Datasets:
HenryAI
/
KerasBERTv1-Data

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
text
stringlengths
0
4.99k
)
model = keras.models.Sequential(
[
lstm_layer,
keras.layers.BatchNormalization(),
keras.layers.Dense(output_size),
]
)
return model
Let's load the MNIST dataset:
mnist = keras.datasets.mnist
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = mnist.load_data()
x_train, x_test = x_train / 255.0, x_test / 255.0
sample, sample_label = x_train[0], y_train[0]
Let's create a model instance and train it.
We choose sparse_categorical_crossentropy as the loss function for the model. The output of the model has shape of [batch_size, 10]. The target for the model is an integer vector, each of the integer is in the range of 0 to 9.
model = build_model(allow_cudnn_kernel=True)
model.compile(
loss=keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True),
optimizer="sgd",
metrics=["accuracy"],
)
model.fit(
x_train, y_train, validation_data=(x_test, y_test), batch_size=batch_size, epochs=1
)
938/938 [==============================] - 12s 11ms/step - loss: 1.3152 - accuracy: 0.5698 - val_loss: 0.5888 - val_accuracy: 0.8086
<tensorflow.python.keras.callbacks.History at 0x154f3e950>
Now, let's compare to a model that does not use the CuDNN kernel:
noncudnn_model = build_model(allow_cudnn_kernel=False)
noncudnn_model.set_weights(model.get_weights())
noncudnn_model.compile(
loss=keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True),
optimizer="sgd",
metrics=["accuracy"],
)
noncudnn_model.fit(
x_train, y_train, validation_data=(x_test, y_test), batch_size=batch_size, epochs=1
)
938/938 [==============================] - 14s 14ms/step - loss: 0.4382 - accuracy: 0.8669 - val_loss: 0.3223 - val_accuracy: 0.8955
<tensorflow.python.keras.callbacks.History at 0x154ce1a10>
When running on a machine with a NVIDIA GPU and CuDNN installed, the model built with CuDNN is much faster to train compared to the model that uses the regular TensorFlow kernel.
The same CuDNN-enabled model can also be used to run inference in a CPU-only environment. The tf.device annotation below is just forcing the device placement. The model will run on CPU by default if no GPU is available.
You simply don't have to worry about the hardware you're running on anymore. Isn't that pretty cool?
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
with tf.device("CPU:0"):
cpu_model = build_model(allow_cudnn_kernel=True)
cpu_model.set_weights(model.get_weights())
result = tf.argmax(cpu_model.predict_on_batch(tf.expand_dims(sample, 0)), axis=1)
print(
"Predicted result is: %s, target result is: %s" % (result.numpy(), sample_label)
)
plt.imshow(sample, cmap=plt.get_cmap("gray"))
Predicted result is: [3], target result is: 5
png
RNNs with list/dict inputs, or nested inputs
Nested structures allow implementers to include more information within a single timestep. For example, a video frame could have audio and video input at the same time. The data shape in this case could be:
[batch, timestep, {"video": [height, width, channel], "audio": [frequency]}]
In another example, handwriting data could have both coordinates x and y for the current position of the pen, as well as pressure information. So the data representation could be:
[batch, timestep, {"location": [x, y], "pressure": [force]}]
The following code provides an example of how to build a custom RNN cell that accepts such structured inputs.
Define a custom cell that supports nested input/output
See Making new Layers & Models via subclassing for details on writing your own layers.
class NestedCell(keras.layers.Layer):
def __init__(self, unit_1, unit_2, unit_3, **kwargs):
self.unit_1 = unit_1
self.unit_2 = unit_2
self.unit_3 = unit_3
self.state_size = [tf.TensorShape([unit_1]), tf.TensorShape([unit_2, unit_3])]
self.output_size = [tf.TensorShape([unit_1]), tf.TensorShape([unit_2, unit_3])]
super(NestedCell, self).__init__(**kwargs)
def build(self, input_shapes):
# expect input_shape to contain 2 items, [(batch, i1), (batch, i2, i3)]
i1 = input_shapes[0][1]
i2 = input_shapes[1][1]
i3 = input_shapes[1][2]
self.kernel_1 = self.add_weight(
shape=(i1, self.unit_1), initializer="uniform", name="kernel_1"