File size: 3,463 Bytes
5fae594
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
"use strict";
Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
exports.cookieCompare = cookieCompare;
/**
 * The maximum timestamp a cookie, in milliseconds. The value is (2^31 - 1) seconds since the Unix
 * epoch, corresponding to 2038-01-19.
 */
const MAX_TIME = 2147483647000;
/**
 * A comparison function that can be used with {@link https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/sort | Array.sort()},
 * which orders a list of cookies into the recommended order given in Step 2 of {@link https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6265.html#section-5.4 | RFC6265 - Section 5.4}.
 *
 * The sort algorithm is, in order of precedence:
 *
 * - Longest {@link Cookie.path}
 *
 * - Oldest {@link Cookie.creation} (which has a 1-ms precision, same as Date)
 *
 * - Lowest {@link Cookie.creationIndex} (to get beyond the 1-ms precision)
 *
 * @remarks
 * ### RFC6265 - Section 5.4 - Step 2
 *
 * The user agent SHOULD sort the cookie-list in the following order:
 *
 * - Cookies with longer paths are listed before cookies with shorter paths.
 *
 * - Among cookies that have equal-length path fields, cookies with
 *    earlier creation-times are listed before cookies with later
 *    creation-times.
 *
 * NOTE: Not all user agents sort the cookie-list in this order, but
 * this order reflects common practice when this document was
 * written, and, historically, there have been servers that
 * (erroneously) depended on this order.
 *
 * ### Custom Store Implementors
 *
 * Since the JavaScript Date is limited to a 1-ms precision, cookies within the same millisecond are entirely possible.
 * This is especially true when using the `now` option to `CookieJar.setCookie(...)`. The {@link Cookie.creationIndex}
 * property is a per-process global counter, assigned during construction with `new Cookie()`, which preserves the spirit
 * of the RFC sorting: older cookies go first. This works great for {@link MemoryCookieStore} since `Set-Cookie` headers
 * are parsed in order, but is not so great for distributed systems.
 *
 * Sophisticated Stores may wish to set this to some other
 * logical clock so that if cookies `A` and `B` are created in the same millisecond, but cookie `A` is created before
 * cookie `B`, then `A.creationIndex < B.creationIndex`.
 *
 * @example
 * ```
 * const cookies = [
 *   new Cookie({ key: 'a', value: '' }),
 *   new Cookie({ key: 'b', value: '' }),
 *   new Cookie({ key: 'c', value: '', path: '/path' }),
 *   new Cookie({ key: 'd', value: '', path: '/path' }),
 * ]
 * cookies.sort(cookieCompare)
 * // cookie sort order would be ['c', 'd', 'a', 'b']
 * ```
 *
 * @param a - the first Cookie for comparison
 * @param b - the second Cookie for comparison
 * @public
 */
function cookieCompare(a, b) {
    let cmp;
    // descending for length: b CMP a
    const aPathLen = a.path ? a.path.length : 0;
    const bPathLen = b.path ? b.path.length : 0;
    cmp = bPathLen - aPathLen;
    if (cmp !== 0) {
        return cmp;
    }
    // ascending for time: a CMP b
    const aTime = a.creation && a.creation instanceof Date ? a.creation.getTime() : MAX_TIME;
    const bTime = b.creation && b.creation instanceof Date ? b.creation.getTime() : MAX_TIME;
    cmp = aTime - bTime;
    if (cmp !== 0) {
        return cmp;
    }
    // break ties for the same millisecond (precision of JavaScript's clock)
    cmp = (a.creationIndex || 0) - (b.creationIndex || 0);
    return cmp;
}