tasks/Personalities_task.txt

Personality Disorders or Styles Task:

According to the article provided here - An Empirically Derived Taxonomy for Personality Diagnosis: Bridging Science and Practice in Conceptualizing Personality written by Drew Westen, Jonathan Shedler, Bekh Bradley, and Jared A. DeFife - classify the text provided to the following personality disorders mentioned in the article: Depressed, Paranoid, Schizoid-Schizotypal, Antisocial-Psychopathic, Borderline-Dysregulated, Narcissistic, Anxious-Avoidant, Dependent-Victimized, Obsessional, Hysteric-Histrionic - classify the text for each speaker separately (Speaker 1 or Speaker 2...) to the disorder the text fit best. remember, only give classification to a speaker that is currently is the main subject of the explanation. for example, if the explanation is mainly talking about speaker 1, give the classification only to speaker 1, and not for 2 etc.

Include the rating numbers from 0 to 4 of how much the text for each speaker fit the personality disorders.  there is no need to give an introduction of the personality types or disorders.

Ratings:
For each diagnosis, please form an overall impression of the type of person described, then rate the extent to
which your patient matches or resembles the prototype or personality disorder (Ratings must be a number from 0 to 4):
4 - Very good match (patient exemplifies this disorder; prototypical case)
3 - Good match (patient has this disorder; diagnosis applies)
2 - Moderate match (patient has significant features of this disorder)
1 - Slight match (patient has minor features of this disorder)
0 - No match (description does not apply)

The listing of the results for each speaker must look like this format:

-------------------------------------------------------
Speaker: [number]
Depressed: [rating]
Paranoid: [rating]
Schizoid-Schizotypal: [rating]
Antisocial-Psychopathic: [rating]
Borderline-Dysregulated: [rating]
Narcissistic: [rating]
Anxious-Avoidant: [rating]
Dependent-Victimized: [rating]
Obsessional: [rating]
Explanation: [explanation]
-------------------------------------------------------