text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
The result we prove is the following:22 |
Theorem 7. LetLrbe a set ofd2Hermitian matrices forming a basis for gl(d,C). |
LetCrstbe the structure constants relative to this basis, so that |
[Lr,Ls] =d2/summationdisplay |
t=1CrstLt (162) |
and letCrbe the matrix with matrix elements (Cr)st=Crst. Then the following |
statements are equivalent |
(1)EachCrhas the spectral decomposition |
Cr=Pr−PT |
r (163) |
wherePris a rankd−1projector which is orthogonal to its own transpose. |
(2)There exists a SIC-set Πr, a set of signs ǫr=±1and a real constant |
α/ne}ationslash=−1 |
dsuch that |
Lr=ǫr(Πr+αI) (164) |
Remark. The restriction to values of α/ne}ationslash=−1 |
dis needed to ensure that the matrices |
Lrare linearly independent, and therefore constitute a basis for gl( d,C) (otherwise |
they would all have trace = 0). The Q-QTproperty continues to hold even if α |
does =−1 |
d. |
It will be seen that it is not only SIC-sets which have the Q-QTproperty, but |
also any set of operators obtained from a SIC-set by shifting by a c onstant and |
multiplying by an r-dependent sign. Sothe Q-QTpropertyis not strictly equivalent |
to the property of being a SIC-set. However, it could be said that t he properties |
are almost equivalent. In particular, the existence of an Hermitian b asis for gl(d,C) |
having the Q-QTproperty implies the existence of a SIC-POVM in dimension d, |
and conversely. |
Proof that (2) =⇒(1).Taking the trace on both sides of |
[Πr,Πs] =d2/summationdisplay |
t=1JrstΠt (165) |
we deduce that |
d2/summationdisplay |
t=1Jrst= 0 (166) |
Then from the definition of Lrin terms of Π rwe find |
Crst=ǫrǫsǫtJrst (167) |
Consequently |
Cr=Pr−PT |
r (168) |
where |
Pr=ǫrSQrS (169) |
Sbeing the symmetric orthogonal matrix |
S= |
ǫ10...0 |
0ǫ2...0 |
......... |
0 0... ǫ d2 |
(170) |
The claim is now immediate.23 |
Proof that (1) =⇒(2).Forthis we need to workharder. Since the proofis rather |
lengthy we will break it into a number of lemmas. We first collect a few ele mentary |
facts which will be needed in the sequel: |
Lemma 8. LetLrbe any Hermitian basis for gl(d,C), and letCrstandCrbe |
the structure constants and adjoint representatives as defi ned in the statement of |
Theorem 7. Letlr= Tr(Lr). Then |
(1)Thelrare not all zero. |
(2)TheCrstare pure imaginary and antisymmetric in the first pair of indi ces. |
(3)TheCrstare completely antisymmetric if and only if the Crare Hermitian. |
(4)In every case |
d2/summationdisplay |
t=1Crstlt= 0 (171) |
for allr,s. |
(5)In the special case that the Crare Hermitian |
d2/summationdisplay |
r=1lrLr=κI (172) |
where |
κ=1 |
d |
d2/summationdisplay |
r=1l2 |
r |
>0 (173) |
Proof.To prove (1) observe that if the lrwere all zero it would mean that the |
identity was not in the span of the Lr—contrary to the assumption that they form |
a basis. |
To prove(2) observethat taking Hermitian conjugates on both sid es of Eq. ( 162) |
gives |
−[Lr,Ls] =d2/summationdisplay |
t=1C∗ |
rstLt (174) |
from which it follows that C∗ |
rst=−Crst. The fact that Csrt=−Crstis an imme- |
diate consequence of the definition. |
(3) is now immediate. |
(4) is proved in the same way as Eq. ( 166). |
To prove (5) observe that if the Crare Hermitian it follows from (2) and (3) that |
d2/summationdisplay |
r=1lrCrst= 0 (175) |
for alls,t. Consequently the matrix |
d2/summationdisplay |
r=1lrLr (176)24 |
commutes with everything. But the only matrices for which that is tr ue are multi- |
ples of the identity. It follows that |
d2/summationdisplay |
r=1lrLr=κI (177) |
for some real κ. Taking the trace on both sides of this equation we deduce |
d2/summationdisplay |
r=1l2 |
r=dκ (178) |
The fact that κ>0 is a consequence of this and statement (1). /square |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.