text
stringlengths
0
23.7k
label
stringclasses
4 values
dataType
stringclasses
2 values
communityName
stringclasses
4 values
datetime
stringclasses
95 values
Merci beaucoup je ne suis pas un mangeur de baguette par contre mais de Poutine
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Too young to remember the Second Life craze?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Wtf does that even mean I ain’t a skibidi kid
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
If you're using 'alr' to mean alright then ya I think you are. You're at least on the path to become one.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
What a time to be alive. That sounds like an ideal job for a gamer
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
And they said slavery was dead !!!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
What does ken jeongs wife have to do with this?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
The only people I know who do it are non-Americans. The only ones I know who do it even in a professional context are Indian. Case in point, the previous commenter is a French kid.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I was wondering what madness would top the pile for the next South Park episode.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
The People Make Games one? Or did Noclip happen to do one as well?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Is that a particularly high bar to clear?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Yep. Everything moves in the direction of more control for authorities. The internet used to be wild-west, now it's all privately-owned for-profit platforms. Even tech companies keep trying to [triple-E](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish) existing non-private protocols like the Web in order to get more control for themselves, and when they can't they try to shove everyone onto private platforms and fill the web with endless shit to make it less attractive.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
One, that wasn't that long ago, and you can still easily find that kind of crap without much searching. The truly wild shit was accidentally stumbling upon child pornography on the open internet. Chat rooms dedicated to grooming kids. The really gross shit.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Do you do your recruiting through any third party? Could they walk any potential applicants through basic skill tests, which they get paid for if the applicant seems to have those basic skills according to you (and get penalized for if the applicant doesn't)?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Yes. I must be mistaken.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
"We wish you all the best in connecting in future with a service provider who more closely matches your requirements"
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Which is why shady employers prioritize hiring them. "Oh, trust me that this thing we're doing to your wages/conditions isn't illegal."
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
It's a game where all the shit realities about being a retail drone are removed, so it seems palatable, with the purpose of making kids want to try it out for real when they get old enough. Hey presto, cheap labor which doesn't really know its rights and doesn't know when to cut its losses.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Yeah but customers are less likely to injure themselves *in the store* with the current IKEA approach. Even the potentially-injurious process of putting the furniture together is framed as something customers to at home or IKEA does and then delivers. There is zero encouragement or even opportunity, really, to assemble anything within the IKEA store itself. No 'assembly stations' or 'play rooms' or even just non-trafficked spaces between the checkouts and the external doors. Plus all the packaging discourages assembly until people get home. This is not coincidental. No customer assembly in-store means lower chance of on-premises injury AND far lower chances of someone running into an assembly problem (real or imagined) then and there and immediately trying to make the staff sort it out for free, possibly by making a scene.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
My kid was playing it last week and he was a manager but no one else was doing their job so he was frantically trying to run the entire shop by himself. He got so mad at everyone else and all I could say was “welcome to management.”
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
> Édit: please tell me y’all know that « Alr » means alright First time I've ever heard it or seen it written down.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Nah, this thread is the first time I've seen it.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
But WHY? Why make Nintendo Miis?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Huh. What was the pay like?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Meataballverse
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Isn’t that what retail is anyways? I always felt like I was cycling pre written dialogue options at my old retail gig
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Literally my reaction. Like, how does someone react to *THAT?*
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
If I could make union ironworker wages (48$ an hour) I totally would work at a coffee shop too lol
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
The amount of adults I've met who basically act like they're owed the world and can do whatever the hell they want...
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
> the training department just doesn't want to train new hires on how to set up and use the computer Sounds like this needs a little pushback, maybe through your boss if you're not the only IT person. Emphasize that you're there to fix broken equipment, not do staff job training, because *there's an actual training department for that*. Oh, it involves a computer? So does every other aspect of everyone else's job in the company, and none of that is your (team's) role either. Unless the training team wants to hire your team for $400/hr to do training.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
I was about to say, my spiels definitely feel like NPC dialogue.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
And everything before it. There's caveman-porn on cave walls.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
How very Second Life.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
You're preaching to the choir lol. Unfortunately, my boss's boss, and their boss, doesn't do anything to push back when we bring it up, so we just have to deal with it. But don't worry, they're cutting our team by half, so I'm sure it'll only get better :P
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
13 an hour is absolute shit. Food services workers in California get much more than that. Hell, it doesnt even meet our minimum wage.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Why do i feel slightly dirty reading this?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Time to find another employer, I'm guessing?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Children know better, they just also need to test boundaries
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Can’t wait for Scammer Payback to get involved with this one. “Hello my name is Steven with Roblox support how may I help you”
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Uncanny Valley is why. Obviously fake is treated as so by your brain. Perfectly real is treated as so by your brain. But there's a point where fake is just real enough to bother your brain and it's abhorrent. It's like watching an animated corpse. So without perfect tech, it's better to err on the side of being obviously fake.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
World population in 1950 was 2 billion. It's now 8 billion. All that open land and opportunity the elders tell us about is gone.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
why are people getting so angry over an abbreviation 💀
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
>Chatrooms everywhere, support groups fro just about everything you could imagine. You could find chats for any health issue you could imagine and groups with people dealing with the same issues. If only there was a site of conversations sorted by niche topics of interest
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
I mean.... lots of people are just here IN REAL LIFE for sex.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
"Hey, should I work at Ikea?" "Fuck no, they only play me 13/hr."
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
with the conversion to canadian the wage is better than most jobs here lmfao
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
I'm both insulted, and impressed that this job pays almost a full dollar over my last job I had. What a world we live in..
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-10-06
Where do I sign up
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-13-06
As if most people enjoy working
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-13-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
I can’t wait until Chinese invent a better LLM and ban the west from using it.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
what makes you think the CCP can't do it? these have been SHIPPING for a while.  Sep 21 2022 XPeng officially launches G9 SUV equipped with 15-minute fast charging and an ADAS that can top Tesla FSD [https://electrek.co/2022/09/21/xpeng-launches-g9-suv-with-15-minute-fast-charging-and-adas-that-challenges-tesla-fsd/](https://electrek.co/2022/09/21/xpeng-launches-g9-suv-with-15-minute-fast-charging-and-adas-that-challenges-tesla-fsd/) That version of the platform can charge from 10-80% in 20 minutes on **XPeng’s new network of 480 kW S4 chargers.** The company claims that’s still better than most of the industry, but has already topped its own speeds. The 4C version of the G9 can deliver the previously promised 200km of range in five minutes, but also recharge from 10-80% in 15 minutes. Hell yeah.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
>“Ready for immediate mass production” is talking about the "other development" >**The other development** was the Gemstone battery, which features all-solid-state [technology](https://www.thecooldown.com/green-tech/). Its 350-watt-hour per kilogram energy density is 40% more than that of most NCM batteries, which will help EVs increase their ranges and use energy more efficiently. >It is planned for rollout in 2027 and commercial availability in 2030, offering a driving range of 1,000 kilometers, or 621 miles, on a single charge.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Why? Because the oil industry controls the car narrative in the West.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Lol, use your last two brain cells to remind us what ICE stands for again? Your car literally makes explosions and fire to move, the chances of an ICE fire [are 0.1% vs 0.0012% for EVs](https://www.drive.com.au/caradvice/how-many-electric-cars-have-caught-fire-australia/).
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I think cost, location, and buildout time are the bigger issues for grid storage than absolute quality of the batteries. They can build batteries out of many things, lithium ion, sodium ion, gravity with sand or water. Just having batteries at all is success.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Hey hey hey hey pull yourself together and think of the shareholders okay. You think these boys would spend 4 whole years in a diploma mill for rich kids and get appointed by rich buddies if they were incompetent leeches? No way !! They’re totally for sure important business guys with big brain ideas you’ll see
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Yeah the US will never see it because our government hates China at least the democrats do.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Context: CATL announced and has already started producing their 4C batteries that’s potentially 15minutes to charge almost fully. CATL makes so many batteries, they’re one of the top 5 LiFePo4 companies in the world I think? This battery claims to be 5C, which is astonishing. They also claim to be able to make multiple lithium chemistries 5C capable, including LiFePo4 and lithium NMC. That’s wild, huge if true. Btw, C rating is Amp current x Amp-hour-capacity. So a 100-amp-hour battery that can charge at 100 amps is 1C. The same battery that can charge at 500amps is 5C. These LiFePo4 batteries can typically discharge faster than they can charge, charging has always been more limited that discharging
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Dude i left that life when i saw everyone around me was somebody i’d hate to actually be. It changed my life. Not necessarily for the better but dude it’s crazy. I saw people in my business classes literally disregard ethics and get high scores. Blew my mind.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Batteries are also available as LFP, which contain none of the cobalt or nickel that are both expensive and unethically sourced.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I will watch a video you show me. My youtube feed isn't packed with shit you care about, its filled with shit i care about. That's like me saying just look at youtube for these drone deploy eks clusters and getting mad you don't know what the fuck I'm talking about. Idiot.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Wait? You don't know that the vast majority of modern batteries come from China? And that they are the leader in this field?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
It’s wild right? But we’re lucky to have you here among the ethical folks, so that’s their loss.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Charging a 80 kWh battery from 10% to 70% in 9 minutes means 48 kWh in 0.15 h or 320 kW, assuming ~~a perfectly spherical cow~~ no losses.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Still got to address the infrastructure issue. Range isn't the issue, availability and charging speed is.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
There are quality good and there are cheap goods. If you want to buy the cheapest thing there is, should you expect the same quality as a more expensive option? You’re going to find both options in China as well.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
If it’s not then our titans of industry have nothing to worry about, right? They’ll come up with something legit any day now surely
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Just follow the money , the US is a major fossil fuels producer , why would they want to push EV battery tech and stunt their petrodollar hegemony? Also China highly subsidizes their EV and Battery industry, the US is just starting that.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Range relieves the need for “charge station on every corner like a gas station”. You can build a moderate infrastructure and be fine with high range vehicles AND mid range or focus on a robust charging network for cars that can only go up to 300 miles. I mean we can do both but if we’re gonna take a focused look at this, then higher range means less charging. 15 minutes to almost full? That’s less than a trip through walmart. Put the range and high charge together and that’ll literally relieve so much of the hassle as people won’t have to charge their cars all day. I live in small town georgia and even WE have a moderate network. Both telsa and other brands on top of most dealers in town that offer electric vehicles also have charging ports you can pay to use. I’m not gonna say we can’t do better because we can. But the infrastructure is there for those who can’t charge at home and with 600+ miles of range that’s more than enough for the average commuter to not have to charge but once a week. We can work on ALL of it. We don’t have to do bits and pieces.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
A lithium ion battery, like what is in smartphones, is still a battery because it works by chemical reaction, charging it only reverses the reaction. We call lithium ion batteries and other batteries that can be recharged rechargeable batteries or just a battery. An accumulator to me would be more like a capacitor that just holds energy with no reaction, I and I think most people would just call it a capacitor though.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I dont think they are saying that bc of racism or US propaganda. China has a serious problem with cutting corners, especially within their own businesses and overstating breakthroughs. Happens everywhere, but happens a lot in China. They have one manufacturer in particular have 10, but i have heard up to 34, dealerships catch fire or burn down. Recently there was someone who couldn't be released from their car due to a glitch. Like the handles didn't work. Amongst others. And hey Tesla has some shit too, but it is not out of the question to question these things being atated by China. Fuck, i hope theyd check up on US company claims as well, it isnt a bad thing. Especially when there is plenty of evidence of issues and safety concerns
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
These products get vetted before being sold in the EU. So I guess EU regulators are in bed with China
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
? Im not really getting the gist of your comment? Are you saying we aren't innovating? Cause we are. We likely have more invested than any other country except China in this realm. And id wager our investments are much better than theirs im general. I am not trying to defend bad actors, bad biz, and slow rollouts. But i am struggling to get your particular issues past what i know as reality.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
the german term that is used is akkumulator or akku for short no one uses weideraufladbare batterie or sekundäre battery wich woudl translade to rechargable battery but no one uses that word even kids learn akku and people do not say rechargable battery or secondary battery they just say battery as far as I ehard thats why I was asking why they dont say accu
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
>is this an american thing? everyone here says akku no one says battery if it is rechargable It's an American and European English speaking thing. [The term "car battery" used to be universally understood to be the 12 volt lead-acid store of electricity for the starter engine.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead-acid_battery) Obviously now it can mean the man power store of an electric vehicle, but "batteries" in english have meant a rechargeable store of power for longer than you or I have been alive.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
When will we use crystals for energy? When is THAT coming? Soon I hope. Like instead of an engine on your car, there is this reactor(alien tech most likely) and then you press a button and a cylinder with liquid nitrogen all over it rises from the center where the "power crystal" (are we calling it that?) is inserted. There are a TON if rgb lights...like 100000s...its not gaudy. Yeah. Opinions?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
we call them akkumulator or akku no one says wiederaufladbare batterie or battery and lithium ion isnt the only smarphonr akkumulators we have
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
thank you for the explanation thats exactly what I wanted to hear as no one over here would say battery to the phone power provider
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Thats fine if germans call it that but in english we call batteries batteries whether they are rechargable or not.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
As long as the connections are thick enough, all batteries can be charged to full voltage in under 10 minutes... *once* at least.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Weren't they selling at a loss? I'd be sceptical of something like that too.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Well, its important to note that America isn't really efficient on EV production and EV related technology over the years. Looking at Elon for example, he spent about a decade now trying to make autopilot a thing or making poorly designed cars like the cyber truck that no one wanted. EV cars in America are still way to expensive for most people to consider one. If we were smart, we would have been focusing more on researching meaningful technology like innovating upon the battery and reducing vehicle cost but it was wasted on technology no one is going to use if they don't even have a vehicle first. Chinese companies are luckier in this aspect as the Chinese government passed legislation to essentially funnel an endless supply of money so they can sell their cars for so cheap they don't even make profits or very little at that. However, America had a head start for years but we twiddled our thumbs doing other things and mismanaged our priorities
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I don't understand why you talk like the US and China are the only makers of EV. Lots of countries right now with manufacturers on the playing field that the US would rather see successful. In my field, this is all what's known as vaporware. Until people start taking delivery and we see feedback, it's just sales and marketing making promises. 80% in 9 minutes (without knowing the capacity) is only a small improvement over an Ioniq 5 and that's actually on the market today.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Nope! Graphene products are being used more and more frequently. However, making products the go-to standard takes a long time. Plastics, for example, took decades to become popular. It wasn't until there was a need for a cheaper alternative during WW2. Electronics tend to move faster since we can change out parts more regularly, but for graphene, since they're larger products, they become harder to make mainstream.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Notice they mention nothing about cycle life in the article.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
This is the piece that I feel people are missing…. Do we think China is pumping all of this money into EV’s and subsidizing the companies so that they can sell their vehicles at a loss for… the good of the environment? Or perhaps it’s an attempt to undercut western and Japanese car makers and try to integrate themselves into another essential part of western economies in order to give them some more strategic leverage…
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Ah Gotion. They really missed out on not naming their battery G-Unit.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
This just sounds like rationalization. The truth is that you completely lost here. China produces much better electric vehicles than you do because they just care about this more than you do.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Just because you don't care about the environment doesn't mean they don't.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
The CCP lies less frequently than your government does.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
China comes up with a "Revolutionary new technology that will advance our technology by a 100 years" every other day. Its all bullshit and concepts meant to attract gullible investors that never sees the light of day. Never believe anything that comes out of China.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
I never said this was a good or bad thing, I merely stating the reason why Chinese companies are able to sell their cars for far cheaper than they could otherwise. Of course, an unlimited supply of money with no oversight is a bad thing but it isn't an inherently Chinese thing either. America has historically had this same problem in subsidizing bad businesses with little oversight. Normally for America it turns into a capitalistic scheme to funnel money to the rich. Just look at the FTX drama with Sam Bankman-Fried as an example. To the point of America being better than we thought - I couldn't disagree with a statement more. Every year I become increasingly disappointed. Why are we spending so much time trying to produce autopilot and AI technology in EVs when the actual car is too expensive? None of these technologies mean anything if you can't even buy the EV. Why is there no focus on the actual car parts so we can make them cheaper? We spent a decade plus on autopilot than the actual battery so it's no surprise the cars are so unaffordable. I mean, we really wasted 5 years on the "CyberTruck" that most people can't even buy. We are not as far as people think we are and the data shows it overwhelmingly. It's actually so shameful how much we failed in the EV race despite funding it for over a decade before any other country did. Tesla was never even able to generate net revenue without government subsidization until 2020 - a perfect example of throwing money with no oversight for continued failure when we should have pulled out the moment we saw Tesla **NOT** focus on car parts but car software.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Love how the dinosaurs in the states hate innovation. Hurr durr oh no the Mexicans, wone left, vote trump! /s
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Er….. I’m sure the numbers are out there. Censorship isn’t just some all encompassing thing the government applies to everything. You also need to look what company it is and if they’re connected to the government. Government doesn’t have stakes in every single manufacturer. Manufacturers would love for government to invest in them but government only invest in the biggest companies.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-07-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
From all unacceptable units only Réaumur is more unfit than Fahrenheit.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
39 mK? You can buy equipment that goes colder than that without even making a custom order
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Don’t downvote this guy. The low temperature is not the impressive part of this experiment. You just buy a system and press a button to get to 10 mK these days.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I bet there are all kinds of interesting things to learn when the universe stops wiggling.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06