text
stringlengths 0
23.7k
| label
stringclasses 4
values | dataType
stringclasses 2
values | communityName
stringclasses 4
values | datetime
stringclasses 95
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise and light pollution are the most overlooked of the pollutions. I’ll exchange a click bait article for an attempt to spread this message | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
This is why regulations exist. These business people will destroy the world if it makes them a nice profit. They will cut down every tree and dump whatever waste in the water if there isn’t a rule against it.
No surprise Elon is outwardly supporting republicans and Trump - they want to repeal the regulations that prevent them from being able to do this. These people are an enemy to humanity. Vote accordingly, or who knows what kind of world future generations will have to endure. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
> The app also asks for access to the user’s contacts
I've always hated the idea of my number being in someone's phonebook and having my information given away by them just because they want to try the latest trendy app.
And I also hate not knowing how a company makes money, because it almost always eventually ends up being "selling user data". Even if they say they don't do it *for now*, that doesn't stop them from collecting and doing so in the future, under a new terms of service that'll be casually disclosed in a modal menu designed to be quickly dismissed by most users. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
How does it play a voice message when the phone is locked? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Yes and my number never got into one | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
So, ICQ clone app 🤷♂️ | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
It’s not very well written but nowadays you’d be surprised at the scale of laser tinkering that is going on. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Will Smith in shambles. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Didn’t Terrence Howard already have this idea when he was in his mother’s womb? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Why would you expect it to create free energy? All engines convert one form of energy into another with some loss, so efficiency is naturally the primary metric. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
So 15% IPC improvements, no NPU, no little-big architecture...
AMD recently had a technological lead in CPUs but it might lose it pretty soon if they're not careful... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Don't they usually drop a series with better numbers? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
A lack of NPU might hurt them, but who cares about the little-big trash. It was just a way for Intel to pretend they had a lot of cores when in reality they had a few good ones with a bunch of under powered ones.
And 15% IPC improvement is nothing to scoff at. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
I won’t be surprised if Nvidia find a way to get their GPUs validated for Copilot+ PCs. They meet the minimum TOPs requirements that’s a major key component. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
I don't understand. They show Ryzen AI too. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Big-little on desktop cpus, ewwww. Rather have large cores and preferably on single ccd for better latency. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
NPUs are dumb and little big architecture doesn't really mean good.
The last time I checked there CPU were more power efficient than intel's which use little big architecture. Not to mention it's desktop so power really doesn't matter honestly if it did Intel would've died years ago.
Do you just listen to buzz words and believe them? Like why do you want an NPU on a desktop? Just use your fucking GPU it's way easier for a GPU to do AI workloads then a CPU. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Last week I pulled the trigger and replaced my 3900x with a 5800x3d totally worth it upgrade for 200€. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
I always just wait till the next cycle to buy the previous one. Prices drop fast. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
You're kidding right ?
They announced similar IPC improvements, big gains to the graphical units, big gains to their NPU, ram direct integration in the SoC, change in direction in their little-big strategy (with a complete change of architecture for their e-cores), some additions to their Hardware decoding capacities.
And other more discutable choices such as the removal of HT. Intel also anounced they will also use TSMC for this new generation of CPU.
I mean not all of those will be true improvements and maybe some numbers are exagerated (as they always are for these kind of announcements), but in terms of innovation there is absolutely no comparison between the two announcements. The Ryzen 9000 is an architecture revision from Series 7000). While intel announced something closer to a complete overhaul of their platform.
I'm really not an intel fanboy (I'm typing this on a ryzen laptop) and I am really hoping both brands keep uping their game like they did in the past few years. But AMD has been doing some shady stuff to hide their lack of progress (like recycling their 4000 Mobile Series CPUs and rebranding them as 7030). I stand by what I said, if AMD continues like this intel will eat their lunch. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-05-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
Is it because it's obviously a privacy nightmare?
> The new functionalities would require users to input personal data including their name, IP address, age, and gender.
Yeah, of course it is.
The idea that Meta would altruistically gather this data for the sake of "democracy" is laughable. Data is their business, what the fuck else do you think their motives are? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Sure, maybe. But you are just alleging things without evidence. It may not be worth the potential risk, that’s for everyone to decide. But it’s certainly not automatically a GDPR violation to have users enter such information. It may or may not be.
Also, the article’s “enter their IP address” seems like they aren’t too technically knowledgeable. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Oof... Not how any of that works... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
I get way more ads now, and have been scammed TWICE.
Instagram has no control or evident quality control over the ads.
Just don’t click them. It should be illegal what’s happening now. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Oof this is a bad idea. We need to just boycott Instagram. Plain and simple. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Might get my girlfriend off of it lmao. Congrats Instagram, you’re achieving the impossible | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
ublock origin and BHInstagram for iOS/Honista for Android is good | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Jokes on them. I don't have that app. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
then my unskippable delete thumb might be coming to an app near me around the same time. the final insult. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Incoming the "I'm not going to use it" comments only for months later their to be record revenue and larger user base increase.
Iv seen this *plenty* for most other popular sites. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
On second thought, forget the blackjack! | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Awful. The amount of intrusive scam ads I’ve get are nearly on par with google.
I’m already barely on instagram as it is. This would likely be the final nail in the coffin if this is true.
I miss the old days of Facebook where you’d just get a Mountain Dew ad here and there and that’s it. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Ah, screw the whole thing. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Profit motive breeds innovation! | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Seriously. The only two things I’ve bought of insta ads were total shit and not worth a fraction of what I paid. I don’t trust anything on there. I am amazed we can’t get legislation to protect people from this shit.
Same with those scams on YouTube or anywhere else that fish in the comments. They are often so cookie cutter it seems impossible to me that they are filterable.
What is this fucking stranglehold? It seems like all pretense is out the window and they just want to visibly abuse us for profit. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Different ads you mean… | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
I use Insta to follow artists and design. Over the last week so so many of the people I follow have left due to Insta intending to scrape their art for AI training | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
You'll be surprised how I skip that ad insta.
Closes app, uninstalls.
It's already close to unbearable, the main feed is trash. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Guy above said he *likes* ads, so go figure.. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Unskippable ad will 100% get me to leave insta. No questions asked. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Honestly man, I'm just there for the ass and skirts idk | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
I was meaning to quit | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
I installed this app recently that limits all social media…I’m loving it, used Instagram for 40 minutes last week total. I have a couple of friends that were telling me they don’t understand the draw to Instagram, like they have to force themselves to even check it out from time to time. I’m starting to feel the same way, mostly just use it for quick posts or work stuff. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Nothing is unskippable. The delete function still exists. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
While you're right people shouldn't be accidentally clicking on ads but let's not act like it's their fault while we gloss over shitty businesses practices.
Maybe we can shame the business hosting out actual malware disguised as a normal elements of the UI to trick as many people as possible out of their roughly 2 billion monthly active users instead of shaming the people who do click on these ads, be it intentional or not? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
Unfortunately, this post has been removed. Image and video based submissions are not allowed by /r/technology.
Please try submitting to /r/TechnologyPorn, /r/Pics, /r/Gifs, or another image-based subreddit. Make sure to read the sidebar there! For videos, please try submitting to /r/Videos, /r/Video, /r/Documentaries, or another video-based subreddit.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technology) if you have any questions or concerns.* | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
It looks like OP posted an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of [concerns over privacy and the Open Web](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot).
Maybe check out **the canonical page** instead: **[https://www.marketwatch.com/story/chinese-spacecraft-lands-on-moons-far-side-amid-growing-space-rivalry-with-u-s-969d5699](https://www.marketwatch.com/story/chinese-spacecraft-lands-on-moons-far-side-amid-growing-space-rivalry-with-u-s-969d5699)**
*****
^(I'm a bot | )[^(Why & About)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/ehrq3z/why_did_i_build_amputatorbot)^( | )[^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)](https://www.reddit.com/r/AmputatorBot/comments/cchly3/you_can_now_summon_amputatorbot/) | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
It’s ok- Boeing is on it! | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Didn't an Indian craft do this last year? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
*giggles in chinese | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Why on earth are some dipshits downvoting you?
Healthy competition in space exploration delivers technology advancements that benefit us all.
There's some fucking luddites in this world. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Space rivalry? Didn't the U.S. land on the moon in 1969?
I don't see how a near 55 year gap in achievement constitutes a raised voice much less a rivalry. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
This happened a long time ago, Mr Beast has more than double the subscribers | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Why does anyone give a shit? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Mrbeast has just 3 million more subscribers than T-series. Avenge happened by beating t series | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Let's all jump and shout about two assholes with internet access, like wtf | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
The fact that Hyundai/Kia were too cheap to put immobilizers in their modern cars, to the point where stealing them became an actual meme, is a massive enough red flag that I'll personally stay away from them forever.
And the fact that they actually charged customers for a "security kit" in response to the scandal is the cherry on top of the shit sundae they made for themselves.
I tend to be against rewarding companies that act like shit with my money, especially when there are alternatives. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Ioniq 5 and 6 are excellent cars, but just FYI, it's Hyundai who is going to benefit from the tax credit, not the consumer. Previously the company subsidized their own 7500 discount to take the place of the credit. You can be sure the discount will go away now. Ultimately the market determines the selling price of the car, and the only difference here is whether Hyundai has to discount their price by 7500 or not. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
The battery pack isn't going to be made in the US for now. So it won't get the full $7500 anyway. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
It is nearly incomprehensible to me that the IONIQ 5 might be made in a new factor for a few months with one port and then with another for the rest of its run. It just doesn't make any sense.
I would think they either delay the car or make them in Korea with SAE combo until the US factory is ready to make them with NACS.
Or just change the NACS switchover date. They said 2024 but it's not like they are required to stick to it. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Which car brand will you be shopping with then? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Will you also not buy Toyota? In 2009 and 2010, it was found that they knew that some of their accelerators were sticking and didn't recall them to save money. I mean, that risked people's lives, not their cars. Surely, you've also taken a blood oath not to buy from Toyota.
What about VW? They were caught cheating the emission system using sophisticated software? Are they also on your never buy list?
What car companies are beyond reproach? And how far back does the issue have to be for you to forget? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
This is true. All mode post 2019 with push to start do not have this issue. You can attempt it with key ignition but they have immobilizers now that make it significantly more difficult. Only models 2018 or older have this issue and even then there’s programs they’ve made that can fix the issue for most models. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
>In 2009 and 2010, it was found that they knew that some of their accelerators were sticking and didn't recall them to save money
You mean this recall?
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/26/business/26toyota.html
>Surely, you've also taken a blood oath not to buy from Toyota.
>What car companies are beyond reproach? And how far back does the issue have to be for you to forget?
I'm not sure why you're so upset that I'm not interested in buying a Kia or Hyundai. Relax. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
No, they recalled some vehicles, but it was later found that they didn't recall all the ones they knew were in danger. That wasn't revealed until after 2010. That's why your article doesn't address it. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
I'll be interested in any noticeable difference in quality between them. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Got it, so it’s a deceptive article. It’s flat packed and assembled here like Chevy bolt. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-04-06 |
No, most is made in South Korea. It’s flat packed and “assembled” here to get around tariffs. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-04-06 |
Yes, but mostly in South Korea. His cousin assembled the flat packed car here. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-04-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
It's already here | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
AI Generated fakes news is one thing.
Deep pockets funding curated narratives on media network is another thing.
So when is AI-powered fact checking journalism going to become a thing? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Not really
But I want to believe that becoming "AI powered" will force these organizations to finally give the source. Which then I can peruse at my own convenience.
I mean that's all I really want. I want media articles to just start giving the sources in MLA format at the bottom of their articles like wikipedia. Like I understand if they got their information from someone they interviewed but if they are making a claim, I want a source for that. Which they are not doing.
My wish is that with AI powered I can do something like break down the article so that I can see in a table format where the article gets all it's information from in an executive summary situation. Have it all laid out for me to look at. Which then I can see and determine if it is a crock of shit or not.
Like a lot of times an article loves to just throw all kinds of figures at you without sourcing anything and you are inundated with so much information, people just end up accepting it.
Like I have been doing this with chatgpt and gemini recently on different articles and there are some trends. For example here with this wired article? After chatgpt tabularized the article, I could see that lot of the claims are sourced from somewhere.
Now if we were to do the same like something from [the telegraph](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/03/this-is-nigel-farages-grandest-moment-it-will-make-the-man/), I can then see that a lot of it is actually hearsay and unsubstantiated. Which is not really a surprise, this is a political commentary from the telegraph about a brexiteer. I would be surprised if the author sourced one study. But from the analysis a majority of it is his own unsourced opinion. Which tells us something right? Right? CoS.
So as you can see, this what I would like to have as a service that automatically does this in a smarter format than what I have done by someone smarter than me. So that we can see from a systematic view, which article is likely a Crock of Shit (CoS) or not.
Not only that. But then articles would be encouraged to source their stuff in the future as well, which in my opinion elevates the quality of articles. Now I could be wrong too.
Edit:
But it just feels good sometimes, to have a robot's second opinion here. Like this is me after a long ass longwinding article. "ChatGPT did the author actually source anything?"
And for the robot to tell you straight up, that no the author didnt actually explicitly source anything.
It's like sometimes you just are not sure if you are being gaslighted to believe that an article or commentary is fact based or not. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
We’ve seen the bot accounts going back to at least 2016 election | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Yea. We didn't know it was this bad though. Its bad bad. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Hello! **Please read this message very carefully.**
Unfortunately, since [your account has less than 10 combined karma](/u/me) and spam from new accounts makes up a significant portion of all spam, your post was automatically, temporarily removed. **Have a tech support question?** Please head over to /r/techsupport, /r/asktechnology, or other tech-centric subreddits listed on the sidebar.
You may still contribute and earn some karma by *commenting* on other existing posts in /r/technology instead. Additionally, you may make meaningful contributions to [other subreddits](/subreddits) to increase your karma count. Tech support questions/opinions/suggestion requests, surveys, blogs, and videos will **NOT** be approved. If this is a legitimate submission that is not covered in the previously listed criteria, please message the moderators to have them manually review your post, or wait a few days and try again.
Thank you!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technology) if you have any questions or concerns.* | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
My opinion is that current AI techniques will never be capable of guiding autonomous vehicles safely in all real-life driving situations. I hope the public will not tolerate the driving injuries and fatalities that result, and are already being reported.
My opinion applies to ordinary roads and to heavily instrumented roads. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Ok... https://www.warpnews.org/transportation/self-driving-cars-are-safer-than-human-drivers-study-shows/ | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
|
Not only that, but MAGA has not offered a single valid reason why they need anything beyond the transcripts that have already been released to the public. This indicates they are acting in bad faith, rendering their request invalid.
[I would say “the GOP,” but that party is dead. MAGA has infected and eradicated sensible conservatism like the cancer it is.] | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Holy Moly Bologna,
So they can't just release and official version via the DOJ website? Or any .Gov website?
Is AI going to be the new excuse for everything? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
I mean do you want to go to the movies or just read about the movies?
This ain't that crazy of a request | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
That’s not how this works, hoss. “I wanna see it for entertainment purposes” is hardly valid when it comes to depositions. It’s not Avengers 5, it’s a law enforcement exercise. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
I made an analogy that went over your head.....
I'm suggesting a video is alot more detailed than something written down.
No matter how you wish to gerrymander the situation - the situation is clear. They're scared it could hurt his political campaign as Hur's comments were a big blow to his image. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
I dont understand the logic for this.
Are they worried deepfaker will take the audio and recreate Biden saying some shit. If that's the case, then that makes no sense. We already have enough audio to make deep fakes of [Biden playing DND with Trump, Obama and Ben Shapiro](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IREgYXOJDe4). This is not a valid argument.
Then are they worried some deepfaker will splice together the interview create fake parts of the interview? If that is the case, then release the interview in whole on youtube or some official channel. Then even if someone does fake the interview, you can compare it to the original and point out the fake bits. This too is not a valid argument.
There probably is some logical arguments to not release the interview in whole. But they have not made that argument.
Maybe they just dont want the full interview to be published, which then yes deepfake scenario two is a danger. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
And trust voters to go to it? There are still people out there that think trump didn’t say “lock her up” because trump just told them that.
I know everyone wants to see the cut and spliced movie of Biden. But they just don’t get it. Heck we couldn’t even watch trump snore. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Biden should have submitted answers in writing like the orange man did for Mueller. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-03-06 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.