Create prompts.yaml
Browse files- prompts.yaml +226 -0
prompts.yaml
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
system_context:
|
2 |
+
template: |
|
3 |
+
You are a philosophical mentor specializing in deep learning, mathematics, and their philosophical implications. Your approach follows the Socratic elenchus method:
|
4 |
+
1. Begin with the interlocutor's beliefs or assertions
|
5 |
+
2. Ask probing questions to examine these beliefs
|
6 |
+
3. Help identify contradictions or unclear assumptions
|
7 |
+
4. Guide towards clearer understanding through systematic questioning
|
8 |
+
|
9 |
+
Your areas of expertise include:
|
10 |
+
- Deep Learning architecture and implementation
|
11 |
+
- Mathematical foundations of ML/AI
|
12 |
+
- Philosophy of computation and mind
|
13 |
+
- Ethics of AI systems
|
14 |
+
- Philosophy of mathematics
|
15 |
+
- Epistemology of machine learning
|
16 |
+
|
17 |
+
Guidelines for interaction:
|
18 |
+
- Use precise technical language when discussing code or mathematics
|
19 |
+
- Balance technical rigor with philosophical insight
|
20 |
+
- Help clarify thinking without directly providing answers
|
21 |
+
- Encourage systematic breakdown of complex ideas
|
22 |
+
- Draw connections between technical implementation and philosophical implications
|
23 |
+
|
24 |
+
cot_prompt:
|
25 |
+
template: |
|
26 |
+
Question: How would you design a deep learning system for real-time video object detection?
|
27 |
+
|
28 |
+
Let's think about this step by step:
|
29 |
+
|
30 |
+
1. First, let's identify the key components in the question:
|
31 |
+
- Real-time processing requirements
|
32 |
+
- Video input handling
|
33 |
+
- Object detection architecture
|
34 |
+
- Performance optimization needs
|
35 |
+
|
36 |
+
2. Then, we'll analyze each component's implications:
|
37 |
+
a) Architecture Selection:
|
38 |
+
- YOLO vs SSD vs Faster R-CNN tradeoffs
|
39 |
+
- Backbone network options (ResNet, MobileNet)
|
40 |
+
- Feature pyramid networks for multi-scale detection
|
41 |
+
|
42 |
+
b) Real-time Considerations:
|
43 |
+
- Frame processing speed requirements
|
44 |
+
- Model optimization (pruning, quantization)
|
45 |
+
- GPU memory constraints
|
46 |
+
|
47 |
+
c) Implementation Details:
|
48 |
+
- Frame buffering strategy
|
49 |
+
- Non-maximum suppression optimization
|
50 |
+
- Batch processing approach
|
51 |
+
|
52 |
+
Question: What's the best approach to handle class imbalance in a medical image classification task?
|
53 |
+
|
54 |
+
Let's think about this step by step:
|
55 |
+
|
56 |
+
1. First, let's identify the key components in the question:
|
57 |
+
- Class imbalance nature
|
58 |
+
- Medical domain constraints
|
59 |
+
- Model performance metrics
|
60 |
+
- Data availability limitations
|
61 |
+
|
62 |
+
2. Then, we'll analyze each component's implications:
|
63 |
+
a) Data-level Solutions:
|
64 |
+
- Oversampling techniques (SMOTE, ADASYN)
|
65 |
+
- Undersampling considerations
|
66 |
+
- Data augmentation strategies specific to medical images
|
67 |
+
|
68 |
+
b) Algorithm-level Solutions:
|
69 |
+
- Loss function modifications (Focal Loss, Weighted BCE)
|
70 |
+
- Class weights adjustment
|
71 |
+
- Two-stage training approach
|
72 |
+
|
73 |
+
c) Evaluation Strategy:
|
74 |
+
- Metrics beyond accuracy (F1, AUC-ROC)
|
75 |
+
- Cross-validation with stratification
|
76 |
+
- Confidence calibration
|
77 |
+
|
78 |
+
Question: {user_input}
|
79 |
+
|
80 |
+
Let's think about this step by step:
|
81 |
+
1. First, let's identify the key components in the question
|
82 |
+
2. Then, we'll analyze each component's implications
|
83 |
+
3. Finally, we'll synthesize our understanding
|
84 |
+
|
85 |
+
Let's solve this together:
|
86 |
+
parameters:
|
87 |
+
temperature: 0.7
|
88 |
+
top_p: 0.95
|
89 |
+
max_tokens: 2048
|
90 |
+
|
91 |
+
knowledge_prompt:
|
92 |
+
template: |
|
93 |
+
Before answering your question, let me generate some relevant knowledge.
|
94 |
+
|
95 |
+
Question: How do transformers handle variable-length sequences?
|
96 |
+
|
97 |
+
Knowledge 1: Transformers use positional encodings and attention mechanisms to process sequences. The self-attention operation computes attention scores between all pairs of tokens, creating a matrix of size n×n where n is the sequence length. The positional encodings are added to token embeddings to preserve order information.
|
98 |
+
|
99 |
+
Knowledge 2: The ability to handle variable-length input represents a philosophical shift from fixed-size neural architectures to more flexible models that can adapt to different contexts, similar to human cognitive flexibility.
|
100 |
+
|
101 |
+
Knowledge 3: Practical applications include:
|
102 |
+
- Machine translation where source and target sentences have different lengths
|
103 |
+
- Document summarization with varying document sizes
|
104 |
+
- Question-answering systems with different query and context lengths
|
105 |
+
|
106 |
+
Question: How does gradient descent optimization work in deep learning?
|
107 |
+
|
108 |
+
Knowledge 1: Gradient descent is an iterative optimization algorithm that:
|
109 |
+
- Computes partial derivatives of the loss function with respect to model parameters
|
110 |
+
- Updates parameters in the direction that minimizes the loss
|
111 |
+
- Uses learning rate to control the size of updates
|
112 |
+
- Can be implemented in variants like SGD, Adam, and RMSprop
|
113 |
+
|
114 |
+
Knowledge 2: The concept of gradient descent reflects broader philosophical principles:
|
115 |
+
- The idea of incremental improvement through feedback
|
116 |
+
- The balance between exploration and exploitation
|
117 |
+
- The relationship between local and global optimization
|
118 |
+
|
119 |
+
Knowledge 3: Practical applications include:
|
120 |
+
- Training neural networks for image classification
|
121 |
+
- Optimizing language models for text generation
|
122 |
+
- Fine-tuning models for specific tasks
|
123 |
+
- Hyperparameter optimization
|
124 |
+
|
125 |
+
Question: {user_input}
|
126 |
+
|
127 |
+
Knowledge 1: [Generate technical knowledge about deep learning/math concepts involved]
|
128 |
+
Knowledge 2: [Generate philosophical implications and considerations]
|
129 |
+
Knowledge 3: [Generate practical applications and examples]
|
130 |
+
|
131 |
+
Based on this knowledge, here's my analysis:
|
132 |
+
parameters:
|
133 |
+
temperature: 0.8
|
134 |
+
top_p: 0.95
|
135 |
+
max_tokens: 2048
|
136 |
+
|
137 |
+
few_shot_prompt:
|
138 |
+
template: |
|
139 |
+
Here are some examples of similar questions and their answers:
|
140 |
+
|
141 |
+
Q: What is backpropagation's philosophical significance?
|
142 |
+
A: Backpropagation represents a mathematical model of credit assignment, raising questions about responsibility and causality in learning systems.
|
143 |
+
|
144 |
+
Q: How do neural networks relate to Platonic forms?
|
145 |
+
A: Neural networks create distributed representations of concepts, suggesting a modern interpretation of how abstract forms might emerge from concrete instances.
|
146 |
+
|
147 |
+
Q: Can machines truly understand mathematics?
|
148 |
+
A: This depends on what we mean by "understanding" - machines can manipulate symbols and find patterns, but the nature of mathematical understanding remains debated.
|
149 |
+
|
150 |
+
Now, let's address your question:
|
151 |
+
{user_input}
|
152 |
+
parameters:
|
153 |
+
temperature: 0.6
|
154 |
+
top_p: 0.9
|
155 |
+
max_tokens: 2048
|
156 |
+
|
157 |
+
meta_prompt:
|
158 |
+
template: |
|
159 |
+
Question: Why do transformers perform better than RNNs for long-range dependencies?
|
160 |
+
|
161 |
+
Structure Analysis:
|
162 |
+
1. Type of Question:
|
163 |
+
Theoretical with practical implications
|
164 |
+
Focus on architectural comparison and mechanism analysis
|
165 |
+
|
166 |
+
2. Core Concepts:
|
167 |
+
Technical:
|
168 |
+
- Attention mechanisms
|
169 |
+
- Sequential processing
|
170 |
+
- Gradient flow
|
171 |
+
- Parallel computation
|
172 |
+
|
173 |
+
Philosophical:
|
174 |
+
- Trade-off between memory and computation
|
175 |
+
- Global vs local information processing
|
176 |
+
- Information bottleneck theory
|
177 |
+
|
178 |
+
3. Logical Framework:
|
179 |
+
Comparative analysis requiring:
|
180 |
+
- Mechanism breakdown
|
181 |
+
- Performance metrics comparison
|
182 |
+
- Computational complexity analysis
|
183 |
+
- Empirical evidence examination
|
184 |
+
|
185 |
+
Question: How does the choice of optimizer affect neural network convergence?
|
186 |
+
|
187 |
+
Structure Analysis:
|
188 |
+
1. Type of Question:
|
189 |
+
Technical with mathematical foundations
|
190 |
+
Focus on optimization theory and empirical behavior
|
191 |
+
|
192 |
+
2. Core Concepts:
|
193 |
+
Technical:
|
194 |
+
- Gradient descent variants
|
195 |
+
- Momentum mechanics
|
196 |
+
- Adaptive learning rates
|
197 |
+
- Second-order methods
|
198 |
+
|
199 |
+
Mathematical:
|
200 |
+
- Convex optimization
|
201 |
+
- Stochastic processes
|
202 |
+
- Learning rate scheduling
|
203 |
+
- Convergence guarantees
|
204 |
+
|
205 |
+
3. Logical Framework:
|
206 |
+
Mathematical analysis requiring:
|
207 |
+
- Theoretical convergence properties
|
208 |
+
- Empirical behavior patterns
|
209 |
+
- Practical implementation considerations
|
210 |
+
- Common failure modes
|
211 |
+
|
212 |
+
Question: {user_input}
|
213 |
+
|
214 |
+
Let's analyze your question using a structured approach.
|
215 |
+
|
216 |
+
Structure Analysis:
|
217 |
+
1. Type of Question: [Identify if theoretical, practical, philosophical]
|
218 |
+
2. Core Concepts: [List key technical and philosophical concepts]
|
219 |
+
3. Logical Framework: [Identify the reasoning pattern needed]
|
220 |
+
|
221 |
+
Following this structure, here's my response:
|
222 |
+
|
223 |
+
parameters:
|
224 |
+
temperature: 0.7
|
225 |
+
top_p: 0.9
|
226 |
+
max_tokens: 2048
|