hash
stringlengths 32
32
| doc_id
stringlengths 5
12
| section
stringlengths 4
1.47k
| content
stringlengths 0
6.67M
|
|---|---|---|---|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.3.10 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 18 and Band 28 (1UL)
|
Table 6.3.10-1: Inter-band CA of Band 18 and Band 28
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA operating Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
UE transmit / BS receive
Channel BW MHz
UE receive / BS transmit
Channel BW MHz
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_18-28
18
815 MHz
–
830 MHz
5, 10, 15
860 MHz
–
875 MHz
5, 10, 15
FDD
28
703 MHz
–
733 MHz
5, 10
758 MHz
–
788 MHz
5, 10
6.3.10.1 List of specific combination issues
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.3.10.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 6.3.10.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
Maximum aggregate bandwidth [MHz]
Bandwidth Combination Set
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_18A-28A
18
Yes
Yes
Yes
25
0
28
Yes
Yes
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.3.10.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_18-28
| |
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.3.10.1.2.1 Co-existence studies for 1 UL/2 DL
|
The 2nd and 3rd order harmonics and IMD products caused in the BS by transmitting of Band 18 and restricted (703 – 733 MHz UL and 758 – 788 MHz DL) Band 28 DL carriers can be calculated as shown in Table 6.3.10.1.2.1-1 below:
Table 6.3.10.1.2.1-1: Band 18 and restricted Band 28 DL harmonics and IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
758
788
860
875
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
1516
1576
1720
1750
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
2274
2364
2580
2625
2nd order IMD products
(f2_low – f1_high)
(f2_high – f1_low)
(f2_low + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
72
117
1618
1663
3rd order IMD products
(f2_low – 2*f1_high)
(f2_high – 2*f1_low)
(2*f2_low – f1_high)
(2*f2_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
641
716
932
992
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low + f2_low)
(2*f1_high + f2_high)
(2*f2_low + f1_low)
(2*f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
2376
2451
2478
2538
3rd order IMD products
(f1_low – f2_high + f2_low)
(f1_high + f2_high – f2_low)
(f2_low – f1_high + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
743
803
830
905
3rd order IMD products
(f1_low – max BW f2)
(f1_high + max BW f2)
(f2_low – max BW f1)
(f2_high + max BW f1)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
743
803
850
885
It can be seen from Table 6.3.10.1.2.1-1 that the 2nd harmonics of BS transmitting in Band 18 may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 3, 4, 9 and 10, and the 3rd harmonics of BS transmitting in Band 18 and restricted Band 28 may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 30, 38, 40 and 41, while the 2nd IMD products caused by BS supporting CA of Band 18 and restricted Band 28 may fall into the BS receive band of Band 24, and the 3rd IMD products may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 40, 41 and 44. Note that the calculation in Table 6.3.10.1.2.1-1 (except the last row) assumes the BS is transmitting with the whole 15 MHz DL frequency of Band 18 and the whole 30 MHz DL frequency of restricted Band 28. If the BS is only transmitting an up to 15 MHz DL in Band 18 and an up to 10 MHz DL in restricted Band 28 as stated in the WIDS, then the 3rd IMD products may only fall into the BS receive band of the Bands 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 28, 40, 41 and 44 as shown in the last row in Table 6.3.10.1.2.1-1. Note that the 3rd IMD products will not fall into the BS receive frequency range within restricted Band 28, or the BS receive frequency range within Band 8 (900 – 915 MHz) that is allocated in Japan. Also the 3rd IMD products may only fall into the BS receive band of certain frequency range within Band 28 under the transmit configurations shown in Table 6.3.10.1.2.1-2 below.
Table 6.3.10.1.2.1-2: Band (18 + 28) BS transmit configurations with 3rd IMD within Band 28 BS receive band
Band 18 DL channel bandwidth (MHz)
Band 28 DL channel bandwidth (MHz)
Lower edge of Band 28 DL frequency block (MHz)
Lower edge of IMD frequency limits (MHz)
15
5 or 10
758 – 762.9
743 – 747.9
It should be noted that Bands 4, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 24, 30, 38, 40 and 44 are not intended for use in the same geographical area as Bands 18 and 28, and the 3rd IMD products caused by BS supporting carrier aggregation of Band 18 and Band 28 will not fall into the BS receive frequency range within Band 8 that is allocated in Japan. Therefore, the focus here will be on the harmonics and IMD falling into Bands 3, 9, 28 and 41.
With the performances of the current BS antenna system, transmit and receive path components, amplifiers, pre-distortion algorithms and filters, it is expected that the harmonics and IMD interference generated within the Band 3, 9 or 41 receiver would be well below the receiver noise floor eliminating the possibility of receiver desensitization, provided that Bands 18 and 28 BS transmitters do not share the same antenna with Band 3, 9 or 41 BS receiver.
On the other hand, it is recommended that Bands 18 and 28 BS transmitters should not share the same antenna with Band 3, 9 or 41 BS receiver, or Band 28 BS receiver for the affected frequency ranges if the aforementioned BS transmit configurations are used, in order to prevent BS receiver desensitization, unless the antenna path meets very stringent harmonics and 3rd order PIM specification so that the harmonics and PIM will not cause Band 3, 9, 28 or 41BS receiver desensitization.
6.3.10.1.3 ∆TIB and ∆RIB values
Given that CA_B18-B28 is low-low band combination, appropriate UE architecture would be quadplexer basis. As one can see in Figure 6.3.10.1.3-1, separation between Band 18 UL and Band 28 DL is only 12 MHz. In addition, Band 18 filter cannot provide steep attenuation toward lower frequency side. Therefore, it is expected that Band 28 UE would suffer from noise of Band 18 UL and we had considered that inter-band CA of this combo is almost impossible to keep commercial service of quality.
Figure 6.3.10.1.3-1: Frequency range of Band 18 and Band 28
However, it is expected that Lower Duplexer of Band 28 DL can provide good blocking characteristic from unwanted signal of Band 18 UL because separation between them is more than twice (27 MHz) of upper duplexer. Operator A in the figure can fortunately use both Lower and Higher Duplexer from perspective of frequency assignment. Therefore, quadplexer to perform CA_B18-B28 is much preferable to be implemented by [Band 18] + [Band 28 Lower DUP] as indicated by red line in Figure 6.3.10.1.3-1. Values of ∆TIB and ∆RIB would be standardized on the basis of such architecture of quadplexer.
For the reported IL values, additional IL values compared to single band operation could be assumed as shown in table 6.3.10.1.3-1:
Table 6.3.10.1.3-1: Additional IL values compared to single band operation
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
Tx IL [dB]
Rx IL [dB]
18
1.2
0.45
28
1.04
0.45
By convoluting above all of studies, values for ∆TIB and ∆RIB are specified as in Table 6.3.10.1.3-3 and 6.3.10.1.3-4.:
Table 6.3.10.1.3-2: ΔTIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_18A-28A
18
0.6
28
0.5
Table 6.3.10.1.3-3: ΔRIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB [dB]
CA_18A-28A
18
0.2
28
0.2
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.3.10.1.4 Maximum sensitivity reduction for Band 28
|
When Band 28 DL is operated simultaneously with Band 18 UL there is a potential self-interference situation as Band 18 UL will become aggressor on Band 28 DL due to narrow frequency separation. Requirements like MSD should be specified for this interference. After intensive discussion in RAN4, required MSDs are specified in Table 6.3.10.1.4-1.
Table 6.3.10.1.4-1: Reference sensitivity for carrier aggregation QPSK PREFSENS, CA (exceptions)
Channel bandwidth
EUTRA CA Configuration
EUTRA band
1.4 MHz
(dBm)
3 MHz
(dBm)
5 MHz
(dBm)
10 MHz
(dBm)
15 MHz
(dBm)
20 MHz
(dBm)
Duplex mode
CA_18A-28A7
18
-100
-97
-95.2
FDD
287
-94
-92.5
NOTE 1: The transmitter shall be set to PUMAX as defined in subclause 6.2.5A of TS36.101.
NOTE 2: Reference measurement channel is A.3.2 with one sided dynamic OCNG Pattern OP.1 FDD/TDD as described in Annex A.5.1.1/A.5.2.1
NOTE 3: The signal power is specified per port
NOTE 4: No requirements apply when there is at least one individual RE within the uplink transmission bandwidth of the low band for which the 2nd transmitter harmonic is within the downlink transmission bandwidth of the high band. The reference sensitivity is only verified when this is not the case (the requirements specified in clause 7.3.1 of TS36.101 apply).
NOTE 5: These requirements apply when there is at least one individual RE within the uplink transmission bandwidth of the low band for which the 3rd transmitter harmonic is within the downlink transmission bandwidth of the high band.
NOTE 6: The requirements should be verified for UL EARFCN of the low band (superscript LB) such that in MHz and with the carrier frequency of the high band in MHz and the channel bandwidth configured in the low band.
NOTE 7: Supported frequency range of Band 28 for this CA configuration is limited as specified for CA_18-28 in Table 5.5A-2 of TS36.101. This relaxation applies only when Band 18 is configured as UL.
6.4 Class A4. Low-low, low-high or high-high band combination with intermodulation problem (low order IM)
<Text will be added.>
6.4.1 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 2 and Band 4
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.4.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
LTE inter-band carrier aggregation configuration CA_2A-4A shall be operated in E-UTRA CA band CA_2-4 as specified in table 6.4.1.1-1.
Table 6.4.1.1-1: CA_2-4 operating bands
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA Band
Uplink (UL) operating band
Downlink (DL) operating band
BS receive / UE transmit
BS transmit / UE receive
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_2-4
2
1850 MHz
–
1910 MHz
1930 MHz
–
1990 MHz
4
1710 MHz
–
1755 MHz
2110 MHz
–
2155 MHz
LTE inter-band carrier aggregation configuration CA_2A-4A shall be operated with E-UTRA channel bandwidths as specified in table 6.4.1.1-2
Table 6.4.1.1-2: CA_2A-4A channel bandwidths
E-UTRA CA configuration / Bandwidth combination set
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
Maximum aggregated bandwidth
[MHz]
Bandwidth combination set
CA_2A-4A
2
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
40
0
4
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
2
Yes
Yes
20
1
4
Yes
Yes
2
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
40
2
4
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.4.1.2 BS co-existence studies for CA_2-4
|
Table 6.4.1.2-1 shows harmonics frequency limits and table 6.4.1.2-2 intermodulation products frequency limits for CA of Band 2 and Band 4, respectively.
Table 6.4.1.2-1: DL harmonics frequency limits for CA of Band 2 and Band 4
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
1930
1990
2110
2155
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
3860 to 3980
4220 to 4310
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
5790 to 5970
6330 to 6465
As shown in table 6.4.1.2-1, no second and no third harmonics will fall to any 3GPP UL frequencies.
Table 6.4.1.2-2: DL intermodulation products frequency limits for CA of Band 2 and Band 4
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
1930
1990
2110
2155
Two-tone 2nd order IMD products
f2_low – f1_high
f2_high – f1_low
f2_low + f1_low
f2_high + f1_high
IMD frequency range (MHz)
120 to 225
4040 to 4145
Two-tone 3rd order IMD products
2*f1_low – f2_high
2*f1_high – f2_low
2*f2_low – f1_high
2* f2_high – f1_low
IMD frequency range (MHz)
1705 to 1870
2230 to 2380
Three-tone 3rd order IMD products
(f1_low –
max BW f2)
(f1_high +
max BW f2)
(f2_low –
max BW f1)
(f2_high +
max BW f1)
IMD frequency range (MHz)
1915 to 2005
2095 to 2170
As shown in table 6.4.1.2-2, no second order intermodulation products will fall to any 3GPP UL frequencies. Third intermodulation products may fall to UL frequencies of Bands 1-4, 9-10, 23, 25, 30, 33, 35-37, 39 or 40. As third intermodulation products may fall to own receive block (both for Band 2 and Band 4, highlighted in table 6.4.1.2-2), the desensitisation may be an issue.
Analysis in table 6.4.1.2-2 assumes BS is transmitting the whole DL frequency for both Band 2 and Band 4. Further analysis were made when two-tone third order intermodulation product will fall to own receive block for CC bandwidths agreed in the Work Item Description (WID): 5MHz, 10MHz and 15MHz for both operating bands plus 1.4 and 3MHz for Band 2. Two-tone third order intermodulation products were summarized in table 6.4.1-3 with assumptions shown in figure 6.4.1.2-1.
Figure 6.4.1.2-1: Assumptions for third intermodulation products analysis
Table 6.4.1.2-3: Two-tone third order IMD products frequency limits for CA of Band 2 and Band 4
Two-tone 3rd order IMD products
IMD frequency range (MHz)
2*f1_low – f2_high
1705 + 2*c + d
2*f1_high – f2_low
1705 + 2*c + 2*a + b + d
Taking into account CC bandwidths agreed in the WID, two-tone third order intermodulation product will fall to own receive block for CC1 and CC2 positions summarized in table 6.4.1.2-4. Considered scenarios are very pessimistic as studies are taking into account channel bandwidths. Taking into account transmission bandwidths (1.08, 2.7, 4.5, … MHz) the region where IMD would fall to receive band would be further reduced.
Table 6.4.1.2-4: CC1 and CC2 positions for two-tone third order IMD product falling to own receive block
CC1 bandwidth (a in MHz)
CC2 bandwidth (b in MHz)
CC1 and CC2 positions (c + d in MHz)
1.4
5
25 > c + d > 18.6
1.4
10
25 > c + d > 13.6
1.4
15
25 > c + d > 8.6
1.4
20
25 > c + d > 3.6
3
5
25 > c + d > 17
3
10
25 > c + d > 12
3
15
25 > c + d > 7
3
20
25 > c + d > 2
5
5
25 > c + d > 15
5
10
25 > c + d > 10
5
15
25 > c + d > 5
5
20
25 > c + d > 0
10
5
25 > c + d > 10
10
10
25 > c + d > 5
10
15
25 > c + d > 0
10
20
25 > c + d ≥ 0
15
5
25 > c + d > 5
15
10
25 > c + d > 0
15
15
25 > c + d ≥ 0
15
20
25 > c + d ≥ 0
20
5
25 > c + d > 0
20
10
25 > c + d ≥ 0
20
15
25 > c + d ≥ 0
20
20
25 > c + d ≥ 0
It is suggested BS transmitters supporting CA of Band 2 and Band 4 should not share the same antenna with Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 23, 25, 30, 33, 35-37, 39 or 40 BS receiver, unless the antenna path meets very stringent third order PIM specification so that the PIM will not cause Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 23, 25, 30, 33, 35-37, 39 or 40 BS receiver desensitization.
6.4.1.3 UE Co-existence studies for CA_2-4
The scope of the WID states that the specifications are done for 1 UL operation. Because of that IMD studies between the UL bands are not required for now. Study of UL 2nd and 3rd order harmonics frequencies is needed. Results of the harmonic study are presented in table 2.2-1. It can be observed that none of the 2nd or 3rd harmonic products fall into own DL bands. It can be noted that band 4 second harmonic extends to 3510 MHz which is the start frequency for band 22 and some harmonic power might land on band 22. Band 4 second harmonic also falls to band 42. Band 2 second harmonic falls to band 43.
Table 6.4.1.3-1: Harmonic analysis for UE UL
Order of harmonics
Harmonic frequency range / MHz
Band 2
2nd harmonic range
3700
3820
Band 4
2nd harmonic range
3420
3510
Band 2
3rd harmonic range
5550
5730
Band 4
3rd harmonic range
5130
5265
6.4.1.4 ΔTIB,c and ΔRIB values
The following additional ILs for combining band 2+4 were reported by three filter manufacturers. Simulations were performed for typical performance but as the duplex-filter baseline performance and quadplexer performance were both simulated it can be assumed that performance difference stays constant under ETC conditions.
Table 6.4.1.4-1: Reported additional ILs for band 2 + 4 quadplexers
E-UTRA bands
UL IL (dB)
vendor 1
DL IL (dB)
vendor 1
UL IL (dB)
vendor 2
DL IL (dB
vendor 2
UL IL (dB)
vendor 3
DL IL (dB)
vendor 3
2
0.55
0.91
0.46
0.53
0.3
0.6
4
0.51
0.41
0.51
0.29
0.9
0.7
Table 6.4.1.4-2: Average UL and DL additional IL for combining band 2 and band 4
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
UL IL [dB]
DL IL [dB]
2
0.44
0.68
4
0.64
0.47
6.5 Class A5. Combination except for A1 – A4
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.1 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 19 and Band 21 (1 UL)
|
Table 6.5.1-1: Inter-band CA
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
Channel BW (MHz)
BS transmit / UE receive
Channel BW (MHz)
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_19-21
19
830 MHz
–
845 MHz
5, 10, 15
(note 1)
875 MHz
–
890 MHz
5, 10, 15
FDD
21
1447.9 MHz
–
1462.9 MHz
5, 10, 15
(note 1)
1495.9 MHz
–
1510.9 MHz
5, 10, 15
NOTE 1: The WI considers only one uplink component carrier to be used in any of the two frequency bands at any time.
6.5.1.1 List of specific combination issues
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.1.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 6.5.1.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_19A-21A
19
Yes
Yes
Yes
21
Yes
Yes
Yes
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.1.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_19-21
|
As band 19 and band 21 are a low-middle band combination the harmonic frequencies are far away from the receive and transmit bands of interest in the DL and UL (see table 6.5.1.1.2-1). Therefore we can conclude that there is no issue on harmonic interference.
Table 6.5.1.1.2-1: Impact of UL/DL Harmonic Interference
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
Band
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
19
830
845
875
890
1660
1690
2490
2535
1750
1780
2625
2670
21
1447.9
1462.9
1495.9
1510.9
2895.8
2925.8
4343.7
4388.7
2991.8
3021.8
4487.7
4532.7
6.5.1.1.3 ΔTIB,c and ΔRIB values
For two simultaneous DL and only one UL, the TIB,c and RIB values are given in the tables below.
Table 6.5.1.1.3-1: ΔTIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_19A-21A
19
[0.3]
21
[0.4]
NOTE: The values in the table reflect what can be achieved with the present state of the art technology. They shall be reconsidered when the state of the art technology progresses
Table 6.5.1.1.3-2: ΔRIB
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB [dB]
CA_19A-21A
19
0
21
0
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.2 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 1 and Band 11 (1 UL)
|
Table 6.5.2-1: Inter-band CA
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
Channel BW (MHz)
BS transmit / UE receive
Channel BW (MHz)
FUL_low – FUL_high
FUL_low – FUL_high
CA_1-11
1
1920 MHz
–
1980 MHz
5,10, 15, 20
(note 1)
2110 MHz
–
2170 MHz
5, 10, 15, 20
FDD
11
1427.9 MHz
–
1447.9 MHz
5, 10
(note 1)
1475.9 MHz
–
1495.9 MHz
5, 10
NOTE 1: Only one uplink component carrier is to be supported in any of the two frequency bands at any time.
6.5.2.1 List of specific combination issues
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.2.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 6.5.2.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_1A-11A
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
11
Yes
Yes
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.2.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_1-11
|
As shown in table 6.5.2.1.2-1, the harmonic frequencies of band 1 and band 11 in UL are away from the receive bands of interest in the DL and we can conclude that there is no issue on UL harmonic interference.
Table 6.5.2.1.2-1: Impact of UL Harmonic Interference
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
Band
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
1
1920
1980
2110
2170
3840
3960
5760
5940
11
1427.9
1447.9
1475.9
1495.9
2855.8
2895.8
4283.7
4343.7
Table 6.5.2.1.2-2: Band 1 and Band 11 DL harmonics and IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
1475.9
1495.9
2110
2170
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
2951.8
2991.8
4220
4340
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
4427.7
4487.7
6330
6510
2nd order IMD products
(f2_low – f1_high)
(f2_high – f1_low)
(f2_low + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
614.1
694.1
3585.9
3665.9
Two tone 3rd order IMD products
|f2_low – 2*f1_high|
|f2_high – 2*f1_low|
(2*f2_low – f1_high)
(2*f2_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
881.8
781.8
2724.1
2864.1
Two tone 3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low + f2_low)
(2*f1_high + f2_high)
(2*f2_low + f1_low)
(2*f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
5061.8
5161.8
5695.9
5835.9
Three tone 3rd order IMD products
(Considering Max BW)
(f1_low – max BW f2)
(f1_high + max BW f2)
(f2_low – max BW f1)
(f2_high + max BW f1)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1415.9
1555.9
2090
2190
From table 6.5.2.1.2-2, it is observed that:
• 2nd and 3rd order harmonics don’t fall into any 3GPP defined BS receive frequencies,
• 2nd order IMD will fall into BS receive frequencies of Band 42, 43,
• Two-tone 3rd order IMD will fall into BS receive frequencies of Band 5, 6, 8, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27 and 44
• Three-tone 3rd order IMD will fall into BS receive frequencies of Band 11, 21.
On the other hand, the issue of possible desensitisation due to IMD fall down would happen whenever a BS supports these frequencies simultaneously, regardless of whether CA is supported or not. Thus this is not a CA specific issue and BS vendors are requested to configure a BS appropriately when the bands mentioned above are operated with Band 1 and 11.
6.5.2.1.3 ΔTIB,c and ΔRIB values
RF parts simulation results are obtained from 3 manufacturers. The additional IL (insertion loss) results are summarized below:
Table 6.5.2.1.3-1: Additional insertion loss
Additional IL (ETC)
Vendor A
Vendor B
Vendor C
Average
Band 1 Tx
0.80
0.78
0.7
0.76
Band 1 Rx
0.70
0.59
0.6
0.63
Band 11 Tx
0.65
0.61
0.7
0.65
Band 11 Rx
0.65
0.59
0.7
0.65
Type of Solution
Diplexer
Matching
Matching
-
Note that vendors B and C propose to insert simple matching circuits between antenna port(s) and duplexers to improve performance while vendor A proposes a stand-alone diplexer scheme. The choices are indicated in “Type of Solution” columns.
For two simultaneous DL and only one UL, the TIB,c and RIB values are given in the tables below.
Table 6.5.2.1.3-2: ΔTIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_1A-11A
1
0.3
11
0.3
NOTE: The values in the table reflect what can be achieved with the present state of the art technology. They shall be reconsidered when the state of the art technology progresses
Table 6.5.2.1.3-3: ΔRIB
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB [dB]
CA_1A-11A
1
0
11
0
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.3 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 8 and Band 11 (1 UL)
|
Table 6.5.3-1: Inter-band CA
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
Channel BW (MHz)
BS transmit / UE receive
Channel BW (MHz)
FUL_low – FUL_high
FUL_low – FUL_high
CA_8-11
8
880 MHz
–
915 MHz
5, 10
(note 1)
925 MHz
–
960 MHz
5, 10
FDD
11
1427.9 MHz
–
1447.9 MHz
5, 10
(note 1)
1475.9 MHz
–
1495.9 MHz
5, 10
NOTE 1: Only one uplink component carrier is to be supported in any of the two frequency bands at any time.
6.5.3.1 List of specific combination issues
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.3.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 6.5.3.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_8A-11A
8
Yes
Yes
11
Yes
Yes
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.3.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_8-11
|
As shown in table 6.5.2.1.2-1, the harmonic frequencies of band 8and band 11 in UL are away from the receive bands of interest in the DL and we can conclude that there is no issue on UL harmonic interference.
Table 6.5.3.1.2-1: Impact of UL Harmonic Interference
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
Band
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
8
880
915
925
960
1760
1830
2640
2880
11
1427.9
1447.9
1475.9
1495.9
2855.8
2895.8
4283.7
4343.7
Table 6.5.3.1.2-2: Band 8 and Band 11 DL harmonics and IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
925
960
1475.9
1495.9
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
1850
1920
2951.8
2991.8
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
2775
2880
4427.7
4487.7
2nd order IMD products
(f2_low – f1_high)
(f2_high – f1_low)
(f2_low + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
515.9
570.9
2400.9
2455.9
Two tone 3rd order IMD products
|f2_low – 2*f1_high|
|f2_high – 2*f1_low|
(2*f2_low – f1_high)
(2*f2_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
444.1
354.1
1991.8
2066.8
Two tone 3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low + f2_low)
(2*f1_high + f2_high)
(2*f2_low + f1_low)
(2*f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
3325.9
3415.9
3876.8
3951.8
Three tone 3rd order IMD products
(Considering Max BW)
(f1_low – max BW f2)
(f1_high + max BW f2)
(f2_low – max BW f1)
(f2_high + max BW f1)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
865
1020
1455.9
1515.9
From the table, it is observed that:
• 2nd order harmonics will fall into BS receive frequency of Band 2, 25, 33, 35, 37, 39,
• 3rd order harmonics don’t fall into any 3GPP defined BS receive frequencies,
• 2nd order IMDs don’t fall into any 3GPP defined BS receive frequencies,
• Two-tone 3rd order IMDs will fall into BS receive frequencies of Band 22, 23, 34 and 42
• Three-tone 3rd order IMDs will fall into BS receive frequencies of Band 8, 21.
On the other hand, the issue of possible desensitisation due to IMD fall down would happen whenever a BS supports these frequencies simultaneously, regardless of whether CA is supported or not. Thus this is not a CA specific issue and BS vendors are requested to configure a BS appropriately when the bands mentioned above are operated with Band 8 and 11.
6.5.3.1.3 ΔTIB,c and ΔRIB values
RF parts simulation results are obtained from 3 manufacturers. The additional IL (insertion loss) results are summarized below:
Table 6.5.3.1.3-1: Additional insertion loss
Additional IL (ETC)
Vendor A
Vendor B
Vendor C
Average
Band 8 Tx
0.55
0.7
0.63
0.63
Band 8 Rx
0.55
0.7
0.53
0.59
Band 11 Tx
0.85
0.8
0.85
0.83
Band 11 Rx
0.85
0.8
0.85
0.83
For two simultaneous DL and only one UL, the TIB,c and RIB values are given in the tables below.
Table 6.5.3.1.3-2: ΔTIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_8A-11A
8
0.3
11
0.4
NOTE: The values in the table reflect what can be achieved with the present state of the art technology. They shall be reconsidered when the state of the art technology progresses
Table 6.5.3.1.3-3: ΔRIB
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB [dB]
CA_8A-11A
8
0
11
0
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.4 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 7 and Band 22 (1 UL)
|
Table 6.5.4-1: Inter-band CA
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA operating Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
UE transmit / BS receive
Channel BW MHz
UE receive / BS transmit
Channel BW MHz
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_7-22
7
2500 MHz
–
2570 MHz
5,10,15,20
2620 MHz
–
2690 MHz
5,10,15,20
FDD
22
3410 MHz
–
3490 MHz
5,10,15,20
3510 MHz
–
3590 MHz
5,10,15,20
6.5.4.1 List of specific combination issues
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.4.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 6.5.4.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
Maximum aggregated bandwidth
[MHz]
Bandwidth Combination Set
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_7A-22A
7
Yes
Yes
Yes
40
0
22
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
6.5.4.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_7-22
|
Table 6.5.4.1.2-1 gives the intermodulation products for band 7 + band 22 CA with 2 DLs. For the 3-tone IMD analysis the maximum transmission as defined in table 6.5.4.1.1-1 is considered. None of the harmonics of one band fall into the receive band of the other.
It can be seen in the table that 2nd order IMD products may fall into BS receive band 5, 6, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26 and 27. The 3rd order IMD products may fall into BS receive bands of 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 22, 24, 25, 35, 38, 41, 42 and 43. However, when the impact of maximum bandwidth is considered, the 3rd order IMD products do not fall into the BS receive of Band 7 and 22.
It should be noted that bands 6, 9, 18, 19, 24, 25, 35, 41 and 42 are not intended for use in the same geographical area (country) as the band combination Band 7 and Band 22. This leaves bands 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 22, 26, 38 and 43 to consider for IMD products.
It is recommended that Bands 7 and 22 BS transmitters do not share the same antenna with band 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 26, 38 and 43 BS receivers so that the antenna PIM will not cause Band 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 26, 38 and 43 BS receiver desensitization.
Table 6.5.4.1.2 -1: 2DLs B7 + B22 IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
2620
2690
3510
3590
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
5240 to 5380
7020 to 7180
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
7860 to 8070
10530 to 10770
Two-tone 2nd order IMD products
f2_low – f1_high
f2_high – f1_low
f2_low + f1_low
f2_high + f1_high
IMD frequency range (MHz)
820 to 970
6130 to 6280
Two-tone 3rd order IMD products
2*f1_low – f2_high
2*f1_high – f2_low
2*f2_low – f1_high
2* f2_high – f1_low
IMD frequency range (MHz)
1650 to 1870
4330 to 4560
Two-tone 3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low + f2_low)
(2*f1_high + f2_high)
(2*f2_low + f1_low)
(2*f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency range (MHz)
8750 to 8970
9640 to 9870
3rd order IMD products
(f1_low – f2_high + f2_low)
(f1_high + f2_high – f2_low)
(f2_low – f1_high + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high – f1_low)
2540 to 2770
3440 to 3660
Three-tone 3rd order IMD products
(f1_low –
max BW f2)
(f1_high +
max BW f2)
(f2_low –
max BW f1)
(f2_high +
max BW f1)
IMD frequency range (MHz)
2600 to 2710
3490 to 3610
Table 6.5.4.1.2 -2 gives the intermodulation products for band 7+ band 22 CA with 1UL. None of the harmonic products fall into the own band and any other receive bands.
Table 6.5.4.1.2 -2: 1UL B7 + B22 harmonic products
UE UL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
UL frequency (MHz)
2500
2570
3410
3490
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
5000 to 5140
6820 to 5380
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
7500 to 7710
10230 to 10470
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7 TDD-FDD Inter-band Carrier aggregation
| |
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.1 General part
| |
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.1.1 BS specific
| |
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.1.2 UE specific
| |
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.1.3 RRM specific
| |
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2 Band combination specific part
| |
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.1 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 1 and Band 41
|
Table 7.2.1-1: Inter-band CA operating bands
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA operating Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
UE transmit / BS receive
Channel BW MHz
UE receive / BS transmit
Channel BW MHz
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_1-41
1
1920 MHz
–
1980 MHz
5,10,15,20
2110 MHz
–
2170 MHz
5,10,15,20
FDD
41
2496 MHz
–
2690 MHz
5,10,15,20
2496 MHz
–
2690 MHz
5,10,15,20
TDD
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.1.1 List of specific combination issues
|
For this band combination to work, following need to be provided:
1. B1 Rx and B41 Rx need to provide deep rejection at B1 Tx
2. B1 Tx needs deep rejection at B1 Rx and B41 Rx
The current RAN4 requirements for this inter-band CA combination only includes PCell in FDD band, i.e. band 1.
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.1.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 7.2.1.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_1A-41A
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
41
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOTE: For the UE that signals support of any bandwidth combination set for carrier aggregation, the UE shall support all single carrier bandwidths for the constituent bands as defined in table 5.6.1-1 of TS 36.101 [4] when operating in single carrier mode.
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.1.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_1-41
|
Table 7.2.1.1.2-1gives the intermodulation products for band 1 + band 41 CA with 2 DLs. For the IMD analysis the maximum transmission as defined in table 7.2.1.1.1-1 is considered. None of the harmonics of one band fall into the receive band of the other. The intermodulation products generated by two operating bands do not impact the own receiver since TDD BS cannot transmit and receive simultaneously in a single band.
It can be seen in the table that 2nd order IMD products may fall into BS receive band 31. The 3rd order IMD products may fall into BS receive bands of 1, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 23, 24, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41. However, when the impact of maximum bandwidth is considered, the 3rd order IMD products do not fall into the BS receive of Band 1, 23, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39, 40.
It should be noted that Bands 4, 7, 10, 24, 31 and 38 are not intended for use in the same geographical area as Band 1 and Band 41. This leaves bands 3, 9 and 41 to consider for IMD products.
Currently Bands 3, and 9 are used in the same geographical area as Bands 1 and 41. It is recommended that Bands 1 and 41 BS transmitters do not share the same antenna with Band 3 or 9 BS receivers so that the antenna PIM will not cause Band 3 or 9 BS receiver desensitization. A TDD BS cannot transmit and receive simultaneously in a single band so the own B41 receiver is protected. However, it is not recommended that different band 41 operators share the same antenna as a Band 1 transmitter unless the operation is synchronized.
Table 7.2.1.1.2-1: 2DLs B1 + B41 harmonics and IMD products frequency limits
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
2110
2170
2496
2690
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
4220
4340
4992
5380
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
6330
6510
7488
8070
2nd order IMD products
|f2_low – f1_high|
|f2_high – f1_low|
|f2_low + f1_low|
|f2_high + f1_high|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
326
580
4606
4860
3rd order IMD products
|f2_high – 2*f1_low|
|f2_low – 2*f1_high|
|2*f2_low – f1_high|
|2*f2_high – f1_low|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1530
1844
2822
3270
3rd order IMD products
|2*f1_low + f2_low|
|2*f1_high + f2_high|
|2*f2_low + f1_low|
|2*f2_high + f1_high|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
6716
7030
7102
7550
3rd order IMD products
|f1_low – f2_high + f2_low|
|f1_high + f2_high – f2_low|
|f2_low – f1_high + f1_low|
|f2_high + f1_high – f1_low|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1916
2364
2436
2750
3rd order IMD products (with maximum channel bandwidth)
|f1_low – max BW f2|
|f1_high + max BW f2|
|f2_low – max BW f1|
|f2_high + max BW f1|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
2090
2190
2476
2710
Table 7.2.1.1.2-2 analyzes the impact of harmonic products for band 1+ band 41 CA with band 1 as UL. We can conclude that none of UL harmonic products fall into the own and any other receive bands.
Table 7.2.1.1.2-2: Impact of UL harmonic interference
UE UL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
UL frequency (MHz)
1920
1980
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
3840 to 3960
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
5760 to 5940
NOTE: Only Band 1 is utilized as UL in the WI.
7.2.1.1.3 ∆TIB and ∆RIB values
For two simultaneous DLs and only one UL, TIB,c and RIB values are shown in tables below.
Table 7.2.1.1.3-2: ΔTIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_1A-41A
1
0.5
41
0.5
Table 7.2.1.1.3-3: ΔRIB
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB [dB]
CA_1A-41A
1
0
41
0
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.2 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 1 and Band 42
|
Table 7.2.2-1: Inter-band CA operating bands
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
Channel BW (MHz)
BS transmit / UE receive
Channel BW (MHz)
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_1-42
1
1920 MHz
–
1980 MHz
5, 10, 15, 20
2110 MHz
–
2170 MHz
5, 10, 15, 20
FDD
42
3400 MHz
–
3600 MHz
5, 10,15, 20
3400 MHz
–
3600 MHz
5, 10, 15, 20
TDD
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.2.1 List of specific combination issues
| |
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.2.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 7.2.2.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
Maximum aggregated bandwidth
[MHz]
Bandwidth Combination Set
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_1A-42A
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
40
0
42
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOTE: For the UE that signals support of any bandwidth combination set for carrier aggregation, the UE shall support all single carrier bandwidths for the constituent bands as defined in table 5.6.1-1 of TS 36.101 [4] when operating in single carrier mode.
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.2.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_1-42
|
The harmonic frequencies do not fall into the frequency ranges of both bands as observed in table 7.2.2.1.2-1. Therefore we can conclude that there is no issue on harmonic interference.
Table 7.2.2.1.2-1: Impact of UL/DL Harmonic Interference
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
Band
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
1
1920
1980
2110
2170
3840
3960
5760
5940
4220
4340
6330
6510
42
3400
3600
3400
3600
6800
7200
10200
10800
6800
7200
10200
10800
Table 7.2.2.1.2-2 shows the second and third order DL harmonics and intermodulation products when two simultaneous DLs are active in Band 1 and Band 42.
Table 7.2.2.1.2-2: Band 1 and Band 42 DL harmonics and IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
2110
2170
3400
3600
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
4220
4340
6800
7200
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
6330
6510
10200
10800
2nd order IMD products
(f2_low – f1_high)
(f2_high – f1_low)
(f2_low + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1230
1490
5510
5770
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low – f2_high)
(2*f1_high – f2_low)
(2*f2_low – f1_high)
(2*f2_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
620
940
4630
5090
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low + f2_low)
(2*f1_high + f2_high)
(2*f2_low + f1_low)
(2*f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
7620
7940
8910
9370
3rd order IMD products
(f1_low – f2_high + f2_low)
(f1_high + f2_high – f2_low)
(f2_low – f1_high + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1910
2370
3340
3660
3rd order IMD products (with maximum channel bandwidth)
(f1_low – f2_BWmax)
(f1_high + f2_BWmax)
(f2_low – f1_BWmax)
(f2_high + f1_BWmax)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
2090
2190
3380
3620
It can be seen from table 7.2.2.1.2-1 that some 2nd IMD products caused by BS supporting carrier aggregation of Band 1 and Band 42 fall into the BS receive band of Bands 11 and 21, while some 3rd IMD products fall into the BS receive band of Bands 1, 5, 6, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18 , 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39, 40, 42, 43 and 44. Note that the calculation in table 7.2.2.1.2-1 (except the last row) assumes the BS transmits the whole 60 MHz DL frequency of Band 1 and the whole 200 MHz DL frequency of Band 42. However even if the BS only transmits up to 20 MHz DL in Band 1 and up to 20 MHz DL in Band 42 as stated in Table 7.2.2.1.1-1, the 3rd IMD products may still fall into the BS receive band of the Bands 5, 6, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 26, 27, 28, 42, 43 and 44 as shown in the last row in table 7.2.2.1.2-1.
It should be noted that Bands 12, 13, 14, 17 is not intended for use in the same geographical area as Band 1 and Band 22 is not intended for use in the same geographical area as Band 42. Consequently, the focus here will be on the harmonics and IMD products falling into Bands 5, 6, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27, 28, 42, 43 and 44.
TDD BS does not transmit and receive simultaneously, so the BS’s own band 42 receiver and other synchronized band 42 receivers would not be interfered. With the performances of the current BS antenna system, transmit and receive path components, amplifiers, pre-distortion algorithms and filters, it is expected that the IMD interference generated within the Band 5, 6, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27, 28 or unsynchronized 44 receiver would be well below the receiver noise floor eliminating the possibility of receiver desensitization,
Therefore, it is recommended that Bands 1 and 42 BS transmitters should not share the same antenna with Band 5, 6, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27, 28, unsynchronized 42, unsynchronized 43 or unsynchronized 44 BS receiver, unless the antenna path meets very stringent 3rd order PIM specification so that the PIM will not cause Band 5, 6, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27, 28, unsynchronized 42, unsynchronized 43 or unsynchronized 44 BS receiver desensitization.
7.2.2.1.3 ∆TIB and ∆RIB values
Following relaxations are allowed for the UE which supports inter-band carrier aggregation of Band 1 and Band 42.
Table 7.2.2.1.3-1: IB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_1A-42A
1
0.3
42
[0.8]
Table 7.2.2.1.3-2: RIB
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB,c [dB]
CA_1A-42A
1
0
42
[0.5]
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.3 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 40
|
Table 7.2.3-1: Inter-band CA operating bands
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
Channel BW (MHz)
BS transmit / UE receive
Channel BW (MHz)
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_3-40
3
1710 MHz
–
1785 MHz
5, 10, 15, 20
(Note 1)
1805 MHz
–
1880 MHz
5, 10, 15, 20
FDD
40
2300 MHz
–
2400 MHz
10, 15, 20
(Note 1)
2300 MHz
–
2400 MHz
10, 15, 20
TDD
NOTE 1: The WI considers only one uplink component carrier to be used in any of the two frequency bands at any time
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.3.1 List of specific combination issues
| |
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.3.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 7.2.3.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_3A-40A
3
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
40
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOTE: For the UE that signals support of any bandwidth combination set for carrier aggregation, the UE shall support all single carrier bandwidths for the constituent bands as defined in table 5.6.1-1 of TS 36.101 [4] when operating in single carrier mode.
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.3.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_3-40
|
Table 7.2.3.1.2-1 summarizes frequency ranges where harmonics occur due to Band 3 or Band 40 for both UL and DL. It can be seen that the harmonic frequencies of Band 3 and Band 40 in DL are away from the BS receive bands of interest in the UL. For the UE aspect, the UL harmonic frequencies of Band 3 and Band 40 does not locate within the UE receive bands of interest in the DL. Therefore we can conclude that there is no issue on harmonic interference.
Table 7.2.3.1.2-1: Impact of UL/DL Harmonic Interference
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
Band
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
3
1710
1785
1805
1880
3420
3570
5130
5355
3610
3760
5415
5640
40
2300
2400
2300
2400
4600
4800
6900
7200
4600
4800
6900
7200
The 2nd DL harmonics of Band 3 carriers may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 43.
The 2nd and 3rd order harmonics and IMD products caused in the BS by transmitting of Band 3 and Band 40 DL carriers can be calculated as shown in table 4 below:
Table 7.2.3.1.2-2: Band 3 and Band 40 DL harmonics and IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
1805
1880
2300
2400
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
3610
3760
4600
4800
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
5415
5640
6900
7200
2nd order IMD products
(f2-low – f1-high)
(f2-high – f1-low)
(f2_low + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
420
595
4105
4280
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low –f2_high)
(2*f1_high –f2_low)
(2*f2_low – f1_high)
(2*f2_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1210
1460
2720
2995
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low + f2_low)
(2*f1_high + f2_high)
(2*f2_low + f1_low)
(2*f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
5910
6160
6405
6680
3rd order IMD products
(f1_low – f2_high + f2_low)
(f1_high + f2_high – f2_low)
(f2_low – f1_high + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1705
1980
2225
2475
3rd order IMD products (with maximum channel bandwidth)
(f1_low – f2_BWmax)
(f1_high + f2_BWmax)
(f2_low – f1_BWmax)
(f2_high + f1_BWmax)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1785
1900
2280
2420
It can be seen from Table 7.2.3.1.2-2 that the 2nd order IMD products may fall into the BS receive band of Band 31. The 3rd IMD products caused by BS supporting carrier aggregation of Band 3 and Band 40 may fall into the BS receive bands of Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 21, 25, 30, 33, 35, 36, 37, 39, and 40. However, when the impact of maximum bandwidth is considered, the 3rd order IMD products do not fall into the BS receive of Band 1, 3, 4, 9, 10, 33, 36, and 37.
It should be noted that Bands 2, 4, 9, 10, 11, 21, 25, 30, 31, and 35 are not intended for use in the same geographical area as Band 3 and 40. Consequently, the focus here will be on the harmonics and IMD products falling into Bands 39, and 40.
TDD BS does not transmit and receive simultaneously, so the BS’s own band 40 receiver and other synchronized band 40 receivers would not be interfered. With the performances of the current BS antenna system, transmit and receive path components, amplifiers, pre-distortion algorithms and filters, it is noted that the harmonics and IMD interference generated in common signal paths within Band 39, if unsynchronized with band 40 may not be well below the receiver noise floor eliminating the possibility of receiver desensitization. Operating band 39 together with band 3 and 40 CA it is either recommended to synchronize bands 39 and 40 carriers or to have at least one of the three carrier signals using separate feeders.
7.2.3.1.3 ∆TIB and ∆RIB values
For two simultaneous DL and one UL the TIB,c and RIB values are shown in table 7.2.3.1.3-1, and in table 7.2.3.1.3-2:
Table 7.2.3.1.3-1: ΔTIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_3A-40A
3
FFS
40
FFS
Table 7.2.3.1.3-2: ΔRIB
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB [dB]
CA_3A-40A
3
FFS
40
FFS
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.4 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 8 and Band 40
|
Table 7.2.4-1: Inter-band CA operating bands
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
Channel BW (MHz)
BS transmit / UE receive
Channel BW (MHz)
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_8-40
8
880 MHz
–
915 MHz
5, 10
(Note 1)
925 MHz
–
960 MHz
5, 10
FDD
40
2300 MHz
–
2400 MHz
10, 15, 20
(Note 1)
2300 MHz
–
2400 MHz
10, 15, 20
TDD
NOTE 1: The WI considers only one uplink component carrier to be used in any of the two frequency bands at any time
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.4.1 List of specific combination issues
| |
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.4.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 7.2.4.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_8A-40A
8
Yes
Yes
40
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOTE: For the UE that signals support of any bandwidth combination set for carrier aggregation, the UE shall support all single carrier bandwidths for the constituent bands as defined in table 5.6.1-1 of TS 36.101 [4] when operating in single carrier mode.
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.4.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_8-40
|
Table 7.2.4.1.2-1 summarizes frequency ranges where harmonics occur due to Band 8 or Band 40 for both UL and DL. It can be seen that the harmonic frequencies of Band 8 and Band 40 in DL are away from the BS receive bands of interest in the UL. For the UE aspect, the UL harmonic frequencies of Band 8 and Band 40 does not locate within the UE receive bands of interest in the DL. Therefore we can conclude that there is no issue on harmonic interference.
Table 7.2.4.1.2-1: Impact of UL/DL Harmonic Interference
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
Band
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
8
880
915
925
960
1760
1830
2640
2745
1850
1920
2775
2880
40
2300
2400
2300
2400
4600
4800
6900
7200
4600
4800
6900
7200
The 2nd DL harmonics of Band 8 carriers may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 2, 25, 33, 35, 37, and 39.
The 2nd and 3rd order harmonics and IMD products caused in the BS by transmitting of Band 8 and Band 40 DL carriers can be calculated as shown in table 7.2.4.1.2-2 below:
Table 7.2.4.1.2-2: Band 8 and Band 40 DL harmonics and IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
925
960
2300
2400
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
1850
1920
4600
4800
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
2775
2880
6900
7200
2nd order IMD products
(f2-low – f1-high)
(f2-high – f1-low)
(f2_low + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1340
1475
3225
3360
3rd order IMD products
(f2_low – 2*f1_high)
(f2_high – 2*f1_low)
(2*f2_low – f1_high)
(2*f2_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
380
550
3640
3875
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low + f2_low)
(2*f1_high + f2_high)
(2*f2_low + f1_low)
(2*f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
4150
4320
5525
5760
3rd order IMD products
(f1_low – f2_high + f2_low)
(f1_high + f2_high – f2_low)
(f2_low – f1_high + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
825
1060
2265
2435
3rd order IMD products (with maximum channel bandwidth)
(f1_low – f2_BWmax)
(f1_high + f2_BWmax)
(f2_low – f1_BWmax)
(f2_high + f1_BWmax)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
905
980
2290
2410
It can be seen from Table 4 that the 2nd order IMD products will fall into the BS receive bands of Band 11 and 21. The 3rd IMD products caused by BS supporting carrier aggregation of Band 8 and Band 40 may fall into the BS receive bands of Band 5, 6, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 30, 31, 40, and 43. However, when the impact of maximum bandwidth is considered, the 3rd order IMD products do not fall into the BS receive of Band 5, 18, 19, 20, and 26.
It should be noted that Bands 2, 6, 11, 18, 19, 21, 25, 30, and 31 are not intended for use in the same geographical area as Band 8 and 40. Consequently, the focus here will be on the harmonics and IMD products falling into Bands 8, 33, 35, 37, 39, 40 and 43.
TDD BS does not transmit and receive simultaneously, so the BS’s own band 40 receiver and other synchronized band 40 receivers would not be interfered. With the performances of the current BS antenna system, transmit and receive path components, amplifiers, pre-distortion algorithms and filters, it recommended that the harmonics and IMD interference generated within the Bands 8, 33, 35, 37, 39, 43, and unsynchronized Band 40 generated in common signal paths is carefully considered. (E.g. by separating band Tx path from the other bands in the feeder system).
7.2.4.1.3 ∆TIB and ∆RIB values
For two simultaneous DL and one UL the TIB,c and RIB values are shown in table 7.2.4.1.3-1, and in table 7.2.4.1.3-2:
Table 7.2.4.1.3-1: ΔTIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_8A-40A
8
0.3
40
0.3
Table 7.2.4.1.3-2: ΔRIB
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB [dB]
CA_8A-40A
8
0
40
0
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.5 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 42 (1 UL)
|
Table 7.2.5-1: Inter-band CA operating bands
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
Channel BW (MHz)
BS transmit / UE receive
Channel BW (MHz)
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_3-42
3
1710 MHz
–
1785 MHz
5, 10, 15, 20
1805 MHz
–
1880 MHz
5, 10, 15, 20
FDD
42
3400 MHz
–
3600 MHz
5, 10,15, 20
3400 MHz
–
3600 MHz
5, 10, 15, 20
TDD
7.2.5.1 List of specific combination issues
7.2.5.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
Table 7.2.5.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
Maximum aggregated bandwidth
[MHz]
Bandwidth Combination Set
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_3A-42A
3
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
40
0
42
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOTE: For the UE that signals support of any bandwidth combination set for carrier aggregation, the UE shall support all single carrier bandwidths for the constituent bands as defined in table 5.6.1-1 of TS 36.101 [4] when operating in single carrier mode.
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.5.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_3-42
|
As shown in Table 7.2.5.1.2-1, second harmonics of Band 3 UL and DL fall into frequency ranges of Band 42 and 43 respectively.
Table 7.2.5.1.2-1: Impact of UL/DL Harmonic Interference
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
Band
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
3
1710
1785
1805
1880
3420
3570
5130
5355
3610
3760
5415
5640
42
3400
3600
3400
3600
6800
7200
10200
10800
6800
7200
10200
10800
Table 7.2.5.1.2-2 shows the second and third order DL harmonics and intermodulation products when two simultaneous DLs are active in Band 3 and Band 42.
Table 7.2.5.1.2-2: Band 3 and Band 42 DL harmonics and IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
1805
1880
3400
3600
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
3610
3760
6800
7200
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
5415
5640
10200
10800
2nd order IMD products
|f2_low – f1_high|
|f2_high – f1_low|
(f2_low + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1520
1795
5205
5480
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low – f2_high)
(2*f1_high – f2_low)
(2*f2_low – f1_high)
(2*f2_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
10
360
4920
5395
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low + f2_low)
(2*f1_high + f2_high)
(2*f2_low + f1_low)
(2*f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
7010
7360
8605
9080
3rd order IMD products
(f1_low – f2_high + f2_low)
(f1_high + f2_high – f2_low)
(f2_low – f1_high + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1605
2080
3325
3675
3rd order IMD products (with maximum channel bandwidth)
(f1_low – f2_BWmax)
(f1_high + f2_BWmax)
(f2_low – f1_BWmax)
(f2_high + f1_BWmax)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1785
1900
3380
3620
It can be seen from table 7.2.5.1.2-1 that some 2nd IMD products caused by BS supporting carrier aggregation of Band 3 and Band 42 fall into the BS receive band of Bands 3, 4, 9, 10, 24 and 43, while some 3rd IMD products fall into the BS receive band of Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 22, 23, 24, 25, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 42 and 43. Note that the calculation in table 6.5.2.1.2-1 (except the last row) assumes the BS transmits the whole 20 MHz DL frequency of Band 3 and the whole 200 MHz DL frequency of Band 42. However even if the BS only transmits up to 20 MHz DL in Band 3 and up to 20 MHz DL in Band 42 as stated in Table 7.2.5.1.1-1, the 3rd IMD products may still fall into the BS receive band of the Bands 22, 42, 43 as shown in the last row in table 7.2.5.1.2-1.
7.2.5.1.3 ∆TIB and ∆RIB values
Following relaxations are allowed for the UE which supports inter-band carrier aggregation of Band 3 and Band 42. These relaxations are derived from the assumption that harmonic trap filter for Band 3 is not considered. The relaxations based on the implement of harmonic trap filter are FFS.
Table 7.2.5.1.3-1: IB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_3A-42A
3
0.3
42
[0.8]
Table 7.2.5.1.3-2: RIB
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB,c [dB]
CA_3A-42A
3
0
42
[0.5]
7.2.6 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 26 and Band 41
Table 7.2.6-1: Inter-band CA operating bands
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA operating Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
UE transmit / BS receive
Channel BW MHz
UE receive / BS transmit
Channel BW MHz
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_26-41
26
814 MHz
–
849 MHz
5,10,15,20
859 MHz
–
894 MHz
5,10,15,20
FDD
41
2496 MHz
–
2690 MHz
5,10,15,20
2496 MHz
–
2690 MHz
5,10,15,20
TDD
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.6.1 List of specific combination issues
|
<Text will be added.>
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.6.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 7.2.6.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
Maximum aggregated bandwidth
[MHz]
Bandwidth Combination Set
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_26A-41A
26
Yes
Yes
Yes
35
0
41
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOTE: For the UE that signals support of any bandwidth combination set for carrier aggregation, the UE shall support all single carrier bandwidths for the constituent bands as defined in table 5.6.1-1 of TS 36.101 [4] when operating in single carrier mode.
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.6.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_26-41
|
Table 7.2.6.1.2-1gives the intermodulation products for Band 26 + Band 41 CA with 2 DLs. For the IMD analysis the maximum transmission as defined in table 7.2.6.1.1-1 is considered. It can be seen from the table that the 2nd harmonics of BS transmitting in Band 26 may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 3, 4, 9 and 10 and the 3rd harmonics of BS transmitting in Band 26 may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 38 and 41, while the 2nd IMD products caused by BS supporting CA of Band 26 and Band 41 may fall into the BS receive band of Band 3, 4, 9, 10, 22, 24 and 42, and the 3rd IMD products may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 5, 6, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27, 28, 38, 41 and 44. Note that Bands 7, 8, 20 and 38 are not intended for use in the same geographical area as Bands 26 and 41. Therefore, sharing antenna for CA operation between Band 26 and Band 41 is not recommended. In addition, when one deploys CA_26-41 operation in certain region, these co-existence studies should be taken into account because harmonics and IMDs could fall into twenty bands in total.
Table 7.2.6.1.2-1: 2DLs B26 + B41 harmonics and IMD products frequency limits
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
859
894
2496
2690
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
1718
1788
4992
5380
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
2577
2682
7488
8070
2nd order IMD products
|f2_low – f1_high|
|f2_high – f1_low|
|f2_low + f1_low|
|f2_high + f1_high|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1602
1831
3355
3584
3rd order IMD products
|f2_high – 2*f1_low|
|f2_low – 2*f1_high|
|2*f2_low – f1_high|
|2*f2_high – f1_low|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
708
972
4098
4521
3rd order IMD products
|2*f1_low + f2_low|
|2*f1_high + f2_high|
|2*f2_low + f1_low|
|2*f2_high + f1_high|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
4214
4478
5851
6274
3rd order IMD products
|f1_low – f2_high + f2_low|
|f1_high + f2_high – f2_low|
|f2_low – f1_high + f1_low|
|f2_high + f1_high – f1_low|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
665
1088
2461
2725
3rd order IMD products (with maximum channel bandwidth)
|f1_low – max BW f2|
|f1_high + max BW f2|
|f2_low – max BW f1|
|f2_high + max BW f1|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
839
914
2486
2700
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.6.1.2.1 B26 UE receiver harmonic mixing problem
|
This CA combination is associated with an undesired property that the B41 UL carrier can align with 3rd order harmonic of B26 DL carrier, as shown in Table 7.2.6.1.2.1-1, which could potentially cause B26 desensitization problem if simultaneous Tx/Rx would be operated, due to the known harmonic mixing problem in typical receiver design.
Table 7.2.6.1.2.1-1 B26 DL and B41 UL harmonic relation
B26 DL
B26 DL x3
B41
Range (MHz)
859 - 894
2577 - 2682
2496 – 2690
Using the commonly adopted L/H band UE reference architecture, as shown in Figure 7.2.6.1.2.1-1, the B41 UL power at B26 LNA input is estimated to be around -33 dBm. Considering that a typical receiver path (excluding off-chip filters) 3rd order harmonic rejection performance would not be better than 20 dB (which includes 9-dB rejection from switching mixer and less than 10 dB from matching selectivity), the desensitization level is expected to be more than 50 dB which can virtually nullify the receiver function. On the other hand, if a transceiver could provide up to 20-dB 3rd order harmonic rejection, to avoid self-desensitization, the isolation from B41 PA output to B26 LNA input shall still be better than 100 dB, which likely cannot be achieved even with additional bandpass filters cascaded before LNA.
Figure 7.2.6.1.2.1-1 UE reference architecture for self-desensitization analysis
Although adding bandpass filters can help reduce desensitization level, it will also introduce additional insertion loss to B26 receiver, yet the MSD is expected to be still higher than 20 dB due to finite PCB isolation. Therefore, it is suggested network to avoid simultaneous Tx/Rx operation when the B41 UL and B26 DL 3rd harmonic alignment condition occurs.
7.2.6.1.3 ∆TIB and ∆RIB values
For two simultaneous DL and one UL the TIB,c and RIB values are shown in table 7.2.6.1.3-1, and in table 7.2.6.1.3-2:
Table 7.2.6.1.3-1: ΔTIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_26A-41A
26
0.3
41
0.3
Table 7.2.6.1.3-2: ΔRIB
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB [dB]
CA_26A-41A
26
0
41
0
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.7 LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 38 (1 UL)
|
Table 7.2.7-1: Inter-band CA
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA Band
Uplink (UL) operating band
Downlink (DL) operating band
Duplex Mode
BS receive / UE transmit
BS transmit / UE receive
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_3-38
3
1710 MHz
–
1785 MHz
1805 MHz
–
1880 MHz
FDD
38
2570 MHz
–
2620 MHz
2570 MHz
–
2620 MHz
7.2.7.1 List of specific combination issues
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.7.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
|
Table 7.2.7.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_3A-38A
3
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
38
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.7.1.2 UE cCo-existence studies for 1UL/2DL
|
Table 7.2.7.1.2-1 presents the harmonic analysis for UE with single uplink. There are no harmonic frequency products interfering own downlink bands but Band 3 second harmonic will fall into band 42 frequency range.
Table 7.2.7.1.2-1: 1UL B3 + B38 harmonic products
UE UL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
UL frequency (MHz)
1710
1785
2570
2620
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
3420 to 3570
5140 to 5240
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
5130 to 5355
7710 to 7860
Table 7.2.7.1.2-2 shows the second and third order DL harmonics and intermodulation products when two simultaneous DLs are active in Band 3 and Band 38.
Table 7.2.7.1.2-2: Band 3 and Band 38 DL harmonics and IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
1805
1880
2570
2620
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
3610
3760
5140
5240
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
5415
5640
7710
7860
2nd order IMD products
|f2_low – f1_high|
|f2_high – f1_low|
(f2_low + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
690
815
4375
4500
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low – f2_high)
(2*f1_high – f2_low)
(2*f2_low – f1_high)
(2*f2_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
990
1190
3260
3435
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low + f2_low)
(2*f1_high + f2_high)
(2*f2_low + f1_low)
(2*f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
6180
6380
6945
7120
3rd order IMD products
(f1_low – f2_high + f2_low)
(f1_high + f2_high – f2_low)
(f2_low – f1_high + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1755
1930
2495
2695
3rd order IMD products (with maximum channel bandwidth)
(f1_low – f2_BWmax)
(f1_high + f2_BWmax)
(f2_low – f1_BWmax)
(f2_high + f1_BWmax)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1785
1900
2550
2640
It can be seen from table 7.2.7.1.2-2 that 2nd harmonics caused by BS supporting carrier aggregation of Band 3 and Band 38 may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 43, while none 3rd harmonic will fall into the BS receive band of currently defined 3GPP Bands.
It can be seen from table 7.2.7.1.2-2 that 2nd IMD products caused by BS supporting carrier aggregation of Band 3 and Band 38 may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 12-14, 17, 26-28 and 44, while 3rd IMD products may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 2, 7, 22, 25, 35, 38, 39, 41 and 42 (assuming BS transmits up to 20 MHz DL in Band 3 and up to 20 MHz DL in Band 38).
As BS cannot transmit and receive in Band 38 at the same time, the 3rd IMD products problem in receive band of Band 38 is not an issue.
7.2.7.1.3 ∆TIB and ∆RIB values
The reported additional IL (Insertion Loss) values, based on implementation/simulation data, under ETC (Extreme Temperature Conditions) for combining band 3 and band 38, for each of the Tx and Rx paths, are shown in Table 7.2.7 .1.3-1.
Table 7.2.7.1.3-1: IL values for band 3+38 diplexer and quadplexers (under ETC)
E-UTRA bands
Vendor A IL (dB)
Vendor B IL (dB)
3 Tx
0.5
0.6
3 Rx
0.5
0.6
38 Tx/Rx
0.5
0.7
For the reported additional IL values, the corresponding average additional IL values for the Tx and the Rx are shown in Table 7.2.7.1.3-2:
Table 7.2.7.1.3-2: Average Tx and Rx IL for combining band 3 and band 38 (under ETC)
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
Tx IL [dB]
Rx IL [dB]
3
0.55
0.55
38
0.6
For two simultaneous DLs and one UL the TIB,c and RIB values are shown in Table 7.2.7.1.3-3 and in Table 7.2.7.1.3-4:
Table 7.2.7.1.3-3: ΔTIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_3A-38A
3
[FFS]0.5
38
[FFS]0.5
Table 7.2.7.1.3-4: ΔRIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB [dB]
CA_3A-38A
3
[FFS]0
38
[FFS]0
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.8 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 19 and Band 42 (1 UL)
|
Table 7.2.8-1: Inter-band CA operating bands
E-UTRA CA Band
E-UTRA Band
Uplink (UL) band
Downlink (DL) band
Duplex
mode
BS receive / UE transmit
Channel BW (MHz)
BS transmit / UE receive
Channel BW (MHz)
FUL_low – FUL_high
FDL_low – FDL_high
CA_19-42
19
830 MHz
–
845 MHz
5, 10, 15
875 MHz
–
890 MHz
5, 10, 15
FDD
42
3400 MHz
–
3600 MHz
5, 10,15, 20
3400 MHz
–
3600 MHz
5, 10, 15, 20
TDD
7.2.8.1 List of specific combination issues
7.2.8.1.1 Channel bandwidths per operating band for CA
Table 7.2.8.1.1-1: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA
CA operating / channel bandwidth
Maximum aggregated bandwidth
[MHz]
Bandwidth Combination Set
E-UTRA CA Configuration
E-UTRA Bands
1.4 MHz
3 MHz
5 MHz
10 MHz
15 MHz
20 MHz
CA_19A-42A
19
Yes
Yes
Yes
35
0
42
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOTE: For the UE that signals support of any bandwidth combination set for carrier aggregation, the UE shall support all single carrier bandwidths for the constituent bands as defined in table 5.6.1-1 of TS 36.101 [4] when operating in single carrier mode.
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.8.1.2 Co-existence studies for CA_19-42
|
The harmonic frequencies do not fall into the frequency ranges of both bands as observed in table 7.2.8.1.2-1. Therefore we can conclude that there is no issue on harmonic interference.
Table 7.2.8.1.2-1: Impact of UL/DL Harmonic Interference
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
Band
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
UL Low Band Edge
UL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
DL Low Band Edge
DL High Band Edge
19
830
845
875
890
1660
1690
2490
2535
1750
1780
2625
2670
42
3400
3600
3400
3600
6800
7200
10200
10800
6800
7200
10200
10800
Table 7.2.8.1.2-1 shows the second and third order DL harmonics and intermodulation products when two simultaneous DLs are active in Band 19 and Band 42.It can be seen from table 7.2.8.1.2-1 that some 2nd harmonic products of Band 19 fall into the BS receive band of Bands 3, 4, 9 and 10, while some 3rd harmonic products fall into the BS receive band of Bands 41.
Table 7.2.8.1.2-2: Band 19 and Band 42 DL harmonics and IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
875
890
3400
3600
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
1750
1780
6800
7200
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
2625
2670
10200
10800
2nd order IMD products
|f2_low – f1_high|
|f2_high – f1_low|
|f2_low + f1_low|
|f2_high + f1_high|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
2510
2725
4275
4490
3rd order IMD products
|2*f1_high – f2_low|
|2*f1_low – f2_high|
|2*f2_low – f1_high|
|2*f2_high – f1_low|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1620
1850
5910
6325
3rd order IMD products
|2*f1_low + f2_low|
|2*f1_high + f2_high|
|2*f2_low + f1_low|
|2*f2_high + f1_high|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
5150
5380
7675
8090
3rd order IMD products
|f1_low – f2_high + f2_low|
|f1_high + f2_high – f2_low|
|f2_low – f1_high + f1_low|
|f2_high + f1_high – f1_low|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
675
1090
3385
3615
3rd order IMD products (with maximum channel bandwidth)
|f1_low – f2_BWmax|
|f1_high + f2_BWmax|
|f2_low – f1_BWmax|
|f2_high + f1_BWmax|
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
855
910
3385
3615
It can be seen from table 7.2.8.1.2-2 that some 2nd IMD products caused by BS supporting carrier aggregation of Band 19 and Band 42 fall into the BS receive band of Bands 7, 38 and 41, while some 3rd IMD products fall into the BS receive band of Bands 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 26, 27, 28, 42, 43 and 44. Note that the calculation in table 7.2.8.1.2-2 (except the last row) assumes the BS transmits the whole 15 MHz DL frequency of Band 19 and the whole 200 MHz DL frequency of Band 42. However even if the BS only transmits up to 15 MHz DL in Band 19 and up to 20 MHz DL in Band 42 as stated in Table 7.2.8.1.1-1, the 3rd IMD products may still fall into the BS receive band of the Bands 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 20, 22, 24, 42, 43 as shown in the last row in table 7.2.8.1.2-2.
It should be noted that Bands 4, 7, 10, 20 and 24 are not intended for use in the same geographical area as Band 19 and Band 22 is not intended for use in the same geographical area as Band 42. Consequently, the focus is on the IMD products falling into Bands 3, 8, 9, 38, 41, 42 and 43, where receiver desensitization might be an issue.
TDD BS does not transmit and receive simultaneously, so the BS’s own band 42 receiver and other synchronized band 42 receivers would not be interfered. Therefore, it is recommended that Bands 19 and 42 BS transmitters should not share the same antenna with Band 3, 8, 9 or unsynchronized Band 38, 41, 43 BS receivers, unless the antenna path meets very stringent 3rd order PIM specification so that the PIM will not cause Band 3, 8, 9 or unsynchronized 38, 41, 43 BS receivers desensitization.
7.2.8.1.3 ∆TIB and ∆RIB values
Following relaxations are allowed for the UE which supports inter-band carrier aggregation of Band 19 and Band 42.
Table 7.2.8.1.3-1: IB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_19A-42A
19
0.3
42
[0.8]
Table 7.2.8.1.3-2: RIB
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB,c [dB]
CA_19A-42A
19
0
42
[0.5]
Annex A:
Change history
Change history
Date
TSG #
TSG Doc.
CR
Rev
Subject/Comment
Old
New
2012-10
RAN4#64bis
R4-125796
Rel-12 Inter-band Carrier Aggregation Technical Report skeleton
N/A
0.1.0
2012-11
RAN4#65
R4-126715
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-125219, “TP for TR ab.cde (inter-band CA) on IMD study of B38 + B39”
R4-125246, “TP for TR36.8XX(Rel-12) : LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 1 and Band 8”
R4-125401, “TP for CA band combination B3+19”
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
• Version number changed
• Removed the word “non-contiguous”
Minor table reference corrections
0.1.0
0.2.0
2013-01
RAN4#66
R4-130546
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-126098, “TP for TR 36.8xx (Inter-Band CA Rel-12): LTE_CA_B3_B26 Core Requirements“
R4-126251, “TP for TR36.8xx (Release12): LTE Advanced inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 28 (1UL)”
R4-126107, “Harmonics and intermodulation products generated by the BS supporting LTE-A CA of Band 2 and Band 4”
R4-126407, “Interband CA B2+B4 UE issues”
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
• TR number updated to 36.851.
• Version number changed
• Added a table to the Scope clause that lists all Rel-12 inter-band carrier aggregation combinations
• LTE_CA_B38_B39 have been removed from the report
• LTE_CA_B1_B7 text from TS 36.850 have been included in this report
• Added missing reference [4]
• Changed the order of subclause 6.1,1, 6.1.2 and 6.1.3 (UID Order)
• Minor editorial corrections
0.2.0
0.3.0
2013-04
RAN4#66bis
R4-131374
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-130196, “TP for TR36.851: CA_1A-26A UE/BS RF aspects”
R4-130883, “TP for TR36.851 (Rel-12) : ∆TIB and ∆RIB values of LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 19”
R4-130033, “TP for TR 36.851: Quadplexer insertion loss data for aggregating band 1”
R4-130727, “Additional IL for Band 1 + Band 7 combination”
R4-130885, “TP for TR 36.851 on IMD study of inter-band CA B39 + B41”
R4-130889 : “TP for TR 36.851 on UE issues for B39+B41”
R4-130558, “TP 36.851: modified classes of inter-band combinations (up to 2 UL)”
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
• Version number changed
• Title modified and aligned with TR 36.850
• Table 1-1 updated with 3 new work items
• Values in Table 6.3.3.1.3-2 replaced by “[FFS]”
Minor editorial corrections
0.3.0
0.4.0
2013-05
RAN4#67
R4-132863
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-130993, “TP for TR36.851 (Release 12): ∆TIB and ∆RIB values of LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 2 and Band 13 (1UL)”
R4-131197, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products for Band Combination (2 + 12)”
R4-131200, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products for Band Combination (3 + 26)”
R4-131201, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (23 + 29)”
R4-131210, “CA_2A-4A addition on 20 MHz channel bandwidth”
R4-131249, “CA_B2_B12: Core requirement considerations and text proposal”
R4-131292, “TP for 36.851 Rel-12: Additional insertion loss data for CA_2-4”
R4-131925, “TP for TR 36.851 (Inter-Band CA Rel-12): LTE_CA_B8_B26 Operating Bands”
R4-131926, “TP for TR 36.851 (Inter-Band CA Rel-12): LTE_CA_B19_B21 Core Requirements”
R4-131985, “TP for TR 36.851 (Inter-Band CA Rel-12): LTE_CA_B23_B29 Core Requirements”
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
• Version number changed
• Renumbering of sub-clause numbers 6.1.1-6.1.5
• Minor editorial corrections
0.4.0
0.5.0
2013-08
RAN4#68
R4-133849
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-132189, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (2 + 13)”
R4-132190, “Corrections on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products for Band Combination (3 + 26)”
R4-131054, “Update on harmonics and intermodulation products generated by the BS supporting LTE-A CA of Band 2 and Band 4”
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
• Version number changed
• Minor editorial corrections
0.5.0
0.6.0
2013-10
RAN4#68bis
R4-134922
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-133147, “TP for TR 36.851: Supported E-UTRA bandwidths per CA configuration for inter-band CA”
R4-133371, “TP for TR36.851 (Release 12): ∆TIB and ∆RIB values of LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 2 and Band 5 (1UL)”
R4-133370, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (2 + 5)”
R4-133475, “TP for TR36.851 (Release 12): ∆TIB and ∆RIB values of LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 2 and Band 12 (1UL)”
R4-133644, “TP for TR36.851: CA_1A-26A specifications”
R4-134414, “Revised TP for TR36.851: CA_1A-18A specifications”
R4-134416, “CA_B12_B25: Core requirement considerations and text proposal”
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
• Version number changed
• Table 1-1 updated with 3 new work items
• Minor editorial corrections
0.6.0
0.7.0
2013-11
RAN4#69
R4-135966
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-134704, “TP for TR36.851 (Release 12): TIB and RIB values of LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 5 and Band 25 (1UL)”
R4-134819, “TP for TR36.851: TIB and RIB values of LTE CA of Band 5&7”
R4-134820, “TP for TR36.851: Co-existence studies for CA_7-28”
R4-134821, “TP for TR36.851: TIB and RIB values of LTE CA of Band 7&28”
R4-135699,” TP for TR36.851: Co-existence studies for CA5-7”
R4-134706, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (5 + 25)”
R4-134597, “Text proposal for LTE-A inter-band CA B12+B25 (2DL/1UL)”
R4-134667, “TP for TR36.851 (Rel-12) : IMD and Harmonics Issues on LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 1 and Band 11”
R4-134668, “TP for TR36.851 (Rel-12) : IMD and Harmonics Issues on R4-134668, LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 8 and Band 11”
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
• Version number changed
• Table 1-1 updated with 4 new work items
Minor editorial corrections
0.7.0
0.8.0
2014-02
RAN4#70
R4-140843
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-137031, “TP on UE requirement structure for TDD inter-band CA_B39_B41”
R4-136063, “TP for TR36.851 (Release 12): ∆TIB and ∆RIB values of LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 5 and Band 30 (1UL)”
R4-134714, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (5 + 30))”
R4-134709, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (2 + 30)”
R4-136066, “TP for TR36.851 (Release 12): ∆TIB and ∆RIB values of LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 29 and Band 30 (1UL)”
R4-134716, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (29 + 30)”
R4-134713, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (4 + 30)”
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
Version number changed
Added headings to sub-clause 6.1.16 and 6.1.18
Clause numbering in 6.1.2 corrected
Minor editorial corrections
0.8.0
0.9.0
2014-03
RAN4#70-Bis
R4-141475
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-140018, “R4-69AH-0077: TP to 36.851 on 1+20 Harmonic and IMD analysis (CA_1-3-20 leading and CA_1-7-20)”
R4-141045, “R4-69AH-0100: TP to 36.851 on 7+8 Harmonic and IMD analysis (CA_7-8-20)”
R4-140079, “TP for TR36.851: Operating Bands for LTE_CA_B8_B27”
R4-140450, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (1 + 28)”
R4-140475, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (12 + 30)”
R4-140476, “TP for TR36.851 (Release 12): TIB and RIB values of LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 12 and Band 30 (1UL)”
R4-140585, “TP for TR36.851 (Rel-12) : Insertion loss value proposal of CA 1+11”
R4-140587, “TP for TR36.851 (Rel-12) : Insertion loss value proposal of CA 8+11”
R4-140913, “TP 36.851 v0.9.0: additional bandwidth combination set for CA_2A-4A”
R4-140970, “TP for TR 36.851: DeltaTIB and DeltaRIB values for LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 4 and Band 27 (1UL)”
R4-141181, “TP for TR 36.851: B1+B5 Harmonic and IMD analysis for 3DLs CA_1A_5A_7A band combination UE”
R4-141183, “Text Proposal on Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and intermodulation products analysis supporting LTE-A CA of Band 1 and Band 3”
R4-141185, “TP for TR 36.851: Harmonics and Intermod analysis for LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 4 and Band 27 (1UL)”
R4-141232, “TP for TR 36.851: Rib values for CA_39A-41A”
R4-141256, “TP for TR36.851: LTE_CA_B3_B27”
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
Version number changed
Updated scope table with new band combinations
Split the scope table to separate 3 band CA combinations
Added headings for missing sub-clauses in TPs
Clause numbering corrected
Minor editorial corrections
0.9.0
0.10.0
2014-05
RAN4#71
R4- 143471
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-141322, "TP for TR 36.851: Additional bandwidth combination set for LTE Advanced inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 20"
R4-141324, "TP for TR 36.851: Additional bandwidth combination set for LTE Advanced inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 7 and Band 20"
R4-141339, "TP for TR36.851: Operating bands and CA configurations on LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (1+42)"
R4-141403, "TP for TR36.851: Editorial corrections for CA 1+8"
R4-141475, "TR 36.851 V0.10.0: Rel-12 Inter-band Carrier Aggregation"
R4-141525, "TP for TR 36.851: Correction of Harmonics and Intermod analysis for LTE-A Inter-band Carrier Aggregation of Band 4 and Band 27 (1UL)"
R4-141755, "TP for TR 36.851: Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and intermodulation products analysis supporting LTE-A CA of Band 8 and Band 27"
R4-141879, "TP for TR 36.851: Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (1 + 18)"
R4-141902, "TP for TR 36.851: Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (18 + 28)"
R4-141943, "TP for TR 36.851: Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (4 + 12)"
R4-142018, "TP for TR 36.851: Skeleton for TDD-FDD CA"
R4-142203, "Bulk Corrections for Harmonics and Intermod anlaysis in TR 36.851"
R4-142455, "TP for TR 36.851: Channel bandwidth for CA B41+B42"
R4-142456, "TP for TR 36.851: B41+B42 Harmonic and IMD analysis"
R4-142457, "TP to TR 36.851: Harmonics/IMD analysis and channel bandwidths for CA_7A-22A"
R4-142482, "Text Proposal for TR 36.851: BS harmonics and intermodulation analysis for TDD-FDD CA B1+B41 combination (CA_1A-41A)"
R4-142483, "TP for TR36.851: Co-existence study on LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (1+42)"
R4-142484, "TP for TR36.851: Harmonics and intermodulation product analysis supporting LTE-Advanced CA of Band 3 and Band 40"
R4-142485, "TP for TR36.851: Harmonics and intermodulation product analysis supporting LTE-Advanced CA of Band 8 and Band 40"
R4-142548, "TP for TR 36.851: LTE_CA_B5_B13 introduction"
R4-142549, "TP for TR36.851: TIB and RIB proposal for CA 1+11"
R4-142553, "Simulation results on UE for Band18+Band28 CA"
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
Version number changed
Updated scope table with new band combinations
Added another table to capture TDD FDD band combinations
Added headings for missing sub-clauses in TPs
Clause numbering corrected
Other minor editorial corrections
0.10.0
0.11.0
2014-08
RAN4#72
R4-144851
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-143148, "TP for TR36.851: Insertion Loss for TDD-FDD CA of Band 8 and Band 40" (KT).
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
Version number changed
Other minor editorial corrections
0.11.0
0.12.0
2014-10
RAN4#72-BIS
R4-146316
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-144239, "TP 36.851: additional bandwidth combination set for CA_2A-4A" (T-Mobile USA).
R4-144283, "TP for TR36.851 (Rel-12): Updated TIB and RIB proposal for CA 8+11" (SoftBank Mobile).
R4-144648, "TP for TR36.851: UE RF requirements for CA_B26-B41" (KDDI).
R4-144978, "TP for 36.851: UE requirements for fallback modes of 3DL combinations with Band 30" (Ericsson).
R4-145007, "TP for TR 37.851: Fallback modes for 3DL CA Band 1+3+20" (Ericsson).
R4-145089, "TP 36.851: additional bandwidth combination set for CA_4A-12A" (T-Mobile USA).
R4-145454, "TP for TR36.851: UE relaxation requirements for CA_B18-B28" (KDDI).
R4-145455, "TP for TR36.851: TIB and RIB for CA_B18-B28" (KDDI).
R4-145496, "TP for TR36.851: On Coexistence Studies of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (26 + 41)" (KDDI).
R4-145565, "TP for 36.851: Delta Tib and Delta Rib for inter-band CA B41+B42" (Huawei).
R4-145058, "TP for the addition of 3MHz bandwidth for Band 12, in the B2+B12 CA combination" (U.S. Cellular).
RP-141245, “TP for 36.851: B1+B3 CA remaining specs” (China Unicom)
RP-141638, “TP for TR 36.851: Band 1 and Band 7 UE Tx and Rx relaxations” (LGUplus, Qualcomm Incorporated, LG Electronics, Nokia Corporation, Intel Corporation, MediaTek)
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
Version number changed
Updated scope table with new band combinations
Added headings for missing sub-clauses in TPs
Clause numbering corrected
Updated Annex
Other minor editorial corrections
0.12.0
0.13.0
2014-11
RAN4#73
R4-147550
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-145707, "TP for TR 36.851: TDD-FDD CA for B1+B41" (China Telecom).
R4-145821, "TP for TR36.851: DTIB and DRIB for CA_B1_B28" (KDDI).
R4-145822, "TP for TR36.851: UE RF requirements for CA_B26_B41" (KDDI).
R4-145913, "TP for TR36.851 on LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (1+42)" (NTT DOCOMO, INC.).
R4-146162, "TP for TR 36.851: Corrections of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (5 + 13)" (Alcatel-Lucent, Intel Corporation, Verizon).
R4-146173, "TP for TR 36.851: Updates of Harmonics and Intermodulation Products caused by LTE Advanc Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (26 + 41)" (Alcatel-Lucent, KDDI).
R4-146383, "TP to 36.851: additional bandwidth combination set for CA_2A-5A" (Ericsson).
R4-146734, "TP for TR36.851: UE RF requirements for CA_3A-38A" (Nokia Corporation).
R4-146735, "TP for Rel-13 2DL TR 36.8xx: LTE_CA_B5_B13" (Intel Corporation, Verizon ).
R4-146766, "TP for TR36.851 on LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (3+42)" (NTT DOCOMO, INC.).
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
Version number changed
Updated scope table with new band combinations
Added headings for missing sub-clauses in TPs
Clause numbering corrected
Updated Annex
Other minor editorial corrections
0.13.0
0.14.0
2014-12
RAN#66
RP-142015
The following TPs have been implemented:
R4-146933, "TP to TR36.851 on BS harmonics and IMD analysis for CA of Band 3 and Band 38" (Nokia Networks).
R4-147578, "TP for Rel-12 2DL TR 36.851: TDD-FDD CA for B1+B41 combination (CA_1A-41A)" (Ericsson, KDDI).
R4-147676, "TP for TR36.851: UE Low-band receiver harmonic mixing problem for CA_B26_B41" (MediaTek Inc.).
R4-148005, "TP for TR 36.851: coexistence studies and UE requirements for CA_7-12" (Ericsson).
R4-148010, "TP for TR36.851 LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band Combination (19+42)" (NTT DOCOMO, INC.).
R4-148015, "TP for TR36.851: MSD proposal on CA_B1_B28" (KDDI).
R4-148101, "Band 7+8 reference sensitivity and TP to 36.851" (Vodafone).
Editorial updates by the rapporteur:
Version number changed
Updated scope table with new band combinations
Added headings for missing sub-clauses in TPs
Clause numbering corrected
Updated Annex
Other minor editorial corrections
0.14.0
1.0.0
|
389f9b67c003a620147a83200e3331ae
|
36.851
|
7.2.7.1.2 Co-existence studies for 1UL/2DL
|
Table 7.2.7.1.2-1 presents the harmonic analysis for UE with single uplink. There are no harmonic frequency products interfering own downlink bands but Band 3 second harmonic will fall into band 42 frequency range.
Table 7.2.7.1.2-1: 1UL B3 + B38 harmonic products
UE UL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
UL frequency (MHz)
1710
1785
2570
2620
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
3420 to 3570
5140 to 5240
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
5130 to 5355
7710 to 7860
Table 7.2.7.1.2-2 shows the second and third order DL harmonics and intermodulation products when two simultaneous DLs are active in Band 3 and Band 38.
Table 7.2.7.1.2-2: Band 3 and Band 38 DL harmonics and IMD products
BS DL carriers
f1_low
f1_high
f2_low
f2_high
DL frequency (MHz)
1805
1880
2570
2620
2nd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
3610
3760
5140
5240
3rd order harmonics frequency range (MHz)
5415
5640
7710
7860
2nd order IMD products
|f2_low – f1_high|
|f2_high – f1_low|
(f2_low + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
690
815
4375
4500
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low – f2_high)
(2*f1_high – f2_low)
(2*f2_low – f1_high)
(2*f2_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
990
1190
3260
3435
3rd order IMD products
(2*f1_low + f2_low)
(2*f1_high + f2_high)
(2*f2_low + f1_low)
(2*f2_high + f1_high)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
6180
6380
6945
7120
3rd order IMD products
(f1_low – f2_high + f2_low)
(f1_high + f2_high – f2_low)
(f2_low – f1_high + f1_low)
(f2_high + f1_high – f1_low)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1755
1930
2495
2695
3rd order IMD products (with maximum channel bandwidth)
(f1_low – f2_BWmax)
(f1_high + f2_BWmax)
(f2_low – f1_BWmax)
(f2_high + f1_BWmax)
IMD frequency limits (MHz)
1785
1900
2550
2640
It can be seen from table 7.2.7.1.2-2 that 2nd harmonics caused by BS supporting carrier aggregation of Band 3 and Band 38 may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 43, while none 3rd harmonic will fall into the BS receive band of currently defined 3GPP Bands.
It can be seen from table 7.2.7.1.2-2 that 2nd IMD products caused by BS supporting carrier aggregation of Band 3 and Band 38 may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 12-14, 17, 26-28 and 44, while 3rd IMD products may fall into the BS receive band of Bands 2, 7, 22, 25, 35, 38, 39, 41 and 42 (assuming BS transmits up to 20 MHz DL in Band 3 and up to 20 MHz DL in Band 38).
As BS cannot transmit and receive in Band 38 at the same time, the 3rd IMD products problem in receive band of Band 38 is not an issue.
7.2.7.1.3 ∆TIB and ∆RIB values
The reported additional IL (Insertion Loss) values, based on implementation/simulation data, under ETC (Extreme Temperature Conditions) for combining band 3 and band 38, for each of the Tx and Rx paths, are shown in Table 7.2.7 .1.3-1.
Table 7.2.7.1.3-1: IL values for band 3+38 diplexer and quadplexers (under ETC)
E-UTRA bands
Vendor A IL (dB)
Vendor B IL (dB)
3 Tx
0.5
0.6
3 Rx
0.5
0.6
38 Tx/Rx
0.5
0.7
For the reported additional IL values, the corresponding average additional IL values for the Tx and the Rx are shown in Table 7.2.7.1.3-2:
Table 7.2.7.1.3-2: Average Tx and Rx IL for combining band 3 and band 38 (under ETC)
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
Tx IL [dB]
Rx IL [dB]
3
0.55
0.55
38
0.6
For two simultaneous DLs and one UL the TIB,c and RIB values are shown in Table 7.2.7.1.3-3 and in Table 7.2.7.1.3-4:
Table 7.2.7.1.3-3: ΔTIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔTIB,c [dB]
CA_3A-38A
3
0.5
38
0.5
Table 7.2.7.1.3-4: ΔRIB,c
Inter-band CA Configuration
E-UTRA Band
ΔRIB [dB]
CA_3A-38A
3
0
38
0
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
1 Scope
|
The present document contains the up-to-date SA5 Work Item Descriptions (WIDs) and captures the status of all SA5 work items in the current Release.
This TR is used as a mean to provide input to the 3GPP work plan handled by MCC.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
2 References
|
The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document.
• References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non‑specific.
• For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
• For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document in the same Release as the present document.
[1] http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Information/WORK_PLAN/
[2] http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Information/WI_Sheet/
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
3 Feature: Operations, Administration, Maintenance & Provisioning (OAM8) UID_340063
| |
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
3.1 BB: Network Infrastructure Management
|
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects TSGS#36(07)0296
Meeting #36, 4 – 7 June 2007, Busan, KOREA
Source: SA5 (Telecom Management)
Title: WID Telecom Management Methodology - Unique_ID 35051
Document for: Approval
Agenda Item: 10.4x (OAM8) - OAM&P Rel 8
3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management) S5-070672
Meeting #52, Xián, CHINA, 02 - 06 April 2007 revision of S5-050287
Work Item Description
Title:
Telecom Management Methodology UID_35051
Acronym: OAM8
Is this Work Item a "Study Item"? (Yes / No): No
1 3GPP Work Area
X
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
2 Linked work items
OAM&P 8 (Operations, Administration, Maintenance & Provisioning), Feature: OAM8
3 Justification
Telecom Management capabilities and functions evolve continuously because for example, new functions are added to manage new kind of nodes introduced into the network, more efficient functions and capabilities are introduced, new technologies are added, old technologies are not longer used. There is a constant need to enhance and further develop the methodology for the evolved Telecom Management area.
To spread the way of working for Telecom Management, the methodology developed by 3GPP is promoted outside 3GPP. The use of the same or similar methodology to develop management capabilities for the various networks would facilitate the integration of these systems and networks where telecom is a part of. Therefore there are some dependencies on external bodies, e.g. 3GPP2, ITU-T and ETSI that are using a methodology that is common to 3GPP. The needs from these external bodies have to be taken into account.
Requirements methodology is developed jointly with ITU-T and ETSI. That work needs to be finished.
IS methodology is being developed jointly with ITU-T and ETSI. Also this work needs to be finished.
SS methodology needs to be developed jointly with ITU-T and ETSI.
The methodology for XML technology was started in Rel-7 and needs to be completed.
In Rel-7 the SOAP technology was introduced. The methodology for how to use it needs to be developed, so that the same problems do not occur as for XML.
It is still not clear how vendor specific extensions shall be done for XML.
4 Objective
To complete the joint methodology for Requirements and IS together with ITU-T and ETSI.
To develop a joint methodology for SS together with ITU-T and ETSI.
To finish the started methodology for XML.
To develop a methodology for SOAP.
To develop a methodology for vendor specific extensions for XML.
5 Service Aspects
None
6 MMI-Aspects
None
7 Charging Aspects
None
8 Security Aspects
None
9 Impacts
Affects:
UICC apps
ME
AN
CN
Others
Yes
X
X
No
X
X
Don't know
X
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
10 Expected Output and Time scale (to be updated at each plenary)
|
New specifications
[If Study Item, one TR is anticipated]
Spec No.
Title
Prime rsp. WG
2ndary rsp. WG(s)
Presented for information at plenary#
Approved at plenary#
Comments
32.275
MMTel Charging
SA5
SA#41 Sep 2008
SA#43 Mar 2009
Affected existing specifications
[None in the case of Study Items]
Spec No.
CR
Subject
Approved at plenary#
Comments
32.298
Add MMTel ASN.1 structure
Update Section 5.2.3 subsystem level CDR definitions with supplementary service data type
SA#43 Mar 2009
32.299
Add MMTel AVPs and descriptions
Define supplementary service AVPs, AVP codes, value types and flag rules. Provide detailed description for supplementary service AVPs
SA#43 Mar 2009
11 Work item rapporteur(s)
GARDELLA, Maryse (Alcatel-Lucent)
12 Work item leadership
SA5
13 Supporting Companies
Alcatel-Lucent, Verizon Wireless, Nortel, Motorola
14 Classification of the WI (if known)
Study Item (no further information required)
Feature (go to 14a)
Building Block (go to 14b)
X
Work Task (go to 14c)
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
14c The WI is a Work Task: parent Building Block
|
UID_390010 EPC Data Definitions
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
9 Impacts
|
Affects:
UICC apps
ME
AN
CN
Others
Yes
No
X
X
X
X
X
Don't know
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
1 3GPP Work Area
|
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
2 Linked work items
OAM&P 8 (Operations, Administration, Maintenance & Provisioning), Feature: OAM8
3 Justification
Circuit is a logic link between two exchange network nodes which bear the user data such as voice, e.g. 64K slot of one 2M E1. Traffic route represents the route via which bearer flow to a specific destination.
To learn the detailed circuit connection relationship between network nodes and traffic route configuration status of the CN CS, bearer transport network related NRM need to be defined, such as circuit, traffic route, etc.
4 Objective
Define Bearer Transport Network (BTN) related NRM applicable to CN CS of UMTS.
Add BTN relative NRM definition of the CN CS to 32.63x Configuration Management (CM); Core network resources IRP.
5 Service Aspects
None
6 MMI-Aspects
None
7 Charging Aspects
None
8 Security Aspects
None
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
14a The WI is a Feature: List of building blocks under this feature
|
(list of Work Items identified as building blocks)
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
14b The WI is a Building Block: parent Feature
|
UID_370059 IMS Multimedia Telephony and Supplementary Services (Acronym: IMSTSS)
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
1 3GPP Work Area *
|
X
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
2 Classification of WI and linked work items
| |
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
2.0 Primary classification *
|
This work item is a … *
Study Item (go to 2.1)
Feature (go to 2.2)
Building Block (go to 2.3)
X
Work Task (go to 2.4)
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
2.1 Study Item
|
Related Work Item(s) (if any]
Unique ID
Title
Nature of relationship
Go to §3.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
2.2 Feature
|
Related Study Item or Feature (if any) *
Unique ID
Title
Nature of relationship
Go to §3.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
2.3 Building Block
|
Parent Feature (or Study Item)
Unique ID
Title
TS
340064
OAM Network Infrastructure Management (OAM8-NIM)
This work item is … *
Stage 1 (go to 2.3.1)
Stage 2 (go to 2.3.2)
Stage 3 (go to 2.3.3)
Test spec (go to 2.3.4)
Other (go to 2.3.5)
2.3.1 Stage 1
Source of external requirements (if any) *
Organization
Document
Remarks
Go to §3.
2.3.2 Stage 2 *
Corresponding stage 1 work item
Unique ID
Title
TS
Other source of stage 1 information
TS or CR(s)
Clause
Remarks
If no identified source of stage 1 information, justify: *
Go to §3.
2.3.3 Stage 3 *
Corresponding stage 2 work item (if any)
Unique ID
Title
TS
Else, corresponding stage 1 work item
Unique ID
Title
TS
Other justification
TS or CR(s)
Or external document
Clause
Remarks
If no identified source of stage 2 information, justify: *
Go to §3.
2.3.4 Test spec *
Related Work Item(s)
Unique ID
Title
TS
Go to §3.
2.3.5 Other *
Related Work Item(s)
Unique ID
Title
Nature of relationship
TS / TR
Go to §3.
2.4 Work task *
Parent Building Block
Unique ID
Title
TS
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
3 Justification *
|
The XML definitions for the IRPs below were not specified in Rel-8. These definitions are required for implementation of a Rel-8 Notification Log IRP. It is not possible to log the notifications generated by Rel-8 implementations of these IRPs. Furthermore, these XML definitions are needed in the specification of SOAP Solution Sets for these IRPs. Without these XML definitions it will not be possible to complete the Rel-9 WI “IRP SOAP Solution Sets continuation from Rel-8 (OAM9) (UID_440065)”.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
4 Objective *
|
The objective is to create the missing specifications listed below. These specifications are needed to support a Rel-8 Notification Log implementation.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
5 Service Aspects
|
None.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
6 MMI-Aspects
|
None.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
7 Charging Aspects
|
None.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
8 Security Aspects
|
None.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
9 Impacts *
|
Affects:
UICC apps
ME
AN
CN
Others
Yes
X
X
No
X
X
X
Don't know
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
10 Expected Output and Time scale *
|
New specifications *
[If Study Item, one TR is anticipated]
Spec No.
Title
Prime rsp. WG
2ndary rsp. WG(s)
Presented for information at plenary#
Approved at plenary#
Comments
TS 32.125
“Telecommunication management; Advanced Alarm Management (AAM) Integration Reference Point (IRP); ”
SA5
SA#46
SA#46
TS 32.355
“Telecommunication management; Communication Surveillance (CS) Integration Reference Point (IRP)”
SA5
SA#46
SA#46
TS 32.505
“Telecommunication management; Self-Configuration of Network Elements Integration Reference Point (IRP)”
SA5
SA#46
SA#46
TS 32.535
“Telecommunication management; Software management Integration Reference Point (IRP)”
SA5
SA#46
SA#46
Note that this is related also to the Rel-9 WID “Management of software entities residing in Network Elements UID_420031” which will need 32.535 to create 32.537 as proposed in that WID.
Affected existing specifications *
[None in the case of Study Items]
Spec No.
CR
Subject
Approved at plenary#
Comments
TS 32.150
Add XML file format definition into IRP concepts (today it only includes RS, IS, SS), as agreed in S5-093318
Telecommunication management; Integration Reference Point (IRP) Concept and definitions
TS 32.153
Add XML template and XML definition and usage guidelines, as agreed in S5-093318
Telecommunication management; Integration Reference Point (IRP) technology specific templates, rules and guidelines
TS 32.335
Add missing XML namespaces to tables and import in schema.
Telecommunication management; Notification Log (NL) Integration Reference Point (IRP); eXtensible Markup Language (XML) solution definitions
11 Work item rapporteur(s) *
Shuqiang Huang (ZTE), [email protected]
Work item leadership *
SA5
13 Supporting Individual Members *
Supporting IM name
Ericsson
Nokia Siemens Networks
Huawei
ZTE
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
3.2 BB: Performance Management
|
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects TSGS#36(07)0301
Meeting #36, 4 – 7 June 2007, Busan, KOREA
Source: SA5 (Telecom Management)
Title: WID IP bearer network Performance measurement definitions - Unique_ID 35061
Document for: Approval
Agenda Item: 10.4x (OAM8) - OAM&P Rel 8
3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management) S5-071047
Meeting SA5#53, 07 - 11 May 2007, Sophia Antipolis, FRANCE revision of S5-050297
Work Item Description
Title:
IP bearer network Performance measurement definition UID_35061
Acronym: OAM8
Is this Work Item a "Study Item"? (Yes / No): No.
1 3GPP Work Area
X
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
2 Linked work items
OAM&P 8 (Operations, Administration, Maintenance & Provisioning), Feature: OAM8
3 Justification
Standardising performance measurements can bring a unified criterion for operators to evaluate the performance of networks provided by different vendors. With the evolution of RAN and All-IP Networks, it is very important to measure the performance of IP network between any two among RNCs, SGSNs, GGSNs, MGWs and MSC Servers. At present, 3GPP does not have performance measurements for it . Hence, it is necessary for us to look into ways to define these measurements.
This WT proposes to widen the scope of TS 32.32x TestIRP to include 3GPP support of IP network performance measurements either by reference to existing measurements from other standards bodies or by initiating an effort in those standards bodies to include the counters that we would identify in this WT. IP performance mainly deals with the time delay, jitter, packet loss etc between any two NEs.
Some of the IP network performance measurements methods have been defined in other standard bodies, such as IETF, so their work can be used as reference.
4 Objective
Include support of Performance Measurement Counters for IP bearer network in TS 32.32x Test IRP either by reference to existing measurements from other standards bodies (ITU-T, IETF) or by initiating an effort in those standards bodies to include the counters that we would identify in this WT.
5 Service Aspects
None
6 MMI-Aspects
None
7 Charging Aspects
None
8 Security Aspects
None
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
3.3 BB: Trace Management
|
This BB has been created in the 3GPP Work Plan in order to host the CT1 Work Task
UID_11067 Service Level Tracing in IMS (OAM8-Trace)
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
3.4 OAM&P Studies (OAM8-Study) UID_340067
|
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects TSGS#36(07)0307
Meeting #36, 4 – 7 June 2007, Busan, KOREA
Source: SA5 (Telecom Management)
Title: WID Study of Element Operations Systems Function (EOSF) definition - Unique_ID 35065
Document for: Approval
Agenda Item: 11.28 (OAM-Study) - OAM&P Studies
3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management) S5-071048
Meeting SA5#53, 7-11 May 2007, Sophia Antipolis, France
Work Item Description
Title:
Study of Element Operations Systems Function (EOSF) definition UID_35065
Acronym: OAM-Study
Is this Work Item a "Study Item"? (Yes / No): Yes
1 3GPP Work Area
X
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
2 Linked work items
OAM&P Rel-8 Studies (OAM-Study), UID_340067
3 Justification
In the Logical Layered Architecture (LLA) of TMN, Network OSFs (N-OSF) are concerned with the management function on network level, and Element OSFs (E-OSF) with the management function on network element level. These two logical layers respectively play the role of network management function.
The Element Management System developed by vendors may mainly cover network management functions described in E-OSF and or N-OSF.
3GPP TS 32.101 also state that the Element Manager (EM) has two aspects of function, element management and sub-network management. However, 3GPP 32.xxx series does not provide a clear definition for Element OSF which can help operators and vendors clarify what are required and can be used as a guide when they deploy network.
It is necessary to state that EM provided by vendor is an entity, which implement E-OSF logical functions and may or may not implement N-OSF functions and even more. The Network Management System (NMS) may or may not direct access to NE and implement part of E-OSF. This scenario (i.e. whether NMS implement or not any E-OSF and whether EM implement any N-OSF or not ) is outside the 3GPP standardization scope. The mapping rule between physical entities (e.g. EMS, NMS) and logical function entities (e.g. E-OSF and N-OSF) is outside of this WID scope.
The definition of E-OSF specification has to be based on the network operating and maintaining experience and consider the potential application environment of UMTS network. Up to now the existing specification from 3GPP may not enough as a guideline for the products. More E-OSF detail function definition is necessary to be defined in a TR as a reference for operator and vendor.
4 Objective
The intention of this TR is to identify and define what will be needed in the E-OSFs. The intention of this TR is not to define new requirements for the eventual standardization of new Interface IRP and/or NRM IRP and/or System Context.
This WI proposes to define the E-OSFs including the following main aspects.
-Define functional scope of Element OSF (E-OSF)
-Define functional requirement of Elements OSF (E-OSF)
-Define the usage (use case) of the result of this WID.
5 Service Aspects
None
6 MMI-Aspects
None
7 Charging Aspects
None
8 Security Aspects
None
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
4 Feature: Charging Management small Enhancements (CH8) UID_350016
|
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects TSGS#35(07)0077
Meeting #35, 12 - 15 March 2007, Lemesos, Cyprus
Source: SA5 (Telecom Management)
Title: R8 WID Online charging correlation
Document for: Approval
Agenda Item: 13 Proposed New WIDs (not part of an existing feature)
3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management) S5-070315
Meeting SA5#51, 22 - 26 Jan 2007, Seville, ES
Work Item Description
Title
Online charging correlation UID_350038
Acronym: CH8
Is this Work Item a "Study Item"? (Yes / No): No
1 3GPP Work Area
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
2 Linked work items
Charging Management small Enhancements (CH8) (Unique_ID 350016)
3 Justification
3GPP Technical Specification 32.240 (Charging architecture and principles) provides the possibility to aggregate and correlate charging information produced by different domains (e.g. IMS, PS) and different sources (e.g. x-CSCF, GGSN, etc.). This intra-domain and inter-domain correlation is specified for the offline charging method. However, such functionality is not offered for online charging. The Online Charging System (OCS) which performs event/session based charging, credit control and rating features collects charging events at the bearer level, the IMS level and at the service level. On the one hand, by controlling the network and application usage separately, the OCS is not able to apply special charging handling to one charging level against the other (e.g. zero rate bearer usage when an IMS session is active). On the other hand, when multiple services are rendered simultaneously to the subscriber, the OCS is not able to perform service bundling of these services.
As such correlation functionality needs to be defined for online charging.
4 Objective
As per the above justification, it is required to update the charging specifications as follows:
• Update the OCS internal architecture to combine the EBCF (Event Based Charging Function) and SBCF (Session Based charging Function) into a single OCF (Online Charging Function) that performs both event and session based charging. This allows to optimize the handling of correlation.
• Introduce a correlation function within the OCS as part of the above OCF which would be implement the service logic for correlation
• Introduce a context monitoring function that defines a context related to the multiple sessions/services activated by a user simultaneously
5 Service Aspects
None
6 MMI-Aspects
None
7 Charging Aspects
This is a charging work item.
8 Security Aspects
None
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
14c The WI is a Work Task: parent
|
Feature UID_370059 IMS Multimedia Telephony and Supplementary Services (Acronym: IMSTSS)
BB: UID_370062 IMS Multimedia Telephony Service (Acronym: IMS-MMTel)
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
11 Work item rapporteurs
|
Gavin WONG, Vodafone (gavin.wong (at) vodafone.com)
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
12 Work item leadership
|
SA5
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
13 Supporting Companies
|
Vodafone, Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Huawei, Nokia Siemens Networks, Orange
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
14 Classification of the WI (if known)
|
Study Item (no further information required)
Feature (go to 14a)
Building Block (go to 14b)
X
Work Task (go to 14c)
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
5 Feature: 3G Long Term Evolution - Evolved Packet System RAN part UID_20068
| |
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
5.1 BB: E-UTRAN Data Definitions UID_390001
|
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects TSGS#37(07)0617
Meeting #37, 17 - 20 September 2007, Riga, LATVIA
Source: SA5 (Telecom Management)
Title: WID on Subscriber and Equipment Trace for eUTRAN and EPC (OAM8) - OAM&P Rel 8
Document for: Approval
Agenda Item: 10.22 (OAM8) - OAM&P Rel 8
3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management) S5-071346
Meeting SA5#54, 25 - 29 June 2007, Orlando, FL USA
Work Item Description
Title
Subscriber and Equipment Trace for eUTRAN and EPC UID_370001
Acronym: E-UTRAN-OAM
Is this Work Item a "Study Item"? (Yes / No): No
1 3GPP Work Area
X
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
2 Linked work items
• LTE
• SAE
3 Justification
The use cases for the existing Subscriber and Equipment trace are valid also for eUTRAN and EPC. Therefore shall the existing Subscriber and Equipment Trace function and the Trace IRP be upgraded to include eUTRAN and EPC.
4 Objective
Include the eUTRAN and EPC nodes and interfaces in the Subscriber and Equipment Trace function and the Trace IRP.
Also the new requirements from TR 32.816 (Study on Management of LTE and SAE) are to be included.
• Work is needed in RAN3, CT1, CT4
5 Service Aspects
None
6 MMI-Aspects
None
7 Charging Aspects
None
8 Security Aspects
Not known
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
6 Feature: 3GPP System Architecture Evolution Specification - Evolved Packet System (non RAN aspects) UID_320005
| |
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
6.1 BB: EPC Data Definitions UID_390010
|
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects TSGS#38(07)0737
Meeting #38, 03 - 06 December 2007, Cancun, MEXICO
Source: SA5 (Telecom Management)
Title: New WID on EPC NRM IRP
Document for: Approval
Agenda Item: 10.21 (SAES) - 3GPP System Architecture Evolution Specification - Evolved Packet System (non RAN aspects)
3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management) S5-071964
Meeting SA5#56, 22 - 26 Oct 2007, Guangzhou, CHINA
Work Item Description
Title
EPC Network Resource Model (NRM) Integration Reference Point (IRP) UID_380037
Acronym: EPC-OAM
Is this Work Item a "Study Item"? (Yes / No): No
1 3GPP Work Area
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
2 Linked work items
UID_320005 3GPP System Architecture Evolution Specification - Evolved Packet System (non RAN aspects)
UID_340036 Study of Management for LTE and SAE (draft TR 32.816) under OAM8-Studies
UID_340063 OAM&P 8 (Operations, Administration, Maintenance & Provisioning) - OAM8
3 Justification
The Evolved Packet Core (EPC) is defined by 3GPP with different Network Elements from the UTMS Core Network.
The Network Resource Model (NRM) of the UTMS Core Network is not applicable to EPC.
The Evolved Packet Core (EPC) system needs to be managed. 3GPP network management paradigm necessitates the standardization of the representations of various managed resources. The standardization of the EPC system managed resources is captured in the so-called EPC Network Resource Model (NRM).
The EPC architecture and capabilities evolve from those defined for UTMS Core Network. The management of the EPC system should also evolve from that for managing the UTMS Core Network. In particular, the NRM for EPC should align and resemble those specified for the Core managed network resources.
The alignment of EPC NRM with Core NRM will have the following benefits:
• The system architecture of EPC evolves from Core network and the existing Core network NRM is proven in operation. Therefore, the alignment will result in a specification that has a higher chance of being bug free when compared to a “brand new” designed specification.
• It will minimise both the standardisation and product development efforts and maintenance efforts (i.e. the cost and time for development including testing and reduction of training cost when the management paradigms for EPC and Core network remained similar);
• It will shorten the time to market for EPC systems;
• It will facilitate a seamless coexistence with Core network management systems.
4 Objective
Define EPC NRM using the same principles as for the UMTS Core network NRM. The definition will be captured in a new NRM IRP called EPC NRM IRP. The defined NRM should have identical characteristics as those defined for other NRMs such as UMTS Core network NRM.
For example: the DN of its instances uses the same name convention as all instances whose IOCs are defined in various NRM IRPs.
For example: Its IOCs will integrate, in identical manner as other NRM such as those defined in UMTS/GSM NRM IRP, with the IOCs defined in Generic NRM IRP.
For example: operations and notifications defined in various Interface IRPs that work with existing instances of various NRM IRPs must work, without change, with the new instances of EPC.
Similar to existing 3GPP NRM IRPs such as UTRAN and Core Network NRM IRP, the proposed new EPC NRM IRP focuses only on the representation of the network resources in question.
This NRM IRP does not deal with the applications or usage of the IOCs.
The objective of this work item is to define the NRM for EPC, e.g.: MME, HSS, Serving GW, PDN GW
5 Service Aspects
None
6 MMI-Aspects
None
7 Charging Aspects
None
8 Security Aspects
Not known.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
6.2 BB: EPC Charging
|
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects TSGS#38(07)0736
Meeting #38, 03 - 06 December 2007, Cancun, MEXICO
Source: SA5 (Telecom Management)
Title: New WID on EPC Charging
Document for: Approval
Agenda Item: 10.21 (SAES) - 3GPP System Architecture Evolution Specification - Evolved Packet System (non RAN aspects)
3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management) S5-072005
Meeting SA5#56, 22 - 26 October 2007, Guangzhou, CHINA
Work Item Description
Title
Evolved Packet Core (EPC) Charging UID_380038
Is this Work Item a "Study Item"? (Yes / No): No
1 3GPP Work Area
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
2 Linked work items
UID_320005 3GPP System Architecture Evolution Specification - Evolved Packet System (non RAN aspects)
3 Justification
The Evolved 3GPP System needs reliable and efficient charging solutions. As the Evolved 3GPP System is an evolvement of UMTS, also the charging solutions for the Evolved 3GPP System should evolve from UMTS. Following the recommendations of the Study on Charging Aspects of 3GPP System Evolution a re-use of the existing UMTS charging standard solutions will have the following benefits:
• It is proven in operation;
• It will minimise both the standardisation and product development efforts (i.e. the cost and time);
• It provides a base, on which more functionality can be developed;
• It will shorten the time to market for Evolved 3GPP systems;
• It will facilitate a seamless coexistence with UMTS charging systems.
• It will also consider non-3GPP access;
• It will enable an easy migration for the Operator to the new solution.
4 Objective
This work item proposes to introduce Charging for the EPC Architecture by following the recommendations given in TR 32.820.
5 Service Aspects
None
6 MMI-Aspects
None
7 Charging Aspects
This work item will cover Charging for EPC.
8 Security Aspects
Further investigation needed.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
7 Feature: IMS Multimedia Telephony and Supplementary Services UID_370059
| |
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
7.1 BB: AoC support in IMS Charging
|
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects TSGS#38(07)0739
Meeting #38, 03 - 06 December 2007, Cancun, MEXICO
Source: SA5 (Telecom Management)
Title: New WID on Advice of Charge (AoC) support in IMS Charging
Document for: Approval
Agenda Item: 10.26 (CH8) - Charging Management small Enhancements
3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management) S5-072012
Meeting SA5#56, 22 - 26 October 2007, Guangzhou, CHINA
Work Item Description
Title
Advice of Charge (AoC) support in IMS Charging UID_380042
The AoC service is standardized in 3GPP and available for CS and PS networks based on Charge Advice Information (CAI).
TISPAN introduced AoC based on Tariff Information according to ITU recommendations and ETSI specifications.
It is becoming available in 3G IMS networks. The usage of AoC in IMS based networks should be defined in 3GPP.
Is this Work Item a "Study Item"? (Yes / No): No
1 3GPP Work Area
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
2 Linked work items
• UID_370059 IMS Multimedia Telephony and Supplementary Services (Acronym: IMSTSS)
3 Justification
AoC is currently listed in the charging requirements for 3GPP in TS 22.115.
The high level description on AoC Information and Charging levels is in TS 22.086 and TS 23.086. AoC is based on the Charge Advise Information (CAI) defined in TS 22.024.
The support of subscribed AoC in CAMEL for CS and PS networks is specified in TS 23.078.
The requirement for AoC support in TISPAN is handled in WID02037 and considers the SIP transfer of charging information in WID 3113.
The transport of tariff information, the evaluation and the advice to the mobile subscriber is not described in IMS.
4 Objective
This work item proposes to introduce AoC in 3GPP IMS Charging and is limited to support AoC information on the corresponding charging interfaces as well as in the OCS.
A new specification will be created with definitions for AoC and description of AoC in IMS Charging. This description will contain the AoC Information for charging purposes.
The determination for SIP transport of tariff information will follow the requirements from TS 22.273.
The mechanism for the tariff change and the support of the tariff format will adhere on the existing 3GPP principles.
Additions, e.g. for different use case or simplifications is For Further Study.
5 Service Aspects
The AoC service provision and information transfer should be made available as a SIP based IMS services. The transfer of tariff information is outside the scope of this WID but is For Further Study in other 3GPP groups.
6 MMI-Aspects
The presentation of the AoC information at the UE/ME is outside the scope of this WID and shall be considered in other 3GPP groups.
7 Charging Aspects
This is a Charging Work Item
8 Security Aspects
Further investigation needed
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
7.2 BB: IMS Multimedia Telephony Service UID_370062
|
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects TSGS#38(07)0749
Meeting #38, 03 - 06 December 2007, Cancun, MEXICO
Source: SA5 (Telecom Management)
Title: New WID on Multimedia Telephony Service and Supplementary Services (MMTel) Charging
Document for: Approval
Agenda Item: 10.26 (CH8) - Charging Management small Enhancements
3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management) S5-072014
Meeting SA5#56, 22 - 26 Oct 2007, Guangzhou, CHINA
Work Item Description
Title:
Multimedia Telephony Service and Supplementary Services (MMTel) Charging UID_380041
Supplementary services are a critical part of IMS. The current IMS charging specifications do not fully support supplementary services and associated charging records. This work proposal recommends adding MMTel charging
Is this Work Item a "Study Item"? (Yes / No): No
1 3GPP Work Area
Radio Access
X
Core Network
Services
2 Linked work items
Feature UID_370059 IMS Multimedia Telephony and Supplementary Services (Acronym: IMSTSS)
BB: UID_370062 IMS Multimedia Telephony Service (Acronym: IMS-MMTel)
3 Justification
The current 3GPP IMS charging documents do not fully cover MMTel supplementary services. The supplementary services are important to network operators since majority of voice calls involves supplementary services, such as call forwarding, call waiting, conference call, etc. Thus, supplementary service charging should be included in IMS session charging.
4 Objective
This work item proposes to introduce MMTel charging in 3GPP IMS. A new specification will be created with definitions for multimedia telephony service charging in IMS. Also this work item will enhance existing SA5 TS 32.298 and TS 32.299 by adding MMTel supplementary services AVPs from Telephone Application Server and corresponding charging fields in the charging data records.
NOTE : MMtel online charging was initially part of this Work Item. It is proposed to handle MMTel online charging in a separate Work Item.
5 Service Aspects
None
6 MMI-Aspects
None
7 Charging Aspects
This is a charging Work Item
8 Security Aspects
None
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
8 Feature: UTRA HNB UID_390033
| |
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
8.1 BB: 3G Home NodeB OAM&P (type 1 definition) (HNB-3G_OAM) UID_420037
|
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects TSGS#42(08)0708
Meeting #42, 8 - 11 December 2008,
Athens, Greece
3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management) S5-082488
Meeting SA5#62, 17~21 November 2008, Miami, USA
Source: Huawei Technologies, Nokia Siemens Network, Ericsson
Title: New WT-level WID on 3G Home NodeB OAM&P (Interface Type 1 Management)
Document for: Approval
Agenda Item: 6.2
Parent Building Block
Unique ID
Title
TS
UID_380065
Home NodeB / eNodeB
HomeNB
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
3 Justification
|
In order to complement the work done in RAN, it’s SA5 responsibility to provide corresponding OAM solution for 3G Home NodeB. SA5 will need to standardize management services that are specific to Home NodeB because of the following Home NodeB characteristics:
• The quantity of Home NodeB is likely to be large
• There may be many Home NodeB vendors
• Home NodeB may be purchased easily by end users in market
• The location of Home NodeB could be in a private residence which may not be accessible for frequent on-site maintenance
SA5 has studied Home NodeB OAM and SON aspects for some time. The management differences between Home NodeB and macro NodeB are listed in TR32.821. The requirements for managing Home NodeB have been provided in the TR32.821 and the consequences on the management interface for Home NodeB are also described.
Based on the study in SA5, it was agreed the interface type 1 and type 2 shown in the following diagram are to be standardized for Home NodeB OAM&P.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
4 Objective
|
This work Item is to define corresponding OAM solution for 3G Home NodeB on interface type 1 management. The workitem will include (but not necessarily limited to):
4.1 Management on Standard Interfaces type 1 for 3G Home NodeB:
• Investigate what management standardization work are needed for management of 3G Home NodeB over interface type 1.
• Define the standardization work mentioned above for 3G Home NodeB management over interface type 1.
4.2 This WI shall include:
• Stage 1 Requirements specified in TS 32.XX1
◦ Configuration Management (CM)
◦ Fault Management
◦ Performance Management
◦ Security aspects of OAM
◦ Note: Input for this TS is derived from TS25.467, TR32.821, SA5 contributions & Specification
• Stage 2 specified in TS 32.XX2
◦ Architecture for HNB Management (derived from TS25.467, TR32.821, SA5 contributions & Specification) for CM, FM and PM
◦ Object Classes for
▪ Configuration Management (CM) for
• HNB Access Network
• Core Network (related to HNB)
• Transport Network (related to HNB)
▪ Fault Management
▪ Performance Management
◦ Stage 2 for contents definition for CM, FM, PM & Logging
◦ Note: Input for this TS is derived from TS25.467, TR32.821, bbf2008 851 00 (BBF contribution), SA5 contributions & Specification
• The HNB to ACS procedure flow document TS 32.xx3
◦ OAM Procedural flows for HNB Discovery, registration, config updates
◦ OAM Procedural flows for FM
◦ OAM Procedural flows for PM
◦ Note: Input for this TS is derived from TS25.467, TR32.821, SA5 contributions & Specification
• Stage 3 specified in TS 32.XX4
◦ Data Format for CM, FM & PM (specified or referenced if required by stage-2)
4.3 The standardization work for management on interface type 2 will not be covered in this workitem.
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
10 Expected Output and Time scale
|
New specifications
[If Study Item, one TR is anticipated]
Spec No.
Title
Prime rsp. WG
2ndary rsp. WG(s)
Presented for information at plenary#
Approved at plenary#
Comments
32.581
Home NodeB OAM&P concepts and requirements(for interface type1)
SA5
SA#43 Mar 2009
SA#43 Mar 2009
32.582
Home NodeB OAM&P Stage2(for interface type1)
SA5
SA#43 Mar 2009
SA#43 Mar 2009
32.583
HNB to ACS procedure flow
SA5
SA#43 Mar 2009
SA#43 Mar 2009
32.584
Home NodeB OAM&P Stage3(for interface type1)
SA5
SA#44 Mar 2009
SA#44 Mar 2009
Affected existing specifications
[None in the case of Study Items]
Spec No.
CR
Subject
Approved at plenary#
Comments
11 Work item rapporteur(s)
Huawei Technologies.([email protected])
12 Work item leadership
SA5
13 Supporting Individual Members
Supporting IM name
Huawei Technologies.
Nokia Siemens Networks
Ericsson
Vodafone
T-Mobile
Telefonica
Alcatel-Lucent
IPAccess
China Mobile
Telecom Italia
Airvana
Motorola
ZTE
Qualcomm
Samsung
14 Classification of the WI (if known)
Study Item (no further information required)
Feature (go to 14a)
X
Building Block (go to 14b)
Work Task (go to 14c)
|
75b0bc4f802ad76b9632a25b25224d00
|
30.818
|
14b The WI is a Building Block: parent
|
Feature UID_390033 UTRA HNB (Acronym: HNB)
Annex A:
List of SA5 Release 8 specifications
Type
Number
Title
rapporteur
TR
30.818
Project scheduling and open issues for SA5, Release 8
ZOICAS, Adrian
TS
32.121
Advanced alarming on Itf-N Integration Reference Point (IRP); Requirements
SUERBAUM, Clemens
TS
32.122
Advanced alarming on Itf-N Integration Reference Point (IRP); Information Service (IS)
SUERBAUM, Clemens
TS
32.123
Advanced alarming on Itf-N Integration Reference Point (IRP); Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) Solution Set (SS)
SUERBAUM, Clemens
TS
32.153
IRP technology specific template
TOVINGER, Thomas
TS
32.154
Backward and Forward Compatibility (BFC); Concept and definitions
TOVINGER, Thomas
TS
32.155
Requirements template
TOVINGER, Thomas
TS
32.274
Charging management; Short Message Service (SMS) charging
WONG, Gavin
TS
32.275
Charging management; MultiMedia Telephony (MMTel) charging
GARDELLA, Maryse
TS
32.280
Charging management; Advice of Charge (AoC) service
GÖRMER, Gerald
TS
32.410
Telecommunication management; Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for UMTS and GSM
LIANG, Shuangchun
TS
32.450
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for E-UMTS: Definitions
HÜBINETTE, Ulf
TS
32.451
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for E-UMTS: Requirements
HÜBINETTE, Ulf
TS
32.500
Self-Organizing Networks (SON); Concepts and requirements
GOMPAKIS, Panagiotis
TS
32.501
Self-Organizing Networks (SON); Self-establishment of eNodeBs; Concepts and requirements
SUERBAUM, Clemens
TS
32.502
Self-Organizing Networks (SON); Self-establishment of eNodeBs; Stage 2
SUERBAUM, Clemens
TS
32.511
Self-Organizing Networks (SON); Automatic Neighbour Relation (ANR) management; Concepts and requirements
TSE, Edwin
TS
32.521
Self-Organizing Networks (SON); Self-optimization and self-healing; Concepts and requirements
WANG, Xuelong
TS
32.531
Telecommunication management; Software management; Concepts and Integration Reference Point (IRP) Requirements
TS
32.532
Telecommunication management; Software management Integration Reference Point (IRP); Information Service (IS)
TS
32.533
Telecommunication management; Software management Integration Reference Point (IRP); Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) Solution Set (SS)
TS
32.537
Telecommunication management; Software management Integration Reference Point (IRP); SOAP Solution Set (SS)
TS
32.581
Home Node B (HNB) Operations, Administration, Maintenance and Provisioning (OAM&P); Concepts and requirements for Type 1 interface HNB to HNB Management System (HMS)
Zou Lan
TS
32.582
Home Node B (HNB) Operations, Administration, Maintenance and Provisioning (OAM&P); Information model for Type 1 interface HNB to HNB Management System (HMS)
SUDARSAN, Padma
TS
32.583
Telecommunications management; Home Node B (HNB) Operations, Administration, Maintenance and Provisioning (OAM&P); Procedure flows for Type 1 interface HNB to HNB Management System (HMS)
Malviya, Manish
TS
32.584
Home Node B (HNB) Operations, Administration, Maintenance and Provisioning (OAM&P); XML definitions for Type 1 interface HNB to HNB Management System (HMS)
ANDRIANOV, Anatoly
TS
32.751
EPC NRM IRP Requirements
LOU, Min
TS
32.752
EPC NRM IRP Information Service
WANG, Xuelong
TS
32.753
EPC NRM IRP CORBA Solution Set
LOU, Min
TS
32.755
EPC NRM IRP Bulk CM XML file format definition
WANG, Xuelong
TS
32.761
E-UTRAN NRM IRP Requirements
ELMDAHL, Per
TS
32.762
E-UTRAN NRM IRP Information Service
ELMDAHL, Per
TS
32.763
E-UTRAN NRM IRP CORBA Solution Set
ELMDAHL, Per
TS
32.765
E-UTRAN NRM IRP Bulk CM XML file format definition
ELMDAHL, Per
TR
32.808
Study of Common Profile Storage (CPS) Framework of User Data for network services and management
ABA, Istvan
TR
32.816
Study on management of Long Term Evolution (LTE) and System Architecture Evolution (SAE)
PETERSEN, Robert
TR
32.818
Study on 3GPP SA5 / MTOSI XML harmonization
DUGUAY, Jean
TR
32.819
Telecommunications management; Element management layer - Operation System Function (E-OSF) definition
YANG, Li
TR
32.820
Charging management; 3GPP System Architecture Evolution (SAE): Charging aspects
GÖRMER, Gerald
Annex B:
Change history
Change history
Date
TSG #
TSG Doc.
CR
Rev
Subject/Comment
Old
New
2010-09
SA#49
SP-100524
--
--
Presentation to SA for Information and Approval
---
1.0.0
2010-10
--
--
--
--
Publication
1.0.0
8.0.0
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.