text
stringlengths 0
23.7k
| label
stringclasses 4
values | dataType
stringclasses 2
values | communityName
stringclasses 4
values | datetime
stringclasses 95
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Yeah, the same.
For me the worst part is: digital market is changing not only industry, but also the games. What if many games are released, but I don't wanna play anything. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
On the used market, I can sometimes find them for 90€ . Wild | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I dunno, I've been PS exclusive when it comes to consoles for a few decades now, and the day 1 releases on gamepass seems pretty appealing to me. Even the best tier of PS plus is lacking in comparison. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
PS+ contains better games by industry standard, and "day one" is meaningless when it's games like redfall and Hellblade 2 lol | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
To someone who's getting into PS just now, it's definitely the better deal. But I pretty much bought the entire first party PS line up either on release or on sale within the first year of their release, so it's completely useless to me, and it makes me feel like an idiot having spent full price on some of those games.
If the next Uncharted game hits PS Plus the same way the new Indiana Jones game will release on Gamepass on day 1 though, then they would win me over as well. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Gamers just repeat fanboy logic without knowing stuff and act like they are experts.
It’s the worse part of fandoms, they hear something once and take it as fact without doing reach on their own.
They ignore the fact most games run on lower end spec PC parts and don’t realize devs just don’t have to optimize for that like they do the series S. Plus, trying to optimize for the series S has let other games to improve their engines, like with BG3. “Takes more work” equals “is bad” to gamers. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
We’re a half-step away from zero-clients that just connect to a console subscription run in a data center. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I’m talking about optical drives. DVD players and things can be updated with firmware to enforce DRM. They would zap your PS5. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
If you listened to reddit you would be forgiven for holding the mistaken belief that everybody runs the latest video card, top of the line specs and a PC less than a year old. Most people I know keep their gaming PC as long as a gaming console generation, often longer. Yes, there are tons of people who want to run the latest and greatest, but that is such a narrow slice and not what anybody should be developing for, unless they want a tiny potential user base. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
All good. I was hoping I’d be wrong Haha | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Steam is different because reasons. Ask these people what percentage of the games they own on PC that are actually disc bases. The answer is somewhere between zero and ten percent for most of them, with most shading towards zero. That's why they mention Diablo or starcraft or some other game from 20 years ago. I don't even know many stores that carry any disc based PC games that aren't "find the object" shovelware that clutter an end cap at Target or Walmart
As for physical, let's look at who leads the charge for physical copies in the console space. Nintendo, who makes sure you can't have it digital unless through their storefront or they will come after your ROMs | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Azure CDN is not a bottleneck. Your local ISP most likely is QoSing the traffic from Microsoft to your local address to avoid congestion. It’s not possible for MS to prioritize traffic once it leaves their controlled fabric. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
|
Fuck this timeline | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
AI will take your next job. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I would be forced to reply in my Daffy Duck voice. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Seriously, I just got done with one recently where both people interviewing me over zoom didn't have cameras on which felt off. The second I see this cartoon in my interview I'm leaving and looking elsewhere. Interviews go both ways and the fit should feel right on both sides. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
"elsewhere"
What about when they all do it | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Ok, I'll just use chatgpt to generate the answers.
"You are the most advanced expert in (this job). Answer the following interview questions"
And the job is yours. Unless of course it hallucinates on some of the answers. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Well clippy, I think my attention to detail is my biggest weakness. Sometimes sure it’s very helpful to add shareholder value, but other times? A hindrance.
My cross to bear. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I’m trying to learn how to set one up myself. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
No it fucking won’t | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I'd actually prefer that to be honest. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I refuse to do those too | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
This is not the cyberpunk we want smh | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
can we start to design AI CEOs and AI gov't officials so we can finally see some sort of actual regulation | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I've already experienced this. I was applying for an IT Cyber security analyst position and the emails I had with "Veronica" were great, I thought I was just killing it and sure to get the job. The next week I have my interview on Microsoft teams, and an ugly ass SIMS 4ish looking picture pops up and "Veronica" was AI the entire time. It sounded like knock off Siri, and couldn't answer any of my questions, and anytime I answered it's question it would make a disapproval "hmmm" noise and continue on. I hung up, and went about my day. A few days later a person actually reached out and it was actually the hiring manager, he wanted to know if I still wanted the job, but I had to do it through "Veronica" even though the hiring manager was on the phone with me at that moment. I politely passed and told him to not bother contacting me again. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I’ve been out of work for quite sometim…. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
If you have the option to work somewhere else, you are not their target audience. They are looking for desperate people. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Some of the worse people I know in my industry keep getting hired in top roles again and again because they interview well or look great on paper. They can talk the talk but can’t walk the walk.
I even had the most qualified marketing manager I’ve ever worked with from an educational perspective, but they couldn’t do the simplest of tasks.
How will AI identify the right person to hire without having that human view where we can call out the idiots from our experience and feeling. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
So you start having all robots dismantled ... and then they start standing up for themselves | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I refuse to do those. If I wanted to do casting videos, I'd go join my friends in acting. I'm so sick of absolutely no human initial review of applications. I have a five-year degree and ten years of experience and have been looking for employment for FOUR years. My application gets auto-rejected for things like having a BS when the listing requires only an Associate degree. People who have no idea how automation works are trying to apply it. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I would pass on the interview | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I want to crawl in a hole and die | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I think I had something like this when answering pre-recorded questions in c. 2015 (consulting roles at a big 4 accounting firm). I had to respond for up to 1 minute. And of course the system wasn’t answering back 10 years ago.
Didn’t love it, but also understand saving time for the first screen - no one on either side really enjoys those and maybe some people perform better with less pressure of a real person? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Happen to me already this type of "interview". I just canceled straight away. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
There’s a new staffing firm that has started doing something like similar; Jobot or something. They hit you up for legit IT job but before you talk to anyone real you have to have a long conversation with a chat bot. After the 8th screening interview question I gave up and blocked all their emails.
So incredibly dumb. If you are trying to hit me up for principle engineering roles I expect some level of personal engagement.
They probably appeal to the demand side but supply side will never use such an impersonal tool for high salary roles. Interviewing is a two way street which is seemingly becoming forgotten in the past two years. I can see this company going under quickly when they fail to recruit talent for the companies they staff for. Being a cost effective alternative doesn’t matter if you are trying to build a two way marketplace but only one side participates. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Companies are testing the waters right now, and trying to get away with stealing the farm in terms of breaking existing law by pretending somehow AI language models are suddenly autonomous people.
Already businesses are finding themselves caught out on these and claiming the algorithms and models did it, not the company, as if they aren't responsible for their software use. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I think the joke is on companies as AI while a big benefit for them, also empowers individuals to compete with companies in a way that they never could before. Sort of like how in the past you would need an entire studio full of expensive equipment and many people to operate to make an hour long video and for the past decade or two an individual can do it all themselves. AI is for sure helping me compete with much larger companies. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Don't work for the man | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
“What position are you applying for?”
“Drop table users” | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Just getting people prepared for their new Bitmoji AI boss... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
"AI, feel this immense regret for me" | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Honestly it took me a few minutes to figure out what was happening, but then yeah, I got out pretty quickly. The big tip off was that his reading was like a 5th grader would read, all stilted and he actually sounded out one of the words. It was pathetic. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-11-06 |
I think you'll find that the people who think that far are few. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-11-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
|
And that's why musk bought it, and is reinstating accounts. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Well it’s always been worth a lot of money as a propaganda platform. Musk just felt it should be a much shittier one. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
next day: 80 000 new accounts made! | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
It wasn’t X, it was Twitter. I’ll bet misinformation has increased since it became X. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Don't to the "both sides" thing. Twitter was and is a cesspool. But you don't normally have Presidents, Senators and Representatives from the left going out and saying complete lies everyday. Like Jews use space lasers to make forest fires. Or Democrats were carting in thousands of fake ballots. All the things that lead to a literal insurrection.
This is not a both sides, everyone is bad thing. What happened in 2020 needs to be addressed. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Nice try. But a reasonable person can easily identify what misinformation is.
Saying that Trump won the election all the while he was losing challenge after challenge is misinformation. Asking people to respect a transperson’s pronouns is decency, not misinformation. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
To be fair there really aren’t many senators representatives or presidents that are on the left… | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Silencing 70000 people we didnt like resulted in information we didnt like getting shared less. Anyone who cant see how easy to abuse this is, is delusional. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Water is wet | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Well these days by "left" I just mean not full right wing crazy people. :P
It's crazy that someone like Biden is painted as a left wing communist by the right these days. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
That’s what blows my mind. I don’t even understand what their actual critique of Biden is.. like, what policies are they not liking right now? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Obvious question is whether that makes deplatforming acceptable. Easy to sign off on when your team isn’t the one paying the price.
Do we have a rigorous definition of misinformation that can be applied across all contexts? Who gets to make these determinations? In this case it’s pretty cut and dry—Trump lost the election, people were insisting that he hadn’t. Is it usually that easy to delineate? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Absolutely and just the worst antisemitism. Not anti Israel, actual antisemitism. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
As a kiwi American politics is crazy, most of the politicians in the US would be considered conservative here and pretty much the entire US "right" would be considered fringe ultra conservative | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
And how many of those were reinstated by the vanguard of "open speech" Mr. taint musk | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
it isn't just 'easy to abuse', it *was* abused. calling it 'deplatforming' doesn't change that it was censorship. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
From what I've been able to follow the main complaint is that he's a senile incompetent evil mastermind.
And they say irony is dead | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
About half are back on it. Invited or not. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I mean the quote you listed at the beginning is a fairly good rule. You don’t want someone incapable (or untrained) using forklifts because then injury can occur to both the untrained and/or incapable operator and people in the vicinity. Similarly you don’t want someone incapable of using welding tools using those tools due to risk of injury. Here, you don’t want someone incapable of distinguishing truth from falsehoods using social media, especially when such person is a minor, because there are nefarious actors on social media persuading people to do stupid and or dangerous things. You need look no further for such examples than TikTok users being injured in real life because they attempted a dangerous challenge on TikTok which misrepresented the risks of the challenge. This is not a dictatorial rule but rather a rule of practicality. No free speech violations in the social media example either because it’s a private company. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Regardless of any particular mindset or opinion, glorifying "deplatformation" sets a dangerous precedent. It may have been for something you agreed with this time, but accepting this into culture makes it easier for people in power positions to stifles people voices when it comes to something you do care about.
What if a law that that makes deplatforming easier gets passed, and we didn't speak up because they used a subjective example you agree with. There are many people in power who are anti-LGBT and would love to abuse this kind of power to silence people they don't agree with.
Even on a cultural level, creating a witch hunt culture sets a dangerous precedent of behavior when it comes to something you do care about.
This is less about X in particular, I'm just commenting on the themes these kind of posts seem to take. We need free speech. It allows us to take a stand against things we disagree with. Without free speech, we could easily be the ones being oppressed by a bigoted government and culture, like many countries do. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
As you like but, as I said, there is nowhere in the world that I'm aware of where that is the case so I'm afraid they can refuse people all they like and still stay open to the public. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Who the Fuck defines Misinformation?
The Ministry of Truth? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Well that’s life. Do anything at your own risk and discretion. But don’t take away someone’s freedom of speech, I see people write or do stupid things everyday but im not going to try and turn the world into a safe space. Thats an individual obligation. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
There were no free speech violations with what happened on X, formerly twitter, in the OP. It’s a private company, I don’t get your point. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I’m quoting the original comment I responded too, why are you changing the context. I’m not debating anything else I left my opinion on a comment. Not based on the post. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
>We need free speech.
You already have it. You just don't understand it very well.
The right to free speech must include the right to freedom of association. After all, you can't speak to someone if you can't associate with them. Separating them would be like having a right to bear arms that doesn't include the right to have ammunition. The one is required for the other.
And if you have freedom of association then you have the freedom to *not* associate too.
Which is what Twitter was doing - removing people they didn't want to associate with.
I'm afraid rights work both ways and you have to take the good with the bad. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
The original comment similarly contained no free speech violations. I haven’t spotted a single proposal or comment on this entire thread, or any comment to which you responded, suggesting that the government was involved here in restricting speech. This was strictly private deplatforming, so under those circumstances if you want to construe your comment as meaning something else, it seems you weren’t really responding to anything relevant here at all. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
How about the one I responded to before you came in to give me your 2 cents. What is your reasoning for even talking to me right now. Are you just trying to psychologically break shit down or something, talk to someone who gives a shit you’re an irritant. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Musk lives in lies. It’s all he is, all he does. Seeing people crack down on lying was taken as a threat to his power. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Yea I looked at Analogjones’ comment. There was literally nothing there about the government restricting speech in violation of the first amendment lol | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Yes it did have a free speech violation. He said people he thinks are spreading misinformation online shouldn’t have the right to communicate on a platform online. To me that’s taking away from freedom of speech, yeah I know,, “it’s a private company” I already know your weak rebuttal. But that’s all I said and that’s all I have to say. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
You call it a weak rebuttal but that’s the law. I thought conservatives were the party of law and order! | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Dude he said some people shouldn’t be able to have a platform. What are you reading. You’re need to pull your head out of your ass cheeks and read. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Not if they use the law for corruption, and who said what party I am. That’s how you know this website is an echo chamber. How do you even know if I’m American? As soon as you feel any disagreement your spider senses pop off and you say “oh conservative! Everyone congregate with me! I need your upvotes please!” You are a sad dookie stain of a human | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
He said if some people can’t use advanced tools they shouldn’t be able to use them. Advanced tools are not the same thing as government suppressing protected speech. It’s a perfectly fine rule and private companies, gov agencies all across this country implement such a rule for their platforms, equipment, etc…. Nothing in the comment indicated supporting arbitrary gov restriction of speech or expression. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Well if you could have it your way you sound like you would just silence everyone you disagree with. Makes sense you’re on Reddit. Everyone off this website looks at Reddit users as one sided propagandists commies. But I’m just on here to validate if that was true. Thanks for the confirmation. Your world views and the way you vote destroys economies. Have a good day sir or dudette whatever you are. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Have a good day | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I stand correct. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
I feel sorry for us all, man. I hope these idiot people won't cause as many problems in the coming years... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
The global Jewish population isn’t responsible for, nor universally represented by the geopolitical actions of the state of Israel, and it’s pretty antisemitic to imply otherwise. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Yet consistently Jews, not Israel, are getting the hate. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
It's almost like conservative views are so universally abhorrent that the only way they gain followers who aren't clinically diagnosed sociopaths is through relentless, reality-breaking dishonesty and disinformation. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Everybody has biases but only Republicans have biases that cause them to believe that violently overthrowing our government and destroying American democracy is a good thing.
Since you hate America so much and want to live in a dictatorship run by a man-child with a personality cult, I hear North Korea is great this time of year. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
"Misinformation"
You'd think people would realize at this point most misinformation is just speech the powers that be don't like. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
It started because he got pissed when the [Babylon Bee got banned](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-05/elon-musk-opined-about-buying-twitter-after-babylon-bee-ban). He made those jokes because he was angry about conservative hate mongers being deplatformed. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Nope. There's been research that's shown that deplatforming works. People don't just move to other places or replace their accounts. Some do, but overall, not many. Ironically, that research was done on reddit after it banned some of its hate subs. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Play the victim harder? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Maybe they should give nap time back to you, you're acting a little cranky there. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Why do conservatives always assume that facts are difficult to justify?
Like... prove that the election was stolen? Oh you can't? That's misinformation.
Or... can you prove that Donald Trump stole confidential documents... why yes, yes we can... not misinformation.
So hard... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
>Each one thinks you're talking about them.
And they are both right, I am. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
If you'd ever set foot on a college campus, you would be intelligent enough to have not started this stupid conversation in the first place. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.