text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
ing all the pixels in all the views and renderingprojecting |
such a point cloud at a view to generate the structured |
noise Directly implementing this literal description is com |
plicated and inefficient |
Therefore we use an equivalent implementation |
Instead of explicitly generating this dense point cloud we |
just put the weighted noises on each pixel of all views |
For the view we query for structured noise we warp the |
noise from all other views to it This is equivalent to pro |
jecting the subpoint cloud generated by each view to the |
querying view therefore it is equivalent to the original |
design |
With this implementation explicitly generating main |
taining and projecting a point cloud with billions of points |
number of views height width is unnecessary and a |
query can be completed in less than one second |
D5 Surrounding Views Reference View Selection |
We construct the surrounding view with one large main |
view and several small reference views The purpose of |
the reference views is twofolded 1 to provide enough |
context about the whole scene and 2 to have enough |
overlapped parts of the main view to facilitate consistency |
enforcing training Therefore we select 40 of the views to |
be a random view of the scene and the rest 60 of the views |
to be a view with at least 20 overlap of the main view |
quantified by the area of matched pixels through warping |
The order of the views is randomly shuffled We observed |
that none of these randomnesses highly alter the editing re |
sult after consistencyenforcing training any choice of |
reference views and their order will lead to a consistent |
edited result of the main view |
D6 Training Pixel Weights |
In consistencyenforcing training we apply warping and |
weighted averages to compute the training reference views |
v so that all the views in vare 3D consistent Using |
identical weights for all pixels will result in blurred images |
In a scene of a person one view only contains their face |
and another view contains the whole body Warping the lat |
ter to the former indicates an upsampling of the face part |
which will be blurred Merging the blurred warped view |
with the former view at the same weight results in blurred |
overall results |
We propose a better pixelweighting strategy based on a |
further analysis of this situation If we warp pixel ato pixel |
b where ahas a larger scope and contains more scene |
objects then we need to upsample the bpart of the view |
froma resulting in blurry Therefore the weight should be |
related to the scope of the pixel Following this we define |
14the pixel area to quantify this scope For a pixel pin a view |
from camera position o the four vertices of the pixel grids |
correspond to the rays otdi4 |
i1 We use NeRF to predict |
each of their depth ti4 |
i1 and calculate their correspond |
ing points Piotidi The pixel area Spof this pixel is |
defined as the area of a square with vertices P1 P2 P3 P4 |
in the 3D space which can be regarded as an approximation |
of the surface area the pixel represents As we need a lower |
weight for a pixel with a larger scope ielarger Sp we |
define the weight as 1Sp which satisfies all our needs |
D7 Training MultiGPU Pipeline |
An illustration of our multiGPU training pipeline is in Fig |
D1 By implementing such a parallelization pipeline by |
ourselves we decouple NeRF training with diffusion gen |
eration and training in the most asynchronized way waiving |
the necessity of tradeoffs between NeRF training and dif |
fusion achieving considerable speed up |
D8 Training Regularizations |
We use the consistency loss as the main loss in the |
consistencyenforcing training However this loss only en |
forces several equalities required by consistency leading |
to trivial results of a purecolor image without regulariza |
tion losses this is also reasonable as all purecolor images |
of the same color are perfectly consistent Also there is no |
encouragement or enforcement to use the 3D information in |
the 3D positional embedding To avoid these we propose |
several regularization losses as shown below |
Maintain Original Behavior We expect that the trained |
diffusion model will generate images that are very similar |
to the original model when all the inputs image noises |
and 3D positional embeddings are identical Therefore |
we use MSE and VGG perceptual and stylization losses |
to regularize both the generated images and the con |
structed referenced images with gradient generated by |
warping and averaging of the trained diffusion with the |
original models output We further expect that the UNet |
in the trained diffusion model predicts similar noises at |
each denoising step as the original UNet so we also use |
this to regularize during each denoising step |
Encourage 3D Information Utilization The original 2 |
takes the original image of the scene as another part of |
input using it as a condition to generate the edited image |
To encourage 3D information utilization we design a reg |
ularization loss to enforce the diffusion model without |
the original image input to generate very similar results |
to the one with the original image input both with 3D po |
sitional embedding input With the lack of the original |
image the only way for the diffusion model to perceive |
the original view is the 3D positional embedding There |
fore the diffusion is trained to use the 3D positional em |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.