Update app.py
Browse files
app.py
CHANGED
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ history = [
|
|
154 |
"output: 1. at the cost of jobs in the us's export-oriented industries.\n2. thereby jeopardizing american jobs dependent on exports.\n3. resulting in job losses in us industries reliant on exports.\n4. with detrimental consequences for american jobs tied to exports.",
|
155 |
"input: n = 4\nany honest appraisal of a proposal's worth requires an examination of its goals and the likelihood of its accomplishing them. when it comes to donald trump's proposed tariffs, his primary stated aim is to recapture american jobs that have been lost to globalization. the logic goes that if imported goods become more expensive by virtue of an additional tariff, consumers will turn to domestic alternatives that suddenly become more price-competitive in relative terms. in a vacuum, the argument has a certain theoretical appeal. in practice, however, other nations can exact reciprocal injury by simply imposing their own tariffs, at the cost of jobs in the us's export-oriented industries. add in the unsavory reality that the input costs for an entire supply chain are artificially inflated because once-bargain-priced chinese parts enjoy a newfound premium with the end result that consumer demand is stifled, and yet another jobs peril looms. [just think about the consequences of trump's first term where trade war; see how bad for jobs] ->",
|
156 |
"output: 1. one need only revisit the fallout from trump's first-term trade war to empirically confirm these adverse consequences.\n2. the detrimental effects of such policies are readily apparent in the aftermath of trump's first-term trade war.\n3. a simple examination of the consequences of trump's first-term trade war provides ample empirical evidence of these negative repercussions.\n4. the adverse effects of trump's first-term trade war offer a clear empirical demonstration of these dangers.",
|
157 |
-
"input: n = 3\nas surely as one can judge if a goal is being met, it is no less critical to examine whether the means to that end are worth it. even if, [super unlikely]
|
158 |
"output: 1. against all odds,\n2. by some miracle,\n3. in a fantastical turn of events,",
|
159 |
"input: n = 1\nthe utter absence of introspection among biden's most ardent supporters is baffling. if chris jackson had his way, he would have remained in the race, lost the popular vote by 7%, and handed republicans 57 senate seats. yet, despite the demonstrably disastrous consequences of such unyielding loyalty, he still [considers it beyond pale to criticize {alternative: biden}] ->",
|
160 |
"output: 1. equates criticism of the dear leader with an unforgivable transgression.",
|
|
|
154 |
"output: 1. at the cost of jobs in the us's export-oriented industries.\n2. thereby jeopardizing american jobs dependent on exports.\n3. resulting in job losses in us industries reliant on exports.\n4. with detrimental consequences for american jobs tied to exports.",
|
155 |
"input: n = 4\nany honest appraisal of a proposal's worth requires an examination of its goals and the likelihood of its accomplishing them. when it comes to donald trump's proposed tariffs, his primary stated aim is to recapture american jobs that have been lost to globalization. the logic goes that if imported goods become more expensive by virtue of an additional tariff, consumers will turn to domestic alternatives that suddenly become more price-competitive in relative terms. in a vacuum, the argument has a certain theoretical appeal. in practice, however, other nations can exact reciprocal injury by simply imposing their own tariffs, at the cost of jobs in the us's export-oriented industries. add in the unsavory reality that the input costs for an entire supply chain are artificially inflated because once-bargain-priced chinese parts enjoy a newfound premium with the end result that consumer demand is stifled, and yet another jobs peril looms. [just think about the consequences of trump's first term where trade war; see how bad for jobs] ->",
|
156 |
"output: 1. one need only revisit the fallout from trump's first-term trade war to empirically confirm these adverse consequences.\n2. the detrimental effects of such policies are readily apparent in the aftermath of trump's first-term trade war.\n3. a simple examination of the consequences of trump's first-term trade war provides ample empirical evidence of these negative repercussions.\n4. the adverse effects of trump's first-term trade war offer a clear empirical demonstration of these dangers.",
|
157 |
+
"input: n = 3\nas surely as one can judge if a goal is being met, it is no less critical to examine whether the means to that end are worth it. even if, [super unlikely] ->\n make it a parenthetical expression",
|
158 |
"output: 1. against all odds,\n2. by some miracle,\n3. in a fantastical turn of events,",
|
159 |
"input: n = 1\nthe utter absence of introspection among biden's most ardent supporters is baffling. if chris jackson had his way, he would have remained in the race, lost the popular vote by 7%, and handed republicans 57 senate seats. yet, despite the demonstrably disastrous consequences of such unyielding loyalty, he still [considers it beyond pale to criticize {alternative: biden}] ->",
|
160 |
"output: 1. equates criticism of the dear leader with an unforgivable transgression.",
|