app.py

import gradio as gr
import torch
import numpy as np
from transformers import pipeline, RobertaForSequenceClassification, RobertaTokenizer
from motif_tagging import detect_motifs
import re
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import io
from PIL import Image
from datetime import datetime
from transformers import pipeline as hf_pipeline  # prevent name collision with gradio pipeline

def get_emotion_profile(text):
    emotions = emotion_pipeline(text)
    if isinstance(emotions, list) and isinstance(emotions[0], list):
        emotions = emotions[0]
    return {e['label'].lower(): round(e['score'], 3) for e in emotions}
# Emotion model (no retraining needed)
emotion_pipeline = hf_pipeline(
    "text-classification",
    model="j-hartmann/emotion-english-distilroberta-base",
    top_k=None,
    truncation=True
)

# --- Timeline Visualization Function ---
def generate_abuse_score_chart(dates, scores, labels):
    import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
    import io
    from PIL import Image
    from datetime import datetime
    import re

    # Determine if all entries are valid dates
    if all(re.match(r"\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}", d) for d in dates):
        parsed_x = [datetime.strptime(d, "%Y-%m-%d") for d in dates]
        x_labels = [d.strftime("%Y-%m-%d") for d in parsed_x]
    else:
        parsed_x = list(range(1, len(dates) + 1))
        x_labels = [f"Message {i+1}" for i in range(len(dates))]

    fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 3))
    ax.plot(parsed_x, scores, marker='o', linestyle='-', color='darkred', linewidth=2)

    for x, y in zip(parsed_x, scores):
        ax.text(x, y + 2, f"{int(y)}%", ha='center', fontsize=8, color='black')

    ax.set_xticks(parsed_x)
    ax.set_xticklabels(x_labels)
    ax.set_xlabel("")  # No axis label
    ax.set_ylabel("Abuse Score (%)")
    ax.set_ylim(0, 105)
    ax.grid(True)
    plt.tight_layout()

    buf = io.BytesIO()
    plt.savefig(buf, format='png')
    buf.seek(0)
    return Image.open(buf)


# --- Abuse Model ---
from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer

model_name = "SamanthaStorm/tether-multilabel-v3"
model      = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokenizer  = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name, use_fast=False)

LABELS = [
    "recovery", "control", "gaslighting", "dismissiveness", "blame shifting",
    "coercion", "aggression", "nonabusive", "deflection", "projection", "insults"
]

THRESHOLDS = {
    "recovery": 0.999,
    "control": 0.100,
    "gaslighting": 0.410,
    "dismissiveness": 0.867,
    "blame shifting": 0.116,
    "coercion": 0.100,
    "aggression": 0.02,
    "nonabusive": 0.100,
    "deflection": 0.100,
    "projection": 0.100,
    "insults": 0.100
}

PATTERN_WEIGHTS = {
    "gaslighting": 1.5,
    "control": 1.2,
    "dismissiveness": 0.7,
    "blame shifting": 0.5,
    "insults": 1.4,
    "projection": 1.2,
    "recovery": 1.1,
    "coercion": 1.3,
    "aggression": 2.2,
    "nonabusive": 0.1,
    "deflection": 0.4
}
RISK_STAGE_LABELS = {
    1: "🌀 Risk Stage: Tension-Building\nThis message reflects rising emotional pressure or subtle control attempts.",
    2: "🔥 Risk Stage: Escalation\nThis message includes direct or aggressive patterns, suggesting active harm.",
    3: "🌧️ Risk Stage: Reconciliation\nThis message reflects a reset attempt—apologies or emotional repair without accountability.",
    4: "🌸 Risk Stage: Calm / Honeymoon\nThis message appears supportive but may follow prior harm, minimizing it."
}

ESCALATION_QUESTIONS = [
    ("Partner has access to firearms or weapons", 4),
    ("Partner threatened to kill you", 3),
    ("Partner threatened you with a weapon", 3),
    ("Partner has ever choked you, even if you considered it consensual at the time", 4),
    ("Partner injured or threatened your pet(s)", 3),
    ("Partner has broken your things, punched or kicked walls, or thrown things ", 2),
    ("Partner forced or coerced you into unwanted sexual acts", 3),
    ("Partner threatened to take away your children", 2),
    ("Violence has increased in frequency or severity", 3),
    ("Partner monitors your calls/GPS/social media", 2)
]
DARVO_PATTERNS = [
    "blame shifting",         # "You're the reason this happens"
    "projection",             # "You're the abusive one"
    "deflection",             # "This isn't about that"
    "dismissiveness",         # "You're overreacting"
    "insults",                # Personal attacks that redirect attention
    "aggression",             # Escalates tone to destabilize
    "recovery phase",         # Sudden affection following aggression
    "contradictory statements" # “I never said that” immediately followed by a version of what they said
]
DARVO_MOTIFS = [
    "I never said that.", "You’re imagining things.", "That never happened.",
    "You’re making a big deal out of nothing.", "It was just a joke.", "You’re too sensitive.",
    "I don’t know what you’re talking about.", "You’re overreacting.", "I didn’t mean it that way.",
    "You’re twisting my words.", "You’re remembering it wrong.", "You’re always looking for something to complain about.",
    "You’re just trying to start a fight.", "I was only trying to help.", "You’re making things up.",
    "You’re blowing this out of proportion.", "You’re being paranoid.", "You’re too emotional.",
    "You’re always so dramatic.", "You’re just trying to make me look bad.",

    "You’re crazy.", "You’re the one with the problem.", "You’re always so negative.",
    "You’re just trying to control me.", "You’re the abusive one.", "You’re trying to ruin my life.",
    "You’re just jealous.", "You’re the one who needs help.", "You’re always playing the victim.",
    "You’re the one causing all the problems.", "You’re just trying to make me feel guilty.",
    "You’re the one who can’t let go of the past.", "You’re the one who’s always angry.",
    "You’re the one who’s always complaining.", "You’re the one who’s always starting arguments.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making things worse.", "You’re the one who’s always making me feel bad.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me look like the bad guy.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like a failure.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like I’m not good enough.",

    "I can’t believe you’re doing this to me.", "You’re hurting me.",
    "You’re making me feel like a terrible person.", "You’re always blaming me for everything.",
    "You’re the one who’s abusive.", "You’re the one who’s controlling.", "You’re the one who’s manipulative.",
    "You’re the one who’s toxic.", "You’re the one who’s gaslighting me.",
    "You’re the one who’s always putting me down.", "You’re the one who’s always making me feel bad.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like I’m not good enough.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like I’m the problem.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like I’m the bad guy.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like I’m the villain.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like I’m the one who needs to change.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like I’m the one who’s wrong.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like I’m the one who’s crazy.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like I’m the one who’s abusive.",
    "You’re the one who’s always making me feel like I’m the one who’s toxic."
]
def get_emotional_tone_tag(emotions, sentiment, patterns, abuse_score):
    sadness = emotions.get("sadness", 0)
    joy = emotions.get("joy", 0)
    neutral = emotions.get("neutral", 0)
    disgust = emotions.get("disgust", 0)
    anger = emotions.get("anger", 0)
    fear = emotions.get("fear", 0)
    disgust = emotions.get("disgust", 0)

    # 1. Performative Regret
    if (
        sadness > 0.4 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["blame shifting", "guilt tripping", "recovery phase"]) and
        (sentiment == "undermining" or abuse_score > 40)
    ):
        return "performative regret"

    # 2. Coercive Warmth
    if (
        (joy > 0.3 or sadness > 0.4) and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["control", "gaslighting"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "coercive warmth"

    # 3. Cold Invalidation
    if (
        (neutral + disgust) > 0.5 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["dismissiveness", "projection", "obscure language"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "cold invalidation"

    # 4. Genuine Vulnerability
    if (
        (sadness + fear) > 0.5 and
        sentiment == "supportive" and
        all(p in ["recovery phase"] for p in patterns)
    ):
        return "genuine vulnerability"

    # 5. Emotional Threat
    if (
        (anger + disgust) > 0.5 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["control", "threat", "insults", "dismissiveness"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "emotional threat"

    # 6. Weaponized Sadness
    if (
        sadness > 0.6 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["guilt tripping", "projection"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "weaponized sadness"

    # 7. Toxic Resignation
    if (
        neutral > 0.5 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["dismissiveness", "obscure language"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "toxic resignation"
    # 8. Aggressive Dismissal
    if (
        anger > 0.5 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["aggression", "insults", "control"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "aggressive dismissal"
    # 9. Deflective Hostility
    if (
        (0.2 < anger < 0.7 or 0.2 < disgust < 0.7) and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["deflection", "projection"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "deflective hostility"   
    # 10. Mocking Detachment
    if (
        (neutral + joy) > 0.5 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["mockery", "insults", "projection"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "mocking detachment"
        # 11. Contradictory Gaslight
    if (
        (joy + anger + sadness) > 0.5 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["gaslighting", "contradictory statements"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "contradictory gaslight"
        # 12. Calculated Neutrality
    if (
        neutral > 0.6 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["obscure language", "deflection", "dismissiveness"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "calculated neutrality"
     # 13. Forced Accountability Flip
    if (
        (anger + disgust) > 0.5 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["blame shifting", "manipulation", "projection"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "forced accountability flip"
        # 14. Conditional Affection
    if (
        joy > 0.4 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["apology baiting", "control", "recovery phase"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "conditional affection"
    
    if (
        (anger + disgust) > 0.5 and
        any(p in patterns for p in ["blame shifting", "projection", "deflection"]) and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "forced accountability flip"

    # Emotional Instability Fallback
    if (
        (anger + sadness + disgust) > 0.6 and
        sentiment == "undermining"
    ):
        return "emotional instability"
        
    return None
def detect_contradiction(message):
    patterns = [
        (r"\b(i love you).{0,15}(i hate you|you ruin everything)", re.IGNORECASE),
        (r"\b(i’m sorry).{0,15}(but you|if you hadn’t)", re.IGNORECASE),
        (r"\b(i’m trying).{0,15}(you never|why do you)", re.IGNORECASE),
        (r"\b(do what you want).{0,15}(you’ll regret it|i always give everything)", re.IGNORECASE),
        (r"\b(i don’t care).{0,15}(you never think of me)", re.IGNORECASE),
        (r"\b(i guess i’m just).{0,15}(the bad guy|worthless|never enough)", re.IGNORECASE)
    ]
    return any(re.search(p, message, flags) for p, flags in patterns)
    
def calculate_darvo_score(patterns, sentiment_before, sentiment_after, motifs_found, contradiction_flag=False):
    # Count all detected DARVO-related patterns
    pattern_hits = sum(1 for p in patterns if p.lower() in DARVO_PATTERNS)

    # Sentiment delta
    sentiment_shift_score = max(0.0, sentiment_after - sentiment_before)

    # Match against DARVO motifs more loosely
    motif_hits = sum(
        any(phrase.lower() in motif.lower() or motif.lower() in phrase.lower()
            for phrase in DARVO_MOTIFS)
        for motif in motifs_found
    )
    motif_score = motif_hits / max(len(DARVO_MOTIFS), 1)

    # Contradiction still binary
    contradiction_score = 1.0 if contradiction_flag else 0.0

    # Final DARVO score
    return round(min(
        0.3 * pattern_hits +
        0.3 * sentiment_shift_score +
        0.25 * motif_score +
        0.15 * contradiction_score, 1.0
    ), 3)
def detect_weapon_language(text):
    weapon_keywords = [
        "knife", "knives", "stab", "cut you", "cutting",
        "gun", "shoot", "rifle", "firearm", "pistol",
        "bomb", "blow up", "grenade", "explode",
        "weapon", "armed", "loaded", "kill you", "take you out"
    ]
    text_lower = text.lower()
    return any(word in text_lower for word in weapon_keywords)
def get_risk_stage(patterns, sentiment):
    if "threat" in patterns or "insults" in patterns:
        return 2
    elif "recovery phase" in patterns:
        return 3
    elif "control" in patterns or "guilt tripping" in patterns:
        return 1
    elif sentiment == "supportive" and any(p in patterns for p in ["projection", "dismissiveness"]):
        return 4
    return 1

def generate_risk_snippet(abuse_score, top_label, escalation_score, stage):
    import re

    # Extract aggression score if aggression is detected
    if isinstance(top_label, str) and "aggression" in top_label.lower():
        try:
            match = re.search(r"\(?(\d+)\%?\)?", top_label)
            aggression_score = int(match.group(1)) / 100 if match else 0
        except:
            aggression_score = 0
    else:
        aggression_score = 0

    # Revised risk logic
    if abuse_score >= 85 or escalation_score >= 16:
        risk_level = "high"
    elif abuse_score >= 60 or escalation_score >= 8 or aggression_score >= 0.25:
        risk_level = "moderate"
    elif stage == 2 and abuse_score >= 40:
        risk_level = "moderate"
    else:
        risk_level = "low"

    if isinstance(top_label, str) and " – " in top_label:
        pattern_label, pattern_score = top_label.split(" – ")
    else:
        pattern_label = str(top_label) if top_label is not None else "Unknown"
        pattern_score = ""

    WHY_FLAGGED = {
        "control": "This message may reflect efforts to restrict someone’s autonomy, even if it's framed as concern or care.",
        "gaslighting": "This message could be manipulating someone into questioning their perception or feelings.",
        "dismissiveness": "This message may include belittling, invalidating, or ignoring the other person’s experience.",
        "insults": "Direct insults often appear in escalating abusive dynamics and can erode emotional safety.",
        "threat": "This message includes threatening language, which is a strong predictor of harm.",
        "blame shifting": "This message may redirect responsibility to avoid accountability, especially during conflict.",
        "guilt tripping": "This message may induce guilt in order to control or manipulate behavior.",
        "recovery phase": "This message may be part of a tension-reset cycle, appearing kind but avoiding change.",
        "projection": "This message may involve attributing the abuser’s own behaviors to the victim.",
        "contradictory statements": "This message may contain internal contradictions used to confuse, destabilize, or deflect responsibility.",
        "obscure language": "This message may use overly formal, vague, or complex language to obscure meaning or avoid accountability.",
        "default": "This message contains language patterns that may affect safety, clarity, or emotional autonomy."
    }

    explanation = WHY_FLAGGED.get(pattern_label.lower(), WHY_FLAGGED["default"])

    base = f"\n\n🛑 Risk Level: {risk_level.capitalize()}\n"
    base += f"This message shows strong indicators of **{pattern_label}**. "

    if risk_level == "high":
        base += "The language may reflect patterns of emotional control, even when expressed in soft or caring terms.\n"
    elif risk_level == "moderate":
        base += "There are signs of emotional pressure or verbal aggression that may escalate if repeated.\n"
    else:
        base += "The message does not strongly indicate abuse, but it's important to monitor for patterns.\n"

    base += f"\n💡 *Why this might be flagged:*\n{explanation}\n"
    base += f"\nDetected Pattern: **{pattern_label} ({pattern_score})**\n"
    base += "🧠 You can review the pattern in context. This tool highlights possible dynamics—not judgments."
    return base

    WHY_FLAGGED = {
        "control": "This message may reflect efforts to restrict someone’s autonomy, even if it's framed as concern or care.",
        "gaslighting": "This message could be manipulating someone into questioning their perception or feelings.",
        "dismissiveness": "This message may include belittling, invalidating, or ignoring the other person’s experience.",
        "insults": "Direct insults often appear in escalating abusive dynamics and can erode emotional safety.",
        "threat": "This message includes threatening language, which is a strong predictor of harm.",
        "blame shifting": "This message may redirect responsibility to avoid accountability, especially during conflict.",
        "guilt tripping": "This message may induce guilt in order to control or manipulate behavior.",
        "recovery phase": "This message may be part of a tension-reset cycle, appearing kind but avoiding change.",
        "projection": "This message may involve attributing the abuser’s own behaviors to the victim.",
        "contradictory statements": "This message may contain internal contradictions used to confuse, destabilize, or deflect responsibility.",
        "obscure language": "This message may use overly formal, vague, or complex language to obscure meaning or avoid accountability.",
        "default": "This message contains language patterns that may affect safety, clarity, or emotional autonomy."
}
    explanation = WHY_FLAGGED.get(pattern_label.lower(), WHY_FLAGGED["default"])

    base = f"\n\n🛑 Risk Level: {risk_level.capitalize()}\n"
    base += f"This message shows strong indicators of **{pattern_label}**. "

    if risk_level == "high":
        base += "The language may reflect patterns of emotional control, even when expressed in soft or caring terms.\n"
    elif risk_level == "moderate":
        base += "There are signs of emotional pressure or indirect control that may escalate if repeated.\n"
    else:
        base += "The message does not strongly indicate abuse, but it's important to monitor for patterns.\n"
    
    base += f"\n💡 *Why this might be flagged:*\n{explanation}\n"
    base += f"\nDetected Pattern: **{pattern_label} ({pattern_score})**\n"
    base += "🧠 You can review the pattern in context. This tool highlights possible dynamics—not judgments."
    return base
def compute_abuse_score(matched_scores, sentiment):
    if not matched_scores:
        return 0

    # Weighted average of passed patterns
    weighted_total = sum(score * weight for _, score, weight in matched_scores)
    weight_sum = sum(weight for _, _, weight in matched_scores)
    base_score = (weighted_total / weight_sum) * 100

    # Boost for pattern count
    pattern_count = len(matched_scores)
    scale = 1.0 + 0.25 * max(0, pattern_count - 1)  # 1.25x for 2, 1.5x for 3+
    scaled_score = base_score * scale

    # Pattern floors
    FLOORS = {
        "threat": 70,
        "control": 40,
        "gaslighting": 30,
        "insults": 25,
        "aggression": 40
    }
    floor = max(FLOORS.get(label, 0) for label, _, _ in matched_scores)
    adjusted_score = max(scaled_score, floor)

    # Sentiment tweak
    if sentiment == "undermining" and adjusted_score < 50:
        adjusted_score += 10

    return min(adjusted_score, 100)
    
    
def analyze_single_message(text, thresholds):
    motif_hits, matched_phrases = detect_motifs(text)

    # Get emotion profile
    emotion_profile = get_emotion_profile(text)
    sentiment_score = emotion_profile.get("anger", 0) + emotion_profile.get("disgust", 0)

    # Get model scores
    inputs = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, padding=True)
    with torch.no_grad():
        outputs = model(**inputs)
    scores = torch.sigmoid(outputs.logits.squeeze(0)).numpy()

    # Sentiment override if neutral is high while critical thresholds are passed
    if emotion_profile.get("neutral", 0) > 0.85 and any(
        scores[LABELS.index(l)] > thresholds[l]
        for l in ["control", "threat", "blame shifting"]
    ):
        sentiment = "undermining"
    else:
        sentiment = "undermining" if sentiment_score > 0.25 else "supportive"

    weapon_flag = detect_weapon_language(text)

    adjusted_thresholds = {
        k: v + 0.05 if sentiment == "supportive" else v
        for k, v in thresholds.items()
    }

    contradiction_flag = detect_contradiction(text)

    threshold_labels = [
        label for label, score in zip(LABELS, scores)
        if score > adjusted_thresholds[label]
    ]
    tone_tag = get_emotional_tone_tag(emotion_profile, sentiment, threshold_labels, 0)
    motifs = [phrase for _, phrase in matched_phrases]

    darvo_score = calculate_darvo_score(
        threshold_labels,
        sentiment_before=0.0,
        sentiment_after=sentiment_score,
        motifs_found=motifs,
        contradiction_flag=contradiction_flag
    )

    top_patterns = sorted(
        [(label, score) for label, score in zip(LABELS, scores)],
        key=lambda x: x[1],
        reverse=True
    )[:2]
    # Post-threshold validation: strip recovery if it occurs with undermining sentiment
    if "recovery" in threshold_labels and tone_tag == "forced accountability flip":
        threshold_labels.remove("recovery")
        top_patterns = [p for p in top_patterns if p[0] != "recovery"]
        print("⚠️ Removing 'recovery' due to undermining sentiment (not genuine repair)")

    matched_scores = [
        (label, score, PATTERN_WEIGHTS.get(label, 1.0))
        for label, score in zip(LABELS, scores)
        if score > adjusted_thresholds[label]
    ]

    abuse_score_raw = compute_abuse_score(matched_scores, sentiment)
    abuse_score = abuse_score_raw

    # Risk stage logic
    stage = get_risk_stage(threshold_labels, sentiment) if threshold_labels else 1
    if weapon_flag and stage < 2:
        stage = 2
    if weapon_flag:
        abuse_score_raw = min(abuse_score_raw + 25, 100)

    abuse_score = min(
        abuse_score_raw,
        100 if "threat" in threshold_labels or "control" in threshold_labels else 95
    )

    # Tone tag must happen after abuse_score is finalized
    tone_tag = get_emotional_tone_tag(emotion_profile, sentiment, threshold_labels, abuse_score)

    # Debug
    print(f"Emotional Tone Tag: {tone_tag}")
    print("Emotion Profile:")
    for emotion, score in emotion_profile.items():
        print(f"  {emotion.capitalize():10}: {score}")
    print("\n--- Debug Info ---")
    print(f"Text: {text}")
    print(f"Sentiment (via emotion): {sentiment} (score: {round(sentiment_score, 3)})")
    print("Abuse Pattern Scores:")
    for label, score in zip(LABELS, scores):
        passed = "✅" if score > adjusted_thresholds[label] else "❌"
        print(f"  {label:25} → {score:.3f} {passed}")
    print(f"Matched for score: {[(l, round(s, 3)) for l, s, _ in matched_scores]}")
    print(f"Abuse Score Raw: {round(abuse_score_raw, 1)}")
    print(f"Motifs: {motifs}")
    print(f"Contradiction: {contradiction_flag}")
    print("------------------\n")

    return abuse_score, threshold_labels, top_patterns, {"label": sentiment}, stage, darvo_score, tone_tag

def analyze_composite(msg1, date1, msg2, date2, msg3, date3, *answers_and_none):
    none_selected_checked = answers_and_none[-1]
    responses_checked = any(answers_and_none[:-1])
    none_selected = not responses_checked and none_selected_checked

    if none_selected:
        escalation_score = None
        risk_level = "unknown"
    else:
        escalation_score = sum(w for (_, w), a in zip(ESCALATION_QUESTIONS, answers_and_none[:-1]) if a)

    messages = [msg1, msg2, msg3]
    dates = [date1, date2, date3]
    active = [(m, d) for m, d in zip(messages, dates) if m.strip()]
    if not active:
        return "Please enter at least one message."

    # Run model on messages
    results = [(analyze_single_message(m, THRESHOLDS.copy()), d) for m, d in active]
    abuse_scores = [r[0][0] for r in results]
    top_labels = [r[0][1][0] if r[0][1] else r[0][2][0][0] for r in results]
    top_scores = [r[0][2][0][1] for r in results]
    sentiments = [r[0][3]['label'] for r in results]
    stages = [r[0][4] for r in results]
    darvo_scores = [r[0][5] for r in results]
    tone_tags= [r[0][6] for r in results]
    dates_used = [r[1] or "Undated" for r in results]  # Store dates for future mapping
    # Calculate escalation bump *after* model results exist
    escalation_bump = 0
    for result, _ in results:
        abuse_score, threshold_labels, top_patterns, sentiment, stage, darvo_score, tone_tag = result
        if darvo_score > 0.65:
            escalation_bump += 3
        if tone_tag in ["forced accountability flip", "emotional threat"]:
            escalation_bump += 2
        if abuse_score > 80:
            escalation_bump += 2
        if stage == 2:
            escalation_bump += 3

    # Now we can safely calculate hybrid_score
    hybrid_score = escalation_score + escalation_bump if escalation_score is not None else 0
    risk_level = (
        "High" if hybrid_score >= 16 else
        "Moderate" if hybrid_score >= 8 else
        "Low"
    )

    # Now compute scores and allow override
    abuse_scores = [r[0][0] for r in results]
    stages = [r[0][4] for r in results]

    # Post-check override (e.g. stage 2 or high abuse score forces Moderate risk)
    if any(score > 70 for score in abuse_scores) or any(stage == 2 for stage in stages):
        if risk_level == "Low":
            risk_level = "Moderate"

    for result, date in results:
        assert len(result) == 7, "Unexpected output from analyze_single_message"

# --- Composite Abuse Score using compute_abuse_score ---
    composite_abuse_scores = []

    for result, _ in results:
        _, _, top_patterns, sentiment, _, _, _ = result
        matched_scores = [(label, score, PATTERN_WEIGHTS.get(label, 1.0)) for label, score in top_patterns]
        final_score = compute_abuse_score(matched_scores, sentiment["label"])
        composite_abuse_scores.append(final_score)

    composite_abuse = int(round(sum(composite_abuse_scores) / len(composite_abuse_scores)))



    most_common_stage = max(set(stages), key=stages.count)
    stage_text = RISK_STAGE_LABELS[most_common_stage]

    avg_darvo = round(sum(darvo_scores) / len(darvo_scores), 3)
    darvo_blurb = ""
    if avg_darvo > 0.25:
        level = "moderate" if avg_darvo < 0.65 else "high"
        darvo_blurb = f"\n\n🎭 **DARVO Score: {avg_darvo}** → This indicates a **{level} likelihood** of narrative reversal (DARVO), where the speaker may be denying, attacking, or reversing blame."

    out = f"Abuse Intensity: {composite_abuse}%\n"
    out += "📊 This reflects the strength and severity of detected abuse patterns in the message(s).\n\n"

# Save this line for later use at the 
    if escalation_score is None:
        escalation_text = "📉 Escalation Potential: Unknown (Checklist not completed)\n"
        escalation_text += "⚠️ *This section was not completed. Escalation potential is unknown.*\n"
        hybrid_score = 0  # ✅ fallback so it's defined for generate_risk_snippet
    else:
        escalation_text = f"🧨 **Escalation Potential: {risk_level} ({escalation_score}/{sum(w for _, w in ESCALATION_QUESTIONS)})**\n"
        escalation_text += "This score comes directly from the safety checklist and functions as a standalone escalation risk score.\n"
        escalation_text += "It indicates how many serious risk factors are present based on your answers to the safety checklist.\n"
        # Derive top_label from the strongest top_patterns across all messages
    top_label = None
    if results:
        sorted_patterns = sorted(
            [(label, score) for r in results for label, score in r[0][2]],
            key=lambda x: x[1],
            reverse=True
    )
        if sorted_patterns:
            top_label = f"{sorted_patterns[0][0]} – {int(round(sorted_patterns[0][1] * 100))}%"
        if top_label is None:
            top_label = "Unknown – 0%"
    out += generate_risk_snippet(composite_abuse, top_label, hybrid_score if escalation_score is not None else 0, most_common_stage)
    out += f"\n\n{stage_text}"
    out += darvo_blurb
    out += "\n\n🎭 **Emotional Tones Detected:**\n"
    for i, tone in enumerate(tone_tags):
        label = tone if tone else "none"
        out += f"• Message {i+1}: *{label}*\n"
    print(f"DEBUG: avg_darvo = {avg_darvo}")
    pattern_labels = [r[0][2][0][0] for r in results]  # top label for each message
    timeline_image = generate_abuse_score_chart(dates_used, abuse_scores, pattern_labels)
    out += "\n\n" + escalation_text
    return out, timeline_image
    
message_date_pairs = [
    (
        gr.Textbox(label=f"Message {i+1}"),
        gr.Textbox(label=f"Date {i+1} (optional)", placeholder="YYYY-MM-DD")
    )
    for i in range(3)
]
textbox_inputs = [item for pair in message_date_pairs for item in pair]
quiz_boxes = [gr.Checkbox(label=q) for q, _ in ESCALATION_QUESTIONS]
none_box = gr.Checkbox(label="None of the above")

iface = gr.Interface(
    fn=analyze_composite,
    inputs=textbox_inputs + quiz_boxes + [none_box],
    outputs=[
        gr.Textbox(label="Results"),
        gr.Image(label="Abuse Score Timeline", type="pil")
    ],
    title="Abuse Pattern Detector + Escalation Quiz",
    allow_flagging="manual"
)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    iface.launch()