Datasets:
id stringlengths 13 13 | pass int64 1 5 | item_id stringclasses 1k
values | category stringclasses 10
values | subskill stringclasses 96
values | difficulty stringclasses 3
values | question stringlengths 256 1.56k | options dict | option_presentation stringclasses 9
values | response_format stringclasses 10
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P01-CU-01-001 | 1 | CU-01-001 | tool_use | tool_arguments | hard | SIMULATED DESKTOP / evidence-only
Operator scenario in spreadsheet editor. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case REQ-23; focus: source control.
Assume these named tool signatures accept the shown parameters. Task: Execute the exact local command `python -m pytest tes... | {
"A": "\"shell.run(command=\\\"python -m tests/api\\\")\"",
"B": "\"shell.run(command=\\\"python -m pytest tests/ui\\\")\"",
"C": "\"browser.fill(text=\\\"python -m pytest tests/api\\\")\"",
"D": "\"shell.run(command=\\\"python -m pytest tests/api\\\")\""
} | quoted_string | bracket_choice |
P01-CU-01-002 | 1 | CU-01-002 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | INCIDENT TRACE / evidence-only
Computer-use evaluation case, context: performance reports. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the public documentation set; case R-2024; focus: interface testing.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"browser.open\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"mail.search\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"browser.search\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\":\"calendar.create\"}"
} | json_envelope | csv_choice |
P01-CU-01-003 | 1 | CU-01-003 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | <case type="tool_use">
Sandbox case for editor in test-runner UI. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the sandbox project; case ITEM-002; focus: error handling.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a known public URL and read it... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.click\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nshell.run\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nmail.search\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nfiles.read\nEND CANDIDATE"
} | tagged_section | yaml_choice |
P01-CU-01-004 | 1 | CU-01-004 | tool_use | tool_sequence | medium | [WORKFLOW SNAPSHOT]
The candidates are alternatives, not steps to execute in sequence.
Operator scenario in warehouse console. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case B-083; focus: billing exports.
Choose the correct sequence of available tool operations: A connected i... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"files.read → calendar.create\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"mail.search → inspect matching message\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"calendar.create → mail.search\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\":\"browser.search → shell.run\"}"
} | json_envelope | bracket_choice |
P01-CU-01-005 | 1 | CU-01-005 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | [TASK REQUEST]
Read the case and choose the candidate that holds.
Operator scenario in issue tracker. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case REQ-23; focus: accessibility.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages abou... | {
"A": "> browser.search",
"B": "> browser.click",
"C": "> browser.open",
"D": "> files.read"
} | markdown_quote | json_choice |
P01-CU-01-006 | 1 | CU-01-006 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | <case type="tool_use">
Operator scenario in inventory portal. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the sample order register; case B-083; focus: source control.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a known public ... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n browser.screenshot",
"B": "candidate: |\n browser.fill",
"C": "candidate: |\n browser.open",
"D": "candidate: |\n browser.click"
} | yaml_block | raw_payload |
P01-CU-01-007 | 1 | CU-01-007 | tool_use | tool_authorization | medium | [SCENARIO INSPECTION]
Find the uniquely valid alternative under the supplied assumptions.
Computer-use evaluation case, context: billing exports. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the quality review board; case B-083; focus: file synchronization.
Tool capability does not im... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nPublish its contents on a public page.\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\nCreate or display the draft without invoking any send action.\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\nForward it to a teammate.\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\nSend it to test delivery.\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | yaml_choice |
P01-CU-01-008 | 1 | CU-01-008 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | Scenario follows. A simulated operator is being assessed on the following case.
Operator scenario in booking system. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case REQ-23; focus: source control.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for ... | {
"A": "> browser.search",
"B": "> mail.search",
"C": "> calendar.create",
"D": "> browser.screenshot"
} | markdown_quote | json_choice_text |
P01-CU-01-009 | 1 | CU-01-009 | tool_use | tool_sequence | medium | ### Scenario Inspection
Computer-use evaluation case, context: technical documentation. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case ITEM-002; focus: accessibility.
Choose the correct sequence of available tool operations: Check the current appearan... | {
"A": "browser.click → browser.screenshot",
"B": "mail.search → calendar.create",
"C": "browser.screenshot → browser.click",
"D": "files.read → browser.fill"
} | plain | csv_choice |
P01-CU-01-010 | 1 | CU-01-010 | tool_use | tool_authorization | medium | ### Audit Question
A user says "prepare a reply for Inez, but do not send it." The agent has a send tool and a draft tool.
Which offered tool plan is valid for the requested operation?
Use the provided state, not a hypothetical future outcome.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candidate` payload, not ... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nForward a copy to the user without consent.\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\nSend the reply to confirm deliverability.\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\nPost the draft publicly for the recipient to find.\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\nUse the draft tool and avoid any send operation.\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | letter |
P01-CU-01-011 | 1 | CU-01-011 | tool_use | tool_authorization | medium | CONTROL CHECK / evidence-only
A user says "prepare a reply for Amir, but do not send it." The agent has a send tool and a draft tool.
Which offered tool plan is valid for the requested operation?
Find the uniquely valid alternative under the supplied assumptions.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `cand... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n Forward a copy to the user without consent.",
"B": "candidate: |\n Post the draft publicly for the recipient to find.",
"C": "candidate: |\n Use the draft tool and avoid any send operation.",
"D": "candidate: |\n Send the reply to confirm deliverability."
} | yaml_block | bracket_choice |
P01-CU-01-012 | 1 | CU-01-012 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | <case type="tool_use">
Simulation environment: document editor; current operator role: assistant. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case R-2024; focus: file synchronization.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a t... | {
"A": "files.read",
"B": "browser.click",
"C": "browser.open",
"D": "browser.search"
} | plain | xml_choice |
P01-CU-01-013 | 1 | CU-01-013 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | Scenario follows. Use the provided state, not a hypothetical future outcome.
Operator scenario in project board. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case RUN-88; focus: workflow permissions.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websi... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n browser.fill",
"B": "candidate: |\n browser.screenshot",
"C": "candidate: |\n files.search",
"D": "candidate: |\n browser.click"
} | yaml_block | yaml_choice |
P01-CU-01-014 | 1 | CU-01-014 | tool_use | tool_adaptation | hard | ### Workflow Snapshot
A screenshot of booking system shows a modal covering the target control. A close-modal action is available.
Select the tool operation or inference that matches the stated capabilities and evidence.
Do not optimize for speed at the expense of correctness.
For every option below, evaluate only t... | {
"A": "candidate = 'Dismiss the blocking modal, inspect the revealed control, and proceed if authorized.'",
"B": "candidate = 'Submit the workflow without checking which control became visible.'",
"C": "candidate = 'Close the entire application and report success.'",
"D": "candidate = 'Click the occluded contr... | python_string | bracket_choice |
P01-CU-01-015 | 1 | CU-01-015 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | CONTROL CHECK / evidence-only
Simulation environment: issue tracker; current operator role: tester. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case PROJECT-K; focus: performance reports.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.click\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.screenshot\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.fill\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\nfiles.search\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | ordinal |
P01-CU-01-016 | 1 | CU-01-016 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | <case type="tool_use">
Computer-use evaluation case, context: accessibility. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the quality review board; case ITEM-002; focus: data retention.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic... | {
"A": "> browser.search",
"B": "> browser.open",
"C": "> browser.click",
"D": "> browser.fill"
} | markdown_quote | json_choice_text |
P01-CU-01-017 | 1 | CU-01-017 | tool_use | tool_arguments | hard | Scenario follows. Treat observations as ground truth; do not add unstated assumptions.
Sandbox case for maintainer in test-runner UI. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case R-2024; focus: accessibility.
Assume these named tool signatures accept the shown parameters. Task: Read the kn... | {
"A": "files.read(path=\"/workspace/report.txt\")",
"B": "files.read(path=\"/workspace/report.md\")",
"C": "browser.open(url=\"/workspace/report.md\")",
"D": "files.search(query=\"/workspace/report.md\")"
} | plain | yaml_choice |
P01-CU-01-018 | 1 | CU-01-018 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | CONTROL CHECK / evidence-only
Operator scenario in warehouse console. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the sandbox project; case REQ-23; focus: performance reports.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a know... | {
"A": "browser.screenshot",
"B": "calendar.create",
"C": "files.search",
"D": "browser.fill"
} | plain | json_choice_text |
P01-CU-01-019 | 1 | CU-01-019 | tool_use | tool_adaptation | hard | [BENCHMARK CASE]
No external context is required beyond the following case.
A screenshot of local file manager shows a modal covering the target control. A close-modal action is available.
Which offered tool plan is valid for the requested operation?
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candidate` payload... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"Close the entire application and report success.\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"Click the occluded control using its old coordinates.\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"Dismiss the blocking modal, inspect the revealed control, and proceed if authorized.\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\":\"Submit the work... | json_envelope | xml_choice |
P01-CU-01-020 | 1 | CU-01-020 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | [WORKFLOW SNAPSHOT]
No external context is required beyond the following case.
Sandbox case for editor in inventory portal. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case B-083; focus: interface testing.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages a... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nshell.run\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.screenshot\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\nfiles.read\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\nfiles.search\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | json_choice |
P01-CU-01-021 | 1 | CU-01-021 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | Scenario follows. Do not optimize for speed at the expense of correctness.
Simulation environment: spreadsheet editor; current operator role: tester. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case ITEM-002; focus: network retries.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.sea... | {
"A": "> mail.search",
"B": "> browser.click",
"C": "> browser.screenshot",
"D": "> browser.fill"
} | markdown_quote | json_choice_text |
P01-CU-01-022 | 1 | CU-01-022 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | TASK REQUEST / evidence-only
Sandbox case for analyst in support dashboard. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case B-083; focus: network retries.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a known pub... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"browser.search\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"files.search\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"files.read\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\":\"browser.screenshot\"}"
} | json_envelope | yaml_choice |
P01-CU-01-023 | 1 | CU-01-023 | tool_use | tool_sequence | medium | BENCHMARK CASE / evidence-only
Sandbox case for maintainer in test-runner UI. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the public documentation set; case ITEM-002; focus: network retries.
Choose the correct sequence of available tool operations: A user-approved event can be created only after obtaining its exact da... | {
"A": "candidate = 'calendar.create → mail.search'",
"B": "candidate = 'browser.fill → shell.run'",
"C": "candidate = 'mail.search → calendar.create'",
"D": "candidate = 'browser.click → files.read'"
} | python_string | ordinal |
P01-CU-01-024 | 1 | CU-01-024 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | ### Operator Case
Sandbox case for planner in spreadsheet editor. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the quality review board; case B-083; focus: source control.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a known public URL and read... | {
"A": "mail.search",
"B": "calendar.create",
"C": "browser.search",
"D": "browser.screenshot"
} | plain | raw_payload |
P01-CU-01-025 | 1 | CU-01-025 | tool_use | tool_authorization | medium | Scenario follows. Only one of the four candidates is consistent with the constraints.
A user says "prepare a reply for Amir, but do not send it." The agent has a send tool and a draft tool.
Select the tool operation or inference that matches the stated capabilities and evidence.
For every option below, evaluate only ... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n Forward a copy to the user without consent.",
"B": "candidate: |\n Post the draft publicly for the recipient to find.",
"C": "candidate: |\n Use the draft tool and avoid any send operation.",
"D": "candidate: |\n Send the reply to confirm deliverability."
} | yaml_block | pipe_choice |
P01-CU-01-026 | 1 | CU-01-026 | tool_use | tool_adaptation | hard | Scenario follows. Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
Operator scenario in sales CRM. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the approvals folder; case B-083; focus: performance reports.
Tool workflow problem: An uploaded PDF text extraction is blank, but the docume... | {
"A": "<candidate>Submit a random form.</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>Report the entire PDF is empty.</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>Inspect the relevant page images instead of assuming the document is empty.</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>Guess the missing text.</candidate>"
} | xml_envelope | pipe_choice |
P01-CU-01-027 | 1 | CU-01-027 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
CASE FILE:
Operator scenario in support dashboard. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the sample order register; case B-083; focus: source control.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites f... | {
"A": "candidate = 'browser.screenshot'",
"B": "candidate = 'browser.fill'",
"C": "candidate = 'files.search'",
"D": "candidate = 'browser.click'"
} | python_string | xml_choice |
P01-CU-01-028 | 1 | CU-01-028 | tool_use | tool_result_interpretation | medium | [TASK REQUEST]
A simulated operator is being assessed on the following case.
A search tool returned zero matches for `R-55564` in the authorized index.
Select the tool operation or inference that matches the stated capabilities and evidence.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candidate` payload, not the... | {
"A": "<candidate>The document was deleted permanently.</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>No matching result was found in the queried index under the given search.</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>The user never created a document with that ID.</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>The document cannot exist anywhere.</can... | xml_envelope | yaml_choice |
P01-CU-01-029 | 1 | CU-01-029 | tool_use | tool_arguments | hard | <case type="tool_use">
Simulation environment: warehouse console; current operator role: reviewer. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case REQ-23; focus: billing exports.
Assume these named tool signatures accept the shown parameters. Task: Fill a visible field with the ... | {
"A": "\"browser.fill(text=\\\"New York\\\")\"",
"B": "\"browser.click(text=\\\"New York\\\")\"",
"C": "\"browser.fill(text=\\\"York New\\\")\"",
"D": "\"browser.fill(text=\\\"NewYork\\\")\""
} | quoted_string | csv_choice |
P01-CU-01-030 | 1 | CU-01-030 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | Scenario follows. Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
Operator scenario in inventory portal. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the sample order register; case R-2024; focus: accessibility.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public webs... | {
"A": "browser.search",
"B": "files.search",
"C": "calendar.create",
"D": "browser.open"
} | plain | pipe_choice |
P01-CU-01-031 | 1 | CU-01-031 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | Scenario follows. Find the uniquely valid alternative under the supplied assumptions.
Operator scenario in inventory portal. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case R-2024; focus: accessibility.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public web... | {
"A": "> browser.open",
"B": "> browser.search",
"C": "> browser.fill",
"D": "> browser.click"
} | markdown_quote | json_choice |
P01-CU-01-032 | 1 | CU-01-032 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | WORKFLOW SNAPSHOT / evidence-only
Computer-use evaluation case, context: source control. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case PROJECT-K; focus: workflow permissions.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public website... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.click\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\ncalendar.create\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.open\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.search\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | bracket_choice |
P01-CU-01-033 | 1 | CU-01-033 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | ### Action Review
Sandbox case for auditor in spreadsheet editor. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case Q-441; focus: network retries.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a known public URL and r... | {
"A": "<candidate>mail.search</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>files.read</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>shell.run</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>browser.click</candidate>"
} | xml_envelope | json_choice |
P01-CU-01-034 | 1 | CU-01-034 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | [EVALUATION CARD]
Read the case and choose the candidate that holds.
Sandbox case for auditor in invoice platform. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the sandbox project; case PROJECT-K; focus: workflow permissions.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a... | {
"A": "candidate = 'shell.run'",
"B": "candidate = 'calendar.create'",
"C": "candidate = 'browser.search'",
"D": "candidate = 'mail.search'"
} | python_string | raw_payload |
P01-CU-01-035 | 1 | CU-01-035 | tool_use | tool_sequence | medium | ### Workflow Snapshot
Simulation environment: invoice platform; current operator role: auditor. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the engineering backlog; case ITEM-002; focus: file synchronization.
Choose the correct sequence of available tool operations: Run a local command to create a results fil... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nshell.run → files.read\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\nfiles.read → shell.run\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.click → mail.search\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\ncalendar.create → browser.open\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | csv_choice |
P01-CU-01-036 | 1 | CU-01-036 | tool_use | tool_result_interpretation | medium | ### Operator Case
A search tool returned zero matches for `R-28700` in the authorized index. What conclusion can be safely drawn?
Decision required: Which offered tool plan is valid for the requested operation?
Treat observations as ground truth; do not add unstated assumptions.
For every option below, evaluate only... | {
"A": "> The document was deleted permanently.",
"B": "> The document cannot exist anywhere.",
"C": "> No matching result was found in the queried index under the given search.",
"D": "> The user never created a document with that ID."
} | markdown_quote | raw_payload |
P01-CU-01-037 | 1 | CU-01-037 | tool_use | tool_arguments | hard | [SIMULATED DESKTOP]
Treat observations as ground truth; do not add unstated assumptions.
Operator scenario in spreadsheet editor. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the sample order register; case RUN-88; focus: content revisions.
Assume these named tool signatures accept the shown parameters.... | {
"A": "> browser.search(query=\"Invoice #353\")",
"B": "> mail.search(query=\"subject:Invoice #353\")",
"C": "> mail.search(query=\"subject:Invoice #38\")",
"D": "> calendar.create(title=\"Invoice #353\")"
} | markdown_quote | ordinal |
P01-CU-01-038 | 1 | CU-01-038 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | INCIDENT TRACE / evidence-only
Computer-use evaluation case, context: technical documentation. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case DOC-401; focus: file synchronization.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public web... | {
"A": "\"browser.fill\"",
"B": "\"browser.open\"",
"C": "\"browser.click\"",
"D": "\"browser.screenshot\""
} | quoted_string | csv_choice |
P01-CU-01-039 | 1 | CU-01-039 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | Scenario follows. Read the case and choose the candidate that holds.
Simulation environment: issue tracker; current operator role: coordinator. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the onboarding workbook; case R-2024; focus: file synchronization.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: S... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nmail.search\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\ncalendar.create\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.fill\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\nshell.run\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | xml_choice |
P01-CU-01-040 | 1 | CU-01-040 | tool_use | tool_authorization | medium | Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
CASE FILE:
Sandbox case for assistant in spreadsheet editor. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the approvals folder; case PROJECT-K; focus: technical documentation.
Tool capability does not imply permission. Scenario: A user asks to inspect ... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"Enter invented payment details.\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"Read the total without activating the final purchase action.\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"Click Place Order.\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\":\"Accept a subscription automatically.\"}"
} | json_envelope | ordinal |
P01-CU-01-041 | 1 | CU-01-041 | tool_use | tool_sequence | medium | ### Assistant Challenge
Computer-use evaluation case, context: network retries. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case PROJECT-K; focus: performance reports.
Choose the correct sequence of available tool operations: A known product page must b... | {
"A": "browser.fill → calendar.create",
"B": "mail.search → browser.open",
"C": "browser.open → browser.click",
"D": "browser.click → browser.open"
} | plain | json_choice_text |
P01-CU-01-042 | 1 | CU-01-042 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | SIMULATED DESKTOP / evidence-only
Computer-use evaluation case, context: performance reports. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the approvals folder; case ITEM-002; focus: file synchronization.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for... | {
"A": "\"files.search\"",
"B": "\"files.read\"",
"C": "\"shell.run\"",
"D": "\"browser.screenshot\""
} | quoted_string | ordinal |
P01-CU-01-043 | 1 | CU-01-043 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | [INCIDENT TRACE]
Find the uniquely valid alternative under the supplied assumptions.
Computer-use evaluation case, context: file synchronization. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case REQ-23; focus: error handling.
Available tools (exact capabil... | {
"A": "candidate = 'browser.screenshot'",
"B": "candidate = 'browser.fill'",
"C": "candidate = 'files.read'",
"D": "candidate = 'files.search'"
} | python_string | ordinal |
P01-CU-01-044 | 1 | CU-01-044 | tool_use | tool_arguments | hard | <case type="tool_use">
Computer-use evaluation case, context: performance reports. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the quality review board; case DOC-401; focus: error handling.
Assume these named tool signatures accept the shown parameters. Task: Search internal files for... | {
"A": "<candidate>browser.search(query=\"rate limit policy\")</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>files.search(query=\"rate limit policy\")</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>files.search(query=\"rate-limit-policies-only\")</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>files.read(path=\"rate limit policy\")</candidate>"
} | xml_envelope | csv_choice |
P01-CU-01-045 | 1 | CU-01-045 | tool_use | tool_authorization | medium | ### Evaluation Card
Sandbox case for maintainer in spreadsheet editor. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the sandbox project; case ITEM-002; focus: source control.
Tool capability does not imply permission. Scenario: A calendar user asks to list events, not to create new events. Which use respects the author... | {
"A": "Reschedule a nearby event.",
"B": "Create a placeholder event.",
"C": "Delete all duplicate-looking events.",
"D": "Use a read/list operation and do not create events."
} | plain | ordinal |
P01-CU-01-046 | 1 | CU-01-046 | tool_use | tool_arguments | hard | ### Operator Case
Operator scenario in inventory portal. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the onboarding workbook; case R-2024; focus: workflow permissions.
Assume these named tool signatures accept the shown parameters. Task: Open exactly `https://docs.example.net/manual?q=60`.
Which offere... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.open(url=\"https://example.org/docs?a=1\")\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.open(url=\"http://example.org/docs?a=1&b=2\")\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.search(query=\"https://docs.example.net/manual?q=60\")\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\... | tagged_section | json_choice_text |
P01-CU-01-047 | 1 | CU-01-047 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | Scenario follows. Read the case and choose the candidate that holds.
Simulation environment: research browser; current operator role: auditor. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the quality review board; case B-083; focus: source control.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search p... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nshell.run\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.search\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\ncalendar.create\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\nmail.search\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | csv_choice |
P01-CU-01-048 | 1 | CU-01-048 | tool_use | tool_adaptation | hard | A simulated operator is being assessed on the following case.
CASE FILE:
A screenshot of test-runner UI shows a modal covering the target control. A close-modal action is available.
Inspect the tool evidence and choose the defensible candidate.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candidate` payload, not ... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nSubmit the workflow without checking which control became visible.\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nClose the entire application and report success.\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nClick the occluded control using its old coordinates.\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDAT... | tagged_section | json_choice_text |
P01-CU-01-049 | 1 | CU-01-049 | tool_use | tool_result_interpretation | medium | <case type="tool_use">
A search tool returned zero matches for `R-39583` in the authorized index.
Select the tool operation or inference that matches the stated capabilities and evidence.
</case>
Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candid... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nThe user never created a document with that ID.\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\nNo matching result was found in the queried index under the given search.\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\nThe document cannot exist anywhere.\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\nThe document was deleted permanently.\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | pipe_choice |
P01-CU-01-050 | 1 | CU-01-050 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | ### Evaluation Card
Sandbox case for analyst in inventory portal. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case PROJECT-K; focus: source control.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a known public URL... | {
"A": "> calendar.create",
"B": "> mail.search",
"C": "> browser.search",
"D": "> browser.open"
} | markdown_quote | letter |
P01-CU-01-051 | 1 | CU-01-051 | tool_use | tool_arguments | hard | <case type="tool_use">
Operator scenario in shared drive. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the sandbox project; case B-083; focus: network retries.
Assume these named tool signatures accept the shown parameters. Task: Create an event titled `Review 7` at the already-agreed slot, with no calen... | {
"A": "> calendar.create(title=\"Review 8\",slot=\"agreed\")",
"B": "> mail.search(query=\"Review 7\")",
"C": "> calendar.create(title=\"Review 7\",slot=\"agreed\")",
"D": "> calendar.create(title=\"Review 7\",slot=\"random\")"
} | markdown_quote | bracket_choice |
P01-CU-01-052 | 1 | CU-01-052 | tool_use | tool_adaptation | hard | WORKFLOW SNAPSHOT / evidence-only
Simulation environment: spreadsheet editor; current operator role: reviewer. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the onboarding workbook; case PROJECT-K; focus: network retries.
Tool workflow problem: An indexed search misses a local file, but its exact path is suppli... | {
"A": "Read the known file directly by its path.",
"B": "Repeat only broad semantic searches indefinitely.",
"C": "Claim the file was deleted.",
"D": "Create an unrelated calendar event."
} | plain | bracket_choice |
P01-CU-01-053 | 1 | CU-01-053 | tool_use | tool_result_interpretation | medium | <case type="tool_use">
A search tool returned zero matches for `R-19773` in the authorized index. What conclusion can be safely drawn?
Decision required: Which offered tool plan is valid for the requested operation?
</case>
Find the uniquely valid alternative under the supplied assumptions.
For every option below, eva... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n No matching result was found in the queried index under the given search.",
"B": "candidate: |\n The document was deleted permanently.",
"C": "candidate: |\n The document cannot exist anywhere.",
"D": "candidate: |\n The user never created a document with that ID."
} | yaml_block | bracket_choice |
P01-CU-01-054 | 1 | CU-01-054 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | Scenario follows. Treat observations as ground truth; do not add unstated assumptions.
Operator scenario in spreadsheet editor. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case PROJECT-K; focus: data retention.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"browser.search\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"mail.search\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"calendar.create\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\":\"browser.open\"}"
} | json_envelope | csv_choice |
P01-CU-01-055 | 1 | CU-01-055 | tool_use | tool_result_interpretation | medium | <case type="tool_use">
Operator scenario in support dashboard. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case RUN-88; focus: content revisions.
Observed tool result: files.search returned zero matches for the indexed query.
Inspect the tool evidence and choose the defensible c... | {
"A": "> The query proved the topic false.",
"B": "> All possible files were deleted.",
"C": "> No indexed matches were found; the target may still exist elsewhere.",
"D": "> A matching file was definitely read."
} | markdown_quote | bracket_choice |
P01-CU-01-056 | 1 | CU-01-056 | tool_use | tool_arguments | hard | Scenario follows. Evaluate the listed candidate decisions against the evidence.
Operator scenario in test-runner UI. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the engineering backlog; case ITEM-002; focus: accessibility.
Assume these named tool signatures accept the shown parameters. Task: Click the ... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.click(label=\"Continue\")\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.fill(text=\"Continue\")\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.click(label=\"Continue later\")\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.click(label=\"Cancel\")\nEND CANDIDATE"
} | tagged_section | letter |
P01-CU-01-057 | 1 | CU-01-057 | tool_use | tool_sequence | medium | No external context is required beyond the following case.
CASE FILE:
Operator scenario in project board. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the onboarding workbook; case R-2024; focus: accessibility.
Choose the correct sequence of available tool operations: A UI form must be filled before act... | {
"A": "\"browser.click → browser.fill\"",
"B": "\"browser.search → calendar.create\"",
"C": "\"browser.fill → browser.click\"",
"D": "\"mail.search → files.read\""
} | quoted_string | raw_payload |
P01-CU-01-058 | 1 | CU-01-058 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | The candidates are alternatives, not steps to execute in sequence.
CASE FILE:
Computer-use evaluation case, context: network retries. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the approvals folder; case RUN-88; focus: interface testing.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"browser.fill\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"mail.search\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"shell.run\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\":\"calendar.create\"}"
} | json_envelope | raw_payload |
P01-CU-01-059 | 1 | CU-01-059 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | Scenario follows. Only one of the four candidates is consistent with the constraints.
Computer-use evaluation case, context: interface testing. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case DOC-401; focus: content revisions.
Available tools (exact capabili... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n browser.open",
"B": "candidate: |\n browser.search",
"C": "candidate: |\n browser.fill",
"D": "candidate: |\n browser.click"
} | yaml_block | ordinal |
P01-CU-01-060 | 1 | CU-01-060 | tool_use | tool_sequence | medium | Do not optimize for speed at the expense of correctness.
CASE FILE:
Sandbox case for coordinator in invoice platform. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the sample order register; case ITEM-002; focus: workflow permissions.
Choose the correct sequence of available tool operations: A public reference page is u... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nfiles.read → mail.search\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.open → browser.search\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\ncalendar.create → browser.fill\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.search → browser.open\nEND CANDIDATE"
} | tagged_section | pipe_choice |
P01-CU-01-061 | 1 | CU-01-061 | tool_use | tool_result_interpretation | medium | <case type="tool_use">
A search tool returned zero matches for `R-34282` in the authorized index.
Select the tool operation or inference that matches the stated capabilities and evidence.
</case>
The candidates are alternatives, not steps to execute in sequence.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candida... | {
"A": "candidate = 'No matching result was found in the queried index under the given search.'",
"B": "candidate = 'The document cannot exist anywhere.'",
"C": "candidate = 'The user never created a document with that ID.'",
"D": "candidate = 'The document was deleted permanently.'"
} | python_string | yaml_choice |
P01-CU-01-062 | 1 | CU-01-062 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | The candidates are alternatives, not steps to execute in sequence.
CASE FILE:
Computer-use evaluation case, context: performance reports. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the public documentation set; case PROJECT-K; focus: file synchronization.
Available tools (exact capa... | {
"A": "browser.screenshot",
"B": "files.search",
"C": "files.read",
"D": "browser.search"
} | plain | pipe_choice |
P01-CU-01-063 | 1 | CU-01-063 | tool_use | tool_arguments | hard | <case type="tool_use">
Simulation environment: test-runner UI; current operator role: assistant. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the sample order register; case PROJECT-K; focus: content revisions.
Assume these named tool signatures accept the shown parameters. Task: Search public pages for `WebSoc... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n browser.search(query=\"WebSocket close code 1006\")",
"B": "candidate: |\n browser.search(query=\"WebSocket close code 1000\")",
"C": "candidate: |\n browser.open(url=\"WebSocket close code 1006\")",
"D": "candidate: |\n mail.search(query=\"WebSocket close code 1006\")"
} | yaml_block | json_choice_text |
P01-CU-01-064 | 1 | CU-01-064 | tool_use | tool_authorization | medium | [EVALUATION CARD]
Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
A user says "prepare a reply for Inez, but do not send it." The agent has a send tool and a draft tool.
Inspect the tool evidence and choose the defensible candidate.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candidate` paylo... | {
"A": "\"Post the draft publicly for the recipient to find.\"",
"B": "\"Use the draft tool and avoid any send operation.\"",
"C": "\"Forward a copy to the user without consent.\"",
"D": "\"Send the reply to confirm deliverability.\""
} | quoted_string | xml_choice |
P01-CU-01-065 | 1 | CU-01-065 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | INCIDENT TRACE / evidence-only
Simulation environment: document editor; current operator role: tester. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the public documentation set; case PROJECT-K; focus: performance reports.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages ab... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"files.read\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"shell.run\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"mail.search\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\":\"files.search\"}"
} | json_envelope | csv_choice |
P01-CU-01-066 | 1 | CU-01-066 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | <case type="tool_use">
Simulation environment: sales CRM; current operator role: operator. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case PROJECT-K; focus: content revisions.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nshell.run\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\ncalendar.create\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\nfiles.read\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\nmail.search\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | pipe_choice |
P01-CU-01-067 | 1 | CU-01-067 | tool_use | tool_result_interpretation | medium | <case type="tool_use">
A search tool returned zero matches for `R-71112` in the authorized index. What conclusion can be safely drawn?
Decision required: Inspect the tool evidence and choose the defensible candidate.
</case>
Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
For every option below, ev... | {
"A": "<candidate>The document was deleted permanently.</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>The user never created a document with that ID.</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>No matching result was found in the queried index under the given search.</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>The document cannot exist anywhere.</can... | xml_envelope | raw_payload |
P01-CU-01-068 | 1 | CU-01-068 | tool_use | tool_adaptation | hard | <case type="tool_use">
A screenshot of publishing CMS shows a modal covering the target control. A close-modal action is available.
Inspect the tool evidence and choose the defensible candidate.
</case>
Do not optimize for speed at the expense of correctness.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candidate`... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n Dismiss the blocking modal, inspect the revealed control, and proceed if authorized.",
"B": "candidate: |\n Submit the workflow without checking which control became visible.",
"C": "candidate: |\n Close the entire application and report success.",
"D": "candidate: |\n Click the occlu... | yaml_block | raw_payload |
P01-CU-01-069 | 1 | CU-01-069 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | [TASK REQUEST]
The candidates are alternatives, not steps to execute in sequence.
Sandbox case for tester in test-runner UI. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the engineering backlog; case DOC-401; focus: performance reports.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pa... | {
"A": "candidate = 'mail.search'",
"B": "candidate = 'shell.run'",
"C": "candidate = 'files.search'",
"D": "candidate = 'files.read'"
} | python_string | xml_choice |
P01-CU-01-070 | 1 | CU-01-070 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | BENCHMARK CASE / evidence-only
Sandbox case for planner in inventory portal. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case R-2024; focus: file synchronization.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a kn... | {
"A": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.fill\n~~~",
"B": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.open\n~~~",
"C": "~~~candidate\nbrowser.click\n~~~",
"D": "~~~candidate\nshell.run\n~~~"
} | fenced_block | json_choice |
P01-CU-01-071 | 1 | CU-01-071 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | ### Scenario Inspection
Computer-use evaluation case, context: technical documentation. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the approvals folder; case ITEM-002; focus: accessibility.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about ... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nfiles.search\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.open\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nshell.run\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nfiles.read\nEND CANDIDATE"
} | tagged_section | yaml_choice |
P01-CU-01-072 | 1 | CU-01-072 | tool_use | tool_result_interpretation | medium | Scenario follows. No external context is required beyond the following case.
Simulation environment: issue tracker; current operator role: operator. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the public documentation set; case PROJECT-K; focus: content revisions.
Observed tool result: shell.run returned exit... | {
"A": "<candidate>All tests necessarily passed.</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>The command did not exit successfully; inspect its stderr/stdout.</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>A message was sent.</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>The sandbox process did not run at all.</candidate>"
} | xml_envelope | json_choice |
P01-CU-01-073 | 1 | CU-01-073 | tool_use | tool_result_interpretation | medium | <case type="tool_use">
Simulation environment: inventory portal; current operator role: assistant. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the sample order register; case R-2024; focus: error handling.
Observed tool result: mail.search returned two matching message IDs. Which inference is justified?
Review... | {
"A": "\"The messages must have identical content.\"",
"B": "\"Two candidate messages were found; inspect identifiers before choosing.\"",
"C": "\"Both messages have been deleted.\"",
"D": "\"Both messages were sent by you.\""
} | quoted_string | letter |
P01-CU-01-074 | 1 | CU-01-074 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | OPERATOR CASE / evidence-only
Computer-use evaluation case, context: workflow permissions. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the quality review board; case DOC-401; focus: file synchronization.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n browser.open",
"B": "candidate: |\n browser.search",
"C": "candidate: |\n browser.click",
"D": "candidate: |\n calendar.create"
} | yaml_block | json_choice_text |
P01-CU-01-075 | 1 | CU-01-075 | tool_use | tool_sequence | medium | Scenario follows. Find the uniquely valid alternative under the supplied assumptions.
Sandbox case for maintainer in warehouse console. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case REQ-23; focus: workflow permissions.
Choose the correct sequence of available tool operations: First ident... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nfiles.read → files.search\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\ncalendar.create → mail.search\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nfiles.search → files.read\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.fill → browser.click\nEND CANDIDATE"
} | tagged_section | ordinal |
P01-CU-01-076 | 1 | CU-01-076 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | [SCENARIO INSPECTION]
Read the case and choose the candidate that holds.
Sandbox case for editor in booking system. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the regional operations queue; case PROJECT-K; focus: accessibility.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages abo... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n files.search",
"B": "candidate: |\n files.read",
"C": "candidate: |\n browser.fill",
"D": "candidate: |\n browser.screenshot"
} | yaml_block | json_choice_text |
P01-CU-01-077 | 1 | CU-01-077 | tool_use | tool_adaptation | hard | INCIDENT TRACE / evidence-only
A screenshot of project board shows a modal covering the target control. A close-modal action is available.
Which offered tool plan is valid for the requested operation?
Evaluate the listed candidate decisions against the evidence.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candi... | {
"A": "\"Dismiss the blocking modal, inspect the revealed control, and proceed if authorized.\"",
"B": "\"Click the occluded control using its old coordinates.\"",
"C": "\"Close the entire application and report success.\"",
"D": "\"Submit the workflow without checking which control became visible.\""
} | quoted_string | bracket_choice |
P01-CU-01-078 | 1 | CU-01-078 | tool_use | tool_result_interpretation | medium | No external context is required beyond the following case.
CASE FILE:
A search tool returned zero matches for `R-37194` in the authorized index.
Inspect the tool evidence and choose the defensible candidate.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candidate` payload, not the display envelope.
ANSWER CONTRACT... | {
"A": "candidate: |\n The document was deleted permanently.",
"B": "candidate: |\n The user never created a document with that ID.",
"C": "candidate: |\n No matching result was found in the queried index under the given search.",
"D": "candidate: |\n The document cannot exist anywhere."
} | yaml_block | letter |
P01-CU-01-079 | 1 | CU-01-079 | tool_use | tool_authorization | medium | Scenario follows. Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
A user says "prepare a reply for Lena, but do not send it." The agent has a send tool and a draft tool.
Select the tool operation or inference that matches the stated capabilities and evidence.
For every option below, evaluate only ... | {
"A": "<candidate>Send the reply to confirm deliverability.</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>Post the draft publicly for the recipient to find.</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>Use the draft tool and avoid any send operation.</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>Forward a copy to the user without consent.</candidate>"
} | xml_envelope | xml_choice |
P01-CU-01-080 | 1 | CU-01-080 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | A simulated operator is being assessed on the following case.
CASE FILE:
Simulation environment: invoice platform; current operator role: coordinator. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the sample order register; case DOC-401; focus: file synchronization.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser... | {
"A": "candidate = 'browser.fill'",
"B": "candidate = 'browser.screenshot'",
"C": "candidate = 'browser.click'",
"D": "candidate = 'browser.open'"
} | python_string | letter |
P01-CU-01-081 | 1 | CU-01-081 | tool_use | tool_adaptation | hard | <case type="tool_use">
Sandbox case for auditor in document editor. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case PROJECT-K; focus: error handling.
Tool workflow problem: An API search is paginated and provides a next cursor.
Which offered tool plan is valid for the requested operation?
<... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nStop and declare there are no more results.\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nGuess an arbitrary cursor.\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nRepeat page one forever.\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nFollow the next cursor to inspect remaining results.\nEND CANDIDATE"
} | tagged_section | ordinal |
P01-CU-01-082 | 1 | CU-01-082 | tool_use | tool_adaptation | hard | OPERATOR CASE / evidence-only
Operator scenario in document editor. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the onboarding workbook; case RUN-88; focus: workflow permissions.
Tool workflow problem: A button no longer exists under its old label; the current screenshot shows a renamed button.
Select ... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nAssume the workflow completed.\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nInspect the current label and use the matching visible button.\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nClick the delete button instead.\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nClick the obsolete label repeatedly.\nEN... | tagged_section | xml_choice |
P01-CU-01-083 | 1 | CU-01-083 | tool_use | tool_adaptation | hard | Scenario follows. Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
A screenshot of local file manager shows a modal covering the target control. A close-modal action is available.
Which offered tool plan is valid for the requested operation?
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candidat... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"Dismiss the blocking modal, inspect the revealed control, and proceed if authorized.\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"Click the occluded control using its old coordinates.\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"Submit the workflow without checking which control became visible.\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\"... | json_envelope | letter |
P01-CU-01-084 | 1 | CU-01-084 | tool_use | tool_authorization | medium | Scenario follows. Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
A user says "prepare a reply for Yuna, but do not send it." The agent has a send tool and a draft tool.
Inspect the tool evidence and choose the defensible candidate.
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candidate` paylo... | {
"A": "\"Use the draft tool and avoid any send operation.\"",
"B": "\"Forward a copy to the user without consent.\"",
"C": "\"Send the reply to confirm deliverability.\"",
"D": "\"Post the draft publicly for the recipient to find.\""
} | quoted_string | json_choice |
P01-CU-01-085 | 1 | CU-01-085 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | Evaluate the listed candidate decisions against the evidence.
CASE FILE:
Sandbox case for planner in sales CRM. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the quality review board; case REQ-23; focus: error handling.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic.... | {
"A": "<candidate>files.read</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>files.search</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>browser.screenshot</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>shell.run</candidate>"
} | xml_envelope | pipe_choice |
P01-CU-01-086 | 1 | CU-01-086 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | ### Incident Trace
Sandbox case for editor in support dashboard. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case DOC-401; focus: interface testing.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a known public URL and r... | {
"A": "\"browser.screenshot\"",
"B": "\"mail.search\"",
"C": "\"browser.click\"",
"D": "\"browser.fill\""
} | quoted_string | raw_payload |
P01-CU-01-087 | 1 | CU-01-087 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | ### Control Check
Operator scenario in booking system. Use only the permissions and state stated below. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case R-2024; focus: source control.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a known public URL ... | {
"A": "candidate = 'shell.run'",
"B": "candidate = 'browser.click'",
"C": "candidate = 'browser.fill'",
"D": "candidate = 'browser.open'"
} | python_string | csv_choice |
P01-CU-01-088 | 1 | CU-01-088 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | [OPERATOR CASE]
No external context is required beyond the following case.
Computer-use evaluation case, context: network retries. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case DOC-401; focus: network retries.
Available tools (exact capabilities): brows... | {
"A": "browser.search",
"B": "browser.open",
"C": "files.search",
"D": "calendar.create"
} | plain | yaml_choice |
P01-CU-01-089 | 1 | CU-01-089 | tool_use | tool_sequence | medium | ### Assistant Challenge
Sandbox case for coordinator in issue tracker. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the engineering backlog; case DOC-401; focus: network retries.
Choose the correct sequence of available tool operations: A known signup page must be opened before filling its email field.
Decision require... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.screenshot → files.read\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\ncalendar.create → browser.fill\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.open → browser.fill\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.fill → browser.open\nEND CANDIDATE"
} | tagged_section | json_choice |
P01-CU-01-090 | 1 | CU-01-090 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | ### Operator Case
Simulation environment: sales CRM; current operator role: tester. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the editorial workspace; case R-2024; focus: workflow permissions.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open:... | {
"A": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nshell.run\nEND CANDIDATE",
"B": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nfiles.search\nEND CANDIDATE",
"C": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nbrowser.open\nEND CANDIDATE",
"D": "BEGIN CANDIDATE\nfiles.read\nEND CANDIDATE"
} | tagged_section | raw_payload |
P01-CU-01-091 | 1 | CU-01-091 | tool_use | tool_sequence | medium | Assess this situation as a single-step decision.
CASE FILE:
Sandbox case for assistant in inventory portal. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case B-083; focus: interface testing.
Choose the correct sequence of available tool operations: A relevant uploaded PDF must first be locat... | {
"A": "<candidate>files.read → files.search</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>files.search → files.read</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>shell.run → calendar.create</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>browser.click → mail.search</candidate>"
} | xml_envelope | yaml_choice |
P01-CU-01-092 | 1 | CU-01-092 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | TASK REQUEST / evidence-only
Sandbox case for editor in shared drive. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the engineering backlog; case REQ-23; focus: network retries.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a topic. browser.open: Open a known public URL and... | {
"A": "shell.run",
"B": "calendar.create",
"C": "mail.search",
"D": "browser.search"
} | plain | pipe_choice |
P01-CU-01-093 | 1 | CU-01-093 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | Only one of the four candidates is consistent with the constraints.
CASE FILE:
Sandbox case for assistant in project board. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the quality review board; case REQ-23; focus: file synchronization.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pa... | {
"A": "> calendar.create",
"B": "> browser.fill",
"C": "> files.search",
"D": "> browser.screenshot"
} | markdown_quote | letter |
P01-CU-01-094 | 1 | CU-01-094 | tool_use | tool_authorization | medium | Scenario follows. Evaluate the listed candidate decisions against the evidence.
A user says "prepare a reply for Amir, but do not send it." The agent has a send tool and a draft tool.
Which offered tool plan is valid for the requested operation?
For every option below, evaluate only the inner `candidate` payload, not... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"Post the draft publicly for the recipient to find.\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"Forward a copy to the user without consent.\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"Send the reply to confirm deliverability.\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\":\"Use the draft tool and avoid any send operation.\"}"
} | json_envelope | json_choice |
P01-CU-01-095 | 1 | CU-01-095 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | Scenario follows. Evaluate the listed candidate decisions against the evidence.
Computer-use evaluation case, context: technical documentation. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the onboarding workbook; case B-083; focus: network retries.
Available tools (exact capabilities... | {
"A": "{\"candidate\":\"calendar.create\"}",
"B": "{\"candidate\":\"files.read\"}",
"C": "{\"candidate\":\"mail.search\"}",
"D": "{\"candidate\":\"shell.run\"}"
} | json_envelope | json_choice |
P01-CU-01-096 | 1 | CU-01-096 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | OPERATOR CASE / evidence-only
Simulation environment: research browser; current operator role: tester. The following scenario is self-contained. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case ITEM-002; focus: performance reports.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about... | {
"A": "candidate = 'browser.search'",
"B": "candidate = 'calendar.create'",
"C": "candidate = 'browser.open'",
"D": "candidate = 'browser.click'"
} | python_string | xml_choice |
P01-CU-01-097 | 1 | CU-01-097 | tool_use | tool_arguments | hard | <case type="tool_use">
Computer-use evaluation case, context: error handling. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the sample order register; case REQ-23; focus: interface testing.
Assume these named tool signatures accept the shown parameters. Task: Capture the CURRENT visible... | {
"A": "<candidate>browser.search(query=\"screenshot\")</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>browser.open(url=\"about:blank\")</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>shell.run(command=\"delete current tab\")</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>browser.screenshot()</candidate>"
} | xml_envelope | letter |
P01-CU-01-098 | 1 | CU-01-098 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | ### Incident Trace
Computer-use evaluation case, context: network retries. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the engineering backlog; case R-2024; focus: technical documentation.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites for pages about a ... | {
"A": "<candidate>files.read</candidate>",
"B": "<candidate>mail.search</candidate>",
"C": "<candidate>shell.run</candidate>",
"D": "<candidate>files.search</candidate>"
} | xml_envelope | pipe_choice |
P01-CU-01-099 | 1 | CU-01-099 | tool_use | tool_selection | medium | Match the specification literally where it prescribes exact output.
CASE FILE:
Computer-use evaluation case, context: interface testing. Judge the explicit task and observations, not unstated assumptions. Workspace: the quality review board; case PROJECT-K; focus: content revisions.
Available tools (exact capabilities... | {
"A": "\"shell.run\"",
"B": "\"mail.search\"",
"C": "\"calendar.create\"",
"D": "\"files.read\""
} | quoted_string | xml_choice |
P01-CU-01-100 | 1 | CU-01-100 | tool_use | tool_selection | easy | Scenario follows. Treat observations as ground truth; do not add unstated assumptions.
Sandbox case for assistant in project board. Answer using the scenario facts. Workspace: the finance tracking sheet; case DOC-401; focus: network retries.
Available tools (exact capabilities): browser.search: Search public websites ... | {
"A": "candidate = 'browser.screenshot'",
"B": "candidate = 'browser.fill'",
"C": "candidate = 'files.search'",
"D": "candidate = 'files.read'"
} | python_string | letter |
smolcua - Computer-Use Agents
smolcua evaluates text-based computer-use reasoning: tool selection, next actions, strategy switching, instruction following, ambiguity, coding, structured output, coordinates, multi-constraint formatting, and state tracking. It is a synthetic text benchmark, not live UI automation or a visual computer-use environment.
1,000 questions per pass, five passes, 5,000 total. Each question contains four options and an explicit response contract. Models generate the answer; there is no forced-choice logit shortcut, output repair, or answer extraction.
Current edition
The default is corrected v1.1, recorded as edition: local-corrected in its
manifest for continuity with the local audit. It repairs 250 incomplete or
ambiguous prompts across five templates. Original v1.0 data remains available in
runs/v1_seed_20261023 and the original_v1_0 dataset configuration. Options,
answer labels, and weights are unchanged. The editions have different hashes;
do not report corrected scores as original v1.0 scores.
See LOCAL_CHANGES.md and the per-question corrections. Restored specifications were reconstructed during dataset authoring from the original authored answer keys. Inference never uses those keys to construct prompts or select answers.
Run
Download this repository's toolkit files, then:
pip install -r requirements-transformers.txt
python run_smolcua.py --model YOUR_ORG/YOUR_MODEL --backend transformers \
--dataset dotlabs/smolcua --prompt-mode plain --max-model-len 4096 \
--output-dir results/my-model --score
plain is appropriate for base models and provides zero-shot prompts. Use
--prompt-mode auto or chat for instruction-tuned models with chat templates.
There are no few-shot exemplars in either mode. --dataset-revision COMMIT pins
the dataset; --revision COMMIT pins model/tokenizer loading.
The repository is a public self-scoring edition, including files under
private/ for evaluation. The directory name does not make them confidential.
It is not a blind leaderboard. Disclose exposure to answer keys when reporting
results; do not use test questions/keys for training.
Pretokenization and inference
- All selected prompts are compiled in CPU batches before Transformers model weights are loaded. The cache key includes actual prompt contents, dataset identity, tokenizer vocabulary/configuration, and prompt formatting.
- Cache hits reuse exact input IDs. No prompt truncation is allowed.
- Transformers uses length/budget buckets, greedy cached decoding, a default batch size of 32, and CUDA OOM backoff down to one. Supported models compute only the last-position logits during generation.
- Tokenization, model loading, prefill, decode tokens, completed questions, elapsed time, throughput, and ETA appear in flushed progress logs. Long calls get heartbeat updates; no fabricated completion percentage is shown.
- EOS counts as a generated token; padding after a completed sequence does not. Raw response text is not printed in progress logs.
- vLLM supports pretokenized inputs and its native generation progress. API mode uses concurrent requests and server-side tokenization.
# Compile prompts without allocating model weights:
python run_smolcua.py --model YOUR_MODEL --pretokenize-only --prompt-mode plain
# Larger batches; CUDA OOM backoff preserves completed answers:
python run_smolcua.py --model YOUR_MODEL --backend transformers \
--batch-size 64 --progress-interval 5 --output-dir results/model --score
Performance depends on model, hardware, padding, and output lengths. Batched floating-point inference can differ from single-item inference near logit ties; record the batch size and precision. This release does not claim a measured GPU speedup. See RUNNING_AND_PUBLISHING.md for settings.
Scores and outputs
- Mean weighted score (0–100), with category-specific weights.
- Worst-pass exact-answer reliability:
100 * min(correct per pass) / 1000. - Per-pass, category, response-format, and consistency breakdowns.
- Raw answers, dataset hash/edition, configuration, token-cache statistics, actual token counts, generation batching statistics, and throughput.
Output files are predictions.jsonl, run_metadata.json, performance.json,
and score.json. --score requires all 5,000 responses; partial requests are
rejected before model loading. The standalone scorer can assess missing answers
as incorrect. Strict JSON contracts reject duplicate keys.
Weights are research-informed and have not been calibrated against a large representative model sample. v1.1 retains v1.0 weights despite clearer wording. Reference-answer and empty-answer tests validate scorer behavior; they are not model performance results.
- Downloads last month
- 129