text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
we can use the following lemma from 28 to implement |
them as linear constraints |
Lemma 7 Lemma 1 in 28 Consider scalars α |
0β0 matrices ARnnΓRnn polytopic |
setsXxHxxhxwith HxRnxnand |
YyHyyhywithHuRnyn and a compact |
convex set Z Rn then the following conditions are |
sufficient and necessary for |
αAX βY ΓZ A1 |
to hold |
ΛRnynxΛ0 A2a |
ΛHxαHyA A2b |
ΛhxβhyhZΓH |
y A2c |
where hZΓH |
y h |
hZΓH1 |
yhZΓHny |
yi |
denotes the stacked support functions individually eval |
uated at the rows of Hy |
PROOF The proof can be found in 28 Lemma 1 2 |
The disturbance inclusion constraints 32k 32l can |
both be rewritten in the form A3 by applying 31 |
Theorem 21 and thus can be implemented as linear |
constraints using Lemma 8 |
Lemma 8 Consider a scalar β0 a vector aRn |
matrices AiRnnΓRnn polytopic sets Xix |
HxixhxiwithHxiRnxnandYyHyy |
hywithHuRnyn and a compact convex set Z Rnthen the following conditions are sufficient and necessary |
for |
a N1M |
i0AiXiβY ΓZ A3 |
to hold |
ΛiRnynxΛi0 i 0 N1A4a |
ΛiHxiHyAi i 0 N1A4b |
N1X |
i0ΛihxiβhyhZΓH |
yHya A4c |
where hZΓH |
y h |
hZΓH1 |
yhZΓHny |
yi |
denotes the stacked support functions individually eval |
uated at the rows of Hy |
PROOF Using standard properties of polytopic sets |
we define the scaled polytope βYyHyyβhy |
Then using Theorem 23 in 31 we get |
βY ΓZyHyyβhyhZΓH |
y |
Therefore A3 is a polytope containment problem |
which can be restated as A4 using 30 Prop 1 2 |
If the set Yin Lemma 8 is restricted to a hyperrect |
angle then it can be specialized to βbeing a diago |
nal matrix ie β diag β1 βny This is due to |
the fact that for hyperrectangle Yand diagonal ma |
trixβthe representation βYyHyyˆβhywith |
ˆβ diag β1In βnyIn avoids inverting βand thus |
still allows optimization over β We can use this to re |
lax the structural constraint Σ i1iσInto Σ i1i |
diag σi1 σin as discussed in Remarks 1 2 Addi |
tionally if Wis a hyperrectangle we recover the distur |
bance tube parameterization in 25 as a special case |
A2 Implementation of 46 |
Since the sets ZiVi andQd |
iin 46 are all computed |
via the Pontryagin difference of a constant polytopic |
and a variable polytopic set see 43 44 they share |
the same shape 31 Theorem 23 For example the sets |
Zm |
izHxzhm |
zall have the shape of state con |
straint Xbut differ in their sizes hm |
zfor different memory |
entries Using this observation constraints 46d 46g |
can be implemented using the following lemma |
Lemma 9 Consider scalars am0and polytopic sets |
XmxHxxhm |
xwith HxRnxnform |
0 M1 then the following set description holds |
M1M |
m0amXmxHxxM1X |
m0amhm |
x A5 |
19PROOF Using standard properties of polytopic sets |
we get the scaled polytope amXmxHxxamhm |
x |
Then using the definition of the Minkowski sum we get |
a1X1a2X2x1x2Hxx1a1h1 |
x Hxx2a2h2 |
x |
Substituting xx1x2 we get the halfspace represen |
tation of Xa1X1a2X2as |
XxHxxHxx1x2a1h1 |
xa2h2 |
x |
Applying this recursively for all m 0 M1 then |
yields A5 2 |
B Experimental Details |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.