engineering.md

I've reviewed your code and I can see that your implementation has some characteristics that could be considered over-engineered for certain scenarios. Let me analyze this:

Signs of potential over-engineering:

1. Multiple specialized agents: You have 6 different specialized agents (web, file processing, vision, video, code interpreter, and text tool agents) plus a manager agent. While this creates a clean separation of concerns, it adds complexity.

2. Hierarchical structure: The manager agent needs to coordinate all the specialized agents, which adds an additional layer of indirection.

3. Complex file handling: You have multiple file handling and processing capabilities spread across several tools and agents.

4. Tool duplication: Some functionality might be duplicated across multiple agents or could be consolidated.

Whether this is over-engineered depends on:

1. Scale of the problem: If you're building for the GAIA benchmark which requires handling diverse tasks (web, file, image, video processing), this might be an appropriate level of modularity.

2. Maintainability needs: The modular approach makes it easier to modify individual components without affecting others.

3. Future expansion: If you plan to add more capabilities, this architecture provides a clear structure for that.

4. Performance requirements: The multiple layers of agent delegation could impact performance if fast response time is critical.

A more streamlined approach could use a single agent with all tools available to it directly, rather than having to coordinate between specialized agents. That would reduce the complexity of coordination but might make the codebase harder to maintain as it grows.

Would you like me to suggest a simplified architecture, or are there specific aspects of the current implementation you're concerned about?