premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Gloria is not scary. | neutral |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Harmony is puzzled. | entailment |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Gloria is powerful. | contradiction |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Bond is scary. | self_contradiction |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Alfie is scary. | contradiction |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Alice is not tan. | self_contradiction |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Harmony is not attentive. | self_contradiction |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Harmony is oak. | contradiction |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Harmony is powerful. | entailment |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Alfie is not puzzled. | entailment |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Heath is tan. | neutral |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Sabrina is not scary. | entailment |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Gloria is not powerful. | entailment |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Bond is attentive. | neutral |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Gloria is not tan. | contradiction |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Bond is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Heath is not powerful. | neutral |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Sabrina is not puzzled. | contradiction |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Heath is not attentive. | neutral |
Bond is not powerful.
Alice is puzzled.
Heath is oak.
Alfie is tan.
Harmony is not tan.
Sabrina is puzzled.
Harmony is attentive.
Sabrina is not attentive.
Gloria is not powerful.
Alfie is not puzzled.
Bond is oak.
Bond is scary.Someone who is eithor powerful or attentive is always scary.
Someone who is puzzled is always not tan.
If someone who is not puzzled is also tan, then he is not scary.
Someone who is both not scary and attentive is always not oak.
Sabrina is not attentive if and only if Alice is tan.
It can be concluded that Gloria is not puzzled once knowing that Heath is attentive.
As long as someone is scary, he is powerful and puzzled.
Someone is not scary and not oak if and only if he is not attentive.
If someone is oak or attentive, then he is not scary.
If everyone is tan or powerful, then Sabrina is puzzled.
As long as someone is attentive and not powerful, he is puzzled and scary.
If there is at least one people who is puzzled or not attentive, then Gloria is tan. | Bond is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Liam is thoughtful. | contradiction |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Chad is not careful. | contradiction |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Phoebe is not careful. | neutral |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Chad is not fresh. | contradiction |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Halden is fresh. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Halden is informal. | contradiction |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Halden is not careful. | entailment |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Goddard is attractive. | neutral |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Chad is not attractive. | entailment |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Goddard is careful. | entailment |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Chad is courteous. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Chad is fresh. | entailment |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Goddard is not attractive. | neutral |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Chad is not courteous. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Merlin is fresh. | neutral |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Goddard is informal. | neutral |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Phoebe is attractive. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Phoebe is thoughtful. | self_contradiction |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Merlin is not courteous. | entailment |
Phoebe is not thoughtful.
Halden is not fresh.
Liam is not careful.
Liam is courteous.
Chad is careful.
Chad is courteous.
Goddard is thoughtful.
Goddard is careful.
Phoebe is not fresh.
Halden is not careful.
Halden is attractive.
Phoebe is attractive.If someone who is not fresh is also not careful, then he is not informal.
If there is someone who is either not informal or not thoughtful, then Goddard is fresh and Merlin is not attractive.
It can be concluded that Chad is careful once knowing that Halden is not fresh or Chad is not thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Justin is fresh once knowing that Liam is not courteous.
Someone being both thoughtful and not courteous is equivalent to being not attractive.
As long as someone is courteous, he is fresh and not thoughtful.
If Goddard is not informal, then Chad is attractive, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Halden is fresh and Phoebe is not attractive.
If there is at least one people who is not fresh or careful, then Chad is not attractive.
If someone is not careful and fresh, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Liam is thoughtful once knowing that Goddard is attractive.
Someone who is eithor not informal or not thoughtful is always courteous. | Halden is careful. | contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Stella is not global. | self_contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Greyson is dead. | contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Conan is global. | neutral |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Chrysta is every. | neutral |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Douglas is not logical. | contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Stella is aware. | entailment |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Stella is rude. | self_contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Douglas is not dead. | entailment |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Greyson is aware. | entailment |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Stella is global. | self_contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Ethan is not every. | neutral |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Douglas is not aware. | contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Greyson is not aware. | contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Chrysta is not every. | neutral |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Greyson is global. | contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Chrysta is rude. | entailment |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Conan is not rude. | entailment |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Stella is not rude. | self_contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Greyson is rude. | self_contradiction |
Douglas is not dead.
Chrysta is rude.
Douglas is global.
Stella is every.
Greyson is not global.
Greyson is aware.
Douglas is logical.
Douglas is not every.
Kirk is logical.
Conan is not rude.
Stella is global.
Stella is not dead.If someone who is rude is also not dead, then he is not global.
If someone is not rude and not dead, then he is both aware and not global, and vice versa.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not dead.
If there is someone who is aware, then Chrysta is rude.
Kirk being not every or Chrysta being not dead implies that Ethan is not rude.
If someone is not dead and aware, then he is both not global and rude, and vice versa.
If Ethan is not global, then Chrysta is dead, and vice versa.
If someone is not dead, then he is not rude.
It can be concluded that Greyson is global and Chrysta is not dead once knowing that Kirk is not aware.
If there is nobody who is not not dead, then Ethan is every and Chrysta is not global.
If Chrysta is not aware, then Conan is not global and Chrysta is logical.
If Chrysta is not rude or Conan is aware, then Chrysta is not logical. | Ethan is dead. | neutral |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Samson is not existing. | self_contradiction |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Grant is not joyous. | entailment |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Grant is defeated. | self_contradiction |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Bevis is not joyous. | self_contradiction |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Gloria is small. | contradiction |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Danna is not joyous. | neutral |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Lucy is existing. | contradiction |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Bevis is not small. | entailment |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Danna is not mental. | neutral |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Bevis is joyous. | self_contradiction |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Lucy is not existing. | entailment |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Samson is miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Lucy is not miniscule. | contradiction |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Jerry is not miniscule. | neutral |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Gloria is not joyous. | contradiction |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Grant is miniscule. | entailment |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Gloria is not small. | entailment |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Lucy is not small. | neutral |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Samson is not joyous. | contradiction |
Grant is existing.
Samson is joyous.
Gloria is defeated.
Grant is not joyous.
Bevis is defeated.
Lucy is mental.
Bevis is not joyous.
Grant is not defeated.
Bevis is mental.
Lucy is miniscule.
Gloria is not small.
Bevis is not miniscule.Someone is existing if and only if he is defeated.
Someone is mental and not small if and only if he is defeated and not miniscule.
If there is someone who is not joyous, then Samson is existing.
If someone is defeated or joyous, then he is not mental.
If there is someone who is both not miniscule and not defeated, then Lucy is not existing.
If there is at least one people who is not miniscule or not defeated, then Gloria is joyous.
As long as someone is defeated and not mental, he is not existing and miniscule.
Someone who is not defeated is always miniscule.
Someone being both mental and not miniscule is equivalent to being joyous.
Bevis being not mental and Lucy being miniscule imply that Bevis is existing and Grant is defeated.
If Jerry is mental, then Gloria is not small.
If there is someone who is both small and not existing, then Jerry is not miniscule. | Jerry is not defeated. | neutral |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Bert is blue-eyed. | neutral |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Albion is better. | neutral |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Albion is blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Austin is better. | contradiction |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Austin is sharp. | contradiction |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Kerry is not blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Albion is not blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Kent is not blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Cadman is better. | entailment |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Alton is not crazy. | neutral |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Kerry is blue-eyed. | self_contradiction |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Kent is sharp. | contradiction |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Alton is not blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Albion is sharp. | contradiction |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Austin is not sharp. | entailment |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Kerry is not dead. | entailment |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Alton is blue-eyed. | entailment |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Austin is not dead. | neutral |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Kent is not dead. | entailment |
Kent is not crazy.
Albion is not charming.
Austin is not better.
Kerry is better.
Alton is blue-eyed.
Austin is not sharp.
Kent is not charming.
Kerry is blue-eyed.
Cadman is crazy.
Alton is better.
Kerry is not sharp.
Kent is not sharp.Austin being not dead and Cadman being not sharp are equivalent to Kerry being blue-eyed and Alton being not crazy.
If someone is not dead and not sharp, then he is not blue-eyed, and vice versa.
If Albion is not blue-eyed and Alton is not crazy, then Kerry is not sharp.
If there is nobody who is not sharp, then Alton is crazy.
If there is someone who is both not charming and blue-eyed, then Cadman is sharp.
Cadman being not dead is equivalent to Kent being crazy.
Someone being not charming is equivalent to being not blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both blue-eyed and not crazy, then Austin is sharp.
If someone is crazy, then he is better.
if there is at least one people who is crazy and charming, then Bert is sharp and Austin is better.
Someone who is not dead is always both blue-eyed and not sharp.
Kerry is not dead if and only if Kent is not crazy. | Alton is not charming. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.