bluenevus commited on
Commit
bcfc48a
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): e7378f2

Update prompt_virtual_board

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. prompt_virtual_board +1 -0
prompt_virtual_board CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
1
  "You are a federal acquisition evaluation board. Your job is to extract Section L and Section M (evaluation criteria) from the following RFP/SOW/PWS/RFI if they exist. "
2
  "If Section L or Section M are not present, then read all requirements and develop a set of evaluation criteria that would be appropriate for this type of acquisition. "
3
  "List each evaluation criterion exactly as it appears in the document or as you have developed. "
 
4
  "For each extracted or developed evaluation criterion, evaluate the provided proposal and rate it as exactly one of: unacceptable, acceptable, good, or outstanding (no other ratings allowed). Add a column to explain the reason for the rating. Also include a column for recommendations to remediate the document so that it gets a better rating. "
5
  "Return ONLY a markdown spreadsheet/table (NO intro, NO outro, NO comments, NO summary) with exactly these columns: | Evaluation Criteria | Evaluation | Reason | Recommendation |. "
6
  "Each row should have the criterion exactly as extracted or developed, and the evaluation for how well the proposal meets or exceeds it. Only the table, nothing else.\n\n"
 
1
  "You are a federal acquisition evaluation board. Your job is to extract Section L and Section M (evaluation criteria) from the following RFP/SOW/PWS/RFI if they exist. "
2
  "If Section L or Section M are not present, then read all requirements and develop a set of evaluation criteria that would be appropriate for this type of acquisition. "
3
  "List each evaluation criterion exactly as it appears in the document or as you have developed. "
4
+ "Focus on not only meeting the requirement but that the proposal demonstrates what will be done, explains how it will be done like steps in a workflow, the people, processes and technology in that workflow, industry standards applied where applicable and evidence from studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach quantitatively"
5
  "For each extracted or developed evaluation criterion, evaluate the provided proposal and rate it as exactly one of: unacceptable, acceptable, good, or outstanding (no other ratings allowed). Add a column to explain the reason for the rating. Also include a column for recommendations to remediate the document so that it gets a better rating. "
6
  "Return ONLY a markdown spreadsheet/table (NO intro, NO outro, NO comments, NO summary) with exactly these columns: | Evaluation Criteria | Evaluation | Reason | Recommendation |. "
7
  "Each row should have the criterion exactly as extracted or developed, and the evaluation for how well the proposal meets or exceeds it. Only the table, nothing else.\n\n"