id
stringlengths 6
9
| query
stringlengths 594
16.3k
| answer
stringlengths 2
16
| text
stringlengths 26
367
| response
stringlengths 72
388
| options
dict | golden_key
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
finqa239
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we monitor the status of the capital markets and regularly evaluate the effect that changes in capital market conditions may have on our ability to execute our announced growth plans and fund our liquidity needs . we expect to continue meeting part of our financing and liquidity needs primarily through commercial paper borrowings , issuances of senior notes , and access to long-term committed credit facilities . if conditions in the lodging industry deteriorate , or if disruptions in the capital markets take place as they did in the immediate aftermath of both the 2008 worldwide financial crisis and the events of september 11 , 2001 , we may be unable to place some or all of our commercial paper on a temporary or extended basis and may have to rely more on borrowings under the credit facility , which we believe will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs , including repayment of debt obligations , but which may carry a higher cost than commercial paper . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations and non-cash items for the last three fiscal years are as follows: .
|( $ in millions )|2018|2017|2016|
|cash from operations|$ 2357|$ 2227|$ 1619|
|non-cash items ( 1 )|287|1397|514|
non-cash items ( 1 ) 287 1397 514 ( 1 ) includes depreciation , amortization , share-based compensation , deferred income taxes , and contract investment amortization . our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 0.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2018 and 0.5 to 1.0 at year-end 2017 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital . investing activities cash flows acquisition of a business , net of cash acquired . cash outflows of $ 2392 million in 2016 were due to the starwood combination . see footnote 3 . dispositions and acquisitions for more information . capital expenditures and other investments . we made capital expenditures of $ 556 million in 2018 , $ 240 million in 2017 , and $ 199 million in 2016 . capital expenditures in 2018 increased by $ 316 million compared to 2017 , primarily reflecting the acquisition of the sheraton grand phoenix , improvements to our worldwide systems , and net higher spending on several owned properties . capital expenditures in 2017 increased by $ 41 million compared to 2016 , primarily due to improvements to our worldwide systems and improvements to hotels acquired in the starwood combination . we expect spending on capital expenditures and other investments will total approximately $ 500 million to $ 700 million for 2019 , including acquisitions , loan advances , equity and other investments , contract acquisition costs , and various capital expenditures ( including approximately $ 225 million for maintenance capital spending ) . over time , we have sold lodging properties , both completed and under development , subject to long-term management agreements . the ability of third-party purchasers to raise the debt and equity capital necessary to acquire such properties depends in part on the perceived risks in the lodging industry and other constraints inherent in the capital markets . we monitor the status of the capital markets and regularly evaluate the potential impact of changes in capital market conditions on our business operations . in the starwood combination , we acquired various hotels and joint venture interests in hotels , most of which we have sold or are seeking to sell , and in 2018 , we acquired the sheraton grand phoenix , which we expect to renovate and sell subject to a long-term management agreement . we also expect to continue making selective and opportunistic investments to add units to our lodging business , which may include property acquisitions , new construction , loans , guarantees , and noncontrolling equity investments . over time , we seek to minimize capital invested in our business through asset sales subject to long term operating or franchise agreements . fluctuations in the values of hotel real estate generally have little impact on our overall business results because : ( 1 ) we own less than one percent of hotels that we operate or franchise ; ( 2 ) management and franchise fees are generally based upon hotel revenues and profits rather than current hotel property values ; and ( 3 ) our management agreements generally do not terminate upon hotel sale or foreclosure . dispositions . property and asset sales generated $ 479 million cash proceeds in 2018 and $ 1418 million in 2017 . see footnote 3 . dispositions and acquisitions for more information on dispositions. .
Question: non cash items represent what percent of cash from operations in 2018?
Answer:
|
0.12176
|
non cash items represent what percent of cash from operations in 2018?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.12176%",
"B": "12.176%",
"C": "1.2176%",
"D": "0.012176%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.12176%",
"B": "12.176%",
"C": "1.2176%",
"D": "0.012176%"
}
|
A
|
finqa241
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . the accruals for deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to a significant amount of judgment by management and are reviewed and adjusted routinely based on changes in facts and circumstances . material changes in these accruals may occur in the future , based on the progress of ongoing tax audits , changes in legislation and resolution of pending tax matters . forward-looking estimates we are providing our 2011 forward-looking estimates in this section . these estimates were based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information used to prepare our december 31 , 2010 , reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . the forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , gas and ngls during 2011 will be similar to 2010 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to our canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using an estimated average 2011 exchange rate of $ 0.95 dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . during 2011 , our operations are substantially comprised of our ongoing north america onshore operations . we also have international operations in brazil and angola that we are divesting . we have entered into agreements to sell our assets in brazil for $ 3.2 billion and our assets in angola for $ 70 million , plus contingent consideration . as a result of these divestitures , all revenues , expenses and capital related to our international operations are reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements . additionally , all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our international operations , unless otherwise noted . north america onshore operating items the following 2011 estimates relate only to our north america onshore assets . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2011 . we estimate that our combined oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 236 to 240 mmboe . ( mmbbls ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) .
||oil ( mmbbls )|gas ( bcf )|ngls ( mmbbls )|total ( mmboe )|
|u.s . onshore|17|736|34|174|
|canada|28|199|3|64|
|north america onshore|45|935|37|238|
oil and gas prices we expect our 2011 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating areas to differ from the nymex price as set forth in the following table . the expected ranges for prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the 201ccommodity price risk management 201d section below . the nymex price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for benchmark west texas intermediate crude oil delivered at cushing , oklahoma . the nymex price for gas is determined using the first-of-month south louisiana henry hub price index as published monthly in inside .
Question: what percentage of north america gas comes from us onshore?
Answer:
|
78.71658
|
what percentage of north america gas comes from us onshore?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "17%",
"B": "45%",
"C": "78.71658%",
"D": "935%"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "17%",
"B": "45%",
"C": "78.71658%",
"D": "935%"
}
|
C
|
finqa242
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions as a component of income tax expense and accounts for sales tax collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities on a net basis . allowance for funds used during construction afudc is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction . the regulated utility subsidiaries record afudc to the extent permitted by the pucs . the portion of afudc attributable to borrowed funds is shown as a reduction of interest , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . any portion of afudc attributable to equity funds would be included in other income ( expenses ) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . afudc is summarized in the following table for the years ended december 31: .
||2015|2014|2013|
|allowance for other funds used during construction|$ 13|$ 9|$ 13|
|allowance for borrowed funds used during construction|8|6|6|
environmental costs the company 2019s water and wastewater operations are subject to u.s . federal , state , local and foreign requirements relating to environmental protection , and as such , the company periodically becomes subject to environmental claims in the normal course of business . environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or provide a future benefit are expensed or capitalized as appropriate . remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued , on an undiscounted basis , when it is probable that these costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated . remediation costs accrued amounted to $ 1 and $ 2 as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the accrual relates entirely to a conservation agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the company with the national oceanic and atmospheric administration ( 201cnoaa 201d ) requiring the company to , among other provisions , implement certain measures to protect the steelhead trout and its habitat in the carmel river watershed in the state of california . the company has agreed to pay $ 1 annually from 2010 to 2016 . the company 2019s inception-to-date costs related to the noaa agreement were recorded in regulatory assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 and are expected to be fully recovered from customers in future rates . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivative financial instruments for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates . these derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures . the company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments . all derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value . on the date the derivative contract is entered into , the company may designate the derivative as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability ( fair-value hedge ) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ( cash-flow hedge ) . changes in the fair value of a fair-value hedge , along with the gain or loss on the underlying hedged item , are recorded in current-period earnings . the effective portion of gains and losses on cash-flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income , until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows . any ineffective portion of designated hedges is recognized in current-period earnings . cash flows from derivative contracts are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. .
Question: what was the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction as a percentage of allowance for other funds used during construction during 2015?
Answer:
|
0.61538
|
what was the allowance for borrowed funds used during construction as a percentage of allowance for other funds used during construction during 2015?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.46154",
"B": "0.61538",
"C": "0.76923",
"D": "0.92308"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.46154",
"B": "0.61538",
"C": "0.76923",
"D": "0.92308"
}
|
B
|
finqa243
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents the company receives a foreign tax credit ( 201cftc 201d ) against its u.s . tax liability for foreign taxes paid by the company including payments from its separate account assets . the separate account ftc is estimated for the current year using information from the most recent filed return , adjusted for the change in the allocation of separate account investments to the international equity markets during the current year . the actual current year ftc can vary from the estimates due to actual ftcs passed through by the mutual funds . the company recorded benefits of $ 16 , $ 11 and $ 17 related to separate account ftc in the years ended december 31 , 2008 , december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 , respectively . these amounts included benefits related to true- ups of prior years 2019 tax returns of $ 4 , $ 0 and $ 7 in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 respectively . the company 2019s unrecognized tax benefits increased by $ 15 during 2008 as a result of tax positions taken on the company 2019s 2007 tax return and expected to be taken on its 2008 tax return , bringing the total unrecognized tax benefits to $ 91 as of december 31 , 2008 . this entire amount , if it were recognized , would affect the effective tax rate . earnings ( losses ) per common share the following table represents earnings per common share data for the past three years : for additional information on earnings ( losses ) per common share see note 2 of notes to consolidated financial statements . outlooks the hartford provides projections and other forward-looking information in the 201coutlook 201d sections within md&a . the 201coutlook 201d sections contain many forward-looking statements , particularly relating to the company 2019s future financial performance . these forward-looking statements are estimates based on information currently available to the company , are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 and are subject to the precautionary statements set forth in the introduction to md&a above . actual results are likely to differ , and in the past have differed , materially from those forecast by the company , depending on the outcome of various factors , including , but not limited to , those set forth in each 201coutlook 201d section and in item 1a , risk factors . outlook during 2008 , the company has been negatively impacted by conditions in the global financial markets and economic conditions in general . as these conditions persist in 2009 , the company would anticipate that it would continue to be negatively impacted , including the effect of rating downgrades that have occurred and those that could occur in the future . see risk factors in item 1a . retail in the long-term , management continues to believe the market for retirement products will expand as individuals increasingly save and plan for retirement . demographic trends suggest that as the 201cbaby boom 201d generation matures , a significant portion of the united states population will allocate a greater percentage of their disposable incomes to saving for their retirement years due to uncertainty surrounding the social security system and increases in average life expectancy . near-term , the industry and the company are experiencing lower variable annuity sales as a result of recent market turbulence and uncertainty in the u.s . financial system . current market pressures are also increasing the expected claim costs , the cost and volatility of hedging programs , and the level of capital needed to support living benefit guarantees . some companies have already begun to increase the price of their guaranteed living benefits and change the level of guarantees offered . in 2009 , the company intends to adjust pricing levels and take certain actions to reduce the risks in its variable annuity product features in order to address the risks and costs associated with variable annuity benefit features in the current economic environment and explore other risk limiting techniques such as increased hedging or other reinsurance structures . competitor reaction , including the extent of competitor risk limiting strategies , is difficult to predict and may result in a decline in retail 2019s market share . significant declines in equity markets and increased equity market volatility are also likely to continue to impact the cost and effectiveness of our gmwb hedging program . continued equity market volatility could result in material losses in our hedging program . for more information on the gmwb hedging program , see the equity risk management section within capital markets risk management . during periods of volatile equity markets , policyholders may allocate more of their variable account assets to the fixed account options and fixed annuities may see increased deposits . in the fourth quarter of 2008 , the company has seen an increase in fixed .
||2008|2007|2006|
|basic earnings ( losses ) per share|$ -8.99 ( 8.99 )|$ 9.32|$ 8.89|
|diluted earnings ( losses ) per share|$ -8.99 ( 8.99 )|$ 9.24|$ 8.69|
|weighted average common shares outstanding ( basic )|306.7|316.3|308.8|
|weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted )|306.7|319.1|315.9|
weighted average common shares outstanding and dilutive potential common shares ( diluted ) 306.7 319.1 315.9 .
Question: what is the net income reported in 2008 , ( in millions ) ?
Answer:
|
-2757.233
|
what is the net income reported in 2008 , ( in millions ) ?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "-2757.233",
"B": "2757.233",
"C": "-8.99",
"D": "8.99"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "-2757.233",
"B": "2757.233",
"C": "-8.99",
"D": "8.99"
}
|
A
|
finqa244
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties the table below provides a summary of our containerboard mills , the principal products produced and each mill 2019s year-end 2011 annual practical maximum capacity based upon all of our paper machines 2019 production capabilities , as reported to the af&pa : location function capacity ( tons ) counce , tn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kraft linerboard mill 1043000 valdosta , ga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kraft linerboard mill 556000 tomahawk , wi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . semi-chemical medium mill 538000 filer city , mi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . semi-chemical medium mill 438000 .
|location|function kraft linerboard mill kraft linerboard mill semi-chemical medium mill semi-chemical medium mill|capacity ( tons ) 1043000 556000 538000 438000|
|counce tn|valdosta ga|tomahawk wi|
|filer city mi|filer city mi|filer city mi|
|total||2575000|
we currently own our four containerboard mills and 44 of our corrugated manufacturing operations ( 37 corrugated plants and seven sheet plants ) . we also own one warehouse and miscellaneous other property , which includes sales offices and woodlands management offices . these sales offices and woodlands management offices generally have one to four employees and serve as administrative offices . pca leases the space for four corrugated plants , 23 sheet plants , six regional design centers , and numerous other distribution centers , warehouses and facilities . the equipment in these leased facilities is , in virtually all cases , owned by pca , except for forklifts and other rolling stock which are generally leased . we lease the cutting rights to approximately 88000 acres of timberland located near our valdosta mill ( 77000 acres ) and our counce mill ( 11000 acres ) . on average , these cutting rights agreements have terms with approximately 12 years remaining . our corporate headquarters is located in lake forest , illinois . the headquarters facility is leased for the next ten years with provisions for two additional five year lease extensions . item 3 . legal proceedings during september and october 2010 , pca and eight other u.s . and canadian containerboard producers were named as defendants in five purported class action lawsuits filed in the united states district court for the northern district of illinois , alleging violations of the sherman act . the lawsuits have been consolidated in a single complaint under the caption kleen products llc v packaging corp . of america et al . the consolidated complaint alleges that the defendants conspired to limit the supply of containerboard , and that the purpose and effect of the alleged conspiracy was to artificially increase prices of containerboard products during the period from august 2005 to the time of filing of the complaints . the complaint was filed as a purported class action suit on behalf of all purchasers of containerboard products during such period . the complaint seeks treble damages and costs , including attorney 2019s fees . the defendants 2019 motions to dismiss the complaint were denied by the court in april 2011 . pca believes the allegations are without merit and will defend this lawsuit vigorously . however , as the lawsuit is in the early stages of discovery , pca is unable to predict the ultimate outcome or estimate a range of reasonably possible losses . pca is a party to various other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business . these legal actions cover a broad variety of claims spanning our entire business . as of the date of this filing , we believe it is not reasonably possible that the resolution of these legal actions will , individually or in the aggregate , have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows. .
Question: what is the total number of containerboard mills and corrugated manufacturing operations?
Answer:
|
48.0
|
what is the total number of containerboard mills and corrugated manufacturing operations?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "37",
"B": "44",
"C": "48",
"D": "52"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "37",
"B": "44",
"C": "48",
"D": "52"
}
|
C
|
finqa245
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 : market for registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities motorola's common stock is listed on the new york and chicago stock exchanges . the number of stockholders of record of motorola common stock on january 31 , 2007 was 75892 . the remainder of the response to this item incorporates by reference note 16 , ""quarterly and other financial data ( unaudited ) '' of the notes to consolidated financial statements appearing under ""item 8 : financial statements and supplementary data'' . the following table provides information with respect to acquisitions by the company of shares of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 . issuer purchases of equity securities ( d ) maximum number ( c ) total number ( or approximate dollar of shares purchased value ) of shares that ( a ) total number ( b ) average price as part of publicly may yet be purchased of shares paid per announced plans under the plans or period purchased ( 1 ) ( 4 ) share ( 1 ) ( 2 ) or programs ( 3 ) ( 4 ) programs ( 5 ) .
|period|( a ) total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) ( 4 )|( b ) average price paid per share ( 1 ) ( 2 )|( c ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 3 ) ( 4 )|( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 5 )|
|10/1/06 to 10/28/06|5284|$ 25.82|0|$ 4500000000|
|10/29/06 to 11/25/06|15613158|$ 22.39|15613158|$ 4150401669|
|11/26/06 to 12/31/06|16430030|$ 21.29|16425602|$ 3800689819|
|total|32048472|$ 21.83|32038760||
( 1 ) in addition to purchases under the 2006 stock repurchase program ( as defined below ) , included in this column are transactions under the company's equity compensation plans involving the delivery to the company of 8445 shares of motorola common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to company employees and the surrender of 1267 shares of motorola common stock to pay the option exercise price in connection with the exercise of employee stock options . ( 2 ) average price paid per share of stock repurchased under the 2006 stock repurchase program is execution price , excluding commissions paid to brokers . ( 3 ) on may 18 , 2005 , the company announced that its board of directors authorized the company to repurchase up to $ 4 billion of its outstanding shares of common stock over a period of up to 36 months ending in may 2008 , subject to market conditions ( the ""2005 stock repurchase program'' ) . on july 24 , 2006 , the company announced that it entered into an agreement to repurchase approximately $ 1.2 billion of its outstanding shares of common stock . this repurchase , which was accomplished through an accelerated stock buyback ( ""asb'' ) agreement , together with all repurchases made prior to the date thereof , completed the repurchases authorized under the 2005 stock repurchase program . under the asb the company immediately paid $ 1.2 billion and received an initial 37.9 million shares in july followed by an additional 11.3 million shares in august . in october , the company received an additional 1.3 million shares , as the final adjustment under the asb . the total shares repurchased under the asb were 50.5 million . ( 4 ) the 1.3 million shares delivered under the asb that were delivered in october , but paid for in july , have not been reflected in october purchases . ( 5 ) the company also announced on july 24 , 2006 that its board of directors authorized the company to repurchase up to an additional $ 4.5 billion of its outstanding shares of common stock over a period of up to 36 months ending in june 2009 , subject to market conditions ( the ""2006 stock repurchase program'' ) . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 033000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00024|yes|no|02/28/2007 03:55|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: in 2006 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs on or after 11/26/2006
Answer:
|
0.51268
|
in 2006 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs on or after 11/26/2006
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.51268%",
"B": "5.1268%",
"C": "51.268%",
"D": "512.68%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.51268%",
"B": "5.1268%",
"C": "51.268%",
"D": "512.68%"
}
|
A
|
finqa247
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , we realized net losses of $ 1 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 1 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2004 , net of deferred taxes of less than $ 1 million , related to these sales . for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , we realized net gains of $ 26 million on sales of available-for- sale securities . unrealized gains of $ 11 million were included in other comprehensive income at december 31 , 2003 , net of deferred taxes of $ 7 million , related to these sales . note 13 . equity-based compensation the 2006 equity incentive plan was approved by shareholders in april 2006 , and 20000000 shares of common stock were approved for issuance for stock and stock-based awards , including stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock , deferred stock and performance awards . in addition , up to 8000000 shares from our 1997 equity incentive plan , that were available to issue or become available due to cancellations and forfeitures , may be awarded under the 2006 plan . the 1997 plan expired on december 18 , 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , 1305420 shares from the 1997 plan have been added to and may be awarded from the 2006 plan . as of december 31 , 2006 , 106045 awards have been made under the 2006 plan . we have stock options outstanding from previous plans , including the 1997 plan , under which no further grants can be made . the exercise price of non-qualified and incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair value of such shares at the date of grant . stock options and stock appreciation rights issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant . for restricted stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , stock certificates are issued at the time of grant and recipients have dividend and voting rights . in general , these grants vest over three years . for deferred stock awards issued under the 2006 plan and the prior 1997 plan , no stock is issued at the time of grant . generally , these grants vest over two- , three- or four-year periods . performance awards granted under the 2006 equity incentive plan and the prior 1997 plan are earned over a performance period based on achievement of goals , generally over two- to three- year periods . payment for performance awards is made in shares of our common stock or in cash equal to the fair market value of our common stock , based on certain financial ratios after the conclusion of each performance period . we record compensation expense , equal to the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date , on a straight-line basis over the options 2019 vesting period . we use a black-scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the options granted . the weighted-average assumptions used in connection with the option-pricing model were as follows for the years indicated. .
||2006|2005|2004|
|dividend yield|1.41% ( 1.41 % )|1.85% ( 1.85 % )|1.35% ( 1.35 % )|
|expected volatility|26.50|28.70|27.10|
|risk-free interest rate|4.60|4.19|3.02|
|expected option lives ( in years )|7.8|7.8|5.0|
compensation expense related to stock options , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock awards , deferred stock awards and performance awards , which we record as a component of salaries and employee benefits expense in our consolidated statement of income , was $ 208 million , $ 110 million and $ 74 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the related total income tax benefit recorded in our consolidated statement of income was $ 83 million , $ 44 million and $ 30 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . seq 87 copyarea : 38 . x 54 . trimsize : 8.25 x 10.75 typeset state street corporation serverprocess c:\\fc\\delivery_1024177\\2771-1-do_p.pdf chksum : 0 cycle 1merrill corporation 07-2771-1 thu mar 01 17:11:13 2007 ( v 2.247w--stp1pae18 ) .
Question: by what percent did the risk free interest rate increase between 2004 and 2006?
Answer:
|
0.52318
|
by what percent did the risk free interest rate increase between 2004 and 2006?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.52318%",
"B": "0.41%",
"C": "0.57%",
"D": "0.67%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.52318%",
"B": "0.41%",
"C": "0.57%",
"D": "0.67%"
}
|
A
|
finqa249
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following discussion and analysis is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of welltower inc . presented in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles ( 201cu.s . gaap 201d ) for the periods presented and should be read together with the notes thereto contained in this annual report on form 10-k . other important factors are identified in 201citem 1 2014 business 201d and 201citem 1a 2014 risk factors 201d above . executive summary company overview welltower inc . ( nyse:well ) , an s&p 500 company headquartered in toledo , ohio , is driving the transformation of health care infrastructure . the company invests with leading seniors housing operators , post- acute providers and health systems to fund the real estate and infrastructure needed to scale innovative care delivery models and improve people 2019s wellness and overall health care experience . welltowertm , a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) , owns interests in properties concentrated in major , high-growth markets in the united states ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , canada and the united kingdom ( 201cu.k . 201d ) , consisting of seniors housing and post-acute communities and outpatient medical properties . our capital programs , when combined with comprehensive planning , development and property management services , make us a single-source solution for acquiring , planning , developing , managing , repositioning and monetizing real estate assets . the following table summarizes our consolidated portfolio for the year ended december 31 , 2017 ( dollars in thousands ) : type of property noi ( 1 ) percentage of number of properties .
|type of property|noi ( 1 )|percentage of noi|number of properties|
|triple-net|$ 967084|43.3% ( 43.3 % )|573|
|seniors housing operating|880026|39.5% ( 39.5 % )|443|
|outpatient medical|384068|17.2% ( 17.2 % )|270|
|totals|$ 2231178|100.0% ( 100.0 % )|1286|
( 1 ) represents consolidated noi and excludes our share of investments in unconsolidated entities . entities in which we have a joint venture with a minority partner are shown at 100% ( 100 % ) of the joint venture amount . see non-gaap financial measures for additional information and reconciliation . business strategy our primary objectives are to protect stockholder capital and enhance stockholder value . we seek to pay consistent cash dividends to stockholders and create opportunities to increase dividend payments to stockholders as a result of annual increases in net operating income and portfolio growth . to meet these objectives , we invest across the full spectrum of seniors housing and health care real estate and diversify our investment portfolio by property type , relationship and geographic location . substantially all of our revenues are derived from operating lease rentals , resident fees/services , and interest earned on outstanding loans receivable . these items represent our primary sources of liquidity to fund distributions and depend upon the continued ability of our obligors to make contractual rent and interest payments to us and the profitability of our operating properties . to the extent that our obligors/partners experience operating difficulties and become unable to generate sufficient cash to make payments or operating distributions to us , there could be a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations , liquidity and/or financial condition . to mitigate this risk , we monitor our investments through a variety of methods determined by the type of property . our asset management process for seniors housing properties generally includes review of monthly financial statements and other operating data for each property , review of obligor/ partner creditworthiness , property inspections , and review of covenant compliance relating to licensure , real estate taxes , letters of credit and other collateral . our internal property management division manages and monitors the outpatient medical portfolio with a comprehensive process including review of tenant relations .
Question: what was total number of properties subject to triple-net leases and seniors housing operating housing?
Answer:
|
1016.0
|
what was total number of properties subject to triple-net leases and seniors housing operating housing?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "573",
"B": "443",
"C": "270",
"D": "1016"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "573",
"B": "443",
"C": "270",
"D": "1016"
}
|
D
|
finqa250
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2007 net revenue|$ 442.3|
|volume/weather|-4.6 ( 4.6 )|
|reserve equalization|-3.3 ( 3.3 )|
|securitization transition charge|9.1|
|fuel recovery|7.5|
|other|-10.1 ( 10.1 )|
|2008 net revenue|$ 440.9|
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2008 for entergy texas , inc.?
Answer:
|
-1.4
|
what is the net change in net revenue during 2008 for entergy texas , inc.?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "-4.6",
"B": "-3.3",
"C": "9.1",
"D": "-1.4"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "-4.6",
"B": "-3.3",
"C": "9.1",
"D": "-1.4"
}
|
D
|
finqa251
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 10.3 million , 10.2 million and 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , 4.5 million and 5.3 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ( in thousands ) : .
||2016|2015|2014|
|interest net of capitalized interest|$ 252030|$ 222088|$ 197383|
|income taxes net of refunds received|$ -39293 ( 39293 )|$ 41108|$ 342741|
eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 were $ 388 million , $ 416 million and $ 972 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2014 included non-cash additions of $ 5 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .
Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what is variation observed in the number of stocks that were excluded , in millions?
Answer:
|
0.8
|
considering the years 2015-2016 , what is variation observed in the number of stocks that were excluded , in millions?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.7",
"B": "0.8",
"C": "1.0",
"D": "1.1"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.7",
"B": "0.8",
"C": "1.0",
"D": "1.1"
}
|
B
|
finqa253
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the descriptions and fair value methodologies for the u.s . and international pension plan assets are as follows : cash and cash equivalents the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity . equity securities equity securities are valued at the closing market price reported on a u.s . or international exchange where the security is actively traded and are therefore classified as level 1 assets . equity mutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the nav of the fund and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager based on the value of the underlying traded holdings and are classified as level 2 assets . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 assets are carried at the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment values , which includes estimated bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company and discount rates that require inputs with limited observability . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2019 were $ 40.2 . contributions for funded plans resulted primarily from contractual and regulatory requirements . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements . we anticipate contributing $ 30 to $ 40 to the defined benefit pension plans in fiscal year 2020 . these contributions are anticipated to be driven primarily by contractual and regulatory requirements for funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: .
||u.s .|international|
|2020|$ 166.8|$ 47.9|
|2021|160.0|49.1|
|2022|166.0|50.1|
|2023|170.1|54.3|
|2024|174.1|58.0|
|2025-2029|919.9|308.3|
these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. .
Question: considering the international projected benefit payments , what is the average yearly projection of the 2025-2029 period?
Answer:
|
61.66
|
considering the international projected benefit payments , what is the average yearly projection of the 2025-2029 period?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "61.66",
"B": "61.88",
"C": "62.10",
"D": "62.32"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "61.66",
"B": "61.88",
"C": "62.10",
"D": "62.32"
}
|
A
|
finqa254
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents in march 2008 , the fasb issued sfas no . 161 , disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities 2014an amendment of fasb statement no . 133 , which requires companies to provide additional disclosures about its objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments , how the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under sfas no . 133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , and related interpretations , and how the derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the company 2019s financial statements . sfas no . 161 also requires companies to disclose information about credit risk-related contingent features in their hedged positions . sfas no . 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after november 15 , 2008 and is required to be adopted by the company beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 . although the company will continue to evaluate the application of sfas no . 161 , management does not currently believe adoption will have a material impact on the company 2019s financial condition or operating results . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the three fiscal years ended september 27 , 2008 ( in millions ) : as of september 27 , 2008 , the company had $ 24.5 billion in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments , an increase of $ 9.1 billion from september 29 , 2007 . the principal components of this net increase were cash generated by operating activities of $ 9.6 billion , proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock plans of $ 483 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $ 757 million . these increases were partially offset by payments for acquisitions of property , plant , and equipment of $ 1.1 billion , payments made in connection with business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 220 million and payments for acquisitions of intangible assets of $ 108 million . the company 2019s cash generated by operating activities significantly exceeded its net income due primarily to the large increase in deferred revenue , net of deferred costs , associated with subscription accounting for iphone . the company 2019s short-term investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly rated securities with a minimum rating of single-a . as of september 27 , 2008 and september 29 , 2007 , $ 11.3 billion and $ 6.5 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , and short- term investments were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company had $ 117 million in net unrealized losses on its investment portfolio , primarily related to investments with stated maturities ranging from one to five years , as of september 27 , 2008 , and net unrealized losses of approximately $ 11 million on its investment portfolio , primarily related to investments with stated maturities from one to five years , as of september 29 , 2007 . the company has the intent and ability to hold such investments for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the principal amounts invested . accordingly , none of these declines in fair value were recognized in the company 2019s statement of operations . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital expenditures , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . capital assets the company 2019s cash payments for capital asset purchases were $ 1.1 billion during 2008 , consisting of $ 389 million for retail store facilities and $ 702 million for real estate acquisitions and corporate infrastructure including information systems enhancements . the company anticipates utilizing approximately $ 1.5 billion for capital asset purchases during 2009 , including approximately $ 400 million for retail facilities and approximately $ 1.1 billion for corporate facilities and infrastructure. .
||2008|2007|2006|
|cash cash equivalents and short-term investments|$ 24490|$ 15386|$ 10110|
|accounts receivable net|$ 2422|$ 1637|$ 1252|
|inventory|$ 509|$ 346|$ 270|
|working capital|$ 20598|$ 12676|$ 8066|
|annual operating cash flow|$ 9596|$ 5470|$ 2220|
.
Question: what was the increase in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments from 2007 to 2008 in millions?
Answer:
|
9104.0
|
what was the increase in cash , cash equivalents , and short-term investments from 2007 to 2008 in millions?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "9104.0",
"B": "910.4",
"C": "91.04",
"D": "9.104"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "9104.0",
"B": "910.4",
"C": "91.04",
"D": "9.104"
}
|
A
|
finqa255
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: key operating and financial activities significant operating and financial activities during 2012 include : 2022 net proved reserve additions for the e&p and osm segments combined of 389 mmboe , for a 226 percent reserve replacement 2022 increased proved liquid hydrocarbon and synthetic crude oil reserves by 316 mmbbls , for a reserve replacement of 268 percent for these commodities 2022 recorded more than 95 percent average operational availability for operated e&p assets 2022 increased e&p net sales volumes , excluding libya , by 8 percent 2022 eagle ford shale average net sales volumes of 65 mboed for december 2012 , a fourfold increase over december 2011 2022 bakken shale average net sales volumes of 29 mboed , a 71 percent increase over last year 2022 resumed sales from libya and reached pre-conflict production levels 2022 international liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes , for which average realizations have exceeded wti , were 62 percent of net e&p liquid hydrocarbon sales 2022 closed $ 1 billion of acquisitions in the core of the eagle ford shale 2022 assumed operatorship of the vilje field located offshore norway 2022 signed agreements for new exploration positions in e.g. , gabon , kenya and ethiopia 2022 issued $ 1 billion of 3-year senior notes at 0.9 percent interest and $ 1 billion of 10-year senior notes at 2.8 percent interest some significant 2013 activities through february 22 , 2013 include : 2022 closed sale of our alaska assets in january 2013 2022 closed sale of our interest in the neptune gas plant in february 2013 consolidated results of operations : 2012 compared to 2011 consolidated income before income taxes was 38 percent higher in 2012 than consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes were in 2011 , largely due to higher liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes in our e&p segment , partially offset by lower earnings from our osm and ig segments . the 7 percent decrease in income from continuing operations included lower earnings in the u.k . and e.g. , partially offset by higher earnings in libya . also , in 2011 we were not in an excess foreign tax credit position for the entire year as we were in 2012 . the effective income tax rate for continuing operations was 74 percent in 2012 compared to 61 percent in 2011 . revenues are summarized in the following table: .
|( in millions )|2012|2011|
|e&p|$ 14084|$ 13029|
|osm|1552|1588|
|ig|2014|93|
|segment revenues|15636|14710|
|elimination of intersegment revenues|2014|-47 ( 47 )|
|unrealized gain on crude oil derivative instruments|52|2014|
|total revenues|$ 15688|$ 14663|
e&p segment revenues increased $ 1055 million from 2011 to 2012 , primarily due to higher average liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes . e&p segment revenues included a net realized gain on crude oil derivative instruments of $ 15 million in 2012 while the impact of derivatives was not significant in 2011 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 16 to the consolidated financial statement for more information about our crude oil derivative instruments . included in our e&p segment are supply optimization activities which include the purchase of commodities from third parties for resale . see the cost of revenues discussion as revenues from supply optimization approximate the related costs . supply optimization serves to aggregate volumes in order to satisfy transportation commitments and to achieve flexibility within product .
Question: what percentage of total revenues consited of e&p production in 2012?
Answer:
|
0.89776
|
what percentage of total revenues consited of e&p production in 2012?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "8.9776%",
"B": "89.776%",
"C": "0.89776%",
"D": "0.089776%"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "8.9776%",
"B": "89.776%",
"C": "0.89776%",
"D": "0.089776%"
}
|
C
|
finqa256
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: administrative fees , which increased $ 5.8 million to $ 353.9 million , are generally offset by related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors . our largest expense , compensation and related costs , increased $ 18.4 million or 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) from 2007 . this increase includes $ 37.2 million in salaries resulting from an 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) increase in our average staff count and an increase of our associates 2019 base salaries at the beginning of the year . at december 31 , 2008 , we employed 5385 associates , up 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) from the end of 2007 , primarily to add capabilities and support increased volume-related activities and other growth over the past few years . over the course of 2008 , we slowed the growth of our associate base from earlier plans and the prior year . we also reduced our annual bonuses $ 27.6 million versus the 2007 year in response to unfavorable financial market conditions that negatively impacted our operating results . the balance of the increase is attributable to higher employee benefits and employment-related expenses , including an increase of $ 5.7 million in stock-based compensation . after higher spending during the first quarter of 2008 versus 2007 , investor sentiment in the uncertain and volatile market environment caused us to reduce advertising and promotion spending , which for the year was down $ 3.8 million from 2007 . occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense increased $ 18 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) compared to 2007 . we expanded and renovated our facilities in 2008 to accommodate the growth in our associates to meet business demands . other operating expenses were up $ 3.3 million from 2007 . we increased our spending $ 9.8 million , primarily for professional fees and information and other third-party services . reductions in travel and charitable contributions partially offset these increases . our non-operating investment activity resulted in a net loss of $ 52.3 million in 2008 as compared to a net gain of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . this change of $ 132.7 million is primarily attributable to losses recognized in 2008 on our investments in sponsored mutual funds , which resulted from declines in financial market values during the year. .
||2007|2008|change|
|capital gain distributions received|$ 22.1|$ 5.6|$ -16.5 ( 16.5 )|
|other than temporary impairments recognized|-.3 ( .3 )|-91.3 ( 91.3 )|-91.0 ( 91.0 )|
|net gains ( losses ) realized onfund dispositions|5.5|-4.5 ( 4.5 )|-10.0 ( 10.0 )|
|net gain ( loss ) recognized on fund holdings|$ 27.3|$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )|$ -117.5 ( 117.5 )|
we recognized other than temporary impairments of our investments in sponsored mutual funds because of declines in fair value below cost for an extended period . the significant declines in fair value below cost that occurred in 2008 were generally attributable to adverse market conditions . in addition , income from money market and bond fund holdings was $ 19.3 million lower than in 2007 due to the significantly lower interest rate environment of 2008 . lower interest rates also led to substantial capital appreciation on our $ 40 million holding of u.s . treasury notes that we sold in december 2008 at a $ 2.6 million gain . the 2008 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) , up from 37.7% ( 37.7 % ) in 2007 , primarily to reflect changes in state income tax rates and regulations and certain adjustments made prospectively based on our annual income tax return filings for 2007 . c a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y . during 2009 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.5 billion to $ 2.9 billion . we repurchased nearly 2.3 million common shares for $ 67 million in 2009 . tangible book value is $ 2.2 billion at december 31 , 2009 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total $ 1.4 billion . given the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity . on january 20 , 2010 , we purchased a 26% ( 26 % ) equity interest in uti asset management company and an affiliate for $ 142.4 million . we funded the acquisition from our cash holdings . in addition to the pending uti acquisition , we had outstanding commitments to fund other investments totaling $ 35.4 million at december 31 , 2009 . we presently anticipate funding 2010 property and equipment expenditures of about $ 150 million from our cash balances and operating cash inflows . 22 t . rowe price group annual report 2009 .
Question: what was the change in capital gain distributions received between 2007 and 2008 as a percent of the capital gain distributions received in 2007?
Answer:
|
-0.74661
|
what was the change in capital gain distributions received between 2007 and 2008 as a percent of the capital gain distributions received in 2007?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "-0.74661",
"B": "0.74661",
"C": "-0.165",
"D": "0.165"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "-0.74661",
"B": "0.74661",
"C": "-0.165",
"D": "0.165"
}
|
A
|
finqa257
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: depreciation and amortization included in operating segment profit for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2008|2007|2006|
|americas|$ 78.5|$ 66.9|$ 56.7|
|europe|57.0|60.7|46.5|
|asia pacific|25.6|22.7|18.7|
|global operations and corporate functions|114.0|79.7|75.5|
|total|$ 275.1|$ 230.0|$ 197.4|
15 . leases future minimum rental commitments under non- cancelable operating leases in effect as of december 31 , 2008 were $ 38.2 million for 2009 , $ 30.1 million for 2010 , $ 20.9 million for 2011 , $ 15.9 million for 2012 , $ 14.3 million for 2013 and $ 29.9 million thereafter . total rent expense for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 aggregated $ 41.4 million , $ 37.1 million and $ 31.1 million , respectively . 16 . commitments and contingencies intellectual property and product liability-related litigation in july 2008 , we temporarily suspended marketing and distribution of the durom bb acetabular component ( durom cup ) in the u.s . to allow us to update product labeling to provide more detailed surgical technique instructions to surgeons and implement a surgical training program in the u.s . following our announcement , product liability lawsuits and other claims have been asserted against us , some of which we have settled . there are a number of claims still pending and we expect additional claims will be submitted . we recorded a provision of $ 47.5 million in the third quarter of 2008 , representing management 2019s estimate of these durom cup-related claims . we increased that provision by $ 21.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 . the provision is limited to revisions within two years of an original surgery that occurred prior to july 2008 . these parameters are consistent with our data which indicates that cup loosenings associated with surgical technique are most likely to occur within that time period . any claims received outside of these defined parameters will be managed in the normal course and reflected in our standard product liability accruals . on february 15 , 2005 , howmedica osteonics corp . filed an action against us and an unrelated party in the united states district court for the district of new jersey alleging infringement of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; 6664308 ; and 6818020 . on june 13 , 2007 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment on the invalidity of the asserted claims of u.s . patent nos . 6174934 ; 6372814 ; and 6664308 by ruling that all of the asserted claims are invalid for indefiniteness . on august 19 , 2008 , the court granted our motion for summary judgment of non- infringement of certain claims of u.s . patent no . 6818020 , reducing the number of claims at issue in the suit to five . we continue to believe that our defenses against infringement of the remaining claims are valid and meritorious , and we intend to defend this lawsuit vigorously . in addition to certain claims related to the durom cup discussed above , we are also subject to product liability and other claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business , for which we maintain insurance , subject to self- insured retention limits . we establish accruals for product liability and other claims in conjunction with outside counsel based on current information and historical settlement information for open claims , related fees and claims incurred but not reported . while it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these cases , it is the opinion of management that , upon ultimate resolution , liabilities from these cases in excess of those recorded , if any , will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . government investigations in march 2005 , the u.s . department of justice through the u.s . attorney 2019s office in newark , new jersey commenced an investigation of us and four other orthopaedic companies pertaining to consulting contracts , professional service agreements and other agreements by which remuneration is provided to orthopaedic surgeons . on september 27 , 2007 , we reached a settlement with the government to resolve all claims related to this investigation . as part of the settlement , we entered into a settlement agreement with the u.s . through the u.s . department of justice and the office of inspector general of the department of health and human services ( the 201coig-hhs 201d ) . in addition , we entered into a deferred prosecution agreement ( the 201cdpa 201d ) with the u.s . attorney 2019s office for the district of new jersey ( the 201cu.s . attorney 201d ) and a corporate integrity agreement ( the 201ccia 201d ) with the oig- hhs . we did not admit any wrongdoing , plead guilty to any criminal charges or pay any criminal fines as part of the settlement . we settled all civil and administrative claims related to the federal investigation by making a settlement payment to the u.s . government of $ 169.5 million . under the terms of the dpa , the u.s . attorney filed a criminal complaint in the u.s . district court for the district of new jersey charging us with conspiracy to commit violations of the anti-kickback statute ( 42 u.s.c . a7 1320a-7b ) during the years 2002 through 2006 . the court deferred prosecution of the criminal complaint during the 18-month term of the dpa . the u.s . attorney will seek dismissal of the criminal complaint after the 18-month period if we comply with the provisions of the dpa . the dpa provides for oversight by a federally-appointed monitor . under the cia , which has a term of five years , we agreed , among other provisions , to continue the operation of our enhanced corporate compliance program , designed to promote compliance with federal healthcare program z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 060000000 ***%%pcmsg|60 |00012|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: in 2008 , america's total depreciation & amortization is what percent of europe and asia combined?
Answer:
|
82.6
|
in 2008 , america's total depreciation & amortization is what percent of europe and asia combined?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "62.1%",
"B": "73.4%",
"C": "82.6%",
"D": "91.9%"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "62.1%",
"B": "73.4%",
"C": "82.6%",
"D": "91.9%"
}
|
C
|
finqa258
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: morgan stanley consolidated statements of changes in total equity 2014 ( continued ) ( dollars in millions ) preferred common paid-in capital retained earnings employee accumulated comprehensive income ( loss ) common held in treasury at cost common issued to employee redeemable controlling interests equity balance at december 31 , 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1508 $ 20 $ 22836 $ 40341 $ 3166 $ ( 157 ) $ ( 2499 ) $ ( 3166 ) $ 8029 $ 70078 net income applicable to morgan stanley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 2014 68 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 68 net income applicable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 524 524 .
||preferred stock|common stock|paid-in capital|retained earnings|employee stock trust|accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss )|common stock held in treasury at cost|common stock issued to employee trust|non- redeemable non- controlling interests|total equity|
|balance at december 31 2011|$ 1508|$ 20|$ 22836|$ 40341|$ 3166|$ -157 ( 157 )|$ -2499 ( 2499 )|$ -3166 ( 3166 )|$ 8029|$ 70078|
|net income applicable to morgan stanley|2014|2014|2014|68|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|68|
|net income applicable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|524|524|
|dividends|2014|2014|2014|-497 ( 497 )|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|-497 ( 497 )|
|shares issued under employee plans and related tax effects|2014|2014|662|2014|-234 ( 234 )|2014|485|234|2014|1147|
|repurchases of common stock|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|-227 ( 227 )|2014|2014|-227 ( 227 )|
|net change in cash flow hedges|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|6|2014|2014|2014|6|
|pension postretirement and other related adjustments|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|-265 ( 265 )|2014|2014|5|-260 ( 260 )|
|foreign currency translation adjustments|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|-128 ( 128 )|2014|2014|-125 ( 125 )|-253 ( 253 )|
|change in net unrealized gains on securities available for sale|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|28|2014|2014|2014|28|
|purchase of additional stake in the wealth management joint venture|2014|2014|-107 ( 107 )|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|-1718 ( 1718 )|-1825 ( 1825 )|
|reclassification to redeemable noncontrolling interests|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|-4288 ( 4288 )|-4288 ( 4288 )|
|other net increases|2014|2014|35|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|892|927|
|balance at december 31 2012|$ 1508|$ 20|$ 23426|$ 39912|$ 2932|$ -516 ( 516 )|$ -2241 ( 2241 )|$ -2932 ( 2932 )|$ 3319|$ 65428|
balance at december 31 , 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1508 $ 20 $ 23426 $ 39912 $ 2932 $ ( 516 ) $ ( 2241 ) $ ( 2932 ) $ 3319 $ 65428 see notes to consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was total cash retuned to shareholders in 2012?
Answer:
|
724.0
|
what was total cash retuned to shareholders in 2012?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "497",
"B": "227",
"C": "724",
"D": "260"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "497",
"B": "227",
"C": "724",
"D": "260"
}
|
C
|
finqa259
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2013 in july 2013 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a $ 1.5 billion share repurchase program to be in effect through july 2014 . as of september 30 , 2013 , the program had remaining authorized funds of $ 251 million . all share repurchase programs authorized prior to july 2013 have been completed . in october 2013 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a new $ 5.0 billion share repurchase program . under the terms of the retrospective responsibility plan , when the company makes a deposit into the litigation escrow account , the shares of class b common stock are subject to dilution through an adjustment to the conversion rate of the shares of class b common stock to shares of class a common stock . these deposits have the same economic effect on earnings per share as repurchasing the company 2019s class a common stock , because they reduce the class b conversion rate and consequently the as-converted class a common stock share count . the following table presents as-converted class b common stock after deposits into the litigation escrow account in fiscal 2012 . there were no deposits into the litigation escrow account in fiscal 2013. .
|( in millions except per share and conversion rate data )|fiscal 2012 july 2012|fiscal 2012 december 2011|
|deposits under the retrospective responsibility plan|$ 150|$ 1565|
|effective price per share ( 1 )|$ 125.50|$ 101.75|
|reduction in equivalent number of shares of class a common stock|1|15|
|conversion rate of class b common stock to class a common stock after deposits|0.4206|0.4254|
|as-converted class b common stock after deposits|103|104|
( 1 ) effective price per share calculated using the volume-weighted average price of the company 2019s class a common stock over a pricing period in accordance with the company 2019s current certificate of incorporation . class b common stock . the class b common stock is not convertible or transferable until the date on which all of the covered litigation has been finally resolved . this transfer restriction is subject to limited exceptions , including transfers to other holders of class b common stock . after termination of the restrictions , the class b common stock will be convertible into class a common stock if transferred to a person that was not a visa member ( as defined in the current certificate of incorporation ) or similar person or an affiliate of a visa member or similar person . upon such transfer , each share of class b common stock will automatically convert into a number of shares of class a common stock based upon the applicable conversion rate in effect at the time of such transfer . adjustment of the conversion rate occurs upon : ( i ) the completion of any follow-on offering of class a common stock completed to increase the size of the litigation escrow account ( or any cash deposit by the company in lieu thereof ) resulting in a further corresponding decrease in the conversion rate ; or ( ii ) the final resolution of the covered litigation and the release of funds remaining on deposit in the litigation escrow account to the company resulting in a corresponding increase in the conversion rate. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the effective price per share from december 2011 to july 2012?
Answer:
|
0.23342
|
what is the percentage change in the effective price per share from december 2011 to july 2012?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.23342%",
"B": "23.342%",
"C": "2.3342%",
"D": "233.42%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.23342%",
"B": "23.342%",
"C": "2.3342%",
"D": "233.42%"
}
|
A
|
finqa260
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . .
|floating rate due december 15 2015|$ 500|
|floating rate due december 15 2016|350|
|1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 )|650|
|2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018|750|
|discount and issuance costs|-2 ( 2 )|
|net proceeds|$ 2248|
( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .
Question: what percentage of the net proceeds came from the floating rates due in 2015 and 2016?
Answer:
|
37.81139
|
what percentage of the net proceeds came from the floating rates due in 2015 and 2016?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "25%",
"B": "37.81139%",
"C": "50%",
"D": "62.18861%"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "25%",
"B": "37.81139%",
"C": "50%",
"D": "62.18861%"
}
|
B
|
finqa261
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .
|date|citi|s&p 500|s&p financials|
|31-dec-2010|100.00|100.00|100.00|
|30-dec-2011|55.67|102.11|82.94|
|31-dec-2012|83.81|118.45|106.84|
|31-dec-2013|110.49|156.82|144.90|
|31-dec-2014|114.83|178.28|166.93|
|31-dec-2015|110.14|180.75|164.39|
.
Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return of citi common stock compared to the s&p financials for the five years ended 31-dec-2015?
Answer:
|
-0.5425
|
what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return of citi common stock compared to the s&p financials for the five years ended 31-dec-2015?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.5425",
"B": "-0.5425",
"C": "0.542",
"D": "-0.542"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.5425",
"B": "-0.5425",
"C": "0.542",
"D": "-0.542"
}
|
B
|
finqa262
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .
|as of december 31,|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates|
|2013|$ -26.9 ( 26.9 )|$ 27.9|
|2012|-27.5 ( 27.5 )|28.4|
we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we had $ 1642.1 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2013 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2013 were the australian dollar , brazilian real , euro , japanese yen and the south african rand . based on 2013 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2013 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: assuming that all the balance of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities is invested to generate the given interest income , what would be the average return of these investments in 2013?
Answer:
|
0.01504
|
assuming that all the balance of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities is invested to generate the given interest income , what would be the average return of these investments in 2013?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.01504",
"B": "0.0247",
"C": "0.0295",
"D": "0.0164"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.01504",
"B": "0.0247",
"C": "0.0295",
"D": "0.0164"
}
|
A
|
finqa263
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: results of operations and the estimated fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition . pro forma results of operations for the business combinations completed during fiscal 2016 have not been presented because the effects of these acquisitions , individually and in the aggregate , would not have been material to cadence 2019s financial results . the fair values of acquired intangible assets and assumed liabilities were determined using significant inputs that are not observable in the market . for an additional description of these fair value calculations , see note 16 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements . a trust for the benefit of the children of lip-bu tan , cadence 2019s president , chief executive officer , or ceo , and director , owned less than 2% ( 2 % ) of rocketick technologies ltd. , one of the acquired companies , and mr . tan and his wife serve as co-trustees of the trust and disclaim pecuniary and economic interest in the trust . the board of directors of cadence reviewed the transaction and concluded that it was in the best interests of cadence to proceed with the transaction . mr . tan recused himself from the board of directors 2019 discussion of the valuation of rocketick technologies ltd . and on whether to proceed with the transaction . a financial advisor provided a fairness opinion to cadence in connection with the transaction . 2014 acquisitions during fiscal 2014 , cadence acquired jasper design automation , inc. , or jasper , a privately held provider of formal analysis solutions based in mountain view , california . the acquired technology complements cadence 2019s existing system design and verification platforms . total cash consideration for jasper , after taking into account adjustments for certain costs , and cash held by jasper at closing of $ 28.7 million , was $ 139.4 million . cadence will also make payments to certain employees through the third quarter of fiscal 2017 subject to continued employment and other conditions . cadence also completed two other business combinations during fiscal 2014 for total cash consideration of $ 27.5 million , after taking into account cash acquired of $ 2.1 million . acquisition-related transaction costs transaction costs associated with acquisitions were $ 1.1 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 3.7 million during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . these costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in cadence 2019s consolidated income statements . note 8 . goodwill and acquired intangibles goodwill the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2016 and 2015 were as follows : gross carrying amount ( in thousands ) .
||gross carryingamount ( in thousands )|
|balance as of january 3 2015|$ 553767|
|effect of foreign currency translation|-1995 ( 1995 )|
|balance as of january 2 2016|551772|
|goodwill resulting from acquisitions|23579|
|effect of foreign currency translation|-2587 ( 2587 )|
|balance as of december 31 2016|$ 572764|
cadence completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 and determined that the fair value of cadence 2019s single reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount of its net assets and that no impairment existed. .
Question: what is the percentage increase in gross carrying amount from the beginning of 2015 to the end of 2016?
Answer:
|
0.03431
|
what is the percentage increase in gross carrying amount from the beginning of 2015 to the end of 2016?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.03431",
"B": "0.03432",
"C": "0.03433",
"D": "0.03434"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.03431",
"B": "0.03432",
"C": "0.03433",
"D": "0.03434"
}
|
A
|
finqa264
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: affiliated company . the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc . the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company . during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india . cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment . in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million . tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen . the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million . with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 . approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no . 142 and ceased amortization of goodwill . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million . the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 . songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas . the sale is expected to close in early 2003 . see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction . the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. .
|as of and for the years ended december 31,|2002|2001|2000|
|revenues|$ 2832|$ 6147|$ 6241|
|operating income|695|1717|1989|
|net income|229|650|859|
|current assets|1097|3700|2423|
|noncurrent assets|6751|14942|13080|
|current liabilities|1418|3510|3370|
|noncurrent liabilities|3349|8297|5927|
|stockholder's equity|3081|6835|6206|
in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 . the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively . the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .
Question: what was the percentage change in revenues for investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 2001 and 2002?
Answer:
|
-0.53929
|
what was the percentage change in revenues for investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method between 2001 and 2002?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "-0.53929",
"B": "0.53929",
"C": "-0.32000",
"D": "0.32000"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "-0.53929",
"B": "0.53929",
"C": "-0.32000",
"D": "0.32000"
}
|
A
|
finqa265
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries 6 . goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill the changes in goodwill by reportable segment are as follows : ( in millions ) corporate business ( 2 ) public other ( 4 ) consolidated balance at december 31 , 2014 ( 1 ) $ 1045.9 $ 185.9 $ 911.3 $ 74.5 $ 2217.6 .
|( in millions )|corporate|small business ( 2 )|public|other ( 4 )|consolidated|
|balance at december 31 2014 ( 1 )|$ 1045.9|$ 185.9|$ 911.3|$ 74.5|$ 2217.6|
|foreign currency translation|2014|2014|2014|-22.4 ( 22.4 )|-22.4 ( 22.4 )|
|acquisition|2014|2014|2014|305.2|305.2|
|balance at december 31 2015 ( 1 )|1045.9|185.9|911.3|357.3|2500.4|
|foreign currency translation|2014|2014|2014|-45.4 ( 45.4 )|-45.4 ( 45.4 )|
|cdw advanced services allocation ( 3 )|28.2|2014|18.3|-46.5 ( 46.5 )|2014|
|balance at december 31 2016 ( 1 )|1074.1|185.9|929.6|265.4|2455.0|
|foreign currency translation|2014|2014|2014|24.6|24.6|
|balances as of december 31 2017 ( 1 )|$ 1074.1|$ 185.9|$ 929.6|$ 290.0|$ 2479.6|
balances as of december 31 , 2017 ( 1 ) $ 1074.1 $ 185.9 $ 929.6 $ 290.0 $ 2479.6 ( 1 ) goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 1571 million , $ 354 million and $ 28 million related to the corporate , public and other segments , respectively . ( 2 ) amounts have been recast to present small business as its own operating and reportable segment . ( 3 ) effective january 1 , 2016 , the cdw advanced services business is included in the company's corporate and public segments . ( 4 ) other is comprised of canada and cdw uk operating segments . with the establishment of small business as its own reporting unit , the company performed a quantitative analysis in order to allocate goodwill between corporate and small business . based on the results of the quantitative analysis performed as of january 1 , 2017 , the company determined that the fair values of corporate and small business reporting units exceeded their carrying values by 227% ( 227 % ) and 308% ( 308 % ) , respectively , and no impairment existed . december 1 , 2017 impairment analysis the company completed its annual impairment analysis as of december 1 , 2017 . for the corporate , small business and uk reporting units , the company performed a qualitative analysis . the company determined that it was more-likely- than-not that the individual fair values of the corporate , small business and uk reporting units exceeded the respective carrying values and therefore a quantitative impairment analysis was deemed unnecessary . although uncertainty regarding the impact of the referendum on the uk 2019s membership of the european union ( 201ceu 201d ) , advising for the exit of the uk from the eu ( referred to as 201cbrexit 201d ) still exists in the current year , the company does not believe there to be any additional risk that would indicate the quantitative analysis performed in the prior year would have a different result . therefore , a qualitative analysis was deemed appropriate for the uk reporting unit . the company performed a quantitative analysis of the public and canada reporting units . based on the results of the quantitative analysis , the company determined that the fair value of the public and canada reporting units exceeded their carrying values by 179% ( 179 % ) and 153% ( 153 % ) , respectively , and no impairment existed . december 1 , 2016 impairment analysis the company completed its annual impairment analysis as of december 1 , 2016 . for the corporate ( which , as of december 1 , 2016 , included small business ) , public and canada reporting units , the company performed a qualitative analysis . the company determined that it was more-likely-than-not that the individual fair values of the corporate , public and canada reporting units exceeded the respective carrying values . as a result of this determination , the quantitative impairment analysis was deemed unnecessary . due to the substantial uncertainty regarding the impact of brexit , the company performed a quantitative analysis of the cdw uk reporting unit . based on the results of the quantitative analysis , the company determined that the fair value of the cdw uk reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and no impairment existed. .
Question: public is what percent of the total goodwill balance at december 31 2014?
Answer:
|
0.41094
|
public is what percent of the total goodwill balance at december 31 2014?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.0336",
"B": "0.0834",
"C": "0.41094",
"D": "0.1667"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "0.0336",
"B": "0.0834",
"C": "0.41094",
"D": "0.1667"
}
|
C
|
finqa266
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents respect to the mainline american and the mainline us airways dispatchers , flight simulator engineers and flight crew training instructors , all of whom are now represented by the twu , a rival organization , the national association of airline professionals ( naap ) , filed single carrier applications seeking to represent those employees . the nmb will have to determine that a single transportation system exists and will certify a post-merger representative of the combined employee groups before the process for negotiating new jcbas can begin . the merger had no impact on the cbas that cover the employees of our wholly-owned subsidiary airlines which are not being merged ( envoy , piedmont and psa ) . for those employees , the rla provides that cbas do not expire , but instead become amendable as of a stated date . in 2014 , envoy pilots ratified a new 10 year collective bargaining agreement , piedmont pilots ratified a new 10 year collective bargaining agreement and piedmont flight attendants ratified a new five-year collective bargaining agreement . with the exception of the passenger service employees who are now engaged in traditional rla negotiations that are expected to result in a jcba and the us airways flight simulator engineers and flight crew training instructors , other union-represented american mainline employees are covered by agreements that are not currently amendable . until those agreements become amendable , negotiations for jcbas will be conducted outside the traditional rla bargaining process described above , and , in the meantime , no self-help will be permissible . the piedmont mechanics and stock clerks and the psa and piedmont dispatchers also have agreements that are now amendable and are engaged in traditional rla negotiations . none of the unions representing our employees presently may lawfully engage in concerted refusals to work , such as strikes , slow-downs , sick-outs or other similar activity , against us . nonetheless , there is a risk that disgruntled employees , either with or without union involvement , could engage in one or more concerted refusals to work that could individually or collectively harm the operation of our airline and impair our financial performance . for more discussion , see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cunion disputes , employee strikes and other labor-related disruptions may adversely affect our operations . 201d aircraft fuel our operations and financial results are significantly affected by the availability and price of jet fuel . based on our 2015 forecasted mainline and regional fuel consumption , we estimate that , as of december 31 , 2014 , a one cent per gallon increase in aviation fuel price would increase our 2015 annual fuel expense by $ 43 million . the following table shows annual aircraft fuel consumption and costs , including taxes , for our mainline operations for 2012 through 2014 ( gallons and aircraft fuel expense in millions ) . year gallons average price per gallon aircraft fuel expense percent of total mainline operating expenses .
|year|gallons|average price per gallon|aircraft fuel expense|percent of total mainline operating expenses|
|2014|3644|$ 2.91|$ 10592|33.2% ( 33.2 % )|
|2013 ( a )|3608|3.08|11109|35.4|
|2012 ( a )|3512|3.19|11194|35.8|
( a ) represents 201ccombined 201d financial data , which includes the financial results of american and us airways group each on a standalone basis . total combined fuel expenses for our wholly-owned and third-party regional carriers operating under capacity purchase agreements of american and us airways group , each on a standalone basis , were $ 2.0 billion , $ 2.1 billion and $ 2.1 billion for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively. .
Question: what were total mainline operating expenses in 2013?
Answer:
|
313.81356
|
what were total mainline operating expenses in 2013?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "33.2%",
"B": "$ 10592",
"C": "35.4",
"D": "313.81356"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "33.2%",
"B": "$ 10592",
"C": "35.4",
"D": "313.81356"
}
|
D
|
finqa269
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: interest expense .
||2019|2018|
|interest incurred|$ 150.5|$ 150.0|
|less : capitalized interest|13.5|19.5|
|interest expense|$ 137.0|$ 130.5|
interest incurred increased $ .5 as interest expense associated with financing the lu'an joint venture was mostly offset by favorable impacts from currency , a lower average interest rate on the debt portfolio , and a lower average debt balance . capitalized interest decreased 31% ( 31 % ) , or $ 6.0 , due to a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily driven by the lu'an project in asia . other non-operating income ( expense ) , net other non-operating income ( expense ) , net of $ 66.7 increased $ 61.6 , primarily due to lower pension settlement losses , higher non-service pension income , and higher interest income on cash and cash items . the prior year included pension settlement losses of $ 43.7 ( $ 33.2 after-tax , or $ .15 per share ) primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations to an insurer for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans . in fiscal year 2019 , we recognized a pension settlement loss of $ 5.0 ( $ 3.8 after-tax , or $ .02 per share ) associated with the u.s . supplementary pension plan during the second quarter . net income and net income margin net income of $ 1809.4 increased 18% ( 18 % ) , or $ 276.5 , primarily due to impacts from the u.s . tax cuts and jobs act , positive pricing , and favorable volumes . net income margin of 20.3% ( 20.3 % ) increased 310 bp . adjusted ebitda and adjusted ebitda margin adjusted ebitda of $ 3468.0 increased 11% ( 11 % ) , or $ 352.5 , primarily due to positive pricing and higher volumes , partially offset by unfavorable currency . adjusted ebitda margin of 38.9% ( 38.9 % ) increased 400 bp , primarily due to higher volumes , positive pricing , and the india contract modification . the india contract modification contributed 80 bp . effective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes . the effective tax rate was 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) and 26.0% ( 26.0 % ) in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the current year rate was lower primarily due to impacts related to the enactment of the u.s . tax cuts and jobs act ( the 201ctax act" ) in 2018 , which significantly changed existing u.s . tax laws , including a reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) , a deemed repatriation tax on unremitted foreign earnings , as well as other changes . as a result of the tax act , our income tax provision reflects discrete net income tax costs of $ 43.8 and $ 180.6 in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the current year included a cost of $ 56.2 ( $ .26 per share ) for the reversal of a benefit recorded in 2018 related to the u.s . taxation of deemed foreign dividends . we recorded this reversal based on regulations issued in 2019 . the 2019 reversal was partially offset by a favorable adjustment of $ 12.4 ( $ .06 per share ) that was recorded as we completed our estimates of the impacts of the tax act . this adjustment is primarily related to foreign tax items , including the deemed repatriation tax for foreign tax redeterminations . in addition , the current year rate included a net gain on the exchange of two equity affiliates of $ 29.1 , which was not a taxable transaction . the higher 2018 expense resulting from the tax act was partially offset by a $ 35.7 tax benefit from the restructuring of foreign subsidiaries , a $ 9.1 benefit from a foreign audit settlement agreement , and higher excess tax benefits on share-based compensation . the adjusted effective tax rate was 19.4% ( 19.4 % ) and 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the lower prior year rate was primarily due to the $ 9.1 benefit from a foreign audit settlement agreement and higher excess tax benefits on share-based compensation. .
Question: what is the variation of the adjusted effective tax rate considering the years 2018-2019?
Answer:
|
0.008
|
what is the variation of the adjusted effective tax rate considering the years 2018-2019?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.008",
"B": "0.026",
"C": "0.086",
"D": "0.104"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.008",
"B": "0.026",
"C": "0.086",
"D": "0.104"
}
|
A
|
finqa270
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 45 and $ 36 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 was $ 4.1 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.4 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expenses for restricted stock of $ 5.7 million , $ 2.7 million , and $ 1.6 million in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . as of may 31 , 2008 , there was $ 15.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25 thousand or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . for periods prior to october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan was the lower of 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the first day or the last day of the quarterly purchase period . with the quarterly purchase period beginning on october 1 , 2006 , the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period ( the 201cpurchase date 201d ) . at may 31 , 2008 , 0.7 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.7 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 8 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . for the quarterly purchases after october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan is based on the 15% ( 15 % ) discount on the purchase date . for purchases prior to october 1 , 2006 , the fair value of each designated share purchased under the employee stock purchase plan was estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes valuation model using the following weighted average assumptions: .
||2007|2006|
|risk-free interest rates|4.93% ( 4.93 % )|3.72% ( 3.72 % )|
|expected volatility|37.02% ( 37.02 % )|26.06% ( 26.06 % )|
|dividend yields|0.19% ( 0.19 % )|0.34% ( 0.34 % )|
|expected lives|3 months|3 months|
the risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a zero coupon united states treasury security with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option from the date of the grant . our assumption on expected volatility is based on our historical volatility . the dividend yield assumption is calculated using our average stock price over the preceding year and the annualized amount of our current quarterly dividend . since the purchase price for shares under the plan is based on the market value on the first day or last day of the quarterly purchase period , we use an expected life of three months to determine the fair value of each designated share. .
Question: what is the percentage change in the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards from 2006 to 2007?
Answer:
|
0.25
|
what is the percentage change in the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards from 2006 to 2007?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.25%",
"B": "0.27%",
"C": "0.29%",
"D": "0.31%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.25%",
"B": "0.27%",
"C": "0.29%",
"D": "0.31%"
}
|
A
|
finqa271
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part i item 1 entergy corporation , domestic utility companies , and system energy employment litigation ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and system energy ) entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are defendants in numerous lawsuits that have been filed by former employees alleging that they were wrongfully terminated and/or discriminated against on the basis of age , race , sex , and/or other protected characteristics . entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are vigorously defending these suits and deny any liability to the plaintiffs . however , no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these cases , and at this time management cannot estimate the total amount of damages sought . included in the employment litigation are two cases filed in state court in claiborne county , mississippi in december 2002 . the two cases were filed by former employees of entergy operations who were based at grand gulf . entergy operations and entergy employees are named as defendants . the cases make employment-related claims , and seek in total $ 53 million in alleged actual damages and $ 168 million in punitive damages . entergy subsequently removed both proceedings to the federal district in jackson , mississippi . entergy cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this proceeding . research spending entergy is a member of the electric power research institute ( epri ) . epri conducts a broad range of research in major technical fields related to the electric utility industry . entergy participates in various epri projects based on entergy's needs and available resources . the domestic utility companies contributed $ 1.6 million in 2004 , $ 1.5 million in 2003 , and $ 2.1 million in 2002 to epri . the non-utility nuclear business contributed $ 3.2 million in 2004 and $ 3 million in both 2003 and 2002 to epri . employees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers . as of december 31 , 2004 , entergy employed 14425 people . u.s . utility: .
|entergy arkansas|1494|
|entergy gulf states|1641|
|entergy louisiana|943|
|entergy mississippi|793|
|entergy new orleans|403|
|system energy|-|
|entergy operations|2735|
|entergy services|2704|
|entergy nuclear operations|3245|
|other subsidiaries|277|
|total full-time|14235|
|part-time|190|
|total entergy|14425|
approximately 4900 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , and the international brotherhood of teamsters union. .
Question: what percent of total full-time employees are in entergy gulf states ?
Answer:
|
0.11528
|
what percent of total full-time employees are in entergy gulf states ?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.11528%",
"B": "1.1528%",
"C": "11.528%",
"D": "115.28%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.11528%",
"B": "1.1528%",
"C": "11.528%",
"D": "115.28%"
}
|
A
|
finqa272
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: synopsys , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued acquisition of magma design automation , inc . ( magma ) on february 22 , 2012 , the company acquired all outstanding shares of magma , a chip design software provider , at a per-share price of $ 7.35 . additionally , the company assumed unvested restricted stock units ( rsus ) and stock options , collectively called 201cequity awards . 201d the aggregate purchase price was approximately $ 550.2 million . this acquisition enables the company to more rapidly meet the needs of leading-edge semiconductor designers for more sophisticated design tools . as of october 31 , 2012 , the total purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation were as follows: .
||( in thousands )|
|cash paid|$ 543437|
|fair value of assumed equity awards allocated to purchase consideration|6797|
|total purchase consideration|$ 550234|
|goodwill|316263|
|identifiable intangibles assets acquired|184300|
|cash and other assets acquired|116265|
|debt and liabilities assumed|-66594 ( 66594 )|
|total purchase allocation|$ 550234|
goodwill of $ 316.3 million , which is not deductible for tax purposes , primarily resulted from the company 2019s expectation of sales growth and cost synergies from the integration of magma 2019s technology and operations with the company 2019s technology and operations . identifiable intangible assets , consisting primarily of technology , customer relationships , backlog and trademarks , were valued using the income method , and are being amortized over three to ten years . acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination totaling $ 33.5 million for fiscal 2012 were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations and consist primarily of employee separation costs , contract terminations , professional services , and facilities closure costs . fair value of equity awards assumed . the company assumed unvested restricted stock units ( rsus ) and stock options with a fair value of $ 22.2 million . the black-scholes option-pricing model was used to determine the fair value of these stock options , whereas the fair value of the rsus was based on the market price on the grant date of the instruments . the black-scholes option-pricing model incorporates various subjective assumptions including expected volatility , expected term and risk-free interest rates . the expected volatility was estimated by a combination of implied and historical stock price volatility of the options . of the total fair value of the equity awards assumed , $ 6.8 million was allocated to the purchase consideration and $ 15.4 million was allocated to future services to be expensed over their remaining service periods on a straight-line basis . supplemental pro forma information ( unaudited ) . the financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of the company and magma , on a pro forma basis , as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of fiscal 2011. .
Question: what percentage of total purchase allocation was ?
Answer:
|
0.33495
|
what percentage of total purchase allocation was ?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "33.495%",
"B": "33.4955%",
"C": "0.33495%",
"D": "0.334955%"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "33.495%",
"B": "33.4955%",
"C": "0.33495%",
"D": "0.334955%"
}
|
C
|
finqa273
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: apple inc . | 2018 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend-reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 29 , 2018 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 27 , 2013 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on september 27 , 2013 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2018 s&p dow jones indices llc , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .
||september2013|september2014|september2015|september2016|september2017|september2018|
|apple inc .|$ 100|$ 149|$ 173|$ 174|$ 242|$ 359|
|s&p 500 index|$ 100|$ 120|$ 119|$ 137|$ 163|$ 192|
|s&p information technology index|$ 100|$ 129|$ 132|$ 162|$ 209|$ 275|
|dow jones u.s . technology supersector index|$ 100|$ 130|$ 130|$ 159|$ 203|$ 266|
.
Question: did apple outperform ( earn a greater return ) than the s&p information technology index in september 2018?
Answer:
|
yes
|
did apple outperform ( earn a greater return ) than the s&p information technology index in september 2018?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "Yes",
"B": "No",
"C": "Cannot be determined",
"D": "Not enough information"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "Yes",
"B": "No",
"C": "Cannot be determined",
"D": "Not enough information"
}
|
A
|
finqa274
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: hollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued .
||( in thousands )|
|2018|$ 148716|
|2019|132547|
|2020|119639|
|2021|107400|
|2022|102884|
|thereafter|857454|
|total|$ 1468640|
transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. .
Question: what percentage of total costs occurred after 2022?
Answer:
|
0.58384
|
what percentage of total costs occurred after 2022?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.58384%",
"B": "5.8384%",
"C": "58.384%",
"D": "583.84%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.58384%",
"B": "5.8384%",
"C": "58.384%",
"D": "583.84%"
}
|
A
|
finqa276
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table shows annual aircraft fuel consumption and costs , including taxes , for our mainline and regional operations for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( gallons and aircraft fuel expense in millions ) . year gallons average price per gallon aircraft fuel expense percent of total operating expenses .
|year|gallons|average priceper gallon|aircraft fuelexpense|percent of totaloperating expenses|
|2018|4447|$ 2.23|$ 9896|23.6% ( 23.6 % )|
|2017|4352|1.73|7510|19.6% ( 19.6 % )|
|2016|4347|1.42|6180|17.6% ( 17.6 % )|
as of december 31 , 2018 , we did not have any fuel hedging contracts outstanding to hedge our fuel consumption . as such , and assuming we do not enter into any future transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , we will continue to be fully exposed to fluctuations in fuel prices . our current policy is not to enter into transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , although we review that policy from time to time based on market conditions and other factors . fuel prices have fluctuated substantially over the past several years . we cannot predict the future availability , price volatility or cost of aircraft fuel . natural disasters ( including hurricanes or similar events in the u.s . southeast and on the gulf coast where a significant portion of domestic refining capacity is located ) , political disruptions or wars involving oil-producing countries , economic sanctions imposed against oil-producing countries or specific industry participants , changes in fuel-related governmental policy , the strength of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies , changes in the cost to transport or store petroleum products , changes in access to petroleum product pipelines and terminals , speculation in the energy futures markets , changes in aircraft fuel production capacity , environmental concerns and other unpredictable events may result in fuel supply shortages , distribution challenges , additional fuel price volatility and cost increases in the future . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cour business is very dependent on the price and availability of aircraft fuel . continued periods of high volatility in fuel costs , increased fuel prices or significant disruptions in the supply of aircraft fuel could have a significant negative impact on our operating results and liquidity . 201d seasonality and other factors due to the greater demand for air travel during the summer months , revenues in the airline industry in the second and third quarters of the year tend to be greater than revenues in the first and fourth quarters of the year . general economic conditions , fears of terrorism or war , fare initiatives , fluctuations in fuel prices , labor actions , weather , natural disasters , outbreaks of disease and other factors could impact this seasonal pattern . therefore , our quarterly results of operations are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year , and historical operating results in a quarterly or annual period are not necessarily indicative of future operating results . domestic and global regulatory landscape general airlines are subject to extensive domestic and international regulatory requirements . domestically , the dot and the federal aviation administration ( faa ) exercise significant regulatory authority over air carriers . the dot , among other things , oversees domestic and international codeshare agreements , international route authorities , competition and consumer protection matters such as advertising , denied boarding compensation and baggage liability . the antitrust division of the department of justice ( doj ) , along with the dot in certain instances , have jurisdiction over airline antitrust matters. .
Question: what were total operating expenses in 2018?
Answer:
|
41932.20339
|
what were total operating expenses in 2018?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "9896",
"B": "7510",
"C": "6180",
"D": "41932.20339"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "9896",
"B": "7510",
"C": "6180",
"D": "41932.20339"
}
|
D
|
finqa277
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we participate in a medicare health support pilot program through green ribbon health , or grh , a joint- venture company with pfizer health solutions inc . grh is designed to support medicare beneficiaries living with diabetes and/or congestive heart failure in central florida . grh uses disease management initiatives including evidence-based clinical guidelines , personal self-directed change strategies , and personal nurses to help participants navigate the health system . revenues under the contract with cms , which expires october 31 , 2008 unless terminated earlier , are subject to refund unless a savings target is met . to date , all revenues have been deferred until reliable estimates are determinable . our products marketed to commercial segment employers and members smart plans and other consumer products over the last several years , we have developed and offered various commercial products designed to provide options and choices to employers that are annually facing substantial premium increases driven by double-digit medical cost inflation . these smart plans , discussed more fully below , and other consumer offerings , which can be offered on either a fully-insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 564700 members at december 31 , 2007 , representing approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . smart plans and other consumer membership other commercial membership commercial medical membership .
||smart plans and other consumer membership|other commercial membership|commercial medical membership|
|fully-insured|327900|1480700|1808600|
|aso|236800|1406200|1643000|
|total commercial medical|564700|2886900|3451600|
these products are often offered to employer groups as 201cbundles 201d , where the subscribers are offered various hmo and ppo options , with various employer contribution strategies as determined by the employer . paramount to our product strategy , we have developed a group of innovative consumer products , styled as 201csmart 201d products , that we believe will be a long-term solution for employers . we believe this new generation of products provides more ( 1 ) choices for the individual consumer , ( 2 ) transparency of provider costs , and ( 3 ) benefit designs that engage consumers in the costs and effectiveness of health care choices . innovative tools and technology are available to assist consumers with these decisions , including the trade-offs between higher premiums and point-of-service costs at the time consumers choose their plans , and to suggest ways in which the consumers can maximize their individual benefits at the point they use their plans . we believe that when consumers can make informed choices about the cost and effectiveness of their health care , a sustainable long term solution for employers can be realized . smart products , which accounted for approximately 55% ( 55 % ) of enrollment in all of our consumer-choice plans as of december 31 , 2007 , are only sold to employers who use humana as their sole health insurance carrier . some employers have selected other types of consumer-choice products , such as , ( 1 ) a product with a high deductible , ( 2 ) a catastrophic coverage plan , or ( 3 ) ones that offer a spending account option in conjunction with more traditional medical coverage or as a stand alone plan . unlike our smart products , these products , while valuable in helping employers deal with near-term cost increases by shifting costs to employees , are not considered by us to be long-term comprehensive solutions to the employers 2019 cost dilemma , although we view them as an important interim step . our commercial hmo products provide prepaid health insurance coverage to our members through a network of independent primary care physicians , specialty physicians , and other health care providers who .
Question: considering the smart plans and other consumer membership , what is the percentage of the fully insured among the total commercial medical plans?
Answer:
|
0.58066
|
considering the smart plans and other consumer membership , what is the percentage of the fully insured among the total commercial medical plans?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.164",
"B": "0.416",
"C": "0.58066",
"D": "0.835"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "0.164",
"B": "0.416",
"C": "0.58066",
"D": "0.835"
}
|
C
|
finqa280
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2010 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .
|balance december 31 2007|$ 756703|
|additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense|101321|
|deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property|-11766 ( 11766 )|
|balance december 31 2008|846258|
|additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense|103698|
|deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property|-11869 ( 11869 )|
|balance december 31 2009|938087|
|additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense|108261|
|deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property|-11144 ( 11144 )|
|balance december 31 2010|$ 1035204|
.
Question: how bigger are the additions in comparison with the deductions during 2009?
Answer:
|
773.68776
|
how bigger are the additions in comparison with the deductions during 2009?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "773.68776",
"B": "773.68777",
"C": "773.68778",
"D": "773.68779"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "773.68776",
"B": "773.68777",
"C": "773.68778",
"D": "773.68779"
}
|
A
|
finqa282
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 3.6 million , $ 2.0 million and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the operating lease obligations included above do not include any contingent rent . sponsorships and other marketing commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) .
|2012|$ 52855|
|2013|46910|
|2014|42514|
|2015|22689|
|2016|3580|
|2017 and thereafter|966|
|total future minimum sponsorship and other marketing payments|$ 169514|
the amounts listed above are the minimum obligations required to be paid under the company 2019s sponsorship and other marketing agreements . the amounts listed above do not include additional performance incentives and product supply obligations provided under certain agreements . it is not possible to determine how much the company will spend on product supply obligations on an annual basis as contracts generally do not stipulate specific cash amounts to be spent on products . the amount of product provided to the sponsorships depends on many factors including general playing conditions , the number of sporting events in which they participate and the company 2019s decisions regarding product and marketing initiatives . in addition , the costs to design , develop , source and purchase the products furnished to the endorsers are incurred over a period of time and are not necessarily tracked separately from similar costs incurred for products sold to customers . the company is , from time to time , involved in routine legal matters incidental to its business . the company believes that the ultimate resolution of any such current proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . in connection with various contracts and agreements , the company has agreed to indemnify counterparties against certain third party claims relating to the infringement of intellectual property rights and other items . generally , such indemnification obligations do not apply in situations in which the counterparties are grossly negligent , engage in willful misconduct , or act in bad faith . based on the company 2019s historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , the company has determined that the fair value of such indemnifications is not material to its consolidated financial position or results of operations . 9 . stockholders 2019 equity the company 2019s class a common stock and class b convertible common stock have an authorized number of shares of 100.0 million shares and 11.3 million shares , respectively , and each have a par value of $ 0.0003 1/3 per share . holders of class a common stock and class b convertible common stock have identical rights , including liquidation preferences , except that the holders of class a common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of class b convertible common stock are entitled to 10 votes per share on all matters submitted to a stockholder vote . class b convertible common stock may only be held by kevin plank .
Question: what was the percentage increase the contingent rent expense from 2010 to 2011
Answer:
|
0.8
|
what was the percentage increase the contingent rent expense from 2010 to 2011
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.2",
"B": "0.4",
"C": "0.6",
"D": "0.8"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "0.2",
"B": "0.4",
"C": "0.6",
"D": "0.8"
}
|
D
|
finqa283
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) fiscal 2007 acquisition : acquisition of biolucent , inc . on september 18 , 2007 the company completed the acquisition of biolucent , inc . ( 201cbiolucent 201d ) pursuant to a definitive agreement dated june 20 , 2007 . the results of operations for biolucent have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment . the company has concluded that the acquisition of biolucent does not represent a material business combination and therefore no pro forma financial information has been provided herein . biolucent , previously located in aliso viejo , california , develops , markets and sells mammopad breast cushions to decrease the discomfort associated with mammography . prior to the acquisition , biolucent 2019s primary research and development efforts were directed at its brachytherapy business which was focused on breast cancer therapy . prior to the acquisition , biolucent spun-off its brachytherapy technology and business to the holders of biolucent 2019s outstanding shares of capital stock . as a result , the company only acquired biolucent 2019s mammopad cushion business and related assets . the company invested $ 1000 directly in the spun-off brachytherapy business in exchange for shares of preferred stock issued by the new business . the aggregate purchase price for biolucent was approximately $ 73200 , consisting of approximately $ 6800 in cash and 2314 shares of hologic common stock valued at approximately $ 63200 , debt assumed and paid off of approximately $ 1600 and approximately $ 1600 for acquisition related fees and expenses . the company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no . 99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination . the acquisition also provides for up to two annual earn-out payments not to exceed $ 15000 in the aggregate based on biolucent 2019s achievement of certain revenue targets . the company has considered the provision of eitf issue no . 95-8 , accounting for contingent consideration paid to the shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase business combination , and concluded that this contingent consideration will represent additional purchase price . as a result , goodwill will be increased by the amount of the additional consideration , if any , when it becomes due and payable . as of september 27 , 2008 , the company has not recorded any amounts for these potential earn-outs . the allocation of the purchase price is based upon estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of september 18 , 2007 . the components and allocation of the purchase price consists of the following approximate amounts: .
|net tangible assets acquired as of september 18 2007|$ 2800|
|developed technology and know how|12300|
|customer relationship|17000|
|trade name|2800|
|deferred income tax liabilities net|-9500 ( 9500 )|
|goodwill|47800|
|final purchase price|$ 73200|
as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued . it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name and developed technology and know-how had separately identifiable values . the fair value of these intangible assets was determined through the application of the income approach . customer relationship represents a large customer base that is expected to purchase the disposable mammopad product on a regular basis . trade name represents the .
Question: what is the estimated price of hologic common stock used in the transaction for biolucent acquisition?
Answer:
|
27.31201
|
what is the estimated price of hologic common stock used in the transaction for biolucent acquisition?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "$6,800",
"B": "$23,114",
"C": "$63,200",
"D": "$27.31201"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "$6,800",
"B": "$23,114",
"C": "$63,200",
"D": "$27.31201"
}
|
D
|
finqa284
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 12 . common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) . under the nonemployee directors program , each nonemployee director may receive annually up to 10000 stock options or 4000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million . additionally , each nonemployee director may elect to receive all or a portion of the annual cash retainer to which the director is otherwise entitled through the issuance of stock options or restricted stock units . each option and restricted stock unit award granted in 2011 or prior generally vests in three equal annual installments . each option and restricted stock unit award granted after 2011 generally vests after one year . upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 10000 shares . these grants vest over three years from the date of grant . under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 1.4 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance . the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) . under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase . under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations . the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states to the extent permitted by local law . the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code . the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 6.6 million shares . the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables . the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s . treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award . expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards 2019 stock . the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 5.1% ( 5.1 % ) . the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .
||2013|2012|2011|
|average risk-free interest rate|0.8% ( 0.8 % )|0.7% ( 0.7 % )|1.7% ( 1.7 % )|
|expected dividend yield|none|none|none|
|expected volatility|31% ( 31 % )|31% ( 31 % )|27% ( 27 % )|
|expected life ( years )|4.6|4.6|4.5|
|fair value per share|$ 19.47|$ 23.93|$ 22.78|
.
Question: what is the percentage change in the fair value per share between 2012 and 2013?
Answer:
|
-0.18638
|
what is the percentage change in the fair value per share between 2012 and 2013?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "-0.18638%",
"B": "0.18638%",
"C": "-18.638%",
"D": "18.638%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "-0.18638%",
"B": "0.18638%",
"C": "-18.638%",
"D": "18.638%"
}
|
A
|
finqa286
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents certain union-represented american mainline employees are covered by agreements that are not currently amendable . until those agreements become amendable , negotiations for jcbas will be conducted outside the traditional rla bargaining process described above , and , in the meantime , no self-help will be permissible . the piedmont mechanics and stock clerks and the psa dispatchers have agreements that are now amendable and are engaged in traditional rla negotiations . none of the unions representing our employees presently may lawfully engage in concerted refusals to work , such as strikes , slow-downs , sick-outs or other similar activity , against us . nonetheless , there is a risk that disgruntled employees , either with or without union involvement , could engage in one or more concerted refusals to work that could individually or collectively harm the operation of our airline and impair our financial performance . for more discussion , see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cunion disputes , employee strikes and other labor-related disruptions may adversely affect our operations . 201d aircraft fuel our operations and financial results are significantly affected by the availability and price of jet fuel . based on our 2016 forecasted mainline and regional fuel consumption , we estimate that , as of december 31 , 2015 , a one cent per gallon increase in aviation fuel price would increase our 2016 annual fuel expense by $ 44 million . the following table shows annual aircraft fuel consumption and costs , including taxes , for our mainline operations for 2015 and 2014 ( gallons and aircraft fuel expense in millions ) . year gallons average price per gallon aircraft fuel expense percent of total mainline operating expenses .
|year|gallons|average price pergallon|aircraft fuel expense|percent of total mainline operating expenses|
|2015|3611|$ 1.72|$ 6226|21.6% ( 21.6 % )|
|2014|3644|2.91|10592|33.2% ( 33.2 % )|
total fuel expenses for our wholly-owned and third-party regional carriers operating under capacity purchase agreements of american were $ 1.2 billion and $ 2.0 billion for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , we did not have any fuel hedging contracts outstanding to hedge our fuel consumption . as such , and assuming we do not enter into any future transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , we will continue to be fully exposed to fluctuations in fuel prices . our current policy is not to enter into transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , although we review that policy from time to time based on market conditions and other factors . fuel prices have fluctuated substantially over the past several years . we cannot predict the future availability , price volatility or cost of aircraft fuel . natural disasters , political disruptions or wars involving oil-producing countries , changes in fuel-related governmental policy , the strength of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies , changes in access to petroleum product pipelines and terminals , speculation in the energy futures markets , changes in aircraft fuel production capacity , environmental concerns and other unpredictable events may result in fuel supply shortages , additional fuel price volatility and cost increases in the future . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cour business is dependent on the price and availability of aircraft fuel . continued periods of high volatility in fuel costs , increased fuel prices and significant disruptions in the supply of aircraft fuel could have a significant negative impact on our operating results and liquidity . 201d insurance we maintain insurance of the types that we believe are customary in the airline industry , including insurance for public liability , passenger liability , property damage , and all-risk coverage for damage to our aircraft . principal coverage includes liability for injury to members of the public , including passengers , damage to .
Question: in 2016 what is the anticipated percentage increase in the aircraft fuel expense
Answer:
|
0.00707
|
in 2016 what is the anticipated percentage increase in the aircraft fuel expense
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.00707%",
"B": "0.707%",
"C": "7.07%",
"D": "70.7%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.00707%",
"B": "0.707%",
"C": "7.07%",
"D": "70.7%"
}
|
A
|
finqa287
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: assets ( including trade receivables ) that are in the scope of the update . asu 2016-13 also made amendments to the current impairment model for held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities and certain guarantees . the guidance will become effective for us on january 1 , 2020 . early adoption is permitted for periods beginning on or after january 1 , 2019 . we are evaluating the effect of asu 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements . note 2 2014 acquisitions the transactions described below were accounted for as business combinations , which requires that we record the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value as of the acquisition date . on october 17 , 2018 , we acquired sicom systems , inc . ( 201csicom 201d ) for total purchase consideration of $ 409.2 million , which we funded with cash on hand and by drawing on our revolving credit facility ( described in 201cnote 8 2014 long-term debt and lines of credit 201d ) . sicom is a provider of end-to-end enterprise , cloud-based software solutions and other technologies to quick service restaurants and food service management companies . sicom 2019s technologies are complementary to our existing xenial solutions , and we believe this acquisition will expand our software-driven payments strategy by enabling us to increase our capabilities and expand on our existing presence in the restaurant vertical market . prior to the acquisition , sicom was indirectly owned by a private equity investment firm where one of our board members is a partner and investor . his direct interest in the transaction was approximately $ 1.1 million , the amount distributed to him based on his investment interest in the fund of the private equity firm that sold sicom to us . based on consideration of all relevant information , the audit committee of our board of directors recommended that the board approve the acquisition of sicom , which it did . the provisional estimated acquisition-date fair values of major classes of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of december 31 , 2018 , including a reconciliation to the total purchase consideration , were as follows ( in thousands ) : .
|cash and cash equivalents|$ 7540|
|property and equipment|5943|
|identified intangible assets|188294|
|other assets|22278|
|deferred income taxes|-48448 ( 48448 )|
|other liabilities|-31250 ( 31250 )|
|total identifiable net assets|144357|
|goodwill|264844|
|total purchase consideration|$ 409201|
as of december 31 , 2018 , we considered these balances to be provisional because we were still in the process of determining the final purchase consideration , which is subject to adjustment pursuant to the purchase agreement , and gathering and reviewing information to support the valuations of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed . goodwill arising from the acquisition of $ 264.8 million , included in the north america segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities , an assembled workforce and potential synergies from combining our existing businesses . we expect that approximately $ 50 million of the goodwill from this acquisition will be deductible for income tax purposes . 74 2013 global payments inc . | 2018 form 10-k annual report .
Question: what is the percent of assets are definitive net assets?
Answer:
|
0.2416
|
what is the percent of assets are definitive net assets?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.2416%",
"B": "2.416%",
"C": "24.16%",
"D": "241.6%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.2416%",
"B": "2.416%",
"C": "24.16%",
"D": "241.6%"
}
|
A
|
finqa288
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) purchase consideration total purchase consideration of approximately $ 17.3 billion was exchanged in october 2007 for the acquired interests . the consideration was comprised of the following: .
||in millions|
|visa inc . common stock|$ 16785|
|visa europe put option|346|
|liability under framework agreement|132|
|total purchase consideration issued at reorganization date|17263|
|visa inc . shares issued as additional purchase consideration at the time of the true-up ( 1 )|1150|
|total purchase consideration|$ 18413|
( 1 ) see description of the true-up of purchase consideration below . see note 4 2014visa europe for more information related to the visa europe put option and the liability under framework agreement . visa inc . common stock issued in exchange for the acquired regions the value of the purchase consideration conveyed to each of the member groups of the acquired regions was determined by valuing the underlying businesses contributed by each , after giving effect to negotiated adjustments . the value of the purchase consideration , consisting of all outstanding shares of class canada , class ap , class lac and class cemea common stock , was measured at june 15 , 2007 ( the 201cmeasurement date 201d ) , the date on which all parties entered into the global restructuring agreement , and was determined to have a fair value of approximately $ 12.6 billion . the company primarily relied upon the analysis of comparable companies with similar industry , business model and financial profiles . this analysis considered a range of metrics including the forward multiples of revenue ; earnings before interest , depreciation and amortization ; and net income of comparable companies . ultimately , the company determined that the forward net income multiple was the most appropriate measure to value the acquired regions and reflect anticipated changes in the company 2019s financial profile prospectively . this multiple was applied to the corresponding forward net income of the acquired regions to calculate their value . the most comparable company identified was mastercard inc . therefore , the most significant input into this analysis was mastercard 2019s forward net income multiple of 27 times net income at the measurement date . the company additionally performed discounted cash flow analyses for each region . these analyses considered the company 2019s forecast by region and incorporated market participant assumptions for growth and profitability . the cash flows were discounted using rates ranging from 12-16% ( 12-16 % ) , reflecting returns for investments times earnings before interest , tax , depreciation and amortization ( 201cebitda 201d ) to ascribe value to periods beyond the company 2019s forecast , consistent with recent payment processing , financial exchange and credit card precedent transactions. .
Question: what portion of the total purchase consideration was issued at the time of the true-up?
Answer:
|
0.06246
|
what portion of the total purchase consideration was issued at the time of the true-up?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "Approximately $1.15 billion",
"B": "Approximately $17.3 billion",
"C": "Approximately $18.413 billion",
"D": "Approximately $0.06246 billion"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "Approximately $1.15 billion",
"B": "Approximately $17.3 billion",
"C": "Approximately $18.413 billion",
"D": "Approximately $0.06246 billion"
}
|
D
|
finqa289
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table 20 : pro forma transitional basel iii tier 1 common capital ratio dollars in millions december 31 .
|dollars in millions|december 31 2013|
|basel i tier 1 common capital|$ 28484|
|less phased-in regulatory capital adjustments:||
|basel iii quantitative limits|-228 ( 228 )|
|accumulated other comprehensive income ( a )|39|
|other intangibles|381|
|all other adjustments|210|
|estimated basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital ( with 2014 phase-ins )|$ 28886|
|basel i risk-weighted assets calculated as applicable for 2014|272321|
|pro forma basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital ratio ( with 2014phase-ins )|10.6% ( 10.6 % )|
estimated basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital ( with 2014 phase-ins ) $ 28886 basel i risk-weighted assets calculated as applicable for 2014 272321 pro forma basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital ratio ( with 2014 phase-ins ) 10.6% ( 10.6 % ) ( a ) represents net adjustments related to accumulated other comprehensive income for available for sale securities and pension and other postretirement benefit plans . pnc utilizes these fully implemented and transitional basel iii capital ratios to assess its capital position , including comparison to similar estimates made by other financial institutions . these basel iii capital estimates are likely to be impacted by any additional regulatory guidance , continued analysis by pnc as to the application of the rules to pnc , and in the case of ratios calculated using the advanced approaches , the ongoing evolution , validation and regulatory approval of pnc 2019s models integral to the calculation of advanced approaches risk-weighted assets . the access to and cost of funding for new business initiatives , the ability to undertake new business initiatives including acquisitions , the ability to engage in expanded business activities , the ability to pay dividends or repurchase shares or other capital instruments , the level of deposit insurance costs , and the level and nature of regulatory oversight depend , in large part , on a financial institution 2019s capital strength . we provide additional information regarding enhanced capital requirements and some of their potential impacts on pnc in item 1 business 2013 supervision and regulation , item 1a risk factors and note 22 regulatory matters in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . off-balance sheet arrangements and variable interest entities we engage in a variety of activities that involve unconsolidated entities or that are otherwise not reflected in our consolidated balance sheet that are generally referred to as 201coff-balance sheet arrangements . 201d additional information on these types of activities is included in the following sections of this report : 2022 commitments , including contractual obligations and other commitments , included within the risk management section of this item 7 , 2022 note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report , 2022 note 14 capital securities of subsidiary trusts and perpetual trust securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report , and 2022 note 24 commitments and guarantees in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . pnc consolidates variable interest entities ( vies ) when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary . the primary beneficiary of a vie is determined to be the party that meets both of the following criteria : ( i ) has the power to make decisions that most significantly affect the economic performance of the vie ; and ( ii ) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that in either case could potentially be significant to the vie . a summary of vies , including those that we have consolidated and those in which we hold variable interests but have not consolidated into our financial statements , as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 is included in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . trust preferred securities and reit preferred securities we are subject to certain restrictions , including restrictions on dividend payments , in connection with $ 206 million in principal amount of an outstanding junior subordinated debenture associated with $ 200 million of trust preferred securities ( both amounts as of december 31 , 2013 ) that were issued by pnc capital trust c , a subsidiary statutory trust . generally , if there is ( i ) an event of default under the debenture , ( ii ) pnc elects to defer interest on the debenture , ( iii ) pnc exercises its right to defer payments on the related trust preferred security issued by the statutory trust , or ( iv ) there is a default under pnc 2019s guarantee of such payment obligations , as specified in the applicable governing documents , then pnc would be subject during the period of such default or deferral to restrictions on dividends and other provisions protecting the status of the debenture holders similar to or in some ways more restrictive than those potentially imposed under the exchange agreement with pnc preferred funding trust ii . see note 14 capital securities of subsidiary trusts and perpetual trust securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information on contractual limitations on dividend payments resulting from securities issued by pnc preferred funding trust i and pnc preferred funding trust ii . see the liquidity risk management portion of the risk management section of this item 7 for additional information regarding our first quarter 2013 redemption of the reit preferred securities issued by pnc preferred funding trust iii and additional discussion of redemptions of trust preferred securities . 48 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: for 2013 , was the basel i tier 1 common capital $ 28484 without phased-in regulatory capital adjustments greater than estimated basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital with 2014 phase-ins?
Answer:
|
no
|
for 2013 , was the basel i tier 1 common capital $ 28484 without phased-in regulatory capital adjustments greater than estimated basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital with 2014 phase-ins?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "Yes",
"B": "No",
"C": "Cannot be determined",
"D": "Not mentioned in the context"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "Yes",
"B": "No",
"C": "Cannot be determined",
"D": "Not mentioned in the context"
}
|
B
|
finqa290
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: corporate income taxes other than withholding taxes on certain investment income and premium excise taxes . if group or its bermuda subsidiaries were to become subject to u.s . income tax , there could be a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flows . united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax , there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . ireland . holdings ireland and ireland re conduct business in ireland and are subject to taxation in ireland . available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .
|calendar year:|pre-tax catastrophe losses|
|( dollars in millions )||
|2013|$ 195.0|
|2012|410.0|
|2011|1300.4|
|2010|571.1|
|2009|67.4|
.
Question: what was the amount of change in pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2010 to 2011 in millions
Answer:
|
729.3
|
what was the amount of change in pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2010 to 2011 in millions
|
{
"options": {
"A": "729.3",
"B": "571.1",
"C": "1300.4",
"D": "67.4"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "729.3",
"B": "571.1",
"C": "1300.4",
"D": "67.4"
}
|
A
|
finqa291
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in 2008 , asp was flat compared to 2007 . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 9% ( 9 % ) in 2007 and decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 . the segment has several large customers located throughout the world . in 2008 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 41% ( 41 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sells products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which accounted for approximately 24% ( 24 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales in 2008 . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s 2008 net sales , were outside the u.s . in 2008 , the largest of these international markets were brazil , china and mexico . as the segment 2019s revenue transactions are largely denominated in local currencies , we are impacted by the weakening in the value of these local currencies against the u.s . dollar . a number of our more significant international markets , particularly in latin america , were impacted by this trend in late 2008 . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol video and broadcast network interactive set-tops , end-to-end video distribution systems , broadband access infrastructure platforms , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 2018 2018home business 2019 2019 ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 2018 2018network business 2019 2019 ) . in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 36% ( 36 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 33% ( 33 % ) in 2008 and 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 . years ended december 31 percent change ( dollars in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 2009 20142008 2008 20142007 .
|( dollars in millions )|years ended december 31 2009|years ended december 31 2008|years ended december 31 2007|years ended december 31 2009 20142008|2008 20142007|
|segment net sales|$ 7963|$ 10086|$ 10014|( 21 ) % ( % )|1% ( 1 % )|
|operating earnings|558|918|709|( 39 ) % ( % )|29% ( 29 % )|
segment results 20142009 compared to 2008 in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales were $ 8.0 billion , a decrease of 21% ( 21 % ) compared to net sales of $ 10.1 billion in 2008 . the 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales reflects a 22% ( 22 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business and a 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales in the home business . the 22% ( 22 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business was primarily driven by lower net sales of gsm , cdma , umts and iden infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products . the 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales in the home business was primarily driven by a 24% ( 24 % ) decrease in net sales of digital entertainment devices , reflecting : ( i ) an 18% ( 18 % ) decrease in shipments of digital entertainment devices , primarily due to lower shipments to large cable and telecommunications operators in north america as a result of macroeconomic conditions , and ( ii ) a lower asp due to an unfavorable shift in product mix . the segment shipped 14.7 million digital entertainment devices in 2009 , compared to 18.0 million shipped in 2008 . on a geographic basis , the 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales was driven by lower net sales in all regions . the decrease in net sales in north america was primarily due to : ( i ) lower net sales in the home business , and ( ii ) lower net sales of cdma and iden infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products . the decrease in net sales in emea was primarily due to lower net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products and higher net sales in the home business . the decrease in net sales in asia was primarily driven by lower net sales of gsm , umts and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales in the home business . the decrease in net sales in latin america was primarily due to : ( i ) lower net sales in the home business , and ( ii ) lower net sales of iden infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products . net sales in north america accounted for approximately 51% ( 51 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2009 , compared to approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2008. .
Question: what was the aggerate net sales in 2008?
Answer:
|
4135.26
|
what was the aggerate net sales in 2008?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "4135.26",
"B": "7963",
"C": "10086",
"D": "10014"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "4135.26",
"B": "7963",
"C": "10086",
"D": "10014"
}
|
A
|
finqa292
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: interest expense related to capital lease obligations was $ 1.6 million during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.6 million during both the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . purchase commitments in the table below , we set forth our enforceable and legally binding purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2015 . some of the amounts are based on management 2019s estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties , and other factors . because these estimates and assumptions are necessarily subjective , our actual payments may vary from those reflected in the table . purchase orders made in the ordinary course of business are excluded below . any amounts for which we are liable under purchase orders are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities . these obligations relate to various purchase agreements for items such as minimum amounts of fiber and energy purchases over periods ranging from one year to 20 years . total purchase commitments were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : .
|2016|$ 95.3|
|2017|60.3|
|2018|28.0|
|2019|28.0|
|2020|23.4|
|thereafter|77.0|
|total|$ 312.0|
the company purchased a total of $ 299.6 million , $ 265.9 million , and $ 61.7 million during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , under these purchase agreements . the increase in purchases the increase in purchases under these agreements in 2014 , compared with 2013 , relates to the acquisition of boise in fourth quarter 2013 . environmental liabilities the potential costs for various environmental matters are uncertain due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible cleanup costs , the complexity and evolving nature of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations , and the timing , varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies . from 2006 through 2015 , there were no significant environmental remediation costs at pca 2019s mills and corrugated plants . at december 31 , 2015 , the company had $ 24.3 million of environmental-related reserves recorded on its consolidated balance sheet . of the $ 24.3 million , approximately $ 15.8 million related to environmental-related asset retirement obligations discussed in note 12 , asset retirement obligations , and $ 8.5 million related to our estimate of other environmental contingencies . the company recorded $ 7.9 million in 201caccrued liabilities 201d and $ 16.4 million in 201cother long-term liabilities 201d on the consolidated balance sheet . liabilities recorded for environmental contingencies are estimates of the probable costs based upon available information and assumptions . because of these uncertainties , pca 2019s estimates may change . the company believes that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures for remediation costs and asset retirement obligations above the $ 24.3 million accrued as of december 31 , 2015 , will have a material impact on its financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows . guarantees and indemnifications we provide guarantees , indemnifications , and other assurances to third parties in the normal course of our business . these include tort indemnifications , environmental assurances , and representations and warranties in commercial agreements . at december 31 , 2015 , we are not aware of any material liabilities arising from any guarantee , indemnification , or financial assurance we have provided . if we determined such a liability was probable and subject to reasonable determination , we would accrue for it at that time. .
Question: what percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2016?
Answer:
|
0.30545
|
what percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2016?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "30.545%",
"B": "3.0545%",
"C": "0.30545%",
"D": "0.030545%"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "30.545%",
"B": "3.0545%",
"C": "0.30545%",
"D": "0.030545%"
}
|
C
|
finqa293
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portu- guese and latin american markets and although pullmantur has diversified its passenger sourcing over the past few years , spain still represents pullmantur 2019s largest market . as previously disclosed , during 2012 european economies continued to demonstrate insta- bility in light of heightened concerns over sovereign debt issues as well as the impact of proposed auster- ity measures on certain markets . the spanish econ- omy was more severely impacted than many other economies and there is significant uncertainty as to when it will recover . in addition , the impact of the costa concordia incident has had a more lingering effect than expected and the impact in future years is uncertain . these factors were identified in the past as significant risks which could lead to the impairment of pullmantur 2019s goodwill . more recently , the spanish economy has progressively worsened and forecasts suggest the challenging operating environment will continue for an extended period of time . the unemployment rate in spain reached 26% ( 26 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is expected to rise further in 2013 . the international monetary fund , which had projected gdp growth of 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) a year ago , revised its 2013 gdp projections downward for spain to a contraction of 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and further reduced it to a contraction of 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) in january of 2013 . during the latter half of 2012 new austerity measures , such as increases to the value added tax , cuts to benefits , the phasing out of exemptions and the suspension of government bonuses , were implemented by the spanish government . we believe these austerity measures are having a larger impact on consumer confidence and discretionary spending than previously anticipated . as a result , there has been a significant deterioration in bookings from guests sourced from spain during the 2013 wave season . the combination of all of these factors has caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the expectations regarding future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined the implied fair value of goodwill for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 million and rec- ognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . there have been no goodwill impairment charges related to the pullmantur reporting unit in prior periods . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) perform worse than contemplated in our discounted cash flow model , or if there are material changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impair- ment analyses , especially in net yields , an additional impairment charge of the pullmantur reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : .
||2012|2011|
|indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names|$ 218883|$ 225679|
|impairment charge|-17356 ( 17356 )|2014|
|foreign currency translation adjustment|3339|-6796 ( 6796 )|
|total|$ 204866|$ 218883|
during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of our trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . these trademarks and trade names relate to pullmantur and we have used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . as described in note 3 . goodwill , the continued deterioration of the spanish economy caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the pullmantur reporting unit , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the timing of future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined that the fair value of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value . accordingly , we recog- nized an impairment charge of approximately $ 17.4 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value of $ 204.9 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) 0494.indd 76 3/27/13 12:53 pm .
Question: what is the average of intangible assets from 2011-2012 , in thousands?
Answer:
|
211874.5
|
what is the average of intangible assets from 2011-2012 , in thousands?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "218883",
"B": "225679",
"C": "204866",
"D": "211874.5"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "218883",
"B": "225679",
"C": "204866",
"D": "211874.5"
}
|
D
|
finqa296
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: "distribution date" ) . until the distribution date ( or earlier redemption or expiration of the rights ) , the rights will be traded with , and only with , the common stock . until a right is exercised , the right will not entitle the holder thereof to any rights as a stockholder . if any person or group becomes an acquiring person , each holder of a right , other than rights beneficially owned by the acquiring person , will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise and payment of the purchase price that number of shares of common stock having a market value of two times the purchase price and , if the company is acquired in a business combination transaction or 50% ( 50 % ) or more of its assets are sold , each holder of a right will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise and payment of the purchase price that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company which at the time of the transaction will have a market value of two times the purchase price . at any time after any person becomes an acquiring person and prior to the acquisition by such person or group of 50% ( 50 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock , the board of directors of the company may cause the rights ( other than rights owned by such person or group ) to be exchanged , in whole or in part , for common stock or junior preferred shares , at an exchange rate of one share of common stock per right or one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share per right . at any time prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock , the board of directors of the company may redeem the rights at a price of $ 0.01 per right . the rights have certain anti-takeover effects , in that they will cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire a significant interest in vertex on terms not approved by the board of directors . common stock reserved for future issuance at december 31 , 2005 , the company has reserved shares of common stock for future issuance under all equity compensation plans as follows ( shares in thousands ) : o . significant revenue arrangements the company has formed strategic collaborations with pharmaceutical companies and other organizations in the areas of drug discovery , development , and commercialization . research , development and commercialization agreements provide the company with financial support and other valuable resources for its research programs and for the development of clinical drug candidates , and the marketing and sales of products . collaborative research , development and commercialization agreements in the company's collaborative research , development and commercialization programs the company seeks to discover , develop and commercialize pharmaceutical products in conjunction with and supported by the company's collaborators . collaborative research and development arrangements may provide research funding over an initial contract period with renewal and termination options that .
|common stock under stock and option plans|17739|
|common stock under the vertex purchase plan|842|
|common stock under the vertex 401 ( k ) plan|270|
|total|18851|
.
Question: what percent of the total common stock is under the vertex 401 ( k ) plan?
Answer:
|
0.01432
|
what percent of the total common stock is under the vertex 401 ( k ) plan?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.01432%",
"B": "0.1432%",
"C": "1.432%",
"D": "14.32%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.01432%",
"B": "0.1432%",
"C": "1.432%",
"D": "14.32%"
}
|
A
|
finqa297
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds . ( b ) the bonds are secured by a series of collateral first mortgage bonds . ( c ) in december 2005 , entergy corporation sold 10 million equity units with a stated amount of $ 50 each . an equity unit consisted of ( 1 ) a note , initially due february 2011 and initially bearing interest at an annual rate of 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) , and ( 2 ) a purchase contract that obligated the holder of the equity unit to purchase for $ 50 between 0.5705 and 0.7074 shares of entergy corporation common stock on or before february 17 , 2009 . entergy paid the holders quarterly contract adjustment payments of 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) per year on the stated amount of $ 50 per equity unit . under the terms of the purchase contracts , entergy attempted to remarket the notes in february 2009 but was unsuccessful , the note holders put the notes to entergy , entergy retired the notes , and entergy issued 6598000 shares of common stock in the settlement of the purchase contracts . ( d ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and the note payable to nypa , and includes debt due within one year . it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms . ( f ) entergy gulf states louisiana remains primarily liable for all of the long-term debt issued by entergy gulf states , inc . that was outstanding on december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . under a debt assumption agreement with entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy texas assumed approximately 46% ( 46 % ) of this long-term debt . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|2009|$ 516019|
|2010|$ 763036|
|2011|$ 897367|
|2012|$ 3625459|
|2013|$ 579461|
in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above . in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the utility operating companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur . entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have received ferc long-term financing orders authorizing long-term securities issuances . entergy arkansas has .
Question: 2012 debt maturities is what percent higher than the next highest year ( 2011 ) ?
Answer:
|
3.04011
|
2012 debt maturities is what percent higher than the next highest year ( 2011 ) ?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "2.04011%",
"B": "3.04011%",
"C": "4.04011%",
"D": "5.04011%"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "2.04011%",
"B": "3.04011%",
"C": "4.04011%",
"D": "5.04011%"
}
|
B
|
finqa298
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 9 : stock based compensation the company has granted stock option and restricted stock unit ( 201crsus 201d ) awards to non-employee directors , officers and other key employees of the company pursuant to the terms of its 2007 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2007 plan 201d ) . the total aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2007 plan is 15.5 . as of december 31 , 2015 , 8.4 shares were available for grant under the 2007 plan . shares issued under the 2007 plan may be authorized-but-unissued shares of company stock or reacquired shares of company stock , including shares purchased by the company on the open market . the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award . the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: .
||2015|2014|2013|
|stock options|$ 2|$ 2|$ 3|
|rsus|8|10|9|
|espp|1|1|1|
|stock-based compensation|11|13|13|
|income tax benefit|-4 ( 4 )|-5 ( 5 )|-5 ( 5 )|
|stock-based compensation expense net of tax|$ 7|$ 8|$ 8|
there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued . the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period . all awards granted in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 are classified as equity . the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus . for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs . the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to common stockholders 2019 equity or the statement of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows . the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures . the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary . stock options in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant . these awards have no performance vesting conditions and the grant date fair value is amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and is included in operations and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. .
Question: what was the rate of the income tax benefit based on the stock compensation
Answer:
|
0.36364
|
what was the rate of the income tax benefit based on the stock compensation
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.27273",
"B": "0.36364",
"C": "0.45455",
"D": "0.54545"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.27273",
"B": "0.36364",
"C": "0.45455",
"D": "0.54545"
}
|
B
|
finqa299
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) applicable indenture . the issuers may also redeem the 2015 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , on or after june 1 , 2010 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . in addition , at any time prior to june 1 , 2008 , the issuers may redeem up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of either or both of the 2010 senior notes and 2015 senior notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 106.750% ( 106.750 % ) and 107.125% ( 107.125 % ) , respectively , of the principal amount thereof , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2014 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , ( i ) prior to october 15 , 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture and ( ii ) on or after october 15 , 2009 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2009 senior notes and the 2012 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date and a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture . if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2007 , we had outstanding 121 mortgage loans totaling $ 1.57 billion that are collateralized by the underlying assets of the properties . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 59.4 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the loans generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except for 15 loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 32.0 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates ranging from 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) to 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) per annum as of december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , the weighted average annual rate on fixed rate debt was 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and the weighted average annual rate on the variable rate debt was 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) . the loans had a weighted average maturity of 7.0 years as of december 31 , 2007 . sunrise 2019s portion of total debt was $ 157.1 million as of december 31 , scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2007 , our indebtedness had the following maturities ( in thousands ) : .
|2008|$ 193101|
|2009|605762|
|2010|282138|
|2011|303191|
|2012|527221|
|thereafter|1436263|
|total maturities|3347676|
|unamortized fair value adjustment|19669|
|unamortized commission fees and discounts|-6846 ( 6846 )|
|senior notes payable and other debt|$ 3360499|
.
Question: what percentage of total maturities makes up senior notes payable and other debt?
Answer:
|
0.99618
|
what percentage of total maturities makes up senior notes payable and other debt?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.99618%",
"B": "0.99618",
"C": "99.618%",
"D": "99.618"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.99618%",
"B": "0.99618",
"C": "99.618%",
"D": "99.618"
}
|
A
|
finqa300
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had $ 295.4 million and $ 295.0 million net , respectively ( $ 300.0 million aggregate principal amount ) outstanding under the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the carrying value includes a discount of $ 4.6 million and $ 5.0 million , respectively . 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes 2014the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes due 2010 ( 201c5.0% ( 201c5.0 % ) notes 201d ) matured on february 15 , 2010 , and interest was payable semiannually on february 15 and august 15 of each year . the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes were convertible at any time into shares of the company 2019s class a common stock ( 201ccommon stock 201d ) at a conversion price of $ 51.50 per share , subject to adjustment in certain cases . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had none and $ 59.7 million outstanding , respectively , under the 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes . ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes 2014the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were issued with a maturity of december 1 , 2011 and interest was payable semi-annually in arrears on june 1 and december 1 of each year . the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by the company and substantially all of the wholly owned domestic restricted subsidiaries of ati and the company , other than spectrasite and its subsidiaries . the notes ranked junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of ati , the sister guarantors ( as defined in the indenture relating to the notes ) and their domestic restricted subsidiaries . the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes were structurally senior in right of payment to all other existing and future indebtedness of the company , including the company 2019s senior notes , convertible notes and the revolving credit facility and term loan . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , ati issued a notice for the redemption of the principal amount of its outstanding ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . in accordance with the redemption provisions and the indenture for the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes , the notes were redeemed at a price equal to 100.00% ( 100.00 % ) of the principal amount , plus accrued and unpaid interest up to , but excluding , september 23 , 2010 , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 0.3 million . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company had none and $ 0.3 million , respectively , outstanding under the ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes . capital lease obligations and notes payable 2014the company 2019s capital lease obligations and notes payable approximated $ 46.3 million and $ 59.0 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . these obligations bear interest at rates ranging from 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) to 9.3% ( 9.3 % ) and mature in periods ranging from less than one year to approximately seventy years . maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , aggregate carrying value of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2011|$ 74896|
|2012|625884|
|2013|618|
|2014|1750479|
|2015|600489|
|thereafter|2541858|
|total cash obligations|5594224|
|unamortized discounts and premiums net|-6836 ( 6836 )|
|balance as of december 31 2010|$ 5587388|
.
Question: what portion of total cash obligations is due within the next 12 months?
Answer:
|
0.01339
|
what portion of total cash obligations is due within the next 12 months?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.01339",
"B": "0.1349",
"C": "0.1339",
"D": "0.01349"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.01339",
"B": "0.1349",
"C": "0.1339",
"D": "0.01349"
}
|
A
|
finqa301
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) .
|december 31 , ( in millions )|december 31 , 2013|december 31 , 2012|2013|2012|
|loans retained|$ 308263|$ 306222|$ 821|$ 1434|
|loans held-for-sale|11290|4406|26|18|
|loans at fair value ( a )|2011|2555|197|265|
|loans 2013 reported|321564|313183|1044|1717|
|derivative receivables|65759|74983|415|239|
|receivables from customers and other ( b )|26744|23648|2014|2014|
|total wholesale credit-related assets|414067|411814|1459|1956|
|lending-related commitments|446232|434814|206|355|
|total wholesale credit exposure|$ 860299|$ 846628|$ 1665|$ 2311|
|credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )|$ -27996 ( 27996 )|$ -27447 ( 27447 )|$ -5 ( 5 )|$ -25 ( 25 )|
|liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives|-14435 ( 14435 )|-15201 ( 15201 )|na|na|
receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what was the percentage change in loans reported from 2012 to 2013?
Answer:
|
0.02676
|
what was the percentage change in loans reported from 2012 to 2013?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.02676%",
"B": "0.2676%",
"C": "2.676%",
"D": "26.76%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.02676%",
"B": "0.2676%",
"C": "2.676%",
"D": "26.76%"
}
|
A
|
finqa302
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: our wholesale segment our wholesale segment sells our products to leading upscale and certain mid-tier department stores , specialty stores , and golf and pro shops , both domestically and internationally . we have continued to focus on elevating our brand by improving in- store product assortment and presentation , as well as full-price sell-throughs to consumers . as of the end of fiscal 2014 , our ralph lauren-branded products were sold through over 11000 doors worldwide and we invested $ 53 million of capital in related shop- within-shops primarily in domestic and international department and specialty stores . our products are also sold through the e- commerce sites of certain of our wholesale customers . the primary product offerings sold through our wholesale channels of distribution include menswear , womenswear , childrenswear , accessories , and home furnishings . our collection brands 2014 ralph lauren women's collection and black label and men's purple label and black label 2014 are distributed worldwide through a limited number of premier fashion retailers . department stores are our major wholesale customers in north america . in latin america , our wholesale products are sold in department stores and specialty stores . in europe , our wholesale sales are a varying mix of sales to both department stores and specialty stores , depending on the country . in japan , our wholesale products are distributed primarily through shop-within-shops at premier and top-tier department stores , and the mix of business is weighted to men's and women's blue label . in the greater china and southeast asia region and australia , our wholesale products are sold mainly at mid and top-tier department stores , and the mix of business is primarily weighted to men's and women's blue label . we also distribute product to certain licensed stores operated by our partners in latin america , europe , and asia . in addition , our club monaco products are distributed through select department stores and specialty stores in europe . we sell the majority of our excess and out-of-season products through secondary distribution channels worldwide , including our retail factory stores . worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 29 , 2014: .
|location|number of doors|
|the americas ( a )|6459|
|europe|4864|
|asia ( b )|130|
|total|11453|
( a ) includes the u.s. , canada , and latin america . ( b ) includes australia , china , japan , the philippines , and thailand . in addition , chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 2800 doors as of march 29 , 2014 . we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume . for fiscal 2014 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of our total wholesale revenues , with macy's , inc . ( "macy's" ) representing approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our total wholesale revenues . our products are sold primarily through our own sales forces . our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city . in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm , and panama . shop-within-shops . as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores , and to differentiate the presentation of our products . as of march 29 , 2014 , we had approximately 22000 shop-within-shops in our primary channels of distribution dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide . the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 100 to 9200 square feet . shop-within-shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases .
Question: what percentage of doors in the wholesale segment as of march 29 , 2014 where in the americas?
Answer:
|
0.56396
|
what percentage of doors in the wholesale segment as of march 29 , 2014 where in the americas?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.56396%",
"B": "5.6396%",
"C": "56.396%",
"D": "563.96%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.56396%",
"B": "5.6396%",
"C": "56.396%",
"D": "563.96%"
}
|
A
|
finqa303
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 10 . commitments and contingencies credit-related commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments , which are off-balance sheet , include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential loss associated with indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit is equal to the total gross contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following table summarizes the total gross contractual amounts of credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. .
|( in millions )|2009|2008|
|indemnified securities financing|$ 365251|$ 324590|
|asset purchase agreements ( 1 )|8211|31780|
|unfunded commitments to extend credit|18078|20981|
|standby letters of credit|4784|6061|
( 1 ) amount for 2009 excludes agreements related to the commercial paper conduits , which were consolidated in may 2009 ; see note 11 . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 375.92 billion and $ 333.07 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers in accordance with their guidelines . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 375.92 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 referenced above , $ 77.73 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 82.62 billion and $ 71.87 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , respectively . legal proceedings : in the ordinary course of business , we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes , litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations , both pending and threatened . these matters , if resolved adversely against us , may result in monetary damages , fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices . the resolution of these proceedings is inherently difficult to predict . however , we do not believe that the amount of any judgment , settlement or other action arising from any pending proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , although the outcome of certain of the matters described below may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved .
Question: what is the percent change in the amount kept as collateral between 2008 and 2009?
Answer:
|
0.12865
|
what is the percent change in the amount kept as collateral between 2008 and 2009?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.12865",
"B": "0.128",
"C": "0.13",
"D": "0.12"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.12865",
"B": "0.128",
"C": "0.13",
"D": "0.12"
}
|
A
|
finqa304
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shares of citigroup common stock . the number of shares to be delivered will equal the cse award value divided by the then fair market value of the common stock . for cses awarded to certain employees whose compensation structure was approved by the special master , 50% ( 50 % ) of the shares to be delivered in april 2010 will be subject to restrictions on sale and transfer until january 20 , 2011 . in lieu of 2010 cap awards , certain retirement-eligible employees were instead awarded cses payable in april 2010 , but any shares that are to be delivered in april 2010 ( subject to stockholder approval ) will be subject to restrictions on sale or transfer that will lapse in four equal annual installments beginning january 20 , 2011 . cse awards have generally been accrued as compensation expenses in the year 2009 and will be recorded as a liability from the january 2010 grant date until the settlement date in april 2010 . if stockholders approve delivery of citigroup stock for the cse awards , cse awards will likely be paid as new issues of common stock as an exception to the company 2019s practice of delivering shares from treasury stock , and the recorded liability will be reclassified as equity at that time . in january 2009 , members of the management executive committee ( except the ceo and cfo ) received 30% ( 30 % ) of their incentive awards for 2008 as performance vesting-equity awards . these awards vest 50% ( 50 % ) if the price of citigroup common stock meets a price target of $ 10.61 , and 50% ( 50 % ) for a price target of $ 17.85 , in each case on or prior to january 14 , 2013 . the price target will be met only if the nyse closing price equals or exceeds the applicable price target for at least 20 nyse trading days within any period of 30 consecutive nyse trading days ending on or before january 14 , 2013 . any shares that have not vested by such date will vest according to a fraction , the numerator of which is the share price on the delivery date and the denominator of which is the price target of the unvested shares . no dividend equivalents are paid on unvested awards . fair value of the awards is recognized as compensation expense ratably over the vesting period . on july 17 , 2007 , the committee approved the management committee long-term incentive plan ( mc ltip ) ( pursuant to the terms of the shareholder-approved 1999 stock incentive plan ) under which participants received an equity award that could be earned based on citigroup 2019s performance against various metrics relative to peer companies and publicly- stated return on equity ( roe ) targets measured at the end of each calendar year beginning with 2007 . the final expense for each of the three consecutive calendar years was adjusted based on the results of the roe tests . no awards were earned for 2009 , 2008 or 2007 and no shares were issued because performance targets were not met . no new awards were made under the mc ltip since the initial award in july 2007 . cap participants in 2008 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , and fa cap participants in those years and in 2009 , could elect to receive all or part of their award in stock options . the figures presented in the stock option program tables ( see 201cstock option programs 201d below ) include options granted in lieu of cap and fa cap stock awards in those years . a summary of the status of citigroup 2019s unvested stock awards at december 31 , 2009 and changes during the 12 months ended december 31 , 2009 are presented below : unvested stock awards shares weighted-average grant date fair value .
|unvested stock awards|shares|weighted-average grant date fair value|
|unvested at january 1 2009|226210859|$ 36.23|
|new awards|162193923|$ 4.35|
|cancelled awards|-51873773 ( 51873773 )|$ 26.59|
|deleted awards|-568377 ( 568377 )|$ 13.91|
|vested awards ( 1 )|-148011884 ( 148011884 )|$ 25.96|
|unvested at december 31 2009|187950748|$ 19.53|
( 1 ) the weighted-average market value of the vestings during 2009 was approximately $ 3.64 per share . at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 1.6 billion of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock awards net of the forfeiture provision . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years. .
Question: at december 2009 what was the annual anticipated unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock awards to be recognized in billions
Answer:
|
1.23077
|
at december 2009 what was the annual anticipated unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock awards to be recognized in billions
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.364",
"B": "1.23077",
"C": "3.64",
"D": "1.6"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.364",
"B": "1.23077",
"C": "3.64",
"D": "1.6"
}
|
B
|
finqa305
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2012 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions , partially offset by the net proceeds of $ 94.8 received from the sale of our remaining holdings in facebook . capital expenditures of $ 169.2 primarily related to computer hardware and software , and leasehold improvements . capital expenditures increased in 2012 compared to the prior year , primarily due to an increase in leasehold improvements made during the year . payments for acquisitions of $ 145.5 primarily related to payments for new acquisitions . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock , and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . net cash provided by financing activities during 2012 primarily reflected net proceeds from our debt transactions . we issued $ 300.0 in aggregate principal amount of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) senior notes due 2017 ( the 201c2.25% ( 201c2.25 % ) notes 201d ) , $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of 3.75% ( 3.75 % ) senior notes due 2023 ( the 201c3.75% ( 201c3.75 % ) notes 201d ) and $ 250.0 in aggregate principal amount of 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) senior notes due 2022 ( the 201c4.00% ( 201c4.00 % ) notes 201d ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) notes were applied towards the repurchase and redemption of $ 399.6 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes . offsetting the net proceeds from our debt transactions was the repurchase of 32.7 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 350.5 , including fees , and dividend payments of $ 103.4 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , japanese yen , canadian dollar and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 6.2 in 2012 . the decrease was a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the brazilian real and south african rand , offset by the u.s . dollar being weaker than other foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , british pound and the euro , as of as of december 31 , 2012 compared to december 31 , 2011. .
|balance sheet data|december 31 , 2013|december 31 , 2012|
|cash cash equivalents and marketable securities|$ 1642.1|$ 2590.8|
|short-term borrowings|$ 179.1|$ 172.1|
|current portion of long-term debt|353.6|216.6|
|long-term debt|1129.8|2060.8|
|total debt|$ 1662.5|$ 2449.5|
liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends. .
Question: what percentage has liquidity dropped from 2012 to 2013?
Answer:
|
0.63382
|
what percentage has liquidity dropped from 2012 to 2013?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.63382%",
"B": "6.3382%",
"C": "63.382%",
"D": "633.82%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.63382%",
"B": "6.3382%",
"C": "63.382%",
"D": "633.82%"
}
|
A
|
finqa306
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: cash flows from operations .
|in millions|fiscal year 2018|fiscal year 2017|fiscal year 2016|
|net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrollinginterests|$ 2163.0|$ 1701.1|$ 1736.8|
|depreciation and amortization|618.8|603.6|608.1|
|after-taxearnings from joint ventures|-84.7 ( 84.7 )|-85.0 ( 85.0 )|-88.4 ( 88.4 )|
|distributions of earnings from joint ventures|113.2|75.6|75.1|
|stock-based compensation|77.0|95.7|89.8|
|deferred income taxes|-504.3 ( 504.3 )|183.9|120.6|
|pension and other postretirement benefit plan contributions|-31.8 ( 31.8 )|-45.4 ( 45.4 )|-47.8 ( 47.8 )|
|pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs|4.6|35.7|118.1|
|divestitures loss ( gain )|-|13.5|-148.2 ( 148.2 )|
|restructuring impairment and other exit costs|126.0|117.0|107.2|
|changes in current assets and liabilities excluding the effects of acquisitions anddivestitures|542.1|-194.2 ( 194.2 )|298.5|
|other net|-182.9 ( 182.9 )|-86.3 ( 86.3 )|-105.6 ( 105.6 )|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 2841.0|$ 2415.2|$ 2764.2|
in fiscal 2018 , cash provided by operations was $ 2.8 billion compared to $ 2.4 billion in fiscal 2017 . the $ 426 million increase was primarily driven by the $ 462 million increase in net earnings and the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities , partially offset by a $ 688 million change in deferred income taxes . the change in deferred income taxes was primarily related to the $ 638 million provisional benefit from revaluing our net u.s . deferred tax liabilities to reflect the new u.s . corporate tax rate as a result of the tcja . the $ 736 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in accounts payable of $ 476 million related to the extension of payment terms and timing of payments , and $ 264 million of changes in other current liabilities primarily driven by changes in income taxes payable , trade and advertising accruals , and incentive accruals . we strive to grow core working capital at or below the rate of growth in our net sales . for fiscal 2018 , core working capital decreased 27 percent , compared to a net sales increase of 1 percent . in fiscal 2017 , core working capital increased 9 percent , compared to a net sales decline of 6 percent , and in fiscal 2016 , core working capital decreased 41 percent , compared to net sales decline of 6 percent . in fiscal 2017 , our operations generated $ 2.4 billion of cash , compared to $ 2.8 billion in fiscal 2016 . the $ 349 million decrease was primarily driven by a $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities . the $ 493 million change in current assets and liabilities was primarily due to changes in other current liabilities driven by changes in income taxes payable , a decrease in incentive accruals , and changes in trade and advertising accruals due to reduced spending . the change in current assets and liabilities was also impacted by the timing of accounts payable . additionally , we recorded a $ 14 million loss on a divestiture during fiscal 2017 , compared to a $ 148 million net gain on divestitures during fiscal 2016 , and classified the related cash flows as investing activities. .
Question: what was percentage change in net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and non controlling interests from 2017 to 2018
Answer:
|
0.27153
|
what was percentage change in net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and non controlling interests from 2017 to 2018
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.27153",
"B": "0.25000",
"C": "0.20000",
"D": "0.15000"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.27153",
"B": "0.25000",
"C": "0.20000",
"D": "0.15000"
}
|
A
|
finqa307
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) its supply chain and improve manufacturing margins . the combination of the companies should also facilitate further manufacturing efficiencies and accelerate research and development of new detector products . aeg was a privately held group of companies headquartered in warstein , germany , with manufacturing operations in germany , china and the united states . the aggregate purchase price for aeg was approximately $ 31300 ( subject to adjustment ) consisting of eur $ 24100 in cash and 110 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 5300 , and approximately $ 1900 for acquisition related fees and expenses . the company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no . 99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination . these 110 shares were subject to contingent put options pursuant to which the holders had the option to resell the shares to the company during a period of one year following the completion of the acquisition if the closing price of the company 2019s stock falls and remains below a threshold price . the put options were never exercised and expired on may 2 , 2007 . the acquisition also provided for a one-year earn out of eur 1700 ( approximately $ 2000 usd ) which was payable in cash if aeg calendar year 2006 earnings , as defined , exceeded a pre-determined amount . aeg 2019s 2006 earnings did not exceed such pre-determined amounts and no payment was made . the components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .
|net tangible assets acquired as of may 2 2006|$ 24800|
|in-process research and development|600|
|developed technology and know how|1900|
|customer relationship|800|
|trade name|400|
|deferred income taxes|-3000 ( 3000 )|
|goodwill|5800|
|estimated purchase price|$ 31300|
the company implemented a plan to restructure certain of aeg 2019s historical activities . the company originally recorded a liability of approximately $ 2100 in accordance with eitf issue no . 95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination , related to the termination of certain employees under this plan . upon completion of the plan in fiscal 2007 the company reduced this liability by approximately $ 241 with a corresponding reduction in goodwill . all amounts have been paid as of september 29 , 2007 . as part of the aeg acquisition the company acquired a minority interest in the equity securities of a private german company . the company estimated the fair value of these securities to be approximately $ 1400 in its original purchase price allocation . during the year ended september 29 , 2007 , the company sold these securities for proceeds of approximately $ 2150 . the difference of approximately $ 750 between the preliminary fair value estimate and proceeds upon sale has been recorded as a reduction of goodwill . the final purchase price allocations were completed within one year of the acquisition and the adjustments did not have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations . there have been no other material changes to the purchase price allocation as disclosed in the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 30 , 2006 . as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued . it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values . the fair value of these intangible assets was determined through the application of the income approach . customer relationship represents aeg 2019s high dependency on a small number of large accounts . aeg markets its products through distributors as well as directly to its own customers . trade name represents aeg 2019s product names that the company intends to continue to use . developed technology and know how represents currently marketable .
Question: what is the fair value of hologic common stock?
Answer:
|
48.18182
|
what is the fair value of hologic common stock?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "Approximately $24,100",
"B": "Approximately $5,300",
"C": "Approximately $31,300",
"D": "Approximately $48.18182"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "Approximately $24,100",
"B": "Approximately $5,300",
"C": "Approximately $31,300",
"D": "Approximately $48.18182"
}
|
D
|
finqa308
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: facility continue to have a maturity date of october 2016 . in addition , the maturity date of the company's revolving credit facility was extended to october 2018 and the facility was increased to $ 900 million from $ 600 million . accordingly , the amended credit agreement consists of the term c-2 loan facility , the term c-3 loan facility and a $ 900 million revolving credit facility . net deferred financing costs are as follows : net deferred financing costs ( in $ millions ) .
||net deferred financing costs ( in $ millions )|
|as of december 31 2011|28|
|financing costs deferred ( 1 )|8|
|accelerated amortization due to refinancing activity ( 2 )|-1 ( 1 )|
|amortization|-5 ( 5 )|
|as of december 31 2012|30|
|financing costs deferred ( 3 )|2|
|accelerated amortization due to refinancing activity|2014|
|amortization|-5 ( 5 )|
|as of december 31 2013|27|
|financing costs deferred ( 4 )|10|
|accelerated amortization due to refinancing activity ( 5 )|-5 ( 5 )|
|amortization|-5 ( 5 )|
|as of december 31 2014|27|
____________________________ ( 1 ) relates to the issuance of the 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes . ( 2 ) relates to the $ 400 million prepayment of the term c loan facility with proceeds from the 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes . ( 3 ) relates to the september 2013 amendment to the celanese us existing senior secured credit facilities to reduce the interest rates payable in connection with certain borrowings thereby creating the term c-2 loan facility due 2016 . ( 4 ) includes $ 6 million related to the issuance of the 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) notes and $ 4 million related to the september 24 , 2014 amendment to the celanese us existing senior secured credit facilities . ( 5 ) includes $ 4 million related to the 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) notes redemption and $ 1 million related to the term c-2 loan facility conversion . as of december 31 , 2014 , the margin for borrowings under the term c-2 loan facility was 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) above the euro interbank offered rate ( "euribor" ) and the margin for borrowings under the term c-3 loan facility was 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) above libor ( for us dollars ) and 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) above euribor ( for euros ) , as applicable . as of december 31 , 2014 , the margin for borrowings under the revolving credit facility was 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) above libor . the margin for borrowings under the revolving credit facility is subject to increase or decrease in certain circumstances based on changes in the corporate credit ratings of celanese or celanese us . term loan borrowings under the amended credit agreement are subject to amortization at 1% ( 1 % ) of the initial principal amount per annum , payable quarterly . in addition , the company pays quarterly commitment fees on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility of 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) per annum . the amended credit agreement is guaranteed by celanese and certain domestic subsidiaries of celanese us and is secured by a lien on substantially all assets of celanese us and such guarantors , subject to certain agreed exceptions ( including for certain real property and certain shares of foreign subsidiaries ) , pursuant to the guarantee and collateral agreement , dated april 2 , as a condition to borrowing funds or requesting letters of credit be issued under the revolving credit facility , the company's first lien senior secured leverage ratio ( as calculated as of the last day of the most recent fiscal quarter for which financial statements have been delivered under the revolving facility ) cannot exceed the threshold as specified below . further , the company's first lien senior secured leverage ratio must be maintained at or below that threshold while any amounts are outstanding under the revolving credit facility. .
Question: how much of the 2013 amortization expense is due to the term c-2 loan facility conversion?
Answer:
|
0.2
|
how much of the 2013 amortization expense is due to the term c-2 loan facility conversion?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.5",
"B": "1",
"C": "4",
"D": "0.2"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "0.5",
"B": "1",
"C": "4",
"D": "0.2"
}
|
D
|
finqa309
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we measure cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities reduced by expenditures for property additions . we use this non-gaap financial measure of cash flow to focus management and investors on the amount of cash available for debt repayment , dividend distributions , acquisition opportunities , and share repurchases . our cash flow metric is reconciled to the most comparable gaap measure , as follows: .
|( dollars in millions )|2012|2011|2010|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 1758|$ 1595|$ 1008|
|additions to properties|-533 ( 533 )|-594 ( 594 )|-474 ( 474 )|
|cash flow|$ 1225|$ 1001|$ 534|
|year-over-year change|22.4% ( 22.4 % )|87.5% ( 87.5 % )||
year-over-year change 22.4 % ( % ) 87.5 % ( % ) year-over-year changes in cash flow ( as defined ) were driven by improved performance in working capital resulting from the benefit derived from the pringles acquisition , as well as changes in the level of capital expenditures during the three-year period . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles . in addition , we continued the investment in our information technology infrastructure related to the reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform . net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . cash paid for additions to properties as a percentage of net sales has decreased to 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in 2012 , from 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2011 , which was an increase from 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in financing activities in february 2013 , we issued $ 250 million of two-year floating-rate u.s . dollar notes , and $ 400 million of ten-year 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes . the proceeds from these notes will be used for general corporate purposes , including , together with cash on hand , repayment of the $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) u.s . dollar notes due march 2013 . the floating-rate notes bear interest equal to three-month libor plus 23 basis points , subject to quarterly reset . the notes contain customary covenants that limit the ability of kellogg company and its restricted subsidiaries ( as defined ) to incur certain liens or enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions , as well as a change of control provision . our net cash provided by financing activities was $ 1317 for 2012 , compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 957 and $ 439 for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the increase in cash provided from financing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010 , was primarily due to the issuance of debt related to the acquisition of pringles . total debt was $ 7.9 billion at year-end 2012 and $ 6.0 billion at year-end 2011 . in march 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps on our $ 500 million five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 , $ 500 million ten-year 4.15% ( 4.15 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2019 and $ 500 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted these notes from their fixed rates to floating rate obligations through maturity . in may 2012 , we issued $ 350 million of three-year 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , $ 400 million of five-year 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes and $ 700 million of ten-year 3.125% ( 3.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , resulting in aggregate net proceeds after debt discount of $ 1.442 billion . the proceeds of these notes were used for general corporate purposes , including financing a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in may 2012 , we issued cdn . $ 300 million of two-year 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) fixed rate canadian dollar notes , using the proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes , which included repayment of intercompany debt . this repayment resulted in cash available to be used for a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in december 2012 , we repaid $ 750 million five-year 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in february 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps on $ 200 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted this portion of the notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2011 , we repaid $ 945 million ten-year 6.60% ( 6.60 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in may 2011 , we issued $ 400 million of seven-year 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 397 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $ 400 million , which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in november 2011 , we issued $ 500 million of five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u . s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 498 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 2.5 billion during 2010 through 2012 . this three year authorization replaced previous share buyback programs which had authorized stock repurchases of up to $ 1.1 billion for 2010 and $ 650 million for 2009 . under this program , we repurchased approximately 1 million , 15 million and 21 million shares of common stock for $ 63 million , $ 793 million and $ 1.1 billion during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . in december 2012 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 300 million during 2013 . we paid quarterly dividends to shareholders totaling $ 1.74 per share in 2012 , $ 1.67 per share in 2011 and $ 1.56 per share in 2010 . total cash paid for dividends increased by 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2012 and 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) in 2011 . in march 2011 , we entered into an unsecured four- year credit agreement which allows us to borrow , on a revolving credit basis , up to $ 2.0 billion . our long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants that limit kellogg company and some of its subsidiaries from incurring certain liens or from entering into certain sale and lease-back transactions . some agreements also contain change in control provisions . however , they do not contain acceleration of maturity clauses that are dependent on credit ratings . a change in our credit ratings could limit our access to the u.s . short-term debt market and/or increase the cost of refinancing long-term debt in the future . however , even under these circumstances , we would continue to have access to our four-year credit agreement , which expires in march 2015 . this source of liquidity is unused and available on an unsecured basis , although we do not currently plan to use it . capital and credit markets , including commercial paper markets , continued to experience instability and disruption as the u.s . and global economies underwent a period of extreme uncertainty . throughout this period of uncertainty , we continued to have access to the u.s. , european , and canadian commercial paper markets . our commercial paper and term debt credit ratings were not affected by the changes in the credit environment . we monitor the financial strength of our third-party financial institutions , including those that hold our cash and cash equivalents as well as those who serve as counterparties to our credit facilities , our derivative financial instruments , and other arrangements . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 29 , 2012 . we continue to believe that we will be able to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations and maintain our debt covenants for the foreseeable future , while still meeting our operational needs , including the pursuit of selected bolt-on acquisitions . this will be accomplished through our strong cash flow , our short- term borrowings , and our maintenance of credit facilities on a global basis. .
Question: what was the average cash flow from 2010 to 2012
Answer:
|
920.0
|
what was the average cash flow from 2010 to 2012
|
{
"options": {
"A": "534.0",
"B": "1001.0",
"C": "1225.0",
"D": "920.0"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "534.0",
"B": "1001.0",
"C": "1225.0",
"D": "920.0"
}
|
D
|
finqa310
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: o 2019 r e i l l y a u t o m o t i v e 2 0 0 6 a n n u a l r e p o r t p a g e 38 $ 11080000 , in the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 , was $ 7702000 and the weighted-average period of time over which this cost will be recognized is 3.3 years . employee stock purchase plan the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan permits all eligible employees to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value . participants may authorize the company to withhold up to 5% ( 5 % ) of their annual salary to participate in the plan . the stock purchase plan authorizes up to 2600000 shares to be granted . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company issued 165306 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.36 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company issued 161903 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.57 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company issued 187754 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 20.85 per share . sfas no . 123r requires compensation expense to be recognized based on the discount between the grant date fair value and the employee purchase price for shares sold to employees . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 799000 of compensation cost related to employee share purchases and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 295000 . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 400000 shares were reserved for future issuance . other employee benefit plans the company sponsors a contributory profit sharing and savings plan that covers substantially all employees who are at least 21 years of age and have at least six months of service . the company has agreed to make matching contributions equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 2% ( 2 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed and 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 4% ( 4 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed . the company also makes additional discretionary profit sharing contributions to the plan on an annual basis as determined by the board of directors . the company 2019s matching and profit sharing contributions under this plan are funded in the form of shares of the company 2019s common stock . a total of 4200000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 6429000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2372000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company recorded $ 6606000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2444000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company recorded $ 5278000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 1969000 . the compensation cost recorded in 2006 includes matching contributions made in 2006 and profit sharing contributions accrued in 2006 to be funded with issuance of shares of common stock in 2007 . the company issued 204000 shares in 2006 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 34.34 . the company issued 210461 shares in 2005 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 25.79 . the company issued 238828 shares in 2004 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 19.36 . a portion of these shares related to profit sharing contributions accrued in prior periods . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 1061000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . the company has in effect a performance incentive plan for the company 2019s senior management under which the company awards shares of restricted stock that vest equally over a three-year period and are held in escrow until such vesting has occurred . shares are forfeited when an employee ceases employment . a total of 800000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . shares awarded under this plan are valued based on the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant and compensation cost is recorded over the vesting period . the company recorded $ 416000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2006 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 154000 . the company recorded $ 289000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 107000 . the company recorded $ 248000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2004 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 93000 . the total fair value of shares vested ( at vest date ) for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 were $ 503000 , $ 524000 and $ 335000 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 was $ 536000 . the company awarded 18698 shares under this plan in 2006 with an average grant date fair value of $ 33.12 . the company awarded 14986 shares under this plan in 2005 with an average grant date fair value of $ 25.41 . the company awarded 15834 shares under this plan in 2004 with an average grant date fair value of $ 19.05 . compensation cost for shares awarded in 2006 will be recognized over the three-year vesting period . changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were as follows : weighted- average grant date shares fair value .
||shares|weighted-average grant date fair value|
|non-vested at december 31 2005|15052|$ 22.68|
|granted during the period|18698|33.12|
|vested during the period|-15685 ( 15685 )|26.49|
|forfeited during the period|-1774 ( 1774 )|27.94|
|non-vested at december 31 2006|16291|$ 30.80|
at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 659000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( cont inued ) .
Question: the non-vested restricted stock balance as if december 31 2006 was what percent of the total shares reserved for future issuance under this plan?
Answer:
|
0.02472
|
the non-vested restricted stock balance as if december 31 2006 was what percent of the total shares reserved for future issuance under this plan?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.02472%",
"B": "0.2472%",
"C": "2.472%",
"D": "24.72%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.02472%",
"B": "0.2472%",
"C": "2.472%",
"D": "24.72%"
}
|
A
|
finqa311
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: e nt e r g y c o r p o r a t i o n a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 7 n an increase of $ 16 million in fossil operating costs due to the purchase of the attala plant in january 2006 and the perryville plant coming online in july 2005 ; n an increase of $ 12 million related to storm reserves . this increase does not include costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita ; and n an increase of $ 12 million due to a return to normal expense patterns in 2006 versus the deferral or capitalization of storm costs in 2005 . other operation and maintenance expenses increased for non- utility nuclear from $ 588 million in 2005 to $ 637 million in 2006 primarily due to the timing of refueling outages , increased benefit and insurance costs , and increased nrc fees . taxes other than income taxes taxes other than income taxes increased for the utility from $ 322 million in 2005 to $ 361 million in 2006 primarily due to an increase in city franchise taxes in arkansas due to a change in 2006 in the accounting for city franchise tax revenues as directed by the apsc . the change results in an increase in taxes other than income taxes with a corresponding increase in rider revenue , resulting in no effect on net income . also contributing to the increase was higher franchise tax expense at entergy gulf states , inc . as a result of higher gross revenues in 2006 and a customer refund in 2005 . other income other income increased for the utility from $ 111 million in 2005 to $ 156 million in 2006 primarily due to carrying charges recorded on storm restoration costs . other income increased for non-utility nuclear primarily due to miscellaneous income of $ 27 million ( $ 16.6 million net-of-tax ) resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study and changes in assumptions regarding the timing of when decommissioning of a plant will begin . other income increased for parent & other primarily due to a gain related to its entergy-koch investment of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) in the fourth quarter of 2006 . in 2004 , entergy-koch sold its energy trading and pipeline businesses to third parties . at that time , entergy received $ 862 million of the sales proceeds in the form of a cash distribution by entergy-koch . due to the november 2006 expiration of contingencies on the sale of entergy-koch 2019s trading business , and the corresponding release to entergy-koch of sales proceeds held in escrow , entergy received additional cash distributions of approximately $ 163 million during the fourth quarter of 2006 and recorded a gain of approximately $ 55 million ( net-of-tax ) . entergy expects future cash distributions upon liquidation of the partnership will be less than $ 35 million . interest charges interest charges increased for the utility and parent & other primarily due to additional borrowing to fund the significant storm restoration costs associated with hurricanes katrina and rita . discontinued operations in april 2006 , entergy sold the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the electric reliability council of texas ( ercot ) region of texas , and now reports this portion of the business as a discontinued operation . earnings for 2005 were negatively affected by $ 44.8 million ( net-of-tax ) of discontinued operations due to the planned sale . this amount includes a net charge of $ 25.8 million ( net-of-tax ) related to the impairment reserve for the remaining net book value of the competitive retail services business 2019 information technology systems . results for 2006 include an $ 11.1 million gain ( net-of-tax ) on the sale of the retail electric portion of the competitive retail services business operating in the ercot region of texas . income taxes the effective income tax rates for 2006 and 2005 were 27.6% ( 27.6 % ) and 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) , respectively . the lower effective income tax rate in 2006 is primarily due to tax benefits , net of reserves , resulting from the tax capital loss recognized in connection with the liquidation of entergy power international holdings , entergy 2019s holding company for entergy-koch . also contributing to the lower rate for 2006 is an irs audit settlement that allowed entergy to release from its tax reserves all settled issues relating to 1996-1998 audit cycle . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2006 to 2007 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation 2019s revolving credit facility , along with a decrease in shareholders 2019 equity primarily due to repurchases of common stock . this increase in the debt to capital percentage is in line with entergy 2019s financial and risk management aspirations . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2005 to 2006 is the result of an increase in shareholders 2019 equity , primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock. .
||2007|2006|2005|
|net debt to net capital at the end of the year|54.6% ( 54.6 % )|49.4% ( 49.4 % )|51.5% ( 51.5 % )|
|effect of subtracting cash from debt|3.0% ( 3.0 % )|2.9% ( 2.9 % )|1.6% ( 1.6 % )|
|debt to capital at the end of the year|57.6% ( 57.6 % )|52.3% ( 52.3 % )|53.1% ( 53.1 % )|
net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable , capital lease obligations , preferred stock with sinking fund , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , shareholders 2019 equity , and preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition . m an ag e ment 2019s f i n anc ial d i scuss ion an d an alys is co n t i n u e d .
Question: what is the change in percentage points in cash-to-debt ratio from 2005 to 2006?
Answer:
|
1.3
|
what is the change in percentage points in cash-to-debt ratio from 2005 to 2006?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.1",
"B": "1.3",
"C": "2.3",
"D": "3.0"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.1",
"B": "1.3",
"C": "2.3",
"D": "3.0"
}
|
B
|
finqa312
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2010 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .
|balance december 31 2007|$ 756703|
|additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense|101321|
|deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property|-11766 ( 11766 )|
|balance december 31 2008|846258|
|additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense|103698|
|deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property|-11869 ( 11869 )|
|balance december 31 2009|938087|
|additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense|108261|
|deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property|-11144 ( 11144 )|
|balance december 31 2010|$ 1035204|
.
Question: considering the years 2009-2010 , what is the increase in the final balance?
Answer:
|
0.10353
|
considering the years 2009-2010 , what is the increase in the final balance?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.10132",
"B": "0.10353",
"C": "0.10826",
"D": "0.11144"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.10132",
"B": "0.10353",
"C": "0.10826",
"D": "0.11144"
}
|
B
|
finqa313
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as of december a031 , 2017 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|2018|$ 17188|
|2019|17188|
|2020|17188|
|2021|17188|
|2022|17188|
|years thereafter|240625|
|total|326565|
|less : amount representing interest|292209|
|present value of net minimum lease payments|$ 34356|
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements note 11 . a0 retirement , other postretirement benefits , and defined contribution plans a0 a0 ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) qualified pension plans entergy has eight qualified pension plans covering substantially all employees . the entergy corporation retirement plan for non-bargaining employees ( non-bargaining plan i ) , the entergy corporation retirement plan for bargaining employees ( bargaining plan i ) , the entergy corporation retirement plan ii for non-bargaining employees ( non-bargaining plan ii ) , the entergy corporation retirement plan ii for bargaining employees , the entergy corporation retirement plan iii , and the entergy corporation retirement plan iv for bargaining employees a0are non-contributory final average pay plans and provide pension benefits that are based on employees 2019 credited service and compensation during employment . effective as of the close of business on december 31 , 2016 , the entergy corporation retirement plan iv for non-bargaining employees ( non-bargaining plan iv ) was merged with and into non-bargaining plan ii . at the close of business on december 31 , 2016 , the liabilities for the accrued benefits and the assets attributable to such liabilities of all participants in non-bargaining plan iv were assumed by and transferred to non-bargaining plan ii . there was no loss of vesting or benefit options or reduction of accrued benefits to affected participants as a result of this plan merger . non-bargaining employees whose most recent date of hire is after june 30 , 2014 participate in the entergy corporation cash balance plan for non-bargaining employees ( non-bargaining cash balance plan ) . certain bargaining employees hired or rehired after june 30 , 2014 , or such later date provided for in their applicable collective bargaining agreements , participate in the entergy corporation cash balance plan for bargaining employees ( bargaining cash balance plan ) . the registrant subsidiaries participate in these four plans : non-bargaining plan i , bargaining plan i , non-bargaining cash balance plan , and bargaining cash balance plan . the assets of the six final average pay qualified pension plans are held in a master trust established by entergy , and the assets of the two cash balance pension plans are held in a second master trust established by entergy . a0 a0each pension plan has an undivided beneficial interest in each of the investment accounts in its respective master trust that is maintained by a trustee . a0 a0use of the master trusts permits the commingling of the trust assets of the pension plans of entergy corporation and its registrant subsidiaries for investment and administrative purposes . a0 a0although assets in the master trusts are commingled , the trustee maintains supporting records for the purpose of allocating the trust level equity in net earnings ( loss ) and the administrative expenses of the investment accounts in each trust to the various participating pension plans in that particular trust . a0 a0the fair value of the trusts 2019 assets is determined by the trustee and certain investment managers . a0 a0for each trust , the trustee calculates a daily earnings factor , including realized and .
Question: what are the minimum lease payments in 2022 as a percentage of the present value of net minimum lease payments?
Answer:
|
0.50029
|
what are the minimum lease payments in 2022 as a percentage of the present value of net minimum lease payments?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.50029",
"B": "0.05275",
"C": "0.05278",
"D": "0.50032"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.50029",
"B": "0.05275",
"C": "0.05278",
"D": "0.50032"
}
|
A
|
finqa314
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: long-term product offerings include active and index strategies . our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile . we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction . in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index . index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs . althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class . in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2014 equity aum of $ 2.451 trillion increased by $ 133.4 billion , or 6% ( 6 % ) , from the end of 2013 due to net new business of $ 52.4 billion and net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements of $ 81.0 billion . net inflows were driven by $ 59.6 billion and $ 17.7 billion into ishares and non-etf index accounts , respectively . index inflows were offset by active net outflows of $ 24.9 billion , with outflows of $ 18.0 billion and $ 6.9 billion from fundamental and scientific active equity products , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than similar u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2014 at $ 1.394 trillion , increasing $ 151.5 billion , or 12% ( 12 % ) , from december 31 , 2013 . the increase in aum reflected $ 96.4 billion in net new business and $ 55.1 billion in net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements . in 2014 , net new business was diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield products . flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income global opportunities funds , with net inflows of $ 13.3 billion and $ 4.2 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion . fixed income net inflows were positive across investment styles , with ishares , non- etf index , and active net inflows of $ 40.0 billion , $ 28.7 billion and $ 27.7 billion , respectively . multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , currencies , bonds and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2014 are presented below . ( in millions ) december 31 , 2013 net inflows ( outflows ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2014 .
|( in millions )|december 31 2013|net inflows ( outflows )|market change|fx impact|december 31 2014|
|asset allocation and balanced|$ 169604|$ 18387|$ -827 ( 827 )|$ -4132 ( 4132 )|$ 183032|
|target date/risk|111408|10992|7083|-872 ( 872 )|128611|
|fiduciary|60202|-474 ( 474 )|14788|-8322 ( 8322 )|66194|
|multi-asset|$ 341214|$ 28905|$ 21044|$ -13326 ( 13326 )|$ 377837|
flows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 15.1 billion , or 52% ( 52 % ) , of net inflows coming from institutional clients . defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 12.8 billion to institutional multi- asset class net new business in 2014 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings . retail net inflows of $ 13.4 billion were driven by particular demand for our multi- asset income fund , which raised $ 6.3 billion in 2014 . the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 48% ( 48 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 18.4 billion . these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget . in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions . flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites . 2022 target date and target risk products grew 10% ( 10 % ) organically in 2014 . institutional investors represented 90% ( 90 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for over 80% ( 80 % ) of aum . the remaining 10% ( 10 % ) of target date and target risk aum consisted of retail client investments . flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings . lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing . 2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of planmanagement . these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what percent change did the fx impact have on the 2014 multi asset value?
Answer:
|
-0.03656
|
what percent change did the fx impact have on the 2014 multi asset value?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.03656%",
"B": "-0.03656%",
"C": "3.656%",
"D": "-3.656%"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.03656%",
"B": "-0.03656%",
"C": "3.656%",
"D": "-3.656%"
}
|
B
|
finqa316
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 9 : stock based compensation the company has granted stock option and restricted stock unit ( 201crsus 201d ) awards to non-employee directors , officers and other key employees of the company pursuant to the terms of its 2007 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2007 plan 201d ) . the total aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2007 plan is 15.5 . as of december 31 , 2015 , 8.4 shares were available for grant under the 2007 plan . shares issued under the 2007 plan may be authorized-but-unissued shares of company stock or reacquired shares of company stock , including shares purchased by the company on the open market . the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award . the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: .
||2015|2014|2013|
|stock options|$ 2|$ 2|$ 3|
|rsus|8|10|9|
|espp|1|1|1|
|stock-based compensation|11|13|13|
|income tax benefit|-4 ( 4 )|-5 ( 5 )|-5 ( 5 )|
|stock-based compensation expense net of tax|$ 7|$ 8|$ 8|
there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued . the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period . all awards granted in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 are classified as equity . the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus . for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs . the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to common stockholders 2019 equity or the statement of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows . the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures . the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary . stock options in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant . these awards have no performance vesting conditions and the grant date fair value is amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and is included in operations and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. .
Question: in 2018 , what percentage of stock-based compensation consisted of stock options?
Answer:
|
0.18182
|
in 2018 , what percentage of stock-based compensation consisted of stock options?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.09091",
"B": "0.18182",
"C": "0.27273",
"D": "0.36364"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.09091",
"B": "0.18182",
"C": "0.27273",
"D": "0.36364"
}
|
B
|
finqa317
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: discounted cash flow model ( dcf ) to estimate the current fair value of its reporting units when testing for impairment , as management believes forecasted cash flows are the best indicator of such fair value . a number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the application of the dcf model to forecast operating cash flows , including sales growth ( volumes and pricing ) , production costs , capital spending , and discount rate . most of these assumptions vary significantly among the reporting units . cash flow forecasts are generally based on approved business unit operating plans for the early years and historical relationships in later years . the wacc rate for the individual reporting units is estimated with the assistance of valuation experts . arconic would recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value without exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit . in connection with the interim impairment evaluation of long-lived assets for the disks operations ( an asset group within the aen business unit ) in the second quarter of 2018 , which resulted from a decline in forecasted financial performance for the business in connection with its updated three-year strategic plan , the company also performed an interim impairment evaluation of goodwill for the aen reporting unit . the estimated fair value of the reporting unit was substantially in excess of the carrying value ; thus , there was no impairment of goodwill . goodwill impairment tests in 2017 and 2016 indicated that goodwill was not impaired for any of the company 2019s reporting units , except for the arconic forgings and extrusions ( afe ) business whose estimated fair value was lower than its carrying value . as such , arconic recorded an impairment for the full amount of goodwill in the afe reporting unit of $ 719 . the decrease in the afe fair value was primarily due to unfavorable performance that was impacting operating margins and a higher discount rate due to an increase in the risk-free rate of return , while the carrying value increased compared to prior year . other intangible assets . intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized while intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized generally on a straight-line basis over the periods benefited . the following table details the weighted- average useful lives of software and other intangible assets by reporting segment ( numbers in years ) : .
||software|other intangible assets|
|engineered products and solutions|5|33|
|global rolled products|5|9|
|transportation and construction solutions|5|16|
revenue recognition . the company's contracts with customers are comprised of acknowledged purchase orders incorporating the company 2019s standard terms and conditions , or for larger customers , may also generally include terms under negotiated multi-year agreements . these contracts with customers typically consist of the manufacture of products which represent single performance obligations that are satisfied upon transfer of control of the product to the customer . the company produces fastening systems ; seamless rolled rings ; investment castings , including airfoils and forged jet engine components ; extruded , machined and formed aircraft parts ; aluminum sheet and plate ; integrated aluminum structural systems ; architectural extrusions ; and forged aluminum commercial vehicle wheels . transfer of control is assessed based on alternative use of the products we produce and our enforceable right to payment for performance to date under the contract terms . transfer of control and revenue recognition generally occur upon shipment or delivery of the product , which is when title , ownership and risk of loss pass to the customer and is based on the applicable shipping terms . the shipping terms vary across all businesses and depend on the product , the country of origin , and the type of transportation ( truck , train , or vessel ) . an invoice for payment is issued at time of shipment . the company 2019s objective is to have net 30-day terms . our business units set commercial terms on which arconic sells products to its customers . these terms are influenced by industry custom , market conditions , product line ( specialty versus commodity products ) , and other considerations . in certain circumstances , arconic receives advanced payments from its customers for product to be delivered in future periods . these advanced payments are recorded as deferred revenue until the product is delivered and title and risk of loss have passed to the customer in accordance with the terms of the contract . deferred revenue is included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . environmental matters . expenditures for current operations are expensed or capitalized , as appropriate . expenditures relating to existing conditions caused by past operations , which will not contribute to future revenues , are expensed . liabilities are recorded when remediation costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated . the liability may include costs such as site investigations , consultant fees , feasibility studies , outside contractors , and monitoring expenses . estimates are generally not discounted or reduced by potential claims for recovery . claims for recovery are recognized when probable and as agreements are reached with third parties . the estimates also include costs related to other potentially responsible parties to the extent that arconic has reason to believe such parties will not fully pay their proportionate share . the liability is continuously reviewed and adjusted to reflect current remediation progress , prospective estimates of required activity , and other factors that may be relevant , including changes in technology or regulations . litigation matters . for asserted claims and assessments , liabilities are recorded when an unfavorable outcome of a matter is .
Question: what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of software and other intangible assets in the transportation and construction solutions segment , in years?
Answer:
|
11.0
|
what is the difference between the weighted average useful lives of software and other intangible assets in the transportation and construction solutions segment , in years?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "4.0",
"B": "7.0",
"C": "11.0",
"D": "16.0"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "4.0",
"B": "7.0",
"C": "11.0",
"D": "16.0"
}
|
C
|
finqa320
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2015|2014|2013|
|net sales|$ 15570|$ 14920|$ 14123|
|operating profit|1681|1649|1612|
|operating margins|10.8% ( 10.8 % )|11.1% ( 11.1 % )|11.4% ( 11.4 % )|
|backlog at year-end|$ 31800|$ 27600|$ 28000|
2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .
Question: what was the average backlog at year-end in millions from 2013 to 2015?
Answer:
|
29133.33333
|
what was the average backlog at year-end in millions from 2013 to 2015?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "27600",
"B": "28000",
"C": "29133.33333",
"D": "31800"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "27600",
"B": "28000",
"C": "29133.33333",
"D": "31800"
}
|
C
|
finqa321
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: operating profit for the segment increased by 15% ( 15 % ) in 2005 compared to 2004 . operating profit increased by $ 80 million at m&fc mainly due to improved performance on fire control and air defense programs . performance on surface systems programs contributed to an increase in operating profit of $ 50 million at ms2 . pt&ts operating profit increased $ 10 million primarily due to improved performance on simulation and training programs . the increase in backlog during 2006 over 2005 resulted primarily from increased orders on certain platform integration programs in pt&ts . space systems space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2006 2005 2004 .
|( in millions )|2006|2005|2004|
|net sales|$ 7923|$ 6820|$ 6359|
|operating profit|746|609|489|
|backlog at year-end|18768|15925|16112|
net sales for space systems increased by 16% ( 16 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . during the year , sales growth in satellites and strategic & defensive missile systems ( s&dms ) offset declines in space transportation . the $ 1.1 billion growth in satellites sales was mainly due to higher volume on both government and commercial satellite programs . there were five commercial satellite deliveries in 2006 compared to no deliveries in 2005 . higher volume in both fleet ballistic missile and missile defense programs accounted for the $ 114 million sales increase at s&dms . in space transportation , sales declined $ 102 million primarily due to lower volume in government space transportation activities on the titan and external tank programs . increased sales on the atlas evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capabilities ( elc ) contract partially offset the lower government space transportation sales . net sales for space systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2005 compared to 2004 . during the year , sales growth in satellites and s&dms offset declines in space transportation . the $ 410 million increase in satellites sales was due to higher volume on government satellite programs that more than offset declines in commercial satellite activities . there were no commercial satellite deliveries in 2005 , compared to four in 2004 . increased sales of $ 235 million in s&dms were attributable to the fleet ballistic missile and missile defense programs . the $ 180 million decrease in space transportation 2019s sales was mainly due to having three atlas launches in 2005 compared to six in 2004 . operating profit for the segment increased 22% ( 22 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in satellites , space transportation and s&dms . the $ 72 million growth in satellites operating profit was primarily driven by the volume and performance on government satellite programs and commercial satellite deliveries . in space transportation , the $ 39 million growth in operating profit was attributable to improved performance on the atlas program resulting from risk reduction activities , including the first quarter definitization of the elc contract . in s&dms , the $ 26 million increase in operating profit was due to higher volume and improved performance on both the fleet ballistic missile and missile defense programs . operating profit for the segment increased 25% ( 25 % ) in 2005 compared to 2004 . operating profit increased in space transportation , s&dms and satellites . in space transportation , the $ 60 million increase in operating profit was primarily attributable to improved performance on the atlas vehicle program . satellites 2019 operating profit increased $ 35 million due to the higher volume and improved performance on government satellite programs , which more than offset the decreased operating profit due to the decline in commercial satellite deliveries . the $ 20 million increase in s&dms was attributable to higher volume on fleet ballistic missile and missile defense programs . in december 2006 , we completed a transaction with boeing to form ula , a joint venture which combines the production , engineering , test and launch operations associated with u.s . government launches of our atlas launch vehicles and boeing 2019s delta launch vehicles ( see related discussion on our 201cspace business 201d under 201cindustry considerations 201d ) . we are accounting for our investment in ula under the equity method of accounting . as a result , our share of the net earnings or losses of ula are included in other income and expenses , and we will no longer recognize sales related to launch vehicle services provided to the u.s . government . in 2006 , we recorded sales to the u.s . government for atlas launch services totaling approximately $ 600 million . we have retained the right to market commercial atlas launch services . we contributed assets to ula , and ula assumed liabilities related to our atlas business in exchange for our 50% ( 50 % ) ownership interest . the net book value of the assets contributed and liabilities assumed was approximately $ 200 million at .
Question: what was the ratio of the increase in the operating profit for m&fc to pt&ts
Answer:
|
8.0
|
what was the ratio of the increase in the operating profit for m&fc to pt&ts
|
{
"options": {
"A": "2.0",
"B": "4.0",
"C": "6.0",
"D": "8.0"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "2.0",
"B": "4.0",
"C": "6.0",
"D": "8.0"
}
|
D
|
finqa322
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: morgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) lending commitments . primary lending commitments are those that are originated by the company whereas secondary lending commitments are purchased from third parties in the market . the commitments include lending commitments that are made to investment grade and non-investment grade companies in connection with corporate lending and other business activities . commitments for secured lending transactions . secured lending commitments are extended by the company to companies and are secured by real estate or other physical assets of the borrower . loans made under these arrangements typically are at variable rates and generally provide for over-collateralization based upon the creditworthiness of the borrower . forward starting reverse repurchase agreements . the company has entered into forward starting securities purchased under agreements to resell ( agreements that have a trade date at or prior to december 31 , 2013 and settle subsequent to period-end ) that are primarily secured by collateral from u.s . government agency securities and other sovereign government obligations . commercial and residential mortgage-related commitments . the company enters into forward purchase contracts involving residential mortgage loans , residential mortgage lending commitments to individuals and residential home equity lines of credit . in addition , the company enters into commitments to originate commercial and residential mortgage loans . underwriting commitments . the company provides underwriting commitments in connection with its capital raising sources to a diverse group of corporate and other institutional clients . other lending commitments . other commitments generally include commercial lending commitments to small businesses and commitments related to securities-based lending activities in connection with the company 2019s wealth management business segment . the company sponsors several non-consolidated investment funds for third-party investors where the company typically acts as general partner of , and investment advisor to , these funds and typically commits to invest a minority of the capital of such funds , with subscribing third-party investors contributing the majority . the company 2019s employees , including its senior officers , as well as the company 2019s directors , may participate on the same terms and conditions as other investors in certain of these funds that the company forms primarily for client investment , except that the company may waive or lower applicable fees and charges for its employees . the company has contractual capital commitments , guarantees , lending facilities and counterparty arrangements with respect to these investment funds . premises and equipment . the company has non-cancelable operating leases covering premises and equipment ( excluding commodities operating leases , shown separately ) . at december 31 , 2013 , future minimum rental commitments under such leases ( net of subleases , principally on office rentals ) were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : year ended operating premises leases .
|year ended|operating premises leases|
|2014|$ 672|
|2015|656|
|2016|621|
|2017|554|
|2018|481|
|thereafter|2712|
.
Question: what is the average operating lease liability for 2014-2016?
Answer:
|
649.66667
|
what is the average operating lease liability for 2014-2016?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "672",
"B": "649.66667",
"C": "621",
"D": "656"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "672",
"B": "649.66667",
"C": "621",
"D": "656"
}
|
B
|
finqa323
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses , or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of many of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions . net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .
|( in thousands )|net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2015|net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016|net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017|
|u.s .|211|150|94|
|e.g .|36|2014|2014|
|other africa|1950|1502|1089|
|total africa|1986|1502|1089|
|other international|88|2014|2014|
|total|2285|1652|1183|
oil sands mining segment we hold a 20 percent non-operated interest in the aosp , an oil sands mining and upgrading joint venture located in alberta , canada . the joint venture produces bitumen from oil sands deposits in the athabasca region utilizing mining techniques and upgrades the bitumen to synthetic crude oils and vacuum gas oil . the aosp 2019s mining and extraction assets are located near fort mcmurray , alberta , and include the muskeg river and the jackpine mines . gross design capacity of the combined mines is 255000 ( 51000 net to our interest ) barrels of bitumen per day . the aosp operations use established processes to mine oil sands deposits from an open-pit mine , extract the bitumen and upgrade it into synthetic crude oils . ore is mined using traditional truck and shovel mining techniques . the mined ore passes through primary crushers to reduce the ore chunks in size and is then sent to rotary breakers where the ore chunks are further reduced to smaller particles . the particles are combined with hot water to create slurry . the slurry moves through the extraction process where it separates into sand , clay and bitumen-rich froth . a solvent is added to the bitumen froth to separate out the remaining solids , water and heavy asphaltenes . the solvent washes the sand and produces clean bitumen that is required for the upgrader to run efficiently . the process yields a mixture of solvent and bitumen which is then transported from the mine to the scotford upgrader via the approximately 300-mile corridor pipeline . the aosp's scotford upgrader is located at fort saskatchewan , northeast of edmonton , alberta . the bitumen is upgraded at scotford using both hydrotreating and hydroconversion processes to remove sulfur and break the heavy bitumen molecules into lighter products . blendstocks acquired from outside sources are utilized in the production of our saleable products . the upgrader produces synthetic crude oils and vacuum gas oil . the vacuum gas oil is sold to an affiliate of the operator under a long-term contract at market-related prices , and the other products are sold in the marketplace . as of december 31 , 2014 , we own or have rights to participate in developed and undeveloped leases totaling approximately 163000 gross ( 33000 net ) acres . the underlying developed leases are held for the duration of the project , with royalties payable to the province of alberta . synthetic crude oil sales volumes for 2014 averaged 50 mbbld and net-of-royalty production was 41 mbbld . in december 2013 , a jackpine mine expansion project received conditional approval from the canadian government . the project includes additional mining areas , associated processing facilities and infrastructure . the government conditions relate to wildlife , the environment and aboriginal health issues . we will evaluate the potential expansion project and government conditions after infrastructure reliability initiatives are completed . the governments of alberta and canada have agreed to partially fund quest ccs for $ 865 million canadian . in the third quarter of 2012 , the energy and resources conservation board ( "ercb" ) , alberta's primary energy regulator at that time , conditionally approved the project and the aosp partners approved proceeding to construct and operate quest ccs . government funding commenced in 2012 and continued as milestones were achieved during the development , construction and operating phases . failure of the aosp to meet certain timing , performance and operating objectives may result in repaying some of the government funding . construction and commissioning of quest ccs is expected to be completed by late 2015. .
Question: what percentage of net undeveloped acres are located in the u.s in 2015?
Answer:
|
0.09234
|
what percentage of net undeveloped acres are located in the u.s in 2015?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.09234%",
"B": "0.092%",
"C": "0.9234%",
"D": "0.923%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.09234%",
"B": "0.092%",
"C": "0.9234%",
"D": "0.923%"
}
|
A
|
finqa325
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: for additional information on segment results see page 43 . income from equity method investments increased by $ 126 million in 2006 from 2005 and increased by $ 98 million in 2005 from 2004 . income from our lpg operations in equatorial guinea increased in both periods due to higher sales volumes as a result of the plant expansions completed in 2005 . the increase in 2005 also included higher ptc income as a result of higher distillate gross margins . cost of revenues increased $ 4.609 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 7.106 billion in 2005 from 2004 . in both periods the increases were primarily in the rm&t segment and resulted from increases in acquisition costs of crude oil , refinery charge and blend stocks and purchased refined products . the increase in both periods was also impacted by higher manufacturing expenses , primarily the result of higher contract services and labor costs in 2006 and higher purchased energy costs in 2005 . purchases related to matching buy/sell transactions decreased $ 6.968 billion in 2006 from 2005 and increased $ 3.314 billion in 2005 from 2004 , mostly in the rm&t segment . the decrease in 2006 was primarily related to the change in accounting for matching buy/sell transactions discussed above . the increase in 2005 was primarily due to increased crude oil prices . depreciation , depletion and amortization increased $ 215 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 125 million in 2005 from 2004 . rm&t segment depreciation expense increased in both years as a result of the increase in asset value recorded for our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 . in addition , the detroit refinery expansion completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 contributed to the rm&t depreciation expense increase in 2006 . e&p segment depreciation expense for 2006 included a $ 20 million impairment of capitalized costs related to the camden hills field in the gulf of mexico and the associated canyon express pipeline . natural gas production from the camden hills field ended in 2006 as a result of increased water production from the well . selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 73 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 134 million in 2005 from 2004 . the 2006 increase was primarily because personnel and staffing costs increased throughout the year primarily as a result of variable compensation arrangements and increased business activity . partially offsetting these increases were reductions in stock-based compensation expense . the increase in 2005 was primarily a result of increased stock-based compensation expense , due to the increase in our stock price during that year as well as an increase in equity-based awards , which was partially offset by a decrease in expense as a result of severance and pension plan curtailment charges and start-up costs related to egholdings in 2004 . exploration expenses increased $ 148 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 59 million in 2005 from 2004 . exploration expense related to dry wells and other write-offs totaled $ 166 million , $ 111 million and $ 47 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 . exploration expense in 2006 also included $ 47 million for exiting the cortland and empire leases in nova scotia . net interest and other financing costs ( income ) reflected a net $ 37 million of income for 2006 , a favorable change of $ 183 million from the net $ 146 million expense in 2005 . net interest and other financing costs decreased $ 16 million in 2005 from 2004 . the favorable changes in 2006 included increased interest income due to higher interest rates and average cash balances , foreign currency exchange gains , adjustments to interest on tax issues and greater capitalized interest . the decrease in expense for 2005 was primarily a result of increased interest income on higher average cash balances and greater capitalized interest , partially offset by increased interest on potential tax deficiencies and higher foreign exchange losses . included in net interest and other financing costs ( income ) are foreign currency gains of $ 16 million , losses of $ 17 million and gains of $ 9 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 . minority interest in income of mpc decreased $ 148 million in 2005 from 2004 due to our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 . provision for income taxes increased $ 2.308 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 979 million in 2005 from 2004 , primarily due to the $ 4.259 billion and $ 2.691 billion increases in income from continuing operations before income taxes . the increase in our effective income tax rate in 2006 was primarily a result of the income taxes related to our libyan operations , where the statutory income tax rate is in excess of 90 percent . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for continuing operations for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 . see note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. .
||2006|2005|2004|
|statutory u.s . income tax rate|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|
|effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits|9.9|-0.8 ( 0.8 )|0.5|
|state and local income taxes net of federal income tax effects|1.9|2.5|1.6|
|other tax effects|-2.0 ( 2.0 )|-0.4 ( 0.4 )|-0.9 ( 0.9 )|
|effective income tax rate for continuing operations|44.8% ( 44.8 % )|36.3% ( 36.3 % )|36.2% ( 36.2 % )|
.
Question: by what percentage did effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits increase from 2004 to 2006?
Answer:
|
18.8
|
by what percentage did effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits increase from 2004 to 2006?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "9.9%",
"B": "-0.8%",
"C": "0.5%",
"D": "18.8%"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "9.9%",
"B": "-0.8%",
"C": "0.5%",
"D": "18.8%"
}
|
D
|
finqa326
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the discount rate assumption was determined for the pension and postretirement benefit plans independently . at year-end 2011 , the company began using an approach that approximates the process of settlement of obligations tailored to the plans 2019 expected cash flows by matching the plans 2019 cash flows to the coupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds . the yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of u.s.-issued aa-graded corporate bonds , all of which were non callable ( or callable with make-whole provisions ) . historically , for each plan , the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments . the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return , prior to administrative and investment management fees , for current and planned asset classes in the plans 2019 investment portfolios . assumed projected rates of return for each of the plans 2019 projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes . based on the target asset allocation for each asset class , the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed , adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets . the company 2019s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases . in the determination of year end 2014 projected benefit plan obligations , the company adopted a new table based on the society of actuaries rp 2014 mortality table including a generational bb-2d projection scale . the adoption resulted in a significant increase to pension and other postretirement benefit plans 2019 projected benefit obligations . assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans . the health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions . a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects : one-percentage-point increase one-percentage-point decrease effect on total of service and interest cost components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5943 $ ( 4887 ) effect on other postretirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 105967 $ ( 86179 ) .
||one-percentage-point increase|one-percentage-point decrease|
|effect on total of service and interest cost components|$ 5943|$ -4887 ( 4887 )|
|effect on other postretirement benefit obligation|$ 105967|$ -86179 ( 86179 )|
the discount rate assumption was determined for the pension and postretirement benefit plans independently . at year-end 2011 , the company began using an approach that approximates the process of settlement of obligations tailored to the plans 2019 expected cash flows by matching the plans 2019 cash flows to the coupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds . the yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of u.s.-issued aa-graded corporate bonds , all of which were non callable ( or callable with make-whole provisions ) . historically , for each plan , the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments . the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return , prior to administrative and investment management fees , for current and planned asset classes in the plans 2019 investment portfolios . assumed projected rates of return for each of the plans 2019 projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes . based on the target asset allocation for each asset class , the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed , adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets . the company 2019s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases . in the determination of year end 2014 projected benefit plan obligations , the company adopted a new table based on the society of actuaries rp 2014 mortality table including a generational bb-2d projection scale . the adoption resulted in a significant increase to pension and other postretirement benefit plans 2019 projected benefit obligations . assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans . the health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions . a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects : one-percentage-point increase one-percentage-point decrease effect on total of service and interest cost components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5943 $ ( 4887 ) effect on other postretirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 105967 $ ( 86179 ) .
Question: what was the ratio of the increase in the service and cost components compared to other post retirement benefit obligation
Answer:
|
0.05608
|
what was the ratio of the increase in the service and cost components compared to other post retirement benefit obligation
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.05608",
"B": "0.12016",
"C": "0.23045",
"D": "0.31579"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.05608",
"B": "0.12016",
"C": "0.23045",
"D": "0.31579"
}
|
A
|
finqa327
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following is a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the year : ( in thousands ) .
|unrecognized tax benefit 2014january 1 2008|$ 7928|
|ansoft unrecognized tax benefit 2014acquired july 31 2008|3525|
|gross increases 2014tax positions in prior period|2454|
|gross decreases 2014tax positions in prior period|-1572 ( 1572 )|
|gross increases 2014tax positions in current period|2255|
|reductions due to a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations|-1598 ( 1598 )|
|changes due to currency fluctuation|-259 ( 259 )|
|settlements|-317 ( 317 )|
|unrecognized tax benefit 2014december 31 2008|$ 12416|
included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.6 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate . also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.0 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in a decrease to goodwill recorded in purchase business combinations , and $ 1.9 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in adjustments to other tax accounts , primarily deferred taxes . the company believes it is reasonably possible that uncertain tax positions of approximately $ 2.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 will be resolved within the next twelve months . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense . related to the uncertain tax benefits noted above , the company recorded interest of $ 171000 during 2008 . penalties recorded during 2008 were insignificant . in total , as of december 31 , 2008 , the company has recognized a liability for penalties of $ 498000 and interest of $ 1.8 million . the company is subject to taxation in the u.s . and various states and foreign jurisdictions . the company 2019s 2005 through 2008 tax years are open to examination by the internal revenue service . the 2005 and 2006 federal returns are currently under examination . the company also has various foreign subsidiaries with tax filings under examination , as well as numerous foreign and state tax filings subject to examination for various years . 10 . pension and profit-sharing plans the company has 401 ( k ) /profit-sharing plans for all qualifying full-time domestic employees that permit participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to section 401 ( k ) of the internal revenue code . the company makes matching contributions on behalf of each eligible participant in an amount equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the first 3% ( 3 % ) and an additional 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 5% ( 5 % ) , for a maximum total of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) of the employee 2019s compensation . the company may make a discretionary profit sharing contribution in the amount of 0% ( 0 % ) to 5% ( 5 % ) based on the participant 2019s eligible compensation , provided the employee is employed at the end of the year and has worked at least 1000 hours . the qualifying domestic employees of the company 2019s ansoft subsidiary , acquired on july 31 , 2008 , also participate in a 401 ( k ) plan . there is no matching employer contribution associated with this plan . the company also maintains various defined contribution pension arrangements for its international employees . expenses related to the company 2019s retirement programs were $ 3.7 million in 2008 , $ 4.7 million in 2007 and $ 4.1 million in 2006 . 11 . non-compete and employment agreements employees of the company have signed agreements under which they have agreed not to disclose trade secrets or confidential information and , where legally permitted , that restrict engagement in or connection with any business that is competitive with the company anywhere in the world while employed by the company ( and .
Question: in 2008 what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits
Answer:
|
0.56609
|
in 2008 what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.56609%",
"B": "5.6609%",
"C": "0.056609%",
"D": "0.0056609%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.56609%",
"B": "5.6609%",
"C": "0.056609%",
"D": "0.0056609%"
}
|
A
|
finqa329
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: cross-border outstandings cross-border outstandings , as defined by bank regulatory rules , are amounts payable to state street by residents of foreign countries , regardless of the currency in which the claim is denominated , and local country claims in excess of local country obligations . these cross-border outstandings consist primarily of deposits with banks , loan and lease financing and investment securities . in addition to credit risk , cross-border outstandings have the risk that , as a result of political or economic conditions in a country , borrowers may be unable to meet their contractual repayment obligations of principal and/or interest when due because of the unavailability of , or restrictions on , foreign exchange needed by borrowers to repay their obligations . cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31: .
|( in millions )|2008|2007|2006|
|united kingdom|$ 5836|$ 5951|$ 5531|
|australia|2044|3567|1519|
|canada|2014|4565|2014|
|germany|2014|2944|2696|
|total cross-border outstandings|$ 7880|$ 17027|$ 9746|
the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 5% ( 5 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) and 9% ( 9 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2008 amounted to $ 3.45 billion ( canada and germany ) . there were no cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 . aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) . capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to assess whether our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives . regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors . we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements . our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt . our capital committee , working in conjunction with our asset and liability committee , referred to as alco , oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies . the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve . both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act .
Question: what are the consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2008?
Answer:
|
157600.0
|
what are the consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2008?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "7880.0",
"B": "17027.0",
"C": "9746.0",
"D": "157600.0"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "7880.0",
"B": "17027.0",
"C": "9746.0",
"D": "157600.0"
}
|
D
|
finqa330
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: expenditures and acquisitions of leased properties are funded by the original contributor of the assets , but no change in ownership interest may result from these contributions . an excess of ashland funded improvements over marathon funded improvements results in a net gain and an excess of marathon funded improvements over ashland funded improvements results in a net loss . cost of revenues increased by $ 8.718 billion in 2003 from 2002 and $ 367 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increases in the oerb segment were primarily a result of higher natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon costs . the increases in the rm&t segment primarily reflected higher acquisition costs for crude oil , refined products , refinery charge and blend feedstocks and increased manufacturing expenses . selling , general and administrative expenses increased by $ 107 million in 2003 from 2002 and $ 125 million in 2002 from 2001 . the increase in 2003 was primarily a result of increased employee benefits ( caused by increased pension expense resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions and a decrease in realized returns on plan assets ) and other employee related costs . also , marathon changed assumptions in the health care cost trend rate from 7.5% ( 7.5 % ) to 10% ( 10 % ) , resulting in higher retiree health care costs . additionally , during 2003 , marathon recorded a charge of $ 24 million related to organizational and business process changes . the increase in 2002 primarily reflected increased employee related costs . inventory market valuation reserve is established to reduce the cost basis of inventories to current market value . the 2002 results of operations include credits to income from operations of $ 71 million , reversing the imv reserve at december 31 , 2001 . for additional information on this adjustment , see 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of critical accounting estimates 2013 net realizable value of inventories 201d on page 31 . net interest and other financial costs decreased by $ 82 million in 2003 from 2002 , following an increase of $ 96 million in 2002 from 2001 . the decrease in 2003 is primarily due to an increase in capitalized interest related to increased long-term construction projects , the favorable effect of interest rate swaps , the favorable effect of interest on tax deficiencies and increased interest income on investments . the increase in 2002 was primarily due to higher average debt levels resulting from acquisitions and the separation . additionally , included in net interest and other financing costs are foreign currency gains of $ 13 million and $ 8 million for 2003 and 2002 and losses of $ 5 million for 2001 . loss from early extinguishment of debt in 2002 was attributable to the retirement of $ 337 million aggregate principal amount of debt , resulting in a loss of $ 53 million . as a result of the adoption of statement of financial accounting standards no . 145 201crescission of fasb statements no . 4 , 44 , and 64 , amendment of fasb statement no . 13 , and technical corrections 201d ( 201csfas no . 145 201d ) , the loss from early extinguishment of debt that was previously reported as an extraordinary item ( net of taxes of $ 20 million ) has been reclassified into income before income taxes . the adoption of sfas no . 145 had no impact on net income for 2002 . minority interest in income of map , which represents ashland 2019s 38 percent ownership interest , increased by $ 129 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 531 million in 2002 from 2001 . map income was higher in 2003 compared to 2002 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . map income was significantly lower in 2002 compared to 2001 as discussed below in the rm&t segment . provision for income taxes increased by $ 215 million in 2003 from 2002 , following a decrease of $ 458 million in 2002 from 2001 , primarily due to $ 720 million increase and $ 1.356 billion decrease in income before income taxes . the effective tax rate for 2003 was 36.6% ( 36.6 % ) compared to 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) and 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) for 2002 and 2001 . the higher rate in 2002 was due to the united kingdom enactment of a supplementary 10 percent tax on profits from the north sea oil and gas production , retroactively effective to april 17 , 2002 . in 2002 , marathon recognized a one-time noncash deferred tax adjustment of $ 61 million as a result of the rate increase . the following is an analysis of the effective tax rate for the periods presented: .
||2003|2002|2001|
|statutory tax rate|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|35.0% ( 35.0 % )|
|effects of foreign operations ( a )|-0.4 ( 0.4 )|5.6|-0.7 ( 0.7 )|
|state and local income taxes after federal income tax effects|2.2|3.9|3.0|
|other federal tax effects|-0.2 ( 0.2 )|-2.4 ( 2.4 )|-0.2 ( 0.2 )|
|effective tax rate|36.6% ( 36.6 % )|42.1% ( 42.1 % )|37.1% ( 37.1 % )|
( a ) the deferred tax effect related to the enactment of a supplemental tax in the u.k . increased the effective tax rate 7.0 percent in 2002. .
Question: by how much did the effective tax rate decrease from 2002 to 2003?
Answer:
|
-0.055
|
by how much did the effective tax rate decrease from 2002 to 2003?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "-0.055",
"B": "0.055",
"C": "-0.036",
"D": "0.036"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "-0.055",
"B": "0.055",
"C": "-0.036",
"D": "0.036"
}
|
A
|
finqa331
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 126 jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak exposure to a counterparty is an extreme measure of exposure calculated at a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . the measurement is done by equating the unexpected loss in a derivative counterparty exposure ( which takes into consideration both the loss volatility and the credit rating of the counterparty ) with the unexpected loss in a loan exposure ( which takes into consideration only the credit rating of the counterparty ) . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is the primary measure used by the firm for credit approval of derivative transactions . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 37.5 billion and $ 35.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 59.4 billion and $ 51.3 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates an adjustment , the cva , to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . the cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the primary components of changes in cva are credit spreads , new deal activity or unwinds , and changes in the underlying market environment . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential impact of wrong-way risk , which is broadly defined as the potential for increased correlation between the firm 2019s exposure to a counterparty ( avg ) and the counterparty 2019s credit quality . many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time . to the extent that these correlations are identified , the firm may adjust the cva associated with that counterparty 2019s avg . the firm risk manages exposure to changes in cva by entering into credit derivative transactions , as well as interest rate , foreign exchange , equity and commodity derivative transactions . the accompanying graph shows exposure profiles to the firm 2019s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the dre and avg metrics . the two measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year , if no new trades are added to the portfolio . the following table summarizes the ratings profile by derivative counterparty of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of other liquid securities collateral , for the dates indicated . the ratings scale is based on the firm 2019s internal ratings , which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s . ratings profile of derivative receivables rating equivalent 2014 2013 ( a ) december 31 , ( in millions , except ratios ) exposure net of all collateral % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral exposure net of all collateral % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral .
|rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios )|rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral|rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral|exposure net of all collateral|% ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral|
|aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3|$ 19202|32% ( 32 % )|$ 12953|25% ( 25 % )|
|a+/a1 to a-/a3|13940|24|12930|25|
|bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3|19008|32|15220|30|
|bb+/ba1 to b-/b3|6384|11|6806|13|
|ccc+/caa1 and below|837|1|3415|7|
|total|$ 59371|100% ( 100 % )|$ 51324|100% ( 100 % )|
( a ) the prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. .
Question: what percentage of the total exposure net of all collateral has a rating equivalent of a+/a1 to a-/a3?
Answer:
|
0.23479
|
what percentage of the total exposure net of all collateral has a rating equivalent of a+/a1 to a-/a3?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.23479%",
"B": "0.24000%",
"C": "0.25000%",
"D": "0.32000%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.23479%",
"B": "0.24000%",
"C": "0.25000%",
"D": "0.32000%"
}
|
A
|
finqa333
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: f-80 www.thehartford.com the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 14 . commitments and contingencies ( continued ) future minimum lease commitments as of december 31 , 2016 operating leases .
||operating leases|
|2017|$ 42|
|2018|35|
|2019|28|
|2020|20|
|2021|10|
|thereafter|28|
|total minimum lease payments [1]|$ 163|
[1] excludes expected future minimum sublease income of approximately $ 2 , $ 2 , $ 2 , $ 2 , $ 0 and $ 0 in 2017 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , 2021 and thereafter respectively . the company 2019s lease commitments consist primarily of lease agreements for office space , automobiles , and office equipment that expire at various dates . unfunded commitments as of december 31 , 2016 , the company has outstanding commitments totaling $ 1.6 billion , of which $ 1.2 billion is committed to fund limited partnership and other alternative investments , which may be called by the partnership during the commitment period to fund the purchase of new investments and partnership expenses . additionally , $ 313 of the outstanding commitments relate to various funding obligations associated with private placement securities . the remaining outstanding commitments of $ 95 relate to mortgage loans the company is expecting to fund in the first half of 2017 . guaranty funds and other insurance-related assessments in all states , insurers licensed to transact certain classes of insurance are required to become members of a guaranty fund . in most states , in the event of the insolvency of an insurer writing any such class of insurance in the state , the guaranty funds may assess its members to pay covered claims of the insolvent insurers . assessments are based on each member 2019s proportionate share of written premiums in the state for the classes of insurance in which the insolvent insurer was engaged . assessments are generally limited for any year to one or two percent of the premiums written per year depending on the state . some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through surcharges on policyholders or through full or partial premium tax offsets , while other states permit recovery of assessments through the rate filing process . liabilities for guaranty fund and other insurance-related assessments are accrued when an assessment is probable , when it can be reasonably estimated , and when the event obligating the company to pay an imposed or probable assessment has occurred . liabilities for guaranty funds and other insurance- related assessments are not discounted and are included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 the liability balance was $ 134 and $ 138 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 amounts related to premium tax offsets of $ 34 and $ 44 , respectively , were included in other assets . derivative commitments certain of the company 2019s derivative agreements contain provisions that are tied to the financial strength ratings , as set by nationally recognized statistical agencies , of the individual legal entity that entered into the derivative agreement . if the legal entity 2019s financial strength were to fall below certain ratings , the counterparties to the derivative agreements could demand immediate and ongoing full collateralization and in certain instances enable the counterparties to terminate the agreements and demand immediate settlement of all outstanding derivative positions traded under each impacted bilateral agreement . the settlement amount is determined by netting the derivative positions transacted under each agreement . if the termination rights were to be exercised by the counterparties , it could impact the legal entity 2019s ability to conduct hedging activities by increasing the associated costs and decreasing the willingness of counterparties to transact with the legal entity . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position as of december 31 , 2016 was $ 1.4 billion . of this $ 1.4 billion , the legal entities have posted collateral of $ 1.7 billion in the normal course of business . in addition , the company has posted collateral of $ 31 associated with a customized gmwb derivative . based on derivative market values as of december 31 , 2016 , a downgrade of one level below the current financial strength ratings by either moody 2019s or s&p would not require additional assets to be posted as collateral . based on derivative market values as of december 31 , 2016 , a downgrade of two levels below the current financial strength ratings by either moody 2019s or s&p would require additional $ 10 of assets to be posted as collateral . these collateral amounts could change as derivative market values change , as a result of changes in our hedging activities or to the extent changes in contractual terms are negotiated . the nature of the collateral that we post , when required , is primarily in the form of u.s . treasury bills , u.s . treasury notes and government agency securities . guarantees in the ordinary course of selling businesses or entities to third parties , the company has agreed to indemnify purchasers for losses arising subsequent to the closing due to breaches of representations and warranties with respect to the business or entity being sold or with respect to covenants and obligations of the company and/or its subsidiaries . these obligations are typically subject to various time limitations , defined by the contract or by operation of law , such as statutes of limitation . in some cases , the maximum potential obligation is subject to contractual limitations , while in other cases such limitations are not specified or applicable . the company does not expect to make any payments on these guarantees and is not carrying any liabilities associated with these guarantees. .
Question: as of december 31 , 2016 what was the percent of the total future minimum lease commitments for operating leases that was due in 2017
Answer:
|
0.25767
|
as of december 31 , 2016 what was the percent of the total future minimum lease commitments for operating leases that was due in 2017
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.25767",
"B": "0.257",
"C": "0.26",
"D": "0.26"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.25767",
"B": "0.257",
"C": "0.26",
"D": "0.26"
}
|
A
|
finqa334
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . other sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below . 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures . the table below presents market risk for inventory positions that are not included in var . the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the underlying asset value . equity positions below relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . these debt positions are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments . these measures do not reflect diversification benefits across asset categories or across other market risk measures . asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december in millions 2013 2012 equity 1 $ 2256 $ 2471 .
|asset categories|asset categories||
|in millions|2013|2012|
|equity1|$ 2256|$ 2471|
|debt|1522|1676|
|total|$ 3778|$ 4147|
1 . december 2012 includes $ 208 million related to our investment in the ordinary shares of icbc , which was sold in the first half of 2013 . credit spread sensitivity on derivatives and borrowings . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives as well as changes in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 4 million and $ 3 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 8 million and $ 7 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . interest rate sensitivity . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the firm had $ 14.90 billion and $ 6.50 billion , respectively , of loans held for investment which were accounted for at amortized cost and included in 201creceivables from customers and counterparties , 201d substantially all of which had floating interest rates . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 136 million and $ 62 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a 12-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans held for investment . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 95 .
Question: what percentage of total 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december 2013 is equity related?
Answer:
|
0.59714
|
what percentage of total 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december 2013 is equity related?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.59714",
"B": "0.40286",
"C": "0.2256",
"D": "0.2471"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.59714",
"B": "0.40286",
"C": "0.2256",
"D": "0.2471"
}
|
A
|
finqa335
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis we believe our credit ratings are primarily based on the credit rating agencies 2019 assessment of : 2030 our liquidity , market , credit and operational risk management practices ; 2030 the level and variability of our earnings ; 2030 our capital base ; 2030 our franchise , reputation and management ; 2030 our corporate governance ; and 2030 the external operating environment , including the assumed level of government support . certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . we allocate a portion of our gce to ensure we would be able to make the additional collateral or termination payments that may be required in the event of a two-notch reduction in our long-term credit ratings , as well as collateral that has not been called by counterparties , but is available to them . the table below presents the additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in our credit ratings. .
|in millions|as of december 2013|as of december 2012|
|additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade|$ 911|$ 1534|
|additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade|2989|2500|
in millions 2013 2012 additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade $ 911 $ 1534 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2989 2500 cash flows as a global financial institution , our cash flows are complex and bear little relation to our net earnings and net assets . consequently , we believe that traditional cash flow analysis is less meaningful in evaluating our liquidity position than the excess liquidity and asset-liability management policies described above . cash flow analysis may , however , be helpful in highlighting certain macro trends and strategic initiatives in our businesses . year ended december 2013 . our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $ 11.54 billion to $ 61.13 billion at the end of 2013 . we generated $ 4.54 billion in net cash from operating activities . we used net cash of $ 16.08 billion for investing and financing activities , primarily to fund loans held for investment and repurchases of common stock . year ended december 2012 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 16.66 billion to $ 72.67 billion at the end of 2012 . we generated $ 9.14 billion in net cash from operating and investing activities . we generated $ 7.52 billion in net cash from financing activities from an increase in bank deposits , partially offset by net repayments of unsecured and secured long-term borrowings . year ended december 2011 . our cash and cash equivalents increased by $ 16.22 billion to $ 56.01 billion at the end of 2011 . we generated $ 23.13 billion in net cash from operating and investing activities . we used net cash of $ 6.91 billion for financing activities , primarily for repurchases of our series g preferred stock and common stock , partially offset by an increase in bank deposits . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 89 .
Question: what is the difference in millions , between additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade at the end of december 2013?
Answer:
|
2078.0
|
what is the difference in millions , between additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade and additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade at the end of december 2013?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "2078.0",
"B": "2989",
"C": "2500",
"D": "1534"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "2078.0",
"B": "2989",
"C": "2500",
"D": "1534"
}
|
A
|
finqa336
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( 2 ) in 2013 , our principal u.k subsidiary agreed with the trustees of one of the u.k . plans to contribute an average of $ 11 million per year to that pension plan for the next three years . the trustees of the plan have certain rights to request that our u.k . subsidiary advance an amount equal to an actuarially determined winding-up deficit . as of december 31 , 2015 , the estimated winding-up deficit was a3240 million ( $ 360 million at december 31 , 2015 exchange rates ) . the trustees of the plan have accepted in practice the agreed-upon schedule of contributions detailed above and have not requested the winding-up deficit be paid . ( 3 ) purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding on us , and that specifies all significant terms , including what is to be purchased , at what price and the approximate timing of the transaction . most of our purchase obligations are related to purchases of information technology services or other service contracts . ( 4 ) excludes $ 12 million of unfunded commitments related to an investment in a limited partnership due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when the limited partnership will request funding . ( 5 ) excludes $ 218 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to our inability to reasonably estimate the period ( s ) when potential cash settlements will be made . financial condition at december 31 , 2015 , our net assets were $ 6.2 billion , representing total assets minus total liabilities , a decrease from $ 6.6 billion at december 31 , 2014 . the decrease was due primarily to share repurchases of $ 1.6 billion , dividends of $ 323 million , and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $ 289 million related primarily to an increase in the post- retirement benefit obligation , partially offset by net income of $ 1.4 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . working capital increased by $ 77 million from $ 809 million at december 31 , 2014 to $ 886 million at december 31 , 2015 . accumulated other comprehensive loss increased $ 289 million at december 31 , 2015 as compared to december 31 , 2014 , which was primarily driven by the following : 2022 negative net foreign currency translation adjustments of $ 436 million , which are attributable to the strengthening of the u.s . dollar against certain foreign currencies , 2022 a decrease of $ 155 million in net post-retirement benefit obligations , and 2022 net financial instrument losses of $ 8 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions .
|years ended december 31 ( millions except percentage data )|2015|2014|2013|
|revenue|$ 7426|$ 7834|$ 7789|
|operating income|1506|1648|1540|
|operating margin|20.3% ( 20.3 % )|21.0% ( 21.0 % )|19.8% ( 19.8 % )|
the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is most closely correlated .
Question: what is the working capital turnover in 2015?
Answer:
|
8.76224
|
what is the working capital turnover in 2015?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "6.2",
"B": "809",
"C": "886",
"D": "8.76224"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "6.2",
"B": "809",
"C": "886",
"D": "8.76224"
}
|
D
|
finqa337
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .
|date|pmi|pmi peer group ( 1 )|s&p 500 index|
|december 31 2012|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|
|december 31 2013|$ 108.50|$ 122.80|$ 132.40|
|december 31 2014|$ 106.20|$ 132.50|$ 150.50|
|december 31 2015|$ 120.40|$ 143.50|$ 152.60|
|december 31 2016|$ 130.80|$ 145.60|$ 170.80|
|december 31 2017|$ 156.80|$ 172.70|$ 208.10|
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?
Answer:
|
-0.513
|
what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "-0.513%",
"B": "0.513%",
"C": "-5.13%",
"D": "5.13%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "-0.513%",
"B": "0.513%",
"C": "-5.13%",
"D": "5.13%"
}
|
A
|
finqa338
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .
||global payments|s&p 500|s&p information technology|
|may 31 2002|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|$ 100.00|
|may 31 2003|94.20|91.94|94.48|
|may 31 2004|129.77|108.79|115.24|
|may 31 2005|193.30|117.75|116.29|
|may 31 2006|260.35|127.92|117.14|
|may 31 2007|224.24|157.08|144.11|
issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2002 to 2003?
Answer:
|
-0.058
|
what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2002 to 2003?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "-0.058",
"B": "0.058",
"C": "0.942",
"D": "-0.942"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "-0.058",
"B": "0.058",
"C": "0.942",
"D": "-0.942"
}
|
A
|
finqa339
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: scheduled maturities of our marketable securities are as follows: .
|in millions|available for sale cost|available for sale fair value|
|under 1 year ( current )|$ 25.4|$ 25.4|
|equity securities|0.3|3.5|
|total|$ 25.7|$ 28.9|
as of may 27 , 2018 , we did not any have cash and cash equivalents pledged as collateral for derivative contracts . as of may 27 , 2018 , $ 0.9 million of certain accounts receivable were pledged as collateral against a foreign uncommitted line of credit . the fair value and carrying amounts of long-term debt , including the current portion , were $ 14169.7 million and $ 14268.8 million , respectively , as of may 27 , 2018 . the fair value of long-term debt was estimated using market quotations and discounted cash flows based on our current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments . long-term debt is a level 2 liability in the fair value hierarchy . risk management activities as a part of our ongoing operations , we are exposed to market risks such as changes in interest and foreign currency exchange rates and commodity and equity prices . to manage these risks , we may enter into various derivative transactions ( e.g. , futures , options , and swaps ) pursuant to our established policies . commodity price risk many commodities we use in the production and distribution of our products are exposed to market price risks . we utilize derivatives to manage price risk for our principal ingredients and energy costs , including grains ( oats , wheat , and corn ) , oils ( principally soybean ) , dairy products , natural gas , and diesel fuel . our primary objective when entering into these derivative contracts is to achieve certainty with regard to the future price of commodities purchased for use in our supply chain . we manage our exposures through a combination of purchase orders , long-term contracts with suppliers , exchange-traded futures and options , and over-the-counter options and swaps . we offset our exposures based on current and projected market conditions and generally seek to acquire the inputs at as close to our planned cost as possible . we use derivatives to manage our exposure to changes in commodity prices . we do not perform the assessments required to achieve hedge accounting for commodity derivative positions . accordingly , the changes in the values of these derivatives are recorded currently in cost of sales in our consolidated statements of earnings . although we do not meet the criteria for cash flow hedge accounting , we believe that these instruments are effective in achieving our objective of providing certainty in the future price of commodities purchased for use in our supply chain . accordingly , for purposes of measuring segment operating performance these gains and losses are reported in unallocated corporate items outside of segment operating results until such time that the exposure we are managing affects earnings . at that time we reclassify the gain or loss from unallocated corporate items to segment operating profit , allowing our operating segments to realize the economic effects of the derivative without experiencing any resulting mark-to-market volatility , which remains in unallocated corporate items. .
Question: what would be the gain/loss if all marketable securities are sold at fair value?
Answer:
|
3.2
|
what would be the gain/loss if all marketable securities are sold at fair value?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.3",
"B": "3.2",
"C": "25.7",
"D": "28.9"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.3",
"B": "3.2",
"C": "25.7",
"D": "28.9"
}
|
B
|
finqa340
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index as of the market close on september 30 , 2007 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . sep-11sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07 sep-12 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones us technology index *$ 100 invested on 9/30/07 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .
||september 30 2007|september 30 2008|september 30 2009|september 30 2010|september 30 2011|september 30 2012|
|apple inc .|$ 100|$ 74|$ 121|$ 185|$ 248|$ 437|
|s&p 500|$ 100|$ 78|$ 73|$ 80|$ 81|$ 105|
|s&p computer hardware|$ 100|$ 84|$ 99|$ 118|$ 134|$ 214|
|dow jones us technology|$ 100|$ 76|$ 85|$ 95|$ 98|$ 127|
.
Question: what was the cumulative total return on apple stock between september 30 2007 and september 30 2012?
Answer:
|
337.0
|
what was the cumulative total return on apple stock between september 30 2007 and september 30 2012?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "74.0",
"B": "121.0",
"C": "248.0",
"D": "337.0"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "74.0",
"B": "121.0",
"C": "248.0",
"D": "337.0"
}
|
D
|
finqa341
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: contractual obligations in 2011 , we issued $ 1200 million of senior notes and entered into the credit facility with third-party lenders in the amount of $ 1225 million . as of december 31 , 2011 , total outstanding long-term debt was $ 1859 million , consisting of these senior notes and the credit facility , in addition to $ 105 million of third party debt that remained outstanding subsequent to the spin-off . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a transition services agreement with northrop grumman , under which northrop grumman or certain of its subsidiaries provides us with certain services to help ensure an orderly transition following the distribution . under the transition services agreement , northrop grumman provides , for up to 12 months following the spin-off , certain enterprise shared services ( including information technology , resource planning , financial , procurement and human resource services ) , benefits support services and other specified services . the original term of the transition services agreement ends on march 31 , 2012 , although we have the right to and have cancelled certain services as we transition to new third-party providers . the services provided by northrop grumman are charged to us at cost , and a limited number of these services may be extended for a period of approximately six months to allow full information systems transition . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . in connection with the spin-off , we entered into a tax matters agreement with northrop grumman ( the 201ctax matters agreement 201d ) that governs the respective rights , responsibilities and obligations of northrop grumman and us after the spin-off with respect to tax liabilities and benefits , tax attributes , tax contests and other tax sharing regarding u.s . federal , state , local and foreign income taxes , other taxes and related tax returns . we have several liabilities with northrop grumman to the irs for the consolidated u.s . federal income taxes of the northrop grumman consolidated group relating to the taxable periods in which we were part of that group . however , the tax matters agreement specifies the portion of this tax liability for which we will bear responsibility , and northrop grumman has agreed to indemnify us against any amounts for which we are not responsible . the tax matters agreement also provides special rules for allocating tax liabilities in the event that the spin-off , together with certain related transactions , is not tax-free . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity in item 8 . we do not expect either the transition services agreement or the tax matters agreement to have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations . the following table presents our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2011 , and the related estimated timing of future cash payments : ( $ in millions ) total 2012 2013 - 2014 2015 - 2016 2017 and beyond .
|( $ in millions )|total|2012|2013 - 2014|2015 - 2016|2017 and beyond|
|long-term debt|$ 1859|$ 29|$ 129|$ 396|$ 1305|
|interest payments on long-term debt ( 1 )|854|112|219|202|321|
|operating leases|124|21|32|23|48|
|purchase obligations ( 2 )|2425|1409|763|209|44|
|other long-term liabilities ( 3 )|587|66|96|67|358|
|total contractual obligations|$ 5849|$ 1637|$ 1239|$ 897|$ 2076|
( 1 ) interest payments include interest on $ 554 million of variable interest rate debt calculated based on interest rates at december 31 , 2011 . ( 2 ) a 201cpurchase obligation 201d is defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on us and that specifies all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum , or variable price provisions ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . these amounts are primarily comprised of open purchase order commitments to vendors and subcontractors pertaining to funded contracts . ( 3 ) other long-term liabilities primarily consist of total accrued workers 2019 compensation reserves , deferred compensation , and other miscellaneous liabilities , of which $ 201 million is the current portion of workers 2019 compensation liabilities . it excludes obligations for uncertain tax positions of $ 9 million , as the timing of the payments , if any , cannot be reasonably estimated . the above table excludes retirement related contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make minimum and discretionary contributions to our qualified pension plans of approximately $ 153 million and $ 65 million , respectively , exclusive of any u.s . government recoveries . we will continue to periodically evaluate whether to make additional discretionary contributions . in 2012 , we expect to make $ 35 million in contributions for our other postretirement plans , exclusive of any .
Question: what is the ratio of long term debt to the total contractual obligations
Answer:
|
0.31783
|
what is the ratio of long term debt to the total contractual obligations
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.081",
"B": "0.31783",
"C": "0.504",
"D": "0.728"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "0.081",
"B": "0.31783",
"C": "0.504",
"D": "0.728"
}
|
B
|
finqa342
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through june 2011 . these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years . as of december 31 , 2006 , annual future minimum payments under these operating leases were as follows ( in thousands ) : .
|2007|5320|
|2008|5335|
|2009|5075|
|2010|4659|
|2011|4712|
|2012 and thereafter|12798|
|total|$ 37899|
rent expense , net of amortization of the deferred gain on sale of property , was $ 4723041 , $ 4737218 , and $ 1794234 for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , january 1 , 2006 and january 2 , 2005 , respectively . 6 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock as of december 31 , 2006 , the company had 46857512 shares of common stock outstanding , of which 4814744 shares were sold to employees and consultants subject to restricted stock agreements . the restricted common shares vest in accordance with the provisions of the agreements , generally over five years . all unvested shares are subject to repurchase by the company at the original purchase price . as of december 31 , 2006 , 36000 shares of common stock were subject to repurchase . in addition , the company also issued 12000 shares for a restricted stock award to an employee under the company 2019s new 2005 stock and incentive plan based on service performance . these shares vest monthly over a three-year period . stock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) . upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased . the 2005 stock plan provides that an aggregate of up to 11542358 shares of the company 2019s common stock be reserved and available to be issued . in addition , the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what percentage of annual future minimum payments under operating leases are due in 2008?
Answer:
|
0.14077
|
what percentage of annual future minimum payments under operating leases are due in 2008?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.14077%",
"B": "14.077%",
"C": "1.4077%",
"D": "0.014077%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.14077%",
"B": "14.077%",
"C": "1.4077%",
"D": "0.014077%"
}
|
A
|
finqa343
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 12 . stock award plans and stock based compensation ( continued ) compensation expense recognized related to the company 2019s espp was approximately $ 0.1 million for each of the years ended march 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 respectively . the fair value of shares issued under the employee stock purchase plan was estimated on the commencement date of each offering period using the black-scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: .
||2009|2008|2007|
|risk-free interest rate|1.01% ( 1.01 % )|4.61% ( 4.61 % )|4.84% ( 4.84 % )|
|expected life ( years )|0.5|0.5|0.5|
|expected volatility|67.2% ( 67.2 % )|45.2% ( 45.2 % )|39.8% ( 39.8 % )|
note 13 . capital stock in august 2008 , the company issued 2419932 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 17.3788 in a public offering , which resulted in net proceeds to the company of approximately $ 42.0 million , after deducting offering expenses . in march 2007 , the company issued 5000000 shares of common stock in a public offering , and in april 2007 , an additional 80068 shares of common stock were issued in connection with the offering upon the partial exercise of the underwriters 2019 over-allotment option . the company has authorized 1000000 shares of class b preferred stock , $ 0.01 par value , of which the board of directors can set the designation , rights and privileges . no shares of class b preferred stock have been issued or are outstanding . note 14 . income taxes deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to tax benefit carryforwards and to differences between the financial statement amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis . deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates . a valuation reserve is established if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized . the tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized . at march 31 , 2009 , the company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards , or nols , of approximately $ 145.1 million and $ 97.1 million , respectively , which begin to expire in fiscal 2010 . additionally , at march 31 , 2009 , the company had federal and state research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.1 million and $ 4.2 million , respectively , which begin to expire in fiscal 2010 . the company acquired impella , a german-based company , in may 2005 . impella had pre-acquisition net operating losses of approximately $ 18.2 million at the time of acquisition ( which is denominated in euros and is subject to foreign exchange remeasurement at each balance sheet date presented ) , and has since incurred net operating losses in each fiscal year since the acquisition . during fiscal 2008 , the company determined that approximately $ 1.2 million of pre-acquisition operating losses could not be utilized . the utilization of pre-acquisition net operating losses of impella in future periods is subject to certain statutory approvals and business requirements . due to uncertainties surrounding the company 2019s ability to generate future taxable income to realize these assets , a full valuation allowance has been established to offset the company 2019s net deferred tax assets and liabilities . additionally , the future utilization of the company 2019s nol and research and development credit carry forwards to offset future taxable income may be subject to a substantial annual limitation under section 382 of the internal revenue code due to ownership changes that have occurred previously or that could occur in the future . ownership changes , as defined in section 382 of the internal revenue code , can limit the amount of net operating loss carry forwards and research and development credit carry forwards that a company can use each year to offset future taxable income and taxes payable . the company believes that all of its federal and state nol 2019s will be available for carryforward to future tax periods , subject to the statutory maximum carryforward limitation of any annual nol . any future potential limitation to all or a portion of the nol or research and development credit carry forwards , before they can be utilized , would reduce the company 2019s gross deferred tax assets . the company will monitor subsequent ownership changes , which could impose limitations in the future. .
Question: what was the range of volatility ( % ( % ) ) in the black scholes calculation for the three year period?\\n
Answer:
|
0.274
|
what was the range of volatility ( % ( % ) ) in the black scholes calculation for the three year period?\\n
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.274",
"B": "0.61",
"C": "0.52",
"D": "0.98"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.274",
"B": "0.61",
"C": "0.52",
"D": "0.98"
}
|
A
|
finqa345
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: and penalties , resulting in a liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2018 . in 2017 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 1 million for interest and penalties , resulting in no material liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017 . the 2017 changes in interest and penalties related to statute of limitation expirations . in 2016 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 2 million for interest and penalties , resulting in a total liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2016 . the 2016 changes in interest and penalties related to reductions in prior year tax positions and settlement with a taxing authority . the following table summarizes the tax years that are either currently under examination or remain open under the applicable statute of limitations and subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions in which the company operates: .
|jurisdiction united states ( 1 )|jurisdiction 2011|jurisdiction -|2017|
|connecticut|2016|-|2017|
|mississippi|2012|-|2017|
|virginia ( 1 )|2011|-|2017|
virginia ( 1 ) 2011 - 2017 ( 1 ) the 2014 tax year has been closed in these jurisdictions . although the company believes it has adequately provided for all uncertain tax positions , amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than the company's accrued position . accordingly , additional provisions for federal and state income tax related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are effectively settled or otherwise resolved . conversely , the company could settle positions with the tax authorities for amounts lower than have been accrued . the company believes that it is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months the company's liability for uncertain tax positions may decrease by $ 14 million due to resolution of a federal uncertain tax position . during 2013 the company entered into the pre-compliance assurance process with the irs for years 2011 and 2012 . the company is part of the irs compliance assurance process program for the 2014 through 2018 tax years . open tax years related to state jurisdictions remain subject to examination . deferred income taxes - deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and for income tax purposes . as described above , deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated as of the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates expected to be in effect when the deferred tax items reverse in future periods . as a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) under the tax act , the company revalued its net deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2017 . net deferred tax assets are classified as long-term deferred tax assets in the consolidated statements of financial position. .
Question: what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017?
Answer:
|
0.0
|
what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.0",
"B": "1 million",
"C": "2 million",
"D": "Not mentioned in the context"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.0",
"B": "1 million",
"C": "2 million",
"D": "Not mentioned in the context"
}
|
A
|
finqa346
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 the valuation of our investment portfolio and assessment of other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses overview and key data as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but are unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations on claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional development on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . loss reserves also include an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2009 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.8 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 25 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim pay- ments are reliably determinable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry net reserves of $ 76 million , net of discount . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008. .
|( in millions of u.s . dollars )|2009 gross losses|2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )|2009 net losses|2009 gross losses|2009 reinsurance recoverable ( 1 )|net losses|
|balance beginning of year|$ 37176|$ 12935|$ 24241|$ 37112|$ 13520|$ 23592|
|losses and loss expenses incurred|11141|3719|7422|10944|3341|7603|
|losses and loss expenses paid|-11093 ( 11093 )|-4145 ( 4145 )|-6948 ( 6948 )|-9899 ( 9899 )|-3572 ( 3572 )|-6327 ( 6327 )|
|other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )|559|236|323|-1367 ( 1367 )|-387 ( 387 )|-980 ( 980 )|
|losses and loss expenses acquired|2013|2013|2013|386|33|353|
|balance end of year|$ 37783|$ 12745|$ 25038|$ 37176|$ 12935|$ 24241|
( 1 ) net of provision for uncollectible reinsurance .
Question: what was the percent of the losses in 2009 based on the unpaid loss and loss expense reserves
Answer:
|
12.8
|
what was the percent of the losses in 2009 based on the unpaid loss and loss expense reserves
|
{
"options": {
"A": "10.2",
"B": "12.8",
"C": "15.4",
"D": "18.6"
},
"goldenKey": "B"
}
|
{
"A": "10.2",
"B": "12.8",
"C": "15.4",
"D": "18.6"
}
|
B
|
finqa348
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 242.5 million primarily due to a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts , which resulted in a $ 422 million income tax benefit . the net income effect was partially offset by a $ 199 million regulatory charge , which reduced net revenue , because a portion of the benefit will be shared with customers . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . 2010 compared to 2009 net income decreased slightly by $ 1.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , a higher effective income tax rate , and higher interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2010 net revenue|$ 1043.7|
|mark-to-market tax settlement sharing|-195.9 ( 195.9 )|
|retail electric price|32.5|
|volume/weather|11.6|
|other|-5.7 ( 5.7 )|
|2011 net revenue|$ 886.2|
the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 . see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective may 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the formula rate plan increase. .
Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011
Answer:
|
-0.15091
|
what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011
|
{
"options": {
"A": "-0.15091%",
"B": "0.15091%",
"C": "-15.091%",
"D": "15.091%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "-0.15091%",
"B": "0.15091%",
"C": "-15.091%",
"D": "15.091%"
}
|
A
|
finqa349
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 7 . derivative instruments effective january 1 , 2001 , aes adopted sfas no . 133 , 2018 2018accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 2019 2019 which , as amended , establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities . the adoption of sfas no . 133 on january 1 , 2001 , resulted in a cumulative reduction to income of less than $ 1 million , net of deferred income tax effects , and a cumulative reduction of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders 2019 equity of $ 93 million , net of deferred income tax effects . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , the impact of changes in derivative fair value primarily related to derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment was a charge of $ 36 million , after income taxes . this amount includes a charge of $ 6 million , after income taxes , related to the ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying as cash flow and fair value hedges for the year ended december 31 , 2001 . there was no net effect on results of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , of derivative and non-derivative instruments that have been designated and qualified as hedging net investments in foreign operations . approximately $ 35 million of other comprehensive loss related to derivative instruments as of december 31 , 2001 is expected to be recognized as a reduction to earnings over the next twelve months . a portion of this amount is expected to be offset by the effects of hedge accounting . the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivative transactions will be reclassified into earnings as interest expense is recognized for hedges of interest rate risk , as foreign currency transaction and translation gains and losses are recognized for hedges of foreign currency exposure and as electric and gas sales and purchases are recognized for hedges of forecasted electric and gas transactions . amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of tax , during the year-ended december 31 , 2001 , were as follows ( in millions ) : .
|transition adjustment on january 1 2001|$ -93 ( 93 )|
|reclassification to earnings|-32 ( 32 )|
|change in fair value|4|
|balance december 31 2001|$ -121 ( 121 )|
aes utilizes derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk , foreign exchange risk and commodity price risk . the company utilizes interest rate swap , cap and floor agreements to hedge interest rate risk on floating rate debt . the majority of aes 2019s interest rate derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . currency forward and swap agreements are utilized to hedge foreign exchange risk which is a result of aes or one of its subsidiaries entering into monetary obligations in currencies other than its own functional currency . the majority of aes 2019s foreign currency derivatives are designated and qualify as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges . certain derivative instruments and other non-derivative instruments are designated and qualify as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation . the company utilizes electric and gas derivative instruments , including swaps , options , forwards and futures , to hedge the risk related to electricity and gas sales and purchases . the majority of aes 2019s electric and gas derivatives are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges . the maximum length of time over which aes is hedging its exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions , excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest , is three years . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , a charge of $ 4 million , after income taxes , was recorded for two cash flow hedges that were discontinued because it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur . a portion of this charge has been classified as discontinued operations . for the year ended december 31 , 2001 , no fair value hedges were de-recognized or discontinued. .
Question: for 2001 what was the net change in aoci in millions?\\n
Answer:
|
28.0
|
for 2001 what was the net change in aoci in millions?\\n
|
{
"options": {
"A": "93.0",
"B": "-93.0",
"C": "-121.0",
"D": "28.0"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "93.0",
"B": "-93.0",
"C": "-121.0",
"D": "28.0"
}
|
D
|
finqa350
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: foreign currency exchange rate risk many of our non-u.s . companies maintain both assets and liabilities in local currencies . therefore , foreign exchange rate risk is generally limited to net assets denominated in those foreign currencies . foreign exchange rate risk is reviewed as part of our risk management process . locally required capital levels are invested in home currencies in order to satisfy regulatory require- ments and to support local insurance operations regardless of currency fluctuations . the principal currencies creating foreign exchange risk for us are the british pound sterling , the euro , and the canadian dollar . the following table provides more information on our exposure to foreign exchange rate risk at december 31 , 2008 and 2007. .
|( in millions of u.s . dollars )|2008|2007|
|fair value of net assets denominated in foreign currencies|$ 1127|$ 1651|
|percentage of fair value of total net assets|7.8% ( 7.8 % )|9.9% ( 9.9 % )|
|pre-tax impact on equity of hypothetical 10 percent strengthening of the u.s . dollar|$ 84|$ 150|
reinsurance of gmdb and gmib guarantees our net income is directly impacted by changes in the reserves calculated in connection with the reinsurance of variable annuity guarantees , primarily gmdb and gmib . these reserves are calculated in accordance with sop 03-1 ( sop reserves ) and changes in these reserves are reflected as life and annuity benefit expense , which is included in life underwriting income . in addition , our net income is directly impacted by the change in the fair value of the gmib liability ( fvl ) , which is classified as a derivative according to fas 133 . the fair value liability established for a gmib reinsurance contract represents the differ- ence between the fair value of the contract and the sop 03-1 reserves . changes in the fair value of the gmib liability , net of associated changes in the calculated sop 03-1 reserve , are reflected as realized gains or losses . ace views our variable annuity reinsurance business as having a similar risk profile to that of catastrophe reinsurance , with the probability of long-term economic loss relatively small at the time of pricing . adverse changes in market factors and policyholder behavior will have an impact on both life underwriting income and net income . when evaluating these risks , we expect to be compensated for taking both the risk of a cumulative long-term economic net loss , as well as the short-term accounting variations caused by these market movements . therefore , we evaluate this business in terms of its long-term eco- nomic risk and reward . the ultimate risk to the variable annuity guaranty reinsurance business is a long-term underperformance of investment returns , which can be exacerbated by a long-term reduction in interest rates . following a market downturn , continued market underperformance over a period of five to seven years would eventually result in a higher level of paid claims as policyholders accessed their guarantees through death or annuitization . however , if market conditions improved following a downturn , sop 03-1 reserves and fair value liability would fall reflecting a decreased likelihood of future claims , which would result in an increase in both life underwriting income and net income . as of december 31 , 2008 , management established the sop 03-1 reserve based on the benefit ratio calculated using actual market values at december 31 , 2008 . management exercises judgment in determining the extent to which short-term market movements impact the sop 03-1 reserve . the sop 03-1 reserve is based on the calculation of a long-term benefit ratio ( or loss ratio ) for the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance . despite the long-term nature of the risk the benefit ratio calculation is impacted by short-term market movements that may be judged by management to be temporary or transient . management will , in keeping with the language in sop 03-1 , regularly examine both quantitative and qualitative analysis and management will determine if , in its judgment , the change in the calculated benefit ratio is of sufficient magnitude and has persisted for a sufficient duration to warrant a change in the benefit ratio used to establish the sop 03-1 reserve . this has no impact on either premium received or claims paid nor does it impact the long-term profit or loss of the variable annuity guaran- tee reinsurance . the sop 03-1 reserve and fair value liability calculations are directly affected by market factors , including equity levels , interest rate levels , credit risk and implied volatilities , as well as policyholder behaviors , such as annuitization and lapse rates . the table below shows the sensitivity , as of december 31 , 2008 , of the sop 03-1 reserves and fair value liability associated with the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance portfolio . in addition , the tables below show the sensitivity of the fair value of specific derivative instruments held ( hedge value ) , which includes instruments purchased in january 2009 , to partially offset the risk in the variable annuity guarantee reinsurance portfolio . although these derivatives do not receive hedge accounting treatment , some portion of the change in value may be used to offset changes in the sop 03-1 reserve. .
Question: what are the total net assets in 2008 , ( in millions ) ?
Answer:
|
14448.71795
|
what are the total net assets in 2008 , ( in millions ) ?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "1127",
"B": "1651",
"C": "7.8%",
"D": "14448.71795"
},
"goldenKey": "D"
}
|
{
"A": "1127",
"B": "1651",
"C": "7.8%",
"D": "14448.71795"
}
|
D
|
finqa351
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: be adjusted by reference to a grid ( the 201cpricing grid 201d ) based on the consolidated leverage ratio and ranges between 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) to 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) for adjusted libor loans and 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) to 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) for alternate base rate loans . the weighted average interest rate under the outstanding term loans and revolving credit facility borrowings was 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) and 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company pays a commitment fee on the average daily unused amount of the revolving credit facility and certain fees with respect to letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2016 , the commitment fee was 15.0 basis points . since inception , the company incurred and deferred $ 3.9 million in financing costs in connection with the credit agreement . 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior notes in june 2016 , the company issued $ 600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) senior unsecured notes due june 15 , 2026 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) . the proceeds were used to pay down amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility . interest is payable semi-annually on june 15 and december 15 beginning december 15 , 2016 . prior to march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or a 201cmake-whole 201d amount applicable to such notes as described in the indenture governing the notes , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . on or after march 15 , 2026 ( three months prior to the maturity date of the notes ) , the company may redeem some or all of the notes at any time or from time to time at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed , plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the redemption date . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants , including limitations that restrict the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create or incur secured indebtedness and enter into sale and leaseback transactions and the company 2019s ability to consolidate , merge or transfer all or substantially all of its properties or assets to another person , in each case subject to material exceptions described in the indenture . the company incurred and deferred $ 5.3 million in financing costs in connection with the notes . other long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 42.0 million and $ 44.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) and 1.7% ( 1.7 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) .
|2017|$ 27000|
|2018|27000|
|2019|63000|
|2020|25000|
|2021|86250|
|2022 and thereafter|600000|
|total scheduled maturities of long term debt|$ 828250|
|current maturities of long term debt|$ 27000|
.
Question: what portion of the total long term debt is due in the next 12 months?
Answer:
|
0.0326
|
what portion of the total long term debt is due in the next 12 months?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.0326",
"B": "0.0652",
"C": "0.032",
"D": "0.065"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.0326",
"B": "0.0652",
"C": "0.032",
"D": "0.065"
}
|
A
|
finqa357
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: troubled debt restructurings ( tdrs ) a tdr is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties . tdrs result from our loss mitigation activities , and include rate reductions , principal forgiveness , postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization , and extensions , which are intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral . additionally , tdrs also result from borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc . in those situations where principal is forgiven , the amount of such principal forgiveness is immediately charged off . some tdrs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest , as restructured , and result in potential incremental losses . these potential incremental losses have been factored into our overall alll estimate . the level of any subsequent defaults will likely be affected by future economic conditions . once a loan becomes a tdr , it will continue to be reported as a tdr until it is ultimately repaid in full , the collateral is foreclosed upon , or it is fully charged off . we held specific reserves in the alll of $ .5 billion and $ .6 billion at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively , for the total tdr portfolio . table 70 : summary of troubled debt restructurings in millions dec . 31 dec . 31 .
|in millions|dec . 312013|dec . 312012|
|total consumer lending|$ 2161|$ 2318|
|total commercial lending|578|541|
|total tdrs|$ 2739|$ 2859|
|nonperforming|$ 1511|$ 1589|
|accruing ( a )|1062|1037|
|credit card|166|233|
|total tdrs|$ 2739|$ 2859|
( a ) accruing loans have demonstrated a period of at least six months of performance under the restructured terms and are excluded from nonperforming loans . loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc are not returned to accrual status . table 71 quantifies the number of loans that were classified as tdrs as well as the change in the recorded investments as a result of the tdr classification during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . additionally , the table provides information about the types of tdr concessions . the principal forgiveness tdr category includes principal forgiveness and accrued interest forgiveness . these types of tdrs result in a write down of the recorded investment and a charge-off if such action has not already taken place . the rate reduction tdr category includes reduced interest rate and interest deferral . the tdrs within this category would result in reductions to future interest income . the other tdr category primarily includes consumer borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc , as well as postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization and contractual extensions for both consumer and commercial borrowers . in some cases , there have been multiple concessions granted on one loan . this is most common within the commercial loan portfolio . when there have been multiple concessions granted in the commercial loan portfolio , the principal forgiveness tdr was prioritized for purposes of determining the inclusion in the table below . for example , if there is principal forgiveness in conjunction with lower interest rate and postponement of amortization , the type of concession will be reported as principal forgiveness . second in priority would be rate reduction . for example , if there is an interest rate reduction in conjunction with postponement of amortization , the type of concession will be reported as a rate reduction . in the event that multiple concessions are granted on a consumer loan , concessions resulting from discharge from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy without formal affirmation of the loan obligations to pnc would be prioritized and included in the other type of concession in the table below . after that , consumer loan concessions would follow the previously discussed priority of concessions for the commercial loan portfolio . 140 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the change in the balance in millions of nonperforming loans from 2012 to 2013?
Answer:
|
78.0
|
what was the change in the balance in millions of nonperforming loans from 2012 to 2013?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "78.0",
"B": "1511",
"C": "1589",
"D": "2739"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "78.0",
"B": "1511",
"C": "1589",
"D": "2739"
}
|
A
|
finqa358
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: .
||2018|2017|
|equity securities|34% ( 34 % )|55% ( 55 % )|
|debt securities|49% ( 49 % )|28% ( 28 % )|
|other|17% ( 17 % )|17% ( 17 % )|
|total|100% ( 100 % )|100% ( 100 % )|
for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .
Question: what was the percent of the increase in the debt securities
Answer:
|
0.75
|
what was the percent of the increase in the debt securities
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.75%",
"B": "1.75%",
"C": "2.75%",
"D": "3.75%"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.75%",
"B": "1.75%",
"C": "2.75%",
"D": "3.75%"
}
|
A
|
finqa359
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement ( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes 201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period . the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8 million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively . the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were : ( millions ) .
|2018|$ 550|
|2019|397|
|2020|300|
|2021|1017|
|2022|497|
.
Question: what is the yearly interest expense related to the 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) note issued in january 2016 , in millions?
Answer:
|
13.0
|
what is the yearly interest expense related to the 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) note issued in january 2016 , in millions?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "10.0",
"B": "11.5",
"C": "13.0",
"D": "14.5"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "10.0",
"B": "11.5",
"C": "13.0",
"D": "14.5"
}
|
C
|
finqa360
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: apple inc . | 2016 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .
||september2011|september2012|september2013|september2014|september2015|september2016|
|apple inc .|$ 100|$ 166|$ 123|$ 183|$ 212|$ 213|
|s&p 500 index|$ 100|$ 130|$ 155|$ 186|$ 185|$ 213|
|s&p information technology index|$ 100|$ 132|$ 142|$ 183|$ 187|$ 230|
|dow jones u.s . technology supersector index|$ 100|$ 130|$ 137|$ 178|$ 177|$ 217|
.
Question: what is the 6 year return of the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index?
Answer:
|
1.17
|
what is the 6 year return of the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "1.17",
"B": "1.30",
"C": "1.37",
"D": "1.78"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "1.17",
"B": "1.30",
"C": "1.37",
"D": "1.78"
}
|
A
|
finqa361
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: at december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .
|in millions|2015|2016|2017|2018|2019|thereafter|
|lease obligations|$ 142|$ 106|$ 84|$ 63|$ 45|$ 91|
|purchase obligations ( a )|3266|761|583|463|422|1690|
|total|$ 3408|$ 867|$ 667|$ 526|$ 467|$ 1781|
( a ) includes $ 2.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 154 million , $ 168 million and $ 185 million for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , international paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings cercla and state actions international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , including the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources . while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 95 million in the aggregate as of december 31 , 2014 . cass lake : one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minnesota . during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a remediation feasibility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million . the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 50 million to address the selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy decision would be delayed . in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean- up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and significantly higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to perform a natural resource damage assessment . it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . other remediation costs in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 41 million as of december 31 , 2014 . other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . legal proceedings environmental kalamazoo river : the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./ portage creek/kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the kalamazoo river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis paper company ( st . regis ) . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . although the company has not received any orders from the epa , in december 2014 , the epa sent the company a letter demanding payment of $ 19 million to reimburse the epa for costs associated with a time critical removal action of pcb contaminated sediments from a portion of the site . the company 2019s cercla liability has not been finally determined with respect to this or any other portion of the site and we have declined to reimburse the epa at this time . as noted below , the company is involved in allocation/ apportionment litigation with regard to the site . accordingly , it is premature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . the company was named as a defendant by georgia- pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the site . the suit .
Question: in 2015 what percentage of december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is represented by lease obligations?
Answer:
|
0.04167
|
in 2015 what percentage of december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations is represented by lease obligations?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.04167",
"B": "0.03922",
"C": "0.04545",
"D": "0.03704"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.04167",
"B": "0.03922",
"C": "0.04545",
"D": "0.03704"
}
|
A
|
finqa362
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: fleet automation approximately 66% ( 66 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single driver trucks . by converting our residential routes to automated service , we reduce labor costs , improve driver productivity and create a safer work environment for our employees . additionally , communities using automated vehicles have higher participation rates in recycling programs , thereby complementing our initiative to expand our recycling capabilities . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 12% ( 12 % ) of our fleet operates on natural gas . we expect to continue our gradual fleet conversion to cng , our preferred alternative fuel technology , as part of our ordinary annual fleet replacement process . we believe a gradual fleet conversion is most prudent to realize the full value of our previous fleet investments . approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of our replacement vehicle purchases during 2013 were cng vehicles . we believe using cng vehicles provides us a competitive advantage in communities with strict clean emission objectives or initiatives that focus on protecting the environment . although upfront costs are higher , we expect that using natural gas will reduce our overall fleet operating costs through lower fuel expenses . standardized maintenance based on an industry trade publication , we operate the eighth largest vocational fleet in the united states . as of december 31 , 2013 , our average fleet age in years , by line of business , was as follows : approximate number of vehicles average age .
||approximate number of vehicles|average age|
|residential|7600|7|
|commercial|4300|6|
|industrial|3600|9|
|total|15500|7|
through standardization of core functions , we believe we can minimize variability in our maintenance processes resulting in higher vehicle quality while extending the service life of our fleet . we believe operating a more reliable , safer and efficient fleet will lower our operating costs . we have completed implementation of standardized maintenance programs for approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of our fleet maintenance operations as of december 31 , 2013 . cash utilization strategy key components of our cash utilization strategy include increasing free cash flow and improving our return on invested capital . our definition of free cash flow , which is not a measure determined in accordance with united states generally accepted accounting principles ( u.s . gaap ) , is cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment , plus proceeds from sales of property and equipment as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows . for a discussion and reconciliation of free cash flow , you should read the 201cfree cash flow 201d section of our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contained in item 7 of this form 10-k . we believe free cash flow drives shareholder value and provides useful information regarding the recurring cash provided by our operations . free cash flow also demonstrates our ability to execute our cash utilization strategy , which includes investments in acquisitions and returning a majority of free cash flow to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases . we are committed to an efficient capital structure and maintaining our investment grade rating . we manage our free cash flow by ensuring that capital expenditures and operating asset levels are appropriate in light of our existing business and growth opportunities , as well as by closely managing our working capital , which consists primarily of accounts receivable , accounts payable , and accrued landfill and environmental costs. .
Question: what is the approximate number of vehicle in the fleet that are operating on compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 12% ( 12 % )
Answer:
|
1860.0
|
what is the approximate number of vehicle in the fleet that are operating on compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 12% ( 12 % )
|
{
"options": {
"A": "4300",
"B": "3600",
"C": "1860",
"D": "7600"
},
"goldenKey": "C"
}
|
{
"A": "4300",
"B": "3600",
"C": "1860",
"D": "7600"
}
|
C
|
finqa363
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) .
|( $ in millions )|foreign currency translation|pension and other postretirement items net of tax|effective financial derivatives net of tax|accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )|
|december 31 2004|$ 148.9|$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )|$ 10.6|$ 33.2|
|2005 change|-74.3 ( 74.3 )|-43.6 ( 43.6 )|-16.0 ( 16.0 )|-133.9 ( 133.9 )|
|december 31 2005|74.6|-169.9 ( 169.9 )|-5.4 ( 5.4 )|-100.7 ( 100.7 )|
|2006 change|57.2|55.9|6.0|119.1|
|effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )|2013|-47.9 ( 47.9 )|2013|-47.9 ( 47.9 )|
|december 31 2006|131.8|-161.9 ( 161.9 )|0.6|-29.5 ( 29.5 )|
|2007 change|90.0|57.9|-11.5 ( 11.5 )|136.4|
|december 31 2007|$ 221.8|$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )|$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )|$ 106.9|
( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n
Answer:
|
0.70705
|
what was the percentage change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) between 2005 and 2006?\\n
|
{
"options": {
"A": "0.70705",
"B": "0.895",
"C": "1.119",
"D": "1.414"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "0.70705",
"B": "0.895",
"C": "1.119",
"D": "1.414"
}
|
A
|
finqa364
|
Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: .
|years ended december 31|2018|2017|2016|
|statutory tax rate|19.0% ( 19.0 % )|19.3% ( 19.3 % )|20.0% ( 20.0 % )|
|u.s . state income taxes net of u.s . federal benefit|-0.4 ( 0.4 )|-1.5 ( 1.5 )|0.4|
|taxes on international operations ( 1 )|-7.3 ( 7.3 )|-30.3 ( 30.3 )|-12.2 ( 12.2 )|
|nondeductible expenses|2.7|3.4|1.4|
|adjustments to prior year tax requirements|0.9|2.0|-1.2 ( 1.2 )|
|adjustments to valuation allowances|3.8|-1.8 ( 1.8 )|-2.2 ( 2.2 )|
|change in uncertain tax positions|0.9|1.6|3.2|
|excess tax benefits related to shared based compensation ( 2 )|-3.6 ( 3.6 )|-8.0 ( 8.0 )|2014|
|u.s . tax reform impact ( 3 )|7.1|51.2|2014|
|loss on disposition|-10.2 ( 10.2 )|2014|2014|
|other 2014 net|-1.2 ( 1.2 )|0.6|1.2|
|effective tax rate|11.7% ( 11.7 % )|36.5% ( 36.5 % )|10.6% ( 10.6 % )|
( 1 ) the company determines the adjustment for taxes on international operations based on the difference between the statutory tax rate applicable to earnings in each foreign jurisdiction and the enacted rate of 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) , 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) and 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) at december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . the benefit to the company 2019s effective income tax rate from taxes on international operations relates to benefits from lower-taxed global operations , primarily due to the use of global funding structures and the tax holiday in singapore . the impact decreased from 2017 to 2018 primarily as a result of the decrease in the u.s . federal tax ( 2 ) with the adoption of asu 2016-09 in 2017 , excess tax benefits and deficiencies from share-based payment transactions are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income . ( 3 ) the impact of the tax reform act including the transition tax , the re-measurement of u.s . deferred tax assets and liabilities from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) , withholding tax accruals , and the allocation of tax benefit between continuing operations and discontinued operations related to utilization of foreign tax credits. .
Question: what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?
Answer:
|
-0.073
|
what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?
|
{
"options": {
"A": "-0.073",
"B": "0.073",
"C": "-0.127",
"D": "0.127"
},
"goldenKey": "A"
}
|
{
"A": "-0.073",
"B": "0.073",
"C": "-0.127",
"D": "0.127"
}
|
A
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.