| # QA4MRE | |
| ### Paper | |
| Title: `QA4MRE 2011-2013: Overview of Question Answering for Machine Reading Evaluation` | |
| Abstract: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~./hovy/papers/13CLEF-QA4MRE.pdf | |
| The (English only) QA4MRE challenge which was run as a Lab at CLEF 2011-2013. | |
| The main objective of this exercise is to develop a methodology for evaluating | |
| Machine Reading systems through Question Answering and Reading Comprehension | |
| Tests. Systems should be able to extract knowledge from large volumes of text | |
| and use this knowledge to answer questions. Four different tasks have been | |
| organized during these years: Main Task, Processing Modality and Negation for | |
| Machine Reading, Machine Reading of Biomedical Texts about Alzheimer's disease, | |
| and Entrance Exam. | |
| Homepage: http://nlp.uned.es/clef-qa/repository/qa4mre.php | |
| ### Citation | |
| ``` | |
| @inproceedings{Peas2013QA4MRE2O, | |
| title={QA4MRE 2011-2013: Overview of Question Answering for Machine Reading Evaluation}, | |
| author={Anselmo Pe{\~n}as and Eduard H. Hovy and Pamela Forner and {\'A}lvaro Rodrigo and Richard F. E. Sutcliffe and Roser Morante}, | |
| booktitle={CLEF}, | |
| year={2013} | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| ### Groups and Tasks | |
| #### Groups | |
| * `qa4mre` | |
| #### Tasks | |
| * `qa4mre_2011` | |
| * `qa4mre_2012` | |
| * `qa4mre_2013` | |
| ### Checklist | |
| For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library: | |
| * [ ] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature? | |
| * [ ] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task? | |
| * [ ] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test? | |
| If other tasks on this dataset are already supported: | |
| * [ ] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted? | |
| * [ ] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates? | |
| * [ ] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant? | |