text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
j0ΞjwjσNwN With this we define RPI set Xf |
for control law 26 in the following lemma |
Lemma 2 The set XfαZf FNΦe with α0 |
is an RPI set for system xN1AxNBκfxN ηN |
with control law κfdefined in 26andηN FNΞ |
if the following two conditions hold |
aαABKfZfΓW αZfwithZfRPI accord |
ing to Definition 4 and Γ AΦe |
N0BΦν |
N0 Ξ0 |
bΦe |
Nj1AΦe |
NjBΦν |
Nj Ξjj 1 N1 |
It holds that if xN XfxN1 XfηN FNΞ |
4Note that iNis not included in 7 hence we need to |
define this case separately |
6PROOF We start by analyzing the dynamics under |
control law 26 ie |
xN1 ABKfzNAeNBνNηN |
Next we insert the definitions of eN νN and ηNto get |
AeNBνNηNN1X |
j0AΦe |
NjBΦν |
NjΞj wjσNwN |
AΦe |
N0BΦν |
N0 Ξ0 w0 |
N1X |
j1AΦe |
NjBΦν |
NjΞj wjσNwN |
Using Φe |
NN1 Σ NN1σNIndue to 15 Γ |
AΦe |
N0BΦν |
N0 Ξ0from a and b we obtain |
AeNBνNηN Γ w0N1X |
j1Φe |
Nj1wj Φe |
NN1wN |
Γ w0N1X |
j0Φe |
Njwj1 |
Therefore the dynamics under control law 26 are |
xN1 ABKfzN Γ w0 z |
zN1N1X |
j0Φe |
Njwj1 |
z |
eN1 |
Now if xNzNeNαZf F NΦe Xf then |
zN1αZfis guaranteed by a and eN1 FNΦe |
holds by construction Therefore xN1 Xf2 |
Intuitively a in Lemma 2 ensures that αZfis RPI |
with respect to control law Kfand optimized distur |
bance Γ w while b constrains the error states to the |
same tube FNΦe after Ntimesteps which is less re |
strictive but similar to the FIR constraint in 10 To |
useXfas the terminal set in the proposed MPC Xf |
needs to satisfy the state constraints ie Xf X and |
control law 26 needs to satisfy the input constraints |
ieκfx U for all x Xf This can be enforced by |
αZf X F NΦe 28 |
αKfZf U F NΦν 29 |
where 28 follows from XfαZf FNΦe and 29 |
follows from |
κfxN KfzNz |
αZfNX |
j0Φν |
NjwNj |
z |
FNΦν UNote that constraints 28 29 and a in Lemma 2 |
are the same constraints as those used in 28 to scale |
the terminal set The main idea is that the online scal |
ing preserves invariance since we simultaneously opti |
mize the scaling of the set αand the disturbance Γ wfor |
which the set is RPI Therefore we can use the results |
in 28 to linearly embed these constraints into the MPC |
formulation as shown in Appendix A1 |
Finally we reformulate the inclusion of the terminal dis |
turbance 27 similar to Section 3 We enforce inclu |
sion 27 on the combined disturbance 6 with |
d |
Ad |
BKfz |
d |
KfzN N1M |
j0 |
d |
AΦe |
Njd |
BΦν |
NjW W |
N1M |
j0ΞjW σNWFNΞ d 1 nD30 |
Using the terminal constraint zNαZfand Lemma 1 |
we get |
αd |
KfZfN1M |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.