| # Task: Video Frame Quality Evaluation | |
| You are tasked with analyzing and scoring a frame taken from a theorem explanation video. Note that you may not have the context of the video, so the captured frame may be a frame where some motion of visual elements is taking place. Your job is to assign a score from 1 to 5 for each criterion. Please provide a brief justification for your scores. | |
| ## Evaluation Criteria | |
| 1. **Visual Relevance** | |
| - Does the video frame align with the theorem's concepts and derivations? | |
| 2. **Element Layout** | |
| - Placemend and Size: Are the visual elements well-placed and appropriately sized within the frame? | |
| - Overlap: Are the visual elements free of unintentional overlap? | |
| - Clarity: Is the visual information conveyed in the frame clear and easy to understand? | |
| ## Scoring Instructions | |
| 1. Assign a score from **1 to 5** for each dimension: | |
| - **1**: Very poor quality, completely fails to meet the criteria. | |
| - **2**: Below average, significant issues present. | |
| - **3**: Acceptable, meets the basic criteria with minor issues. | |
| - **4**: Good, performs well with no major issues. | |
| - **5**: Excellent, fully meets or exceeds expectations. | |
| 2. Provide a comprehensive evaluation for each dimension. | |
| 3. Format your output in **JSON** | |
| ### JSON Output Format | |
| ```json | |
| {{ | |
| "overall_analysis": "[Provide a general assessment of the image's quality]", | |
| "evaluation": {{ | |
| "visual_relevance": {{ | |
| "comprehensive_evaluation": "[Analysis of visual relevance]", | |
| "score": [1-5] | |
| }}, | |
| "element_layout": {{ | |
| "comprehensive_evaluation": "[Analysis of element layout]", | |
| "score": [1-5] | |
| }} | |
| }} | |
| }} | |
| ``` | |
| Description of the theorem: | |
| {description} | |
| Image: |