nirantk/nli-triplets · Datasets at Hugging Face

anchor stringlengths 5 1.82k	entailment stringlengths 1 351	contradiction stringlengths 1 295	metadata dict
uh or maybe eventually uh just waiting it out and that's where a lot of aggravation comes i think is is uh these guys spend so much time in the appeal process or just in the waiting process they may spend years	The guys appeal a lot.	The guys aren't allowed to appeal.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
um-hum it's not so much that i that i haven't seen a lot of really bad sentences passed either by trials or by judges what bothers me is that uh they really don't mean anything	The bad sentences don't mean anything.	The bad sentences that are passed, mean a lot to me.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Shakespeare wanted me to remind those who prefer a return to Admin Law Judges that What's past is prologue.	There are people who wish to return to Admin Law Judges.	There are none who prefer return to Admin Law Judges.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
no i do not think one appeal is everybody's entitled to one appeal	One appeal should be allowed for everyone.	Some people shouldn't get appeals.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
That respect, she said, need not be for the judge personally.	She conveyed, That respect doesn't need to be personally for the judge.	She stated, That respect is personally for the judge.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Abe Fortas' 1968 nomination as chief justice of the Supreme Court, which Republicans delayed to death, marked the first sign of change, but Robert Bork's 1987 Supreme Court nomination truly ushered in the era of appointments warfare.	Fortas was nominated for the supreme court.	Fortas was not nominated for the court.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
The Indiana legislature renamed that judgeship and Bailey was tabbed Decatur Superior Court judge from 1992-98, winning reelection twice.	Bailey was re-elected twice and was Decatur Superior Court judge for six years.	The Ohio legislature renamed that judgeship and Bailey did not win the re-election.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
An understanding of courtroom procedure is vital before you try to represent yourself.	You need to know what is happening in the courtroom.	It is quite easy to represent yourself.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
i guess there should be some flexibility because every situation may be unique that the judge can either increase that or keep it just at its minimum things of that nature	All of the situations are unique and therefore a rigid system does not suit it well.	I think that the lack of uniqueness among the situations means that it can be rigid.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Judges certainly appreciate it.	Judges feel favorable toward it.	Judges detest it.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Under state law, the minimum fine for contempt of a PFA is $100; the maximum fine is $1,000 and up to six months in jail.	There is a fine for contempt of a PFA.	There is no fine for contempt of a PFA.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
even if if they're even in that long or they appeal and then they get an appeal that says it was you know an unjust amount of time it was an extraordinary long length or something	Appeals are made stating they have been in for an undeservedly long time.	Appeals are made everyday requesting lengthier sentences.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
what the story the actual facts are at this point i don't i don't really know if some of the poor judges that are just trying to decide how it should be divided	What actually happened isn't clear, so the judges have a difficult job.	Everything is on the record, so it's a straightforward decision for the rich judges.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
some their kind of law doesn't get them to the courtroom but even in um litigation which is doing lawsuits is a lot of times that you never get to the courtroom itself and	Frequently, when it comes to litigation, you never see the inside of the courtroom.	You get to see courtrooms frequently if you have litigation cases.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Lower courts are televised without diminishing our respect.	Lower courts are on tv.	No courts are allowed on tv.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
well they should start with the the if they would get rid of seems to me i know there's a lot about courts that people don't understand there's more people in jail right now for child support	People do not understand many aspects of courts.	people definitely understand everything about courts	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
because there's no the answer is not being given to them in the court system and i think initially when our country was set up it was set up with God and it was really an integral part and no you can't you can't force people but i think people are hurting and they're out doing crack sitting on the street they were the kind of people that i think mostly we would want to receive it if it was presented to see i don't know i guess i'm kind of frustrated that you know we've gotten away from the Christian basis that our court system was founded upon i mean it reeks of the Bible just the whole thing the whole system and so i feel like if that was presented more openly and not just relying upon and para church ministr y to come in and do it but that the system itself you know you know what i mean	The system was initially set up with God.	The system does not depend on religion.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT	Certiorari to the us court of appeals for the second circuit	The court didgrbmakr any appeal	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Brown and Cole County Circuit Judge Byron Kinder used some of the money to remodel the Cole County Courthouse and to pay additional salaries to courthouse secretaries.	Some money was used to remodel the county courthouse.	Judge Byron Kinder disagreed with the use of the money for these purposes.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
yeah a lot more appointee's i guess makes him carry a lot more weight	There is a direct relationship between the number of appointees and the weight he has to carry.	There is no link between the number of appointees and the weight he has to carry.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
This holding not only has no foundation in our jurisprudence	Holdings can have foundations in our jurisprudence.	Our jurisprudence is clearly the foundation for this holding.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
If people don't have access to the courts, somebody who has the upper hand takes advantage.	Somebody with the advantages will exploit it when people don't have access to the courts.	Nobody will take advantage even if people don't have access to the courts.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
As early as the 1780s, however, the pendulum had swung back, and many Americans looked to the courts to check the excesses of their legislators.	Americans have been relying on the courts since the 1780s.	Americans have only recently started relying on the courts to settle their disputes.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
In recent decisions, the Supreme Court has both circumscribed preferential policies and made clear that they can be limited or abolished by legislation.	The Supreme Court circumscribed preferential policies in a recent decision, as well as made it clear that they can be limited by the law.	The Supreme Court is all powerful, and that was proven very recently.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Everyone has a stake in making our justice system accessible and fair.	It's important to everyone that we have a fair and accessible justice system.	To most people, it doesn't matter whether the justice system is fair or not.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Two of the Superior Court judges and the District Court judge would be in Clark County, with one Superior Court judge added in the joint district that serves Benton and Franklin counties and one each in Kittitas and Kitsap counties.	There would be a new Clark County judge in the District Court.	There would be two new District Court judges in Clark County.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
People are judged and, in turn, judge others by how they look.	Judgement is something that goes both ways.	Normally people who have been judged do not judge others.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Without a lawyer facing the batterer in the context of the courtroom . . . it can be intimidating.	Facing the batterer without a lawyer by your side can be frightening.	Lawyers are completely useless and the courtrooms aren't scary at all.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
More than anyone, they know it can be nearly impossible to do the former and avoid the latter in a one-sided contest where only one litigant has a lawyer.	They know best that it can be hard to do the former.	They know that they can easily avoid the latter.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
It is well understood that when there are two reasonable constructions for a statute, yet one raises a constitutional question, the Court should prefer the interpretation which avoids the constitutional issue.	Statues have two reasonable constructions for it to be well understood.	The court should prefer the interpretation which adheres to the constitutional issue.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
As it happens, though, the Supreme Court got it just about right 20 years ago.	The Supreme Court was right in their decision 20 years ago.	The Supreme Court is considered to have got it all wrong 20 years ago.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
(The judge will not make that decision until Nov. 10 at the earliest.)	The judge will decide in November.	The judge said he will decide in October.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Judicial decisions do not stand as binding precedent for points that were not raised, not argued, and hence not analyzed.	Judicial decisions do not cause precedent for unanalyzed points.	The decisions are binding for points that were not brought up.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
, also on certiorari to the same court.	It was at the equal status court.	They were dramatically different venues.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
A recent study of the kiosks' first 18 months of operation concluded it is too soon to tell if the system will relieve pressure on court calendars.	There is no way to tell whether this system will have a positive impact on court calendars.	The study concluded that the system has ill effects on court calendars.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Most of the current textual infidelity, though, occurs because the doctrine of stare decisis --which dictates adherence to precedent--forces today's judges to live with adventurous Supreme Court decisions from earlier in the century.	In the past, the Supreme Courts made many decisions that were loose with the constitution.	In the past, the Supreme Court has stuck rigidly to codified law and the constitution.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Judge Coffin has personal reasons for agreeing with the alarm sounded by the Paper Chase to Money Chase report.	The Paper Chase to Money Chase report raises an alarm which Judge Coffin has personal reasons for agreeing with.	Judge Coffin is strongly opposed to the jubilation of the Paper Chase to Money Chase report.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
6 Identity vs. behavior.	Judge identity vs behavior.	Judge identity vs emotions..	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Courts must consider only those questions of statutory validity that are presented by litigants, and if the Government chooses not to subsidize the presentation of some such questions, that in no way distorts the courts' role.	The courts' role will not be changed in any way if the Government decides not to support the presentation of certain questions.	If the government chooses not to answer certain questions, that should change the court's role.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
A reality in that America's courts are open to everyone, and even the least powerful can seek justice, against the mightiest opponents.	American courts are open to everyone.	American courts are only used by rich people.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court had never ruled that the First Amendment could be used in this way.	The Supreme Court never said the First Amendment could be used in that way.	The First Amendment could be used in that way according to the Supreme Court.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
It is so important that the courts remain open to all citizens not just the rich.	The courts should remain open to all citizens.	Equal access to the court system is not particularly important.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Court officials statewide fear the number of self-represented litigants has reached crisis levels and threatens to clog court calendars.	Self-represented litigants are a threat to court calendars.	There are not enough self-represented litigants.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
The judiciary is very supportive, with the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, being deeply engaged in planning efforts.	The legal side of the government is very supportive.	The legal side of the government is not supportive.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Supreme Court are carved the words Equal Justice Under Law.	Equal Justice Under Law is carved on the Supreme Court building.	Equal Justice Under Law only applies if you are poor.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
*We note that three other circuits have concluded that rational basis judicial review is available for decisions of the LSC that affect grantees.	The conclusion, according to three circuits, was that the rational basis judicial review is available in certain circumstances.	No other circuits have concluded that the review is available for decisions.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Alexander also requested money for five additional Superior Court judgeships and one additional District Court judgeships, arguing that increased caseloads require more judges.	One of Alexander's arguments was that larger caseloads required more judges.	Alexander was seeking money for just 3 additional judgeships in the District Court.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
The federal court suit	The suit of the federal court.	The unitary court.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
A spate of explicit parental responsibility laws passed by states and communities over the last couple of years give judges the power to make parents pay for juvenile detention or undergo counseling with their kids.	Judges get the power to make parents pay for juvenile denetion, due to the spate of explicit parental responsibility laws passed by states.	A spate of explicit parental responisibility laws passed by states and communities over the last couple of years give judges the power for parents to not undergo counseling with their kids.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
well in some sense they they should be politicians in that you know you want them to respect the people and you don't want them to have you don't want a judge to be appointed because you don't want someone's friend to be a judge	"Politicians should respect the people and not be involved in nepotism."	"It doesn't matter if politicians respect the people or are involved in nepotism."	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
As a trial judge I am always happy to see equity in the courts.	I am very pleased to see equity in the courts.	I favour inequity in courts.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
In a telephone interview, Judge Coffin provided no details of the commission's thinking, but said it would make recommendations in three broad federal, state and campus.	Judge Coffin didn't give details.	Judge Coffin gave details about the commission's plans.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
The Supreme Court might not cooperate in rejecting the administration's public position and embracing its secret desire.	The Supreme Court has a secret desire.	The Supreme Court will definitely cooperate in rejection the public position.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
It is very important in our imperfect justice system that the police and prosecutors do not get the idea that the ends justify the means.	It is imperative that the parties involved do not grasp the notion that the end justifies the means.	The perfection of the justice system is not important.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Some legal scholars, such as Robert Bork, claim these search powers are unconstitutionally broad.	Robert Bork has criticisms of search powers.	Robert Born has no comment on search powers.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Zastany said the center will demystify the judicial process for many people.	Explaining the judicial process is something the center will do, according to Zastany.	The only thing the center will do is boost apple crops said Zastany.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
A sizable minority of judges may still regard the conflicting parties equally in their rulings, she said, but newer state laws have increasingly put the focus on violent abuse as the main problem requiring state intervention.	Newer state laws focus on violent abuse as the main problem.	Violent abuse is a non issue.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
A key part of that is the notion of equal justice and equal access to the court system.	The key element is that justice and access are equal within the courts.	They did not want some to have access to justice.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Perhaps the most that can be said on the subject is contained in a passage written by Chief Justice Shaw of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts that we have often	Chief Justice Shaw has the most to say on the subject.	No one has anything to say on this subject.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Frank O'Bannon to sit on the Indiana Court of Appeals First District, where he works today.	Frank O'Bannon will stay at the First District of the Indiana Court of Appeals.	The Indiana Court of Appeals First District fired Frank O'Bannon.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Most judges have been making clear to the batterers that the issue is between the state courts and them, Ms.	The issue is between the courts and the batterers, according to most judges.	Most judges agree that the issue is between the batterers and their victims.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
to yeah to carry it out it sort of takes the justice out of the justice system	Carrying that out removes the idea of justice from the justice system.	To carry it out makes it seem like the justice system is finally working.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
And quantified standards have the added advantage of flexibility--they can be adjusted to different levels for different crimes.	When numbers are used, the outcomes can be scaled.	The one size fits all drug laws are easy to scale to the severity of the crime.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
are they politicians	Are they politicians?	Are they judges?	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Village contests judge competitors on their most spectacular flying skills height, dexterity, and the humming sound produced by the wind through the kite-head.	Village contests judge competitors on their flying.	They don't judge it, they just watch.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Eight feet, pondered Justice Stephen Breyer.	The Justice, Steven Breyer considered the matter.	"Nine, maybe ten feet," stated the Justice.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
At Wednesday's Supreme Court session, the justices were quite concerned with the size of something.	The justices were pre-occupied with the size of something during Wednesday's Supreme Court session.	The justices on Wednesday paid no mind to the size of the object.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
oh it's fairly good size i mean it's it's not it's not small but it's certainly small by Atlanta standards	Atlanta judges things as small that are normally considered fairly good sized.	Something that is small by Atlanta standards is small anywhere.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
In figure skating, that means the only system that could satisfy Cinquanta is a system with only one judge.	Only a system with one judge would be satisfactory to Cinquanta.	Cinquanta would be most satisfied with a panel of 5 judges.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Batterers use the courts as a way to maintain control, she said.	The courts are one way that batterers maintain control.	Batterers know that they cannot get help from the courts.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
Before they get injured they are separated, and the winner is decided by a panel of judges while the loser is dragged off.	A panel of judges are tasked with deciding the winner.	They are only separated after someone is injured.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Supreme Court" }
He mostly hangs out with a group of older, Southern black men, who call him Jumper and Black Cat.	The group of guys he tends to hang out with gave him the nickname Jumper.	Though he occasionally hangs out with a group of black men, they aren't who he usually likes to be with.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
Isn't that America's last bastion of mobsters, racists, and hacks?	Isn't is America's last wave of mobsters, racists and hacks?	It's America's first wave of racists.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
If the pulp fiction of Edgar Rice Burroughs gives us a glimpse into the often appalling collective unconscious of white-supremacist America, the Disney version of Tarzan will provide a similar service to future scholars pondering the equally weird mentality of feminized and Green America, circa 2000.	Edgar Rice Burroughs' pulp fiction demonstrates the largely negative mentality of white-supremacist America.	Edgar Rice Burroughs' pulp fiction offers no glimpse into the mentality of white-supremacist America.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
A Newsweek columnist says that the case did not divide blacks and whites	The case did not cause a divide.	There is a divide between blacks and whites.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
We told those white liberals years ago that you couldn't expect more from Negroes.	The white liberals were told a long time ago.	We never told those white liberals that they couldn't expect much from negroes.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
Hispanic Americans comprise the largest ethnic group of all, with numbers fast approaching 40 percent of the population.	The largest ethnic group is Hispanic Americans, consisting of 40% of the total population.	The ethnic group with the most populace is South East Asians.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
yeah that that can really be a problem i know in in in New York there's a problem with the Koreans that uh that that the uh black community is complaining that the Koreans are taking over	In New York there is tension between the black community and the Korean population.	The Korean population and the black community are like two peas in a pod.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
There are other pop-genetics arguments against cross-ethnic adoption, and against adoption in general.	Adoption, in general, has many other "pop-genetic" arguments against it.	There are no arguments against cross-ethnic adoption.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
i mean you know if you had long hair in high school in the sixties you got labeled a hippie and you keep that image your whole life no matter what you do and i i just	During the 1960s, having long hair when you were in high school resulted in you being known as a hippie.	Having a shaved head when you were at high school during the sixties always led to you becoming labelled as a hippie.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
In the white white-white, white-Asian, and perhaps white-Latino issue.	In the white-any race issue.	In the black-any race issue.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
What kind of person would write a question about race and then get all shirty on people who were just trying to have a little fun?	Who would get mad about that?	I got mad when people joked about it.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
The thesis was taken up last year by Canadian Michael Bradley in his incoherent book Chosen People From the Caucasus . Bradley is known for a book-length rant titled The Iceman Inheritance , which identifies the origins of white racial evil in prehistoric psychosexual tensions of some sort.	White racism is examined in The Iceman Inheritance.	Michael Bradley wrote his book Chosen People From The Caucasus 10 years ago.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
well i mean how can you contrast the the Europeans and their vocalism on their rights to to say the people in Latin America i mean why are they why are they not as vocal or why do they not you know stand up so to speak for their rights	Why do Europeans fight for their rights, but Latin Americans stay quiet?	It is no surprise the Latin American communities will fight for their rights.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
In 1958, 4 percent of white Americans approved of interracial marriages.	Long ago, most people were against interracial marriage.	Most people used to support interracial marriage.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
And there is yet another valid that the widespread transmission of racial stereotypes might indeed be helpful to hate groups.	Racial stereotypes might help hate groups.	Racial stereotypes do nothing for hate groups.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
Ethnic diversity is only one element in a range of factors a university properly may consider in attaining the goal of a heterogeneous student body.	There are a number of elements that a university should consider in attaining the goal of a heterogeneous student body	The only meaningful element of a heterogeneous student body is ethnic diversity.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
Where's the social purpose in that--affirmative action for lousy actors and worse writers (most of whom, it must be noted, are white)?	Affirmative action for lousy actors has a questionable social purpose.	There is affirmative action for good actors and better writers.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
Our A Low-Wage Workforce Without the Brown People.	Brown people make up the low-wage workforce.	The low-wage workforce is all white people.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
White ethnics have ceased to be the dominant force in urban life.	White ethics are no longer the dominant force.	White ethics dominate all aspects of urban life.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
Why would you assume that this comment has to do with African-Americans anyway?	Why did you think this comment has to do with Americans anyway?	Don't you think this comment has a lot to do with African-Americans?	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
Black -- Not of Hispanic Origin 27%	27% are black and not Hispanic.	Hispanic blacks.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
Obviously, cross-ethnic adoption is dicey.	Inter ethnic adoption is dicey.	Adoption is illegal.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
multiethnic, democratic societies.	Democratic societies with more than one ethnicity.	Democratic societies with only white people.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
Aware that they are paying a premium for the label rather than the quality, minority consumers are bound to feel exploited.	Minority consumers often feel manipulated by being premium brands.	Minority consumers focus on the quality of the goods rather than the label.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
uh racial i think or like you say maybe communication of knowing that hey up in other English colonies or previous English colonies everything is equal and yet down there it's not you know	Other English colonies have things equal.	Nothing was equal or fair in English colonies.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
The only time the authors attack passionately and in detail the privileging of whiteness is when such practices are located safely in the past.	The only time authors attack privileging whiteness is when the practices are in the past.	Authors do not attack white privilege.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
'But think of it this way, Ben- White's already sponsored more minor attacks.	White encouraged small attacks.	White discouraged violence.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
But there is plenty of evidence that it was heartily appreciative of the racial subtext.	The racial subtext was most likely appreciated in this circumstance.	Your claims of racial subtext are unfounded. You should stop reading so much into things.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }
It's hard to know where to draw the line when you're making a joke about race, especially when it comes to those shifty, no-good Cajuns.	Even when joking about racism, you can come off as racist.	Racism should never be joked about.	{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Race" }

uh or maybe eventually uh just waiting it out and that's where a lot of aggravation comes i think is is uh these guys spend so much time in the appeal process or just in the waiting process they may spend years

The guys appeal a lot.

The guys aren't allowed to appeal.