text
stringlengths 22
2.01M
|
|---|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000 08:26
AM ---------------------------
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: cop shock
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000
08:30 AM ---------------------------
To: Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Chad
Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: cop shock
- FingerPig.avi
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 11:33
AM ---------------------------
"RACITI, Melissa" <[email protected]> on 04/20/2000 09:54:33 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "BURKE, Ted (TDB)" <[email protected]>, "O'BRIEN, Lisa"
<[email protected]>, "ELORZA, Juliana" <[email protected]>,
"DELPINO, Fiorella" <[email protected]>
Subject: Critical Path Items
This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person: to do so could be a breach of confidence. Thank you for
your co-operation. Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email [email protected]
if you need assistance.
==================================================
Attached are clean and blacklined copies of the Critical Path Items list
(and the related Ancillary Items list). The blacklined copy is marked to
show changes from the draft thereof dated 4/12/00 We will distribute the
dial-in information for the 4/25 conference call.
Best regards
- COMPARE001.DOC
- NY003675655.DOC
|
This is the matrix related to the the Cuiaba II discussion on shared services.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/18/2001 03:24 PM
---------------------------
Rob G Gay
01/17/2001 04:23 PM
To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Decision on Furnas Jan 22
We just had a call with Novak, Barquin (V&E) and Tozzini on options for next
Monday such as economic equilibrium, arbitration, litigation etc. We will be
putting all the results together for you by Friday Morning. In the mean
time, it may be helpful for you to reflect on the following (particularly the
table). This is really starting to bring it into focus for me. We will try
to do the same for our options on Monday's decision.
|
Bob: I have not met with them in a long time, and do not plan to anymore.
Thanks.
|
I was just thinking about how much fun you are. Since you asked for more
pictures ...
|
Could you then sell our Love Life & Money Suite. Is this done on
consignment or how do you operate. We may also have some other artists to
discuss because we are building a new home and we will have less wall space
in some cases and different needs in others.
Thanks
Rob
Donna Rose <[email protected]> on 02/07/2001 11:21:57 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Zjawinska
Dear Rob,
It would be unframed.....
Best
DonnaAt 09:49 AM 2/7/01 -0600, you wrote:
>I am interested. Would that be framed? I'll talk it over with my wife.
>
>
>
>
>Donna Rose <[email protected]> on 02/06/2001 10:46:53 PM
>
>To: [email protected]
>cc:
>
>Subject: Re: Zjawinska
>
>
>Sorry...I cannot do a trade...but I can probably provide a Startled for you
>at about $1800.
>
>Best
>
>DonnaAt 11:08 AM 2/2/01 -0600, you wrote:
> >I noticed on your web site that you have a number of Joana Zjawinska's for
> >sale including "Love, Life & Money Suite 2" (which we currently own) and
> >"Startled".
> >
> >I was wondering if you would consider a trade where we would provide "Love
> >Life & Money" (framed) and we would receive "Startled"?
Donna Rose
President, Art Brokerage Inc. Since 1981.
http://www.artbrokerage.com
PO Box 3730, Ketchum, Id. 83340 Mail only.
208-788-1484 Mountain Time after 7-6 ...no early calls
please...Monday-Saturday Fax 24 hours 208-788-1492 Sunday..only by
email email 24 hours [email protected]
Web address http://www.artbrokerage.com
Watch for us on PBS and Discovery Channel airing now!
Check out DEAL...enter artwork
online...free...http://artbrokerage.com/deal/htm
Our Photo Classifieds get results! 89.99 for 6 months... or $99.99 for 1
year......http://www.artbrokerage.com/ads/ads2.htm
Never Pay Retail!
|
Brent: unfortunately no one from my group will be able to participate in the
Kipp Academy events this weekend. There was some interest though in future
events. Thanks.
|
I'm fine with this and ready to sign if Rick Lammers is happy.
Michael Tribolet
12/01/2000 12:33 PM
To: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON, Connie F
Estrems/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tracee Bersani@ECT, Rob G
Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Final Cuiaba DASH for signature
Here is the final Cuiaba DASH. The DASH need to be signed and reviewed
through Jeff Skilling by noon on Monday. Rick Buy has indicated there
will be no exceptions.
Michael Tribolet
Office 713 853-3820
Cellular 713 515-3577
Home 713 729-7910
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/31/2001 02:25 PM
---------------------------
Jose Bestard@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/30/2001 12:59 PM
To: Cuiaba LT
cc: "Luiz Sergio Assad" <[email protected]>, "Fred Sampaio"
<[email protected]>, Jose Lucio Reis/SA/Enron@Enron, Luiz
Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Meeting With Furnas - Jan 29 01 - Tariff until Gas Commisioning
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/30/2001 12:55 PM ---------------------------
Created 01/30 10:55 AM Modified 01/30 12:55 PM
Title: Meeting With Furnas - Jan 29 01 - Tariff until Gas Commisioning
Furnas: Celso Ferreira, Roberto de la Nina
EPE: Jose Bestard, Laine Powell, Christiaan Huzier
Consent.- Before entering into the purpose of the meeting, I told Celso that
we were sending him a letter to confirm our understanding from the previous
meeting, that they are linking the approval of the Anex 4/Consent to changes
in the contact. and that they refused to sign the original consent language.
For avoidance of doubt, the text of both versions are included in the letter.
He said that our understanding was correct and that he would answer in the
affirmative.
He was not familiar with the original text. I showed him my copy with the
three initials. He asked whose initials were from Furnas. (I don't know - was
not present at that meeting. Rick and John may know).
Roberto de la Nina gave him the background from Furnas side.
Tariff and Commissioning.
Celso started the session by drawing a diagram of the Contractual Obligation
provisions compared to the Current Situation. He wanted to lead us to pay
the fuel differential, from 100% dispatch or alternatively buy from the MAE
(lower cost to us).
[Comment.- Irrespective of the Force Majeure arguments that we have, the MAE
make up possibility has to be used carefully to avoid falling into the trap,
by precedent, or assuming a market exposure that we presently do not have.]
I replied that his reading of the Contract was correct, except that he did
not read the Force Majeure section. We had the obligation to change to gas
on the dates he mentioned, except that we have a Force Majeure due to the
Government Actions, and therefore we have the right to change the schedule.
Celso replied that his people did not think this fit the case; i.e.
"additional difficulty of drilling through rocks"; I replied that we have a
strong case that everyone knows about, including the regulator Aneel, which
extended the use of the CCC until June 2001.
[Comment.- I expect Furnas to challenge our documentation to calculate how
many days we are entitled due to FM causes. At the end there will be a
"negotiated agreement", or the result or arbitration.]
Aneel Authorization.- I told him that we needed to bring him up to date
about Aneel's approval.
Aneel sent us a letter that we were not authorized to operate in Combined
Cycle, not that we had CCC account coverage during for CC operation.
Gave him a copy of the letter of our request to Aneel asking for both ; CC
and CCC coverage. We were ready for 480 MW, but on diesel.
Celso asked what we would do if we got CC authorization but not CCC
coverage.- I told him that we did not have the money to pay for the fuel,
that we would have to convert back to Simple Cycle, use the current
authorization for minimum use and wait for the gas to be available to go
through commissioning.
He said that under the contract we are obligated to provide power; that he
would buy from the MAE and sent us the bill. I told him that under the
Contract we can change the gas-change-over date because of FM. During a FM
period our mutual obligations would cease, except that they in this case they
had a capacity payment obligation given that the cause was Government
action.
He understood that they have a right to cancel the Contract after 12 months
[Comment - but they would have the MAE exposure as well for the Initial
Contracts]
Laine gave him an update of the ridge contruction and the parallel path that
we will take on Ridge 10; drill and also seek a permit for a partial crossing
of the first crest, drilling through the second crest, all withing the
existing ROW.
Laine explained the processes and limitatios of returnind to SC operations
and then back again to CC gas comissioning.
Our Proposal.- Our proposal is that we get authorization to enter into
operation as combined cycle unit; the CCC administration pays for the diesel,
and receives the gas revenues as compensation. This keeps us and Furnas at
the Contract equilibrium, and the Brazilian electric system has 480 MW
combined cycle plant; providing stability to that area.
Under this proposal, until the gas gets there to start commissioning, ONS
would dispatch the power plant according to economic dispatch at R$110/Mwhr;
minimum 290 MW. The CCC covers the actual dispatch the MRE cover the dispatch
to the Initial Contracts with Furnas.
I suggested that they join us for that petition to Aneel. He called Mario
Santos to set up a meeting, to enlist the help of ONS in that petition as
well.
The meeting is set up for Wednesday at 9:30 AM. To prepare we need to
provide the factual information, heat rates, costs, etc.
|
I was reviewing the pictures you sent. You are not only an adventuress but
also a Goddess. Happy Valentines day.
I turned Pete down on the offer to stay. I guess I'm just ready to move on
and this feels pretty dead end here. But I'll try and catch up with you from
time to time if I can.
Beija
Rob
|
Ina: from scheduling. the following people will attend tonight:
Suzanne Christiansen
Patti Sullivan
Matt smith
Ted Evans
Jan Sutherland
Stacey Brewer
Hillary Mack
Shelly Mendel.
As you know, I will not be attending. Thanks for everything.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 02:22
PM ---------------------------
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000 10:42
AM ---------------------------
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: cop shock
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000
08:30 AM ---------------------------
To: Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Chad
Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: cop shock
- FingerPig.avi
|
Hi Jamie,
Tried to call you today to keep in touch but the phone just rang. Hope you
are enjoying Indosuez. I have announced that I am leaving Enron at the end
of February when my contract runs out. With them getting out of
international infrastructure it is time to move on. I am going to retire for
a while and see how the life of leisure suits me. Give me a call when you
have a minute (713-646-7582).
Regards,
Rob
"Jamie MABILAT" <[email protected]> on 08/02/2000 03:51:48 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Update
Hi guys,
To keep you au fait with my latest adventures, I decided to leave Dresdner
Kleinwort Benson as a result of I what I perceived to be increasing
uncertainty
on the investment bank's future in the context of its' failed merger(s). So I
have now joined Credit Agricole Indosuez's project finance group here in
London.
Not quite the outfit of a DrKB but a strong franchise in project finance and a
very talented, motivated team...plus I missed project finance!
My details are now:
Tel. (44) 20 7971 4029
Mob. (44) 7712 76 4343
e-mail: [email protected]
Hope all is well with y'all. Keep in touch.
Jamie.
"This E-Mail is not intended to create a legal relationship between Credit
Agricole Indosuez and the recipient. Credit Agricole Indosuez is regulated by
the SFA for the conduct of investment business in the UK. The information
contained in this E-mail is intended for the named recipient(s) only. It may
contain certain privileged and confidential information or information which
is otherwise protected from disclosure and further
dissemination by you could have adverse legal consequences. If you are not
the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take action in
reliance on this information"
|
We will provide the appropriate clarificatiions ASAP.
[email protected] on 02/14/2001 09:43:16 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Questions re: Siemens Negotiations
Rob - We've reviewed your memo which sets forth general points of your
negotiations with Siemens. Following are comments and questions regarding
certain negotiated points:
EOT Claim Agreement
Owner must operate and maintain per O&M manuals and industry practices on oil;
if not, owner must correct items materially affecting Contractor's
commissioning
obligations
We observe that while this point places reasonable responsibility on the Owner
to correct problems that were a result of their commercial operations, it is
introduces an opportunity for the Contractor to place unfounded blame on the
owner for affecting the Contractor's ability to commission.
Risk of Loss remains with owner during commissioning on gas
We understand that the Facility is under the care, custody and control of the
Owner and that the Facility is currently operating under the insurance
coverage
intended for the commercial operating period (versus the construction period).
Please confirm that there is no reason to be concerned about insurance
coverage
if a problem arises resulting in material damage attributable to Contractor
action during commissioning on gas. We are also advising the Lenders to have
this point reviewed by an insurance advisor.
Degradation - agree to use curves with credit to owner for degradation during
commissioning
During our last conference call it was indicated that the first choice was to
test to determine degradation and the alternative was to agree on a set of
curves. It appears that Siemens was unwilling to agree to the test approach.
We observe that the curves used to determine owner credit may be biased to the
benefit of Siemens. We trust that your operations experts will diligently
review the basis for the curves.
Performance LD's on gas per the EPC contract with first $4,000,000 forgiven by
owner
Please explain the rationale behind forgiving $4 million of Contractor LDs.
Delay LD's on gas do not start until 60 days after performance test on gas
During our last conference call it was indicated that there would be a stand
down until 7/1/01 when gas is available, no LDs would be paid related to oil
firing performance, and that the LD clock would start if gas commissioning is
not complete within 60 days. We do not understand the above negotiated point.
Please confirm that our understanding is correct or clarify your negotiated
point.
TAA Agreement
No 12-month look back.
We assume that this negotiated point is related to the time period factored
into
the availability calculation for purposes of determining whether or not an
extension or additional work by the Contractor has been triggered as a result
of
dropping below the availability standards. Please explain how this negotiated
point affects the mechanics of the TAA and also please explain how
availability
will be calculated. As we noted during our last conference call, we are
concerned that Siemens believes that the availability value is not reduced if
maintenance work is being performed during periods when the Facility is not
being dispatched.
12 month Initial Guarantee Period, with the clock suspended for gas
commissioning unless owner delay.
We interpret the above negotiated point to mean that the 12-month clock for
the
initial guarantee period stops during commissioning regardless of how long it
takes the Contractor to commission on gas (unless delays are attributable to
Owner) and re-starts after Contractor has successfully completed the
performance
testing on gas. Please confirm that our understanding is correct.
In order to provide the lenders an adequate warranty period on gas (if
there are additional delays on the P/L) our Insurance group has indicated
that we will have no problem obtaining 12 months renewable business
interruption insurance when we go operational on gas. This should solve
the issue over the revised warranty with Siemens because it covers defects,
design, and workmanship on the turbines and includes lost profits, etc.
Incidentally, for insurance purposes the turbines are designated DE3 which
is not a new technology designation. The duration of BI coverage is 18
months per event with US$150,000 deductible.
Stone & Webster is advising the Lenders to have an insurance advisor review
this
point.
Thanks in advance for your response. Hope all is well.
Regards,
Bradley
|
Heather: can you proof this and get this ready? Thanks.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/18/2001 03:49 PM
---------------------------
Rob G Gay
01/18/2001 03:51 PM
To: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]@ENRON, John
Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rafael Rangel/NA/Enron@Enron, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Decision Matrix - Strategy
This is the matrix related to the the Cuiaba II discussion on shared services.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/18/2001 03:24 PM
---------------------------
Rob G Gay
01/17/2001 04:23 PM
To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Decision on Furnas Jan 22
We just had a call with Novak, Barquin (V&E) and Tozzini on options for next
Monday such as economic equilibrium, arbitration, litigation etc. We will be
putting all the results together for you by Friday Morning. In the mean
time, it may be helpful for you to reflect on the following (particularly the
table). This is really starting to bring it into focus for me. We will try
to do the same for our options on Monday's decision.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000 12:17
PM ---------------------------
"RACITI, Melissa" <[email protected]> on 04/18/2000 11:58:44 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'Dutton, Chris CMJ SI-GPBF'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: Force majeure - Conference Call on Wednesday, April 19, at 2: 30
pm EDT
This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person: to do so could be a breach of confidence. Thank you for
your co-operation. Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email [email protected]
if you need assistance.
==================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: ELORZA, Juliana
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 12:29 PM
To: 'Mary Mervenne (E-mail)'; 'Thomas Mahaffey (E-mail)'; 'Nancy Rivera
(E-mail)'; 'Frank Kluesener (E-mail)'; 'Karl Heinz Wellmann (E-mail)';
'Stefan Unna (E-mail)'; 'Chaim Wachsberger (E-mail)'; O'BRIEN, Lisa;
'Robert Shapiro (E-mail)'; 'John Barquin (E-mail)'; 'John Novak
(E-mail)'; 'Stephen Friedlander (E-mail)'
Cc: BURKE, Ted (TDB); RACITI, Melissa; DELPINO, Fiorella
Subject: RE: Force majeure - Conference Call on Wednesday, April 19, at
2:30 pm EDT
Dear All,
We have scheduled a conference call to initiate the discussions of the force
majeure claims. The dial-in information is:
Date: Wednesday, April 19
Time: 2:30 pm EDT
Dial in (Domestic): (888) 271-0949
International access: (304) 345-7526
Participant Code: 132912
Thank you.
|
Rick,
I'm not sure Felipe understands that he needs to finalize the model with me
first before he sends around a "lender package" for the senior guys to
review. We are still trying to make everything make sense, make certain
strategic decisions on presentation, and make all of the presentations tic
and tie as Connie would say. I believe we will have no problem accomplishing
all of this by early Monday and then you and Laine can review and make
additional changes if you like. We can talk on Monday as well about how we
handle Shell, but an expedited approach should be doable with the right
spin. However, I am concerned that the base case you agreed with Johanas is
no longer accurate given the status of Laine's negotiations.
I did not understand specifically your question about cash below. Could you
clarify this particular concern further for me so I can look into it. I am
going to get much closer to the model this time than last because of the
turnover due to Robert and Joana moving on. Give me a call if there is
anything else you want me to look into.
Regards, Rob
Richard A Lammers
12/15/2000 04:36 PM
To: Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tracee Bersani@ECT, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Cuiaba Lender Package
hy are we excludung cash from the lender model.Did we not do this last time.I
think shell required this. We also need to put on these models that this is
Enron's latest update and send to shell simultaneaously or get shell's
approval first( which ain't going to happen quick)
|
Can you be available for a call with S&W on Monday 10:00 CST?
|
could ya'll comment on this please? Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2000 05:04
PM ---------------------------
Mark L Schrab
01/11/2000 04:58 PM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
Subject: Rankings for Source/Destination
Please forward to logistics in your region......
Would any of the desks be opposed to enabling Unify to default the
Destination rankings to the same rankings that are created in the Source
rankings. There would still be the ability to change to ranking on the
Destination side however, it would not affect the rankings on the Source
side. This will save time pathing and prevent the amount of data entry
errors. Would you please forward comments to your manager. Dave
Nommenson is aware that some of us are interested in this and would like to
find out if it would be something worth putting into production.
Thanks.
|
I have attached my review of the electrical list. This should allow us to
have another discussion. The ones with oK we want but I would like to
discuss further your "costs" for these items because you have a separate
mark-up.
|
Thanks,
I'll pull it together and let you know what time. I'm shooting for tomorrow.
[email protected] on 02/21/2001 06:06:17 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Questions re: Siemens Negotiations
Rob -
Just spoke with Brad (he's in Seattle sans computer). He said 11 or noon cst
on
Friday would be best, but he could manage any time Friday if necessary. Next
week is open (any time) if we had to push it back. Let me know & I'll get the
message to Brad. I'm OK any of those times as well. Thanks
|
What's up with Laine and the incompetence routine?
|
Heather: Jackie Adams will represent the West desk. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000 05:01
PM ---------------------------
Heather Choate
02/03/2000 04:57 PM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mtg: Alternate Work Schedules
A lunch meeting has been scheduled to discuss Alternate Work Schedules...
On Wednesday, February 9, 2000
in EB3013 from 11:30am to 1:00pm
(lunch provided)
Please forward me the attending names for your group with a copy to Bob by
tomorrow (2/4).
Thanks,
Heather
|
Bob: here is the completed version with changes.
|
Sorry, I've been in all day meetings Mon & Tues. I'll get to it early
tomorrow.
|
Hi
I'm sorry we missed you at the Christmas Party. My wife and daughter had
tickets to a Christmas Play that conflicted, otherwise it would have been
nice to see everyone. Things are fine with me, though big changes are in
store. I'm really worried about Peter and Brian because they have not heard
anything yet from anyone about what their role will be. I should have more
to say about my situation by tomorrow afternoon.
Cheers
|
I am not receiving any of the lender comments that were discussed below.
Please keep me informed and include me in any discussions if possible as
well. Thank you.
The Designated Financial Groundhog
John Novak
12/14/2000 07:00 AM
To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron, [email protected],
Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joao Carlos Albuquerque/SA/Enron, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Cuiaba Events 12/13/00
Claudia spoke yesterday with Laterman who, despite having been in the
meetings where it was agreed to move agreed items from the Consent to the
Aditivo, seemed to think that there were new issues being raised. Claudia
was very firm with him that there was nothing new and that he needed to go
back through an old draft of the Consent to confirm that every item in the
Aditivo used to be in the Consent. They have an internal meeting scheduled
today and the hope is that Laterman will have done this exercise and can
confirm that there is nothing new (otherwise he will look foolish if we have
to later correct him, which we can do by showing Celso et al an old draft of
the consent). However, Laterman also confirmed what Adelino appeared to be
saying below: that they intend to hold up the Aditivo in order to get their
"clarifications" inserted -- i.e., the same old issue regarding sharing the
spot price pain on F/M delay.
Separately, Claudia spoke with Maur?cio and he relayed some innocuous
drafting comments. He also said, however, that he and Maria Aparecida had
prepared a memo to go to Firmino describing the open "commercial" points
which had never been agreed. He would not tell Claudia what these points
were and said they were for Firmino to decide and not for the lawyers.
Claudia was very firm in insisting that this memo describe every issue they
think is still open in the documents so we don't end up resolving open items,
as we are close to doing with respect to the big 4, only to find that he and
Maria Aparecida have more comments. Action item: Jim or Jo?o Carlos -- we
need to hit Firmino on any "new" commercial issues asap -- there should be
none. He's supposed to have received the memo yesterday so a call today may
be appropriate.
This is beginning to feel like Ground Hog Day all over again!
Rgds,
John
Jose Bestard@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/14/2000 02:15 AM
To: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G
Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joao Carlos
Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Cuiaba Events 12/13/00
Joao Carlos called me to tell me that Celso had agreed to take the three key
issue to the Diretoria, but that there were a number of issues in Aditivio #4
that had not been agreed and required "clarification". He asked me to contact
Adelino Rodrigues. I was concerned that we would be going back to square one
- No release until we agree to clarify their language. Joao Carlos said "no
negotiations", "just clarifications". I was still concerned, because I was
told that the only new aspect was the Guarantee language for the
privatization event and clause 9, the details/mechanics of the 90 days
payments.
I finally got hold of Adelino around 11:00 am. I asked him if he had received
the Aditivo #4, he said he had it. I asked him if he had any questions, he
said he was reading it. I pressed him to give me a response today, he said
he was meeting with the Contract Committee (internal) tomorrow at 9:00 AM. I
asked him to get together by noon- he said he needed to report any issues to
the Diretoria. I ask him to meet at 2:00 PM and he agreed.
Adelino wanted to include other Contract Clarifications issues in this
Aditivo #4. I told him that this was not the place. This Aditivo was to
provide a faithful portrait of the results of discussion in regards to the
Lenders issues. It was to mirror the key clauses the Covenant. And it was
created at the direction of Eletrobras to provide a better legal foundation.
I told Adelino that we would be signing other Aditivos in the future and it
was our intend to clarify the items we included in the Transfer Agreement.
Adelino felt that there were other items not previously agreed in this
Aditivo.
I called Claudia. She told me that she had met with Celso and Adelino and
that this had come up and she had assured them that there was nothing extra
that had not been agreed. She told me that Celso had not agreed. She was to
speak to the Legal department in Furnas to be backed up.
She was walking into a Furnas meeting with Adelino. I asked her to press
this matter with Adelino and the legal department.
I saw the exchange of the e-mail with the Lenders. They are reacting with one
day delay so I do not know if they are current in their comments. John and
Rick let's have a quick talk early tomorrow. I will call you.
Jose
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000 11:14
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 04/19/2000 07:56:17 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Brazil Daily Apr 19
(See attached file: bd000419.pdf)
- bd000419.pdf
|
Nobody could do this today. We will schedule for next week.
Regards,
Rob
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2000 12:44
PM ---------------------------
From: Dave Nommensen 06/16/2000 05:25 PM
To: Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Pyle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim Ogg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jaikishore Bharathi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Regan M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul F
Poellinger/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Unify stress test next week with Sybase 12.0
We have done some preliminary testing of the latest version of Sybase
(version 12). We have seen very positive results from our initial tests and
would like to proceed with a "stress test" (not to be confused with me
showing up each day at work). We would like to do 2 tests next week due to
hardware and business restrictions.
The test would be similar to those from late-1998 (ah, those were the
days!). We will ask all users, as well as I.T. folks, to run as many of
their usual processing during a scripted time frame from approx noon - 1:30pm
on Tuesday and Wednesday. Be sure to order some yummy pizza or sandwiches for
your staff!
The Sybase 12.0 environment can be accessed via Start/Programs/Test
Applications/Unify Applications/Unify Gas-Power Stage. On the Login window,
select server = "ASE 12 Test". If you usual Production password does not
work, try "houston". If that does not work, try a neighbor's (Audit says
that fine, its just a test). Each user should plan to run several sessions
where permissible to simulate a heavy load on the system and to make up for
those not able to participate during this time. Please have your staff try
to login some time Monday to insure they have access.
The test script during the time period will be:
12:00 - 1:30 Logistics: pathing, nominating, running some reports
12:20 - 1:30 Volume Management: do your thing
12:40 - 1:30 Settlements/Accounting: pile in
Please let me know if your area would NOT be able to assist in this very
important test. The results of these 2 tests will dictate whether we should
pursue our migration to this new release in mid-July. The less bid weeks
with poor system performance the better!
Thanks in advance for your help, d.n.
|
Toni: just about any day would be fine. We are really busy between 7:30 and
11:30 every morning. Just let me know when you want to sit down with us.
Thanks.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 01:18
PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Suzanne Christiansen 12/04/2000 12:20 PM
To: [email protected]@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Funny
---------------------- Forwarded by Suzanne Christiansen/HOU/ECT on
12/04/2000 12:13 PM ---------------------------
"Karen K. Beach" <[email protected]> on 12/04/2000 12:15:39 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Funny
Received: from [10.100.2.115] (mp-emf1.mp.rkmc.com [10.100.2.115]) by
mp-gwia1.mp.rkmc.com; Mon, 04 Dec 2000 10:58:18 -0600
Received: from mp-emav1 (unverified) by (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5)
with SMTP id <T0a640273504638fb06@> for <[email protected]>; Mon, 4 Dec 2000
10:58:43 -0600
Received: from susdayte01.daytonoh.ncr.com ([192.127.94.7]) by mp-emav1
(NAVIEG 2.1 bld 63) with SMTP id M2000120410573728110 for
<[email protected]>; Mon, 04 Dec 2000 10:57:38 -0600
Received: by SUSDAYTE01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<XL830R62>; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 11:58:01 -0500
Message-ID: <6B90E33D6C66D3119C7D00E029265322048580BC@SUSDAYTE01>
From: "George, Keith A" <[email protected]>
To: Subject: FW: FW: Yet Another Vote for Al
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 11:57:48 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C05E13.54BE4880"
<<< Please read the disclaimer below >>>
> Subject: FW: Yet Another Vote for Al
> Message-ID: <573B03AE56B3D411AF1100D0B70630B91C3697@corpmx3>
> <<TheAlGoreBallot.exe>>
*******************************************
Information contained in this e-mail
transmission is privileged and
confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, do not read,
distribute, or reproduce this
transmission. If you have received
this e-mail transmission in error,
please call 612-349-8799.
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.
www.rkmc.com
*******************************************
- TheAlGoreBallot.exe
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000 10:45
AM ---------------------------
Enron Technology
From: Kenneth Gurley @ ENRON 02/29/2000 10:10 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Wile/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Terminal Server
Randy,
Here are the instructions for the TS update. I just ran it here on my pc and
everything works fine.
1. go to http:\\remoteservices.enron.com
2. click here
3. save program to c:\
4. double click on citrixclient.exe after it has been downloaded.
This will add a Terminal Server icon to the desktop. Double click on this to
launch the new version of TS.
Thanks,
KG
|
Why?
Tracee Bersani@ECT
01/05/2001 10:24 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Cuiaba: Release of certain Assets from Loan Pledge
Rob,
I just spoke with Rafael, and he has requested that certain assets be
excluded from pledge items against the Cuiaba senior loans (EPE and GASMAT).
All cars and vehicles;
All furniture and IT equipment,
All telephone lines
(Please note that for EPE, the amounts related to those items is around 0.7%
of the total permanent assets and for GASMAT is around 0.4%.)
Inventories except spare parts ( 38% of the total inventories).
(So, we should take out, fuel ( 55% of the total inventories), and other
items that are around 7% of the total inventories).
Regards,
Tracee
|
Bob: just to update my previous memo, Cynthia Lara has just accepted our
offer, with a tentative start date of Monday July 17th. Thanks.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 10:44
AM ---------------------------
"PO_JACK" <[email protected]> on 11/07/2000 09:29:38 AM
To: "Regina Perkins" <[email protected]>, "Randy Gay" <[email protected]>,
"Phyllis Fuller" <[email protected]>, "Peter Vint" <[email protected]>, "Sally
Shuler" <[email protected]>, "Sabra Dinari" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Good Morning All, This is Fred Jackson
Just thought I would say hello and let you know I'm still in the land of the
living.? Take note of my new e-mail address and stay in touch.? Talk to you
all soon.
?
Peace & Hair Grease,
?
FGJ
|
Could you please take a moment to rspond on the attached. Thanks You
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 12/19/2000 09:21 AM
---------------------------
Christiaan Huizer@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/19/2000 06:20 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Felipe
Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: EPE Dispatch
Rob,
Regarding items 1 and 2, please contact Lucio Reis in Sao Paulo office and he
can explain.
Item 3 is incorrect. The 300 MW would be generated by the two gas turbines at
about 100 MW each and the remaining 100 MW coming from the steam turbine. The
steam turbine receives its energy from the exit gases from the gas turbines
and they both contribute equally to the resulting steam turbine output
(theoretically at least, in practice depending on optimization of machines)
Again, please talk with Lucio.
Regards,
Christiaan
Rob G Gay@ENRON
12/18/2000 04:41 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EPE Dispatch
Here is what we have concluded based on discussions this morning:
1) We believe that Furnas has agreed to contract and pay for 300 MW on oil to
meet regulatory requirements concerning required capacity and reserve
margin. We do not believe that they intend for us to be dispatrched above
220 MW. (Do we have any document which could substantiate this?)
2) Although dispatch on a merit order basis would suggest that EPE runs full
time (with 300 MW available), there are practical constraints in the
transmission system which will prohibit this from actually occuring. [ Please
describe these constraints using some official sounding jargon but minimal
detail and in particular indicate what is involved to de-bottleneck and how
long this will take. I presume that Furnas is solely responsible for the
corrective measures.]
3) Based on our analysis, the optimal operating approach would be to generate
220MW with one turbine and 91 MW with the other for a total of 311 if
dipatched above 220 MW.
If we can prove that 1) & 2) are correct or convince the lenders that they
are, then I think we can suggest that fuel oil exposure is negligibe if gas
is ready by April 01. We will have to see how it looks when we add the Sue
Garvin flex months.
Therefore, a merit order analysis is only necessary if i) our supposition
about Furnas' motivations are incorrect and/or ii) the transmission problem
is cleared. If this happens it would be nice to be able to predict reduced
fuel utilization due to a) reduced dispatch during daily off-peak hours or
seasonal impacts, b) due to scheduled outages, and c) due to managing our
availabilty in such a way as to reduce fuel consumption operating losses.
Any data you can provide will be helpful.
Have I successfully connected the dots here?
If you have previously sent these materials to Felipe or Tracee please simply
grumble to yourself if you have to do an extra e-mail to me. Remember, you
don't have to be nice to a short timer unless you need them to get something
done.
Regards,
Rob
|
Julie: Thanks. Let me know when you know something different.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 11:34
AM ---------------------------
"ELORZA, Juliana" <[email protected]> on 04/20/2000 10:35:45 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Anamaria
Rosenthal (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc: "BURKE, Ted (TDB)" <[email protected]>, "RACITI, Melissa"
<[email protected]>, "O'BRIEN, Lisa" <[email protected]>,
"DELPINO, Fiorella" <[email protected]>
Subject: Conference Call on Tuesday, April 25 re Critical Path Items
e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you have
received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person: to do so could be a breach of confidence. Thank you for
your co-operation. Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email [email protected]
if you need assistance.
==================================================
The dial in information is:
Date: Tuesday, April 25
Time: 10:30 am EDT
Dial in (Domestic): (888) 476-3762
International access: (517) 267-1046
Participant Code: 241515
Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: RACITI, Melissa
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 10:55 AM
To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Cc: BURKE, Ted (TDB); O'BRIEN, Lisa; ELORZA, Juliana; DELPINO, Fiorella
Subject: Critical Path Items
Attached are clean and blacklined copies of the Critical Path Items list
(and the related Ancillary Items list). The blacklined copy is marked to
show changes from the draft thereof dated 4/12/00 We will distribute the
dial-in information for the 4/25 conference call.
Best regards
|
Dan
I just re-read this memo. I can respond for Cuiaba but I need to enlist
Eduardo, Brian & Peter to obtain status and issues on their projects. I will
forwrd a recent summary of issues on Cuiaba.
Also, by projects do you mean major infrastructure transactions or do you
mean everything thhat is going on?
From: Daniel Castagnola@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 01/03/2001 03:45 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeremy Thirsk@ECT
cc:
Subject: Financings
Happy New Year! I am compiling a list of projects already financed, under
financing, or soon to be under financing during 2001. Could you provide me
with the following information:
1) List of projects in your area already financed
i) List of issues that may require bank involvement
ii) List of issues that may require ENE financing personnel but not banks
involvement
2) List of project currently under financing
i) List of key issues (Cuiaba- please be kind)
3) List of project to be finance during 2001
i) Main issues to be expected.
Thanks in advance for this information.
Dan
|
I believe that is correct.
Tracee Bersani@ECT
02/01/2001 05:02 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Insurance
Rob,
Didn't he say we were only covered up to $200 MM (e.g. the limit of our
contract frustration cover?) With the current Shell/enron sharing
percentages, it would seem that we are entitled to 72% of the $360 MM payment
or $259 MM, thus we would only be out by $59 MM.
Tracee
Rob G Gay@ENRON
02/01/2001 04:57 PM
To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Mariella Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cliff Shedd/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Insurance
According to Cliff Shedd, we would be covered by insurance if we terminated
the contract with Furnas and Furnas failed to pay the termination payment.
However the insurers will only pay after we receive an arbitration judgement
against them and the refuse to honor the judgement. I assume we would also
have to exhaust our remedies against trhe guarantor (Eletrobras).
Also, we are required to notify the underwriters immediately of a material
default.
|
Did I make you laugh?
"Sue V. Herbich" <[email protected]> on 12/19/2000 07:14:06 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Thinking of you
only you can give new meaning to a rear-ender :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 1:12 PM
To: Sue V. Herbich
Subject: RE: Thinking of you
P.S.
I'd like to rear end you too.
|
Once more
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/22/2001 03:04 PM
---------------------------
Rob G Gay
01/22/2001 03:26 PM
To: Blanca Bollom/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Lender Presentation
Can you print 10 color copies? Thanks
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 02:28
PM ---------------------------
"Lisk, Daniel D." <[email protected]> on 12/11/2000 10:43:37 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Daniel Lisk
Mr. Gay,
My name is Daniel Lisk, your new Gas Scheduler. I'm slated to begin work on
the Monday the 18th, and must say I am VERY excited to get started. It will
be an honor to work for Enron. I know I am just beginning a long and
productive career with an amazing company.
I received your email address from Molly Magee. I had a few questions
regarding Holiday plans and start-day preparation and she directed me to
this email address. I know you are very busy, so please reply at your
convenience.
My first question regards holiday planning. If I remember correctly, it was
mentioned someone was working or on call one weekend a month. It may be too
early to tell, but if I'm scheduled to work that weekend (December 22nd -
25th) I would like to make plans accordingly. My mother in Missouri can be
very persistent (aka annoying) and wants to know my plans.
Also, I would like to put my name first on volunteers to work that weekend.
However, I understand my lack of experience may prevent me from accepting
that responsibility this soon. If I will not be working, may I ask that you
tell me what days I will have off. I need to know if I should buy a plane
ticket, get my car serviced for the drive, or make plans in Houston.
Finally, I've bought a training video covering Excel and begun reading a
book titled "Trading Natural Gas", by Fletcher J. Sturm (former senior
trader of natural gas derivatives for Enron Capital and Trade). I want to
start contributing from day one and would like to know if there is anything
I can do to facilitate that. Any other programs, books, push-up and
crunches, you could suggest would be aggressively pursued.
I look forward to seeing you again next week Mr. Gay. My schedule on Monday
appears to be; "New Hire Training" from 8:00 am to 4:00 pm. If possible, I
can be on your floor early to observe, leave for training from 8 to 4, then
return at 4:10 pm and stay until the close of business if you like?
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Daniel D. Lisk
Vinson & Elkins
IPTL Project Assistant II
713-758-2213
[email protected]
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You
|
Thanks, Guys
I have just finished reviewing the docs which provide a pretty clear picture
of how the negotiations are going. This looks to be a pretty good outcome
from a financing standpoint. I have not explained it to the lenders yet but
will appraise them that a settlement is in progress and though there are some
concessions, on balance we still have a strong package. The one area where I
would suggest a change is with respect to the way you are handling the noise.
I would suggest that instead of writing it with no test on gas, just relax
the requirement to where they have to meet the World Bank Guideline on gas.
Other than that it looks good but I have a few questions and clarifications,
so maybe you and Cliff could call when you have a break in the action.
Thanks
Laine A Powell@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/16/2001 03:23 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: [email protected], Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: EOT Documents - Siemens Settlement
Rob -
Don't know if you have spoken to the banks or owners eng about the Siemens
EOT settlement? Tried to set something up with you on Friday but did not
hear back. In any case attached is the latest version of the document that
covers the issue. This should not be sent to the banks since we are still
negotiating with SCC however it gives a good indication of where we are
going. If you need more information pls give Cliff a call or I can be
reached tomorrow in Cuiaba. In any case next week we plan on closing this
issue with Siemens and need bank sign-off real time as discussed.
rgds
Laine
---------------------- Forwarded by Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/16/2001 07:19 AM ---------------------------
"Rankin, Cliff" <[email protected]> on 01/16/2001 06:54:01 AM
To: "Powell, Laine (Enron)" <[email protected]>, [email protected],
"Guidry, John (Enron)" <[email protected]>, [email protected],
"Rankin, Cliff" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, [email protected]
cc:
Subject: EOT Documents
Attached are (i) clean and black-lined drafts of the letter agreement among
SCC and Contractors regarding Siemens' EOT claim, reflecting comments from
V&E and Owner, and (ii) the initial draft of the letter agreement between
EPE and Siemens AG regarding the TAA.
If you have any difficulty opening the attached, please let me know by reply
to this message. Thanks.
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You
<<Letter Agreement re TAA.DOC>> <<Letter Agreement -- Siemens/SCC re
EOT.DOC>> <<Letter Agreement -- Siemens/SCC re EOT(1).DOC>>
- Letter Agreement re TAA.DOC
- SCC re EOT.DOC
- SCC re EOT(1).DOC
|
Thought you might be interested. Cuiaba is really taking a toll.
Regards,
Rob
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001 09:45 AM
---------------------------
John Novak
02/12/2001 01:48 PM
To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Celina
Ozorio/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Christiaan Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
[email protected], "PGS - Pedro G. Seraphim" <[email protected]>,
Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: John Barquin
FYI, I understand from John Barquin that he has decided to take a 1 year
leave of absence from V&E, starting Feb 1. Cuiab? will be continue to be
covered by Cliff Rankin and Steve Tarry and the rest of the V&E team. In
addition, John will be available for consultation on historical matters as
necessary.
Regards,
John
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 01/13/2000 12:42
PM ---------------------------
Dawn C Kenne
01/13/2000 10:14 AM
To: Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin
Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Gruesen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Eisenbrandt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Blanca A
Lopez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra Pollack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin
Rostant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Bloom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Danthea Dumayas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer K Longoria/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simone La
Rose/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phyllis R Kennedy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Anderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Washington/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette
Miroballi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trisha Hughes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt A
Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bennett Kaufman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rhonda Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kenneth W Walther/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Y2K Data
Thank you for your help in getting the Y2K data to us to burn onto the CD's.
The next process is to destroy the CD's. All CD's will be destroyed if we do
not hear back from you by 10:00 am tomorrow. Please contact Will Kelly at
853-9710 or by e-mail.
Please relay this information to anyone in your group with data on these CD's
to make sure they do not need it.
|
Yes. They are actually antique windows that I found at an antique store and
decided to feature in the cabinet. It is really fun to visualize something
like that and then make it happen. It happens a whole lot faster than Int'l
Project Finance too!!
|
Can you believe this? We have more red tape than Washington on this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 06:39
AM ---------------------------
From: Bryce Baxter 10/16/2000 05:13 PM
To: Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Penalties
Stacy Dickson called, and she said penalties for non-performance in the past
have been handled by supplying information to Legal and they will then write
a letter to the counterparty stating that per the contract you were supposed
to deliver X but you didn't perform, so now you owe us $Y. I asked her what
she would need to do this and she gave me the following list of items.
Please coordinate getting this to her - the spreadsheet you prepared may
already have the volume comparison, prices, and penalty calc in it - we just
need to get copies of the confirms and contracts. Let me know if you have
any questions. Thanks.
Counterparty Legal Name
Copy of contract
Confirm
Actual Volumes
Prices (prob gas daily)
Amount we think the penalty should be
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 08:53
AM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Rebecca W Cantrell 12/14/99 05:07 PM
To: Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth
Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa
Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M
Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ray Hamman/HOU/EES@EES, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Luce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Shiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barend
VanderHorst/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Coates/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: A Reminder -- 2000 GRI Surcharges
Effective 1/1/00............
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/14/99
05:03 PM ---------------------------
Enron North America Corp.
From: Rebecca W Cantrell 11/10/99 05:39 PM
To: Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth
Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa
Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M
Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ray Hamman/HOU/EES@EES, Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES,
Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M
Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Shiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Walker/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: 2000 GRI Surcharges
Just a reminder that the GRI surcharges will go down for all member pipelines
a bit effective 1/1/99, per the Settlement approved by FERC in April, 1998.
Here are the rates through 2004:
Rates (cents per Dth)
1999
2000
2001
2001
2003
2004
Commodity 0.75 0.72 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.0
High Demand* 23.0 20.0 9.0 6.0 5.0 0.0
Low Demand* 14.2 12.3 5.5 3.7 3.1 0.0
Small Customer 1.8 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.0
*refers to high load factor or low load factor customers.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000 11:07
AM ---------------------------
"Vanessa Wilson" <[email protected]> on 04/04/2000 10:30:48 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: GE Letter Agreement
Alan,
In response to your e-mail, the Letter Agreement has not been further revised
since I sent it to you on March 30th (that e-mail is attached hereto).
The open issues relate to the following items in Attachment 8 which contains
certain provisions to be used as part of the "Base Agreement:"
1. The issue detailed in the attached of whether WestLB will indemnify GEII
against actions of the Enron entity acting as "Agent." Rob Gay is reviewing
this issue. This issue would impact Section 20.1(a).
2. The inclusion of certain language that Enron has requested which would
more clearly establish that GEII's indemnity obligation includes
consequential damage claims by third parties. The language at issue appears
in Sections 20.1(b) and 27.2.
At Brett Wiggs' request, Cheryl Costa is discussing the above issues with
GEII. If you have any questions or comments or would like to discuss the
foregoing, please contact me at 713-655-5102.
------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.
Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their
professional qualifications will be provided upon request.
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:16:35 -0500
From: "Vanessa Wilson" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: GE Letter Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_EEB7315F.5938C8D4"
As requested, attached please find the e-mail I sent to Rob Gay to which the
current draft of the Letter Agreement with GEII is attached and which briefly
summarizes the indemnity issue we have been discussing.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss the attached further,
please feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:36:15 -0500
From: "Vanessa Wilson" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: GE Letter Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_EEB7315F.5839C9D5"
Rob,
Attached please find the current draft of the Letter Agreement (32581.7),
including Attachment 8 (32573.7) which sets forth various provisions to be
included in the Purchase Agreement. Article 20 regarding indemnification is
included in Attachment 8.
As we discussed, West LB has some concerns regarding including language in
Article 20 which GEII requested by which West LB would indemnify GEII for
Enron's acts (in its capacity as Agent). West LB has suggested they would be
willing to undertake this obligation if they are reimbursed by Enron through
the Acquisition and Development Agreement. Today, for the first time, West
LB indicated that they may require a cap on this liability for Agent's acts
in the Purchase Agreement.
GEII has requested that West LB undertake this obligation and Enron has
agreed to pursue it with West LB. In light of this, the language which would
establish West LB's indemnity obligation for the Agent's acts is not included
in the current draft of Attachment 8.
Please let me know how you would like to proceed. As I mentioned, we are
trying to finalize the Letter Agreement with GEII very shortly. I apologize
for any confusion and look forward to working with you on this matter. If
you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please
feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.
Thanks,
Vanessa.
- 32581_7.doc
- 32573_7.doc
- 32614_2.xls
|
Marlene: the following information per your request to set up Transcolorado
Pipeline in Global.
Transcolorado Gas Transmission Company
Interstate pipeline
Address: 370 Van Gordon Street
Lakewood, CO 80228
Phone # (Main) 303-763-3673
Contact: Steve Irizarry 303-763-3473
Rate Zones: Rocky Mountains
San Juan
Imelda: the curves you need to set up are
Rocky Mountains: curve will be Wyoming Hub
San Juan: curve will be El Paso San Juan Non-Bondad
Thanks, and let me know if there are any additional questions.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 09:59 AM
---------------------------
"Jones, Matthew" <[email protected]> on 11/30/2000 01:25:58 PM
To: "'Rankin, Cliff (V&E)'" <[email protected]>, "'Barquin, John'"
<[email protected]>
cc: "'Dutton, Chris'" <[email protected]>, "'Gay, Rob (Enron)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Tarry, Steve (V&E)'" <[email protected]>, "''Novak,
John (Enron)'" <[email protected]>, "Pirrie, Andrew"
<[email protected]>
Subject: ECA
I attach DWS/Shell comments on the latest version of the ECA. The comments
appear in the text in bold caps, underlined.
The following also need to be included in the draft:
1. provisions for sponsor guarantee buyout, once agreed; and
2. a provision along the lines of Section 7.06 of the TBS Security
Agreement (relating to step-in to the TBS agreements) so as to give
SOTL/Enron Corp privity in relation to these rights. (This point was agreed
with Mary some time ago in one of the New York meetings.)
Consideration also needs to be given as to whether there should be express
recognition of the rights of STDC and Enron Netherlands to subscribe subdebt
under the ECA.
Regards
_____________________________________
Matthew Jones
Denton Wilde Sapte
One Fleet Place London EC4M 7WS UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7246 7500
Fax: +44 (0)20 7246 7777
E-mail: [email protected]
_____________________________________
<<DWSShell comments on ECA.DOC>>
******************************************************************************
**
This e-mail is from Denton Wilde Sapte. Our web site is at
http://www.dentonwildesapte.com A list of our partners may be inspected at
our principal place of business, which is at Five Chancery Lane, Clifford's
Inn, London, EC4A 1BU, UK. Our central telephone number is (0)20 7242 1212.
This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s)
named above. It may contain confidential or privileged information and
should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person. If you are
not a named recipient, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail from
your system.
******************************************************************************
**
- DWSShell comments on ECA.DOC
|
We just had a call with Novak, Barquin (V&E) and Tozzini on options for next
Monday such as economic equilibrium, arbitration, litigation etc. We will be
putting all the results together for you by Friday Morning. In the mean
time, it may be helpful for you to reflect on the following (particularly the
table). This is really starting to bring it into focus for me. We will try
to do the same for our options on Monday's decision.
|
It's not the same as a self evaluation form but I hope you find this
informative as to my where abouts this year. I am collecting similar lists
from the folks who report to me.
|
In non-default situations the Lenders allow the banks to have rights and
typically substantial input on waivers modifications etc. As you can imagine
the IFC would not want the liability of being responsible to B banks if they
changed the deal without their consent and the B banks would e uncomfortable
turning over that right to a third party. They would lose control of the
credit process.
Richard Quek@ECT
02/18/2001 11:50 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: IFC Precedents
Rob,
Thanks for the feedback. Does the IFC veto cover all waivers, consents,
approvals, etc (except for those that require unanimous approval like changes
to pricing, tenor, security, etc, of course)?
On the prepayment penalties (other than the customary break-funding costs),
what have you seen, in terms of the levels imposed?
Regards,
Richard
Rob G Gay@ENRON
02/15/2001 03:48 AM
To: Peter N Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Richard Quek/SIN/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: IFC Precedents
There are prepayment penalties associated with IFC loans. As to the lender
Veto, the Veto should only apply to the banks covered by their umbrella and
should not be applicable to the relationship to other MLA's or uncovered
lenders. For instance if OPIC is lending $50MM, FMO $10MM, and the B banks
$40MM, the voting rights should be 50% for OPIC and 50% FMO (since FMO is the
lender of record for the B banks). Unanimous consent items would then
require both OPIC and FMO to consent.
Peter N Anderson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/14/2001 10:45 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: IFC Precedents
Rob-
I told Richard that I had no experience with IFC. Suggested that you may
have.
Regards
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter N Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/14/2001 10:44 AM ---------------------------
Richard Quek@ECT
02/14/2001 10:34 AM
To: Peter N Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: IFC Precedents
Peter,
As you might know, we are in the midst of discussions with a group of lenders
on the Bulacan project in the Philippines. The lender of record if the FMO
(Netherlands Development Finance Corporation) and the structure is modelled
on the IFC "A" and "B" loan structure. As the "A" loan lender, FMO is saying
that they want veto rights over all decisions that are to be taken by the
lenders. Do you know if the IFC has such veto rights in their facilities -
will greatly appreciate your feedback on this asap. In addition, does the IFC
impose prepayment penalties?
Regards,
Richard
|
Those dates are fine for me. Copies of the docs will be sent your way
shortly.
Peter E Weidler
12/20/2000 08:57 AM
To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Christiaan Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Cuiaba Project
I have been informed that Cuiaba I is in Global Assets shop and that I have
been tasked with responsibility for bringing it to successful closure.
Think there are different definitions of successful closure. Financial
close is key step - gets Enron's money out, but does not improve the
economics of the project. I am looking to get as much of Enron's money out
as possible and improve the economics of the remaining investment.
Cuiaba I is very much intertwined with the GTB/Transredes chain - also with
Cuiaba II - restructuring of the project is complex - but we have pretty
clear contractual rights to restructure the supply - if the Furnas consent
does not come - poker game becomes very high stakes during January - and of
course compounding all this is construction and budget and the mark to market
position.
I would like to meet with Jose, John, Joao Carlos, Rick, Rob, Laine,
Christiaan, and Felipe in Houston on the 8th, 9th and 10th (if needed) of
January to go through this from top to bottom and figure out the game plan
for how we are going to play these different opportunities off of one
another.
Please confirm your attendance -
Joe/Orlando - if I am missing a key participant - please let me know.
Rob - can you get someone to make copy of the PPA, GSA, and Key financing
documents for me to read.
Yvette - please get a large conference room for the three days.
Pete
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000 12:50
PM ---------------------------
"Barquin, John" <[email protected]> on 06/06/2000 09:14:52 AM
To: "Rankin, Cliff" <[email protected]>
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Novak, John (Enron)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Hermes Fee Letter
Cliff -- Can you please tell Rob and John what you need from them in order
to finalize a draft of the Hermes fee/reimbursement letter?
|
Tracee,
Could you print this out and let's try another round together.
Thanks
|
This is the type of thing I'll be doing for the forseable future. It has been
great working with you.
Regards,
Rob
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 04:04
PM ---------------------------
Tori Kuykendall
04/26/2000 03:55 PM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000
03:53 PM ---------------------------
Matthew Lenhart
04/26/2000 03:40 PM
To: Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000
03:39 PM ---------------------------
Shirley Elliott <[email protected]> on 04/26/2000 08:03:31 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
Allison Damon <[email protected]>, Josh Sherman <[email protected]>, Maria
Vigil <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
I think we've all seen a different version of this.
______________________________ Forward Header
__________________________________
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
Author: [email protected] at Internet-USA
Date: 4/26/2000 8:00 AM
E-mail me back and let me know what you scored.
- CORRUPTI.EXE
- RFC-822.TXT
---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
---------------------------
From: [email protected] at Internet-USA
Date: 4/26/00 8:00AM -0500
To: Shirley Elliott at DTT.US.HOUSTON
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2000 11:51
AM ---------------------------
"Vanessa Wilson" <[email protected]> on 03/30/2000 11:16:35 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: GE Letter Agreement
As requested, attached please find the e-mail I sent to Rob Gay to which the
current draft of the Letter Agreement with GEII is attached and which briefly
summarizes the indemnity issue we have been discussing.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss the attached further,
please feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.
------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:36:15 -0500
From: "Vanessa Wilson" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: GE Letter Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_4E179871.E8897E40"
Rob,
Attached please find the current draft of the Letter Agreement (32581.7),
including Attachment 8 (32573.7) which sets forth various provisions to be
included in the Purchase Agreement. Article 20 regarding indemnification is
included in Attachment 8.
As we discussed, West LB has some concerns regarding including language in
Article 20 which GEII requested by which West LB would indemnify GEII for
Enron's acts (in its capacity as Agent). West LB has suggested they would be
willing to undertake this obligation if they are reimbursed by Enron through
the Acquisition and Development Agreement. Today, for the first time, West
LB indicated that they may require a cap on this liability for Agent's acts
in the Purchase Agreement.
GEII has requested that West LB undertake this obligation and Enron has
agreed to pursue it with West LB. In light of this, the language which would
establish West LB's indemnity obligation for the Agent's acts is not included
in the current draft of Attachment 8.
Please let me know how you would like to proceed. As I mentioned, we are
trying to finalize the Letter Agreement with GEII very shortly. I apologize
for any confusion and look forward to working with you on this matter. If
you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please
feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.
Thanks,
Vanessa.
- 32581_7.doc
- 32573_7.doc
- 32614_2.xls
|
Toni: can you please work up an offer for Josh Chapa for $60,000? Do not
make the offer until you hear back from me, but I would like to move on this
asap. Thanks.
|
Phone number at Enron is 713-646-7582
Address:
Rob Gay
Enron
333 Clay Street
Houston, TX 77002
|
Isabel: It is ok to pay this invoice per Randy Gay. If you need anything
else just let me know. Thanks.
|
terrific,thanks
"Beckworth, Melissa" <[email protected]> on 12/06/2000 11:57:49 AM
To: "Gay, Rob (Enron)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: FW: Cuiaba sub-debt
Rob - I just received your message about the loan extensions and Central
Bank registrations. I have been working with Celso Bernardi, Rafael Rangel
and Rick Hopkinson of Enron and Fabio Yamada and Irenne Yamanaka of Machado
Meyer on this. Also, I am preparing sort of a "critical path" items
checklist on the sub-debt that John Barquin and I are going to discuss with
John Novak tomorrow at 9 a.m. After we work through it, I would be glad to
forward it to you.
In short and in answer to your specific question, as advised by Machado
Meyer, I think that we will either be reissuing new promissory notes for all
of the sub-debt with new maturity dates or entering into loan agreements
between EPE and GasMat (as Borrowers) and then the respective Enron and
Shell lenders to extend the maturity date to December 31, 2001 as the note
from Celso below explains. Then we will just deliver request for extension
letters to the Central Bank to request them to amend the registrations to
reflect the new maturity date. This should all be done before the existing
loans mature on December 31, 2000.
Please let me know if you have any further questions for now and I will keep
you apprised of any developments. Regards, Melissa
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: FW: Cuiaba sub-debt
Melissa,
as agreed in the Cuiaba Owners Meeting yesterday, by Rick (Enron) and
Johannes (Shell), we need to extend the maturity date of the shareholders
loans to Dec. 31st, 2001 and keep all the other conditions.
I am sending a confirmation to Shell of this and request a letter from the
borrower talking about that. Also I have been in contact with Fabio and
Yrenne about this issue.
Please let me know if you need anything else.
rgds
Celso
"Beckworth, Melissa" <[email protected]> on 29/11/2000 11:31:01
To: "Powell, Laine (Enron)" <[email protected]>, "Lammers, Rick
(Enron)" <[email protected]>
cc: "Novak, John (Enron)" <[email protected]>, "Beckworth, Melissa"
<[email protected]>, "Lammers, Rick (Enron)"
<[email protected]>, "Gay, Rob (Enron)"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], "Barquin, John"
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: FW: Cuiaba sub-debt
FYI - Regarding Rick's note about the default interest, I have spoken to
Fabio Yamada and Irenne Yamanaka of MMSO regarding what we need to do to
document the extensions. Fabio says that we can have a simple loan
agreement
(I would assume there would be one between each Lender and the Enron/Shell
borrowers) where the various parties agree to the extension. The notes
would
not have to be reprinted/replaced and can remain as they are. We would just
send notification letters to the Central Bank requesting that the existing
registrations be amended to reflect the extension. Rick Hopkinson is
checking with Raquel Novais and Fabio Yamada of MMSO regarding any possible
Brazilian tax issues that would arise from this transaction/extension. I
will let you know when I receive that information. Regards, Melissa
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 1:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: Cuiaba sub-debt
Rick et al.
Pls include Celso Bernardi on all these emails.
rgds
Laine
Richard A Lammers@ENRON
29-11-2000 04:48 AM
Sent by: Richard A Lammers@ENRON
To: John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]
cc: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: FW: Cuiaba sub-debt (Document link: A Laine Powell 2000)
John I am board with the extension for sure.I do not agree with amending
the notes to add the default interest provision if this will jeopardise our
central Bank approval or cause other significacnt delays. Please advise as
I will try to clear this with Celso tomorrowI
John Novak
11/28/2000 09:51 AM
To: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Cuiaba sub-debt (Document link: Richard A Lammers)
Gents - let's add this to our list to discuss on the call this evening.
"Beckworth, Melissa" <[email protected]> on 11/27/2000 07:11:59 PM
To: "Novak, John (Enron)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: Cuiaba sub-debt
John - What do you think? Can I go forward with this extension of the
sub-debt until June 30, 2001?
-----Original Message-----
From: Beckworth, Melissa
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 7:20 PM
To: Novak, John (Enron); Barquin, John
Cc: '[email protected]'
Subject: FW: Cuiaba sub-debt
Importance: High
John/John -
We have a new sub-debt issue -- The existing shareholder subordinated loan
promissory notes have a maturity of the earlier of December 31, 2000 or the
closing of third-party financing, and the Central Bank registrations
reflect
that. Celso has requested MMSO to draft letters to the Central Bank asking
for an extension of the maturity to June 30, 2001. He says that Johannes
Walzebuck has agreed to the extension of maturity for Shell but that he has
had no response from Enron (I think he sent a message to Novak, Powell,
Lammers, Rangel, Walzebuck and Dutton on Nov 13). The A&R SFA doesn't have
an explicit maturity date for the loans but it has a form of note attached
which carries the maturity date -- the notes are to be considered a part of
the agreement. The form of note attached to the A&R SFA carries default
interest but the simple form notes that are actually in existence (the ones
that were just printed) do not have default interest provisions (we had to
match the original registrations and default interest was not a registered
payment condition). Unless you all want to just leave the notes and hope
that we can collect default interest, I have asked MMSO what we need to do
-- I assume we have to issue replacement promissory notes with the new
maturity date. We would then send the notification letters to the Central
Bank notifying them of the extension. We also need to address this in the
2nd A to the A&R SFA. My note below tries to explain what all is going on
with the various assignments and notifications.
The main thing I need from you is to let me know what your thoughts are
from
an Enron perspective and how you wish for me to proceed. Do you need to
talk
to Lammers/Powell/Gay? Let me know. Regards, Melissa
-----Original Message-----
From: Beckworth, Melissa
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:59 PM
To: '[email protected]'; Araujo, Renata Jayme De;
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Cc: [email protected]; Barquin, John; Novak, John (Enron);
Hopkinson, Rick (Enron)
Subject: Cuiaba sub-debt
Celso - I apologize that I have not been able to speak with you about this.
I do not recall receiving a message from you about this previously, and I
have been out of the office without access to my e-mail or international
service all day today. The Amended and Restated Shareholders Funding
Agreement will have to be amended (there is a 2nd Amendment in draft form
right now that has not been finalized) to include a new form of note with
the new maturity date. We will also have to draft some form of letter
agreement/waiver to address the fact that the maturity of the previously
issued promissory notes is being extended (perhaps this can just be an
additional provision in the 2nd amendment).
Fabio and Irenne - Will we need to issue replacement promissory notes with
the new maturity date for all of the existing promissory notes or is there
any other way to address this effectively under Brazilian law?
Also, Fabio and Irenne - with respect to the notification letters for the
TR
Buyout loans, I wonder if it might be easier to go ahead and deliver the
notices of assignment to the Central Bank because the loans that were
assigned (and the loans mentioned in the letters) do not encompass all of
the shareholder loans. The Shell assignment agreement for the SGL to SCHL
assignment for EPE should be complete within the next few days and is dated
"as of September 30, 2000". I assume Shell has notification letters to
deliver as well for that assignment. Did you receive my fax with the
mark-up
of the notification letters?
Maybe we could do this in two steps:
1) Deliver the notification of assignment letters and schedules for the
Transredes Buyout and for the Shell assignment of EPE loans from SGL to
STDCL.
2) Execute 2nd Amendment to A& R Shareholders Funding Agreement with new
form of promissory note with new maturity and approving extension of
maturity date of existing loans, complete the Enron assignments of the
replacement notes (for EPE and GasMat credits) to Enron Netherlands
Holdings
B.V., and notify the Central Bank of the extension of the maturity date on
the existing promissory notes and of the Enron assignments.
The reason I suggest this breakdown is that the items in number 1 are
basically complete and have been approved. The others are not complete yet
and could be done in the next week or two.
I know this is a lot to coordinate; you can let me know if you have
suggestions about the different steps we should take and in what order.
I will try to speak to John and John about the Enron approvals on this and
get back to everyone.
Regards, Melissa
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 10:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Alteracao de Certificado de Registro
Renata,
I have been triyng to talk to Melissa on this issue, but she is not
responding to me. I sent an email about this to Laine, Lammers, Rafael
Rangel, Novak and Miguel Mendoza from Enron and Johannes from Shell. I
only got answer from Shell approving my suggestion for extension. Also I
need from someone to confirm that there is no restriction in the
shreholders agreement about this extension.
I requested Irene to send me the draft to save time in the near future.
Let me know if you need aything else.
rgds
Celso
"Araujo, Renata Jayme De" <[email protected]> on 20/11/2000 18:45:25
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected] '" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Beckworth, Melissa" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Alteracao de Certificado de Registro
Dear all,
I have spoken with Irene and she will get the remaining copies from Ricardo
Pinto (from Machado Meyer), and Sandra Vassel.
Irene has told me that the change in the dates of the certificates is due
to
the fact that the loans that are going to be used to repay the amounts
reflected in the certificates are not going to be granted this year, but
only mid next year. Therefore, the current date (12/31/2000) would be
changed to June 30th, 2001. Celso, I would like to ask you to kindly
confirm
this understanding, since Irene has told me that you asked her to make the
letters to the Central Bank notifying the date change, but she had not had
more details about the matter.
Finally, Melissa has asked Machado Meyer whether the current drafts of the
letters to the Central Bank notifying the two assignment of credits (from
Transredes to Enron and Shell, so called "Transredes Byout", and from Shell
Generating to Shell Treasury) have to change due to the date change
reflected in the new letters circulated below.
Thank you for the attention.
Regards,
Renata
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: 17/11/00 14:20
Subject: Alteracao de Certificado de Registro
Renata,
Eu envie copia das Atas da Reuniao dos Quotistas das duas
empresas, onde eles aprovam a assinatura do Credit Assignment Agreement
entre a Transredes e a Enron e a Shell de 15 de setembro de 2000.
Nos nao temos outro documento que fale sobre isto. Voce poderia nos
ajudar?
no aguardo
Obrigada!
Cris
---------------------- Forwarded by Cristiane Mantelli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on
17/11/2000 16:13 Cris,
"Irenne Yamanaka - (YAM)" <[email protected]> on 14/11/2000 17:17:17
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
cc: "Fabio Yamada - (FBY)" <[email protected]>
Subject: Alteracao de Certificado de Registro
Prezados Senhores,
Conforme solicitado, seguem anexas minutas das cartas a serem
apresentadas
pelo Banco Central, referentes a alteracao da data de vencimento dos
emprestimos.
Por favor, queiram nos informar acerca da situacao atual (i) do processo
de
cessao dos creditos da Transredes para os demais credores e (ii) do
processo de cessao dos creditos pela Shell Generating Ltd. a Shell
Treasury
Dollar Company Ltd., para, se for o caso, efetuarmos as modificacoes
necessarias nas minutas.
Nesse sentido, esclarecemos desde ja que, no caso da cessao (ii) nao ter
ocorrido, deverao ser apresentadas cartas referentes aos emprestimos
concedidos pela Shell Generating Ltd. (11/1998 ate 12/1999) e,
separadamente, outras cartas referentes aos emprestimos concedidos pela
Shell Treasury Dollar Company Ltd. (01/2000 ate hoje).
Permanecemos a disposicao para quaisquer esclarecimentos que se facam
necessarios.
Atenciosamente,
Fabio Yamada
Irenne Yamanaka
(See attached file: extension.EPE.doc)
(See attached file: extension.Enron.doc)
(See attached file: extension.Transredes.doc)
(See attached file: extension.Shell.doc)
<<extension.EPE.doc>> <<extension.Enron.doc>>
<<extension.Transredes.doc>> <<extension.Shell.doc>>
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You
++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system. Thank You
|
Thanks
Well done. That's the best rate we have seen for some time.
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: PQP OPIC Certificates of Participation (COPs) Pricing
Rob, for your info. the COP's were sold today.
The Investor spd over UST was 105 bps and the UST was 5.31%.
|
Hi, we have been missing each other on the phone. Were you able to trace the
package?
My home Email is [email protected]
|
Guys: currently the system is designed to match upstreams and downstreams
for buy/sells in contract exchange, and the scheduler would then recreate
these paths in Unify. In my opinion this does not guarantee data integrity
between the systems. Carrie and I have scheduled a meeting for 1:30 pm today
in 21c2 to discuss. Please feel free to attend and give your opinions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 06:35
AM ---------------------------
Carrie Slagle
10/16/2000 05:11 PM
To: Lisa Kinsey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey J Brewer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eddie Janzen/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: "Auto-Pathing" Buy/Sells
Hello!
Randy and I were discussing some additional functionality after the meeting
today. . .
Is there any reason that we could NOT automate the creation of the buy/sell
or brokered paths in UNIFY once the deals have been matched in the Contract
Exchange module? Will the Contract Exchange module contain enough
information to create the UNIFY path just a scheduler would?
In other words, is the path creation process for buy/sell deals only manual
"re-entry" of the data that will be sitting out in Contract Exchange? OR is
there additional information that you need to create the path that is not
sitting in Contract Exchange?
This, of course, assumes that the meter has been added to the deal in
Contract Exchange and the deal has bridged from SITARA to UNIFY.
It seems to us that this should be possible and valuable, but please give us
your input!
Thanks,
Carrie
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000 11:30
AM ---------------------------
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Deal # 96724 Alteration
Hello,
We had trouble calc'ing our BC Physical books yesterday and pinponted it to
this deal, which had an addition yesterday.
In order to get a calc. we deleted the day from the deal. This of course will
go back in, and I just wanted to let you know what is happening.
The deal was for 111 MMBTU's; EC - IM Canada BC buying from ENA - IM West;
the entry was dated 05/24/00 to PGEN/KINGSGATE/KING from PGEN/KINGSGATE/KING
for a fee of NOVA_AECO-DAILY-US-CGPR...
I have let Rich Gebauer know about it on our end.
Have a great weekend.
Brian.
|
The insurance has been purchased by Enron exclusively to cover our equity and
our subd debt through our commercial program (not OPIC). We have covered
the following investments to date on Cuiaba.
EPE $235MM
GASMAT $ 60MM
GASBOL $132MM
Up to US$200MM could be reimbursed for an insuarble event. However, that
$200 may be limited by draws associated with insurable events at other
projects. This $200MM could be further limited by draws from other projects
because the program has a cap of $250MM total, but the cap can be reinstated
following a draw with an exclusion for the country where the previous hit
occurred.
Mariella Mahan@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/02/2001 11:27 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron,
Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Insurance
Rob,
Isn't the $200 million the cap of OPIC and doesn't that apply to 100% of the
equity covered by OPIC, which means that, I guess (and I don't know if Shelll
qualifies or if we structured around this) we share with Shell the $200
million on the basis of equity percentages held by each?
Thanks
Rob G Gay@ENRON
02/02/2001 09:27 AM
To: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Mariella Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Insurance
I believe that is correct.
Tracee Bersani@ECT
02/01/2001 05:02 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Insurance
Rob,
Didn't he say we were only covered up to $200 MM (e.g. the limit of our
contract frustration cover?) With the current Shell/enron sharing
percentages, it would seem that we are entitled to 72% of the $360 MM payment
or $259 MM, thus we would only be out by $59 MM.
Tracee
Rob G Gay@ENRON
02/01/2001 04:57 PM
To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Mariella Mahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cliff Shedd/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Insurance
According to Cliff Shedd, we would be covered by insurance if we terminated
the contract with Furnas and Furnas failed to pay the termination payment.
However the insurers will only pay after we receive an arbitration judgement
against them and the refuse to honor the judgement. I assume we would also
have to exhaust our remedies against trhe guarantor (Eletrobras).
Also, we are required to notify the underwriters immediately of a material
default.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000 06:49
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 04/18/2000 06:51:47 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Brazil Daily Apr 18
---------------------- Forwarded by Marcos Cunha/SAO/WLB on 18/04/2000 08:21
---------------------------
Frederico Turolla
17/04/2000 18:40
To: [email protected]
cc: (bcc: Marcos Cunha/SAO/WLB)
Subject: Brazil Daily Apr 18
(See attached file: bd000418.pdf)
- bd000418.pdf
|
Thank you.
Felipe Ospina
12/12/2000 08:58 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: OPIC/KFW Next Steps
Rob,
I will start preparing the models and working with Tracee to make sure we
have everything up to date for the lenders.
Thanks.
Rob G Gay
12/11/2000 04:24 PM
To: Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine A
Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT, Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: OPIC/KFW Next Steps
I spoke with Mary Mervene this morning and the llenders declined to convene
this week although we will arrange an ECA call for Thursday or Friday. Mary
has requested that we do the following:
1) Send the Lenders and S&W the new budget info and the revised change order
summary.
2) Revise the model to reflect the new costs and the new timeline.
3) S&W will review the model and then we will repeat the exercise of
calculating fuel oil and Furnas penalty exposures.
4) Finalize sponsor support elements.
This can all occur fairly quickly except I am concerned because we have not
resolved the budget with Shell, and theoretically the lenders can take 30
days to review the model and budget when submitted.
We also need to discuss strategy because we may want to delete the
contingency from the budget since the lenders are going to want the sponsors
to commit to some general contingency supporty anyway.
|
Rick, Laine, and John, please add any comments or subjects which you think
Jim should address with Munoz. He would like to call him some time today.
|
will do
Richard A Lammers
02/06/2001 12:43 PM
Sent by: Richard A Lammers
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Blanca Bollom/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tracee Bersani@EES
Subject: Latest Equity Contribution Agreement
Rob - can you or Blanca send me the latese ECA so I can sent the exact
covenant language regarding development costs on to Shell . We also need to
decide if we need to revisit this with both Shell and the Lenders .Thanks.
|
He and I talked. You can stop bothering him for now. When we get him next
week will extract our pound of flesh and we will make him buy the beer.
From: Stephen Gray@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 12/06/2000 12:25 PM EST
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Meetings next week
Rob,
Does this mean Cliff won't be available for our call on Friday or to return
my three weeks of accumulated voice-mails and e-mails until next week?
If so, I'll stop trying to reach him.
Steve Gray
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/07/2000 01:52
PM ---------------------------
From: William Kelly 04/07/2000 01:52 PM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Game
I appreciate your inviting the Risk group on this outing. I understand about
the ticket issue, but the gesture is what counts anyway.
Thanks again.
WK
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001 05:16 AM
---------------------------
Rob G Gay
02/12/2001 09:48 AM
To: [email protected], "Kluesener, Frank" <[email protected]>, "Rivera,
Nancy A." <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: GSA
On Friday we distributed RFPs for securing bridge gas. Letters went today
to Chaco, TotalfinaElf, Andina, Maxus, BritishGas and Petrobras for them to
quote us 6-month gas with our option to extend for another 6 months. We have
given them until March 2nd to respond.
Pete Weidler will meet with YPF (hopefully with Ernesto Lopez Anad?n) the
week of the 19th.
|
Two agreements have been negotiated with Siemens as part of the plant
turnover for Provisional Completion Phase III on oil: 1) the EOT Claim
Agreement between Siemens and SCC and 2) modifications to the TAA between
Siemens and EPE.
The changes which the lenders should review are as follows:
EOT Claim Agreement
14 Day Availability Test with respect to Provisional Completion Phase III on
oil, on a look-back basis over 6 months, required as a specific performance
requirement
After PC on oil, Siemens can demobilize
Compensation for commissioning on oil $5,720,000; $30,000 per day for owner
delay
Bonus of $15,000 per day that PC achieved before 17 Feb
Phase III Substantial Completion on gas
60 days prior written notice on gas availability
If sound level guarantees demonstrated on oil, only need to demonstrate far
field sound on gas
Owner must operate and maintain per O&M manuals and industry practices on
oil; if not, owner must correct items materially affecting Contractor's
commissioning obligations
Performance guarantees remain in tact per EPC
Long stop date on Phase III Substantial Completion on gas of 31 Dec 01
Substantial Completion on gas - punchlist limited to deficiencies from Work
performed to achieve Substantial Completion on gas
Risk of Loss remains with owner during commisioning on gas
Siemens agrees to enter into negotiations to provide operational assistance
Degradation - agree to use curves with credit to owner for degradation during
commissioning
Compensation for commissioning on natural gas $1,220,000 lump sum; $20,000
per day for owner delay
Warranty - 6 months after Provisional Completion on oil
Option to buy extended warranty for up to 6 months at $175,000; must elect 60
days prior to expiration of Primary Warranty Period
Performance LD's on gas per the EPC contract with first $4,000,000 forgiven
by owner
Delay LD's on gas do not start until 60 days after performance test on gas
Payments to be paid (including EOTof $5,720,000): 15 Feb $5,446,141; 28 Feb
$14,353,401 with offset of $4,000,000 for Phase I LD payment due from Siemens
to SCC
Late payment interest rate of 14%
TAA Agreement
Effective date Provisional Completion Phase III on oil
No 12 month look back
12 month Initial Guarantee Period, with the clock suspended for gas
commissioning unless owner delay.
Additional Insurance
In order to provide the lenders an adequate warranty period on gas (if there
are additional delays on the P/L) our Insurance group has indicated that we
will have no problem obtaining 12 months renewable business interruption
insurance when we go operational on gas. This should solve the issue over
the revised warranty with Siemens because it covers defects, design, and
workmanship on the turbines and includes lost profits, etc. Incidentally,
for insurance purposes the turbines are designated DE3 which is not a new
technology designation. The duration of BI coverage is 18 months per event
with US$150,000 deductible.
Typically we will always have this coverage in place but if their is a
supplier warranty then the party providing the warranty pays ahead of the
insurer. In the case where the supplier does not pay or the warranty has
ended then the insurer is the primary.
We will need to execute these agreements immediately. Please advise with
your thoughts as soon as possible..
|
Bob: FYI, my guys tried again last night to update and were unable to.
|
Thanks Christiaan,
but, why not 2 combustion turbines at 90 MW's each and the steam turbine fro
whatever we can get?
Christiaan Huizer@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/19/2000 06:20 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A
Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Felipe
Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: EPE Dispatch
Rob,
Regarding items 1 and 2, please contact Lucio Reis in Sao Paulo office and he
can explain.
Item 3 is incorrect. The 300 MW would be generated by the two gas turbines at
about 100 MW each and the remaining 100 MW coming from the steam turbine. The
steam turbine receives its energy from the exit gases from the gas turbines
and they both contribute equally to the resulting steam turbine output
(theoretically at least, in practice depending on optimization of machines)
Again, please talk with Lucio.
Regards,
Christiaan
Rob G Gay@ENRON
12/18/2000 04:41 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christiaan
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EPE Dispatch
Here is what we have concluded based on discussions this morning:
1) We believe that Furnas has agreed to contract and pay for 300 MW on oil to
meet regulatory requirements concerning required capacity and reserve
margin. We do not believe that they intend for us to be dispatrched above
220 MW. (Do we have any document which could substantiate this?)
2) Although dispatch on a merit order basis would suggest that EPE runs full
time (with 300 MW available), there are practical constraints in the
transmission system which will prohibit this from actually occuring. [ Please
describe these constraints using some official sounding jargon but minimal
detail and in particular indicate what is involved to de-bottleneck and how
long this will take. I presume that Furnas is solely responsible for the
corrective measures.]
3) Based on our analysis, the optimal operating approach would be to generate
220MW with one turbine and 91 MW with the other for a total of 311 if
dipatched above 220 MW.
If we can prove that 1) & 2) are correct or convince the lenders that they
are, then I think we can suggest that fuel oil exposure is negligibe if gas
is ready by April 01. We will have to see how it looks when we add the Sue
Garvin flex months.
Therefore, a merit order analysis is only necessary if i) our supposition
about Furnas' motivations are incorrect and/or ii) the transmission problem
is cleared. If this happens it would be nice to be able to predict reduced
fuel utilization due to a) reduced dispatch during daily off-peak hours or
seasonal impacts, b) due to scheduled outages, and c) due to managing our
availabilty in such a way as to reduce fuel consumption operating losses.
Any data you can provide will be helpful.
Have I successfully connected the dots here?
If you have previously sent these materials to Felipe or Tracee please simply
grumble to yourself if you have to do an extra e-mail to me. Remember, you
don't have to be nice to a short timer unless you need them to get something
done.
Regards,
Rob
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 04:57
PM ---------------------------
Tori Kuykendall
04/26/2000 03:55 PM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000
03:53 PM ---------------------------
Matthew Lenhart
04/26/2000 03:40 PM
To: Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000
03:39 PM ---------------------------
Shirley Elliott <[email protected]> on 04/26/2000 08:03:31 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
Allison Damon <[email protected]>, Josh Sherman <[email protected]>, Maria
Vigil <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
I think we've all seen a different version of this.
______________________________ Forward Header
__________________________________
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
Author: [email protected] at Internet-USA
Date: 4/26/2000 8:00 AM
E-mail me back and let me know what you scored.
- CORRUPTI.EXE
- RFC-822.TXT
---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
---------------------------
From: [email protected] at Internet-USA
Date: 4/26/00 8:00AM -0500
To: Shirley Elliott at DTT.US.HOUSTON
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
*To: [email protected] at Internet-USA
Subject: Fw: Corruption Test
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
|
Bob: I am still wonderring why the external modems my group had were
removed. It seems like I am always having to order modems and accessories
every time we move anyone. Since we are getting ready to move again, maybe
we should get an inventory of everything each logistic's person has at their
workstation, and this is what should be moved.
|
This is the sponsor undertakings which we commonly refer to as the Central
Bank Indemnity.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 12/20/2000 09:51 AM
---------------------------
"RACITI, Melissa" <[email protected]> on 11/08/2000 11:07:55 AM
To: [email protected], "Adriana Mathias Baptista (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], "Ana beatriz kesselring"
<[email protected]>, "Ana Silvia Dias"
<[email protected]>, "Anabela de Oliveira"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], "Analia
Miqueri (BFM&L) (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Anamaria Rosenthal"
<[email protected]>, "Andrea Gavino (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], "Andreia Almeida"
<[email protected]>, "Andrew Pierrie (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Barbara Boehm" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], "Beatriz Mello"
<[email protected]>, "Blanca Bollom" <[email protected]>,
"Bradley Barta" <[email protected]>, [email protected],
"BURKE, Ted (TDB)" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Carolina
Galvao" <[email protected]>, "Chaim Wachsberger (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], "Christian
Huizer (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Claudia Bonelli"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], "Cliff Rankin"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected],
"Daniela Serpa" <[email protected]>, "David Schumacher (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Deia Holzmann"
<[email protected]>, "DELPINO, Fiorella"
<[email protected]>, "ELORZA, Juliana"
<[email protected]>, "Fatima Carr" <[email protected]>,
"Fernando Aguirre (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Fernando Rojas
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Frank Kluesener
(KfW) (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "gabriela
marques" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Gra?a
Pedretti" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "Heloisa Andrade (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], "Ivan Bole (BFM&L)
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Javier Errecondo (BFM&L) (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], "Joana Ryan" <[email protected]>, "Joao Francisco
Regos" <[email protected]>, "John Barquin"
<[email protected]>, "John Novak" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], "Jose Bestard" <[email protected]>,
"Jos, Roberto Martins" <[email protected]>, "Juan Carlos Moreno
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Karla Wurth (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Karl-Heinz Wellmann (KfW) (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], "Kruskaia
Sierra-Escalante (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Laine Powell"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], "Louis Piscitelli"
<[email protected]>, "Maria del Carmen Ballivian (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Mary Mervenne (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], "Nancy Rivera (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "O'BRIEN, Lisa" <lisa.o'[email protected]>, "Pablo
Rojas (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Pedro
Seraphim" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "RACITI, Melissa"
<[email protected]>, "Renata Araujo" <[email protected]>,
"Ricardo Indacochea (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Ricardo
Nogueira" <[email protected]>, "Ricardo Sanches"
<[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], "Rob Gay" <[email protected]>,
"Robert Shapiro (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Roberto La Laina
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Rodd Werstil"
<[email protected]>, "Rodrigo Sales (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], "SHAKOOR,
Fiona"
<IMCEAEX-_O=FRESHFIELDS_OU=USA-NEW+20YORK_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=FSHAKOOR@freshfield
s.com>, [email protected], "Stefan Unna (C&P) (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Stephen Coats" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], "Steve Muller" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], "Thomas Felsberg"
<[email protected]>, "Thomas Mahaffey (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Central Bank Agreement
This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person: to do so could be a breach of confidence. Thank you for
your co-operation. Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email [email protected]
if you need assistance.
==================================================
Attached are clean and blacklined copies of the revised execution copy of
the Central Bank Agreement.
Best regards.
- COMPARE001.DOC
- NY003678709.DOC
|
I don't need to be involved in the wording of the L/C as long as Rick Lammers
is involved and it should probably be the same or substantially similar to
the existing one from ABN. If we have to do some free form work let me know
and I will take a look at it.
|
John can you give me some feedback on this before it goes. I am waiting on
input from Rick concerning the Vintage deal.
|
Bob: we probably need to get everyone together on this and come up with a
consolidated stance before we go outside the group. As you pointed out,
there are several areas that could open us up to potential problems. We want
ot be careful not to get things out in the iopen that we do not want out.
Thanks.
|
According to Cliff Shedd, we would be covered by insurance if we terminated
the contract with Furnas and Furnas failed to pay the termination payment.
However the insurers will only pay after we receive an arbitration judgement
against them and the refuse to honor the judgement. I assume we would also
have to exhaust our remedies against trhe guarantor (Eletrobras).
Also, we are required to notify the underwriters immediately of a material
default.
|
Toni: Debra is a nice enough person, but does not really fit our needs. She
did not seem to fully understand what our job would entail, and I had a hard
time figuring out what she does now. She does not seem to possess the energ
y level or the sense of urgency our job requires. She is clearly not a hire
from my perspective. Call me if you need anything else.
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 11:01
AM ---------------------------
From: Laird Dyer on 11/01/2000 08:59 AM PST
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT,
[email protected]
Subject: American Public Energy Agency: Natural Gas Sale to APEA/Glendale
Joe,
Late last year Lucy Ortiz gave me your name as the contact regarding gas
sales under the APEA contract. I have also been coordinating with Randy Gay
in our Houston office regarding payments and deliveries.
We have been notified by Coral Energy, representing the City of Glendale,
that effective December 1, 2000, Glendale wants to receive their entire
quantity (4,178 MMBtu/d) at the Nova Inventory Transfer ("NIT") point. This
point is located in Alberta and will be supplied by Enron's Calgary office.
Can you please notify Chase Manhattan, for purposes of settling the swaps
associated with this transaction, to settle at NIT for December 2001 and
beyond, unless another notice is issued to us.
If you no longer have responsibility for managing these issues, could you
please forward this to the correct person.
Thanks,
Laird Dyer (415.782.7805)
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/11/2001 01:33 PM
---------------------------
"Boehm, Barbara" <[email protected]> on 01/11/2001 01:52:39 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Meeting next week
Rob
Tom will be traveling next week. Is it possible to postpone our meeting
until the next week (1/22 or 1/23) so that he can attend, and to give Frank
more time to make arrangements to come over?
Barbara
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/05/2001 10:44 AM
---------------------------
Rob G Gay
02/01/2001 10:50 AM
To: [email protected], "Kluesener, Frank" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Updated Memo
I've updated the memo to insert the missing references. I also learned that
he meetings with ONS and ANEEL are scheduled for tomorrow. Thanks
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 11:38
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 07/18/2000 11:02:43 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: For Kathleen Fwd: Islander
Hi Kathleen,
Attached is an e-mail from Mike Bass. My response follows.
Anita
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
Full-name: Mkbass1
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 21:47:48 EDT
Subject: Islander
To: [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 119
Is it to late to change the Home Depot article. The issue with the county has
been resolved
Here is a revised version
"The developer of the Home Depot/ Target Center on FM2094 is proceeding on
plan.
The developers have requested that the Texas Department of Transportation
modify the new FM 2094 road to include three left turn lanes and a light at
Miller Road. The Water District has agreed to also include the new center in
their district as long as they pay any extra costs and meet certain other
conditions. The Developers have agreed to pay the extra cost for both
requests. The City passed a resolution to support both requests by the
developer and to express our intention to annex the property once the
developer closes on the property and makes an annexation request of the City.
The County and the Developers have also agreed to share in resurfacing part,
about 2100 feet, of Hanson Road- - a $200,000 cost. This is a significant
expense on top of all the other cost mentioned above.
But the project is proceeding as planned. The developers are still planning
on closing on the property in the next few weeks."
Mike Bass
|
Bob: per your request, here is the rundown on Patti's activities for August
and beyond.
1. We calculated the amount we made on her experience in handling El Paso's
transport to be close to $1 million/ month.
2. I could not even begin to calculate the amount made just by having her
here. If Patti had just quit with everyone else gone, the amount lost on El
Paso would be huge, including loss of credibility on our part with our
customers. The exact amount would be close to $1 million/month I would think.
3. The spreads out West have been huge this summer. We were able to take
advantage of this because Patti was here to do the scheduling during a very
difficult time.
4. When I was out for the entire month of August, Patti was not only holding
down a desk that usually three people handle, but was also filling in on
management duties.
5. Patti worked 14 weeks in a row, including weekends, without taking a day
off. She worked at least 12 hours a day during this time, handling several
different jobs at a time.
6. The exact value of what Patti did is hard to determine. I would estimate
that her presence here and stepping in to help out was woth about $5 million
to the desk.
|
Jana: I would definitely like to have an analyst start as soon as possible.
Let me know what the procedure is (i.e. do I interview, will an anlyst just
be assigned to me, etc.) I had already talked to Mason Hamlin before, and he
opted for another rotation, although he was perffectly acceptable to me. So
let me know what I need to do and when I could expect an analyst. Also, a
new hire analyst is acceptable. Thanks.
|
I have not been able to find out any details except that apparently he
decided long ago that he would take some time off after becoming a partner
and so now he is going to do it.
I have never received a call from Bob Draggon. Should I still be expecting
one or have you already convinced him?
Dan Castagnola is being requested as my replacement on Cuiaba and Peter
Anderson is also being discussed. I will be involved primarily to provide
history and guidance, but it will be from my home or parts unknown. You can
feel free to call me at any time (281-334-2360). I will be in the office
here thru March 1.
Kindest Regards
Rob
"Rivera, Nancy A." <[email protected]> on 02/13/2001 08:35:25 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Mervenne, Mary" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: John Barquin
What's with John? Is he OK?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:20 PM
> To: Rivera, Nancy A.
> Subject: John Barquin
>
> Thought you might be interested. Cuiaba is really taking a toll.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rob
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001 09:45
> AM ---------------------------
>
>
> John Novak
> 02/12/2001 01:48 PM
>
> To: Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard A
> Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Eddy
> Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Celina
> Ozorio/SA/Enron@Enron, Laine A
> Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christiaan
> Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, [email protected],
> "PGS - Pedro G. Seraphim" <[email protected]>, Rob G
> Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
> cc:
>
> Subject: John Barquin (Document link: Rob G Gay)
>
> FYI, I understand from John Barquin that he has decided to take a 1 year
> leave of absence from V&E, starting Feb 1. Cuiab? will be continue to be
> covered by Cliff Rankin and Steve Tarry and the rest of the V&E team. In
> addition, John will be available for consultation on historical matters as
> necessary.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
>
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000 08:27
AM ---------------------------
Elizabeth L Hernandez
04/28/2000 08:20 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole Cortez/DEN/ECT@Enron, Paul T
Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron
cc: Hillary Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: West Desk & Denver Desk
Effective immediately Hillary Mack will be taking over the Deal Validation
piece of the West and Denver Desk. I would appreciate it very much if
everyone would please call Hillary at X3-3425 for all issues pertaining to
the West desk and the Denver desk.
Randy, please forward this message on to the Logistics group.
Effective May 1st I wll be doing the Deal Validation piece on the East Desk.
Thanks again!
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000 11:14
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 04/18/2000 05:43:25 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Brazil Daily Apr 19
---------------------- Forwarded by Marcos Cunha/SAO/WLB on 18/04/2000 19:13
---------------------------
Nicola Tingas
18/04/2000 19:03
Sent by: Frederico Turolla
To: [email protected]
cc: (bcc: Marcos Cunha/SAO/WLB)
Subject: Brazil Daily Apr 19
(See attached file: bd000419.pdf)
- bd000419.pdf
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.