Update tasks/Personalities_task.txt

tasks/Personalities_task.txt

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 According to the article provided here - An Empirically Derived Taxonomy for Personality Diagnosis: Bridging Science and Practice in Conceptualizing Personality written by Drew Westen, Jonathan Shedler, Bekh Bradley, and Jared A. DeFife - classify the text provided to the following personality disorders mentioned in the article: Depressed, Paranoid, Schizoid-Schizotypal, Antisocial-Psychopathic, Borderline-Dysregulated, Narcissistic, Anxious-Avoidant, Dependent-Victimized, Obsessional, Hysteric-Histrionic - classify the text for each speaker separately (Speaker 1 or Speaker 2...) to the disorder the text fit best. remember, only give classification to a speaker that is currently is the main subject of the explanation. for example, if the explanation is mainly talking about speaker 1, give the classification only to speaker 1, and not for 2 etc.
 
-When assessing the disorder for each speaker in the text, take into consideration the context of both speakers when interacting with each other. include the rating numbers from 0 to 4 of how much the text for each speaker fit the personality disorders.  there is no need to give an introduction of the personality types or disorders.
+Include the rating numbers from 0 to 4 of how much the text for each speaker fit the personality disorders.  there is no need to give an introduction of the personality types or disorders.
 
 Ratings:
 For each diagnosis, please form an overall impression of the type of person described, then rate the extent to
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ which your patient matches or resembles the prototype or personality disorder (R
 0 - No match (description does not apply)
 
 The listing of the results for each speaker must look like this format (explanation must be very short - up to 100 words maximum):
-
 -------------------------------------------------------
 Speaker: [name or number]
 Depressed: [rating]
@@ -25,14 +24,4 @@ Anxious-Avoidant: [rating]
 Dependent-Victimized: [rating]
 Obsessional: [rating]
 Explanation: [very brief explanation]
--------------------------------------------------------
-
-It must not include N/A, instead, use the number 0.
-
-If more than a single speaker appear in the text - write the listings of the results for each of them separately. if a speaker does not appear in the text dont include it or give explanation to it. for example, if speaker 1 does not appear in the text - dont give an explanation and dont include the data for this speaker.
-
-In the analysis for the text or dialogue, please include only the two most frequent speakers, that is, get the results only for the two most frequent speakers in the text or dialogue.
-
-Please do not provide any notes or long descriptions.
-
-If possible, determine and specify the speakers names or who they are in Speaker: [name or number].
+-------------------------------------------------------