file
stringlengths 14
33
| message
stringlengths 24
126k
| Sender
stringclasses 754
values | Receiver(s)
stringlengths 0
500
|
|---|---|---|---|
arnold-j/sent/382.
|
subject: Re:
content: sec 222 row 2
| ||
arnold-j/sent/383.
|
subject: Re:
content: ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000 10:49
AM ---------------------------
Matthew Arnold 03/28/2000 06:35 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:
I'm in.
John Arnold
03/27/2000 08:54 AM
To: Matthew Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
lyle lovett national anthem
nolan ryan first pitch
dwight gooden first real pitch
| ||
arnold-j/sent/384.
|
subject: Re:
content: 7:00 game
can you let me know tomorrow??
| ||
arnold-j/sent/385.
|
subject:
content: lyle lovett national anthem
nolan ryan first pitch
dwight gooden first real pitch
| ||
arnold-j/sent/386.
|
subject:
content: Hello:
I just wanted to arrange to meet for the Astros tickets.
I work and live downtown.
My cell phone number is 713-557-3330.
Thanks,
John
| ||
arnold-j/sent/387.
|
subject: Re:
content: i just had the whole it staff up here.
I just got two good tickets to Thursday's Astros/Yankees game
| ||
arnold-j/sent/388.
|
subject:
content: hey:
when are you back in town??
| ||
arnold-j/sent/389.
|
subject:
content: Hey :
Just wanted to see if you're doing anything tonight...
Any interest in getting dinner?
John
| ||
arnold-j/sent/39.
|
subject: Re: NY
content: Hello:
It is the Blue Men Group. Two friends highly recommend it. It's in the
Astor Theatre on Lafayette in the Village.
43rd should be good. I think you woul dhave had more flavor in Harlem though
"Jennifer White" <[email protected]> on 11/21/2000 01:54:16 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: NY
I've been tasked with getting tickets to a show. Was it 'Blue Men Group'
that you recommended we see? And Michelle lives on W43rd, so it's not
as bad as you thought.
___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com
| ||
arnold-j/sent/390.
|
subject: Re: Enron Online
content: Please grant Steven Vu execution privileges on EOL
John Arnold
| ||
arnold-j/sent/391.
|
subject: Re: EnronOnline Approval Access Request
content: Pleas approve Tricia's request to become an authorized EOL trader
| ||
arnold-j/sent/392.
|
subject: Re: AOL Instant Messenger Confirmation (ziEbq0PbJo enronjda)
content: ok
| ||
arnold-j/sent/393.
|
subject: Re: Defense
content: maine impossible to get to .. next idea?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/394.
|
subject: RE: waiting
content: maine impossible to get to...next option?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/395.
|
subject: Re: Natural gas update
content: mark:
what are your thoughts on crude and gasoline?
"Mark Sagel" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 09:23:02 PM
To: "John Arnold" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Natural gas update
Latest natural report
- ng051301.doc
| ||
arnold-j/sent/396.
|
subject: Re:
content: most bullish thing at this point is moving closer to everyone's
psychological $4 price target and that everybody and their dog is still
short. next sellers need to be from producer community. saw a little this
week with williams hedging the barrett transaction but wouldnt say thats
indicative of the rest of the e&p community. short covering rallies will
get more common here. velocity of move down has slowed significantly for
good (except maybe in bid week). my concern is if we go to $4 and people
want to cover some shorts, who's selling it to them? might feel a lot like
it did when we were trying to break $5.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/397.
|
subject:
content: most bullish thing at this point is moving closer to everyone's
psychological $4 price target and that everybody and their dog is still
short. next sellers need to be from producer community. saw a little this
week with williams hedging the barrett transaction but wouldnt say thats
indicative of the rest of the e&p community. short covering rallies will
get more common here. velocity of move down has slowed significantly for
good (except maybe in bid week). my concern is if we go to $4 and people
want to cover some shorts, who's selling it to them? might feel a lot like
it did when we were trying to break $5.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/398.
|
subject: RE: waiting
content: yea
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:50:42 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: waiting
nevermind. are you at work?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 5:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: waiting
huh?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:32:22 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: waiting
No english? i got the math.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 5:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: waiting
probability *
payout =
1 heads .5 0 = 0
tails 2 heads .25 1
= .25
tails 3 heads .125 2
= .25
tails 4 heads .0625 4
= .25
tails 5 heads .03125 8
= .25
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:23:47 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: waiting
which game is that?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 5:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: waiting
Expected value of game = 1/2 * 0 + 1/4 * 1 + 1/8 *2 + 1/16 *4 +1/32 *
8+....
= 0 +.25 +.25 +.25 +.25 +...
= infinity
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:11:46 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: waiting
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/399.
|
subject:
content: most bullish thing at this point is moving closer to everyone's
psychological $4 price target and that everybody and their dog is still
short. next sellers need to be from producer community. saw a little this
week with williams hedging the barrett transaction but wouldnt say thats
indicative of the rest of the e&p community. short covering rallies will
get more common here. velocity of move down has slowed significantly for
good (except maybe in bid week). my concern is if we go to $4 and people
want to cover some shorts, who's selling it to them? might feel a lot like
it did when we were trying to break $5.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/4.
|
subject: Re:
content: and they say it was purely coincidental the announcement came today.
6 is fine.
"Jennifer White" <[email protected]> on 12/13/2000 01:18:41 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject:
Hmmm... interesting news at Enron today. Should I plan to come to your
place around 6PM?
___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com
| ||
arnold-j/sent/40.
|
subject: Re: ENSIDE Newsletter
content: I'm always here so just coordinate with my assistant, Ina Rangle. Thanks,
John
Kathie Grabstald
11/20/2000 02:32 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENSIDE Newsletter
Good Afternoon, John!
Thanks for agreeing to be one of the Profile articles in the next issue of
the ENSIDE. Michelle Vitrella assured me that you would be an interesting
topic! Our newsletter is set for publication in February and I am setting my
interview schedule now. I would love to sit down and visit with you for
about 30 minutes in the early part of December. Please let me know a day and
time that is convenient for you.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Kathie Grabstald
ENA Public Relations
x 3-9610
| ||
arnold-j/sent/400.
|
subject: RE: waiting
content: huh?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:32:22 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: waiting
No english? i got the math.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 5:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: waiting
probability *
payout =
1 heads .5 0 = 0
tails 2 heads .25 1
= .25
tails 3 heads .125 2
= .25
tails 4 heads .0625 4
= .25
tails 5 heads .03125 8
= .25
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:23:47 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: waiting
which game is that?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 5:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: waiting
Expected value of game = 1/2 * 0 + 1/4 * 1 + 1/8 *2 + 1/16 *4 +1/32 *
8+....
= 0 +.25 +.25 +.25 +.25 +...
= infinity
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:11:46 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: waiting
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/401.
|
subject:
content: most bullish thing at this point is moving closer to everyone's psychological
$4 price target and that everybody and their dog is still short. next
sellers need to be from producer community. saw a little this week with
williams hedging the barrett transaction but wouldnt say thats indicative of
the rest of the e&p community. short covering rallies will get more common
here. velocity of move down has slowed significantly for good (except maybe
in bid week). my concern is if we go to $4 and people want to cover some
shorts, who's selling it to them? might feel a lot like it did when we were
trying to break $5.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/402.
|
subject: Re: Defense
content: don't make me type the math on the computer pooks
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:05:12 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Defense
What's your defense for you bid 0 for the company? Why was the info
assymetry at 100%???
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Extra credit
have you taken any finance courses yet? what's good?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/403.
|
subject: RE: waiting
content: probability * payout =
1 heads .5 0 = 0
tails 2 heads .25 1 = .25
tails 3 heads .125 2 = .25
tails 4 heads .0625 4 = .25
tails 5 heads .03125 8 = .25
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:23:47 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: waiting
which game is that?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 5:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: waiting
Expected value of game = 1/2 * 0 + 1/4 * 1 + 1/8 *2 + 1/16 *4 +1/32 *
8+....
= 0 +.25 +.25 +.25 +.25 +...
= infinity
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:11:46 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: waiting
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/404.
|
subject: RE: Extra credit
content: i think it's 100
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:01:23 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
fill in
$ ____2_ per/share
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Extra credit
fill in
$ _____ per/share
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 02:39:23 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
what's my bid for what??
ps
don't no crap me.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
no crap, what's your bid?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 12:48:23 AM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Extra credit
break even on info ass-symetry is 100%, any project above that level is
profitable to Pooks&Co.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 1:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: try this one...
For extra credit....
If the company is worth 150% more under management A rather than 50% more,
does your answer change?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/11/2001 05:13:59 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: try this one...
will you do all of my homework?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: try this one...
i'll pay a grand total of 0
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/10/2001 05:15:59 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: try this one...
Please read the following problem very carefully, and write in a number at
the end. You should be ready to defend your answer. Only a number is
allowed, not an algebraic equation.
Acquiring a Company
In the following exercise you will represent Company A (the acquirer),
which is currently considering acquiring Company T (the target) by means of
a tender offer. You plan to tender in cash for 100% of Company T's shares
but are unsure how high a price to offer. The main complication is this:
the value of Company T depends directly on the outcome of a major oil
exploration project it is currently undertaking. Indeed, the very
viability
of Company T depends on the exploration outcome. If the project fails, the
company under current management will be worth nothing--$0/share. But if
the project succeeds, the value of the company under current management
could be as high as $100/share. All share values between $0 and $100 are
considered equally likely. By all estimates, the company will be worth
considerably more in the hands of Company A than under current management.
In fact, whatever the ultimate value under current management, the company
will be worth fifty percent more under the management of A than under
Company T. If the project fails, the company is worth $0/share under
either
management. If the exploration project generates a $50/share value under
current management, the value under Company A is $75/share. Similarly, a
$100/share value under Company T implies a $150/share value under Company
A,
and so on.
The board of directors of Company A has asked you to determine the
price
they should offer for Company T's shares. This offer must be made now,
before the outcome of the drilling project is known. From all indications,
Company T would be happy to be acquired by Company A, provided it is at a
profitable price. Moreover, Company T wishes to avoid, at all cost, the
potential of a takeover bid by any other firm. You expect Company T to
delay a decision on your bid until the results of the project are in, then
accept or reject your offer before the news of the drilling results reaches
the press.
Thus, you (Company A) will not know the results of the exploration
project
when submitting your price offer, but Company T will know the results when
deciding whether or not to accept your offer. In addition, Company T will
accept any offer by Company A that is greater than the (per share) value of
the company under current management. Thus, if you offer $50/share, for
instance, Company T will accept if the value of the company to Company T is
anything less than $50.
As the representative of Company A, you are deliberating over price
offers
in the range of $0/share (this is tantamount to making no offer at all) to
$150/share. What price offer per share would you tender for Company T's
stock?
$______ per/share
| ||
arnold-j/sent/405.
|
subject: Re: waiting
content: Expected value of game = 1/2 * 0 + 1/4 * 1 + 1/8 *2 + 1/16 *4 +1/32 * 8+....
= 0 +.25 +.25 +.25 +.25 +...
= infinity
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:11:46 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: waiting
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/406.
|
subject: Re: Constellation
content: i think its a jv with the trading side mostly staffed by goldman folks
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:06:01 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Constellation
so, its a goldman co, but it also controls Duquesne and BGE?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Extra credit
yes
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:03:17 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
is constellation energy a goldman company?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Extra credit
me thinks you missed a 9
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 02:58:28 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
1.99999999999999999999999999999999999
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/407.
|
subject: Re: am i right???
content: no
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:02:45 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: am i right???
wait, of course i am. i always am.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Extra credit
me thinks you missed a 9
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 02:58:28 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
1.99999999999999999999999999999999999
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/408.
|
subject: RE: Extra credit
content: yes
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:03:17 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
is constellation energy a goldman company?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Extra credit
me thinks you missed a 9
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 02:58:28 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
1.99999999999999999999999999999999999
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/409.
|
subject: Re: 2
content: are you prepared to defend your answer?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:01:04 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: 2
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Extra credit
and your offer?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 02:58:28 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
1.99999999999999999999999999999999999
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/41.
|
subject: Re: Cal02
content: isn't market making on electronic systems fun???
[email protected] on 11/20/2000 01:17:35 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Cal02
I cant go take a pee w/o you sneaking up on me on ICE, ICE BABY.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/410.
|
subject: RE: Extra credit
content: me thinks you missed a 9
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 02:58:28 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
1.99999999999999999999999999999999999
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/411.
|
subject: RE: Extra credit
content: have you taken any finance courses yet? what's good?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/412.
|
subject: RE: Extra credit
content: fill in
$ _____ per/share
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 02:39:23 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
what's my bid for what??
ps
don't no crap me.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
no crap, what's your bid?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 12:48:23 AM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Extra credit
break even on info ass-symetry is 100%, any project above that level is
profitable to Pooks&Co.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 1:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: try this one...
For extra credit....
If the company is worth 150% more under management A rather than 50% more,
does your answer change?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/11/2001 05:13:59 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: try this one...
will you do all of my homework?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: try this one...
i'll pay a grand total of 0
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/10/2001 05:15:59 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: try this one...
Please read the following problem very carefully, and write in a number at
the end. You should be ready to defend your answer. Only a number is
allowed, not an algebraic equation.
Acquiring a Company
In the following exercise you will represent Company A (the acquirer),
which is currently considering acquiring Company T (the target) by means of
a tender offer. You plan to tender in cash for 100% of Company T's shares
but are unsure how high a price to offer. The main complication is this:
the value of Company T depends directly on the outcome of a major oil
exploration project it is currently undertaking. Indeed, the very
viability
of Company T depends on the exploration outcome. If the project fails, the
company under current management will be worth nothing--$0/share. But if
the project succeeds, the value of the company under current management
could be as high as $100/share. All share values between $0 and $100 are
considered equally likely. By all estimates, the company will be worth
considerably more in the hands of Company A than under current management.
In fact, whatever the ultimate value under current management, the company
will be worth fifty percent more under the management of A than under
Company T. If the project fails, the company is worth $0/share under
either
management. If the exploration project generates a $50/share value under
current management, the value under Company A is $75/share. Similarly, a
$100/share value under Company T implies a $150/share value under Company
A,
and so on.
The board of directors of Company A has asked you to determine the
price
they should offer for Company T's shares. This offer must be made now,
before the outcome of the drilling project is known. From all indications,
Company T would be happy to be acquired by Company A, provided it is at a
profitable price. Moreover, Company T wishes to avoid, at all cost, the
potential of a takeover bid by any other firm. You expect Company T to
delay a decision on your bid until the results of the project are in, then
accept or reject your offer before the news of the drilling results reaches
the press.
Thus, you (Company A) will not know the results of the exploration
project
when submitting your price offer, but Company T will know the results when
deciding whether or not to accept your offer. In addition, Company T will
accept any offer by Company A that is greater than the (per share) value of
the company under current management. Thus, if you offer $50/share, for
instance, Company T will accept if the value of the company to Company T is
anything less than $50.
As the representative of Company A, you are deliberating over price
offers
in the range of $0/share (this is tantamount to making no offer at all) to
$150/share. What price offer per share would you tender for Company T's
stock?
$______ per/share
| ||
arnold-j/sent/413.
|
subject: RE: Extra credit
content: and your offer?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 02:58:28 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Extra credit
1.99999999999999999999999999999999999
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/414.
|
subject: Re: Extra credit
content: rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's you
bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2? what
you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent/415.
|
subject: Re: Extra credit
content: no crap, what's your bid?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 12:48:23 AM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Extra credit
break even on info ass-symetry is 100%, any project above that level is
profitable to Pooks&Co.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 1:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: try this one...
For extra credit....
If the company is worth 150% more under management A rather than 50% more,
does your answer change?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/11/2001 05:13:59 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: try this one...
will you do all of my homework?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: try this one...
i'll pay a grand total of 0
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/10/2001 05:15:59 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: try this one...
Please read the following problem very carefully, and write in a number at
the end. You should be ready to defend your answer. Only a number is
allowed, not an algebraic equation.
Acquiring a Company
In the following exercise you will represent Company A (the acquirer),
which is currently considering acquiring Company T (the target) by means of
a tender offer. You plan to tender in cash for 100% of Company T's shares
but are unsure how high a price to offer. The main complication is this:
the value of Company T depends directly on the outcome of a major oil
exploration project it is currently undertaking. Indeed, the very
viability
of Company T depends on the exploration outcome. If the project fails, the
company under current management will be worth nothing--$0/share. But if
the project succeeds, the value of the company under current management
could be as high as $100/share. All share values between $0 and $100 are
considered equally likely. By all estimates, the company will be worth
considerably more in the hands of Company A than under current management.
In fact, whatever the ultimate value under current management, the company
will be worth fifty percent more under the management of A than under
Company T. If the project fails, the company is worth $0/share under
either
management. If the exploration project generates a $50/share value under
current management, the value under Company A is $75/share. Similarly, a
$100/share value under Company T implies a $150/share value under Company
A,
and so on.
The board of directors of Company A has asked you to determine the
price
they should offer for Company T's shares. This offer must be made now,
before the outcome of the drilling project is known. From all indications,
Company T would be happy to be acquired by Company A, provided it is at a
profitable price. Moreover, Company T wishes to avoid, at all cost, the
potential of a takeover bid by any other firm. You expect Company T to
delay a decision on your bid until the results of the project are in, then
accept or reject your offer before the news of the drilling results reaches
the press.
Thus, you (Company A) will not know the results of the exploration
project
when submitting your price offer, but Company T will know the results when
deciding whether or not to accept your offer. In addition, Company T will
accept any offer by Company A that is greater than the (per share) value of
the company under current management. Thus, if you offer $50/share, for
instance, Company T will accept if the value of the company to Company T is
anything less than $50.
As the representative of Company A, you are deliberating over price
offers
in the range of $0/share (this is tantamount to making no offer at all) to
$150/share. What price offer per share would you tender for Company T's
stock?
$______ per/share
| ||
arnold-j/sent/416.
|
subject: Re:
content: i need significant lead time to prepare for boots day. please advise earlier
next time.
From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 05/11/2001 06:09 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:
I'll be here until tomorrow afternoon, then off to Waco to see my mom. I
just got back to my desk after being in meetings all day. Who knows how long
I'll be here tonight and I have a shit load of work to do tomorrow. Why do I
work here again?
What's up with you? I bought some guest to your floor today but you weren't
around. And I have on boots with curly hair.
Take care, MSA
Oh, let's chat about Guggenheim next week. Are you going on the 17th too?
John Arnold@ECT
05/11/2001 11:58 AM
To: Margaret Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:
you in town this weekend?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/418.
|
subject:
content: Kim:
I will not be at the may 18 management mtg as I will be in NY on business.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/419.
|
subject: Re: myrtle beach
content: Appreciate the offer but I won't be able to get out of work,
"Piasio, Stephen [FI]" <[email protected]> on 05/10/2001 11:23:18 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: myrtle beach
do you or any one of your colleagues at the mighty Enron want to join us at
our annual golf outing in Myrtle Beach. You pay the air, we've got the
rest.
Only 4 rules:
no cologne
no top button buttoned on the golf shirt
not permitted to break 100
no cameras
reminder:
Friday June 1 2 rounds
Saturday, June 2 1 round/poolside
Sunday, June 3 1 round
Enron has an open invite. Please let me know.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/42.
|
subject:
content: best GUESS P&L tonight is +7
| ||
arnold-j/sent/420.
|
subject: RE: try this one...
content: For extra credit....
If the company is worth 150% more under management A rather than 50% more,
does your answer change?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/11/2001 05:13:59 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: try this one...
will you do all of my homework?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: try this one...
i'll pay a grand total of 0
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/10/2001 05:15:59 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: try this one...
Please read the following problem very carefully, and write in a number at
the end. You should be ready to defend your answer. Only a number is
allowed, not an algebraic equation.
Acquiring a Company
In the following exercise you will represent Company A (the acquirer),
which is currently considering acquiring Company T (the target) by means of
a tender offer. You plan to tender in cash for 100% of Company T's shares
but are unsure how high a price to offer. The main complication is this:
the value of Company T depends directly on the outcome of a major oil
exploration project it is currently undertaking. Indeed, the very
viability
of Company T depends on the exploration outcome. If the project fails, the
company under current management will be worth nothing--$0/share. But if
the project succeeds, the value of the company under current management
could be as high as $100/share. All share values between $0 and $100 are
considered equally likely. By all estimates, the company will be worth
considerably more in the hands of Company A than under current management.
In fact, whatever the ultimate value under current management, the company
will be worth fifty percent more under the management of A than under
Company T. If the project fails, the company is worth $0/share under
either
management. If the exploration project generates a $50/share value under
current management, the value under Company A is $75/share. Similarly, a
$100/share value under Company T implies a $150/share value under Company
A,
and so on.
The board of directors of Company A has asked you to determine the
price
they should offer for Company T's shares. This offer must be made now,
before the outcome of the drilling project is known. From all indications,
Company T would be happy to be acquired by Company A, provided it is at a
profitable price. Moreover, Company T wishes to avoid, at all cost, the
potential of a takeover bid by any other firm. You expect Company T to
delay a decision on your bid until the results of the project are in, then
accept or reject your offer before the news of the drilling results reaches
the press.
Thus, you (Company A) will not know the results of the exploration
project
when submitting your price offer, but Company T will know the results when
deciding whether or not to accept your offer. In addition, Company T will
accept any offer by Company A that is greater than the (per share) value of
the company under current management. Thus, if you offer $50/share, for
instance, Company T will accept if the value of the company to Company T is
anything less than $50.
As the representative of Company A, you are deliberating over price
offers
in the range of $0/share (this is tantamount to making no offer at all) to
$150/share. What price offer per share would you tender for Company T's
stock?
$______ per/share
| ||
arnold-j/sent/421.
|
subject: RE: in
content: you dont like my ideas
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/09/2001 05:06:50 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: in
i'll call
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 8:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject:
pookie:
check this out:
www.sailmainecoast.com/index.html
| ||
arnold-j/sent/422.
|
subject:
content: you in town this weekend?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/423.
|
subject: PG&E Energy Trading
content: ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 11:53
AM ---------------------------
From: Jason R Williams/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/11/2001 10:50 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S
Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate,
Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: PG&E Energy Trading
Phillip, Scott, Hunter, Tom and John -
Just to reiterate the new trading guidelines on PG&E Energy Trading:
1. Both financial and physical trading are approved, with a maximum tenor of
18 months
2. Approved entities are: PG&E Energy Trading - Gas Corporation
PG&E Energy Trading - Canada Corporation
NO OTHER PG&E ENTITIES ARE APPROVED FOR TRADING
3. Both EOL and OTC transactions are OK
4. Please call Credit (ext. 31803) with details on every OTC transaction.
We need to track all new positions with PG&E Energy Trading on an ongoing
basis. Please ask the traders and originators on your desks to notify us
with the details on any new transactions immediately upon execution. For
large transactions (greater than 2 contracts/day or 5 BCF total), please call
for approval before transacting.
Thanks for your assistance; please call me (ext. 53923) or Russell Diamond
(ext. 57095) if you have any questions.
Jay
| ||
arnold-j/sent/424.
|
subject: Re: Question?
content: yes
Ina Rangel
05/10/2001 05:47 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Question?
John,
Do you think we need to see about sending an IT Tech for you and Maggi on
Friday to make sure everything is working okay? If we do, we would have to
pay for their travel expenses.
It would be beneficial to you instead of having to be on the phone with IT
for any problems.
Let me know.
-Ina
| ||
arnold-j/sent/425.
|
subject: Re: try this one...
content: i'll pay a grand total of 0
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/10/2001 05:15:59 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: try this one...
Please read the following problem very carefully, and write in a number at
the end. You should be ready to defend your answer. Only a number is
allowed, not an algebraic equation.
Acquiring a Company
In the following exercise you will represent Company A (the acquirer),
which is currently considering acquiring Company T (the target) by means of
a tender offer. You plan to tender in cash for 100% of Company T's shares
but are unsure how high a price to offer. The main complication is this:
the value of Company T depends directly on the outcome of a major oil
exploration project it is currently undertaking. Indeed, the very viability
of Company T depends on the exploration outcome. If the project fails, the
company under current management will be worth nothing--$0/share. But if
the project succeeds, the value of the company under current management
could be as high as $100/share. All share values between $0 and $100 are
considered equally likely. By all estimates, the company will be worth
considerably more in the hands of Company A than under current management.
In fact, whatever the ultimate value under current management, the company
will be worth fifty percent more under the management of A than under
Company T. If the project fails, the company is worth $0/share under either
management. If the exploration project generates a $50/share value under
current management, the value under Company A is $75/share. Similarly, a
$100/share value under Company T implies a $150/share value under Company A,
and so on.
The board of directors of Company A has asked you to determine the price
they should offer for Company T's shares. This offer must be made now,
before the outcome of the drilling project is known. From all indications,
Company T would be happy to be acquired by Company A, provided it is at a
profitable price. Moreover, Company T wishes to avoid, at all cost, the
potential of a takeover bid by any other firm. You expect Company T to
delay a decision on your bid until the results of the project are in, then
accept or reject your offer before the news of the drilling results reaches
the press.
Thus, you (Company A) will not know the results of the exploration project
when submitting your price offer, but Company T will know the results when
deciding whether or not to accept your offer. In addition, Company T will
accept any offer by Company A that is greater than the (per share) value of
the company under current management. Thus, if you offer $50/share, for
instance, Company T will accept if the value of the company to Company T is
anything less than $50.
As the representative of Company A, you are deliberating over price offers
in the range of $0/share (this is tantamount to making no offer at all) to
$150/share. What price offer per share would you tender for Company T's
stock?
$______ per/share
| ||
arnold-j/sent/426.
|
subject: RE: in
content: newport??
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/09/2001 05:06:50 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: in
i'll call
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 8:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject:
pookie:
check this out:
www.sailmainecoast.com/index.html
| ||
arnold-j/sent/427.
|
subject: Re: eBay End of Auction - Item # 1236142249 (DAVE MATTHEWS TICKETS
content: 199.99+ $18 o/n shipping = 217.99
Visa 4128 0033 2341 1978 exp 8/02
shipping and billing address :
John Arnold
909 Texas Ave #1812
Houston, TX 77002
713-557-3330
[email protected] on 05/10/2001 01:20:57 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re: eBay End of Auction - Item # 1236142249 (DAVE MATTHEWS TICKETS
HOUSTON 4TH ROW 5/12)
Pay Patrick Kenne, [email protected], at paypal.com or bidpay.com, bid
plus $12 for Fed-Ex Saver, or $18 for Fed-Ex overnight shipping. Put shipping
info in note section. If you want Fed-Ex c.o.d., get a money order for bid
plus $25 to Paula Fowler ready to give to fed-ex and e-mail me your shipping
address. If you want to use paypal, add 1% to total, they charge me 2.3%
now!! If you are sending a money order, send to Patrick Kenne 2879 Timber
Range Court Columbus, Ohio 43231. Please include auction # and all shipping
info. Thanks, Pat 614-891-9707
| ||
arnold-j/sent/428.
|
subject: Option Advisory Committee Meeting May 31
content: ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 02:21
PM ---------------------------
"Schaefer, Matthew" <[email protected]> on 05/10/2001 01:26:57 PM
To: Brad Banky <[email protected]>, David Rosenberg
<[email protected]>, James Haupt <[email protected]>, Jeff Frase
<[email protected]>, Jeff Ong <[email protected]>, Jim Adams
<[email protected]>, John Arnold <[email protected]>, Kayvan Scott
Malek <[email protected]>, Michael Maggi <[email protected]>, Robert Collins
<[email protected]>, Russ Knutsen <[email protected]>, Sanjiv Khosla
<[email protected]>, William Coorsh <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Option Advisory Committee Meeting May 31
Please be advised that the Option Advisory Committee meeting will be at 4:00
eastern time, May 31, 2001.
Matthew Schaefer
New York Mercantile Exchange
212.299.2612
| ||
arnold-j/sent/43.
|
subject: Re:
content: get lost
| ||
arnold-j/sent/430.
|
subject: (01-154) Implementation of New NYMEX Rule 9.11A (Give-Up Trades)
content: ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 08:18
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 05/10/2001 07:50:19 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: (01-154) Implementation of New NYMEX Rule 9.11A (Give-Up Trades)
IMPORTANT MEMO
Notice # 01-154
May 7, 2001
TO:
All NYMEX Division Members and Member Firms
FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President
RE:
Implementation of New NYMEX Rule 9.11A ("Give-Up Trades")
DATE:
May 7, 2001
===========================================================
Please be advised that beginning on the trade date of Friday, June 1, 2001,
new NYMEX Rule 9.11A ("Give-Up Trades") will go into effect.
! In the absence of an applicable give-up agreement, new Rule 9.11A will
define the respective responsibilities/obligations to an order of executing
brokers, customers and Clearing Members.
! The term "executing broker" as used in Rule 9.11A refers to the
registered billing entity, Member Firm or Floor Broker to whom the order is
transmitted.
! Rule 9.11 will provide that, in the absence of an applicable give-up
agreement, a Clearing Member may reject a trade only if: (1) the trade
exceeds trading limits established by the Clearing Member for that customer
that have been communicated to the executing broker as provided by the rule
or (2) the trade is an error for which the executing broker is responsible.
! The new rule also places affirmative obligations on executing brokers
to confirm Clearing Member authorization for an account. For example,
prior to an executing broker accepting and executing an initial order for
any new customer account, such executing broker must confirm with the
Clearing Member by telephonic, electronic or written means, that:
(a) the customer has a valid account with the Clearing Member;
(b) the account number;
(c) the brokerage rate;
(d) the customer is authorized by the Clearing Member to place orders with
the executing broker for that account; and
(e) a listing or summary of persons authorized to place orders for that
account.
Moreover, the executing broker must retain a copy of the authorization or
the specifics of the telephonic confirmation, which includes: opposite
party, date, time, and any other relevant information. The Compliance
Department will conduct periodic audits of such records, and falsification
of such information shall be the basis for disciplinary action.
If you have any questions concerning this new rule, please contact Bernard
Purta, Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Operations, at (212)
299- 2380; Thomas LaSala, Vice President, NYMEX Compliance Department, at
(212) 299-2897; or Arthur McCoy, Vice President, Financial Surveillance
Section, NYMEX Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2928,
NEW RULE 9.11A ("Give-Up Trades")
(Entire rule is new.)
Rule 9.11A Give-Up Trades
In the absence of a give-up agreement whose terms and conditions govern the
responsibilities/obligations of executing brokers, customers and Clearing
Members, the following rules shall define the respective
responsibilities/obligations of those parties to an order. The "executing
broker", as used in this rule, is the registered billing entity, Member
Firm or Floor Broker to whom the order is transmitted.
(A) Responsibilities/Obligations of Clearing Members
(1). Limits Placed by Clearing Member. A Clearing Member may, in its
discretion, place trading limits on the trades it will accept for give-up
for a customer's account from an executing broker, provided however, that
the executing broker receives prior written or electronic notice from the
Clearing Member of the trading limits on that account. Notice must be
received by the executing broker in a timely manner. A copy of such notice
shall be retained by the Clearing Member.
(2). Trade Rejection. A Clearing Member may reject ("DK") a trade only if:
(1) the trade exceeds the trading limits established under Section I(A) of
this rule for that customer and it has been communicated to the executing
broker as described in Subsection (A); or (2) the trade is an error for
which the executing broker is responsible. If a Clearing Member has a
basis for rejecting a trade, and chooses to do so in accordance with the
provisions of Rule 2.21(B), it must notify the executing broker promptly.
(3). Billing. A Clearing Member will pay all floor brokerage fees incurred
for all transactions executed by the executing broker for the customer and
subsequently accepted by the Clearing Member by means of the ATOM system.
Floor brokerage fees will be agreed upon in advance among the Clearing
Member, customer and the executing broker.
(B) Responsibilities/Obligations of Executing Brokers
(1) Customer Order Placement. An executing broker will be responsible for
determining that all orders are placed or authorized by the customer. Once
an order has been accepted, a broker or the broker's clerk must:
(a) confirm the terms of the order with the customer;
(b) accurately execute the order according to its terms;
(c) confirm the execution of the order to the customer as soon as
practicable; and
(d) transmit such executed order to the Clearing Member as soon as
practicable in accordance with Exchange Rules and procedures.
2. Use of Other Persons. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the
executing broker is allowed to use the services of another broker in
connection with the broker's obligations under these rules. The executing
broker remains responsible to the customer and Clearing Member under these
rules.
3. Executing Broker Responsibility for Verifying Clearing Member
Authorization. Prior to a broker accepting and executing an initial order
for any new customer account, the executing broker must confirm with the
Clearing Member by telephonic, electronic or written means, that:
(f) the customer has a valid account with the Clearing Member;
(g) the account number;
(h) the brokerage rate;
(i) the customer is authorized by the Clearing Member to place orders with
the executing broker for that account; and
(j) a listing or summary of persons authorized to place orders for that
account.
The executing broker must retain a copy of the authorization or the
specifics of the telephonic confirmation, which includes: opposite party,
date, time, and any other relevant information. The falsification of such
information shall be the basis for disciplinary action.
4. Rejection of Customer Order. Where an executing broker has confirmed
Clearing Member authorization to execute orders on behalf of a customer in
accordance with this Rule 9.11A, the broker may, in the broker's
discretion, reject an order that the customer transmits to the broker for
execution. The broker shall promptly notify the customer and the Clearing
Member(s) of any such rejection.
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Tel: 312-368-6149
Fax: 312-368-2281
[email protected]
http://www.carrfut.com
| ||
arnold-j/sent/431.
|
subject: FW: details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship
content: Russell:
Just fyi, they're willing to take us for 20 years.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 08:17
AM ---------------------------
From: Eric Bass/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/10/2001 07:42 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship
Channel Inside FERC
John,
Attached are the volumes associated with the 20 yr Soc Gen deal we talked
about. I have yet to hear from credit. I will let you know the status as it
becomes available.
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Alexander+2EWERNER+40us+2Esocgen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship
Channel Inside FERC
Hi Eric,
Please find below the detailed terms of a possible deal that we have been
talking about during our phone conversation this morning.
Nature of deal : If the transaction takes place, Societe Generale would sell a
financial fixed price swap (flat price, not basis differential) to Enron. The
monthly settlement would be financial. There would not be any exchange of
physical product.
Period of the deal : June 1st, 2001 to January 31st, 2021.
Used Reference : Natural Gas-Houston Ship Channel Index Inside FERC , monthly
settlement.
Volumes of the financial swap transaction : Please find below the volumes
given
month by month in MMBTU.
(See attached file: volumes-10-5-01-for-Enron.xls)
Since there is a tiny chance that the deal trades today, could you please
check
if you have credit with SG for this period.
If not, could you find out how much time it approximately takes to get the
credit.
In terms of credit, SG is good with Enron for this period.
Thank you,
Alexander Werner
**************************************************************************
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely
for the addressee(s). It shall not be construed as a recommendation to
buy or sell any security. Any unauthorized access, use, reproduction,
disclosure or dissemination is prohibited.
Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
shall assume any legal liability or responsibility for any incorrect,
misleading or altered information contained herein.
**************************************************************************
**************************************************************************
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely
for the addressee(s). It shall not be construed as a recommendation to
buy or sell any security. Any unauthorized access, use, reproduction,
disclosure or dissemination is prohibited.
Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
shall assume any legal liability or responsibility for any incorrect,
misleading or altered information contained herein.
**************************************************************************
- volumes-10-5-01-for-Enron.xls
| ||
arnold-j/sent/432.
|
subject: Re: reminder -pira dinner sund may 13 th 7.45 pm st regis
content: i think the velocity of the down move will be much less severe from here.
still dont think this is equilibrium. need to see aga coming in lower than
expectations for a couple weeks signaling that we've moved down the demand
curve. think a lot of spec shorts are looking to take profits as we get
close to the psychological 400 target. market needs producer selling to get
us through there. have seen some as williams is starting to hedge barrett :
hence the weakness in the back of the curve recently. still going lower but
it will be a tougher move from here.
From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 02:12 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: reminder -pira dinner sund may 13 th 7.45 pm st regis
what do you think now?
see you sunday
| ||
arnold-j/sent/433.
|
subject: RE:
content: maybe they're for more sophisticated palates
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 02:27 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
I pawned them off on my unsuspecting coworker - Phil. He liked them!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:27 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: Re:
it's an aquired taste
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 02:25 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
those things are TERRIBLE!!!!
| ||
arnold-j/sent/434.
|
subject: Re:
content: Hot like wasabi when I bust rhymes
Big like Leann Rimes
Because I'm all about value
| ||
arnold-j/sent/435.
|
subject: Re:
content: it's an aquired taste
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/09/2001 02:25 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
those things are TERRIBLE!!!!
| ||
arnold-j/sent/436.
|
subject:
content: i couldnt do it. it took 13 minutes for my alarm to wake me up.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/437.
|
subject: gas message board access
content: is there a password or just knowing the address
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001 05:08
PM ---------------------------
From: Alex Mcleish/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 10:40 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: gas message board access
John, is access to the board on a password basis now? If so, when you get a
chance could you authorise access for myself and Andew Hill (a colleague in
crude fundamentals) please? A similar board for crude and products should be
ready within a couple of weeks. Thanks
Alex
| ||
arnold-j/sent/438.
|
subject: RE:
content: i'm just kidding. i'm getting a haircut from 530-600. i'll call you when i
get out.
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 04:49 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
I guess that's fair - considering the deal you worked out with Dean.
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:48 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:
you i guess.
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 04:23 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
so who are the drinks on until I do ? . . . . .
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:25 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:
drinks on tickleknees if you do
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 02:03 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
you're killing me!!! I WILL close two of the three!!! and I predict that I
will make $500,000 - on two tiny little gas deals.
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:04 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:
maybe we need a closer in that seat
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:56 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
he's a cheapskate - I am just sitting here on the edge of my seat with three
customers that won't pull the trigger!
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:
how about we celebrate the near completion of your deal and have tickleless
pay for it.
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:26 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
push the summer down about $.03-.04 so I can get one of my deals done and we
could celebrate!
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject:
wanna get sauced after work?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/439.
|
subject: RE:
content: you i guess.
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 04:23 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
so who are the drinks on until I do ? . . . . .
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:25 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:
drinks on tickleknees if you do
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 02:03 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
you're killing me!!! I WILL close two of the three!!! and I predict that I
will make $500,000 - on two tiny little gas deals.
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:04 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:
maybe we need a closer in that seat
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:56 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
he's a cheapskate - I am just sitting here on the edge of my seat with three
customers that won't pull the trigger!
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:
how about we celebrate the near completion of your deal and have tickleless
pay for it.
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:26 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
push the summer down about $.03-.04 so I can get one of my deals done and we
could celebrate!
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject:
wanna get sauced after work?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/44.
|
subject: ACCESS Trades for 11/09/00
content: ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000 03:54
PM ---------------------------
"Mancino, Joseph (NY Int)" <[email protected]> on 11/09/2000 08:32:32 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: ACCESS Trades for 11/09/00
Here are the trades executed on ACCESS last night:
S 50 Z 5350
S 50 Z 5335
B 9 Z 5330
B 2 Z 5320
B 4 Z 5322
B 6 Z 5323
B 5 Z 5345
B 10 Z 5355
B 3 Z 5355
B 5 Z 5358
B 100 Z 5323
S 100 F 5369
Joseph Mancino
E.D. & F. Man International
(212)566-9700
| ||
arnold-j/sent/440.
|
subject: RE:
content: drinks on tickleknees if you do
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 02:03 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
you're killing me!!! I WILL close two of the three!!! and I predict that I
will make $500,000 - on two tiny little gas deals.
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:04 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:
maybe we need a closer in that seat
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:56 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
he's a cheapskate - I am just sitting here on the edge of my seat with three
customers that won't pull the trigger!
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:
how about we celebrate the near completion of your deal and have tickleless
pay for it.
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:26 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
push the summer down about $.03-.04 so I can get one of my deals done and we
could celebrate!
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject:
wanna get sauced after work?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/441.
|
subject: RE:
content: maybe we need a closer in that seat
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:56 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
he's a cheapskate - I am just sitting here on the edge of my seat with three
customers that won't pull the trigger!
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: RE:
how about we celebrate the near completion of your deal and have tickleless
pay for it.
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:26 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
push the summer down about $.03-.04 so I can get one of my deals done and we
could celebrate!
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject:
wanna get sauced after work?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/442.
|
subject: RE:
content: how about we celebrate the near completion of your deal and have tickleless
pay for it.
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:26 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
push the summer down about $.03-.04 so I can get one of my deals done and we
could celebrate!
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject:
wanna get sauced after work?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/443.
|
subject: RE:
content: is that with or without two snoozes?
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/08/2001 01:24 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
and get up at 5:07 a.m.?
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject:
wanna get sauced after work?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/444.
|
subject:
content: wanna get sauced after work?
| ||
arnold-j/sent/445.
|
subject: Re: RISK Magazine Interview
content: Jennifer:
I don't think we have much interest in doing this interview since it
primarily pertains to our views of the market. I would speak in such
generalities that it probably wouldn't be a good interview.
John
Jennifer Walker@ENRON
05/07/2001 08:57 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RISK Magazine Interview
John:
Kevin Foster with Risk Magazine is working on an article for the June issue
regarding Gas Markets in the U.S. Basically, he is interested in Enron's
opinion of:
1. Physical Supply/Demand of gas and how this is affecting financial trades
2. Where do we anticipate gas prices going over the summer?
3. The state of the industry--any major issues that may affect the market?
If this sounds like a story we would be interested in doing, please let me
know and I will coordinate a short phone interview with Kevin Foster. I know
it usually works best for your schedule to do this after 4pm, so please let
me know if Tuesday after 4 would be good for you.
Thanks for your help and please call me with any questions.
Jennifer Walker
Public Relations
x3-9964
| ||
arnold-j/sent/446.
|
subject: RE: you shudda been in vegas
content: that night i had so much brain damage i couldnt function.
as opposed to ????
"Lafontaine, Steve" <[email protected]> on 05/07/2001
06:29:44 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: RE: you shudda been in vegas
was a great time-sat at bo collins dinner table spoke briefly. by that nite
i had so much brain damage i couldnt function.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 11:31 AM
To: LaFontaine, Steve
Subject: Re: its never gonna break
your guys are probably seeing this as well, but, 50 cents higher our
customer biz was 95/5 from buy side. now it's 50/50. can almost smell
blood among the producers. only problem is trade is sooooo short they cant
see straight. were the market still not so fundamentally overvalued right
now i'd be looking for a 25 cent move up. just can't see that happening at
this level though.
********************Legal Disclaimer**************************
This email may contain confidential information and is
only for the use of the intended or named recipient. It
has been prepared solely for informational purposes
from sources believed to be reliable, and is not a
solicitation, commitment or offer. All information is
subject to change without notice, and is provided
without warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, dissemination, distribution,
copying or other use of this email and its attachments
(if any) is strictly prohibited and may be a violation of
law. If you have received this email in error, please
immediately delete this email and all copies of it from
your system (including any attachments), destroy any
hard copies of it, and notify the sender. Thank you.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/447.
|
subject: Re: ng
content: i guess i have to keep my 395 price target. just nothing bullish in the near
term except crude. and that's not enough now. need to get to a new price
regime to pick up more demand quickly.
From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/06/2001 05:47 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ng
what do you think this week and next 3 weeks-----june expiry 4.20?
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:00 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: Re: please fill in--i lost the scrap of paper
my numbers from mar 15. would raise jun-augy by 10 cents because of the
supportive weather we had from mar 15-apr 15
From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 01:17 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: please fill in--i lost the scrap of paper
arnold
May-01 455
Jun-01 395
Jul-01 370
Aug-01 350
Sep-01 350
Oct-01 360
Nov-01 360
Dec-01 325
Jan-02 280
Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759
| ||
arnold-j/sent/448.
|
subject: Re:
content: none
From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/07/2001 07:46 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry
Arora/ENRON@enronXgate, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Christopher F
Calger/ENRON@enronXgate, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT,
W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris
Gaskill/ENRON@enronXgate, Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/ENRON@enronXgate,
Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/ENRON@enronXgate, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, Jonathan
McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate,
Michael L Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jean
Mrha/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT,
Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S
Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Swerzbin, Mike"
<[email protected]>@SMTP@enronXgate, C John Thompson/ENRON@enronXgate,
Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank W
Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/ENRON@enronXgate,
Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
I asked everyone for their A/A needs and received very little feedback.
Please respond promptly.
Thanks
John
| ||
arnold-j/sent/449.
|
subject: Re: its never gonna break
content: your guys are probably seeing this as well, but, 50 cents higher our customer
biz was 95/5 from buy side. now it's 50/50. can almost smell blood among
the producers. only problem is trade is sooooo short they cant see
straight. were the market still not so fundamentally overvalued right now
i'd be looking for a 25 cent move up. just can't see that happening at this
level though.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/45.
|
subject: Re: Resume
content: Alan:
I received your email. I'll make sure it goes through the proper channels.
It may help if you give specific positions that interest you most as Enron is
such a big place, it will help focus the resume to the right people.
John
| ||
arnold-j/sent/450.
|
subject: Re:
content: only if you promise to post regular updates on the trucking market.
call chris gaskill to get the password.
From: Matthew Arnold/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 10:22 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
sign me up for the gas message board
| ||
arnold-j/sent/451.
|
subject: RE:
content: will see you there (most probably)
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 10:18 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:
My floor looks good - now i just have to paint. Have fun in San Antonio.
Monday morning?
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:38 AM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: Re:
i like that feeling...as long as someone doesnt punch you in the gut. i'm
going to san antonio at lunch today to play soccer so i just took the day
off. catching up on 2 weeks of email. i know how to relax don't i
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 09:34 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
Every single muscle in my stomach is sore.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/452.
|
subject: Re: Hi
content: Hey Adam:
sorry for the delay. just been very busy. congrats on joining enron. think
you made the right chioce. i would recommend structuring. it's a good way
to understand how enron works, how we look at and manage risk, and you get
close to the trading component. a friend of mine, ed mcmichael runs the gas
structuring group. try emiling him probably at [email protected]. keep in
touch,
john
"Bayer, Adam Ryan" <[email protected]> on 04/10/2001 03:06:34 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Hi
Hi John,
I hope your gas markets are moving nicely this week. Its
been a long time since we talked, but a lot has happened.
But the most important thing has been my decision to join
Enron. At this point, I am looking around for a rotation,
and I have received a lot of advice pointing me towards
Gas/Power Structuring and RAC rotations. I am wondering if
you know some people in these areas who might be looking
for analysts. I have heard that traders work closely with
the structured finance and RAC guys, true? If you have
time please let me know if you know of anything.
Thanks,
Adam Bayer
| ||
arnold-j/sent/453.
|
subject: Re: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Quigley050401
content: this is my idea of vacation...
| ||
arnold-j/sent/454.
|
subject: Re: Fimat (Soc Gen Line)
content: yes i will
From: Sarah Wesner/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 09:50 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Fimat (Soc Gen Line)
John - I got a call from Warren Tashnek today. He is concerned about the
usage of the Fimat line because the trading volume is not covering its
costs. He wanted to know how to increase business with Enron. I referred
him to you. As you know, he is so nice and not trying to start a fight with
us but needs more trades to justify the cost of the line. Will you please
address this with him?
Thanks, Sarah
| ||
arnold-j/sent/455.
|
subject: option candlesticks technical paper
content: ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001 09:40
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 05/04/2001 09:31:27 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: option candlesticks technical paper
Several people have asked how to read the Carr Futures option candlestick
charts.
Attached is a research note discussing tracking and trading option
volatility.
(See attached file: Tracking and Trading Nat Gas Vols.pdf)
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Tel: 312-368-6149
Fax: 312-368-2281
[email protected]
http://www.carrfut.com
- Tracking and Trading Nat Gas Vols.pdf
| ||
arnold-j/sent/456.
|
subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Quigley050401
content: do you know what my user id and password are?
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001 09:33
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 05/04/2001 10:37:18 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Quigley050401
The following expense report is ready for approval:
Employee Name: Henry Quigley
Status last changed by: Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Quigley050401
Report Total: $107.45
Amount Due Employee: $107.45
To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com
| ||
arnold-j/sent/457.
|
subject: Re:
content: i like that feeling...as long as someone doesnt punch you in the gut. i'm
going to san antonio at lunch today to play soccer so i just took the day
off. catching up on 2 weeks of email. i know how to relax don't i
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 09:34 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
Every single muscle in my stomach is sore.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/458.
|
subject: Re:
content: absolutely...though i'm not sure how you do it. call chris gaskill and he
should be abl to help.
From: Kevin McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 09:33 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
John,
Could I get access to the gas message board?
KJM
| ||
arnold-j/sent/459.
|
subject:
content: Jeff:
To explain the P&L of -349,000 :
We executed the trade when you gave the order (the delta anyway), first thing
in the morning. The market rallied 8 cents from the morning, with the back
rallying about 2.5 cents. On 904 PV contracts, curve shift was -226,000.
The balance, $123,000, is almost exactly $.01 bid/mid, which I think is
pretty fair considering the tenor of the deal and that it included price and
vol. Cal 3 straddles, for instance, are $1.39 / $1.45.
Looking out for you bubbeh:
John
| ||
arnold-j/sent/46.
|
subject: Re:
content: I almost forget about your debt, but then your BMW 315ia reminded me of it.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/460.
|
subject: Re: No Cracks
content: almost forgot about you....
will take care of . we'll keep you guys together close to the traders.
From: Mike A Roberts 05/01/2001 09:48 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: No Cracks
Johnny,
Please don't let my group fall through the cracks!
We'd like to be as close to your desk in the new building as possible (8
seats)
unless you think we should focus on one of the geographical desks
- Mike
| ||
arnold-j/sent/461.
|
subject: Re: Please respond
content: no
[email protected] on 05/01/2001 11:44:40 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Please respond
Carr is hosting an enymex presentation at our office in New York this
Monday, May 7th from 2-4 PM. We are double checking our head count to make
sure that we will be ready for the people attending the presentation.
If you would, please reply to this email with a yes or a no to indicate
your intentions of attending this enymex presentation.
Thank you.
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Tel: 312-368-6149
Fax: 312-368-2281
[email protected]
http://www.carrfut.com
| ||
arnold-j/sent/462.
|
subject: option candlesticks as a hot link
content: ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 08:10
AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 05/01/2001 07:51:18 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: option candlesticks as a hot link
The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates. , 2001 Carr Futures
The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.
Option Candlesticks
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/candlesticks48.pdf
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Tel: 312-368-6149
Fax: 312-368-2281
[email protected]
http://www.carrfut.com
| ||
arnold-j/sent/463.
|
subject:
content: Stranger:
Any interest in getting a drink or dinner Tuesday? havent seen you in
forever.
| ||
arnold-j/sent/464.
|
subject: RE: Your note
content: my email as far as i know is [email protected]. not on msn though.
i made space for your 8 people as well as ferries, roberts, and the other
person (??) you requested. Come down tomorrow and i'll show you the layout
again.
john
From: Jean Mrha/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 08:34 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Your note
Arnold,
I am trying to talk via MSN messenger service and it will not accept
[email protected] or any other reasonable email path. What is your official
email path? I am assuming that you are using Outlook. I am here at work
trying to close a deal.
I will forward your message to Grass, but I want to visually see the layout
of the floor. I will end up having spots on five and six. Also, Nelson
Ferries' and Linda Roberts' location are very important to the
Wellhead/Ecommerce effort. And yes, John will need room to grow.
What did you think of the article?
Mrha
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 8:23 PM
To: Mrha, Jean
Subject:
Jean:
I think the location i talked about before is actually better for you. The
area towards the edge of the building borders the northeast gas group,
long-term originators, and mid-market orig group. not exactly who you need
to be around. the location in the center is much closer to the east gulf
group, specifically sandra, and the same distance to the central and texas
trading groups. most importantly, it provides room for both your group and
the trading group to expand. call me if you want to talk further....
thanks for the article.
john
| ||
arnold-j/sent/465.
|
subject: Advisory invoice
content: can you take care of this...
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 08:26
PM ---------------------------
"Mark Sagel" <[email protected]> on 04/27/2001 10:14:42 AM
To: "John Arnold" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Advisory invoice
John:
?
Attached is the invoice covering the current period.
?
Hope all is well. No changes on analysis.? Market will have occasional
rallies (not significant) but all evidence shows lower levels to be seen.?
Most bearish case shows decline until late May or first two weeks of June.?
Prices from 420 - 380.
- invoice enron 9943.doc
| ||
arnold-j/sent/466.
|
subject:
content: Jean:
I think the location i talked about before is actually better for you. The
area towards the edge of the building borders the northeast gas group,
long-term originators, and mid-market orig group. not exactly who you need
to be around. the location in the center is much closer to the east gulf
group, specifically sandra, and the same distance to the central and texas
trading groups. most importantly, it provides room for both your group and
the trading group to expand. call me if you want to talk further....
thanks for the article.
john
| ||
arnold-j/sent/467.
|
subject: Re: March 2001/1Q 2001 Reporting Package
content: would like to meet to review to make sure i understand. may only take a
couple minutes. are you free at 330 on tuesday?
From: Edie Leschber/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 10:28 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: March 2001/1Q 2001 Reporting Package
John,
I have the reporting package for March 2001 and 1Q 2001 for the Financial
Team for you.
Would you like to meet to review or would you prefer that I just deliver it
to you for your review?
Thank you,
Edie Leschber
X30669
| ||
arnold-j/sent/468.
|
subject: Re: pulaski
content: remind jim how the h/j/k spread acted this year. granted it won't behave
that way again until close to expiry, but i like the j/k outright much moreso
than the condor.
Caroline Abramo@ENRON
04/30/2001 12:24 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: pulaski
---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron on 04/30/2001
01:23 PM ---------------------------
Jim Pulaski <[email protected]> on 04/30/2001 12:17:09 PM
To: "Caroline. Abramo (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject:
btw, that wasnt me buying the f-g/j-k on friday at 4
| ||
arnold-j/sent/469.
|
subject: natural update
content: ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 09:30
AM ---------------------------
"Mark Sagel" <[email protected]> on 04/29/2001 06:50:29 PM
To: "John Arnold" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: natural update
Latest comments FYI
- ng042901.doc
| ||
arnold-j/sent/47.
|
subject:
content: Hello:
I am not able to pull up the link for the short term outlook for natural
gas. Can you please make sure the link is updates.
Thanks,
John
| ||
arnold-j/sent/470.
|
subject:
content: can you get me the number of our contact at the Delano. I have a personal
favor to ask them.
john
| ||
arnold-j/sent/471.
|
subject:
content: pookie:
check this out:
www.sailmainecoast.com/index.html
| ||
arnold-j/sent/472.
|
subject:
content: 212 836 5030
| ||
arnold-j/sent/473.
|
subject:
content: kimberly:
any interest in accompanying me to maggi's bd party sat nite?
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.