Datasets:
tensorkelechi
/
arxiv-cstext

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
89.3k
1 Ξm
N1 and the σiare obtained
from either ΦemorΣmusing 36a Additionally we
compute the tubes for iNas
Zprev
NM1M
m0λ
mZm
NVprev
NM1M
m0λ
mVm
N
Qdprev
N M1M
m0λ
mQdm
N
Apart from the tubes we also store the fused terminal
set scaling the shifted error system responses and the
shifted disturbance filter since they are needed to re
compute 48 in case λ
0 0 in the next solution of 46
Therefore we compute
αprevM1X
m0λ
mαm
ΦeprevM1X
m0λ
mΦem
shiftΦνprevM1X
m0λ
mΦνm
shift
ΣprevM1X
m0λ
mΣm
shiftΞprevM1X
m0λ
mΞm
shift
before collecting all computed sets and parameters in
memory entry
Mprev Zprev
iVprev
iQdprev
i αprev
ΦeprevΦνprevΣprevΞprev51
and updating the memory according to Algorithm 2
Remark 4 In practice shifting operations 4950
can be peformed by the secondary process after comput
ing new ΦeΦνΣΞ Due to the specific shifting op
eration these computations only need to be performed
Ntimes Therefore also the tightened sets in 48 eg
X F iΦem
shift can be computed by the secondary process
The primary process then just peforms the convex com
bination in 48 which only slightly increases the com
putational complexity of the primary process
13Algorithm 2 Update memory MPrimary Process
Input MprevMk1
Output Mk
1procedure updateMemory Mprev
2 runs every time the primary process terminates
3 MkMk1
4 M0kMprevwhere Mprevis given by 51
53 Theoretical Guarantees
In the following we provide theoretical guarantees for
the proposed asynchronous computation scheme applied
to 1 ie we prove recursive feasibility and ISS of pri
mary process 46 for any state of the memory includ
ing the case in which the memory is updated For the
proofs we make use of the following assumption
Assumption 2 At the start of the control task mem
oryMcontains at least one memory entry M0for which the
primary process is feasible ie 46is feasible for M0
Z0
iV0
iQd0
i α0Φe0Φν0Σ0Ξ0withλ0 1
Note that Assumption 2 is satisfied if for example the
secondary process is once run offline and the memory is
initialized with the computed memory entry Mnew
Proposition 5 Let Assumption 2 hold Then primary
process 46is recursively feasible for any state of mem
oryMkand any memory updates according to Algo
rithms 1 and 2
PROOF We prove the proposition using the standard
shifting argument 3 and relying on the proof of Theo
rem 3 We construct the candidate sequences specifically
for the case in which we only use memory slot M0that
contains the shifted previous tubes 51 This allows us
to show recursive feasibility for any state of the mem
ory including the case in which the memory is updated
since we can always fallback to the tubes in M0 Due to
Assumption 2 the primary process is then guaranteed
to be recursively feasible
Letz z
0 z
Nv v