premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Bowen is ugliest. | contradiction |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Humphrey is not careful. | neutral |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Bowen is not serious. | entailment |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Bowen is not loyal. | neutral |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Kent is ugliest. | contradiction |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Nicholas is not ugliest. | contradiction |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Hadley is not loyal. | self_contradiction |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Bond is ugliest. | entailment |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Leslie is not quaint. | entailment |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Bowen is loyal. | neutral |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Hadley is helpless. | neutral |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Nicholas is helpless. | contradiction |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Nicholas is not careful. | self_contradiction |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Kent is helpless. | contradiction |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Hadley is ugliest. | entailment |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Humphrey is loyal. | neutral |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Hadley is not serious. | self_contradiction |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Hadley is quaint. | self_contradiction |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Bond is careful. | self_contradiction |
Nicholas is serious.
Nicholas is not quaint.
Hadley is loyal.
Nicholas is not careful.
Bowen is not serious.
Bowen is not ugliest.
Nicholas is not helpless.
Bond is serious.
Hadley is not serious.
Hadley is not quaint.
Kent is not ugliest.
Nicholas is loyal.Someone who is both careful and quaint is always ugliest.
If Leslie is loyal, then Hadley is serious.
If there is someone who is both not helpless and serious, then Humphrey is not ugliest.
Kent being helpless or Kent being loyal implies that Humphrey is not serious.
It can be concluded that Bond is not serious and Kent is not helpless once knowing that Hadley is loyal.
As long as someone is either not quaint or ugliest, he is careful and not loyal.
If someone who is not serious is also loyal, then he is quaint.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is not quaint.
If there is at least one people who is quaint, then Leslie is not careful and Nicholas is not serious.
Leslie being not helpless implies that Hadley is not ugliest and Bond is not serious.
If someone is not quaint and loyal, then he is serious, and vice versa.
Humphrey is serious if and only if Bond is helpless. | Bowen is not ugliest. | entailment |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Carl is electronic. | contradiction |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Kelvin is not plain. | entailment |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Kelvin is plain. | contradiction |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Raymond is careless. | contradiction |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Tobias is not plain. | entailment |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Carl is not concerned. | self_contradiction |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Kelvin is not careless. | neutral |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Tobias is not medical. | self_contradiction |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Raymond is medical. | neutral |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Tobias is electronic. | contradiction |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Tommy is not outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Tommy is not electronic. | entailment |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Tobias is not careless. | entailment |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Tobias is not concerned. | self_contradiction |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Kilian is not outstanding. | neutral |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Kelvin is not outstanding. | contradiction |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Raymond is plain. | neutral |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Kelvin is medical. | entailment |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Carl is not outstanding. | self_contradiction |
Tommy is not careless.
Carl is not concerned.
Carl is not plain.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Raymond is not careless.
Carl is not electronic.
Charles is electronic.
Raymond is concerned.
Tobias is not electronic.
Carl is outstanding.
Kelvin is outstanding.
Tommy is not electronic.If all people are careless or concerned, then Tobias is outstanding.
As long as someone is not medical, he is not outstanding and concerned.
Charles being not plain implies that Kelvin is not medical.
Kilian is careless if and only if Raymond is not electronic.
Someone who is eithor careless or not medical is always not concerned.
If Raymond is not outstanding or Raymond is electronic, then Kilian is careless.
If there is someone who is either not plain or not outstanding, then Tobias is concerned.
Someone being not medical is equivalent to being not outstanding.
Someone who is not concerned is always both not careless and outstanding.
If someone is not electronic or he is not medical, then he is not outstanding.
Someone being not plain is equivalent to being medical.
If someone is outstanding or not electronic, then he is not plain. | Kelvin is not concerned. | neutral |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Marlon is not massive. | neutral |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Quinn is pleasant. | entailment |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Silvia is attractive. | contradiction |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Albert is not pleasant. | contradiction |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Marlon is massive. | neutral |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Harvey is not pleasant. | entailment |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Silvia is pleasant. | neutral |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Odessa is not massive. | contradiction |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Marlon is reliable. | neutral |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Odessa is reliable. | contradiction |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Albert is reliable. | contradiction |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Quinn is not attractive. | self_contradiction |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Silvia is not attractive. | entailment |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Quinn is intellectual. | self_contradiction |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Albert is not intellectual. | self_contradiction |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Harvey is not intellectual. | neutral |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Quinn is not massive. | self_contradiction |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Albert is pleasant. | entailment |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Silvia is not reliable. | entailment |
Odessa is massive.
Harvey is not pleasant.
Odessa is intellectual.
Albert is intellectual.
Odessa is attractive.
Albert is pleasant.
Quinn is typical.
Quinn is not massive.
Silvia is massive.
Marlon is pleasant.
Albert is massive.
Silvia is not attractive.If someone is reliable, then he is both not attractive and massive.
Odessa being not intellectual and Albert being not massive imply that Silvia is not attractive.
As long as someone is not massive, he is not reliable and attractive.
Someone who is not intellectual is always both massive and not attractive.
If someone is not attractive and not intellectual, then he is both massive and pleasant, and vice versa.
As long as someone is either not typical or attractive, he is not reliable and intellectual.
If someone is typical and not reliable, then he is not intellectual, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not intellectual and pleasant, then Marlon is not massive.
Someone who is eithor intellectual or massive is always not reliable.
Silvia being not pleasant is equivalent to Harvey being attractive.
Harvey being reliable is equivalent to Odessa being not typical and Marlon being not attractive.
If Marlon is not pleasant, then Albert is typical and Joshua is not reliable. | Quinn is attractive. | self_contradiction |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Norman is not imaginative. | neutral |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Chad is sharp. | contradiction |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Kiefer is not sharp. | self_contradiction |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Braden is modern. | neutral |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Kiefer is popular. | entailment |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Norman is not easygoing. | entailment |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Jessie is thoughtless. | contradiction |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Mark is not sharp. | self_contradiction |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Mark is popular. | self_contradiction |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Braden is not popular. | entailment |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Chatwin is not easygoing. | neutral |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Mark is not imaginative. | self_contradiction |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Norman is not thoughtless. | entailment |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Mark is sharp. | self_contradiction |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Jessie is easygoing. | neutral |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Mark is not modern. | entailment |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Mark is modern. | contradiction |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Braden is popular. | contradiction |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Braden is not easygoing. | neutral |
Kiefer is not imaginative.
Mark is not modern.
Jessie is not thoughtless.
Norman is not easygoing.
Chad is not sharp.
Jessie is not popular.
Chad is not easygoing.
Mark is sharp.
Norman is not thoughtless.
Mark is imaginative.
Kiefer is not sharp.
Kiefer is thoughtless.If there is at least one people who is both thoughtless and not easygoing, then Mark is sharp.
Someone being both not imaginative and popular is equivalent to being not sharp and thoughtless.
Someone is sharp and thoughtless if and only if he is not imaginative.
As long as someone is not modern, he is not sharp and not popular.
Someone who is both thoughtless and modern is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both easygoing and imaginative, then Kiefer is popular.
It can be concluded that Jessie is not imaginative once knowing that Norman is not modern.
If someone is imaginative, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norman is not easygoing and Mark is imaginative once knowing that Kiefer is modern.
If there is someone who is either not easygoing or thoughtless, then Braden is not popular and Chatwin is not imaginative.
If Braden is thoughtless and Chatwin is not sharp, then Braden is not modern and Kiefer is imaginative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is easygoing, then Jessie is not imaginative and Jessie is not sharp. | Chatwin is not thoughtless. | contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Spencer is tame. | neutral |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Adrian is friendly. | entailment |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Crispin is not annoying. | neutral |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Alisa is not acceptable. | contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Adrian is not acceptable. | self_contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Adrian is not tame. | neutral |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Chalmers is annoying. | contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Sherman is modern. | self_contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Sherman is not annoying. | self_contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Spencer is annoying. | contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Sherman is not friendly. | entailment |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Chalmers is steep. | neutral |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Spencer is friendly. | neutral |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Sherman is steep. | self_contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Crispin is not modern. | contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Sherman is annoying. | self_contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Chalmers is not modern. | entailment |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Adrian is modern. | contradiction |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Sheridan is modern. | entailment |
Sheridan is steep.
Alisa is annoying.
Chalmers is not annoying.
Sherman is annoying.
Adrian is not acceptable.
Crispin is modern.
Chalmers is not modern.
Alisa is acceptable.
Sheridan is not annoying.
Sherman is not tame.
Sheridan is not tame.
Adrian is friendly.If there is someone who is friendly, then Alisa is modern and Spencer is not annoying.
It can be concluded that Sherman is not steep once knowing that Sherman is annoying or Sheridan is not acceptable.
Someone who is both steep and tame is always not friendly.
If someone is modern, then he is steep.
If Alisa is not friendly, then Alisa is modern.
Someone who is both not tame and annoying is always not modern.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Sheridan is steep and Sheridan is acceptable.
Someone is not annoying and modern if and only if he is not tame.
If there is at least one people who is both not tame and steep, then Chalmers is friendly.
If someone is not acceptable or not friendly, then he is not modern.
Someone who is not steep is always not friendly.
If there is someone who is both annoying and tame, then Adrian is acceptable. | Sherman is not tame. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.