Datasets:
tensorkelechi
/
arxiv-cstext

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
89.3k
Method
The first variant basic gradient ascent with Newtons first
divided difference method offers advantages such as reduced
memory usage suitability for estimations of convex utility
functions and faster convergence However it is easy to get
trapped in local minima and struggle with handling sensi
tivity to noise or fluctuations in the objective function The
estimation of the utility function significantly influences the
calculation of the gradient J as depicted below
Juaxy
ipuaxy
ip1
axy
ipaxy
ip1 ifaxy
ipaxy
ip1 10
Juaxy
ipuaxy
ip1 ifaxy
ipaxy
ip1 11
B Gradient Ascent with Newtons First Divided Difference
Method and Momentum
The second variant builds upon the previous approach by
incorporating momentum with expected benefits including
suitability for estimations of nonconvex utility functions with
less memory usage comfort of oscillations faster convergence
by smoothing the optimization trajectory and allowing rapid
adaptation to the gradient landscape However drawbacks in
clude the risk of overshooting optimal solutions and sensitivity
Fig 4 An illustration of kickoff procedure in SbPGs with
gradientbased learning
to hyperparameters In this variant Eq 8 remains applicable
but the gradient of the utility function Jis now denoted as
Jp
axy
ip1axy
ipα Jpγou 12
where Jpis calculated based on momentum
Jpβ Jp1 1β J 13
with βrepresenting the momentum factor weighting The
computation of Jremains consistent with Eq 10 and 11
C Gradient Ascent with Newtons First Divided Difference
Method of Polynomial Interpolation
The third variant incorporates polynomial interpolation
which results in a more precise approximation of the objec
tive functions landscape and facilitates smoother and more
efficient exploration of the optimization space However this
enhancement introduces increased computational complexity
and memory requirements along with potential challenges
in selecting appropriate polynomial degrees or coefficients
In this variant we do not utilize momentum which allows
us to use Eq 8 The objective function is estimated using
interpolating polynomial forms which derives the following
equation to compute the gradient of the utility function J
Juaxy
i0 axy
i1 axy
ip
uaxy
i1 axy
i1 axy
ipuaxy
i0 axy
i1 axy
ip1
axy
ipaxy
i0
14
where uaxy
i0 axy
i1 axy
iprepresents the recursive gener
ation of the divided differences with the bracket notation
introduced to differentiate these differences This notation
starts from uaxy
i0 uaxy
i0
D KickOff with Random Exploration
Similar to gradientbased optimization in neural networks
often initialized with random weights which has been proven
effective 38 we propose introducing a kickoff start for
the proposed gradientbased learning in SbPGs as pictured
in Fig 4 The concept involves beginning with a period of
random exploration similar to best response learning before
transitioning to the proposed gradient ascent method This
kickoff mechanism causes Eq 9 invalid
V R ESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
In this section we introduce the laboratory testbed used for
evaluating the proposed methods Then we present the results
of benchmark tests conducted on the testbed Finally we
provide the results and discussions of the proposed methodsA Bulk Good Laboratory Plant
The Bulk Good Laboratory Plant BGLP 15 39 rep
resents a modular distributed production system characterized
by its intelligence flexibility and plugandplay functional
ity 6 The basic setup comprises four main modules which
are loading storing weighing and filling stations They are
arranged sequentially and equipped with different actuators