Datasets:

mengru
/

data_for_STA

train dict
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "Adams only.", "Brooks only.", "Case only.", "Adams and Brooks" ], "question": "Davis decided to kill Adams. He set out for Adams's house. Before he got there he saw Brooks, who resembled Adams. Thinking that Brooks was Adams, Davis shot at Brooks. The shot missed Bro...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "guilty, because this is a public welfare offense. ", "guilty, because he cannot be excused on the basis of his own failure to keep proper records. ", "not guilty, because the statute punishes omissions and he was not given fair warning of his duty to act. ", "not guilty,...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "Yes, because Mann threatened to use deadly force. ", "Yes, unless Mann was related to Borrower. ", "No, if it was apparent that Lender was about to inflict serious bodily harm upon Borrower. ", "No, because Lender was the original aggressor by threatening Borrower with a...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "must permit Don to answer if he had objected to Peter's testimony.", "may permit Don to answer, whether or not he had objected to Peter's testimony. ", "may permit Don to answer only if he had objected to Peter's testimony.", "cannot permit Don to answer, whether or not ...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "partial breach of contract only if Ames had properly or substantially painted the porch.", "partial breach of contract whether or not Ames had properly or substantially painted the porch.", "total breach of contract only if Ames had properly or substantially painted the porc...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "succeed if he can prove that he had painted the porch according to specifications.", "succeed, because he cashed the check under economic duress. ", "not succeed, because he cashed the check without objection. ", "not succeed, because he is entitled to recover only the r...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "succeed, because by cashing the check Ames impliedly promised to repaint the porch. ", "succeed, because Ames accepted Bell's offer by not replying to the letter of June 18. ", "not succeed, because Bell's letter of June 18 was a counteroffer which Ames never accepted. ", ...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "unconstitutional as an undue burden on interstate commerce.", "unconstitutional as a violation of the privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.", "constitutional, because the state does not know the quality of out-of-state barber schools. ", "constitu...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "constitutional as an effort to ensure that barbers speak English adequately.", "constitutional as an exercise of the state police power.", "unconstitutional as a bill of attainder.", "unconstitutional as a denial of equal protection" ], "question": "The State of Auro...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "dismissed, because there is no diversity of citizenship. ", "dismissed, because of the abstention doctrine. ", "decided on the merits, because federal jurisdiction extends to controversies between two states. ", "decided on the merits, because a federal question is invol...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "The privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment", "The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment", "The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment", "The obligation of contracts claus" ], "question": "The State of Aurora requires licens...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "murder.", "involuntary manslaughter.", "voluntary manslaughter.", "no form of criminal homicide" ], "question": "John was fired from his job. Too proud to apply for unemployment benefits, he used his savings to feed his family. When one of his children became ill, he...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "assault.", "negligence.", "invasion of privacy.", "false imprisonment" ], "question": "Professor Merrill, in a lecture in her psychology course at a private university, described an experiment in which a group of college students in a neighboring city rushed out and ...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "Yes, if the students would not have performed the experiment but for Merrill's lecture. ", "Yes, if Carr's claim against the students is based on negligence. ", "No, because the students were not Merrill's employees. ", "No, because Merrill did not authorize the car wash...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "win, because his use was adverse to Amos and once adverse it continued adverse until some affirmative showing of a change. ", "win, because Eric made no attempt to renew permission after Amos quit possession of Goldacre. ", "lose, because his use was with permission. ", ...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "An objection by Dr. Webb asserting her privilege against disclosure of confidential communications made by a patient.", "An objection by Parr's attorney on the grounds of the doctor-patient privilege.", "A finding by the trial judge that Zadok had left the office without act...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "asked on cross-examination of an expert witness.", "asked on direct examination of a young child.", "asked on direct examination of a disinterested eyewitness.", "related to preliminary matters such as the name or occupation of the witness" ], "question": "A leading ...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "prevail, because by leaving the ladder, Roofer became a trespasser on Orissa's property. ", "prevail, because by leaving the ladder, Roofer created the risk that a person might unlawfully enter the house. ", "not prevail, because the act of the thief was a superseding cause....
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "trespasser ab initio.", "licensee.", "tenant at sufferance.", "tenant from month to month" ], "question": "Homer and Purcell entered into a valid, enforceable written contract by which Homer agreed to sell and Purcell agreed to purchase Blackacre, which was Homer's r...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "Her acting contract with Albert was legally severable into weekly units.", "Her performance of the literal terms of the contract was physically impossible.", "Her reliance on the engagement with Albert by declining another acting role created an estoppel against Albert.", ...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "Albert could not find any substitute except Helen, who demanded a contract for a minimum of six months if she was to perform at all. ", "Helen, by general acclaim, was much better in the role than Bertha had been. 7 ", "Albert had offered Bertha a position as Helen's underst...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "must have a legal expert from the same locality testify that defendants' conduct was a breach.", "must have a legal expert from the same state testify that defendants' conduct was a breach.", "can rely on the application of the jurors' common knowledge as to whether there wa...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "would have, but for her lawyers' negligence, recovered from Motorist. ", "had a good faith claim against Motorist that was lost by her lawyers' negligence.", "was severely and permanently injured when struck by Motorist's automobile.", "did not negligently contribute to ...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "Immediately after being insulted by Robert, Defendant takes a knife and stabs and kills Robert. ", "Angered over having been struck by Sam, Defendant buys rat poison and puts it into Sam's coffee. Sam drinks the coffee and dies as a result. ", "Intending to injure Fred, Defe...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "guilty, because this is a public welfare offense. ", "guilty, because she should have inquired whether the signs had been abandoned. ", "not guilty if the jury finds that she honestly believed the signs had been abandoned.", "not guilty unless the jury finds that the sta...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "not guilty, because Ted had as much right as Howard to be in the house. ", "not guilty, because Howard attacked Ted with a deadly weapon. ", "guilty, because Ted's presence in Janet's bedroom prompted Howard's attack. ", "guilty, because Ted's failure to obey Howard's or...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "Sarah has an equitable servitude concerning the use of the tract.", "Sarah, as a taxpayer, has legal interest in the use of the tract. ", "Sarah is a creditor beneficiary of Oscar's promise with respect to the tract.", "Pete is not a bona fide purchaser" ], "question...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "Sarah, because the restrictive covenant in her deed runs with the land. ", "Sarah, because the presence of the mobile home may adversely affect the market value of her land. ", "Joe, because his deed did not contain the restrictive covenant. ", "Joe, because he is not a ...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "Pete, because the school board has been guilty of laches. ", "Pete, because his deed did not refer to the subdivision plan. ", "the school board, because Pete had constructive notice of the proposed use of the tract. ", "the school board, because there has been a dedicat...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "strictly liable, because the tree was on his property. ", "liable for Contractor's negligence if, to House's knowledge, Contractor was engaged in hazardous activity. ", "liable, because he assumed responsibility when he paid Contractor for the repair. ", "liable on the b...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "the tree was on the property of House.", "he repaired the sidewalk at the direction of House.", "he could not reasonably foresee that the tree would fall.", "he was relieved of liability when House paid for the repair" ], "question": "House owns his home in City. On ...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "No, if payment by House was an acceptance of the work. ", "No, because House selected Contractor to do the work. ", "Yes, if the judgment against House was based on vicarious liability. ", "Yes, because House's conduct was not a factual cause of the harm." ], "questi...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "valid, because constitutionally the sovereign is not liable except with its own consent. ", "valid, because the legislature is vested with constitutional authority to repeal laws it has enacted. ", "invalid, because a state is equitably estopped to disclaim a valid bid once ...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "police power.", "war and defense power.", "power to tax and spend for the general welfare.", "power to enforce the privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment." ], "question": "The strongest constitutional basis for the enactment of a federal statute...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "succeed, because Peterson's deed from Owens did not mention the easement. ", "succeed, because more than 40 years have passed since the Water District last entered Barrenacres. ", "fail, because the Water District's plan is within its rights. 11 ", "fail, because the Wat...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "succeed, because his deed from Owens did not mention the easement. ", "succeed, because of an implied obligation imposed on the Water District to restore the surface to its condition prior to entry. ", "fail, because of the public interest in maintaining a continuous water s...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "The plaintiffs should succeed, because the interest of Church terminated with the first removal of sand and gravel ", "Church and Darin should be enjoined, and damages should be recovered but impounded for future distribution. ", "The injunction should be granted, but damage...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "Johnson forced his way into a woman's home, bound her, and compelled her to tell him that her jewelry was in an adjoining room. Johnson went to the room, took the jewelry, and fled. ", "A confederate of Brown pushed a man in order to cause him to lose his balance and drop his br...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "Illegal, because the Attorney General must prosecute if the House of Representatives directs. ", "Illegal, because the Attorney General must prosecute those who violate federal law. ", "Legal, because ambassadors are immune from prosecution for acts committed in the course ...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "Green may refuse to answer the questions if she can demonstrate that they are unrelated to matters upon which Congress may legislate.", "the House may question Green on matters pertaining to the expenditures of funds appropriated by Congress.", "only the Senate may question ...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "there was no breaking", "he consented to the entry.", "no overt act was committed by him.", "there was no intent to commit a felony." ], "question": "Harry met Bill, who was known to him to be a burglar, in a bar. Harry told Bill that he needed money. He promised to ...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "acted under a mistake of law.", "had the consent of the owner.", "reasonably thought he was in Harry's house.", "found the window unlocked" ], "question": "Harry met Bill, who was known to him to be a burglar, in a bar. Harry told Bill that he needed money. He promis...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "Bill was the alter ego of Harry.", "they did not intend to commit burglary.", "there was no overt act.", "there was no agreemen" ], "question": "Harry met Bill, who was known to him to be a burglar, in a bar. Harry told Bill that he needed money. He promised to pay B...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "admissible as an excited utterance.", "admissible as a prior consistent statement.", "admissible as a statement by Wood regarding a condition he observed, made while he was observing it. ", "inadmissible if there was no evidence that Wood had expertise in determining dru...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "It may be used only to refresh Chase's recollection.", "It is admissible for impeachment and as substantive evidence that Chase was sober.", "It is inadmissible, because Duke's Bar cannot impeach its own witness. ", "It is inadmissible, because it is hearsay, not within ...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "admissible to show that the prior conduct of Duke's Bar was negligent.", "admissible to show that Duke's Bar was aware of the need for taking precautionary measures.", "inadmissible, because subsequent measures by an employee are not binding on Duke's Bar. ", "inadmissib...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "admissible as an admission by the owner of Duke's Bar that Chase was drunk when he left the bar.", "admissible as a factual admission made in connection with an offer of compromise.", "inadmissible as hearsay, not within any exception ", "inadmissible as a statement made...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "She had heard the same voice on a similar tape recording identified to her by Daly's brother.", "She had heard Daly speak many times, but never over the telephone. ", "She had, specifically for the purpose of preparing to testify, talked with Daly over the telephone at a tim...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "Devlin's casual business practices created his loss.", "the need for certainty in land title records controls.", "the agency implied to complete the deed cannot be restricted by the oral understanding.", "the recording of the deed precludes any questioning of its provisi...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "the Statute of Frauds prevents the introduction of any evidence of Devlin's and Parnell's agreement", "recording of the deed from Devlin to Parnell precludes any question of its genuineness.", "as between Devlin and a bona fide purchaser, Devlin is estopped. ", "the clea...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "Yes, because a property owner is strictly liable for acts on his premises if such acts cause harm to persons using the adjacent public sidewalks. ", "Yes, if the person who threw the ashtray cannot be identified. ", "No, because Ohner had no personal knowledge of the conduct...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "Lack of consideration", "Mistake of fact as to basic assumption", "Statute of Frauds", "Indefiniteness of Charles's promis" ], "question": "While negligently driving his father's uninsured automobile, 25-year-old Arthur crashed into an automobile driven by Betty. Bot...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "I only", "II only", "Both I and II", "Neither I nor I" ], "question": "While negligently driving his father's uninsured automobile, 25-year-old Arthur crashed into an automobile driven by Betty. Both Arthur and Betty were injured. Charles, Arthur's father, erroneousl...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "I only", "I and II only", "II and III only", "Neither I nor II nor II" ], "question": "While negligently driving his father's uninsured automobile, 25-year-old Arthur crashed into an automobile driven by Betty. Both Arthur and Betty were injured. Charles, Arthur's fa...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "Yes, because Dodge had detrimentally relied on Charles's promise. ", "Yes, because Charles's promise was supported by a bargained-for exchange. ", "No, because Dodge's claim against Arthur's estate was worthless. ", "No, because Charles at most had only a moral obligatio...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "Yes, because Arthur's debt of $200 was liquidated and undisputed. ", "Yes, because Dodge honestly believed that he had a legal right against Charles for the full $200. ", "No, because Charles honestly believed that Dodge did not have a legal right against him for the $200. "...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "No legitimate educational function is served by the free distribution of textbooks.", "The state may not in any way aid private schools.", "The Constitution forbids private bias of any kind.", "Segregation is furthered by the distribution of textbooks to these students."...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "Private religious schools, like public nonsectarian schools, fulfill an important educational function. ", "Religious instruction in private schools is not constitutionally objectionable.", "The purpose and effect of the free distribution of these textbooks is secular and do...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "Defendant had been hypnotized at a party and ordered by the hypnotist to strike the person he disliked the most.", "Defendant was suffering from an epileptic seizure and had no control over his motions.", "Defendant was heavily intoxicated and was shadowboxing without realiz...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "prevail, because the story concerned her personal, private life. ", "prevail if the story was false.", "not prevail, because News did not print the story with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity. ", "not prevail if News exercised ...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "No, because there is no practicable way for Utility to reduce the fumes. ", "No, because Utility's acts constituted a public nuisance. ", "Yes, because Farmer's personal injuries were within the scope of the liability imposed on Utility. ", "Yes, because the generation o...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "No, because Utility was not negligent. ", "No as to 1976 crop damage, because Farmer did not mitigate damages by selling his farm in 1975. ", "Yes as to 20 percent of his crop damage, because use of available equipment would have reduced the fumes by 20 percent. ", "Yes,...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "the parol evidence rule does not bar the introduction of evidence for the purpose of interpreting a written agreement.", "the memorandum was not a completely integrated agreement.", "HDS detrimentally relied on the oral promise of coordination in signing the memorandum", ...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "Yes, because June 6 was within one month of completion. ", "Yes, because CP had done one-half the job. ", "No, because of a constructive condition precedent requiring at least substantial completion of the work before HDS would have a duty to pay ", "No, because \"within...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "Yes, because it was the compromise of an honest dispute. ", "Yes, because the Statute of Frauds does not apply to subsequent oral modifications. ", "No, because it was oral ", "No, because it was not supported by consideration." ], "question": "On March 1, Computer P...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "Yes, because \"CP to complete by July 1\" is an express condition. ", "Yes, because the doctrine of substantial performance does not apply to commercial contracts. ", "No, because both parties manifested an understanding that time was not of the essence. ", "No, because ...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "Yes, because CP had substantially performed. ", "Yes, because the program would save HDS $12,000 a year. ", "No, because shortening the processing time by one-half was an express condition subsequent. ", "No, because HDS's computer systems manager did not certify satisfa...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "Yes, because continued use of the programs by HDS would save at least $12,000 a year. ", "Yes, because HDS was continuing to use programs created by CP for which, as HDS knew, CP expected to be paid. ", "No, because failure of an express condition precedent excused HDS from ...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "denied, because the search was incident to a valid custodial arrest. ", "denied, because Police Officer acted under a reasonable suspicion and legitimate concern for his own personal safety. ", "granted, because there was no reasonable or proper basis upon which to justify c...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "granted, because Donna's request to contact her attorney by telephone was reasonable and should have been granted immediately. ", "granted, because of the \"fruit of the poisonous tree\" doctrine. ", "denied, because the statements were volunteered and not the result of inte...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "There is no evidence that tenured teachers are any more qualified than he is.", "He leased a home in reliance on an oral promise of reemployment by the college president.", "He was the only teacher at the college whose contract was not renewed that year.", "In the expect...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "Barnes' academic performance had been substandard. 19", "A speech he made that was critical of administration policies violated a college regulation concerning teacher behavior.", "Barnes worked at the college for less than five years.", "Barnes could be replaced with a ...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "constitutional, because the protection of wild animals is important to the general welfare. ", "constitutional, because Congress has authority to make regulations respecting federal property. ", "unconstitutional, because wild animals as defined by state common law are not f...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "the attempted gifts to grandchildren are void under the Rule Against Perpetuities.", "the attempted gifts to grandchildren are void as unlawful restraints on alienation.", "the provisions concerning grandchildren are valid and will be upheld according to their terms.", "...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "the land is located in a state where the Statute of Frauds will not be applied if there has been such part performance as will result in an irreparable hardship if the contract is not performed.", "the land is located in a state where the Statute of Frauds will not be applied if...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "denied, because a tenant by the entirety has no right to partition ", "denied, because Wade has absolute title to the property. ", "granted, because the tenancy by the entirety that was created by the deed was severed when Wade abandoned Mary. ", "granted, because the es...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "Yes, if Sand could have effectively secured the chute at moderate cost. ", "Yes, because Sand is strictly liable for harm resulting from an artificial condition on its property. ", "No, if Commuter had the last clear chance to avoid the injury. ", "No, because Ladd was a...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "her conduct was not the cause in fact of the harm.", "she used reasonable care in the maintenance of her brakes.", "she could not reasonably foresee Ladd's presence in the street.", "she did not act willfully and wantonl" ], "question": "Sand Company operated an inst...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "larceny, because he took the papers only to prevent identification and not for his own use. ", "larceny, because he did not take anything from a living victim. ", "robbery, because he did not take the papers by means of force or putting in fear. ", "robbery, because he d...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "not prevail, because Bill was not an aggressor. ", "not prevail unless Bill intended his gesture as a threat.", "prevail if David honestly believed that Bill would attack him.", "prevail only if a reasonable person under the circumstances would have believed that Bill wo...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "It is not relevant in determining the right of Ped.", "It may be considered by the trier of fact on the issue of Driver's liability.", "It will bar Ped's recovery unless Driver saw Ped in time to avoid the impact.", "It will bar Ped's recovery as a matter of law" ], ...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "prevail, because Trucker's violation of a state statute makes him strictly liable for all injuries caused thereby. ", "prevail, because the probable purpose of Section 2 of the Vehicle Code of State was to safeguard pedestrians in using crosswalks. ", "not prevail, because P...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "denied, because the college president, in loco parentis, had the responsibility of preventing unlawful activity by students under the president's supervision. ", "denied, because there was probable cause to make the search and police obtained a warrant before commencing the sear...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "guilty.", "not guilty, because his act did not hasten the deceased's death, but instead prolonged it by one day. ", "not guilty, because the deceased was already suffering from a fatal illness. ", "not guilty, because the poison was not the sole cause of deat" ], "qu...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "Police arrested Thief and recovered goods he had stolen. At the direction of the police, Thief took the goods to Defendant. Defendant, believing the goods to be stolen, purchased them. Defendant is charged with attempting to receive stolen property. ", "Defendant misrepresented ...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "\"Isn't it a fact that you are Potts' close friend?\" ", "\"Isn't it true that you are known in the community as Louie the Lush' because of your addiction to alcohol?\" ", "\"Didn't you fail to report some income on your tax return last year?\" ", "\"Weren't you convi...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "the judge is convinced that she will incriminate herself.", "there is clear and convincing evidence that she will incriminate herself.", "there is a preponderance of evidence that she will incriminate herself.", "the judge believes that there is some reasonable possibili...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "nothing Terrence could have done would have overcome the original absence of a written agreement.", "the actions and payments of Terrence are as consistent with his being a tenant as with an oral contract.", "Terrence did not secure Olga's approval for the improvements that ...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "Only by an offeree's return promise to make a reasonable effort to bring about the arrest and conviction of an arsonist within the scope of the offer.", "Only by an offeree's making the arrest and assisting in the successful conviction of an arsonist within the scope of the offe...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "by lapse of time, on December 31 of the year in which it was made. ", "not by lapse of time, but only by effective revocation. ", "not by revocation, but only by lapse of a reasonable time. ", "either by lapse of a reasonable time or earlier by effective revocatio" ], ...
{ "answer": 2, "choices": [ "by publication in the legal notices of a local newspaper.", "in the same manner as made, i.e., by local telecast at least once daily for one week. ", "in the same manner as made or by a comparable medium and frequency of publicity.", "by notice mailed to all residents of...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "A unilateral offer of employment by Humongous which became irrevocable for a reasonable number of days after Gimlet commenced his investigation of the store's arson.", "An employment for compensation subject to a condition precedent that Gimlet succeed in his investigation.", ...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "The city was benefited as a result of Gimlet's services.", "The city's offer was in the nature of a bounty, so that the elements of contract are not essential to the city's liability. ", "The fact that the city attempted to revoke its offer only a few months after making it ...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "Yes, because Grower intended that the dog frighten Wife. ", "Yes, because the breaking of the leash establishes liability under res ipsa loquitur. ", "No, because Wife made an unauthorized entry on Grower's land. ", "No, because Grower did not intend to cause any harmful...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "Yes, because the landowner did not have a privilege to use excessive force. ", "Yes, if Husband reasonably believed that the dog might bite him. ", "No, if the dog did not come in contact with him. ", "No, if Grower was trying to protect his" ], "question": "Husband ...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "Yes, because Wife and Husband entered on his land without permission. ", "Yes, because Grower had posted his property with a \"No Trespassing\" sign. ", "No, because Wife and Husband were confronted by an emergency situation. ", "No, because Grower used excessive force t...
{ "answer": 0, "choices": [ "there is no rational basis for preferring as heirs collateral relatives and even the state over unacknowledged children, and therefore the law violates the equal protection clause. ", "he has been deprived of property without due process because his fundamental right to inherit ...
{ "answer": 3, "choices": [ "the authority of a state over the disposition of decedents' property located in the state is not affected by the Constitution of the United States", "a statute prescribing the means of disposing of the property of intestate decedents does not constitute invidious discrimination....
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "nothing.", "a possibility of reverter.", "a right of entry for condition broken.", "a reversion in fee simple absolute" ], "question": "Alice conveyed Twinoaks Farm \"to Barbara, her heirs and assigns, so long as the premises are used for residential and farm purpose...
{ "answer": 1, "choices": [ "prevail, because he is the sole owner of Lawnacre. ", "prevail if, but only if, the cotenancy created in Celeste and Donald was a tenancy by the entirety. ", "not prevail if he had knowledge of the conveyance prior to Celeste's death.", "not prevail, because Paul and Don...

End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

This is the data for paper "Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms".

💻 Usage

huggingface-cli download --repo-type dataset mengru/data_for_STA --local-dir ./

📖 Citation

Please cite our paper if you use STA in your work.

@misc{wang2025STA,
      title={Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms}, 
      author={Mengru Wang, Ziwen Xu, Shengyu Mao, Shumin Deng, Zhaopeng Tu, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang},
      year={2025},
      eprint={2505.20322},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL}
}

Downloads last month: 51

Size of downloaded dataset files:

47.5 MB

Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:

47.5 MB

Number of rows:

99,842

Paper for mengru/data_for_STA

Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms

Paper • 2505.20322 • Published May 23, 2025 • 14