issue_id
int64
2.04k
425k
title
stringlengths
9
251
body
stringlengths
4
32.8k
status
stringclasses
6 values
after_fix_sha
stringlengths
7
7
project_name
stringclasses
6 values
repo_url
stringclasses
6 values
repo_name
stringclasses
6 values
language
stringclasses
1 value
issue_url
null
before_fix_sha
null
pull_url
null
commit_datetime
timestamp[us, tz=UTC]
report_datetime
timestamp[us, tz=UTC]
updated_file
stringlengths
23
187
chunk_content
stringlengths
1
22k
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
ZipEntry ze = (ZipEntry) e.nextElement(); String n = ze.getName(); if (n.endsWith(".class")) { n = n.replace('/', '.'); n = n.substring(0, n.length() - 6); ResolvedType typeA = w.resolve(n); assertFalse(typeA.isMissing()); List<ResolvedMember> viaIteratorList = typeA.getMethodsWithoutIterator(false, true, true); viaIteratorList = typeA.getMethodsWithoutIterator(false, true, false); } } zf.close(); } catch (IOException t) { t.printStackTrace(); fail(t.toString()); } etime = System.currentTimeMillis(); System.out.println("Time taken for 'grab all up front' approach: " + (etime - stime) + "ms"); } private void checkType(World w, String name) { checkTypeHierarchy(w, name, true); checkTypeHierarchy(w, name, false); checkMethods(w, name, true); checkMethods(w, name, false); } private void checkMethods(World w, String name, boolean wantGenerics) { ResolvedType typeA = w.resolve(name); assertFalse(typeA.isMissing()); List<ResolvedMember> viaIteratorList = getThemAll(typeA.getMethods(wantGenerics, true)); List<ResolvedMember> directlyList = typeA.getMethodsWithoutIterator(true, true, wantGenerics);
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
Collections.sort(viaIteratorList, new ResolvedMemberComparator()); Collections.sort(directlyList, new ResolvedMemberComparator()); compare(viaIteratorList, directlyList, name); } private static class ResolvedMemberComparator implements Comparator<ResolvedMember> { public int compare(ResolvedMember o1, ResolvedMember o2) { return o1.toString().compareTo(o2.toString()); } } private void checkTypeHierarchy(World w, String name, boolean wantGenerics) { ResolvedType typeA = w.resolve(name); assertFalse(typeA.isMissing()); List<String> viaIteratorList = exhaustTypeIterator(typeA.getHierarchy(wantGenerics, false)); List<ResolvedType> typeDirectlyList = typeA.getHierarchyWithoutIterator(true, true, wantGenerics); assertFalse(viaIteratorList.isEmpty()); List<String> directlyList = new ArrayList<String>(); for (ResolvedType type : typeDirectlyList) { String n = type.getName(); if (!directlyList.contains(n)) { directlyList.add(n); } } Collections.sort(viaIteratorList); Collections.sort(directlyList); compareTypeLists(viaIteratorList, directlyList); } private void compare(List<ResolvedMember> viaIteratorList, List<ResolvedMember> directlyList, String typename) { assertEquals(typename + "\n" + toString(directlyList), typename + "\n" + toString(viaIteratorList));
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
} private void compareTypeLists(List<String> viaIteratorList, List<String> directlyList) { assertEquals(typeListToString(directlyList), typeListToString(viaIteratorList)); } private String toString(List<ResolvedMember> list) { StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(); for (ResolvedMember m : list) { sb.append(m).append("\n"); } return sb.toString(); } private String typeListToString(List<String> list) { StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(); for (String m : list) { sb.append(m).append("\n"); } return sb.toString(); } private String toString(List<ResolvedMember> one, List<ResolvedMember> two, boolean shouldIncludeGenerics) { StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(); sb.append("Through iterator\n"); for (ResolvedMember m : one) { sb.append(m).append("\n"); } sb.append("Directly retrieved\n"); for (ResolvedMember m : one) { sb.append(m).append("\n"); } return sb.toString(); }
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
private String typeListsToString(List<String> one, List<String> two) { StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(); sb.append("Through iterator\n"); for (String m : one) { sb.append(">" + m).append("\n"); } sb.append("Directly retrieved\n"); for (String m : one) { sb.append(">" + m).append("\n"); } return sb.toString(); } private List<ResolvedMember> getThemAll(Iterator<ResolvedMember> methods) { List<ResolvedMember> allOfThem = new ArrayList<ResolvedMember>(); while (methods.hasNext()) { allOfThem.add(methods.next()); } return allOfThem; } private List<String> exhaustTypeIterator(Iterator<ResolvedType> types) { List<String> allOfThem = new ArrayList<String>(); while (types.hasNext()) { allOfThem.add(types.next().getName()); } return allOfThem; } /** * Setup up two simple projects and build them in turn - check the structure model is right after each build */ public void testBuildingTwoProjectsAndVerifyingModel() {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
initialiseProject("P1"); initialiseProject("P2"); build("P1"); checkForNode(getModelFor("P1"), "pkg", "C", true); build("P2"); checkForNode(getModelFor("P2"), "pkg", "C", false); build("P1"); checkForNode(getModelFor("P1"), "pkg", "C", true); build("P2"); checkForNode(getModelFor("P2"), "pkg", "C", false); } public void testBuildingTwoProjectsAndVerifyingStuff() { initialiseProject("P1"); initialiseProject("P2"); build("P1"); checkForNode(getModelFor("P1"), "pkg", "C", true); build("P2"); checkForNode(getModelFor("P2"), "pkg", "C", false); build("P1"); checkForNode(getModelFor("P1"), "pkg", "C", true); build("P2"); checkForNode(getModelFor("P2"), "pkg", "C", false); } /** * Complex. Here we are testing that a state object records structural changes since the last full build correctly. We build a * simple project from scratch - this will be a full build and so the structural changes since last build count should be 0. We * then alter a class, adding a new method and check structural changes is 1. */
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
public void testStateManagement1() { File binDirectoryForP1 = new File(getFile("P1", "bin")); initialiseProject("P1"); build("P1"); AjState ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(binDirectoryForP1); assertTrue("There should be a state object for project P1", ajs != null); assertTrue("Should be no structural changes as it was a full build but found: " + ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild() == 0); alter("P1", "inc3"); build("P1"); checkWasntFullBuild(); ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(new File(getFile("P1", "bin"))); assertTrue("There should be state for project P1", ajs != null); checkWasntFullBuild(); assertTrue("Should be one structural changes as it was a full build but found: " + ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild() == 1); } /** * Complex. Here we are testing that a state object records structural changes since the last full build correctly. We build a * simple project from scratch - this will be a full build and so the structural changes since last build count should be 0. We * then alter a class, changing body of a method, not the structure and check struc changes is still 0. */ public void testStateManagement2() { File binDirectoryForP1 = new File(getFile("P1", "bin")); initialiseProject("P1"); alter("P1", "inc3"); build("P1"); AjState ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(binDirectoryForP1);
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
assertTrue("There should be state for project P1", ajs != null); assertTrue("Should be no struc changes as its a full build: " + ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs .getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild() == 0); alter("P1", "inc4"); build("P1"); checkWasntFullBuild(); ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(new File(getFile("P1", "bin"))); assertTrue("There should be state for project P1", ajs != null); checkWasntFullBuild(); assertTrue("Shouldn't be any structural changes but there were " + ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild() == 0); } /** * The C.java file modified in this test has an inner class - this means the inner class has a this$0 field and <init>(C) ctor * to watch out for when checking for structural changes * */ public void testStateManagement3() { File binDirForInterproject1 = new File(getFile("interprojectdeps1", "bin")); initialiseProject("interprojectdeps1"); build("interprojectdeps1"); AjState ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(binDirForInterproject1); assertTrue("There should be state for project P1", ajs != null); assertTrue("Should be no struc changes as its a full build: " + ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs .getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild() == 0); alter("interprojectdeps1", "inc1"); build("interprojectdeps1"); checkWasntFullBuild(); ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(new File(getFile("interprojectdeps1", "bin")));
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
assertTrue("There should be state for project interprojectdeps1", ajs != null); checkWasntFullBuild(); assertTrue("Shouldn't be any structural changes but there were " + ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild() == 0); } /** * The C.java file modified in this test has an inner class - which has two ctors - this checks how they are mangled with an * instance of C. * */ public void testStateManagement4() { File binDirForInterproject2 = new File(getFile("interprojectdeps2", "bin")); initialiseProject("interprojectdeps2"); build("interprojectdeps2"); AjState ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(binDirForInterproject2); assertTrue("There should be state for project interprojectdeps2", ajs != null); assertTrue("Should be no struc changes as its a full build: " + ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs .getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild() == 0); alter("interprojectdeps2", "inc1"); build("interprojectdeps2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(new File(getFile("interprojectdeps2", "bin"))); assertTrue("There should be state for project interprojectdeps1", ajs != null); checkWasntFullBuild(); assertTrue("Shouldn't be any structural changes but there were " + ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild() == 0); } /** * The C.java file modified in this test has an inner class - it has two ctors but also a reference to C.this in it - which will * give rise to an accessor being created in C
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
* */ public void testStateManagement5() { File binDirForInterproject3 = new File(getFile("interprojectdeps3", "bin")); initialiseProject("interprojectdeps3"); build("interprojectdeps3"); AjState ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(binDirForInterproject3); assertTrue("There should be state for project interprojectdeps3", ajs != null); assertTrue("Should be no struc changes as its a full build: " + ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs .getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild() == 0); alter("interprojectdeps3", "inc1"); build("interprojectdeps3"); checkWasntFullBuild(); ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(new File(getFile("interprojectdeps3", "bin"))); assertTrue("There should be state for project interprojectdeps1", ajs != null); checkWasntFullBuild(); assertTrue("Shouldn't be any structural changes but there were " + ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild() == 0); } /** * Now the most complex test. Create a dependancy between two projects. Building one may affect whether the other does an * incremental or full build. The structural information recorded in the state object should be getting used to control whether * a full build is necessary... */ public void testBuildingDependantProjects() { initialiseProject("P1"); initialiseProject("P2"); configureNewProjectDependency("P2", "P1"); build("P1"); build("P2");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
alter("P1", "inc1"); build("P1"); build("P2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); alter("P1", "inc3"); build("P1"); build("P2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); alter("P1", "inc4"); build("P1"); build("P2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); } public void testPr85132() { initialiseProject("PR85132"); build("PR85132"); alter("PR85132", "inc1"); build("PR85132"); } public void testPr125405() { initialiseProject("PR125405"); build("PR125405"); checkCompileWeaveCount("PR125405", 1, 1); alter("PR125405", "inc1"); build("PR125405"); checkForError("PR125405", "only abstract aspects can have type parameters");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
alter("PR125405", "inc2"); build("PR125405"); checkCompileWeaveCount("PR125405", 1, 1); assertTrue("Should be no errors, but got " + getErrorMessages("PR125405"), getErrorMessages("PR125405").size() == 0); } public void testPr128618() { initialiseProject("PR128618_1"); initialiseProject("PR128618_2"); configureNewProjectDependency("PR128618_2", "PR128618_1"); assertTrue("there should be no warning messages before we start", getWarningMessages("PR128618_1").isEmpty()); assertTrue("there should be no warning messages before we start", getWarningMessages("PR128618_2").isEmpty()); build("PR128618_1"); build("PR128618_2"); List l = getWarningMessages("PR128618_2"); List warnings = getWarningMessages("PR128618_2"); assertTrue("Should be one warning, but there are #" + warnings.size(), warnings.size() == 1); IMessage msg = (getWarningMessages("PR128618_2").get(0)); assertEquals("warning should be against the FFDC.aj resource", "FFDC.aj", msg.getSourceLocation().getSourceFile().getName()); alter("PR128618_2", "inc1"); build("PR128618_2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); IMessage msg2 = (getWarningMessages("PR128618_2").get(0)); assertEquals("warning should be against the FFDC.aj resource", "FFDC.aj", msg2.getSourceLocation().getSourceFile() .getName()); assertFalse("a new warning message should have been generated", msg.equals(msg2)); } public void testPr92837() { initialiseProject("PR92837"); build("PR92837");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
alter("PR92837", "inc1"); build("PR92837"); } public void testPr117209() { try { initialiseProject("pr117209"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("pr117209", "-proceedOnError");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
build("pr117209"); checkCompileWeaveCount("pr117209", 6, 5); } finally { } } public void testPr114875() { if (System.getProperty("os.name", "").toLowerCase().equals("linux")) { return; } initialiseProject("pr114875"); build("pr114875"); alter("pr114875", "inc1"); build("pr114875"); checkWasFullBuild(); alter("pr114875", "inc2"); build("pr114875"); checkWasFullBuild(); } public void testPr117882() { initialiseProject("PR117882"); build("PR117882"); checkWasFullBuild(); alter("PR117882", "inc1"); build("PR117882");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
checkWasntFullBuild(); } public void testPr117882_2() { initialiseProject("PR117882_2"); build("PR117882_2"); checkWasFullBuild(); alter("PR117882_2", "inc1"); build("PR117882_2"); checkWasFullBuild(); } public void testPr115251() { initialiseProject("PR115251"); build("PR115251"); checkWasFullBuild(); alter("PR115251", "inc1"); build("PR115251"); checkWasFullBuild(); } public void testPr220255_InfiniteBuildHasMember() {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
initialiseProject("pr220255"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("pr220255", "-XhasMember"); build("pr220255"); checkWasFullBuild(); alter("pr220255", "inc1"); build("pr220255"); checkWasntFullBuild(); } public void testPr157054() { initialiseProject("PR157054"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("PR157054", "-showWeaveInfo"); configureShowWeaveInfoMessages("PR157054", true); build("PR157054"); checkWasFullBuild(); List weaveMessages = getWeavingMessages("PR157054"); assertTrue("Should be two weaving messages but there are " + weaveMessages.size(), weaveMessages.size() == 2); alter("PR157054", "inc1"); build("PR157054"); weaveMessages = getWeavingMessages("PR157054"); assertTrue("Should be three weaving messages but there are " + weaveMessages.size(), weaveMessages.size() == 3); checkWasntFullBuild(); fullBuild("PR157054"); weaveMessages = getWeavingMessages("PR157054"); assertTrue("Should be three weaving messages but there are " + weaveMessages.size(), weaveMessages.size() == 3); } /** * Checks we aren't leaking mungers across compiles (accumulating multiple instances of the same one that all do the same * thing). On the first compile the munger is added late on - so at the time we set the count it is still zero. On the * subsequent compiles we know about this extra one. */
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
public void testPr141956_IncrementallyCompilingAtAj() { initialiseProject("PR141956"); build("PR141956"); assertTrue("Should be zero but reports " + EclipseFactory.debug_mungerCount, EclipseFactory.debug_mungerCount == 0); alter("PR141956", "inc1"); build("PR141956"); assertTrue("Should be two but reports " + EclipseFactory.debug_mungerCount, EclipseFactory.debug_mungerCount == 2); alter("PR141956", "inc1"); build("PR141956"); assertTrue("Should be two but reports " + EclipseFactory.debug_mungerCount, EclipseFactory.debug_mungerCount == 2); alter("PR141956", "inc1"); build("PR141956"); assertTrue("Should be two but reports " + EclipseFactory.debug_mungerCount, EclipseFactory.debug_mungerCount == 2); alter("PR141956", "inc1"); build("PR141956"); assertTrue("Should be two but reports " + EclipseFactory.debug_mungerCount, EclipseFactory.debug_mungerCount == 2); } public void testPr121384() {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
initialiseProject("pr121384"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("pr121384", "-showWeaveInfo"); build("pr121384"); checkWasFullBuild(); alter("pr121384", "inc1"); build("pr121384"); checkWasntFullBuild(); } /* * public void testPr111779() { super.VERBOSE=true; initialiseProject("PR111779"); build("PR111779"); alter("PR111779","inc1"); * build("PR111779"); } */ public void testPr93310_1() { initialiseProject("PR93310_1"); build("PR93310_1"); checkWasFullBuild(); String fileC2 = getWorkingDir().getAbsolutePath() + File.separatorChar + "PR93310_1" + File.separatorChar + "src" + File.separatorChar + "pack" + File.separatorChar + "C2.java"; (new File(fileC2)).delete(); alter("PR93310_1", "inc1"); build("PR93310_1"); checkWasFullBuild(); int l = AjdeInteractionTestbed.MyStateListener.detectedDeletions.size(); assertTrue("Expected one deleted file to be noticed, but detected: " + l, l == 1); String name = (String) AjdeInteractionTestbed.MyStateListener.detectedDeletions.get(0); assertTrue("Should end with C2.java but is " + name, name.endsWith("C2.java")); } public void testPr93310_2() { initialiseProject("PR93310_2"); build("PR93310_2");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
checkWasFullBuild(); String fileC2 = getWorkingDir().getAbsolutePath() + File.separatorChar + "PR93310_2" + File.separatorChar + "src" + File.separatorChar + "pack" + File.separatorChar + "C2.java"; (new File(fileC2)).delete(); alter("PR93310_2", "inc1"); build("PR93310_2"); checkWasFullBuild(); int l = AjdeInteractionTestbed.MyStateListener.detectedDeletions.size(); assertTrue("Expected one deleted file to be noticed, but detected: " + l, l == 1); String name = (String) AjdeInteractionTestbed.MyStateListener.detectedDeletions.get(0); assertTrue("Should end with C2.java but is " + name, name.endsWith("C2.java")); } public void testPr113531() { initialiseProject("PR113531"); build("PR113531"); assertTrue("build should have compiled ok", getErrorMessages("PR113531").isEmpty()); alter("PR113531", "inc1"); build("PR113531"); assertEquals("error message should be 'foo cannot be resolved' ", "foo cannot be resolved", (getErrorMessages("PR113531") .get(0)).getMessage()); alter("PR113531", "inc2"); build("PR113531"); assertTrue("There should be no exceptions handled:\n" + getCompilerErrorMessages("PR113531"), getCompilerErrorMessages( "PR113531").isEmpty()); assertEquals("error message should be 'foo cannot be resolved' ", "foo cannot be resolved", (getErrorMessages("PR113531") .get(0)).getMessage());
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
} public void testPr119882() { initialiseProject("PR119882"); build("PR119882"); assertTrue("build should have compiled ok", getErrorMessages("PR119882").isEmpty()); alter("PR119882", "inc1"); build("PR119882"); List errors = getErrorMessages("PR119882"); assertTrue("Should be at least one error, but got none", errors.size() == 1); assertEquals("error message should be 'i cannot be resolved' ", "i cannot be resolved", ((IMessage) errors.get(0)) .getMessage()); alter("PR119882", "inc2"); build("PR119882"); assertTrue("There should be no exceptions handled:\n" + getCompilerErrorMessages("PR119882"), getCompilerErrorMessages( "PR119882").isEmpty()); assertEquals("error message should be 'i cannot be resolved' ", "i cannot be resolved", ((IMessage) errors.get(0)) .getMessage()); } public void testPr112736() { initialiseProject("PR112736"); build("PR112736"); checkWasFullBuild();
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
String fileC2 = getWorkingDir().getAbsolutePath() + File.separatorChar + "PR112736" + File.separatorChar + "src" + File.separatorChar + "pack" + File.separatorChar + "A.java"; (new File(fileC2)).delete(); alter("PR112736", "inc1"); build("PR112736"); checkWasFullBuild(); } /** * We have problems with multiple rewrites of a pointcut across incremental builds. */ public void testPr113257() { initialiseProject("PR113257"); build("PR113257"); alter("PR113257", "inc1"); build("PR113257"); checkWasFullBuild(); alter("PR113257", "inc1"); build("PR113257"); } public void testPr123612() { initialiseProject("PR123612"); build("PR123612"); alter("PR123612", "inc1"); build("PR123612"); checkWasFullBuild(); } public void testPr152257() { initialiseProject("PR152257");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
configureNonStandardCompileOptions("PR152257", "-XnoInline"); build("PR152257"); List errors = getErrorMessages("PR152257"); assertTrue("Should be no warnings, but there are #" + errors.size(), errors.size() == 0); checkWasFullBuild(); alter("PR152257", "inc1"); build("PR152257"); errors = getErrorMessages("PR152257"); assertTrue("Should be no warnings, but there are #" + errors.size(), errors.size() == 0); checkWasntFullBuild(); } public void testPr128655() { initialiseProject("pr128655"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("pr128655", "-showWeaveInfo"); configureShowWeaveInfoMessages("pr128655", true); build("pr128655"); List firstBuildMessages = getWeavingMessages("pr128655"); assertTrue("Should be at least one message about the dec @type, but there were none", firstBuildMessages.size() > 0); alter("pr128655", "inc1"); build("pr128655"); checkWasntFullBuild(); List secondBuildMessages = getWeavingMessages("pr128655"); for (int i = 0; i < firstBuildMessages.size(); i++) { IMessage m1 = (IMessage) firstBuildMessages.get(i); IMessage m2 = (IMessage) secondBuildMessages.get(i); if (!m1.toString().equals(m2.toString())) { System.err.println("Message during first build was: " + m1); System.err.println("Message during second build was: " + m1); fail("The two messages should be the same, but are not: \n" + m1 + "!=" + m2);
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
} } } public void testPr128655_2() { initialiseProject("pr128655_2"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("pr128655_2", "-showWeaveInfo"); configureShowWeaveInfoMessages("pr128655_2", true); build("pr128655_2"); List firstBuildMessages = getWeavingMessages("pr128655_2"); assertTrue("Should be at least one message about the dec @type, but there were none", firstBuildMessages.size() > 0); alter("pr128655_2", "inc1"); build("pr128655_2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); List secondBuildMessages = getWeavingMessages("pr128655_2"); for (int i = 0; i < firstBuildMessages.size(); i++) { IMessage m1 = (IMessage) firstBuildMessages.get(i); IMessage m2 = (IMessage) secondBuildMessages.get(i); if (!m1.toString().equals(m2.toString())) { System.err.println("Message during first build was: " + m1); System.err.println("Message during second build was: " + m1); fail("The two messages should be the same, but are not: \n" + m1 + "!=" + m2); } } } public void testPr129163() { initialiseProject("PR129613"); build("PR129613");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
alter("PR129613", "inc1"); build("PR129613"); assertTrue("There should be no exceptions handled:\n" + getCompilerErrorMessages("PR129613"), getCompilerErrorMessages( "PR129613").isEmpty()); assertEquals("warning message should be 'no match for this type name: File [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]' ", "no match for this type name: File [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]", (getWarningMessages("PR129613").get(0)) .getMessage()); } public void testPr129163_2() { initialiseProject("pr129163_2"); build("pr129163_2"); checkWasFullBuild(); alter("pr129163_2", "inc1"); build("pr129163_2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); } public void testIncrementalIntelligence_Scenario01() { AjdeInteractionTestbed.VERBOSE = true; initialiseProject("Project1"); initialiseProject("Project2");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
configureNewProjectDependency("Project2", "Project1"); build("Project1"); build("Project2"); alter("Project1", "inc1"); build("Project1"); build("Project2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); alter("Project1", "inc2"); build("Project1"); build("Project2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); alter("Project1", "inc3"); build("Project1"); setNextChangeResponse("Project2", ICompilerConfiguration.EVERYTHING); build("Project2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); checkCompileWeaveCount("Project2", 1, 1); checkCompiled("Project2", "ClassAExtender"); alter("Project2", "inc1"); build("Project1"); build("Project2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); alter("Project1", "inc4"); build("Project1"); setNextChangeResponse("Project2", ICompilerConfiguration.EVERYTHING);
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
build("Project2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); checkCompileWeaveCount("Project2", 2, 2); checkCompiled("Project2", "ClassAExtenderExtender"); } private void checkCompiled(String projectName, String typeNameSubstring) { List files = getCompiledFiles(projectName); boolean found = false; for (Iterator iterator = files.iterator(); iterator.hasNext();) { String object = (String) iterator.next(); if (object.indexOf(typeNameSubstring) != -1) { found = true; } } assertTrue("Did not find '" + typeNameSubstring + "' in list of compiled files", found); } /* * public void testPrReducingDependentBuilds_001_221427() { AjdeInteractionTestbed.VERBOSE=true; * IncrementalStateManager.debugIncrementalStates=true; initialiseProject("P221427_1"); initialiseProject("P221427_2"); * configureNewProjectDependency("P221427_2","P221427_1"); * * build("P221427_1"); build("P221427_2"); alter("P221427_1","inc1"); rename private class in super project * MyStateListener.reset(); build("P221427_1"); build("P221427_2"); * * AjState ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(new File(getFile("P221427_1","bin"))); * assertTrue("There should be state for project P221427_1",ajs!=null); * System.out.println(MyStateListener.getInstance().getDecisions()); checkWasntFullBuild();
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
* assertTrue("Should be one structural change but there were "+ ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), * ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild()==1); * * } * * Case002: changing a class to final that is extended in a dependent project public void * testPrReducingDependentBuilds_002_221427() { AjdeInteractionTestbed.VERBOSE=true; * IncrementalStateManager.debugIncrementalStates=true; initialiseProject("P221427_3"); initialiseProject("P221427_4"); * configureNewProjectDependency("P221427_4","P221427_3"); * * build("P221427_3"); build("P221427_4"); build OK, type in super project is non-final alter("P221427_3","inc1"); change * class declaration in super-project to final MyStateListener.reset(); build("P221427_3"); build("P221427_4"); build FAIL, * type in super project is now final * * AjState ajs = IncrementalStateManager.findStateManagingOutputLocation(new File(getFile("P221427_3","bin"))); * assertTrue("There should be state for project P221427_3",ajs!=null); * System.out.println(MyStateListener.getInstance().getDecisions()); * * List errors = getErrorMessages("P221427_4"); if (errors.size()!=1) { if (errors.size()==0) * fail("Expected error about not being able to extend final class"); for (Iterator iterator = errors.iterator(); * iterator.hasNext();) { Object object = (Object) iterator.next(); System.out.println(object); } * fail("Expected 1 error but got "+errors.size()); } assertTrue("Shouldn't be one structural change but there were "+ * ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild(), ajs.getNumberOfStructuralChangesSinceLastFullBuild()==1); * * } */
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
public void testPr129163_3() { initialiseProject("PR129163_4"); build("PR129163_4"); checkWasFullBuild(); initialiseProject("PR129163_3"); configureNewProjectDependency("PR129163_3", "PR129163_4"); build("PR129163_3"); checkWasFullBuild(); alter("PR129163_4", "inc1"); build("PR129163_4"); checkWasntFullBuild(); alter("PR129163_3", "inc1"); build("PR129163_3"); checkWasntFullBuild(); } public void testPr133117() {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
initialiseProject("PR133117"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("PR133117", "-Xlint:warning"); build("PR133117"); assertTrue("There should only be one xlint warning message reported:\n" + getWarningMessages("PR133117"), getWarningMessages("PR133117").size() == 1); alter("PR133117", "inc1"); build("PR133117"); List warnings = getWarningMessages("PR133117"); List noGuardWarnings = new ArrayList(); for (Iterator iter = warnings.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) { IMessage element = (IMessage) iter.next(); if (element.getMessage().indexOf("Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp") != -1) { noGuardWarnings.add(element); } } assertTrue("There should only be two Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp warning message reported:\n" + noGuardWarnings, noGuardWarnings.size() == 2); } public void testPr131505() { initialiseProject("PR131505"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("PR131505", "-outxml"); build("PR131505"); checkWasFullBuild(); String outputDir = getWorkingDir().getAbsolutePath() + File.separatorChar + "PR131505" + File.separatorChar + "bin"; checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "", 0, outputDir); alter("PR131505", "inc1");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
build("PR131505"); checkWasFullBuild(); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "", 1, outputDir); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "A", 1, outputDir); alter("PR131505", "inc2"); build("PR131505"); checkWasntFullBuild(); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "", 1, outputDir); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "A", 1, outputDir); alter("PR131505", "inc3"); build("PR131505"); checkWasFullBuild(); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "", 2, outputDir); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "A1", 1, outputDir); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "A", 1, outputDir); File a1 = new File(getWorkingDir().getAbsolutePath() + File.separatorChar + "PR131505" + File.separatorChar + "A1.aj"); a1.delete(); build("PR131505"); checkWasFullBuild(); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "", 1, outputDir); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "A1", 0, outputDir); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "A", 1, outputDir);
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
alter("PR131505", "inc4"); build("PR131505"); checkWasFullBuild(); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "", 2, outputDir); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "A", 1, outputDir); checkXMLAspectCount("PR131505", "pkg.A", 1, outputDir); } public void testPr136585() { initialiseProject("PR136585"); build("PR136585"); alter("PR136585", "inc1"); build("PR136585"); assertTrue("There should be no errors reported:\n" + getErrorMessages("PR136585"), getErrorMessages("PR136585").isEmpty()); } public void testPr133532() { initialiseProject("PR133532"); build("PR133532"); alter("PR133532", "inc1"); build("PR133532"); alter("PR133532", "inc2"); build("PR133532"); assertTrue("There should be no errors reported:\n" + getErrorMessages("PR133532"), getErrorMessages("PR133532").isEmpty()); } public void testPr133532_2() { initialiseProject("pr133532_2"); build("pr133532_2"); alter("pr133532_2", "inc2"); build("pr133532_2"); assertTrue("There should be no errors reported:\n" + getErrorMessages("pr133532_2"), getErrorMessages("pr133532_2") .isEmpty());
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
String decisions = AjdeInteractionTestbed.MyStateListener.getDecisions(); String expect = "Need to recompile 'A.aj'"; assertTrue("Couldn't find build decision: '" + expect + "' in the list of decisions made:\n" + decisions, decisions .indexOf(expect) != -1); } public void testPr133532_3() { initialiseProject("PR133532_3"); build("PR133532_3"); alter("PR133532_3", "inc1"); build("PR133532_3"); assertTrue("There should be no errors reported:\n" + getErrorMessages("PR133532_3"), getErrorMessages("PR133532_3") .isEmpty()); } public void testPr134541() { initialiseProject("PR134541"); build("PR134541"); assertEquals("[Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch] should be associated with line 5", 5, (getWarningMessages("PR134541").get(0)) .getSourceLocation().getLine()); alter("PR134541", "inc1"); build("PR134541"); checkWasntFullBuild(); assertEquals("[Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch] should now be associated with line 7", 7, (getWarningMessages("PR134541").get(0)) .getSourceLocation().getLine()); } public void testJDTLikeHandleProviderWithLstFile_pr141730() {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
initialiseProject("JDTLikeHandleProvider"); build("JDTLikeHandleProvider"); IHierarchy top = getModelFor("JDTLikeHandleProvider").getHierarchy(); IProgramElement pe = top.findElementForType("pkg", "A"); String expectedHandle = "=JDTLikeHandleProvider<pkg*A.aj'A"; assertEquals("expected handle to be " + expectedHandle + ", but found " + pe.getHandleIdentifier(), expectedHandle, pe .getHandleIdentifier()); } public void testMovingAdviceDoesntChangeHandles_pr141730() { initialiseProject("JDTLikeHandleProvider"); build("JDTLikeHandleProvider"); checkWasFullBuild(); IHierarchy top = getModelFor("JDTLikeHandleProvider").getHierarchy(); IProgramElement pe = top.findElementForLabel(top.getRoot(), IProgramElement.Kind.ADVICE, "before(): <anonymous pointcut>");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
alter("JDTLikeHandleProvider", "inc1"); build("JDTLikeHandleProvider"); checkWasntFullBuild(); IHierarchy top2 = getModelFor("JDTLikeHandleProvider").getHierarchy(); IProgramElement pe2 = top .findElementForLabel(top2.getRoot(), IProgramElement.Kind.ADVICE, "before(): <anonymous pointcut>"); assertEquals("expected advice to be on line " + pe.getSourceLocation().getLine() + 1 + " but was on " + pe2.getSourceLocation().getLine(), pe.getSourceLocation().getLine() + 1, pe2.getSourceLocation().getLine()); assertEquals("expected advice to have handle " + pe.getHandleIdentifier() + " but found handle " + pe2.getHandleIdentifier(), pe.getHandleIdentifier(), pe2.getHandleIdentifier()); } public void testSwappingAdviceAndHandles_pr141730() { initialiseProject("JDTLikeHandleProvider"); build("JDTLikeHandleProvider"); IHierarchy top = getModelFor("JDTLikeHandleProvider").getHierarchy(); IProgramElement call = top.findElementForLabel(top.getRoot(), IProgramElement.Kind.ADVICE, "after(): callPCD.."); IProgramElement exec = top.findElementForLabel(top.getRoot(), IProgramElement.Kind.ADVICE, "after(): execPCD.."); alter("JDTLikeHandleProvider", "inc2");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
build("JDTLikeHandleProvider"); checkWasFullBuild(); IHierarchy top2 = getModelFor("JDTLikeHandleProvider").getHierarchy(); IProgramElement newCall = top2.findElementForLabel(top2.getRoot(), IProgramElement.Kind.ADVICE, "after(): callPCD.."); IProgramElement newExec = top2.findElementForLabel(top2.getRoot(), IProgramElement.Kind.ADVICE, "after(): execPCD.."); assertEquals("after swapping places, expected 'after(): callPCD..' " + "to be on line " + newExec.getSourceLocation().getLine() + " but was on line " + call.getSourceLocation().getLine(), newExec .getSourceLocation().getLine(), call.getSourceLocation().getLine()); assertEquals("after swapping places, expected 'after(): callPCD..' " + "to have handle " + exec.getHandleIdentifier() + " (because was full build) but had " + newCall.getHandleIdentifier(), exec.getHandleIdentifier(), newCall .getHandleIdentifier()); } public void testInitializerCountForJDTLikeHandleProvider_pr141730() { initialiseProject("JDTLikeHandleProvider"); build("JDTLikeHandleProvider"); String expected = "=JDTLikeHandleProvider<pkg*A.aj[C|1"; IHierarchy top = getModelFor("JDTLikeHandleProvider").getHierarchy(); IProgramElement init = top.findElementForLabel(top.getRoot(), IProgramElement.Kind.INITIALIZER, "..."); assertEquals("expected initializers handle to be " + expected + "," + " but found " + init.getHandleIdentifier(true), expected, init.getHandleIdentifier(true)); alter("JDTLikeHandleProvider", "inc2"); build("JDTLikeHandleProvider");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
checkWasFullBuild(); IHierarchy top2 = getModelFor("JDTLikeHandleProvider").getHierarchy(); IProgramElement init2 = top2.findElementForLabel(top2.getRoot(), IProgramElement.Kind.INITIALIZER, "..."); assertEquals( "expected initializers handle to still be " + expected + "," + " but found " + init2.getHandleIdentifier(true), expected, init2.getHandleIdentifier(true)); } public void testPr134471_IncrementalCompilationAndModelUpdates() { try { initialiseProject("PR134471"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("PR134471", "-showWeaveInfo -emacssym"); configureShowWeaveInfoMessages("PR134471", true); build("PR134471"); AsmManager model = getModelFor("PR134471"); IProgramElement nodeForTypeA = checkForNode(model, "pkg", "A", true); IProgramElement nodeForAdvice = findAdvice(nodeForTypeA); List relatedElements = getRelatedElements(model, nodeForAdvice, 1); IProgramElement programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true))); int line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("advice should be at line 7 - but is at line " + line, line == 7);
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
alter("PR134471", "inc1"); build("PR134471"); model = getModelFor("PR134471"); nodeForTypeA = checkForNode(model, "pkg", "A", true); nodeForAdvice = findAdvice(nodeForTypeA); relatedElements = getRelatedElements(model, nodeForAdvice, 1); programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true))); line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("advice should be at line 7 - but is at line " + line, line == 7); } finally { } } public void testPr134471_MovingAdvice() { initialiseProject("PR134471_2"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("PR134471_2", "-showWeaveInfo -emacssym"); configureShowWeaveInfoMessages("PR134471_2", true); build("PR134471_2"); AsmManager model = getModelFor("PR134471_2"); IProgramElement programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true))); int line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine();
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
assertTrue("advice should be at line 7 - but is at line " + line, line == 7); alter("PR134471_2", "inc1"); build("PR134471_2"); model = getModelFor("PR134471_2"); checkWasntFullBuild(); programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true))); line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("advice should be at line 11 - but is at line " + line, line == 11); } public void testAddingAndRemovingDecwWithStructureModel() { initialiseProject("P3"); build("P3"); alter("P3", "inc1"); build("P3"); assertTrue("There should be no exceptions handled:\n" + getCompilerErrorMessages("P3"), getCompilerErrorMessages("P3") .isEmpty()); alter("P3", "inc2"); build("P3"); assertTrue("There should be no exceptions handled:\n" + getCompilerErrorMessages("P3"), getCompilerErrorMessages("P3") .isEmpty()); }
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
public void testPr134471_IncrementallyRecompilingTheAffectedClass() { try { initialiseProject("PR134471"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("PR134471", "-showWeaveInfo -emacssym"); configureShowWeaveInfoMessages("PR134471", true); build("PR134471"); AsmManager model = getModelFor("PR134471"); IProgramElement programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true))); int line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("advice should be at line 7 - but is at line " + line, line == 7); alter("PR134471", "inc1"); build("PR134471"); model = getModelFor("PR134471"); IProgramElement nodeForTypeA = checkForNode(model, "pkg", "A", true); IProgramElement nodeForAdvice = findAdvice(nodeForTypeA); List relatedElements = getRelatedElements(model, nodeForAdvice, 1); alter("PR134471", "inc2"); build("PR134471"); checkWasntFullBuild(); model = getModelFor("PR134471"); programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true))); line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine();
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
assertTrue("advice should be at line 7 - but is at line " + line, line == 7); } finally { } } public void testPr134471_IncrementallyRecompilingAspectContainingDeclare() { initialiseProject("PR134471_3"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("PR134471_3", "-showWeaveInfo -emacssym"); configureShowWeaveInfoMessages("PR134471_3", true); build("PR134471_3"); checkWasFullBuild(); AsmManager model = getModelFor("PR134471_3"); IProgramElement programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true), 7)); int line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("declare warning should be at line 10 - but is at line " + line, line == 10); programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true), 6)); line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("advice should be at line 7 - but is at line " + line, line == 7); alter("PR134471_3", "inc1"); build("PR134471_3"); model = getModelFor("PR134471_3"); checkWasntFullBuild();
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true), 7)); line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("declare warning should be at line 12 - but is at line " + line, line == 12); alter("PR134471_3", "inc2"); build("PR134471_3"); checkWasntFullBuild(); model = getModelFor("PR134471_3"); programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true), 7)); line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("declare warning should be at line 12 - but is at line " + line, line == 12); } public void testPr134471_IncrementallyRecompilingTheClassAffectedByDeclare() { initialiseProject("PR134471_3"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("PR134471_3", "-showWeaveInfo -emacssym"); configureShowWeaveInfoMessages("PR134471_3", true); build("PR134471_3"); checkWasFullBuild(); AsmManager model = getModelFor("PR134471_3"); IProgramElement programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true), 7)); int line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine();
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
assertTrue("declare warning should be at line 10 - but is at line " + line, line == 10); programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true), 6)); line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("advice should be at line 7 - but is at line " + line, line == 7); alter("PR134471_3", "inc1"); build("PR134471_3"); model = getModelFor("PR134471_3"); checkWasntFullBuild(); programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true), 7)); line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("declare warning should be at line 12 - but is at line " + line, line == 12); alter("PR134471_3", "inc2"); build("PR134471_3"); checkWasntFullBuild(); model = getModelFor("PR134471_3"); programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true), 7)); line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("declare warning should be at line 12 - but is at line " + line, line == 12);
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
alter("PR134471_3", "inc3"); build("PR134471_3"); checkWasntFullBuild(); programElement = getFirstRelatedElement(model, findCode(checkForNode(model, "pkg", "C", true), 7)); line = programElement.getSourceLocation().getLine(); assertTrue("declare warning should be at line 12 - but is at line " + line, line == 12); } public void testDontLoseXlintWarnings_pr141556() { initialiseProject("PR141556"); configureNonStandardCompileOptions("PR141556", "-Xlint:warning"); build("PR141556"); checkWasFullBuild(); String warningMessage = "can not build thisJoinPoint " + "lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard " + "[Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"; assertEquals("warning message should be '" + warningMessage + "'", warningMessage, (getWarningMessages("PR141556").get(0)) .getMessage()); alter("PR141556", "inc1"); alter("PR141556", "inc2"); build("PR141556"); checkWasntFullBuild(); assertTrue("there should still be a warning message ", !getWarningMessages("PR141556").isEmpty()); assertEquals("warning message should be '" + warningMessage + "'", warningMessage, (getWarningMessages("PR141556").get(0)) .getMessage()); } public void testAdviceDidNotMatch_pr152589() {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
initialiseProject("PR152589"); build("PR152589"); List warnings = getWarningMessages("PR152589"); assertTrue("There should be no warnings:\n" + warnings, warnings.isEmpty()); alter("PR152589", "inc1"); build("PR152589"); checkWasntFullBuild(); warnings = getWarningMessages("PR152589"); assertTrue("There should be no warnings after adding a whitespace:\n" + warnings, warnings.isEmpty()); } public void testNoFullBuildOnChangeInSysOutInAdviceBody_pr154054() { initialiseProject("PR154054"); build("PR154054"); alter("PR154054", "inc1"); build("PR154054"); checkWasntFullBuild(); } public void testShouldFullBuildOnExceptionChange_pr154054() { initialiseProject("PR154054_2"); build("PR154054_2"); alter("PR154054_2", "inc1"); build("PR154054_2"); checkWasFullBuild(); } public void testPR158573() {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
initialiseProject("PR158573"); build("PR158573"); List warnings = getWarningMessages("PR158573"); assertTrue("There should be no warnings:\n" + warnings, warnings.isEmpty()); alter("PR158573", "inc1"); build("PR158573"); checkWasntFullBuild(); warnings = getWarningMessages("PR158573"); assertTrue("There should be no warnings after changing the value of a " + "variable:\n" + warnings, warnings.isEmpty()); } /** * If the user has specified that they want Java 6 compliance and kept the default classfile and source file level settings * (also 6.0) then expect an error saying that we don't support java 6. */ public void testPR164384_1() { initialiseProject("PR164384"); Hashtable<String,String> javaOptions = new Hashtable<String,String>(); javaOptions.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.compliance", "1.6"); javaOptions.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.codegen.targetPlatform", "1.6"); javaOptions.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source", "1.6"); configureJavaOptionsMap("PR164384", javaOptions); build("PR164384"); List<IMessage> errors = getErrorMessages("PR164384"); if (getCompilerForProjectWithName("PR164384").isJava6Compatible()) { assertTrue("There should be no errors:\n" + errors, errors.isEmpty()); } else {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
String expectedError = "Java 6.0 compliance level is unsupported"; String found = ((IMessage) errors.get(0)).getMessage(); assertEquals("Expected 'Java 6.0 compliance level is unsupported'" + " error message but found " + found, expectedError, found); assertTrue("expected there to be more than the one compliance level" + " error but only found that one", errors.size() > 1); } } /** * If the user has specified that they want Java 6 compliance and selected classfile and source file level settings to be 5.0 * then expect an error saying that we don't support java 6. */ public void testPR164384_2() { initialiseProject("PR164384"); Hashtable<String,String> javaOptions = new Hashtable<String,String>(); javaOptions.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.compliance", "1.6"); javaOptions.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.codegen.targetPlatform", "1.5"); javaOptions.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source", "1.5"); configureJavaOptionsMap("PR164384", javaOptions); build("PR164384"); List errors = getErrorMessages("PR164384"); if (getCompilerForProjectWithName("PR164384").isJava6Compatible()) { assertTrue("There should be no errors:\n" + errors, errors.isEmpty()); } else { String expectedError = "Java 6.0 compliance level is unsupported"; String found = ((IMessage) errors.get(0)).getMessage(); assertEquals("Expected 'Java 6.0 compliance level is unsupported'" + " error message but found " + found,
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
expectedError, found); assertTrue("expected there to be more than the one compliance level" + " error but only found that one", errors.size() > 1); } } /** * If the user has specified that they want Java 6 compliance and set the classfile level to be 6.0 and source file level to be * 5.0 then expect an error saying that we don't support java 6. */ public void testPR164384_3() { initialiseProject("PR164384"); Hashtable<String,String> javaOptions = new Hashtable<String,String>(); javaOptions.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.compliance", "1.6"); javaOptions.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.codegen.targetPlatform", "1.6"); javaOptions.put("org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source", "1.5"); configureJavaOptionsMap("PR164384", javaOptions); build("PR164384"); List errors = getErrorMessages("PR164384"); if (getCompilerForProjectWithName("PR164384").isJava6Compatible()) { assertTrue("There should be no errros:\n" + errors, errors.isEmpty()); } else { String expectedError = "Java 6.0 compliance level is unsupported"; String found = ((IMessage) errors.get(0)).getMessage(); assertEquals("Expected 'Java 6.0 compliance level is unsupported'" + " error message but found " + found, expectedError, found);
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
assertTrue("expected there to be more than the one compliance level" + " error but only found that one", errors.size() > 1); } } public void testPr168840() throws Exception { initialiseProject("inpathTesting"); String inpathTestingDir = getWorkingDir() + File.separator + "inpathTesting"; String inpathDir = inpathTestingDir + File.separator + "injarBin" + File.separator + "pkg"; String expectedOutputDir = inpathTestingDir + File.separator + "bin"; File f = new File(inpathDir); Set<File> s = new HashSet<File>(); s.add(f); configureInPath("inpathTesting", s); build("inpathTesting"); List<IMessage> warnings = getWarningMessages("inpathTesting"); assertTrue("Expected there to be one warning message but found " + warnings.size() + ": " + warnings, warnings.size() == 1); File from = new File(testdataSrcDir + File.separatorChar + "inpathTesting" + File.separatorChar + "newInpathClass" + File.separatorChar + "InpathClass.class"); File destination = new File(inpathDir + File.separatorChar + "InpathClass.class"); FileUtil.copyFile(from, destination); build("inpathTesting"); checkWasntFullBuild(); warnings = getWarningMessages("inpathTesting");
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
assertTrue("Expected there to be two warning message but found " + warnings.size() + ": " + warnings, warnings.size() == 2); } public void testInpathHandles_271201() throws Exception { AjdeInteractionTestbed.VERBOSE = true; String p = "inpathHandles"; initialiseProject(p); String inpathTestingDir = getWorkingDir() + File.separator + "inpathHandles"; String inpathDir = inpathTestingDir + File.separator + "binpath"; System.out.println(inpathDir); File f = new File(inpathDir); Set s = new HashSet(); s.add(f); configureInPath(p, s); build(p); IProgramElement root = getModelFor(p).getHierarchy().getRoot(); dumptree(root, 0); PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter(System.out); try { getModelFor(p).dumprels(pw); pw.flush(); } catch (Exception e) { } List l = getModelFor(p).getRelationshipMap().get("=inpathHandles/,<codep(Code.class[Code"); assertNotNull(l); }
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
public void testInpathHandles_IncrementalCompilation_271201() throws Exception { AjdeInteractionTestbed.VERBOSE = true; String p = "inpathHandles"; initialiseProject(p); String inpathTestingDir = getWorkingDir() + File.separator + "inpathHandles"; String inpathDir = inpathTestingDir + File.separator + "binpath"; File f = new File(inpathDir); Set<File> s = new HashSet<File>(); s.add(f); configureInPath(p, s); build(p); assertNotNull(getModelFor(p).getRelationshipMap().get("=inpathHandles/,<codep(Code.class[Code")); IProgramElement root = getModelFor(p).getHierarchy().getRoot(); alter(p, "inc1"); build(p); assertNotNull(getModelFor(p).getRelationshipMap().get("=inpathHandles/,<codep(Code.class[Code")); assertNotNull(getModelFor(p).getRelationshipMap().get("=inpathHandles<p{B.java[B")); String fileB = getWorkingDir().getAbsolutePath() + File.separatorChar + "inpathHandles" + File.separatorChar + "src" + File.separatorChar + "p" + File.separatorChar + "B.java"; (new File(fileB)).delete(); build(p); assertNotNull(getModelFor(p).getRelationshipMap().get("=inpathHandles/,<codep(Code.class[Code")); assertNull(getModelFor(p).getRelationshipMap().get("=inpathHandles<p{B.java[B")); } public void testInpathHandles_WithInpathMap_271201() throws Exception {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
AjdeInteractionTestbed.VERBOSE = true; String p = "inpathHandles"; initialiseProject(p); String inpathTestingDir = getWorkingDir() + File.separator + "inpathHandles"; String inpathDir = inpathTestingDir + File.separator + "binpath"; System.out.println(inpathDir); File f = new File(inpathDir); Set<File> s = new HashSet<File>(); s.add(f); Map<File,String> m = new HashMap<File,String>(); m.put(f, "wibble"); configureOutputLocationManager(p, new TestOutputLocationManager(getProjectRelativePath(p, ".").toString(), m)); configureInPath(p, s); build(p); IProgramElement root = getModelFor(p).getHierarchy().getRoot(); dumptree(root, 0); PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter(System.out); try { getModelFor(p).dumprels(pw); pw.flush(); } catch (Exception e) { } List<IRelationship> l = getModelFor(p).getRelationshipMap().get("=inpathHandles/,wibble<codep(Code.class[Code"); assertNotNull(l); } private void printModelAndRelationships(String p) {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
IProgramElement root = getModelFor(p).getHierarchy().getRoot(); dumptree(root, 0); PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter(System.out); try { getModelFor(p).dumprels(pw); pw.flush(); } catch (Exception e) { } } public void testInpathHandles_IncrementalCompilation_RemovingInpathEntries_271201() throws Exception { AjdeInteractionTestbed.VERBOSE = true; String p = "inpathHandles2"; initialiseProject(p); String inpathDir = getWorkingDir() + File.separator + "inpathHandles2" + File.separator + "binpath"; File f = new File(inpathDir); configureInPath(p, f); build(p); assertNotNull(getModelFor(p).getRelationshipMap().get("=inpathHandles2/,<codep(A.class[A")); assertTrue(new File(inpathDir, "codep" + File.separator + "A.class").delete()); setNextChangeResponse(p, ICompilerConfiguration.EVERYTHING); build(p); }
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
/** * Retrieve program elements related to this one regardless of the relationship. A JUnit assertion is made that the number that * the 'expected' number are found. * * @param programElement Program element whose related elements are to be found * @param expected the number of expected related elements */ private ListgetRelatedElements(AsmManager model, IProgramElement programElement, int expected) {
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
List relatedElements = getRelatedElements(model, programElement); StringBuffer debugString = new StringBuffer(); if (relatedElements != null) { for (Iterator iter = relatedElements.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) { String element = (String) iter.next(); debugString.append(model.getHierarchy().findElementForHandle(element).toLabelString()).append("\n"); } } assertTrue("Should be " + expected + " element" + (expected > 1 ? "s" : "") + " related to this one '" + programElement + "' but found :\n " + debugString, relatedElements != null && relatedElements.size() == 1); return relatedElements; } private IProgramElement getFirstRelatedElement(AsmManager model, IProgramElement programElement) { List rels = getRelatedElements(model, programElement, 1); return model.getHierarchy().findElementForHandle((String) rels.get(0)); } private List<String> getRelatedElements(AsmManager model, IProgramElement advice) { List<String> output = null; IRelationshipMap map = model.getRelationshipMap(); List<IRelationship> rels = map.get(advice); if (rels == null) { fail("Did not find any related elements!"); } for (Iterator<IRelationship> iter = rels.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) { IRelationship element = iter.next(); List<String> targets = element.getTargets(); if (output == null) { output = new ArrayList<String>(); } output.addAll(targets);
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
} return output; } private IProgramElement findAdvice(IProgramElement ipe) { return findAdvice(ipe, 1); } private IProgramElement findAdvice(IProgramElement ipe, int whichOne) { if (ipe.getKind() == IProgramElement.Kind.ADVICE) { whichOne = whichOne - 1; if (whichOne == 0) { return ipe; } } List kids = ipe.getChildren(); for (Iterator iter = kids.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) { IProgramElement kid = (IProgramElement) iter.next(); IProgramElement found = findAdvice(kid, whichOne); if (found != null) { return found; } } return null; } /** * Finds the first 'code' program element below the element supplied - will return null if there aren't any */ private IProgramElement findCode(IProgramElement ipe) { return findCode(ipe, -1); } /**
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
* Searches a hierarchy of program elements for a 'code' element at the specified line number, a line number of -1 means just * return the first one you find */ private IProgramElement findCode(IProgramElement ipe, int linenumber) { if (ipe.getKind() == IProgramElement.Kind.CODE) { if (linenumber == -1 || ipe.getSourceLocation().getLine() == linenumber) { return ipe; } } List<IProgramElement> kids = ipe.getChildren(); for (Iterator iter = kids.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) { IProgramElement kid = (IProgramElement) iter.next(); IProgramElement found = findCode(kid, linenumber); if (found != null) { return found; } } return null; } private IProgramElement checkForNode(AsmManager model, String packageName, String typeName, boolean shouldBeFound) { IProgramElement ipe = model.getHierarchy().findElementForType(packageName, typeName); if (shouldBeFound) { if (ipe == null) { printModel(model); }
322,039
Bug 322039 Fully qualified ITD has incorrect handle identifier
In the following aspect: public aspect Aspect { public void q2.ThisClass.something2() {} } In aspectJ, the ITD has the following handle identifier (notice that the ITD name is not fully qualified): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)ThisClass.something2 However, it should be (with fully qualified name): =AspectJ Project/src2<p*Aspect.aj'Aspect)q2.ThisClass.something2 This means that fully qualified ITDs cannot be navigated to or searched. I'm a little surprised that this doesn't work because I thought I had tests for it...
resolved fixed
6b35ea4
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-18T17:29:04Z
2010-08-07T00:13:20Z
tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/incremental/tools/MultiProjectIncrementalTests.java
assertTrue("Should have been able to find '" + packageName + "." + typeName + "' in the asm", ipe != null); } else { if (ipe != null) { printModel(model); } assertTrue("Should have NOT been able to find '" + packageName + "." + typeName + "' in the asm", ipe == null); } return ipe; } private void printModel(AsmManager model) { try { AsmManager.dumptree(model.getHierarchy().getRoot(), 0); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } private static void log(String msg) { if (VERBOSE) { System.out.println(msg); } } private File getProjectRelativePath(String p, String filename) { File projDir = new File(getWorkingDir(), p); return new File(projDir, filename); } private File getProjectOutputRelativePath(String p, String filename) { File projDir = new File(getWorkingDir(), p); return new File(projDir, "bin" + File.separator + filename); } }
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
/* ******************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2002 Palo Alto Research Center, Incorporated (PARC). * 2005 Contributors * All rights reserved. * This program and the accompanying materials are made available * under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution and is available at * http:www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html * * Contributors: * PARC initial implementation * Adrian Colyer, Andy Clement, overhaul for generics, Abraham Nevado * ******************************************************************/ package org.aspectj.weaver; import java.lang.ref.Reference; import java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue; import java.lang.ref.SoftReference; import java.lang.ref.WeakReference; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Collections; import java.util.HashMap; import java.util.HashSet;
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
import java.util.Iterator; import java.util.List; import java.util.Map; import java.util.Properties; import java.util.Set; import java.util.WeakHashMap; import org.aspectj.bridge.IMessage; import org.aspectj.bridge.IMessage.Kind; import org.aspectj.bridge.IMessageHandler; import org.aspectj.bridge.ISourceLocation; import org.aspectj.bridge.Message; import org.aspectj.bridge.MessageUtil; import org.aspectj.bridge.context.PinpointingMessageHandler; import org.aspectj.util.IStructureModel; import org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.TypeKind; import org.aspectj.weaver.patterns.Declare; import org.aspectj.weaver.patterns.DeclareAnnotation; import org.aspectj.weaver.patterns.DeclareParents; import org.aspectj.weaver.patterns.DeclarePrecedence; import org.aspectj.weaver.patterns.DeclareSoft; import org.aspectj.weaver.patterns.DeclareTypeErrorOrWarning; import org.aspectj.weaver.patterns.Pointcut; import org.aspectj.weaver.patterns.TypePattern; import org.aspectj.weaver.tools.PointcutDesignatorHandler; import org.aspectj.weaver.tools.Trace; import org.aspectj.weaver.tools.TraceFactory; /** * A World is a collection of known types and crosscutting members. */ public abstract class World implements Dump.INode {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
private IMessageHandler messageHandler = IMessageHandler.SYSTEM_ERR; /** * handler for cross-reference information produced during the weaving process */ private ICrossReferenceHandler xrefHandler = null; /** * Currently 'active' scope in which to lookup (resolve) typevariable references */ private TypeVariableDeclaringElement typeVariableLookupScope; protected TypeMap typeMap = new TypeMap(this); private Set<PointcutDesignatorHandler> pointcutDesignators; public static boolean createInjarHierarchy = true; private final AspectPrecedenceCalculator precedenceCalculator; private final CrosscuttingMembersSet crosscuttingMembersSet = new CrosscuttingMembersSet(this); private IStructureModel model = null; private Lint lint = new Lint(this);
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
private boolean XnoInline; private boolean XlazyTjp; private boolean XhasMember = false; /** * Xpinpoint controls whether we put out developer info showing the source of messages */ private boolean Xpinpoint = false; private boolean behaveInJava5Way = false; private boolean timing = false; private boolean timingPeriodically = true; private boolean incrementalCompileCouldFollow = false; private String targetAspectjRuntimeLevel = Constants.RUNTIME_LEVEL_DEFAULT; private boolean optionalJoinpoint_ArrayConstruction = false; private boolean optionalJoinpoint_Synchronization = false; private boolean addSerialVerUID = false; private Properties extraConfiguration = null; private boolean checkedAdvancedConfiguration = false; private boolean synchronizationPointcutsInUse = false;
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
private boolean runMinimalMemory = false; private boolean runMinimalMemorySet = false; private boolean shouldPipelineCompilation = true; private boolean shouldGenerateStackMaps = false; protected boolean bcelRepositoryCaching = xsetBCEL_REPOSITORY_CACHING_DEFAULT.equalsIgnoreCase("true"); private boolean fastMethodPacking = false; private int itdVersion = 2; private boolean minimalModel = false; private boolean targettingRuntime1_6_10 = false; private boolean completeBinaryTypes = false; private boolean overWeaving = false; public boolean forDEBUG_structuralChangesCode = false; public boolean forDEBUG_bridgingCode = false; public boolean optimizedMatching = true; protected long timersPerJoinpoint = 25000; protected long timersPerType = 250; public int infoMessagesEnabled = 0; private static Trace trace = TraceFactory.getTraceFactory().getTrace(World.class); private long errorThreshold; private long warningThreshold; /** * A list of RuntimeExceptions containing full stack information for every type we couldn't find. */ private List<RuntimeException> dumpState_cantFindTypeExceptions = null; /** * Play God. On the first day, God created the primitive types and put them in the type map. */ protected World() { super();
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
if (trace.isTraceEnabled()) { trace.enter("<init>", this); } typeMap.put("B", ResolvedType.BYTE); typeMap.put("S", ResolvedType.SHORT); typeMap.put("I", ResolvedType.INT); typeMap.put("J", ResolvedType.LONG); typeMap.put("F", ResolvedType.FLOAT); typeMap.put("D", ResolvedType.DOUBLE); typeMap.put("C", ResolvedType.CHAR); typeMap.put("Z", ResolvedType.BOOLEAN); typeMap.put("V", ResolvedType.VOID); precedenceCalculator = new AspectPrecedenceCalculator(this); if (trace.isTraceEnabled()) { trace.exit("<init>"); } } /** * Dump processing when a fatal error occurs */ public void accept(Dump.IVisitor visitor) { visitor.visitObject("Shadow mungers:"); visitor.visitList(crosscuttingMembersSet.getShadowMungers()); visitor.visitObject("Type mungers:"); visitor.visitList(crosscuttingMembersSet.getTypeMungers()); visitor.visitObject("Late Type mungers:"); visitor.visitList(crosscuttingMembersSet.getLateTypeMungers());
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
if (dumpState_cantFindTypeExceptions != null) { visitor.visitObject("Cant find type problems:"); visitor.visitList(dumpState_cantFindTypeExceptions); dumpState_cantFindTypeExceptions = null; } } /** * Resolve a type that we require to be present in the world */ public ResolvedType resolve(UnresolvedType ty) { return resolve(ty, false); } /** * Attempt to resolve a type - the source location gives you some context in which resolution is taking place. In the case of an * error where we can't find the type - we can then at least report why (source location) we were trying to resolve it. */ public ResolvedType resolve(UnresolvedType ty, ISourceLocation isl) { ResolvedType ret = resolve(ty, true); if (ResolvedType.isMissing(ty)) { getLint().cantFindType.signal(WeaverMessages.format(WeaverMessages.CANT_FIND_TYPE, ty.getName()), isl);
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
} return ret; } /** * Convenience method for resolving an array of unresolved types in one hit. Useful for e.g. resolving type parameters in * signatures. */ public ResolvedType[] resolve(UnresolvedType[] types) { if (types == null) { return ResolvedType.NONE; } ResolvedType[] ret = new ResolvedType[types.length]; for (int i = 0; i < types.length; i++) { ret[i] = resolve(types[i]); } return ret; } /** * Resolve a type. This the hub of type resolution. The resolved type is added to the type map by signature. */ public ResolvedType resolve(UnresolvedType ty, boolean allowMissing) { if (ty instanceof ResolvedType) { ResolvedType rty = (ResolvedType) ty; rty = resolve(rty); return rty;
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
} if (ty.isTypeVariableReference()) { return ty.resolve(this); } String signature = ty.getSignature(); ResolvedType ret = typeMap.get(signature); if (ret != null) { ret.world = this; return ret; } else if (signature.equals("?") || signature.equals("*")) { ResolvedType something = getWildcard(); typeMap.put("?", something); return something; } if (ty.isArray()) { ResolvedType componentType = resolve(ty.getComponentType(), allowMissing);
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
ret = new ArrayReferenceType(signature, "[" + componentType.getErasureSignature(), this, componentType); } else { ret = resolveToReferenceType(ty, allowMissing); if (!allowMissing && ret.isMissing()) { ret = handleRequiredMissingTypeDuringResolution(ty); } if (completeBinaryTypes) { completeBinaryType(ret); } } ResolvedType result = typeMap.get(signature); if (result == null && !ret.isMissing()) { ret = ensureRawTypeIfNecessary(ret); typeMap.put(signature, ret); return ret; } if (result == null) { return ret; } else { return result; } } private BoundedReferenceType wildcard; private BoundedReferenceType getWildcard() { if (wildcard == null) { wildcard = new BoundedReferenceType(this);
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
} return wildcard; } /** * Called when a type is resolved - enables its type hierarchy to be finished off before we proceed */ protected void completeBinaryType(ResolvedType ret) { } /** * Return true if the classloader relating to this world is definetly the one that will define the specified class. Return false * otherwise or we don't know for certain. */ public boolean isLocallyDefined(String classname) { return false; } /** * We tried to resolve a type and couldn't find it... */ private ResolvedType handleRequiredMissingTypeDuringResolution(UnresolvedType ty) { if (dumpState_cantFindTypeExceptions == null) { dumpState_cantFindTypeExceptions = new ArrayList<RuntimeException>(); } if (dumpState_cantFindTypeExceptions.size() < 100) { dumpState_cantFindTypeExceptions.add(new RuntimeException("Can't find type " + ty.getName())); }
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
return new MissingResolvedTypeWithKnownSignature(ty.getSignature(), this); } /** * Some TypeFactory operations create resolved types directly, but these won't be in the typeMap - this resolution process puts * them there. Resolved types are also told their world which is needed for the special autoboxing resolved types. */ public ResolvedType resolve(ResolvedType ty) { if (ty.isTypeVariableReference()) { return ty; } ResolvedType resolved = typeMap.get(ty.getSignature()); if (resolved == null) { resolved = ensureRawTypeIfNecessary(ty); typeMap.put(ty.getSignature(), resolved); resolved = ty; } resolved.world = this; return resolved; } /** * When the world is operating in 1.5 mode, the TypeMap should only contain RAW types and never directly generic types. The RAW * type will contain a reference to the generic type. * * @param type a possibly generic type for which the raw needs creating as it is not currently in the world * @return a type suitable for putting into the world */ private ResolvedType ensureRawTypeIfNecessary(ResolvedType type) { if (!isInJava5Mode() || type.isRawType()) { return type; }
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
if (type instanceof ReferenceType && ((ReferenceType) type).getDelegate() != null && type.isGenericType()) { ReferenceType rawType = new ReferenceType(type.getSignature(), this); rawType.typeKind = UnresolvedType.TypeKind.RAW; ReferenceTypeDelegate delegate = ((ReferenceType) type).getDelegate(); rawType.setDelegate(delegate); rawType.setGenericType((ReferenceType) type); return rawType; } return type; } /** * Convenience method for finding a type by name and resolving it in one step. */ public ResolvedType resolve(String name) { ResolvedType ret = resolve(UnresolvedType.forName(name)); return ret; } public ReferenceType resolveToReferenceType(String name) { return (ReferenceType) resolve(name); } public ResolvedType resolve(String name, boolean allowMissing) { return resolve(UnresolvedType.forName(name), allowMissing); } /** * Resolve to a ReferenceType - simple, raw, parameterized, or generic. Raw, parameterized, and generic versions of a type share * a delegate.
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
*/ private final ResolvedType resolveToReferenceType(UnresolvedType ty, boolean allowMissing) { if (ty.isParameterizedType()) { ResolvedType rt = resolveGenericTypeFor(ty, allowMissing); if (rt.isMissing()) { return rt; } ReferenceType genericType = (ReferenceType) rt; ReferenceType parameterizedType = TypeFactory.createParameterizedType(genericType, ty.typeParameters, this); return parameterizedType; } else if (ty.isGenericType()) { ResolvedType rt = resolveGenericTypeFor(ty, false); ReferenceType genericType = (ReferenceType) rt; return genericType; } else if (ty.isGenericWildcard()) { return resolveGenericWildcardFor((WildcardedUnresolvedType) ty); } else { String erasedSignature = ty.getErasureSignature(); ReferenceType simpleOrRawType = new ReferenceType(erasedSignature, this); if (ty.needsModifiableDelegate()) { simpleOrRawType.setNeedsModifiableDelegate(true); } ReferenceTypeDelegate delegate = resolveDelegate(simpleOrRawType); if (delegate == null) {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
return new MissingResolvedTypeWithKnownSignature(ty.getSignature(), erasedSignature, this); } if (delegate.isGeneric() && behaveInJava5Way) { simpleOrRawType.typeKind = TypeKind.RAW; ReferenceType genericType = makeGenericTypeFrom(delegate, simpleOrRawType); simpleOrRawType.setDelegate(delegate); genericType.setDelegate(delegate); simpleOrRawType.setGenericType(genericType); return simpleOrRawType; } else { simpleOrRawType.setDelegate(delegate); return simpleOrRawType; } } } /** * Attempt to resolve a type that should be a generic type. */ public ResolvedType resolveGenericTypeFor(UnresolvedType anUnresolvedType, boolean allowMissing) { String rawSignature = anUnresolvedType.getRawType().getSignature(); ResolvedType rawType = typeMap.get(rawSignature);
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
if (rawType == null) { rawType = resolve(UnresolvedType.forSignature(rawSignature), allowMissing); typeMap.put(rawSignature, rawType); } if (rawType.isMissing()) { return rawType; } ResolvedType genericType = rawType.getGenericType(); if (rawType.isSimpleType() && (anUnresolvedType.typeParameters == null || anUnresolvedType.typeParameters.length == 0)) { rawType.world = this; return rawType; } if (genericType != null) { genericType.world = this; return genericType; } else { ReferenceTypeDelegate delegate = resolveDelegate((ReferenceType) rawType); ReferenceType genericRefType = makeGenericTypeFrom(delegate, ((ReferenceType) rawType));
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
((ReferenceType) rawType).setGenericType(genericRefType); genericRefType.setDelegate(delegate); ((ReferenceType) rawType).setDelegate(delegate); return genericRefType; } } private ReferenceType makeGenericTypeFrom(ReferenceTypeDelegate delegate, ReferenceType rawType) { String genericSig = delegate.getDeclaredGenericSignature(); if (genericSig != null) { return new ReferenceType(UnresolvedType.forGenericTypeSignature(rawType.getSignature(), delegate.getDeclaredGenericSignature()), this); } else { return new ReferenceType(UnresolvedType.forGenericTypeVariables(rawType.getSignature(), delegate.getTypeVariables()), this); } } /** * Go from an unresolved generic wildcard (represented by UnresolvedType) to a resolved version (BoundedReferenceType). */ private ReferenceType resolveGenericWildcardFor(WildcardedUnresolvedType aType) { BoundedReferenceType ret = null; if (aType.isExtends()) { ReferenceType upperBound = (ReferenceType) resolve(aType.getUpperBound()); ret = new BoundedReferenceType(upperBound, true, this); } else if (aType.isSuper()) { ReferenceType lowerBound = (ReferenceType) resolve(aType.getLowerBound()); ret = new BoundedReferenceType(lowerBound, false, this); } else {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
ret = getWildcard(); } return ret; } /** * Find the ReferenceTypeDelegate behind this reference type so that it can fulfill its contract. */ protected abstract ReferenceTypeDelegate resolveDelegate(ReferenceType ty); /** * Special resolution for "core" types like OBJECT. These are resolved just like any other type, but if they are not found it is * more serious and we issue an error message immediately. */ public ResolvedType getCoreType(UnresolvedType tx) { ResolvedType coreTy = resolve(tx, true); if (coreTy.isMissing()) { MessageUtil.error(messageHandler, WeaverMessages.format(WeaverMessages.CANT_FIND_CORE_TYPE, tx.getName())); } return coreTy; } /** * Lookup a type by signature, if not found then build one and put it in the map. */ public ReferenceType lookupOrCreateName(UnresolvedType ty) { String signature = ty.getSignature(); ReferenceType ret = lookupBySignature(signature); if (ret == null) { ret = ReferenceType.fromTypeX(ty, this);
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
typeMap.put(signature, ret); } return ret; } /** * Lookup a reference type in the world by its signature. Returns null if not found. */ public ReferenceType lookupBySignature(String signature) { return (ReferenceType) typeMap.get(signature); } /** * Member resolution is achieved by resolving the declaring type and then looking up the member in the resolved declaring type. */ public ResolvedMember resolve(Member member) { ResolvedType declaring = member.getDeclaringType().resolve(this); if (declaring.isRawType()) { declaring = declaring.getGenericType(); } ResolvedMember ret; if (member.getKind() == Member.FIELD) { ret = declaring.lookupField(member); } else { ret = declaring.lookupMethod(member); } if (ret != null) {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
return ret; } return declaring.lookupSyntheticMember(member); } private boolean allLintIgnored = false; public void setAllLintIgnored() { allLintIgnored = true; } public boolean areAllLintIgnored() { return allLintIgnored; } public abstract IWeavingSupport getWeavingSupport(); /** * Create an advice shadow munger from the given advice attribute */ /** * Create an advice shadow munger for the given advice kind */ public final Advice createAdviceMunger(AdviceKind kind, Pointcut p, Member signature, int extraParameterFlags, IHasSourceLocation loc, ResolvedType declaringAspect) { AjAttribute.AdviceAttribute attribute = new AjAttribute.AdviceAttribute(kind, p, extraParameterFlags, loc.getStart(), loc.getEnd(), loc.getSourceContext()); return getWeavingSupport().createAdviceMunger(attribute, p, signature, declaringAspect); } /** * Same signature as org.aspectj.util.PartialOrder.PartialComparable.compareTo */ public int compareByPrecedence(ResolvedType aspect1, ResolvedType aspect2) {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
return precedenceCalculator.compareByPrecedence(aspect1, aspect2); } public Integer getPrecedenceIfAny(ResolvedType aspect1, ResolvedType aspect2) { return precedenceCalculator.getPrecedenceIfAny(aspect1, aspect2); } /** * compares by precedence with the additional rule that a super-aspect is sorted before its sub-aspects */ public int compareByPrecedenceAndHierarchy(ResolvedType aspect1, ResolvedType aspect2) { return precedenceCalculator.compareByPrecedenceAndHierarchy(aspect1, aspect2); } /** * Nobody should hold onto a copy of this message handler, or setMessageHandler won't work right. */ public IMessageHandler getMessageHandler() { return messageHandler; } public void setMessageHandler(IMessageHandler messageHandler) { if (this.isInPinpointMode()) { this.messageHandler = new PinpointingMessageHandler(messageHandler); } else { this.messageHandler = messageHandler; } } /** * convenenience method for creating and issuing messages via the message handler - if you supply two locations you will get two * messages. */
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
public void showMessage(Kind kind, String message, ISourceLocation loc1, ISourceLocation loc2) { if (loc1 != null) { messageHandler.handleMessage(new Message(message, kind, null, loc1)); if (loc2 != null) { messageHandler.handleMessage(new Message(message, kind, null, loc2)); } } else { messageHandler.handleMessage(new Message(message, kind, null, loc2)); } } public void setCrossReferenceHandler(ICrossReferenceHandler xrefHandler) { this.xrefHandler = xrefHandler; } /** * Get the cross-reference handler for the world, may be null. */ public ICrossReferenceHandler getCrossReferenceHandler() { return xrefHandler; } public void setTypeVariableLookupScope(TypeVariableDeclaringElement scope) { typeVariableLookupScope = scope; } public TypeVariableDeclaringElement getTypeVariableLookupScope() { return typeVariableLookupScope; } public List<DeclareParents> getDeclareParents() { return crosscuttingMembersSet.getDeclareParents(); } public List<DeclareAnnotation> getDeclareAnnotationOnTypes() { return crosscuttingMembersSet.getDeclareAnnotationOnTypes();
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
} public List<DeclareAnnotation> getDeclareAnnotationOnFields() { return crosscuttingMembersSet.getDeclareAnnotationOnFields(); } public List<DeclareAnnotation> getDeclareAnnotationOnMethods() { return crosscuttingMembersSet.getDeclareAnnotationOnMethods(); } public List<DeclareTypeErrorOrWarning> getDeclareTypeEows() { return crosscuttingMembersSet.getDeclareTypeEows(); } public List<DeclareSoft> getDeclareSoft() { return crosscuttingMembersSet.getDeclareSofts(); } public CrosscuttingMembersSet getCrosscuttingMembersSet() { return crosscuttingMembersSet; } public IStructureModel getModel() { return model; } public void setModel(IStructureModel model) { this.model = model; } public Lint getLint() { return lint; } public void setLint(Lint lint) { this.lint = lint; } public boolean isXnoInline() { return XnoInline;
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
} public void setXnoInline(boolean xnoInline) { XnoInline = xnoInline; } public boolean isXlazyTjp() { return XlazyTjp; } public void setXlazyTjp(boolean b) { XlazyTjp = b; } public boolean isHasMemberSupportEnabled() { return XhasMember; } public void setXHasMemberSupportEnabled(boolean b) { XhasMember = b; } public boolean isInPinpointMode() { return Xpinpoint; } public void setPinpointMode(boolean b) { Xpinpoint = b; } public boolean isMinimalModel() { ensureAdvancedConfigurationProcessed(); return minimalModel; } public boolean isTargettingRuntime1_6_10() { ensureAdvancedConfigurationProcessed(); return targettingRuntime1_6_10; }
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
public void setBehaveInJava5Way(boolean b) { behaveInJava5Way = b; } /** * Set the timing option (whether to collect timing info), this will also need INFO messages turned on for the message handler * being used. The reportPeriodically flag should be set to false under AJDT so numbers just come out at the end. */ public void setTiming(boolean timersOn, boolean reportPeriodically) { timing = timersOn; timingPeriodically = reportPeriodically; } /** * Set the error and warning threashold which can be taken from CompilerOptions (see bug 129282) * * @param errorThreshold * @param warningThreshold */ public void setErrorAndWarningThreshold(long errorThreshold, long warningThreshold) { this.errorThreshold = errorThreshold; this.warningThreshold = warningThreshold; } /** * @return true if ignoring the UnusedDeclaredThrownException and false if this compiler option is set to error or warning */ public boolean isIgnoringUnusedDeclaredThrownException() { if ((errorThreshold & 0x800000) != 0 || (warningThreshold & 0x800000) != 0) { return false; }
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
return true; } public void performExtraConfiguration(String config) { if (config == null) { return; } extraConfiguration = new Properties(); int pos = -1; while ((pos = config.indexOf(",")) != -1) { String nvpair = config.substring(0, pos); int pos2 = nvpair.indexOf("="); if (pos2 != -1) { String n = nvpair.substring(0, pos2); String v = nvpair.substring(pos2 + 1); extraConfiguration.setProperty(n, v); } config = config.substring(pos + 1); } if (config.length() > 0) { int pos2 = config.indexOf("="); if (pos2 != -1) { String n = config.substring(0, pos2); String v = config.substring(pos2 + 1); extraConfiguration.setProperty(n, v); } } ensureAdvancedConfigurationProcessed(); } public boolean areInfoMessagesEnabled() {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
if (infoMessagesEnabled == 0) { infoMessagesEnabled = (messageHandler.isIgnoring(IMessage.INFO) ? 1 : 2); } return infoMessagesEnabled == 2; } /** * may return null */ public Properties getExtraConfiguration() { return extraConfiguration; } public final static String xsetWEAVE_JAVA_PACKAGES = "weaveJavaPackages"; public final static String xsetWEAVE_JAVAX_PACKAGES = "weaveJavaxPackages"; public final static String xsetCAPTURE_ALL_CONTEXT = "captureAllContext"; public final static String xsetRUN_MINIMAL_MEMORY = "runMinimalMemory"; public final static String xsetDEBUG_STRUCTURAL_CHANGES_CODE = "debugStructuralChangesCode"; public final static String xsetDEBUG_BRIDGING = "debugBridging"; public final static String xsetBCEL_REPOSITORY_CACHING = "bcelRepositoryCaching";
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
public final static String xsetPIPELINE_COMPILATION = "pipelineCompilation"; public final static String xsetGENERATE_STACKMAPS = "generateStackMaps"; public final static String xsetPIPELINE_COMPILATION_DEFAULT = "true"; public final static String xsetCOMPLETE_BINARY_TYPES = "completeBinaryTypes"; public final static String xsetCOMPLETE_BINARY_TYPES_DEFAULT = "false"; public final static String xsetTYPE_DEMOTION = "typeDemotion"; public final static String xsetTYPE_DEMOTION_DEBUG = "typeDemotionDebug"; public final static String xsetTYPE_REFS = "useWeakTypeRefs"; public final static String xsetBCEL_REPOSITORY_CACHING_DEFAULT = "true"; public final static String xsetFAST_PACK_METHODS = "fastPackMethods"; public final static String xsetOVERWEAVING = "overWeaving"; public final static String xsetOPTIMIZED_MATCHING = "optimizedMatching"; public final static String xsetTIMERS_PER_JOINPOINT = "timersPerJoinpoint"; public final static String xsetTIMERS_PER_FASTMATCH_CALL = "timersPerFastMatchCall"; public final static String xsetITD_VERSION = "itdVersion"; public final static String xsetITD_VERSION_ORIGINAL = "1"; public final static String xsetITD_VERSION_2NDGEN = "2"; public final static String xsetITD_VERSION_DEFAULT = xsetITD_VERSION_2NDGEN; public final static String xsetMINIMAL_MODEL = "minimalModel"; public final static String xsetTARGETING_RUNTIME_1610 = "targetRuntime1_6_10"; public boolean isInJava5Mode() { return behaveInJava5Way; } public boolean isTimingEnabled() { return timing; } public void setTargetAspectjRuntimeLevel(String s) { targetAspectjRuntimeLevel = s; } public void setOptionalJoinpoints(String jps) {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
if (jps == null) { return; } if (jps.indexOf("arrayconstruction") != -1) { optionalJoinpoint_ArrayConstruction = true; } if (jps.indexOf("synchronization") != -1) { optionalJoinpoint_Synchronization = true; } } public boolean isJoinpointArrayConstructionEnabled() { return optionalJoinpoint_ArrayConstruction; } public boolean isJoinpointSynchronizationEnabled() { return optionalJoinpoint_Synchronization; } public String getTargetAspectjRuntimeLevel() { return targetAspectjRuntimeLevel; } public boolean isTargettingAspectJRuntime12() { boolean b = false; if (!isInJava5Mode()) { b = true; } else { b = getTargetAspectjRuntimeLevel().equals(org.aspectj.weaver.Constants.RUNTIME_LEVEL_12); } return b;
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
} /* * Map of types in the world, can have 'references' to expendable ones which can be garbage collected to recover memory. An * expendable type is a reference type that is not exposed to the weaver (ie just pulled in for type resolution purposes). */ public static class TypeMap { public final static int DONT_USE_REFS = 0; public final static int USE_WEAK_REFS = 1; public final static int USE_SOFT_REFS = 2; public List<String> addedSinceLastDemote; public List<String> writtenClasses; private static boolean debug = false; public static boolean useExpendableMap = true; private boolean demotionSystemActive; private boolean debugDemotion = false; public int policy = USE_WEAK_REFS; final Map<String, ResolvedType> tMap = new HashMap<String, ResolvedType>(); final Map<String, Reference<ResolvedType>> expendableMap = Collections .synchronizedMap(new WeakHashMap<String, Reference<ResolvedType>>()); private final World w; private boolean memoryProfiling = false; private int maxExpendableMapSize = -1; private int collectedTypes = 0; private final ReferenceQueue<ResolvedType> rq = new ReferenceQueue<ResolvedType>(); TypeMap(World w) {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
demotionSystemActive = w.isDemotionActive() && (w.isLoadtimeWeaving() || w.couldIncrementalCompileFollow()); addedSinceLastDemote = new ArrayList<String>(); writtenClasses = new ArrayList<String>(); this.w = w; memoryProfiling = false; } public Map<String, Reference<ResolvedType>> getExpendableMap() { return expendableMap; } public Map<String, ResolvedType> getMainMap() { return tMap; } public int demote() { return demote(false); } /** * Go through any types added during the previous file weave. If any are suitable for demotion, then put them in the * expendable map where GC can claim them at some point later. Demotion means: the type is not an aspect, the type is not * java.lang.Object, the type is not primitive and the type is not affected by type mungers in any way. Further refinements * of these conditions may allow for more demotions. * * @return number of types demoted */ public int demote(boolean atEndOfCompile) { if (!demotionSystemActive) { return 0;
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
} if (debugDemotion) { System.out.println("Demotion running " + addedSinceLastDemote); } boolean isLtw = w.isLoadtimeWeaving(); int demotionCounter = 0; if (isLtw) { for (String key : addedSinceLastDemote) { ResolvedType type = tMap.get(key); if (type != null && !type.isAspect() && !type.equals(UnresolvedType.OBJECT) && !type.isPrimitiveType()) { if (type.isParameterizedOrRawType()) { type = type.getGenericType(); } List<ConcreteTypeMunger> typeMungers = type.getInterTypeMungers(); if (typeMungers == null || typeMungers.size() == 0) { tMap.remove(key); insertInExpendableMap(key, type); demotionCounter++; } } } addedSinceLastDemote.clear(); } else { List<String> forRemoval = new ArrayList<String>(); for (String key : addedSinceLastDemote) { ResolvedType type = tMap.get(key); if (type == null) {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
forRemoval.add(key); continue; } if (!writtenClasses.contains(type.getName())) { continue; } if (type != null && !type.isAspect() && !type.equals(UnresolvedType.OBJECT) && !type.isPrimitiveType()) { if (type.isParameterizedOrRawType()) { type = type.getGenericType(); } List<ConcreteTypeMunger> typeMungers = type.getInterTypeMungers(); if (typeMungers == null || typeMungers.size() == 0) { /* * if (type.isNested()) { try { ReferenceType rt = (ReferenceType) w.resolve(type.getOutermostType()); * if (!rt.isMissing()) { ReferenceTypeDelegate delegate = ((ReferenceType) type).getDelegate(); boolean * isWeavable = delegate == null ? false : delegate.isExposedToWeaver(); boolean hasBeenWoven = delegate * == null ? false : delegate.hasBeenWoven(); if (isWeavable && !hasBeenWoven) { skip demotion of * this inner type for now continue; } } } catch (ClassCastException cce) { cce.printStackTrace(); * System.out.println("outer of " + key + " is not a reftype? " + type.getOutermostType()); throw new * IllegalStateException(cce); } } */ ReferenceTypeDelegate delegate = ((ReferenceType) type).getDelegate(); boolean isWeavable = delegate == null ? false : delegate.isExposedToWeaver(); boolean hasBeenWoven = delegate == null ? false : delegate.hasBeenWoven(); if (!isWeavable || hasBeenWoven) { if (debugDemotion) { System.out.println("Demoting " + key); } forRemoval.add(key); tMap.remove(key);
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
insertInExpendableMap(key, type); demotionCounter++; } } else { writtenClasses.remove(type.getName()); forRemoval.add(key); } } else { writtenClasses.remove(type.getName()); forRemoval.add(key); } } addedSinceLastDemote.removeAll(forRemoval); } if (debugDemotion) { System.out.println("Demoted " + demotionCounter + " types. Types remaining in fixed set #" + tMap.keySet().size() + ". addedSinceLastDemote size is " + addedSinceLastDemote.size()); System.out.println("writtenClasses.size() = " + writtenClasses.size() + ": " + writtenClasses); } if (atEndOfCompile) { if (debugDemotion) { System.out.println("Clearing writtenClasses"); } writtenClasses.clear(); } return demotionCounter; } private void insertInExpendableMap(String key, ResolvedType type) {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
if (useExpendableMap) { if (!expendableMap.containsKey(key)) { if (policy == USE_SOFT_REFS) { expendableMap.put(key, new SoftReference<ResolvedType>(type)); } else { expendableMap.put(key, new WeakReference<ResolvedType>(type)); } } } } /** * Add a new type into the map, the key is the type signature. Some types do *not* go in the map, these are ones involving * *member* type variables. The reason is that when all you have is the signature which gives you a type variable name, you * cannot guarantee you are using the type variable in the same way as someone previously working with a similarly named * type variable. So, these do not go into the map: - TypeVariableReferenceType. - ParameterizedType where a member type * variable is involved. - BoundedReferenceType when one of the bounds is a type variable. * * definition: "member type variables" - a tvar declared on a generic method/ctor as opposed to those you see declared on a * generic type. */ public ResolvedType put(String key, ResolvedType type) { if (!type.isCacheable()) { return type; } if (type.isParameterizedType() && type.isParameterizedWithTypeVariable()) { if (debug) { System.err .println("Not putting a parameterized type that utilises member declared type variables into the typemap: key=" + key + " type=" + type); }
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
return type; } if (type.isTypeVariableReference()) { if (debug) { System.err.println("Not putting a type variable reference type into the typemap: key=" + key + " type=" + type); } return type; } if (type instanceof BoundedReferenceType) { if (debug) { System.err.println("Not putting a bounded reference type into the typemap: key=" + key + " type=" + type); } return type; } if (type instanceof MissingResolvedTypeWithKnownSignature) { if (debug) { System.err.println("Not putting a missing type into the typemap: key=" + key + " type=" + type); } return type; } if ((type instanceof ReferenceType) && (((ReferenceType) type).getDelegate() == null) && w.isExpendable(type)) { if (debug) { System.err.println("Not putting expendable ref type with null delegate into typemap: key=" + key + " type=" + type); } return type; }
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
/* * if ((type instanceof ReferenceType) && type.getWorld().isInJava5Mode() && (((ReferenceType) type).getDelegate() != * null) && type.isGenericType()) { throw new BCException("Attempt to add generic type to typemap " + type.toString() + * " (should be raw)"); } */ if (w.isExpendable(type)) { if (useExpendableMap) { if (policy == USE_WEAK_REFS) { if (memoryProfiling) { expendableMap.put(key, new WeakReference<ResolvedType>(type, rq)); } else { expendableMap.put(key, new WeakReference<ResolvedType>(type)); } } else if (policy == USE_SOFT_REFS) { if (memoryProfiling) { expendableMap.put(key, new SoftReference<ResolvedType>(type, rq)); } else { expendableMap.put(key, new SoftReference<ResolvedType>(type)); } } } if (memoryProfiling && expendableMap.size() > maxExpendableMapSize) { maxExpendableMapSize = expendableMap.size(); } return type; } else {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
if (demotionSystemActive) { addedSinceLastDemote.add(key); } return tMap.put(key, type); } } public void report() { if (!memoryProfiling) { return; } checkq(); w.getMessageHandler().handleMessage( MessageUtil.info("MEMORY: world expendable type map reached maximum size of #" + maxExpendableMapSize + " entries")); w.getMessageHandler().handleMessage( MessageUtil.info("MEMORY: types collected through garbage collection #" + collectedTypes + " entries")); } public void checkq() { if (!memoryProfiling) { return; } while (rq.poll() != null) { collectedTypes++; } } /** * Lookup a type by its signature, always look in the real map before the expendable map */ public ResolvedType get(String key) {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
checkq(); ResolvedType ret = tMap.get(key); if (ret == null) { if (policy == USE_WEAK_REFS) { WeakReference<ResolvedType> ref = (WeakReference<ResolvedType>) expendableMap.get(key); if (ref != null) { ret = ref.get(); } } else if (policy == USE_SOFT_REFS) { SoftReference<ResolvedType> ref = (SoftReference<ResolvedType>) expendableMap.get(key); if (ref != null) { ret = ref.get(); } } } return ret; } public ResolvedType remove(String key) { ResolvedType ret = tMap.remove(key); if (ret == null) { if (policy == USE_WEAK_REFS) { WeakReference<ResolvedType> wref = (WeakReference<ResolvedType>) expendableMap.remove(key); if (wref != null) { ret = wref.get(); } } else if (policy == USE_SOFT_REFS) { SoftReference<ResolvedType> wref = (SoftReference<ResolvedType>) expendableMap.remove(key);
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
if (wref != null) { ret = wref.get(); } } } return ret; } public void classWriteEvent(String classname) { if (demotionSystemActive) { writtenClasses.add(classname); } if (debugDemotion) { System.out.println("Class write event for " + classname); } }
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
} /** * This class is used to compute and store precedence relationships between aspects. */ private static class AspectPrecedenceCalculator { private final World world; private final Map<PrecedenceCacheKey, Integer> cachedResults; public AspectPrecedenceCalculator(World forSomeWorld) { world = forSomeWorld; cachedResults = new HashMap<PrecedenceCacheKey, Integer>(); } /** * Ask every declare precedence in the world to order the two aspects. If more than one declare precedence gives an * ordering, and the orderings conflict, then that's an error. */ public int compareByPrecedence(ResolvedType firstAspect, ResolvedType secondAspect) { PrecedenceCacheKey key = new PrecedenceCacheKey(firstAspect, secondAspect); if (cachedResults.containsKey(key)) { return (cachedResults.get(key)).intValue(); } else { int order = 0; DeclarePrecedence orderer = null;
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
for (Iterator<Declare> i = world.getCrosscuttingMembersSet().getDeclareDominates().iterator(); i.hasNext();) { DeclarePrecedence d = (DeclarePrecedence) i.next(); int thisOrder = d.compare(firstAspect, secondAspect); if (thisOrder != 0) { if (orderer == null) { orderer = d; } if (order != 0 && order != thisOrder) { ISourceLocation[] isls = new ISourceLocation[2]; isls[0] = orderer.getSourceLocation(); isls[1] = d.getSourceLocation(); Message m = new Message("conflicting declare precedence orderings for aspects: " + firstAspect.getName() + " and " + secondAspect.getName(), null, true, isls); world.getMessageHandler().handleMessage(m); } else { order = thisOrder; } } } cachedResults.put(key, new Integer(order)); return order; } } public Integer getPrecedenceIfAny(ResolvedType aspect1, ResolvedType aspect2) { return cachedResults.get(new PrecedenceCacheKey(aspect1, aspect2)); } public int compareByPrecedenceAndHierarchy(ResolvedType firstAspect, ResolvedType secondAspect) { if (firstAspect.equals(secondAspect)) {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
return 0; } int ret = compareByPrecedence(firstAspect, secondAspect); if (ret != 0) { return ret; } if (firstAspect.isAssignableFrom(secondAspect)) { return -1; } else if (secondAspect.isAssignableFrom(firstAspect)) { return +1; } return 0; } private static class PrecedenceCacheKey { public ResolvedType aspect1; public ResolvedType aspect2; public PrecedenceCacheKey(ResolvedType a1, ResolvedType a2) { aspect1 = a1; aspect2 = a2; } @Override public boolean equals(Object obj) { if (!(obj instanceof PrecedenceCacheKey)) { return false; } PrecedenceCacheKey other = (PrecedenceCacheKey) obj; return (aspect1 == other.aspect1 && aspect2 == other.aspect2); } @Override public int hashCode() {
323,417
Bug 323417 Sometimes StackOverflow is got while weaving
Build Identifier: 1.6.10 While weaving LifeRay 6.0.5 over tomcat 6.0.26 sometimes the next exceptions appear: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.lang.String.indexOf(String.java:1521) at org.aspectj.weaver.TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature(TypeFactory.java:199) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.forSignature(UnresolvedType.java:375) at org.aspectj.weaver.UnresolvedType.getRawType(UnresolvedType.java:533) at org.aspectj.weaver.ResolvedType.getRawType(ResolvedType.java:2400) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:430) at org.aspectj.weaver.ReferenceType.isAssignableFrom(ReferenceType.java:399) ... Reproducible: Sometimes
resolved fixed
f631ad6
AspectJ
https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj
eclipse/org.aspectj
java
null
null
null
2010-08-25T01:46:42Z
2010-08-23T19:00:00Z
org.aspectj.matcher/src/org/aspectj/weaver/World.java
return aspect1.hashCode() + aspect2.hashCode(); } } } public void validateType(UnresolvedType type) { } public boolean isDemotionActive() { return false; } private final Map<Class<?>, TypeVariable[]> workInProgress1 = new HashMap<Class<?>, TypeVariable[]>(); public TypeVariable[] getTypeVariablesCurrentlyBeingProcessed(Class<?> baseClass) { return workInProgress1.get(baseClass); } public void recordTypeVariablesCurrentlyBeingProcessed(Class<?> baseClass, TypeVariable[] typeVariables) { workInProgress1.put(baseClass, typeVariables); } public void forgetTypeVariablesCurrentlyBeingProcessed(Class<?> baseClass) { workInProgress1.remove(baseClass); } public void setAddSerialVerUID(boolean b) { addSerialVerUID = b; } public boolean isAddSerialVerUID() {