| # Defensive LLM Application Development Guide | |
| This guide provides comprehensive guidance for developing secure and resilient LLM-based applications. It focuses on practical strategies for preventing, detecting, and mitigating security vulnerabilities throughout the application lifecycle. | |
| ## Core Security Principles | |
| Building secure LLM applications requires adherence to several foundational principles: | |
| ### 1. Defense in Depth | |
| Implement multiple, layered security controls to protect against various attack vectors: | |
| - **Model-Level Protections**: Leverage built-in safety mechanisms | |
| - **Application-Level Validation**: Implement input and output validation | |
| - **System-Level Controls**: Deploy application isolation and monitoring | |
| - **User-Level Restrictions**: Implement appropriate access controls | |
| - **Operational Safeguards**: Establish monitoring and incident response | |
| ### 2. Security by Design | |
| Integrate security from the earliest stages of development: | |
| - **Threat Modeling**: Identify potential threats before implementation | |
| - **Security Requirements**: Define explicit security requirements | |
| - **Architecture Reviews**: Evaluate designs for security implications | |
| - **Secure Defaults**: Implement restrictive default configurations | |
| - **Continuous Assessment**: Build security testing into development workflow | |
| ### 3. Least Privilege | |
| Restrict capabilities to the minimum necessary: | |
| - **Model Capability Scoping**: Limit model access to necessary capabilities | |
| - **User Authorization**: Implement fine-grained access controls | |
| - **System Access Limits**: Restrict access to external systems and resources | |
| - **Context Restrictions**: Limit context visibility to necessary information | |
| - **Output Constraints**: Restrict outputs to appropriate formats and channels | |
| ### 4. Secure Integration | |
| Ensure secure integration with existing systems: | |
| - **API Security**: Implement robust authentication and authorization | |
| - **Data Transport Security**: Encrypt data in transit | |
| - **Input Sanitization**: Validate and sanitize data before processing | |
| - **Output Filtering**: Filter and validate model outputs before use | |
| - **Error Handling**: Implement secure error handling to prevent information leakage | |
| ### 5. Continuous Verification | |
| Continuously verify security properties: | |
| - **Automated Testing**: Implement automated security testing | |
| - **Regular Assessments**: Conduct periodic security assessments | |
| - **Monitoring and Alerting**: Deploy monitoring for security events | |
| - **Incident Response**: Establish procedures for handling security incidents | |
| - **Feedback Integration**: Incorporate security feedback into development | |
| ## Vulnerability Prevention Strategies | |
| ### Input Validation and Sanitization | |
| Implement comprehensive input validation: | |
| 1. **Content Filtering** | |
| - Apply consistent filtering across all input channels | |
| - Implement both pattern-based and semantic filtering | |
| - Consider context-specific filtering requirements | |
| - Balance filtering strictness against legitimate use cases | |
| 2. **Structural Validation** | |
| - Validate input structure and format | |
| - Enforce size and complexity limits | |
| - Check for unexpected formatting or encoding | |
| - Validate conformance to expected patterns | |
| 3. **Contextual Analysis** | |
| - Evaluate inputs in the context of conversation history | |
| - Detect sudden topic or instruction shifts | |
| - Identify potential manipulation patterns | |
| - Consider cross-modal consistency for multimodal inputs | |
| 4. **User Input Segmentation** | |
| - Clearly separate user inputs from system instructions | |
| - Implement distinct handling for different input types | |
| - Consider input isolation patterns for sensitive operations | |
| - Apply different validation rules based on input type | |
| ### System Instruction Protection | |
| Protect system instructions from manipulation: | |
| 1. **Architectural Approaches** | |
| - Implement architectural separation between instructions and user inputs | |
| - Consider multi-component designs with separate instruction handling | |
| - Explore fine-tuning models with embedded instructions | |
| - Evaluate instruction-less design patterns where appropriate | |
| 2. **Instruction Reinforcement** | |
| - Regularly reinforce critical instructions | |
| - Implement dynamic instruction refreshing | |
| - Consider checkpointing conversation state | |
| - Explore meta-instruction approaches for consistency enforcement | |
| 3. **Instruction Monitoring** | |
| - Monitor for unexpected instruction changes | |
| - Implement detection for instruction manipulation attempts | |
| - Compare responses against expected behavioral baselines | |
| - Deploy canary instructions to detect manipulation | |
| 4. **Implicit Instruction Approaches** | |
| - Explore models fine-tuned for specific behaviors | |
| - Reduce reliance on explicit instructions for security constraints | |
| - Implement behavior guardrails independent of instructions | |
| - Consider dual-model verification approaches | |
| ### Prompt Engineering for Security | |
| Design prompts with security in mind: | |
| 1. **Clear Boundary Establishment** | |
| - Explicitly define model role and limitations | |
| - Include specific prohibited actions | |
| - Provide clear guidance on acceptable outputs | |
| - Establish unambiguous interaction parameters | |
| 2. **Resistance to Manipulation** | |
| - Design prompts resistant to redefinition or override | |
| - Avoid patterns vulnerable to prompt injection | |
| - Implement critical instruction reinforcement | |
| - Consider instruction obfuscation for sensitive directives | |
| 3. **Secure Multi-Turn Interactions** | |
| - Maintain conversational context securely | |
| - Implement conversation state validation | |
| - Consider periodic context refreshing | |
| - Design for resistance to multi-turn manipulation | |
| 4. **Security-Focused Evaluation** | |
| - Test prompts against common attack patterns | |
| - Evaluate boundary enforcement consistency | |
| - Measure prompt effectiveness across diverse inputs | |
| - Consider adversarial testing of prompt designs | |
| ### Output Validation and Filtering | |
| Ensure outputs meet security requirements: | |
| 1. **Content Policy Enforcement** | |
| - Apply consistent output filtering across all channels | |
| - Implement both pattern-based and semantic filtering | |
| - Consider context-specific output requirements | |
| - Balance filtering against legitimate use cases | |
| 2. **Structural Validation** | |
| - Validate output structure and format | |
| - Verify adherence to expected patterns | |
| - Check for unexpected content or formatting | |
| - Consider template enforcement for structured outputs | |
| 3. **Semantic Analysis** | |
| - Evaluate outputs for potential harmful content | |
| - Consider contextual factors in output evaluation | |
| - Implement detection for potentially harmful outputs | |
| - Deploy classification models for output evaluation | |
| 4. **Contextual Consistency** | |
| - Verify consistency with prior conversation context | |
| - Check alignment with user requests | |
| - Detect anomalous shifts in output patterns | |
| - Consider multi-turn output analysis | |
| ### Tool Use Security | |
| Secure integration with external tools and systems: | |
| 1. **Tool Access Control** | |
| - Implement granular control over tool access | |
| - Require explicit authorization for tool use | |
| - Consider command verification systems | |
| - Implement tool use logging and auditing | |
| 2. **Input Parameter Validation** | |
| - Validate all tool parameters before use | |
| - Implement strong typing and format validation | |
| - Check for injection attempts in parameters | |
| - Consider parameter constraints based on context | |
| 3. **Command Isolation** | |
| - Isolate tool execution environments | |
| - Implement least-privilege execution contexts | |
| - Consider sandboxing for tool operations | |
| - Deploy execution time and resource limits | |
| 4. **Output Processing Security** | |
| - Validate tool outputs before processing | |
| - Implement secure parsing of tool results | |
| - Consider output filtering for sensitive information | |
| - Design for graceful handling of unexpected outputs | |
| ### Multi-Modal Security | |
| Address security in multi-modal applications: | |
| 1. **Cross-Modal Consistency** | |
| - Verify consistency across different input modalities | |
| - Implement security checks for each modality | |
| - Consider potential conflicts between modalities | |
| - Deploy unified security policies across modalities | |
| 2. **Modal-Specific Validation** | |
| - Implement specialized validation for each modality | |
| - Consider unique attack vectors for each input type | |
| - Deploy modal-specific security models | |
| - Design specialized filtering for different modalities | |
| 3. **Modal Translation Security** | |
| - Secure the translation between different modalities | |
| - Implement validation at translation boundaries | |
| - Consider potential information loss or manipulation | |
| - Deploy consistent security enforcement across translations | |
| 4. **Modal Pipeline Integrity** | |
| - Ensure end-to-end security across modal processing | |
| - Implement chainable validation between stages | |
| - Consider integrity verification between processing steps | |
| - Design for complete traceability across modal pipelines | |
| ## Vulnerability Detection Strategies | |
| ### Runtime Monitoring | |
| Implement continuous monitoring for security events: | |
| 1. **Input Monitoring** | |
| - Monitor for known attack patterns in inputs | |
| - Implement classification for potentially malicious inputs | |
| - Consider anomaly detection for unusual input patterns | |
| - Deploy contextual analysis of input streams | |
| 2. **Behavior Monitoring** | |
| - Track model behavior for unexpected patterns | |
| - Implement baselines for normal operation | |
| - Monitor for sudden changes in behavior | |
| - Consider differential analysis across interactions | |
| 3. **Output Monitoring** | |
| - Implement content policy monitoring for outputs | |
| - Consider statistical pattern monitoring | |
| - Deploy anomaly detection for unusual outputs | |
| - Implement semantic analysis of response patterns | |
| 4. **System Interaction Monitoring** | |
| - Track interactions with external systems | |
| - Monitor resource utilization patterns | |
| - Implement logging of all system operations | |
| - Consider monitoring of execution environments | |
| ### Anomaly Detection | |
| Detect unusual patterns that may indicate attacks: | |
| 1. **Statistical Anomaly Detection** | |
| - Establish baselines for normal operation | |
| - Monitor for statistical deviations | |
| - Implement time-series analysis of behavior | |
| - Consider multi-dimensional anomaly detection | |
| 2. **Contextual Anomaly Detection** | |
| - Evaluate behaviors in conversation context | |
| - Detect context inconsistencies | |
| - Monitor for unusual context transitions | |
| - Implement semantic anomaly detection | |
| 3. **User Behavior Anomalies** | |
| - Establish user interaction baselines | |
| - Detect changes in interaction patterns | |
| - Monitor for unusual query sequences | |
| - Consider user-specific anomaly modeling | |
| 4. **System Interaction Anomalies** | |
| - Track normal patterns of system interaction | |
| - Monitor for unusual resource requests | |
| - Detect unexpected API or tool usage | |
| - Implement timing analysis for operations | |
| ### Canary Tokens and Traps | |
| Implement traps to detect manipulation attempts: | |
| 1. **Instruction Canaries** | |
| - Embed verifiable markers in instructions | |
| - Monitor for unexpected changes to markers | |
| - Implement detection for marker manipulation | |
| - Consider cryptographic verification of instructions | |
| 2. **Behavioral Tripwires** | |
| - Define explicit behavioral boundaries | |
| - Implement detection for boundary violations | |
| - Monitor for attempts to probe boundaries | |
| - Consider graduated response to violation attempts | |
| 3. **Content Policy Probes** | |
| - Periodically test content policy enforcement | |
| - Verify consistent policy application | |
| - Monitor for policy enforcement degradation | |
| - Implement alerting for policy failures | |
| 4. **Access Control Verification** | |
| - Regularly verify access control enforcement | |
| - Implement detection for escalation attempts | |
| - Monitor for unexpected permission changes | |
| - Consider continuous verification of authorization | |
| ### Security Logging and Auditing | |
| Implement comprehensive logging for security analysis: | |
| 1. **Input Logging** | |
| - Log all user inputs with metadata | |
| - Implement secure, tamper-evident logging | |
| - Consider privacy-preserving logging techniques | |
| - Design for efficient log analysis | |
| 2. **Processing Event Logging** | |
| - Log key processing events and decisions | |
| - Implement context tracking in logs | |
| - Consider performance impact of logging | |
| - Design for effective debugging | |
| 3. **Output Logging** | |
| - Log all model outputs | |
| - Implement filtering for sensitive information | |
| - Consider compliance requirements for output logs | |
| - Design for retroactive security analysis | |
| 4. **System Interaction Logging** | |
| - Log all external system interactions | |
| - Implement detailed tooling operation logs | |
| - Consider resource usage tracking | |
| - Design for correlation with other log sources | |
| ## Vulnerability Mitigation Strategies | |
| ### Containment Techniques | |
| Contain the impact of potential security breaches: | |
| 1. **Session Isolation** | |
| - Isolate user sessions from each other | |
| - Implement strong session boundaries | |
| - Consider security context regeneration | |
| - Design for minimal cross-session information sharing | |
| 2. **Conversation Segmentation** | |
| - Implement logical conversation boundaries | |
| - Consider conversation checkpointing | |
| - Design for secure state transitions | |
| - Implement context reset capabilities | |
| 3. **Resource Constraints** | |
| - Implement resource usage limits | |
| - Consider rate limiting and throttling | |
| - Design for graceful degradation | |
| - Implement escalating constraints for suspicious activity | |
| 4. **Execution Environment Isolation** | |
| - Deploy isolated execution environments | |
| - Implement sandbox approaches for tool use | |
| - Consider container-based isolation | |
| - Design for minimal privilege operations | |
| ### Response Strategies | |
| Develop effective responses to detected attacks: | |
| 1. **Graduated Response** | |
| - Implement escalating response levels | |
| - Consider confidence-based response scaling | |
| - Design for proportional countermeasures | |
| - Implement response effectiveness monitoring | |
| 2. **Secure Fallbacks** | |
| - Design secure default behaviors | |
| - Implement safe mode operations | |
| - Consider degraded operation capabilities | |
| - Design for graceful security failovers | |
| 3. **User Notification** | |
| - Implement appropriate user alerting | |
| - Consider transparency in security responses | |
| - Design for actionable security notifications | |
| - Implement education in security alerts | |
| 4. **Adaptive Defense** | |
| - Deploy learning-based defensive systems | |
| - Implement response effectiveness tracking | |
| - Consider continuous defense improvement | |
| - Design for adaptation to evolving threats | |
| ### Recovery Mechanisms | |
| Design for effective recovery from security events: | |
| 1. **State Restoration** | |
| - Implement secure conversation state recovery | |
| - Consider checkpointing for critical operations | |
| - Design for partial state restoration | |
| - Implement verification of restored states | |
| 2. **Security Context Refresh** | |
| - Deploy mechanisms to refresh security context | |
| - Implement instruction reinforcement | |
| - Consider complete context regeneration | |
| - Design for security state verification | |
| 3. **Integrity Verification** | |
| - Implement methods to verify system integrity | |
| - Consider cryptographic verification approaches | |
| - Design for detection of persistent compromise | |
| - Implement regular integrity checks | |
| 4. **Post-Incident Learning** | |
| - Deploy mechanisms to learn from incidents | |
| - Implement feedback loops for defense improvement | |
| - Consider automated defense adaptation | |
| - Design for continuous security enhancement | |
| ## Implementation Patterns | |
| ### Model Interface Security | |
| Secure the interface to language models: | |
| 1. **Request Validation** | |
| - Implement comprehensive input validation | |
| - Consider schema validation for requests | |
| - Design for rejection of malformed requests | |
| - Implement context validation | |
| 2. **Response Processing** | |
| - Validate and filter model responses | |
| - Implement output transformation for security | |
| - Consider selective response editing | |
| - Design for handling unexpected outputs | |
| 3. **Context Management** | |
| - Implement secure context handling | |
| - Consider cryptographic context protection | |
| - Design for context integrity verification | |
| - Implement context sanitization | |
| 4. **Error Handling** | |
| - Design secure error handling procedures | |
| - Implement informative but safe error messages | |
| - Consider graceful degradation on errors | |
| - Design for security event detection in errors | |
| ### System Architecture Patterns | |
| Design system architecture with security in mind: | |
| 1. **Layered Defense Architecture** | |
| - Implement multiple security layers | |
| - Design for defense in depth | |
| - Consider security boundary definition | |
| - Implement security layer independence | |
| 2. **Service Isolation** | |
| - Separate functionality into isolated services | |
| - Implement clear security boundaries | |
| - Consider microservice architecture | |
| - Design for minimal inter-service trust | |
| 3. **Intermediary Security Services** | |
| - Deploy dedicated security services | |
| - Implement centralized policy enforcement | |
| - Consider security service redundancy | |
| - Design for security service independence | |
| 4. **Fault Isolation** | |
| - Design for containment of security failures | |
| - Implement blast radius limitation | |
| - Consider graceful degradation paths | |
| - Design for recovery from security events | |
| ### Authentication and Authorization | |
| Implement robust access controls: | |
| 1. **User Authentication** | |
| - Implement strong user authentication | |
| - Consider multi-factor authentication | |
| - Design for secure credential management | |
| - Implement authentication monitoring | |
| 2. **Fine-Grained Authorization** | |
| - Deploy granular access controls | |
| - Implement least privilege principles | |
| - Consider attribute-based access control | |
| - Design for contextual authorization | |
| 3. **Session Management** | |
| - Implement secure session handling | |
| - Consider session timeout policies | |
| - Design for session isolation | |
| - Implement session integrity verification | |
| 4. **API Security** | |
| - Deploy robust API authentication | |
| - Implement API rate limiting | |
| - Consider API scope restrictions | |
| - Design for API abuse detection | |
| ### Secure Development Lifecycle | |
| Integrate security throughout the development lifecycle: | |
| 1. **Threat Modeling** | |
| - Conduct threat modeling during design | |
| - Implement security requirement definition | |
| - Consider attack surface analysis | |
| - Design for threat-driven security | |
| 2. **Secure Coding Practices** | |
| - Implement secure coding standards | |
| - Consider code review for security | |
| - Design for defensive programming | |
| - Implement automated security analysis | |
| 3. **Security Testing** | |
| - Deploy comprehensive security testing | |
| - Implement automated security scanning | |
| - Consider penetration testing | |
| - Design for continuous security validation | |
| 4. **Security Monitoring and Response** | |
| - Implement production security monitoring | |
| - Consider incident response procedures | |
| - Design for security event detection | |
| - Implement post-incident analysis | |
| ## Operational Safeguards | |
| ### Deployment Security | |
| Secure the deployment environment: | |
| 1. **Environment Hardening** | |
| - Implement secure configuration | |
| - Consider attack surface reduction | |
| - Design for security by default | |
| - Implement regular security auditing | |
| 2. **Access Control** | |
| - Deploy least privilege access | |
| - Implement separation of duties | |
| - Consider just-in-time access | |
| - Design for privileged access management | |
| 3. **Monitoring and Alerting** | |
| - Implement comprehensive security monitoring | |
| - Consider real-time alerting | |
| - Design for security incident detection | |
| - Implement automated response capabilities | |
| 4. **Update Management** | |
| - Deploy secure update procedures | |
| - Implement update verification | |
| - Consider rollback capabilities | |
| - Design for continuous security improvement | |
| ### Security Assessment | |
| Regularly assess security posture: | |
| 1. **Vulnerability Scanning** | |
| - Implement regular vulnerability scanning | |
| - Consider automated security testing | |
| - Design for continuous vulnerability detection | |
| - Implement finding prioritization | |
| 2. **Penetration Testing** | |
| - Deploy regular penetration testing | |
| - Implement red team exercises | |
| - Consider adversarial testing | |
| - Design for realistic attack simulation | |
| 3. **Compliance Auditing** | |
| - Implement compliance verification | |
| - Consider regulatory requirement tracking | |
| - Design for evidence collection | |
| - Implement continuous compliance monitoring | |
| 4. **Security Metrics** | |
| - Deploy security performance metrics | |
| - Implement security posture tracking | |
| - Consider risk-based metrics | |
| - Design for security improvement measurement | |
| ### Incident Response | |
| Prepare for security incidents: | |
| 1. **Response Planning** | |
| - Develop incident response procedures | |
| - Implement response team structure | |
| - Consider scenario-based planning | |
| - Design for rapid response capability | |
| 2. **Detection and Analysis** | |
| - Implement incident detection mechanisms | |
| - Consider forensic analysis capabilities | |
| - Design for evidence preservation | |
| - Implement root cause analysis | |
| 3. **Containment and Eradication** | |
| - Deploy containment procedures | |
| - Implement threat eradication | |
| - Consider business continuity | |
| - Design for minimal operational impact | |
| 4. **Recovery and Learning** | |
| - Implement secure recovery procedures | |
| - Consider post-incident analysis | |
| - Design for continuous improvement | |
| - Implement lessons learned process | |
| ### Security Updates | |
| Maintain current security protections: | |
| 1. **Vulnerability Management** | |
| - Implement vulnerability tracking | |
| - Consider risk-based prioritization | |
| - Design for rapid vulnerability response | |
| - Implement dependency management | |
| 2. **Model Security Updates** | |
| - Deploy model update procedures | |
| - Implement security regression testing | |
| - Consider update verification | |
| - Design for seamless security improvements | |
| 3. **Security Intelligence** | |
| - Implement threat intelligence integration | |
| - Consider emerging threat monitoring | |
| - Design for proactive defense | |
| - Implement security knowledge management | |
| 4. **Defense Adaptation** | |
| - Deploy adaptive defense mechanisms | |
| - Implement security control evolution | |
| - Consider automated defense updates | |
| - Design for continuous security enhancement | |
| ## Specialized Security Considerations | |
| ### Domain-Specific Security | |
| Address security in specific application domains: | |
| 1. **Healthcare Applications** | |
| - Implement PHI protection measures | |
| - Consider regulatory compliance (HIPAA) | |
| - Design for clinical safety | |
| - Implement medical information security | |
| 2. **Financial Services** | |
| - Deploy financial data protection | |
| - Implement fraud prevention measures | |
| - Consider regulatory compliance | |
| - Design for transaction security | |
| 3. **Legal Applications** | |
| - Implement privilege protection | |
| - Consider confidentiality requirements | |
| - Design for legal accuracy | |
| - Implement citation verification | |
| 4. **Educational Applications** | |
| - Deploy age-appropriate content filtering | |
| - Implement educational integrity measures | |
| - Consider developmental appropriateness | |
| - Design for safe learning environments | |
| ### Enterprise Integration | |
| Secure enterprise application integration: | |
| 1. **Identity Integration** | |
| - Implement enterprise identity integration | |
| - Consider single sign-on compatibility | |
| - Design for directory service integration | |
| - Implement role mapping | |
| 2. **Data Integration** | |
| - Deploy secure data access patterns | |
| - Implement data classification respect | |
| - Consider data lineage tracking | |
| - Design for data governance compatibility | |
| 3. **Security Control Integration** | |
| - Implement enterprise security control integration | |
| - Consider policy enforcement point integration | |
| - Design for security event forwarding | |
| - Implement unified security monitoring | |
| 4. **Compliance Integration** | |
| - Deploy enterprise compliance integration | |
| - Implement audit trail compatibility | |
| - Consider regulatory alignment | |
| - Design for evidence generation | |
| ### Privacy Considerations | |
| Address privacy in LLM applications: | |
| 1. **Data Minimization** | |
| - Implement minimal data collection | |
| - Consider need-to-know processing | |
| - Design for data purpose limitation | |
| - Implement data lifecycle management | |
| 2. **User Control** | |
| - Deploy user consent mechanisms | |
| - Implement preference management | |
| - Consider transparency measures | |
| - Design for revocation capabilities | |
| 3. **De-Identification** | |
| - Implement PII detection and protection | |
| - Consider anonymization techniques | |
| - Design for privacy-preserving processing | |
| - Implement re-identification risk management | |
| 4. **Privacy by Design** | |
| - Deploy privacy-enhancing technologies | |
| - Implement privacy impact assessment | |
| - Consider privacy threat modeling | |
| - Design for privacy as a default | |
| ### Ethical Considerations | |
| Address ethical dimensions of security: | |
| 1. **Fairness and Bias** | |
| - Implement bias detection and mitigation | |
| - Consider disparate impact assessment | |
| - Design for equitable security enforcement | |
| - Implement inclusive security design | |
| 2. **Transparency** | |
| - Deploy appropriate security transparency | |
| - Implement explainable security measures | |
| - Consider user understanding | |
| - Design for security awareness | |
| 3. **Appropriate Trust** | |
| - Implement trust calibration mechanisms | |
| - Consider appropriate reliance guidance | |
| - Design for accurate capability representation | |
| - Implement trust boundary clarity | |
| 4. **Safety Considerations** | |
| - Deploy harm prevention measures | |
| - Implement civil discourse promotion | |
| - Consider vulnerable user protection | |
| - Design for societal benefit | |
| ## Conclusion | |
| Building secure LLM applications requires a comprehensive approach that addresses vulnerabilities throughout the application lifecycle. By implementing the strategies outlined in this guide, developers can create applications that maintain security while delivering powerful capabilities. | |
| Remember that security is an ongoing process rather than a one-time achievement. Continuous monitoring, regular assessment, and adaptive defense are essential components of an effective security program for LLM applications. | |
| As LLM technology continues to evolve, security approaches must evolve as well. Stay current with emerging threats and defensive techniques to ensure your applications remain secure in a changing landscape. | |
| ## Additional Resources | |
| ### Security Testing Tools | |
| - [LLMSecForge Testing Tools](../../tools/README.md) | |
| - [Vulnerability Scanners](../../tools/scanners/README.md) | |
| - [Security Harnesses](../../tools/harnesses/README.md) | |
| ### Vulnerability References | |
| - [Vulnerability Taxonomy](../../docs/taxonomy/README.md) | |
| - [Case Studies](../../docs/case-studies/README.md) | |
| - [Security Research](../../research/README.md) | |
| ### Implementation Guidelines | |
| - [Secure Architecture Patterns](../templates/secure-architecture.md) | |
| - [Security Policy Templates](../templates/security-policies.md) | |
| - [Security Controls Checklist](../checklists/security-controls.md) | |
| ### Security Community | |
| - [Responsible Disclosure](../../frameworks/disclosure/README.md) | |
| - [Security Benchmarking](../../frameworks/benchmarking/README.md) | |
| - [Governance Framework](../../docs/governance/README.md) | |