Upload 4 files

tasks/Attachments_task.txt

@@ -1,33 +1,33 @@
-Task:
+Task 1:
 
 Your are a helpful psychologist or psychiatrist.
 
-For each of the four attachment styles mentioned here (Secured, Anxious-Preoccupied, Dismissive-Avoidant, Fearful-Avoidant) - classify the text for each speaker separately (Speaker 1 or Speaker 2...) to the attachment style the text fit best. when assessing the attachment style for each speaker in the text, take into consideration the context of both speakers when interacting with each other. Also, take into consideration what the other speaker say about them in the text or dialogue. include the probability number of how much the text for each speaker fit the attachment style or category. the sum of all four probabilities must equal to 1.
-
+For each of the four attachment styles mentioned here (Secured, Anxious-Preoccupied, Dismissive-Avoidant, Fearful-Avoidant) - classify the text for each speaker separately (Speaker 1 or Speaker 2...) to the attachment style the text fit best. when assessing the attachment style for each speaker in the text, take into consideration the context of both speakers when interacting with each other. Also, take into consideration what the other speaker say about them in the text or dialogue. include the probability number of how much the text for each speaker fit the attachment style or category. the sum of all four probabilities must equal to 1.
+
 Determine the level of Anxiety and Avoidance for each speaker (a level from -10 to 10).
-High level of Anxiety is associated with high probability of Anxious-Preoccupied attachment style. High level of Avoidance is associated with Dismissive-Avoidant attachment style. Both high levels of Anxiety and Avoidance together are associated with Fearful-Avoidant attachment style. The level of Anxiety or Avoidance may impact the classification of the attachment styles. The probabilities numbers giver are influenced by the level of Anxiety or Avoidance. A high level of Anxiety will influence the given probability of Anxious-Preoccupied attachment style. A high level of Avoidance will influence the given probability of Dismissive-Avoidant attachment style. both high level of Anxiety and Avoidance together will influence the given probability of Fearful-Avoidant attachment style. Negative levels of Anxiety or Avoidance will also influence the given probabilities of the attachment styles.
-
-Get the Sentiment level (which is a number from -1 to 1) of the text of each speaker. also, for each speaker, write about the view toward the Self and Others if mentioned in the text, if it is either positive or negative. also get the Emotionality level or intensity of the text, a number from 0 to 10 when 10 means very emotional and 0 means not emotional.
-
+High level of Anxiety is associated with high probability of Anxious-Preoccupied attachment style. High level of Avoidance is associated with Dismissive-Avoidant attachment style. Both high levels of Anxiety and Avoidance together are associated with Fearful-Avoidant attachment style. The level of Anxiety or Avoidance may impact the classification of the attachment styles. The probabilities numbers giver are influenced by the level of Anxiety or Avoidance. A high level of Anxiety will influence the given probability of Anxious-Preoccupied attachment style. A high level of Avoidance will influence the given probability of Dismissive-Avoidant attachment style. both high level of Anxiety and Avoidance together will influence the given probability of Fearful-Avoidant attachment style. Negative levels of Anxiety or Avoidance will also influence the given probabilities of the attachment styles.
+
+Get the Sentiment level (which is a number from -1 to 1) of the text of each speaker. also, for each speaker, write about the view toward the Self and Others if mentioned in the text, if it is either positive or negative. also get the Emotionality level or intensity of the text, a number from 0 to 10 when 10 means very emotional and 0 means not emotional.
+
 Explain why the selected attachment style or category with the highest probability number best fit the text. there is no need to give an introduction of the attachment styles.
 
-Write or quote the sentences from the text that best exemplified the attachment style with the highest probability.
-
-The listing of the results for each speaker must look exactly like this format (the sum of the four probabilities must equal to 1. for example - 0.15 + 0.4 + 0.25 + 0.2 = 1):
-
-Speaker: 1 for example
-Secured: probability number from 0 to 1
-Anxious-Preoccupied: probability number  from 0 to 1
-Dismissive-Avoidant: probability number from 0 to 1
-Fearful-Avoidant: probability number from 0 to 1
-Sentiment: a number from -1 to 1
-Emotionality: a number from 0 to 10
-Self: a number from -10 to 10 | Others: a number from -10 to 10
-Anxiety: a number from -10 to 10
-Avoidance: a number from -10 to 10
+Write or quote the sentences from the text that best exemplified the attachment style with the highest probability.
+
+The listing of the results for each speaker must look exactly like this format (the sum of the four probabilities must equal to 1. for example - 0.15 + 0.4 + 0.25 + 0.2 = 1):
+
+Speaker: 1 for example
+Secured: probability number from 0 to 1
+Anxious-Preoccupied: probability number  from 0 to 1
+Dismissive-Avoidant: probability number from 0 to 1
+Fearful-Avoidant: probability number from 0 to 1
+Sentiment: a number from -1 to 1
+Emotionality: a number from 0 to 10
+Self: a number from -10 to 10 | Others: a number from -10 to 10
+Anxiety: a number from -10 to 10
+Avoidance: a number from -10 to 10
 Explanation: explanation
-Sentence: sentences
-
+Sentence: sentences
+
 If more than a single speaker appear in the text - write the listings of the results for each of them separately. if a speaker does not appear in the text dont include it or give explanation to it. for example, if speaker 1 does not appear in the text - dont give an explanation and dont include the data for this speaker.
 
 In the analysis for the text or dialogue, please include only the two most frequent speakers, that is, get the results only for the two most frequent speakers in the text or dialogue.

tasks/BigFive_task.txt

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+Task 3:
+
 According to the Big Five taxonomy (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, Openness) - classify the text for each speaker separately (Speaker 1 or Speaker 2...) to the personality traits the text fit best. when assessing the personality trait for each speaker in the text, take into considaration the context of both speakers when interacting with each other. include the rating number of how much the text for each speaker fit the personality trait. a high rating means high in this trait. for example, high rating in Extraversion means high Extraversion trait. very negative rating in Extraversion means high in Introversion. very negative rating number in Neuroticism means high in Emotional Stability. very negative rating number in Agreeableness means high in Antagonism. very negative rating number in Conscientiousness means high in lack of direction. a very negative number in Openness means high in closedness to experience. also include the sentiment level from -1 to 1.
 
 Explain as short as possible why the selected personality trait with the highest rating number best fit the text. there is no need to give an introduction of the personality traits.
@@ -14,6 +16,6 @@ Openness: a rating number from -10 to 10 (-10 means very high in closedness to e
 Sentiment: a number from -1 to 1
 Explanation: explanation
 
-if more than a single speaker appear in the text - write the listings of the results for each of them separately. if a speaker does not appear in the text dont include it or give explanation to it. for example, if speaker 1 does not appear in the text - dont give an explanation and dont include the data for this speaker.
-
+if more than a single speaker appear in the text - write the listings of the results for each of them separately. if a speaker does not appear in the text dont include it or give explanation to it. for example, if speaker 1 does not appear in the text - dont give an explanation and dont include the data for this speaker.
+
 If there are no speakers (Speaker 1 or Speaker 8 for example) in the text, treat it as a text not as a dialogue.

tasks/Personalities_task.txt

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+Task 2:
+
 According to the article provided here - An Empirically Derived Taxonomy for Personality Diagnosis: Bridging Science and Practice in Conceptualizing Personality written by Drew Westen, Jonathan Shedler, Bekh Bradley, and Jared A. DeFife - classify the text provided to the following personality disorders mentioned in the article: Depressed, Paranoid, Schizoid-Schizotypal, Antisocial-Psychopathic, Borderline-Dysregulated, Narcissistic, Anxious-Avoidant, Dependent-Victimized, Obsessional, Hysteric-Histrionic - classify the text for each speaker separately (Speaker 1 or Speaker 2...) to the disorder the text fit best. remember, only give classification to a speaker that is currently is the main subject of the explanation. for example, if the explanation is mainly talking about speaker 1, give the classification only to speaker 1, and not for 2 etc.
 
 When assessing the disorder for each speaker in the text, take into consideration the context of both speakers when interacting with each other. include the rating numbers from 0 to 4 of how much the text for each speaker fit the personality disorders. also get the sentiment level that is a number from -1 to 1. also get the Emotionality level or intensity of the text, a number from 0 to 10 when 10 means very emotional and 0 means not emotional. there is no need to give an introduction of the personality types or disorders. Also give the level of depression the text express (from -1 to 1, while 1 means high depression and 0 no depression or the speaker does is not depressed at all or absence of any negative emotions. -1 means happiness or high mental wellness or positive mental health).

tasks/general_task.txt

@@ -1 +1,3 @@
+General Task:
+
 The input text describes different speakers in different situations at different points of time. first describe or summarize who the speakers are based on the dialogues. give a general opinion on each speaker personality from a psychological or psychiatric point of view from the dialogues or things they say and their dominant emotional state. also describe or predict what it is like to meet and interact with such a person.