id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA3700
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at the invoiced amounts , less an allowance for doubtful accounts , and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer receivables based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are written off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 15 million , $ 14 million and $ 15 million as of december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales as a reduction . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 67.6</td><td>$ 75.3</td><td>$ 77.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>bad debt expense</td><td>17.1</td><td>20.1</td><td>25.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs</td><td>-15.7 ( 15.7 )</td><td>-24.6 ( 24.6 )</td><td>-21.9 ( 21.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( a )</td><td>2.5</td><td>-3.2 ( 3.2 )</td><td>-6.1 ( 6.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 71.5</td><td>$ 67.6</td><td>$ 75.3</td></tr></table> ( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) basis . lifo inventories represented 39% ( 39 % ) and 40% ( 40 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement cost . property , plant and equipment property , plant and equipment assets are stated at cost . merchandising and customer equipment consists principally of various dispensing systems for the company 2019s cleaning and sanitizing products , dishwashing machines and process control and monitoring equipment . certain dispensing systems capitalized by the company are accounted for on a mass asset basis , whereby equipment is capitalized and depreciated as a group and written off when fully depreciated . the company capitalizes both internal and external costs of development or purchase of computer software for internal use . costs incurred for data conversion , training and maintenance associated with capitalized software are expensed as incurred . expenditures for major renewals and improvements , which significantly extend the useful lives of existing plant and equipment , are capitalized and depreciated . expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred . upon retirement or disposition of plant and equipment , the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in income . depreciation is charged to operations using the straight-line method over the assets 2019 estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 40 years for buildings and leasehold improvements , 3 to 20 years for machinery and equipment , 3 to 15 years for merchandising and customer equipment and 3 to 7 years for capitalized software . the straight-line method of depreciation reflects an appropriate allocation of the cost of the assets to earnings in proportion to the amount of economic benefits obtained by the company in each reporting period . depreciation expense was $ 586 million , $ 561 million and $ 560 million for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 3.9
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that balance in 2016, in percentage?
|
0.05769
|
CONVFINQA3701
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents totaled an absolute notional equivalent of $ 292.3 million and $ 190.5 million , respectively , with the year-over-year increase primarily driven by earnings growth . at this time , we do not hedge these long-term investment exposures . we do not use foreign exchange contracts for speculative trading purposes , nor do we hedge our foreign currency exposure in a manner that entirely offsets the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates . we regularly review our hedging program and assess the need to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on an ongoing basis . cash flow hedging 2014hedges of forecasted foreign currency revenue we may use foreign exchange purchased options or forward contracts to hedge foreign currency revenue denominated in euros , british pounds and japanese yen . we hedge these cash flow exposures to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates . these foreign exchange contracts , carried at fair value , may have maturities between one and twelve months . we enter into these foreign exchange contracts to hedge forecasted revenue in the normal course of business and accordingly , they are not speculative in nature . we record changes in the intrinsic value of these cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) until the forecasted transaction occurs . when the forecasted transaction occurs , we reclassify the related gain or loss on the cash flow hedge to revenue . in the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur , or it becomes probable that it will not occur , we reclassify the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) to interest and other income , net on our consolidated statements of income at that time . for the fiscal year ended november 30 , 2018 , there were no net gains or losses recognized in other income relating to hedges of forecasted transactions that did not occur . balance sheet hedging 2014hedging of foreign currency assets and liabilities we hedge exposures related to our net recognized foreign currency assets and liabilities with foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates . these foreign exchange contracts are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded as interest and other income , net . these foreign exchange contracts do not subject us to material balance sheet risk due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset gains and losses on the assets and liabilities being hedged . at november 30 , 2018 , the outstanding balance sheet hedging derivatives had maturities of 180 days or less . see note 5 of our notes to consolidated financial statements for information regarding our hedging activities . interest rate risk short-term investments and fixed income securities at november 30 , 2018 , we had debt securities classified as short-term investments of $ 1.59 billion . changes in interest rates could adversely affect the market value of these investments . the following table separates these investments , based on stated maturities , to show the approximate exposure to interest rates ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>due within one year</td><td>$ 612.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>due between one and two years</td><td>564.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>due between two and three years</td><td>282.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>due after three years</td><td>127.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1586.2</td></tr></table> a sensitivity analysis was performed on our investment portfolio as of november 30 , 2018 . the analysis is based on an estimate of the hypothetical changes in market value of the portfolio that would result from an immediate parallel shift in the yield curve of various magnitudes. .
Question: what is the sum of the investments due within one and within one and two years?
|
1176.3
|
CONVFINQA3702
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents totaled an absolute notional equivalent of $ 292.3 million and $ 190.5 million , respectively , with the year-over-year increase primarily driven by earnings growth . at this time , we do not hedge these long-term investment exposures . we do not use foreign exchange contracts for speculative trading purposes , nor do we hedge our foreign currency exposure in a manner that entirely offsets the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates . we regularly review our hedging program and assess the need to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on an ongoing basis . cash flow hedging 2014hedges of forecasted foreign currency revenue we may use foreign exchange purchased options or forward contracts to hedge foreign currency revenue denominated in euros , british pounds and japanese yen . we hedge these cash flow exposures to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates . these foreign exchange contracts , carried at fair value , may have maturities between one and twelve months . we enter into these foreign exchange contracts to hedge forecasted revenue in the normal course of business and accordingly , they are not speculative in nature . we record changes in the intrinsic value of these cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) until the forecasted transaction occurs . when the forecasted transaction occurs , we reclassify the related gain or loss on the cash flow hedge to revenue . in the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur , or it becomes probable that it will not occur , we reclassify the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) to interest and other income , net on our consolidated statements of income at that time . for the fiscal year ended november 30 , 2018 , there were no net gains or losses recognized in other income relating to hedges of forecasted transactions that did not occur . balance sheet hedging 2014hedging of foreign currency assets and liabilities we hedge exposures related to our net recognized foreign currency assets and liabilities with foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates . these foreign exchange contracts are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded as interest and other income , net . these foreign exchange contracts do not subject us to material balance sheet risk due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset gains and losses on the assets and liabilities being hedged . at november 30 , 2018 , the outstanding balance sheet hedging derivatives had maturities of 180 days or less . see note 5 of our notes to consolidated financial statements for information regarding our hedging activities . interest rate risk short-term investments and fixed income securities at november 30 , 2018 , we had debt securities classified as short-term investments of $ 1.59 billion . changes in interest rates could adversely affect the market value of these investments . the following table separates these investments , based on stated maturities , to show the approximate exposure to interest rates ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>due within one year</td><td>$ 612.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>due between one and two years</td><td>564.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>due between two and three years</td><td>282.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>due after three years</td><td>127.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1586.2</td></tr></table> a sensitivity analysis was performed on our investment portfolio as of november 30 , 2018 . the analysis is based on an estimate of the hypothetical changes in market value of the portfolio that would result from an immediate parallel shift in the yield curve of various magnitudes. .
Question: what is the sum of the investments due within one and within one and two years?
Answer: 1176.3
Question: what is the total due?
|
1586.2
|
CONVFINQA3703
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents totaled an absolute notional equivalent of $ 292.3 million and $ 190.5 million , respectively , with the year-over-year increase primarily driven by earnings growth . at this time , we do not hedge these long-term investment exposures . we do not use foreign exchange contracts for speculative trading purposes , nor do we hedge our foreign currency exposure in a manner that entirely offsets the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates . we regularly review our hedging program and assess the need to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on an ongoing basis . cash flow hedging 2014hedges of forecasted foreign currency revenue we may use foreign exchange purchased options or forward contracts to hedge foreign currency revenue denominated in euros , british pounds and japanese yen . we hedge these cash flow exposures to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates . these foreign exchange contracts , carried at fair value , may have maturities between one and twelve months . we enter into these foreign exchange contracts to hedge forecasted revenue in the normal course of business and accordingly , they are not speculative in nature . we record changes in the intrinsic value of these cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) until the forecasted transaction occurs . when the forecasted transaction occurs , we reclassify the related gain or loss on the cash flow hedge to revenue . in the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur , or it becomes probable that it will not occur , we reclassify the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) to interest and other income , net on our consolidated statements of income at that time . for the fiscal year ended november 30 , 2018 , there were no net gains or losses recognized in other income relating to hedges of forecasted transactions that did not occur . balance sheet hedging 2014hedging of foreign currency assets and liabilities we hedge exposures related to our net recognized foreign currency assets and liabilities with foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates . these foreign exchange contracts are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded as interest and other income , net . these foreign exchange contracts do not subject us to material balance sheet risk due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset gains and losses on the assets and liabilities being hedged . at november 30 , 2018 , the outstanding balance sheet hedging derivatives had maturities of 180 days or less . see note 5 of our notes to consolidated financial statements for information regarding our hedging activities . interest rate risk short-term investments and fixed income securities at november 30 , 2018 , we had debt securities classified as short-term investments of $ 1.59 billion . changes in interest rates could adversely affect the market value of these investments . the following table separates these investments , based on stated maturities , to show the approximate exposure to interest rates ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>due within one year</td><td>$ 612.1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>due between one and two years</td><td>564.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>due between two and three years</td><td>282.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>due after three years</td><td>127.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1586.2</td></tr></table> a sensitivity analysis was performed on our investment portfolio as of november 30 , 2018 . the analysis is based on an estimate of the hypothetical changes in market value of the portfolio that would result from an immediate parallel shift in the yield curve of various magnitudes. .
Question: what is the sum of the investments due within one and within one and two years?
Answer: 1176.3
Question: what is the total due?
Answer: 1586.2
Question: what is the sum of those due within 2 years divided by the total amount due?
|
0.74158
|
CONVFINQA3704
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investment policy , which is described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . we calculate the expense associated with the pension plan and the assumptions and methods that we use include a policy of reflecting trust assets at their fair market value . on an annual basis , we review the actuarial assumptions related to the pension plan , including the discount rate , the rate of compensation increase and the expected return on plan assets . the discount rate and compensation increase assumptions do not significantly affect pension expense . however , the expected long-term return on assets assumption does significantly affect pension expense . our expected long- term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension expense has been 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) for the past three years . the expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the allocation strategy currently in place among those classes . while this analysis gives appropriate consideration to recent asset performance and historical returns , the assumption represents a long-term prospective return . we review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted . for purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption , 201clong- term 201d refers to the period over which the plan 2019s projected benefit obligation will be disbursed . while year-to-year annual returns can vary significantly ( rates of return for the reporting years of 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 were +20.61% ( +20.61 % ) , -32.91% ( -32.91 % ) , and +7.57% ( +7.57 % ) , respectively ) , the assumption represents our estimate of long-term average prospective returns . our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment , but primarily utilizes qualitative judgment regarding future return expectations . recent annual returns may differ but , recognizing the volatility and unpredictability of investment returns , we generally do not change the assumption unless we modify our investment strategy or identify events that would alter our expectations of future returns . to evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption , we examine a variety of viewpoints and data . various studies have shown that portfolios comprised primarily of us equity securities have returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) over long periods of time , while us debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation of equities and bonds produces a result between 8% ( 8 % ) and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns , and in many cases low returns in recent time periods are followed by higher returns in future periods ( and vice versa ) . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from other observers . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2009 was 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) , unchanged from 2008 . during 2010 , we intend to decrease the midpoint of the plan 2019s target allocation range for equities by approximately five percentage points . as a result of this change and taking into account all other factors described above , pnc will change the expected long-term return on plan assets to 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) for determining net periodic pension cost for 2010 . under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to change by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2010 estimated expense as a baseline . change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2010 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2010pensionexpense ( inmillions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 3</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 41 million in 2010 compared with pretax expense of $ 117 million in 2009 . this year-over-year reduction was primarily due to the amortization impact of the favorable 2009 investment returns as compared with the expected long-term return assumption . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we expect that the minimum required contributions under the law will be zero for 2010 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various .
Question: what were the pretax pension expenses in 2010?
|
117.0
|
CONVFINQA3705
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investment policy , which is described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . we calculate the expense associated with the pension plan and the assumptions and methods that we use include a policy of reflecting trust assets at their fair market value . on an annual basis , we review the actuarial assumptions related to the pension plan , including the discount rate , the rate of compensation increase and the expected return on plan assets . the discount rate and compensation increase assumptions do not significantly affect pension expense . however , the expected long-term return on assets assumption does significantly affect pension expense . our expected long- term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension expense has been 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) for the past three years . the expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the allocation strategy currently in place among those classes . while this analysis gives appropriate consideration to recent asset performance and historical returns , the assumption represents a long-term prospective return . we review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted . for purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption , 201clong- term 201d refers to the period over which the plan 2019s projected benefit obligation will be disbursed . while year-to-year annual returns can vary significantly ( rates of return for the reporting years of 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 were +20.61% ( +20.61 % ) , -32.91% ( -32.91 % ) , and +7.57% ( +7.57 % ) , respectively ) , the assumption represents our estimate of long-term average prospective returns . our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment , but primarily utilizes qualitative judgment regarding future return expectations . recent annual returns may differ but , recognizing the volatility and unpredictability of investment returns , we generally do not change the assumption unless we modify our investment strategy or identify events that would alter our expectations of future returns . to evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption , we examine a variety of viewpoints and data . various studies have shown that portfolios comprised primarily of us equity securities have returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) over long periods of time , while us debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation of equities and bonds produces a result between 8% ( 8 % ) and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns , and in many cases low returns in recent time periods are followed by higher returns in future periods ( and vice versa ) . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from other observers . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2009 was 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) , unchanged from 2008 . during 2010 , we intend to decrease the midpoint of the plan 2019s target allocation range for equities by approximately five percentage points . as a result of this change and taking into account all other factors described above , pnc will change the expected long-term return on plan assets to 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) for determining net periodic pension cost for 2010 . under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to change by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2010 estimated expense as a baseline . change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2010 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2010pensionexpense ( inmillions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 3</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 41 million in 2010 compared with pretax expense of $ 117 million in 2009 . this year-over-year reduction was primarily due to the amortization impact of the favorable 2009 investment returns as compared with the expected long-term return assumption . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we expect that the minimum required contributions under the law will be zero for 2010 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various .
Question: what were the pretax pension expenses in 2010?
Answer: 117.0
Question: and what were they in 2009?
|
41.0
|
CONVFINQA3706
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investment policy , which is described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . we calculate the expense associated with the pension plan and the assumptions and methods that we use include a policy of reflecting trust assets at their fair market value . on an annual basis , we review the actuarial assumptions related to the pension plan , including the discount rate , the rate of compensation increase and the expected return on plan assets . the discount rate and compensation increase assumptions do not significantly affect pension expense . however , the expected long-term return on assets assumption does significantly affect pension expense . our expected long- term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension expense has been 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) for the past three years . the expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the allocation strategy currently in place among those classes . while this analysis gives appropriate consideration to recent asset performance and historical returns , the assumption represents a long-term prospective return . we review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted . for purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption , 201clong- term 201d refers to the period over which the plan 2019s projected benefit obligation will be disbursed . while year-to-year annual returns can vary significantly ( rates of return for the reporting years of 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 were +20.61% ( +20.61 % ) , -32.91% ( -32.91 % ) , and +7.57% ( +7.57 % ) , respectively ) , the assumption represents our estimate of long-term average prospective returns . our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment , but primarily utilizes qualitative judgment regarding future return expectations . recent annual returns may differ but , recognizing the volatility and unpredictability of investment returns , we generally do not change the assumption unless we modify our investment strategy or identify events that would alter our expectations of future returns . to evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption , we examine a variety of viewpoints and data . various studies have shown that portfolios comprised primarily of us equity securities have returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) over long periods of time , while us debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation of equities and bonds produces a result between 8% ( 8 % ) and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns , and in many cases low returns in recent time periods are followed by higher returns in future periods ( and vice versa ) . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from other observers . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2009 was 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) , unchanged from 2008 . during 2010 , we intend to decrease the midpoint of the plan 2019s target allocation range for equities by approximately five percentage points . as a result of this change and taking into account all other factors described above , pnc will change the expected long-term return on plan assets to 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) for determining net periodic pension cost for 2010 . under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to change by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2010 estimated expense as a baseline . change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2010 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2010pensionexpense ( inmillions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 3</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 41 million in 2010 compared with pretax expense of $ 117 million in 2009 . this year-over-year reduction was primarily due to the amortization impact of the favorable 2009 investment returns as compared with the expected long-term return assumption . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we expect that the minimum required contributions under the law will be zero for 2010 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various .
Question: what were the pretax pension expenses in 2010?
Answer: 117.0
Question: and what were they in 2009?
Answer: 41.0
Question: what was, then, the decline over the year?
|
76.0
|
CONVFINQA3707
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investment policy , which is described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . we calculate the expense associated with the pension plan and the assumptions and methods that we use include a policy of reflecting trust assets at their fair market value . on an annual basis , we review the actuarial assumptions related to the pension plan , including the discount rate , the rate of compensation increase and the expected return on plan assets . the discount rate and compensation increase assumptions do not significantly affect pension expense . however , the expected long-term return on assets assumption does significantly affect pension expense . our expected long- term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension expense has been 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) for the past three years . the expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption established by considering historical and anticipated returns of the asset classes invested in by the pension plan and the allocation strategy currently in place among those classes . while this analysis gives appropriate consideration to recent asset performance and historical returns , the assumption represents a long-term prospective return . we review this assumption at each measurement date and adjust it if warranted . for purposes of setting and reviewing this assumption , 201clong- term 201d refers to the period over which the plan 2019s projected benefit obligation will be disbursed . while year-to-year annual returns can vary significantly ( rates of return for the reporting years of 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 were +20.61% ( +20.61 % ) , -32.91% ( -32.91 % ) , and +7.57% ( +7.57 % ) , respectively ) , the assumption represents our estimate of long-term average prospective returns . our selection process references certain historical data and the current environment , but primarily utilizes qualitative judgment regarding future return expectations . recent annual returns may differ but , recognizing the volatility and unpredictability of investment returns , we generally do not change the assumption unless we modify our investment strategy or identify events that would alter our expectations of future returns . to evaluate the continued reasonableness of our assumption , we examine a variety of viewpoints and data . various studies have shown that portfolios comprised primarily of us equity securities have returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) over long periods of time , while us debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation of equities and bonds produces a result between 8% ( 8 % ) and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns , and in many cases low returns in recent time periods are followed by higher returns in future periods ( and vice versa ) . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from other observers . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2009 was 8.25% ( 8.25 % ) , unchanged from 2008 . during 2010 , we intend to decrease the midpoint of the plan 2019s target allocation range for equities by approximately five percentage points . as a result of this change and taking into account all other factors described above , pnc will change the expected long-term return on plan assets to 8.00% ( 8.00 % ) for determining net periodic pension cost for 2010 . under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to change by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2010 estimated expense as a baseline . change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2010 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2010pensionexpense ( inmillions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 3</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 41 million in 2010 compared with pretax expense of $ 117 million in 2009 . this year-over-year reduction was primarily due to the amortization impact of the favorable 2009 investment returns as compared with the expected long-term return assumption . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we expect that the minimum required contributions under the law will be zero for 2010 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various .
Question: what were the pretax pension expenses in 2010?
Answer: 117.0
Question: and what were they in 2009?
Answer: 41.0
Question: what was, then, the decline over the year?
Answer: 76.0
Question: and what is this decline as a portion of the 2009 expenses?
|
0.64957
|
CONVFINQA3708
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
as of september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $ 1.4 billion , of which $ 563 million , if recognized , would affect the company 2019s effective tax rate . as of september 25 , 2010 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $ 943 million , of which $ 404 million , if recognized , would affect the company 2019s effective tax rate . the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 943</td><td>971</td><td>$ 506</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>49</td><td>61</td><td>341</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>425</td><td>240</td><td>151</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 24 , 2011 and september 25 , 2010 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 261 million and $ 247 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2011 and 2009 of $ 14 million and $ 64 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1988 and 2001 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company does not believe it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits would materially change in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . comprehensive income comprehensive income consists of two components , net income and other comprehensive income . other comprehensive income refers to revenue , expenses , gains and losses that under gaap are recorded as an element .
Question: what is ending balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2011?
|
1375.0
|
CONVFINQA3709
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
as of september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $ 1.4 billion , of which $ 563 million , if recognized , would affect the company 2019s effective tax rate . as of september 25 , 2010 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $ 943 million , of which $ 404 million , if recognized , would affect the company 2019s effective tax rate . the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 943</td><td>971</td><td>$ 506</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>49</td><td>61</td><td>341</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>425</td><td>240</td><td>151</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 24 , 2011 and september 25 , 2010 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 261 million and $ 247 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2011 and 2009 of $ 14 million and $ 64 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1988 and 2001 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company does not believe it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits would materially change in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . comprehensive income comprehensive income consists of two components , net income and other comprehensive income . other comprehensive income refers to revenue , expenses , gains and losses that under gaap are recorded as an element .
Question: what is ending balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2011?
Answer: 1375.0
Question: what about in 2010?
|
943.0
|
CONVFINQA3710
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
as of september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $ 1.4 billion , of which $ 563 million , if recognized , would affect the company 2019s effective tax rate . as of september 25 , 2010 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $ 943 million , of which $ 404 million , if recognized , would affect the company 2019s effective tax rate . the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 943</td><td>971</td><td>$ 506</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>49</td><td>61</td><td>341</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>425</td><td>240</td><td>151</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 24 , 2011 and september 25 , 2010 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 261 million and $ 247 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2011 and 2009 of $ 14 million and $ 64 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1988 and 2001 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company does not believe it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits would materially change in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . comprehensive income comprehensive income consists of two components , net income and other comprehensive income . other comprehensive income refers to revenue , expenses , gains and losses that under gaap are recorded as an element .
Question: what is ending balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2011?
Answer: 1375.0
Question: what about in 2010?
Answer: 943.0
Question: what is the net change from 2010 to 2011?
|
432.0
|
CONVFINQA3711
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
as of september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $ 1.4 billion , of which $ 563 million , if recognized , would affect the company 2019s effective tax rate . as of september 25 , 2010 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $ 943 million , of which $ 404 million , if recognized , would affect the company 2019s effective tax rate . the aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 943</td><td>971</td><td>$ 506</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>49</td><td>61</td><td>341</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>425</td><td>240</td><td>151</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 24 , 2011 and september 25 , 2010 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 261 million and $ 247 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2011 and 2009 of $ 14 million and $ 64 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1988 and 2001 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company does not believe it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits would materially change in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . comprehensive income comprehensive income consists of two components , net income and other comprehensive income . other comprehensive income refers to revenue , expenses , gains and losses that under gaap are recorded as an element .
Question: what is ending balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2011?
Answer: 1375.0
Question: what about in 2010?
Answer: 943.0
Question: what is the net change from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 432.0
Question: what about the net change from 2009 to 2010?
|
-28.0
|
CONVFINQA3712
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
visa indemnification our payment services business issues and acquires credit and debit card transactions through visa u.s.a . inc . card association or its affiliates ( visa ) . in october 2007 , visa completed a restructuring and issued shares of visa inc . common stock to its financial institution members ( visa reorganization ) in contemplation of its initial public offering ( ipo ) . as part of the visa reorganization , we received our proportionate share of class b visa inc . common stock allocated to the u.s . members . prior to the ipo , the u.s . members , which included pnc , were obligated to indemnify visa for judgments and settlements related to certain specified litigation . as a result of the acquisition of national city , we became party to judgment and loss sharing agreements with visa and certain other banks . the judgment and loss sharing agreements were designed to apportion financial responsibilities arising from any potential adverse judgment or negotiated settlements related to the specified litigation . in september 2014 , visa funded $ 450 million into its litigation escrow account and reduced the conversion rate of visa b to a shares . we continue to have an obligation to indemnify visa for judgments and settlements for the remaining specified litigation . recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 2 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage , residential mortgage and home equity loans/ lines of credit directly or indirectly through securitization and loan sale transactions in which we have continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 12.3 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 3.7 billion at december 31 , 2014 and $ 3.6 billion at december 31 , 2013 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 35 million and $ 33 million as of december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . table 150 : analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 43</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>2</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 35</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity loan/ line of credit repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , pnc reached agreements with both fnma and fhlmc to resolve their repurchase claims with respect to loans sold between 2000 and 2008 . pnc paid a total of $ 191 million related to these settlements . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines of credit that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition of national city . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines of credit is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . 214 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the balance, in millions, for commercial mortgage recourse obligations at the end of 2014?
|
35.0
|
CONVFINQA3713
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
visa indemnification our payment services business issues and acquires credit and debit card transactions through visa u.s.a . inc . card association or its affiliates ( visa ) . in october 2007 , visa completed a restructuring and issued shares of visa inc . common stock to its financial institution members ( visa reorganization ) in contemplation of its initial public offering ( ipo ) . as part of the visa reorganization , we received our proportionate share of class b visa inc . common stock allocated to the u.s . members . prior to the ipo , the u.s . members , which included pnc , were obligated to indemnify visa for judgments and settlements related to certain specified litigation . as a result of the acquisition of national city , we became party to judgment and loss sharing agreements with visa and certain other banks . the judgment and loss sharing agreements were designed to apportion financial responsibilities arising from any potential adverse judgment or negotiated settlements related to the specified litigation . in september 2014 , visa funded $ 450 million into its litigation escrow account and reduced the conversion rate of visa b to a shares . we continue to have an obligation to indemnify visa for judgments and settlements for the remaining specified litigation . recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 2 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage , residential mortgage and home equity loans/ lines of credit directly or indirectly through securitization and loan sale transactions in which we have continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 12.3 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 3.7 billion at december 31 , 2014 and $ 3.6 billion at december 31 , 2013 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 35 million and $ 33 million as of december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . table 150 : analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 43</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>2</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 35</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity loan/ line of credit repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , pnc reached agreements with both fnma and fhlmc to resolve their repurchase claims with respect to loans sold between 2000 and 2008 . pnc paid a total of $ 191 million related to these settlements . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines of credit that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition of national city . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines of credit is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . 214 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the balance, in millions, for commercial mortgage recourse obligations at the end of 2014?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was the balance, in millions, for commercial mortgage recourse obligations at the start of 2014?
|
33.0
|
CONVFINQA3714
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
visa indemnification our payment services business issues and acquires credit and debit card transactions through visa u.s.a . inc . card association or its affiliates ( visa ) . in october 2007 , visa completed a restructuring and issued shares of visa inc . common stock to its financial institution members ( visa reorganization ) in contemplation of its initial public offering ( ipo ) . as part of the visa reorganization , we received our proportionate share of class b visa inc . common stock allocated to the u.s . members . prior to the ipo , the u.s . members , which included pnc , were obligated to indemnify visa for judgments and settlements related to certain specified litigation . as a result of the acquisition of national city , we became party to judgment and loss sharing agreements with visa and certain other banks . the judgment and loss sharing agreements were designed to apportion financial responsibilities arising from any potential adverse judgment or negotiated settlements related to the specified litigation . in september 2014 , visa funded $ 450 million into its litigation escrow account and reduced the conversion rate of visa b to a shares . we continue to have an obligation to indemnify visa for judgments and settlements for the remaining specified litigation . recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 2 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage , residential mortgage and home equity loans/ lines of credit directly or indirectly through securitization and loan sale transactions in which we have continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 12.3 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 3.7 billion at december 31 , 2014 and $ 3.6 billion at december 31 , 2013 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 35 million and $ 33 million as of december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . table 150 : analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 43</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>2</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 35</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity loan/ line of credit repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , pnc reached agreements with both fnma and fhlmc to resolve their repurchase claims with respect to loans sold between 2000 and 2008 . pnc paid a total of $ 191 million related to these settlements . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines of credit that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition of national city . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines of credit is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . 214 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the balance, in millions, for commercial mortgage recourse obligations at the end of 2014?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was the balance, in millions, for commercial mortgage recourse obligations at the start of 2014?
Answer: 33.0
Question: what is the sum of those values?
|
68.0
|
CONVFINQA3715
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
visa indemnification our payment services business issues and acquires credit and debit card transactions through visa u.s.a . inc . card association or its affiliates ( visa ) . in october 2007 , visa completed a restructuring and issued shares of visa inc . common stock to its financial institution members ( visa reorganization ) in contemplation of its initial public offering ( ipo ) . as part of the visa reorganization , we received our proportionate share of class b visa inc . common stock allocated to the u.s . members . prior to the ipo , the u.s . members , which included pnc , were obligated to indemnify visa for judgments and settlements related to certain specified litigation . as a result of the acquisition of national city , we became party to judgment and loss sharing agreements with visa and certain other banks . the judgment and loss sharing agreements were designed to apportion financial responsibilities arising from any potential adverse judgment or negotiated settlements related to the specified litigation . in september 2014 , visa funded $ 450 million into its litigation escrow account and reduced the conversion rate of visa b to a shares . we continue to have an obligation to indemnify visa for judgments and settlements for the remaining specified litigation . recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 2 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage , residential mortgage and home equity loans/ lines of credit directly or indirectly through securitization and loan sale transactions in which we have continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 12.3 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 3.7 billion at december 31 , 2014 and $ 3.6 billion at december 31 , 2013 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 35 million and $ 33 million as of december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . table 150 : analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 43</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>2</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 35</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity loan/ line of credit repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , pnc reached agreements with both fnma and fhlmc to resolve their repurchase claims with respect to loans sold between 2000 and 2008 . pnc paid a total of $ 191 million related to these settlements . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines of credit that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition of national city . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines of credit is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . 214 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the balance, in millions, for commercial mortgage recourse obligations at the end of 2014?
Answer: 35.0
Question: what was the balance, in millions, for commercial mortgage recourse obligations at the start of 2014?
Answer: 33.0
Question: what is the sum of those values?
Answer: 68.0
Question: what is the average value?
|
34.0
|
CONVFINQA3716
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td><td>-1146 ( 1146 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td><td>$ 1382</td></tr></table> 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was the net change in the value of free cash flow from 2012 to 2013?
|
703.0
|
CONVFINQA3717
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td><td>-1146 ( 1146 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td><td>$ 1382</td></tr></table> 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was the net change in the value of free cash flow from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 703.0
Question: what was the 2012 value?
|
1382.0
|
CONVFINQA3718
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td><td>$ 6161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td><td>-3633 ( 3633 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td><td>-1146 ( 1146 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td><td>$ 1382</td></tr></table> 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was the net change in the value of free cash flow from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 703.0
Question: what was the 2012 value?
Answer: 1382.0
Question: what is the percent change?
|
0.50868
|
CONVFINQA3719
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .
Question: what is the number of electric consumers in 2007?
|
132000.0
|
CONVFINQA3720
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .
Question: what is the number of electric consumers in 2007?
Answer: 132000.0
Question: what about in 2006?
|
95000.0
|
CONVFINQA3721
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .
Question: what is the number of electric consumers in 2007?
Answer: 132000.0
Question: what about in 2006?
Answer: 95000.0
Question: what is the increase in the number of electric consumers?
|
37000.0
|
CONVFINQA3722
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .
Question: what is the number of electric consumers in 2007?
Answer: 132000.0
Question: what about in 2006?
Answer: 95000.0
Question: what is the increase in the number of electric consumers?
Answer: 37000.0
Question: what percentage increase does this represent?
|
0.38947
|
CONVFINQA3723
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements on march 18 , 2008 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 600 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) notes due 2013 ( the 201c2013 notes 201d ) , $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due 2018 ( the 201c2018 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.70% ( 7.70 % ) notes due 2038 ( the 201c2038 notes 201d and , together with the 2013 notes and the 2018 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . the notes were offered by the company pursuant to its existing shelf registration . the proceeds of this offering of $ 1538 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) and additional borrowings of $ 195 million under the 20ac650 million revolving credit facility were used to repay existing debt , including certain short-term debt and the amounts outstanding under the 20ac1 billion bridge loan . no further amounts can be borrowed under the 20ac1 billion bridge loan . the discount and issuance costs related to the notes , which totaled $ 12 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective lives of the notes . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac1 billion bridge loan agreement 5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 1047</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . commercial paper 5.3% ( 5.3 % ) as of dec . 31 2008</td><td>222</td><td>617</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility weighted average 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) as of dec . 31 2008 ( 1 )</td><td>200</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other weighted average 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of dec . 31 2008</td><td>362</td><td>154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 784</td><td>$ 1818</td></tr></table> total $ 784 $ 1818 ( 1 ) borrowings under this facility have a term of 30 days and can be rolled over monthly until the facility expires in 2010 . ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2008 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 totaled $ 228 million , $ 102 million and $ 90 million , respectively . rental expense for operating leases was $ 267 million , $ 188 million and $ 161 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 , are ( in millions ) $ 126 in 2009 , $ 107 in 2010 , $ 82 in 2011 , $ 65 in 2012 , $ 51 in 2013 and $ 202 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit of $ 82 million as of december 31 , 2008 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 guarantees outstanding were $ 70 million . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 9 million and $ 3 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 40 million and $ 17 million , as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit or guarantees is likely . 10 . financial instruments , excluding derivative financial instruments included in ppg 2019s financial instrument portfolio are cash and cash equivalents , cash held in escrow , marketable equity securities , company-owned life insurance and short- and long-term debt instruments . the fair values of the financial instruments approximated their carrying values , in the aggregate , except for long-term long-term debt ( excluding capital lease obligations ) , had carrying and fair values totaling $ 3122 million and $ 3035 million , respectively , as of december 31 , 2008 . the corresponding amounts as of december 31 , 2007 , were $ 1201 million and $ 1226 million , respectively . the fair values of the debt instruments were based on discounted cash flows and interest rates currently available to the company for instruments of the same remaining maturities . 2008 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 .
Question: what is the ratio of rental expense for operating leases of 2008 to 2007?
|
1.42021
|
CONVFINQA3724
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements on march 18 , 2008 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 600 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) notes due 2013 ( the 201c2013 notes 201d ) , $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due 2018 ( the 201c2018 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.70% ( 7.70 % ) notes due 2038 ( the 201c2038 notes 201d and , together with the 2013 notes and the 2018 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . the notes were offered by the company pursuant to its existing shelf registration . the proceeds of this offering of $ 1538 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) and additional borrowings of $ 195 million under the 20ac650 million revolving credit facility were used to repay existing debt , including certain short-term debt and the amounts outstanding under the 20ac1 billion bridge loan . no further amounts can be borrowed under the 20ac1 billion bridge loan . the discount and issuance costs related to the notes , which totaled $ 12 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective lives of the notes . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac1 billion bridge loan agreement 5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 1047</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . commercial paper 5.3% ( 5.3 % ) as of dec . 31 2008</td><td>222</td><td>617</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility weighted average 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) as of dec . 31 2008 ( 1 )</td><td>200</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other weighted average 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of dec . 31 2008</td><td>362</td><td>154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 784</td><td>$ 1818</td></tr></table> total $ 784 $ 1818 ( 1 ) borrowings under this facility have a term of 30 days and can be rolled over monthly until the facility expires in 2010 . ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2008 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 totaled $ 228 million , $ 102 million and $ 90 million , respectively . rental expense for operating leases was $ 267 million , $ 188 million and $ 161 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 , are ( in millions ) $ 126 in 2009 , $ 107 in 2010 , $ 82 in 2011 , $ 65 in 2012 , $ 51 in 2013 and $ 202 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit of $ 82 million as of december 31 , 2008 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 guarantees outstanding were $ 70 million . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 9 million and $ 3 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 40 million and $ 17 million , as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit or guarantees is likely . 10 . financial instruments , excluding derivative financial instruments included in ppg 2019s financial instrument portfolio are cash and cash equivalents , cash held in escrow , marketable equity securities , company-owned life insurance and short- and long-term debt instruments . the fair values of the financial instruments approximated their carrying values , in the aggregate , except for long-term long-term debt ( excluding capital lease obligations ) , had carrying and fair values totaling $ 3122 million and $ 3035 million , respectively , as of december 31 , 2008 . the corresponding amounts as of december 31 , 2007 , were $ 1201 million and $ 1226 million , respectively . the fair values of the debt instruments were based on discounted cash flows and interest rates currently available to the company for instruments of the same remaining maturities . 2008 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 .
Question: what is the ratio of rental expense for operating leases of 2008 to 2007?
Answer: 1.42021
Question: what was the value of rental expense for operating leases in 2008?
|
267.0
|
CONVFINQA3725
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements on march 18 , 2008 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 600 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) notes due 2013 ( the 201c2013 notes 201d ) , $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due 2018 ( the 201c2018 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.70% ( 7.70 % ) notes due 2038 ( the 201c2038 notes 201d and , together with the 2013 notes and the 2018 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . the notes were offered by the company pursuant to its existing shelf registration . the proceeds of this offering of $ 1538 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) and additional borrowings of $ 195 million under the 20ac650 million revolving credit facility were used to repay existing debt , including certain short-term debt and the amounts outstanding under the 20ac1 billion bridge loan . no further amounts can be borrowed under the 20ac1 billion bridge loan . the discount and issuance costs related to the notes , which totaled $ 12 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective lives of the notes . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac1 billion bridge loan agreement 5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 1047</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . commercial paper 5.3% ( 5.3 % ) as of dec . 31 2008</td><td>222</td><td>617</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility weighted average 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) as of dec . 31 2008 ( 1 )</td><td>200</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other weighted average 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of dec . 31 2008</td><td>362</td><td>154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 784</td><td>$ 1818</td></tr></table> total $ 784 $ 1818 ( 1 ) borrowings under this facility have a term of 30 days and can be rolled over monthly until the facility expires in 2010 . ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2008 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 totaled $ 228 million , $ 102 million and $ 90 million , respectively . rental expense for operating leases was $ 267 million , $ 188 million and $ 161 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 , are ( in millions ) $ 126 in 2009 , $ 107 in 2010 , $ 82 in 2011 , $ 65 in 2012 , $ 51 in 2013 and $ 202 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit of $ 82 million as of december 31 , 2008 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 guarantees outstanding were $ 70 million . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 9 million and $ 3 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 40 million and $ 17 million , as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit or guarantees is likely . 10 . financial instruments , excluding derivative financial instruments included in ppg 2019s financial instrument portfolio are cash and cash equivalents , cash held in escrow , marketable equity securities , company-owned life insurance and short- and long-term debt instruments . the fair values of the financial instruments approximated their carrying values , in the aggregate , except for long-term long-term debt ( excluding capital lease obligations ) , had carrying and fair values totaling $ 3122 million and $ 3035 million , respectively , as of december 31 , 2008 . the corresponding amounts as of december 31 , 2007 , were $ 1201 million and $ 1226 million , respectively . the fair values of the debt instruments were based on discounted cash flows and interest rates currently available to the company for instruments of the same remaining maturities . 2008 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 .
Question: what is the ratio of rental expense for operating leases of 2008 to 2007?
Answer: 1.42021
Question: what was the value of rental expense for operating leases in 2008?
Answer: 267.0
Question: what is the ratio times the 2008 value?
|
379.19681
|
CONVFINQA3726
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 2009</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 2009</td><td>24</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 24</td><td>$ 268</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 .
Question: what was the total interest payment in 2010?
|
189.0
|
CONVFINQA3727
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 2009</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 2009</td><td>24</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 24</td><td>$ 268</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 .
Question: what was the total interest payment in 2010?
Answer: 189.0
Question: what was the total interest payment in 2009?
|
201.0
|
CONVFINQA3728
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 2009</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 2009</td><td>24</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 24</td><td>$ 268</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 .
Question: what was the total interest payment in 2010?
Answer: 189.0
Question: what was the total interest payment in 2009?
Answer: 201.0
Question: what is the effective rate?
|
0.9403
|
CONVFINQA3729
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 2009</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 2009</td><td>24</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 24</td><td>$ 268</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the commitment fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of sixty percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , on november 12 , 2010 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 1.900% ( 1.900 % ) notes due 2016 ( the 201c2016 notes 201d ) , $ 500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 3.600% ( 3.600 % ) notes due 2020 ( the 201c2020 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.500% ( 5.500 % ) notes due 2040 ( the 201c2040 notes 201d ) . these notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 ( the 201coriginal indenture 201d ) between the company and the bank of new york mellon trust company , n.a. , as trustee ( the 201ctrustee 201d ) , as supplemented by a first supplemental indenture dated as of march 18 , 2008 between the company and the trustee ( the 201cfirst supplemental indenture 201d ) and a second supplemental indenture dated as of november 12 , 2010 between the company and the trustee ( the 201csecond supplemental indenture 201d and , together with the original indenture and the first supplemental indenture , the 201cindenture 201d ) . the company may issue additional debt from time to time pursuant to the original indenture . the indenture governing these notes contains covenants that limit the company 2019s ability to , among other things , incur certain liens securing indebtedness , engage in certain sale-leaseback transactions , and enter into certain consolidations , mergers , conveyances , transfers or leases of all or substantially all the company 2019s assets . the terms of these notes also require the company to make an offer to repurchase notes upon a change of control triggering event ( as defined in the second supplemental indenture ) at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from this notes offering was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 791 million of which $ 31 million was used as of december 31 , 2010 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2010 2009 20ac650 million revolving credit facility , 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2009 $ 2014 $ 110 other , weighted average 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2010 and 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) as of december 31 , 2009 24 158 total $ 24 $ 268 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2010 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 totaled $ 189 million , $ 201 million and $ 228 million , respectively . 2010 ppg annual report and form 10-k 43 .
Question: what was the total interest payment in 2010?
Answer: 189.0
Question: what was the total interest payment in 2009?
Answer: 201.0
Question: what is the effective rate?
Answer: 0.9403
Question: what is the estimated interest expense in 2011?
|
177.71642
|
CONVFINQA3730
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
meet customer needs and put us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical issues and events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2010 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 2.5 billion , including expenditures for ptc , which may be revised if business conditions or new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan . 2022 positive train control ( ptc ) 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 200 million during 2010 on the development of ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the fra . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions but expect volume to increase from 2009 levels . in addition , we anticipate continued pricing opportunities and further productivity improvements . results of operations operating revenues millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2008 v 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>$ 15486</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>797</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>$ 16283</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td><td>10% ( 10 % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: what is the total capital investments in 2010, in billions?
|
2.5
|
CONVFINQA3731
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
meet customer needs and put us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical issues and events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2010 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 2.5 billion , including expenditures for ptc , which may be revised if business conditions or new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan . 2022 positive train control ( ptc ) 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 200 million during 2010 on the development of ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the fra . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions but expect volume to increase from 2009 levels . in addition , we anticipate continued pricing opportunities and further productivity improvements . results of operations operating revenues millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2008 v 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>$ 15486</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>797</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>$ 16283</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td><td>10% ( 10 % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: what is the total capital investments in 2010, in billions?
Answer: 2.5
Question: what about in millions?
|
2500.0
|
CONVFINQA3732
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
meet customer needs and put us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical issues and events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2010 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 2.5 billion , including expenditures for ptc , which may be revised if business conditions or new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan . 2022 positive train control ( ptc ) 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 200 million during 2010 on the development of ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the fra . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions but expect volume to increase from 2009 levels . in addition , we anticipate continued pricing opportunities and further productivity improvements . results of operations operating revenues millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2008 v 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>$ 15486</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>797</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>$ 16283</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td><td>10% ( 10 % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: what is the total capital investments in 2010, in billions?
Answer: 2.5
Question: what about in millions?
Answer: 2500.0
Question: what portion of total capital investments is related to development of ptc?
|
0.08
|
CONVFINQA3733
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
meet customer needs and put us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical issues and events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2010 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 2.5 billion , including expenditures for ptc , which may be revised if business conditions or new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan . 2022 positive train control ( ptc ) 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 200 million during 2010 on the development of ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the fra . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions but expect volume to increase from 2009 levels . in addition , we anticipate continued pricing opportunities and further productivity improvements . results of operations operating revenues millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2008 v 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>$ 15486</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>797</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>$ 16283</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td><td>10% ( 10 % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: what is the total capital investments in 2010, in billions?
Answer: 2.5
Question: what about in millions?
Answer: 2500.0
Question: what portion of total capital investments is related to development of ptc?
Answer: 0.08
Question: what is the net change in net revenue from 2007 to 2008?
|
1687.0
|
CONVFINQA3734
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
application of specific accounting literature . for the nonconsolidated proprietary tob trusts and qspe tob trusts , the company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet . the following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 : in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proceeds from new securitizations</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 10.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows</td><td>0.5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 0.5 2014 2014 municipal investments municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing . the company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership . client intermediation client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security , referenced asset or index . these transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes . in these transactions , the spe typically obtains exposure to the underlying security , referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument , such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap . in turn the spe issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security , referenced asset or index . the spe invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract ( gic ) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction . the company 2019s involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the spe 2019s derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the spe . in certain transactions , the investor 2019s maximum risk of loss is limited and the company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level . the company 2019s maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the spe and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the company through a separate instrument issued by the spe . the derivative instrument held by the company may generate a receivable from the spe ( for example , where the company purchases credit protection from the spe in connection with the spe 2019s issuance of a credit-linked note ) , which is collateralized by the assets owned by the spe . these derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under fin 46 ( r ) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the spe . structured investment vehicles structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) are spes that issue junior notes and senior debt ( medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper ) to fund the purchase of high quality assets . the junior notes are subject to the 201cfirst loss 201d risk of the sivs . the sivs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets . the company acts as manager for the sivs and , prior to december 13 , 2007 , was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the sivs . in response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the sivs for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the siv-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets , on december 13 , 2007 , citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the sivs 2019 senior debt ratings . as a result of this commitment , citigroup became the sivs 2019 primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities . on february 12 , 2008 , citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities , which took the form of a commitment to provide $ 3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the sivs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero . the mezzanine capital facility was increased by $ 1 billion to $ 4.5 billion , with the additional commitment funded during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes . the facilities were at arm 2019s-length terms . interest was paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a per annum fee was paid on the unused portion . during the period to november 18 , 2008 , the company wrote down $ 3.3 billion on siv assets . in order to complete the wind-down of the sivs , the company , in a nearly cashless transaction , purchased the remaining assets of the sivs at fair value , with a trade date of november 18 , 2008 . the company funded the purchase of the siv assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the sivs , as the medium-term notes mature . the net funding provided by the company to fund the purchase of the siv assets was $ 0.3 billion . as of december 31 , 2008 , the carrying amount of the purchased siv assets was $ 16.6 billion , of which $ 16.5 billion is classified as htm assets . investment funds the company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity , hedge funds , real estate , fixed income and infrastructure . the company earns a management fee , which is a percentage of capital under management , and may earn performance fees . in addition , for some of these funds the company has an ownership interest in the investment funds . the company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments . the company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees 2019 investment commitments. .
Question: what are the proceeds from new securitizations in 2008?
|
1.2
|
CONVFINQA3735
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
application of specific accounting literature . for the nonconsolidated proprietary tob trusts and qspe tob trusts , the company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet . the following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 : in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proceeds from new securitizations</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 10.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows</td><td>0.5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 0.5 2014 2014 municipal investments municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing . the company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership . client intermediation client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security , referenced asset or index . these transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes . in these transactions , the spe typically obtains exposure to the underlying security , referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument , such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap . in turn the spe issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security , referenced asset or index . the spe invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract ( gic ) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction . the company 2019s involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the spe 2019s derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the spe . in certain transactions , the investor 2019s maximum risk of loss is limited and the company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level . the company 2019s maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the spe and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the company through a separate instrument issued by the spe . the derivative instrument held by the company may generate a receivable from the spe ( for example , where the company purchases credit protection from the spe in connection with the spe 2019s issuance of a credit-linked note ) , which is collateralized by the assets owned by the spe . these derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under fin 46 ( r ) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the spe . structured investment vehicles structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) are spes that issue junior notes and senior debt ( medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper ) to fund the purchase of high quality assets . the junior notes are subject to the 201cfirst loss 201d risk of the sivs . the sivs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets . the company acts as manager for the sivs and , prior to december 13 , 2007 , was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the sivs . in response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the sivs for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the siv-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets , on december 13 , 2007 , citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the sivs 2019 senior debt ratings . as a result of this commitment , citigroup became the sivs 2019 primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities . on february 12 , 2008 , citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities , which took the form of a commitment to provide $ 3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the sivs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero . the mezzanine capital facility was increased by $ 1 billion to $ 4.5 billion , with the additional commitment funded during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes . the facilities were at arm 2019s-length terms . interest was paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a per annum fee was paid on the unused portion . during the period to november 18 , 2008 , the company wrote down $ 3.3 billion on siv assets . in order to complete the wind-down of the sivs , the company , in a nearly cashless transaction , purchased the remaining assets of the sivs at fair value , with a trade date of november 18 , 2008 . the company funded the purchase of the siv assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the sivs , as the medium-term notes mature . the net funding provided by the company to fund the purchase of the siv assets was $ 0.3 billion . as of december 31 , 2008 , the carrying amount of the purchased siv assets was $ 16.6 billion , of which $ 16.5 billion is classified as htm assets . investment funds the company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity , hedge funds , real estate , fixed income and infrastructure . the company earns a management fee , which is a percentage of capital under management , and may earn performance fees . in addition , for some of these funds the company has an ownership interest in the investment funds . the company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments . the company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees 2019 investment commitments. .
Question: what are the proceeds from new securitizations in 2008?
Answer: 1.2
Question: what about in 2007?
|
10.5
|
CONVFINQA3736
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
application of specific accounting literature . for the nonconsolidated proprietary tob trusts and qspe tob trusts , the company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet . the following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 : in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proceeds from new securitizations</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 10.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows</td><td>0.5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 0.5 2014 2014 municipal investments municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing . the company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership . client intermediation client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security , referenced asset or index . these transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes . in these transactions , the spe typically obtains exposure to the underlying security , referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument , such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap . in turn the spe issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security , referenced asset or index . the spe invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract ( gic ) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction . the company 2019s involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the spe 2019s derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the spe . in certain transactions , the investor 2019s maximum risk of loss is limited and the company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level . the company 2019s maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the spe and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the company through a separate instrument issued by the spe . the derivative instrument held by the company may generate a receivable from the spe ( for example , where the company purchases credit protection from the spe in connection with the spe 2019s issuance of a credit-linked note ) , which is collateralized by the assets owned by the spe . these derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under fin 46 ( r ) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the spe . structured investment vehicles structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) are spes that issue junior notes and senior debt ( medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper ) to fund the purchase of high quality assets . the junior notes are subject to the 201cfirst loss 201d risk of the sivs . the sivs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets . the company acts as manager for the sivs and , prior to december 13 , 2007 , was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the sivs . in response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the sivs for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the siv-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets , on december 13 , 2007 , citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the sivs 2019 senior debt ratings . as a result of this commitment , citigroup became the sivs 2019 primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities . on february 12 , 2008 , citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities , which took the form of a commitment to provide $ 3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the sivs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero . the mezzanine capital facility was increased by $ 1 billion to $ 4.5 billion , with the additional commitment funded during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes . the facilities were at arm 2019s-length terms . interest was paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a per annum fee was paid on the unused portion . during the period to november 18 , 2008 , the company wrote down $ 3.3 billion on siv assets . in order to complete the wind-down of the sivs , the company , in a nearly cashless transaction , purchased the remaining assets of the sivs at fair value , with a trade date of november 18 , 2008 . the company funded the purchase of the siv assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the sivs , as the medium-term notes mature . the net funding provided by the company to fund the purchase of the siv assets was $ 0.3 billion . as of december 31 , 2008 , the carrying amount of the purchased siv assets was $ 16.6 billion , of which $ 16.5 billion is classified as htm assets . investment funds the company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity , hedge funds , real estate , fixed income and infrastructure . the company earns a management fee , which is a percentage of capital under management , and may earn performance fees . in addition , for some of these funds the company has an ownership interest in the investment funds . the company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments . the company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees 2019 investment commitments. .
Question: what are the proceeds from new securitizations in 2008?
Answer: 1.2
Question: what about in 2007?
Answer: 10.5
Question: what is the net change?
|
-9.3
|
CONVFINQA3737
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
application of specific accounting literature . for the nonconsolidated proprietary tob trusts and qspe tob trusts , the company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet . the following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 : in billions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proceeds from new securitizations</td><td>$ 1.2</td><td>$ 10.5</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows</td><td>0.5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 0.5 2014 2014 municipal investments municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing . the company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership . client intermediation client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security , referenced asset or index . these transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes . in these transactions , the spe typically obtains exposure to the underlying security , referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument , such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap . in turn the spe issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security , referenced asset or index . the spe invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract ( gic ) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction . the company 2019s involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the spe 2019s derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the spe . in certain transactions , the investor 2019s maximum risk of loss is limited and the company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level . the company 2019s maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the spe and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the company through a separate instrument issued by the spe . the derivative instrument held by the company may generate a receivable from the spe ( for example , where the company purchases credit protection from the spe in connection with the spe 2019s issuance of a credit-linked note ) , which is collateralized by the assets owned by the spe . these derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under fin 46 ( r ) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the spe . structured investment vehicles structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) are spes that issue junior notes and senior debt ( medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper ) to fund the purchase of high quality assets . the junior notes are subject to the 201cfirst loss 201d risk of the sivs . the sivs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets . the company acts as manager for the sivs and , prior to december 13 , 2007 , was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the sivs . in response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the sivs for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the siv-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets , on december 13 , 2007 , citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the sivs 2019 senior debt ratings . as a result of this commitment , citigroup became the sivs 2019 primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities . on february 12 , 2008 , citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities , which took the form of a commitment to provide $ 3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the sivs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero . the mezzanine capital facility was increased by $ 1 billion to $ 4.5 billion , with the additional commitment funded during the fourth quarter of 2008 . the facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes . the facilities were at arm 2019s-length terms . interest was paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a per annum fee was paid on the unused portion . during the period to november 18 , 2008 , the company wrote down $ 3.3 billion on siv assets . in order to complete the wind-down of the sivs , the company , in a nearly cashless transaction , purchased the remaining assets of the sivs at fair value , with a trade date of november 18 , 2008 . the company funded the purchase of the siv assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the sivs , as the medium-term notes mature . the net funding provided by the company to fund the purchase of the siv assets was $ 0.3 billion . as of december 31 , 2008 , the carrying amount of the purchased siv assets was $ 16.6 billion , of which $ 16.5 billion is classified as htm assets . investment funds the company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity , hedge funds , real estate , fixed income and infrastructure . the company earns a management fee , which is a percentage of capital under management , and may earn performance fees . in addition , for some of these funds the company has an ownership interest in the investment funds . the company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments . the company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees 2019 investment commitments. .
Question: what are the proceeds from new securitizations in 2008?
Answer: 1.2
Question: what about in 2007?
Answer: 10.5
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -9.3
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
|
-0.88571
|
CONVFINQA3738
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are public investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund manager . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) . fixed income securities categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g . interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . private equity funds , real estate funds , hedge funds , and fixed income securities categorized as level 3 are valued based on valuation models that include significant unobservable inputs and cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners , while hedge funds are valued by independent administrators . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners or independent administrators use both the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . commodities categorized as level 1 are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . commodities categorized as level 2 represent shares in a commingled commodity fund valued using the nav , which is corroborated by observable market data . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 3.6 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.5 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2013 . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 235 million related to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we expect no required contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2013 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018 - 2022</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 1900</td><td>$ 1970</td><td>$ 2050</td><td>$ 2130</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 12880</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>200</td><td>210</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>1080</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 380 million in 2012 , $ 378 million in 2011 , and $ 379 million in 2010 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 48.6 million and 52.1 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011. .
Question: what was the number of shares from the common stock held by defined contribution plans in 2012, in millions?
|
48.6
|
CONVFINQA3739
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are public investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund manager . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) . fixed income securities categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g . interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . private equity funds , real estate funds , hedge funds , and fixed income securities categorized as level 3 are valued based on valuation models that include significant unobservable inputs and cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners , while hedge funds are valued by independent administrators . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners or independent administrators use both the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . commodities categorized as level 1 are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . commodities categorized as level 2 represent shares in a commingled commodity fund valued using the nav , which is corroborated by observable market data . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 3.6 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.5 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2013 . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 235 million related to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we expect no required contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2013 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018 - 2022</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 1900</td><td>$ 1970</td><td>$ 2050</td><td>$ 2130</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 12880</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>200</td><td>210</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>1080</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 380 million in 2012 , $ 378 million in 2011 , and $ 379 million in 2010 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 48.6 million and 52.1 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011. .
Question: what was the number of shares from the common stock held by defined contribution plans in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 48.6
Question: and what was it in 2011, also in millions?
|
52.1
|
CONVFINQA3740
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are public investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund manager . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) . fixed income securities categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g . interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . private equity funds , real estate funds , hedge funds , and fixed income securities categorized as level 3 are valued based on valuation models that include significant unobservable inputs and cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners , while hedge funds are valued by independent administrators . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners or independent administrators use both the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . commodities categorized as level 1 are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . commodities categorized as level 2 represent shares in a commingled commodity fund valued using the nav , which is corroborated by observable market data . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 3.6 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.5 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2013 . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 235 million related to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we expect no required contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2013 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018 - 2022</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 1900</td><td>$ 1970</td><td>$ 2050</td><td>$ 2130</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 12880</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>200</td><td>210</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>1080</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 380 million in 2012 , $ 378 million in 2011 , and $ 379 million in 2010 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 48.6 million and 52.1 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011. .
Question: what was the number of shares from the common stock held by defined contribution plans in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 48.6
Question: and what was it in 2011, also in millions?
Answer: 52.1
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
|
-3.5
|
CONVFINQA3741
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are public investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund manager . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) . fixed income securities categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g . interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . private equity funds , real estate funds , hedge funds , and fixed income securities categorized as level 3 are valued based on valuation models that include significant unobservable inputs and cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners , while hedge funds are valued by independent administrators . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners or independent administrators use both the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . commodities categorized as level 1 are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . commodities categorized as level 2 represent shares in a commingled commodity fund valued using the nav , which is corroborated by observable market data . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 3.6 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.5 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2013 . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 235 million related to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we expect no required contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2013 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018 - 2022</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 1900</td><td>$ 1970</td><td>$ 2050</td><td>$ 2130</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 12880</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>200</td><td>210</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>1080</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 380 million in 2012 , $ 378 million in 2011 , and $ 379 million in 2010 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 48.6 million and 52.1 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011. .
Question: what was the number of shares from the common stock held by defined contribution plans in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 48.6
Question: and what was it in 2011, also in millions?
Answer: 52.1
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: -3.5
Question: what was the number of shares from the common stock held by defined contribution plans in 2011, in millions?
|
52.1
|
CONVFINQA3742
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker , or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds are public investment vehicles valued using the net asset value ( nav ) provided by the fund manager . the nav is the total value of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding . commingled equity funds are categorized as level 1 if traded at their nav on a nationally recognized securities exchange or categorized as level 2 if the nav is corroborated by observable market data ( e.g. , purchases or sales activity ) . fixed income securities categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g . interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers , or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . private equity funds , real estate funds , hedge funds , and fixed income securities categorized as level 3 are valued based on valuation models that include significant unobservable inputs and cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . valuations for private equity funds and real estate funds are determined by the general partners , while hedge funds are valued by independent administrators . depending on the nature of the assets , the general partners or independent administrators use both the income and market approaches in their models . the market approach consists of analyzing market transactions for comparable assets while the income approach uses earnings or the net present value of estimated future cash flows adjusted for liquidity and other risk factors . commodities categorized as level 1 are traded on an active commodity exchange and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . commodities categorized as level 2 represent shares in a commingled commodity fund valued using the nav , which is corroborated by observable market data . contributions and expected benefit payments we generally determine funding requirements for our defined benefit pension plans in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 3.6 billion related to our qualified defined benefit pension plans . we plan to make contributions of approximately $ 1.5 billion related to the qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2013 . in 2012 , we made contributions of $ 235 million related to our retiree medical and life insurance plans . we expect no required contributions related to the retiree medical and life insurance plans in 2013 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018 - 2022</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 1900</td><td>$ 1970</td><td>$ 2050</td><td>$ 2130</td><td>$ 2220</td><td>$ 12880</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>200</td><td>210</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>220</td><td>1080</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 380 million in 2012 , $ 378 million in 2011 , and $ 379 million in 2010 , the majority of which were funded in our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 48.6 million and 52.1 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011. .
Question: what was the number of shares from the common stock held by defined contribution plans in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 48.6
Question: and what was it in 2011, also in millions?
Answer: 52.1
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: -3.5
Question: what was the number of shares from the common stock held by defined contribution plans in 2011, in millions?
Answer: 52.1
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2011 number of shares, in percentage?
|
-0.06718
|
CONVFINQA3743
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 168 nonrecurring fair value changes the following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , related to financial instru- ments held at these dates . year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ -3550 ( 3550 )</td><td>$ -1159 ( 1159 )</td><td>$ -218 ( 218 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>-389 ( 389 )</td><td>-2728 ( 2728 )</td><td>-502 ( 502 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total loans</td><td>-3939 ( 3939 )</td><td>-3887 ( 3887 )</td><td>-720 ( 720 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other assets</td><td>-104 ( 104 )</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td><td>-161 ( 161 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accounts payable andother liabilities</td><td>31</td><td>-285 ( 285 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total nonrecurringfairvalue gains/ ( losses )</td><td>$ -4012 ( 4012 )</td><td>$ -4857 ( 4857 )</td><td>$ -879 ( 879 )</td></tr></table> accounts payable and other liabilities 31 ( 285 ) 2 total nonrecurring fair value gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 4012 ) $ ( 4857 ) $ ( 879 ) in the above table , loans predominantly include : ( 1 ) write-downs of delinquent mortgage and home equity loans where impairment is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral ; and ( 2 ) the change in fair value for leveraged lending loans carried on the consolidated balance sheets at the lower of cost or fair value . accounts payable and other liabilities predominantly include the change in fair value for unfunded lending-related commitments within the leveraged lending portfolio . level 3 analysis level 3 assets ( including assets measured at fair value on a nonre- curring basis ) were 6% ( 6 % ) of total firm assets at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 . level 3 assets were $ 130.4 billion at december 31 , 2009 , reflecting a decrease of $ 7.3 billion in 2009 , due to the following : 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in gross derivative receivables , predominantly driven by the tightening of credit spreads . offset- ting a portion of the decrease were net transfers into level 3 dur- ing the year , most notably a transfer into level 3 of $ 41.3 billion of structured credit derivative receivables , and a transfer out of level 3 of $ 17.7 billion of single-name cds on abs . the fair value of the receivables transferred into level 3 during the year was $ 22.1 billion at december 31 , 2009 . the fair value of struc- tured credit derivative payables with a similar underlying risk profile to the previously noted receivables , that are also classified in level 3 , was $ 12.5 billion at december 31 , 2009 . these de- rivatives payables offset the receivables , as they are modeled and valued the same way with the same parameters and inputs as the assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 3.5 billion in loans , predominantly driven by sales of leveraged loans and transfers of similar loans to level 2 , due to increased price transparency for such assets . leveraged loans are typically classified as held-for-sale and measured at the lower of cost or fair value and , therefore , included in the nonre- curring fair value assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments , primarily in loans and residential- and commercial- mbs , principally driven by sales and markdowns , and by sales and unwinds of structured transactions with hedge funds . the declines were partially offset by a transfer from level 2 to level 3 of certain structured notes reflecting lower liquidity and less pricing ob- servability , and also increases in the fair value of other abs . 2022 a net increase of $ 6.1 billion in msrs , due to increases in the fair value of the asset , related primarily to market interest rate and other changes affecting the firm's estimate of future pre- payments , as well as sales in rfs of originated loans for which servicing rights were retained . these increases were offset par- tially by servicing portfolio runoff . 2022 a net increase of $ 1.9 billion in accrued interest and accounts receivable related to increases in subordinated retained interests from the firm 2019s credit card securitization activities . gains and losses gains and losses included in the tables for 2009 and 2008 included : 2022 $ 11.4 billion of net losses on derivatives , primarily related to the tightening of credit spreads . 2022 net losses on trading 2013debt and equity instruments of $ 671 million , consisting of $ 2.1 billion of losses , primarily related to residential and commercial loans and mbs , principally driven by markdowns and sales , partially offset by gains of $ 1.4 billion , reflecting increases in the fair value of other abs . ( for a further discussion of the gains and losses on mortgage-related expo- sures , inclusive of risk management activities , see the 201cmort- gage-related exposures carried at fair value 201d discussion below. ) 2022 $ 5.8 billion of gains on msrs . 2022 $ 1.4 billion of losses related to structured note liabilities , pre- dominantly due to volatility in the equity markets . 2022 losses on trading-debt and equity instruments of approximately $ 12.8 billion , principally from mortgage-related transactions and auction-rate securities . 2022 losses of $ 6.9 billion on msrs . 2022 losses of approximately $ 3.9 billion on leveraged loans . 2022 net gains of $ 4.6 billion related to derivatives , principally due to changes in credit spreads and rate curves . 2022 gains of $ 4.5 billion related to structured notes , principally due to significant volatility in the fixed income , commodities and eq- uity markets . 2022 private equity losses of $ 638 million . for further information on changes in the fair value of the msrs , see note 17 on pages 223 2013224 of this annual report. .
Question: in the year of 2008, what was the amount of the loans held-for-sale?
|
2728.0
|
CONVFINQA3744
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 168 nonrecurring fair value changes the following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , related to financial instru- ments held at these dates . year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ -3550 ( 3550 )</td><td>$ -1159 ( 1159 )</td><td>$ -218 ( 218 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>-389 ( 389 )</td><td>-2728 ( 2728 )</td><td>-502 ( 502 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total loans</td><td>-3939 ( 3939 )</td><td>-3887 ( 3887 )</td><td>-720 ( 720 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other assets</td><td>-104 ( 104 )</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td><td>-161 ( 161 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accounts payable andother liabilities</td><td>31</td><td>-285 ( 285 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total nonrecurringfairvalue gains/ ( losses )</td><td>$ -4012 ( 4012 )</td><td>$ -4857 ( 4857 )</td><td>$ -879 ( 879 )</td></tr></table> accounts payable and other liabilities 31 ( 285 ) 2 total nonrecurring fair value gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 4012 ) $ ( 4857 ) $ ( 879 ) in the above table , loans predominantly include : ( 1 ) write-downs of delinquent mortgage and home equity loans where impairment is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral ; and ( 2 ) the change in fair value for leveraged lending loans carried on the consolidated balance sheets at the lower of cost or fair value . accounts payable and other liabilities predominantly include the change in fair value for unfunded lending-related commitments within the leveraged lending portfolio . level 3 analysis level 3 assets ( including assets measured at fair value on a nonre- curring basis ) were 6% ( 6 % ) of total firm assets at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 . level 3 assets were $ 130.4 billion at december 31 , 2009 , reflecting a decrease of $ 7.3 billion in 2009 , due to the following : 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in gross derivative receivables , predominantly driven by the tightening of credit spreads . offset- ting a portion of the decrease were net transfers into level 3 dur- ing the year , most notably a transfer into level 3 of $ 41.3 billion of structured credit derivative receivables , and a transfer out of level 3 of $ 17.7 billion of single-name cds on abs . the fair value of the receivables transferred into level 3 during the year was $ 22.1 billion at december 31 , 2009 . the fair value of struc- tured credit derivative payables with a similar underlying risk profile to the previously noted receivables , that are also classified in level 3 , was $ 12.5 billion at december 31 , 2009 . these de- rivatives payables offset the receivables , as they are modeled and valued the same way with the same parameters and inputs as the assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 3.5 billion in loans , predominantly driven by sales of leveraged loans and transfers of similar loans to level 2 , due to increased price transparency for such assets . leveraged loans are typically classified as held-for-sale and measured at the lower of cost or fair value and , therefore , included in the nonre- curring fair value assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments , primarily in loans and residential- and commercial- mbs , principally driven by sales and markdowns , and by sales and unwinds of structured transactions with hedge funds . the declines were partially offset by a transfer from level 2 to level 3 of certain structured notes reflecting lower liquidity and less pricing ob- servability , and also increases in the fair value of other abs . 2022 a net increase of $ 6.1 billion in msrs , due to increases in the fair value of the asset , related primarily to market interest rate and other changes affecting the firm's estimate of future pre- payments , as well as sales in rfs of originated loans for which servicing rights were retained . these increases were offset par- tially by servicing portfolio runoff . 2022 a net increase of $ 1.9 billion in accrued interest and accounts receivable related to increases in subordinated retained interests from the firm 2019s credit card securitization activities . gains and losses gains and losses included in the tables for 2009 and 2008 included : 2022 $ 11.4 billion of net losses on derivatives , primarily related to the tightening of credit spreads . 2022 net losses on trading 2013debt and equity instruments of $ 671 million , consisting of $ 2.1 billion of losses , primarily related to residential and commercial loans and mbs , principally driven by markdowns and sales , partially offset by gains of $ 1.4 billion , reflecting increases in the fair value of other abs . ( for a further discussion of the gains and losses on mortgage-related expo- sures , inclusive of risk management activities , see the 201cmort- gage-related exposures carried at fair value 201d discussion below. ) 2022 $ 5.8 billion of gains on msrs . 2022 $ 1.4 billion of losses related to structured note liabilities , pre- dominantly due to volatility in the equity markets . 2022 losses on trading-debt and equity instruments of approximately $ 12.8 billion , principally from mortgage-related transactions and auction-rate securities . 2022 losses of $ 6.9 billion on msrs . 2022 losses of approximately $ 3.9 billion on leveraged loans . 2022 net gains of $ 4.6 billion related to derivatives , principally due to changes in credit spreads and rate curves . 2022 gains of $ 4.5 billion related to structured notes , principally due to significant volatility in the fixed income , commodities and eq- uity markets . 2022 private equity losses of $ 638 million . for further information on changes in the fair value of the msrs , see note 17 on pages 223 2013224 of this annual report. .
Question: in the year of 2008, what was the amount of the loans held-for-sale?
Answer: 2728.0
Question: and what was the total of all loans?
|
3887.0
|
CONVFINQA3745
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 168 nonrecurring fair value changes the following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , related to financial instru- ments held at these dates . year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ -3550 ( 3550 )</td><td>$ -1159 ( 1159 )</td><td>$ -218 ( 218 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>-389 ( 389 )</td><td>-2728 ( 2728 )</td><td>-502 ( 502 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total loans</td><td>-3939 ( 3939 )</td><td>-3887 ( 3887 )</td><td>-720 ( 720 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other assets</td><td>-104 ( 104 )</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td><td>-161 ( 161 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accounts payable andother liabilities</td><td>31</td><td>-285 ( 285 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total nonrecurringfairvalue gains/ ( losses )</td><td>$ -4012 ( 4012 )</td><td>$ -4857 ( 4857 )</td><td>$ -879 ( 879 )</td></tr></table> accounts payable and other liabilities 31 ( 285 ) 2 total nonrecurring fair value gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 4012 ) $ ( 4857 ) $ ( 879 ) in the above table , loans predominantly include : ( 1 ) write-downs of delinquent mortgage and home equity loans where impairment is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral ; and ( 2 ) the change in fair value for leveraged lending loans carried on the consolidated balance sheets at the lower of cost or fair value . accounts payable and other liabilities predominantly include the change in fair value for unfunded lending-related commitments within the leveraged lending portfolio . level 3 analysis level 3 assets ( including assets measured at fair value on a nonre- curring basis ) were 6% ( 6 % ) of total firm assets at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 . level 3 assets were $ 130.4 billion at december 31 , 2009 , reflecting a decrease of $ 7.3 billion in 2009 , due to the following : 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in gross derivative receivables , predominantly driven by the tightening of credit spreads . offset- ting a portion of the decrease were net transfers into level 3 dur- ing the year , most notably a transfer into level 3 of $ 41.3 billion of structured credit derivative receivables , and a transfer out of level 3 of $ 17.7 billion of single-name cds on abs . the fair value of the receivables transferred into level 3 during the year was $ 22.1 billion at december 31 , 2009 . the fair value of struc- tured credit derivative payables with a similar underlying risk profile to the previously noted receivables , that are also classified in level 3 , was $ 12.5 billion at december 31 , 2009 . these de- rivatives payables offset the receivables , as they are modeled and valued the same way with the same parameters and inputs as the assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 3.5 billion in loans , predominantly driven by sales of leveraged loans and transfers of similar loans to level 2 , due to increased price transparency for such assets . leveraged loans are typically classified as held-for-sale and measured at the lower of cost or fair value and , therefore , included in the nonre- curring fair value assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments , primarily in loans and residential- and commercial- mbs , principally driven by sales and markdowns , and by sales and unwinds of structured transactions with hedge funds . the declines were partially offset by a transfer from level 2 to level 3 of certain structured notes reflecting lower liquidity and less pricing ob- servability , and also increases in the fair value of other abs . 2022 a net increase of $ 6.1 billion in msrs , due to increases in the fair value of the asset , related primarily to market interest rate and other changes affecting the firm's estimate of future pre- payments , as well as sales in rfs of originated loans for which servicing rights were retained . these increases were offset par- tially by servicing portfolio runoff . 2022 a net increase of $ 1.9 billion in accrued interest and accounts receivable related to increases in subordinated retained interests from the firm 2019s credit card securitization activities . gains and losses gains and losses included in the tables for 2009 and 2008 included : 2022 $ 11.4 billion of net losses on derivatives , primarily related to the tightening of credit spreads . 2022 net losses on trading 2013debt and equity instruments of $ 671 million , consisting of $ 2.1 billion of losses , primarily related to residential and commercial loans and mbs , principally driven by markdowns and sales , partially offset by gains of $ 1.4 billion , reflecting increases in the fair value of other abs . ( for a further discussion of the gains and losses on mortgage-related expo- sures , inclusive of risk management activities , see the 201cmort- gage-related exposures carried at fair value 201d discussion below. ) 2022 $ 5.8 billion of gains on msrs . 2022 $ 1.4 billion of losses related to structured note liabilities , pre- dominantly due to volatility in the equity markets . 2022 losses on trading-debt and equity instruments of approximately $ 12.8 billion , principally from mortgage-related transactions and auction-rate securities . 2022 losses of $ 6.9 billion on msrs . 2022 losses of approximately $ 3.9 billion on leveraged loans . 2022 net gains of $ 4.6 billion related to derivatives , principally due to changes in credit spreads and rate curves . 2022 gains of $ 4.5 billion related to structured notes , principally due to significant volatility in the fixed income , commodities and eq- uity markets . 2022 private equity losses of $ 638 million . for further information on changes in the fair value of the msrs , see note 17 on pages 223 2013224 of this annual report. .
Question: in the year of 2008, what was the amount of the loans held-for-sale?
Answer: 2728.0
Question: and what was the total of all loans?
Answer: 3887.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
|
0.70183
|
CONVFINQA3746
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 168 nonrecurring fair value changes the following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , related to financial instru- ments held at these dates . year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ -3550 ( 3550 )</td><td>$ -1159 ( 1159 )</td><td>$ -218 ( 218 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>-389 ( 389 )</td><td>-2728 ( 2728 )</td><td>-502 ( 502 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total loans</td><td>-3939 ( 3939 )</td><td>-3887 ( 3887 )</td><td>-720 ( 720 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other assets</td><td>-104 ( 104 )</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td><td>-161 ( 161 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accounts payable andother liabilities</td><td>31</td><td>-285 ( 285 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total nonrecurringfairvalue gains/ ( losses )</td><td>$ -4012 ( 4012 )</td><td>$ -4857 ( 4857 )</td><td>$ -879 ( 879 )</td></tr></table> accounts payable and other liabilities 31 ( 285 ) 2 total nonrecurring fair value gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 4012 ) $ ( 4857 ) $ ( 879 ) in the above table , loans predominantly include : ( 1 ) write-downs of delinquent mortgage and home equity loans where impairment is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral ; and ( 2 ) the change in fair value for leveraged lending loans carried on the consolidated balance sheets at the lower of cost or fair value . accounts payable and other liabilities predominantly include the change in fair value for unfunded lending-related commitments within the leveraged lending portfolio . level 3 analysis level 3 assets ( including assets measured at fair value on a nonre- curring basis ) were 6% ( 6 % ) of total firm assets at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 . level 3 assets were $ 130.4 billion at december 31 , 2009 , reflecting a decrease of $ 7.3 billion in 2009 , due to the following : 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in gross derivative receivables , predominantly driven by the tightening of credit spreads . offset- ting a portion of the decrease were net transfers into level 3 dur- ing the year , most notably a transfer into level 3 of $ 41.3 billion of structured credit derivative receivables , and a transfer out of level 3 of $ 17.7 billion of single-name cds on abs . the fair value of the receivables transferred into level 3 during the year was $ 22.1 billion at december 31 , 2009 . the fair value of struc- tured credit derivative payables with a similar underlying risk profile to the previously noted receivables , that are also classified in level 3 , was $ 12.5 billion at december 31 , 2009 . these de- rivatives payables offset the receivables , as they are modeled and valued the same way with the same parameters and inputs as the assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 3.5 billion in loans , predominantly driven by sales of leveraged loans and transfers of similar loans to level 2 , due to increased price transparency for such assets . leveraged loans are typically classified as held-for-sale and measured at the lower of cost or fair value and , therefore , included in the nonre- curring fair value assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments , primarily in loans and residential- and commercial- mbs , principally driven by sales and markdowns , and by sales and unwinds of structured transactions with hedge funds . the declines were partially offset by a transfer from level 2 to level 3 of certain structured notes reflecting lower liquidity and less pricing ob- servability , and also increases in the fair value of other abs . 2022 a net increase of $ 6.1 billion in msrs , due to increases in the fair value of the asset , related primarily to market interest rate and other changes affecting the firm's estimate of future pre- payments , as well as sales in rfs of originated loans for which servicing rights were retained . these increases were offset par- tially by servicing portfolio runoff . 2022 a net increase of $ 1.9 billion in accrued interest and accounts receivable related to increases in subordinated retained interests from the firm 2019s credit card securitization activities . gains and losses gains and losses included in the tables for 2009 and 2008 included : 2022 $ 11.4 billion of net losses on derivatives , primarily related to the tightening of credit spreads . 2022 net losses on trading 2013debt and equity instruments of $ 671 million , consisting of $ 2.1 billion of losses , primarily related to residential and commercial loans and mbs , principally driven by markdowns and sales , partially offset by gains of $ 1.4 billion , reflecting increases in the fair value of other abs . ( for a further discussion of the gains and losses on mortgage-related expo- sures , inclusive of risk management activities , see the 201cmort- gage-related exposures carried at fair value 201d discussion below. ) 2022 $ 5.8 billion of gains on msrs . 2022 $ 1.4 billion of losses related to structured note liabilities , pre- dominantly due to volatility in the equity markets . 2022 losses on trading-debt and equity instruments of approximately $ 12.8 billion , principally from mortgage-related transactions and auction-rate securities . 2022 losses of $ 6.9 billion on msrs . 2022 losses of approximately $ 3.9 billion on leveraged loans . 2022 net gains of $ 4.6 billion related to derivatives , principally due to changes in credit spreads and rate curves . 2022 gains of $ 4.5 billion related to structured notes , principally due to significant volatility in the fixed income , commodities and eq- uity markets . 2022 private equity losses of $ 638 million . for further information on changes in the fair value of the msrs , see note 17 on pages 223 2013224 of this annual report. .
Question: in the year of 2008, what was the amount of the loans held-for-sale?
Answer: 2728.0
Question: and what was the total of all loans?
Answer: 3887.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.70183
Question: in the year subsequent to that one, what was the total of accounts payable and other liabilities, in millions?
|
31.0
|
CONVFINQA3747
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 168 nonrecurring fair value changes the following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , related to financial instru- ments held at these dates . year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ -3550 ( 3550 )</td><td>$ -1159 ( 1159 )</td><td>$ -218 ( 218 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>-389 ( 389 )</td><td>-2728 ( 2728 )</td><td>-502 ( 502 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total loans</td><td>-3939 ( 3939 )</td><td>-3887 ( 3887 )</td><td>-720 ( 720 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other assets</td><td>-104 ( 104 )</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td><td>-161 ( 161 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accounts payable andother liabilities</td><td>31</td><td>-285 ( 285 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total nonrecurringfairvalue gains/ ( losses )</td><td>$ -4012 ( 4012 )</td><td>$ -4857 ( 4857 )</td><td>$ -879 ( 879 )</td></tr></table> accounts payable and other liabilities 31 ( 285 ) 2 total nonrecurring fair value gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 4012 ) $ ( 4857 ) $ ( 879 ) in the above table , loans predominantly include : ( 1 ) write-downs of delinquent mortgage and home equity loans where impairment is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral ; and ( 2 ) the change in fair value for leveraged lending loans carried on the consolidated balance sheets at the lower of cost or fair value . accounts payable and other liabilities predominantly include the change in fair value for unfunded lending-related commitments within the leveraged lending portfolio . level 3 analysis level 3 assets ( including assets measured at fair value on a nonre- curring basis ) were 6% ( 6 % ) of total firm assets at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 . level 3 assets were $ 130.4 billion at december 31 , 2009 , reflecting a decrease of $ 7.3 billion in 2009 , due to the following : 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in gross derivative receivables , predominantly driven by the tightening of credit spreads . offset- ting a portion of the decrease were net transfers into level 3 dur- ing the year , most notably a transfer into level 3 of $ 41.3 billion of structured credit derivative receivables , and a transfer out of level 3 of $ 17.7 billion of single-name cds on abs . the fair value of the receivables transferred into level 3 during the year was $ 22.1 billion at december 31 , 2009 . the fair value of struc- tured credit derivative payables with a similar underlying risk profile to the previously noted receivables , that are also classified in level 3 , was $ 12.5 billion at december 31 , 2009 . these de- rivatives payables offset the receivables , as they are modeled and valued the same way with the same parameters and inputs as the assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 3.5 billion in loans , predominantly driven by sales of leveraged loans and transfers of similar loans to level 2 , due to increased price transparency for such assets . leveraged loans are typically classified as held-for-sale and measured at the lower of cost or fair value and , therefore , included in the nonre- curring fair value assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments , primarily in loans and residential- and commercial- mbs , principally driven by sales and markdowns , and by sales and unwinds of structured transactions with hedge funds . the declines were partially offset by a transfer from level 2 to level 3 of certain structured notes reflecting lower liquidity and less pricing ob- servability , and also increases in the fair value of other abs . 2022 a net increase of $ 6.1 billion in msrs , due to increases in the fair value of the asset , related primarily to market interest rate and other changes affecting the firm's estimate of future pre- payments , as well as sales in rfs of originated loans for which servicing rights were retained . these increases were offset par- tially by servicing portfolio runoff . 2022 a net increase of $ 1.9 billion in accrued interest and accounts receivable related to increases in subordinated retained interests from the firm 2019s credit card securitization activities . gains and losses gains and losses included in the tables for 2009 and 2008 included : 2022 $ 11.4 billion of net losses on derivatives , primarily related to the tightening of credit spreads . 2022 net losses on trading 2013debt and equity instruments of $ 671 million , consisting of $ 2.1 billion of losses , primarily related to residential and commercial loans and mbs , principally driven by markdowns and sales , partially offset by gains of $ 1.4 billion , reflecting increases in the fair value of other abs . ( for a further discussion of the gains and losses on mortgage-related expo- sures , inclusive of risk management activities , see the 201cmort- gage-related exposures carried at fair value 201d discussion below. ) 2022 $ 5.8 billion of gains on msrs . 2022 $ 1.4 billion of losses related to structured note liabilities , pre- dominantly due to volatility in the equity markets . 2022 losses on trading-debt and equity instruments of approximately $ 12.8 billion , principally from mortgage-related transactions and auction-rate securities . 2022 losses of $ 6.9 billion on msrs . 2022 losses of approximately $ 3.9 billion on leveraged loans . 2022 net gains of $ 4.6 billion related to derivatives , principally due to changes in credit spreads and rate curves . 2022 gains of $ 4.5 billion related to structured notes , principally due to significant volatility in the fixed income , commodities and eq- uity markets . 2022 private equity losses of $ 638 million . for further information on changes in the fair value of the msrs , see note 17 on pages 223 2013224 of this annual report. .
Question: in the year of 2008, what was the amount of the loans held-for-sale?
Answer: 2728.0
Question: and what was the total of all loans?
Answer: 3887.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.70183
Question: in the year subsequent to that one, what was the total of accounts payable and other liabilities, in millions?
Answer: 31.0
Question: and what was it that year of 2008?
|
-285.0
|
CONVFINQA3748
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 168 nonrecurring fair value changes the following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , related to financial instru- ments held at these dates . year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ -3550 ( 3550 )</td><td>$ -1159 ( 1159 )</td><td>$ -218 ( 218 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>-389 ( 389 )</td><td>-2728 ( 2728 )</td><td>-502 ( 502 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total loans</td><td>-3939 ( 3939 )</td><td>-3887 ( 3887 )</td><td>-720 ( 720 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other assets</td><td>-104 ( 104 )</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td><td>-161 ( 161 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accounts payable andother liabilities</td><td>31</td><td>-285 ( 285 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total nonrecurringfairvalue gains/ ( losses )</td><td>$ -4012 ( 4012 )</td><td>$ -4857 ( 4857 )</td><td>$ -879 ( 879 )</td></tr></table> accounts payable and other liabilities 31 ( 285 ) 2 total nonrecurring fair value gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 4012 ) $ ( 4857 ) $ ( 879 ) in the above table , loans predominantly include : ( 1 ) write-downs of delinquent mortgage and home equity loans where impairment is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral ; and ( 2 ) the change in fair value for leveraged lending loans carried on the consolidated balance sheets at the lower of cost or fair value . accounts payable and other liabilities predominantly include the change in fair value for unfunded lending-related commitments within the leveraged lending portfolio . level 3 analysis level 3 assets ( including assets measured at fair value on a nonre- curring basis ) were 6% ( 6 % ) of total firm assets at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 . level 3 assets were $ 130.4 billion at december 31 , 2009 , reflecting a decrease of $ 7.3 billion in 2009 , due to the following : 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in gross derivative receivables , predominantly driven by the tightening of credit spreads . offset- ting a portion of the decrease were net transfers into level 3 dur- ing the year , most notably a transfer into level 3 of $ 41.3 billion of structured credit derivative receivables , and a transfer out of level 3 of $ 17.7 billion of single-name cds on abs . the fair value of the receivables transferred into level 3 during the year was $ 22.1 billion at december 31 , 2009 . the fair value of struc- tured credit derivative payables with a similar underlying risk profile to the previously noted receivables , that are also classified in level 3 , was $ 12.5 billion at december 31 , 2009 . these de- rivatives payables offset the receivables , as they are modeled and valued the same way with the same parameters and inputs as the assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 3.5 billion in loans , predominantly driven by sales of leveraged loans and transfers of similar loans to level 2 , due to increased price transparency for such assets . leveraged loans are typically classified as held-for-sale and measured at the lower of cost or fair value and , therefore , included in the nonre- curring fair value assets . 2022 a net decrease of $ 6.3 billion in trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments , primarily in loans and residential- and commercial- mbs , principally driven by sales and markdowns , and by sales and unwinds of structured transactions with hedge funds . the declines were partially offset by a transfer from level 2 to level 3 of certain structured notes reflecting lower liquidity and less pricing ob- servability , and also increases in the fair value of other abs . 2022 a net increase of $ 6.1 billion in msrs , due to increases in the fair value of the asset , related primarily to market interest rate and other changes affecting the firm's estimate of future pre- payments , as well as sales in rfs of originated loans for which servicing rights were retained . these increases were offset par- tially by servicing portfolio runoff . 2022 a net increase of $ 1.9 billion in accrued interest and accounts receivable related to increases in subordinated retained interests from the firm 2019s credit card securitization activities . gains and losses gains and losses included in the tables for 2009 and 2008 included : 2022 $ 11.4 billion of net losses on derivatives , primarily related to the tightening of credit spreads . 2022 net losses on trading 2013debt and equity instruments of $ 671 million , consisting of $ 2.1 billion of losses , primarily related to residential and commercial loans and mbs , principally driven by markdowns and sales , partially offset by gains of $ 1.4 billion , reflecting increases in the fair value of other abs . ( for a further discussion of the gains and losses on mortgage-related expo- sures , inclusive of risk management activities , see the 201cmort- gage-related exposures carried at fair value 201d discussion below. ) 2022 $ 5.8 billion of gains on msrs . 2022 $ 1.4 billion of losses related to structured note liabilities , pre- dominantly due to volatility in the equity markets . 2022 losses on trading-debt and equity instruments of approximately $ 12.8 billion , principally from mortgage-related transactions and auction-rate securities . 2022 losses of $ 6.9 billion on msrs . 2022 losses of approximately $ 3.9 billion on leveraged loans . 2022 net gains of $ 4.6 billion related to derivatives , principally due to changes in credit spreads and rate curves . 2022 gains of $ 4.5 billion related to structured notes , principally due to significant volatility in the fixed income , commodities and eq- uity markets . 2022 private equity losses of $ 638 million . for further information on changes in the fair value of the msrs , see note 17 on pages 223 2013224 of this annual report. .
Question: in the year of 2008, what was the amount of the loans held-for-sale?
Answer: 2728.0
Question: and what was the total of all loans?
Answer: 3887.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.70183
Question: in the year subsequent to that one, what was the total of accounts payable and other liabilities, in millions?
Answer: 31.0
Question: and what was it that year of 2008?
Answer: -285.0
Question: by how much, then, did it increase over this period, in millions?
|
316.0
|
CONVFINQA3749
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 6 . selected financial data the following table represents our selected financial data . the table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this report . the table below reflects immaterial error corrections discussed in note 2 : summary of significant accounting policies in item 8. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6708</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>2014</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>358</td><td>100</td><td>241</td><td>203</td><td>-2332 ( 2332 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>146</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>131</td><td>119</td><td>-2397 ( 2397 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6392</td><td>6069</td><td>5270</td><td>5097</td><td>4821</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1779</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>4341</td><td>3838</td><td>1637</td><td>1708</td><td>1823</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>170</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.10</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.91</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr></table> basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.96 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.91 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure . ( 3 ) on march 30 , 2011 , the record date of the stock distribution associated with the spin-off from northrop grumman , approximately 48.8 million shares of $ 0.01 par value hii common stock were distributed to northrop grumman stockholders . this share amount was utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings ( loss ) per share for the three months ended march 31 , 2011 , and all prior periods , as no common stock of the company existed prior to march 30 , 2011 , and the impact of dilutive securities in the three month period ended march 31 , 2011 , was not meaningful. .
Question: what was the amount of the total assets in 2012, in millions of dollars?
|
6392.0
|
CONVFINQA3750
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 6 . selected financial data the following table represents our selected financial data . the table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this report . the table below reflects immaterial error corrections discussed in note 2 : summary of significant accounting policies in item 8. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6708</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>2014</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>358</td><td>100</td><td>241</td><td>203</td><td>-2332 ( 2332 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>146</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>131</td><td>119</td><td>-2397 ( 2397 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6392</td><td>6069</td><td>5270</td><td>5097</td><td>4821</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1779</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>4341</td><td>3838</td><td>1637</td><td>1708</td><td>1823</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>170</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.10</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.91</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr></table> basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.96 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.91 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure . ( 3 ) on march 30 , 2011 , the record date of the stock distribution associated with the spin-off from northrop grumman , approximately 48.8 million shares of $ 0.01 par value hii common stock were distributed to northrop grumman stockholders . this share amount was utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings ( loss ) per share for the three months ended march 31 , 2011 , and all prior periods , as no common stock of the company existed prior to march 30 , 2011 , and the impact of dilutive securities in the three month period ended march 31 , 2011 , was not meaningful. .
Question: what was the amount of the total assets in 2012, in millions of dollars?
Answer: 6392.0
Question: and what was it in 2008, also in millions of dollars?
|
4821.0
|
CONVFINQA3751
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 6 . selected financial data the following table represents our selected financial data . the table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this report . the table below reflects immaterial error corrections discussed in note 2 : summary of significant accounting policies in item 8. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6708</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>2014</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>358</td><td>100</td><td>241</td><td>203</td><td>-2332 ( 2332 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>146</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>131</td><td>119</td><td>-2397 ( 2397 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6392</td><td>6069</td><td>5270</td><td>5097</td><td>4821</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1779</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>4341</td><td>3838</td><td>1637</td><td>1708</td><td>1823</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>170</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.10</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.91</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr></table> basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.96 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.91 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure . ( 3 ) on march 30 , 2011 , the record date of the stock distribution associated with the spin-off from northrop grumman , approximately 48.8 million shares of $ 0.01 par value hii common stock were distributed to northrop grumman stockholders . this share amount was utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings ( loss ) per share for the three months ended march 31 , 2011 , and all prior periods , as no common stock of the company existed prior to march 30 , 2011 , and the impact of dilutive securities in the three month period ended march 31 , 2011 , was not meaningful. .
Question: what was the amount of the total assets in 2012, in millions of dollars?
Answer: 6392.0
Question: and what was it in 2008, also in millions of dollars?
Answer: 4821.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the years?
|
1571.0
|
CONVFINQA3752
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 6 . selected financial data the following table represents our selected financial data . the table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this report . the table below reflects immaterial error corrections discussed in note 2 : summary of significant accounting policies in item 8. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6708</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>2014</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>358</td><td>100</td><td>241</td><td>203</td><td>-2332 ( 2332 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>146</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>131</td><td>119</td><td>-2397 ( 2397 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6392</td><td>6069</td><td>5270</td><td>5097</td><td>4821</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1779</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>4341</td><td>3838</td><td>1637</td><td>1708</td><td>1823</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>170</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.10</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.91</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr></table> basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.96 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.91 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure . ( 3 ) on march 30 , 2011 , the record date of the stock distribution associated with the spin-off from northrop grumman , approximately 48.8 million shares of $ 0.01 par value hii common stock were distributed to northrop grumman stockholders . this share amount was utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings ( loss ) per share for the three months ended march 31 , 2011 , and all prior periods , as no common stock of the company existed prior to march 30 , 2011 , and the impact of dilutive securities in the three month period ended march 31 , 2011 , was not meaningful. .
Question: what was the amount of the total assets in 2012, in millions of dollars?
Answer: 6392.0
Question: and what was it in 2008, also in millions of dollars?
Answer: 4821.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the years?
Answer: 1571.0
Question: and what is that in dollars?
|
1571000000.0
|
CONVFINQA3753
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 6 . selected financial data the following table represents our selected financial data . the table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this report . the table below reflects immaterial error corrections discussed in note 2 : summary of significant accounting policies in item 8. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 6708</td><td>$ 6575</td><td>$ 6723</td><td>$ 6292</td><td>$ 6189</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>2014</td><td>290</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2465</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>358</td><td>100</td><td>241</td><td>203</td><td>-2332 ( 2332 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>146</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>131</td><td>119</td><td>-2397 ( 2397 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets</td><td>6392</td><td>6069</td><td>5270</td><td>5097</td><td>4821</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>1779</td><td>1830</td><td>105</td><td>283</td><td>283</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term obligations</td><td>4341</td><td>3838</td><td>1637</td><td>1708</td><td>1823</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>free cash flow ( 2 )</td><td>170</td><td>331</td><td>168</td><td>-269 ( 269 )</td><td>121</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.10</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )</td><td>$ 2.91</td><td>$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )</td><td>$ 2.68</td><td>$ 2.44</td><td>$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )</td></tr></table> basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.96 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.91 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure . ( 3 ) on march 30 , 2011 , the record date of the stock distribution associated with the spin-off from northrop grumman , approximately 48.8 million shares of $ 0.01 par value hii common stock were distributed to northrop grumman stockholders . this share amount was utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings ( loss ) per share for the three months ended march 31 , 2011 , and all prior periods , as no common stock of the company existed prior to march 30 , 2011 , and the impact of dilutive securities in the three month period ended march 31 , 2011 , was not meaningful. .
Question: what was the amount of the total assets in 2012, in millions of dollars?
Answer: 6392.0
Question: and what was it in 2008, also in millions of dollars?
Answer: 4821.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the years?
Answer: 1571.0
Question: and what is that in dollars?
Answer: 1571000000.0
Question: and during only the middle year of that period, in 2010, how much did the net earnings represent in relation to those total assets?
|
0.02486
|
CONVFINQA3754
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a significant portion of our natural gas production in the lower 48 states of the u.s . is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas . average settlement date henry hub natural gas prices have been relatively stable for the periods of this report ; however , a decline began in september 2011 which has continued in 2012 with february averaging $ 2.68 per mmbtu . should u.s . natural gas prices remain depressed , an impairment charge related to our natural gas assets may be necessary . our other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and eg . natural gas prices in europe have been significantly higher than in the u.s . in the case of eg our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices less volatile . the natural gas sales from eg are at fixed prices ; therefore , our worldwide reported average natural gas realized prices may not fully track market price movements . oil sands mining osm segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil we produce . roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select . output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mines or the upgrader . the operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime . per-unit costs are sensitive to production rates . key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian alberta energy company ( 201caeco 201d ) natural gas sales index and crude oil prices , respectively . recently aeco prices have declined , much as henry hub prices have . we would expect a significant , continued declined in natural gas prices to have a favorable impact on osm operating costs . the table below shows average benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td><td>$ 62.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a )</td><td>77.97</td><td>65.31</td><td>52.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b )</td><td>$ 3.68</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 3.49</td></tr></table> wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) $ 95.11 $ 79.61 $ 62.09 western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a ) 77.97 65.31 52.13 aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b ) $ 3.68 $ 3.89 $ 3.49 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada . ( b ) monthly average day ahead index . integrated gas our integrated gas operations include production and marketing of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in eg . world lng trade in 2011 has been estimated to be 241 mmt . long-term , lng continues to be in demand as markets seek the benefits of clean burning natural gas . market prices for lng are not reported or posted . in general , lng delivered to the u.s . is tied to henry hub prices and will track with changes in u.s . natural gas prices , while lng sold in europe and asia is indexed to crude oil prices and will track the movement of those prices . we have a 60 percent ownership in an lng production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . gross sales from the plant were 4.1 mmt , 3.7 mmt and 3.9 mmt in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . we own a 45 percent interest in a methanol plant located in equatorial guinea through our investment in ampco . gross sales of methanol from the plant totaled 1039657 , 850605 and 960374 metric tonnes in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . methanol demand has a direct impact on ampco 2019s earnings . because global demand for methanol is rather limited , changes in the supply-demand balance can have a significant impact on sales prices . world demand for methanol in 2011 has been estimated to be 55.4 mmt . our plant capacity of 1.1 mmt is about 2 percent of total demand . operating and financial highlights significant operating and financial highlights during 2011 include : 2022 completed the spin-off of our downstream business on june 30 , 2011 2022 acquired a significant operated position in the eagle ford shale play in south texas 2022 added net proved reserves , for the e&p and osm segments combined , of 307 mmboe , excluding dispositions , for a 212 percent reserve replacement ratio .
Question: what is balance of the western canadian select dollars per bbl in 2011?
|
77.97
|
CONVFINQA3755
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a significant portion of our natural gas production in the lower 48 states of the u.s . is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas . average settlement date henry hub natural gas prices have been relatively stable for the periods of this report ; however , a decline began in september 2011 which has continued in 2012 with february averaging $ 2.68 per mmbtu . should u.s . natural gas prices remain depressed , an impairment charge related to our natural gas assets may be necessary . our other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and eg . natural gas prices in europe have been significantly higher than in the u.s . in the case of eg our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices less volatile . the natural gas sales from eg are at fixed prices ; therefore , our worldwide reported average natural gas realized prices may not fully track market price movements . oil sands mining osm segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil we produce . roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select . output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mines or the upgrader . the operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime . per-unit costs are sensitive to production rates . key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian alberta energy company ( 201caeco 201d ) natural gas sales index and crude oil prices , respectively . recently aeco prices have declined , much as henry hub prices have . we would expect a significant , continued declined in natural gas prices to have a favorable impact on osm operating costs . the table below shows average benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td><td>$ 62.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a )</td><td>77.97</td><td>65.31</td><td>52.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b )</td><td>$ 3.68</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 3.49</td></tr></table> wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) $ 95.11 $ 79.61 $ 62.09 western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a ) 77.97 65.31 52.13 aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b ) $ 3.68 $ 3.89 $ 3.49 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada . ( b ) monthly average day ahead index . integrated gas our integrated gas operations include production and marketing of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in eg . world lng trade in 2011 has been estimated to be 241 mmt . long-term , lng continues to be in demand as markets seek the benefits of clean burning natural gas . market prices for lng are not reported or posted . in general , lng delivered to the u.s . is tied to henry hub prices and will track with changes in u.s . natural gas prices , while lng sold in europe and asia is indexed to crude oil prices and will track the movement of those prices . we have a 60 percent ownership in an lng production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . gross sales from the plant were 4.1 mmt , 3.7 mmt and 3.9 mmt in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . we own a 45 percent interest in a methanol plant located in equatorial guinea through our investment in ampco . gross sales of methanol from the plant totaled 1039657 , 850605 and 960374 metric tonnes in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . methanol demand has a direct impact on ampco 2019s earnings . because global demand for methanol is rather limited , changes in the supply-demand balance can have a significant impact on sales prices . world demand for methanol in 2011 has been estimated to be 55.4 mmt . our plant capacity of 1.1 mmt is about 2 percent of total demand . operating and financial highlights significant operating and financial highlights during 2011 include : 2022 completed the spin-off of our downstream business on june 30 , 2011 2022 acquired a significant operated position in the eagle ford shale play in south texas 2022 added net proved reserves , for the e&p and osm segments combined , of 307 mmboe , excluding dispositions , for a 212 percent reserve replacement ratio .
Question: what is balance of the western canadian select dollars per bbl in 2011?
Answer: 77.97
Question: what about in 2009?
|
52.13
|
CONVFINQA3756
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a significant portion of our natural gas production in the lower 48 states of the u.s . is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas . average settlement date henry hub natural gas prices have been relatively stable for the periods of this report ; however , a decline began in september 2011 which has continued in 2012 with february averaging $ 2.68 per mmbtu . should u.s . natural gas prices remain depressed , an impairment charge related to our natural gas assets may be necessary . our other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and eg . natural gas prices in europe have been significantly higher than in the u.s . in the case of eg our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices less volatile . the natural gas sales from eg are at fixed prices ; therefore , our worldwide reported average natural gas realized prices may not fully track market price movements . oil sands mining osm segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil we produce . roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select . output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mines or the upgrader . the operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime . per-unit costs are sensitive to production rates . key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian alberta energy company ( 201caeco 201d ) natural gas sales index and crude oil prices , respectively . recently aeco prices have declined , much as henry hub prices have . we would expect a significant , continued declined in natural gas prices to have a favorable impact on osm operating costs . the table below shows average benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td><td>$ 62.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a )</td><td>77.97</td><td>65.31</td><td>52.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b )</td><td>$ 3.68</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 3.49</td></tr></table> wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) $ 95.11 $ 79.61 $ 62.09 western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a ) 77.97 65.31 52.13 aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b ) $ 3.68 $ 3.89 $ 3.49 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada . ( b ) monthly average day ahead index . integrated gas our integrated gas operations include production and marketing of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in eg . world lng trade in 2011 has been estimated to be 241 mmt . long-term , lng continues to be in demand as markets seek the benefits of clean burning natural gas . market prices for lng are not reported or posted . in general , lng delivered to the u.s . is tied to henry hub prices and will track with changes in u.s . natural gas prices , while lng sold in europe and asia is indexed to crude oil prices and will track the movement of those prices . we have a 60 percent ownership in an lng production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . gross sales from the plant were 4.1 mmt , 3.7 mmt and 3.9 mmt in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . we own a 45 percent interest in a methanol plant located in equatorial guinea through our investment in ampco . gross sales of methanol from the plant totaled 1039657 , 850605 and 960374 metric tonnes in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . methanol demand has a direct impact on ampco 2019s earnings . because global demand for methanol is rather limited , changes in the supply-demand balance can have a significant impact on sales prices . world demand for methanol in 2011 has been estimated to be 55.4 mmt . our plant capacity of 1.1 mmt is about 2 percent of total demand . operating and financial highlights significant operating and financial highlights during 2011 include : 2022 completed the spin-off of our downstream business on june 30 , 2011 2022 acquired a significant operated position in the eagle ford shale play in south texas 2022 added net proved reserves , for the e&p and osm segments combined , of 307 mmboe , excluding dispositions , for a 212 percent reserve replacement ratio .
Question: what is balance of the western canadian select dollars per bbl in 2011?
Answer: 77.97
Question: what about in 2009?
Answer: 52.13
Question: what is the net change?
|
25.84
|
CONVFINQA3757
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
a significant portion of our natural gas production in the lower 48 states of the u.s . is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas . average settlement date henry hub natural gas prices have been relatively stable for the periods of this report ; however , a decline began in september 2011 which has continued in 2012 with february averaging $ 2.68 per mmbtu . should u.s . natural gas prices remain depressed , an impairment charge related to our natural gas assets may be necessary . our other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and eg . natural gas prices in europe have been significantly higher than in the u.s . in the case of eg our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices less volatile . the natural gas sales from eg are at fixed prices ; therefore , our worldwide reported average natural gas realized prices may not fully track market price movements . oil sands mining osm segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil we produce . roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select . output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mines or the upgrader . the operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime . per-unit costs are sensitive to production rates . key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian alberta energy company ( 201caeco 201d ) natural gas sales index and crude oil prices , respectively . recently aeco prices have declined , much as henry hub prices have . we would expect a significant , continued declined in natural gas prices to have a favorable impact on osm operating costs . the table below shows average benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl )</td><td>$ 95.11</td><td>$ 79.61</td><td>$ 62.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a )</td><td>77.97</td><td>65.31</td><td>52.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b )</td><td>$ 3.68</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 3.49</td></tr></table> wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) $ 95.11 $ 79.61 $ 62.09 western canadian select ( dollars per bbl ) ( a ) 77.97 65.31 52.13 aeco natural gas sales index ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( b ) $ 3.68 $ 3.89 $ 3.49 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada . ( b ) monthly average day ahead index . integrated gas our integrated gas operations include production and marketing of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in eg . world lng trade in 2011 has been estimated to be 241 mmt . long-term , lng continues to be in demand as markets seek the benefits of clean burning natural gas . market prices for lng are not reported or posted . in general , lng delivered to the u.s . is tied to henry hub prices and will track with changes in u.s . natural gas prices , while lng sold in europe and asia is indexed to crude oil prices and will track the movement of those prices . we have a 60 percent ownership in an lng production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . gross sales from the plant were 4.1 mmt , 3.7 mmt and 3.9 mmt in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . we own a 45 percent interest in a methanol plant located in equatorial guinea through our investment in ampco . gross sales of methanol from the plant totaled 1039657 , 850605 and 960374 metric tonnes in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . methanol demand has a direct impact on ampco 2019s earnings . because global demand for methanol is rather limited , changes in the supply-demand balance can have a significant impact on sales prices . world demand for methanol in 2011 has been estimated to be 55.4 mmt . our plant capacity of 1.1 mmt is about 2 percent of total demand . operating and financial highlights significant operating and financial highlights during 2011 include : 2022 completed the spin-off of our downstream business on june 30 , 2011 2022 acquired a significant operated position in the eagle ford shale play in south texas 2022 added net proved reserves , for the e&p and osm segments combined , of 307 mmboe , excluding dispositions , for a 212 percent reserve replacement ratio .
Question: what is balance of the western canadian select dollars per bbl in 2011?
Answer: 77.97
Question: what about in 2009?
Answer: 52.13
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 25.84
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
|
0.49568
|
CONVFINQA3758
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 181 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009 ( in millions )</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>derivative payables</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross derivative fair value</td><td>$ 1565518</td><td>$ 1519183</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 offsetting receivables/payables</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid</td><td>-65468 ( 65468 )</td><td>-39218 ( 39218 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>carrying value on consolidated balance sheets</td><td>$ 80210</td><td>$ 60125</td></tr></table> in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received and posted liquid secu- rities collateral in the amount of $ 15.5 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 156--- 173 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index , as described further below . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are both otc derivative contracts . single- name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while cds index are used to manage credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index is comprised of a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are established approximately every six months with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the reference entities in the index experi- ences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against spe- cific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client demands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of exposure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-linked notes a credit linked note ( 201ccln 201d ) is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the cln purchases credit protection on a referenced entity from the note investor . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . in that event , the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note , but rather , the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note .
Question: what was the value of netting adjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid?
|
65468.0
|
CONVFINQA3759
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 181 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009 ( in millions )</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>derivative payables</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross derivative fair value</td><td>$ 1565518</td><td>$ 1519183</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 offsetting receivables/payables</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid</td><td>-65468 ( 65468 )</td><td>-39218 ( 39218 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>carrying value on consolidated balance sheets</td><td>$ 80210</td><td>$ 60125</td></tr></table> in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received and posted liquid secu- rities collateral in the amount of $ 15.5 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 156--- 173 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index , as described further below . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are both otc derivative contracts . single- name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while cds index are used to manage credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index is comprised of a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are established approximately every six months with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the reference entities in the index experi- ences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against spe- cific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client demands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of exposure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-linked notes a credit linked note ( 201ccln 201d ) is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the cln purchases credit protection on a referenced entity from the note investor . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . in that event , the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note , but rather , the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note .
Question: what was the value of netting adjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid?
Answer: 65468.0
Question: what is that value time 1000000?
|
65468000000.0
|
CONVFINQA3760
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 181 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009 ( in millions )</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>derivative payables</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross derivative fair value</td><td>$ 1565518</td><td>$ 1519183</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 offsetting receivables/payables</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid</td><td>-65468 ( 65468 )</td><td>-39218 ( 39218 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>carrying value on consolidated balance sheets</td><td>$ 80210</td><td>$ 60125</td></tr></table> in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received and posted liquid secu- rities collateral in the amount of $ 15.5 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 156--- 173 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index , as described further below . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are both otc derivative contracts . single- name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while cds index are used to manage credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index is comprised of a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are established approximately every six months with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the reference entities in the index experi- ences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against spe- cific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client demands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of exposure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-linked notes a credit linked note ( 201ccln 201d ) is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the cln purchases credit protection on a referenced entity from the note investor . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . in that event , the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note , but rather , the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note .
Question: what was the value of netting adjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid?
Answer: 65468.0
Question: what is that value time 1000000?
Answer: 65468000000.0
Question: what was product of liquid securities collateral by 1000000?
|
15500000.0
|
CONVFINQA3761
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 181 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009 ( in millions )</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>derivative payables</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross derivative fair value</td><td>$ 1565518</td><td>$ 1519183</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 offsetting receivables/payables</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid</td><td>-65468 ( 65468 )</td><td>-39218 ( 39218 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>carrying value on consolidated balance sheets</td><td>$ 80210</td><td>$ 60125</td></tr></table> in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received and posted liquid secu- rities collateral in the amount of $ 15.5 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 156--- 173 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index , as described further below . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are both otc derivative contracts . single- name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while cds index are used to manage credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index is comprised of a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are established approximately every six months with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the reference entities in the index experi- ences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against spe- cific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client demands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of exposure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-linked notes a credit linked note ( 201ccln 201d ) is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the cln purchases credit protection on a referenced entity from the note investor . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . in that event , the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note , but rather , the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note .
Question: what was the value of netting adjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid?
Answer: 65468.0
Question: what is that value time 1000000?
Answer: 65468000000.0
Question: what was product of liquid securities collateral by 1000000?
Answer: 15500000.0
Question: what is that value times 1000?
|
15500000000.0
|
CONVFINQA3762
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 181 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009 ( in millions )</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>derivative payables</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross derivative fair value</td><td>$ 1565518</td><td>$ 1519183</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 offsetting receivables/payables</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid</td><td>-65468 ( 65468 )</td><td>-39218 ( 39218 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>carrying value on consolidated balance sheets</td><td>$ 80210</td><td>$ 60125</td></tr></table> in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received and posted liquid secu- rities collateral in the amount of $ 15.5 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 156--- 173 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index , as described further below . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are both otc derivative contracts . single- name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while cds index are used to manage credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index is comprised of a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are established approximately every six months with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the reference entities in the index experi- ences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against spe- cific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client demands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of exposure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-linked notes a credit linked note ( 201ccln 201d ) is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the cln purchases credit protection on a referenced entity from the note investor . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . in that event , the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note , but rather , the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note .
Question: what was the value of netting adjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid?
Answer: 65468.0
Question: what is that value time 1000000?
Answer: 65468000000.0
Question: what was product of liquid securities collateral by 1000000?
Answer: 15500000.0
Question: what is that value times 1000?
Answer: 15500000000.0
Question: what is the sum of that value and the total netting adjustments?
|
80968000000.0
|
CONVFINQA3763
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis palisades plants and related assets to their fair values . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges . as a result of the entergy louisiana and entergy gulf states louisiana business combination , results of operations for 2015 also include two items that occurred in october 2015 : 1 ) a deferred tax asset and resulting net increase in tax basis of approximately $ 334 million and 2 ) a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) as a result of customer credits to be realized by electric customers of entergy louisiana , consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . results of operations for 2015 also include the sale in december 2015 of the 583 mw rhode island state energy center for a realized gain of $ 154 million ( $ 100 million net-of-tax ) on the sale and the $ 77 million ( $ 47 million net-of-tax ) write-off and regulatory charges to recognize that a portion of the assets associated with the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project is no longer probable of recovery . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 write-off . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 5829</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>louisiana business combination customer credits</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 6179</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 an increase in base rates at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider for entergy new orleans , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in formula rate plan revenues for entergy louisiana , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station ; and 2022 an increase in revenues at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2016?
|
6179.0
|
CONVFINQA3764
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis palisades plants and related assets to their fair values . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges . as a result of the entergy louisiana and entergy gulf states louisiana business combination , results of operations for 2015 also include two items that occurred in october 2015 : 1 ) a deferred tax asset and resulting net increase in tax basis of approximately $ 334 million and 2 ) a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) as a result of customer credits to be realized by electric customers of entergy louisiana , consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . results of operations for 2015 also include the sale in december 2015 of the 583 mw rhode island state energy center for a realized gain of $ 154 million ( $ 100 million net-of-tax ) on the sale and the $ 77 million ( $ 47 million net-of-tax ) write-off and regulatory charges to recognize that a portion of the assets associated with the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project is no longer probable of recovery . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 write-off . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 5829</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>louisiana business combination customer credits</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 6179</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 an increase in base rates at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider for entergy new orleans , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in formula rate plan revenues for entergy louisiana , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station ; and 2022 an increase in revenues at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2016?
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what about in 2015?
|
5829.0
|
CONVFINQA3765
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis palisades plants and related assets to their fair values . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges . as a result of the entergy louisiana and entergy gulf states louisiana business combination , results of operations for 2015 also include two items that occurred in october 2015 : 1 ) a deferred tax asset and resulting net increase in tax basis of approximately $ 334 million and 2 ) a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) as a result of customer credits to be realized by electric customers of entergy louisiana , consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . results of operations for 2015 also include the sale in december 2015 of the 583 mw rhode island state energy center for a realized gain of $ 154 million ( $ 100 million net-of-tax ) on the sale and the $ 77 million ( $ 47 million net-of-tax ) write-off and regulatory charges to recognize that a portion of the assets associated with the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project is no longer probable of recovery . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 write-off . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 5829</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>louisiana business combination customer credits</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 6179</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 an increase in base rates at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider for entergy new orleans , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in formula rate plan revenues for entergy louisiana , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station ; and 2022 an increase in revenues at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2016?
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what about in 2015?
Answer: 5829.0
Question: what is the net increase in net revenue from 2015 to 2016?
|
350.0
|
CONVFINQA3766
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis palisades plants and related assets to their fair values . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges . as a result of the entergy louisiana and entergy gulf states louisiana business combination , results of operations for 2015 also include two items that occurred in october 2015 : 1 ) a deferred tax asset and resulting net increase in tax basis of approximately $ 334 million and 2 ) a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) as a result of customer credits to be realized by electric customers of entergy louisiana , consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . results of operations for 2015 also include the sale in december 2015 of the 583 mw rhode island state energy center for a realized gain of $ 154 million ( $ 100 million net-of-tax ) on the sale and the $ 77 million ( $ 47 million net-of-tax ) write-off and regulatory charges to recognize that a portion of the assets associated with the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project is no longer probable of recovery . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 write-off . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 5829</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>louisiana business combination customer credits</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 6179</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 an increase in base rates at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider for entergy new orleans , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in formula rate plan revenues for entergy louisiana , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station ; and 2022 an increase in revenues at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2016?
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what about in 2015?
Answer: 5829.0
Question: what is the net increase in net revenue from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 350.0
Question: what is the net revenue in 2015?
|
5829.0
|
CONVFINQA3767
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis palisades plants and related assets to their fair values . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges . as a result of the entergy louisiana and entergy gulf states louisiana business combination , results of operations for 2015 also include two items that occurred in october 2015 : 1 ) a deferred tax asset and resulting net increase in tax basis of approximately $ 334 million and 2 ) a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) as a result of customer credits to be realized by electric customers of entergy louisiana , consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . results of operations for 2015 also include the sale in december 2015 of the 583 mw rhode island state energy center for a realized gain of $ 154 million ( $ 100 million net-of-tax ) on the sale and the $ 77 million ( $ 47 million net-of-tax ) write-off and regulatory charges to recognize that a portion of the assets associated with the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project is no longer probable of recovery . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 write-off . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 5829</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>louisiana business combination customer credits</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 6179</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 an increase in base rates at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider for entergy new orleans , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in formula rate plan revenues for entergy louisiana , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station ; and 2022 an increase in revenues at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2016?
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what about in 2015?
Answer: 5829.0
Question: what is the net increase in net revenue from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 350.0
Question: what is the net revenue in 2015?
Answer: 5829.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
|
0.06004
|
CONVFINQA3768
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future minimum lease payments under all the company 2019s operating leases are approximately as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years ending</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>september 24 2005</td><td>$ 4848</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>4672</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>3680</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>september 27 2008</td><td>3237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>september 26 2009</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>40764</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( not reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $ 165 )</td><td>$ 60359</td></tr></table> the company subleases a portion of its bedford facility and has received rental income of $ 277 , $ 410 and $ 682 for fiscal years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively , which has been recorded as an offset to rent expense in the accompanying statements of income . rental expense , net of sublease income , was approximately $ 4660 , $ 4963 , and $ 2462 for fiscal 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . business segments and geographic information the company reports segment information in accordance with sfas no . 131 , disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information . operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate , discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance . the company 2019s chief decision-maker , as defined under sfas no . 131 , is the chief executive officer . to date , the company has viewed its operations and manages its business as four principal operating segments : the manufacture and sale of mammography products , osteoporosis assessment products , digital detectors and other products . as a result of the company 2019s implementation of a company wide integrated software application in fiscal 2003 , identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments only consist of inventories , intangible assets , and property and equipment . the company has presented all other assets as corporate assets . prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation . intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. .
Question: what was the change in rental expense between 2002 and 2003?
|
2501.0
|
CONVFINQA3769
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future minimum lease payments under all the company 2019s operating leases are approximately as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years ending</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>september 24 2005</td><td>$ 4848</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>4672</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>3680</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>september 27 2008</td><td>3237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>september 26 2009</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>40764</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( not reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $ 165 )</td><td>$ 60359</td></tr></table> the company subleases a portion of its bedford facility and has received rental income of $ 277 , $ 410 and $ 682 for fiscal years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively , which has been recorded as an offset to rent expense in the accompanying statements of income . rental expense , net of sublease income , was approximately $ 4660 , $ 4963 , and $ 2462 for fiscal 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . business segments and geographic information the company reports segment information in accordance with sfas no . 131 , disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information . operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate , discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance . the company 2019s chief decision-maker , as defined under sfas no . 131 , is the chief executive officer . to date , the company has viewed its operations and manages its business as four principal operating segments : the manufacture and sale of mammography products , osteoporosis assessment products , digital detectors and other products . as a result of the company 2019s implementation of a company wide integrated software application in fiscal 2003 , identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments only consist of inventories , intangible assets , and property and equipment . the company has presented all other assets as corporate assets . prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation . intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. .
Question: what was the change in rental expense between 2002 and 2003?
Answer: 2501.0
Question: and what was that rental expense in 2002?
|
2462.0
|
CONVFINQA3770
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future minimum lease payments under all the company 2019s operating leases are approximately as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years ending</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>september 24 2005</td><td>$ 4848</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>4672</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>3680</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>september 27 2008</td><td>3237</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>september 26 2009</td><td>3158</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>40764</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( not reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $ 165 )</td><td>$ 60359</td></tr></table> the company subleases a portion of its bedford facility and has received rental income of $ 277 , $ 410 and $ 682 for fiscal years 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively , which has been recorded as an offset to rent expense in the accompanying statements of income . rental expense , net of sublease income , was approximately $ 4660 , $ 4963 , and $ 2462 for fiscal 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . business segments and geographic information the company reports segment information in accordance with sfas no . 131 , disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information . operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate , discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in making decisions how to allocate resources and assess performance . the company 2019s chief decision-maker , as defined under sfas no . 131 , is the chief executive officer . to date , the company has viewed its operations and manages its business as four principal operating segments : the manufacture and sale of mammography products , osteoporosis assessment products , digital detectors and other products . as a result of the company 2019s implementation of a company wide integrated software application in fiscal 2003 , identifiable assets for the four principal operating segments only consist of inventories , intangible assets , and property and equipment . the company has presented all other assets as corporate assets . prior periods have been restated to conform to this presentation . intersegment sales and transfers are not significant. .
Question: what was the change in rental expense between 2002 and 2003?
Answer: 2501.0
Question: and what was that rental expense in 2002?
Answer: 2462.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2002 rental expense, in percentage?
|
1.01584
|
CONVFINQA3771
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2012 2011 2010 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011</td><td>% ( % ) change 2011 v 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4685</td><td>$ 4681</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>-% ( - % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>3608</td><td>3581</td><td>2486</td><td>1</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>2143</td><td>2005</td><td>1836</td><td>7</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1760</td><td>1617</td><td>1487</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1197</td><td>1167</td><td>1142</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>788</td><td>782</td><td>719</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14181</td><td>$ 13833</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>15% ( 15 % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 348 million in 2012 versus 2011 . depreciation , wage and benefit inflation , higher fuel prices and volume- related trucking services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries , contributed to higher expenses during the year . efficiency gains , volume related fuel savings ( 2% ( 2 % ) fewer gallons of fuel consumed ) and $ 38 million of weather related expenses in 2011 , which favorably affects the comparison , partially offset the cost increase . operating expenses increased $ 1.8 billion in 2011 versus 2010 . our fuel price per gallon rose 36% ( 36 % ) during 2011 , accounting for $ 922 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , volume-related costs , depreciation , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses . expenses increased $ 20 million for costs related to the flooding in the midwest and $ 18 million due to the impact of severe heat and drought in the south , primarily texas . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . a $ 45 million one-time payment relating to a transaction with csx intermodal , inc ( csxi ) increased operating expenses during the first quarter of 2010 , which favorably affects the comparison of operating expenses in 2011 to those in 2010 . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . expenses in 2012 were essentially flat versus 2011 as operational improvements and cost reductions offset general wage and benefit inflation and higher pension and other postretirement benefits . in addition , weather related costs increased these expenses in 2011 . a combination of general wage and benefit inflation , volume-related expenses , higher training costs associated with new hires , additional crew costs due to speed restrictions caused by the midwest flooding and heat and drought in the south , and higher pension expense drove the increase during 2011 compared to 2010 . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.22 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2012 , compared to $ 3.12 in 2011 , increased expenses by $ 105 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2012 versus 2011 , driving expense down . the fuel consumption rate was flat year-over-year . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.12 ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2011 , compared to $ 2.29 per gallon in 2010 , increased expenses by $ 922 million . in addition , higher gasoline prices for highway and non-highway vehicles also increased year-over-year . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 5% ( 5 % ) in 2011 versus 2010 , driving expense up by $ 122 million . purchased services and materials 2013 expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers ( including equipment 2012 operating expenses .
Question: what was the difference in equipment and other rents expense between 2011 and 2012?
|
30.0
|
CONVFINQA3772
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2012 2011 2010 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011</td><td>% ( % ) change 2011 v 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4685</td><td>$ 4681</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>-% ( - % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>3608</td><td>3581</td><td>2486</td><td>1</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>2143</td><td>2005</td><td>1836</td><td>7</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1760</td><td>1617</td><td>1487</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1197</td><td>1167</td><td>1142</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>788</td><td>782</td><td>719</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14181</td><td>$ 13833</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>15% ( 15 % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 348 million in 2012 versus 2011 . depreciation , wage and benefit inflation , higher fuel prices and volume- related trucking services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries , contributed to higher expenses during the year . efficiency gains , volume related fuel savings ( 2% ( 2 % ) fewer gallons of fuel consumed ) and $ 38 million of weather related expenses in 2011 , which favorably affects the comparison , partially offset the cost increase . operating expenses increased $ 1.8 billion in 2011 versus 2010 . our fuel price per gallon rose 36% ( 36 % ) during 2011 , accounting for $ 922 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , volume-related costs , depreciation , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses . expenses increased $ 20 million for costs related to the flooding in the midwest and $ 18 million due to the impact of severe heat and drought in the south , primarily texas . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . a $ 45 million one-time payment relating to a transaction with csx intermodal , inc ( csxi ) increased operating expenses during the first quarter of 2010 , which favorably affects the comparison of operating expenses in 2011 to those in 2010 . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . expenses in 2012 were essentially flat versus 2011 as operational improvements and cost reductions offset general wage and benefit inflation and higher pension and other postretirement benefits . in addition , weather related costs increased these expenses in 2011 . a combination of general wage and benefit inflation , volume-related expenses , higher training costs associated with new hires , additional crew costs due to speed restrictions caused by the midwest flooding and heat and drought in the south , and higher pension expense drove the increase during 2011 compared to 2010 . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.22 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2012 , compared to $ 3.12 in 2011 , increased expenses by $ 105 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2012 versus 2011 , driving expense down . the fuel consumption rate was flat year-over-year . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.12 ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2011 , compared to $ 2.29 per gallon in 2010 , increased expenses by $ 922 million . in addition , higher gasoline prices for highway and non-highway vehicles also increased year-over-year . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 5% ( 5 % ) in 2011 versus 2010 , driving expense up by $ 122 million . purchased services and materials 2013 expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers ( including equipment 2012 operating expenses .
Question: what was the difference in equipment and other rents expense between 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 30.0
Question: and the total operating expenses for 2012?
|
14181.0
|
CONVFINQA3773
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2012 2011 2010 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011</td><td>% ( % ) change 2011 v 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4685</td><td>$ 4681</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>-% ( - % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>3608</td><td>3581</td><td>2486</td><td>1</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>2143</td><td>2005</td><td>1836</td><td>7</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1760</td><td>1617</td><td>1487</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1197</td><td>1167</td><td>1142</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>788</td><td>782</td><td>719</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14181</td><td>$ 13833</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>15% ( 15 % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 348 million in 2012 versus 2011 . depreciation , wage and benefit inflation , higher fuel prices and volume- related trucking services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries , contributed to higher expenses during the year . efficiency gains , volume related fuel savings ( 2% ( 2 % ) fewer gallons of fuel consumed ) and $ 38 million of weather related expenses in 2011 , which favorably affects the comparison , partially offset the cost increase . operating expenses increased $ 1.8 billion in 2011 versus 2010 . our fuel price per gallon rose 36% ( 36 % ) during 2011 , accounting for $ 922 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , volume-related costs , depreciation , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses . expenses increased $ 20 million for costs related to the flooding in the midwest and $ 18 million due to the impact of severe heat and drought in the south , primarily texas . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . a $ 45 million one-time payment relating to a transaction with csx intermodal , inc ( csxi ) increased operating expenses during the first quarter of 2010 , which favorably affects the comparison of operating expenses in 2011 to those in 2010 . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . expenses in 2012 were essentially flat versus 2011 as operational improvements and cost reductions offset general wage and benefit inflation and higher pension and other postretirement benefits . in addition , weather related costs increased these expenses in 2011 . a combination of general wage and benefit inflation , volume-related expenses , higher training costs associated with new hires , additional crew costs due to speed restrictions caused by the midwest flooding and heat and drought in the south , and higher pension expense drove the increase during 2011 compared to 2010 . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.22 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2012 , compared to $ 3.12 in 2011 , increased expenses by $ 105 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2012 versus 2011 , driving expense down . the fuel consumption rate was flat year-over-year . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.12 ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2011 , compared to $ 2.29 per gallon in 2010 , increased expenses by $ 922 million . in addition , higher gasoline prices for highway and non-highway vehicles also increased year-over-year . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 5% ( 5 % ) in 2011 versus 2010 , driving expense up by $ 122 million . purchased services and materials 2013 expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers ( including equipment 2012 operating expenses .
Question: what was the difference in equipment and other rents expense between 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 30.0
Question: and the total operating expenses for 2012?
Answer: 14181.0
Question: and in 2011?
|
13833.0
|
CONVFINQA3774
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2012 2011 2010 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011</td><td>% ( % ) change 2011 v 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4685</td><td>$ 4681</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>-% ( - % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>3608</td><td>3581</td><td>2486</td><td>1</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>2143</td><td>2005</td><td>1836</td><td>7</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1760</td><td>1617</td><td>1487</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1197</td><td>1167</td><td>1142</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>788</td><td>782</td><td>719</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14181</td><td>$ 13833</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>15% ( 15 % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 348 million in 2012 versus 2011 . depreciation , wage and benefit inflation , higher fuel prices and volume- related trucking services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries , contributed to higher expenses during the year . efficiency gains , volume related fuel savings ( 2% ( 2 % ) fewer gallons of fuel consumed ) and $ 38 million of weather related expenses in 2011 , which favorably affects the comparison , partially offset the cost increase . operating expenses increased $ 1.8 billion in 2011 versus 2010 . our fuel price per gallon rose 36% ( 36 % ) during 2011 , accounting for $ 922 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , volume-related costs , depreciation , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses . expenses increased $ 20 million for costs related to the flooding in the midwest and $ 18 million due to the impact of severe heat and drought in the south , primarily texas . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . a $ 45 million one-time payment relating to a transaction with csx intermodal , inc ( csxi ) increased operating expenses during the first quarter of 2010 , which favorably affects the comparison of operating expenses in 2011 to those in 2010 . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . expenses in 2012 were essentially flat versus 2011 as operational improvements and cost reductions offset general wage and benefit inflation and higher pension and other postretirement benefits . in addition , weather related costs increased these expenses in 2011 . a combination of general wage and benefit inflation , volume-related expenses , higher training costs associated with new hires , additional crew costs due to speed restrictions caused by the midwest flooding and heat and drought in the south , and higher pension expense drove the increase during 2011 compared to 2010 . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.22 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2012 , compared to $ 3.12 in 2011 , increased expenses by $ 105 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2012 versus 2011 , driving expense down . the fuel consumption rate was flat year-over-year . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.12 ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2011 , compared to $ 2.29 per gallon in 2010 , increased expenses by $ 922 million . in addition , higher gasoline prices for highway and non-highway vehicles also increased year-over-year . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 5% ( 5 % ) in 2011 versus 2010 , driving expense up by $ 122 million . purchased services and materials 2013 expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers ( including equipment 2012 operating expenses .
Question: what was the difference in equipment and other rents expense between 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 30.0
Question: and the total operating expenses for 2012?
Answer: 14181.0
Question: and in 2011?
Answer: 13833.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
|
348.0
|
CONVFINQA3775
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
operating expenses millions 2012 2011 2010 % ( % ) change 2012 v 2011 % ( % ) change 2011 v 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>% ( % ) change 2012 v 2011</td><td>% ( % ) change 2011 v 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>compensation and benefits</td><td>$ 4685</td><td>$ 4681</td><td>$ 4314</td><td>-% ( - % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel</td><td>3608</td><td>3581</td><td>2486</td><td>1</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased services and materials</td><td>2143</td><td>2005</td><td>1836</td><td>7</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation</td><td>1760</td><td>1617</td><td>1487</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equipment and other rents</td><td>1197</td><td>1167</td><td>1142</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>788</td><td>782</td><td>719</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14181</td><td>$ 13833</td><td>$ 11984</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>15% ( 15 % )</td></tr></table> operating expenses increased $ 348 million in 2012 versus 2011 . depreciation , wage and benefit inflation , higher fuel prices and volume- related trucking services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries , contributed to higher expenses during the year . efficiency gains , volume related fuel savings ( 2% ( 2 % ) fewer gallons of fuel consumed ) and $ 38 million of weather related expenses in 2011 , which favorably affects the comparison , partially offset the cost increase . operating expenses increased $ 1.8 billion in 2011 versus 2010 . our fuel price per gallon rose 36% ( 36 % ) during 2011 , accounting for $ 922 million of the increase . wage and benefit inflation , volume-related costs , depreciation , and property taxes also contributed to higher expenses . expenses increased $ 20 million for costs related to the flooding in the midwest and $ 18 million due to the impact of severe heat and drought in the south , primarily texas . cost savings from productivity improvements and better resource utilization partially offset these increases . a $ 45 million one-time payment relating to a transaction with csx intermodal , inc ( csxi ) increased operating expenses during the first quarter of 2010 , which favorably affects the comparison of operating expenses in 2011 to those in 2010 . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . expenses in 2012 were essentially flat versus 2011 as operational improvements and cost reductions offset general wage and benefit inflation and higher pension and other postretirement benefits . in addition , weather related costs increased these expenses in 2011 . a combination of general wage and benefit inflation , volume-related expenses , higher training costs associated with new hires , additional crew costs due to speed restrictions caused by the midwest flooding and heat and drought in the south , and higher pension expense drove the increase during 2011 compared to 2010 . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.22 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2012 , compared to $ 3.12 in 2011 , increased expenses by $ 105 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2012 versus 2011 , driving expense down . the fuel consumption rate was flat year-over-year . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.12 ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2011 , compared to $ 2.29 per gallon in 2010 , increased expenses by $ 922 million . in addition , higher gasoline prices for highway and non-highway vehicles also increased year-over-year . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , increased 5% ( 5 % ) in 2011 versus 2010 , driving expense up by $ 122 million . purchased services and materials 2013 expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers ( including equipment 2012 operating expenses .
Question: what was the difference in equipment and other rents expense between 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 30.0
Question: and the total operating expenses for 2012?
Answer: 14181.0
Question: and in 2011?
Answer: 13833.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: 348.0
Question: so then what percent was the change in equipment and other rents compared to the change in total expense?
|
0.08621
|
CONVFINQA3776
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks , which reached the following number of subscribers via pay television services as of december 31 , 2013 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>global networks discovery channel</td><td>internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 271</td><td>regional networks discovery kids</td><td>internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 76</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>animal planet</td><td>200</td><td>sbs nordic ( a )</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tlc real time and travel & living</td><td>162</td><td>dmax ( b )</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>discovery science</td><td>81</td><td>discovery history</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>investigation discovery</td><td>74</td><td>shed</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>discovery home & health</td><td>64</td><td>discovery en espanol ( u.s. )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>turbo</td><td>52</td><td>discovery familia ( u.s. )</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>discovery world</td><td>23</td><td>gxt</td><td>4</td></tr></table> ( a ) number of subscribers corresponds to the collective sum of the total number of subscribers to each of the sbs nordic broadcast networks in sweden , norway , and denmark subject to retransmission agreements with pay television providers . ( b ) number of subscribers corresponds to dmax pay television networks in the u.k. , austria , switzerland and ireland . our international networks segment also owns and operates free-to-air television networks which reached 285 million cumulative viewers in europe and the middle east as of december 31 , 2013 . our free-to-air networks include dmax , fatafeat , quest , real time , giallo , frisbee , focus and k2 . similar to u.s . networks , the primary sources of revenue for international networks are fees charged to operators who distribute our networks , which primarily include cable and dth satellite service providers , and advertising sold on our television networks . international television markets vary in their stages of development . some markets , such as the u.k. , are more advanced digital television markets , while others remain in the analog environment with varying degrees of investment from operators to expand channel capacity or convert to digital technologies . common practice in some markets results in long-term contractual distribution relationships , while customers in other markets renew contracts annually . distribution revenue for our international networks segment is largely dependent on the number of subscribers that receive our networks or content , the rates negotiated in the agreements , and the market demand for the content that we provide . advertising revenue is dependent upon a number of factors including the development of pay and free-to-air television markets , the number of subscribers to and viewers of our channels , viewership demographics , the popularity of our programming , and our ability to sell commercial time over a group of channels . in certain markets , our advertising sales business operates with in-house sales teams , while we rely on external sales representation services in other markets . in developing television markets , we expect that advertising revenue growth will result from continued subscriber and viewership growth , our localization strategy , and the shift of advertising spending from traditional analog networks to channels in the multi-channel environment . in relatively mature markets , such as western europe , growth in advertising revenue will come from increasing viewership and pricing of advertising on our existing television networks and the launching of new services , both organic and through acquisitions . during 2013 , distribution , advertising and other revenues were 50% ( 50 % ) , 47% ( 47 % ) and 3% ( 3 % ) , respectively , of total net revenues for this segment . on january 21 , 2014 , we entered into an agreement with tf1 to acquire a controlling interest in eurosport international ( "eurosport" ) , a leading pan-european sports media platform , by increasing our ownership stake from 20% ( 20 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) for cash of approximately 20ac253 million ( $ 343 million ) subject to working capital adjustments . due to regulatory constraints the acquisition initially excludes eurosport france , a subsidiary of eurosport . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in eurosport france and a commitment to acquire another 31% ( 31 % ) ownership interest beginning 2015 , contingent upon resolution of all regulatory matters . the flagship eurosport network focuses on regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and motor sports and reaches 133 million homes across 54 countries in 20 languages . eurosport 2019s brands and platforms also include eurosport hd ( high definition simulcast ) , eurosport 2 , eurosport 2 hd ( high definition simulcast ) , eurosport asia-pacific , and eurosportnews . the acquisition is intended to increase the growth of eurosport and enhance our pay television offerings in europe . tf1 will have the right to put the entirety of its remaining 49% ( 49 % ) non-controlling interest to us for approximately two and a half years after completion of this acquisition . the put has a floor value equal to the fair value at the acquisition date if exercised in the 90 day period beginning on july 1 , 2015 and is subsequently priced at fair value if exercised in the 90 day period beginning on july 1 , 2016 . we expect the acquisition to close in the second quarter of 2014 subject to obtaining necessary regulatory approvals. .
Question: what was, in millions, the difference in the number of international subscribers between discovery channel and animal planet?
|
71.0
|
CONVFINQA3777
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks , which reached the following number of subscribers via pay television services as of december 31 , 2013 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>global networks discovery channel</td><td>internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 271</td><td>regional networks discovery kids</td><td>internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 76</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>animal planet</td><td>200</td><td>sbs nordic ( a )</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>tlc real time and travel & living</td><td>162</td><td>dmax ( b )</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>discovery science</td><td>81</td><td>discovery history</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>investigation discovery</td><td>74</td><td>shed</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>discovery home & health</td><td>64</td><td>discovery en espanol ( u.s. )</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>turbo</td><td>52</td><td>discovery familia ( u.s. )</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>discovery world</td><td>23</td><td>gxt</td><td>4</td></tr></table> ( a ) number of subscribers corresponds to the collective sum of the total number of subscribers to each of the sbs nordic broadcast networks in sweden , norway , and denmark subject to retransmission agreements with pay television providers . ( b ) number of subscribers corresponds to dmax pay television networks in the u.k. , austria , switzerland and ireland . our international networks segment also owns and operates free-to-air television networks which reached 285 million cumulative viewers in europe and the middle east as of december 31 , 2013 . our free-to-air networks include dmax , fatafeat , quest , real time , giallo , frisbee , focus and k2 . similar to u.s . networks , the primary sources of revenue for international networks are fees charged to operators who distribute our networks , which primarily include cable and dth satellite service providers , and advertising sold on our television networks . international television markets vary in their stages of development . some markets , such as the u.k. , are more advanced digital television markets , while others remain in the analog environment with varying degrees of investment from operators to expand channel capacity or convert to digital technologies . common practice in some markets results in long-term contractual distribution relationships , while customers in other markets renew contracts annually . distribution revenue for our international networks segment is largely dependent on the number of subscribers that receive our networks or content , the rates negotiated in the agreements , and the market demand for the content that we provide . advertising revenue is dependent upon a number of factors including the development of pay and free-to-air television markets , the number of subscribers to and viewers of our channels , viewership demographics , the popularity of our programming , and our ability to sell commercial time over a group of channels . in certain markets , our advertising sales business operates with in-house sales teams , while we rely on external sales representation services in other markets . in developing television markets , we expect that advertising revenue growth will result from continued subscriber and viewership growth , our localization strategy , and the shift of advertising spending from traditional analog networks to channels in the multi-channel environment . in relatively mature markets , such as western europe , growth in advertising revenue will come from increasing viewership and pricing of advertising on our existing television networks and the launching of new services , both organic and through acquisitions . during 2013 , distribution , advertising and other revenues were 50% ( 50 % ) , 47% ( 47 % ) and 3% ( 3 % ) , respectively , of total net revenues for this segment . on january 21 , 2014 , we entered into an agreement with tf1 to acquire a controlling interest in eurosport international ( "eurosport" ) , a leading pan-european sports media platform , by increasing our ownership stake from 20% ( 20 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) for cash of approximately 20ac253 million ( $ 343 million ) subject to working capital adjustments . due to regulatory constraints the acquisition initially excludes eurosport france , a subsidiary of eurosport . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in eurosport france and a commitment to acquire another 31% ( 31 % ) ownership interest beginning 2015 , contingent upon resolution of all regulatory matters . the flagship eurosport network focuses on regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and motor sports and reaches 133 million homes across 54 countries in 20 languages . eurosport 2019s brands and platforms also include eurosport hd ( high definition simulcast ) , eurosport 2 , eurosport 2 hd ( high definition simulcast ) , eurosport asia-pacific , and eurosportnews . the acquisition is intended to increase the growth of eurosport and enhance our pay television offerings in europe . tf1 will have the right to put the entirety of its remaining 49% ( 49 % ) non-controlling interest to us for approximately two and a half years after completion of this acquisition . the put has a floor value equal to the fair value at the acquisition date if exercised in the 90 day period beginning on july 1 , 2015 and is subsequently priced at fair value if exercised in the 90 day period beginning on july 1 , 2016 . we expect the acquisition to close in the second quarter of 2014 subject to obtaining necessary regulatory approvals. .
Question: what was, in millions, the difference in the number of international subscribers between discovery channel and animal planet?
Answer: 71.0
Question: and what was that difference between discovery channel and discovery science?
|
190.0
|
CONVFINQA3778
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .
Question: in 2019, what was the total of the foreign pension plan?
|
21.7
|
CONVFINQA3779
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .
Question: in 2019, what was the total of the foreign pension plan?
Answer: 21.7
Question: and what was that total for the domestic one?
|
14.5
|
CONVFINQA3780
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .
Question: in 2019, what was the total of the foreign pension plan?
Answer: 21.7
Question: and what was that total for the domestic one?
Answer: 14.5
Question: how much, then, did the foreign plan total represent in relation to this domestic one?
|
1.49655
|
CONVFINQA3781
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .
Question: in 2019, what was the total of the foreign pension plan?
Answer: 21.7
Question: and what was that total for the domestic one?
Answer: 14.5
Question: how much, then, did the foreign plan total represent in relation to this domestic one?
Answer: 1.49655
Question: and for that year and the four subsequent ones, what was the combined total of this domestic plan?
|
47.4
|
CONVFINQA3782
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .
Question: in 2019, what was the total of the foreign pension plan?
Answer: 21.7
Question: and what was that total for the domestic one?
Answer: 14.5
Question: how much, then, did the foreign plan total represent in relation to this domestic one?
Answer: 1.49655
Question: and for that year and the four subsequent ones, what was the combined total of this domestic plan?
Answer: 47.4
Question: and what is this difference between this total and the total of that plan for 2024-2028?
|
10.7
|
CONVFINQA3783
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 : number of restricted stock weighted average grant- date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of restricted stock</td><td>weighted average grant- date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2005</td><td>3488668</td><td>$ 41.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1632504</td><td>$ 56.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1181249 ( 1181249 )</td><td>$ 40.20</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-360734 ( 360734 )</td><td>$ 44.04</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2006</td><td>3579189</td><td>$ 48.07</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1818716</td><td>$ 56.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1345412 ( 1345412 )</td><td>$ 44.48</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-230786 ( 230786 )</td><td>$ 51.57</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2007</td><td>3821707</td><td>$ 53.12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>1836532</td><td>$ 59.84</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1403826 ( 1403826 )</td><td>$ 50.96</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-371183 ( 371183 )</td><td>$ 53.75</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2008</td><td>3883230</td><td>$ 57.01</td></tr></table> under the provisions of fas 123r , the recognition of deferred compensation , a contra-equity account representing the amount of unrecognized restricted stock expense that is reduced as expense is recognized , at the date restricted stock is granted is no longer permitted . therefore , upon adoption of fas 123r , the amount of deferred compensation that had been reflected in unearned stock grant compensation was reclassified to additional paid-in capital in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . restricted stock units the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of other awards , including restricted stock units . the company generally grants restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . each restricted stock unit repre- sents the company 2019s obligation to deliver to the holder one share of common shares upon vesting . during 2008 , the company awarded 223588 restricted stock units to officers of the company and its subsidiaries with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 59.93 . during 2007 , 108870 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.29 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . during 2006 , 83370 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.36 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . the company also grants restricted stock units with a 1-year vesting period to non-management directors . delivery of common shares on account of these restricted stock units to non-management directors is deferred until six months after the date of the non-management directors 2019 termination from the board . during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , 40362 restricted stock units , 29676 restricted stock units , and 23092 restricted stock units , respectively , were awarded to non-management direc- the espp gives participating employees the right to purchase common shares through payroll deductions during consecutive 201csubscription periods . 201d annual purchases by participants are limited to the number of whole shares that can be purchased by an amount equal to ten percent of the participant 2019s compensation or $ 25000 , whichever is less . the espp has two six-month subscription periods , the first of which runs between january 1 and june 30 and the second of which runs between july 1 and december 31 of each year . the amounts that have been collected from participants during a subscription period are used on the 201cexercise date 201d to purchase full shares of common shares . an exercise date is generally the last trading day of a sub- scription period . the number of shares purchased is equal to the total amount , as of the exercise date , that has been collected from the participants through payroll deductions for that subscription period , divided by the 201cpurchase price 201d , rounded down to the next full share . effective for and from the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price is 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the exercise date . prior to the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price was calculated as the lower of ( i ) 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the first day of the subscription period , or .
Question: what is the net impact of granted and vested shares in the number of unvested restricted stocks in 2007?
|
473304.0
|
CONVFINQA3784
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 : number of restricted stock weighted average grant- date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of restricted stock</td><td>weighted average grant- date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2005</td><td>3488668</td><td>$ 41.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1632504</td><td>$ 56.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1181249 ( 1181249 )</td><td>$ 40.20</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-360734 ( 360734 )</td><td>$ 44.04</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2006</td><td>3579189</td><td>$ 48.07</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1818716</td><td>$ 56.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1345412 ( 1345412 )</td><td>$ 44.48</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-230786 ( 230786 )</td><td>$ 51.57</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2007</td><td>3821707</td><td>$ 53.12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>1836532</td><td>$ 59.84</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1403826 ( 1403826 )</td><td>$ 50.96</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-371183 ( 371183 )</td><td>$ 53.75</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2008</td><td>3883230</td><td>$ 57.01</td></tr></table> under the provisions of fas 123r , the recognition of deferred compensation , a contra-equity account representing the amount of unrecognized restricted stock expense that is reduced as expense is recognized , at the date restricted stock is granted is no longer permitted . therefore , upon adoption of fas 123r , the amount of deferred compensation that had been reflected in unearned stock grant compensation was reclassified to additional paid-in capital in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . restricted stock units the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of other awards , including restricted stock units . the company generally grants restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . each restricted stock unit repre- sents the company 2019s obligation to deliver to the holder one share of common shares upon vesting . during 2008 , the company awarded 223588 restricted stock units to officers of the company and its subsidiaries with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 59.93 . during 2007 , 108870 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.29 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . during 2006 , 83370 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.36 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . the company also grants restricted stock units with a 1-year vesting period to non-management directors . delivery of common shares on account of these restricted stock units to non-management directors is deferred until six months after the date of the non-management directors 2019 termination from the board . during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , 40362 restricted stock units , 29676 restricted stock units , and 23092 restricted stock units , respectively , were awarded to non-management direc- the espp gives participating employees the right to purchase common shares through payroll deductions during consecutive 201csubscription periods . 201d annual purchases by participants are limited to the number of whole shares that can be purchased by an amount equal to ten percent of the participant 2019s compensation or $ 25000 , whichever is less . the espp has two six-month subscription periods , the first of which runs between january 1 and june 30 and the second of which runs between july 1 and december 31 of each year . the amounts that have been collected from participants during a subscription period are used on the 201cexercise date 201d to purchase full shares of common shares . an exercise date is generally the last trading day of a sub- scription period . the number of shares purchased is equal to the total amount , as of the exercise date , that has been collected from the participants through payroll deductions for that subscription period , divided by the 201cpurchase price 201d , rounded down to the next full share . effective for and from the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price is 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the exercise date . prior to the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price was calculated as the lower of ( i ) 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the first day of the subscription period , or .
Question: what is the net impact of granted and vested shares in the number of unvested restricted stocks in 2007?
Answer: 473304.0
Question: what about the total impact of the forfeited shares are included?
|
242518.0
|
CONVFINQA3785
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 : number of restricted stock weighted average grant- date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of restricted stock</td><td>weighted average grant- date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2005</td><td>3488668</td><td>$ 41.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1632504</td><td>$ 56.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1181249 ( 1181249 )</td><td>$ 40.20</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-360734 ( 360734 )</td><td>$ 44.04</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2006</td><td>3579189</td><td>$ 48.07</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1818716</td><td>$ 56.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1345412 ( 1345412 )</td><td>$ 44.48</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-230786 ( 230786 )</td><td>$ 51.57</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2007</td><td>3821707</td><td>$ 53.12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>1836532</td><td>$ 59.84</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1403826 ( 1403826 )</td><td>$ 50.96</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-371183 ( 371183 )</td><td>$ 53.75</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2008</td><td>3883230</td><td>$ 57.01</td></tr></table> under the provisions of fas 123r , the recognition of deferred compensation , a contra-equity account representing the amount of unrecognized restricted stock expense that is reduced as expense is recognized , at the date restricted stock is granted is no longer permitted . therefore , upon adoption of fas 123r , the amount of deferred compensation that had been reflected in unearned stock grant compensation was reclassified to additional paid-in capital in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . restricted stock units the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of other awards , including restricted stock units . the company generally grants restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . each restricted stock unit repre- sents the company 2019s obligation to deliver to the holder one share of common shares upon vesting . during 2008 , the company awarded 223588 restricted stock units to officers of the company and its subsidiaries with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 59.93 . during 2007 , 108870 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.29 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . during 2006 , 83370 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.36 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . the company also grants restricted stock units with a 1-year vesting period to non-management directors . delivery of common shares on account of these restricted stock units to non-management directors is deferred until six months after the date of the non-management directors 2019 termination from the board . during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , 40362 restricted stock units , 29676 restricted stock units , and 23092 restricted stock units , respectively , were awarded to non-management direc- the espp gives participating employees the right to purchase common shares through payroll deductions during consecutive 201csubscription periods . 201d annual purchases by participants are limited to the number of whole shares that can be purchased by an amount equal to ten percent of the participant 2019s compensation or $ 25000 , whichever is less . the espp has two six-month subscription periods , the first of which runs between january 1 and june 30 and the second of which runs between july 1 and december 31 of each year . the amounts that have been collected from participants during a subscription period are used on the 201cexercise date 201d to purchase full shares of common shares . an exercise date is generally the last trading day of a sub- scription period . the number of shares purchased is equal to the total amount , as of the exercise date , that has been collected from the participants through payroll deductions for that subscription period , divided by the 201cpurchase price 201d , rounded down to the next full share . effective for and from the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price is 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the exercise date . prior to the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price was calculated as the lower of ( i ) 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the first day of the subscription period , or .
Question: what is the net impact of granted and vested shares in the number of unvested restricted stocks in 2007?
Answer: 473304.0
Question: what about the total impact of the forfeited shares are included?
Answer: 242518.0
Question: what is the balance of unvested restricted stock as december 31 2008?
|
3883230.0
|
CONVFINQA3786
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 : number of restricted stock weighted average grant- date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of restricted stock</td><td>weighted average grant- date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2005</td><td>3488668</td><td>$ 41.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1632504</td><td>$ 56.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1181249 ( 1181249 )</td><td>$ 40.20</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-360734 ( 360734 )</td><td>$ 44.04</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2006</td><td>3579189</td><td>$ 48.07</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1818716</td><td>$ 56.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1345412 ( 1345412 )</td><td>$ 44.48</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-230786 ( 230786 )</td><td>$ 51.57</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2007</td><td>3821707</td><td>$ 53.12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>1836532</td><td>$ 59.84</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1403826 ( 1403826 )</td><td>$ 50.96</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-371183 ( 371183 )</td><td>$ 53.75</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2008</td><td>3883230</td><td>$ 57.01</td></tr></table> under the provisions of fas 123r , the recognition of deferred compensation , a contra-equity account representing the amount of unrecognized restricted stock expense that is reduced as expense is recognized , at the date restricted stock is granted is no longer permitted . therefore , upon adoption of fas 123r , the amount of deferred compensation that had been reflected in unearned stock grant compensation was reclassified to additional paid-in capital in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . restricted stock units the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of other awards , including restricted stock units . the company generally grants restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . each restricted stock unit repre- sents the company 2019s obligation to deliver to the holder one share of common shares upon vesting . during 2008 , the company awarded 223588 restricted stock units to officers of the company and its subsidiaries with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 59.93 . during 2007 , 108870 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.29 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . during 2006 , 83370 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.36 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . the company also grants restricted stock units with a 1-year vesting period to non-management directors . delivery of common shares on account of these restricted stock units to non-management directors is deferred until six months after the date of the non-management directors 2019 termination from the board . during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , 40362 restricted stock units , 29676 restricted stock units , and 23092 restricted stock units , respectively , were awarded to non-management direc- the espp gives participating employees the right to purchase common shares through payroll deductions during consecutive 201csubscription periods . 201d annual purchases by participants are limited to the number of whole shares that can be purchased by an amount equal to ten percent of the participant 2019s compensation or $ 25000 , whichever is less . the espp has two six-month subscription periods , the first of which runs between january 1 and june 30 and the second of which runs between july 1 and december 31 of each year . the amounts that have been collected from participants during a subscription period are used on the 201cexercise date 201d to purchase full shares of common shares . an exercise date is generally the last trading day of a sub- scription period . the number of shares purchased is equal to the total amount , as of the exercise date , that has been collected from the participants through payroll deductions for that subscription period , divided by the 201cpurchase price 201d , rounded down to the next full share . effective for and from the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price is 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the exercise date . prior to the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price was calculated as the lower of ( i ) 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the first day of the subscription period , or .
Question: what is the net impact of granted and vested shares in the number of unvested restricted stocks in 2007?
Answer: 473304.0
Question: what about the total impact of the forfeited shares are included?
Answer: 242518.0
Question: what is the balance of unvested restricted stock as december 31 2008?
Answer: 3883230.0
Question: what about as of december 31 2007?
|
3821707.0
|
CONVFINQA3787
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 : number of restricted stock weighted average grant- date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of restricted stock</td><td>weighted average grant- date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2005</td><td>3488668</td><td>$ 41.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1632504</td><td>$ 56.05</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1181249 ( 1181249 )</td><td>$ 40.20</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-360734 ( 360734 )</td><td>$ 44.04</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2006</td><td>3579189</td><td>$ 48.07</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1818716</td><td>$ 56.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1345412 ( 1345412 )</td><td>$ 44.48</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-230786 ( 230786 )</td><td>$ 51.57</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2007</td><td>3821707</td><td>$ 53.12</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>1836532</td><td>$ 59.84</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested and issued</td><td>-1403826 ( 1403826 )</td><td>$ 50.96</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-371183 ( 371183 )</td><td>$ 53.75</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>unvested restricted stock december 31 2008</td><td>3883230</td><td>$ 57.01</td></tr></table> under the provisions of fas 123r , the recognition of deferred compensation , a contra-equity account representing the amount of unrecognized restricted stock expense that is reduced as expense is recognized , at the date restricted stock is granted is no longer permitted . therefore , upon adoption of fas 123r , the amount of deferred compensation that had been reflected in unearned stock grant compensation was reclassified to additional paid-in capital in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . restricted stock units the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of other awards , including restricted stock units . the company generally grants restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . each restricted stock unit repre- sents the company 2019s obligation to deliver to the holder one share of common shares upon vesting . during 2008 , the company awarded 223588 restricted stock units to officers of the company and its subsidiaries with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 59.93 . during 2007 , 108870 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.29 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . during 2006 , 83370 restricted stock units , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 56.36 were awarded to officers of the company and its subsidiaries . the company also grants restricted stock units with a 1-year vesting period to non-management directors . delivery of common shares on account of these restricted stock units to non-management directors is deferred until six months after the date of the non-management directors 2019 termination from the board . during 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , 40362 restricted stock units , 29676 restricted stock units , and 23092 restricted stock units , respectively , were awarded to non-management direc- the espp gives participating employees the right to purchase common shares through payroll deductions during consecutive 201csubscription periods . 201d annual purchases by participants are limited to the number of whole shares that can be purchased by an amount equal to ten percent of the participant 2019s compensation or $ 25000 , whichever is less . the espp has two six-month subscription periods , the first of which runs between january 1 and june 30 and the second of which runs between july 1 and december 31 of each year . the amounts that have been collected from participants during a subscription period are used on the 201cexercise date 201d to purchase full shares of common shares . an exercise date is generally the last trading day of a sub- scription period . the number of shares purchased is equal to the total amount , as of the exercise date , that has been collected from the participants through payroll deductions for that subscription period , divided by the 201cpurchase price 201d , rounded down to the next full share . effective for and from the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price is 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the exercise date . prior to the second subscription period of 2007 , the purchase price was calculated as the lower of ( i ) 85 percent of the fair value of a common share on the first day of the subscription period , or .
Question: what is the net impact of granted and vested shares in the number of unvested restricted stocks in 2007?
Answer: 473304.0
Question: what about the total impact of the forfeited shares are included?
Answer: 242518.0
Question: what is the balance of unvested restricted stock as december 31 2008?
Answer: 3883230.0
Question: what about as of december 31 2007?
Answer: 3821707.0
Question: what is the net change during 2008?
|
61523.0
|
CONVFINQA3788
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
|
991.1
|
CONVFINQA3789
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
Answer: 991.1
Question: and for 2006?
|
942.1
|
CONVFINQA3790
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
Answer: 991.1
Question: and for 2006?
Answer: 942.1
Question: so what was the difference between these two values?
|
49.0
|
CONVFINQA3791
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
Answer: 991.1
Question: and for 2006?
Answer: 942.1
Question: so what was the difference between these two values?
Answer: 49.0
Question: and the specific amount for 2006 again?
|
942.1
|
CONVFINQA3792
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
Answer: 991.1
Question: and for 2006?
Answer: 942.1
Question: so what was the difference between these two values?
Answer: 49.0
Question: and the specific amount for 2006 again?
Answer: 942.1
Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?
|
0.05201
|
CONVFINQA3793
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marketing we are a supplier of gasoline and distillates to resellers and consumers within our market area in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . in 2007 , our refined products sales volumes totaled 21.6 billion gallons , or 1.410 mmbpd . the average sales price of our refined products in aggregate was $ 86.53 per barrel for 2007 . the following table sets forth our refined products sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years . refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( thousands of barrels per day )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gasoline</td><td>791</td><td>804</td><td>836</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distillates</td><td>377</td><td>375</td><td>385</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>propane</td><td>23</td><td>23</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>feedstocks and special products</td><td>103</td><td>106</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>heavy fuel oil</td><td>29</td><td>26</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>asphalt</td><td>87</td><td>91</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>1410</td><td>1425</td><td>1455</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>average sales price ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>$ 86.53</td><td>$ 77.76</td><td>$ 66.42</td></tr></table> total ( a ) 1410 1425 1455 average sales price ( dollars per barrel ) $ 86.53 $ 77.76 $ 66.42 ( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd and 77 mbpd in 2006 and 2005 . on april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard . this change resulted in lower refined products sales volumes for 2007 and the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under our previous accounting practices . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements . the wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers and sales in the spot market accounted for 69 percent of our refined products sales volumes in 2007 . we sold 49 percent of our gasoline volumes and 89 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis . half of our propane is sold into the home heating market , with the balance being purchased by industrial consumers . propylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics and sulfur are domestically marketed to customers in the chemical industry . base lube oils , maleic anhydride , slack wax , extract and pitch are sold throughout the united states and canada , with pitch products also being exported worldwide . we market asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . our customer base includes approximately 750 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers . we have blended ethanol with gasoline for over 15 years and increased our blending program in 2007 , in part due to renewable fuel mandates . we blended 41 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2007 and 35 mbpd in both 2006 and 2005 . the future expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and changes in government regulations . we sell reformulated gasoline in parts of our marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; milwaukee , wisconsin and hartford , illinois , and we sell low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states . we also sell biodiesel in minnesota , illinois and kentucky . as of december 31 , 2007 , we supplied petroleum products to about 4400 marathon branded-retail outlets located primarily in ohio , michigan , indiana , kentucky and illinois . branded retail outlets are also located in georgia , florida , minnesota , wisconsin , north carolina , tennessee , west virginia , virginia , south carolina , alabama , pennsylvania , and texas . sales to marathon-brand jobbers and dealers accounted for 16 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2007 . speedway superamerica llc ( 201cssa 201d ) , our wholly-owned subsidiary , sells gasoline and diesel fuel primarily through retail outlets that we operate . sales of refined products through these ssa retail outlets accounted for 15 percent of our refined products sales volumes in 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , ssa had 1636 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 201cspeedway 201d and 201csuperamerica . 201d ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.796 billion in 2007 , compared with $ 2.706 billion in 2006 . profit levels from the sale of such merchandise and services tend to be less volatile than profit levels from the retail sale of gasoline and diesel fuel . ssa also operates 59 valvoline instant oil change retail outlets located in michigan and northwest ohio . pilot travel centers llc ( 201cptc 201d ) , our joint venture with pilot corporation ( 201cpilot 201d ) , is the largest operator of travel centers in the united states with 286 locations in 37 states and canada at december 31 , 2007 . the travel centers offer diesel fuel , gasoline and a variety of other services , including on-premises brand-name restaurants at many locations . pilot and marathon each own a 50 percent interest in ptc. .
Question: what was the sum of propane production in 2006 and 2007?
|
46.0
|
CONVFINQA3794
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marketing we are a supplier of gasoline and distillates to resellers and consumers within our market area in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . in 2007 , our refined products sales volumes totaled 21.6 billion gallons , or 1.410 mmbpd . the average sales price of our refined products in aggregate was $ 86.53 per barrel for 2007 . the following table sets forth our refined products sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years . refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( thousands of barrels per day )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gasoline</td><td>791</td><td>804</td><td>836</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distillates</td><td>377</td><td>375</td><td>385</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>propane</td><td>23</td><td>23</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>feedstocks and special products</td><td>103</td><td>106</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>heavy fuel oil</td><td>29</td><td>26</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>asphalt</td><td>87</td><td>91</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>1410</td><td>1425</td><td>1455</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>average sales price ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>$ 86.53</td><td>$ 77.76</td><td>$ 66.42</td></tr></table> total ( a ) 1410 1425 1455 average sales price ( dollars per barrel ) $ 86.53 $ 77.76 $ 66.42 ( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd and 77 mbpd in 2006 and 2005 . on april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard . this change resulted in lower refined products sales volumes for 2007 and the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under our previous accounting practices . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements . the wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers and sales in the spot market accounted for 69 percent of our refined products sales volumes in 2007 . we sold 49 percent of our gasoline volumes and 89 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis . half of our propane is sold into the home heating market , with the balance being purchased by industrial consumers . propylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics and sulfur are domestically marketed to customers in the chemical industry . base lube oils , maleic anhydride , slack wax , extract and pitch are sold throughout the united states and canada , with pitch products also being exported worldwide . we market asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . our customer base includes approximately 750 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers . we have blended ethanol with gasoline for over 15 years and increased our blending program in 2007 , in part due to renewable fuel mandates . we blended 41 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2007 and 35 mbpd in both 2006 and 2005 . the future expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and changes in government regulations . we sell reformulated gasoline in parts of our marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; milwaukee , wisconsin and hartford , illinois , and we sell low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states . we also sell biodiesel in minnesota , illinois and kentucky . as of december 31 , 2007 , we supplied petroleum products to about 4400 marathon branded-retail outlets located primarily in ohio , michigan , indiana , kentucky and illinois . branded retail outlets are also located in georgia , florida , minnesota , wisconsin , north carolina , tennessee , west virginia , virginia , south carolina , alabama , pennsylvania , and texas . sales to marathon-brand jobbers and dealers accounted for 16 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2007 . speedway superamerica llc ( 201cssa 201d ) , our wholly-owned subsidiary , sells gasoline and diesel fuel primarily through retail outlets that we operate . sales of refined products through these ssa retail outlets accounted for 15 percent of our refined products sales volumes in 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , ssa had 1636 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 201cspeedway 201d and 201csuperamerica . 201d ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.796 billion in 2007 , compared with $ 2.706 billion in 2006 . profit levels from the sale of such merchandise and services tend to be less volatile than profit levels from the retail sale of gasoline and diesel fuel . ssa also operates 59 valvoline instant oil change retail outlets located in michigan and northwest ohio . pilot travel centers llc ( 201cptc 201d ) , our joint venture with pilot corporation ( 201cpilot 201d ) , is the largest operator of travel centers in the united states with 286 locations in 37 states and canada at december 31 , 2007 . the travel centers offer diesel fuel , gasoline and a variety of other services , including on-premises brand-name restaurants at many locations . pilot and marathon each own a 50 percent interest in ptc. .
Question: what was the sum of propane production in 2006 and 2007?
Answer: 46.0
Question: what is the sum including 2005?
|
68.0
|
CONVFINQA3795
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois , at 20 south wacker drive . the following is a description of our key locations and facilities . location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2032 ( 2 ) 512000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois trading floor and office space leased 2027 ( 3 ) 150000 333 s . lasalle chicago , illinois trading floor and office space owned n/a 300000 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 250000 one north end new york , new york trading floor and office space leased 2028 ( 4 ) 240000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>primary use</td><td>owned/leased</td><td>lease expiration</td><td>approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20 south wacker drive chicago illinois</td><td>global headquarters and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2032 ( 2 )</td><td>512000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>141 west jacksonchicago illinois</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2027 ( 3 )</td><td>150000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>333 s . lasallechicago illinois</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>owned</td><td>n/a</td><td>300000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>550 west washingtonchicago illinois</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2023</td><td>250000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>one north endnew york new york</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2028 ( 4 )</td><td>240000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>one new change london</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2026</td><td>58000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>data center 3chicagoland area</td><td>business continuity and co-location</td><td>leased</td><td>2031 ( 5 )</td><td>83000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>bagmane tech park bangalore india</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2020 ( 6 )</td><td>72000</td></tr></table> data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location leased 2031 ( 5 ) 83000 bagmane tech park bangalore , office space leased 2020 ( 6 ) 72000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased or owned by us unless otherwise noted . ( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2032 with two consecutive options to extend the term for five years each . ( 3 ) the initial lease expires in 2027 and contains options to extend the term and expand the premises . ( 4 ) the initial lease expires in 2028 and contains options to extend the term and expand the premises . in 2019 , the premises will be reduced to 225000 square feet . ( 5 ) in march 2016 , the company sold its datacenter in the chicago area for $ 130.0 million . at the time of the sale , the company leased back a portion of the property . ( 6 ) the initial lease expires in 2020 and contains an option to extend the term as well as an option to terminate early . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal and regulatory matters 201d in note 12 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 87 for cme group 2019s legal proceedings disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what square footage will the one north end ny, ny premises be reduced to in 2019?
|
225000.0
|
CONVFINQA3796
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois , at 20 south wacker drive . the following is a description of our key locations and facilities . location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2032 ( 2 ) 512000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois trading floor and office space leased 2027 ( 3 ) 150000 333 s . lasalle chicago , illinois trading floor and office space owned n/a 300000 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 250000 one north end new york , new york trading floor and office space leased 2028 ( 4 ) 240000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>primary use</td><td>owned/leased</td><td>lease expiration</td><td>approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20 south wacker drive chicago illinois</td><td>global headquarters and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2032 ( 2 )</td><td>512000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>141 west jacksonchicago illinois</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2027 ( 3 )</td><td>150000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>333 s . lasallechicago illinois</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>owned</td><td>n/a</td><td>300000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>550 west washingtonchicago illinois</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2023</td><td>250000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>one north endnew york new york</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2028 ( 4 )</td><td>240000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>one new change london</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2026</td><td>58000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>data center 3chicagoland area</td><td>business continuity and co-location</td><td>leased</td><td>2031 ( 5 )</td><td>83000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>bagmane tech park bangalore india</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2020 ( 6 )</td><td>72000</td></tr></table> data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location leased 2031 ( 5 ) 83000 bagmane tech park bangalore , office space leased 2020 ( 6 ) 72000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased or owned by us unless otherwise noted . ( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2032 with two consecutive options to extend the term for five years each . ( 3 ) the initial lease expires in 2027 and contains options to extend the term and expand the premises . ( 4 ) the initial lease expires in 2028 and contains options to extend the term and expand the premises . in 2019 , the premises will be reduced to 225000 square feet . ( 5 ) in march 2016 , the company sold its datacenter in the chicago area for $ 130.0 million . at the time of the sale , the company leased back a portion of the property . ( 6 ) the initial lease expires in 2020 and contains an option to extend the term as well as an option to terminate early . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal and regulatory matters 201d in note 12 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 87 for cme group 2019s legal proceedings disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what square footage will the one north end ny, ny premises be reduced to in 2019?
Answer: 225000.0
Question: and what is the starting square footage?
|
240000.0
|
CONVFINQA3797
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois , at 20 south wacker drive . the following is a description of our key locations and facilities . location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2032 ( 2 ) 512000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois trading floor and office space leased 2027 ( 3 ) 150000 333 s . lasalle chicago , illinois trading floor and office space owned n/a 300000 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 250000 one north end new york , new york trading floor and office space leased 2028 ( 4 ) 240000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>primary use</td><td>owned/leased</td><td>lease expiration</td><td>approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20 south wacker drive chicago illinois</td><td>global headquarters and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2032 ( 2 )</td><td>512000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>141 west jacksonchicago illinois</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2027 ( 3 )</td><td>150000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>333 s . lasallechicago illinois</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>owned</td><td>n/a</td><td>300000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>550 west washingtonchicago illinois</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2023</td><td>250000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>one north endnew york new york</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2028 ( 4 )</td><td>240000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>one new change london</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2026</td><td>58000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>data center 3chicagoland area</td><td>business continuity and co-location</td><td>leased</td><td>2031 ( 5 )</td><td>83000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>bagmane tech park bangalore india</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2020 ( 6 )</td><td>72000</td></tr></table> data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location leased 2031 ( 5 ) 83000 bagmane tech park bangalore , office space leased 2020 ( 6 ) 72000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased or owned by us unless otherwise noted . ( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2032 with two consecutive options to extend the term for five years each . ( 3 ) the initial lease expires in 2027 and contains options to extend the term and expand the premises . ( 4 ) the initial lease expires in 2028 and contains options to extend the term and expand the premises . in 2019 , the premises will be reduced to 225000 square feet . ( 5 ) in march 2016 , the company sold its datacenter in the chicago area for $ 130.0 million . at the time of the sale , the company leased back a portion of the property . ( 6 ) the initial lease expires in 2020 and contains an option to extend the term as well as an option to terminate early . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal and regulatory matters 201d in note 12 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 87 for cme group 2019s legal proceedings disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what square footage will the one north end ny, ny premises be reduced to in 2019?
Answer: 225000.0
Question: and what is the starting square footage?
Answer: 240000.0
Question: so by how much will the square footage decrease?
|
-15000.0
|
CONVFINQA3798
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois , at 20 south wacker drive . the following is a description of our key locations and facilities . location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2032 ( 2 ) 512000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois trading floor and office space leased 2027 ( 3 ) 150000 333 s . lasalle chicago , illinois trading floor and office space owned n/a 300000 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 250000 one north end new york , new york trading floor and office space leased 2028 ( 4 ) 240000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>primary use</td><td>owned/leased</td><td>lease expiration</td><td>approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20 south wacker drive chicago illinois</td><td>global headquarters and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2032 ( 2 )</td><td>512000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>141 west jacksonchicago illinois</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2027 ( 3 )</td><td>150000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>333 s . lasallechicago illinois</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>owned</td><td>n/a</td><td>300000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>550 west washingtonchicago illinois</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2023</td><td>250000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>one north endnew york new york</td><td>trading floor and office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2028 ( 4 )</td><td>240000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>one new change london</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2026</td><td>58000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>data center 3chicagoland area</td><td>business continuity and co-location</td><td>leased</td><td>2031 ( 5 )</td><td>83000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>bagmane tech park bangalore india</td><td>office space</td><td>leased</td><td>2020 ( 6 )</td><td>72000</td></tr></table> data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location leased 2031 ( 5 ) 83000 bagmane tech park bangalore , office space leased 2020 ( 6 ) 72000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased or owned by us unless otherwise noted . ( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2032 with two consecutive options to extend the term for five years each . ( 3 ) the initial lease expires in 2027 and contains options to extend the term and expand the premises . ( 4 ) the initial lease expires in 2028 and contains options to extend the term and expand the premises . in 2019 , the premises will be reduced to 225000 square feet . ( 5 ) in march 2016 , the company sold its datacenter in the chicago area for $ 130.0 million . at the time of the sale , the company leased back a portion of the property . ( 6 ) the initial lease expires in 2020 and contains an option to extend the term as well as an option to terminate early . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal and regulatory matters 201d in note 12 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 87 for cme group 2019s legal proceedings disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: what square footage will the one north end ny, ny premises be reduced to in 2019?
Answer: 225000.0
Question: and what is the starting square footage?
Answer: 240000.0
Question: so by how much will the square footage decrease?
Answer: -15000.0
Question: so what is the percentage decrease?
|
-0.0625
|
CONVFINQA3799
|
Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
building . the construction of the building was completed in december 2003 . due to lower than expected financing and construction costs , the final lease balance was lowered to $ 103.0 million . as part of the agreement , we entered into a five-year lease that began upon the completion of the building . at the end of the lease term , we can purchase the building for the lease balance , remarket or relinquish the building . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the building , we are bound to arrange the sale of the building to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the maximum recourse amount of $ 90.8 million ( 201cresidual value guarantee 201d ) . see note 14 in our notes to consolidated financial statements for further information . in august 1999 , we entered into a five-year lease agreement for our other two office buildings that currently serve as our corporate headquarters in san jose , california . under the agreement , we have the option to purchase the buildings at any time during the lease term for the lease balance , which is approximately $ 142.5 million . we are in the process of evaluating alternative financing methods at expiration of the lease in fiscal 2004 and believe that several suitable financing options will be available to us . at the end of the lease term , we can purchase the buildings for the lease balance , remarket or relinquish the buildings . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the buildings , we are bound to arrange the sale of the buildings to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the maximum recourse amount of $ 132.6 million ( 201cresidual value guarantee 201d ) . for further information , see note 14 in our notes to consolidated financial statements . the two lease agreements discussed above are subject to standard financial covenants . the agreements limit the amount of indebtedness we can incur . a leverage covenant requires us to keep our debt to ebitda ratio less than 2.5:1.0 . as of november 28 , 2003 , our debt to ebitda ratio was 0.53:1.0 , well within the limit . we also have a liquidity covenant which requires us to maintain a quick ratio equal to or greater than 1.0 . as of november 28 , 2003 , our quick ratio was 2.2 , well above the minimum . we expect to remain within compliance in the next 12 months . we are comfortable with these limitations and believe they will not impact our cash or credit in the coming year or restrict our ability to execute our business plan . the following table summarizes our contractual commitments as of november 28 , 2003 : less than over total 1 year 1 2013 3 years 3-5 years 5 years non-cancelable operating leases , net of sublease income ................ . $ 83.9 $ 23.6 $ 25.9 $ 16.3 $ 18.1 indemnifications in the normal course of business , we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products . historically , costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations . we have commitments to make certain milestone and/or retention payments typically entered into in conjunction with various acquisitions , for which we have made accruals in our consolidated financial statements . in connection with our purchases of technology assets during fiscal 2003 , we entered into employee retention agreements totaling $ 2.2 million . we are required to make payments upon satisfaction of certain conditions in the agreements . as permitted under delaware law , we have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity . the indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officer 2019s or director 2019s lifetime . the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited ; however , we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid . we believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>over 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-cancelable operating leases net of sublease income</td><td>$ 83.9</td><td>$ 23.6</td><td>$ 25.9</td><td>$ 16.3</td><td>$ 18.1</td></tr></table> building . the construction of the building was completed in december 2003 . due to lower than expected financing and construction costs , the final lease balance was lowered to $ 103.0 million . as part of the agreement , we entered into a five-year lease that began upon the completion of the building . at the end of the lease term , we can purchase the building for the lease balance , remarket or relinquish the building . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the building , we are bound to arrange the sale of the building to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the maximum recourse amount of $ 90.8 million ( 201cresidual value guarantee 201d ) . see note 14 in our notes to consolidated financial statements for further information . in august 1999 , we entered into a five-year lease agreement for our other two office buildings that currently serve as our corporate headquarters in san jose , california . under the agreement , we have the option to purchase the buildings at any time during the lease term for the lease balance , which is approximately $ 142.5 million . we are in the process of evaluating alternative financing methods at expiration of the lease in fiscal 2004 and believe that several suitable financing options will be available to us . at the end of the lease term , we can purchase the buildings for the lease balance , remarket or relinquish the buildings . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the buildings , we are bound to arrange the sale of the buildings to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the maximum recourse amount of $ 132.6 million ( 201cresidual value guarantee 201d ) . for further information , see note 14 in our notes to consolidated financial statements . the two lease agreements discussed above are subject to standard financial covenants . the agreements limit the amount of indebtedness we can incur . a leverage covenant requires us to keep our debt to ebitda ratio less than 2.5:1.0 . as of november 28 , 2003 , our debt to ebitda ratio was 0.53:1.0 , well within the limit . we also have a liquidity covenant which requires us to maintain a quick ratio equal to or greater than 1.0 . as of november 28 , 2003 , our quick ratio was 2.2 , well above the minimum . we expect to remain within compliance in the next 12 months . we are comfortable with these limitations and believe they will not impact our cash or credit in the coming year or restrict our ability to execute our business plan . the following table summarizes our contractual commitments as of november 28 , 2003 : less than over total 1 year 1 2013 3 years 3-5 years 5 years non-cancelable operating leases , net of sublease income ................ . $ 83.9 $ 23.6 $ 25.9 $ 16.3 $ 18.1 indemnifications in the normal course of business , we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products . historically , costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations . we have commitments to make certain milestone and/or retention payments typically entered into in conjunction with various acquisitions , for which we have made accruals in our consolidated financial statements . in connection with our purchases of technology assets during fiscal 2003 , we entered into employee retention agreements totaling $ 2.2 million . we are required to make payments upon satisfaction of certain conditions in the agreements . as permitted under delaware law , we have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity . the indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officer 2019s or director 2019s lifetime . the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited ; however , we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid . we believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal. .
Question: what is the amount of non-cancelable operating leases net of sublease income due in less than 1 year?
|
23.6
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.