text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
Transitioning from general LLMs to a medical LLMs in |
volves three stages of continued training continued pretrain |
ing instruction finetuning and human alignment However |
given that the general LLM has completed training and pos |
sesses some medical knowledge alongside its general knowl |
edge all three phases may not be necessary to train a medical |
LLM based on the general LLM Tab II presents information |
about the medical LLMs including number of parametersbase model and training stages employed Medical LLMs |
learn different capabilities at various training stages and |
have diverse demands on computational resources and dataset |
scales We categorize the training process into four paradigms |
based on the combination of training stages as depicted in |
Fig 3 The characteristics and strategies of each paradigm are |
described in detail below |
A IFT |
Instruction finetuning also termed supervised finetuning |
refers to parameter finetuning of pretrained LLMs using |
instruction data QA pairs During the training process only |
the loss of response content is considered After instruction |
finetuning medical LLMs can demonstrate strong medical |
instruction following and zeroshot learning ability It can |
effectively grasp instructions from medical practitioners or |
patients thereby enhancing doctors clinical efficiency and |
addressing patients needs efficiently |
Medical LLMs depicted in Tab II all employ instruction |
finetuning to enhance their capacity for addressing medical |
issues This is because the general LLMs inherently possess |
extensive knowledge and thus models only require instruc |
tion finetuning to adapt to medical directives Additionally |
the emergence of Parameter Efficient FineTuning PEFT |
accelerates the training process of instruction finetuning and |
reduces the demand for computational resources Strengths |
Instruction finetuning IFT can improve large medical lan |
guage models performance in instruction following adherence |
with minimal computational resources and time consumption |
Weaknesses Without continued pretraining and human align |
ment the knowledge understanding of the model may be |
limited and the response of the model may not accurately |
simulate the characteristics of a physician |
1 Parameter Efficient FineTuning As can be seen from |
Tab II there are two types of instruction finetuning methods |
used in medical LLMs one is full parameter finetuning and |
the other is Parameter Efficient FineTuning PEFT 114 |
Full parameter finetuning involves training and updating all |
parameters related to the medical LLM during instruction fine |
tuning Conversely PEFT reduces the number of model pa |
rameters requiring training thereby reducing the performance |
demands of the necessary equipment for training while en |
suring that the finetuned models performance is comparable |
to that of full parameter finetuning The most commonly |
used parameterefficient finetuning method in the medical |
LLMs is LowRank Adaptation LoRA 115 LoRA approx |
imates parameter updates for each layer by adding lowrank |
decomposition matrices while freezing the original weights |
thereby reducing the number of training parameters and the |
training time Another commonly used method is QLoRA |
116 which is a parameter quantization technique based on |
the LoRA method In QLoRA the original model parameters |
are quantized to 4bit while the newly added lowrank de |
composition matrix parameters are saved as 16bit for training |
This approach further reduces the performance requirements of |
the training equipment and lowers the threshold for developing |
medical LLMs in medical institutions In addition there areJOURNAL OF L ATEX CLASS FILES VOL 14 NO 8 AUGUST 2021 11 |
TABLE II |
DETAILED INFORMATION OF MEDICAL LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS NOTE P ARADENOTES PARAMETERS CP DENOTES CONTINUED |
PRETRAINING IFT DENOTES INSTRUCTION FINE TUNING AND HA DENOTES HUMAN ALIGNMENT |
Models Backbone Para B CP IFT IFT Methods HAPreferred |
LanguagesOpen |
SourcesData |
MedPaLM 24 PaLM 98 540 Prompt Tuning EN 012023 |
ChatDoctor 25 LLaMA 99 7 Full Para EN 032023 |
DoctorGLM 26 ChatGLM 100 6 LoRA CN 042023 |
BenTsao 27 LLaMA 99 7 LoRA CN 042023 |
ChatGLMMed 28 ChatGLM 100 6 LoRA CN 042023 |
MedAlpaca 29 LLaMA 99 7 13 Full Para LoRA CN 042023 |
PMCLLaMA 30 LLaMA2 101 13 Full Para CN 042023 |
HuatuoGPT 8Baichuan 102 |
ZiyaLLaMA 1037 13 Full Para CN 052023 |
ChatMedConsult |
31LLaMA 99 7 LoRA CN 052023 |
MedPaLM 2 32 PaLM2 104 EN 052023 |
Clinical Camel 33 LLaMA2 101 13 70 QLoRA EN 052023 |
ShenNongTCM 34 LLaMA 99 7 LoRA CN 062023 |
MedicalGPT 35ZiyaLLaMA 103 |
BaichuanChat 10213 LoRA EN CN 062023 |
ClinicalGPT 36 BLOOM 105 7 LoRA CN 062023 |
DISCMedLLM 37 Baichuan 102 13 Full Para CN 082023 |
Zhongjing 38 ZiyaLLaMA 103 13 LoRA CN 082023 |
BianQue 39 ChatGLM 100 6 Full Para CN 102023 |
Alpacare 40 LLaMA 99 7 13 Full Para EN 102023 |
QilinMed 41 Baichuan 102 7 LoRA CN 102023 |
Taiyi 42 Qwen 106 7 QLoRA ENCN 112023 |
ChiMedGPT 43 ZiyaLLaMA 103 13 Full Para CN 112023 |
MediTron 44 LLaMA2 101 7 70 Full Para EN 112023 |
HuatuoGPTII 45Baichuan2 102 |
Yi 1077 13 34 Full Para CN 122023 |
AntGLMMed 46 GLM 108 10 Full Para LoRA |
CpolyEN CN 122023 |
GPTdoctor 47 Baichuan2Chat 102 13 LoRA CN 122023 |
BioMistral 48 MistralInstruct 109 7 QLoRA Multilingual 022024 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.