# )\n",
    "# results = response.choices[0].message.content\n",
    "# print(results)\n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 39,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "Rank 1: gpt-4o-mini\n",
      "Rank 2: gemini-2.0-flash\n",
      "Rank 3: deepseek-chat\n",
      "Rank 4: llama3.2:latest\n",
      "Rank 5: llama-3.3-70b-versatile\n",
      "Rank 6: claude-3-7-sonnet-latest\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# OK let's turn this into results!\n",
    "\n",
    "results_dict = json.loads(results)\n",
    "ranks = results_dict[\"results\"]\n",
    "for index, result in enumerate(ranks):\n",
    "    competitor = competitors[int(result)-1]\n",
    "    print(f\"Rank {index+1}: {competitor}\")"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "<table style=\"margin: 0; text-align: left; width:100%\">\n",
    "    <tr>\n",
    "        <td style=\"width: 150px; height: 150px; vertical-align: middle;\">\n",
    "            <img src=\"../assets/exercise.png\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" style=\"display: block;\" />\n",
    "        </td>\n",
    "        <td>\n",
    "            <h2 style=\"color:#ff7800;\">Exercise</h2>\n",
    "            <span style=\"color:#ff7800;\">Which pattern(s) did this use? Try updating this to add another Agentic design pattern.\n",
    "            </span>\n",
    "        </td>\n",
    "    </tr>\n",
    "</table>"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "<table style=\"margin: 0; text-align: left; width:100%\">\n",
    "    <tr>\n",
    "        <td style=\"width: 150px; height: 150px; vertical-align: middle;\">\n",
    "            <img src=\"../assets/business.png\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" style=\"display: block;\" />\n",
    "        </td>\n",
    "        <td>\n",
    "            <h2 style=\"color:#00bfff;\">Commercial implications</h2>\n",
    "            <span style=\"color:#00bfff;\">These kinds of patterns - to send a task to multiple models, and evaluate results,\n",
    "            are common where you need to improve the quality of your LLM response. This approach can be universally applied\n",
    "            to business projects where accuracy is critical.\n",
    "            </span>\n",
    "        </td>\n",
    "    </tr>\n",
    "</table>"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "metadata": {
  "kernelspec": {
   "display_name": ".venv",
   "language": "python",
   "name": "python3"
  },
  "language_info": {
   "codemirror_mode": {
    "name": "ipython",
    "version": 3
   },
   "file_extension": ".py",
   "mimetype": "text/x-python",
   "name": "python",
   "nbconvert_exporter": "python",
   "pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
   "version": "3.12.10"
  }
 },
 "nbformat": 4,
 "nbformat_minor": 2
}