Spaces:
Running
Running
File size: 3,010 Bytes
a23082c |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 |
# User Requirements for GAIA Framework Improvement
Based on the provided `pasted_content.txt`, the user's requirements for improving the GAIA multi-agent framework are as follows:
## Overall Goal
Improve the existing multi-agent framework to maximize performance on the GAIA benchmark.
## Specific Objectives
1. **Code Quality Review:**
* Analyze all source files (`.py`, config, tests, docs if present).
* Identify weaknesses such as:
* Design smells
* Performance issues
* Missing type hints
* Brittle parsing logic
* Insufficient test coverage
* Other reliability impairments.
2. **Refactor Proposals:**
* For each identified weakness, suggest concise improvements.
* Provide practical improvements as diff-style patches where feasible.
3. **New Feature Implementation:**
* **YouTube Ingestion:**
* Input: YouTube video URL.
* Process: Download audio -> Chunk audio (≤ 60 seconds) -> Transcribe chunks using Gemini 1.5 Pro.
* Output: Full transcript and a one-paragraph summary.
* **Generic Audio Transcription:**
* Input: Local audio file path or remote audio URL.
* Process: Transcribe using Gemini 1.5 Pro (preferred for latency tolerance) or Whisper-cpp (fallback).
* Output: Expose functionality via a simple Python API.
4. **Extra Agent Design:**
* Design at least three new specialized agents.
* These agents should demonstrably contribute to boosting GAIA benchmark performance.
* For each new agent, provide:
* Purpose
* Key tool calls
* Sketch of the agent loop/logic.
5. **Migration Plan:**
* Define the recommended order for applying the proposed refactor patches and implementing new features.
* List all new dependencies required for `requirements.txt`.
* Outline the minimal unit and/or integration tests needed to validate each new feature or significant change.
## Output Format Requirements
* Start the final report with a short ASCII diagram representing the *revised* system architecture (incorporating proposed changes).
* For each modified source file or new module:
* Provide a one-sentence rationale for the change.
* Include any required unified diff patches enclosed in triple backticks with the filename in the header.
* Group related changes together.
* Use plain paragraphs rather than long bullet lists where appropriate.
* Maintain concise prose.
* Ask brief clarifying questions if uncertainties arise during the process.
## Process Constraint
* Wait for user confirmation before starting the review.
* The initial phase involves analysis and presenting the improvement plan (including architecture diagram, code review findings, refactor proposals, new feature designs, extra agent designs, and migration plan).
* Stop after presenting this initial plan and await further instructions or confirmation.
|