text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
manipulating noise 3We evaluate a range of scenes and |
editing instructions achieving stateoftheart performance |
in both scenes considered by previous work and more com |
plicated largescale indoor scenes from ScanNet |
22 Related Work |
NeRFBased Scene Editing Neural radiance field |
NeRF 21 and its variants 1 3 7 19 33 35 38 44 |
are widelyused approaches to representing scenes NeRF |
leverages neural networks or other learnable architectures to |
learn to reconstruct the 3D geometry of a scene only from |
multiview images and their camera parameters and sup |
port novel view synthesis With the development of NeRF |
editing a NeRFrepresented scene is also deeply studied |
covering different types of editing objectives and editing |
operation indicators aka user interfaces Some meth |
ods 16 20 41 support editing the position color andor |
shape of a specific object indicated by users through a |
pixel a text description or a segment etc Another line |
of work 4 24 39 46 studies humanguided shape edit |
ing which allows users to indicate a shape editing oper |
ation with a cage or point cloud provided by the model |
The task we investigate is instructionguided scene editing |
which allows users to indicate the editing operation through |
instructions in natural language The first work in this di |
rection is NeRFArt 34 which mainly focuses on style |
transfer instructions and uses pretrained CLIP 26 as the |
stylization loss for the instructionindicated style More re |
cent work 8 13 15 45 49 leverages diffusion models 10 |
instead of CLIP to benefit from powerful diffusion models |
and support more general instructions |
DistillationBased 3D Scene Generation Lacking 3D |
datasets to train powerful 3D diffusion models current so |
lutions distill the generation signal from a 2D diffusion |
model to exploit its ability in 3D generation DreamFu |
sion 25 is the first work in this direction which proposes |
score distillation sampling SDS to distill the gradient up |
date direction score from 2D diffusion models and |
supports instructionguided scene generation by distilling a |
pretrained diffusion model 28 HiFA 48 proposes an an |
nealing technique and rephrases the distillation formula to |
improve the generation result Magic3D 18 improves the |
generation results by introducing a coarsetofine strategy |
and a mesh exportation and refinement method Prolific |
Dreamer 36 further improves the generation results by in |
troducing an improved version of SDS namely variational |
score distillation VSD to augment and finetune a pre |
trained diffusion model and use it for generation |
Diffusion DistillationBased 3D Scene Editing Similar |
to 28 for instructionguided generation tasks another dif |
fusion model 2 was proposed for instructionguided im |
age editing by generating the edited image conditioned on |
both the original image and the instruction which is there |
fore compatible with SDS 25 Instruction 3Dto3D 13 |
uses SDS with 2 to support instructionguided style trans |
fer on 3D scenes InstructNeRF2NeRF IN2N 8 adopts |
another way to operate the 2D diffusion model similar to |
the rephrased version of SDS in HiFA 48 which iteratively generates edited images to update the NeRF dataset |
for NeRF fitting and supports more general editing instruc |
tions such as objectspecific editing ViCANeRF 6 pro |
poses a different pipeline to first edit key views and then |
blend key views and apply refinement EditDiffNeRF 45 |
augments the diffusion model and finetunes it with a CLIP |
loss to improve the success rate of editing DreamEdi |
tor 49 utilizes a finetuned variant of 29 instead of 2 |
and focuses on objectspecific editing |
Consistency in DistillationBased Pipelines When dis |
tilling from 2D diffusion to perform 3D generation or edit |
ing 3D awareness and 3D consistency of the generated |
images are crucial as 3Dinconsistent multiview images |
are not a valid descriptor of a scene However achiev |
ing 3D consistency in 2D diffusion is challenging Early |
work 8 13 18 25 48 does not alter the diffusion model |
and relies on consistency derived from NeRF by directly |
training NeRF with the inconsistent multiview images The |
NeRF will then converge to an averaged or smoothed ver |
sion of the scene according to its model capability which |
results in blurred results with few textures and even fails |
to generate regular patterns like a plaid or checkered pat |
tern Followup work begins to improve the consistency of |
the diffusion andor the pipeline ViCANeRF 6 achieves |
consistency by proposing a different pipeline based on key |
views ProlificDreamer 36 makes the diffusion 3Daware |
by inputting the camera parameter to the diffusion model |
and applying perscene finetuning CSD 15 IVID 37 |
and ConsistNet 42 propose a joint distillation procedure |
for multiple views aiming to generate or edit multiple im |
ages in one batch consistently through either attention |
depthbased warping or KullbackLeibler divergence |
However these methods all share two major constraints |
1 the noise used for generation is not controlled therefore |
a single view may lead to different and inconsistent gener |
ation results with different noises 2 these methods only |
study and enforce the consistency between images within |
a single batch Nevertheless the full generation or editing |
procedure for the scene is across multiple batches and there |
might be inconsistencies in different batches Our Con |
sistDreamer resolves these limitations by proposing novel |
structured noise and consistencyenforcing training |
3 ConsistDreamer Methodology |
Our ConsistDreamer is a novel IN2Nlike 8 framework |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.